#book-recommendations

1 messages · Page 217 of 1

flint forge
#

Yes

#

No that’s not true

#

No probably not. I’d do pinter

#

I think you should see some abstract algebra before topology anyway

#

And I think that someone intentionally doing topology before analysis might be procrastinating

#

Which is fair I would too

#

So instead of smth more tradition like riding

#

Rudin

#

I suggest Pinter AA

cloud bobcat
#

i did pinter aa then rudin and found that rly good

obsidian valley
#

Guess who ordered themselves pinter for christmas B)

gray gazelle
#

i migth get a copy of lee

#

finally

#

no more pdf

#

would motivate me to d o the extra stuff too

obsidian valley
#

i love asking for textbooks for christmas

#

i usually ask for like

#

sock

#

but this year i asked for books and my family members are like

#

wow so smart

#

and i nod

gray gazelle
#

wow big brain jesse

obsidian valley
#

himbo

#

B)

broken meadow
#

😎

#

smart jesse

obsidian valley
gray gazelle
#

interesting catThink

#

thanks for letting me know

upbeat vine
#

Recommendations for basic spectral theory?

hearty steppe
#

What is spectral theory

sage python
#

@upbeat vine I don't know much spectral theory except for what happened in a functional analysis class

#

That said, there's a functional analysis book which seems really really good

#

"Functional Analysis, Spectral Theory, and Applications" by Einsiedler and Ward

marble solar
#

I got my copy of knots & links the other day : D

hollow peak
#

how good is it to do the classical NT chapters of apostol then move onto ireland and rosen? I'm not sure how solid the treatment of analytic stuff is there

marble solar
#

The analytic stuff in apostol is good

#

I prefer Terry Tao's 254A however, or Nick Anderson's Math 205A from like fall 2019?

#

Those are a good set of notes that are easier to read

hollow peak
#

I was thinking that the algebraic treatment is just generally more useful than going all the way through apostol without it

marble solar
#

Even the early stuff in apostol

#

Is good

hearty steppe
#

Can you DM me a link to those notes moon

marble solar
#

Sure

hearty steppe
#

Oh wait that’s NT

marble solar
#

Yeah analytic NT

still umbra
#

What are some good math books to get as a Christmas gift for someone? They are starting a math major next year

gray gazelle
#

ask them if they're eyeing any textbooks in particular catThink

still umbra
#

Preferably around the $20 AUD area

#

So kinda rules out textbooks

gray gazelle
#

dover books?

#

those are cheap (at least in canada)

still umbra
#

Pop-sci math stuff

karmic thorn
#

Yeah, either get Dover or the Indian edition of some mainstream book. opencry

gray gazelle
#

indian editions...

broken meadow
#

Cursed.

gray gazelle
#

have fun having entire chapters removed and shit printing quality

karmic thorn
#

Don't blame me for the missing chapters.

gray gazelle
#

back in my first year i ordered a copy of my linear algebra textbook

#

indian edition, $30

#

seemed like a good deal, yeah?

karmic thorn
#

Darn you paid a lot

gray gazelle
#

i opened it and some pages fell out, then i noticed the entire chapter on jordan forms was missing (which was also the unit we were on)

karmic thorn
#

Was it Friedberg?

gray gazelle
#

then i managed to get a good version of the book

#

ya

#

let me post my nice version

#

hardcover too flonshed

karmic thorn
#

Yeah, apparently Pearson is messing up with Indian edition.

#

Wiley does a good job, the printing usually sucks but at least the content is complete.

gray gazelle
#

,rotate

hasty eagleBOT
gray gazelle
#

nice hardcover

#

pretty big too

karmic thorn
#

Damn, nice.

#

I bought Tao's Analysis I, hardcover for like $3

gray gazelle
#

obligatory size comparison with my favorite book opencry

karmic thorn
#

That's the best buy I've ever made

gray gazelle
#

wow thats cheap

karmic thorn
#

Indeed.

#

Calc on Manifolds is smaller than I thought

gray gazelle
#

it's not very big

karmic thorn
#

I somehow always think Spivak's books must be encyclopaedic in size

gray gazelle
#

his diffgeo series and calculus book are

karmic thorn
#

I see.

gray gazelle
#

but CoM is very CoMpact

#

idk yohan, read the heine borel part hmmm

#

the best part of this book is the part where he says stokes' theorem is trivial

drifting elm
#

@fathom monolith "The same concrete approach has led us from cartesian closed categories, which are instrumental to build models of functional programming languages, to equational descriptions of cartesian closed categories. Functional programming languages can be compiled into a language of categorical combinators, whos phrases serve as code executed on a simple abstract machine, called the categorical abstract machine."

#

Categorical Combinators, Sequential Algorithms, and Functional Programming - Ebook written by P.-L. Curien. Read this book using Google Play Books app on your PC, android, iOS devices. Download for offline reading, highlight, bookmark or take notes while you read Categorical Combinators, Sequential Algorithms, and Functional Programming.

#

this one has all the CS math in it

gray gazelle
#

why would someone buy an ebook when you can get it for free?

drifting elm
#

only 34 pages but also this is john mccarthy who invented lisp. this is a famous paper.

still umbra
#
  • It's free
modern silo
#

What's your take on Strang versus Axler? Basically, the two books feature very different philosophies for linear algebra, which one do you like more?

hasty turret
#

Axler is better than strang

#

You can easily learn applied linear algebra, once you understand the theory

stark creek
#

Does artin teach la aswell

#

looks like it

karmic thorn
#

I still don't know if I should prefer the matrices-first approach or vector spaces-first approach to learning LA for the first time.

hearty steppe
#

I wasn’t really a fan of Strang when I was more of a LA newb

#

I think Friedburg et al is a much better book, the applied book that is

#

But Lang intro to LA is the book I’ve been mostly reading for theory

drifting elm
#

34 pages of penrose tilings for claw free

karmic thorn
#

Yeah, Friedberg looks good.

hearty steppe
#

Yea there’s a ton of exercises in it

mint cloud
#

hey i want book reccs pls

obsidian valley
#

Any specific

#

fields

#

lol

sudden kindle
#

I was told neukirch class field theory is good for class field theory

flint forge
#

Not a ton

#

But a little

karmic thorn
#

Hmmm, should probably resume with Lay's book then.

hasty turret
#

What about linear equations?

karmic thorn
#

It does start with linear equations lol

#

Then matrices and row reduction is presented as a way of solving those equations.

fathom monolith
#

my first introduction to LA was through a DiffyQ and LA mixed textbook for a class of similar structure. The LA section starts by defining what a vector space is and then asking students to prove (aka just verify) if certain definitions of a vector space meet the criteria, and then it goes straight to sub spaces and then eigen values and if you dont know matrix operations then thats your problem.

This is by far the worst structure I have ever seen in my life for introducing it, very few students do well in the LA portion. So much so that the course will just wave that half of the course if you do bad.

#

I then took a senior level LA class this past semester through axlers book and it was pretty fun actually, and made my past confusion seem trivial.

#

Long story short Spaces are a bad starting place imo

gray gazelle
#

LA and DE at the same time sully

fathom monolith
#

very common at engineering focused schools

gray gazelle
#

la

fathom monolith
#

LA before calculus gang rise up

gray gazelle
#

diff eq should go first

#

do it like cambridge

cobalt arch
#

So is aluffi a good intro to cat theory PepoG ?

dapper root
#

I like it, but others will say no

#

it won't be too heavy on it, just use the words and introduce them

#

it gets heavier only in the last 2 chapters

#

I like the book FWIW

cobalt arch
#

What does that abbreviation mean?

dapper root
#

for what it's worth

cobalt arch
#

Oh

dapper root
#

but I'm just a santa hat-wearing chair monkey so

#

¯_(ツ)_/¯

cobalt arch
#

True

#

🎅

#

Well some people think that cat theory can be an introductory course for undergrads. I want to try that out and see where it will lead me..

#

Just because it is assumed that something might be the case doesn't mean it is. After all category theory is a different foundational theory.

dapper root
#

eh

#

For some ppl

#

for most it's just a language you use and a tool

cobalt arch
#

Well I find use in that

dapper root
#

it's hard to get that vibe because internet is full of a lot of cat theory memers

cobalt arch
#

Haha

#

I don't want to sound condescending

#

I am just curious to see if I can learn cat theory and it is something I guess I want to undertake.

valid moth
#

yeah idk about an entire course in cat theory

#

normally seems like you pick it up via other things

cobalt arch
#

Yeah I have heard that a lot that it it is unmotivated to introduce cat theory to undergrads.

ripe granite
obsidian valley
#

I see more UGCT

ripe granite
obsidian valley
#

Forsaken wants to be UGCT, I am judging him

valid moth
#

hscgt

ripe granite
#

what's a ugct

cobalt arch
#

I guess I need it for a conceptual scheme more so than a unifying theory although it tends to the latter as well.

obsidian valley
#

We talked about it the other day

#

undergrad cat theorist

ripe granite
#

oh

valid moth
#

ug cat theist

cobalt arch
#

Undergrad cat theorist

valid moth
#

theist as short for theorist should be mandatory

cobalt arch
#

Well I don't know why it is taboo:)

valid moth
#

"what do you do

im an algebraic number theist"

obsidian valley
#

model theist hmmm

ripe granite
valid moth
#

yes... CT is a nono

obsidian valley
#

It's not taboo perse

cobalt arch
#

I mean it seems so

obsidian valley
#

It's just meme

#

There are qualified HSCT on this server

valid moth
#

pog my uh online college orientation thing starts in half an hour 😳

obsidian valley
#

All of, one or two

#

but

#

For MIT? flonshed

valid moth
#

I'm really wondering if fall 2921 is gonna be in person

#

LOL I meant 2021

#

yeah jesse

obsidian valley
#

cool

valid moth
#

If not idk

#

Gap year maybe

obsidian valley
#

grats on acceptance B)

valid moth
#

Thanks

#

I'm really thinking about gap year

#

Again, I have a friend who graduated last year, and is delaying till 2022

#

pmao

#

lmao*

obsidian valley
#

oh wait did you actly get into MIT

#

I'm just memeing

#

Why not Princeton sully

valid moth
#

yeah I did

obsidian valley
#

oh sick

#

Ok unironic congrats then KEK

valid moth
#

Thanks

obsidian valley
#

thats doxx

#

i wont post KEK

valid moth
#

also let's move to chill sully

obsidian valley
sudden kindle
#

IM a math theorist

#

math theologian

valid moth
#

math theist*

gray gazelle
#

I'm an abstract nonsenser

drifting elm
#

the first book looks like a great calc II book actually

#

$45 on ebay

fossil island
#

$0 as pdf

#

The first book seems more pirated than the second

drifting elm
#

I sometimes buy books

#

I like books

fossil island
#

Yeah I'm mostly joking. I think books are good also in that their presence is looming

#

You look at your desk and see the book

drifting elm
#

oh yeah

#

you can be away from the computer

#

just you and the math

#

face off throw down mono-e-mono

hasty turret
#

Ok,You have some problems

fossil island
#

Yeah the first half of his analysis I book seems like a good intro to proofs class tbh

drifting elm
#

all the stuff on sums but with proofs of why it converges

#

that is pretty popular in calc II I think

fossil island
#

Yeah depends how proofy you like your calc ii

#

I'm actually interested in the difference of this stuff now. My uni offers like a 2 course sequence in analysis but they go over like banach spaces, normed spaces, and hilbert spaces, and then does like functional analysis. So how different is analysis ii by tao to that?

drifting elm
#

watch the video

fossil island
#

Yeah I should do that lol

warped cedar
#

anyone have book recommendations for someone going to math grad school?

#

Just generally perhaps algebra or topology

#

im gonna start applying next year so

#

i got time

#

i just really want it so im trying to figure my shit out now

#

one of my advisors told be I needed to completely master linear algebra so i have been working on getting as strong as possible

winged jewel
#

What book do u guys currently read now?

summer shuttle
#

I flunked highschool maths pretty bad so catching up

#

Honestly I probably wouldn't recommend this book though, its really dry 😩

winged jewel
#

Nice

winged jewel
cobalt arch
#

There is a good book on trig if you want to practice problems a lot Kanoba

summer shuttle
#

Its good, im learning! I just think the explanations could be better 😄 Quite often I'll find my self referring to khan academy an googling stuff

#

Forsaken I'll finish this book an probably buy some books on discrete math 🙂

cobalt arch
#

Okay just wanted to say:)

#

Discrete math by rosen is quite thorough

summer shuttle
#

No worries, I know theres a tonne of material online but I really get a good sense of a achievement when I get through a thick book heh

#

An because I work full time as a developer I dont mind having an excuse to get away from my screens

cobalt arch
#

And the trigonometry book is called trig or treat

#

I know a nice pun

#

Haven't gone through it but it is good if you like thick books

summer shuttle
#

I should do some trig too

#

😄

#

This one?

ebon swan
#

who reads books fucking simps

summer shuttle
#

Nice, good contribution to the discussion

ebon swan
#

your welcome just stop reading and do some man shit

#

like crossfit

#

ive fully read an entire chapter book

summer shuttle
#

Cool man, well done

summer shuttle
#

I work as a VFX artist in the games industry 🙂

#

For one of Activision-Blizzard Subsidiaries

winged jewel
summer shuttle
#

But I want to expand my skill base much more into programming an I failed highschool math real bad

#

😄

ebon swan
#

book no good for mind

#

mind good for me

winged jewel
#

Ye

#

If only nixon read book, he may solve watergate.

#

Nvm u won't understand tho

ebon swan
#

water gate NO REEL

summer shuttle
#

I'll add it to the pile 🙂

viral sonnet
#

any good books for c#?

gray gazelle
#

C#? You mean the language?

grave egret
gray gazelle
#

I mean why would ask on a math server

gray gazelle
wintry edge
#

anyone know of any good introduction books or better yet notes for game theory?

flint forge
#

I think I used osborne

#

It was pretty good

#

Lots of examples and pretty rigorous iirc

sudden kindle
#

There are too many books in this world

#

We need more video lecture series

static crest
prisma snow
#

No, if you watched more video lecture series, you would have less time for the many books

sudden kindle
#

I dont wanna read books

prisma snow
#

Good luck with life

static crest
#

lol, I was gonna say good luck in math

#

but that sounds more right

sudden kindle
#

Thanks

drifting elm
#

john conway invented game theory so maybe read conway

#

you don't like conway?

#

john conway thinks he invented game theory

#

if not him then who

flint forge
#

Lecture series are great

#

And often distill information far more efficiently than a textbook can

drifting elm
#

burn the books

static crest
#

lecture series are fine, but there aren't too many books in this world

#

lecture series are great even

#

it's just not perfect

#

neither are books

#

if the take was "we need more lecture series" not "we need not more books"

#

would've been less dunked

hasty turret
#

Aren't both the same people?

static crest
#

that's certainly a take

flint forge
#

I hope that quarantine leads to a big explosion of online learning materials

#

From profs who don’t take down their lectures on YouTube and lots of recorded online conferences

sudden kindle
#

There has been , but still cant find a good lecture series on class field theory pensivebread

karmic thorn
#

I like lecture series which have accompanying notes and resources. They seem to be more valuable than just going through books or trying to use a random book alongside a lecture series.

ripe granite
# sudden kindle There has been , but still cant find a good lecture series on class field theory...

If K/QQ_p is a finite extension, local class field theory tells us that the abelianization of its absolute galois group G_K ^{ab} is isomorphic to the profinite completion of the units in K. But wait there's more! One can reconstruct:
*the units of the residue field (completed)
*the units of the integers (completed)

▶ Play video
prisma snow
#

Yeah, those poor auditory and kinesthetic learners

sudden kindle
#

We have to force ourselves to read books

drifting elm
#

I prefer books

#

can't pay attention in lecture when it is really slow or I already know the subject matter

#

can't pause when it has something I need to check in a book

#

chalkboard drawings are prone to bad handwriting or errors

#

this is actually backed up by other books on mysticism

#

like 3 artists

#

one is a sculptor with the hands

#

one is a painter

#

one is a musician

#

but why

#

why are they different

#

why do they have a preference

#

why did each pick a different career

#

why not the same

prisma snow
#

Lol, I was joking about the learning styles

drifting elm
#

why not 3 painters 0 sculptors 0 musicians

#

you could argue that these different sensory pathways are like a weighted graph that shows bandwidth for each pathway

flint forge
#

This is not quite true

drifting elm
#

and that the weights are not exactly the same for all individuals

flint forge
#

There are people who find visual intuition essential and people who are medically incapable of visualization

drifting elm
#

ADD is lack of bandwidth

#

but maybe it is only lack of bandwidth in one channel

prisma snow
#

I wouldn't say a lecture series online has the same benefits as actually going to a class. The main benefit imo in lecture series is I can focus on a lecture series for longer, because my concentration needs improving.

flint forge
#

It explicitly does

#

For example it probably disproves your theory that there is an optimal method for every subject

#

It is

drifting elm
#

I think it is much harder to argue that there are no pedagogical consequences of such a discovery

flint forge
#

It’s clearly false as you are stating it lol

#

Hell, there is so much evidence that for example people with ADHD learn better when they are more engaged actively

#

As opposed to straight lecture

prisma snow
#

The optimal method for a blind person to learn real analysis is to read baby rudin. Proof me wrong.

drifting elm
#

how do they do those fonts?

#

is it all latex in brale??

#

THIS IS A BUTTON

flint forge
#

Than the one you tried to make

#

I agree that self reported preferences are probably useless

drifting elm
#

PICTURE OF A CIRCLE

flint forge
#

But it clearly does not argue that there is an optimal learning strategy

#

How one would even try to prove such a thing seems basically insurmountable to me anyway

#

It seems trivially false however

#

Plenty of people have legitimate neurodivergence

#

You literally said it

#

.

#

.

flint forge
#

There’s a big difference between “self reported neuroscience is universally pretty bad”

static crest
flint forge
#

If you translate rudin yourself I’d wager than you’d learn analysis pretty well

#

I don’t see how that’s a response to that

#

I think you are conflating “learning styles” with the fact that different people do indeed learn differently

#

Neurodivergence plays an important role in education

#

And people do in fact need different approaches

#

I agree that the traditional trio is probably useless. The reason I refer to it as self reported is that diagnosed medical conditions do in fact change things

#

And there is evidence to back it up esp in the case of eg adhd/autism

#

The main thing I disagreed with is “there is an optimal way to learn things” because it’s patently false

#

I was addressing a direct quote

#

He seems to think I misinterpreted that direct quote

#

But his interpretation makes no sense to me

#

Conflating that with an optimal method is inherently ableist

#

It’s not

#

One is a fact and the other is normative

#

It literally is

#

Try teaching social cues and subtle mannerisms to someone with autism the way a neurotypical person learns it

#

And you will see that

#

Okay try teaching sculpture to someone incapable of visualization the same way

#

Try teaching matrix algebra to someone with dyscalculia

#

Try teaching giving a lengthy lecture to a room full of people with adhd lol

#

Medically justified learning styles exist and are distinct from what you were arguing against. However the claim that learning can be optimized for the general population is patently false.

#

It’s not just a matter of phrasing

#

“Optimal” versus “optimal for neurotypical people” is an important distinction

#

The former is erasure

#

If that’s the case there was a misunderstanding given that literally interpreted that’s not what your words said lol

#

And I was responding mostly to @sweet lotus for his earlier comment

#

This is what the lengthy response was for

#

It’s not just word choice, it’s wrong.

#

If it was misinterpreted that’s different

#

Yes I agree with this. I understand what you were getting at now.

#

Sorry I misunderstood

marble solar
#

In the math education course I took, we went over research that showed that people learned about the same amount using any of the three methods, despite them claiming to be specialized towards one of the three (tactile/kinesthetic, auditory, or visual)

#

Max brings up a fair point that people with differing learning abilities (ADHD, Autism, dyscalculia, dyslexia, etc.) have slightly different study patterns that optimize

#

I have ADHD/Dyscalculia/Dyslexia

#

The way I study usually doesn't work for most people, so I think Max is correct here

#

I've thought about getting on medication/treatment for ADHD, but I'm worried that I'd have to change my study habits and it can greatly impact my ability to get work done while we experiment with the correct dosage

sudden kindle
#

What are your study habits

marble solar
#

I usually intensely focus on a subject for several hours on end

#

So I'll go four or five hour sessions on PDEs or Knot Theory/geometric topology

#

This is detrimental to most students since you get diminishing returns on studying the same subject for over an hour and a half

#

There's some neuroscience research to back this up somewhere

#

See we agree on things Max!

flint forge
#

I also think adhd meds for adults can cause really noticeable shifts in personality/mood

#

I had really severe depression that coincidentally ended right when I weaned off

#

And yes we do

hearty steppe
#

Yea if you take meds don’t take amphetamines or eugeroics daily. Give yourself off days

#

Or it can mess with your sleep/mood/etc

flint forge
#

Otoh don’t mess w your prescription unless you talk to a doctor

#

Some meds have nasty side effects if you stop taking them

dapper root
#

I just stopped my ADHD meds cold turkery

#

and for about a month I felt like I had to throw up multiple times a day

#

I think I read that's a side effect

#

turns out amphetamines are you know, a drug

#

and you suffer withdrawal pandaThink

flint forge
#

Damn that’s hard to do

marble solar
#

Is it even worth it to start if I've never been on?

valid moth
#

i started like 10 days ago or so maybe

#

tried it a bit and then stopped, now gonna talk to pediatrician and adjust

#

but i did see a glimmer of hope the first day

coral kettle
#

anyone have good recomms for lebesgue integs and measure theory?

stray veldt
#

introduction to measure theory and integration by ambrosio, de prato and mennucci

coral kettle
#

thxthx ill check it out

prisma snow
stray veldt
#

yes

#

my intro measure theory class used the book

fallen monolith
#

all math books look interesting to menene_cwooki

fallen monolith
stray veldt
#

i think so, i didn't always go to class and just used the book

#

since my teacher presented just the book content basically

prisma snow
#

Thanks

fallen monolith
#

ohh i see

#

thx @stray veldt

long anchor
#

how do u guys feel about serge langs undergrad abstract algebra book hmmm

#

im trying to find a good book to self study abstract algebra

gray gazelle
#

do dummit&foote or artin

#

I liked d&f more for intro

long anchor
#

oh yeah artin looked nice thonk

#

oh also what about lee's algebra book ?

#

is that any good ?

gray gazelle
#

never read it, but I think d&f is really good for self study, a lot of examples, exercises and it's wordy, although some people don't like it

long anchor
#

kk ill check it out to see if it like it or nah

prisma snow
#

I am some people

#

Maybe I'm just slow, but I felt like I was making no progress with df when I read it. And it's not like I wasn't understanding, it just took forever

prisma snow
#

At first just course notes, then Rotman

#

And some Hungerford (his undergrad book)

flint forge
valid moth
#

lmao

#

im kind of sad i missed this online event where riehl was going to speak about her life/works-- it was on the 19th so i completely forgot about it

coral kettle
#

ooh thxthx

drifting elm
#

I have a question about learning fourier transform

#

what are the prerequisites

#

is it calc II?

#

or something else

radiant crown
#

Fourier stuff can have many flavours

drifting elm
#

I paid for these books but they are just a bit over my head

radiant crown
#

so it's kind of hard to say

drifting elm
#

I am studying discrete fourier transform and discrete time fourier transform

#

both

#

I need to know laplacian transform

#

but I guess I need calc II first?

#

or linear alg?

#

one thing that keeps messing me up is how to derive sin from $e^{ix}$

hasty eagleBOT
drifting elm
#

how is that even possible

#

this must be part of complex analysis?

static crest
#

you'd probably want calc II and lin alg

drifting elm
#

ok

static crest
#

like those are the bare basics, without them, you're kinda just learning formulas

drifting elm
#

is it just eulers formula?

static crest
#

for a deeper understanding, you'd start wanting complex analysis, and maybe even start delving into functional analysis

drifting elm
#

ohhhh OhNo_cat

static crest
#

say I give you
a = x + y
b = x - y

#

can you find y in terms of a and b?

drifting elm
#

sure

static crest
#

it's doing that, but x = cos, y = sin, a = e^it, b = e^{-it}

#

don't get lost in the symbols, abstract it out to something you can understand at times

drifting elm
#

I guess because I never learned a lot of complex arithmetic

#

only basic angular frequency formula for electrical engineering

#

which is really just a subset of eulers formula

static crest
#

I thought complex analysis was like mandatory in electrical

#

it is here

drifting elm
#

I did not go for EE I am CS

static crest
#

ohh I see

drifting elm
#

CS was cheaper

#

but I self study EE for 10 years

#

had some work related stuff for EE

static crest
#

ya, you'd want to probably learn complex analysis, at least the basics, I'd say

drifting elm
#

my EE library is bigger than my math library or my CS library

#

does tao's books do complex analysis?

static crest
#

I don't think so

drifting elm
#

right

#

papa rudin then

static crest
#

for complex, I'd recommend Ahlfors

#

actually

#

rather than papa rudin

drifting elm
#

this?

static crest
#

ya, it's one of the most standard complex analysis textbooks

#

for undergrad

silver herald
#

I thought Gamelin was the standard Complex Anal. text

static crest
#

idk, around here I've seen Ahlfors used the most, but I did say "one of the" to make sure

#

but even if it isn't the most standard, I can attest to it being a good textbook

drifting elm
#

I need to really start from nothing

#

maybe then linear algebra

#

is there a lin alg book for complex numbers?

#

the DSP books say matrices are only used in state variable filters

#

so maybe I don't need lin alg?

#

never read the part on SVF

static crest
#

lin alg is just good to know, because it always just pops up randomly

#

it's often assumed to be like a baseline of math understanding

#

so even if not directly necessary

#

it's just a very good area of math to just be familiar with

drifting elm
#

but lets say maybe if I was in a hurry to code some fft stuff for a project for work

#

I don't really have time

#

so I would read complex analysis

static crest
#

if you just want to code it up, then you don't need much math at all, but to learn where the fft algorithm really comes from, lin alg is kinda necessary

drifting elm
#

ok

static crest
#

because the dft is often shown via a dft matrix

#

it's not very deep lin alg, mind you

drifting elm
static crest
#

but just being familiar with it is good

drifting elm
#

this book is about group theory, proofs, matrix multiplication

static crest
#

I'd say you'd want to learn lin alg separately, from skimming over the contents, that book is about abstract algebra APART from linear algebra

#

it specifically seems to be avoiding talking about vector spaces and modules

#

so I'd say they kinda expect you to know that from elsewhere?

drifting elm
#

I have 3blue1brown videos

#

watched them all

#

never worked out the examples myself

#

I understand determinants and change of basis

#

so doing ok?

static crest
#

try grabbing a lin alg textbook from somewhere, and work through exercises

#

in each chapter

#

see if you can do them

drifting elm
#

before reading the complex analysis?

static crest
#

if you can't, then it might be a good idea to review that content in the textbook

#

complex analysis doesn't really require lin alg no

#

lin alg is more like a mathematical maturity thing

drifting elm
#

I see

fallen monolith
#

the questions in gamelin's CA is pretty hard i feel

drifting elm
#

fft is also related to e and logs though right?

#

so I should go back to calc books on logs?

fallen monolith
#

and no i havent used LA while working thr the book

static crest
#

fft runtime complexity requires logs, and like any complex analysis with trig will force you to work with e^

#

elementary functions you should definitely be very comfortable with

drifting elm
#

manipulating functions containing e should all be in the calc books right?

static crest
#

usually in pre-calc

drifting elm
#

my school skipped the logs when they teach calc 1

#

so lame

static crest
#

usually elementary functions are part of pre-calc

drifting elm
#

skipped a few chapters 👎

static crest
#

and are assumed knowledge for calc 1

drifting elm
#

precalc did not teach us anything

#

it was algebra

#

I go to a really garbage school

fallen monolith
#

my sch doesnt rly teach math well

#

and everyone around me hates math

static crest
#

you might want to look through basic mathematics by lang, to quickly catch up and refresh some things.
then, I'd go for learning calc 1 and 2
then, I'd try lin alg
and after, I'd go for complex analysis or other higher math (like abstract algebra)

#

this is the order I'd suggest for you

drifting elm
#

I am repeating calc 1

static crest
#

with the first three steps, you'll form a good enough mathematical basis, that you should get a good idea of where to go next

drifting elm
#

because precalc was so garbage at my school

fallen monolith
#

what do u learn in precalc

drifting elm
#

they did not prepare us in precalc

#

I did

#

didn't know my exponent rules or trig identities

#

my calc 1 teacher skipped logs and e

#

I am pissed about that

fallen monolith
#

< learn it on ur own?

drifting elm
#

exactly

#

I do everyday precalc self tests

#

on my own

#

I am going to pass calc 1 easy next time

#

memorizing all the theorems now

fallen monolith
#

well all the best to u

drifting elm
#

I would have gladly studying anything they told me to

#

but they didn't teach me anything

#

yup

fallen monolith
#

smh i feel that studying is rly an individual task. a teacher's lesson can be enlightening and speed things up but it still depends on urself to learn the concepts.

drifting elm
#

I asked the teacher can you explain step by step what you did on the blackboard? he just skipped 5 steps didn't teach exponent rules writes the answer poof

#

precalc did not teach conjugate

#

I used wolfram alpha

#

and studied the calc book a lot

#

but none of the trig identities and exponent rules were in there

#

complete fail

#

teach did not understand my questions

#

didn't help

#

got tutoring from my school but that didn't help

fallen monolith
#

help urself??

drifting elm
#

I didn't understand why I was failing

#

I thought I was stupid

#

or it was just hard stuff

#

I thought if I read the calc book more it will get easier

fallen monolith
#

i feel sorry for uSadCat

drifting elm
#

well I hang out here and I can see where all the math books are

#

I won't be troubled by these things in the future

mossy flume
#

If you wanna help yourself

#

IMO the best resource for anything that comes before calculus is Khan Academy

#

so if you have those holes in your knowledge (like exponent/log rules, trig, etc)

#

go there

#

if you know that stuff honestly calc becomes so so so so much easier

#

cause in 99% of places as far as I can tell

#

calc is taught assuming you know all that stuff

dapper root
gray gazelle
#

Can I has a chmkey nuggie pls

gray gazelle
#

can someone recommend a good book on differencial equations for someone who is learning it for the first time?

drifting elm
#

do you want ODE or PDE?

fathom monolith
#

Im looking to buy myself a math history book for for christmas. I was looking at John Stillwells work, and wondering if anyone had read some of it?

fathom monolith
#

te last one sounds interesting too though

drifting elm
#

this one is %50 math

#

even number chapters are mathy bits and odd are history about the life of rheiman

fathom monolith
#

thanks kurt

drifting elm
#

Dr eulers fabulous formula talks a lot about the clothes the food the attitudes and the musical instruments they played

fathom monolith
#

oh thats not my jive actually

drifting elm
#

very graphic

fathom monolith
#

im interested in the development of math and maybe some fist fights along the way

drifting elm
#

tour of the calculus is about shit posting letters mathematicians send each other

fathom monolith
#

im in done

#

thank you

drifting elm
#

my axiomatic set theory book and also maybe the rhiemann book talk about how dedekind went crazy and ended up in a mental institution because of the bullying that goes with peer review

hidden herald
#

hmm any prerequisites I should ensure I read up before I study classical chevalley groups?

drifting elm
#

terry tao's blog redirects here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_of_Lie_type

In mathematics, specifically in group theory, the phrase group of Lie type usually refers to finite groups that are closely related to the group of rational points of a reductive linear algebraic group with values in a finite field. The phrase group of Lie type does not have a widely accepted precise definition, but the important collection of f...

#

my guess would be complex analysis, group theory, lie algebra

#

but also I know nothing about chevalley till 5 mins ago

ripe granite
#

Has anyone read intersection homology by Kirwan?

#

or know of any good references on intersection homology and D-modules

sage python
#

Next semester I'm taking a class on intersection homology actually

gray gazelle
empty plaza
#

Hi, does anyone know about de Méré problem on division of stakes. I'm reading an English book about history of math, but I am stuck at some parts. I'm not native in English.

hidden herald
#

Oh, it seems to be about probabilities and expected values

#

Basically you divide the pot based on the expected value of winnings for each player

#

@empty plaza

empty plaza
#

Yeah, but I don't know how to interpret this.

#

between the yellow parts.

hidden herald
#

Ah, okay let's say it's best of 9 (but we finish at 9). Then first player is winning 5-1. Who wins?

#

Likewise if the game will end in a coin toss, then the pot should be split evenly.

empty plaza
#

Can you explain more on the "a certain sum belongs to him whether he wins or loses"?

#

My thought is that whoever wins should take all, but this seems a bit contradic.

hidden herald
empty plaza
#

Somehow I get it, but still not clear haha.

#

That certain sum does not necessarily of ratio 5:1 correct?

hidden herald
#

no, the ratio 5:1 is wrong, because in best of 9, even if the first player lost the last 3 games, the first player still won overall.

#

@empty plaza

empty plaza
#

Thanks, after a while I think I get it now.

#

That second rule should be placed first, it make the first easier to understand.

#
  1. If the scores are even, stakes should be divided in half.
  2. If situation guarantees a player always get some certain stakes, he would be guaranteed to received it.

Example: 80$

  • By rule 1 : if (5;5) -> (40$,40$)
  • if (5;4): two cases
    • next game: (5,5) --> (40$,40$)
    • next game: (6,5) --> (80$,0$)
      => By rule 2: First player always get at least 40$ (whether he win or loses the next game)
hasty eagleBOT
midnight oracle
inner charm
#

Mac Lane's Categories for the Working Mathematician, right?

#

hm, any specific recommendations, or will any intro texts do fine?

molten wave
#

not sure... I could never really finish one

prisma snow
#

Lol relatable

#

How mathematically mature are you, Flick? If you haven't done a lot of higher level math, there is a free book 'Topology Without Tears' that is really detailed in its explanations (too much so if you already know a bit, but perfect if you don't). Otherwise, Munkres for topology

inner charm
#

Topology Without Tears it is, then

prisma snow
#

Abstract Algebra, I haven't read it yet, but I've heard good things about Pinter for a first timer.

inner charm
#

I have the mathematical maturity of someone who has no idea what mathematical maturity really is

#

But thanks, i'll look at those! :D

prisma snow
#

Okay, if you feel like you can't understand either of them, you may need to look at a proofs book to teach you how proofs work

inner charm
#

wait, topology without tears is all in sans-serif \😩

static crest
#

if you want an abstract algebra textbook for the not so mathematically mature

#

gallian is decent

karmic thorn
#

Pinter is even more beginner friendly imo.

static crest
#

oh it is?

#

damn

drifting elm
#

woops sorry that was not meant to be a reply

inner charm
#

Oh, did you mean that for someone else or me?

drifting elm
#

I was just posting it to the chat

#

I accidentally replied to someone

#

not meant for anyone specifically

#

I just wanted to say that as a beginner I really liked how easy this book was

#

I never see anyone recommend it

grave egret
#

Can anyone suggest me an introductory topology book?

golden bear
#

Thoughts on Tao’s analysis 1 and 2? Do you think is somewhat appropriate to compare it to Rudin?

grave egret
#

Munkres is real hard for me.

marble solar
#

@golden bear Not comparable to Rudin

#

Pugh is a closer match, or even apostol

gray gazelle
#

Is Rudin the book for analysis MoonBears

marble solar
#

Hrmmm... I'm not a fan

#

I prefer pugh or spivak's calculus depending on your level

gray gazelle
#

Having no background in proofs

marble solar
#

Spivak's calculus

#

You probably need some linear algebra too

gray gazelle
#

I see

#

Thanks !

golden bear
#

@gray gazelle Linear algebra done right Textbook by Sheldon Axler

marble solar
#

That's a good one, that or hoffman and kunze

#

Maybe schaum's outline to linear

grave egret
#

Baby rudin chapters 1 and 2.

#

@gray gazelle I suggest learning proofs and then using rudin.

#

Thats my personal suggestion.

golden bear
#

@grave egret No just learn linear algebra that will teach you proofs

grave egret
#

Like basis and stuff.

#

I don't even know what a basis is I read it and don't really understand it.

marble solar
#

I agree with killer whale ; )

#

the definition is right there!

hasty turret
#

Seems straightforward

grave egret
#

Okay.

golden bear
#

Try harder mate

grave egret
#

5 mins. And another 5 mins reading the next part to see if I understand it.

marble solar
#

You don't get to claim that you don't know the definition when the definition is right there. If you don't understand it, then just fucking memorize it

golden bear
#

if you are trying to understand it in mins you are in one hell of a ride in the math journey

grave egret
#

Oh.

warm socket
#

it would help if the 93/552 thing wasn't hiding stuff

marble solar
#

If you don't understand, memorize definitions, and the statements of theorems

#

It'll help build your understanding

#

That way, even if you're completely lost, you can scrounge something together on the exam

grave egret
#

Maybe I'm too used to calculus, linear algebra and basic analysis.

marble solar
#

One thing in math is you will inevitably hit a wall where it stops being "easy" to see

#

Where/when you hit this wall depends on the person

#

But if you continue in math, you will hit it

warm socket
#

also you are given examples straight away

marble solar
#

^_^

upbeat vine
grave egret
hasty turret
#

If you can't do this with examples,I don't see how you would deal with algebra

#

Or higher math,in general

grave egret
#

The thing is, last time I spent like 20 minutes understanding a theorem till I understood it, I discovered I had picked the wrong book.

hasty turret
#

That means you picked the right book

upbeat vine
#

But as a broader point, texts in topology do suffer from extreme case of reductionism where definitions are invoked with less-to-none context

grave egret
#

I had downloaded real and complex analysis instead of pma.

static crest
#

monkers

grave egret
#

Yeah.

golden bear
grave egret
#

Okay. I didn't know that it was normal to spend longer on theorems.

upbeat vine
#

@grave egret As per my experience, a lot of students skip the introductions or prefaces of math textbooks where ample amount of intuition is provided. Maybe you wanna check that out.

marble solar
#

If you're just encountering new ideas

#

about 30 minute-1hr per page

#

Is a good rule of thumb

upbeat vine
#

Yeah that is the usual suggestion as well. If less than 30-minutes is all you are spending, then you are definitely doing something wrong.

grave egret
#

Okay.

marble solar
#

Something I do sometimes is just go through the text and learn all the definitions/theorems

#

Then go try some exercises

#

Then if I can't do the exercises, I go learn the proof of the theorems

grave egret
#

Maybe that's why I was unsuccessful when I tried to learn gal theory.

upbeat vine
golden bear
#

@grave egret are you a high school or middle school student?

grave egret
#

High school student.

golden bear
#

Suggestion, try to relearn the basics book so from 93/552 go back to 1/552

#

I know it sucks but it will be worth it and your math matuirity will also happy too

grave egret
#

This is something that confuses me about the books,

#

I must confess that I skipped chapter 1 because it was all very similar to most of what I've learnt in discrete math, set theory, other analysis books etc.

upbeat vine
#

Yeah chapter 1 of Munkres just gives you the basic set theory needed for topology.

#

You should be able to understand what topological basis are without going through chapter 1, provided you know basic set theory.

grave egret
#

Oh.

#

I'll try dedicating more time.

#

Nevermind bad analogy because the universal set is only 1.

#

So like all element must be in at least one basis

#

And the intersection of 2 of them contains another basis.

upbeat vine
#

So once you are given a topology, which would be a collection of all open sets, it would sometimes be tedious to talk about a topology by talking about all of its open sets. So say if I want to check if the topology only has infinite open sets, it would be tedious to check if every open set is infinite. So what you want is something that you can handle a little easily but also gives you the complete information of the topology (compare GPS coordinates of your house versus the house address etc, both of them are sufficient to let you get to your destination, but one is easier to handle). This is what basis are for a topology. They are easier to describe and hence handle, but gives the total info about the open sets of a topology. Aka saying something "topological" about the basis is equivalent to saying something topological about all the open sets.

drifting elm
upbeat vine
#

Baby rudin; "principles of mathematical analysis"

drifting elm
#

oh right

#

more than one code word for that book now

upbeat vine
#

i havent heard pma before tho

drifting elm
#

baby rudin

golden bear
#

i only heard of Rudin

#

I don't use baby rudin

#

I just say rudin

grave egret
#

Yes baby rudin.

upbeat vine
#

but there are three classical analysis books by rudin

drifting elm
#

my axiomatic set theory book talks about how there are different paradigms for set theory that are incompatible

#

I shit my pants

#

never heard of zermelo before

upbeat vine
#

dont shit ur pants pls

drifting elm
#

imagine reading a book on set theory and not once being told that it is actually based on zermelo set theory

hearty steppe
#

Wdym

drifting elm
#

like imagine learning the english language but never hearing the word "english" only the word "language"

#

then thinking there is only one language and also not even knowing the name of the language you speak

gray gazelle
#

ok?

timber mesa
quick hornet
#

its more like

#

most mathematicians dont care

#

zfc works as a framework so its used

#

if a problem was found in it, it'd be repaired, another letter would be added to zfc, and we'd move on with our lives

#

mathematicians dont really think about foundations much unless thats their specific area of research

hearty steppe
#

zfc?

quick hornet
#

the zermelo-fraenkel set theoretic axioms together with choice.

#

so its less like not knowing about different versions of english, and more like not realizing that brits and americans spell "colo(u)r" differently

#

although even that isnt really accurate since

#

you actually have to think about spelling in your day-to-day life

#

most mathematicians dont need to think about foundations except perhaps to handwave "yeah oops these are actually classes not sets but w/e"

#

so perhaps it's more like not realizing that you aspirate your "p"s and "t"s

drifting elm
#

it was not clear from the book that I don't need to worry

#

so obviously I paniced

quick hornet
#

well you need to worry if you care about foundations

#

and a book on formal set theory certainly should touch on that

drifting elm
#

I thought that I would need to learn all the different ones

#

it makes me feel better that I can relax and not worry about ancient dead ends of math history

#

actually while we are on the subject I found some stuff on modern classical umbral calculus

#

is this a complete waste of time?

slender dragon
#

Do you know some really introductory good book about Module Theory?

gray gazelle
warped cedar
gray gazelle
#

¯_(ツ)_/¯

static crest
#

ya

#

d&f specifically has a little unit on modules

#

but it's a common thing to see

#

in a lot of abstract algebra texts

#

here's what's covered in d&f modules

#

if you wanna know

sage python
#

Wait that's not D&F's font

timber mesa
#

probably a newer edition of D&F? I ordered one recently

static crest
timber mesa
static crest
#

d&f font is pretty well known it seems lol

#

everyone instantly realizes when it's not d&f font

sage python
#

Well I know D&F lol

static crest
#

not just you, it's been a couple of people lately that noticed that the screenshots I was sending was not d&f font

sage python
#

Ah

gray gazelle
#

Do you even know algebra if you don't know the d&f font?

drifting elm
#

secret handshake of math

gray gazelle
#

you can tell when a screenshot is out of d&f because it will be 90% text

#

with no space

static crest
slender dragon
#

I have that book, I just wanted to know if there was more options

#

Thanks

calm crane
#

(see pinned message)

worldly basalt
#

Any book recommendation for Data structures and algorithms??

stray veldt
#

CLRS

worldly basalt
#

Could you me a name that I could libgen

stray veldt
#

Introduction to Algorithms is a book on computer programming by Thomas H. Cormen, Charles E. Leiserson, Ronald L. Rivest, and Clifford Stein. The book has been widely used as the textbook for algorithms courses at many universities and is commonly cited as a reference for algorithms in published papers, with over 10,000 citations documented on ...

worldly basalt
#

Thanks

broken meadow
#

oh yea that book seems p good so far

#

i need to read more of it

static crest
#

CLRS is very good

quartz pawn
#

Y'all have thoughts on AOCP , Knuth's books?

gray gazelle
#

I need to read Knuth's books

fathom monolith
#

That alg book is legit incredible

molten wave
#

even I've read CLRS and we don't study in english

hearty steppe
#

Isn’t CLRS pretty basic?

#

That’s like for an intro to algo course

abstract helm
#

if a guy computes, can we call him a computer

night knot
#

Any book recommendation for Data structures and algorithms??
Since CLRS was already stated, I'll throw in Algorithm Design by Kleinberg and Tardos

wooden sparrow
gray gazelle
#

maybe silberschatz for databases (at least i think it is better than the cow book)

silver herald
#

Well okay then, Finite State Automata it is

gray gazelle
#

metal gear rising hmmm

hasty turret
#

Nanomachines son

silver herald
molten wave
#

@fast portal hopcroft

hidden herald
#

karp

drifting elm
#

I seems to cover a lot for a first book on the subject

#

with an appendix for noobs and another appendix for advanced

#

nice notation guide in the beginning

lusty jacinth
#

Is basic high school math (no calculus) the only prerequisite needed to understand intro to linear algebra 5e by Gilbert strang ?

velvet briar
#

Yes

lusty jacinth
#

Would one need mathematical maturity to truly understand it?

velvet briar
#

Nah you're probably pretty okay

#

Keep in mind it's not the only source out there

lusty jacinth
#

Yeah, I got it to pair with the mit ocw course...

velvet briar
#

Many people take a more "applied" linear algebra course

lusty jacinth
#

Oh

velvet briar
#

Where Strang may not be useful

lusty jacinth
#

Are there any video lectures you’d recommend?

velvet briar
#

If you are in an applied course
3b1b's linear algebra series is fantastic

#

Not a set of courses, but an animated attempt to try to make the concepts natural. It pairs well with a book

lusty jacinth
#

Oh okay, so since I’d be missing out from some of the application by reading strang what other books or videos would you recommend as supplement

#

I tried khan academy but it seemed like a lot of stuff just wasn’t there

velvet briar
#

Nah Khan can do lin alg as well

lusty jacinth
#

Huh, okay

#

Well thanks

velvet briar
#

I was suggesting the opposite, that strang might be too in depth. If you feel like you can still do it, why not?

lusty jacinth
#

oh okay, no I intend to go with the course

velvet briar
#

Oh nvm Strang is an applications book haha

#

For some reason I thought it wasn't

#

Yeah that is a good pairing

lusty jacinth
#

Nice

#

I’ll check out the linear alg playlist form 3b1b

#

Thanks again

velvet briar
#

Np. Feel free to ask if you want anything else

livid ermine
#

3blue1brown is based

silver herald
grave egret
#

I remember learning LA using 3b1b it makes it so easy.

warped cedar
#

3b1b is great

#

if you are looking for an actual book id recommend lang

#

he has a couple go for the introduction to linear algebra if you are starting

#

i like books thats why id recommend it

mossy flume
#

I need to learn some surface level linear algebra over break

#

I'm doing a proof based lin alg course next sem and I know 0 linear algebra

#

Probably gonna grind khan academy and the 3b1b videos for a conceptual overview

marble rock
#

what do you guys think of the textbook topology and geometry

#

by glen e bredon

#

i read uptill compactness and hausdorff spaces in simons

#

i wanna learn topology

#

is it good for atleast just the use of the first chapter to learn point-set?

#

it looks harder but is this an upshot that its harder or is that bad

#

it looks dense

#

and like hard hitting def thm style so what do u guys think

flint forge
#

If you want to learn point set I recommend Hatcher’s notes or Topology: a categorical approach

#

Maybe both

hearty steppe
#

I thought you liked Munkres

marble rock
#

the thing is i learned about like half point set but then i noticed my textbook doesnt have quotient spaces

#

im missing out connectdness and thats it

#

should i keep going with tmy text and learn quotient spaces from outside

#

or

#

?

#

the motivation is to learn algebraic top

#

i am using hatchers notes as another source

#

already

flint forge
#

I never liked minored

#

I used to think munkres was the best textbook

#

I changed my mind

static crest
#

what's the best now

flint forge
#

Topology a categorical approach is very good imo

#

But I haven’t met anyone who used it as a first text

static crest
#

is it good for like a first course in it

flint forge
#

So it’s hard for me to be too confident

#

But the pov is provides is ideal for doing math I care about

static crest
#

I see, I wanna delve into some topology at some point next year

flint forge
#

And it’s way less dry

static crest
#

maybe I'll check it out

flint forge
#

I think that it is at the very least a great companion to a more traditional approach to topology

#

So you can see why certain point set defns are the way they are

#

Like I think things like box v product topology make way more sense from the pov of universal mapping properties

unkempt grove
#

hi hi
im currently reading needham's vca and he does some interesting stuff with cubics. what books do you recommend to go more in depth? (depressed cubics, vietes cosine formula, finding roots by intersection of x^3 and a line, etc)

marble rock
#

for some1 who wants to do AT

#

and have no problems with the T part

#

how much topology should u know

#

or like up to what concepts

timber mesa
# static crest is it good for like a first course in it

it's probably good for a second course or for review (I might use it for review myself soon), it's very short so it skims over important stuff. For a first course I'd use Topology Without Tears or the first few chapters of Munkres.

abstract helm
#

if a guy computes, can we call him a computer

drifting elm
#

the computer we talk about today was at that time referenced as automatic computers

#

so the first automatic computer programmers were both women

#

so when you say my computer is acting strange just check what year it is before you say something offensive

#

if time travel ever gets invented in the future

hasty turret
#

idk why anyone would have wanted to be a computer

drifting elm
#

it was a shit job

hasty turret
#

That seems like a braindead job,ngl

drifting elm
#

at that time the wage gap was real

#

so it was an actual example of sexism

#

also 80 years ago

#

funny thing is though

#

they eventually became smarter than men

#

because they had access to computers

#

the men had all the money so it was an interesting case of guy with money doesn't know how to use a computer

warped cedar
#

thoughts on Taos analysis books?

drifting elm
#

my opinion so far is that they are well written and presented. well organized. beginner friendly.

#

and actually you will be wanting more when you get to the end

#

they are extremely on topic

raw herald
#

Its nice reading, like its one of those books that you don't dread reading

gray gazelle
#

Hmm

#

what about rudin's

#

I started Rudin, so far two proofs it's like he pulled things out of his (bleep) with no further explanation.

#

Is there pre-req for Rudin's?

golden bear
gray gazelle
#

that's not useful, I mean is there knowledge required to know before tackling Rudin?

molten wave
#

it's not really specific knowledge

#

it's just experience with mathematical objects in general

#

and various proof tactics