#book-recommendations
1 messages · Page 164 of 1
I thought winds of winter wasn't going to be the last book
It was supposed to be the second to last? And then the last was supposed to be a time for wolves? Or was that random rumors that went around and I took as fact?
i think the last is supposed to be "a dream of spring"
I honestly disengaged a long time ago because waiting actively for several years is unhealthy.
lemme check
it was Dream of Spring that will be the last but he did say there are some subplots he wanted to finish in WoW
fr its been like forever
iirc
this is going to become another Wheel of Time situation isn't it
author passes before finishing and project gets picked up by another author
People
yes
i think Martin said he didnt want anyone else finishing the series
How do u write this using a pen on paper
oh well cliffhanger forever then
yep
This is a very fancy p
I looks like a bunch of squiggles if I write it
😭
I hate the R they use in relations
It's almost as fancy
But good luck my guy
I don't know what to respond
Notations should be simplified if we must write it using a pen 😭
For real, we're no wordsmith
Next they’ll expect me to write with a feather and ink directly
The Tell-Tale Heart by Edgar Allen Poe
Their writing is this fire???
Flatland
There's of course Dune if you're okay with soft magic-esque things but not really magic.
Assassin's Creed has some books as well. And pretty much most genres in period fantasy kinda have little to no magic.
oh shi i remember reading that long ago
I love Assassin's Creed
fire writing
What books u guys recommend rn reading infinite powers
Spivak's Calculus. Ditch pop math. Read the real deal.
Napoleon is a book? I thought he was a person.
Real funny
What are you looking for exactly? Any specific area of interest?
I’d say Great War leaders
Like Napoleon.
Mehmet 2nd
I’m looking to Chinese the Romance of the Three kingdoms
The Kingdom DP is showing lol
Churchill has stuff written about himself and the wars he's been in. That said his racist colonial cruelties don't get a mention.
Right….anyone but Churchill??? No? Lol
Well I wouldn’t mind reading a fantasy novel
the romance of the 3 kingdoms is fiction
Ashoka The Great has a nice biography. It's called Ashoka: Portrait of a Philosopher King.
the records of the three kingdoms is the history book
This is what I live for
Consider the Viking Sagas for this. There's plenty of them that have been translated and most have been inspired by real historical events but have been narrated with a lot of whimsy and exaggeration lying on borderline untrue things as well.
Thanks I’ll look into it
who knows about Shackleton incredible voyage
Any thriller book that reads at good as that?
Hi could anyone recommend a textbook for PDEs? I feel like I want some more practice questions to work with
The Dawn of Everything a New History of Humanity by David Graeber & David Wengrow.
Can someone tell me if the proofs in Book of Proof are sufficiently rigorous?
Do you have a balanced news diet? Go to https://ground.news/night to see reporting from a variety of sources and perspectives around the world. Subscribe for 40% off their unlimited access Vantage plan through our link.
For 72 years, Louis XIV ruled as the most powerful king in Europe.
He centralized power, reshaped the map of Europe, and turne...
kurzgesagt has a history channel now
Have you read it?
long ago yes
This isn’t the one that ran away from Napoleon
?
napoleon wasnt born yet
youre familiar with sapiens by yuval harrari?
well the book i just recommended is much better at representing history without many fallacies than this
and also its more anarchic in nature
written by cultural anthropologists
700ish pages of pure fun
you can then go into any era i prefer 1500s-1800s europoe
I know about this book
But im just like
How much of it is actually real
We know like 0.00000001% of human history
The dawn of everything?
which author is the archeologist
Ok
yeah its just an overview sort of
brief
if u wanna go into it more than u neewd other books
does anybody have any interesting math books in german
preferably on algebra
or complex anal
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCuy1DaQzWI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0KQYNtPl7V4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sH03uLuOtSY
This isn't a denialist video😎
📜Subscribe: https://bit.ly/3tapuza | 💖Support: https://bit.ly/3PWNHmc
💖Support on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC57gLBfdhN1zWMLmiW2Ya6Q/join
📣Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/t3essays
🇵🇱Kanał po polsku: https://www.youtube.com/MyslecGlebiej
✉Get in touch: t3essays at gmai...
A rebuttal to Kurzgesagt's misleading video about 'staying hopeful' on climate change.
We WILL Fix Climate Change! By Kurzgesagt: https://youtu.be/LxgMdjyw8uw
Support me on Patreon: https://patreon.com/BadEmpanada
Twitch stream: https://twitch.tv/BadEmpanada
Follow my Instagram: https://instagram.com/BadEmpanada
Become a member on YouTube: https...
Kurzgesagt does their usual thing of whitewashing Western imperialism, alongside the normal German thing of ignoring Israeli genocide, in new video on 'War'. I react like a slop
Support me on Patreon: https://patreon.com/BadEmpanada
Become a BadEmpanada Live member: https://www.youtube.com/@BadEmpanadaLive/join
Main Channel: https://youtube.com/...
given kurzgeshit is a german climatewasher and genocide denier, i doubt his history channel will be of any value
<@&268886789983436800>
its pop-science and pop-history, it wouldn't be of any value regardless
for random topics it doesn't really matter, its no different to any other general source on the topic
ig hes tryna not offend anyone
who's "anyone?" i guess people that know the history of colonialism and imperialism aren't part of that group? or people who know that the invisible hand of the market won't magically solve climate change?
is the hand invisible so it's easier to commit theft🤡
Hi, I currently have a “extendable wings contraptions/jet pack” obsession going on thanks to an Artificer character I’m playing. Does anyone know any good under-grad to mid-college+ level engineering, design, and fabrication books and resources I can get ideas from and that are also good for studying up in that area?
are you really asking for engineering textbooks to make a jetpack with wings
like a videogame
Aeronautical engineering for small craft. I had to get the words of my head to make better sense of them.
is that just a euphemism for what I said above though
well, maybe someone can help
Anything from any angle helps. 🤷♂️
one year deadline so you can fly around like cupid next Valentine's
What was once science fiction is now “modern” fact.
Oh, clever for a test run.🤣
I remembered I actually have this book
https://www.amazon.com/Wheres-My-Jetpack-Amazing-Science/dp/1596911360/
I prefer funky anal
👅
BadEmpanada 💀
Yakub's greatest soldier
This dude's gone of the deep end recently
Dude has been off the deep end for a long time
Bro does not know how to log off it doesn’t matter who you are or what you disagree with him about he will send you death threats on twitter over literally anything lol
He should stick to history videos. He used to have a stronger understanding of societal issues a couple years ago, but he's lost that. Either way, his politics are not built on strong fundamentals so I don't really take anything he says seriously unless it's backed up by sources
examples?
examples?
Of what?
OMG STAR TREK
give some examples of how he has a weaker understanding of "societal issues" than before
No
What's this politics channel?
good one unc
I agreee with asking for examples for the death threats as that's a serious accusation, but I didn't claim that and I'm not gonna begin a full political debate with you
I mean look at his twitter for 5 minutes lol
Idk I haven’t been on twitter in years
That’s the way he was back then I have no doubt in my mind he hasn’t changed
But I have no desire to debate politics with people that online lol
Get your politics from people who aren’t permanently angry. There are plenty of leftists fitting that description. Anger isn’t a good basis for politics
Yep, even religion.
Thanks. I’ll check it out.
not trying to dunk on you here, but saying, "yep, even" is supposed to set up for something less obviously political, but you ended your sentence with something obviously political
Honestly, I pulled the sentence out of my ass, ||because I was thinking back to an argument I had with someone else that tried to say religion couldn’t be political and didn’t follow a similar MO at some levels.||
So, let’s not go there.
looking for a starter book on linear algebra for a high schooler to go into deeper topics any suggestions?
what specifically would you look for in "deeper topics"?
there are a couple of directions you could go in
Artin Algebra
most lower division linear algebra courses are focused more on matrix computations than actually proving anything
?
Author, name of book
if you want a more rigorous approach you might look at FIS, hoffman/kunze, etc
are you answering them? if so that is a terrible reccomendation
It's not a terrible recommendation. I was a high schooler when I read it
I can attest its a very accessible and good book that will teach the kid what mathematics is if they wish to learn so
nvm i was thinking of a different book with similar author and name, i guess that one works
yeah i was thinking of emil artin's geometric algebra, i think ive heard that book just referred to as algebra or something
it technically could have been an answer to their question, but would have been a bad one lol
Oh lol
Yeah, I should specify. "Algebra" by Mike Artin
The only thing I'd say is to not rush. Take it one step at a time, the abstraction slowly builds up chapter by chapter. They'd be able to stop any time and return to it later.
I remember being too eager and rushing, which is a double edge sword. Hence the warning.
no correlation btw
Book recommendations for linear algebra engineering undergrad?
what books do the linalg classes at your school use
Larson
op its contents seem a bit on the small side
https://textbooks.math.gatech.edu/ila/
Full free online interactive book
@stone basalt
Welcome to Mathcord, new nerd. Hope you enjoy your stay!
@cerulean thicket
Welcome to mathcord, nerd. Hope you enjoy your stay!
I've been here since June of 2025...
But thank you nonetheless
Not subject to reflection property huh
illustrations in fomenko fuchs alg top are astonishing
I like poe's poems more
sorry for late response
I need a non-fiction book reccomendation guys
I like Maths, Science, Comp. Science, History, Politics and just... more stuff ig
Anyone has book recomendations for the Elliptic functions/integrals? I'm reading Greenhill's textbook, it's pretty good but a bit convoluted at points
like the poems in The "Raven"?
Get back to me when you learn to speak like an adult because I can’t hear over the sound of your diaper being changed.
I can absolutely recommend "The ailing Empire" by Sebastian Haffner. It's about the history from the creation of the german empire till the fall of the Third Reich. Haffner really gets into details about alliances and why the world wars started and how the germany of Bismarck almost inevitably slid down the path of our favourite painter.
Or George Orwell's Animal Farm and 1984 (I mean it's kinda fiction, but more an allegory on reality.)
im currently learning analysis with Browders Intro to Analysis. To those who're familiar with the book, do you think it can be called a comprehensive course of real analysis? i know there's always Amann & Escher's three volumes set that dont compare to Browder at all but still. How much real analysis would one know if he studied Browders book?
im asking because i wanna know how much of analysis ill have lacking when ive finished the book
you say you're willing to study law in your bio, then go for Hobbs, Lock, Rousseau, Constant, Montesquieu. Anything of the mentioned authors will be of value
Thank you!
Thank you!
<@&268886789983436800>
What is the best book for number theory starts with peano axioms?
fwiw, if you want to do peano axioms, terence tao's analysis 1 beginning is about that
and there's also the online natural numbers game, which has you do it in lean
hopefully someone chimes in with an actual number theory recommendation tho
What's your motivation for learning number theory? Peano arithmetic can be learned on its own and you can find it in many standard books
Start in Mathematical Olympiad

Thats not good?
I don't have any book recommendations geared towards math olympiad sorry
I can give you a list of number theory book recommendations though
Okey thanks
I will definitely choose something for myself
Yes olympiads are blegh
@violet burrow
Welcome to Mathcord, new nerd
does anyone know any good books for EDA? currently i'm reading an introduction to statistical learning but if any1 knows any better books let me know
Are you the official greeter of this server?
no he's just like that
I'll take this as a compliment
if you were baffled by the SML book, that is gonna be rough book to choose instead
Harper has video lectures on YouTube from OPLSS you can look for
@normal crystal any webtoons you've been reading lately
oops, I think you asked me in the other channel and I forgot to answer
recently I was reading
Echoes of a Reverse Planet
Glitch Utopia
The Magic Theory of the Regressed Sword Saint
Veteran of the Apocalypse
The Genius Girl Who Hides The Martial World's Public Enemy
Murim Psychopath
My Simulated Path To Immortality
Android or Gboard knows what you type
you can do better than murim psychopath man...
enjoy your furry daily vlogs on the homepage
@remote sparrow based on your previous recs, I think the ones of those you might possibly enjoy are
My Simulated Path To Immortality
Veteran of the Apocalypse
or none
idk, surprise me
they both look like slop
i recently binged aza
what are you reading
Need a math book to binge
novels or just manhwa?
manhwa
webtoons don't have to be of korean origin
i can't say i've been particularly gripped by any k-novel thus far
the ones i've seen seemed better off adapted in comic form; they practically read like scripts for an upcoming manhwa adaptation
dude i found you on google
honestly i havent really been reading much manhwa recently, except maybe bad born blood, but theyre lowkey dragging that one.
i havent read a novel since second coming of gluttony either lmao
but i do sometimes read the first few chapters of new manhwas just to scope and see whats going on
murim psychopath iirc was status window slop or some shit
orv seems to be like
a korean one piece
ppl keep saying it has a slow start and it gets really good after like 100 episodes
as far as the manhwa anyway
difference is that orv's novel actually has an ending
so cool ig
i read like 40ish episodes of the orv manhwa and haven't gotten back to it
that author or artist has a sheet of solid manhwa too
other than orv
Dokja was an Average Office Worker whose sole interest was reading his favorite web novel “Three Ways to Survive the Apocalypse”.But when the novel suddenly becomes reality, he is the only person who knows how the world will end. Armed with this realization, Dokja uses his understanding to change th...
which one
its tower slop
tower of god was good for a while
it's literally just korean one piece now
was that what it was called?
idk
nah thats not it
aren't there at least several tower stories
tower of god is probably one of the OGs
My local time warden cannot be this cute
well she's a petplayer now
waaaaaaay more than several
did you ever read Mage Again
the artist:
can we stay on topic please
Nope. That would be Tower of God.
But it's gotten very weirdly off the rails imo since the Hell Train and Last Station arcs.
THE OG. Afaik it was planned to be an entire universe on its own. But idk what happened. The story keeps getting dragged into long and weird tangents.
I used to love it. But rn with the Lo Po Bia family and Po Bidau family at war, the story has diverted way too much from climbing the tower. It's possible to develop the lore while making progress with the main storyline. And ToG was doing that so well up until The Last Station arc.
Imho it's seriously fallen off.
It used to dominate the webtoon charts back in the day.
Yes. It's becoming your run of the mill power fantasy
He's hella interesting. Not as a character but as an irregular within the tower
I don't get the idea of loving maths and doing it unless you are forced to do it, I mean what's even fun in it, yeah it's kinda fun when ur getting problems but other than that it don't make sense to me. I still wanna get into maths thou but I just don't know how to 😭, I know the basic principles and formulas of 3d geometry, calculus and algebra. Which book shld I start with?
Like every science, Math is an art
The idea of loving it comes from appreciating that
But it depends what kinda math do you want to learn
There are different types of maths?
Yes
Theres statistics geometric calculus etc
If ur already familiar with those things I’d suggest learning linear algebra next
well if you don't enjoy math, you most likely won't enjoy it from forcing yourself to do it
are there any related topics you find interesting?
Well I've liked doing algebra and geometry
maybe you could try like a beginner friendly abstract algebra book?
try dummit and foote
no
really don't think that is the right kind of book in this case
there are better introductions, books like those exist for a reason
lang undergraduate algebra
oo alrr will do
If you don't find it fun, then no point forcing yourself to get into it. You'll regret trying to. Do what you like. There's more to the world than math but we just like to find it in all those things as well. You don't have to.
i just meant i never actually tried doing math by myself on my own interest, i was always forced to do it because of academics. I just wanna give it a try and see what it’s about.
its not like im forcing myself to get into maths rn
If you're not already interested then chances are you won't be. But there's no harm in exploring stuff. Just don't go in with unrealistic expectations of some sort of epiphany that will motivate you to pursue the subject.
yeah, most people find interest in math (or anything for that matter) by independently stumbling upon it or someone like a teacher causing that spark
either way, its best to start with what you know you like and go from there
i would say an abstract algebra book is probably good because it revisits a lot of ideas you're probably familiar with but from a new perspective. whether or not that perspective would be interesting to you is hard to say
I would also view linear algebra and euclidean geometry in the same vein.
aight imma let you know bout my experience w it!
thanks for the recommendation thou
fraleigh's abstract algebra i think is a good example, there's probably better ones but that's all I can think of right now
pinter's as well
thats the one i personally used for a first introduction
furries killed it

which is not being taught in most schools...
science is the study of what you don't know
so if you already know all the forms and plugging in to do calculations idk what you're doing!!
did you not read that far
dog people
cat people
watch the creator do a spinoff webtoon from Rachel's perspective
just to antagonize the fans
Not that I like it but a valid defense is that the methods and curricula are designed to cater to the many as opposed to the few. The interested few tend to diverge in different ways. Some come to appreciate mathematics as an art form, some come to appreciate it's utility, some come to build things with the science they know and some come to the fascination of what they don't know. If the curriculum and instruction catered to finding things out and proving/solving beautiful problems then we would be left without engineers, doctors, philosophers and so much more.
General schooling aside what is really worrying is why aren't there enough schools to cater to exactly these things. If universities can provide instruction for a focused degree, why can't at least some schools also provide instructions in a manner that caters to audiences who want to do science or mathematics in the proper sense?
Engineers do not do or need math besides theory to identify problems and data to troubleshoot. At the end of the day, it's a craft. I'd argue that cs and physics folks use math the same way mathematicians do, just in different areas and often not rigorously (not that one cannot do it).
I wonder why. What do you do as an engineer and how does the math help
Anyone using Hodder Boost for IB Math AI HL?
Well. That's more so mathematical modelling and experimental design tbf. I can understand engineers working along these lines requiring math but most do not?
Like what you're doing is not so far off from experimental physics either.
Like if I were working at a factory and some equipment went bust, what math do I need?
Or let's say the circuit I made doesn't do it's job correctly. Would I work out the math or troubleshoot by playing with the circuit?
Yeah. That's pretty much where I am getting at tbf. Engineering is usually very tinkering and troubleshooting heavy in the industry. And engineers predominantly find themselves in the industrial sector as opposed to academia.
For those who wanna or do work in an area that requires designing, modelling and testing things there is ofc a bit more math involved but the extent would likely depend on the specific case.
Yeah but like diagnostic stats is more so learning how to run them and interpret the data is it not? It's more so data analytics.
This academia or industry?
Very interesting. This is fascinating to know.
I was always under the impression that engineering students learning all sorts of complicated math is kinda pointless.
Can I apply survival analysis on myself to see whether I live or die? (Get into a good PhD program or not)

I think there might be a fixed point theorem that tells you no rather easily xD
What's your favorite book
That's random and also too broad a question. Give me a genre or smth to narrow it down and I can tell you my top 3.
do you not believe that there's unity in all knowledge?
was only curious about your current interests but if you ask.. hm I won't say real analysis, I'm tempted to ask for linear algebra but I'll ask for abstract algebra or numerical analysis:)
Favorite rational homotopy theory book
Okay now I get why you wanna be narrow
I’m sorry, if you’re applying to PhDs the answer is you die
If you don’t get in you get executed
If you get in, academia kills you
a little bit
Is academia worse than industry?
My current interests do not lie in pure mathematics. Never have tbf. That has nothing to do with favourites tho. Weird way to ask a question about interests (mine lie in quantum foundations and information theory) ngl.
If I were to recommend books for Abstract Algebra then I'd go with Judson for an introduction. It's got nice applications and also sagemath exercises so you'll grow in familiarity with computer algebra systems as well. For harder problems I'd look at Herstein's Topics in Algebra. For advanced material I'd use Gorodentsev. Always nice to check out Keith Conrad's blurbs on some of the topics as well.
For numerical analysis I'd just use FNC. It's a solid starting point. I don't see much of a point going further into it with FA and stuff. Much more interesting to look at HPC but at this point books imho are not that useful.
DNE. Never gone into it. Not interested either.
information theory
Then you probably have read some percentage on Number theory I assume?
as both study structures in numbers... ig?
Not for or in the context of information theory but yes. The basics.
Oh what would be a good start in your opinion then
That's like all of math more or less.
If you get in, academia kills you
Only if I die
I firmly believe there's unity in all knowledge anyway
To what?
Number theory
What about spectral theory?
Uh huh. Explain the unity of general relativity and quantum theory. I'll wait.
favorite book
Burton's Elementary Number Theory is solid.
What's your motivation? Are you looking for elliptic curves? Dry number theory? Analytic flavor?
Moretti's Spectral Theory and Quantum Mechanics.
I also like Einseidler and Ward's FA book for this. It's not necessarily geared to my interests but a very nice book nonetheless.
I should write a book recommendation list for number theory and maybe someone can pin for future use
what is a nice book about mathematical logic that is both beginner friendly and rigorous?
i really want a good logic book to start my CS journey chat
dude isn't that like an open problem in physics 😭 ??
unity is unknown...
Guys, I want to get really really really good at mathematics
I think a comprehensive list of different books for every main field with several books, based on why you want to study the field/current "skill" level, would be extremely beneficial, because I know especially for myself that navigating what books across different topics would be the best for me and what I want is extremely difficult to navigate, and it's not like I have the pockets to buy tons of books and see which works best
Yes that's my goal. When I get home I'll write a summary of each number theory book I know and what can you get from it
Could you guys suggest me some books for these topics:
- Coordinate geometry
- Number theory
- Probability
- Trigonometry
- Calculus
I'm currently reading Number Theory by George E. Andrews (published in the 1970s I think) and it's pretty yummy. It is pretty terse (that is, it often asserts things assuming the reader will be able to figure out why the previous implies the current, which in some cases can take a few minutes) but I quite enjoy it. As for 3 4 and 5, if you're studying them for school I think the best thing to do would be the check out whatever textbooks your school uses for them
I need something that doesn't require much prerequisites
The book I mentioned doesn't really have any, imo, except I suppose basic notation you might not see in high school like sum and divides and modularity
It's written to be digestible for both math students and humanities students so it's not incredibly technically dense
Well, not everything will be Greek to me then. I will check it out, thanks!
What branch of CS do you wanna get into?
Not exactly CS, I just want to study these topics to the best of my ability for an exam
That gives us a better frame of reference as not all branches require the math you mentioned
Call it a penchant
Mhm!
It's for an exam, not any branch.
When will you be taking the exam? That is, are you needing to learn these subjects for the first time, or just study them?
Ah okay
In terms of studying I think past papers are the best way to study for specific exams
Just study them.
Is it a math placement exam by any chance?
Instead of vaguely studying the material and trying to guess what will be on the exam
No. It also has sections for physics and chemistry
Hm, that's true. I just wanted to get a better idea of what I am gonna study for the next month.
😨
Im sorry Lana
I must defend my applied brethren’s
I don't know the full situation but I think it's generally best to study one field at a time, because then your brain kinda molds itself into that field. Like if you're studying both number theory and graph theory, you have a math brain, but if you zero in specifically on number theory, now you have a number theory brain, and the connections feel much more natural. The same applies to other things like hobbies
No one is perfect

That's such a good observation! But I lack time, and I need to prepare these all at a time as the questions mix multiple concepts from the ones I mentioned.
Some of us like getting paid
Glad to be in the minority then ig
I have to stay in school as long as possible to postpone getting a JOB 😨
Will do
In terms of importance, I’d spend the bulk of your time studying calculus, as physics & chem are rooted in it
Much appreciated!
I agree
Stewart is an instant go to
I agree with that also
Black book by Vikas Gupta
Hm, true. I have studied these topics before, you could say I need some kind of a level up.
Questions only
Hm
Wait so what kind of exam exactly is it?
Is it some sort of placement or evaluative exam?
An engineering entrance exam
Ohhh
Which one
I think probably building a general intuition would be better than trying to cram a ton of knowledge, given your time frame
study, a lot.
Yeah, that seems to be the best possible way
The JEE
Ya bro do black book
i doubt a pre-u student has anything better to do with their time
Hm
Nothing like it. SAT is reasonable.
I had to make sense of the situation, not the best at drawing analogies
Agree
Call it an Olympiad level entrance exam that relies on rote memory and formula vomit as opposed to real skills.
Agreed
Hm, what do you suggest?
Are we talking about JEE
Welcome to the table, hiido
Quit preparing for that shit and find alternate options. There's plenty. Do your due dilligence.
As far as generally studying stuff goes, I can recommend stuff
But not for that bullshit.
Yes, but again, what do you suggest? Besides, I plan to learn these topics out of general interest anyway.
Might as well just go to a US school frankly
Hm, what if I genuinely want to study this stuff? Then?
- Pogorelov's Analytical Geometry,
- Burton's Elementary Number Theory,
- Blitzstein and Hwang's Introduction to Probability,
- Gelfand's Trigonometry,
- Spivak's Calculus.
Do these build concepts from the ground-up or are they jargon-heavy?
Spivak as a first read is pretty ballsy
Potentially have Lang's Basic Mathematics and Geometry book for reinforcement at hand.
Noted
Calc- stewart’s early transcendentals (it has sections on trig so you don’t need another text for that)
Probability - any stats book works, I have one by Wackerly
The others, i dont know much
It's doable. But not with the same standard of rigor you'd expect at the undergrad level.
Thanks for the suggestions!
Imo spivak is ideal if you already know some calc OR are a maths student
I have always wanted to learn mathematics the mathematics way, this exam stuff doesn't really suit me
Stewart is the standard for 99% of stem students
Stewart into spivak is pretty effective ive heard
You do require a solid background on Precalculus before picking up Spivak or even Blitzstein when he gets to continuous probability distributions. Lang's Basic Mathematics is good enough for that but for a more standard course you can also look at Axler's Precalculus.
true, its more natural to immediately start with PMA or RCA instead
Will take a look into these!
Anything for physics?
Fuck it just start with hartshorne
Oh
real
Is general physics or smth precise?
but why would someone do that
General physics
I mean after stewart isnt it more reasonable to just go for some RA book instead of spivak?
like say rudin or abbott
I have one by Sears & Zemansky
Halliday, Resnick and Krane (5th Ed). Along with Feynman's Lectures and Irodov's Problems in General Physics.
Is it good?
Probably
I disagree w/ Feynmann im ngl
Idrk much about calculus texts I was mathematically afk until abstract algebra
Noted
I enjoyed it
Why?
Go read D&S. I'm watching you
fair
Dummit and Soote
Life before and after D&S
I don’t see it much as a book to learn from, but more so to gain awareness
life before and after NT/AG arcs
The college physics one?
Truly
University physics?
If so, yes
Exactly why I didn't mention it as a primary text. It's a solid set of lectures to couple with a standard text and a problem book for insight.
Hm
Life when you realize things can be thought of as Galois representations
tfw you spot reciprocity in nature 
I suck at chemistry
btw does one need background in representation theory to study these or is it ok to see representation theory for the first time here
Chemistry is cool if you look at quantum groups
Yeah, this went over my head too
Near absolute zero
Depends on what you want
You can absolutely get exposed to representations early one
I mean you already are
i mean yea
Do I get to represent myself using representation theory?
You need to study a lot more math or physics to make sense of that comment lol
Tensor products as well
True. And Thanks for the recommendations
where to learn about galois representations
But if you want to play with basic examples of Galois representations that's completely fine and accessible
Yes
Have you gone through Dirichlet characters?
tysm for the recommendation
I know what a dirichlet character is, nothing more nothing less ig
yeah these are Galois representations
I can vouch this is the best recommendation
yea ok but like where to read about galois representations in details. Like if one wants to study modular forms, one reads something like D&S.
Yes you can go into many rabbitholes with this
there is this recommendation, is there any other resource to supplement this one?
I recommend learning Dirichlet characters really well
can i reask my question again if it wasnt answered or its potential spam?
This can be learned while doing algebraic number theory
Also make sure you learn how to connect it to Kronecker Weber. Super important
Did you do a course of ANT? 🐜
no
Also basic idea of p adic is required
If you want representations coming elliptic curves then you will have to do some elliptic curves obviously
Then you can look at the Tate module
But anyways let's not get ahead of ourselves. Learn your Dirichlet characters
something related to this?
true
alright thanks deltoid and nHecke(G)
Deltoid's dms
It's a good sign
supposedly deltoid's channel should do the job but he almost never yaps about galois representations in that channel
diamond shurman
ohhh ok nice, tysm
you should know elliptic curve stuff before learning about galois representations tho
a big class of galois reps come from elliptic curves so they're pretty important to the theory
later on if you keep learning about the the theory you'll learn about reps coming from abelian varieties but that's not as important when you're starting out
the the the-ory
how much should i know? Does D&S not cover the necessary stuff?
2 doesn’t divide odd numbers
if no then would something like silverman's rational points on elliptic curves do the job?
bro still remembers this
not really
you'd need to know the basics from like silverman's arithmetic of elliptic curves
My memeory is very good
like at the very least you'd need to know how elliptic curves over C work
idk if the silverman book you mentioned covers that
I see, I will keep that in mind. I wanted to study elliptic curves sooner or later anyways
you need that because like
the most basic examples of galois reps come from elliptic curves
then you have more complicated examples coming from cusp forms
and it just goes on from there
you can argue that dirichlet characters are technically the simplest example because they're 1D reps but that's kinda cheating lol
Cheating?
i love your takes:)
ohhh ok. I will keep everything you told me in mind and see what to do from there
JEE?
1D reps don't exist lalalalalalalalalalalalala
tysm irony
🫡
Ah so class field theory is not real
🚬
my religion only believes in GL(n) for n>1
What are the best resources to learn undergrad math topics covered in Putnam?
I only have AIME qualification and studied up to Calc 3.
Hello, can I get some book recommendations for analytic geometry?
whats the best book for pre university math
mainly just practice problems from previous years
there's also the book putnam and beyond
Openstax + youtube honestly
I recommend this book if I can find it🤡
Basic Number Theory:
- "A Classical Introduction to Modern Number Theory" By Ireland and Rosen.
Read chapters 1 to 5. You can technically do more but I recommend learning the later chapters in other books. - "A Course in Arithmetic" by Serre.
This book is short and touches both analytic and algebraic aspects briefly. It goes over quadratic forms if you are into that.
Algebraic number theory:
For this, I mainly used Neukirch as my go to book. It's the classical book. You can also look at Milne's notes. There is also "Number fields" by Marcus which I think is easier to read and it has a lot of exercises too but it does not go into depth.
Analytic Number theory:
The classic go to option here is Apostol's "Analytic Number Theory." It's beginnner friendly compared to what I'm going to recommend after and it focuses on proving the prime number theorem. It also goes over Dirichlet's theorem on arithmetic progression.
If you feel like you liked the log spam flavor of number theory, you can look more into books like Montgomery's "Multiplicative Number theory" or "The Distribution of Prime numbers" by Koukoulopoulos.
Elliptic Curves:
For a gentle introduction, you can look at "Rational Points on Elliptic Curves" by Silverman. If you want to dive into these things seriously then you can look at "The Arithmetic of Elliptic Curves" by Silverman and the sequel to this book.
Modular forms:
If you care about geometric aspects and Galois representations then I highly recommend starting with Diamond and Shurman. For an analytic approach you can look at the sequel to Apostol's book. It goes over Ford circles.
Class field theory:
Technically you can just go with Neukirch but there are other ways to go about this. If you don't know the deal with class field theory then read Cox's "Primes of the form x^2+ny^2." Then you can look at Childress. It's easier to read than many traditional sources. For serious things you can look at Milne's notes or Cassels & Frohlich.
@shell maple
yall mods can we pin this please?
@split portal
any books good as a first introduction to topology?
munkres
ive got mendelson's already, bit dense ngl
mmmm ive heard mix things about it tho 
like some ppl say they cant decipher the book
still thanks for the recommendation 
I learned intuitionistic alongside classical
Neither are prerequisite to the other really
I took a course
Idk what good books there are for logic
What area of logic?
I mean like proof theory, model theory, etc
Intuitionistic and other systems are studied in several different contexts
Hi, what book do you recommend for measurement theory?
https://measure.axler.net is free, there's also the books by folland, royden, rudin, schilling, etc...
Yeah the two main branches in logic are proof theory and model theory
"syntax" and "semantics"
I would not say this lol
proof theory is basically dead and type theory is puppetting it's corpse
set theory and computability are also big fields of logic that are independent
idk if this has been mentioned before but the free download link for dummit and foote's abstract algebra is dead
actually it seems like a lot of the download links on https://mathematics.gg/books are dead or otherwise not working, although i wonder if that's a mobile/data thing?
probably doesnt help that my connection appears to be unstable
yeah pi.math.cornell.edu simply wont load for me
not really looking for a book rn just procrastinating ig
book for general relativity, preferably lots of practice questions and maths-heavy
Thanks man i'll save this, That's useful
Ask in physics server
I already did
i just want books for the maths that you would use really
that's why i ask here
like, could you recommend some books on PDEs, and differential geometry?I know those are important for GR
well any math book about those topics would go far deeper than what you use in the physics
Lee Smooth Manifolds and Riemannian Manifolds for differential geometry
do you want to learn only for GR?
not necessarily, i just need it for that atm
You can use Rustum Choksi's PDE and O'Neil's Semi-Riemannian Geometry.
Latter expects some background in Topology tho.
I think any beginner GR books cover the necessary math
like schutz, caroll, also misner thorne wheeler goes through it too
should i get a book tor topology too then 😭
imma have to carry back so many books atp
okay cool
Do you wanna study GR rigorously?
Tu's an introduction to manifolds is similar to lee's book and has an appendix covering the neccessary topology
Well. They tend make some casual errors every now and then.
average physicist teaching math \j
I just want to have enough understanding to where I can listen to someone talk about it and not be super confused
Then just get MTW
okay an appendix is probably good so i can lookup what else to study
Don't bother with math texts
is mtw dummit foote of gr
wdym? i want to know the maths
do you want to know the math for its own sake?
MTW (Misner Thorne Wheeler) will teach you the math you need as you go on for GR
idk if im making sense 😭
But not rigorously right? Cos there's two different games here.
yes i want to know all of the maths
i think he probably has no idea what hes getting into
oh okay cool
Same
yeah sorry i don't have any idea 😭
im just curious really
Do you know the difference between how mathematicians and physicists tend to approach math?
idk dude i just want to learn the maths
How much physics or math do you even know? Let's start with that
if there's pre requisite knowledge i can just study those beforehand
There's shit tons and it depends on how you wish to approach the subject my lad.
Math done the mathematician way and math done the physicist way can be very different.
Even if conveying the same thing. The methods vary vastly.
||mathematician way: sin x defined from exponential ; physicist way: sin x = x
||
In physics you can get away by using empirically obvious arguments. In math, you need proofs for those things.
what math would you say is required to know, I can tell you if i have/haven't done those rather than listing everything I've ever done?
Just list the general topics you know
okay then mathematics way
like calculus, ODEs, classical mechanics etc whatever
uh okay then maybe like ODEs, Linear algebra and Analysis ?? im not entirely sure how that helps as i don't know what's required in the first place and if these are relevant 😭
Real Analysis, Point-Set Topology, Linear Algebra, Group Theory, ODEs and PDEs. Finally Differential Geometry.
thank you ❤️❤️
that's what i needed i think
well you are saying "what math is required". that kind of implies your motivations for learning the math is specifically to be able to understand the physics
i want to understand the maths to watch YouTube videos about GR physics
😭😭
in that case it would be a waste of time to learn so much stuff, as much of it you wouldn't even use
it depends what your motivations are, like i said
From what I can see it's hard to see you like it given how little you know about it.
im only first year sorry 😭😭
Cos it's pretty common knowledge as to how physicists and mathematicians operate differently.
uh okay
Aside from the arcane mathematical physicists such as myself but even we have our differences lol.
...
To watch yt videos u just need to know calculus lmao
Not even that lol
Yea XD
yeah then that plan is good, just know that math and physics are two separate disciplines. they have quite a bit of overlap but the focuses of each are very much different
Suspension of belief and lack of critical thinking is all you need
idc im curious about it now
you havent answered what math and physics do you know currently
only then we can help you with a proper roadmap
oh mb didnt see
Majoring in math or physics?
maths
Okay. Then this is good
if u know analysis and linear algebra then u can pick up Tu's intro to manifolds
and learn topology from the appendix as you go
Or you can even go for Lee's topological manifolds for the topology
yeah thats how i learned (am learning) differential geometry, tu is good
i touched tu after calculus 2 and still was able to follow through
LOL
(didnt finish)
For GR specifically O'Neil's book is great. You can probably pick it up after learning a bit of topology. Mainly what you need is an understanding of connectedness, compactness and separation axioms. Tbf a lot of this is implicitly taught if you did multivariable analysis properly. That's often good enough to start O'Neil.
Consider reviewing Analysis from Zorich for some physics context. Pretty sure you can do O'Neil right after since you already know Linear Algebra.
Although doing some Group Theory can be very helpful beforehand as well. Understanding isometries come very handy when you get to Killing vectors and stuff.
okay so: Tu's intro to manifolds, O'Niels GR, Analysis from Zorich, Rustum Choksi's PDE and O'Neil's Semi-Riemannian Geometry, Lee Smooth Manifolds and Riemannian Manifolds for differential geometry
is that everything?
if u finish these all u will become goated 🔥
i did group theory, but it was mainly i think dihedral group and some general core concepts like subgroups isomorphisms and maybe other important stuff
yes i understand it's a lot of information and will take a while but I like to have something to do
Well if you know how to identify symmetry groups in this context you are good to go. In GR we would deal with some Lie Groups is all.
alright then
Which are essentially groups that are also smooth manifolds
You don't need to look at Riemannian Geometry to do GR. Doing Semi-Riemannian (for GR) alone is more than fine if you have some experience with Euclidean Geometry. Elements of Riemannian Geometry will pop up by themselves wherever necessary. You can check out prereqs to O'Neil and work through them alone.
okay noted, I'll get the semi riemannian one
Anybody got recs for History, Psychology, Law, etc. Non-fiction books?
What do you want to learn
nature of existence by mctaggart
Anything ig, the book should be interesting and recreational but also informative. If the book regards law or history then it's optimal that the history refers to Europe or the law mentioned is regarding Britain.
Any interest in rich people?
https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691215730/as-gods-among-men
"In this masterly book, [Alfani] offers an insightful long-run perspective and fascinating lessons for the future. A must-read!"—Thomas Piketty, author of Capital in the Twenty-First CenturyA sweeping narrative that shows how the rich historically justified themselves by helping their societies in times of crisis, why they no longer do, and wh...
Ooh, that looks interesting
if you're in university, just sign up for classes relevant to physics
I don't have very many physics modules though?
I dont mean fluid dynamics or stuff like that
i mean modules like diff geometry
lemme see
functional analysis and topology, all relevant as well
tensor calculus is probably mandatory for you guys
i don't think there's diff geometry module that i can see
Differential geometry?
there's this one
Are you looking at first year modules only?
The title should literally be "Differential geometry" with an added curves and surfaces probably
this is differential geometry
there's no title of that
😭
hmm okay
idk if i want to do it as a module tho
I'd rather do a different module and just self-study diff geometry
Most of the math you need for physics you already take in first year tbf
like probability and physics, ODE's and what not
up to you
first year of maths?
First year in university
if you're doing a course in maths
a lot arent worth wasting time on tbh
differential geometry would be a module i would sign up for, regardless if i have an interest in physics or not
huh? but they look interesting?
real interesting stuff there.
i mean 80% looks interesting to me
Do the differential geometry module
or sign up for it
hmm I'll make a list i suppose
Is there anyone studying Sigma injective modules ?
Any books or free resources for basic physics
How basic?
free resources : openstax university physics is decent
There is https://lightandmatter.com/books.html
Can't speak about the quality though
hey guys, a couple of questions:
- what are the prereqs for differential geometry?
- are manifolds regarded as something that needs special, separate study from diffgeo? are they supposed to be learned before or after diffgeo? what the relation between them in general?
- is riemannian geometry a subset of differential geometry? or is it just ''advanced'' diff geo (ive seen people say that somewhere)?
ive really gotten into philosophy lately and ive always loved math. usually philosophy courses offer math courses with the two go hand in hand. does anyone have a good recommendation of a book that does this?
into philosophy of which kind?
i guess in this context it doesnt really matter. i just want to see how both the subjects are presented together as an argument
it matters to understand the nature of the interplay between them that you were presumably seeking, but if you just want a book with ''philosophy'' and ''mathematics'' put together in the title, there's a nice book by Linnebo,''Philosophy of Mathematics''
again, idk what exactly you are looking for. a remark: Linnebo's book is about intuitionism, empiricism, nominalism and other ways to think about math foundations (also usually called ''philosophy of mathematics'')
i guess it would be hard to find a book that connects whats usually understood by philosophy (Heidegger, Plato, Nietzsche, Bergson and whatnot) and mathematics
Moby dick?
dick, exactly
but obviously the nature of the philosophy would be argued using two perspectives: mathematics and philosophy
that would explain it
thanks!! ill check these out
what was rhat
scam attempt
just dont pay attention to this kind of messages
i dont have one
will do
you have the role
oh sorry i guess you dont have the degree yet
yes, im studying math at the undergraduate level
not that good since im not a math major, i study various liberal arts (formally), besides people would be angry we're talking in the channel meant for talking about books
thats why i asked this
btw if anyone would be so kind to reply id be very grateful
- Multivariable analysis (analysis in R^n) and linear algebra if you want to learn diff geo of curves and surfaces, also you need some pointset topology if you do manifolds
- You can learn elementary diff geo of curves and surfaces in R^3 or R^n, and then there's diff geo of manifolds which work with different spaces than R^n. Both are part of diff geo as a whole, not separate. Usually people learn diff geo of curves and surfaces, and then move on to manifolds.
- Riemannian geometry is differential geometry on smooth manifolds, and yes it is much more advanced than your differential geometry of curves and surfaces
thanks!!
the general roadmap is diff geo of curves and surfaces -> some topology and smooth manifolds theory -> riemmanian geometry
I mean you can kinda skip the C&S stuff and just do topo -> snooth manifold theory
True
Also yeah you can skip curves and surfaces diff geo entirely and start with topology and manifolds
so i found this for recommendations for mathematical logic
https://www.logicmatters.net/tyl/
A Study Guide A re-titled, expanded version of the old Teach Yourself Logic study guide. This is a book length guide to the main topics and some suitable texts either for teaching yourself logic by individual self-study, or to supplement a university course. You only need to read just the first half-dozen pages to see […]
No problem. Happy to help
Ya it’s quite nice
btw
Peter Smith was convicted of downloading cp 😭
It’s a good book regardless
how do you know this information
never mind just read a reddit post on him
cambridge is on some bullshit
Read about the author kindly
.
Somebody recommended priest's intro into logic instead cuz it's cool
Chat I want to learn poly-dimensional geometry, what's a good book? I've studied physics-based mathematics up to some basic functional analysis and measure theory (primarily for QM)
-
Real Analysis, Point Set Topology, Analysis on Manifolds and Linear Algebra are the pre-requisites. Group Theory is a useful addition.
-
One usually can (and some do) study Topological Manifolds before getting into Differential Geometry which mostly deals with Topological Manifolds with Differentiable Structure. The former isn't entirely necessary to do as a prereq tho.
-
Riemannian Geometry is essentially the study of Smooth Manifolds with a Riemannian metric (a generalisation of the notion of distance). It's pretty much where one gets all the usual ideas about curves, surfaces, areas and volumes in physical space.
Typically Riemannian Geometry is a lot easier to motivate than general Differential Geometry (which also includes things like Semi-Riemannian Geometry and other weird things) which in turn is easier to motivate than a general study of Topological Manifolds. That said, elements of both are used implicitly when one gets introduced to Riemannian Geometry.
thanks for such a detailed answer, comrade
Privet comrade 🇷🇺
Nws. Imho, if I were to study geometry from scratch, I'd go, Euclidean Geometry -> Riemannian Geometry -> Topological Manifolds -> Semi-Riemannian Geometry -> Algebraic Geometry.
zdravstvuy
semi-riemannian geometry being a necessary step??
tbh im hearing about it for the first time now
btw, do you know any good books on euclidean geometry? ive seen a couple but they seem incomplete and are mostly about affine spaces
Not really a necessity. But it is rather well developed thanks to GR and shows you how one can play around with the metric a little to get drastically different results. Consider it more of a very useful physics-inspired detour.
Lee's Axiomatic Geometry is solid.
Loney's plane trig is fine
ngl im afraid of old books
I'll check it tho, thank you
you can't copyright a proof
Math Sorcerer ai'ed a Guide To Proofs, huh
What if the proof uses an illegal number 
As in here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_number
An illegal number is a number that represents information which is illegal to possess, utter, propagate, or otherwise transmit in some legal jurisdiction. Any piece of digital information is representable as a number; consequently, if communicating a specific set of information is illegal in some way, then the number may be illegal as well.
Any good introduction to linear algebra and analitic geometry books? They can be seperate books but still a bit beginer friendly
That's common
friedberg insel and spence
@rigid trail
One, nice Bocchi pfp
Two, welcome to Mathcord :D
Hi, thanks!
I'm not that new to this server but I recently rejoined
In that case, welcome back :D

Probably around that
cheap books to ask for for my birthday? i'm thinking a book on a topic that i'd otherwise never see in my education that is still accessible at my level. or something that goes deeper into a topic i already know in some interesting way. rn i know all of hs math (although my knowledge is kinda rusty and it was not taught rigorously) and calc 1/2 but also not in a rigorous way more just computational. i have some understanding of formal logic and mathematical structures but not proofs yet
so like idk maybe something on math history or recreational mathematics? need ideas
are you interested in math history? interested in higher math?
a book like fearless symmetry comes to mind
or those author's other book "elliptic tales"
it doesn't require much if any mathematical experience but those introduce some interesting concepts in number theory and algebra
another book i read somewhat recently was sabbagh's the riemann hypothesis
Watch zundamons theorem for Free
【BGM】
ほのぼのワルツ【リコーダー】(https://commons.nicovideo.jp/)
魔法使いと振り子時計
Caravan
【お借りしている素材】
VOICEVOX:ずんだもん (立ち絵:坂本アヒル様)
VOICEVOX:四国めたん (立ち絵:坂本アヒル様)
効果音ラボ
pixabay
#数学
#ずんだもん解説

I chose (c) 1968 George B. Thomas' Calculus to tutor calculus online. I am not a fan of modern publishers pushing overly chatty asides in math textbooks.
what about one or two expensive books?
for example, spivak's calculus would work quite well
A lot of advanced mathematics books you can get way cheaper by just looking for used previous editions.
yeah sure
Understanding Analysis by Stephen Abbott
Or Algebraic Geometry by Robin Hartshorne
either would work
(jk 2nd one wouldn't)
i was looking into those. do you have any reccomendations from them there's so many idk what to choose lmao
what topics would you find interesting
i'm not sure i only recently got interested in math so ig jus anything
Counterexamples in Analysis and Counterexamples in Topology is an interesting read
Though in some sense more like a reference
mind u
he also had sss intercourse with prostitutes
Hello
JUST what is the appropriate punishment - in these laissez-faire
times - for consorting with call-girls in your place of work? An
oldfashioned honourable resignation? The sack? A ten-year banishment?
Five years?
mathematicians/philosophers trying not to do something creepy/weird
yeah compared to philosophers 😂
especially those ones in the 19th century
i also realized just today that the guy who wrote this book was convicted of a similar thing as well 
that case was even worse it seems
Atomic habits
This should fit the requirements that you stated. It's computational and it's something very interesting which is never taught in high school
great historical work on algebraic geometry in 1950-1960s
don't buy it, or try to read it
Plofker's Mathematics in India is a good math history text that you'd otherwise not hear of.
@mortal iris what is prob stats about and why should we care?
🎰
gambling games of chance are a pretty obvious way to motivate probability and statistics
also, the idea of quantifying the likelihood of future events is another compelling reason to care
ooo
what does statistics help us in
idk any application other than machine learning
...like clinical trials?
or google biostats
quality assurance at factories depends on some knowledge of stats, since you can't feasibly test all products, but only a sample
practically every aspect of biomedical research is hypothesis testing.
I think his question is how basic statistics is useful
Advanced statistics is indeed used in machine learning and econometrics
I think a big point to make here is that something that is mathematically advanced does not make it immediately more useful
And basic statistics on treatment, etc. are still being relied on
figuring out the p-value of two given means is not "advanced statistics"
Machine learning is not p-value.
The asker clearly doesn't place a lot of value in this basic stuff too
anyway for recreational stats maybe check out the lady tasting tea
Why ping me here for this lol. The entire world runs on stats. That's enough to care.
i despise statistics man, i really do.
Why? It's beautiful
im just being reactionary
if you grew up calculating alot of statistics by hand, you'll hate it, and if you dont, you're probably a masochist
Thermodynamics. Economics. Psychology. Information theory, both classical and quantum. Quantum physics. Diagnostic medicine. Image recognition. Computer vision. So many things.
Not all of them require machine learning but all of these do benefit from it regardless.
Heck even education and politics.
Percentiles and polls and what not
Stats are everywhere. Sports ofc.
If you calculate a lot of statistics by hand then you have too many fingers
did your school not teach you how to calculate the mean, standard error of the mean, or standard deviations?
and also, being someone who does biomedical research, a rigorous definition for a lot of the statistical tests we are expected to do will hardly be found.
we dont get classes in statistics, unless i actively try and sign up for one
Hello guys, if you don't mind I would appreciate books recommendations for STEM subjects, mostly physics, math, bio and chem. I have poor knowledge so maybe something beginner-friendly
Hi, I'm here to ask for book recommendations, kinda like Veratisium's videos, where they talk about the story of how they proved different formulas or explain the purpose of using a specific area of fields. I'd like to learn math with stories or historic backgrounds, if possible.
Yes and I never did them by hand. Refused to even for an exam. I know how to if needed but that need comes only in the event of an apocalypse lol.
Hi, I'm here to ask for book recommendations, kinda like Veratisium's videos,
So you want to be bullshat while making things sound cool as opposed to correct?
calc the mean is by .mean 
You can check out Keith Conrad's expository papers or John Baez.
I'm not sure they'd understand them if they're watching Veritasium without being alarmed by some of the casual errors made by that channel.
Yes that's the point. I want them to get into these things properly and stop watching Veritasium for math content
I think it was an alright channel till they uploaded their p adic video and I was pissed
This one is valid
This is a book you can try out
Something I found frustrating about TAing Indian students is they worship JEE way too much and I think it's damaging their mathematical reasoning abilities
I yet have to see something good coming out of JEE
With international exposure I think that worship fades
Or at least, that's the best possible way
If that worship doesn't fade after internationalisation, it's difficult to say
You won't. Imagine being given Olympiad level problems to solve with a minute for each. There's no way to be good at this without being mechanical and devoid of reasoning.
every time i see that exam brought up, its always in a negative light
how bad is that exam
And some of the problems regardless of level are just in poor taste.
They're not really that hard
Very. There are some cool problems occasionally but overall it's poorly designed and intended to do everything but support education or test genuine skills.
From my experience it doesn't fade away. There's some god awful toxic mentality around that exam. Apparently you get "humbled" or if you did good then you're gifted or something and I'm just like ????????
If anything there are better ways to get yourself humbled
is it an entrance exam into university-level engineering sciences or just some bullshit
Just take an analysis course in high school. Most of these shits who think they can do Calculus well because they do unreasonable integrals will be left in dread.
Both
Gaokao, yes. JEE is not a cultural thing. It's a money thing.
The exam was not as bad as it is today as opposed to like 30 years ago.
ill be honest, one exam dictating your future prospects in maths, engineering or physics sounds a little too crazy
Privatising education and outsourcing training to coaching centers who make a fortune by strategising the exam while killing the subject.
And the worst thing it's an Olympiad type of exam
And in India it's bad considering they are the sole entry point into the elite universities by name, the so called IITs.
They're just as trashy as your average university here for the most part.
With the exception of a handful of IITs
shouldnt be too difficult then, no?
But one could honestly get in with full scholarships to far better institutions if they had the agency to look.
still stupid though
One minute per problem on average
hell nah
Including both physics and math, let alone the chemistry stuff
Yes
@mortal iris did you do the exam?
It's not like that in India. It's just that under social and peer pressure due to the big name carried by these IITs (think Ivy League level of fame but worse both in quality and due to high demand), the students don't have a chance to even explore their options. The teachers here also don't know any better. They're arguably stupider than the students.
I was preparing for it for a while but then I quit. Did give the first part of the exams which are relatively reasonable. Despite qualifying for the advanced exam I decided to not appear.
Based
Do these IIT's guarantee jobs?
cuz if so then im not shocked
Hell no. But very high suicide rates are guaranteed.
interesting how this is a classical symptom of a lot of modern day prestigious univeristies
cambridge as well, though a lot of reforms were introduced
like I want to learn the story of how they got there & proved it (learning advanced maths throughout too)
Tbf for IITs at the very least, a big part of the suicide rate is the stunted social development of the kids who work their nuts off to get in. They don't know how to deal with anything but the adversity of studying for exams.
Hey , guys any good book for Combinatorics?
Combinatorics (A Problem Based Approach) by P. Mladenovic, nice book.
Some kids are put in coaching institutes as early as 4th grade.
No, but they are also the only way in to prestigious jobs (apart from international top unis)
Not true.
the fuck...
Not entirely true, but very true in a high statistical sense
There's also a city in India called Kota in Rajasthan which is literally a coaching center on its own.