#book-recommendations
1 messages · Page 168 of 1
Oh may i ask why?
When lance lance changed my name to "a girl." they also said that I was lying, I'm keeping my eye on this user.
many are around
Imaginary friend thingy occupying my mind currently, and in the past it was an inability to think
It's been a good 4-6 months I believe since I've been able
bunch of users named FBI have been trolling here recently
Huh?
Yeah kids trying to troll, this is what modmail is for :3
Also pre uni and highschooler don't imply eachother
Pre uni is math level
Oh i got a simmilar problem minor schizophrenia.
Highschooler is based on you being in highschool
It sucks being unable to do what I think I used to love, but eh, like goes on.
Well you see around were i am from pre-uni is used to refer to near the end of high school classes so thats why.
Yeah that makes sense
The pre uni role here is just a math level, so highschoolers can be undergrad if that is the level of math they are doing
Good to know thanks but you do seem to be a high schooler no?
I am indeed :3
Appreciate it
I think its exactly what you want . Also other text like "book of proof" might be helpful to learn to do proofs like to work with proofs. But for language and symbols that is definitely it
Np
Funny enough I find it similar to computer theory. In my class we wrote proofs like this, not as rigorous but similar
They are indeed simmilar
I'm in 8th grade and I am very passionate about this subject. if you can recommend me a book, good, if not it's ok (English is not my first language so if there is something wrong in this message, sorry )
What kind of book ?
just to read how peoples think or how to think like a mathematician if you understand
or some books about math but for my age
There’s a book called chess, I guess. Let me check the name
No I am not sure but heard of it
I don’t know any books for that, but if you want to read books on how people think or in general psychology
You should consider The Laws of Human Nature by Robert Greene
thank you very much 🫶
Hii everyone. Is there any book(s) that cover these? I am mainly looking for practice questions. Thank youu!
Unrelated question, this is what I am doing in Mathematical Analysis II, I was wondering, is this standard?
Does anyone have any references on where to continue studying? I wanna self study algebraic number theory (I have a class, but the professor only sends pdfs once every week). The syllabus is the following:
Integers: divisibility and factorization.
Euclidean domains, principal ideal domains, and unique factorization domains.
2. RINGS OF ALGEBRAIC INTEGERS
Algebraic number fields and rings of algebraic integers.
Integral bases. Examples: quadratic fields and cyclotomic fields.
Existence of integral bases for the ideals of a ring of algebraic integers.
3. DEDEKIND DOMAINS
Factorization of ideals: existence and uniqueness of factorization into prime ideals.
Chinese Remainder Theorem: norm of an ideal.
Fundamental identity concerning the factorization of ideals generated by a prime number.
Dedekind’s Theorem and the Dedekind–Kummer Theorem.
4. FACTORIZATION IN QUADRATIC FIELDS AND IN CYCLOTOMIC FIELDS
5. THE IDEAL CLASS GROUP
Finiteness of the ideal class group.
Class number of an algebraic number field.
Characterization of rings of integers that are principal ideal domains.
Lattices and full lattices in a Euclidean space.
Minkowski’s bound.
6. UNITS IN RINGS OF ALGEBRAIC INTEGERS
Dirichlet’s Unit Theorem.
Kummer’s lemma on the non-existence of non-trivial integer solutions to Fermat’s equation for regular prime numbers.
Thus far I've finished chapter 2
"Introduction to Analysis in one Variable" and "Introduction to Analysis in Several Variables" here: https://mtaylor.web.unc.edu/notes/math-521-522-basic-undergraduate-analysis-advanced-calculus/
Sequences and series is typically covered in Analysis 1. So is Riemann Integration. The subtopics seem to suggest a very applied Vector Calculus course rather than Analysis for the rest.
Does anyone have any good resources for learning Latin and/or ancient Greek? For context as to languages I know/are familiar with:
C2 in English (native speaker)
B1-B2 in Spanish
A2-B1 in Hindustani/Hindi/Urdu (heritage speaker)
Formerly B1 in Mandarin, haven't spoken it in a decade, barely remember any of it
A1 in Czech
So varying grammar systems, cases, etc.. are a mild pain in the arse for me but they're not scary to me.
My main goal here is to learn enough Latin to read something like Virgil's Aenid, Cicero's speeches, etc... or a similar level. I could just pop open a dictionary or read a translation but I do want to properly understand how texts like this were written in the past and also I just have an interest in latin and greek from a linguistics standpoint and feel that I have a large hole there I need to patch
<@&268886789983436800> asking for pirated resources
i was just asking where to get it vro
@sage cedar indeed, we can't allow people to ask for such resources; unless provided by the book's author themselves, it's still bound to copyrights, and therefore can be subject to copyright claims. We gotta be compliant with discord's ToS as an affiliate server!
oh mb
are these all postgraduate math topics?
undergrad
Guys hi im in the 10th grade I was wondering how I could learn more advanced math than I already learn ( I saw integrants and the complexity of it seemed very appealing) also I don't want to persue it as a job I just want to do it cause it seems something I could do in my free time ? Any suggestions on how I could learn more advanced mathematics maybe some books idk ? Also I'm stuck I found mit courseware but idk where to start ?
i don't think so, they got a postgraduate role
https://www.jmilne.org/math/CourseNotes/ANT.pdf
https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-662-03983-0
Any recommendations will be useful
Yes but alg nt is in some places an undergrad topic, some places it's grad
thomas' calculus
ok as you say
search your math topics there you want to learn
or you can use khan academy, to get some idea
Yeah but like how would I be able to learn if idk the things before like idk if you get what I mean wouldn't they be advanced?
hmm i understand
I mean the things that they teach before the things I wanna learn
you can khan academy then
Is it free ?
it will teach you things you need to know before you start your adv mathematics journey
Ok
Thanks does it have like not homework but like some practice ? To test my knowledge
?
if youare just doing this for hobby, i would suggest don't go for books right now, because those take a lot of time
khan academy has some practice problems and tests
Ok but the website does it have any practice is there a website with some practice?
I knew it
Yeah some I want not many
chapter 1 is early undegrad though
yeah but other chapters didn't seemed like undergrad topics, also you got a postgrad role
Where would you even have time to put this into an undegrad xd
I had pretty much algebraic courses every semester after my first year
uhh you have to find that out, also in mitopencourseware you will find sheets and pdfs of problems in the course you will watch, you may try to solve those
i know i know but @molten gulch told you are undergrad
I didn't
i mean you did say those are undergrad math topics 😅
anyways
nevermind those
first chapter is undergrad
You could maybe fit a few of these topics in undergrad
does the books recommended in the channel topic helps?
I'm reading Number Fields now
This is somewhat out of date compared to the pin list
But it also has some recs not in the pin list
Hmmm
What if we merged both
still it's good in my opinion
Agreed
Idea!
but I don't want to ping mods >.<
uhhh
also it's published under a series intended for masters+
also your messages are hidden because you are a spammer? 😅
at least that's what showing it to me
hope those helps mate
i think most topics in your syllabus have lots of proofs right?
Yeah
This is the case in most pure maths courses
The book I was reading initally I was on page 220~
on Number fields it's now page like 50 lol
how do you all even remember all those proofs? 😅
Practice and eventually some bits of intuition
You reason through them
motivate them
why it should be true
instead of just following it along
you become a better mathematician
What about function fields
i see
Weils basic nt is a really great book
I don't care about them
Hello! if any one here is aware of spivak calculus( I mean have used it). The book generally starts with what would be the end of most calculus books I.e limits(very in depth), upper bound, and a few hard theorems. It’s my intro to calculus. Could I tho like read until the limits chapter and then start on derivatives and integrals in the book( needing it for a computational based calc exam, don’t really wanna give up on the deep intro). Any opinion here would be very useful
good news it's like one of the main books ppl here seem to recommend lol
idk what to say about the idea of reading until limits but i'm sure someone else can help!
Well that is great
well who would guessed the book that is marketed as calculus for mathematician would be famous with mathematicians😭
Thank you sir🫡
not a sir but you're welcome ig
god can ppl not read profiles or even nicknames
ikr lol
Sir is gender neutral😭
ppl glaze the fuck out of it but for a good reason
I’m sorry ma’am
it rlly isn't
and either way just don't call someone that if they tell you not to pls
i'm trying to help you in the long run
Sadly tho it’s the only book that way
I really do use it in a gender neutral way tho
Didn’t mean anything with it
regardless of how you use it is a gendered term
I’m explaining myself is all
ok but if you misgender someone accidentally you dont need to explain why you did it just apologize and try not to next time
idk if your first response to someone just asking you not to call them something it comes off as kinda defensive or rude if you try to explain yourself instead of just apologizing and saying you won't do it again
Okay I’m fr sorry😭
I'm looking for a textbook (or some other resources) that covers the following topics (perhaps partially). It's best if it contains problems and solutions to them, but if a textbook is good, I'll also be interested in it.
- Wiener and Poisson Processes – Basic properties.
- Markov Processes – Definition, equivalent conditions, and basic properties. Strong Markov property. Regularity of trajectories.
- The Markov Property for Strong Solutions of stochastic equations with Lipschitz coefficients.
- Markov Semigroups, infinitesimal operator, resolvent, and generator.
- Continuous-Time Markov Chains.
- Diffusion Processes.
- Feynman-Kac Formula.
- Connections with Partial Differential Equations (PDEs). Probabilistic solutions to the Dirichlet problem.
it's all good just pls be a bit more considerate with these things lol
Yeah I just felt bad that’s why I was explaining myself and again very sorry and sorry if I came off as rude after
all good dawg i already accepted your apology

Thank you
It's not lol
There's only one I'd consider worth spending time on. Definitely not a waste.
Leonard Susskin's Theoretical Minimum is good
Especially if you don't have time to work through a more serious physics book
The problem with the road to reality is that it's too hard
It'll take way too long to get through the mathematics in there
if it helps id make fun of u for calling me ts bc it sounds like reddit lingo
even tho im a guy
thanks for the gold kind stranger
an area of which i am most confident.
beautiful prose there folknem!
Ahuh, ok
Open up the table of contents, and see how far you know the math
For me, I end at about chapter 15-16
at what level
undergraduate
i think that brother is trying to get me killed
Lol. You don't wanna do 400+ pages of undergrad-to-2nd year grad math before you get to any physics?
like graph theory combinatorics?
well no I'm thinking stuff like questions about poker hands...
"Winning Ways for Your Mathematical Plays" J. Conway
1000 pages of shitting down your throat
thank you
Ah, an area of which you are most confident!
Sarcasm aside, the theoretical minimum is a good place to start for pop-physics
That might as well be a textbook
nah i already gave up
ill stick to my higher mechanics texts
Well somtimes it's nice to have everything in one book
This lasted less than 30 minutes. Ah to be a young undergrad again
I remember when I thought I could do Algebra
Good times
A common point of contention among physicists
Read the book, "scythe"
This shit is so true
my brain has been at this constant state of purgatory since i learned how to do proper arithmetics
and mind you, been over 12 years since.
if you even look at my notes now, its literally me writing the same thing every 3 pages
grue...
p
real!!
”If G is a group and H is a subgroup of G…”
do you know the book Abstract algebra Textbook by Dan Saracino
I don't encourage you read these "how to think like a mathematician" like books even though there are a lot of them. It makes you fixed at a certain view point so i encourage you to do more harder and interesting math and just go higher and higher and you will become a mathematician yourself.
yes what of it
The math is developed with a lot of heavy exposition, examples and aesthetically pleasing sketches. It's neither rigorous like a math text nor heavily computational like a physics text. It is pop physics with the math front and center because most of the physics cannot be done justice to without it.
So is it like?


Logarithms and trigonometry haven't really been my strong suite right now and I'm trying to find book to self-teach myself about those concepts.
It's really hard to go further into calculus while having a weak grasp in those 2 fields. So I'm stuck in the power rule rn
does anyone have any good book recommendations on logs and trigs?
Can an recommend me books for logs, trigs like the guy above. I also need similar help. And also a book for linear algebra
literally any standard US algebra 2 textbook works
whats a good textbook for alg 1? (linear algebra)
“algebra 1” in a precollege setting is not linear algebra.
introductory linear algebra deals with matrices, systems, linear maps, vector spaces, eigenvalues, etc
high school algebra 1 is usually one variable linear and quadratic equations, two variable linear systems, etc
Stitz and Zeager's Precalculus
This is a pop delulu text from a physics perspective.
Real mathematicians contributed tho
So I’m surprised it’s bad
It's not great but not bad either. Definitely for delulu physics tho.
<@&268886789983436800>
how to know ur good in maths or not
excellent suggestion, if i had a degree in physics.
When you’ve taken your Real Analysis class or Discrete Mathematics class in college
I mean I like to study it
I'm avg in it
All I lose is calc mistake
Mostly
I lowk thought you were asking “how to know if you’re into maths”
Um it's kinda same doubt
;-;
Maybe you have issues with your foundations?
Yeahhhhhh
Make some effort with studying the basics: Algebra, Pre-Calculus and Trigonometry
1 have roughly 2 months for my next grade to start and i have to finalize that should I take maths or bio
I*
next grade?
Yeah
you mean college?
oh AP classes!
11th going
i somehow cant edit
i lost signal
Oh
Try to read Serge Lang’s Basic Mathematics
I’m pretty sure he had specified in the preface where to skip if you’re knowledgeable enough with arithmetic and how much it covers the high school maths.
I will
Try
just make sure ur "prealg/alg1/alg2/collegealg + trig or precalc is on point
and ur set
try to do calculus afterwards
and if u dont really have that geometry in you, try covering it
alongside alg 2 ideally
Hi, sorry for my question on this channel but: isn't there an offtopic channel in this discord?
i believe this is best as reference tbh rather than trying to learn from it as a complete beginner
He isn’t a complete beginner
And there’s no “better” books in high school maths
They’re all the same with different authors/publishers
I tend to advice my students when relearning the basics to avoid those with publishers
Example of them are Serge Lang’s Basic Mathematics and Kolmogorov’s Mathematics: Its Contents, Methods and Meaning
i think if you dont wish to spend several months on a textbook then books like "demystified" and "for idiots" or just shorter books are better (only till calc 1)
it doesnt really matter where you learn from until calculus/linear alg or proof based mathematics imo
I don't have access to this channels, how do i get access?
click on "id like to socialize option", that should remove the studying role
Im actually like this
reclick
it doesnt do nothing
type ",iamnotstudying" here
No selfroles matching apotato.
See ,selfroles --list for the list of valid selfroles.
Not exactly a book rec but anyone know any good tools to generate problem sets?
Or maybe like a good free online resource that has decent quality problem sets
Gimme a ping so I can come back
does anyone have any recommendations for learning about the arithmetical hierarchy?
you mean order of operation?
oh never mind
How to learn algebraic geometry
How much maths have you already done
Basic abstract algebra and category theory
And also some number theory/complex analysis
have you done any topology?
Learn commutative algebra first on the level of Atiyah Macdonald and learn a little bit of point set topology (tbh you don’t actually need that much since AG style topology involves stuff you don’t see too much outside of AG eg irreducible spaces, noetherian spaces…) then read some basic AG book eg fulton Algebraic curves or Gathmann’s AG notes. Later on you’ll learn scheme theoretic AG from Vakil or Hartshorne probably
Ok, thank you
You only need enough topology to understand gluing constructions and sheafs
tbh i've done most of the prerequisites to vakil, except for commutative algebra and topology
ok
I'll learn commutative algebra nexr
Yeah you gotta eat your veggies basically
I recommend learning dimension theory as well, on the level of the fundamental theorem of dimension theory in Atiyah Macdonald
Interesting
Honestly i'm more interested in Number theory, but also interested in AG
Ok
I'll learn atiyah-macdonald then dimensional theory
,iamnotstudying
Removed the studying! role from you.
this worked lol, thank u very much
dimension theory should be in atiyah
there's another book https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/116075.2 which has all the stuff in atiyah + all the exercises of atiyah + solutions and I think it covers the material a bit differently but is also free
@frozen perch
Hmm, I picked everything up incidentally through unpublished computability theory notes or the Algorithmic Randomness book by Downey and Hirschfeldt. But what's good...
Cooper is very friendly and definitely covers it
That won't get into measure or topology too much from what I recall, so for stuff that's not just the computability theory perspective you'd need another resource
you're still flagged as a spammer lol
1 year, 10 months, 30 days left
@pseudo heart
- ted shifrin's multivariable mathematics (book), his lectures of his math 3500 and 3510 courses that follow the book (youtube playlist), and his work worked "differential geometry: a first course in curves and surfaces"
- lee's intro to smooth manifolds (book that i never read enough)
- robert davie's playlist on diffg, his playlist on manifolds, and his one on tensor calculus (videos)
- the entirety of morgan weiler's channel on youtube (videos giving notes on stuff like forms)
- some of eigenchris's videos on tensors/tensor calc (youtube playlists)
- all 4 playlists under the courses tab on whybmaths' channels
- a little bit of spivak's calculus obviously
imma send more
mix of vids and books
lee is peak
also something something ISM is diff top and IRM is diff geo
also for the specifically diff forms side of things i suggest
- bachman's geometric approach to forms (book)
- exterior calculus in graphics (lecture notes)
- the way that gregory bixler, dan piponi, and duarte maia present the visualization of forms is rlly good too (literally just search any of their names followed by "visualization" and "forms") (pdf blog post thingies)
is there an equivalent of Apostol's Calculus for ODE? By this I mean an ODE textbook that
- doesn't assume a prior non-rigorous computational course
- doesn't explain things in tediously "American pedagogical" detail assuming the student is incapable of following an argument
- nevertheless, still covers the classical applied ODE material
- doesn't devote half its space to dynamical systems (this is intended to exclude Arnol'd, Teschl, and books like that)
- isn't full of errors (though I have not read the book myself, I have read that Birkhoff & Rota, used for MIT 18.034 for a long time, is notoriously buggy)
^ @pseudo heart also an important note
Boyce’s
From what I have read of that book it fails my second criterion
Simmons maybe, or Ince
i assume you have already looked at Tenenbaum right?
Yes, and also Ince (which I am not sure can be read by post-1920 humans)
I have not seen Simmons, I will check that one out
how about Zill’s?
Also have not seen, will check out
tysm!!
ofccc!
these are all some of my favs :3
ahhhh
c2b7_97705, meowl, thank you! I will take a look at those two
yee bc you need your manifold to be (pseudo)riemannian to get a metric on it
mrs. coboundary, when did you get the fancy uncial font
the classic 5th edition btw
nitro
one day John Lee will run out of manifolds to introduce people to
atp he's gotta just be called John Manifold
inventor of the manifold
except when he goes to France he's really confused because everyone calls him John Variety
Every smooth manifold admits a metric btw
maybe old-fashioned
it seems like people think of such treatments that fit the criteria you lay out as a bit outdated generally
will check that one out also, thank you! This fits me since I am also a bit outdated
"Can someone please tag the bot or send a link for the 'Bartle Real Analysis' solutions PDF? I can't find it in the search
If it's an actual legal pdf I see no issue
Our issues are mainly some stuff being against TOS
Like piracy
hey we can not support piracy, its against discord TOS to ask for illegal copies.
If you have his intro to real analysis book, he doesn't have a solution one, but he does provide hints at the backend section
Yes, I know, but I want model solutions because they are the only acceptable ones.
That's true, but there isn't time to solve a huge number of questions without being sure.
If anyone can help me, I would be very grateful.
it's not
"use brain" and "go to office hours"
your prof would help you better than some discord user
Sorry im dumb I should've guessed on them being unable to find it
any measure theory book?

I am LADR hater but MIRA lover
Sensible take
Introductory book on enumerative combinatorics? I have linear algebra in R^n and introductory group theory (product groups, quotient groups) under my belt, and some multivariable calculus, but I don't know any Ring theory or Probability Theory that is commonly required to learn advanced topics.
I would like a book that goes in depth into core topics in enumerative combinatorics but also includes some review, if anyone knows any 🙂
I was considering "A course in enumeration" by Aigner, but it seemed a little too advanced for me. I don't have much time and need to cover the core topics until summer
nvm I found it.
Maybe not very useful for diff geo aspect of forms but I would add that I recommend Bott Tu differential forms in algebraic topology
Does anyone have recommendations for more informal/hobbyist maths? I'm trying to improve my repertoire and I feel some fun reads could be nice.
I wouldn't mind a more complex read though if anyone has ideas.
It's a ploy by big maths to make you buy more maths books. 😱
literally ur a mfin mathematician for fuckin ten + years mate write me a full fucking roadmap in appendix
TAKES 2 PAGES
i think they get discounts etc if i remember correctly
they also have like book fairs where they get free books and libraries full of basically any text you want
IRRC
yeah ironically its like one of those situations where yk rich ppl end up paying way less than the average folk LMFAOO
obv not but if ur rich its way more preferrable
yk being an international student is also somewhat of a humiliation ritual cuz ur restricted heavy

Thanks!
you never heard of a library??
Oxford and cambridge are copyright libraries, so they have most books ever published
There's some online access to ebooks too, but I think ebooks were only recently included to copyright libraries' access rights
some colleges do book grants, some will buy a copy for the college library on request
yes mfers have access to all the elite books in the world
the 97% state school oxford college has £1000 higher rent than the richer colleges 😔
Used to be the poorest college before a £27,000,000 donation 2 years ago
hm i suppose for those who wish to enter university as soon as they graduate highschool this does indeed set an impossible goal, regardless of grades. A scholarship doesn't add money to your wallet, only relieves some you have to give out of your own pocket
again if it were upto me i'd take a gap year or two and do something on my own to fill the funds required for such an adventure
or again you can go somewhere else and proceed here later on
upto you :))
tbf the rent is £6100 which would be one of the cheapest for any other uk uni, so it's not really that bad
again, compare that to europe or anywhere else and third worlders
i don't have the money for travel and i fear employment
i already have my oxford offer to read mathematics starting in october, so I think I'll just enroll and use my college's enrichment travel grant to explore the world :)
youre starting bachelors ? 🙂
yessir
im very happy for you :)) soar high
you too, i hope the workload is bearable haha 😅
You can also get access to mathematical books via big public libraries like British Library or mathematical societies
Probably there is something like that in the US too, maybe in New York?
Mm, maybe not in the US, it seems like AMS membership doesn’t provide any library access
Not really since you can get em all free online.
yeye that's a good one too
oxford wont let their students go homeless dawg, just get accepted in and dont worry about rent.
my only advice to you is not to bring any more than you need to your university dorm
There's no way! What?! 6100 pounds a month??
no
lmao
probably 6100 over a period of 6 to 9 months
Why does no one make such a donation to me?
Oh that makes more sense
I've been wanting to go through that book, how is it?

No it's a flat rate for the year. Usually it's for 6 months and you have to vacate out of term times. But due to renovations, in 2nd and 3rd year, it'll be offsite accommodation but for 9 months, and only have to vacate over summer.
Hello guys! What do you is the best sequence for combinatorics(from intro to like pretty advanced). Also, you can assume proof skills.
Guyss does anyone have textbooks or exams from oxford about discrete mathemfatics(specifically relations) if yes I will appreciate it
Ik a great book that has a chapter about it
But a specific exam from Oxford
I think they have their exams online
This is the archive for them
Omg great
Form 2000s
I’m glad I found what you were looking for
Also in general most proof books would have great chapters on relations
Naive set theory and or book of proofs
Have very good exercises
I only used book of proofs tho
Dosnt matter i only need to estimate how the questions look so ik what to expect on my exam. My professor’s son finished there and she is using his tasks for almost everything lmao
I was replyong to the from 2000 message
Well good luck😭
Not to your last
Oh oh
Ic
Well I was gonna say the book basic mathematics has a weirdly good chapter on mappings
Yee im good with those but my prof is very fond of brain twisters that are not so naive hahahah
Yeah book of proofs is pretty big fan of those too
😭
Ooo cool
Well it’s good for you to be challanged
Yhh
Genuinely great the exercises are insanely good
Cuz I tried hammack before and he was meh
Especially in computer science
Are you like into cs or complexity theory more?
It’s pretty pretty useful
Relations are very cool
Functions are relations and they are pretty much most of math
😭
Yhh very true
I want a graphing calculator that can graph relations
Does anyone have any nice resources for the history of algebraic geometry? The goal here is to introduce some of the basic intuition for why one should care about the notion of a variety or solution sets to polynomial equations in the first place?
This seems quite easy to do with linear algebra, as linear systems of equations are abound, and solutions to these equations have clear geometric significance, but I'm having trouble coming up with a good way to introduce why one should care about systems of polynomial equations and how grobner bases can make it easy(ier) to solve these equations. I'm familiar with how back in hellenistic times, the greeks studied intersections of planes with various conic sections, but what led them to consider these problems in the first place? Besides that, where did the notion of projective and affine spaces (specifically the modern language/definition to talk about them) come from?
any books to learn single variable calculus from scarcth
i wanna start real analysis 1 by Terrence tao sir
Thomas or Stewart are fine
This is a good book for analysis
also Jen, I just downloaded Dieudonne's paper and started reading it
Looks very promising for what I was going for here
thomas calculus you meant
yes
oh ok
ive been slowly reading and rereading and rerereading https://www.jstor.org/stable/2317664 a quick overview by dieudonne of some of the MANY phases of the history of algebraic geometry id love to share my struggles in reading it 
Oh you mean discover of conics?
I'd very much appreciate that!
Conics are quite a general object, algebraic geometry can study conics yes, but that's not all that it's used for
i saw this
note its very sketchy in parts and i dont think its a very good place to look for intuition, but its maybe a good place to get a sense for some of the structure of the history, though note also this article is from the 70s iirc and the field’s moved very far since then 
can. you also tell me is it ok if i side by side do book of proof
For conics I have read the book by Pappus.... That's a great book to develop intuition regarding identification of graphs from equations and it also helps with some quadratics
Agreed, mainly what I'm looking for is the more concrete varieties side of things rather than schemes as the end product is going to be a short 3-5 page note on what algebraic geometry is and why one may come to care about it, so I think slightly older sources should be fine(?)
I'm familiar with the theory, I'm more looking into the history of their study, but this does give me another marker on the journey, which is to take a look into a bit of ancient greek mathematics, I appreciate it
should be fine alongside calc
thanks
Book recommendation for a beginner
dr seuss
What have you studied so far, based on that one can give you recommendations
It would probably be a good idea to give some context. A beginner can mean anything from someone who is starting their undergrad to someone who does not know how to do basic addition of numbers
Yeah that book has the history also I guess. I know you are talking about how Mathematicians think of this and how it proceeded. For example, I have read the history of bombelli before he discovered numbers( complex plane) , used the integration of 1/(1 + x²) dx which led to the discovery of euler's identity of e^(i θ) = cos θ + i sin θ... He first factored 1+x² as (1-xi) (1+xi) and then converting it into partial fractions.
ye
These are the very basic ideas of algebra and geometry, this is not algebraic geometry as I am referring to it
as an example of an affine variety
I am sorry.... I am still in High School. So I think I can't help you further.
Yeah that's fine
I will check that out
None
Do you know how to do 3 + 3?
Someone starting their undergrad but haven't studied math's in my high school either
8? Like if we mix them E3
https://www.khanacademy.org/ You can learn everything there from the most basics, you can see yourself what level u are at currently
can someone help me with trig
Why are you stating the name of the channel repeatedly
now
https://www.stitz-zeager.com/szprecalculus07042013.pdf This should have everything you need
There's also S.L. Loney's Plane Trigonometry and Hall and Knight's Higher Algebra
Also Lang's Basic Mathematics
thanks
Is michael spivaks calculus 3 a good book?
his book is just called "Calculus"
Sorry, I meant third edition
Really really goated
Prob my fave math textbook
I feel like if you understand the content you get really good geometric intuition for cohomology
There is also many concrete computations where you just explicitly take an integral to find some characteristic numbers and stuff, so I also really like it for learning characteristic classes
It’s quite cool
I mean it’s just goated pretty much in everything it has in the book
I am doing a double major one in cs and the other in actuarial maths but i was in a math oriented highschool and now the actuarial maths course takes a more theoretical approach at the start so i guess both
Sry for the late reply i was afk
Holy peak
Alright I'll definitely need to go through this then
you guys recomend some self-taught english book?
I really need one, I suck in english
Idk if this is a good place to ask.
is there any number theory book that is comprehensive enough to serve as a general reference and has a somewhat modern viewpoint
i guess what im asking for is an analogue of lang but for number theory instead of algebra
neukirch for algebraic number theory
Neukirch my goat
not sure for other areas of number theory, and i don't think any comprehensive "general reference" exists
Also check Silverman for elliptic curves
D&S for modular curves/modular forms
These go hand in hand
ty!
You mean for speaking? For that I think the best way is just to watch movies and shows with english subtitles and just practice speaking with other people
If you mean reading and writing then yeah just read whatever books you're interested in, fiction or non-fiction and practice writing
Oh yeah? name every number then
for i in R:
i = then
ℂ∪ℍ
Yall I need an epic book for complex analysis
Specifically tuned for electrodynamics stuff
Any recommendations?
Boa Anizio
Só vim ler o chat q eu sempre fico
hmm, legal
estudando o que ultimamente?
acho que nunca puxei papo de verdade ctg
We better be speaking english
yeah
Physics, Calculus and Olympiad Mathematics
I used Moyses' physics book, but I got to the part where he uses vector calculus, and I haven't studied that yet
Im still learning integrals (through Thomas' Calculus book)
It is not necessary to speak english here, I think it. I saw some people speaking in French lately.
Huh
Damn, you look pretty advanced
We allow non English in the help channels only
Ok
do you want to take some Bachelor's on physics or math?
Its not like we don't like other languages, its just easier to moderate
By now I'd choose physics, I still have some time to choose tho
it is compreensive, thanks
Maybe, but I don't think It helps in competitive math, specifically for OBMEP (Brazilian mathematical olympiad for public schools)
Maybe in some maner, I believe it can be pretty productive actually.
And what do you think about OBF and OBFEP?
I know more math than physics, despite what I said
Specifically high school physics
Which is required for those olympiads
You can gain a scholarship on Farias Brito or Ari de Sá by earning a medal. Some of these guys called me after I earned only a silver medal xd
yeah, it is very famous on ITA/IME niche
Does anyone have book recommendations for learning mathematics at an advanced Secondasry School or 'high school' level?
Things to solve this with:
I got TME 1 (An Excursion Through Elementary Mathematics vol.1) in my desk
these sort of things are undergraduate level, if you want why this work
I guess it would be easier for me getting a medal in mathematical olympiads than physics olympiads
Because its lower in general content to learn from where I'm now
Oh, ok. Do you know about anything for an undergraduate level?
you can pick Terence Tao's analysis book, it's pretty good for anyone who hasn't had some contact with undergraduate material
Alright, thanks!
Its a very good book, I had the number theory one to do a seminar.
You are welcome
Have you heard of MONT? (Modern Olympiad Number Theory)
Maybe I saw in the IMPA's library
😯
You want to make OBM or just OBMEP?
I'd like to try OBM
Do you think I still got time? I have this and next year
only
good luck, I never succeeded to get in, but you look very prepared
make the Jacob Palis olympiad, It is very hard to get in OBM by OBMEP
and yes, maybe you can get a bronze medal in time
just work hard
I heard some people say they are making in-person exams by now
There were some guys using AI past year
:/
This makes it harder to me to get in OBM
But, still easiear to get in OBM by Jacob Palis
what state do you live?
Thick Bush
Bruh, this is sad
look for some olympiad classes at Farias Brito or Ari de Sá
maybe you can get a scholarship
OBMEP probably is gonna be my unique chance for getting an application to IMPATech
look for PETI - OBM too
I will try OBM, but I don't think I would succeed from it
just try, maybe you can get it. I can help you too if you want
You cannot
Class 10th hai level mere
Thanku
I have the complete opposite opinion lmao
not a MIRA "hater" tho, I just didn't like it very much
MIT’s main library has a worse physics section than my personal library.
But that’s all I looked at while I was there, I didn’t really explore other subjects
hi just coming in2 ask
what do you all think of vilenkin’s combinatorics?
& should i read it after bonás book?
Hey everyone! I’m a UK college student studying CS and maths. I’m mostly into pure maths, though stats is cool too. Anyone got any good book recommendations? I’m looking for something that starts simple and gradually gets more advanced, doesn’t need to assume a ton of prior knowledge at the start. Not looking for encyclopedias, just a solid, readable book. Open to anything in stats or pure maths NOT mechanics!
Thanks!
Guys, would u say "Linear Algebra Done Right" by Sheldon Axler is a good book for lin alg?
I prefer Gilbert Strang's books.
it doesn't make Axler's book bad though ;)
Not for a first exposure imo
I think FIS or HK is better for a first course in LA
"Concrete Mathematics" by Knuth, Graham, Patashnik is interesting
It's good for a first course if you supplement with some resources about determinants, rref, and matrix versions of stuff like spectral thm, diagonalization, etc
I recommend it though
Also if you have already taken a first course that covered this then definitely read ladr
FIS is good too
strang just comes off as incoherent from what ive read
yeah, Strang has a particular, somewhat unusual style of presentation, it shows in his video lectures and books too. It's not bad and many people like it, but it's not for everyone
but shouldn't we invite/write some Discord bot to reply to those questions about Linear Algebra books? I bet this question has been asked, thoroughly discussed and answered approximately a million times
we can even provide a list of concrete users of this Discord recommending one book or another :) Normally if a user X recommends FIS, they will keep recommending it and so on
good idea
Hey
I am a computer science undergrad and have done a UG level combinatorics course. Other relevant coursework might include UG level graph theory, discrete math, statistics.
I am looking for some good books on combinatorics, I would prefer something which is less heavy on proofs and more focused on problem solving.
Is ur username based on the inheritance cycle books?
I love those books
Either Epp or Rosen's Discrete Mathematics should do the job. For stats, Wasserman's All of Statistics is a solid place to go to.
I am looking for books on combinatorics, also I have covered most of the topics from Rosen’s Discrete Math
Oh mb. I read your question wrong.
You can try Peter Cameron's Combinatorics. It's pretty algorithmic and not super heavy on structural proofs.
yes omg i'm so happy that like quite a few people have noticed
Thanks
Hope you remember me lol
How should I do Hall and knights higher algebra? It's a little too advanced for me
Could you recommend some other books which are perfect to understand math properly, in depth ?
Want to study as many books as I can
I feel like Hall has the theory not in depth
Let me get this straight. It's a little too advanced but it's not covering things in depth? Make that make sense lol.
If its a little advanced for you then dont read it, look for an introduction to algebra book that has rigorous treatment.
What you seem want is a book that babysits you through everything. Such things are often not conducive to learning. If the text makes things deliberately hard to understand, then it's a different matter.
Hall and Knight's Higher Algebra is certainly not one of those texts but you might as well go one level lower to Algebra for Beginners instead if you find it difficult.
And you are free to seek help when you don't understand something.
I don't know what connotation of rigor you're using here but if elementary algebra feels difficult without it, then proper mathematical rigor might just make things worse if the student is not used to it already.
maybe i shouldnt have said rigorous but what i meant was a book that could bridge between arithmetical quantities that you could attach some concrete example to with algebra.
you also have books that do a good job demonstrating algebraic laws without getting into proofs and all that
ideally, you should be looking for a book that does both (though i doubt you would find a book that does either entirely separately) if you havent done maths properly
at least at the middle to high school level
Hall and Knight's Algebra for Beginners is great for that, which is why I recommended it now. However they did come in asking for something equivalent to Higher Algebra given the stage of the Indian curriculum they're facing atm.
never mind, i thought they were tlaking about higher algebra
They were. They found it too difficult. That's because their foundations are lacking. In which case going back to middle school level Algebra like in Algebra for Beginners is the best thing to do. Which is what I suggested above.
Oh lol I thought you guy's were talking about Brian C. Hall's rep theory book
guys can you give me textbooks for self learning math?
that depends a lot on what level of math you want to learn
What maths do you already know and what do you want to learn
could anyone recommend me some maths books to work on my concepts (class 11 JEE aspirant btw)
Hall and Knight's Higher Algebra, Loney's Plane Trigonometry and Coordinate Geometry. Johnston's Intro to Linear and Matrix Algebra. Thomas and Finney's Calculus and Analytical Geometry. Blitzstein's Introduction to Probability (first half).
(Being an aspirant for an exam is quite stupid btw.)
Calculus Made Easy is this a good starter book?
I need a book too thats covers all of integrale vektoren etc. im 16yo and it would be my first math book
Just a book covering all starter school math and maybe the start of studium
this covers differential and integral single variable calculus
you'd need something else for multivariable and vector stuff
Read stewart it covers vector and 3d calc
How should i learn automorphic forms and the langlands program? I’m decently familiar with abstafct algebra, great at complex analysis, i know basic analytic and elementary number theory
i love stewart
aahaha thank you for the recommendationss
seems like you dont know much about the indian system thoo
I know it very well. I've lived it.
books for improving coordinate geometry(I am kinda beginner so...)
Have you checked out openstax? Pretty sure they have a geometry textbook
Should I read the principia of Mathematica?
Newton's or Russell's ?
you know what, neither in fact
Don’t unless you’re interested in history of math
Contrary to popular belief it does not actually take 500 pages to prove 1+1=2 and modern exposition is much better
How long does it take lol
dhar mann book guys?
Well if you use your eyes it might be instantly
If I have an apple and another apple it’s gonna be two apples
wait so are there are any good books for this?
What is two
To me it’s a representation of a thing
Like 80 max
Idk the real definition
You need to develop enough set theory to define induction the natural numbers and principle of recursive definitions
Then once you’ve defined everything it’s immediate
I think the axioms you actually need are axiom of pairing, axiom of union, comprehension, and power set (to define successor you must apply axiom of union to the set {x, {x}} so you somehow need to show that’s a set), axiom of infinity aka axiom of induction (to define N and addition)
Nah
So that’s a decent bit but not 300 pages or whatever worth
I’m not versed in abstract math but is a physical two different than a marked two in a equation
Wdym by a “physical two”
If you mean like 2 apples the intuition is that the mathematical 2 is just a formal way to construct a model for something with 2 objects
In a way where we can actually prove things abt it
^
mb
I mean we have some axioms for what we think numbers should satisfy (Peano’s axioms) and then the set theory construction of the naturals is just a way to define mathematical objects (sets) that satisfy these axioms
But any other mathematical structure that satisfies those axioms deserves equally well to be called “the naturals”
Whether those axioms are the right ones to describe numbers is more of a philosophical than a mathematical question…
Anyone have any good differential topology recommendations? Heard that there are two approaches to the subject: differential and topological. I’d be more interested in a topological approach
This is not really a textbook but a good overview of outstanding problems in differential topology in dimensions >= 4 is “the wild world of 4 manifolds”
Assuming you aren’t just looking for an intro to smooth manifolds but an intro to some of the modern research question called differential topology that is
It can be over any dimension of manifold. However, the more abstract the better
More of foundations
guillemin and pollack
For a project of mine i need to have a good grasp on octonions. Do you have recommendation on a book to learn everything about this, clifford algebra and potentially Jordan algebra. It's ok if it's part of a larger book on more than these concepts.
For foundations as someone else said Guilleman and Pollack is good, I’d also recommend Lee ITSM
Wich book do you mean ian stewert or james stewert ?
So likee the title of the book
And maybe if you know if there is a german version of it
James Stewart - Calculus
Ok imma read it
hi everyone i am taking ODE's in the fall semester and im looking for some book reccomendations in advance
Hm
Nagle is what I read
Fundamentals of differential equations
Ch1-9
bruh, do yall schools not have a recommended reading list or something
Sometimes the list is trash
i mean yea u can learn from any textbook really
Qingkai Kong a short course in ordinary differential equations
Completely out of context if you want to learn precalculus, calculus and calculus with more variables I reccomend the books of calculus of stewart where you will find a book for precalculus another for calculus and another one of calculus with many variables. And I think there isnt much difference between versions so Dont worry about that.
book recommendations for formal logic / FOL? I dont think there are any necessary prerequisites, and have heard Enderton come up a good bit on reddit.
enderton is good, i like kunen's "the foundations of mathematics" as well
I've seen both actually and in fact have smith's notes bookmarked. I don't know how the exercises compare between all of them though. I'll probably use multiple books though so I suppose that isnt very important.
Kunen ive also seen floating around and being recommended, looks very clean from briefly skimming through it a couple of times
So there are solutions to almost all of the problems? Pretty good,
Is this like meant to be covered fully in a semester or is there only part of it you should read?
guys book rec for pre algebra?
Not for a logic class, just for the love of the game. I do have experience with proofs and basic analysis at the level of (baby) rudin so I have a working understanding of the very basics. I see no reason to not finish the textbook though and would be my goal, as I am not in a particular time crunch.
elements of algebra. Euler
Euler's writing style may be difficult for someone in middle school
Openstax prealgebra is fine
its not bad man
I will warn you that it might not make sense unless you have more experience playing around with abstract mathematical structures
Abstract algebra like group theory and so on is usually a good way to come into contact with those ideas
yeah it just piqued my interest after some reading on it, I have a vague idea on what it is about but I assumed that it would be more of an introduction to philosophy, specifically logic
im in no rush to learn these things though so I usually take a good deal of time to understand and develop an intuition
It is very cool!
just don't be discouraged if things don't make sense the first time you see them
I'm new to IMO scene and preparing for IMO I have around 2 years for preparing for IMO. can u recommend me books to cover IMO syllabus and have unique and creative problems
max stirner giving math advice
Is anyone using math books named Basic maths by serge lang?
Anyone know any good math books for like yr 9 level
If you have good algebra knowlegde, learning intro level calc would open up a lot for you
✋ I'm about to finish it
Is it worth it book?
"The beginner should not be discouraged if they find they do not have the prerequisites for reading the prerequisites."
Me trying to learn Atiyah-Singer Index Theorem be like
Lol good luck
something on linear algebra please
the yt videos cover everything including basic matrix floof that i have already done
i just want to study the geometrical aspect of linear transformations
@ me pls
thx
I personally thought Strang was pretty fine for more pictorial approach to intro linear algebra
I've also worked through it and I think if it's the first time seeing the material then there are better options. If I recall correctly he explicitly mentions in the preface that he expects you to have already seen most of the material, just not quite as formally as he presents it. Other than that, I thought the intuitive geometry section was put together poorly. The rest of the book was fine.
Elementary LA by anton
What’s a better alternative to that book?
If you're trying to learn the material covered by Basic Mathematics and haven't seen it before then working through Khan Academy up to precalculus would probably be a good alternative
honestly I've struggled particularly at that section
can i try it?
3B1B has some nice videos for intuition. There's also Georgia Tech's Interactive Linear Algebra textbook online.
You'd rather go to classics like Loney for the Geometry. Lang has a separate Geometry text too but idk how good that is.
Hall and Knight's Elementary Algebra for Schools. At some point after you're comfortable with algebra you can start with Loney's Plane Trigonometry.
Im looking for a book with lots of examples regarding calculus( mainly integration ). Any suggestions ?
Is S.L. Loneys Plane Trigonometry a good book for learning trig?
From what I know Calculus by michael spivak is a good book for overall proof and examples of calculus.
The answer to all of your questions is "Linear Algebra Done Right" by Sheldon Axler.
This channel can now be archived and closed as all future questions are answerable by this
no

WHat are some good algebrea books, like not linear but algebra 1
For plain old modern algebra 1 which usually covers groups (whereas linalg 1 is all vector space theory) artin's algebra should be fine
when someone says algebra but not linalg I assume they mean groups rings fields 😭
ive seen lots of precollege students confuse “one variable linear equations” with “linear algebra” so usually im a bit skeptical whenever someone mentions it
From where you buy mathematics book? amazon is good?
ebay sells for cheap for relatively g ood quality books
Discover a wonderful selection of rare and collectible books, used copies, signed and first editions and more, from booksellers located around the world.
Where is sour drop
use bookfinder or a print-on-demand service
A classic
I’ve never tried trigonometry before
Really? That feels like a sin
(Someone please pity laugh)
Huh
Because in trig it’s a whole lot of sin cos and tan
Ooh, hhhaah
You get a tan cos of sin
I get it
Hahah
Thank you for laughing
It’s means the world to me even if it’s just pity
thank u for clarifying the fact that ur not indian
if u a non Indian i recommend you to do elementary algebra. hall and knight aint elementary lvl gng😭😭😭
wot
sarcasm gng, ts for any person indian or not
Sorry the whole conversation has been pretty interesting so far
Is rs aggarwal good for grade 9
Any suggestions for a measure theory book. Goal is to learn it for probability theory, stochastic processes and ML sort of stuff but also just for fun. Am a second year financial math undergrad and my only previous exposure to pure math is reading abbots analysis rudins analysis and axlers LADR.
was thinking taos?
also open to an online course reccomendation
i would also suggest looking at billingsley
Thank you! I didnt know axler had a measure theory book, I enjoy the clear structure of his writing so will give this a look
Currently studying Differential Equations for S.L. Ross, completed 3 chapters up to Orthogonal and Oblique Trajectories.
Can someone recommend a book for further practice containing difficult problems?
Any books that explain about vector fields? Been wondering a little
loring tu intro to manifolds
Recently I got the book Introduction to Topology (by Gamelin & Greene). I took graduate differential geometry (from do Carmo's book) before this and was quite lost on the fundamentals of differentiable manifolds due to taking classes out of order. Does Introduction to Topology provide a sufficient exposition on manifolds to prepare one for a differential geometry class?
If not I second this question
Well I suppose I'll know soon enough just by working through it in full. It'll take some months though
it looks like it covers very little about manifolds
What's the best book for linear algebra?
who @'d me
I'm looking for a book that has computational exercises on Galois theory and field theory: things like discussing irreducibility of polynomials, finding Galois groups, calculating degrees of extensions, using the Fund. Thm. of symmetric polynomials, etc
Our exam may be something of a speed competition involving mostly exercises of that sort, so I need to prepare
friedberg insel spence
id suggest a book called upadhyay and upadhyay
for 9th grade
In Loneys Plane Trigonometry when it sais “Euc VL 33” is that like a citation to a paper?
possibly referring to euclids elements
Is there anywhere I can access them?
tried google?
hello, does anybody know about a good linear algebra book? consider i only know the basics
”Linear Algebra done right” is mentioned every time i swear
i will look it up, thanks!
But really someone more knowledgable should answer
check pins
Usually I think that you would do more computational LA before getting into proof based LA, especially if you don't know how to write proofs. Anton is a good book and has a lot of exercises.
are you referring to the elementary linear algebra book?
yes
its better for engineers/physicists/applied mathematics
<@&268886789983436800> requesting pirated resources
We can't help you with this, due to Discord TOS
Oh, I see. I am sorry
I didnt know
Its okay, I appreciate it.
Has anyone here read Hrbacek & Jech's 'Introduction to Set Theory'? I'd like to know what you think of the book and if you would recommend it.
its good, i would reccomend it
okay thank you
i also like Roitman's modern set theory, which covers much of the same content
i'll check it out then thx
Strang is great in my opinion. Linear Algebra Done Right is a gentle read for linear algebra with proofs, but for most it’s a second pass through the introduction of the subject (it even says so in the preface)
I’m sure there is a lot of info in the pinned, but as a biased physicist, I liked Strang, but I also was already very familiar with the subject before I used the book, which would also bias me.
I can attest that Strang’s LA is amazing. You can accompany the book with his lectures from MiT as well
Endorsed, basically
except for axler?
If you have some proofs under your belt, the standard rec is FIS or Axler
If you have a whole course under your belt already, and understand the determinant, then Axler is acceptable
But the title makes claims the book does not back up!
if you mean the algebra taught in school, any book you can get your hands on or from a library is going to work. the website/app khan academy is also very nice
I keep on coming here to look for good fantasy book recommendations and then remember this is a maths server.
?
that statement is fair if they are taking a certain kind of computation-focused course
so your linalg class doesnt cover vector spaces, subspaces, span, linear independence, bases, or linear maps.
an intro linalg class that doesn't have any of [these](#book-recommendations message) is not a linalg class
ok well you must cover spans and vector spaces if you cover bases
and you will indirectly be exposed to linear maps (though ur class is weird and bad if it doesnt actually mention them) if you cover matrices
some courses either barely cover or essentially ignore vector spaces and linear maps
doesnt sound fair to name it linalg then lol
often a course like that would be called something like "matrix theory"
Re:Zero light novel/web novel
Thank you!
Yeah, true. I'd either just call it "Linear Algebra for Engineers" because of how abstracted first courses can be to where you don't really need to worry about rigor (depending on department) or just "Matrix Theory".
Read the Tolkien Legendarium if you haven't already. It's got so much that you'd probably spend a few years there. It is arguably THE fantasy template.
Need I mention A Song of Ice and Fire by George R. R. Martin. Hopefully he finishes the series before kicking the bucket but what's already there can take you a while to go through.
There's also Lev Grossman's Magicians trilogy which is a satirical fantasy with twisted interpretations of elements from both Narnia and Potterverse. There's also an awesome TV adaption of the same.
For mythological fantasy, you can also consider checking out Rick Riordan's Percy Jackson, Heroes of Olympus and Kane Chronicles. There's also Bibek Debroy's 10 Volume Mahabharata which is a historical mythological fantasy (but also a religious text of sorts).
If you're into manga, then there's Witch Hat Atelier and One Piece. If you're into anime then there's Hunter × Hunter (the manga is good but some of the exposition is tough to consume in that medium). There's also Frieren and Fullmetal Alchemist Brotherhood.
Among manhwa and LNs, Omniscient Reader's Viewpoint and The Beginning After The End are excellent reads. Tower of God used to be amazing as well but I've not caught up in some time. There's ofc the aforementioned Re:Zero and also Mushoku Tensei.
For a nice English web novel, check out Mother of Learning
any recommendation for studying projective geometry ? (if anyone has taken a course on it i would like to ask him questions about the subject if possible)
Not "years" but yeah at least 1 year to catch up with Arc 10
If you read 2 chapters a day
Maybe more during weekends
hi
@molten gulch you got a buddy it seems
I liked Kazuo Ishiguro's Buried Giant a lot. And Pratchett's Discworld books are a fun read!
Buried Giant is great!
hi ! does anyone have good resources for PDEs ? Specifically heat and transport equations
Adopting a unified mathematical framework, this textbook gives a comprehensive derivation of the rules of continuum physics, describing how the macroscopic response of matter emerges from the underlying discrete molecular dynamics. Covered topics include elasticity and elastodynamics, electromagn...
Happy Pride Month!
I wanted to share this short compilation video I made to celebrate the LGBTQ CERN community in 2020.
When LGBTQ+ individuals are visible in the scientific community, it sends a powerful message of inclusivity and acceptance. It lets aspiring scientists know that their sexual orientation and gender identity do not hinder thei...
I did NOT ask for this
I needed books
You asked for proud physics
hey man, I didn't question your demands
Proud->pride
The term "proud physics" isn't commonly used
My bad
Preuni
Preuni->proud->pride omg im lgbtq!
Conceptual Physics - Hewitt
Ah yes, I got that one
But it's very light in math
do you know calc
Not yet
Collecting resources though, I do it at once and never again
Preuni means vastly different things in different places
Hold up,
Like what math can you do and what physics can you do as of now is much more important than the label "preuni"
Don't mind my current math level, I'm collecting resources early
For various reasons
The other algebra based books are similar ie Cutnell, Giancoli
you can look at a typical university textbook and ignore the the calc somewhat
Here is the syllabus
Part 1: The Level
· Difficulty: Advanced High School
· Prerequisite: Calculus (differentiation, integration, vectors)
Part 2: Topic List
I. Mechanics
· Motion and Force
· Forces
· Work, Energy, and Conservation Laws
· Momentum and Collisions
· Circular Motion and Gravitation
· Oscillations
II. Thermodynamics
· Heat and Temperature
· Thermodynamics of Gases
III. Waves
· Wave Properties
· Sound
· Light
IV. Electromagnetism
· Electric Fields and Currents
· Magnetism
· Electromagnetic Induction and AC Circuits
V. Atomic Physics (Modern Physics)
· Electrons and Light
· Atomic Structure and Quantum Theory
· Semiconductors and Nuclear Physics
Then we need to know how far you plan to go with physics I'd assume
☝🏻 does that answer your question?
Yes that'll definitely allow people to get you better resources than guesswork on what you are doing.
University Physics or Fundamentals of Physics are typical texts
😭
I don't need to study both, right?
You recommend one?
just look and see which you like better
they have similar coverage
That means look for the one with better pictures 👀
(Or that's what I'll do)
Young and Freedman's University Physics
Halliday, Resnick, and Walker's Fundamentals of Physic
Or just start by reading independent texts on the topic
Taylor's Classical Mechanics
Griffiths' Introduction to Electrodynamics
Shankar's Introduction to Quantum Mechanics
I have nothing really good for particles at this level
No, pick one
he's not ready for the upper level texts
TCC pls!
no go for the one that's more rigorous or has a style of writing you prefer, images can always be subtituted
I see.
So: Conceptual physics as an intro
Then move to Young and Freedman's University physics OR Fundamentals of physics (based on writing style, and difficulty)
Good?
You'd need to learn calculus in between
If you never had exposure to physics and don't know calc
Hewitt is a good book
Yeah, I'm studying math too (on that in a min)
I'm preparing for a specific exam which requires me to study pre-university level Math, Chemistry, and Physics
I'm collecting resources rn
if it's for a specific exam, the answer is easier
use what they say to use
If its a high school level physics the calculus-based physics text might be overkill depending on the exam
See the syllabus above 🔝
They just drop the past exams, give you the syllabus - and that's it. You gotta figure it out yourself
One sec
These are the topics for math
Would Aops suffice?
that's just a normal high school syllabus
I think its overkill imo tho im pre-uni
so yes i think so
Oh- he said he'd done calculus and integration tho, or was that something he had to learn and then was gonna do phsics
The later
hellos
Yes it is, that's what I meant by "pre uni"
For casual conversation, head over to #discussion #serious-discussion or #chill
This channel has its own purpose, and it isnt for regular conversation.
Does anyone know any book that is about discovering mathematics, not just "consuming" it?
Like discovering number theory or something like that
Oh there’s a combo book like this
It’s like Combinatorics through discovery
Let me find it
Thank you!😊
For jee class 11
Start by making yourself intuitively comfortable with the essentials of Calculus and Linear Algebra. At the Pre-Uni level, it's more than sufficient if you can follow 3B1B (LinAlg, Calc). Read from the Feynman Lectures in Physics. Solve problems from Irodov's Problems in General Physics. This is sufficient to bridge the gap between Pre-Uni and First Year Physics. You can add the three volumes of University Physics as a supplement for topics not explored as much in Feynman's Lectures such as Electrical Circuit Analysis.
That's essentially useful, thank you.
These resources help me bridge the gap, as you say. Then I'll be able to learn from the resources provided here, in this order:
- Conceptual Physics
- University Physics (Freedman, Young)
- Fundamentals of Physics.
Right? That's the plan I guess.
And for Calculus, I can use Stewart's.
Conceptual Physics is for a first introduction to physics. Assuming you've not even done Precalculus.
Also I'd recommend Halliday, Resnick and Krane's Physics over the Halliday, Resnick and Walker's Fundamentals of Physics. The latter is verbose and confusing at times.
The stuff I mentioned is a better to work with if you're learning independently. Allows you to gain better insight. Using the aforementioned texts to complement for your syllabus is better.