#book-recommendations
1 messages · Page 211 of 1
Literally waste of time
You'd be more productive literally sleeping all day
grow up big and strong
multivariable calc is Bad
or is this a book by lang
i was talking about the class
no I'm saying moth should learn multivariable calc before using F'ing Lang
the most evil and sinister book
Multivariable calculus is for nerds
its for engineers 
Mapping class groups
Did someone say mapping class groups
ism?
Intro to Smooth Manifolds by Lee
Mapping
Does someone know of a book containing a detailed solution to the multivariate Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process?
With derivations of it's mean and variance
What if you learn multivariable calc from lang? :^)
then ur probably big brain
Or learn the entire maths degree using only lang from basic maths to gtm from lang?
I don't think it works that way
why not just learn differential manifolds instead by lang? :^)
lang has nearly everything you need!
idk about that
Is Lang good at everything?
who is Lang?
Need some recommendations for a first course in analytic geometry at the undergrad level.
These are the contents of my course.
Will take a look, thanks.
For Units 3 and 4 I could use Burton's ENT textbook, any recs for the units on set theory?
Owww nice, thanks!
What?
Munkres doesnât do cardinal arithmetic
Or Cantor Schroeder Bernstein as far as I know
You can pick up Halmos
Itâs really short and literally like 7 bucks or something
naive set theory by halmos covers all of this iirc
These look like fun classes. I've never had a NT class :(. Enjoy, Ted!
Thanks Luna!
Okay, I'll take a look at both Halmos and the Wikipedia articles haha.
This is the only NT course being offered in 3 years.
I only hate NT because of how simple its problems sound, and then I can't solve any :(
And maybe an applications of algebra in the 6th semester
Nice
True, the problems are deceitful.
My course is loaded with DEs though. I'm also looking forward to a course on Automata Theory in the third year.
A state uni. It has a good math programme.
Was that the one you were waiting on?
Yeah, it was the one I had been waiting to hear back from until two days back haha.
Congrats đ
Oh, I didn't make the cut into two of the hardcore programmes.
Thanks Chmonkey and Ultra!
I'm really excited to start.
I just hope it doesn't wear out as I progress ahead.
:(
they do be spitting facts
My undergrad doesnât suck...
Does working hard compensate for a sucky course?
At least not any more than grad school I think
I like my undergrad more or less, but there's low points in all of them
at least from what I've heard
I see.
just do what you enjoy, and you should have a decent time
I know people who did certain things for more money
and they're struggling to stay afloat
sad!
I'm driven towards maths not so much by pragmatic considerations as I am by my own interest.
No matter what it is, it's bad in India XD
Just fight bureaucracy and try to get into better classes
Skip stuff you know, email profs
Idk how much you can do in India
I know Europe is pretty stringent on this compared to the US
I don't even think the uni permits that, the system is too rigid in the present
Moonbears say you can skip classes by taking first then informing the staff later 
I donât email my advising
His uni also said no skipping but he did it anyway
I email professors directly
A new education policy is underway which could allow flexible selections but it may not come into effect by the time I finish my undergrad.
but what if your prof is ur advisor
Why skip classes though?

Saves time
If you know analysis at level A
I see.
Also helps avoid bad courses
On this point I got to where I am now because I just did what shamrock did
He was in my freshman analysis class and just did whatever to get into better classes and I just followed suit
And I think it worked out well, so Iâd recommend you search out similar people
Your expertise is indeed inspirational for me, ngl.
I donât have expertise lol
Wait
i mean when i entered my uni i saught that my groupmates were stronger than me if maff
I would deny such a claim
XD
now i am the strongest in my group ngl
Weâre classmates lmao
Hahaha. That's nice.
This is news to me
hiiii
me too
Anyway Iâd prefer to enter a class at like 30th percentile
does anyone have any books for algebraic geometry?
hi ch
and then i found mathematics server...
I wouldnât recommend you learn AG but also I do it
True. I just hope I'm at the bottom of the pit.
oops
So if you want to start
self promotion
yohan and you read #âhow-to-get-help
read #âhow-to-get-help
This server is a constant you're-not-smart-enough reminder for me.
Damn beaten
fastest hand on the wild east
That's the plan, Ultra.
Do bother comparing yourself to people who have been doing math for years if you have a competitive spirit.
Acknowledging I'm not good enough is step 1, acknowledging I can grind and get good is step 2.
If only I had met more capable peers at school I might have been pushed to work harder and not rely on my "genius" to get away with good score on school tests without working hard.
- acknowledging i'm not good enough
- getting deprresed and start drinking
basically my plan
I feel like it is given you will never feel competitive against any of those people because you can tell they are out of your league. Me thinks a reasonable and competitive lad would be more interested in beating his upperclassmen but oh well
haha.
Oh, I wouldn't compare myself to you for the life of me.
This is exactly how i cruised through school
It isnât uncommon to find some moment where you question everything but pushing through that is important
Youâll feel fucking stupid at times and useless but you just accept that others are where they are and youâre where you are
Look back in two years time and youâll be surprised
~~The past is a spook. Neither accept or deny it, simply live on. ~~
you can compete with ppl out of your league but always compare yourself with your state 2 weeks/month/years ago
hiya woogie
Nothing exists
ultra is free to reject present too
i exist outside of space. So I will too.
Are you bounded by time,duke?
what is time, without past nor future?
Time is subset of space.
An illusion?
A point?
I regret shitposting about time
you should regret all your shitposting
But,That was in the past
what is past
And there is no past
imagine having people to compete in in sch đ
hai
Commander Vimes:
no u

I had some schoolwork to do here
That is so true.
I've bought Calculus:Early Transcendentals by James Stewart was wondering if this was any good for calc 1, 2, and 3. Is there anything in particular that I should know before getting into this book?
yes
I'm in calc 1 rn, I've gotten this book to self study
alright
it seems like it's a comprehensive book
does it cover all of calc 3?
https://www.knewton.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/alta-Calculus-Early-Transcendentals-v2-TOC.pdf - I think this is the table of contents
alright cool
thanks
From my experience when reading it, it wasn't the best thing for self studying. It's better for going along with a college course. I would recommend Khan Academy's Calc 3 course, because they got someone to teach it that is actually really good at teaching (Grant Sanderson, 3Blue1Brown)
yeah I heard he made the course
with regards to self studying, did you mean it wasn't great for self studying calc 3 or were you saying it isn't great for self studying in general?
multivariable calculus by stewart is good, early transcendentals is pretty good
intro to smooth manifolds by lee if you are into that sort of thing 
@lusty jacinth Try Colley or Marsden vector calculus both are very good and are intro books but are also rigorous. But you can try stewart. I'm doing problems out of Colley again and I think it's really good.
oh okay
awesome
I'll note these down
Oh, is AOPS Precalculus any good? I'm mainly looking at it for reference but my brother is also studying precalc so I'm wondering if it's good for precalculus.
from the looks of it, the textbooks looks good but I figured asking around wouldn't hurt. This is the table of contents I think https://s3.amazonaws.com/aops-cdn.artofproblemsolving.com/products/precalculus/toc.pdf.
I have a copy of fulton Alg. top @sage python I've been mulling it over
It seems to be pretty good
what
Yeah idk it myself but my impression is that it's AT for people who don't do AT
I mean, the only real pre-req is like calc 3
SO you can do a low level sophomore junior level course on it
Hi rubidinium, two servers eh?
yes
Sorry I ignored your question bcuz I have no opinion
lol np
oh yeah
I'll check that out
but from the reviews I saw a few minutes ago, AOPS precalc looks good so I might just end up getting it
@sage python do you think fulton would pair well with hatcher in a course
Like if you do low level fulton
medium level munkres
high level hatcher
Cuz there's interesting things in Fulton that are done at a nice level
I mean they're sorta all different, it's not just level but goal
Hatcher is very geometric but it's kinda still AT for, at least topologists, including algebraic topologists
Fulton's in a way easier but it's more like, if you do geometry and sorta need AT but need it from the geometry side
So e.g. you're more interested in De Rham cohomology and stuff like that
So there's gonna be a lot of overlap but different takes
Munkres is just point-set so it's kinda its own thing
One thing that I like about Fulton is
I can sit down and do every exercise without too much
Thinking
Like I get comfy
Hatcher is not super comfy
That's fair. I think Rotman's kinda my preferred easy intro to AT
Someone I know gave a good overview of books if you don't like Hatcher
I suggested Rotman, Fulton, Massey, and Bredon in that order
Rotman is for people who will never understand pictures
Fulton is for people who want to do this junk and move on with their lives
Massey is for people who understand squares better than triangles
and Bredon is a good book
If you don't mind might I ask what you two were talking about?
Algebraic Topology is using algebraic structures like the integers, or more generally abstract algebra, to say things about inherently geometric things
But we have special rules about the geometric things: namely we can slide things around, sometimes we can pinch things, sometimes we can cut things, sometimes we can really distort things
There ends up being a lot one can say about the relationship these things have with inherently algebraic things like polynomials
or numbers
etc.
@sage python Rotman is for people who will never understand pictures Fulton is for people who want to do this junk and move on with their lives Massey is for people who understand squares better than triangles and Bredon is a good book
hatcher is for people who [?]

Hatcher is for people who use math discord
I'm doing some fulton exercises now sloth king dami
They're comfy. I might just do a few once a week try to get most of the book done
Her name is Margaret Thatcher

@sage python the other advantage of Fulton is the hints at the back
Y'know I think I'm just gonna work through this for my topology qual
and hope it gives me enough of a foundation to just combine it with other facts of topology I know
to pass
Fuck Hatcher for anything beyond chapter 0 & 1
It just looks like pain
how to prove it
Yes, Godel recommended How to prove it. And I asked you about if the book is a worthwhile read
Itâs probably the best intro to proofs book out there.
Thereâs not too many problems in the exercises per section and each problem uniquely challenges the concepts glossed per section
I peaked at Zhang and tbh it seems Zhang doesnât really have the same flare.
Loch told to go with Amann Escher
Never heard of that one
Oh okay
ok its also pretty good
I only heard of Escherâs real analysis book
it's an analysis book, but it has an intro to proofs
It's an analysis book,that does everything an amateur would need
Ohh......
bruh
i mean, how to prove it is fine
but imo it is too long
and it goes into more set theory than you will need
false
Godel, that's what I was referring to. I'm not biased. I just said what he said
Idk I donât think thereâs that much set theory involved. It doesnât go over anything more than power sets and families of sets when it comes to set theory
Yea it is a little longer but more detailed
it literally covers the most important set theory - relations, functions, induction, infinite sets
Maybe another fun intro to proofs is just solving proof contest problems
it is
also the order is kinda weird imo
I mean there is a whole chapter on induction (which seems like a good thing) and the very last chapter is a prelude into real analysis
yeah relations and functions should be switched but other than that its good
And there is a chapter on functions which again I think is good exposure
What about the chapter on relations
yes, i think all of this (minus the last chapter) is important
relations i would do somewhere else
i mean, if you want to see what i would do, just read #book-recommendations message
What's the last chapter?
@wooden sparrow jsut read how to prove it, there are better analysis books anyways
Yea thatâs a prelude to analysis tho, cantor is definitely brought up on first chapter of Abbott
i would just define cardinality via existence of bijections
do cantors first diagonal argument
show that a function A -> 2^A can't be surjective
and use that to show that R is uncountable
it's like 2 pages
Well uncountable means infinite right
uncountable means bigger than N
i.e. infinite and no bijection between the set and N
you can essentially do russells paradox to show that any function from a set into the powerset is not surjective
Err well isnât there the Aleph Null property of certain kinds of infinite sets
this is the hardest part, but you can just believe it
and then it is very easy to show that R is uncountable
because you go from 2^N to [0, 1] injectively
btw which intro to proofs course doesnt cover cantor bernstein theorem
most of them
Why donât they call it Cantor-Berenstain theorem lmao
cardinality aleph null just means there is a bijection to N
Thatâs all it means?
But doesnât that mean that it is more finite than other infinite sets
Wait how come it's not alphabetical order? I thought names in theroems are so
it's the smallest infinite set
For Aleph Null property
in some sense
This
it's defined as the cardinality of N
c4t btw what chapter are you on rn?
Soo..... umm... which book did you guys decide is better?
how to prove it
Okay
Oh Iâm on the last couple exercises of 3.6
Pretty much about to be on relations chapter soon
nice c4t proud of you 
I will give an anti-recommendation to D and F. And a recommendation to Rotman.
d&f bad
i like the anti-recommendation lmao
is it worth getting a book about ring theory
im just trying to collect books
||Libgen all of them||
usually i do
but i like physical books too
i have quite a lot of books
i libgen books i dont care to purchase
but if i want them then ill buy them
usually not at full price tho
ill get used copies for ~10$
depends how much i care to get it
But only after I'm convinced it's good
if i really want it ill buy a new
As far as abstract algebra goes, Gallian's Contemporary Abstract Algebra is the one I use and I really like it as a first text.
LIBGEN 'EM ALL
No, but a book on commutative algebra is basically this
As well as module theory
Tbh the theory of rings proper isnât all that amazing, I mean Iâm sure thereâs a lot of stuff you can say, and if you look away from commutative stuff more I guess. But rings really come into their own when you consider them in combination with modules
Modules kind of âfixâ whatâs wrong with rings, and can be stated simply as the fact that the category of rings is trash (kernels arenât rings if you require a ring to have identity), but modules over a fixed ring is an abelian category
the purpose of modules is to help study rings
jacobson
hungerford
mandem
So I was looking at some "Elementary Number Theory" books but there are multiple authors.
May someone recommend the most concise for a beginner.
Topology of Numbers (Allen Hatcher)
Is Elementary Number Theory by David B good?
you recommend any good combinatoric books for olympiads>
For Star_, A book of Abstract algebra by Pinter is decent and pretty cheap
that does seem nice but informal
@sage python I did all of the first section of Fulton Alg. Top. exercises last night
How can ppl not recommend this book? Even if you want to go onto like Hatcher
This is really good intuition with explicit examples and integrating
All you need is calc 3 and a little bit of brain power
I mean some people are ready to just start Hatcher
In which case Fulton is an unnecessary diversion
I think there are things in there that Hatcher doesn't do
Like Riemann surfaces algebraic curve type stuff
Sure which can be learned elsewhere
Fulton's probably quite good, especially for certain folk, don't get me wrong
I think it's better than Hatcher for my interests right now
But it's not a holy grail necessarily, and if you wanna continue in algebraic topology other books are better
Because I don't need a lot of the fancier topological structures/machinery
A passing familiarity would be fine for now
e.g. Rotman if you're less geometric, Hatcher if you're more geometric
Maybe in the future I'll need more machinery
I've worked through chapter 0 & 1 of Hatcher - it's really good
but it seems overbearing at times
It's also nice seeing how stokes theorem plays a part in alg. top. from the beginning
IDK, I think I've just become a huge fan of this text
Alright - here ye here ye
READ ALL OF FULTON'S WORKS
THEY ARE ALL THAT GOOD
Fulton's prob the right perspective for you on algebraic topology
Next you gotta read intersection theory
heard fulton's intersection theory is hard af lol
3264 and all that seems like a very nice book
what a chad name
it's a reference to the number of smooth conics tangent to 5 conics in general position
in P2
but yeah, seems easier to read compared to fulton
ahh - I like Fulton smol boi books
Alg. Top., alg. curves, and his rep theory
those are the small mind moon bears ones
i need to read the rep theory book
I've done too many 197s
Oh LOL
I dont think I can do anymore
I think you need the graduate vice chair's approval for that lol
gangbo I think
Gangbo won't give a fuck
Where can I find the times tables?
uhh, annals of math
anals of math
Where that?
look it up
@grand flax if you can manage finding the annals of mathematics, you should be able to manage finding a times table
this is a test
There is no chart?

there is
Where
look in there
look harder
Confusion.
as a professional mathematician, i reference the annals times table daily
you should be able to find it
the IUTT papers have them too
I mean just a time table chart

author started talking about geodesic polar coordinates so i had to go find those
and then i realized
after avoiding coordinates for so long i forgot how to use them

it's too easy to just say "oh this thing is obviously well-defined if you just write it in coordinates"
a trap i fell in to
pain.
ye lmao
coordinates can be deceiving
I thought you could always write $d = \partial + \bar{\partial}$
Brofibration
not to mention the author's curvature convention is different from the one i'm used to 
i'm convinced do carmo smoked a bowl every time he sat down to write a chapter of his RG book
I havent computed the curvature of a non-trivial connection yet
as they say, write inebriated edit sober
and it's been 6 weeks since we introduced them
do not, it is not worth it
.
if you replace inebriated with sleep-deprived, that was me checking over my complex analysis homework earlier
let me find the part where i forgot how inequalities work
|f(z) - g(z)| &= |-z+1| \leq |z|+1 = 2,
|g(z)| &= |z^7-2z^5+6z^3| \leq |z|^7 + 2|z|^5 + 6|z|^3 = 9 > |f(z)-g(z)|
i feel like it's a legitimate strategy, sometimes it's easier to stay undistracted when you're drunk/sleep-deprived/etc. or like not feel so shitty thinking i have to do work, because i can't think anyway
yeah when i'm tired i can put more focus into something; not necessarily productive focus, but focus nonetheless
ah i c

I understand that completely actually. My ADD does not make my mind wander so off to other places quite as often.
Do you take stimulants Don?
I have an ADHD diagnosis, and I'm wondering if stimulants would actually make me not brain fart all the time
Considering buying Cassels-Frohlich tbh
Cassels frohlich?
Algebraic Number Theory
No I don't have stimulants. I honestly don't even have a diagonsis but I've been recommended to a clinical pyschologist by my physician to get some testing done @marble solar .
I'm probably gonna get an official diagonsis within the coming month or so; still unsure if I want to take stimulants or not but it probably couldn't hurt to at least try them for a little while.
Yeah - all my friends who take prescribed stimulants say it works wonders for them
Same here.
So I've been thinking about it - but alas my spouse is like anti-drug
With good reasons, stimulants can really fuck you up
Oh yea lots of cardiovascular risk assocaited with them - heart disease from prolonged overruse / reliance.
Not mention neurological issues i.e. depression.
Yeah - and my family has history of heart disease/heart attacks
I'm pretty healthy, I exercise mostly regularly
(Or I did before covid)
is there any good place to get math books other than libgen if my library has failed me (other than paying money)
when I'm looking for specific books I mean, not just browsing
university library
Usually you can work something out to rent something
Even if you're not a student there
hmm, interesting
I'll try that out when stuff reopens for me
is libgen the only main piracy site?
springerlink
I think you could access all springerlink titles for free for a bit
might still be the case
doesn't seem free anymore
RIP
If youre enrolled in a university with a university VPN, you might want to try again after connecting to it
some universities give you springerlink access
Enjoy your UCLA vpn while it lasts bro
in high school, not uni
the stuff on b-ok.cc seems to usually be linked on libgen, I think it's one of the sites libgen links to
scihub
what are some good books for an intro to linear algebra? I head strangs intro to linear algebra 5th edition was nice but not much about any other books.
there is lang's intro to LA but if you want a bit more challenge, which I am currently doing, you can try hoffman and kunze's LA
You also have Axler's LA Done Right and Halmos' LA
Best book for Linear Algebra?
Definitely not strang
I want to learn something pretty much complete if possible
(sorry for using the word complete, but you know what I mean, something that includes lot of topics if possible)
Definitely not Axler then 
Axler is good if you do not need determinants
somehow i wasted 3 hours and read 2 pages

ok lol 1.5 hours from that it was lecture so pdf was just opened
other 1.5 hours i listened to music
My university it's making me read a book from Schaum series by Seymour lipschutz.
And I feel it is really... MEH?
if that makes sense
That either boils down to Hoffman and Kunze or Halmos
but learning LA from Halmos
I would say Hoffman and Kunze but again that varies with everyone here
Thanks â€ïž
h&k tho i havent seen halmos
Halmos is a really thin book
Are there any good resources to learn about plotting graphs? I'm not looking for a guide on plotting graphs of elementary functions, but rather understand how loci and curves work in general. (If you know about it already, I want to get good enough to write Batman Equation sort of stuff on my own to describe very arbitrary shapes on the Cartesian plane)
this is fourier yes
yea it is literally a fourier transform
truncated
How about basic cycloids, ellipsoids and stuff?
also series not transform
there isnt really any thing dedicated to teaching how to draw graphs cuz like it isnt interesting and really you can just use functions you already know or like fourier the thing
i mean yea but like morally they are the same
I mean there's analytic geometry
at least to me
I had a class that was all about conics and shit
screaming
It doesn't go into the level of depth I'm looking for.
@fast portal Hold on I just got something more wack from Wolfram, lemme show you
I was trying to draw a curve and Wolfram won't give it to me
I asked for a solution, and this is what I get.
Funny, GeoGebra gave the curve right away
True!
I looked at the book on algebraic curves Ultra suggested
just turn the mathematical crank
It had a shit-tonne of explainations on drawing ellipsoids and stuff manually
were they doable without a pc
The one I remember the most is diff Eq
idk about diff eq
Oh, okay. I'll have to wait to get to Fourier Analysis, then.
Like calc 3 no?
I think you might be fine with just basic real analysis and a bit of multivariate analysis
That's when we touch on FS
for like the latter bits
our fourier analysis class actually bundled in the topics on parameterized integrals
Okay.
what's a good book for probability and statistics at highschool level
I don't think Fourier stuff ever showed up in a course for me, it just became a thing I needed to know. the discrete fourier transform did come up a lot in my coursework.
there was a book recommendation on numberphile perhaps but I can't remember the title. something like "pictures of graphs of interesting functions". not sure the name. google can't find it.
it is important to know that there are two major areas. the discrete fourier analysis and the discrete-time fourier analysis.
Oh, okay.
I have the prerequisites lists here in front of me
it depends if you are also doing electrical engineering
or if you are a computer science student
if you are an EE you will study network analysis and filter design first
this includes laplace domain laplace transforms. models of signals and models of systems
i would advise you to at least take real analysis beforehand
and possibly some complex
you definitely need to be up on complex numbers %100
at least the unit circle adding angles
In physics, angular frequency Ï (also referred to by the terms angular speed, radial frequency, circular frequency, orbital frequency, radian frequency, and pulsatance) is a scalar measure of rotation rate. It refers to the angular displacement per unit time (e.g., in rotation) or the rate of change of the phase of a sinusoidal waveform (e.g., i...
lmao that gif
there are ways to do this using euler's formula
he is happy to know the formula đ
I'll be starting as a math major soon.
Don't do it Ted, it's a tarp
I think if you can do calc 2 then you will probably be ok in FFT
it is not going to be easy
there is an old paper "shannon's sampling theorem" that should help if you study discrete time fourier transform
it was the foundation for everything after it
Hahaha, analysis you mean?
Sounds good!
But I guess I'll postpone it till I finish real analysis.
ok I found what I was looking for in the book. you need "solutions to linear differential equations with constant coefficients"
laplace transform, z-transform, euler's formular for complex numbers, geometric series.
@karmic thorn
Will take a look, thank you.
I'll be taking a differential equations class next year, might be a good idea to get some insight before starting.
this is even more specific than that
all ODE with constant coefficients
you can learn this in 1 day
Lmao, will take a look right away then.
What do you guys think of Spivak's Physics for Mathematicians: Mechanics?
I think that one is too much
His manifolds book is not that great though
Arnold's mathematical methods of classical mech is pretty good
yA wrOng aboUt tHat nEkO
I think it is good just not as good as his single variable
yeah i'm gonna have to disagree with you on that one
yA rIght About thaT
Like I said it is still quite good just in comparison with his single variable book
i am going to let you know
if moonbears and i are in the chat
it is spivak CoM fanclub

so that means you also read his entire differential geometry books?
:^)
i'm still a differential geometry baby
his diff geo books do have pretty covers tho
i know at most the contents of vol 1 and 2
at the absolute most
wtf is 3-5 anyways
I didn't read them how are they?

nani
i'm still angry about this rg problem
just thought i should bring that up
tfw the only parts of "closed manifold diffeomorphic to even dimensional sphere" you need to solve a problem are "orientable, even dimension"
like bruh
is this spivak
talk about wasting time 
i saw 5 volumes
yes
oh ok
I was asking about this particular book
i've read gelfand's algebra should i read his other books as well?
Sure his Functions & Graphs, and Method of Coordinates are great too
After that you could try some other books like Lang's Short Calculus or Spivak's The Hitchhicker's Guide to Calculus
hallo
okay then thanks
Thoughts on *Matrix Analysis & Applied Linear Algebra * by Meyer for a second course in linear algebra (graduate level)? Should get up to SVD and maybe Jordan form http://www.cse.zju.edu.cn/eclass/attachments/2015-10/01-1446085870-145420.pdf
tbh that table of contents looks like a first course in linear algebra

but i do like the selection
graduate level though?
nah
Meyer is ok. Go for Friedberg et al âelementary linear algebra - A Matrix Approachâ
oh poros did you know uoft has a grad linalg course now?
oh really?
or something like t hat
lemme find
its more on the applied side iirc
nothing about it on the prof's site 
it's completely new
isn't this just an easier version of the other linear algebra book by the same authors?
Symplectic
they're asking for a graduate level textbook and the linalg book by FIS is in no way graduate level



Thanks
didn't know the romans did lin alg
I'm looking at some of the later stuff in the book and I don't think I learned it in my first course
the meyer book, that is
oh damn, that actually seems like a nice tb @gray gazelle
i do like the springer aesthetic of the roman book
inb4 "first linalg course" refers to a course where you learn how to row reduce
and only row reduce
*learns how to put entries into matrices*
i am biased but i think the book by friedberg insel spence (NOT the one c4t recommended) is perfect for a 1st course
that, or axler
but that is not the subject here
yeah that's the book i learned from
well what would be the key topics in a graduate linear algebra course
roman's toc
or you'd just have linear algebra in the form of module theory in the core algebra course 
well some of the topics in roman seem like they'd be covered in functional analysis

yeah meyer seems quite a bit less rigorous
focusing more so on applied stuff, hence the name
matrix stuff
Meyer just doesn't really have much compared to Friedberg et al
and Friedberg et al has plenty of exercise problems
you mean content wise that meyer doesn't cover as much?
what a shitty table of contents (formatting wise)
is there a better one for the book c4t rec'd?
also uh
those are out of order 
i have a strong doubt that meyer covers less than this book and an even stronger urge to confirm that doubt
Uh I mean I think Friedberg et al is more organized and obviously covers in better depth.
why are the author names between every line
lmao?
no clue
I think they just cover different topics
TTerra why do you always emoji me like that
xD
definitely pick up a theoretical linear algebra book while going thru an applied book
such as roman
I like Lang and Janich

how many tbs has lang written
damn you want to make people go thru hell reading graduate level text don't you lol

they literally asked for grad level??
yeah i did
oh shit my bad
.
yea I mean
I like going off Abhijeets recommendations honestly cause so far they pretty much work 80% of the time
i'd recommend either freidberg insel spence "linear algebra" or axler for a first course and roman for a second
also
let me post an interesting one
give me a sec
abstract linear algebra
aren't vector spaces part of like abstract algebra
ok
Trich have you tried Berberian and Shilov?
vector spaces are linear algebra
yet
I know vector spaces are linear algebra
yeah i have shilov
the thing is, "linear algebra" always gets turned into "row reduction course" because of the computational power of matrix stuff
ok
but like i know what you mean poros
i've tried reading it
but aren't they technically also part of abstract algebra, which is just the study of algebraic structures (which a vector space is, I think)
yes
linear algebra \subset abstract algebra
in that order
oh god that's a lot of linear algebra
that is true
rip
since it does module theory
uoft?
university of toronto
poros and i go there
ahhh
squint hard enough and functional analysis can look like linear algebra
see that's what im worried about a bit
like i like computational biology and hence applied math
but i dont want to let go of pure math
I mean I like what I'm doing right now, but I wish I also could've done pure math on top, but alas
just impossible
how didn't i think of that
unless I do two bachelors
physically impossible to fit any decent amount of pure math courses into the course load
I know a friend of mine is just doing extra years in bachelors
you cant study baby rudin on top of a 25 credit semester?
fucking engineers 
what? engineers don't want to learn theoretical math
I do
oh
then you're not an engineer
I'm an engineer, I'm very rare though
well your special
I am planning on staying in academia
Engineer-Mathematician Theorem
Engineers != Mathematicians

my summer research was all about homomorphic encryption, which just used a fuckton of lattice and galois theory
I didn't even feel like it was engineering
what year are you?
its not really engineering mate
(except the parts where I had to implement parts of it)
its research
research != engineering
its really research engineering
which is like
ya, that's what I enjoy
that's just throwing two rocks together
basically research and development
I don't particularly care for being a wage slave
lmao
but a wage slave mathematician is such an A E S T H E T I C
I don't think many people on this server want to be wage slave. Have you tried reading Abbott's "Understanding Analysis" it is an amazing book and it really breaks things down for you vs Rudin
yeah that's a solid book
yea I'm gona get through more of it soon
oh, the prof responded and said that tensors wont be covered in the class
just take diffgeo and have them hammered into your skull
precalculus
lol
lol
classical: multivariable calculus, probably some linear algebra and diffeq
differential-topological: topology, linear algebra, and the previous stuff
in my experience
ahh ok i was thinking of learning point-set topology a little and then going ham and trying to jump into Manifolds and other shit
good book for self studying diff geo?
do carmo ig
I have not, but it seems interesting, I'll put it in my tb queue. I have to work through "Computational Number Theory" by Shoup first for my upcoming internship the coming summer
i wanna read some of lee this christmas
but people have mentioned also that Cummutative Algebra is important for modern geo stuff?
LOL
err
classical: do carmo's curves and surfaces
differential-topological:
-lee is the standard recommendation, fantastic book
-tu is also good, but it's a lot easier and covers much less ground
there's also guillemin and pollack if you want to go hard in the topological aspects of the theory
differential-geometrical:
-lee's riemannian geometry book, same quality as his ISM if not better
-do carmo's RG is very "to-the-point"
yea Commutative algebra, I had to double check
thoughts on diff geo for like ai/comp bio stuff?
some people on this server have mentioned it is a helpful way to get into algebraic topology and algebraic geo stuff
still not really
oh, ok good to know i guess?
depends on the kind of algebraic topology
right
i'm hesitant to say for certain because my algebraic topology knowledge is bounded above by the second half of munkres' topology book
which is basically nothing in the grand scheme of things
I might start reading Munkres in a few months. I am a little worried of trying to do too many math subjects at a time too soon
you can get into basic algebraic topology only needing like, the definition of a group
but past that you definitely need more algebra
yea
I also want to prioritize linear algebra and real analysis along with passively getting thru the rest of this prob stats book
what book are you using?
for what
prob stats
Walpole et al
I've been really liking Hogg et all
theres like 18 chapters of material so its definitely enough for a foundation to get more into it
and generally a lot of exercises
Did someone say differential topology earlier?
Terra did






