#book-recommendations
1 messages · Page 122 of 1
We should have the bot respond automatically with the .gg/books link whenever someone asks for a recommendation
that way nobody has to waste their time waiting, and nobody has to waste their time telling someone to use Khan Academy to learn trig for the 300th time
Which I believe could use with quite a few more entries
ye
Hi, I'm a high school math student, I am looking for a book to learn about polynomials from which will also include proofs of theorems and stuff
I want to learn about the basics of polynomials with proofs
take… literally any high school algebra text?
😭 that’s literally me
AoPS intermediate algebra does a decent job proving most of the foundational results although a few of them (fundamental theorem of algebra, etc) do get handwaved bc you need much more advanced tools for it
every time i come here it’s always an algebra 1/2 request
instead of something interesting like pdes or complex analysis
and at such a low level the textbook market is even more oversaturated
that if you just spend 2 seconds looking
you’re more likely than not to find smth that works
also I’ve never heard of a high school algebra text focusing exclusively on polynomials wtf
you don’t know what you don’t know
??????????????????
you absolutely do need the techniques and basic knowledge from real analysis in order to be able to do complex
if you are comfortable with epsilon delta proofs then no
you will use real analysis tools
but won't need to prove anything that real anaysy
everything either gets proven by the taylor expansion
or the cauchy integral formula
at least some basic familiarity with foundational techniques from real would be helpful tho no?
oh of course
but you don't have to exactly know the constrution of riemann integral to prove anything about integrals in complex
that's what i meant
some schools offer something called, proof-based calculus
something like that should suffice for prereq
complex anal like complex anal
or just stating and using the theorems
cos there's a big difference
well is the main focus proofs or applications
applications
theres no way they can do the theorems without real analysis experience first 😭
Complex Variables and Applications, 9e will serve, just as the earlier editions did, as a textbook for an introductory course in the theory and application of functions of a complex variable. This new edition preserves the basic content and style of the earlier editions. The text is designed to d...
notable counterexample
just use rudin 
rudin dedicated like only one chapter to lebesgue theory 😭
no it has 2 chapters
"its just common sense" ahh
not that it's still good lol
you sure about that
the last two chapter are "integration of differential forms" then "the lebesgue theory"
It defines measure space in the final chapter on lebesgue theory
oh i meant the big rudin
Hello I am bhargava from India, I'm 13 (14 by this June) who has just arrived into high school. I have however plans of completing it before my summer holidays end, not only because I like thinking in depth of it but also because I don't like school and would rather work a ton to go to university instead directly.
but, my summer holidays end on may 31st , I am on a time crunch. I was academically poor with less marks than most people, but I do love thinking in depth and I can do it without getting distracted if it's a topic I love (i.e maths Or physics)
so what I really want someone to ask me to learn concepts each day and explain it when I finish my research and going indepth of that topic. and you'd ask questions so I actually understand what I'm talking about. And at the end of the month or sooner, I'd have learnt maths of 4 years of high school.
this feels like a better way for me to learn instead of reading books because It is something that I feel in command of and I like doing it. So please come if you can, I already spent over a month of my summer holidays trying to find a path.
Don't avoid books
I won't
but
I can't just focus on it if u say I read it
I wanna do it on my own
When someone gives me specific topics to research about
I see books and everything on it and go indepth while it still being fun to me
First section of big rudin is on measure theory at least
The specific topics should be high school math and maybe basic calculus
it seems
okay
to give a context otherwise people wouldn't understand what they're tryna do
no it can be higher
I can spent as much hours as it takes if it's something I love
but high school math should be covered by the end
Well at least get high school math first
You really cant go far without that
yes but to do that properly without just turning pages
I shouldn't get bored by it
if u give me an advanced topic for example
he wants a personal (free) tutor for the next 27 days to "learn all of high school"
I will spend hours on it to learn the ideas from basic maths
Books are great, they have high quality exercises. but if you want supplements, there is Khan Academy, lots of youtube series, and also https://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/
no
I will repay when I get a job
or when I can
i don't think math books are "boring" unless you get bad ones
mhm
either way
that's not how it works on this server
you can ask questions in help
gl
yes but there isn't an interest for me to just keep on reading them unless I want to learn a topic. which is why I want someone to ask topics each day that I'd go well into
and I would refer all those materials and understand it
Please learn high school math first
I will but I want a motive to do so
it's very hard to do "research" into other topics if you dont even have that
the motive is you giving me a topic
The motivation is so you can understand interesting math later
not really, I wanted to develop a theory on structural infinities a few days ago
Preliminaries - Exponent Properties, Rational Exponents, Negative Exponents, Radicals, Polynomials, Factoring, Rational Expressions, Complex Numbers
Solving Equations and Inequalities - Linear Equations, Quadratic Equations, Completing the Square, Quadratic Formula, Applications of Linear and Quadratic Equations, Reducible to Quadratic Form, Equations with Radicals, Linear Inequalities, Polynomial & Rational Inequalities, Absolute Value Equations & Inequalities.
Graphing and Functions - Graphing Lines, Circles, and Piecewise Functions, Function Definition, Function Notation, Function Composition, Inverse Functions.
Common Graphs - Parabolas, Ellipses, Hyperbolas, Absolute Value, Square Root, Constant Function, Rational Functions, Shifts, Reflections, Symmetry.
Polynomial Functions - Dividing Polynomials, Zeroes/Roots of Polynomials, Finding Zeroes of Polynomials, Graphing Polynomials, Partial Fractions.
Exponential and Logarithm Functions - Exponential Functions, Logarithm Functions, Solving Exponential Functions, Solving Logarithm Functions, Applications.
Systems of Equations - Substitution Method, Elimination Method, Augmented Matrix, Nonlinear Systems.
start with that
I studied a lot for it
LMAO
and I've went pretty deep
what does that mean
basically uh I had the idea of a function which
diverges using convergence
where it's a recursive self multiplying number
he will tell you
if you're his personal tutor of HS math for the next 27 days
but each step depends on time
Half of the remaining
so
for example
a power a
takes 0.5 seconds
and a power a power a takes 0.25 seconds
what
similarly it goes till the time is reached
pls use math notation instead of explaining using seconds
#crank as a honeypot
mods need to try it
each function results as: T(n) = 1/2 power (n+1)
Isnt that just knuth up arrow
,, f(n) = \frac{1}{2^{n+1}} ?
qiu
In mathematics, Knuth's up-arrow notation is a method of notation for very large integers, introduced by Donald Knuth in 1976.
In his 1947 paper, R. L. Goodstein introduced the specific sequence of operations that are now called hyperoperations. Goodstein also suggested the Greek names tetration, pentation, etc., for the extended operations beyo...
no, that's T of n
f(n) = A {f(n-1)Number of knuths arrows)}
for example, if f0 is just a power a which is something like 3 power 3 , 9
then f1 is 3 power 3 power 3 ... 9 times
and f0 takes 0.5 seconds to complete
f(1) takes 0.25 seconds
What does it mean that it takes a certain amount of seconds
This sounds like that lightswitch paradox but without any paradox part
the seconds of your life you're losing to this explanation
it doesn't really have a valid reason to depend on time which is why it failed as a theory when I realized that
I'm not trying to prove that here
I am just saying
I can dive into concepts
if someone gives me
I hope someone does
Qiu already gave you
yeah
My friend
I am gonna go through it
thank you for giving me that
appreciate the copy paste.
it is from https://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/
you can make it your motivation to complete pauls
you already came in hot with a goal of all your HS math in less than 4 weeks
you had the topics before you even typed
HS math
if you finish pauls then you will have up to calc 4 under your belt (mostly)
wdym
yes
but I needed a different way to learn it
times like this I actually do wish I had image perms
or maybe you just need to start doing it
math isnt always about fun
but once you start learning then it becomes fun
yeah but it is necessary to get through
All true
just pretend chatGPT is a member of this server
and each day ask it to tell you the next topic from your list
math isn't, but I am. I can change how I percieve to learn math. Whether in a way I love it without getting bored or not.
This is actually a good idea if this is what you are seeking
Then change it
change yourself to perceive loving Pauls notes for the next 27 day
it's gonna be the only option anyways in a day if no human agrees to my request
actually for the next couple of years
Pauls gonna serve you well through calc 4
so get cozy with it
You don’t need a human
All you need is yourself
and a robot 🤖
I don't need yes, I don't need tasty foods either, but I want someone so it feels better for me to learn it
graphing stuff is fun wdym
whats your background, why do you so greatly feel the need to learn math if you seemingly dont acc want to 😭
He’s 13
oh so its like school
you can just learn it from your high school like most people then
u dont rly gotta listen tho
if you have the motivation to be way ahead, you gotta self study
✌️😂
stop deeping it, just go to school, do some studying, youll be fine
no one is gonna hand hold you if you want to be ahead
i mean i kinda understand where they are coming from
no you don't
you're just arriving late to be contrarian
someone woke up on the wrong side of bed 😂 ✌️
🤡
🍿
My background comes from an Indian family who absolutely fuckingly I believe to be blind soceital sheeps as in they don't understand the why of many things and just go on with their elders' way.
I am academically pretty poor and india is very competitive because a few hundred million chicks were fucked here. I wanna change my life though to be something which I'd want and like- to an extent atleast
ok first of all, you did NOT need to phrase it that way
Tf???
ok but why does it have to be math, there must be thing you acc enjoy that you could pursue instead
okay so you have a lot of motivation?
Alright what the fuck
I have already spent a month arguing on a lot of things, to receive no response
go study math with that motivation, pls
yes
it will help you
tbh, I don't take any of this chat cereal
from the initial request
if I want a story with plot holes
I'll watch donghua
I enjoy deep thinking, and math is a pretty similar thing
shock value isnt gonna make MORE people give u an actual response
eat your veggies, learn highschool algebra
no
deep thinking will assist you in any discipline
I dont think you understand much either my friend
I am not disciplined enough tho, I do agree it is important but I do not want to be disciplined to go somewhere and do 8 hours of nothing. if it was like a university, I could understand why I needed the discipline because of the importance of time there
fellow daoist
...what
i dont really see how that relates
im just saying why dont you take that enjoyment of deep thinking and apply it to say history or science or whatever else
If you aren’t disciplined nobody will help you.
no I don't, I question things I'm a skeptic. but the answers I get is somewhat of a nonsense
if you have the motivation you can build the discipline
There is no nonsense it what we are trying to tell you—just study.
yea it isn't nonsense but
you cant be saying "i wanna learn math i wanna learn math i wanna learn all high school math in 1 month" but also be not motivated enough to actually learn it
I don't think it's the most efficient for me to study by seeing books
some ppl wonder why im pretty much in this channel all the time instead of discussion
only if I'm motivated by it I will learn it completely
books are very efficient
yes they are
read the chapters, do the exercises
#book-recommendations discourse > #discussion discourse
but I won't be if u give me a book and say "ok read this and u be fine "
much much faster than high school courses
Ooo new color
your original question was asking people to ask you abt topics to go in depth, right? and you said you are willing to put a lot of work into smth that interests you. I dont see where this comes in
you guys still answering after the mass chick production line is something
I wanna do that myself
like are you willing to put in the work or not
damn pog
if no, use some deep thinking to figure out why
Yeah i know that line was actually crazy
that's how it works though
if yes, follow peoples advice and use textbooks or khan academy or smth
Books, pauls notes, khan academy, youtube. you can ask questions on any math in this server. what else do you really need?
i don't really read cultivation type stories, what's the appeal behind them?
Motivation and discipline. But we cant give him that
there are resources and I am willing to put the effort but if it's in a way self motivated, it would be efficient for me
what are u on abt twin
if someone gives me tasks about concepts
you arent willing to put in the effort if you need someone else to keep you motivated
I feel self motivated enough
well yes
my dad watches a lot of wuxia movies
???
I want someone to just state concepts' names and leave
And I'd explain them with my own research and indepth thinking
Okay, start with high school algebra concepts
It will help with literally all the rest of math
what do u mean by "research"
like afaik there arent many open problems in high school algebra
Internet and searching and tryna understand the why of it then the how of it
by thinking
almost all of the wuxia movies my dad watches have a crappy vietnamese dub
Aight im out wth is this lmao
its much better at least at the HS level to be more structured and use a textbook or khan academy, or smth
okay tbf there isnt a much of "why" and "how" in high school math, but also you're definitely going to need high school math before you get to that point so..
you just dont have the background to be googling stuff and understanding it all
,ci
Name: book-recommendations [#book-recommendations]
Type: Text channel
ID: 716264872018706443
NSFW: No
Category: Discussion (360643390594875392)
Created at: <t:1590841253:F>
Use this channel to ask for book recommendations. Tends to be mostly math but feel free to ask about other literature (YMMV). Check out https://mathematics.gg/books too!
send him to the nlab
i love nlab
hmm, I don't read webnovels
but I do read some manhua and watch some donghua
some of them are interesting, some are just like comfort trash
the donghua produced in the last couple years with higher production values are night and day to a few years ago
for cultivator genre specifically, yea, most follow the same general path
but if you accept that, it can be enjoyable
(this is the entire page)
bruhhhh
Kai is the hardest working warrior in his generation... and the unluckiest. In a world where most people receive magical skills, classes, or cultivation, Kai has nothing but his wits and his strength. His only choice will be to forge a new path against fate, no matter where it takes him.
Savage monsters pour endlessly from the wasteland, threate...
this is inspired by cultivation stories
i think this is good
definitely, especially in the lower budget, more trash ones
if you had those hours back
you could spend them being that guy's personal tutor this month
what a shame
I cannot
I'm not chinese heritage or even asian🤡
I would like to learn some mandarin though
on the Todo List
I would say my removed position is part of the appreciation for me
for the donghua
what the fuck did i miss
books not being recommended
a few hundred million 😭
6'10 btw
ashdjasd
same guy who was asking for feminist literature in here a few days back i think
poor guy tripped over his ferrari cause he was too distracted reading feminist literature
hope he's doing alright
that might be someone else, he sold the ferrari to help singlehandedly fund NPR
yeah fair enough I mean he was too tall to fit in it anyways so win-win
@silent roost i looked through your list. could you recommend me a personal finance book? i want to improve my money wisdom.
what did he say
okay tysm!!
yes i have essentially 0 money smarts so i feel like all of these recs offer improvements for me 
wow amazing!! tysm!!
i feel curious what your investment philosophy is 
just skip to making those videos
that's how they made money too🤡
hmm this all sounds very interesting. i'm not sure what it all means yet, but i can read more about it c:
who has shaped your investment philosophy the most?
wow super interesting.
ig like, i could make a portfolio and put some money in it, even to get the feel of how it all works.
a real black swan event
an old, rich man grooming for good

anyway, ty sabrina for your perspective! time to read. 
do people regularly beat the SPY?
interesting. so it sounds wise to start with the SPY, read a lot, and then try to vary?
especially if i have like a simulator portfolio on the side to try my skills on
this might sound like a silly question, but is like storing money as cash considered an investment too?
if there is a negative real interest rate🤡
mm interesting. so i'm learning to use SPY as the money grower and SGOV as like my bank account while i'm new to investments
i think i'll probably start with SPY and SGOV.
it sounds like that's like the minimum viable strategy for me right now.
and ig the percentage of my overall wealth that i store in SGOV depends on how accessible i want my money?
another possibly silly question, but like, what are the safe like portfolio services to invest through?
Sabrina
that sounds kinda complicated. so it sounds like if i were to copy your portfolio, then i'd likely not accurately reflect changes to it, and may do myself a disservice that way.
i think that makes the most sense for me 
Oh etfs are good 
Yes I know because “America has a free exercise market or whatever”
It just gives a general price on what a option is worth
okay ty again sabrina i really appreciated your wisdom 
So I use the heston model if I wanna account for a lot of volatility is this for options and futures?
Yeah I trade American
But I was told that black scholes is onlt calibrated at European markets
Then how do I calibrate it for free markers
The Heston seems to be a bit better though cause it takes into account the large amount of voltality.
Oh

Please teach me the ways of option trading

Can we use an example pls
On how I would use the Heston model
Okay yeah heston model works 
For instance, can we take a look at a stock? So we can examine which method to use (black-scholes or Heston)
Can you dm me what resources I should look into so I can look into it and become a more proficient options trader?
I see the potential in so many things, such as the fact that Tesla stock oscillates quite frequently (very volatile) so I typically make a strangle and collect massive profits)
How does this relate to options trading 
After I learn this volatility stuff how would I translate that into options trading

So learn this…?
Then analyze a 5 yr graph of a stock to determine the volatility, then use the Heston or black-scholes to gain insight and then execute the trade?
Options trading is interesting though
Can you dm me all the resources so I can understand more about volatility
And then ill use the volatility with the two equations/models
I might be fucked
But can’t it rake in a shit load of money?
Why do they not do it then
Wait cfa will definitley help for options trading
I just want to options trade lol
My porfilio is just index funds and I wanna start working on options
Why is the first volume 600 pages

I’m a mathematician at heart but these seems interesting
Are you a cfa
Isn’t cfa like economics
How long will it take me to get into the cfa
Like just finish all these fucking books

What the fuck
Bro I just want to options trade

Mhm
Fucking hate those premiums
Can you just dm me the resources

Yeah
It basically shows investors fear
The reason it’s so high is cause the tariffs
Sabrina, I buy options.
And then I sell them at like idk
Wait I still might need it
So make a call
And then make a strike accordingly?

CFA research aghgggg
Anyone familiar with james stewart algebra and trig 4th edition ?
how long does one of these take you? just curious
I thought complex functional analysis
(idk if it exists)
use a different book
don’t support st*wart’s textbook industrial complex nonsense
did you know he got so rich from price gouging the shit out of his calculus textbook with its endless edition changes and whatnot
that he built this stupid ass mansion “integral house” as a vanity project?
I mean, why not? If you got the money and can afford it, why not live the way you want to live? Stewarts Calculus book is pretty decent
https://www.amazon.com/review/R2IADID8E966E8 if you’re looking to actually understand the material surely there are better texts out there
he dead, dw
This attitude is found not only in the proofs but in the presentation generally. Stewart is basically a dog trainer. Sit! Roll over! Good boy! That is the spirit in which this calculus book treats you. You are taught to do tricks, rather than being led on an intellectual journey of exploration and discovery.
This can be seen in the many topics that are taught without any credible motivation provided for the reader. For one thing, the book is packed with supposedly "applied" or "real-world" problems designed to capture the reader's interest, which are easily seen to be intellectually bankrupt upon the slightest critical examination. Like a politician telling blatant lies and counting on people being too stupid to see through them, so also Stewart tries to fool you with cheap smokescreens into thinking that his problems have real-world relevance. Most ridiculously, of course, this is seen in the gratuitous full-colour stock photos that are peppered in various places. For instance, pre-med students constitute a significant portion of calculus students, so let's appease them with some problems about blood pressure and drug concentrations and so on, with some pointless stock photos of blood vessels and whatnot taking up a good chunk of the page, as if the book was not bloated and expensive enough without them. These problems, like so many other "real world" ones, consist of nothing but plugging numbers into formulas. The generic template for such problems is: "The function so-and-so represents something-or-other. What's the something-or-other when the value of the variable is 53?" The disastrous message to students is clear: applying mathematics means plugging numbers into formulas. It clearly does not involve thinking about why the formula is that way in the first place. It also clearly does not involve any kind of qualitative reasoning or any kind of conceptual conclusions. Applying mathematics simply means: when I plug this number in, that number comes out.
I don't disagree
but that's most undergrad (lower level) textbooks
the multivariable chapters get especially bad
so much shit gets handwaved and not properly motivated
I had to use it for a multivar class i took while still in high school
the same is true of the entire structure of the corresponding AP test
some random thing is given by extremely contrived function that we asspulled
richardo
sounds like you might regret the Stewart4Life forehead tattoo you got
live and learn
essentially isomorphic
all lower division calculus textbooks are basically identical in their utter lack of rigor and needless bloat
I prefer the tone of Thomas, there's something cloying about Stewart
but yea, all the major calc texts are similar by design
basically it doesn’t really matter which you pick
the market is oversaturated enough as is
paul’s online notes are a decent supplement if you want to see more worked computation examples
did your school not provide a book
😭
damn
yeah
larson/hostetler/edwards which was also terrible
idk when they bought those books but they must’ve been decades old
the district just cut >$1M from their budget for next year 😭 so must’ve been when they had a better financial situation
i graduated HS 3 years ago so that’s no longer my problem but
😔
I have a lot to say about how poorly designed APs are and how it’s facilitating k12 education’s race to the bottom
but i shall spare yall my rant
ok the spark notes version is:
- it’s what students should be covering in high school anyway (see for example the bullshit that is AP PRECALC)
- accordingly, it’s nowhere near actually being college level (also most APs besides like calc BC take a semester’s worth of material and then stretch it out to full year length)
- c*llegeb**rd’s monopoly on HS education self-perpetuates as people gravitate more towards APs while the non AP classes continue to nosedive in popularity and quality
that’s not college math
most schools count that as 000 level
ie non college level remedial courses
you can’t use it for actual credit anywhere
AP Precalc puzzles me because Precalc doesn't even count towards graduation at many universities
so it's like congrats! you got ahead
of what
idk
- the exams themselves have also continued to be dumbed down (all the exams post covid have been heavily nerfed and hollowed out of any challenge they could possibly have had)
- and continues to contribute to the needless toxic bullshit gamification of college admissions at the mid-high to high tiers
yea, I get that logic if it's already on the table
SEVENTEEN jfc 😭
I only took 10
yeah ew i hate gaming the system like that
lmao I was also salutatorian of my class
17
did you take AP in AP Studies🤡
AP lunch
AP recess
????
you can always transfer to a better school
look people won’t care how many APs you spammed in high school
make the best of your current situation
they usually stop caring by the end of first year
I know I did
I feel like your speech would've been YouTube gold
starts calm, ends with
"IT WAS JUST ONE F@&KING B IN AP CALCULUS, JUST ONE DAMMIT"
Fuck AP
anyway remember what channel this is lol?
All my homies hate collegeboard
Those fuckers gave me a 3 on ap calc bc because they didn't like the txt format I submitted for online exam 💀
I think I got a 0 on the frq
oh the covid years
Yeah man that was fucked up
seems like an eternity ago now im 1 year from finishing my undergrad
I was just a naive little 14yr old and they threw me off so hard with sudden online testing
real
I did my calc AB responses in latex 💀💀💀
I like how Cleo just asked for intro financial literacy advice
and Sabrina was like "You are a CFA now, book your test date"
Okay now book related question
Arnold odes book
I took an ODEs course but this thing is still confusing for me
Am I mentally challenged
I had a negative experience with every single collegeboard exam I've taken. Usually with environment
With AP CS it was Java
have you looked at Simmons’ ODE book?
I haven’t read much of it but it’s supposed to be decent
Such a snooze fest writing getters and setters HANDWRITTEN
I'll look at it
At least ap CS is a free 5
Lmao
I dont think you really need to know java to get a 5 on AP cs
it's just common sense stuff
I literally watched the AP classroom videos the night before
I have never written a line of Java on a computer in my life
Funny I can say that but it is true
Same
Only Java written is hand written 💀
Dude I could not believe that they made people hand write getters and setters
That's the most npc stuff ever
They really should have the AP exam be like python or something idk
Much more relevant than Java for most ppl
I think a functional lang would be sick but I don't think many ppl would be happy with that
Actually I'm curious if any (non mathematician) ppl started programming with a functional language
I feel like everyone starts with python js java c/++ etc
sure
if that's what their school did
Thanks yeah it looks like what I need lol
I gotta review odes because I just hardcore memorized that bs instead of intuitively grasping
most lower division ODE courses are like that apparently
😔
just memorize endless list of disjointed techniques
how is ts even possible, the class is taught in java
Yeah I was really disappointed
stupidly enough my uni doesn’t require ODE for math majors
which is
??????????????????
I think a lot of stuff will be cleared up for me once I learn PDEs
oh that sounds like what happened at my HS
the AP CS “”””””””teacher””””””””
was TOTALLY INCOMPETENT
to the point that the STUDENTS were teaching the “TEACHER”
😭😭😭
well mean it happens here too, my ap physics teacher has 0 physics education and is like genuinely incompetent
i love collegeboard
I was taking a programming elective purely because some of my friends were in it. I was helping the teacher with Python lol
I still have not found the time to learn ODE
and I’m applying to grad school next year
halp
😭
perhaps
all ODE's are PDE's 🗿
it’s just as mathy as anything else
Depends on the course. My course was super applied and lame
I don't understand anything conceptually except how to solve them
diffeq is the language of chemistry, physics, etc
without knowing ODE/PDE you can’t really do much in those fields
Well odes can be pretty cool but I think pde much more interesting in pure math sense
I kinda wish I was in EE for money
But I also love these math courses
if we switched places you'd be broke
pog
I'm just hoping that my lack of cs degree won't hold me back too much
it's just a piece of paper...I know the stuff but idk
Honestly
Yeah
But idk what else I'd do lowk
my only strengths are math and cs
please censor next time you say that
me, a music/math double major:
whats wrong with liberal arts majors?
most people apply direct to Phd programs
"i have black friends" ahh argument
I am NOT cut out for grad school 💀

gotta love the music side being completely unemployable
(classical piano 😭😭)
one of my piano classmates at one point was tripling in piano + flute + cognitive science
I think she eventually dropped to piano + flute double
oh forgot to mention this is one of the top music schools in the US too 💀 but part of a larger university
strings (probably violin/cello imo)
No it is triangle
Piano is so good
piano compositions are goated
All the other instruments should fall off the face of the earth and I would be less devastated than if piano went
true and based
What chapters do i need to focus in that book? I taking calculus in few months i dont got time for doing 1000 pages
chapters 1-11 or so should cover your standard single variable curriculum, calc 1 and 2
per the routine I will also mention Paul's online notes + Khan academy + Youtube (eg 3blue1brown calc series)
good supplements
3b1b good for before you start calculus or as you start
just for intuition sake
3b1b series in particular
is not meant to replace a full course
but to supplement it
same goes for his “essence of linear algebra” series
yes, but that doesn't mean the methods for finding closed form solutions as is traditionally taught are useful outside of a small class of problems
anyone that's not doing a degree that's specific to a profession (e.g. engineering, law, or medicine) is a liberal arts major
math, physics, and bio majors are liberal arts students
boyce and diprima is fine
paul's notes can supplement it well
i really really like arnold ode but i feel a little bit dumb reading it
if you are more comfortable with physics than me then maybe it'll be easier
(a lot of the examples are physics intuition based)
this is free with video lectures
it's based on a free textbook that is meant to be similar to Boyce Diprima
https://web.uvic.ca/~tbazett/diffyqs/frontmatter-1.html
im guessing youve just never been good at them
like most mathematicians
ah
where does the disdain for the humanities come from then
oops, I forgot the link
i tend to find that people in STEM dont like humanities because they werent very good at them, but i suppose there can be other reasons
Yes diprima is amazing. I can attest to this
oh thats the other reason
fair enough
but why look down
rather than simply not enjoy
i dont like analyzing or discussing history or literature, i just read it
i dont wanna have to talk to othesr about it if i dont want to
i see
math major is BS at my uni 🗿
At my Uni they offer both BA and BS
pure and applied both bs
pure math BS is interesting
yea
im double majoring in two fields both who have only BAs
im really choosing the academia life man
tho honestly i could get a fairly scientific job with pure math background
Chipper, I edited the link in if you didn't notice
kind of want to work with physicists and such so im looking to go into applied. Not sure yet tho
Ah yes, all those poor souls that were forced to buy a calculus book by....absolutely no one. Nobody makes anyone buy a book
my research next fall (if i end up doing it, which i should) will be physics related, and i study pure math
Much less were they killed over it
math sorcerer cast a mind control spell on me to buy AI slop textbook
i hope you are joking
does this mean i would sooner be killed for proving sqrt(2) as irrational before getting killed for not buying a book
any good introductory real anal. books???
syllabus saying you should get them != you should get them
Ive thought about Understanding Analysis
abbott the normal rec
rudin if you wanna die like me
i mean if you want your uni to sucker you into buying shit you dont need
that's obviously false
books with access codes are a normal requirement for many, many classes
you don't have a choice
yeah this ones pretty good
You're not required to buy a book for your class. You can be pushed to, but it's not like your life is on the line for buying the calculus book. Nobody is required to learn calculus. If you don't want to learn, then you don't have to!
UTM is gold ngl
contrarian maxxing
my course also has Ross as a supplement analysis textbook
i think it is ok, some quirks but overall very clear
oh ts true
I bet 9/10 times that these students dont even need to spend $100 on a calc textbook
Just go to a thrift store
no one should spent $100 on a calculus textbook
spend that on analysis instead 😭
you can get all of calc information online trivially
pirating is usually ethical
I hope you don't gamble
imo
cant wait for my next paycheque. boutta hoard some texts from UTM 😭😭
Your life isn't on the line to take a class with an online component. You can choose not to take such a class. You can also choose not to take any classes at all. Calling James Stewart's success blood money is ridiculous
i dont
1, I didn't
2, you're arguing in bad faith for the opposite pov
Multiple pieces for a moving conversation. My main point is it's not blood money, and you're not required to buy a book. If a particular class requires an access code, you can choose not to take that class
my uni has a math library which is rlly nice
i can just browse the books
i dont even check anything out
is there any website other than amazon where i can get books
i just get an idea of what books are good then buy them myself or acquire pdf
i usually would get used books
you're just being silly or naive now, idk
but 👍
i dont see the point in getting brand new books ngl
lift the burden of another student instead 🗿
Ah yes the "I don't like the way this class will be taught so I won't take it" silliness
Some people prefer the new book smell and aesthetics
I guess it's naive then, np
i see
try harder
ok I got it for like $10 lightly used off Amazon and that is worth imo
but pdf nice too
Would you recommend the stacks project as an intro textbook?
The Stacks Project is not a textbook and it is definitely not meant to be an introductory textbook.
That's just functional analysis 
I think working over real and complex vector spaces is common in func anal
This book is open source so if you don't like anything you can change it yourself
Font isn't comic sans? You can make it comic sans
I agree
It's not about what a new book is like, but rather what it is not like. Torn pages, writing in pen, and so on.
But I agree that most math students treat their books well enough to buy used every time
I've bought three used and the only book I would've possibly complained about had a slightly torn dust jacket
It reminds me of nlab lol
You have to be quite familiar with a lot of ideas to make efficient, practical use of it
an open source textbook
false advertising

@remote sparrow @merry sphinx 3Blue1Brown's math book shelf, Munkres, Stein and Shakarchi, Needham's VCA 
@median fossil he even has QFT books, based 
Anthony Zee's QFT book, but not Schwartz's book 😔
I strongly dislike the first part of Schwartz
The first 100 pages or so
Surely it's the greatest QFT book of all time
hesfalse
Tong and Harlow notes + Srednicki + Banks + Weinberg + P&S + Zinn-Justin ftw
This looks like an L + ratio copypasta 
you basically listed all other popular textbooks other than schwartz
Do i see delgine?? 
Yes that was on purpose 
Hi sir does anybody have good dpps or sheets for maths advanced level
Makes sense
whatre your guys' favourite graph theory books
the one that ends the quickest!
the three canonical graph theory books, diestel, bollobas, and bondy/murty are each biased towards different areas of graph theory
maybe skim through all of them!
@gray gazelle i see topology and groupoids
Realist thing I ever heard
thank you :)
these r the ones my prof marked, dyk anything abt West if it's not one of the canonical ones?
Not a recommendation, actually a book to avoid, don’t recommend Wilson’s introduction to graph theory, it was what my class used and I hated it
Not poorly written or anything, just insultingly slow
Good to know, thank you
And I remember the 4th and 5th edition were quite different with one being significantly worse than the other, but I can’t remember which way around
at first it might seem like diestel isnt good because "man these theorems are very strange and their proofs are boring"
and then youll realize thats bc ur doing graph theory
Proof - If assumption A holds, this is trivial otherwise consider the following 137 cases:
i asked my favorite algebraist professor at my uni if he were willing to do a graph theory independent study with me
and he just straight up said "no way" because "its the most boring subject both to teach and to study"
i mean yeah using graph theory for other means can be cool
my research this summer is somewhat graph theoretic
but like trying to do graph theory for its own sake just sucks
lol fair
you might as well just pick up a few basic graph theoretic tools and call it a day
yeah i didnt love the straight up graph theory stuff but stuff like using graph theoretic arguments in topology was neat
west tries to be a survey
so i guess it's balanced, but doesn't go very deep in any particular direction
I see, thanks
Also, sorry to ask, I don't immediately see it from skimming their tables of content, which areas would these be?
i think a survey-type book is best for graph theory
diestel - classification problems/structural graph theory
bollobas - extremal graph theory
bondy/murty - more topics relevant to computer science
Spivak calculus 
theres a List here https://realnotcomplex.com/analysis/calculus/
Discover incredible free resources to study mathematics - textbooks, lecture notes, video and online courses.
doesn't cover multivariable calculus
you need to say calculus on manifolds instead
wdym by readable? I think Stewart calc is very easy to follow along
If you don’t understand a topic, you could always find it on Paul’s Online Math Notes
It’s pretty good
And perhaps that’ll help you
studying physics alongside multivar should give you a fair bit more intuition
you need multivariable calculus to be able to fully describe E&M: vector fields, line/surface integrals, etc
curl and divergence operators also have very nice descriptions using physics
Mutlivar intuition is really satisfying
(im gonna eat my words so hard when I take analysis in several dimensions next sem)
my senior year of HS i took multivar alongside AP phys 2; while the AP obviously did not explicitly involve calculus in any way there was nonetheless a lot of overlap in the content they covered
Was wondering if I could get a book recommendation for a linear algebra textbook
More specifically
I have taken a class in linear algebra, covering usual stuff like vector spaces, linear independence, basis, span, transformations, matrices, eigenvalues/eigwnvectors/diagonlizability, dual space, a little bit over R of normed/inner product spaces, adjoint stuff solely for the purpose of proving the spectral theorem, and some basic multivar stuff crammed in at the end
I feel like quite weak with matrices in general
I was looking for a book to really strengthen my knowledge (a good number of difficult/non trivial exercises) with good coverage of matrices
computational linalg books (ie most lower division treatments of it) focus a lot more on drilling matrix computations than actually doing proofs if that’s what you’re looking for
Using a modern matrix-based approach, this rigorous second course in linear algebra helps upper-level undergraduates in mathematics, data science, and the physical sciences transition from basic theory to advanced topics and applications. Its clarity of exposition together with many illustrations...
This is the revised and expanded edition of the problem book Linear Challenging Problems for Students , now entitled Problems in Linear Algebra and Matrix Theory . This new edition contains about fifty-five examples and many new problems, based on the author's lecture notes of Advanced Linear Alg...
any reccomendations for proof based mvc books?
Spivak calculus on manifolds
thanks!
hubbard or shifrin
good if you want something fast to get into the topic
will look into those as well, thanks!
I mostly wanna formally learn a bit of mvc so i can do complex analysis, just putting that out there incase a specific book might work best for that
I saw a couple weeks ago
the Hubbard new DiffEq book that continues their Vector book is supposed to be published in December
Cool
digital logic ?
based pfp
Does anyone have book recommendations for Multivariable Calculus? I'm trying to study ahead during the summer for the class.
The University is using the weird Pearson access, and I'm not able to pay the ~120 dollars for the ebook access yet.
Multivariable calculus?
Here is a set of notes used by Paul Dawkins to teach his Calculus III course at Lamar University. Topics covered are Three Dimensional Space, Limits of functions of multiple variables, Partial Derivatives, Directional Derivatives, Identifying Relative and Absolute Extrema of functions of multiple variables, Lagrange Multipliers, Double (Cartesi...
Lecture notes on Vector Calculus

I'm currently going through Geometry\ (Basic and High-school) what are some good books? I feel pretty burnt out from videos being my only source of learning...
As long as you understand the logic behind what is happening, and you aren't just memorizing the algorithms, any resource should work to be honest. Especially because a lot of first courses in complex analysis assume that you're dumber than a real analysis student
In a math-specialized server, so few people interact with high school math that we simply don't know what books are good for that stuff, which is why we always recommend videos. In high school people are still trying to figure out how they need to go about understanding math, so it's harder to pick any one book and say "this". Usually all you need to do is internalize and practice patterns. So the best I can do is say "Basic Mathematics" by Lang, assuming he has content on geometry other than trig..
If there's geometry in that book, I suspect it will be at least somewhat more challenging than a video, but if I had to give someone a book for high school math, that would be it..
Yeah honestly I don't have a lot of motivation to properly do mvc right now and was thinking I'll pick it up on the side while doing complex analysis but I decided to ask and note down some books anyway just incase my plans change
Oh I mean fair
If you're interested in the geometry of curves and surfaces, that could also be a strong motivator
I see
I'll probably get into it at some point lmao
Differential Geometry mentioned 🗣️🔥🔥🔥🔥
also tbh you don't really need to learn it formally for complex analysis, iirc all you need to know are line integrals and green's theorem
The resources I've provided above should be more than enough
I see
these
Oh nice
then I think this might offer a newer perspective for you
I see
Btw we're not at all trying to beat you down, just save you time. Obviously don't rush the basics, but think like a grad student. Do what you think you need to do, not everything you could do.
LA is quite important for MVC
makes sense
thanks
This is scary
I wanna learn all that I can but it seems in grad school it seems I'd need to focus on what I need to do
I know a bit of the computational side, I'm currently doing LADR though
LADR 
it's just fun in general
4th edition is better, but I went through 3rd edition and imo it was a 6/10
I regret buying Axler
I should've bought FIS
FIS is based
What's FIS
insel, spence, and I forget the first guy's name
Yeah I read the additions for the 4th edition, I'm glad I picked it up after the update
Friedberg
I see
it's great
I need to work out what it is I hate about LADR so much at some point
I think the descision to work over R and C is silly, but theres something much more broad about that book that I just do not fuck with
well I've only done a calc book and an real analysis book before this so I don't have any point of comparison
fair
and I cant put my finger on quite what it is, possibly its just the way Axler writes
it's not really silly
The lack of symbols maybe? idk
it makes sense imo
That part is annoying to me
beyond just algebra or coding theory you mostly don't care about arbitrary fields
Plus he does mention other fields when he finds necessary
More often than not you can just work over any field, or at worst any algebraicly closed field. I dont see any point in restricting yourself in a "second course"
For example one of the theorems given as an exercise wasn't true if you consider the field {0,1} with the binary kinda definition of addition and multiplication which he did mention
Beyond harmonic analysis you dont really care about fourier series, but they were still in my RA class. Its an algebra course, I think this is a non-argument
ah right stuff like determininants get funny in characteristic 2, but as long as you point that trivia out when it happens it's fine
Everything gets funny in char 2
that's a fair point, but inner products are only valid over R or C 
general bilinear forms don't count
Not true but sure lol
what do you mean? 
Well you can define an inner product on continuous functions over some interval
Perfectly good inner product space
continuous functions? from where to where?
Arguably youre always working over R or C, which ill give you, but you can just restrict to that when talking about inner products
real/complex valued?
that's what I mean
Dont have to no, \int_a^b f\overline{g} is the standard inner product there
that's what I said?

but yeah I don't disagree with you I too would like to work over general fields like Hoffman and Kunze
But again, you have general bilinear forms and all the rest, inner products are a nice case for R and C which you can just mention when appropriate
there is some neat algebraic facts that you miss out on when you restrict to R or C
This really isnt my issue with Axler anyway, its just not a choice I like
But I guess different books for different audiences
Not that I really know what my issue with Axler is
determinants 
But I think he fixed his treatment in 4th ed
determinants and related topics like eigen-stuff in 3rd ed was abysmal
Yeah I consider anything before 4th ed to be a waste of time
Like it or not determinants are increcibly useful and you need to know how to use them, they need to be treated properly
just learn linear algebra through D&F 
||jk don't do that||
Axler's treatment of determinants in his 4th edition though feels like something that's better deferred until after learning some abstract algebra. His treatment of it is the same (or nearly the same) as D&F's, but you have a way better grasp of what's going on with multilinear algebra, permutations, etc when you arrive at the chapter in D&F's book. But that takes significantly longer to get to, so..
Yeah you should probably at least make sure the phrase "Linear Algebra" or "Vector Space" appears somewhere in the title of your book
ok now some guy is going to show up with a book titled topological vector spaces or some shit, my mistake
nah, the converse doesn’t hold
you’re likely still correct as stated
i don’t even think this is true.
fourier series are useful lots of places
not sure what counts as ‘algebra’ here, but number fields are also useful and aren’t R or C.
there’s also a ton of stuff on finite field representations
FIS my beloved
what a good text
that's my top LA rec
very well written, good treatment of determinants IMO (unique alternating multi-linear function from the set of linear transformations -> k which is 1 on the identity)
good coverage of topics
I agree that Fourier series show up elsewhere, my point is that even if R and C are the only fields non-algebraists care about (which isn’t true) it wouldn’t be an argument for only dealing with R and C
I used to like Axler in theory but after using it in class for a semester not so much 💀he takes a functional analyst’s perspective to the material and in my opinion doesn’t really emphasize the algebraic ideas going on under the surface?
It just doesn’t feel like an algebra book almost
And the proofs are very sort of analysis-y with choosing ordered bases and stuff
is hungerford algebra good for reference
i want a book thats just like a list of concepts and definitions and theorems
also i liked axler as a book i read next to the class textbook
i cant imagine learning from it directly
but it was just cool as a different perspective
although im still mad about htat hting that he defined but did not name or say any of the properties at all of
i think it was the coimage
i heard the galois theory chapter isn't that great
lang and jacobson make good references
GOAT
yea this is literally the only thing it'd be good for 
People say Schaum's Outlines are "just problem books" but for some reason their style just clicks with me. I wish I'd known about them when I was in college and earlier. I could have been an astrophysicist!
You still can be an astrophysicist 
or at least an astroschaumsicist
thats why engineering exists
your views are skewed because you've spent too much time in the math server 
try the physics server in #old-network
that can be quite entertaining
I was
I temporarily left to focus on exams
<@&268886789983436800>
Has anyone read Mathematical Thinking by Douglas West and Paul D'Angelo?
It's meant as a fun introduction to proofs
How good is it? It's the only proofs book in India that isn't egregiously expensive
<@&268886789983436800> ? 
Let's try pinging metal @broken meadow plz delete scam link, also happy birthday
I got it, just finished work
Easy, ta
Now you look weird mq 
is barbeau's book on polynomials the only good book? I am trying to learn some theory for a regional math olympiad of sorts, and i find normal olympiad-style books a bit too fast paced. need to cover the main things like finding roots, vieta's, factor/remainder theorems, integer/rational root theorems, conjugate root theorem, symmetric polynomials, interpolation, the sum of squares, functional relations involving polynomials; that kind of stuff.
Hello. I would like to self study following topics of undergraduate math:
Calculus (single-variable and multivariable)
Discrete mathematics
Probability and statistics
Linear algebra
Prerequisites for stochastic calculus
What books are the most recommended for these topics? I’m especially open to books used in other parts of the world, not only english literature used in the Americas. I’m fluent in english, spanish and german. I’m studying Chinese Mandarin.
For stochastic calculus, is studying analysis a prerequisite?
Thanks a lot in advance
thats where i found it; looked to be the only decent one that also covers theory
I dont myself work in stochastic calculus but seeing from a friend, I would say stochastic definitely has a hard analysis prereq
I would think you basically need real analysis fourier analysis and measure theory at the very least for stochastic
@gray jungle same pfp as you James
for a second i thought you James Ash
amir parvadi and 117 polynomials also cover theory, and the former is free
i think 117 polynomials is easier but not sure
which one do you recommend? i'd like a book thats not insanely difficult and does some build up; so i get a decent treatment; this is prolly my first time doing olympiad math related to polynomials so.
damn also a TCOAAL player
Yeah lol
TCOAAL?
So good they named it twice
internet issues 
try 117 problems, you can see a preview here https://www.awesomemath.org/wp-pdf-files/xyz/look-inside/117-polynomial-problems-from-amsp-look-inside.pdf
If I am interested in a quant career what areas of math should I focus on and what are good books for those areas. Right now I am reading apostal calculus volume 1 and plan to read volume 2 after but what next?
I like jerrold marsden’s books, theyre available for free online.
which ones?
doesn't seem like there are any pdfs for the student textbooks
does being able to view them on the caltech library website count?
i see you can download each chapter for some books
Huh, before one could have downloaded the PDF straight off the author's website
Things have changed
but that's not the same as the full book in one pdf (although you could concatenate the pdfs)
apostol calculus? damn
the full books are farther down the list
looks like only the Calc 3 volumes and SGs and Calc Unlimited are open
you can still download the open ones
Vector Calc was never free
but you can get them legit free from the links on his site anyway
that IS legitimate
that's my point
he's the author and made it open with agreement
oops, you said illegitimately
forget it, I'm done
I've heard that the AoPS books are pretty good and I'm thinking of reading one. What's your take on them?
And do you think any of them could be found for free?
you can't discuss the 2nd question here
people do tend to like them
what is a good book for doing group theory?
I want something short and fun
I did linear algebra from hoffman and enjoyed that and currently following rudin for analysis
something in the same lines would be appreciated
He's asking for a group theory book rather than a linear algebra book
Herstein’s group theory chapters are really good
The rest of the book as I understand is not as exceptional but
rotman
there are online-only chapters for this book too
any pre reqs?
Rotman's intro to group theory seems pretty decent as well: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4612-4176-8
Just look up marsden calculus pdf and you’ll find somethinf
lol, just noticed you already said Rotman
I'll make another suggestion then, Actions of Groups: https://www.cambridge.org/highereducation/books/actions-of-groups/9E2CF39D99D882E664FFAB8547B39469
oh i linked that book in this channel some time ago
i don't really know anything about that book
just seemed cool
I can't remember where I found that book, there's a decent chance I got it from you actually 
On any topic, undergraduate and beyond. Can be an exercise-only collection or a regular book with an abundance of exercises. The presence of the solutions is crucial, although doesn't need to be a part of the book - an external resource would suffice.
Okay so for canadian hs, Quadratics, Trigonometry and some functions
Iv always understood how to solve them but never really understood how it works if that makes sense
u guys know any books that can help me grasp the concepts?
try the aops books?
Does this have group with operators?
Government wanted people to go into STEM
because it covered a large area and took credit for naturally occuring mathematicians 
So a lot of people went into stem
USSR was deadset on producing top tier scientists
if you look at some of the textbooks they had teenagers reading, its kinda insane
Landau Lifshitz 
No
it was a combination of capacity and control
what's the control exactly
well this was a real headline that ran: https://x.com/TheEconomist/status/1152408254435270656
In Soviet times, communist regimes pressed both men and women into scientific careers https://t.co/347mOJmHdv
the headline was definitely changed after backlash
See posts, photos and more on Facebook.
Artin's Algebra
