#book-recommendations
1 messages · Page 145 of 1
have u read bretscher on linear algebra friend?
otto bretscher
no now is the first time i am hearing of it
i was using linear algebra by werner greub
i grabbed howard anton, bretscher but i will do axler after real analysis or along
do u think it replaces axler or?
yes i do, i dont really like axler's book tbh
why not if i may ask? is it cuz of the determinant thingy?
though i have to say this, this book is a hard hitter
but i liked it
tbh i dont really know how to explain that lmao. But i didnt like the style of writing in general
although i tried it a few years ago so i dont even remember any details
i tried it for a very short time and stopped since i didnt like it
there is also linear algebra by friedberg insel and spence
its a good book too
and here is a list of linear algebra books with descriptions
friend
after real analysis do you recommend numerical analysis or complex?
or do you recommend abstract algebra and topology instead
Do abstract algebra
and then topology correct?
complex, topo, and alg are all good
in what order?
it's good to know some topology for complex
algebra isn't really related to the former two at first
preliminaries for abstract alg is linear alg and proofs i assume alongside some real analysis?
you don't need any real analysis for abstract algebra
amazing
Lin alg helps with mathematical maturity but its not ne essary
do u think i shld do linear algebra before multivariable calc?
yes definitely
but in the book im using by anton and later by bretscher, it says calculus is required for alot of problems
im assuming its only single variable?
Fa sure
damn so me doing linear algebra before multi variable calc is basically like a huge advantage
Idk man id say more like 80% calc and a bit of lin alg
well hmm
Nah i kinda agree with this for vector calc
yeah you really shouldn't be taking multivariable otherwise lol
thats what confused me
you needa get hired
Fr make me national head of education
i enjoy self studying mathematics but i hate being taught
maybe i dont enjoy most professors out there
but i think self studying is overall more enjoyable
i still haven't finished a single math book front to back
i want to do that for knuths concrete mathematics
i feel like ur only supposed to do 80%
i mean they wrote the whole book
yes but like 20% is really repetitive often
mm maybe so
if its not go ahead
whats special abt it
over discrete math
or any logic and set theory book
Most people don't
Consider that most university courses only cover a portion of the assigned textbook
why is this tho
oh yes ik abt the book but im asking what makes it special over
lets say discrete math books or logic and set theory
Not all of the content is equally important and it may be optimal to only cover the most salient topics on a first read, so as to not get bogged down in unimportant details
youre supposed to cover the rest on your own later or?
You're not really "supposed" to do anything other than what you want to do
If you want to know all of the stuff in a book, you can read the whole thing
are you expected to
No
i guess i am just biased to knuth, didn't even consider other books
i think that it also prepares you for taocp which is something i'm interested in
me too but i heard its for later
theoreitcal cs
i'm not sure, i don't think it requires prereqs other than like sheer determination
i haven't looked into it in awhile
i think ill read him after analysis and cs fundamentals
i think it is a difficult book so it probably helps to study proofs and other math before working through it
whats your favourite shoe brand
algebra book i need learn algebra better
I suppose you mean elementary algebra
I don't really know a book for that
Artin is quite good for algebra
I think he means elementary algebra
Im 7th grader so
Yea I realized from your name and from your about me🗿
what'd he do?
never too early to start dummy foot 😁
jk, honest advice would be to hop on khan academy prolly
or really any of the free resources on the internet
ngl overhyped
it's aight
nah
honest advice is to just relax and enjoy life
because by the time he graduates college
it'll be 2035
Chatgpt 13.0 will be out
and will do anything he can do but better
ngl i doubt ai will progress in pure math as much
in the next 8-10 years
A few days ago, a UCLA professor just used chatgpt to generate the key idea in solving and optimisation problem
was it sucessful?
yes
suprising
now ask ai to visualize and analyze basic euclidean geometry problem
a one that isnt on the net
alpha geoemetey could probably destroy it
another ai?
deep minds ai
alpha evolve already discovered an improvement from straasens algorithm despite humans failing after trying for 50+ years
i think one area it could maybe be useful in is translation of written natural language proofs into truly formal proofs
like lean/coq/other tt's
perhaps
but depends
we know
i think llm's may be able to do more useful stuff by then
exactly
there are so many different methods and types of ai that are being worked on rn
current llm's are not really trained for pure math specifically, it's just picking up on it from whatever math literature it happens to come across
always bet on the human spirit
forget got imagine the most advanced unreleased models
its as useful as an 11 year old
thats if youre willing to overlook its countless mistakes
a ucla math professor used it to solve an unsolved problem xd
it can find relevant material p quickly
that i agree with
well yes you need to be trained in math yourself to be able to use it effectively
do you think cs majors are going homeless due to their inability to create unique code which isnt available on the net
they're finished
i think that's an obvious enough point 
in 2020 i said cs majors would be cooked by late 2024 i wish i was wrong but i gotta say i told u so to all the cs majors
i just think they dont read that many books lol
i think we have barely taken advantage of the findings of cognitive scientists on optimal learning
send books
true
but it's kinda wasted now
cuz ai will make humans near obselete
awful yes
realistic yes (when it comes to knowledge)
just hop on semax
get a prescription of semax and adhd meds xD
Sanjay Sarma @gray gazelle
he has a book
on it
ah
Grasp - The Science Transforming How We Learn
As the head of Open Learning at MIT, renowned professor
Sanjay Sarma has a daunting job to fling open the doors of the MIT
experience for the benefit of the wider world. But if you're going to
undertake such an ambitious project, you first have to How do we learn?
What are the most effective ways of educating? And how can the science
of learning transform education to unlock our potential, as individuals
and across society?
brooo
nooooooo 😭 😭 😭
what to read on linalg after one's done FIS?
are there any further general courses or people take special courses after finishing FIS, like multilinear algebra etc
for multilinear I feel like most people learn some in a grad course on algebra or in a (good) multivariable calculus course or differential geometry or such
i was just wondering if there are books that teach about the same stuff as in FIS, but like deeper or from other points of view
i heard of Kostrikin-Manin, for example, maybe there are others alike?
greub
is that suitable for study though? i thought that was an encyclopedia or something
Hi Someone use Anki
!da2a
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
thanks
By Michael Nielsen, January 2019
anyone have a textbook on real analysis (I just finished linear algebra) im pretty new to higher level math
Can you explain the article for me sorry i dont understand
rudin
abbott, ross, rudin are all solid (least to most technical)
what should one read after abbott?
ross and then rudin?
got u
Personally would struggle through Rudin after abbott
Ross is nice but if you alr did abbott then I don't see a strong point
better alternatives to rudin?
Rudin is very good
It's just hard
Would recommend starting with Abbott if you are new to more rigorous math
it's a lot more friendly
bro first finish abbot and algebra and allat 😭
always be 10 steps ahead
now i shall be quietly observing for new books..
👻
We cannot allow this, sorry
oh my bad
@magic garnet Just fyi, piracy is against discord ToS so we cannot allow it on this server. Please don't ask for or post pirated resources here.
You couldve just sent name and author?
ya its all tge math u missed by garrity
dose somwon haw ri gore book fro ri gore menster?
First Jay Cummings, then Mangatiana Robdera along with Ana Alves' book, and finally you try your hand at Sohrab.
Then move on to a more rigorous one. There are many people here who believe they have the same abilities, but that's not really the case. That's why I've been struggling on my own as a self-taught person, since I didn't learn much in my mathematics degree, unfortunately.
You have enough examples and solved problems to start developing your intuition.
Which rudin are you talking about?
If baby rudin then I wouldn't really recommend doing it after Abbott
Like either do Abbott or rudin
Or some other intro analysis book
But doing both Abbott and rudin would be a waste of time imo
Looking for a good textbook on classical model and proof theory, ideally one that fixates on godel, tarski, and lob
Preferably, it should go up to type theory and modal logics
Ive been studying off a logic handbook, but ive been made aware that there are many weaknesses in my understanding
what handbook wass it
gabbay and guenther 2nd edition
Which, ngl i loved it, but its definitely meant for people who already know logic
instead do topology with us 
how about you actually read the article first
the conventional choices for mathematical logic books typically use hilbert systems as their proof system, which is helpful for doing metalogic, but unwieldy for deriving formulas within the system, so while you nominally see some proof and model theory in conventional introductions to mathematical logic, hilbert systems are not typically the main focus in a dedicated proof theory textbook. i haven't seen any book that covers everything you ask for, at least in real depth.
what about with model theory and proof theory in first order languages then
they all get to godel's incompleteness theorems
well, i want a book that actually proves results about these from semantic interpretations, endertons doesnt go at nearly the depth im looking for
what do you mean by "proves results about these from semantic interpretations?"
never even mentioned
Why are we learning his theorems if theyre incomplete?
im looking for something that constructs \models, shows how to extend canonical models, gives results on this extension, etc
yeah stuff like this
is this what you're talking about?
i haven't seen stuff about that in any intros
seems specific to modal logic
idk...maybe read a modal logic book for more details after reading an introductory logic book?
Well, im looking for a particular book well beyond the usual introductory logic books like enderton
Does enderton ever actually define the \models relation?
is there a reason you think he doesn't?
Im just asking
Because that relation is absolutely necessary for what im aiming to learn
pages 23 (for propositional logic) and 81 (for first order logic)
which is?
the end goal is algebraic semantics
ill give enderton a read, then
no clue about that, might want to ask #foundations or #theoretical-cs
a bit sad it stops at the skolem functions
Bro i sent that ages ago
Did u just scroll up reading for hours
But ngl yes
Because hyouka is so ass
Bro was trying to clipfarm me
mq 🤝 bussy beaver
Who is bussy beaver
@still panther
Sour drop 👟 Sweet rise
am i kicking sweet rise
Ahh. I love you to internet potato.
would not have made sense to a medieval peasant.
guys pls tell me someone read powerless in here bc no one ik read it and it makes me mad bc i luv it sm
He did say that
super late response but i guess i'm biased to stories with chessmaster or chessmaster-esque characters, like Overlord, The Saga of Tanya the Evil, A Practical Guide to Evil, Nebula's Civilization or The Last Sovereign (NSFW JRPG that recently left early access on Steam). besides that, i like more grounded, character-driven dramas or stories with political intrigue, like Osora, Proof of Dignity, or the The Spark in your Eyes. i try to read whatever looks good to me though, and i'm not completely against power fantasy slop.
Erkin, a young pharmacist from the north, was orphaned from the war between the Northern Nations and Mormeratta. After making a name for himself in Mormeratta, he is summoned to treat a mysterious “master of the castle” whom no one has ever seen. He reluctantly agrees, hoping it will bring him one step closer to finding the infamous Witch of...
quite good and probably outside of your comfort zone
@fair fiber
do you follow Pale Lights?
no
this inner product -external product lingo pisses me off
what even is a vector projection
what can I read to finally learn all the "inner product", "outer product" stuff
I just remember that the cos between the 2 serves a good metric of distance cuz of the curse of dimensionality over high dimensional spaces
but this justification with inner vector product stuff seems interesting
this'll be in basically any linear algebra textbook (though very few people use the term outer product), friedberg insel spence is a common recommendation
alrighttt, thanks
out of curiosity, is it doable to learn linalg without performing the math by hand?
what do you mean performing by hand?
right so
learning is an active process; you need to do things that build on and enhance your understanding
usually I would just read some linalg, then it would ask me to perform some matmul multiplications by hand
with is and stuff
I solve a few, get tired, and go do something else
like, you can do those kinds of things only a few times and get used to them and not really have to practice them again
I like proofs
but doing the exercises really makes it a hassle to go through it tbh
I see
and there are more abstract approaches that are heavier on proofs and dodge matrix operations as much as possible (though they are fundamentally unavoidable in most modern math)
I mean why even bother doing something u can plug in a modern calculator and get out a result 😭
that's not really active learning, that's just mindlessly moving numbers to reach a trivial answer
well, having to write a lot of matrix multiplication algorithms for a class was greatly aided by having an intuitive understanding of how various elements of a matrix contribute to a product
know about any good proof focused linalg book?
FIS as stated above is a common good one
my personal favourite is linear algebra done wrong by treil, which is a bit easier I think
but more explicit with matrices than some of its peers
just need the intuition, can't be bothered to get tired doing mindless calculations
if I wanna do any of that, I'll figure it out then or feed it to a computer
I'll try out that one then, thankss
intuition and computation go hand in hand
So don't be scared to do a few computational exercises, they're helpful
Where can I study the method of exhaustion that Archimedes used?
I wish to understand it, in depth with examples
do calculations when you get stuck on something else you currently want to do
for me i find myself ping-ponging between homological algebra and vector calculus/physics, because homalg tends to work more on the abstract nonsense part of my brain, and when that gets tired, i’m willing to compute a bunch of integrals
if everything is tired, history and english
What about computing simplicial homology of some spaces 
I noticed there are some really cheap paperback FIS Linear Algebra books for sale through amazon, and I wonder if they're trustworthy. $25 vs $150 from Pearson. Is this some kind of scam or counterfeit?
Sus
yeah, seems too good to be true
Unless it’s a copy that is falling apart 😆
Hey, just wanted to ask for some book recommendations for getting back into math and useful math for programmers. I've been a developer for 4 years but never went to Uni. My math background is weak and I could probably improve my quality of work by also improving my math background.
From a friend that went through computer science Uni I got recommended:
https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-658-05620-9
Its a German book and it seems too advanced for me. I am sure I lack a lot of fundamentals, so that's why I wrote "getting back into math". To make it worse, I have ADHD so I have trouble with extremely dry books. Maybe someone has 1 or 2 good recommendations that would help me. Much appreciated!
hi
can't comment on the book u sent link to
i don't have access to it
but i think u might benefit from first going through smth like Pre calculus
then getting into discrete math
if you're doing programming, it might be worth looking into discrete mathematics
also its quite close to what he might have been doing
if you want something german, i think you'd be happier with something like "Mathematik für Informatiker" by Teschl
i think it has less strong requirements than something like Papula (which is a book for engineers) and probably more interesting given your background
while i think it could be tough if you didnt do math in a while, its possible
Doesn't have to be German, but I'll check on this one either way, thanks!
hey guys, does anybody have a recommendation for a statistics book after one's finished doing Ross' First Course in Probability? I'd like statistics to be treated on a similar level as that of Ross'
does anyone know how good these books are and if they aren't, any substitutes that could take their place
it's probably "International Edition", i.e. copies that are made for sale only in India, Nepal, Bhutan, Pakistan and maybe some other countries - those books are usually paperbacks and they are much cheaper than normal editions, but the content is the same. Usually they have a blurb somewhere on the cover "not for sale outside of countries X, Y and Z"
for example, here is Artin's Algebra, normally super-expensive, but this is International Edition:
you can see the red blurb in top-left corner "Circulation outside of the Indian subcontinent is not authorized".
and this is FIS that you mentioned, with the same blurb:
this is the Supreme Court case about this matter: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kirtsaeng_v._John_Wiley_%26_Sons,_Inc.
Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 568 U.S. 519 (2013), is a United States Supreme Court copyright decision in which the Court held, 6–3, that the first-sale doctrine exhausts copyright of the works lawfully made or purchased abroad.
summary can be found in this article from Biblio: https://biblio.co.uk/International_Edition_Textbooks
if you don't mind I'll make sure people will see my question
Don't international editions also drop 1-2 chapters?
abstract?
abstract what
Yes Artin's text is a text on "modern" or "abstract" algebra
not sure, but I don't see this mentioned anywhere, people usually say that it's just paperbacks, black-and-white printing and cheaper paper
paperback is actually a plus for me 🙂
I like my books more flexible and easier to carry around if needed
Does anyone have any good book recommendations 🥹
Pre algebra
openstax
I see, that explains it! might take a chance on a copy soon, my old 4th edition is pretty beat up
sometimes
there's no guarantee they're exactly the same
you have to look into what is said about the particular book
This is actually incredibly interesting! Thank you!
you can check against the table of contents or the pdf sometimes
I think a more common problem is they change the problem sets
that alone isn't necessarily an issue for self-learning unless they pile on a bunch of errors
that's the problem with the CS APP global version
idk about FIS and Sipser
but those are books that are popular enough and been out for years, so it's probably known if there are differences
does anyone know anything about Programming for Mathematicians by Seroul?
I'm looking to get better at programming, ideally with some theoretical backing and with as much mathematical detail as possible, so any other appropriate recommendations would also be appreciated
@gray gazelle recommend something bruh
What is a good problem book to go with euclidean geometry? Apart from evan chen
Hello guys, is there any book about Permutation and Combination?
I wanna have one, can you recommend for me?
theres probably nothing explicitly meant for highschoolers
you can follow the chapters in other typical highschool math books
but if you need one you can look at https://appliedcombinatorics.org/appcomb/
literally any standard introductory combinatorics text should have a chapter or two on them
AoPS intro to counting and probability is one example geared towards younger students
I need the theory of combinatorics
guys, what's the best book to learn Analysis from if my goal is to cover sequences, series, point-set topology (open, closed sets, connectivity, compactness, continuity), limits, differentiation in one and several variables, Riemann integration and integrability, multiple integrals, and some measure theory, Lebesgue integral.
i consider Tao's Analysis I, II appropriate, but i know there are many more books of the same level and with similar contents. If you know any good books, let me know, plz
I haven't seen multiple integrals covered in Tao's, though
<@&268886789983436800>
unironically rudin covers all this lol
well, i heard chaps from 8th and on weren't so greatly written tbh
idk if it's just hearsay though
that's not been the primary reason one would not want to use rudin
Depending on what you know/are comfy with the other 8 chapters aren't great either.
A lot of the stuff you're asking for are also usually covered across several different courses which would typically use several different books/sources as well.
I personally like rudin, but I don't think it's that great for point set given that the whole thing is done in the context of metric spaces.
yo does anyone have a good resource for topological groups?
Like an introduction or...? For what purpose?
They're used in a lot of different places like Lie groups, Harmonic analysis etc.
(I say etc. but that's literally the only two places I know where they're used
)
Pugh "Real Mathematical Analysis" covers all of that too, and seems to be quite popular (and also what I've bought for myself, but haven't properly started on it yet)
"Younger students" im 18 doing pre algebra aops made me question my life
You can learn whatever math at any age, it doesn't really matter 🗣️
Hello, I’m a self-study type and like deep thinking. Topics:
Algebra: indices & surds, factorisation, polynomials (remainder/factor theorem, roots, Vieta), quadratics & graphs, partial fractions (simple/complex), rational functions, rational-exponential combos, binomial theorem (integer/real n), exponential & logarithmic functions, functions (domain, range, inverse, composite), parametric equations, advanced circles & tangents, sequences & series (arithmetic, geometric, convergent, binomial), summation techniques.
Trigonometry & Geometry: radians, sine/cosine/tangent, sine & cosine rules, advanced trig identities, inverse trig, multi-angle trig equations, graph transformations, coordinate geometry (lines, circles), 3D vectors (algebra, dot/cross products, unit vectors), lines & planes in 3D, angles & distances.
Calculus: differentiation (power, product, quotient, chain, implicit, logarithmic), stationary points, maxima/minima, curve sketching; integration (indefinite/definite, substitution, parts, rational-exponential, derivative recognition), areas/volumes; differential equations (first-order linear, separable).
Sequences & Series: arithmetic/geometric sequences, sums/sigma notation, binomial expansions, convergent series, Maclaurin/Taylor/binomial series, function approximations, links to differentiation/integration.
Problem Solving & Logic: proofs (algebraic, trig, sequence/series), vector proofs (perpendicularity, collinearity, angles), multi-step reasoning across topics, pattern recognition (hidden derivatives, sequence → series → approximation).
fr that's why i learned how to add fractions in second year of highschool 🔥
neamesis tries not to use 🗣️ emoji (challenge impossible)
It gets more complicated the just skimming bro
Math and money is my depression no math knowledge i have nor money
Same
Pls someone
aops
Pls no more
Aops literally doesnt teach just makes you question
We must learn then question
We cannot question before learning
you must learn through question🗣️
Anything specific? Your list of topics is kinda broad?
I was studying aops 3 hours lmao still at chapter one
Yea one minute
that's normal
it's a steep learning curve
there are so many questions you should be taking hours
Fwiw no matter what you do, in order to learn math you need to do problems. Over time the problems get harder. The aops books are kind of intentionally trickier since they are geared more towards kids into competition math.
As you go further in math spending long-ish chunks of time stuck on hard problems will become more common like mq is saying lmao.
Proof, Logic & Problem-Solving
• Algebraic & trigonometric proofs
• Sequence/series derivations
• Vector proofs (perpendicularity, collinearity, angles)
• Multi-step reasoning across algebra, calculus, & geometry
• Pattern recognition and generalisation
Calculus
• Differentiation: power, product, quotient, chain, implicit, logarithmic
• Applications: stationary points, maxima/minima, curve sketching
• Integration: substitution, by parts, rational + exponential forms, definite/indefinite
• Areas under curves & volumes of revolution
• Differential equations: first-order linear & separable
Sequences & Series
• Arithmetic & geometric progressions
• Sigma notation and summation techniques
• Convergent infinite series
• Binomial expansions
• Maclaurin & Taylor series approximations
• Links between series, differentiation, & integration
Geometry & Trigonometry
• Coordinate geometry: lines, distances, midpoints, circles
• Tangents & normals to circles
• Trig ratios, radians, sine & cosine rules
• Identities (double/triple angle, sum-to-product, etc.)
• Inverse trig functions
• Multi-angle trig equations
• 3-D geometry: vectors, dot & cross products, lines & planes, angles & distances
Functions & Graphs
• Function composition / inverses / domains & ranges
• Graph transformations (translations, reflections, stretches)
• Parametric forms of curves
• Rational-exponential and composite graphs
Algebraic Structures
• Laws of indices & surds
• Factorisation and polynomials
• Remainder & factor theorems, Vieta’s relations
• Quadratic & rational functions
• Partial fractions (simple → complex)
• Exponential & logarithmic functions
• Binomial theorem (integer & real n)
what's aops though?
A book series
Yes its like 1k pages for pre algebra aops
Art of problem solving
Honestly what you've listed has a lot of overlap with a typical precalc class
This is just standard high school curriculum - the proofs
Algebra and Analysis undergraduate books usually cover all these in the first few chapters
What- they are very complicated dude
I was meaning to mention that you might be interested in this book: https://classicalrealanalysis.info/com/
Sorry I didn't see all of it. Most of it is high school and there is some first year uni stuff
me? are you responding to my previous request?
thanks, I'll take a look now
Besides the aops stuff you're doing now, have you done algebra/trig?
Some of the hardest im doing is
Trigonometry (Advanced)
• Full set of trig functions (sin, cos, tan, sec, cosec, cot)
• Complex identities & transformations
• Expressions of the form a \sin x + b \cos x → R \sin(x \pm \alpha) etc.
• Solving more complicated trig equations
Vectors
• 2D & 3D vectors: magnitudes, unit vectors, position & displacement vectors
• Scalar product applications: angles, perpendicularity, projections
• Lines & planes in 3D: intersections, parallelism
Problem-Solving & Proofs
• Multi-step questions combining algebra, calculus, trig, and vectors
• Proofs involving sequences, series, vectors, and complex numbers
• Deeper reasoning: pattern recognition, linking different areas
Calculus
• Differentiation: parametric & implicit differentiation
• Integration: advanced substitution, integration by parts, rational functions, trig relationships
• Differential equations: first-order separable, applied contexts
• Applications: tangents & normals, rates of change
Algebra & Functions (Advanced)
• Complex numbers: Cartesian & polar forms, roots, conjugates, Argand diagrams
• Advanced rational functions & partial fractions
• Logarithmic & exponential functions at higher level
• Series expansions: binomial, Maclaurin & Taylor series (more manipulations, approximations)
this one is crazy good though. I've managed to find the first 30-some pages and it's just what i needed, so imma probably go into this one
Yes but very shallow understanding
But dude maclaurin and taylor isnt easy nor highschool im self studying anyways
Power series junk does pop up in hs for some folks
It's kind of regional
Some places cover more math than others
The basics are usually not so bad for power series. But you could spend your whole life studying things related to series.
You could do that with a lot of topics in math.
Is there active research in the theory of infinite series still?
(Well yeah if you count like zeta functions and such) but besidrs that
If you can do the problems in a typical precalc book (maybe with a little struggle) I wouldn't really worry about how shallow your understanding is.
I mean, there are series problems and examples popping up everywhere in math.
Fair fair
I don't think I know anybody who solely studies series. You absolutely meet people who have series stuff pop up in their work in various ways.
Self studying for an exam which requires very deep understanding so i did this
Well if you are comfy enough on precalc material to do problems out of a typical precalc book then there isn't really any issue with your knowledge in that dept.
How about calc stuff? Can you say the same for a book like stewart?
Asking me?
Yeah you
Idk never read it did AP calc a bit
Ah well then why not do that next?
But then switched ciriculim
Too easy tbh went to calc bc too
But the overall depth learning etc didnt like it planning to go uni in uk
Well when you say too easy does that include everything out of a book like stewart's calculus?
Probably not
i need a book that explains power series any recommendations??
Okay, well then you don't know as much calc as you think and you should probably just continue with it.
Thats like uni level i think i was told many uni students use it
Stewart and larson are fine. Paul's online math notes are also good.
But if your issue is depth, then a university level book would be more in depth?
Regardless it doesnt matter cause the continuation of it wont matter cause it i would have done only 3 ap meaning no good uni all education goes to waste
So i will probably read stewart and just not now
If you compare any of the "main" calc books you see at most unis they all look pretty similar to stewart so idk if I'd call it a waste.
Gotta secure a uni that teaches strong math
A typical path in the US for ug math looks something like calc 1-3 -> lin alg + ode -> proofs -> upper div math.
Not the book as the waste but continuing american circ tbh but i will still read
Fair
Damnnn
Are in uni doot
I like de moivre theory
Upper div is usually some flavor of two sem abstract algebra, two sem real analysis, some electives, complex analysis and probably more lin alg
Yes I am in grad school
So like this kinda gives you a clearish path if you are in the us
If not, you can also look up the course sequence for math majors at a uni near you to see what the path you'd wanna do looks like.
Then you just pick books for each class.
That's probably not for a full math major then.
The community college I started at capped off the math classes it offered at lin alg and ode fwiw
I just took a bunch of classes and really enjoyed it so I kept doing classes lmao
I see
I started in cs which I knew required a bunch of math
Then as I finished at the cc level I decided I wanted to add math for a double major when I transferred to uni
Ohhh very rigorous
Actually diabolical, they should do, calc 1 -> proofs -> Lin alg + analysis -> algebra, topology, measure theory 😔
here is the ultimate path if you disagree you are wrong
Calc 1-2 alongside Linear Algebra
Calc 3 alongside intro to proofs and logic
Proof based linear algebra + Discrete Math
Real Analysis - Data structures and algorithms
I need to learn linear algebra in 4 days 
Linalg is not too hard to catch up on
This is our program except you just skip non-proof LA and ODE lol
That's probably pretty nice
in my program we don't really learn analysis then jump into measure theory
Yeah it's not bad, but it's kind of strange. You could get a math degree and never do any diffeq which is strange, I think
What do you do?
Ah I thought you meant ode and la were still mandatory after proofs
Not doing la somewhere in ug math is not great
Ah hmm
I might still be misreading
we are supposed to learn real anal first sem but no one is ready so it's sort of a mix of calc and analysis
but 70-30 split

and then there's no proper real anal so students jump into measure theory and get wrecked
Sorry I wasn't very clear, theoretical LA is required but no diffeq is required anywhere
Do they not learn calc in high school?
they do learn but very little
it's nothing like india
unless they take a gifted or accelerated program in hs they don't learn 20% of what you see in JEE
we don't got cmi fr

Please censor that word
j*e
Uhh
Hi
I live in the asian subcontinent
And i want to learn the fundamental theorem of arithmetic in a highschool level
You mean that theorem about unique decomposition to primes?
Its very simple
Any basic numebr theory textbook will have that
Hi
I need recommendations for intro group theory books
i can see rose, rotman, and pinter from some looking around
for context i've done the first 6 chapters of LADR and i really liked the style of the book
ik the premise of the book is not something i am going to find in groups but
just to give you an idea of what i like I guess
gallian is the standard recommendation
Like a deep dive into primes and stuff
It's simply the statement that any integer (or element of a factorial ring/UFD) can be written as a product of irreducible elements up to order. In the case of Z this is just a statement about how every nonzero number has a (unique up to order) prime factorization
I know
Ive seen some interesting videos on this topic and i wanted to learn more about it
Maybe try Burton's number theory book?
Thanks :3
i like rotman and clark is good too https://www.amazon.com/Elements-Abstract-Algebra-Dover-Mathematics/dp/0486647250. pinter is commonly recommended too but never heard of rose
Is this good for noobies
I suppose
What about The dudley one?
Ireland and rosen is good
it might be better based on your background idk
Which book? Classical Intro to Modern NT?
Or do you mean this one?
I don't think Ireland was involved in writing this though
I do mean classical intro to modern nt
Bro is recommending an algebraic NT book to a high school student with no prior experience with either algebra or NT
🗿
I would not misgender them
Bro is gender neutral bro
I will say if there's a problem thank you very much
This is fine usually
Yall is a banger
Youse
btd6 reference username 😱
I use Pinter as an easy but fun book (it’s a cheap Dover paperback and really good: has plenty of exercises grouped in topics and conversational style), and also Herstein’s “Topics in Algebra” for something deeper, quaint and more old-school (it also has great exercises!). I also like Gallian (it’s more like a relatively easy, pretty, modern textbook with pictures, historical asides and many calculation exercises) and Dummit and Foote for its encyclopaedic coverage and still readable prose. If you like practice-based books where you need to prove a lot of intermediate theorems as exercises and work hard then Clark is another nice Dover edition which is cheap, short and sweet, but covers a lot of ground
I am also tempted by Artin’s Algebra, you may like it coming from LADR perspective, because it uses many examples from Linear Algebra. Also there is an MIT course which Artin himself teaches, it has homework exercises and reading assignments based on this book, which is handy if you are self-studying.
i don't think linear alg is that important for intro group theory
i think you'll see it more when you study fields or ring theory
I think he said that just to show which style of books he enjoys
Not because he thinks that LADR is important for studying group theory
herstein is good, but i would note that it omits group actions. a modern book that does group actions early and frequently would be Algebra in Action by shahriar shahriari. it doesn't treat module theory, unlike herstein.
big thumbs up to pinter for beginners
a similarly elementary book is judson, which is free online, but leaves fewer important results as exercises
I forget, how much does artin use actions? I know it introduces them relatively early as it should, but how much does it use them after
i did a ctrl-f search for action, which showed a few mentions, including one hit for "group action." however, it's not in the index, and i didn't see a formal definition for it in the text. however, lecture notes following artin definitely do
ah he calls them "group operations"
they're given a definition on page 176
What are the benefits of using group actions? Do they provide a nice framework for presenting or explaining some other material?
They lead to orbit stabilizer theorem
Which is one of many ways of proving sylow theorem
it also leads to cayley theorem
so it in general creates very useful tools to do important things like classify groups
He calls it a group operation
Pinter is also not big on group actions and orbit stabiliser theorem, he relegated them fully to exercises:
I liked explanation of group actions in Dummit and Foote
I cannot emphasize this enough: group actions are 99% of the reasons people care about groups, even if they don't say the words "group action" in how they talk about them
OK, but can you elaborate? Why is it so?
so to apply group theory to any other subject, the way you do it is you find some group lurking about acting on the things you care about
(typically acting in a way that is compatible with whatever structure you have)
this is analogous to how you prove Sylow theorems or use orbit-stabilizer to classify things in finite group theory, there are lots of natural actions of finite groups on themselves/on objects related to them
so you notice such an action and then you use it to guide how to think about your objects and decompose them (e.g. into orbits)
besides being a useful tool for group theory qua group theory, group actions are fundamental concepts in representation theory
In the mathematical field of representation theory, group representations describe abstract groups in terms of bijective linear transformations of a vector space to itself (i.e. vector space automorphisms); in particular, they can be used to represent group elements as invertible matrices so that the group operation can be represented by matrix ...
Representation theory is a branch of mathematics that studies abstract algebraic structures by representing their elements as linear transformations of vector spaces, and studies modules over these abstract algebraic structures. In essence, a representation makes an abstract algebraic object more concrete by describing its elements by matrices a...
so like, representation theory is literally the study of group actions on vector spaces, Lie theory is used in geometry by finding Lie groups (or algebraic groups in the algebraic setting) or Lie algebras acting on your spaces, harmonic analysis is primarily about topological groups acting on spaces, and so on
Galois theory is about actions of the Galois group on roots of polynomials
Thanks! Sounds exciting 🙂 I have to get deeper in my algebra studies (preferably in combination with some other field) to really appreciate that interplay though
Do group actions play an important role in algebraic number theory as well?
yeah, through the Galois theory thing I mentioned at the very least, though I know very little number theory
Galois theory being the starting point of algebraic number theory
Cool. That’s my current program, i.e. the driving force behind my studies: to get to Galois theory and Algebraic Number Theory
Representation theory also sounds interesting but for that I’ll need more linear algebra I guess
if you have taken a class/gone through a book in abstract linear algebra, you probably have enough to start out and learn as you go
e.g. at the level of Axler or FIS or Treil or Hoffman-Kunze or ...
Yeah, I’ve got Axler and Halmos
And Strang too, but I don’t really like computational stuff 🙂
is anyone down to study lees smooth manifold together? I already went through the integration on surfaces in Rn part in zorich
Modules may be seen as a ring action
How
You guys should read harry potter
and the principles of mathematical analysis
it seems like an appropriate textbook for anyone finishing pre calc
If u can read harry potter u can read pma🗣️
Does anyone have recommendations for books or resources to help me get better at this style of equational reasoning proofs? The resources offered by the professor are quite limited
i have a feeling that "introduction to mechanics and symmetry" is not an introduction to mechanics
This is basic logic, this should be covered in any "discrete mathematics" text
I don't recommend that demonstrative method. Sure, it generates logic, but it's better to learn at the conjunctive level.
You can look at Jay's book.
I believe the important thing here is that that is the professor's method may very much show up on exams
Also knowing how to manipulate logical expressions is quite important to do a few times by hand IMHO
-James
Yea it’s very specified to his method which makes it difficult to practice from discrete math books
Isn’t that covered in discrete math?
Professor doesn't upload any material and I'm not able to travel to uni so I have to do it outside
that screenshots from like 5 yrs ago during covid lol
just wanted to know if anyone had good ones to use I've been using "a logical approach to discrete math" rn
mixed with the fact I kinda suck at it tbh
maybe try Rosen
appreciate it, I'll give it a look
Well like it was thinking about how it generalizes Cayley. This isn't a novel view at all, and I don't think it particularly is a good pov on Yoneda, but it helped me because it came to me when I was thinking about group actions so I was able to think about it myself.
Left Group actions are just functors G->Set, and the Hom functor is the G action on G corresponding to left multiplication. Natural transformations between functors G->Set correspond to morphisms of G sets, and so you can state Yoneda for functors G->Set algebraically.
Yes exactly
It says that the regular representation is a free G-set
Specifically, the free set on one generator
You can generalise this observation using coends
hi do any of you know any good books to study advanced math for year 11 HSC
my plan is to learn everything over the summer holidays
i’m in the southern hemisphere
its called pre calculus with some topics in calc 1, read axler alg and trig and then thomas calc
Any good channel (youtube) for game theory? (If there is a specific playlist then even better )
okay thank you hurray
it’s always just the opposite
so when autumn starts for you it’s spring here
march to may is autumn
june to august is winter
september to november is spring
they draw santa in speedos and everyone goes to the beach during christmas here
okay thats mad funny ngl
no
i'm sure you can find a used copy that's sold at a much more affordable price though, or you can get it printed somehow
I guess Axler precalculus is a good one
I'm not deeply familiar with the text but A Logical Approach to Discrete Math by Gries features this style of equational reasoning (edit: Sorry I should've read ahead, didn't see that you're already working with that text)
Proves every theorem (not calling it theorem), except two by what i remember.
Btw, I don't believe that overly rigorous textbooks are the best option for those starting to learn mathematics; they should focus on the didactic and learning.
No. It is an old book and Axler used many contents from this book on his precalculus book
Anyway you can always find great stuff for free
<@&268886789983436800> advertising distribution of pirated resources
Hey so unfortunately we can't allow people to use this server as a platform to enable the distribution of pirated resources due to discord ToS @pseudo hill
you’re evil
what does that mean
How so? Any pirated resources on this server at all could mean discord makes an example of this place and shuts it down, according to mods it's happened before
Solution is we move off Discord to a random IRC server 
Don't discourage mod pinging. If the mod ping is inappropriate we'll say so.
My personal stance is that pirating textbooks is good, actually. But the stance we have to enforce on this server is that it is not allowed. Because if we don't the server could be shut down or forcibly removed from the current mods and owner.
Lmao what the , forcibly removed from the current mods and owner?
Who takes control of it
If that happens
Has anyone happened to read Fomenko's Homotopic Topology book? I'm an undergrad and wondering what background I should read if I'm interested in the subject
Harry Potter is good
Discord itself
Proving something and not calling it theorem, but a "result"
what if its just an pdf and not pirated?
how do yk its pirated
Like posting a pdf cannot be piracy, right? maybe sending to a link?
This is probably a subtle point but I think it's likely to be deleted unless it can be verified as non pirated
Like the issue is that discord can't say plausible deniability for hosting pirated shit on their website because they can get sued lol
its probably best to assume that if it Could be considered pirated it is to be considered so
There's some shit about this in the DMCA probably but I'm not too familiar with copyright law
im gonna go find discord tos rule on it and find loops around it so they cant ban me lol
Well if you find loopholes, I will report them.
i think u misread me
i dont mean im gonna do it
Ryan 
sounds like a plan
but we need to build a distributed messaging app with functionality like discord but security like signal 
Preferably in haskell or rust
i understand rust but why haskell dear friend?
because i said so
yk wha, forget rust
haskell supremacy


do it in arms
[because i like haskell and think imperative programming should not be encouraged]
(or we could move to matrix. but it isn't exactly decentralized)
and idk that much about its encryption sheme 
i think signal is okay but its just not very well optimized
signal doesn't exactly have the convenience of discord lol
I think convenience is a problem lmao
The harder it is to set up, the better
for whom is it better???
i tried to set up wireguard on my droplet for THREE days 😭
and because i don't know networking, i couldn't debug what went wrong 😭
(specifically DNS didn't go thru)
so i just gave up 😭
Sharing a pdf of material you don't have permission to distribute is pirating
The copyright holder has the exclusive right to distribute, reproduce, etc. the material
K nerd
I don't know what probability has to do with anything here but go off
I only share cdfs anyway
does anyone know of a really good graduate level text on monte carlo methods
and who is the copyright owner?
that's right, the publisher 
True sigma algebras know that pdf is equivalent to cdf
Yeah but the copyright holder decides the license
The copyright holder is commonly the publisher as many authors give away their rights to the publisher during the publishing process and the publisher will almost always pick the most restrictive terms possible as that's the most profitable to them
Self publishing ftw 
Generally, it's obvious, if it's not obvious then we'll figure it out, if we can't figure it out, then probably not something that Discord would be able to figure out either. 
The important thing is that the mod team makes a good faith effort
Does anyone have a pdf on like all of algebra? Like basic equations to abstract algebra
Doesn't exist, read openstax or lang's basic mathematics or something, then read artin's algebra for abs alg or something
yeah it's a specific request lol. I'll check those out though ty
try reading literally all of the arxiv?
I honestly wouldn’t have asked if I knew what that was
Marcel Berger's influential text "Geometry Revealed - A Jacob's ladder to modern higher geometry" seems very interesting as a survey in classical geometrical problems. I've looked through the book but idk what the prereqs are... any help would be appreciated 🙂
Danny Yee was also quite excited about it and put it n his “best books” section, here is the review: https://dannyreviews.com/h/Geometry_Revealed.html
A Jacob's Ladder to Modern Higher Geometry | Berger's goal in Geometry Revealed is to give the reader a feel for the conceptual frameworks of modern geometry, attempting to reach as far as possible with a minimum of assumed knowledge and formal scaffolding...
any beginner friendly book recommendations for mathematical induction or number theory?
Can anyone recommend me any mathematics books on equation based
I am in 9th grade
I want learn the physics and qm equations
wa hell nah
maybe books are not the best to learn phsyics and quantum mechanics, even textbooks arent usually the best way to learn these things for most people
just look up study resources aand/or videos thats what i do and it works for me

if you can find lectures from very good professors its best
I mean, I know that people often say they can't learn so well from textbooks, and I believe them. But I have no clue what their problem is. To me... it's just... read??
how do people learn from videos!
expect the knowledge to passively enter them via osmosis 
expect elrichardo to teach me fr
me
teach
?
😭
i just flubbed an interview last week where i was supposed to do that
Mathematical induction is just one thing basically, not sure you need a whole book on that! Wikipedia article is quite readable: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_induction?wprov=sfti1
Mathematical induction proves that we can climb as high as we like on a ladder, by proving that we can climb onto the bottom rung (the basis) and that from each rung we can climb up to the next one (the step).
This quote from “Concrete Mathematics” summarises it quite well, and I always keep this in mind when thinking about mathematical induction
Is there a book on how to write logix and arguments as math?
sounds like
what proof/logic books
do
I need a good book for 3rd year electrical engineering with lots of equations
Hammack book of proof, there's some pure logic books somewhere in pins but those probably require some maths you don't know yet
This is very broad, but have you tried kreyszig's advanced engineering mathematics or maybe some mathematical methods texts physicists use?
The link for the abstract algebra book does not work
Which one?
You don't! Videos are entertainment unless they're proper taped lectures and you're taking notes
i like those little autumn lectures oxford and harvard and mit gives
theyre usually so nice
<@&268886789983436800>
What was it
Videos can be extremely informative if they are properly structured and dense. Though maybe just less efficient in most cases.
But things like debates and podcasts and discussions have very little educational value, except maybe referring you to other sources which you then read
Not everyone is good at reading
Debates have alot of educational value
If you actively engage
I know basic algebra lol, thats it indeed. thank you
Do you know analysis and topology?
The very basics of both
I was searching for a book that explains how you write logical arguments in math slang
Just for fun
how to prove it
No that's the name of a book
How to Prove it by Velleman
lol
🐧
What if you want to visualize a concept in mathematics, can videos be helpful for that ?
Why aren’t there books for bilingual people
Have some parts in one language and other parts in another
Lol
why reduce the target audience??
It might help bilinguals to get a richer understanding of the topic
wha-
ic
yet another troll
might be useful for LLMs maybe?
What?
Oh yea
can someone find me a book for beginners at linear algebra
thats a beautiful quote thanks!
Friedberg insel and spence
thank
book
FIS >>
🗿
FISH???? real
w
No it was fist
I recommend a good book I read recently, it's called: " Out of the Dust " ! It was written by: Karen Hesse.. -Ford
Its about an Teenager that is living in the Dust-Bowl in Oklahoma -Ford
In the 1930s -Ford
No math? Hell no
Oh.. I apologize. -Ford
Who is ford
And i was kidding
My name is Stanford, but I go by Ford.
We are an System, I am signing off as my alter signoff. -Ford
Bro is at stanford university
Wdym ?
A " System " is someone with DiD ( Dissociative identity Disorder ) -Ford
An " Alter " is an separate identity that the " Host " has. -Ford
DiD is what used to be called multiple personalities -Ford *
I am an Alter based off of " Stanford Pines " from Gravity Falls -Ford
What does this mean and also I don't think it works like that. -Ford
It's a very emotional and very interesting read / story. I also would recommend the book: Guinness world records of 2025! -Ford
👀 another system :o
Hoi! -James
that is not the responsibility of the author, it is the responsibility of your state
to translate works properly and distribute them
or atleast allow private companies to do it for you instead
I liked arithmetic by paul lockhart
No, thanks
What advanced undergrad/beginner grad level books would ya'll recommend for math stats? Maybe from a more pure-oriented angle.
my professors book fr
a concise introduction to mathematical statistics
https://sites.math.duke.edu/~rtd/PTE/pte.html for probability
This is exactly the kind of thing I was looking for! 😍
is the eguchi-gilkey-hanson review a good-enough coverage of diff geo for physics
(if it helps, i only need enough to comfortable get through "intro to mechanics and symmetry" by marsden+ratiu
Yeah it's good enough for most stuff
Although i don't think it has symplectic geometry which is what you want for mechanics
Maybe for that you can check our Arnolds appendicies
Okay i checked the book out
İt seems like it covers much of the math prerequisites there too
And i don't know your end goal but if it's just classical mechanics, bundles, connections, characteristics classes are a massive overkill
does someone have this book
Elemantary algebra by HS Hall and SR Knight
and also Higher algebra by Hall and Knight
burden is solid
using it right now
🍯
is real analysis via seqeunces and series a good read?
author?
Charles H.C. Little
Any books for pre-uni?
What level are you at? In other words, what are you learning at school?
Rn Im in 10th grade, Next we gon have trigonometry in maths. But I already can do Most, so any book suggestion would be fine

If you're familiar with algebra (solving multiple equations), trigonometry, limits, derivate (the relations between the derivates and original function), then I think you could actually just dive into calculus.
Is 10th grade the second grade in high school for you (total of 3 or 4?)?
2nd year highschool
Would have been 3rd but got nerfed by my health
If you cover all of this, then I think you could just start with a calculus book. And also, if you're not going to study STEM related subjects, then you should focus on your current schedule and do math later as a hobby.
I wanna study EE later on, maybe Ill change the major, maybee
Do you still have some suggestions for those? Just to have it
Spivak's calculus and Thomas's calculus are two calculus books that people like to recommend. If there's a specific EE at a university that you currently aim, you can take a look at their program and see what book they use.
For EE, I recommend doing electronics now instead of math, so you can build up the interest and check if you really think this is something you want to do.
Ill check them out, thank you. In my area I have a uni but I think this more like civil engineering, sadly🥹
Alrighttt, thank you man. Great help
Ron Larson for Trigonometry,
goated book
is there a book that contains only the results of linear algebra (with proofs)?
not a study book, but more like an encyclopedia?
There's Hogben's Handbook of Linear Algebra
which is just 2000 pages of results
oh wait but it doesn't have many proofs
just facts
is there a good mathematical stats book ?
introductory, not requiring measure theory but not too applied either and one that nicely lays out definitions and structure
i've covered most of the first 4 chaps in Evans Rosenthal
For the Putnam and beyond book is there any pre requisites expected? If so what? Im taking linear algebra and took an ode class just curious if I should know more
Check the preface
if you really wanna challenge yourself, pick up either apostol or spivak
i'm curious if there's anything like this but updated aside from pins:
https://mathematics.gg/books
Not that I am explicitly aware of
aw rip
i'm surprised neither apostol or spivak is here:
https://mathematics.gg/books/calculus
That page hasn't been updated in a while to my knowledge
yeah 2022
@sage python revive this /s /hj
Does anyone have book recommendations
for what?
!da2a
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question!
For reading
what
Stories
uh 🥀
Tends to be mostly math but feel free to ask about other literature (YMMV).
Tf are these responses gng
Like tf does it mean by “just ask your question” ? Ts is actually trying to rage bait
you didn't specify what you want to read about tho
I mean how can a bot try to rage bait
Oh yea u are right my bad
😂😭😇
Nah bot was trying to rage bait fr
You don't just ask for someone to give you resources, you should be specifying the domain in which the resources are to be provided
For real bro 😎
casella and berger
i guess bickel and doksum too
Hello
Here for some books recommendations
For stats and calculate and linear algebra
Calculas*
proof based?
LADR4e for LA
Spivak for calc
Well for newbies
I need a free material, not necessarily a book, to introduce me into Answer Set Programming.
@gray gazelle
im not veryyy into art history—i study literature! but a few titles come up about fashion, literature and music
Quentin Bell's On Human Finery—not quite a chronological account, but i think it provides interesting cultural and sociological perspectives on dress as art and a social language; i think it makes for a good companion to more historical surveys like Laver's Costume and Fashion
The Norton Anthology to World Literature is a more canonical text covering a very vast time period (past 2000 years iirc), with pretty good intros to literary movements within their time (cultural, philosophical influences)
The Western Canon by Harold Bloom is much more controversial: he argues against feminist literary criticism, semiotics, Lacanian psychoanalysis and deconstruction (all of which i love!)—exclusions are quite telling, but i think it's a good exposition for aesthetics in lit
The Romantic Agony by Mario Praz—amazing analysis of erotic sensibility!!! this is very focused on the late 18th to 19th centuries, but i think more broadly it's quite incisive in how Romanticism influenced modernism
Music and Cultural Theory by John Shepard and Peter Wicke—it examines cultural musicology from ethnomusicology, neuroscience, structuralist theories and some semiotics, aiming to integrate musicology with cultural theory (as the name suggests) by showing how each informs the other. i think this is a great theoretical map of how to think about music as a cultural system if you're looking to make connections between disciplines
The Cultural Study of Music—ethnomusicology, a bit more academic, but it covers how music interacts w society, tech, ideology and culture! (actually i think this is less dense than Music and Cultural Theory)
I’ll try to get The Norton Anthology
Ts too funny
i am unable to choosethe right linear algebra book.... i considered linear algebra done right VS hoffman and kunze... can someone help please ??... i kinda of know the computational linear algebra in my physics courses as in how to work with matrices with numbers and i have intuition of linear transformation from 3b1b vids.... but what i lack is proof based approach that connects the general properties of linearity in various things i study in physics like linear differential equations, linear operators, and complex number treated as vector space element rather than a field, etc... i will also be learning complex analysis and multivariable analysis after linear algebra.. so something that helps that too...
why can't you just start with LADR, read a chapter or two and see if you like it or not? (after all it's a free book in Open Access)
you don't have to read a perfect book, a good book should be enough (and very likely there is no single perfect book)
then, if you like it, keep reading it. If not, start considering Hoffman and Kunze, read a chapter or two. How is that as an algorithm? 🙂
cuz i am wondering if there is some hidden gem out there out of many unknown linear algebra books
I think it's better to start reading some books and then eventually make your own mind about which ones you like and which you don't (and what is a gem and what is rubbish) - rather than agonise too long over which book to choose. LADR and H&K are both good books, recommended by many people, and your own considerations too, so you can't go wrong with them. There is also FIS and Linear Algebra Done Wrong (also free) if you want more...
just open any book and do it

Requirement/practice is prioritized than theory. You should focus on problem solving, if you counter something you don't know, learn it, not that you learned something then you specifically do the problems.
for ah the canonical intro at my school seems to be gardeners art through the ages.
i'll read it!!!
oh i had that assigned as my textbook for ap art history a long time ago
its awesome i really liked it
(im not familiar w art history in a general sense ahaha)
for ap art history we used smart history which was peak
but with readings out of gardners
we also got shown some vids from khan academy
i had no idea
Should I take AP art history
Bro, everyone should read 'Infinite Powers' - this book is responsilbe for making me LOVE calculus
if u want to yes
https://mtaylor.web.unc.edu/notes/linear-algebra-notes/ is good, but most linear algebra books are pretty much the same
name of author?
steven strogratz
it's more of a history book than something that teaches you calculus
Any book recommendations for the Putnam test or other math competition
i like history dw
anything by art of problem solving (aops) is good for amc and the like
im pretty sure they stop at calculus tho
also arent they supplementary
rather than primary for learning
they don't have calculus yeah