#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 26 of 1
i still have a looong way ahead
im not a math major
yet
im a third year cs
once im done i should do a masters and get rec letters and shit
but hey
im learning new cool stuff in both cs and math
so life is great
THis is a formal sum, correct
Yes
Wikipedia is actually such a good resource for learning math
yes
cuz math is symbol pushing
u do not need any opinions
u just need the right definitions
hehe
what exactly is the homomorphism then
what do you mean
it sends a simplex to a thing which is like a collection of all its boundary pieces
a signed collection with multiplicity, you could say
(so that things cancel like we want them to)
i don't really understand how to explain the particular choice of alternating signs though
besides like "i know why it makes del^2 = 0"
I was trying to construct an exact sequence of sorts out of free abelian groups on simplicies
kinda got lost
decided to look at a few papers and wikipedia

I don't really give a fuck about the homologies at the given moment
it's exact if you're considering simplices in a space without holes
or like
other nasty things
I'm considering purely R^n rn
oh ok
htf would you even define one outside of R
and the homology group is ker/im
thats it
and basic point-set
oh
lmao
if hom group is trivial
then its exact
iff?
the homology of a chain complex is the quotients of the kernels to the images, an exact sequence is one where the kernels are always the images.
yeah
I just wanted to find a practical example of an exact sequence and I realized oh shit what if I somehow work with simplicies, their boundaries are n-1 simplicies
but I can't quite find a way to put a "group structure" on em
sure. in terms of manifolds, exactness corresponds to being able to fill in the insides of n-simplices and homology measures how badly you fail to do that
I mean I guess you can consider Hom(X,S(n)) for like the nth simplex out of some topological space but that seems messy to compute
so like, free parts of your homology groups tell you that there's holes you can't fill in, and torsion parts tells you that you would need to do a twisty to fill in some simplices
what is it you want to put a group structure on?
usually the group structure is the very nasty "consider the abelian group on all the possible simplices as generators"
this gives you what's called the "singular chain complex"
so like
oh jesus
you literally just consider each simplex as a symbol and then you add them together
it's what I'm looking for tho
... so the free abelian group i mentioned
yea
though I don't like them cuz they're annoying to construct symbolically
the thing i took issue with was the "exact sequence" part
but you're right that it's exact in R^n
same with free groups generally
idk how you can even DEFINE a simplex outside of R^n without somehow calling reference to it
yeah this is very infinite dimensional and so it's nice that there turn out to be many ways of doing this that get you the same things you want
you embed it in topologically
like
you map from simplex to your space
i don't even think it needs to be embedded
just a continuous function is fine
and then what you consider is formal sums of those maps
this is the REAL singular chain complex
the singular chain complex of R^n consists of maps of simplices into R^n, not just simplices in R^n
so those can be all bendy and fucked up
hm
broo
how long does it usually take for you guys to come up with medium difficulty proof
So a formal sum on Hom(S(n),X)
Then what’s the boundary morphism on these sums
bro help
what
this
It's the one you posted. It acts on a single simplex by giving you the restrictions of maps to each face, and then summing them in the right way with the right signs.
It acts on a linear combination of simplices linearly.
my god there are a lot of active help channels
Do undergraduate advisors actually know anything about the field they're in
Maybe dumb question but I don't have a lot of faith in my uni's advisors lol
This probably depends on your uni
At my cc they had no background in my major besides access to the catalog reqs and stuff
At my uni they're usually professors in the dept
If you hit two balls based on the resonance of the strings and the resonance is odd then what happens to the balls?
about a medium amount of time
medium proofs are 7 minutes more or less, give or take
I find the idea that you'd start with the idea of a "medium difficulty" proof and from there derive the time
Surely you would define what a medium-difficulty proof is in terms of the time taken
I don't think there is anything close to a universal idea of what a medium-difficulty proof is
It really just depends on what you've done and what you're talking about.
Is there any special properties which define the complex numbers up to isomorphism.
It is the unique algebraically closed field of characteristic 0 with cardinality of the continuum, if I remember correctly.
... so bijective to R
sets of the same cardinality are in bijection, yes
the statement is still correct
Can I ask why you
reacted?
Did I say something incorrect, or do you just not like the fact?
I was not expecting to see cardinality of R lol
well, C has the cardinality of R...
What's much nicer is A, the set of algebraic numbers, which is just the algebraic closure of Q. It's countable!
Please read #❓how-to-get-help
It's funny to see your reactions to this Mizalign lol
I was not expecting that either, frankly
[Steinitz 1910]: Up to isomorphism, there is exactly one algebraically closed field with prescribed uncountable cardinality and characteristic.
For example the algebraic closure of ℂ(t) is isomorphic to ℂ.
158
Counterpoint: Gal(Q)
Here's another "cursed" fact
Gotta say ShiN I don't see what you're saying?
what in god's name is a projective variety
The absolute galois group of R is much nicer than the absolute galois group of Q. Mostly a joke tho since the problem lies more in Q than Q bar
Oh right fair
Affine varieties are I guess understandable, idk why we need affine spaces for em.
they live there
A projective variety is a variety on the projective plane, i.e. the set of solutions of some polynomial equation*, but on the projective rather than affine plane.
*the polynomial equation must satisfy some requirements in order to be well-defined on the projective plane
Also isn't every affine space with a vector space isomorphic to every other one via some translation
"affine space" here means something different than linear algebra
Like, it just means k^n
????
o h
It's an unfortunate name
affine space you forget the vector space structure
We think of affine space as like, forgetting the basepoint.
that's how I view it aswell
Yup
Isn't it more that Gal(R) is unusually simple?
A^n= V(0)
I sorta view it like vectors without labels, you can only "label" vectors between them
Gal(F_p) is also not that bad. Q just has so.many holes
I don't understand projective spaces, but I haven't really seen them yet
Too many holes
We're not really interested in affine space so much as the varieties within it.
Projective space is affine space but better behaved sometimes
projective is the algebrogeometric replacement of compactness
Wise
It is very convenient when establishing some correspondences as well
This all started when I realized that prime ideals are kinda epic in the case of poly rings, and I wanted to look more into it
it all started when i was born at a very young age...
otherwise they just seem like they're given the "prime" label just so you can define a closed-topology on them
hmmm
Prime ideals are called prime because they behave like prime.numbers
(prime numbers and multiples of prime numbers)
I never thought I'd see the word nice in a mention of intersection theory
yeah I was gonna ask if you meant prime ideals in Z
brb
cats just spilled something 
Prime ideals in general are meant to capture this idea

When u only care about ideals unique factorisation is much easier
Algebraic number theory more like ideal theory
they are named like that probably because the first rings studied were all dedekind and this is the correct mental image there
ideals were originally called "ideal numbers"
i dont know if this is useful, but this is definitely a misrepresentation
at least that's how I saw them
your view of mathematics is not good
The whole fact that we look at the spectrum of a ring instead of the affine space is less to do with how it's just neat how there's a topology on them, and more to do with the fact that somehow, there's information missing in affine space (for most rings)
so maybe try not to make general statements about the subject
Loch is being very direct lol, but yes I must say that's a very short-sighted view of what's happening
I "found" prime ideals on my own by accident when trying to define topologies on posets, and then adding an operation on them. Turns out ideals and ideals multiplication form this. The problem is that it isn't useful
I was specifically looking for topologies to see what properties they would have
but there's much more to it I want to find out
read a book on algebraic geometry
depending on your algebra background this takes multiple years
I'm going to.
let (S,<,+) be a partially ordered semigroup such that x + y < x and x + y < y.
Nice thing is that you can also reconstruct a commutative ring from its spectrum so you're not losing any information
that's fucking AWESOME
don't forget the sheaf tho
baby steps
The sheaf is implied
I mean, just looking at the topological space without it does in fact lose information
Ok sure
I figured mizalign probably didnt know
You're right
When I think of a spectrum I think of it as an affine scheme not just as a topological space
But that might not be clear
let (S,<,+) be a partially ordered semigroup such that x + y < x and x + y < y. Then define K to be the subset of K such that for all p in K: x + y < p <=> x < p OR y < p. Then if you define L(x) to be the intersection of elements greater than x and P, the set of all L(x) form the closed sets in a topology.
The whole "prime" thing I added JUST to allow L(x + y) = L(x) union L(y)
I wanted to see when for all distinct pairs x and y, there exists disjoint neighborhoods between eachother
turns out the set of ideals of a ring, with ideal product & inclusion, forms EXACTLY this
and it's the Zariski topology
and there's a lot more cool shit in this case beyond that
which I want to see
robin hartshorne
when we define a projective space, is it usually over an affine space or just like
over the vector space itself
It's with respect to a field
Over the vector space is a nice coordinate free way to do it, people will write P(V) for the projective space on a vector space V
Once you fix a basis V=k^n+1 then P(V) is identified with P^n
Yo if anyone knows how to do this they should tell me
Thought this was RH but forgor about the weird powers of -1
Lol
Oh it is
alternating riemann hypothesis
Just solve for x
eta function :)))
Damn
(ignore the divergence)
is project euler good for getting better at functional programming?
Yes, it is
But just to get you decently familiar with the language
Once that has been done you're practically just doing interview prep
I would also recommend doing actual projects of stuff you want to make
In addition to doing more mathy projects
Anything that feels more practical will boost your confidence in the programming language
isn't this dirichelet eta
actually, there is no real solution
brooo
As an analyst, Zariski is not Hausdorff, so I refuse to acknowledge its existence
Lmfao
Topology? I hardly know her!
functor? I hardly know her!
new topology axioms just dropped: Closed under arbitrary unions, finite intersections, contains the empty set and the universe set, is Hausdorff, and either locally compact or polish (depending on the dimensions)
Do you guys know any book in measure theory or functional analysis that covers bochner integration?
Or just like
Any material on the subject whatsovever
rudin FA covers it
🙄 functors
yeah I'm not smart enough to contextualize that yet. . . . .
ill try to explain: topology is the study of open sets. this is a joke saying we assume the "collection of open sets" is well behaved by assuming the underlying space is hausdorff (basically as reasonable as you can be), locally compact (which allows you to for eg define volume) or a Polish space (well behaved space)
the best part is that this joke actually works
topology is often frustrating because math hates us, adding more axioms makes math hate us less
math is inherently frustrating
So, what's inside of a "set"?
Also, what's a closed set? Or is there even one?
Elements of a set. An example would be the set containing 1 and -3, notated {1,-3}
i need a good way of representing the earth..
e.g egg, crust = the skin, mantle = the egg white
core = yolk

But it's wrong
x=1 is the alternating harmonic series which converges to ln2
well
it converges to ln2 conditionally
not absolutely
which means the series can be rearranged to converge conditionally to any real number
it is conditionally convergent for any x<=1
wot
why does it give -54 lmao
b-but
Re(-56) < 0
lmao
wait are you suggesting that there are nontrivial zeros with Re(x)>=1
did wolfram disprove the riemann hypothesis?
based
Well... I mean yeah that checks out
Mm maybe delete that please
You should delete this
Please
Hi everyone, im not sure if this is the right place to talk, but I feel like shit. Not really understanding anything and a teacher who sucks at teaching. I feel really stuffed and feel like crying. Im hopeless right now.
I think im going to fail this class
https://estore.wacom.com/en-US/one-by-wacom-small-ctl472k1a.html what do you guys think about this graphic table (152x95mm)? I thinked to move from paper to a graphic table. I got tired doing math on paper, do you guys have some experience with this and if so please reply.
What class are you struggling with?
Calculus 2
I mean the most you can do rn is do loads of practice problems and when you get stuck just ask on the server, no one's going to bite
do not do the funct until marriage
Hi I am struggling with linear algebra 1 what tips could you give me to pass the course i have an exam in two days and where can i find proof based problems with solutions.
(a) congrats on honourable, (b) that book looks really good
Might take a look later today
So, what makes a set "Open" ?
Also, g'morning everyone!!!
An open set would be, for eg {x|a<x<b}
Read as "the set of x such that a<x<b"
Its open because it doesn't contain a or b
@glossy crescent I woulda left it at the ① or ②
Yellow Washingbear 
I've just started Calculus 2 and I'm trying to prove the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus/Leibniz-Newton Formula but the Mean Value Theorem arise every time and I'd like to avoid it. Is it possible to avoid it? Or is it a fundamental part of the way definite integrals work?
Why do you want to avoid the MVT
Good question. I usually try to understand concepts by building upon the least amount of knowledge required
if you take real analysis, you can prove it via pc constant integration
thats what Tao does at least
Sorry, what does pc stand for?
Yoo washingbear honorable
In what context
Pc constant integration
Alrighty then! Thanks!
So, a set that has ambiguity is an open set?
no
there is a precise definition
but its probably not important for you to know that right now
intuitively its a set in which you can move a little bit in every direction at every point, but i dont know if this is useful to you
there is no "boundary"
Why can't you define a topology where the open sets are {x|a<=x<=b} ?
well, then $\bigcup_{n\in\bN}\left[a+\frac{1}{n}, b-\frac{1}{n}\right]$ has to be open too
Lochverstärker
and thats just (a, b)
so now every interval is open
and suddenly everything is open
Well I mean more to the point, something like [0,1] u [2,3] must be open, but clearly isn't an interval.
so it's insufficient merely to define the closed intervals to be the only open sets
Ofc If we're talking about using it as a basis the above is a problem too
I should have said basis yeah
Also {x} = [x,x] so that's an easier way of seeing everything is open 
I like this topology. No gatekeeping of what sets can be open or not
So it's the discrete topology
it doesnt have any information
ye, true
discussion really is awful today
im trying to go through some problem sets
I wonder how many I can actually solve.
none. none is the answer.
hey ally can i ask for your opinion on a sketch?
yeah in a min
sure
hello!
hehe

Omg it’s me!
lmao slurp
Anyone know what this is
I still have to decide which channel is gonna be the mirupii art dump channel
lagrangian of the standard model sir
just a ninja of the night
bro it feel good when u dont have shit on the floor anymore
true
Please see #❓how-to-get-help
and confused why it not correct if its adjacent angle
Like a way to find the correct angle
Cute <33
Slap a 0 at the end of an equal sign and you have the average pde
AYO WHO TF WAS GONNA TELL ME DERIVATIVES ARE LITERALLY JUST LINEAR TRANSFORMATIONS WTF
Its all coming together yall something primal just snapped in my brain
Haha
Derivatives are linear operators on the vector space of functions
D(f+g) = D(f)+D(g), D(af)=aD(f)
they're homomorphisms under addition
🤯 i would've appreciated at least like a mild nod to that fact in first year
its never gonna be the same
If you used linear algebra done right, you'd have seen the derivative as a linear operator on the finite dim vector space of polynomials of bounded degree
I like the way they've worded it and actually made the connection, I might download this as a supplement
new mirupii art
@silver meteor Trying to understand why that tag irks that user
it do be like that 
I think they were blind
Did you notice that, that user got muted and they (or mod) deleted all the messages? The channel was #help-13 if you forgot
what's your advice for doing well on the AMC 10
can I use sdtc when the exponent is four?
Standard model Lagrangian
Your art? How about our art? 
clicks save image
Joke™
?
i know....
You're being very awkward rn lmao
I opened a question in one of the math help channels but had to go eat lunch before I could try applying the advice I recived, and the channel closed due to inactivity while iIwas eating. Do I reopen it until I've had time to try the advice and see if it worked or not or just leave it as is?
You can open a new channel if you want, no worries
@tawdry radish ur art is epic btw
Yes
Wtf don't so Tru that
Why
Grass you meanie 
So true means what was said was true
And I am smiling and nodding in agreement
Right?


o wao that's really pretty 
quite the cute little creature you drew
i think i know the left cloud
New windows background 
oh hold on
enjoy

I’m going back to the basics
So classical mechanics first
Like types of motion and wtv
I want to learn fluids
very good
Why can't real life be this epic. I need pyrovision goggles or something. Maybe a shit ton of kawaii merch
Ye
no u dont 
my hatred for fluids is only second to my hatred of electric current
I know some quantum but little classical mech lol
haha... perhaps dont try learn QM with this in ur mind
What
how u do know QM 
Little
mooood.

The book was like Lie group/algebra representations modeling stuff in quantum systems
U shud
Idl
Idk
What do u do instead
I’m gonna destroy my sleep schedule now
Since I have to do sports
And wake up at 5
i have to study for college entrances still 
wow
and how do u think i will get a college?
its not like im in the us, most of the colleges are shitty as fuck
how shitty u may ask?
linear algebra in 5th sem out of a 6th sem shitty
😭
I mean
That’s in some places here
Like first semester high school algebra, second semester precalc, third semester calc 1, fourth systemester calc 2, 5th semester linear algebra
entire semesters on fourier transform (not fourier analysis)
and how do u think people get into cmi
thats right
entrance exams
that are really fucking annoying
But those are math exams right
how difficult is calculus (i am on the first pages of a calculus book)
i dont want to go to cmi lol
Oh lol
its something to get used to
like all maths
good to hear
😭
my brain has hyped calculus up to be this awesome thing i bet i will be pretty disappointed
that or overwhelmed
i did so too!
and i was fairly disappointed
Huh
okay gn. it's my first time talking in this server and this place is awesome lol
Do U know amu
Nice
what about amu
I have horrible grades in highschool right now (I always have and it’s not likely to change) but I’m really good with tests. I consistently got 97th+ percentile on the PSAT test’s (without ever studying) and on amc 12 practice tests I get very good scores (90+ usually). sadly I can’t actually take amc 12 since the nearest testing center is very far from me. How do I get colleges to actually about me and would college even be a good idea for me?
have your grades been poor due to a lack of turning assignments in or
yes.
I don’t really plan to do the assignments anyway
right so it sounds like you have the intelligence to do well in university, but your work ethic doesn't match this.
alright, why do you want to go to college?
I’ve been told it’s just required at this point
yes exactly.
if you have zero desire to complete academic work, why then pay an institution to give you more work you're not going to do?
because if I don’t my choices of what I want to do will be extremely limited.
even in an interview scenario, the idea of "I'm smart I just don't care enough to try" doesn't sound alluring.
yeah i know
my advice if you're prepared to get your act together and actually do work, go to community college for a year or two, get good grades there, then transfer to a proper university
well you... kinda did this to yourself...?
i did yea
don't waste your money in university if you're not prepared to work
sounds like your only option yeah
but you do definitely have a second chance with what I'm suggesting
go to communie and actually try
but don't try to go directly to uni because your grades and work ethic aren't gonna do you any favors.
Yall, my sequence got published to the oeis!!!
(I personally went to community college and worked my way up, and am currently a PhD student at a much better university)
I was really leaning on not going to college but I just needed auntie else to say it
just feels wrong since everyone i know has been telling me to go
what will you do without college?
also you don't necessarily have to go to college to get a decent career, it just depends on what you are wanting to do
like do you have any trade skills?
i have no idea
don’t even know what that is
trade skills are great as an alternative
like... practical skills.
fix cars, plumb, electrician
cook
huhm.
if you don't know what you want to do, college is a pretty expensive way to figure that out lol
yeahhhh
I’m good at math and like nothing else.
yeah i could
still have two years left in high school to figure out what to do in that gap year
yeah take a gap year and get a shitty job that at least builds up some very basic savings
Hmm, ive thought about studying again at uni. I have a masters, so would I likely go for another masters of math? Or just bachelor's of math?
gives you some perspective on the world and you're not going into the red by spending time figuring things out that way
I already have a few thousand from a stock I just got lucky on
learn what an allen wrench is.
start a garden
Eat a buffalo burger
something else
Smell the flowers
honestly just due to my intelligence with math I was hoping I’d use it to my advantage
hold a bee
it kiiiiinda doesn't work that way?
you definitely can use that to your advantage, but you also need work ethic
like, again, the "I'm smart I just can't be fucked to care" is not a good angle.
it's like multiplying, if your work ethic is 0, then multiplying by 0 kills everything else 
Well i’ve been trying to teach myself work ethic for years now since I noticed my issues. Still not very hard working.
what good is being smart if you don't do anything with it.
I mean I don't think the solution here is to just keep working harder, you need goals to work towards
true true
This is not the first time i’ve been told this.
What is your obsession with holding bees?
And if you are wondering yes I have actually held bees before. Not fun.
idk, bumblebees are fun to hold 
I didn't gave much work ethic in HS either tbh
yeah same
I would be scared to hug beedrill
I didn't really get a work ethic until I became friends with a group of tryhards
I had pretty terrible work ethic until maybe the start of college, which is also when I figured out I wanted to go into math
and I ended up deep in the self improvement grindset
I used to be in a group like that but I started to drift away from them
It be like that
my drive suddenly became "I wanna be impressive. and if I'm gonna be someone that everyone remembers I gotta GRIND"
now I drink five coffees a day and hardly sleep
Woah

it also gave me a perfectionist complex and chronic anxiety BUT FORGET THAT PART
For the things I am interested in (mostly the stuff that can impress people) like the game I’m building in desmos, I do have that motivation (I spent like all my time over this last weekends getting polygon collision to work)
but just not with school in any way
wanna know what I did in HS to get motivated
I went "how can i apply this to what I actually care about"
Yeah I’ve done that before.
I’m motivated in my calculus class and only my calculus class.
for example in Honors Chem I used the chem knowledge to make my own paints
yeah I mean beyond a certain point there's only so much you can do to trick yourself into working on these things lol
hmmmmmm
some of it is busy work and that's just life
yeah all I can say is like
Yall in HS, all I cared about was weed and skateboarding
oh boy is it “work harder”?
that's what I did
knew it
I literally found a friend to compete with and that worked for some reason
not a universal cure but
it was fun having the academic equivalent of a pokemon rival
I think the main issue with school for me is that I don’t see how doing the work will further my goals.
there's always going to be some amount of work that you are going to have to force, it's not going to be interesting. The trick is to have the majority of the work you do lining up with the kinds of work you naturally obsess about
as everything I’ve learned in school I learned online beforehand and it’s hard to convince myself that it will be different in the future without evidence.
a good chunk of the work does further your goals indirectly
if you go into mathematics you'll end up doing a LOT of writing
so all those dumb English essays aren't completely wasted
its just hard to see the longterm goals
especially if youve only been alive for like what
16 years
youre younger than youtube LOL
yeah with the east’s thing the hard part for me is just forming an opinion on the subject at hand, since it’s almost always something subjective
essays
not east’s
yeah I think with those it's like
research papers > essays tbh
yes
don't take it too seriously in the sense that you're not actually having to stick with an opinion, just pick one and explore it
but do take it seriously in the sense that like
that gives me an idea…
engaging with stuff like this will reward you in the long run
like it's very true that the essay writing you do for school is kind of a stupid game
It’s not that I don’t have opinions, it’s that it’s hard for me to prove stuff without objective evidence
well right that's what's challenging about more subjective writing
you still have to do this kind of subjective writing in mathematics believe it or not
also college application essays!
there's an art to convincing people that an idea is a good idea before you've seen it through
also scholarships essays
grant proposals are a lot of pretty story telling
my PhD advisor did a cool thing and posted one of his (successful) grant proposals now that the period has ended
and wrote a bit about how things shaped up in the end and what he would have done differently
it was very instructive
thats how i made my first portfolio
my prof linked me his and explained what he did and what he would’ve done differently
i still need to update mine, it’s not very good
being an artist and liking math is hard LOL
I’m relatively new to math since I’m still in high school but why would you need to convince someone some math idea is a good idea before researching it? It’s not like you have to conduct expensive experiments like the other sciences.
because they’re funding you and they don’t want to waste time and money
has anyone read mathematics made difficult?
Mathematics Made Difficult is a book by Carl E. Linderholm that uses advanced mathematical methods to prove results normally shown using elementary proofs. Although the aim is largely satirical, it also shows the non-trivial mathematics behind operations normally considered obvious, such as numbering, counting, and factoring integers. Linderhol...
wow this article doesn't even begin to make the book justice
sketches
is that a rabbit?
i should just start saying this when people ask me how old i am. 
which one
the left one
im younger than youtube
it makes my bones ache.
Specifically how does the Grothendieck wizardry connect to the classical approach
im slightly older than spongebob
nice sketches :0
If that can be explained to someone who doesn't know comalg but is studying classical AG
I would actually like to read that
no you wouldn’t
not that complicated the author is a god tier memer
probably something like doing addition with category theory or something really stupid like that
so basically just as bad as set theory. Got it. I would like to read this.
Finally some challenge
Do you actually have that book btw?
oOo
explains the very inner working of very simple operations, just like the book.
fighting cancer right now
and this is bad why?
Well, sotrue is sarcastic by origin
Current mood: mildly annoyed that \subset is proper by default in LaTeX
I feel like I use \subseteq way more
I could just redefine them, but..


\subseteq is the most consistent option
Subset seems to be the default in general for some reason
Even when equality is possible
Its weird
My homework wants me to round to three decimal places, disgusting
Let me retreat to math class
It's basically stats
"Calculate the probability of X given Y using the table"
I don't see how expressing it as a decimal is useful at all.. just keep it as a fraction
also, the homework is written in MS word
😭
anyone here familiar with kaggle/jupyter notebooks?
(like just look at this :|)
Is there a way to say two surfaces are tangent at a point
wdym, you just said it
Their tangent spaces at that point are equal.
Hey just finished university moving into a teaching roll and becoming a college lecturer was wondering how someone can get helper?
Do you mean the helper role on this server
Yhea
Oh okay, just message @polar panther saying you want the role, and they'll give you the role
Would love to stay less rusty thanks👍
Oh cool thanks
yup! no problem and thanks for helping :)
@bronze wedge probably an interesting problem for you in #help-30
tried explaining that a 21x21 matrix can't multiply a 2x1 vector, but wasn't good enough for them
i need help
goooooooood EVENING!!
You mean good morning? 😂
anyone here familiar with kaggle?
Good morning!
Good. Morning.
Gmorning slurp!
Need to be more specific
I actually haven't encountered that alt form before
hahah same
well
we can use it jn the future
give graders heart palpitations when they see the alternate form yield the correct answer
seems like it'd really only be handy if the constant term is 1
complete the square the other way
yea that's cool
the interesting thing about it is that it has no singularitiies
cause it looks like it could but that would imply you could have singularities usually but that would only happen if you dont have a quadratic in the first place
the alternate form doesn't work if c=0
you get 0/0
which is unfortunate
but that makes sense
since if you're solving for x^-1, then x≠0, but x=0 is a solution iff c=0
and if c = 0 you're hopefully smart enough to realize you don't need to bother with the quadratic formula at that point
Lol
On one of the tests in grading
wow
thats super cute
i would give that person a couple of extra marks, just for that drawing
Same. This isn't my section (we are each grading one page for all students in all sections) so I'll air it to that sections instructor
I'm pretty sure he is the second character there
awww cute
Wow that’s a great drawing!
imagine the grade for this was like 30% and this mocked the person ahahah
bleeeh got a functinonal analysis midterm tomorrow looots of studying to do
🫂
fun anal sounds cool doe
good luck!

fun anal is by definition.. fun
whowouldathunkit
gethunk

cute

is the universe continuous or discrete, and why do you think so?
discrete for all human purposes
its fundamentally discrete, but continuity is close enough
time is continuous though
at least i think
i need reasoning here too
we are made of discrete things (atoms)
okay?
atoms are made of smaller things
which are made of smaller things
and who's to say that can't go on to infinity?
that reasoning doesn't really work
physoids are almost sure there are no more iirc
if it can, then we can't really check
mm true
Reality is continuous
啊哈哈、我的好好的朋友啦!好久不见啦、怎么样啊?
Are you Chinese?
Or has learning chinese become a thing nowadays. I'm too old to get with the times.
This server as a whole is just too intellectually advanced for me anyways.
nonsense
bro have you seen this server
no offense but literally 99.999999% of the people here (including me) are very much the opposite of 'intellectually advanced'
and
even if it was
then you should stay here anyways
uhhh there's a quote
"if you're the smartest person in the room, you're in the wrong room"
At any given time, there is at least one person somewhere who is in the wrong room.
That's why I always force my peers to take an ÍQ test before i enter the room
wth is with these price tags i rlly dont understand luxury brands and thats not high quality it looks so dirty and old why is it so expensive
People pay for the name more than for the quality
There are def quality brands which are much cheaper
Hi everyone. Do you have any cool idea of some math design for a logo? It is for sweatshirts of the maths section in my uni, if you have good idea feel free to propose things!
biology student
🤢
this isnt really true, luxury clothes ARE generally better than mid-tier clothes
just not better enough to justify the price
are you sure?
law of diminishing returns once again making economics gayer
i dont know what you think mid-tier is but a lot of brand clothing is really bad quality
and produced really badly
i dont mean whatevers trendy with skater bros
i mean actual luxury stuff that costs thousands of dollars
a majority of hyped up brand clothing nowadays is piss poor, but when you move outside of those high volume lines usually the quality is closer to the price tag
ok sure
to be clear, it is not worth thousands of dollars
but brand clothing is increasingly popular with teenagers
and the stuff they wear is not high quality in any sense
correct, and that trend is dumb
but not really related i dont think
except insofar as they are more aware that, say, gucci exists than they used to be
but i still dont think gucci is "popular" in the sense that kids are buying it
if you look at stuff marketed at adults (i think ralph lauren) then yeah
i see a lot of kids wear gucci
or fake gucci at least
yeah bags are one product where you do just buy for the brand
there isnt really much utility in a different bag material (or rather, there is but high-end materials arent really better than low-end ones in terms of functionality)
and you can find whatever aesthetic you like for cheapish
not if your aesthetic is "visible brand logo" 
you can find that too, just find a good knockoff
ok but thats illegal
not for the consumer!
you support criminals
plus you get to like, roleplay being rich AND anti-capitalist
you wouldnt download a gucci bag
2 trendy aesthetics at once
"yeah im rich, yeah i subvert this oppressive financial system, yes we exist"
3d printed drip
Yes
I'll give you an example
Some time ago I was in Venice, and the place is basically one big clothing marketplace
A very good, hand made, real leather, artisan bag, (like astounding quality. Made out of one piece of leather with some black magick) was a few hundred euros
250 or so. Maybe 300.
So that was the most expensive bag in a shop for the local artisans.
But 300 euros is really chump change when you go looking at the brands near the main squares. Although there is no way that you get higher quality than the previously mentioned bag.
oh man ya gotta hit up the mask shops next time youre there
hell yea
So anyway yeah you're paying for the brand. But to buy quality clothing without the brand you gotta know where to look
Bit of a catch 22. I personally have no idea how to buy quality... So I'll buy American eagle or some of the "made to last" brands if I want it to last
My more understanding friends buy Castro for that
wtf is a sheaf
a bundle of grain stalks
uh, is there some more information on this?
identify all points on the boundary?
usually normalizing works
挺好:))
biology student :)))
you are?
Lol who knows
it's not a shitpost?? 
yay someone that's worse than a business student
hardly.
wtf
...
no gmod u are still the worst
How watching a movie everyday affect your ability to study math or overall ability as a student?

It will make you a very good film student 👍
lol does it really affect? If you are stil completing your homework
It may or may not affect you; really depends on you.
does it affect you? in place of movies you can assume a useless activity
yeah you are breathing thats pretty useless
unfortunately google says there are 50000 movies that exist, so you would need to watch more than one movie per day to watch them all in a lifetime
that isn't my goal, I just desire a little bit entertainment or peace before going to bed

Imagine worrying about doing things you enjoy in your free time









