#book-recommendations
1 messages · Page 215 of 1
the books are there for anyone who wants to know the answer
if you don't want to know then don't read the book
I think I learn more reading professional proofs without errors
that way I know how it should be done
I still learn a lot
Yea but like exercises and HW are still valuable
And imo more valuable than just reading along
Any books on the laws of algebra of sets?
Do I need Boolean algebra for proving such laws?
@cobalt arch are you looking for a book on set theory?
or group theory
or number theory
or abstract algebra
Hm
number theory is the creation of sets that satisfy some algebra
For example I need a book that covers the algebra of sets like the idempotent law.
Do I need any abstract algebra for basic set algebra? For example the idempotent law is a magma equipped with multiplication.
and abstract algebra covers group theory but also there is more stuff in abstract algebra
no you do set theory first
this is the basics
set theory before number theory
Yeah but the basics are built on top of these more abstract objects
set theory is easy if you already know boolean algebra
But not the other way around?
learning set theory without boolean algebra is harder
Okay
you are learning two things at the same time that makes it hard
group theory is a more advanced area of discrete math
Because a magma is a groupoid but my knowledge halts there.
boolean is easy
that is all abstract algebra you know already
but also group theory
I learned group theory first before magmas monoids groupoids
before rings and fields it was just groups
Aren't fields more basic?
groups are the most basic
Hm I see do they have only one operation?
but you get that in an abstract algebra book anyway
depends how you look at it.
in abstract algebra you can have many operations on a group
you can have sets of operations or groups of operations
it can get crazy
In what aspects are groups the most basic structures?
Actually let's not start this convo
I know it can get pretty deep
you learn addition and subtraction in an advanced math class
but like as if you are a lawyer proving 2+2=4
Haha sounds silly but it isn't 
natural numbers are a group
- is an operation on a group
prove that the natural numbers are closed under addition
2 + 2 = 4 is a definition though
given by the definition of +
on N or Z
so u cant really prove it :c
right
so lawyer is screwed
you can prove that 4 is a natural number though
well, it's a natural number by definition
an alternate proof for why 4 is a natural number is 2+2=4
you can prove it's distinct from 1, 2, and 3 though
Okay too much info I need a starting point.
google that
Hahaha
true story
w0t
banned for saying 2+2=4?
@cobalt arch probably just start with a discrete math book?
afk
So a discrete math textbook like rosen's covers Boolean algebra? I need to learn what a magma is 
can we not post alt right recruitment rags
yes people on twitter say dumb things all the time in the name of "wokeness"
whats magma :0
i still wont trust claims from TPM that people are being "banned" because of it
anyway, back to the topic at hand
i would be very surprised if a discrete mathematics textbook does not cover boolean algebra
but they may not use that term
they may use terms like "propositional logic" or similar
those who call it "boolean algebra" tend to be targeted at CS students and will use the notion + for OR and * for AND
those who call it "___ logic" tend to be targeted at math students and will use the notation ∨ for OR and ∧ for AND
it doesnt really make a difference
imagine not using + for XOR, the more logical choice
$\oplus$ for XOR is more common
Chillin' with Quillen
even if it makes less sense when regarding it as a magma
I meant for cs, I know they use + for OR (because they did in my courses)
I was not a fan
real CS students use ^ for xor 
fine, but programming is applied CS
ok, but you dont go to uni for cs to learn how to code, they're teaching the theory
Programming is not CS
right but depending on how programming-heavy the CS class you're taking is you might use ^ for xor instead of circle +
although i guess xor is a pretty theoretical thing and u normally arent writing it in code
i used it out of spite yesterday
anyway i agree that + for XOR "makes the most sense", at least from an algebraic perspective
but CS students/programmers never really look at it from an algebraic perspective
i guess != is just an xor
so whatever
you use xor when doing bit manipulation stuff
which can either be very common or very rare
depending on what you do
yeah
meh, i guess if varA and varB are true-false booleans, then varA ^ varB and varA != varB are the same thing
i prefer the former but maybe thats just my math sensibilities
I prefer the latter
because it's more clear
to others
and compilers do all the magic anyways
as long as you're not coding in infinite for loops, compilers will optimize it well enough
all the small details can be ignored
!= is slightly different in that it treats any number not 0 as 1
Imagine not using infinite loop spaces
which is more useful if you arent manipulating bits
you can just leave the the last empty
for(;;)
yes
listen i havent wrote c-style code in literally ever
i think i also forgot to declare i an int
but for(;;) doesnt loop until overflow does it?
;;
it loops endlessly
lame
while loops can lead to overflow?
personally i determine how large my ints are
by looping until they overflow
this is the most efficient method trust me
I find my floating point epsilon by running ODE simulations on various step sizes
plotting the errors
and finding where the errors start increasing due to floating point errors
you can just maximize |1 - sin^2 x - cos^2 x|
thats what i said smh

warning: iteration 2147483646 invokes undefined behavior [-Waggressive-loop-optimizations]

heh
if you change to unsigned it optimizes out
the true chad is to have a loop to constantly push into the stack
until you hit the heap
then continue as usual
you will probably hit some library's shared memory mapping first
true chads will use size_t
true

the stack has a guard page on the bottom end of it
when you hit it, the kernel expands your stack
oh does it?
until it can't
ahh
then it segfaults
the only dumb stack stuff i do is changing rbp and rsp directly lol
change those to point to heap and have fun stuff happen
have you ever called 32-bit code from 64-bit and vice versa
oh god yes
size_t is just so iterator size is never larger than the maximum array index possible in the system
it's more generic
across systems
size_t D:
people trying to come up with CPU architectures suitable for efficient functional programming: noooo you can't do that you have to run on stock hardware
javascript:

I think it's less that you can't do that, it's just that new architectures really have no ecosystem to work in
whats a good math textbook that is gamer friendly
love it, thank you
why did I not know about this before
You were simply not based enough
nvm it's not very good, someone learning algebra for the first time wouldnt understand what's going on
it would be funny if there was a book written in a similar style that you could actually learn algebra from
What kind of background would someone need to get into Homotopy Type Theory?
a traumatic experience in your past
Does taking an intro to CS course with 5 years of programming experience count?
Quality exchange
can anyone tell me some good probability and set/number theory books
I want to qualify for the amc
aime*
10a
in grad school do I need to get books like Papa Rudin or Royden?
You don't need to buy them necessarily
I have papa rudin already but are they prerequisites to take in grad school?
It's probably good to learn that material while in grad school
or better, before grad school
Yeah optimal would be before, I guess I assume this guy is in his 4th year lol
I haven't applied to grad school yet I am still at the workforce :^)
nice, me too
inb4 you haven't even gone to ug
I graduated from ug for quite some time
but as an applied science major :^)
so I am looking at doing some pure maths, currently at Spivak Calculus, and all
$$\oplus;\otimes$$
\opus 
galois
in programming we have && & | || but they are not the same
I see $\oplus$ for operations in abstract algebra but I see $\otimes$ in CS books
galois
galois
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
galois
sorry
I see oplus mostly in linear algebra and otimes for tensor products
@maiden gust try the aops books
do past AMC practice tests
all the past questions are on aops too
Can you guys recommend a good textbook for topology? Undergrad level/easy if that's a thing...
it might help to be vaguely familiar with like, basic topology in R^n or metric space stuff
just so it doesn't seem like the topics are coming out of nowhere
yeah ideally you go into topology knowing the topology used in basic analysis of R^n
it isnt necessary
but it helps motivate a lot of stuff
and makes it so you can spend less time thinking about it when it comes up in examples
since you already know how they work
in terms of strictly necessary prerequisites, just proofs really
and mathematical maturity naturally
and particularly, probably only ch2-4, and bits of 5-8 are useful
(well, probably other parts are useful as well, but those parts are not what munkres is known for)
i guess the other "pre-req" is, what is even the motivation for point set topology? i do not totally know this either, i guess to avoid annoying arguments about epsilons and deltas. but assuming this is the true reason, this is probably a good think to keep in mind (how does my topological argument simplify all the epsilon delta bullshit that i would have to keep track of otherwise with metrics? assuming the spaces i'm working with are metrizable in the first place)
well epsilonics dont even necessarily make sense for some constructions
eg topological continuity
yet continuity in abstract topological spaces still keeps its "important" properties, e.g. continuous image of compact set is compact
I'm looking for comprehensive, introductory textbooks which cover ordinary and partial differential equations. Any suggestions?
Yeah, I'm looking for proof-based ODE/PDEs.
Oh, okay, will check them out. Thanks!
Differential Equations with Applications and Historical Notes, GF Simmons
@karmic thorn for really good ODEs textbook I recommend ODEs Basics and Beyond by Schaeffer/Cain, only prerequisites are basic real analysis and linear algebra. It has a lot of problems as well.
(If you don't remember linear algebra/real analysis there are also appendices that cover those)
Will check them out, thanks! Glazing across MO and MSE makes a strong case for Arnold's texts, but I'll check out all of these.
Because you are an engineer
Engineer? lol just do Erwin Kreyszig's book
Simmons seems to fit in my budget, might be the one I settle for.
Oh
Which one do you suggest, then?
I already have a copy of Tenenbaum but it's kinda meh.
His Advanced Engineering Math book?
Or is there one on DEs?
Damn.
I have copies of Riley, Hobson and Bence as well as Boas
Can they suffice?
RHB is thicc
Oh, I see.
I find Boas to be very clearly written, but maybe not as rigorous or comprehensive.
2 months No
2 sems yes
Aah.
Ohh I'm leading that life too
This is my syllabus for this sem
Haven't even touched probability and statistics and exam is at the end the year
higher calculus 
WOW i was LITERALLY just about to come in here and ask about diff eqs books
Lucky day.
You are lucky on this holy day
are you indian
People deducing from spelling errors that I'm an Indian
I don't know if that's a good thing or bad
i am lucky on this wholly day
You are whole on this lucky day
Hey if I was curious about graph theory where should I start
A Walk Through Combinatorics by Miklos Bona is very well written imo. You could check it out.
Thanks!
@worldly basalt is that for a systems and signals class?
We are required to take this in 3rd sem
That's engg math 3
Have already done 1 and 2 in previous sems

well
kreyszig is not bad
but meh
i already annihilated your mom's #❓how-to-get-help
but my ODE course uses Kreyszig as main book

no
i am mathematician
ok economist
by smell
Damn Bro how did you finish Diestal??
By far the hardest book I ever read
Its so dense
huh, i've worked out of diestel and i didnt find it that hard
he wasnt very explicit with his proofs mind
but i never found the things he skipped particularly hard to show
im curious what math books youre comparing it to if it's the "hardest"
well mostly math competition book but also rudin and the like
huh, im surprised you considered diestel harder than rudin
different strokes i guess
some serious titu books as well. The problems felt quite hard in deistal
someone tell me what rudin book everyone is talking about. there are 5 books
there are two more books
labeled I and II
Definitely.
rudin is more difficult than tao right
Intro to analysis?
Why go with difficult books during intro though? Do you learn more stuff from it?
My thoughts: if you want to jump into Rudin just do it. If after two weeks or so you’re just still “holy shit this sucks wtf is going on” try an easier book and come back to it later if you feel like it
If the potential worry of purchasing two books is a deterrent to this, there are ways around this which I don’t think we’re supposed to talk about. But I suggest you be creative

We are trying to move away from it I tihnkn
We may try to enter some discord program
which would require us to end talk of 🏴☠️
Anyone that has read both of jech's books on axiomatic set theory?
ah I see
When we say books do we mean actual literature or textbooks
what's the difference?'
Books as in math books, textbooks mostly
what do you mean, they're both made up
anyone have any insightful books on becoming a polymath
I guess diestel looked sort of dry to me
I think I did the first chapter then I was like meh
is there a way we can set up speedruns for textbooks and completing problems? like I want to know the %any time of Calculus on Manifolds
calculus on manifolds
one day
wouldnt a textbook any% just be completing the last problem
in that case an any% would be like
skipping all the exposition and proofs
and just reading definitions and theorems
*understanding it
that can be another category
crap, this is not turning out to be a good idea
yeah that's true. i just want to know how long would it take to get through spivak's calculus on manifold (reasonably understanding it)
ok i think i need to burn calculus on manifolds, he literally puts indexing for R_n vectors at the TOP
okay there you told him
spivak's book doesn't actually use einstein notation to its full extent 
so the later parts on differential forms are filled with big sums
nobody tell algebraic geometers
i mean commutative algebraists
my PDEs course has the best notation
the two ~ indicate this is an approximation by discretizing in two ways
i is the index of discretization in time
k is the index of discretization in space
if they tried they could squeeze another index inside the "u"
How introductory 
Introductory like I don't even name what a model is
Oh...
Enderton?
I guess
or Ebbinghaus
I like Enderton but someone here really likes Ebbinghaus
Just their "mathematical logic" books, you start dealing with models proper in Ch.2 of enderton
Uh
Apparently the standard text for proper model theory is Hodges
It scares me.
I mean, have you done much mathematical logic?

You can't say Hodges isn't scary 
Oh

Hence it is standard
What's the standard one

I am doing it and don't mind if I need to do more of it
idk I think it's probably best to start with a textbook on logic broadly before focusing on model theory
¯_(ツ)_/¯
Ultra knows better than me for sure though
well first you start with jacobson
yeah learn algebra 
He has a book for that
That's the real move
You mean mathematical logic right
I thought Jacobson has LA and Abstract Alg books
The MT textbooks I've skimmed (3 of them) all use a lot of examples from algebra
so if you don't know algebra it'll be 
MT?
model therory
Ultra tell us
Give wisdom

Whats the standard intro text
is there evne one

What is CK
Why do you want to do model theory
That's because I want to learn some areas on philosophy wich requires logic and other category and model theory. So I am doing math homework before to get started on the real point
A philosopher 
there are fields of philosophy that require knowledge of high level math? :0
There are some areas like philosophy of language who prereq high level modal logic and on philosophy of space-time wich use this a lot in some ways
oh yeah makes sense
the modal logician at my school also teaches the philosophy of language course
I'll probably take it 

Thoughts on Chomsky?
It's like this what I mean
Another south american model theorist
what the hell is going on
Why are you all from Brazil
KEK
Every model theorist on twitter is south american I swear to god
idk anything about wittgenstein but chomsky seems cool
chomsky grammars feel kinda mathy
but apparently he didnt study math at all
Back in 1985 the American graph theorist Frank Harary gave a seminar that he began with an anecdote about Chomsky. Chomsky and he were out for a walk when Chomsky said that he thought that it was time that someone should develop a mathematical theory for studying connections, with objects being vertices and relations between them represented as edges!
source: https://www.quora.com/How-much-mathematics-does-Noam-Chomsky-know
well apparently he didnt study enough math to know what graphs were
@sweet lotus does CK requires lots of pre knowledge to get full read?
Algebra or smh
yo anyone have a recommendation for a measure/probability theory book?
This might be good
Not that I have read it, but I have wondered about reading stanford math 230 lecture notes
Measure Theory from what I have read so far seems like cancerous integration ad infinitum
not sure if this does smth with prob tho
is there a "classic"/best textbook for learning about complex systems?
A lot of what I've tried to investigate myself just via googling all seems very handwavy
95% of the stuff on youtube/random blogs on complex systems just sounds like corporate speak tbh
Any good recs for Stochastic Processes?
Sheldon Ross, Stochastic Processes
@still umbra for control theory or FFT?
People, next semester I'm going to start my first course of Linear Algebra, in my local bookstore I have this options for books, Linear Algebra and its Applications by David C. Lay, Linear Algebra by Grossman and A modern introduction of linear algebra by David Poole. BTW: At my university they recommend Anton H. Linear Algebra and Strang Linear Algebra, but I can't find them in my lenguage.
Control theory is one aspect of complexity systems theory
right but is this as a prerequisite for fourier analysis or something else?
you want ODE and PDE books
Applied complexity theory to economics will probably be the end goal
then control theory book
yeah, I'm taking a PDE class this semester
I have two signals and systems books
they both cover discrete and continuous systems
I basically want to prepare/prestudy the content for this unit
I could email the lect
I'm guessing you want to skip discrete time fourier
so my books would not be right for yu
my books are for CS and EE
ty
Mathematical sociology is the area of sociology that uses mathematics to construct social theories. Mathematical sociology aims to take sociological theory and to express it in mathematical terms. The benefits of this approach include increased clarity and the ability to use mathematics to derive implications of a theory that cannot be arrived...
I know nothing about this but it looks like it is closer to your goals
possibly
you probably want stochastic processes
I don't know if complex systems is even the right word
hmm
I don't know enough
A complex adaptive system is a system that is complex in that it is a dynamic network of interactions, but the behavior of the ensemble may not be predictable according to the behavior of the components. It is adaptive in that the individual and collective behavior mutate and self-organize corresponding to the change-initiating micro-event or co...
What field of study would you say these ideas come from
If you're familar
They've come up in some papers I've read
"The study of complex adaptive systems, a subset of nonlinear dynamical systems"
so there
that describes a very specific area of math
some terry tao stuff
nonlinear dynamical systems
How do I get help for math in this place
post in a questions channel
Great question, if only there was a dedicated channel for that
maybe you get someone maybe you don't
either way keep it over there
nonlinear dynamics is in fact dynamics
oh nice
so presumably, I should start with the book in #books-old
Introduction to Dynamical Systems
by Brin
Well, maybe
reading that book will take awhile
are you already familiar w basic point set topology and measure theory?
🤦
No, haven't learnt that yet
Those are prerequisites for brin/stuck
I'm doing a topology unit next semester too x)
but I doubt it will be much help for reading a book now
lel
it looks like thats no exactly what you want though
it seems like this isn't really a very organized field
i'd look for like a survey text or something specifically about this
a book for your book
Hi
Anyone online
no
everyone is offline.
@gray gazelle then what are you
offline.
I'm offline as well
we've always been offline
don't question
Hi...
wake up, it's been years
we miss you
please


@gray gazelle if you have a question, just read #❓how-to-get-help and ask
BUT I DO NOT WANT TO WAKE UP
They weren't talking to you. We prefer you sleeping forever.
but i am not sleeping neither
The current time for Commander Vimes is 10:26 PM (+06) on Wed, 16/12/2020.
TTerra is 11 hours behind, at 11:26 AM (EST) on Wed, 16/12/2020.
sleeping at 10 pm 
what is sleeping
It's fun
спать

i dunno what спать means
🤨
It's cunt in Russian
no
It is
cunt in russian is lunasong
Finally the origin of my name is known
what's a good book on abstract algebra?
see pinned
pinned where?
oh lol
i'm blind
artin refers to this one right https://www.pearson.com/us/higher-education/product/Artin-Algebra-2nd-Edition/9780132413770.html
Yeah
Anyone have a pdf link for APPLIED NUMERICAL ANALYSIS USING MATLAB
2nd edition
Author: FAUSETT ?
Have you looked on libgen?
:(
I got my copy of Knots and Links
First exercise I try is a commutative diagram
: (
Get rekt
: (((((
I actually had something in algebraic curves, and I was the only one in the class to draw a commutative diagram
Ok
Take that algebraists
Lmao
I think on the first day
We had a quiz to state the first isomorphism theorem
That prof. did everyday quizzes
So you'd come in, 5 minute quiz
It was either you got it or you didn't
IDK even know why they bother teaching them after the second
They’re useful
It's much more general than groups
Third is more useful than first
And the lattice one is more important than either of those
Anytime you have a sufficiently complicated algebraic structure
elman?
yA ofc
he also had a gauss poster iirc
What's funny brofibration, is my grad algebraic curves prof. had the same thesis advisor as Elman
Their styles were very...similar
Who tf is this brofibraruon guy
all I know there is some junior at UCLA who knows a scary amount of math
right, like dami
Dami’s a sophomore I think
artistic license
You go to LA, and you see kids taking grad courses sophomore year and you begin to think it's normal
Isn’t that normal?
I most probably won't lmao, im no probability theorist by ive got a 0% chance of getting in
try first quarter freshman year lmao
If you have 0% I have -1%
Oh are there more freshman that do that now bro?
And I want to believe I at least have epsilon%
It used to be Connie would make you wait till sophomore
yup
not if you've got multiple IMO medals
Shut up Arch
what if they never studied algebra in hs and then did commutative algebra first year
Lol wut
galois theory first semesterr
someone
Galois?
no
I mean, That seems kind of plausible
no galois theory
Hegel/Sloth/Moth/whatever they go by now
They’re still in HS tho...
ms*
Are you done with finals bro?
congrats chmonkey lol
need to do a history essay ffs
Okay brofibration wtf class are you taking
Teo ruiz?
226C third quarter grad RG?
spectral AG
Are you in 227?
237
Ah ok
They’re offering a spectral AG course?
topics in alg top
Yeah, UCLA runs advanced topics courses all the time
And you’re taking it junior year and you have 0% chance to get into Columbia
-_-
Sure
UCLA mindset, you're always surrounded by people that are miles ahead of you
No matter what level you are at
This is crap you study in like 4th year of your PhD lmao
you wont say that once you know about a lot of the other juniors lmao
Or 3rd
Even the top people feel like you're not at the top
Does that apply to tao?
I’m gonna go do Hartshorne
I bet Tao felt off
Given that he was like 14
Altho his undergrad wasn’t a crazy one
At a crazy uni I mean
Usually smaller schools do a better job of mentoring students
well yea, he probably wanted to go somewhere close to home
As everyone could recall, the way professors at LA treat students is less than great lol
as he was 14
Given that he was a kid
Yeah
So I just mean he probably wasn’t surrounded my monsters
you just got sniped
You could be a literal genius and they'll still shit on you for not being able to do X fast enough
sleep
||For John it was Visan in Harmonic, but you didn't hear that from me Bro||
johnDS
you do seem to be a pretty strong applicant, you shouldn't be too worried. My application has quite a few weak points in it
also, I did not talk to any profs during my second year (because I'm an idiot), so I might be screwed on the rec letters part of it
also underperformed on my REU, so yeah unless I do something over the next 2 quarters I will end up with a very mediocre application
ample time to prove quantum ergodicity conjecture
Fortunately, the option of doing a masters and re-applying to phd programs does exist.
wdym
There’s a few more that do I think
But I want to go to Columbia which is maybe a tier down
I mean I think one saving grace i hbe is that my gpa overall is still > 3.9
Outside of math too
nah getting into chicago or berk is insanely hard
Which isn’t true for some. But idk if thag really matters Much
Idk how much they look at non-math gpa
easy and hard aren't well defined anyway
I was wondering if you meant undergrad or grad for a sec lol
I feel like at some level it becomes sorta up in the air? Like I def know people who got rejected by Chicago but got into Princeton, etc
Overall Princeton's probably a bit rougher though
I mean define super
Okay that's likely a bit more true, esp if we include UCLA as top 10
even at UCLA, which isnt a hard school to get into, there's at least 5 people in my year with very competitive applications
5 people just at UCLA
But there are def tiers below "grad classes freshman year" which the typical good applicant has to worry about
there's a lot more unis
I don't have a good read on Chmonkey's level so if he's knocking on the door of that then he's prob fine
But e.g. I was learning grad level analysis my second year
there's probably a lot more at places like mit, princeton, chicago
So the year I entered at Chicago there were 13 people who started right away in honors analysis
you all worry too much about this imo
just go learn math and stop caring about others
UCLAs intake is approx 20-30 grad students per year. If that's the average intake, then that's approx 200-300 spots in the top 10
I think Chmonkey's only applying this round to Columbia which is gonna be especially rough this time around
Yup
So full disclosure it might not look pretty. But I mean he's got another year
And even if he doesn't get into Columbia he'd be fine at e.g. Wisconsin
I mean I did that knowing that’s the case
I understand what you're feeling bro, it's so demoralizing when everyone around you feels like they're miles ahead of you no matter what; you'll probably get into a quality program Bro
yeah but it's probably a good idea. I can't do it as the rejection would absolutely crush me.
slim yeah
don't worry chm smh right here i am looking at 2019 mathgre apps and there's a 3.87 gpa DAM with 83% math gre and two reus (and basically just this) who got into brown
But I want to do another year
If he gets into Columbia he'll push hard to graduate this year, otherwise normal
Chmonkey did you do the Columbia app?
School thinks 4th but this is my 3rd year here
I came from community college in Hs
And applied as transfer like a dipshit
So they said I was a sophomore my freshman year
It’s all fucked
So this is “4th” year
Did it cause you trouble?
But really 3rd
Eh, I’ll just explain it on my application
Or whatever
And yes I’ve started the application process
Wrote drafts of the statement
Asked for refs
Reccs
Etc
Anyway yeah if you finished the Columbia app already just pretend you already got rejected, start doing the things you need to do to graduate this year just in case
Haven’t submitted but it’s due Jan 14tb
I mean so
All I need to graduate is “non-major credits@
But try to forget that you did it
And it’s so few I can do it in 1 quarter if I do 18 I think?
So I can graduate if I choose to as late as like March
you know, i have yet to see someone get into MIT on these mathgre pages
I might get fucked on what classes I get but
i should make a bingo card
¯_(ツ)_/¯
Archsys, you have simply not looked hard enough
I have definitely seen people who have gotten into MIT
So yeah finish the app soonish and then forget about it. Don't wanna hype yourself up too much and then get disappointed
Maybe it's cuz ppl who worry about posting stats on a brazilian trading card site don't do enough math?
Moonbears all the good students are terrified and making chance me posts in a naive attempt to lessen their stress
Smh
this is hard to do, but good thing is I turn 21 before the application time
hey i submitted 7 grad apps yesterday]
Congrats amin!
Lol
not you m'king
they should redesign mgre forum
No
it looks like 2000 website
They should kill the mgre forum
yes
that too
Reddit and /sci/ already exist
There's no need for some bad forum for ppl to lie about their stats
i can never trust someone on reddit
We already have terrible ones for that
i bet a lot of people lie on mgre forum
Yes everyone lies on the internet
What's the motivation for doing that?
I bet you think my name is moonbears
just to feel good about anonymous jelousy
I... see...
oh wow Moonbears, you must be so smart
KEEP IT COMIN'
sign my forehead
I think you need a marker, but balls might work too
I'd have to be pretty plastered to ask him for that
I think He would just be like "ok, This is weird,but whatever idc"
Heh that was an amusing exchange
namely i saw someone get into MIT on mathgre
Did you see someone get into mathgre on MIT tho?
but seriously tho, im in a discord server with a few other math phd applicatants. thats the only type of interation i get with the application process community. i dont look on mgre forum but they post about it sometimes
Also mathgre is for plebs real people who wanna panic about admissions use [REDACTED]
I will not say the name of the site because some people here are in the middle of grad apps and I do not wish to ruin their lives
Lol I don’t know what this is supposed to be a reference to even
Chmonkey that's good
No anarch, do
Don't look it up

I thought math GRE was the the de facto one
I saw a lot of like
.lolol
"Double minor"
3.98 math gpa
Post by lzxnl » Wed Jan 30, 2019 10:04 pm
Undergrad Institution: International, one of the highest ranked in the country
Masters Institution: Same as above
Major(s): Applied Mathematics (Diploma, Masters), Physics (Bachelors)
GPA: 4.00
Type of Student: International Asian Male
GRE Revised General Test
Q: 170 (96%)
V: 165 (96%)
W: 6.0 (99%)
GRE Subject Test in Mathematics:
M: 890 (92%)
TOEFL Score: Waived
Program applying: Applied Mathematics PhD
Research experience: 1 summer project on fluid mechanics + student conference, masters thesis on rarefied gas dynamics which my supervisor is rapt about, writing a paper soon, original work
Awards/Honours/Recognitions: Freshman maths award, scholarship in masters all semesters for academic merit, dean's list first and third year undergrad (not second year because exchange)
Pertinent activities/jobs: Have tutored every maths subject completed in my first two years of undergrad, as well as a few from my third year and one from my masters.
Any Miscellaneous Points that Might Help: Masters supervisor works at Caltech half the year as a professor (which means supervision in that semester is indeed challenging ): )
Any Other Info That Shows Up On Your App and Might Matter: Consistently did more subjects than the standard work load, consistently did subjects without the prerequisites and performed well in them (like graduate level Electromagnetism as a sophomore, graduate level Stochastic Calculus without having taken measure-theoretic probability)
Applying to Where:
MIT - Accepted 8/2, 30k fellowship, going :D
Harvard - Rejected 7/2
NYU Courant - Rejected 12/4
Caltech - Rejected 23/2
UCLA - Rejected 19/4
University of Michigan - Ann Arbor - Accepted unofficially 5/2, officially 6/2
Brown University - Accepted unofficially 31/1, officially 22/2```
30k damn
quadruple major
What is accepted unofficially
Rip

He got in for an applied math program
same
Chmonkey yeah I mean I guess keep checking out math gre and see what info you can glean noting that some stuff is weird
Okay good
Undergrad Institution: Asian
Major: Math
Minor(s): N/A
GPA: Major 3.9
Type of Student: International
GRE Revised General Test: Q96%/V65%/W41%
GRE Subject Test in Mathematics: 91%
TOEFL Score: 108 = R30/L30/S23/W25
Program Applying: Pure Math
Research Experience: N/A
Awards/Honors/Recognitions: Nothing special
Pertinent Activities or Jobs: Have been a tutor a few times
Any Miscellaneous Points that Might Help:
- 2 famous letter writers
- 2 graduate courses
Applying to Where:
Chicago - Admitted on Jan 8 :D GOING!
Stanford - Rejected on Feb 23
Princeton - Rejected on Jan 31
MIT - Rejected on Feb 13
UCB - Rejected on Feb 8
Columbia - Admitted on Feb 8 :D
Brown - Rejected on Feb 15
UPenn - :shock:
Toronto - Rejected on Mar 28
UBC - Rejected on May 10
Wisconsin Madison - Admitted on Feb 13
Northwestern - Rejected on Feb 10
UCSD - Rejected on Mar 7
UCSB - Admitted on Feb 15
UCI - Withdrawn``` tf
how did they get into chicago
I think it's just too inconsistent and too many liars
Awards/Honors/Recognitions: Nothing special
Pertinent Activities or Jobs: Have been a tutor a few times
Any Miscellaneous Points that Might Help:
- 2 famous letter writers
- 2 graduate courses```
Hey arch
uchicago
Wanna stop posting this
CAN WE PLEASE STOP POSTING MGRE POSTS
well sure i already did my bingo
yeah stop
I mean 2 famous letter writers is not bad, and the stats are high
seems i have touched a nerve amongst the undergrads
So I could see it

waht is this gif lol
I mean it blows up the screen too lol
yeah i cant read the convo
Imagine not having an 8 inch phone
this kid is so cool
PTYamin, where did you apply?
I applied to 7 schools
UW Seattle?
Applications were way more exhausting than they should have been
Princeton, MIT, Michigan, UW Madison, Minnesota, CU Boulder, Rutgers
Wtf
OH FUCK
yay i was able to recall from memory
Seattle's not the best for number theory tbh
Sorry to my letter writers who all submitted to boulder
Man everyone is applying this year 
what kind of math are you interested in?
damn moon bears
dont you have a spreadsheet with the deadlines?
I got so god damn stressed about my car and Austin
I do
My car got broken into on Monday and my shit got jacked
Bruh
Fucking rip
thats terrible
Then Austin decided to throw a fit about my uhhh transcripts not being official
so I scrambled to get that done
you had to upload official transcripts or send them?
I had to email them to myself
yeah i did that
And then download them, then upload them to the austin portal
Not the unofficial ones
like you get an official transcript (its 10 dollars at my school) sent to yourself
Many of my schools that I studied at charged me
and then upload that
oh shit
not just one school

