#serious-discussion
1 messages ¡ Page 15 of 1
i wish there were a nonannoying way to zoom in on pfps
the not very people role was supposed to go away after 24h but it hasn't yet 
what is that role anyway
yes please
did you do a bad thing to be designated not cool?
why did you request it?
you guys can time roles tho, right?
Here is the full image
it was a joke lol
Roles are either timed or not timed, we dont choose each time we grant a role
so like... is there a different water on the top than on the bottom?
If only you knew gmod
fr
lol
knew what..
Ok not THAT ffs
wait but knew what
this goes so hard

tterra!
That is different water
to clarify, ryc, this does not
Presumably its sunlight
my headcannon is that the waters have different density and separated out
the top water is bottomwaterdrophobic
yes that is how the ocean works
im not a water scientist idk how this shit works
that's actually true to some extent
oop
There is a pycnocline
the bottom is underwater
Which is a sharp change in density
the top is surface water
Cause of sharp changes in temperature and salinity
the ocean is cool af
Yes eric is describing it
it really is
oceanography đ
one of the sciences that tells us how fast we're screwing up the world
the planet is gonna be fine in a few thousand years
and causing a mass extinction
i think the species we are dirving to extinction would take issue with that lmao
those happen semi-regularly
but on the plus side

biologists have a new urgency to get grant funding to study rare species!
lmfao
questionable arguments
the classic "climate change isnt real because the climate has changed in the past" argument
that only tells us that climate changes once in a while
also all those other extinction events were ridiculous disasters!
oceanography graphs >>
hey they weren't a disaster for the cyanobacteria!
we are under no obligation to cause another
(obligatory /s)
why dont we convert CO2 to uhh
we are
hang on i have an idea
Baguettes
personally, I don't believe in climate change denial

So-called "climate change deniers" sure do act like the climate is changing. You really think they exist? Think for yourselves people.
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/jreg
Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/mc_swm
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/greg.guevara
Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/JustKillEachOther/
Merch: https://teespring.com/...
celestially they were all pretty normal events
i guess
but that also gives more incentive for germany to switch from oil!
i mean come on
people dont like nuclear because of chernobyl
but im pretty sure chernobyl was hastily built
yeah I mean, there are good reasons and dumb reasons to not want nuclear
nope, only dumb reasons
:|
sure, but ideally we would allow them to remain on the celestial timescale
wikipedia, "mathematical joke"
and where do we get the power we need to construct a dyson sphere to provide our power?
,w tell me a joke
LOL
exponential growth
BanAnaMan time
LOL
WEW
exponential growth of base amount zero is still zero
Engineers seem to get pretty far ignoring lots of stuff thatâs deemed impossible
that's where bananach got the joke from??
LOL
i do not understand these jokes
LMFAO
please hlep me
,w joke
yes hes a wolfram thief
@neat lintel I'm disappointed
fuck u eric
We were having a relevant discussion bere
fine
thank you
Engineers are all approximately the same
ok, so all jokes aside
why do you see them as disasters?
giant asteroid strike isn't a disaster?
nope, it is n o r m a l
it allowed us to exist
Because they greatly disrupted the evolutionary process, and made things a lot less interesting for a long time
I think that's a W
:|
Yes I think so too but like
that's an L if anything
they applied great evolutionary pressures and made evolution much more interesting over time
Now u get a :|
:|
honestly
U get a :|||
Justice!

and i think that's a win
Remember, extinction is a good thing
U mean we ended up with birds
this is a good emoji
it means you've made way for the new model
Every past extinction event was for the sole purpose of the development of corner taco trucks
birds too
Anything else is just a consequence
I'll drink to that
I dunno, if I had a choice I wouldn't ask for all those species to get destroyed just for the purpose of being born
I wouldnt ask for it
Itâs not about you or me. Itâs about the taco truck
But i wouldnt reverse it
they were doomed anyways
there was no purpose to their destruction
And I cant ask for it until it needs to be reversed
it was certain from the moment of their creation
we simply make a good thing from it
eh
either way is fine with me
I wouldn't give two shit if I didn't exist
I mean
I don't exist to give two shits
This is weird and usually I consider thinking too hard about things which are outside of my control completely to be a waste of my energy
stoicism in a nutshell
Sometimes itâs nice to waste our energy for a bit :).
eh I dunno about that, that's more or less the basis for some philosophical fields
Instead I will try to do things Now that make people in the next like hundred years hurt less
And not think about random disasters from a million years ago
dostoyevsky makes a similar point in the brothers karamazov
in the scene where ivan rejects the ticket to heaven
am I being spoiled?
Hi
Others are welcome to do it, I do it on other stuff
no not really
ello
would you say that's your goal in life?
No it just happens on occasion as a consequence of smaller stuff that i do
In very very small amounts
I do not have a set goal
There are mostly just things I want to not do
I'm pretty happy as long as I don't do them and remain semi comfortable

it's good to know that not everyone is driven as if by divine calling lmao
although I do wish I was like that tbh
but ig just wandering around mindless is also not that bad
I love them
currently collecting more bites until school starts
im gonna tell my qual graders that its my birthday this weekend and so they cannot fail me
i think its a winning strategy
Can anyone help with a simple proof
I study physics
lecturer says something about work and that it's the line integral
well then I guess I need to learn about line integrals and what does a line integral mean
the mathematics lecturer says that we can think of a line integral being the work done on a force field
nice
No latex. Too lazy. Isn't F.d the magnitude of the projection of F onto d or something? I've always understood a work line integral as summing these magnitudes?
I haven't done basic physics junk in ages so I don't even remember if that's accurate.
yeah took some time to look it up but I understand it now
I.e. you're adding the amount of force applied in the direction of the path you take your line integral along.
A line integral can be thought of as a special case of a directed integral, between some oriented parameterization of a Path and a Vector field it gives you the sum of their dot products, a measure of how much the vector field flows along the path with the chosen orientation
Okay, that sounds pretty close to how I was thinking of it from an intuitive pov.
yup the idea of it being a special case got me the "aha" moment
technically the full directed integral also collects a term that communicates the flux of the field through that path as well, and can be generalized to higher dimensional objects than vector fields and curves
GC
I only remember flux as a thing from surface integrals lol
I thought it just measured flow outward thru a surface in a vector field or something?
but it's just frustrating, why can't the lecturer just explain the math in theory from the pure math perspective and not just give how we use the thing instead of explaining WHAT IS the thing
I'm probably mixing it up lol
that is an example of a flux integral yes
Different goals maybe?
probably
though you're probably thinking of the one that uses the dot product with the surface normal
Yeah that's exactly what I thought of lol
in GC we take the exterior product with a bivector representing the surface
the value is the same up to a pseudoscalar coefficient
Idk what gc is not gonna lie
you take a plane segment representing a piece of the surface
wait thats a lie i do have a goal
in GC you use that, in Vector Calc you find the vector normal to that plane
its kinda general tho ns if it counts
then take your vector field
in GC you take the vector, wedge it with the plane, and the answer is an oriented volume element, the volume tells you how much the field passes through the surface, the flux
in Vector Calculus you take the normal vector (which is the direction of maximal flux), and you take the dot product of the vector field with the normal vector, this tells you how much the field aligns with the vector passing directly through the surface, the flux
the catch is Vector Calc can't repeat its procedures regardless of dimension (i.e. unique normal vectors only exist in 3D and arguably 2D and 7D)
the GC approach (like the differential forms approach) generalizes without care to higher dimensional spaces and objects
so back to the statement from GC (with an analog in Complex Analysis)
I'm not aware of a vector calculus procedure for finding the flux of a vector field through a path in 3D (I assume the cross product could suffice)
in GC this is just done by wedging the vector field and path tangent vectors in your integrand
the output is a bivector with multiple components (3 in 3D), telling you the amounts of flux though the path in each direction (physically this is like the torque exerted upon something moving through the path by the vector field)
in the special case of 2D, combining this with the flow integral yields the complex integral
There aren't a lot of good overly rigorous resources that I've had the pleasure of reading myself. like Alan Macdonald's Vector and Geometric Calculus was informative but he also waves his hands through a few things I would have preferred proofs of, and he stops at developing integration on open sets rather than arbitrary manifolds; and the chapter on differential geometry neglects to use many of the tools of GC that we've spent time developing (i.e. not using the GC form of the shape operator, quite perplexingly)
I would still recommend VAGC, also the vidoes linked on https://bivector.net/doc.html , especially sudgylacmoe's content (he has more than what is embedded)
and because of the techniques you can also benefit from studying content from differential forms, exterior algebra, and tensor calculus
not all of it
I've heard good things about Clifford Algebra to Geometric Calculus by Hestenes and Sobczyk, but I haven't had the pleasure of reviewing it myself
very informative, thanks
Alan McDonald and David Hestenes also have some videos on the topic on youtube (easily found by searching Geometric Calculus or either of their names), Alan's aren't the most informative by themselves and function best alongside the content of his book, and Hestenes' opinions can be pretty radical
15x+41y = 1.
(b) 1234x + 4321y = 5.
??
Mfw doesn't read where to post help qns
Doesn't bother to elaborate on his qns
Only puts two equations there
At least put some elaboration on what your question is, what you have attempted and what you are stuck on
Also these were in #rules, just an fyi if you missed it there you can check it out
geometric calculus
it's the calculus of functions on a clifford algebra
or "geometric algebra"
since you know GC, what advantages does it offer over doing vector calc but with differential forms and the wedge product
like multivectors and stuff?
like it generalizes complex analysis and quaternionic analysis?
well one is that I've still yet to see a counterpart in differential forms for the general flux integral, the multivector formalism is easier to introduce than differential forms or tensors imo, and I think the theorems are a bit more general thanks to the multivectors (like The generalized stokes' theorem from Differential Forms only accepts k-form valued functions, but the GC version accepts general multivectors
fascinating
there's also no counterpart in forms for the geometric product, which forms the basis for the new representations of linear transformations via versors and the generalizations of complex numbers and quaternions
what are versors?
I might be getting a bit confused because there's two parts to it but like
$\overline{U}(\vec{v}) = U\vec{v}U^\dagger$
wraithlord_koto
We often represent a linear transformation in GA as that overline, meaning a sandwich product between a multivector U and it's reversion U^\dagger
a versor either refers to the transformation, or the multivectors on either side of the sandwich product
i.e. a factorable multivector
I forget which exactly, but they're related in this usage
v is a vector and U is a multivector?
I've seen representing rotations in GA like that, sandwiching a vector between two (something) but I've forgotten 
also can vector manifolds be represented as a fiber bundle? where the base space and the fibers are also vector manifolds
Alright so versors do follow this form, except it's underline{U} not overline, and v can be any multivector
the versor itself is the U multiplied on either side, being a versor means that it is formed by multiplying together a number of vectors
so yes rotations are formed in the same way, we call the specific versors used in rotations "Rotors", a rotor is a unitary multivector with scalar and bivector parts
I see okay
so it's a term only really used in a 3 dimensional clifford algebra?
no
this procedure extends to arbitrary dimension
and it allows us to use the same equation to perform a linear transformation on any dimensional object in our space
oh I see okay it has scalar and bivector parts in any arbitrary dimensions
yes
basically the bivector marks the angle, and you need a scalar to keep things the right size after the angle is applied
ah I see
wow that's really cool
which book did you start with when you learned GA?
I think vector manifolds are more akin to tangent bundles specifically, but I'm not confident in my knowledge about manifolds
me neither
I wonder if people have rewritten GR in the langauge of vector manifold theory (or UGA I guess?)
wow nice
I forget the name
but one of the modern quantum gravity hypotheses is written using GC
wow that's pretty cool
Gauge Theory Gravity is the one
I started with LAGA by Alan MacDonald for reading material since it was like 20 bucks, he goes through linear algebra (without the geometric part) and then extends to geometric algebra, he only develops G^n though
which is perfect for starting
but not all of the ideas are as simple or transfer to different signatures
like in G^n it's true that any unit bivector will square to -1
whereas in G^p,q,r it could square to -1, 1, or 0 depending on which vectors created it (which plane it lies in)
generally, in G^n the interpretation is pretty straightforward, but like you saw in PGA (G^3,0,1), whenever you choose a different signature interpreting your different vectors can become more challenging
can you have an inner product on a GA?
Yes, an easy basic construction of a Geometric Algebra starts with an inner product space
I see okay
I've talked about this before but there are 4 big (contradicting) definitions for an inner product between general multivectors
like between any two k-vectors of the same k, it's simple
the dot product you'd expect
commutes, scalar valued, associative and distributive, all the good stuff
wraithlord_koto

it's really simple
scalar product says take the geometric product (distribute everything out), and then return the scalar part
"Fat" dot product says take the max(left contraction, right contraction)
left contraction says that the j-vector on the left "eats" vectors from the k-vector on the right (0 if they don't have any dimensions in common, or j > k)
the right contraction is the left contraction but with the directions reversed
ywyw
good luck on diff geo!
or more analysis i guess, lol since you said you were learning that before diff geo

Don't u dare
what is this servers obsession with geometric algebra
because apparently geometric calculus is really powerful, and I wanna know exactly how powerful it is 

lol
apparently (according to one dude who made a youtube video)
I did a talk on geometric calculus (just another kind)
nevermind the fact that there is no active research field around this topic and no one uses it for anything
and that it's effectively a direct rephrasing of forms / tensor calculus
ryc GA hater!!
indeed
are we referencing wildberger here?
No
I appreciate the haters because they keep us honest
but please refrain from making libelous and false statements
because most people only care to learn enough to get the job done, and they already have their tools
like it shouldn't need explaining that matrix math can do anything GA can do, it's not like we define something that isn't a linear transformation between vector spaces in order to get our groundwork running; so for the vast majority they likely just hear "my tool works" and move on. There are some exceptions to that, a form of geometric algebra (PGA) is increasingly popular in computer graphics and vision for example, and there are a few indie games out there using geometric algebra to play around in 4 dimensions

namely because to do the matrix representations of the things you want, you end up with a lot of wasted space and elements that don't mean anything
along with, depending on the exact representations you chose, some ambiguity in what is what
but Projective Geometric Algebra gives a very nice fit to the objects (points, lines, planes) and transformations (rotations, translations, reflections, etc) you want to represent
basically GA is seeing adoption where quaternions or dual quaternions are typically used
like I mentioned earlier, one of the modern quantum gravity candidates, Gauge Theory Gravity, is also formulated using Geometric calculus
Gauge theory gravity (GTG) is a theory of gravitation cast in the mathematical language of geometric algebra. To those familiar with general relativity, it is highly reminiscent of the tetrad formalism although there are significant conceptual differences. Most notably, the background in GTG is flat, Minkowski spacetime. The equivalence princ...

do you have something i can read about this?
looks like math invented by physicists and therefore cringe
you mean like calculus?
yes
great example
LMFAO
rattus physics hater?

ye, that isnt a good counterexample lol
newton 
more like pooton
jack i thought u were based 
imagine getting your math from an alchemist

my research is similar to condensed matter physics but that doesn't suit the purposes of the meme I've embarked on

also who tf is JACK
jack
aka
raiden

somebody that i used to know
do you use TQFTs?
do i look like a nerd?
yes
mm fair enough

no I don't
what do you use
your memes buried my actual question on where to learn Projective Geometric Algebra
nah but I got a video or two
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T7xVTBpHMjA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ichOiuBoBoQ
A high-speed introduction to the Algebra of planes.
My GAME2020 talk on PGA as an algebra for the Euclidean group.
Follow up on my SIGGRAPH 2019 talk : https://youtube.com/watch?v=tX4H_ctggYo
More info on https://bivector.net
I don't actually use anything like QFT or whatnot. It only vaguely resembles condensed matter physics. but also not really

ok thank you, i will check it out
rattus is an applied maths guy
wait rattus, which maths do u apply?

shyshu look at chill right now
PDEs
personal dog energy
applying math to other math 
Ooo
I recently published a paper that developed a continuum (PDE) description of a particular age-structured Markov process model for the eukaryotic cell cycle. So really I'm a mathematical biologist
I know a biologist
same
hmm if you google that description of the paper its the first result so go wild doxing me folks
that's not the right way to get citations on your paper 
markov process model?
wait what exactly does it model?
and where there are additional states that give, rather than the usual exponentially distributed waiting time between birth events, hypoexponential waiting times

the king of rats is back!
it models the cell cycle

cell cycle?
how much biology do you actually have to know?
yeah, the lifetime of a cell
are your papers (or papers in mathematical biology in general) read by biologists too?
depends, there's quite a broad spectrum
I work much more on the mathematical end of things
but I have a collaborator who works with actual experimental data
the point of the models I try to develop is that they're sufficiently general so as to apply to really any biological process that exhibit certain mathematical structure
even humans?
mathematical biology seems like a cool field
it does
Just enough to reproduce 
well, the recent model I developed could apply to any growing population, under the assumption that birth times are hypoexponentially-distributed (which is, like, a hilariously week assumption for any biological process)
what does hypoexponential mean
literally the first
i googled what u wrote and still the first one 
I don't understand what you're doing but it seems awesome 
,w hypoexponential
so yeah it works equally well for tumor cells as it would for a population of humans
age-structured population growth models are quite common in demography
so it models the population of the eukaryotic bacteria?
a hypoexponential distribution is a generalisation of an Erlang distribution
hmmmm
"a tensor is an element of a tensor product space" 
Not nececssarily eukaryotic, actually. Though that was the original distribution
I see
we are getting closer to a word i know
a hypoexponential distribution is just the sum of exponential distributions
"all bacteria are prokaryotic,"
Oo
so a linear combination of exponentials?
distribution as in generalized functions or....?
not a linear combination, just a sum

no
i was trying to be linear algebraic 
then?
A sum is a conical combination
if order 3 polynomials aren't linear, how come they're vectors
but yeah that'd be an even more general version
if you were to take linear combinations
it's just a typical distribution in probability

OH it's not the linear sum of exponential functions. Its probability density function is given by the convolution of exponential probability density functions
so a function f : A -> [0, 1] where A is any set?
It has no neat form
I recall it should have some matrix form?
In probability theory the hypoexponential distribution or the generalized Erlang distribution is a continuous distribution, that has found use in the same fields as the Erlang distribution, such as queueing theory, teletraffic engineering and more generally in stochastic processes. It is called the hypoexponetial distribution as it has a coeffic...
i don't know probability theory 
I have a book called probability theory on my shelf
it's a thicc boi
I haven't opened it yet
By who?
Chung or bust
"probability theory on my shelf" what a strange name for a book
brb
a probability distribution can be associated with a probability density function, which is just a measurable function that integrates to 1
distributions are more probability applications than probability theory
non-negative measurable function, I should clarify
PDFs don't have to exist
exist as in?
Loeve
nope, don't recognise
but yeah that's a good point. not all probability distributions have an associated density function
It's a GTM on probability theory >_>
anyway the thing I'm talking about is exponential distributions
which are super simple and nice
que
the probability increases exponentially?
$\lambda e^{-\lambda x}$, more generally
rattus neanderthalensis
how does that relate to actual probabilities from 0 to 1?
it's uniquely the continuous memoryless distribution
You integrate the le^{-lx} function to get probabilities
I see
I've decided, I'm going to use geometric algebra to give meaning to negative and complex probabilities đ
Anyway you will see exponential everywhere if you like markovian models
In my case, I consider exponential waiting times. So, you integrate $\lambda e^{-\lambda t}$ over some interval $T$ to find the probability that the event happens within that interval
rattus neanderthalensis

ahh okay makes sense
not a real field of math
@next schooner Is there a reason for the Markovian model? Or 'fits data'?
the only probability density functions I know is $\psi \hat{x} {\psi}^*$
Neamesis (Neamesis for honorabl)

i||imaginary field||
\mbb{C}

is that a versor 
It can be "partitioned" in a way that certain groups of states correspond exactly to phases of the cell cycle, so it's got good biological justification and fits the data well. Also its very amenable to computation, which is mostly what I'm interested in
Epic latex fail
You mean the M phase that kind of thing?
yeah
I didn't want the latex bot to render it 
I can't imagine how a biochemical phase results in memoryless phenomena
Maybe I'm not very creative
I would think there's some correlation between how much time is spent in some phase
okay 
Oh it doesn't at all. But a sequence of memoryless processes provides an excellent model for said phase.
yes but there must be a reason for memorrylessness
mitochondria is the powerhouse of the cell
For nuclear processes, the physicists just say god rolls dice
The markov model isn't perfect by any means, as it can't account for inter-generational correlations (or even inter-sibling correlations) in the cell cycle
But for certain processes it works very well
1453 fall of Constantinople
I think they use an effective field theory for that
not sure though
Not really. It's just mathematically convenient and fits the data well.
maybe the exponential fit is because there's like a hidden/unknown Poisson process that advances the phases
so there's a geometric sequence of coin flips that decides if the cell will advance
Yeah
Phase lengths are generally Erlang
The exact mechanism for this isn't entirely understood
that's already a thing...
no, not about the theory, about the fact that it is not possible to predict if/when some electron can escape its coulomb barrier for example. This is a naturally probabilistic model
But there is some evidence to suggest that what you're saying is the case
you can't say that and not drop a link and/or theorem
but he just did
trustmebro.com
Exotic probability is a branch of probability theory that deals with probabilities which are outside the normal range of [0, 1].
According to the author of various papers on exotic probability, Saul Youssef, the valid possible alternatives for probability values are the real numbers, the complex numbers and the quaternions. Youssef also cites t...
you can also have random variables that take values in complex numbers, but that's different
Kolmogorov right now: 
Kolmogorov didn't die a polymath for you to ignore his axioms
oh my god that is beautiful, I hope it remains beautiful whenever I learn how to use it
lol
Oh @next schooner sorry for the ping out of nowhere, but back in June I went to a conference on optimal transport, and there was a cool talk about it with respect to developmental biology you might find interesting
Cell's a pretty good journo o,o
I only recognise Rigollet
it seems he's the only statistician 
Yeah the person who gave the talk was Schiebinger, he's over at UBC
The idea is that optimal transport can be used to determine the ancestry of cell lines and hence be used to more easily create things like ipscs. The thing is sampling probability distributions, and in short timescales, the true coupling (think what cell descends from what) is approximated by the optimal transport coupling given those sampled data
YOOOO that's so cool
I want to do some mathematical biology in the future
prob more on the behavioral ecology side though
Neat, thanks, I'll check it out. I've read several papers and done some modelling of gene regulatory networks in the past. I'm unfamiliar with optimal transport, though D:
Good choice
It's a fun field. All sorts of math applied to all sorts of problems
I'm excited!
Seems like there's so much stuff to be done
Relatively low-hanging fruits and more ambitious stuff
It's not too difficult to pick up the basics, if you go into #talks, I have a ~60 minute introduction to it recorded
Actually
where is #talks?
Oh neat, cheers
oh gotcha
lol
ok lets see if i remembered the quadratic formula from yesterday

(b+-sqrt(b^2-4ac))/2a
yes.
Lol
[\frac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}]
kirby
reference sheets my beloved
this is a trivial special case of the formula for the roots of any polynomial
bruhhh
that's what sucks about formula sheets
you don't learn necessary formulas
Complete the square should get you the formula?
gmod...
thanks tterra
hi
what
see "Abel-Ruffini"
there is no general (algebraic, involving roots and shit) formula for the roots of a quintic or higher
doesn't mean there is no formula that uses stuff other than roots and shit

lmao
do u guys like my nick
it was funny for a sec
no
but you ruined it by mentioning it
it doesn't include rattus neanderthalensis and is, therefore, a terrible meme
fuck u
wtf
what
don't stop
pp
fuck

lol
ok got it
no

LOL
why does only loch get the capitals
bc only his name is capitalized
he is simply cooler
you think i buy that sorry excuse?
which one of ryc, mniip, or loch is calling me cute
gmode
pp
wtf is happening
ye
I honestly don't know either 
you expect me to know that?
roll my weed on my dash
you can call me rolls royce
eh
and if you don't know it
fluent is relative
oh it's the dies irae
that's haunting
do you have a favourite musical setting of it?
ah lol
tbf so was beethoven toward the end of his life
there's a really famous deaf percussionist
evelyn glennie
I like beethoven
what if we were to rid politicians of all privacy
was profoundly deaf since 12 (and losing hearing since 8)
wait, yeah that's true
but she still feels the music
why do you like doom's ost then?
just not with her ears
the lyrics???
i quite like bach
lately ive gotten into metal
ive been enjoying metallica
quite a bit
what about megadeth
idk what that is
what about Death
oh ive heard of death
the guy killed himself right
anyways i dont like death metal
OK so Megadeth is this bombass band that was founded by Dave Mustaine, original lead guitarist for Metallica who got kicked out on the way to record Kill 'Em All because he was an angry drunk
But they still use his solos for that album, and riffs for about 3
"sad but true" is my favorite metallica song
So he makes Megadeth and does his own thing starting in 84
They're similar at times but Megadeth has more of an edge to it
generally they're faster and more technical
but not far off on approachability, unless you just hate Dave's voice
a lot of people do, I love it
.>
hmm
the one whose parents didn't let them (her?) learn a language
i rarely think with a voice in my head, usually my thoughts dont involve words, i bet a lot of people are the same
I think with a voice in my head
how often does this happen?
like, when I heard the genie case, that alone was deeply disturbing
but I thought that was just a one time occurance

what about involving other stuff like idk derivatives and integrals or whatever other operation you might need?
Actually a lot of people donât have the ability to do this at all
I'm a mix of both I think
Talking in my head when reading has become so automatic to me itâs hard for me to read really fast
yea, i do that too, usually if i know what the author sounds like, i imagine that voice
i find books more readable if you know how the author talks
cause then you can figure out what intonation is supposed to be used, for a given word
giving it more context
yeah you gotta unlearn this at some point if you want to read fast
reading fast is overrated
eh it's a useful skill
ah yes, love me some glorified skimming
- some speed reader, probably
lol I mean the key is keeping up the speed and the comprehension
it's not just reading every other word
it's reading all of it
but if you speak it in your head while you read, that limits how fast you can read and comprehend

whereas if you internalize the process of reading, you can go a lot faster
and still keep up comprehension with some practice
yea like when you're looking at a sign outside a shop you don't read it out loud do you? you just look at it and you know what it says
it's exactly like that but on a larger scale
I think doing it the slower way is just better for actually understanding what you're reading
because going slower is better
if you actually practice it, you can "understand at a faster rate"
if you mean comprehend the words on the page, sure
yes
and understand what the sentence is saying
honestly I'm not gonna argue about it without looking up some actual research behind it 
I am specifically thinking of mathematical (even technical non-fiction in general) reading rn so that's also hugely different
atm I usually just skim read for the important information but yeah I should work on it
imma go learn math
oh yeah definitely, if it's like math or physics or anything you're learning, then you cant read it like a novel
I was talking about the complement of the set of textbooks 
takes months to go through a math book, but you can finish other books that's the same size in like a week
no
well I'm gonna read my book anyways
you're banished to the realm of set theory
not yet
axiomatic set theory
go to #foundations and collect -200 dollars

lol
I'm stealing this
Lazy excavating
Or the city is too broke to do it properly
Wtf
Also the wind is an average 14mph/22kph and the sand is very fine so it's constantly being blown
If it were clear skies then it would look great
I love the waves
Yeah great looking waves
I can hear it outside my bedroom window, but sand blows in at night even though I'm a couple blocks away so I can't leave it open at night, plus it gets too cold
SandstormsâŚâŚ
Darude
du du du du du
WTF
You live on the ocean???
So jealous
đ¤˝ââď¸ yes me right now

Hi
It's pretty nice
swimming in open water is so fun but so scary god damn it
Is latex pronounced with a k?
Lay-tech
Is latex used for math equations and then copy pasted onto word/doc or do u write everything on latex
Rhymes with fetch
You can write everything in latex and then get pdfs out of it
Oh okay
Do you do homework on latex
Only if your handwriting is that bad
Then print it and turn it in

For my next assignment I'll use latex
It's a good skill to learn. But budget time to writing it
it'll take you an age a_fire
You could do just one problem
I've texed all my homeworks since the end of my first semester. It starts out slow but you can quickly get very quick
And handwrite the rest. That'll get you pretty far.
I suggest learning it over holiday so you don't have to stress yourself out with deadlines
Nice
You just end up doing less googling for symbols you need and end up memorizing them
And yea, start with writing a few questions in it then go up gradually
Also I gave a latex workshop in this server, if you search my posts in #events you'll find the recording.
It's for total beginners
i find detexify to be pretty bad tbh
I might give it again at the start of the semester
Good for beginners probably
In a week or two
Okay
also Dr. Trefor Bazett has a TeX tutorial series on yt
I'll check it out
And ask in #latex-help
as part of your teaching duties or on the server?
It would just be fun
Just read the TeXbook
If you read the texbook youâll learn all the secretsâŚâŚâŚâŚ..
iirc LaTeX has no official pronunciation
leslie lamport didn't want anyone to be locked into a specific pronunciation
Yeah
But thatâs a dumb take and just cuz you make something doesnât mean you get to name it
I do
gif is pronounced zif
Pexactly
And youâre both wrong
slurp is pronounced burp
Indeed
Slurpie burpie
Rycie bycie-shmoochikins-gigglehead-muffin
I just had a muffin
If you pronounce it differently I will judge you
lay techs is the correct pronunciation
fr
Lah tech
ew
Lay tek
There's no reason for it to be lay
no
I will teach you the correct pronounciation when you come here
If you're going to complain about lateral
Except it's not an English word so english phonology doesn't apply
That is the most incorrect pronunciation unironically
shut up slurp
What does that have to do with anything
What are you gonna do, enunciate words to me slowly?

And also physically
Hebrew has the correct letters for this ××××

×ע××
Learn Hebrew, remove ambiguity
Nah I checked Wikipedia before posting
Lmfao
Imagine trusting Hebrew math wiki?
Uh yeah
Latex but the last letter is chet
Itâs not a chet
Yeah but what if it was
Oh
That would be sick
Then that would be
Would sound bad
Shit taste
Would it
Yea if you pronounce chet as it's supposed to be pronounced
i.e. throaty
Youâre one of those
Both of you are bad
Intention doesnât matter shin
You don't get to have an opinion ryc
Speak throaty chets
that professor on twitter said L'tech and thats how i say it from now on
I am not orthodox
Itâs more like a mizrachi thing no?
It's both
I am evidently not mizrahi either
One of them better have been pilpel
Ryc when he gets to israel "ahhh, shalom"

"ma shlomcha"
U think i remember any of that sbit now
Yes?
Time to download duolingo
"ani ar wai see"
I think thatâs too advanced for him
I dont think i can beat shin
It is but thats besides the point
Okay at least youâre somewhat realistic
I will have to settle for beating him at everything else
I hate listening to all those birthright people speaking Hebrew even though thatâs probably what I sound like
Name one thing you think you can beat me at except wordle and the daily mini
I still canât figure out how to correctly pronounce a reish
(speak literally no hebrew and eat all the food)
Makes me sad
Good!
you can't take those two things from me!
If this were a fair competition youâd have to compare Hebrew wordles
As well as English ones

ha ha






