#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 27 of 1
literally one of the first result after googling sheaves and I'm not sure certain about the quality of this paper but it seemed interesting and I am currently reading it so I thought I'd share 
ah yes
was that in the paper?
yes
isn’t like the spectrum of a ring like the archetypical example of a sheaf of rings
The quote is from Dr. Scott A. Vanstone - Professor Emeritus. University of Waterloo and renowned cryptographer when I presented my proof of the equations that define the Prime Number sequence to him in 2014. At the time he was also co-founder of TrustPoint Innovation Technologies, Ltd. His credentials were world class:
PhD (Mathematics) — Uni...
depends what you mean prototypical?
imo the best motivating examples (also historically earlier i think, but im not sure) are sheaves of holomorphic functions on complex manifolds
Beautiful proof
Nah
Oh not too bad
Yeah
Caught them?
are you sure you want to share your license plate
hit them back
Yeah maybe delete that picture quick
There are >10k people here
Not all of them, I assume, will act in good faith...

OUT OUT OUT
Yup, a girl was backing up and apparently didn't see my car... she stopped and apologized
Oh that's good
She also let me take pics of her insurance card and license plate.
totally not a weird version of the sieve of eratosthenes
i like that it proves that 2 is not prime
I don't have a single friend who recognize me 😔 but ok
losing 3 is a sacrifice i am willing to make
35 is my favourite prime number
I think what he's trying yo say is there are infinitely many primes of the form 5x+6 and infinitely many primes of the form 7x+6 and numbers of the first set are separated by at most 2 from a number of the second set. Thus there are infinitely many twin primes: QED
he has a somewhat soothing voice
This is the kinda handwavy argument you wrote in your hw assignment that you have no time to properly think about
lmao
when we graded discrete math exam (mostly graph theory)
we often had students present arguments as trivial
and for a few we argued like 30 mins
first question: is the claim even true?
if yes, is it trivial?
I love it when my unbounded variable is infinite
no idea what this dude is thinking, he even made an own website and seems to habe written many books
I remember one time my prof got stuck on a proof during class so he stared at a board for a while, erased everything, and then wrote "Proof left as exercise"
Someone then asked if we could do that on our exam
he even goes as far as to fake quotes lol
Cranks gonna crank 
"Amazing", "Billiant!", "So simple!"
this reminds me of hat one proof of the riemann hypothesis that's completely unknown
lemme post it
Are you just taking from r/badmathematics lmao
Nonono
this was like a completely buried video
the guy detailed a proof using robins bounds that was completely inexplicable
i often find these kind of videos when filtering for newest videos
https://youtu.be/GuGaNk727LU look guys, a new indeterminate form
In this video, you will see a mistake made by many(*) mathematicians. Also, you will see a simple proof for a new(**) indeterminate form that has an incredible connection to the Riemann hypothesis. Lastly, you will see a route to a new promising math tool to solve problems like the Riemann hypothesis that we cannot prove with the current math t...
I was just in here talking about those types of videos lol
i've seen this guy around
imagine already being wrong in the first 3 seconds of the video
he's a big guy in the community
ah yes the collatz conjecture
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=grxSNq5g6aI honourable mention
This video is the first in a series of video lectures that introduces an exciting revolutionary approach to solving differential and integral calculus equations. This unique form of calculus is called Quaternionic Eulerian Calculus. Or as it is commonly referred to, QEC (Quick)} . QEC is a completely new approach to calculus that is bas...
for the QEC being absolutely just... i dont understand
the most popular one is to just use probabilities and say the sequence tends downwards
i had an existential crisis after that one, how close am i to being a crank really?
there was a guy who did a pretty good video for collatz that seemed legit
it wasnt an actual proof so much as the leads rhe guy had
i think it was this? https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=V3VAhulI8K8
Outro music by Thomas. He's a cool dude.
Check out his stuff here: https://www.instagram.com/thomas_maingot/
The rest of the music, I wrote. You can find some of it here:
https://www.SoundCloud.com/nereim
i like how confident this guy is and how his proof is just so "irrefutable"
oh totally, a lot of them will not even acknowledge the existence of being wrong
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=L4rog-w57sU this guy in particular has DEEP LORE of getting in a fight with wikipedia for writing his own page saying he proved RH lmao
A production of Aleph Naught Computing (Australia.)
Australian Business Number 83421295022.
All rights reserved.
On Sum of Divisors and Robin's Theorem.
January 2021.
DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13589.55523
License CC BY 4.0.
Project: Questions in Number Theory.
best one was still the guy that proved 2=1 because one magnet and another magnet put together give one magnet
posting a proof on youtube is already suspicious
now doing that for the RH
..............................
True for suitable definitions of "="
His video was hilarious. I think he must be trolling though
there was one guy who put out a paper claiming to prove collatz on reddit
I remember this one
that one was satire tho, wasn't it?
please tell me that was satire
please
idk, he has many other video, some where he shows how to generate infinite energy or some shit, i think its serious
what's funny is that it was made with much more understanding of how to actually do maths than most of the ones on vixra
June Huh's story is wild to be honest
like
I know of many a secuirty researcher with a situation simular to his
your mom is satire
Your dad is satire
there were a few crucial errors, but it looks legitimate at first glance
Do you have a link perhaps?
i cannot remember
Lol weak defense
and presumably "your dad is satire" is strong defence?
Since when did #serious-discussion become #discussion
Since always??
It's like they swapped
since everyone left discussion
that's not how I see it
Oh did something unusually bad happen?
Like this convo is of higher quality than whatever is going on in #discussion
discussion 2 is chiller tho because the newbies don't come here
sup
I have #discussion perma-muted
no it just fizzled out
same
fucking based
I know it 😎
Why'd you do that to yourself
it just reminds me to leave
At least I hope it's not
Also Ally weren't you studying artin? How's that going
it's not always awful
i tell myself I'll get around to it
Hahaha I didn't mean to pressure you ofc
yeah i need to be doing more
ally, wanna do some study group sometime?
We really need more than one algebra channel tbh
It's so cramped in there
maybe a channel just for group theory too. That'd be nice.
it's the largest advanced channel
ik just saying procrastination is the most hollow way to put it but ye...
You saw the stats too? I think that backs up what I'm saying
im the same though 😭
the topic in maths i find the most intriguing rn is probably analytic geometry
even without seeing the stats, it holds the highest number of messages between all the advanced channels
like, x^2+y^2=1 kinda stuff?
Well yes that's the statistic
but i don't have nearly a third of the prereqs lol
No that's algebraic geometry you're thinking of
ally's edits always crack me up lel
the one where you use the cartesian plane to study geometric shapes
isn't that what analytic geometry is?
i find it interesting because 1. it's a cool concept and 2. both of the main sources online seem to focus on the complex side of it and i think it'd be interesting looking at the general case
Wait hold on holldddd onnnnn Ally
oh no that's coordinate geometry, which some weird people call analytic geometry
Are you sure you don't mean algebraic geometry
that's what wikipedia calls it 
no i mean analytic geometry
alg geom but with analytic functions instead of polynomials
don't use wikipedia for maths
use nlab
analytic geometry

have you seen GAGA stuff already Ally?
if you have to use anything
again I have barely any prereqs
rip
and is very analysis-biased

i need to update the graph
Well, essentially it is one of the main theorems which formalizes the notion of complex differential geometry = complex algebraic geometry.

yeah
but I suppose that is less fun lmao
but what about general analytic geometry
What would be general analytic geometry?
i know p-adic/rigid analytic geometry is also a thing
analytic functions on general topological vector spaces
or like banach spaces if you don't want that much generalisation
not sure but I think the implicit function theorem means this is "just" differential geometry
if you mean like "sets cut out by general smooth functions"
what
this isn't about smooth functions this is about zero sets of analytic functions
those being functions given by a local "power series"
idk anything abt the topic tho
so you might be right
oh I see
I have no idea what sort of stuff you can prove in such a general setting.
I guess holomorphic functions are analytic so a subset of this would fall under complex geometry, but maybe there's more to say when the x_i and y_i are independent
But studying analytic manifolds is a big thing.
complex geometry is a subset of this
wait yeah we're saying the same thing
lol
I'm scared of any field of math which is more than one word
coordinate geometry
nooooo
analysis
copium
you see this, ladies and gents?
the correct meaning of the word cope
I know
unheard of
how do you pronounce this

/analdʒiɐu/ roughly
with the stress somewhere
has to be on the second syllable
or third
third??
/analˈdʒiɐu/
that sounds so bizarre
is the first a pronounced as in apple?
or like analgeom /analdʒiˈɒm/
yes hence the /a/
me?
yea
/ˈapɫ̩/
/əˈnæl/?
whattt
I don't know IPA lel
only slightly
You need to britishmaxx. You need to stop saying elevator and start saying lift. You need to make your children watch peppa pig.
peppa pig exists in the usa tho
Our tendrils are expanding...
the real british shows are on cbeebies
😢
cbeebies was the shit tho
cbeebies was good
i looked at the lost of old cbeebies shows recently
and i remember so many of them
They're prolly all gone now ;_;
no more wonder pets 😔
wait why? isn't this broad transcription
Ally's transcription was a bit more narrow
btw how do you guys type IPA so fast?
oh...
I can prob find an ipa keyboard tho
slashes doesn't mean broad
whew that one was really fast
IPAIPAIAPIPASHIT
I messed up guys
but trust me it was fast
what do they mean
they mean phonemic
oh, I thought we were doing phonemic transcriptions
no we were trying to represent the sounds actually said i thought
which would be phonetic
Oh
I was wondering that do humble people push their selves to be humble or is it jn their nature? Is humility something you learn and achieve or you are rather born with it? Don't answer both
Humility is like math skill. You can have a natural tendency toward it but if you want to improve you have to work at it
Dont answer the answer
I didn't understand could you elaborate
You said don’t answer both but the answer is both
This sums up pretty well, thnx
Fellas, whats the deal with Biomathematics? I mean, clearly it's a merge of mathematics and biology. What kind of maths is involved? Is it like maths that's solely based on biology? I am aware that I can just pose the question in some browser, this is my home though. It would be nice to hear from someone who is actually invested in the field
Mathbio is a pretty huge field
Ranging from reasonably theoretical stuff to very hands-on applied stuff
Personally, my research looks at biological systems that can grow, move, and interact. What this means depends on the context, but I'm generally interested in mathematical models that are sufficiently general so as to be applicable to a wide range of scenarios
So I work a lot with Markov processes and PDEs and, more specifically, how and when to switch between those two methods of representing a system depending on certain relevant factors (population size, etc)
It goes from like behavioral ecology to molecular biology
Yeah
If there's a piece of math you like you can almost surely find a biological application for it
I saw some stuff about stochastic context-free grammars being applied to reading DNA
I was like wtf
DANG eric helpful
Yeah I can see that
algebra
That's a little vague
what do you mean
Well "algebra" could mean countless things
Never heard of applied rep theory huh
does that actually exist
Yes
rep theory is used in spectroscopy quite a bit
I saw an article fairly recently on applications of finite group theory to molecular systems biology
,w spectroscopy
Wolfram Alpha doesn't understand your query!
Perhaps try rephrasing your question?
Click here to refine your query online
I mean there's a ton of stuff that algebra has applications to
Imo algebra applications are way cooler than differential equations and numerical analysis
sheaves?
besides physics?
e.g. figuring out which frequencies of light that molecules resonate at
right but thats physics then?
well
what in biology
imo PDEs are fuckin great
Error correcting codes, graph theory
Algebraic statistics
alg stats sounds kinda dope
PDEs are useful but I can see their application being somewhat uninteresting because of the, like, triviality of it
statistical mechanics winds up in ecology
yeah i can see all of that
Mm statistical mechanics is kinda what I do
mmm ising models
i imagine most of the non-phys applications of math are like probability/analysis/stochastic
It's useful all over biology
Error correcting codes and algebraic/spectral graph theory Invictus
how does ECC use algebra
Hamming codes, also I discovered this one paper a while back that uses simplicial complexes called "left right Cayley complexes" to get error correcting codes that are "locally testable"
yeah he had a video on it
on the cayley complexes?
Wait what
ah ok
This is the paper I'm talking about
thanks 👍
But yeah also cryptography
K theory
Find a biological application
can't wait to sully all the arxiv RH proofs
arxiv should annex elsevier
Yeah kinda
I've been trying to find out what stuff GPT3 knows
I just found it funny that it automatically defaults to a mathoverflow question
Unfortunately the answer doesn't make sense for me 🤷
plus it is just wrong. I specified that the field might not be algebraically closed.
I'm sure the 3 people online on arxiv will be very entertained
LOL
It did some good proofs earlier but it isn't very clever
1 sec I'll fetch it
This is almost perfect
lol I put in something about semimartingales once, and it just started talking about free lunches
I would just want more explanation on the end
Is that a direct copy of some answer on the internet
Probably not
Because I also did a test where I replaced the divisiblity sign with # and it still worked
Like, sometimes I had to try a couple of times before the proof was valid
o.O
On more complicated ones, it never came up with a valid proof.
I feel like there's no way, it's gotta be copying from something or making simple substitutions
But still, it is smarter than some undergrads 
Mm I don't think so
This was funny ^
LOL
Hmm I have an idea
Man it's really not getting this one.
It's really quite good
lol
This is also quite funny http://www.questioz.com/questioz-research-archives/category/natural-sciences-math
Author: Nitin Kanuri Reviewer: The Questioz Editorial Board Reviewer's Note: A well written and well-formatted research paper. The paper explores an extremely interesting topic and gives...
o.O
well for the argument
(original by descartes)
he does it by casework (1 interperetation)
suppose he is thinking: then either
- he is being decieved into thinking by a devil/evil god: he must exist as he is being decieved, he has to exist to be decieved
or - he is not being decieved: he is thinking, so he has to exist!
this is nothing more than a summary of the 1st meditation
there are some logical issues, but it reads well, and makes an interesting point (an assumption)
yeah v cool
another shill for philosophy server for math reading group there
i already converted emma!
Lol
but how does it work?
how is emma doing
it mostly takes stuff that already exists right?
good
nice!
still scared i have a crush on a straight girl 
yea then never hurts to try
aaa
So do you.
how does what work
playground
I asked it to give me the solution of a atcoder problem
but it gave me a solution to a different problem
wrong!
speaking from experience 
i mean it's better to try because it hurts either way
hows that
confessing is so fun
it's like
you feel like you're jumping from a high building but you know you're not
sorta like sky diving ig but I've never tried that
lel
yuh i got 0 experience
@alpine kindle just ask her to hang out or smth, you don't need to go all out straight up
instead the few times ive done it it's gone in the "alright, i'm just unlucky and this person is not gay / compatible" direction
which is like, not disappointing, just "o yea this is how reality works"
i don't wanna do that rn
i just had a discussion with some other people where i realised why i find it hard to talk to new people
it's because i don't have a gauge for their interest in and familiarity with certain topics
so i think I'm gonna ask her what she's into to do with computing
and go from there
oof
oof, you can't read peoples minds 😔
this is just a general thing I've just noticed about talking to people
I think that's really important when conversing with someone 
darq thinks we should all try being more like anya
ryc you know I haven't watched sxf
i didn't know that
oh
i haven't thought about spy x family since manan and yohan stopped harassing me about reading it
I can tell when people are (dis)interested
the interest isn't the big thing
you just pay attention to how engaged they are with the topic of discussion
it's the level
when you're like, actively talking to them a bunch sure
i know what she's broadly interested in
:0
I am a moderator
i mean
I've honed in on computing as a shared interest
you're like the 3rd most active user or smth
Some would call me the mod of the people
lmfao
some mods can b onactive no?
i surely wouldn’t
nah, ann and nami has been slacking lately
nami is the weird mega weeb
no but
both still have higher activity scores than me
whats this
in terms of the active role bot
whyd u ping me
lol
oh, i see
who tf are circle and dream snow?
:0
so i need to figure out which bits she knows more than me, which bits we know the same, and which bits i know more than her
we just been
how to see this
s?top
but in bots
in one of the spam channels
i will do it here 😎
how're some users barely active in the general channels but super prolific helpers?
🙏
why
cux we are
helpful
hahaha
but
i like blu more
pink would be nice too
they have a life
The helpful role, it explains it there
bruh how
oh, goddess, you're circle??
wait lmao you're 1st place
wait, I'm not top 10 anymore??
eyyyyyy
@neat frost get no lifed bitch HAHAHAHAHAHHA
Hahahhha yes
u just
realised?
HAHAHA
Math help grindset
So helpful gets helper powers but without the annoying helper pinging
hmmm
I wanted helper powers for when people don't know how to use the server and they forget to keep the channel alive by replying to the the bot message, but I hated the pinging.
Especially the pre mature pings
so no diff
The plan is to limit role pings via bot so maybe that can come back? Do you think
whats that
Limit how?
Like people would be unable to ping prematurely
gi stands for Gastrointestinal obviously, kinky ig
googling wmw yields a machining company so prolly some engineering stuff
39 is your age?
I dunno what ri is tho
There's a way to set that up so people can't open the channel with a ping or prematurely ping?
well, you can just track when they open the help channel, no?
Disable role pinging, add a command to the bot that pings the role
that won't be as user friendly tho
True but oh well
Would the command make the bot ping every 15 minutes?
Probably not
Have you seen the amount of people who prematurely ping? Like the post their question, wait 2 minutes then ping
how about pinging helpers actually pings the bot
and the bot deletes the message and decides whether to actually ping helpers
I know 
that's annoying af
HAHAGA
I think I found an infinite money glitch on roobet
i said interests
I honestly couldn't put up with 3 days of helper duty
i
the entitled/egocentric people were just waaay too many
That's why I never became a helper
thus muted role
i think you need to slam your head into a toilet to see the pot of gold come out
:0
damn obtuse looking ass bots
What
Im not a bot lmao I just made a python script
yeah yeah yeah you're gonna tell us all bout it chucklenuts
I have nothing to gain from this lmao
I cant even play roobet in the usa
Its a statistics problem, thats why i posted it here
Id love if someone wanted to check my work
and see if I made an error
maybe that's not actually a problem
to reward people that read

that seems like good design imo
THOSE COULD BE INTERESTS!
taking you at face value apologies for the blow out, i see a lot of gambling bots now and it aggravates
Its alright, maybe a bad time to 'promote' gambling
lmfao, if it cheats them i suppose thats a good thing
yeah, it seems like it does, still a risk of losing all your money and DMing people on discord begging for more tho. Gambling is dangerous
oh hell yeah ofcourse
@ slicker
In my head I read the missing part as "Ironic devices are allowed"
thief

aww thats so cute drawing :0
Surprise they didn't right " give me an A or the giraffe gets it"
I would’ve docked points for that
ok slurp this is how you get your mod status revoked
Role that does nothing
tox is like 12 isnt he
They r big fans of math. I wanna assume they have goatees
Imma just say toxic
Good morning slurp!
@placid finch hi
u forgot cats 
what u mean ?
Knock it off
hey is anyone ok with calling me and teaching me some maths by the equations i give them?
dm if me u do want to teach me maths
Good morning!
You want people to tutor you for free?
free is the best deal
Yes, this server was open for free lol
U just need to explain concepts and why ykyk, 😭
if you dont want to ask questions, the right people wont want to explain
Oh damn
Then what do I dooo 😭
ask questions?
((0,0),(1,0)) = A; V = c(1,0) for any c in R; is "Av = u " a linear operation?
All matricies are their own endomorphisms of vector spaces
so yes,
it’s linearity and morphisms of vector spaces being linear is how we define them once basises get involved
not all matrices are endo
have you heard of rectangular matrices?
Fair point, they’re homomorphisms but endo if square
i’m so used to only using squares that I forget the rectangular ones lmao
also the matrix intuition breaks down in inf dim
hamel basis? schauder basis?
you don't have a self-dual vector space of countable dimension
instead you have the countable product of R be the dual of the countable coproduct of R
back
i don’t know the difference
hamel basis is when you insist that linear combinations are only allowed to have finitely many terms
Infinite basises mean that every vector is a sum of a scaled number of a finite collection of them
at least that’s gaurunteed by Zorn’s
schauder basis is when you endow your space with a norm topology and define the meaning of an infinite sum
for example, scaled trig functions make up a schauder basis in the space of continuous periodic functions in L^p norm when p < infty
because any continuous periodic function can be approximated arbitrarily well (in L^p norm) by a trig polynomial
This reminds me that what physicists call completeness of a Hilbert Space is the existence of a countable orthonormal basis (being separable) 
At least that's what I get when they use it in the context of solving the Schrodinger equations.


Wait, this is an example of a separable inner product space that is not a hilbert space?
yes sure
well
Q^n is an example of a separable inner product space that is not a hilbert space
and any nonclosed subspace of L^2 is one too
even funnier is when physicists insist hilbert spaces are only over the complex numbers

Is growing a beard disrespectful?
what?
If my professors don't have a beard and I grow one
thats fine
this should be pinned
gonna make my username a net
lmao
Studying regression with hand written material wasn't fun
Could not tell if I'm seeing ^ or ` or ___ or 1 or i or j
Had a much harder time trying to decipher what I'm reading than learning regression
I write my lowercase is as backwards js when they're indices
Actually just in general when it's math
what are reu alternatives.
graduate early go do phd
just learn to give mathematical letters "tails"
i drew this with a mouse so it looks bad but
hopefully you get the point
or write your j's like this
yeah this is what i do
mostly because it looks stylish
same reason to use $\ell$ over $l$
Namington
math phys > TCS > math finance
when reading math
when i see \ell i think of the latex command so i emphasize the ll more and hold on that longer
Still better than 𝕴 and 𝕵
this will be the next evolution of captcha

Exactly
$$\mathfrak{A}$$
$$\mathfrak{U}$$
Benutzername
The first fundamental theorem of calculus states basically that the derivative of the indefinite integral under a curve is equal to that curve right
Can you formulate it like the indefinite integral of a functions derivative is equal to that function, and prove that?
yes
Yeah, definitely.
Some people consider that the second FTC but you can get one from the other.
But it's probably easier to prove that the derivative of the indefinite integral is the function, and not the other way around.
Thanks for answering, exactly what I was wondering about
i am about to go ham on this copy of princeton companion to mathematics i found in my school library
this is like a bible
i am overjoyed
anamono
leech lattice
me
🥲
i can think of the 4th dimension as cross sections of 3rd dimensions
but how do i do 5+

ok i have a good idea
picture the 3d cross sections on a number line
then if you move in a certain direction you are moving through the 4th dimension
now imagine it as a 2d plane
move in the + or -x direction and you are moving in the 4th dimension
and then for 6 dimensions just imagine a 3d space moving within another 3d space?
woah that's cool
is he actually though?
It doesn't matter, in my head he is
But this edition is from 1988 or something so probably not
A cross section of the 4th dimension ofc
if you have a linear operator, and you find its matrix representation, and choose its basis to be made up of a set of its eigenvectors, is that matrix then necessarily diagonal?
if there is a basis consisting of eigenvectors then yes, the matrix of the operator with respect to that basis is diagonal, and the i'th diagonal element is the eigenvalue corresponding to the i'th eigenvector in the basis
In fact, a linear map having a basis of eigenvectors is precisely what it means to be diagonalisable.
what even is IUT
ive only seen people joke about it and read that it is "not generally accepted by the mathematical community" acc to wikipedia
even if it was comprehensible there would have had to have been atleast one proof by now using the notation mochizuki came up with to prove abc as well as its techniques in proving related results which can be easily tackled with abc true
i know a danielle ratcliffe
John G. Ratcliffe sounds like pseudonym josh would adorne
Maybe just replace John with josh lmao
wot
doxxed
youve doxxed yourself so hard here
now I am rat
and i am shyshu
eventually people will forget all knowledge of my former self
i wont
And I will be but a rodent
i never forget
i remember your old name i think
good night
I don't actually give a shit really
But i don't want former students of mine identifying me so
i know i was just saying for some reason lol
am i ur former student
Go to BED NOW
you’ll never know
Very naughty by the seems of it
OK shy whatever you say poppet
sad empire noises

Is there any mathematical meaning that can be attached to "a <<< b" that they write commonly in like physics lol
,ti shyshu
The current time for Samsyet is 12:20 AM (IST) on Tue, 27/09/2022.
Alison40 is 4 hours and 30 minutes behind, at 07:50 PM (BST) on Mon, 26/09/2022.
yes it's very late for you
not really, it depends on what a,b are as well since in one context one can be considered to be much smaller than the other, but in a different context that might not be seen as such
Git rkt

Putting link here too so it doesn't get washed away too quickly https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScSvL67KZ7wCmE3_51qHa0-NOSo0UdTtaUhsEUbEsoJjSmy5w/viewform?usp=sf_link (takes max 1 min)
We are three students doing an academic project where we have to create a new or develop an existing product. Our product idea is a universal device holder for, among other things, books, tablets, and phones with many more functions. Our product is targeted to those who value practicality, dozing off, or the comforts of the bed/couch, while havi...
what does "much smaller" mean?
it has no precise meaning and it depends on the context
there's probably a trick to this problem that makes it simple but at a first glance this looks like pain ;-;
Z(G) what is that
The center (Zentrum) of G
the center of G, i.e. the set of elements that commute with all the elements in G
Ah ok
Beats me 992, but I would imagine you do some sylow tomfoolery
175533
yeah probably. Though this problem is in the section right before sylow's theorem (it's gotta do with the conjugacy action on cosets if i remember correctly) so maybe there's a way to do it without sylow's
Hm.
is that the prime factorization? thanks if so lol
Yeah
So H must be a union of conjugacy classes. That's just necessary.
So presumably there's a unique way to write 16 as a sum of divisors of 17 * 5^2 * 3^2
Which presumably is... 1 + 1 + ... + 1
That would prove that this subgroup is in the center
If you can prove that, you're done.
Well actually what am I saying—that's obviously false
There's some extra annoyances
Well here's another idea
If you can prove there is even a single non-unit central element in H
then you're done
since that will generate H.
So while this isn't unique just by sums of divisors, if we can show that there's always a summand of 1, then we're done.
The divisors that are <16 are 1, 3, and 5. So if I've calculated correctly, the only possible way that doesn't contain a summand of 1 is when we have 17 = 1 + 3 + 3 + 5 + 5. So we need to look at that case, probably.
Back
My guess is now we look at the stabilisers of these conjugacy classes.
So we get four distinct normal subgroups, two of size 17x5x5x3 and two of size 17x5x3x3
Beats me from here. Interesting exercise for sure
thanks for the help anyways lol
stealin info in the mathdiscord i see
good luck!
I'm trying to think if I can somehow say $N_G(H)/C_G(H)$ is isomorphic to the trivial subgroup of $aut(H)$, and $N_G(H) = G$, then that would force $C_G(H)$ to be equal to $G$ which would imply $H$ is a subgroup of Z(G)
992qqoloy
Oh fuuuuuck
right
since H is cyclic
and a prime
|Aut(H)| = 16
so G/C_G(H) must divide 16 but also 3^25^217
which means G/C_G(H) equals 1 which means that C_G(H) = G
yes thats right
does this shape have a name?
that's an ellipse
not to be confused with an eclipse
but it's at an angle
the orientation doesn’t matter
interesting
yeah, it's at a 45 degree angle. adding xy's to conic section equations tends to do a rotatey-thing
that's cool
you can see what's going on in terms of rotation matrices, or in terms of 2x2 matrix linear algebra. but i don't know a nice algebra 2 way to see how this works
i'm about to be in linear algebra, i guess i'll learn more there
Ellipse
U need to diagonalize a matrix
Compute the EIGENVECTORS
regular value
Hpo
completing the square prob?
same thing as diagonalizing a quadratic form
it's called like legendre's something or other right
wat
you really don't need linalg to understand why adding xy to that shifts it like it does
Is this correct
This fits better in #proofs-and-logic
Please see #❓how-to-get-help if you haven't already
it fits better for spiderman
Oh hi
Sorry for the ping
Stirling formula, I would wager
heh, can't use that, it would be circular then
I find Joel David Hamkins's lecture series on philosophy of mathematics (which is available on his youtube channel) very enlightening. Would recommend to anyone
who got coursehero
@odd narwhal guess what
You thought a squat with 110kg max weight was bad?
I'm my dorm, there's a gym for the residents, right?
There's no squat rack

How on earth
Does a gym NOT have a squat rack??
I-
Bruh
is it just one of those cardiobunny gyms with like, a bunch of pelotons and nothing else
Don't ask me
that's what my apartment gym is kinda like 
I think I saw some machines that're in the doubles
Split squats time
Somehow that's not as bad
And no squat rack
mine does have a squat rack but the weight situation in general is just so scuffed
the best gyms are the powerlifting gyms where it literally just looks like a construction site

There are quite a few machines there tbh
Lmaoo
I stan machines








