#book-recommendations
1 messages · Page 84 of 1
Okay
hi everyone, does anyone would be interested in reading high dimensional probability book, or its related papers/techs, together? forming a reading group for example? I am currently dedicate my 2months to this, and hopefully could find a study partner. It would be very helpful to discuss with someone, ask/answer questions.
How would you recommend Freitag-Busam
resources to brush up/revise basic probability, i got a oa for it !
Do you mean the book by Roman Vershynin?
yes! and maybe with the book by roman handel, together
He has notes I guess.
Seems like it's not for undergraduate student
yes, i think maybe for masters, phds. i am doing it for research purpose, just want to enhance knowledge
yes, it is lecture notes
Roman vershynin has lecture videos also. I don't remember where.
They are similar but seem different also.
on youtube
Advanced undergraduate math students should be able to do it
It is not an easy book/topic
But I think it is not algebraic geometry Hartshorne

So it's in between easy and very hard
The name Hartshorne reminds me this
I think it is easier than Massart? But it really depends on you. I think math people tend to like Massart more
What's Massart?
I think these notes are new, and cover the same topics (as HDP by Vershynin)
https://tropp.caltech.edu/notes/Tro21-Probability-High-LN-corr.pdf
@trail hemlock are Art of problem solving books usually just teach you when you get into solutions?
I'm getting confusion because of it whether I'll accept or not the way it do
That's cool man, congrats
almost done with studying lin alg (im using hoffman kunze) and was wondering whether going through a book like advanced lin alg by steven roman is beneficial/makes sense
went through the topics of the book but noticed that i didnt know most of the stuff covered in it
Yes it does
It's a GTM after all
In all seriousness, woman tries to be encyclopedic in its exposition, being very terse at points where you least want him to be
Most of the book relies on module theory, which, idk man I'd like a course on rings before touching that
If you're done with Hoffman Kunze, try Golan for problems and Greub (The Reference™)
'sup y'all!
Has anyone got any recommendation for a good text book on Operator Algebras for someone in a hurry lol.
You can try the Banach Algebra notes from https://mtaylor.web.unc.edu/notes/functional-analysis-course/.
Yeah, I'm way due to learn this topic. Will definitely look into it, thanks
What book should I start with If I want to relearn Calculus properly?
I am already familiar with most of the single-variable calculus and some multi-variable as well. I can also solve intermediate problems generally. I just don't feel confidently good about it so I wanna do it properly.
I have tried Stewart's Calculus: Early Transcendentals(which was the textbook when I studied it first time in college but I wasn't very serious then). Anyway, this one doesn't seem rigourous enough.
I am also considering Abbott's Understanding Analysis - it looks good but I just wanna ensure before I wade into it properly.
I want a book which focuses on concepts, proof writing, good problems, and understanding. I don't care about it having real-world examples or such. I don't want it to be oversimplified either - the way they do often to make it approachable for beginners.
I shall be very grateful for a good recommendation.
Spivak maybe?
Abbott's book fits your criteria. Also the single variable book here: https://mtaylor.web.unc.edu/notes/math-521-522-basic-undergraduate-analysis-advanced-calculus/.
@hasty marsh someone asked similar earlier
spivak 'calculus' - i believe is a gentle transition from calculus as you may know it to real analysis
tao 'analysis i' - quite conversational, takes its times
abbot - idk abt, but its gets recommended a lot
rudin 'principles of mathematical analysis' - seen as THE undergraduate book on real analysis, but other treatments may be better for you
Could someone possibly provide me with a pdf of Spivak, please? I can't seem to find it.
for a more expansive comparison see this #book-recommendations message
I heard rudin is difficult to read?
its certainly not regarded as an easy book, no
but if its not your style then absolutely go for something else !
Which one is relatively easier? Especially for engineers who are not hardcore mathematicians
Spivak is easier?
as for pdf's you will do your own business but i will provide you one of shadow libraries
but you can't trust me
what are you looking for ?
I have found it now. Thank you, though.
Books on Calculus and Complex Analysis
Someone said Spivak and Rudin for Calculus
But Rudin is difficult as I heard
Don't know about Spivak
then probably spivak and/or tao if you dont like rudin
What about Complex Analysis?
Thank you, guys. I really appreciate the help.
probably check out this message #book-recommendations message
even this is not legal afiak
I said more legal
Do not provide or mention these 
what I did was certainly less legal
Yeah they're currently going through legal drama
sorry about that 
wish it were widely availible
, legally ofocurse
be the change you want to see in the world 
I'm going to import it 
every textbook is free if you run fast enough
I'm anticipating for David Morin's Algebra

Using archive is technically legal for users. You're streaming content from someone else.
Downloading a PDF from certain websites already mentioned is actually illegal, since you're obtaining and now possessing copyrighted material
presumably not illegal in every country, ig
Big fan of David Morin lol
Morin wrote an algebra textbook?? 
why did nobody tell me
Discord is in the US is the point
would lang be a good alternative to spivak?
physicist gonna teach math, watch out
And mathcord is a discord partner
oh for sure it's not ok here, and also against server rules regardless of legality
oh, wrong algebra 
dang it
uh, can I also have a few algebra book recommendations
Yeah posting links in server was the topic
check Dami's pinned message
abstract algebra or like us 'algebra'
yes coming soon in July 
ah, yea that's a no go
The answer is always Lang
Lang hates me..
I thought lang was supposed to be for calc
"first undergrad text for algebra"
answer: lang 
Lang has books for an entire UG curriculum
except AnaNT for some reason 
AnaNT?
analytic number theory
ah
what about introduction algebra?
idk
that's a UG course?
of rather variable quality, alas
hall and knight perhaps ?
for problems
people recommend artin quite a bit
artin or herstein
fuck no
Always

to physicsrocks: Lang's Algebra is a notoriously difficult book lol
Salagos is just a Lang shill
Lang has written a book for almost every single undergrad math course
qualification to read the book: be Terence Tao
hmm, did he write a topology book? i can't remember
Lang's too chad but hates me
that's abstract?
Yeah makes me cry every time 
yes
yeah so, I would probably not recommend Lang as a first introduction to algebra
what you guys recommend is for higher levels
of what
The harder the better, I have high ambitions
Salagos and Xela will shill it, but idk
oh you just want that stuff
nope
i want other stuffs also
but not something too abstract that
maybe you should read what is said about lang here https://tableschairsandbeermugsmathemagician.blogspot.com/2015/08/normal-0-false-false-false-en-us-x-none.html
my hair pulls off
If you're extremely motivated sure.
Otherwise it's more of a second textbook after you've done a more reasonable text
physicsrocks?
That's me
yes, that's @native cradle
lol Lang's book is really hard for me
as one can see, web design was mathemagician's passion
👍 , I better be
any other recommendations other than AOPS introduction to algebra?
haha yeah its pretty bad
each page is like totally different font size and colour, its all over the place
while tuloomath is down, you can find it on web archive
Just in Real and Functional Analysis IIRC, but no dedicated textbook.
uhh maybe some light number theory, can be a gentle intro to abs alg
is even hall and knight recommendable to students lol..
through like modular arithmetic and equivalence relations
umm i just really like to get into calculus now
so you want to do calculus or algebra im confused now
lang's calculus books are actually not bad, certainly better than something like stewart
algebra then calculus

what about comapred to spivak?
right so what was your quarrel with what i said here @gray gazelle ?
A Free Complete Online Self Study Library And Advisory Center of Pre-University/ University Level Mathematics Lecture Notes, Inexpensive Textbooks And Other Resources, Textbook Reviews, Student Advice, Affordable Tutoring, Counseling Services, Blog Commentary and Much, Much More!!
here's one of his other websites
yeah i checked itt out, bit annoying to navigate in wayback
but its nice that its still around
Lang lore is crazy
very entertaining to read
different audience, lang's are not rigorous treatments like spivak, they're more like traditional texts used for non math majors, but without all the colorful fluff and pointless applications to life sciences and economics etc
he does give reasonable arguments for why the theorems are true, but it's not proof focused like spivak
Let's start from the top.
What is your current math education and abilities. What is the most recent math you have done. What is your goals
shit, paid an arm thinking it would be equivalent to the arm and a leg spivak costs, oh well
thanks
yea it's not really a substitute for something like spivak, sorry
at least you didn't pay the going price for apostol, wtf
Knowledge is knowledge, and honestly a majority of the material is the same in many textbooks, it's just a different voice.
you shouldn't buy apostol new anyhow
spivak is 239 USD here
^ look at that list price, $332 per volume
thats insane
At least it's all three semesters
Also tbf I think I paid like $250 for Stewart
who is paying this
land was 59 USD
fuck that's high
when he was still alive you could get it through his website for like $70 or $80 iirc
criminal
FIS was like $300 at my uni bookstore 
oh yea stewart is absurdly priced and bad
If you check out Calculus by Kitchen, it's similiar level to Spivak and Apostol and only like... $50-$100?
Salqvist Correspondence Theorem
I got it for around 10 USD ,
I did not buy FIS
thanks
it's $30.17 right now
just used pdf
Amazing
yeah, around 25 uSD here
The paperback is $30
Spivak's celebrated textbook is widely held as one of the finest introductions to mathematical analysis. His aim is to present calculus as the first real encounter with mathematics: it is the place to learn how logical reasoning combined with fundamental concepts can be developed into a rigorous ...
I'm not buying it anyways
used copies of spivak are fine
my recent is quadratic equations... and my goals is quite big tho pursue a major in Physics but first get into Oly so I'll get some scholarship abroad and not pay college lol..
I low key want to buy apostol just to have it, they're nice tomes for the bookshelf at least
I got gifted a bunch of free books from someone on this server, so I've basically saved half a thousand dollars already 
maybe more
I should probably wait until uni before I start spiviak, might be there in the library
where are you looking?
are you outside the US?
amazon india
ohh a physical one?
yeah, 6 physical books
damnn, from who?
and any edition is fine too, if you don't need the exact problem sequence for homework assignments
i think i paid $20 for the 1st edition, has served me well over the years
another user whom I will not name rn
not a mod...
that's being lucky
well still a W
i will note that the third and fourth editions have a combined solutions manual available for purchase
ah that's useful for self study for sure
I'm still waiting for Salqvist reply lol..
what would be a good altenrative to spivak for multi-variable calc though
theres no shame in using an "easier" one if youre starting from scratch though cause a lot of the harder ones cover the basics in more of a reference style
and you wanna build up the foundation properly
No access?
i've never seen a really great one, but the book by shifrin is pretty decent
shifrin is goated
you have perma-studying role
thanks
ah yes i forgot
if you don't know LA you could try hubbard, but it's veeeery slow paced
it depends where you are in your mathematical education
Check out Brian McLogan and Professor Leonard on YouTube and go from there.
Most errors in calculus and physics aren't calculus errors, they're arithmetic errors. You really need to master and be proficient at the level you're currently at first before moving on.
You're honestly a few weeks to a couple months away from Calc depending on how much work you put in.
Basic Mathematics is pre-calculus level designed to prepare you to study Calculus, if that's too hard then again, you need to stay at the level you're at first before moving on.
Don't worry about any other textbooks until you're ready to move up.
If you need help with Basic Mathematics then utilize #prealg-and-algebra #precalculus and the other pre-uni channels
shifrin also goes through LA from first principles btw
there's a lot of ways it can be taught depending on how much you know
starting my first year this year
but I'm doing AOPS?
holy crap dude
thats beautiful
dont even wanna think how much that costs tho 😭
Yeah my Calc textbook is from 1994 and it's really not that different from any of the brand new calc books out there lol
can i do AOPS instead...
holy shit
that’s so good
Basic Mathematics by serge lang doesn't suit my taste at all since it's too hard and yea beyond my level..
That's fine too, it's all the same
ah alr
The point is to just master where you're at
I'm alr in Chapter 2 lol
The rest of my message still applies
yes that's right
tbh if you truly comprehensively go through shifrin or hubbard, you can start from not knowing much of anything and leave with a very good understanding of calc/linalg
is this different from the classic spivak ?
But i can just do calculus by aops..
yea, probably true, i seem to recall that he does it at a brisker pace than hubbard but it's been a while since i looked at either
i think shifrin is like half the page count anyway
this is like 15USD so I hope so
This more so attempts to bridge someone that's done multivariable to differential goemetry
.... after you finish precalc 
no this is differential geometry iirc
oh yes. I'm reading this rn
i probably need to not mind other textbooks it's really tempting 
it's much smaller and more terse than his Calculus
it's multivariable calc
oh sorry ouy said different
it's both
cool, thanks
multivariate analysis into intro diff geo
yea do not read spivak calc on manifolds for a first exposure to multivariable calculus
I uhh, didn't seem to get the memo 
oops i was way off haha
my sympathies are with you
tbh the line between multivariable calc and diff geo is a bit blurry
I'm trying to emulate a program at a top 25 uni ( I didn;t get into any of the top unis in India (iit/nit/isi)), so I;d be greatuful if anyone could share the entire list of books I should use to emulate one
yeah it is a lot shorter i think
thats not really so simple
but a multivariable calc book has more focus on all those analytic bounds and estimates and such
theres not reaally a 'canon' for maths books as much as some people (lang worshippers) may like there to be
different books are going to be better for different people, who do things in different orders, or have different needs otherwise or style preferences etc etc etc
shifrin/hubbard are standard for multivariable at top universities too
thanks!
haha if lang were the math canon i'd probably go read statistics instead
the main text is like 600ish pages, but there's like 150+ pages worth of appendices
strang then axler is also pretty standard linear algebra progression
strang over axler?
no
ah
i should change that lmfao
check out the pinned messages for some recommendations on various courses @native cradle
thanks
theres also these lists https://hbpms.blogspot.com
a List of Undergraduate and Basic Graduate Textbooks and Lecture Notes
- the blog
oops didnt copy
@native cradle all in all though a lot of it is just which resources click for you, like some people will just mesh better with the style and pace of some books over others
dont try to restrict yourself too much

if you can access a university library then you can have a look a few different texts see what you like
Yeah, I'll be ablr to access it in 2 months
and its quite reasonable to use multiple texts at the same time
and I get access to springer pdfs too(legally)
to get different perspectives, help you move past points you get stuck on
yeah
👍
i also remember initially i went through the same mentality of searching for "the perfect book" for stuff and realized pretty quick that you usually end up using a variety of resources while trying to learn something
mhm
and once you get the definitions properly exercises are key
that's really expensive though
well
so it's not too useful to get caught up in finding a single perfect book for your needs
i think most people here arent buying the books
i dont wanna get banned so im not gonna elaborate
ill say no more
LMAO
physicsrocks does buy a lot of physical books though
so I guess this becomes more important
you can borrow books from the library though
or just study with them in the library
yeah thats true
I will probably do that once Uni starts
so you dont have to always buy
and you dont need to use the 'best' books, you will still get a lot from less known books that may be cheaper
nah read spivaks calculus
aops calc handles a lot of stuff in not the best way
not very rigorous
i dont think theyre after rigorous
it tries to be less computational but fails to be very rigorous
Yeah I use 2-3 textbooks for each subject. I'm not over here only in Lang textbooks lol
it’s a weird in between
LA is going to be like 4-5 textbooks 
oh so like lang ed 1, 2 and 3 ?
lmfao so many times ive had everything click when im reading or watching some completely random thing with like 30 views
whats the lineup
Springer allows unlimited downloads, and there's multiple textbooks per subject.
This is what a lot of us do
Stop lmfao 
i genuinely have like 50 LA books
Hi, can someone reccomend me a book that mentions smooth iteration coloring for mandel brot set?
Specifically this
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plotting_algorithms_for_the_Mandelbrot_set ,
Also why cant I add images in this channel
Lang, FIS, Halmos, H&K, Roman more or less
Amazing 
the only thing that comes close is probably real analysis but still doesnt hold a candle
Axler dissenter here I see
I'm really not into rigor especially if i do calculus based physics but does it require rigor tho?
I approve, kind of
whats FIS ?
Friedberg, Insel, Spence
ah not heard of that one
axler is good but not complete

I'm an Axler semi-dissenter too 
I've skimmed Axler but I have no interest in actually going through it lol
I have FIS but it seems kind of matrix intensive 😭, so will probably use axler for a while
Axler is not bad, he just does things a bit funny
I know
just make sure you also learn from someone with a sane perspective on the subject and youre good
axler is fine, and a decent chunk of his book is a cleaner exposition than in FIS tbh
just don't make it your only exposure, that's not what it is designed for
got it
why so many tho ... why not say just halmos and roman
matrices are boring
would strang be a good second option?
a lot of people like strang, i did not like it (used it for my first course)
i never used strang
strang can be first course but it's mainly computational
another book
and when he does try to give insight it's frankly muddled and confusing (to me at least)
i was assigned a combined linear algebra/differential equations book
i don't generally like early determinants; i would prefer for it to be deferred
yeah but once multilinear maps are covered its fair game
otherwise you can't really describe it without just giving a rote formula
i guess the reason for early determinants is because applications (like multivariable calculus) use them
I like the 'axiomatic' way of defining the det
Because I can.
No real reason, LA is actually something I want to master. I probably won't even stop there honestly. That's not even including other textbooks like ones devoted to matrices
multivariable calculus shouldn't be taught before linear algebra
yea
the cofactor expansion is not a good def imo
but it is
why do you say so 
sadly the majority of students who take mvc don't get to LA until later, if at all
no you typed faster
oh I see
and math departments if nothing else have to serve those other majors, they're a good revenue source
ah ok fair enough then, thought you might have some master plan of 'h&k ch 1-3, lang 4, ...' or something crazy
hmm
i never thought of the cofactor expansion as a definition but more of an algorithm
unfortunately, I've seen it used as a definition quite often
yea doesn't FIS do it that way?
they do, iirc
thats pretty opaque if you dont know whats going on
but my courses didn't do that
one demerit for FIS haha
they did it the axiomatic way
the H&K treatment is much nicer
FIS' Jordan form chapter is a trainwreck idk
that's probably my largest complaint lol
yea i don't really love FIS but it's semi-reasonable for most things and easier to recommend as an intro than H&K or axler
wait, so I should use FIS before axler?
you don't have to
I did chapter one of axler, mostly made sense to me
there's no need
btw physicsrocks
if you already know things like row reduction and other basic matrix-oriented stuff then you're not missing much if you read axler
I can send you some course notes my prof wrote for eigenstuff and beyond
they're quite good
Oh no lol at least not purposely
we don't need to talk about this
its not that i dont think youll understand axler, its just that his perspective is kind of unorthodox and you want to complement it with something else
I was actually introduced to matrices at school, and I hated it, so this was a breath of fresh air
a common alternative for introducing determinants early is the permutation formula thingy
i think we did the axiomatic way and then introduced the cofactor expansion as a way to calculate
the Leibniz formula?
have you ever taken a look at meckes and meckes
idk the name
yeah, that's viable too.. i think shilov does it that way, and fairly well
like using sgn
or
yeah
no, i don't know that one at all, is it good?
i really like it
it does determinants late too
Linear Algebra offers a unified treatment of both matrix-oriented and theoretical approaches to the course, which will be useful for classes with a mix of mathematics, physics, engineering, and computer science students. Major topics include singular value decomposition, the spectral theorem, lin...
just out of curisoity, for NT, I'm currently using Burton, is that missing anything?
it covers all the standard topics
usually the most you'll get up to is quadratic reciprocity in a one-semester elementary NT course
imo number theory is a bit of a rabbit hole though like youll just keep discovering new concepts and techniques the more exercises you do
true for most areas of math ofc but i think especially nt
this book looks nice i looked through it
"The Rat Poison Principle
Q: How do you find out if something is rat poison?
A: You feed it to a rat."
Lmfao
@gray jungle which book are you gonna use for the measure theory study group?
folland
@gray jungle wait there's a measure theory study group? Where???
not yet. we are starting one in a month and a half, give or take
you can apply when we announce it 
Damn that's awesome! Thanks!
i guess its on the line between undergrad and graduate
Assuming that the announcement will be made here?
ye
Perfect
Alright, I'll brush up my stuff
Idiosyncrasy at its finest
indeed
I think Axler + Kowalski is the complete referencr
I read a lot of stuff from Kowalski instead of Axler
Axler has ZERO motivation for quotient spaces
i'd like to shill algebra by michael artin
and hoffman & kunze if you want something classic
what are some good books for studying maths in business applications as a rising freshman?
perferably under $100?
jesus why would you pay $100 for a friggin book?
a lot of textbooks are worse than that
bruh most textbooks are over $100
do you have any recomendations
no idea sorry
youre good thx
but its likely you can find one for free (legally) online
lol wdym legally
springer give institutional access to a lot of books
oh
so you can just download pdfs for free
otherwise theres a lot of open access stuff out there
i.e. other pdf ebooks that are legally free
you too !
we don't mention libgen in this server?
no
its smth smth piracy illegal in america, discord based in america, this server partner of discord
probably also smth in there abt discord ToS
That's bannable here
Can you link the kowalski book/notes?
i see
I found some online but I don't know if that is what you refer to
good book
has a nice linear algebra review at the beginning too
yeah
this isnt a book rec but does anyone know which are good wired headphones in the $50-100 price range
usb or aux doesnt matter
for home or to travel with ?
home, just to use with a desktop
hm not so sure in that case
ill give my travel rec tho bc like ... decent headphones on the go are decent generally too
yeah
ath m50x second hand i think fits p nicely in that price range, and theyre kinda the go to for travel
ty ill look into it
otherwise you probably cant go wrong with something from sennheiser
im sure there are many other options tho
happy hunting
oh fair
i actually thought all their stuff was like
super expensive
but it seems like they have lower range models too
yeah thx
i had some ancient logitech ones that broke so
lmfao
I have openback sennheisers that costed me about $50-100 iirc
I really can't remember what model, but they've served me extremely well, I've had them for years now
i recommend the count of monte cristo by alexandre dumas
ty ill see if i can find it
any recs for type theory and formal verification?
samsom sr850s
i found em as a super budget option on some audiophile forum a few years ago
and they serve me well
default EQ sounds alright
low impedence
but they have been described as "thin" sounding, however this is difficult to notice most of the time
a little more expensive but still in budget is Sennheiser HD 280
CAN SOMEONE FIND ME A BOOK THAT TALKS ABOUT THIS FORMULA I NEED TO REFERNCE IT I CANT FIND IT ON ANY BOOK
SMOOTH COLORING ALGORITHM
OR NORMALIZED ITERATION COUNT
n+1-log2(log2(zn))
IT IS FOR THE MANDELBROT SET
I got the HD 599s
Exactly
WHY ARE U TALKING ABOUT HEADHPONES IN A BOOK RECOMMANDATION channel
thx will check it out
it says a book that course has used multiple times on the page you linked
u can try a book in measure theory or just ask anyone here, they can help
I had sennhisers in the past, extremetly good
thx for the responses @trail hemlock and @native cradle
looks like sennheiser is probably the move if i can find the ones in question
who is this kid yapping about "MANDELBROT SETS"
most def, sennheiser is awesome
ive been wanting HD650s
i just saw that LMAO
but then i check my balence and realize im broker than a joke
Fr i ruined the whole channel
rip
i initially thought that sennheiser models were all super expensive
and thus we werent off topic
Fr im using em to listen to math videos
i make do with my headphones for music
i have a NAS with so much vinyul rips
and foobar2k
dream is a nice audio setup but ehhh
subtle flex 🙏
yeah i use airpods now but would rather have headphones for my pc
LMAO
snobby ass audiophiles hate on airpods
personally i like em. the sound nice and their battery lasts fuckin forever
yeah tbf airpods are pretty good
although i think mine are fucked for some reason
the sound is super low
ohh this happends to me a lot
and i cant tell whether im going deaf, whether im just listening to quiet shit, or whether theres something up with the airpods
dirt gets caught in the mesh
i just put a dot of water on the mesh
and use a toothpick to get all the stuff out
then paper towel to wipe off the stuff and its good as new
could it still be dirty without it being visible?
cuz
it looks ok to me
like i just kind of scraped it out
spoiler cuz its disgusting, but this works wonders...
man i aint tryna eat my earwax
we all must sacrafice for audio quality
but im frustrated enough with it that i just might
Youre right
there is also the option of putting sticky gum on the mesg to get all the shit out, but i havent tested this
becuase my parents wont buy me gum 😔
im probably not gonna mess with that
thats for the best
https://www.reddit.com/r/airpods/comments/8respc/how_to_clean_and_care_for_your_airpods_compulsive/
anything in this thread will work
because of course sme redditor 6 years ago had the same exact problem as you
lmfao ill check it out
hey the airpods read data from the device
bro the only thing u can look here is headphones
Headphone?
Sounds like a good discussion for #chill or #serious-discussion 
Skill issue, not book recs issue 
LMAO
why not #bots?
Perfect
my favourite channel
bros at the lowest! point in his life
😭
@tribal crow
it is true though
no access or no access 
i recommend you "in ear monitors" especially if you want a good quality sounds not some whacky shit, i have many of them..
@trail hemlock Update: I got selected just waiting for the official email from them
YAYYY
why does spivak seem like calc 3 +
Good JOBBB
🤔
in what sense?
in the sense that it has partial derivatives and stoke's theorem, unless im looking at the wrong thing
and uh
at least for me thats taught in multivariable
oh, you're looking at his Calculus on Manifolds
oh
not his Calculus
which one
ahh
wait is that calc 3 tho?
I guess you could say so 
I've been reading the book myself
kewl
☠️
i thought spivak was just 1 and 2
maybe apostle was sum like that idevk
gettin them all confuzzled
Apostol is 1-3
bruh
spivak looks like 1 and 2 and then another book on apparently 3
maybe i just made the "only calc 1" thing up
💀
thanks
This is more of a question on how to learn, but is it a bad idea to practice first, understand later?
Book recommendations
I don't think you can meaningfully distinguish the two
you can only understand by practicing
so to me, it makes little sense to say practice first, understand later
I mean If I don't understand a proof, I just solve problems anyway
you're understanding by practicing!
ah, blackboxing?

I have mixed feelings about blackboxing, so it would be better to ask someone else
though this is also not the channel for that
#math-discussion or #serious-discussion are better
I could probably ask in a mixed use channel
you can ask in #advanced-lounge then
I mean I'm agaisn't it, but at times I get pretty desperate lol
mhm
sometimes u gotta
of course
not enough time in one's life to never do so :P
indeed 
what's no access?
what channel is what i mean..
it’s #advanced-lounge

Can someone recommend me a good book on probability at college level?
I am taking up data science and ai course ...and the curriculum includes lots of probability and statistics..that's why
I only read a few pages of this book but some people say its good: probability an introduction by grimmett and welsh
If it is your first course in probability I think this book is fine
Does anyone know a good book in which highschool geometry of the earth is treated?
(longitude and latitude calculations)
One solid textbook i know of : An introduction to Probability Theory and its Application - William Feller
It's a really comprehensive textbook usable from undergraduate to Postgraduate lvl
my freind suggested me ross..is it better?
Yeah, Ross is also a great book for starters, and in terms of learning curve it's slightly better than Feller. But Feller will definitely carry you longer i think
ohk
i will buy it
oh and i should tell you, Sheldon Ross like his other books place a great emphasis on solved examples, while Feller tends to explain things more and his books ( both vol.) feel like a treaty
What are some best textbooks for algebra 1 and 2
On calculus:
- James Stewart Calculus
- Larson
On Probability:
- Bluman's elementary statistics
- Sheldon's ross probability of engineers
On linear Algebra:
- the book by howard anton (I don't remember)
- Jim heffron
On General mathematics for engineers - Kreyzig's Advanced engineering maths
Can I get some book recommendations too?
For algebra 1 and 2
What's the content of algebra 1 and 2
because I am not from the USA
Then you should be good
Well, at that age I didn't use math textbooks, I just solved homework from the assigned problem sheets. So, I can't recommend sth that I haven't really tried.
But I guess you could use Khan academy
yooo lee just dropped a new book
Is this a grad level topic?
indeed

Sounds really interesting though
Hope he talk or mention about Kälher manifolds
it is insanely interesting!
kahler = hermitian + symplectic structure?
I think so, Im not so much into it. I saw the complex struture one, I think the rest are compatible
hard linear algebra book? is hofmann kunze most rigurous?
"hardest" and "most rigurous" are hard things to define but HK is a solid book, I like it
i'm going through friedberg linear algebra and i think it's pretty rigorous
Basic mathematics by serge lang
bro broke up with springer
looks good
it seems he does
ICM is downloadable already
it's been downloadable for 2 months or so
though uhhh, not legally
i love anna and her archive
the library has its genesis too

what are the pre-requisites for manifold theory ?
topology and multivariable calculus
missing a couple, but very impressive nonetheless
you don't need much topology at all. really only the notions of open sets and hausdorff spaces. but mvc is a bit more non negotiable
good luck !
862.2 TB for BOOKS is unheard of
I don't even know single variable calc beyond the regular highschool stuff lol
thanks
read spivak's calculus on manifolds for a gentle introduction 
Yeah, imagine having so little.
it's been there for 2 months now, though I would advise against naming specific shadow libraries here
oh I didn’t know
Wait was Lee’s book out for that long?
it's not even been published yet
but some people seem to have unofficially published it as soon as he announced it 
LOL
Does anyone have any good textbooks about Cellular Automatons and Emergent Properties?
Yes, but that is a simplification, see: https://arxiv.org/abs/1404.7662
Are there any resources to start learning non-elementary integrals
Axler (measure theory) has kinda unique style than other books like folland, schilling (iirc), and cohn
I wonder which one will be suitable for supplement for Axler
Here by supplement I mean a book that I can use for further details and explanation. Also some extra problem and examples
I recommend Folland.
Idk why Folland seems me horrible like baby Rudin used to look like. But nowadays I enjoy struggling with his book. It isn't bad idea to try to read it (as supplement). I will read it along with Axler.
He is, which is why I recommend it as supplement to Axler
that’s what she said 😔😔
i have finished pgte and am looking for another piece of extremely long webfiction
Kai is the hardest working warrior in his generation... and the unluckiest. In a world where most people receive magical skills, classes, or cultivation, Kai has nothing but his wits and his strength. His only choice will be to forge a new path against fate, no matter where it takes him.
Savage monsters pour endlessly from the wasteland, threate...
looks interesting
Wait till you read greub lol
i will read about it, thank u
ooh 
Btw is it just me or most links on the genesis have stopped working
let me check
I was finally able to find a copy of spivak 
nice!
they seem to work prefectly fine for me 

got it for 57USD too, so even better
you will get way more than 57 hours of joy/pain out of it
Do you have a book recommendation for that topic?
Weird, for me none of the IPFS links work, only the GET link works
hey, it it works, it works right? 
Fair enough 😭
Kowalski?
Oh it's that ETH guy
just wanted to be sure before I place an order, Shifrin is good for multi var calc
right?
yeah, but hubbard is really good too, and cheaper
Matrix Editions is a small publishing firm
specializing in mathematics at the university and research level. It was founded in 2001.
Its primary author is John Hubbard, professor at Cornell University.
all good
for basic topology? mvc? or manifolds?
Manifolds.
I learned with these lecture notes. not very verbose, but well-written with lots of examples
Thank you, I appreciate it!
My refs. for Topology and MVC are Gamelin and Greene Introduction to Topology and Wade's Introduction to Real Analysis respectively, do you have any thoughts on those or some suggestions for better stuff? 🙂
maybe this is something other people could answer? I learned these things via lectures, I don't know what's up with the textbook scene
It's okay 🙂 Thank you!
Congratulations on your offer!
Any book recommendations for precalculus?
basic mathematics by serge lang
I recommend Mir Publisher books to everyone on this server, they are nice
Ffr Mir publisher books are goated, even the technical ones are decent to read
too bad hardcopies are hard to come by, it's either too expensive or no stocks
What are some introductory books on probability
Aops?
well I'm no expert so i will not answer that..
ask Sour Drop for it
I was able to buy the course in diff geo and topology by Mishchenko
it really depends if it's still in the archive...
Thanks 
Guys, I just wanted to let everyone know, there is a website called google scholars where you can search for books and get a preview. Hope this helps
Oh, you got into CMI? Congratulations!
No no, ISI
PhD in CS
Awesome
Thanks
Just out of curiosity, does where I do my bsc matter if I want to study at ISI ( going to a tier 2 college)
Congratulations!
Congrats
do i need to like
read combinatorics on it's own to be able to understand the simplicial parts in AT?
No
Thanks all ❤️
Not really
They absolutely don't care. I forgot all my documents at home and they didn't care much, just had to write an application 
it actually depends if what college you're asking
Indian statistical Institute
but if it's in third world country you're fucked
i dont know 

I'm in the third world
well actually India is very good
i think even most Indians get into US
check the rankings online
of the college
but it really doesn't depend much what college you're in
it's the hard work..
bruh
India is not a third world country
i was even shocked
for what you've said
India was classified as a 'Third World' country at the time of Independence from British rule in 1947. At that time, India's Gross Domestic Product was just 2.7 lakh crore, but now it has grown to $3.75 trillion. India, which is the world's 6th largest economy, is currently classified as a developing nation.
I thought that was the standard defn, economically speaking, developing, yeah
ISI and CMI are top institutes for math in India, so don't worry too much, many students from these places go to top universities for further studies, you can also find good jobs after BSc or MSc. I would recommend CMI over ISI though.
They are low on rankings, but have exceptionally amazing faculty and research, they have very small intakes. For example, for MSc math in CMI, they take in only 7-8 every year 
here..
Well dw too much about it
after you're done with BSc you can transfer in your MSc
like in the US
especially waterloo
you’ll be like the guy who became the villain
check waterloo meme
oh 
bro got it
Well, I am from electrical engineering, so I am not aiming for math
I find myself doing more math than EE tbf 
well theory will only take you so far

Any books recommended for vector and linear algebra practice?
Any particular reason for that? I think they have pretty different specialities, in particular CMI is much more algebra pilled while ISI is more stats, tcs
I am biased since I am close with deans from CMI
Axler has many exercises (though most are easy)
I also want to go to an ISI 🤔
But I got to know bout it too late—
I am thinking of going for msc math after my ee, i realized i like math more a bit too late 
It do be like that
I just got some t3 clg confirmed for me rn, tho I can get t2 if I wait a bit although I can't trust CET cell at this point.
It takes time and maturity to start appreciating math
true
For me, I liked maths from my childhood. But the forced part made me hate studying in general. Now that all that "study hard for a good clg" is done, I'm back to liking math.
Oh, what does clg refer to?
College
I sort of did not like math. Then i realized how useful it is in game development. But only after i read a book on how to write proofs did i really get a taste of it.
oh. What does tier 3 refer to? top 3 ranking?
Also the teachers man...
School maths teachers had been my personality development material from a young age.
No. It's like, bad clg kinda stuff.
Google says that clg is tire3
Not entirely sure what you mean 
Want me to trauma dump or something?
nono
Have you read Locharts lament?
Never heard of it.
I just passed out of hs and going to start clg
I highly recommend. https://worrydream.com/refs/Lockhart_2002_-_A_Mathematician's_Lament.pdf Its on the topic of "modern" math education.
It has soo much writing, it doesn't even feel like a maths book >->
I'll give it a read.
that's what a number theory book is like 
Its not a math book per say. Its about one particular guy lamenting over the state of math education.
I found this post recommending to complete Problem Solving Strategies by Arthur [sometimes] if u want to go to ISI or CMI
So I was trying that rn
Dem... One page in and I can already relate.
I was forced to learn music.
well they ask rudin level problems in their exams 
I've 4-5 years before I go for their exam then ig (I dunno what lvl that is)
Lol what kinda number theory books are you reading?
david M burton
Elementary NT
TIFR is kinda better than CMI for an MSc
Mostly because I'm heavily biased towards alg geom
And now I feel like doing trauma dumping (lite)...
In 6th grade, my maths teacher tore my copy cause I did the maths homework too soon—
Ironically, it was raining outside, and she threw it out the window...
I vowed to never do homework again.
Hii I am newbie at this server
Arc of a Scythe is an amazing read
any good books for algebra and pre-calculus?
you could use your textbook or just khan academy 
wheres the textbook?
is khan academy in its own good?
i wanted to go deeper
khan academy is better than reading a book for these topics
also i dont remember any book name give me a bit
look up for openstax.com
it has some books on something you want
free?
ye
khanacademy is good as a starting point
you can get the exposure to the topic
then later you can read the book and you can learn more from it
yea
but it actually depends on your learning style
Sour Drop to the rescue 
anyone know a good book that includes character varieties?
Okay so I've been meaning to learn about the stuff
When I visited a friend who was taking a class on that and similar such things, the lecture that day was on character varieties, and the prof told me when I asked that the source was "Varieties of group representations and splittings of 3-manifolds" by Culler and Shalen
okay i'll check that out thank you
good introductory complex analysis books?
@foggy quest
Recently I found that Taylor has a book on measure theory too
YESS THIS IS A GREAT READ
It's not that good; though some parts are good
I'm wanting to get a solid foundation in discrete/fast Fourier transforms. I have an undergrad math background with a pretty heavy focus on combinatorics, so while I have basic differential/integral calculus (including multivariate), I'm pretty week on analysis overall. I've seen https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691113845/fourier-analysis recommended, wondered if folks had opinions/feedback on what background I might need for it or other texts I should look at.
Bro is secretly M Taylor...
I see through your exquisitely chosen pfp....
Paper and print quality is pretty good
If I recall, they don't use measure theory in their treatment. To state the results in the full generality, you need measure theory. In contrast, to learn the DFT, you don't need to know any calculus at all. DFT is pure linear algebra until you actually need to apply it to continuous time signals.
I'd like to have a high-level understanding of the derivation and meaning of the DFTs (the "why"), but it doesn't need to be a full, rigorous accounting, so that sounds okay to me.
I like this textbook
anyone have an physics book that i can learn without trigonometry, or without experience in any other mathematics field? i know geometry and some algebra, but not trigonometry for basic physics, and the summer is coming and i wanna start physics, not learn the other things just to start it yk?
there's no way around learning trig but it shouldn't take much time to get acquainted with the basics
do i learn from khan academy?
yeah khan is fine
its not like you cant learn any physics in the meantime but like
its gonna pop up pretty much immediately
but like, i still havent finished the algebra khan academy one, and i tried to took an test from the final chapter on the algebra, and it was kinda difficult
so you are gonna want to know what sin cos and tan are and how to solve triangles and stuff at the very least
oh
do i gotta learn all of algebra to learn advanced or basic physics?
nah
i mean learn it yes cause itll make you better but if your question is about starting then no
i do need calculus for advanced right?
yeah
but there are things you can learn in the meantime
you shouldn't view it as like, having to finish 100% of some course then move onto the next or something like that
oh
so i learn basic algebra on khan academy, then geometry course, and then trigonometry, then i can learn some physics?
and when i wanna move on to the advanced area, i learn calculus and pre-calculus right?
can i learn atleast the most important parts of physics and algebra and calculus with only khan academy or is an book an good thing to help me master it?
well idk exactly what you know rn, but if you learn basic trig you can just do this stuff concurrently with the highschool physics (non-calc)
because i prefer reading then watching classes tbh


. Thanks