#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 16 of 1
Are you?
Slurp's not a native speaker 
:?
yes!
Idk i'm pretty good at celeste
i don't believe you
@neat frost confirm
This is true about me tho
He also talked about how he was bad at hebrew like 2 sentences up
lmao, I didn't see that
.
birthright people?
It's a trip non israeli jewish people are taken on by the israeli govt
Kinda propaganda vibes but it's also really nice
Like idk how much of it is trying to push an image of israel
But a lot of it is just
Hiking in nature
ah
it keeps being a bad time!
I blame your friend
Yes
if my friend had been able to go
Well, you know
then i would have gone before i met you
Chrew
which would have made my life a hell of a lot better
but alas i must engage in charity
Damn i've been on this discord for a little over a year
i will do you the service of eating your food
Ryc giving into the propaganda like a good brainwashed little jew
yes absolutely
shawshank is gonna take me to the big dome

The big dome?
im not meeting shawshank idk who tf that guy is
Israel has many domes ryc
The iron dome?
You mean the iron dome?
yes the iron dome
First off there's like, 20 something of them
Smh my head
what!?
Second of all you're not going near thosw
That's military ground
yeah but you guys have military connections right
They also now have the iron beam or whatever
what's the iron beam
Laser
wtf
Pew pew pew Star Wars
i think i'm just gonna stick to swimming and hiking
Idk any aerial defence people
U can see the dome in Jerusalem
And pray at the western wall
Put a note in asking god for a hot israeli bf
the first message ryc ever posted was slightly over a year ago 
oh come on
How funny would it be if ryc got arrested for trespassing in a military base or whatever and started an international whatever with the us?
"sightly" it was like april 1st
I talked with ryc about this and he told me he's wanted to go for a while
it's been 1 and a third years
Such a cliche, you gonna go to the Dead Sea as well?
Wow I only joined like 2.5 months after you ruc
spot on
I didn't realise that
Then lemme guess, you wanna go to eilat
why tf do you have that date remembered? lmao
It’s April first, important date
I have some family down there, I think near Eliat? Might be way off. I really ought to show my face there sometime
But honestly I don't want to go there at the moment
doesn't feel like a good time
then again, when is a good time...
Usually it’s fine
yeah i'm a big water dude
Like even now it’s fine probably
ofc i want to do the floaty thing
Hello I have two equations with 1 unknown variable . Can any one get solution for x?
equ 1: (p* multiplier) mod F4 = g
equ 2: (p* multiplier) mod F = g
I want to get one multiplier on this two equation. how can calculate this equations to get same multiplier?
You've been told to read #❓how-to-get-help
i've wanted to go since i was old enough to
Don't post your question in several channels
yes but i was relevant within a month and it took you like 8 months to become relevant
No?
Idk man doesn’t seem sincere, if you really wanted to go you would’ve gone already……..
well i remember cause it was april fools day and everyone's names were numbers
I got into ivory after like 2-3 months
It took me like a year to become relevant
Also I was a math baby when I got into this server
shin is relevant?
i am the most patient person you will ever meet
So is like a worm
darq came to me begging for his blue back
I'll wait until I meet someone more so
Geddit
bc
I'll wait
haha
Yes
please laugh
No… don’t explain the joke

how baby are we talking?
I was gonna react with a kek until you started explaining…
literally not baby at all
why, the joke was awful
I just finished my 2nd semester
Pity
I knew very basic group theory, some pointset, calc 2, linalg and combo and was reading algtop and real analysis in the summer
patience is more impressive the more someone has to be impatient for
what's a worm gonna do in israel?
Dry up
i.e. what many ugs know by the end of their bachelors
that's like
literally me
wtf
I am baby compared to where I am now
Hey Clerk
except AT ig
sup
but that's coming soon
What’s the diff between real anal and what you learned in calc?
(kindergarten)
When I say real anal I mean measure theory
Ryc Calculate Tor_1^kx,y
I kinda wanna check that out it seems interesting
I loke royden
I also have my notes and ankther professors notes
Mine r in English the professor's are in hebrew
They good?
I'd say
Tor is like tensor right
I'd like to see some of your notes sometime
Tor is the derived functor of tensor yes
Would you be willing to DM them to me?
hmmm
me too please
what's (x, y)
I also have at notes but they are unfinished and also the course was bad so I wouldn't recommend
Thanks!
Ideal generated by (x,y)
can’t even do kindergarten math
kindergarteners do like
Darq what notes do u want
I feel bad though because I also need to learn ODEs and it’s just so much memorizing that I need to work on
subtracting numbers!
Ryc how do I do this
what
Memorize
oh
hmm
All these shits
I gave my 10 y/o Serre's "Basic Arithmetic" and he says it's too hard, is my child simply stupid?
well all the ODEs techniques are like
how about measure theory
And how come I can’t just laplace everything
opaque versions of very clear intuitive ideas
So much easier
like "i want to turn this into a product rule"
Drat, I could've sworn it was called Basic Arithmetic but it's "A Course in Arithmetic" ffs
Ryc the idea is to show by dimension shifting that this is the same as Tor_2(k,k) and then you just calculate directly using a free resolution
you're learning cookbook odes?
lmfaoo
what a loser
Wdym
Like it’s some proofs and some techniques
It might be Tor_0 actually idr which direction the dimensions shift
yes, very poignant. i see. i should have thought of it myself, my colleague.
Fuck I've forgotten all my homological algebra ;_;
Though the proofs are terrible the prof is terrible the course is terrible the questions are terrible and I fucking hate it
Really should've thought of that
Odes proofs are fun 
the ones that go: this is a DE, this is how to solve it, this is why that's a solution
and that's literally all of it on repeat
They might be, but the proofs the prof gives are like half baked
No I was right it's Tor_2
Boytjie
oh that's annoying
Clerk!
Sad times
Please don't hurt me!
what's tor 2, is there a nice way of thinking about it
i know people say ext 2 is not nice to think about
clerk and boytjie!
Some of it is like that, but a lot of it isn’t. Like the first few lectures were literally that but since then it hasn’t really been
If you find out, let me know xoxoxox
Idk maybe this is a dumb way to think about it, but like
ext1 and tor1 are like 'holes' but dual in a sense
yes
ext1(A,B) measures holes in A that are shaped like B
and tor1(A,B) measures holes in A that can be bridged by B, I guess
oh that's a nice way to put it
this is how I think about it
And then ext2, tor2 are just gobbledygook let's be honest
yeah i completely understand that
Idk, say "higher dimension" and it makes vague sense
There is the Yoneda ext interpretation.
That's something relatively concrete
Tor_2 is always 0 anyways
Nice
Hey nerds I need interesting concept for planets and or moons, literally could be anything like a giant jaw breaking, and don’t worry about the physics
At least Tor is in theory easy to calculate
Isn’t Tor like a browser
yes
lmao
it's short for torsion I believe
whatever that is
yeah, it is
Just like how ext is short for extension
this is because Tor_1(A, Z/pZ) is the subgroup of elements x \in A, such that px = 0
so it counts the torsion elements of order p
I think also Tor_1(A, Q/Z) is just the torsion subgroup of A
Seems right to me
I find myself revisiting the motivation for tor like
fairly frequently
it's always interesting to like
try and go back and justify the definitions computationally
what
I just had a question on this like a few days ago
see working through weibel does have some payoffs lol
if it's any consolation i also worked through a bunch of that stuff
I should document mistakes that aren't in the errata yet
So I can get an acknowledgement
nice
Idk if I should email chuck about it rn cuz then it'll be weird when I email him again asking if he's taking students
Imagine if the book got a reprint
Crazy
I’m coming up with different types of planets and moon for dnd and I need some ideas for what these planets and moons look like
alright my idea for a planet is that it's in the exact center of two binary stars, and doesn't rotate. so it's always either midday or dusk, but the sunset/rise is on both sides. the planet is covered in turing patterns of land which have nice beaches on the borders and are about 2 miles thick, the rest of the planet is an ocean which is split into two connected components
U can prove this two ways fairly easily, one is with direct limits which ig is more hands-on and one with LES which is very nice
Like take the tail of the LES for
0-> Z-> Q-> Q/Z->0
the inhabitants are humanoid but somewhat amphibian. there is a wall that stretches the entire centerline of the landmass
The way weibel proves it is that Tor commutes with filtered colimits and Q/Z is the direct limit of Z/n under the maps sending x to m/n x for n|m
on one side live the people bordering one of the oceans, and the people bordering the other ocean despise them
You have to check that the transition maps become inclusions tho
Gross! Go away Weibel!
Lmao
a planet with a qurtz green/yellowish opaque crust and a yellow core so the core is slightly visible
hello ryc
but the first group doesn't mind their adversaries aside from needing to protect themselves
Why's the LES not good enough for him? Smh
That's one of the only times I ever explicitly computed the induced maps until now
i actually like this proof
is #foundations just graduate level #proofs-and-logic
With weibel the answer is probably that he didn't think about it let's be honest
or is there something more to it that i do not know
sort of but also sort of not
and a bioluminescent atmosphere emitting blue light
@mint canopy A modification of this proof shows that the torsion free Abelian groups are flat.
Both proofs generalise easily to any integral domain ofc
maybe 
OK fiiiine that's cool I guessss
also, the crust might be made up of slime
That one's nicer cuz everything is 0
So no need to check transition maps
Amazing
Tor(A,Q/Z)
Cuz Q/Z is divisible
Yea
Fun fact: Weibel.uses this fact without ever stating it (nor in the errata or appendix)
Q/Z is like the canonical injective object. my monad brain is like
I guess you're just supposed to know that in Z-mod injective iff divisible
Even tho he defined injective objects earlier
Actually it might be an exercise but i'm 99% sure it's not
I think you're supposed to use Baer's criterion
Yea sure clerk but he never states this outright
Which if you didn't know this fact you might not get what he's doing
But yea one direction is baer's criterion
CAn we just take a moment to appreciate how epic Baer's criterion is
Baer's criterion is very based
I really think it's a great theorem
Does the corollary follow from the exercise or from baer's criterion?
You can do a lot of homological algebra without using Baer's criterion using the monad approach to homological algebra
like, you can prove a lot of the same theorems about ext and injective resolutions but without using the axiom of choice or anything
Interesting
in short like, there's an approach to homological algebra which, instead of being based on these notions of projective injective etc which make sense in any abelian category
you can have a kind of customized approach that treats certain objects as projective/injective etc
like
the first time i came across this was in the acyclic models theorem
there's a notion of a projective/free functor C -> Ab but
it's not literally projective in the sense of being a projective object in the abelian category
similarly there's a notion of an acyclic complex of functors but
it's not literally exact in the sense of the abelian category structure
instead you're working with these relativized notions
Complex of functors?
Yeah like a chain complex in the functor category [C, Ab]
Oh ok
the acyclic models theorem gives a notion of 'free' functor and an 'acyclic complex' of functors which allows you to carry out the proof of the comparison lemma
but they aren't like, just projective and acyclic in the usual sense of an abelian category
which is cool
i should talk more about this another time but i don't want to get into it rn
I'll be happy to hear about it
Sounds really cool
Maybe I can force howard to learn this with mr
- past tense or n = shownard
a to e so its shownerd
so its show🤓
wonder why dead chat
wtf it's pronounced REEK????
im gonna keep on calling it rike or rice
Rycie bycie-shmoochikins-gigglehead-muffin
rycicle
Ugh gmod your nickname scared me for a sec
LMAOOOOO
No, that post was a joke
Ryc also didn't join in september
thank god
Chrew
can you ping this again while you're at it?
this deserves to be pinned more than once
You can't pin the same post twice
So, sometimes fractions are written with the partial part direct,y adjacent to the whole part and nothing but a space in between. But this notation signifies multiplication.
1 1/4 obviously = 1•1/4 = 1/4
the same notation can mean different things in different contexts
"bras" in french means your arm
"bras" in english does not
Its annoying because the basic notation of the ten digits and a slash for division is still their.
Why bother writing it with an arithemtic operation if youre just going to have the wrong operation somewhere else
i have literally never been in a context where this posed a problem for understanding
if im reading a recipe, i know 2 3/4 means 2 + 3/4
since otherwise they wouldve just written 6/4 (or 3/2 or 1.5 or whatever)
And "bras" in physics are a notational abomination
But 2 3/4 just = 6/4
Why use a slash for division if you're just going to use a space for addition instead of multiplication. The slash follows standard notation while the sapce does not.
Whats even worse is using a dash for addition.
this just seems like a very silly thing to complain about
1-1/4 should = 3/4
But in measurement 1-1/4=1+1/4
Why not just type a plus symbol instead? It's not that difficult
like youre smarter than all those recipe writers since you know what the "correct" notation is
and want to prove that by bitching even though this proves literally 0 barrier to understanding
Im not any smarter than them. It just confuses me
Well I just got it on a Quaker corn meal corn bread recipe. It's sorta weird using a minus when they mean plus.
Anyways, obviosuly the minus must indicate addition in the contrxt of measurements, becuase it would be simplified to 3/4 otherwise
why was that the first example that came to mind?

googled french false friends and its the first one that came up
wtf is a direct and inverse limit
what a great sticker
direct limit is when it is equal to kL, inverse limit is when it is equal to k/L
thank me later
It’s when you invert the limit
Me about to ask what an inverse limit is knowing damn well it would be funny if you said it’s the dual of the direct limit
Direct limits are (filtered) colimits
Inverse limits are (cofiltered) limits
Have fun with that one
Ultraproduct desu
Personally I don't believe numbers exist
nothing can't exist if nothing exists
Empty sets are a logical impossibility
I went to
Something exists, therefore nothing does not exist
Personally I believe paradoxes don't exist
Any paradoxes are a result of your interpretation of my logical system, not my logical system
Cope
Lmao
Does anyone know if a good resource for conic sections
Like a proper formal treatment that's aimed at math students trying to fill holes not highschoolers that just want formulas and don't understand rigor
Yes
oh then AoPS intermediate algebra does exactly this
Reviewing for the GRE subject test and want to actually learn them properly instead of memorizing formulas
Damn it's not free
Not sure if I'm ready to swallow my (probably unfounded tbh) malware fears and try ||libgen|| yet
Do you know of a free resource
if website-who-shall-not-be-named has malware, then i would be dead by now
i promise you its 0 malware
lol
also how have you gotten this far without it lmao
I haven't needed that many books
ok what is algebraic geometry though
it doesnt look very geometric
no pictures
so is it algebra but differenter?
as far as I know, it's studying the zeros of multivariate polynomial functions using tools from algebra
but I think modern AG is much more general or something
with "schemes" and stuff 
all the examples of complex algebraic varieties (sets of solutions to systems of polynomial equations in affine/projective space) are pretty geometric
didn't you hear what they said? "no pictures"
no pictures of complex algebraic varieties
im kidding 
there are definitely pictures of Riemann surfaces but yeah anything beyond that is hard to draw for dimension reasons
I think that's a 2D slice of a 6D complex algebraic variety
but 3 complex dimensions
some of the examples more closely related to number theory that are accessed through the modern language of scheme theory are still fairly geometric and there are ways they behave analogously to Riemann surfaces and things like this
where does the algebra part come in?
I mean all of these spaces are built algebraically
like the algebraic varities are given a group or a ring structure?
in the language of schemes, these are all locally of the form Spec(R) for some commutative ring R
well do you know what Spec(R) is
There’s just so much scary terms in alg geo. It’s like math 2.0
I only know what a ring is 
Hey
spectrum of a ring? no idea what that is
do you know what a prime ideal of a ring is?
Is anybody good at stats
And understand box and whisker graphs
oh no
Tried nobody could help
No one here understands box and whisker graphs
Why tho
lol I guess I'll come back after learning more algebra, I don't understand ideals of rings yet 


provided you know what a prime ideal is, Spec(R) is the set of all prime ideals of R
Migillope do you know box and whisker
you equip this with a certain topology
No I only know what a prime ideal is sorry
wait so a prime ideal is just the ideal of a ring that's similar to the prime numbers in the ring of integers?
like that idea but generalized?
yeah exactly, for the ring Z the prime ideals are (p) for p prime, and (0)
huh okay
where (x) means the ideal generated by x

I see okay
Spec(R) is a topological space defined on prime ideals of a ring?
yeah you define a topology on the set of prime ideals of a commutative ring called the Zariski topology
it's a topological space where the points are prime ideals?
I expected it somehow to have something to do with spectral sequences
that's pretty cool
the reason why this is a decent notion is like
for example if you take the polynomial ring k[x] in 1 variable where k is an algebraically closed field
like let's say C[x]
okay

oh niceee
so
if you wanted to study 3 variable polynomials from the ring R, you'd use spec(R[x, y, z]) and look at the scheme locally homeomorphic to that?
Spec(C[x,y,z]) would be affine 3-space
or is that not what a scheme is used for?
and in there you could study solutions to polynomials in 3 variables
so varieties in A^3
a good example of a scheme that is not affine is the projective line P^1
@vivid halo can you help me
No they only know spec(R)
you get this by gluing two copies of the affine line A^1 together
and affine 3-space is just any space that's isomorphic to an affine subspace of R^4? (R^4 the vector space)
(complex) affine 3-space is like C^3
ah okay
wth affine space is this?? I saw it for like 2 lectures in my first class in diff geo and all it was introduced as was a vector space with origin removed 
,w graph y^2 = x^3 +2x + 3
yeah that's a great example of an algebraic variety
huh
that's an affine elliptic curve in A^2
hm right yeah makes sense
usually you would consider the corresponding projective elliptic curve in the projective plane P^2
okay so in that graph it's a variety in R^2, so using schemes would an algebraic variety be on the scheme?
so instead of the zeros of a polynomial in 2 variables, you look at the zeros of a homogeneous polynomial in 3 variables
you can homogenize y^2=x^3+2x+3 as y^2z=x^3+2xz^2+3z^3
so just multiply everything by z until the total degrees match
I see
that's also a scheme?
yeah you can make this into a scheme
the affine elliptic curve y^2=x^3+2x+3 is the affine scheme Spec(C[x,y]/(x^3+2x+3-y^2))
hm but why do schemes help you? like why can't you use just C^2 or whatever instead of the scheme which resembles that
so one reason for this is that the scheme has extra points that encode some additional information
for Spec(C[x]) we had just one extra point, (0)
for Spec(C[x,y]) we have a lot of extra points

we have the generic point (0), but also the generic points of irreducible affine curves
so like we have lots of points which are not closed
which is weird
so you have to learn commutative algebra in order to get to AG?
what even is commutative algebra? like algebra with rings but looking more closely at commutative rings?
yeah definitely, since the spaces are built from understanding, among other things, prime ideals of commutative rings
yeah commutative algebra is just studying commutative rings and modules over them

wait nG what exactly are sheafs? are they used in AG too?
oh yes they are very much used in AG and are the main thing that I didn't mention in the definition of schemes
you can talk about sheaves of sets, Abelian groups, rings, modules, whatever
a nice motivating example is sheaves of rings as sheaves of functions

so imagine we have a space X and we want to associate to each open subset U of X a ring of functions O(U) on U
yeah some ring of functions, maybe X is like a smooth manifold and O(U) is the ring of smooth functions U->R
ah okay
so keeping standard examples of rings of functions like this in mind what sorts of properties should this satisfy
one basic thing is that if you have two open subsets V≤U≤X then you should get a map O(U)->O(V)
since you can just restrict a function f on U to a function f|_V on the smaller set V
there's some obvious compatibilities, like if I have three open subsets W≤V≤U≤X then the composition O(U)->O(V)->O(W) is O(U)->O(W)
and so on
so far this tells us this assignment O is a presheaf, meaning it's functorial in the above sense
the thing that makes a sheaf in addition to these compatibilities is gluing:
if you have an open cover {U_i} of X, so a bunch of open subsets U_i with union X
and if you have a function f_i on each U_i
if f_i and f_j agree on each overlap U_i\cap U_j that means you should be able to glue
so you should be able to produce a function f on X whose restriction to each U_i is the corresponding function f_i
and they agree on the overlaps so it smoothly varies over X?
it's not really about smoothness, just that the values of the functions are compatible with each other
ah okay
okay
that's called gluing?
yup
ah I see
the other condition is separation: if you have two functions f and g on X
and they agree on each U_i
then f=g
yeah these two gluing conditions mean this assignment is a sheaf
so like the assignment of rings of continuous/smooth/holomorphic functions on open subsets of topological/smooth/complex manifolds, all these are sheaves of rings on the space
schemes have sheaves of rings of functions too
oh wow
nice
lol I'm assuming I'd need to know more math in order to understand why sheafs are used a lot
I mean they're used a lot because they're a convenient way to organize the data of being able to talk about functions on a space
hm I see
packages everything up very nicely

so you can have a sheaf of rings of linear transformations (matricies in a given basis i guess) of a finite dimensional vector space with the default topology
hmm maybe this isn't the best example
no i mean im just asking if it can be applied to vector spaces
oh sure well like one thing you can do is look at modules over sheaves of rings, or sheaves of modules

these are very closely related to vector bundles
oh really?
well so in the smooth setting you have the Serre-Swan theorem
that if you have a smooth vector bundle E over a smooth manifold X
then you can regard the space Γ(E) of smooth sections of E as a C^∞(X)-module
where C^∞(X) is the ring of smooth functions on X
this module is finitely generated
when X is connected, every finitely generated C^∞(X)-module arises in this way
this just went from 0 to 1000 in 2 seconds
hm that's a ring?
yeah since you can add/multiply functions pointwise

so what this says is that vector bundles are very closely related to modules over the ring of functions
in the smooth case we didn't need the entire sheaf of smooth functions
so we didn't need to consider like, C^∞(U)-modules for all open subsets of X
we only needed to consider a single C^∞(X)-module
there's other situations like complex manifolds where you really need the whole sheaf of functions and you can't just look at functions on all of X
I see
<@&268886789983436800>
Damn im genuinely suprised you are not banned yet
Mods on a holiday 
what happened?
there was spam, i dealt with it

i hacked ur account and am about to disable it

gonna force you to study

Riveting
I dreamt there was a Neamesis category with three channels specifically for Neamesis
And then a bunch of news articles flashed with headlines like
"the pilgrim of discord servers"


That wasn't a dream DarQ
Lol
that was just you foreseeing the future
it was the opposite of the future
The past
thank you for your future insight oracle, you may now rest again
i meant to say the opposite of what happens in the future
grammar fail 
Anyways
yes no one knows why I keep extending everything out to infinity 
Fuck this hizzaouse dawg!
Spend more time with me


same that's why I log out every now and then
to keep at least a part of my mind sane
Lmao
hello
Hellollo
i just got a question
both 
im used to it now
both of my friends using books i dont believe anyone should use
sadge
u sullied me for no reason aenigmata
so now i return the favor
Allufi is fine
I know
so is D&F
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
but artin is better!
and doing category theory early on is a sin
not comprehensive = not good 
Artin isn't necessarily better
it is!
coz im using it
😌
aluffi dont got shit on that
No you're not 
i am
im finishing the LA part for now
the only reason he likes artin is because he has a physical copy of it
*I am not
im just skimming the theory part and then doing questions
i got the copy coz i loved the book
smh

I'm eating artin's book 
who knew shitposting about LA for a year and a half would teach u a bit 
wat
oh really? how do you find the spectral radius of a matrix?

At any rate, I'm not sold on allufi yet
Eigenvalues innit
you will be 
Plus who actually cares about the spectral radius lol that’s like numerical analysis shit
artin readers be like:
be based


I'm not sure if categorical treatment of algebra for a first intro is some pedagogically 
exactly!

reading it later can be beneficial
but absolutely dont recc it
coz category theory is evil

Not reading it is more beneficial
based
real anal or complex anal?
Hope still remains
Real
in R^n? or metric spaces?
why do i see anal the first thing i come back to this chat
Just R
nice
because mathematicians love real analysis
that abbreviation tho...
Neam, are you an undergrad?
neam is in the same year as me
im about to be an undergrad in like 1 or 2 months
hopefully 
I see
Lol
also any of ya'll know how to do the harder inequality proofs
nope
aw
no one in this server knows
damn
I also struggle with real analysis
it's a secret

uwu
then go study for the exam that will get u a uni!

bye chat 
👋
hoping to never see you again axler user see you soon!

are you waiting for results or is there an exam you haven't done yet
isn't that kind of late for an entrance exam
JEE
yea it got pushed back due to the covid stuff and other exams' date clashing with it and stuff
after 2nd attempt i have barely studied anything
pure math is more fun 
😭
😭
imagine feeling emotions when u could be doing LA
JEE Doomer hours
wtf
Half past JEE Doomer hour
50 past JEE Doomer hour
24 hours!!!
Yay!
Morbomorbism
Morbiomorphism
Just made scrambled eggs for the first time in a while in my cast iron and nothing stuck!
Nice
Last time I did, just a week or so after I got it, everything stuck and it was hell
Not so this time!
I'm proud if Mr. Ciron
looks nice 
how many egss is in that
never heard of that
does it taste good?
nani
tbh i would add milk or heavy cream
i do this too
it works way better than milk
i add sour cream
Can you view finite extensions possibly via homomorphisms in some way
the whole basis thing reminds me of the square of an ideal but it's not directly related in any way
you can for algebraic extensions
along with saying every intermediate ring is a field
or is there just any equivalent statement using polynomials instead of considering it as a vector soace
*space
L eggs
this also dilutes the taste of eggs if you dislike it
its a good strategy
lol wdym
dimension of any extensions is determined by dimension of a quotient as a vector space
the way you phrased your question is funny though
what's wrong with Axler
down with determinants
shyshu be like: I don't use it therefore it's bad.

I see
@arctic grove people subtweeting... hmmm
what subtweeting, he was @mentioned when I replied
Oh i didn't notice LOL
huehuehue
alright shyshu you got owned
LMAO
also good morning for when u see this :)
Are the symbols within the parentheses (not sure how to spell it). Does anybody know what they mean?
For the future #❓how-to-get-help
Even for silly questions like that
Probably best to go to the physics server
solar constant
Oh
er wait
that's not what it's called
solar radius lol
solar constant is something different
yeah exactly
(we define it to be exactly 695700 km)
(since the actual radius of the sun varies)
at least I think that's exact, I'm not sure
Does it ever get smaller
actually it might not be exact but w/e
it fluctuates yeah
also depends on where you measure from
if you want more detail I would ask on the physics server
check #old-network
Do things have to be "sphery" for you to measure its radius
Or does everything have a "radius"
for the radius to be constant, it needs to be a sphere.
but you can certainly measure a radius-like thing for other objects
we call this "distance from centre to surface" or something similar
the definition of a sphere is as a body where this distance is constant
i.e. |(x, y, z)| = x² + y² + z² = r²
Another similar question
Does everything have sin, cos, tan
Ive only ever seen people use it in triangles
Im not very good at math ;-;
Most Christians believe that everyone has sin, yes.
Lol
IDK about tans, my impression is that certain complexions are more prone to tanning
sine, cosine, and tangent are usually introduced using triangles
but you can take sine, cosine, and tangent of any angle
in general
and even of complex numbers!
What is a complex number :^
nami what are you talking about lol
it's a number system where you can have the square root of -1
"the "
oe the square root of any negative number
Is the square root of -1 an actual number
shhhhh
Or did we just kind of said its imaginary and left it at that
we say it's imaginary, but this is a classification term more than a philosophical one
it's like the "rational" vs "irrational" distinction
just a convenient term to use
not anything with metaphysical implications
It's a bivector
talking about “i”, what would be the square root of “i”?
sqrt(2)/2 + i sqrt(2)/2
,calc (sqrt(2)/2 + i * sqrt(2)/2)^2
Result:
1i
1i
no need to get so pretentious on us TeXiT, just say i
challenge: try to see geometrically why this makes sense
(what does "squaring" correspond to on the complex plane? what does "square rooting" correspond to?)
:0, i’ll try to, but now i want to go to sleep Xd, enough math for me
this tool might be helpful: https://ventrella.com/ComplexSquaring/
in particular, try the "circle" and "imaginary" options
thank you
@small mist brb sry
determinants
its the other way round, the book is bad, hence why i dont use it
😌
thonk
Good morning shyshu
good morning slurp!
physicists call eigenvectors which share an eigenvalue to be degenerate, what do mathhead call it?
Vectors in the same eigenspace?
yeah
scratched line
good luck!
Elementary functions, basically college algebra and trig/precal rolled into one
gotcha
dinner time? oh hells no
Is it true that in 1942, Einstein gave the same physics exam to his students as in 1941, because the answers had changed?
My cat is chonky and I don't know how to make it stop :(
She's already on diet food and I've adjusted her calorie intake according to vet instructions. I only give her 2 treats per day
She's pretty active too
Does she go outside?
No she's an indoor cat
Does the vet know that?
Yes
Not long, but its actually a little more than I was giving her before
Perhaps the cat is just a phat cat
she might be stealing food
She only has access to her bowl
I got her a leash though, maybe I can start taking her out
Me too!
Let $F$ be a field, $K$ a subfield, and $\sigma$ an automorphism of $F$,
For all $x \in K$, it's not always true that $\sigma(x) \in K$, right?
Mizalign




