#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 28 of 1
for good reason yes
likewise a lot of athletes don't squat
it's kinda prone to back injury or pain compared to other lifts
Squat rack is a great piece of equipment
But you can do lots of lifting on the same group without it
yeah
How expensive is a squat rack?
few grand
Bruh
like a grand for a really shitty one
actually a grand will get you a nice one
it's the like $500 ones that start to get like
it's not a box anymore just the absolute minimum needed to hold stuff
why do weights cost so much
at least a squat rack is something that has to be machined, it has to be adjustable, bear a lot of load, etc
but plates it's just fucking
a chunk of metal
No you're doing well if you can get one in a home gym
make your own plates with concrete
Might as well
100% I get scared for my back sometimes when I squat

alright so
are there any complex-analysis-pilled people here who could help me out w/ some terminology
what do you call a contour that goes around the boundary of the region {0 ≤ |z| ≤ R, 0 ≤ arg(z) ≤ theta}
like this-ish
That region is a called a sector
I don't know that its boundary has a specific name
that i do know of, in retrospect
im talking about like. integrating over the boundary of a sector whose radius goes to infinity
honestly thats not a bad way to say what it is you’re doing
but maybe theres a funny catchphrase like keyhole contour or whatever
Bruh what
Mine cost like
300$
And it's good. It doesn't move around and can hold upwards of 500kg
I've put >230 on a bar for squats on it so far at home and it was good
I really can't think of any discipline in which athletes weight train that doesn't use squatting to some degree
Now if they're doing them properly is a different story
It's also a very versatile exercise with a lot of variations for different purposes
But military training is usually not heavy on the gym training. It's there but it's also just a lot of cardio, cardio in gear, rucking, etc
also somewhat a focus on calisthenics, military men and women love their pullups n pushups after all
i think training strength can be taken for personal tastes but in general will be enough as a monotherapy against the plagues that come from modern living, or in a minor form is a compatible lifestyle choice to running
I was looking at the wrong shit lmao
Lol
how much do you guys lift?
mathcord lifting comp?
HAHHAHha
My chances are better than most other places
Unless you meant to lift math
Let's put in this this, I am a fibration 
I actually like the idea of like endurance lifting but there's a modifier for the number of questions you can answer midset
mathcord strong&smartman lifting competition
wait lemme find the image
255/165/247.5 are.my.meet prs (kg) but I messed up dl last meet
is that DBS or SBD? pretty good numbers regardless
Sbd
Dl.is actually from last meet since this meet I fucked up
This being 2 months ago
Hbu
Yeah idk what that means
Squat/bench/deadlift
Yea you always count the bar
How much is it
20kg
Ah ok
Standard olympic barbell
i don't compete or anything but in kg my prs pre injury were 200x13/125x5/185x3
That's better then hahaha
i've mostly been chasing these numbers since covid started mind you, but i enjoy the craft a lot
i was going for 220x13 when i got injured lmao i've since stopped doing high rep high weight
tore my midback, doc said i was lucky nothing was bulging but i was bedridden for a few months
You do???
Yes..
Oof damn
That sounds rough

Worse i've had is a strained band in my leg 2.5 years ago, luckily I could still train upper body
Yeah I never want to hurt myself
It was pretty funny for the time cause i got accepted for a summer research position the day before and then had to tell the prof i had to work from home
Yeahh I chuckle about it but that prof still won't talk to me ahahahaha
regardless i think expanding horizons was probably the best thing that happened after that
Not like it was your fault
i was told i couldn't touch a barbell for atleast a year and a half so i started doing calisthenics stuff in the mean time and i got pretty far with that the following year
oh cmon it totally was, i was being irresponsible
Sure, but it's not like you could have foreseen the injury
I get it though. You really start pursuing something
Yeahh, I suppose I didn't, you get so lost in the moment leading up to a PR like that you don't do the long term trajectory on failure, just that you'll do it
I was like that with running
regardless i think its a great past time and the risks are only apparent if you're being dumb or if you're at your limits
yeah? did you push too hard?
got any tips btw? i'm starting to get into it again
Listen to great music
I got sesamoiditis
What
apologies but that looks like something off an incel forum
true, I live next to a bunch of parks which has been pretty dandy
i see that now
And it hurt so much but I'd still tried to run because I was addicted to it
Parks are Great
You can be that asshole who is condescendingly doing sports while people enjoy themselves there
i am always that guy
Blast good music
i dominate the local public schools doing pull ups and dips with a 40 gallon jug of sand tied to my nuts
Like 2.5 k
Absolute banger
children fear me, their mothers want me, the fish find me
Mfer tagged modmail
i pity the fool who won't
What’s the point of this channel? We already have a discussion channel
It’s for when discussion is moving fast
Overflow
I tend to just talk on top of people
Since it’s text
I recently discovered a solution to an optimization issue I've been running into for the past 2 weeks! WOOO!
yayyyyyyyyy
awooooooga
Actually.... I seems like I got excited too early. For my problem I've realized that my present solution just moves the issue to another part of my code.... 😢
"How are you still single?" - Grandma
I'm stuck on some bug
20 minutes with 0 progress. Everything looks fine.
maybe bedtime. Lame though it was shaping up.
it is kind of infuriating because the logical save point is exactly after one small tweak that can easily occur w/ no bug
wow dumb. I moved the files out of the directory and moved them back and now it's all good.
elixir's favorite build tool mix's tracking busted somehow
just geometric series it
this is only valid if 0.9999... converges, so it's not really a rigorous proof
but it's a nice informal way of thinking about things yeah
Not really, in general. The only thing I can think of is that they come up once in a while in complex analysis and analytic number theory, where you have functional equations for special functions.
yooooooooo
someone called me and told me all my info is up on doxbin
couldnt find myself tho

i have my number on fb so its not weird how he got my number
he was egyptian whos phone zone was in the USA but he told me he is in canada
is that possible?
but it does converge
Doxbin was shut down like 7 years ago lol
there are mirrors
on the normal web
not even on the deep web
like .org
i kept searching for me
he told me the postt was like a few hours ago
couldnt find anything
and he kept insisting that he sends me a link
told him okay but then he didnt send shit
u think he is just trying to phish?
the internet is not a substitute for real life
some of the people that have profiles like instagram, or worse are anonymous but describe themselves and their interests like it's their social life
but that something is not in any of my phones
sounds like spearphishing
he said i have long hair
( all my pfps in any social media have long hair )
and he has my number
but my number is on fb
so wduthik
dude dont use ur irl pic for discord
probably doesn't take much effort to scan discord profiles for matching faces
well relatively speakin
it's easy to get the full res and reverse search or something
good point
i just wanna makesure my phone isnt hacked
idc about my info on fb or insta
he can ssuck my dick
your phone can't get hacked
because only you have your sim card
if someone can call you, it doesn't mean you've been hacked
well unless you're of high enough interest to be worth it its quite unlikely
im not
If someone messages you "I have your info pay up" it's best to ignore them
how do i know if im not hacked
you never will 😎
stop being an idiot and do your own research instead of whatever you're doing now
hijacking conversation to bitch about linked in not taking down profiles and leaving them indexed in search engines for like a fucking decade
yeah someone with security clearance at your provider
even that is illegal
goddamn fucking trogolodytes those microsoft fucks
well i mean those sorts of people skirt the law how they please so that's not much of a counter
i was talking more like if someone hit your phone with the fuckin whats it called uhh pegasus? spyware
he isn't high profile enough
thats what i'm saying, but still a little bit of paranoia goes a long way
and the people that are use alternative providers
you'd be surprised
yeah it sounded like shizo adderall comedown
most elite rich stay on enterprise plans with public providers
and i want to say a majority have godawful op sec
yeah but it just doesn't happen man
yeahh
which makes me think i think pulling money is really ineffective with those tools
mark zuckerburg doesn't use whatsapp
its best for silencing dissidents
zucc don't but the ceo of atleast 200 fortune 500 companies do
deep state appreciator very nice
Hello,
Why "Kernel" has so much different meanings in math and computing?
And each of those meaning, seemingly dpn't have similar characteristics
Do they actually have similar meaning?
Thank you
beware of the day ultraspyware becomes affordable for crime
they've all probably got the zucc on the ropes
dude, intel chips have had a backdoor since like 2016
everything is spyware
please don't use wikipedia like its an authority about these things, kernel usually has the same intuitive meaning on most things besides the kernel of an operating system
and being profited on
Management engine was pretty difficult to pull cohesive data from, interruption in the bitstream and your datadump will be annoying as hell to work with
i will agree NSA probably got plenty out of it but outside of actual vulnerabilities due to bad core design accomodating for the ME and PSP it was about the best it'll ever be
they say all that as if it's a problem they haven't solved
you know how hush hush the computing algorithms are for submarine sonar?
they've got that shit in the bag
in natural language, "kernel" = "core of things"? then why it becomes "mapping function" in math? so "kernel" = "mapping function"?
thank you
with upcoming fTPM standards being far more aggressive (pluton specifically) and being able to remotely update without allowing the user to do anything about it its kinda ridiculous how fucked the user is
muh sonar can't tell the difference between frozen surface ice and the ocean floor
sure bud
go learn some math and build the intuition yourself, nothing to give
Well yeah there's been blacked out algorithms for a long time now
this isn't etymology class
i'd dare say that a large portion of mathematics is swallowed up in the same hole
and what you see in academy is useless scraps
might even be extended to physics
not to talk shit on academics, there's plenty useful things in there but
invention secrecy act guarantees its been in physics since the 50s
i knew a nuclear tech who's an absolute wiz
heck they might have a cure for cancer and are just using the hype for income now
i think the secret for the military was doing a good job segmenting information
we just don't know
the nuclear tech had no idea about anything to do with complex analysis but he could pick up on stuff real quick because most of what he understood was just obfuscated
or i guess specialized for the cause
well no this was more pharma's doing
"oh, i've seen something like that before"
and uses intuition like he's worked in 4d space or what
resolving most cancers with permanent preventative treatment requires a lot of what pharma can't profit off of long term
he told me he just had a lot of experience with signals n stuff i didn't want to prod
it's all sketchy. organ harvesting, the clinits keeping people on meds for the rest of their lives
finishing with this though, if you look at most treatments for cancer today they more or less keep the patient indentured for a while after treatment, obviously its a bit of cat and mouse but the problem likely would have been resolved with the billions donated if it weren't for the fact that there was trillions of profit at stake
can't say that here
yeah exactly
keeping them dependent
plus the promotion of lifestyles that keep you indentured, such as hormone treatments or the acceptance of obesity as of the past decade has definitely given me a think bout that
careful, consider removing the term
i don't care if i get banned lol
me neither. but it's a chore
all this and things like democratic procedures
how in control are we as people, really
dont get too lost in the doomer talk
there's always 2 choices aside from the ones that railroad you
join em or leave em
wasn't trying to go there. just extending it to talk about democracy
nothing stopping you from going innawoods and living out your life all ted k like
strive to become successful within the system, or to be independent of it
in a way
dude
i'm serious though, partaking is a choice, although that choice is going away over time
going away real fast. most higher-academic institutions basically require willful ignorance to be recognized
i'm not talking about that really
just look at the man that discovered dna, and got the nobel prize for it
all his degrees taken away because he said certain social outcomes were partly the result of genetics
in what way?
i'm talking about the internet being restricted, and all avenues to access it being vetted, and children having their genetic information held onto for an interminable future right at birth
that's all real things, fuck academia lmao
it's probably the biggest meme. a phd is just a club membership
i'm not talking about that dude
i'm saying that there will people who's entire lives will be assigned numbers and values and expectations
born in this day and age, evaluated in the dataset of insurance and advertising agencies
completely without the choice to leave that
like that, yeah
just variables to maximize for profit in an algorithm
sending certain ads etc.
does that really play out as much as the others?
surely advertisements aren't the cause of the current social contagion
the "great reset" is a likely end to the means being justified here
cause evidently insurance and advertising has capped out and has reached the point of recursive degradation
and i'm not sure money is their objective
weird flex but ok
thanks
Hi!
Does anyone know rational expression
what math level would you expect from a motivated top high school student (in the us) entering a prestigious college for a math major?
i’ve heard like most mit admits have already studied basic abstract algebra/analysis + probably some like number theory by they time they enter school
I've heard there are about 4 students that're at about the same level as moth that enter Harvard each year
i’m not really talking about like outlier kids like imo representatives, but the typical average student entering a good college (obviously not average in the normal sense)
what level is moth?
Graduate
I think most have done the stem AP classes but not much more
AP calc, physics, etc
there’s probably some students who come from very targeted math high schools which cover like calculus at 8th grade and end up at like high undergrad/graduate level by graduation
that’s true
I wonder how/if moth did that actually
the best way would probably be just like taking dual enrollment right
i would be very surprised if a dual enrolment situation allows students to take high-level math courses
"high level" meaning upper UG/early grad
hmm good point
i can’t think of any way other than just placing really well in competitions
Bruh, that's a thing???
I wish we had that here 
like even if you put ‘self studied undergraduate level math’ on an application, would the ao’s even look at it a second time without any proof that you did so?
You should prolly ask in #advanced-lounge
i also don’t have this as an option idk what to do 
This server has really warped my sense of how much HSers take UG courses lmao
well i wouldnt even expect the people processing applications to recognize that, say, hatcher is a big boy math book for example
well it has "topology" in the name so they might
but idk, imagine an applications person looking at this lmao
at a graduate level, the applications committee is in-department (or at least works closely with it)
but at an UG level i dont think thats the case even at top schools
It is?
My perspective is fucked 
big boy relative to the average applicant
But the prereqs for that is like, a good course in algebra and basic pointset, isn't it?
how many high schoolers do you know have point set
whats pointset
A handful, and all on this server lmao
The necessary formalism to do topology, analysis etc
oh ok
k
I must say this server has done the same to me
I have gaslighted myself into thinking that I should’ve done like 5-6 additional courses so far
Is differential equation, Matrices, Vector Algebra and Linear programming normal topics for senior year high school students
what they are gonna be in my class 12th book lol
Matrices are very much a HS topic here
eh, basic matrix algebra is a topic in many highschools
sometimes they arent
its not like adding and multiplying matrices is hard
and this list is really weird, because "matrices" isnt really a topic you learn
It isn't in my country
We had them in some probability stuff
linear programming and differential equations are on the other hand super hard
but then again, knowing what a differential equations is is easy in hs
Where the sum of the entries is one
and writing a linear program
so they could be covered i guess?
but the necessary theory not
Yeah we did intro diff eqs in physics and maths
Matrices 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Matrix 3.3 Types of Matrices 3.4 Operations on Matrices 3.5 Transpose of a Matrix 3.6 Symmetric and Skew Symmetric Matrices 3.7 Elementary Operation (Transformation) of a Matrix 3.8 Invertible Matrices
Is these stuff common for HS
Btw darQ how’s that plan going
that is a bit above what i would expect from a north american high school course
Has the non existent squat rack thrown you off track
but below what i'd expect from a university lin alg or calc 3 course
Or are you managing
Which one
First
that said, its less that its particularly difficult and more that its simply something high school doesnt bother to cover
ohk i guessed it lol I am gonna study this stuff next year
i would consider most of that list conceptually lighter than e.g. conic sections
The Bench and stuff
ohk
its hard to motivate
you can do gaussian elimination i guess
but motivating the transpose takes some work
cant imagine a highschool do it properly
Btw, my biceps don't recover that fast for some reason
I did close grip chin ups at first 10 reps I think just fine
But when I tried to curl by the end of the workout I couldn't even curl a 10 kg
motivate the transpose by wishing to define the pseudoinverse in order to compute the condition number of matrices
🧠

this seems very stupid but i genuinely think it might be the easiest motivation
The chin up can be heavy on the bicep
You can kinda manipulate it to hit more of the lats than the bicep tho
How do you get roles such as Undergrad?
Which I think is the point in the program
You wouldn’t put two bicep exercises in one day with that plan
ohk thnx

The biggest barrier rn is time
I sometimes finish uni at 17.30
How are you running into time issues with that plan
And the residence gym closes at 19.0
I also have to dine coz the dorm's restaurant also closes by 19.0
I dunno, it's dumb
Uni attendance is mandatory so I have basically negative time in the morning
mandatory attendance 
huh it's not atypical for me to end uni at ungodly hours
like I only have class in the morning but I study or attend seminars in the afternoon
Yeah, I'm really hoping to get it waived

So i want to be able to check if a number n represented in 63 bits is, infact, a perfect square, WITHOUT using square roots "explicitly"
aka casting to a double, doing the sqrt function, then casting back, due to the loss of like, 10 bits
Is there a way I can do some dyadic bullshit and hensel lifting OR a dyadic newton's method on x^2 - k = 0 to maybe find out if a number is a square, possibly after some bit masking
Man your uni experience is weird
But?
It calls itself a "school"
But like
In french
Dunno if the meaning is different haha

By the end i don't get a bachelor's degree
I get w/e this is https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Engineer's_degree
You’re doing engineering?
It's a long story

use gmp
the short answer is you can for most numbers figure out by checking mod various integers p
the long answer depends on the computer architecture you use
gmp?
gnu multi precision arithmetic library
testing modulo smart chosen values of p is super fast
because you only have to examine a few bits
and this has success rate of 90%+
after a single test almost
so unless you are very unlucky this runs in constant time
mmm
what do you mean by this
what is "p"
square in Z implies square in Z/pZ^\times
depending on p there are only a few values that can occur
and if p is related to your architecture in the correct way it can be done by checking the last bit(s)
then only "pseudo-squares" remain
and those are rare
So just, quadratic/cubic/quartic... residues
you asked about squares not cubes etc
I was referring to this
?
this only cares about quadratic residues
p can be anything
you start by testing mod 256
this can be tested by only checking the last byte
what determines what we should chose for "smart values"
and there arent that many residues that occur
mmm masking
certainly constantly many
and this already has a success chance of 80%+ to rule out wtv you are testing
then depending on architecture you can do more tests
if you are super unlucky you have to take a squareroot i guess
but thats almost impossible
not sure if its necessary actually, never looked at the details
oh kinda overread, it depends on the architecture and how easily your processor can access the data iirc
On a 32-bit system similar tests are done mod 9, 5, 7, 13 and 17, for a total 99.25% of inputs identified as non-squares. On a 64-bit system 97 is tested too, for a total 99.62%.
and
Only 44 different values occur for squares mod 256, so 82.8% of inputs can be immediately identified as non-squares.
is this true for polys
is this related in any way to hensel lifting
no
this is for reg 16 bit ints, right
it doesnt matter
the probabilities change, they depend on the distribution of squares vs non-squares
oooooo
like, if you only test small or only big numbers then you would adjust those tests maybe and do more/less
Alrighty
gmp has arbitrary precision integers though
so we just chose ones that have the lowest percentages of quadratic residues
they are chosen bcs they can be computed fast
sure
i think the number of residues vs non-residues depends only on the number of primes in the factorization?
i forgor
DMs
w h y
architecture reasons
These moduli are chosen because they’re factors of 2^24-1 (or 2^48-1 for 64-bits), and such a remainder can be quickly taken just using additions (see mpn_mod_34lsub1).
In any case each modulus is applied to the mpn_mod_34lsub1 or mpn_mod_1 remainder and a table lookup identifies non-squares. By using a “modexact” style calculation, and suitably permuted tables, just one multiply each is required, see the code for details. Moduli are also combined to save operations, so long as the lookup tables don’t become too big. gen-psqr.c does all the pre-calculations.
wtf 48
by now i pasted most of the documentation
How to install and use the GNU multiple precision arithmetic library, version 6.2.1.
Why 48 and not 64 
However, not all 64-bit instruction sets support full 64-bit virtual memory addresses; x86-64 and ARMv8, for example, support only 48 bits of virtual address, with the remaining 16 bits of the virtual address required to be all 0's or all 1's, and several 64-bit instruction sets support fewer than 64 bits of physical memory address.
… how have I not heard of this
probably didnt read the first paragraph on wikipedia
i’m taking computer science
which is why I am doing this, to optimize something I made for a project
are you taking a computer architecture class
no
well, then there is your answer
the answer is almost always to use a library for things like this
someone else thought more about this than you ever will
I want to comprehend why this works, and that 48 bit fact is SUPER useful
thank you btw
oh yeah, i shouldve just posted the link earlier
gmp is open source, you can also check the code
a lot of this is number theory stuff I also want to learn
the author should be listed somewhere too
if its really important to you, you can email them
uhh
there is a standard book due to cohen
but i doubt its a lot of fun to read 💀
the only better book i know is german however, so ...
there is a chapter on square detection in it too
Cohen's "A Course in Computational Algebraic Number Theory", chapter 1.7.2
it lists a few alternatives and gives proofs on why they work
they are architecture agnostic though
what
trying to find this
its in the link i posted
^
.
I wanted to but I need to log in
Why do you need my email for this lol
No thanks
My bad bruh
good
What did he do?
i tried to @everyone
I study pure math by what kind of brigde now?
Are you a college student at all
Are you?
Im applying to math in college this year
hoping someone has some god tier tips
I'm applying cambridge but supposedly it's really hard
Tip 1: No tip can reduce the suffering
Never ever take the weekend off
There you go
God tier tip
Always take the weekend off
Your brain needs rest
tbh i take most weekdays off
I don't really know what to do
Like Ive done UCAS and stuff
if you can minmax standardized tests, do it
What you mean by minmax
a relatively high percent cheat or pay for grades so learning how to spread high marks over multiple sessions (something you do here in north america for SAT or ACT) and being really good at test taking can be done with a lot of effort
Figure out a way to solve the problems as fast as possible by using the given options
Can save a lot of time by doing that
there's a few very convenient mental shortcuts, such as considering whats first not the answer
forget what their out of, is it 900 or 1000?
800
world is so competitive nowadats
you can probably do it but dont neglect the language portion
Yeah I'm glad I'm done with hs
Did either of you apply to UK
lmfao im 5 years removed from all this and back then test score inflation was already a problem, can only imagine how much worse it is now
no
cause my number one college is cambridge
I was hoping someone here has like
applied here
and got in
can someone help me with this
y is 24 and x is 20
Since it's a right angle the intersect from o will be the midpoint
And pls don't just give ppl answers 
Is anyone good enough in explicits formula and reccursives formula to help me ? on the help 27 channel.
The rudest of baits
So I came across this statement today "One third of all numbers are divisible by 3" and for some reason wanted to delve into it a bit more. So, am I right in saying that it's:
true for integers, false for real / complex numbers, etc. However, is it even possible to assign a meaningful proportion in the case of reals / complex numbers? How would this kind of counting work?
the usual manner of counting is by correspondences, however its a bit meaningless in the case of the reals unless you're comparing two uncountable sets of things, in which case i don't think you can make a reasonable assessment of densities that way
hmm I see, thanks
i'm sure there's someone really into analysis around here who could tell you more though
also worth asking what you mean by divisibility by 3 in the case of real and complex numbers... aren't they all divisible by 3?
^
you could think about it in terms of measure theory
idrk how measure theory works though
lmao
Dunno either
Yo
Any good books
Or content
For someone looking to learn math
For engineering
divisibility only really makes sense for integers, a number x is divisible by 3 if x=3y for some integer y. If you allow x to be real/complex you get that they'd have to be integers anyway, and it's meaningless to allow y to be a non-integer.
and a way of giving a well-defined notion of "a third of all positive integers" is through the concept of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_density
under which the set of all multiples of 3 is indeed a set with natural density = 1/3
as for books I don't think I can rec much more than like, Stewart's calculus which includes a bunch of engi applications
but if you mean like casual content then Zach Star is an engineer that makes videos about math and their applications, sometimes in engineering https://www.youtube.com/c/zachstar/videos
I'm looking to learn math in general tho
Like I'm kinda lost
Idk which path to follow in order to get the knowledge I need for calculus algebra and geometry
Will try that one I guess
Not sure if I have what it takes tho
Lang wrote like 100 books, some of them are actually good
I recommend basic mathematics by lang if you want something that covers high school math but u want proof.
Math! Encounters with High School Students
I fr thought your username said the one and only snoop dog
I read it as that at first
@meager sonnet cube 2 sauerbraten instagib is only arena fps
22 45 90 minutes into the lecture (the whole lecture was like that)
The lecture so far her literally been the prof writing definitins and stuff down
And people writing them into their notebooks
Kill me 
This game is the best game
That’s just how lectures are at first but it’s not because you already know some of the material that you’ll stay ahead so don’t let down
I won't 
hi
Yo
is there a real-life (non theorical) example of application for complex number in polar coordinates?
Yes
i can't understand what's the damn Im and Re and a and b and z ...
This is used very often in anything that involves trigonometry, for example
Basically anything that involves oscillation will be modeled by e^it
so like for example a pendulum
or an ac circuit
complex numbers in polar coordinates are used frequently in the solution to how these systems behave
ah ok
The way you should think about polar coordinates is that it lets you keep track of an amplitude, an angular frequency, and a phase simultaneously which is why we love complex numbers
which are all really important quantities to keep track of if you're working with stuff that oscillates
i googled it but i don't understand anything about complex and ac circuit
so like
amplitude = how big the oscillation is (for ac circuits, this is like how big the voltage gets at its maximum), angular frequency = how fast the oscillation is (for ac circuits, this is like how many times a second the current switches from clockwise to counterclockwise), phase = what part of the oscillation the system is at (for ac circuits, this is like whether it starts clockwise, whether it starts counterclockwise, whether it starts with zero voltage, etc)
is there a schema somewhere for the application of complex on circuits?
i can't find anything visual ; (
then, is there a link between clocks and how particles behave (quantum physics)?
i heard that shrodinger used complex numbers to manipulate the wave functions (a concept from Broglie, right) right?
how much math do you already know?
yes! quantum mechanics models stuff like electrons as "wave functions"
for the same reason
easy way to store both an amplitude and a phase
i just love to learn about how things work by analogies and history
yeah
What about differential equations
There is a good differential equation lecture playlist on mit ocw
That's where I learned diffeqs from
I don't know of any short visual videos that explain why e^it is important, but I'm sure they exist if you look them up
i'm on the level of an undergraduate in maths
but i'm relearning everything from first principles
i need to behave like a 5yo
yeah i learn it from caltech videos
well one of the reasons we use e^it is because it has nice derivative properties
it's an eigenfunction of the derivative operator
so like d/dt e^it = i e^it
this makes it extremely useful to solve differential equations
You can highlight text in notability?? Like it snaps to the right shape? Wow TIL
how much math do i need to solve this? does anyone know? (the goal is to reduce it to a single transfer function)
does anyone mind giving a second opinion on #help-51 we have just gone back and forth and made no progress we both think it is suppose to be done a different way, thanks.
<@&268886789983436800>
One; lion; lemon; orange; apple; ball
a) tie
b)hydro
c)class
d)juniper
@waxen shoal think about it like this
If I add 1 to n
And double that
That's like
1 + 2 + ... + n
n + (n-1) + ...+ 1
habanero
But you'll notice that if you add something from the top row by the corresponding entry in the bottom row
?
Hey guys, i watched tutorial online (math high school) but mostly only teach me how to solve problem in particular topics, any recommended tutorial or book to make me understand those? (Like gilbert strang lecture for linear algebra)
Khan Academy I think is decent
I'm wondering if you can like, construct a sheaf of semigroups
why? the answer is why not (also because I'm bored)
let S be a abelian semigroup, then we can consider the collection of all multiplicatively closed subsets, denoted L(S). Well, we can consider the product of two subsets to just be the collection of all the products between them, forming a semigroup structure on L(S). From there, we can define an ideal to be a subset A such that for all subsets B, AB is a subset of A. We can then define the collection of ideals to be I(S). For any A and B in I(S), then AB ⊆ A and AB ⊆ B, so we have a sort of join-semilattice
So by extension, for any ideal C
A ⊆ C OR B ⊆ C => AB ⊆ C
so we can create a collection of prime ideals, where the aforementioned condition is biconditional for all A and B, and now we have a topology
If this is signal processing, a decent bit. Most transfer functions are complex functions so you should know some basics of complex analysis, as well as fourier analysis
actually, gtg
Holy
It is lmao
I made a hyperbolic geometry visualization out of post its and tape
Semi-related random thought, is there any sort of equivalent to Penrose tiling in hyperbolic space?
Also this thing is probably much cooler in person cause you can actually look at abd play around with it
why isnt law of cosines taught first instead of pythagorean theorem
bc students typically learn pythag before trig
i mean i learned pythag before law of sines/cosines but never really had the law of cosines importance emphasized in my school
i remembered law of sines more but it was never said directly to me that pythag is a special case of law of cosines.
Youve kind of got a point but I think it comes down to the fact trig is usually taught later
Pythagorean theorem is just a bit easier to teach
Should be, the hyperbolic space admits a lot of tilings
@woven whale unless I made some sort of mistake, the derivative of $||F(x)||$ at $\bar{x}$ is $\frac{1}{||F(\bar{x})||} F(\bar{x})^\text{T}DF(\bar{x})$
DarFuQ
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
DarFuQ
DarFuQ
can anyone help me on this 1 problem real quick?
please see #❓how-to-get-help
...the directional derivative (the direction being d)...
Pythagoras is trig
bruh
@light needle dont want to interrupt discussion but what is a good resource for cstar algs
for an intro, pederson for func anal into murphy is p good imo
can anyone explain how -2 modulo 26 is 24
-2 = -2+26 mod 26
i understand modulus division is the remainedr but dont understand how it works here
sure, so essentially 26 can divide -26
but this has remainder of -2-(-26)=24
does that make sense?
how does 26/-26 have a remainder?
no
what is the quotient/remainder?
r=2
correct
what we did was first find the greatest integer less than or equal to 29 that is a multiple of 3
which is 27
then we calculated the quotient to be 27/3=9 and then took the remainder to be 29-27=2
do you follow?
yes
so now if we are working mod 26
consider the number 24
the greatest integer less than or equal to 24 that is a multiple of 26 is 0
we have 0/26=0 and 24-0=24
thus the quotient is 0 and r=24 so 24=24 mod 26
do you still follow?
im thinking
the greatest integer less than or equal to -2 that is a multiple of 26 is -26
we are doing 26 mod 24 right?
correct
makes sense
and we have -26/26=-1 and -2-(-26)=24 so r=24
so -2 = 24 mod 26
does this make sense?
in general, you have a = a + kn mod n for k \in Z
if you dont want to work with remainders you can also define a = b mod n if b-a is a multiple of n
then -2=24 mod 26 is obvious as 24-(-2)=26 which is obviously a multiple
let me know if you have any questions
alr thx
no problem
Is anyone good with math related to audio? Like measuring sine waves based on amplitude, peak-to-peak value, period, wavelength, and frequency? I need some help with some problems related to this.
Also #❓how-to-get-help
@azure nymph Hey buddy, I don't need you to send me links like that. FYI it's difficult finding servers that cover audio-related math so I only asked my question here to check if anyone is familiar with audio math. I was very clear, so need to be that way. Have a good one though...
@azure nymph Sorry if I misunderstood and you were only trying to help. I've just run into some sarcastic, rude people at times.
Have you ever felt this mixed feelings of you understand a concept and you don't understand it at the same time? Like for example, you can solve problems that are related to a particular concept, but for some reason it still annoys you as if you don't truly understand the concept, and instead it feels like you memorised it.
Uniform integrability was (for a long time) something I had a hard time intuitively grasping
I hear a lot of people have a hard time with localization
thank god, I thought I was the only one
it feels strange isn't it? do I understand it or do I not understand it
Ik I can do problems related to it
but it doesn't feel clicked
Prerequisites for geometry
of rings
Because if so that’s ironic as fuck because that’s what’s confusing my intuition rn lol
maybe look into what this corresponds to in alg geo
that's what loch suggested at least i think
(if you're talking from a comm alg perspective)
yes
i don’t think there is a non-comm analogue that generalizes well
i’m mostly considering integral domains aswell
no i meant like
if you're learning this because you're reading alg geo it'd be useless to say look into the alg geo perspective
but if you're reading comm alg without knowledge of alg geo it might be helpful to look up the connection occasionally for motivation of the topic
isn’t the alg geo perspective like exclusively used for structure sheafs or smth
i’ve heard about it briefly skimming through the alg geo chat
im just echoing here
so im afraid i cant answer that
lol I'm talking about "localization" in stochastic analysis
Though that applies too

Localization (and Sigma localization) are basically ways to generalize "sigma finite/additive/etc measures", but for some reason no one explains it this way
hey does anyone have a good resource for understanding or visualizing linear algebra concepts? I'm having difficulty understanding the core of things from Vector spaces/subspaces and after in regards to spans, linear independences and all the theorems that come with it
I guess I'm mainly having difficulty because a lot of the theorems that appear in class seem very random and I can't connect concepts in my brain
You should definitely check out 3b1b's essence of linear algebra
Essence of linear algebra
Snipped
We need a third opinion
darq was first
YES
FUCK
LOL
WE WIN DEEES
Win dees nuts are in your mouth
ok thank you
This is totally normal when you're first exposed to the material btw
Especially in higher level math
Things become much clearer in picture the more you come in contact with the material in the wild, however
And the more you do exercises, etc
try #discrete-math
but a hint: theres a very naive solution that likely won't be minimal but that does successfully cross the bridge
||have each woman cross with their husband and then return alone. then simply have them cross back in pairs, with a single woman returning each time||
they cant return alone because theyll be in the presence of a man who is not her husband
how are proofs by contradiction usually structured in actual papers
do they ever just say "suppose, for contradiction"?
idk fs but i seriously doubt it
i'd bet it's something like: assume blahblahblah. <.....> so we see our assumption was false, and thus <....>
Try solving the 3 lions and 3 goats or the wolf, goat, cabbage puzzle first to work your way up to the n problem.
Okay here's how it should be:
At one time, a couple shall cross the bridge with the torch and the woman shall return back and hand over the torch to another couple.
Like this, after 6 crossings all men will be on the other side and all women (with the torch) will be left to cross.
Now, any one woman will go with another, dropping one to the other side and in the end, everyone will be at par.
Thereby for 3 couples, the minimum amount of crossings will be 9
The same method would apply to 4 couples. Each husband would be dropped by her wife until only all women are left to cross.
The answer will be 13 in this case.
For n couples:
Let's suppose only 1 couple had to cross the bridge.
Thus, only 1 crossing would be needed to cross the bridge.
For 2 couples, at least 5 attempts would be needed to cross the bridge. (Refer to the method above)
If you've noticed *for every couple added, the minimum number of attempts needed to cross the bridge increase by 4. ( For 1 couple-1, for 2 couples-5, for 3 couples-9, for 4 couples-15)
This forms a simple Arithmetic Progression.
Therefore, the minimum number of attempts needed to cross the bridge by n couples is:
=> a + (n-1)d;
where a= the first term of the progression, n= number of couples and d= common difference(here;4)
=> 1 + (n-1)4
=> 1 + 4n-4
=> 4n-3
Here's your solution!
I cannot read your handwriting
I am going to punch you for introducing quartics
Symmetric polynomials my hated
Let x,y,z be real nos such that, x + y + z = 0 and xy + yz + zx = -3. Find the value of |x^3y+y^3+z+z^3x|
all of those are sym polys
except the last one ig
(t-x)(t-y)(t-z) = t^3 - t^2(x+y+z) + t(xy + yz + zx) - xyz = t^3 - 3t + xyz
Me trying not to use cardano's
the quartic term of the aforementioned poly is actually x^3y+y^3+z+z^3x
@neat lintel Is this actually solvable?
If we let xyz = w, then x^3y+y^3+z+z^3x = -18w
I can't think of a way to find what w is, I can probably do some poly bullshit though
Actually I can, but it seems like a fuckton of work
Yes it is
9
Correct!!!
How did you do it tho
I plugged in x=0 and y = -z = sqrt 3
Ayeee
Don't hate the player, hate the game 
But there is one more way of getting to the solution

Yeah plug in x = -y = sqrt 3 and z = 0
Nope
That's another way of getting to the solution
Like without plugging
Proper method
Like Solving it
Multiply xy + yz + zx by itself and calculate in the polynomial ring K[x,y,z]/(x+y+z)
I dunno if that will work
But its not that
It will
I consider these types of solutions to be hit and trial.
Just plugging any value and hoping for the best
Would love to see your solution if thats the case.
In fact there must exist a polynomial P such that
(xy+yz+zx)^2 + P(x+y+z) = x^3y + y^3z + z^3x
you can see that -18xyz = xy^3 + yz^3 + zx^3x
just finding xyz is what got me stuck
f(t) = (t-x)(t-y)(t-z) = t^3 - 3t - xyz
Knowing f(t)^3’s quartic term is what we are looking for, we can use binomial theorem basically
xxyy + 2xyyz + 2xxyz + 2yzzx + yyzz + zzxx
-xxxy -yyyz -zzzx + (x+y+z)(xyz)
Yeah that should work
How would I get xyz if I used my method
we are only really given 2 equalities trying to find a solution for 3 variables which seems fucky
Why should there be a reasonable form for xyz
so how would we solve for the abs value of the quartic term of f(t)^3
I don't know
Hint
Just square the -3 term and then for each term in the extended product substitute for y = -x-z and do the same for x and z
The solution pops out
Like, if we know x + y =0, we can't really find xy
Jesus Christ
in this case, if we know x + y + z = 0, and xy +yz + zx = -3 I don't see how we can find xyz
we could use roots though but they get finnicky
You guys can
More hints
if we use some solution, then yeah, but like otherwise we can't find it afaik
\begin{align}
(xy+yz+zx)^2 &= xxyy + xyyz + xxyz + xyyz + yyzz + xyzz + xxyz + xyzz + xxzz\
%\intertext{this is the binomial formula}
&= xxyy + 2xyyz + 2xxyz + yyzz + 2xyzz + xxzz\
&= xx(-x-z)y + \cdots + yyz(-x-y) + \cdots + (-y-z)xzz\
&= -xxxy -xxyz + 2xyyz + 2xxyz -yyyz -xyyz + 2xyzz - xzzz - xyzz\
%\intertext{grouping terms}
&= -xxxy -yyyz -xzzz +xxyz + xyyz + xyzz\
&= -(x^3y+y^3z+z^3x) + (xyz)(x+y+z)
\end{align}
Lets assume we know
x + y + z = 0, then z = -(x+y)
xy+yz+zx = -3, let w = xyz, = -xy(x+y)
then f(t) = (t-x)(t-y)(t-z) = t^3 - 3t - xyz
Now, xy^3 + yz^3 + zx^3 is the quartic term of f(t)^3, and by using binomial theorem, we know that it's 8xyz
so |18xyz| = 18|xy(x+y)|
but we cannot say anything else, besides finding the matching z for some pair x,y
and for every (x,y) there is a different xyz
IF we had xyz SET, then we COULD find it
for 3 variables, we'd need 3 equalities to find a unique pair (x,y,z) (with certain conditions ofc)
Well in that case you can use one more result
Nothing
These are just general identities
once again, there shouldn't be only one solution
There is not
Brudimann
Ok I give up, that's the solution though
y,z
However, if you DID specify xyz, or something related, then you CAN solve it
Literally just calculate it in the polynomials algebra
I did specify they are real numbers
that's not enough
It's NOT
Lets say they are integers
It is


