#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 9 of 1
Another alternative is $\sum s^{(n-1)\dots 0}f^{(0\dots(n-1))}(0)$
PhysMan
it's nice though I agree
it can get confusing fast though
if you write the indices a lot
and in different places
(like subscripts, the denominator of a fraction, etc)
it's a nice way to visualize what's going on though
just to clarify to myself, differentiable is just a fancy way of saying the derivative graph is continuous, is it not?
the derivative can be discontinuous
Such as a cusp.
"derivative graph"
Oh sorry.
differentiable just means that the derivative exists
here's the derivative and value graphs of the two functions
https://www.desmos.com/calculator/frpkkohkkm
the blue one is the function itself
obviously
if f is everywhere differentiable, f' is not necessarily continuous, but interestingly, it does satisfy the intermediate value property
is this not an example of a non-continuous yet differentiable graph
i read it wrong
no, it's not differentiable at x=-1
desmos is probably just too dumb to display that though
lol
you said the derivative only had to exist
yeah and the derivative of the blue function doesn't exist at x=-1
differentiable means that this limit exists:
$$f'(c) = \lim_{h\to 0} \frac{f(c+h) - f(c)}{h}$$
Eric Tao (he/him)
just to clarify, they meet with a a ≥ and >
yeah
check for yourself that this limit does not exist when h → 0+
for c = -1
Are you going to give advanced ?
oh , that's what you mean
yeah, my mistake there, that makes more sense now
thanks
Can a function be differentiable but its derivative is not continuous? @storm sage
not this year no

It’s a yes
x^2sin(1/x)’s derivative at x=0 can be found with squeeze theorem
LOL
It’s bounded above and below by x^2 and -x^2
lmao
it kinda is?
How
well its not something u can immediately think of probably
Yeah that’s what obvious means
but its what u can easily get to
It’s a limit technique
coz its got the perfect combo
I mean I was thinking an obvious counterexample would be a piecewise function but that doesn’t work
an oscillatory limit paired with a nice funciton
The idea is just f<=g<=h implies f’<=g’<=h’
So if you make x approach a value and the f’ and h’ are equal
You found g’
Ah
But why is this true
Like
-1 <= sin <= 1, but 0 <= cos <= 0 isn’t true
I feel like I’m making some obvious mistake though
Hm
I need to restrict my hypothesis more
A derivative is a limit
coz i have never heard of a squeeze for derivatives 

He means it doesn’t work in that way for derivatives
That’s actually what they start with
Feeding you counterexamples to unintuitive scenarios
Ah

Yeah I’d heard of the weierstrauss function that’s kinda insane
Seems like it’s doing a rigorous foundation for calc, but since you’re dealing with infinity it brings in a bunch of unintuitive baggage
its much more than that, at times u treat/build it all from the ground up
which can be painfully boring/too formalistic to be fun
but it has its good parts
metric spaces
You can construct the real numbers in multiple ways
dedekind cuts dont exist, dont @ me
Ah
R is the completion of Q as a metric space
Completion as a metric space?
In fact for undergrad math EXPECT every intro to field X course to construct the real numbers in their own way. Its either algebraic, set theoretic, topological/analytic or something similar
Interesting
a sequence that goes smaller and smaller
thats not the rigorous definition ik
Oh a
but it gets the idea across well
Literally a sequence that should converge to a value
And it makes sense that you’d want your number line to have every sequence converge
no....
What why
It doesn’t uh…
We call spaces in which every Cauchy sequence converges COMPLETE
the reals are complete
cauchy sequences are sequences in which the difference between consecutive terms can get arbitrarily small
Yeah I mean “should” in the sense of constructing a smooth, complete number line
Not consecutive…
No
No?
No
What about it isn’t


Cauchy sequences say that any two elements in ur sequence can become arbitrarily close to one another for large enough N
That doesn’t mean those two values that become super close (to each other) converged to something
They could’ve diverged
The differences between consecutive terms of the partial sums of the harmonic series converge to 0
But the partial sums of the series are not a cauchy sequence
Imma be honest I dont understand what this means

Just because element x got super close to element y as time tends to infinity doesn’t mean that x or y converged to something in the giant space it lives in. All we know is “x converged to y” in a sense. We don’t know if y converged in the set so we don’t know if x converged either
oh
Cauchy sequence = for each epsilon, there's a point after which all elements of the sequence are within epsilon of each other
Yeah this is what I was thinking
I don’t understand, x and y are elements, they don’t get anywhere or converge to anything
Maybe I’m being dumb
Don’t get pedantic on me now
I’m being hand wavy for a reason
Let’s say you have two sequences x and y that are implied with indices
Ok
They get super close to each other as n grows super large right
How do you know the sequence x or y converged in the space tho?
All you know is the sequences converged in a sense to each other
But as a duo they might diverge relative to the space they live in
Blows up etc
Goes to an element not in the set
Think of a Cauchy sequence which converges to sqrt(2) as time goes to infinity
(or start oscillating between many elements)
But claim you only know about rationals
It’s definitely Cauchy
Did not converge in the set of rationals
So it’s a Cauchy sequence that diverged in Q
But it converged in R
Right that makes sense

yup but the derivative always satisfies an intermediate value property
who knew geometers can explain analysis so well 
But then
im complimenting u coocomba!
so for example if f'(3) = 80 and f'(5) = 90 then somewhere between 3 < x < 5 we have f'(x) = 89
Topologists invented limit points!
What’s wrong with saying Cauchy sequences “should” converge, in the context of trying to construct a smooth number line?
So what!
this will not be considered topology by anyone
We know Q isn’t smooth because we have sequences that don’t hit anything, but they get arbitrarily close to a value
That’s called completion. We usually take every Cauchy sequence and say STICK IT IN
if it wasn’t a limit point it is now!
The space is now complete
Spaces are not always complete
In fact we’d really like them to BE complete
they are very holey at times
Ah, so that’s literally

Homology moment
We have a formalism to make it happen
actually
Although I guess another more vague question is
is C complete as a metric space?
Yes it should be
How do we know the Cauchy sequence construction of real numbers works
As in, how do we know there’s no holes left, in a sense
This is why topology is important
thats where topo comes in
It turns out the completion of the reals is equivalent to its closure
the geometer can explain that better
Oooo
They are intimately related
thats sick
It is not true in general
i didnt know that
Closure in topological terms
A closure says “find every last limit point of this set and put it in the set we have rn”
It’s equivalent to the set union its set of limit points
A completion focuses specifically on placing Cauchy sequences in the set
Every complete metric space equals its closure im p sure
And it’s very similar
Let me check
It’s like if you generalized the “arbitrary closeness”
A limit point of S is a point in X such that every open neighborhood contains another element of S
Complete metric spaces must be closed but closed spaces need not be complete
Closed metric spaces need not be complete?
what is a closed metric space
isn't every metric space by definition closed with respect to itself
A metric space is complete if and only if it is closed in every space containing it
no such thing as a closed metric space
a closed subset of a metric space you mean
the proof roughly has to deal with looking at cauchy sequences
Yeah this is one of the few things I don't like as much about Baby Rudin, it isn't clear on what properties are those of a metric space (so they hold for subsets by virtue of subspace topology) vs those which are properties of subsets of a metric space
Closedness is a property of a subset of a metric space, meaning if you want to say "A is closed", you must specify "as a subset of X".
While completeness is a property of a metric space
Now, if A is a subset of X, then you can think of A as a subspace, either in terms of open sets or in this case by restricting the metric
Yeah but I don't believe in that definition
Don’t worry, that definition doesn’t believe in you either <3
all you mofos sotruing me ain't got no shit
you tellin' me in the discrete topology every function is continuous?
get tf outta here, that shit ain't real


darq yes we are collectively lying to u!
we want to make u a bad mathematician
almost as bad as john gabriel!
what txtbook
neat thing I noticed: For a subring $B$ of ring $A$, $B$ is a two sided ideal of $A$ if: $\forall a \in A, b \in A (a \in B \vee b \in B \Rightarrow ab \in B)$
But the conditional becomes a biconditional if $B$ is a prime ideal.
Mizalign
actually if B is a subset of the A ring
But a subring B contains the same multiplicative identity as A, so if it were an ideal then it would be all of A
hm?
Nvm, I was responding to what you said before clarifying B is a subset, not a subring
now I’m even more confused
You said that if B is a subring of A, then B is a two sided ideal of A if this condition holds
But if B were a subring, it contains the multiplicative identity as A. The only ideal containing the identity is the whole ring, hence B would be equal to A
WHAT
isn’t that for a field
also I thought an ideal is a subring
kinda like the ring theoretic analogue of a regular subgroup
Miz do you like for your rings to have multiplicative identities
Then ideals are not subrings
If an ideal I of a ring A contains 1, then for all r in A, we have r1 is in I by definition of an ideal
Therefore r in I, hence I = R
Ideals are analogous to normal subgroups in the sense that the kernel of a homomorphism is an ideal
Ideals can also be thought of as submodules of the ring viewed as a module over itself
You might be confusing this with the fact that in a field, every non trivial ideal is the whole field
And that follows from the fact that every non zero element is invertible, hence xx^-1 = 1 would be in the ideal, which I've shown implies that the ideal is just the whole field
absolutely not
Timo I'm eating a yummy jalapeno and cheese bagel RIGHT NOW
Did you bring enough to share with the whole class?
Haha
I was about to make a terrible topology joke with the bagel
Didn't let my intrusive thoughts win
why do seagulls fly over the sea
probably S1 x D2 or something
this guys lost brother
he looks contractible tbh
he has to fit into the spaceships somehow after all
ig if it's a hyphen
R2 - D2
then its homotopy equivalent to circle
agony
timo you ever been rock climbing?
Thats cool walter
I know lots of people who do it and they all love it
I hope you have a good time
my biggest fear is that it will rain and the rocks get wet and I slip and fall for several miles
which makes no sense because it's indoors
but I will update all of my fans on how it goes
They pour water from above for a more realistic experience
Hahaha
I have a traumatic rock climbing memort from when i was a kid
I was at some kind of childrens museum that had a rock wall and i wanted to climb it
But like half way up my leg cramped and i fell off
agony
And i was so embarrassed i started crying
And 20 years later i am still scared of rock climbing lol
Well i guess i did go climbing once
Thanks Buncho, I find great comfort in your story
which doesn't really count tho
jk jk lol, that really does suck though
have you always had a fear of heights timo
Hahaha i turned out (mostly) okay anyway :P
bizarre
I guess it happens though, I only became scared of the ocean recently
but ofc there's nothing irrational about fear of heights or ocean
Yeah the ocean is scary as hell
probably squid people as well
cephalopods are great
I suppose so
I go to the aquarium a good bit as like
exposure therapy
But now I think I'm just dependent on the glass barrier between me and the unknown
jellyfish look really pretty though, I'll give them that
Aquariums are kinda cool but i always feel bad for the marine animals
because like
ocean very big
bouldering!
aquarium very small
Bouldering is where you dont have a harness, it's shorter (like 15-20 feet) and there's big cushions on the ground
Ok nice
That's more fun imo
And also easier on the heights thing
It seemed like it, yeah
maybe i should give it another go some time
I thought I was super into like
The idea of open ocean swimming
When I was swimming last week in the ocean at the beach
I was over a sandbar, and suddenly I came up to a 45 degree incline that just led into black
And something set off in my body and I just booked it in the opposite direction without even giving myself time to think
instinctual
So I'm wondering now if I'd actually like open ocean swimming
Lol
But I still want to try!
yeah I've got massive respect for open ocean swimmers
I've been wanting to try stand up paddling
That's fun
it looks like a relaxing activity
I used to do competitive when I was younger and thought I'd be able to do long distance open ocean when I was older
but it was simply not meant to be
there's this video of a stand up paddler getting his shit rocked by a dolphin
hilarious
I kinda wanted to try rock climbing again but there is just nothing near me :(
The closest place (which might not even be open anymore) is like 40 minute transit each way
Hahahaha
I will crush the childrens museum rock wall
I believe in you 
I looked it up
Its 10-15 minutes away by car
But 40 minutes by public transit

The transit in my city is so bad

I miss living in chicago
The bus and train system was great
Most people i knew didnt have a car
St louis is really car centric though
Which makes it hard
missouri, more like misery
living in/near an unwalkable city is very annoying though
Yeah :S
I really dont want to learn to drive but i might have to at some point
I have anxiety about driving and anxiety about not driving and idk which one will win out hahaha
I think I get it, I'll go to any lengths not to drive in the city
I'm okay with suburbs, especially when the roads are empty
But I do still feel like driving is something most people would benefit from knowing
Yeah i wont argue with that
I just dont want to like go through the hassle of learning and buying a car and paying for insurance and gas and maintenance
yeah owning a car is EXPENSIVE
Yeah
The easiest solution would just be to date someone who can drive
But my bf also cant drive D:
So we are just double useless
Aww yeah
started to really appreciate that two days ago
because he ain't here atm
and i was shopping for a party that i hosted yesterday
carrying two of these was not that much fun
and usually we just got them into his car
Oh yeah that sucks
i also live on the 4th floor 
Oh no hahaha
My grocery store is a 10 minute walk away and sometimes i buy too much and have a heavy load to carry
But i try to just go more frewuently and buy less at a time
Yeah i do the same
but sometimes i just get the urge to buy a lot of stuff and see how well i can carry it
ok i am rebranding my lifelong fear of driving and inability to get my license as an ‘ethical opposition to car culture’
47183
5460
Literally me
lmao
Lmfao
BASED
Kinda hyped for my permit this fall ngl
I'm an unironic r/fuckcars activist

Yeah cars suck, but recommend a cool polyhedron to build with paper and explain why you think it's cool, plz 
If I agree I might build it
Yes, but I don't want simple and cute polyhedrons, I want cool polyhedrons
(I hope no one from the blockify cult reads this)
Also, I already built lots of cubes
guys, i apreaceate all the helping you guys do, just try to explain as much as much in plain english while being specific about it. sometimes its hard to understand if one says something not entirely vague but a little vague. or one uses mathmatical notation or a=b something, while i understand that a=b, sometimes idk what to do with a=b if i haven't understood you well. thats all, apreciate it
think about it
really think about it. really just. dream about this. because almost everyone who helps is uber pro max delta in math
Legend has it, @tawdry falcon is still typing to this day
Octahemioctahedron
No explanation needed
In most cases, people who help only give hints about how to solve a problem, or show how to solve a more general type of problems
You might not know what the person helping you takes for obvious and it's ok to not understand something instantly, it happens all the time when I ask for help. You should immediately ask them what they mean, to help them help you
Also, keep in mind that people who help do it out of love for maths and/or teaching (in fact, everyone does this for free), and no one will intentionally try to make things harder for no reason
That's a good one, seems tough to build with paper only.
Looks like it's made with triangles only, super cool!
Also, bonus points for cool name
:o all the triangles are the same size and form pyramids 🤯
Nice ok
I messed up some folds Some happy little accidents occurred, but I'm pretty sure hopefully I can get it right

,calc 2 * 2^1023
Result:
Infinity
,calc 1.99999999999999 * 2^1023
Result:
1.7976931348623e+308
@hollow sundial for science ^
,iam dying
Gave you the studying! selfrole.
,calc 2^1024-1
Result:
Infinity
,calc (2^1023)+((2^1023)-0.01)
Result:
Infinity
,calc (2^1023)+((2^1022))
Result:
1.3482698511467e+308
oh yeah
nonna smart
and nice
Guys I did it ^^ It's beautiful (There's an ugly side, but I won't send it ahah)
There it is
(thanks @wicked ore for the suggestion)
Yes! I copied a net I found online, if anyone wants it I can send it
that is really cool. tbh i didnt think you were serious but that looks great!
thanks for sharing
thanks guys
That is cool
Czesaro polyhedron
Very pretty object, well done nonna
for this server, they should have a integration emoji
I'm having a probability problem. Here it is.
There is a game that I am currently playing in which there exists different elements that can be controlled by a player. The "elements" are chosen by the 100 rolls, given to a player upon debut.
The chance of rolling spatial is 0.01% per roll. What are the chances of rolling spatial with the full 100 rolls?
Is it 1%?
probability of NOT rolling spatial is 99.99% = 0.9999 per roll
probability of not rolling spatial in 100 rolls is 0.9999^100 = 0.990049338691372
therefore probability of rolling spatial at least once in 100 rolls is 1 - 0.990049338691372 = 0.00995066130862809 = 0.995066130862809%
so, very close to 1% but not quite exactly
this assumes of course that the rolls are statistically independent
@austere hazel how goes school?
Frustratingly frustrating
Deserves to be said twice
That said i've had a bit of fun with the imc recently so there's that
Teaching, sets, logic, how to prove things, differentiation, integration, DEs
Nah, i just had fun with the questions
Trained a few who did go
Is it really competing vicariously if i'm on the side of the ones making questions?
I've always liked making questions better than solving them
Takes a special evil to make questions
Part of the joy is seeing how many die and how many don't die
Do you make questions deliberately using certain techniques like differentiating under the integral etc.
I like to combine techniques
Impressive
Whether or not they turn out to be special techniques isn't all that important
i should make a diabolical calc test before i graduate hs as a funny joke
There's a sucker born every minute
30 questions
Later on i made several in both math and physics and had more suckers do them
Give it to your teacher and bet 1% of your grade they can't solve it. (Then maybe just slide a quick unsolved problem into it to guarantee your victory XD)
its going to be funny
Where's the fun in that?
Heck, I would have won that 1% if I had simply asked my high school math teacher what the square root of -1 was
...what?
i
I was taught that in middle school
I'm not kidding. I ABSOLUTLY COULD NOT convince my math teacher that imaginary numbers were a real usable concept in math
And right after that lesson i went to ask what's something raised to a complex power
how
idk about raising something to a complex power
but how do you not know sqrt(-1) as a math teacher
Complex powers generally just represent rotations in the complex plane, don't they? I haven't followed it too much, I'm more of a prime numbers guy than that stuff XD
Yes, but i didn't know that back then
multiplying by e^i theta represents a rotation
in general, multiplying by a complex number means a stretch and a rotation
Yeah, that one I knew
like for example if you multiply by 2, everything gets stretched by 2
Step 1: Look for teacher
Step 2: Hire random off street with fake cert
Step 3: ???
Step 4: Profit...?
The funniest part is
I literally showed her that the TI-84 calculators we used could work with complex numbers
And she still didn't believe that they meant anything at all XD
RIP.
step 1, don't require math teachers to have a math degree?
Is that how it works these days?
Hahahahahhahahahaha
Hahahahahhahahahahahahaa
God no
Honestly, I'm not sure what worries me more- people who don't have certification to work the job they do, or people who DO have the certification and STILL have no idea what they're doing
America K-12 education is pathetic
ok how do i create a document with latex
One of the reasons i'm thankful i'm not in America
I'm Canadian, so it doesn't apply to me anyway XD
People who teach sometimes get these sticks up their asses that they know everything there is to know in a subject and can't be questioned, its probably not that she doesnt know its i but rather that she refuses to believe concepts outside her expertise are more than little whimsical fantasies
You use a LaTeX editor
"i graduated from high school, how can i not know everything i need to know to teach high school students?"
Fair point. She did kinda give me that "I'm the teacher, and what I say is true" vibe at times
I almost feel like it was a waste of my love of random math to write a whole paper on comparing the distributions of numbers with different amounts of prime factors with each other for the final in that class
Oh?
Because I know it went way over her head lol
I might be interested in having a look, if you don't mind
Ehhh, well it was actually very flawed
I have an ongoing side project i'm stuck in that seems to need a study of prime factor behaviour
The issue was, I based the analysis off of data from a program I made, but the program didn't properly count the number of factors a result had. BUT- I've done lots of other cool things with primes, if you want to chat about those lol
Why not, might be helpful
But erm, this seems like it needs more attention than i can afford today, so maybe tomorrow :/
I've actually been coding a prime factoring algorithm using my newest ideas. And alright
gonna add you as a friend so i can pm you~
Just ping and/or PM me whenever you want to know about it lol. It's nothing groundbreaking- at least not yet. But it's still a neat way to visualize them
ok
yeah, i'm not looking for groundbreaking, i'm looking for sufficient to get past that block i have
my main stuff is in FA and has little to do with primes
I see. Yeah, I just do math as a hobby, but I'm actually studying computer science lol. It's definitely nice whenever I need to make a program to do all the work for me XD
luckily (or unluckily) for me, everything i have to do is on paper xD
no computer coding necessary!
Yeah, there are definitely benefits to that kind of work. I mean, TECHNICALLY no coding is required for what I'm doing either
unless you count TeX as a coding language, which...i don't
I can just prove it much easier (Though, I suppose "prove" isn't the right word. Rather "apply the proof")
some days though, i feel like coding might have been a better option
Depends why you want it. I like to code video games, and want to make them for a living- it's just convenient to have for math as well
that reminds me i still have a visual novel scenario to write
i'm not worrying about the coding part until we get to said part
Makes sense. Python is a really easy language to learn, and has libraries available to make visual novels in (It's what Doki Doki Literature Club was made in, at least the original)
Not enough nested trig functions
please, why restrict yourself to sin and cos?
chain rule is easy though

quotient rule is where it's at
why not tan, cot, sec, csc, sinh, cosh, etc
integrate something that needs a non-obvious sub
besides, if you really want to waste time, just ask them to write the first 100 digits of some ridiculous fraction using long division. (I know that isn't calc, but like-)
have them differentiate x x-arrow x
integrate something that needs induction
honestly i dont think i should make this test yet tbh
i dont think im at the point where i can devise diabolical questions on calc
devious calc 2 😈😈😈
Get some 2d functions in there and throw in indicator functions, those will really fuck with people
Eh, just ask them what sqrt(-1) is. Worked for me XD
bro even i dont know what indicator functions are
ok yeah im not making it yet
not the time
They indicate a point is a part of a set. 1 when yes 0 when no.
ryc, i-
Hi alex
Did you enjoy the bb24 prejury
I did
I havent been paying a ton of attention this week
I’m two weeks behind 
take your time to learn and ever devise more cruelly
i am going to make an immensely cruel calc 1 test on april
big brother?
I haven’t even seen ||pooch evicted||

I tried watching it on my tv but my housemates were being obstructive and I don’t have another way to watch it
Even I saw that. And it was the only clip of the only episode I've watched this season XD
I guess I could watch old episodes but that is so much time that I don’t have
You dont have another way to watch it...
it is literally 2022
Ok just
Please please watch the week 3 veto and eviction episodes
You dont need to watch anything else
But those are 2 very very good episodes
Ok, I will do that - p sure I’ll get hooked from them
Unless you know what's been happening since then
I don’t
It's very fun bb
This better be worth it. I watched the entirety of last season in 2 days last summer, so I do have the stamina
grad students: "yeah we're really busy, its nothing like undergrad"
grad students:
Well yeah but it’s never just 2 episodes
I’ll put it on tomorrow morning
It sucks! We're all dying! Wah wah
on god?
Yep
Shhh, don't reveal the secret! Fire everywhere!
real
Grad school gives you more free time but also you spend a lot more time doing harder math
And doing harder math takes more energy
so is like
I didn't have that question in my quizes. Must only be in some curriculums XD
you have more free time
Not if you are fueled by rage and impotence
but the time you dont have free time is
then it just leads to a feedback loop
It's a lot about stamina and self control / managing your decisions well I would say
Lol
SA simpleart
Main shtick about grad vs undergrad is local vs global pressure
Undergrad has a lot more structure
You have your weekly psets, you know your exam dates, at least have an idea how grading will look like
So doing that and just "living well" is kinda the correct course of action in undergrad. Maybe you have to think a little bit about what to do during summers for the sake of future grad school or career
Grad school starts off slightly like that but more chill
But then eventually it becomes a lot of global pressure but less local pressure/structure
Obv if you have a good advisor there's still a ton of guidance
But it's more like yeah make yourself look impressive enough to get good jobs by the time you're out, plus some mix of worrying about balancing prepping for possible academia and industry
There are some deadlines along the way but you have to have a lot more self control
There isn't a pset worth n% of your grade that's due this Friday, there's an advisor meeting which you should prepare for but which you can kinda wing if you're lucky and sometimes when you're not feeling it you take that option.... more times than you should
This is a very good description of it
gamed enta ya daminark
idk why but without zooming in, your pfp looks like jesse pinkman
Yea i do understand that. We all have our differences
Starting to sound conplainy there. If you want your problem solved and aren't happy with the free help you're getting, go pay for a tutor
No no, thats not the case at all. I didn't mean it in a negative manner. 😅 😁
I understand, appreciate, and respect all the amazing work you guys are doing. It was more about voicing the differences in levels of math we have in this server.
And this statement was supposed to be a joke to emphasize the idea of the 'expert blind spot', the idea that since experts work on something for so long that many things are obvious to them compared to the layman.
The statement "dream about it" comes from how i feel sometimes, when i am between the phase of sleep and being awake, and in this dream like thinking; this is the phase where reality sort of breaks down in my mind. And everything starts to appear strange. Where normal and mundane things appear strange and don't make any sense. So assuming that it would be same with thinking about math, the parts of math that appear so normal often would appear strange in this phase.
Now back to doing math
yea its communication
I am here to provide my update: I fell and died several times, but ultimately I survived. Overall I had a really great time and I'll absolutely go again when I have the chance. After we finished rock climbing we also hiked up a nearby mountain. Then we got greek food for dinner. A fun day for sure
also my new glasses came in
doctor's appointment in the morning went well and soon I will be on my way to the airport
daily vlogs when?
also, please teach me how to die
lol
ya
I just started reading dandadan
that shit is soooo good

Seriously, @supple flame have you seen dandadan?
bruh
that's exactly what I'm thinking right now
worse yet, the manga is SICK
holy shit, are you even living

wuss dat?
Hell’s paradise fan 
I’ve just been there around the beginning of English serialization
mappa is really just adapting everything huh
adappa
that's great!
ah shit, I didn't take this into account
yohan, I'm gonna take my sweet fucking time with this one
don't you DARE spoil anything
bruh, my classmates spoiled so many shows for me

one I was talking to one of my classmates and I just heard about shigatsu no uso
so I was like, do you know this show
and I barely finished talking and he was like ||"you know the blonde dies by the end, right?"||
I'll never forgive them 
I liked that show so much 
you can just read it from mangaplus, dumbo
they released all chapters for (all?) their mangas for free

even MY internet lets me read manga
jeez
good morning rycie bycie!
Ty for this, another show I am now relieved from ever watching
Ryc have I complained to you about B trees yet?
Not red black trees?
you haven't watched your lie in april?
What is B?
Not specified
Like the creators never specified
It’s a full tree (idk if that’s what you call it, but like all the leaves are on the same level) where you have an m, and every node has a sorted list of m-1 values with m children, and in each node except the root there must be at least m/2 values
You can then create algorithms to ensure that this remains full
Or complete
Whatever
So the height is always logarithmic
Anyway I just knew I’d fuck up a B tree question if it was on my test, and guess what? I fucking did
some anime is mainstream
watching anime doesn't necessarily equal being a weeb
It’s a generalization of a 2-3 tree
Wtf
So dumb
True
Basically on my test I had to give an example 2-3 tree for a reason, and I forgot to add a fucking subtree. Like the root had 2 values and therefore should have 3 children, but I only drew 2
Yes like spy x family and whatever else I've seen
But not whatever this lie in april thing is
spy x family is barely mainstream
I don’t think it would really have affected my answer, but that was like a large part of the question, and that was dumb of me
BUT YOUR LIE IN APRIL IS, YOU UNCULTURED HEATHEN
And the question was worth 12 points
Slurp
Yes
If you dont get an A on the test
RYC
Call me and I'll beat them up
Thank you rycie bycie
Now let me tell darq whats what
I fucking despise b trees
THAT SHOW IS FOR. WEEEEBS.
Now Imma wait for loch to return so I can complain to him
Yes loch is more of an adult isnt he
Also ryc I’m home and I have no clue where my family is
No he just knows what b trees are lol
Probably all getting ice cream without you
So he can be like “oh don’t worry slurp that wasn’t a big deal, you’ll probably only lose like maximum 5 points”
And I’d believe him cuz he’s a CS dude
I just need the reassurance
Oh dont worry slurp that wasnt a big deal, you'll probab
Fuck
I'm kind of a CS dude
I'm an everydude
including an anime dude?
Anyone know how long you should wait for a mod mail request?
I told you, you should’ve spammed ryc
I’m no spammer
Oh yeah
One sec
I'm just checking in one more time and then we will get back to you
Thanks
Not a weeb btw
gmod
@ancient flame I don't think your definition works for finite sets
oh fuck
besides, 0*inf is undefined
so then how would you show that $\int_{[a, b]}=\int_{(a, b)}$?
gmod
by using a stronger definition?
oh like lebesgue shit?
lowmath discovers measure theory
lol
oh
your definition is wrong in the first place
you don't multiply by 1/N, you multiply by (b-a)/N
I should've noticed that sooner myself lol
icic
Yo
Well Riemann integration would typically be defined for real-valued functions anyway right so xd
But sure stuff like you can define some sequence going to infinity and keep everything else the same
lol tterra mutes chill
Why would you not mute chill
bc I like chill
The proverbial cesspit
LOL
That's my proverbial cesspool
did you expect anything else?
also, this definition only works for sufficiently nice functions
I keep discovering things wrong with your definition 
nope
but what was the point of posting this
look harder
i'll let you figure that one out
suppose you try to integrate the function $f(x)=x$ and the function
$$f(x)=
\begin{cases}
x & \text{x is rational} \
0 & \text{x is irrational}
\end{cases}
$$
Idk, mods seem to think its funny to rename their channels with higher numbers as if there are those many. shows how mature they are.
DarQ
yeah that's not riemann integrable
from, say, 0 to 1
Meow
yeah, by your definition, the integral of the second function is the same as the first
which is nonsense
woof
That hurt my head to read

It was deleted
oh
oh yea i thought migi was talking about your $x$ x is rational tex
riemann
is there a machine learning channel here?
no, but consider the related server linked in #old-network
gmod
Jee-mawd
WTF
what
it originally came from my irl name, and after being transformed and convoluted over the years it became gmod
Your real name is gregory mod 
ofc
I should do some math today 
it's okay to not do math
no
no
bruh
I went full monkey brain today bruh
I couldn't be productive for more than 2 minutes lol
nG, what math are you working on atm?
ignored

it's fine Darq, just imagine a combination of words that look like they might possibly belong in the English language but you're not sure, and string them together
thats what nG would've answered with
WTF
deepest lore
oop sorry I was relocating downstairs
splitting time between doing work on thesis problem and trying to finish editing papers
I've been confusing myself with hypergeometric functions lately
what's it like, working on really hard problems?
open problems and the like
idk the problems I'm doing aren't actually that hard once you know what's going on, it's just writing everything up clearly and organizing everything is hard
or like, there's a lot of annoying struggling with getting notation and conventions from different sources to match up
based
yeah, that doesn't like something I wanna deal with
ehh I mean you have to deal with this to some degree with research
some fields are worse than others
also there's some tradeoff between like, is it easier to resolve conflicts like this or just work it out yourself
that and like, reproving results rather than relying on or reproducing proofs that other people have written

If we have a semigroup $S$ with a partial order R such that:
$(xy)Rx \vee (xy)Ry$. Let an element p be normal if for all x and y in S
$xRp \vee yRp \Leftrightarrow (xy)Rp$. let $Nor(S)$ be the set of prime elements. Then the anti-tail of an element $x$ is $K(x) = {y \in Nor(S) : x\cancel{R}y}$. Is the family of all anti-tails a topology?
Mizalign
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
actually I wrote it down a bit differently
mizlang, are you allergic to the advanced channels or smth?
banned from em lol
not using em correctly which is fair
Actually I'm gonna ask something different
Let $G$ be an infinite-order group, and $F$ be an uncountable collection of subgroups of $G$. Is the set theoretic intersection, aka: $\ \bigcupF = {x : \forall y \in F(x \in y)} \$ a subgroup? hhhh
Mizalign
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
any intersection of subgroups is a subgroup
actually lol it is
if x is in all of them, then so must it's inverse be in all of them
yep
usual drill with intersections
what if we're considering ideals of a ring
any intersection of "collection of sets with property P" is usually a collection of sets with property P. Sigma algebras, topologies, etc
what's the analogue of prime ideals?
We just say for a semigroup $S$, an ideal is a subset $X$ of $S$ such that for all elements of $S$, if either $x$ or $y$ is in $X$, then it's product is in $X$. We say an ideal is normal or prime if this is biconditional.
Mizalign
shit, gtg
do you want your semigroup to be commutative?
the structure of ideals in rings is much nicer when they are commutative
ofc, it still generalizes tho
true but I haven't heard of spec in non commutative algebra (maybe it does exist, not sure)
i think the set of prime ideals that do not contain a given ideal are elements of a topology of all of the aforementioned sets
it just happens to coincide
technically, the product of ideals is a product, so there’s a semigroup of purely ideals
me when I read a proof: oh yeah this is super obvious
me five seconds later when I try to remember the reason: uhhhhhh
For me, not trying to remember the proof, but understanding the main ideas of the proof and why they make sense in that context are what help me “remember” proofs well after reading them.
I find that trying to prove theorems before hand helps with this
just for like 10-15 minutes
I also do a writeup for particularly tricky/unintuitive proofs
what about it?
you can complete the semigroupnto a group ig
even ignoring desired topological properties, there are a couple of papers I've come across that illustrate why naive generalizations of Spec to noncommutative rings sorta just don't work





