#math-pedagogy
1 messages Ā· Page 39 of 1
I find that amazing about the English speakers
What do AP, IB, HL, AICE stand for?
Context matters, I'd say
AP is Advanced Placement, American exams handled by CollegeBoard aimed at high schoolers
IB is the International Baccalaureate, which is similar to the APs in that they're special programmes aimed at high schoolers but also different in terms of subject matter and teaching/learning methodology as far as I know
HL in this context means a High Level IB subject
With IBs, you can either take the Standard Level of a subject or the High Level
If I recall correctly, there's a 6 subject compulsion of which three are High Level and the rest Standard Level
Then you have AICE (Advanced International Certificate of Education) which is actually a modified form of Cambridge's International A-Levels
AICE folk take the same exams as A-Level students, but the difference lies in the fact that A-Levels need 3 subjects minimum whilst AICE requires you to take a variety of them to satisfy credit criteria
Thank you very much
No problem
Fascinating that IB is considered great abroad
They've just started bringing it here, but the students currently enrolled in our school's IB programme hate it claiming the teachers are awful
If that's the case, I'd hope it gets better
Our IB teachers were very good. I honestly think the IB program overall is much better than the AP
mhmm
What I've read is good
We don't have APs here though so I can't say much on those
We're A-Level folk
Hopefully the implementation gets better here
ive heard mostly negatives about ib for us based unis mainly due to unis capping how many credits you can transfer over thru ib
Oh yeah, I was talking about the program itself. The unis haven't really adapted to IB's yet
Some colleges still don't even take them
Weird
@remote vine as a native english speaker, it's hard for me too
acronyms suck until you know them
then you just use them and annoy others who don't know them yet
I heard if you TA you can get some of your debt waived in college. Is this true?
TAing is generally a paid gig
relieving debt is one way that payment can be given, but an atypical one in my experience
depends on the program
bio students can TA to get credits towards their major n the like
pre meds are notorious for this and similarly notorious for caring very little about their students in my experience
some times it's paid
masters students get their tuition waved for the quarters they TA here
Anyone up for looking at an exploration I wrote for supernatural numbers?
i will look at it
The idea is that I'm going to be having one group of 4-5 students work on this together and then put together a 5-10 minute presentation showing off the number system and what it's like to the other groups, each of whom will be working on a different number system
They'll have 2 class periods to work through the exploration and make the presentation
(This is for that special summer program for high school kids who love math)
Also I'm working on fixing typos š
Neat, the supernaturals have some cool properties
Which properties do you think are cool?
I didn't think to form a lattice with them, but I can see why that works
Yeah!
When I drew it out for the first time a lot of things clicked
And convinced me that adding in the infinite exponents actually did get you something useful
(Also apparently they're really useful when describing profinite groups)
Also I tried to design it so that it does some explaining where necessary, but the majority of it is spent with the students exploring the properties
looking at it I think it's got some nice exercises. I don't understand the phrasing of exercise 15. how do you order natural numbers by inclusion? is it somehow related to the divisibility hasse diagrams or something?
also exercise 9 just tells me that the proper generalization is to use ordinal numbers as exponents. then 2^w + 2^w = 2*2^w = 2^(w+1) so there isn't a contradiction ;)
Oops
I meant partially ordered by divisibility
I was trying to reiterate that I didn't mean the linear order, and I instead said the wrong one XD
And good point about Exercise 9 -- I also thought of using ordinals as exponents and wondered what that might do
division will definitely be messed up
Division is already pretty messed up
hi. I often I pretend I am a tutor.
hm, how would one define a function in the simplest terms possible? My first thought was: a function maps values from a domain to values in a codomain
would that be sufficient generally?
i'm thinking maybe saying instead: it takes values found in one group and transforms them to values of another
but i'm afraid that might not be clear and cuts out too much

Technically a function is just a set of ordered pairs of ... anything. (thing, thing's "favorite" color) is the context here. A function is: {(Paul, Red), (Mike, Blue), (Jennifer, Purple),(That Bull In Spain, Red)}
hm, so really it's just a method to find the other half of the pair based off the first?
Is it not "method" per se, but just general pairing? You can define the pairing with "method" though.
@turbid zenith I think it's definitely much more well worked out than the original idea you proposed a while back
@scarlet perch The most generalized simplified form of a function for sets is your domain to codomain, but if you want a more intuitive approach as vincent listed you can consider functions as ways to get from one object to another (or as his example uses, the function g(x) = (x, f(x)) for any function f to create ordered pairs).
you can also get more fun with m o r p h i s m s and treat functions as the paths which can be followed along a collection of sets and functions (since you'd probably not care about all functions and sets, you'd likely restrict that collection)
Rather than as maps from an object in the domain to the codomain, you could just chase the diagram, but that's probably not too helpful for you
Yeah, the ordinal thing buncho said would also be what i would say about the addition, but you could just treat it as N U {inf} (plus it still doesn't fix addition for 2^inf + 3^inf xd)
also ooh p adics
If you don't include the inverse limit thing at least in a passing mention i'll be dissappointed
Thank you! @lost raptor
...I don't actually understand the inverse limit thing
hence at least in a passing mention
I don't understand it well enough to even mention it. :/
just be like
"yeah you can make the p-adics with this cool diagram, but this goes above your heads and mine" or smshit
it looks fancy enough to probably wow them
Infinite decimals to the left and weird absolute values are enough to wow them š
Yeah but i'd certainly enjoy if my teacher pulled some crazy shit outta nowhere and said "yeees but actually please no" (or other equivalent statement referring to how it's a bit much)
The surreal numbers assignment will have a bit of that heh š
Have you seen what multiplication looks like
I think so, but in any case refresh me
Oh yeah surreals
I thought you said supernatural for a second and I was like "wait was it something weird"
Yeah I took surreals and once played with them a while back and examined what got broke when you allowed * to be treated as a number wrt addition and mult
I'm making four activities total --- hyperreal, surreal, p-adic, supernatural
$\eta_z \cdot r = (2-r)\cdot\eta_z$ is certainly something I remember writing, though I forget if it was actually right, for $\eta_z = {z | -z}$ or something
Darkrifts:
Yeesh.
It had some weird negation sign that couldn't be distributed because it was as a unary operator, not multiplication by -1, and I forget if the statement I wrote included it or not
It probably has a - in front of the right half tbh, but I can't be bothered to go back and find out
In any case, if one accepts $2* = * + * = * + (-*) = 0$ then that holds somewhat
Darkrifts:
@turbid zenith How are you gonna introduce the surreals? I assume you'd not do anything beyond S_omega
Basically start off with the left-and-right-set thing at first, get used to what numbers are created when
then look at what's created on day omega and afterward
And see how you get a lot of ordinal-like numbers as well as infinitesimals
Hopefully also have an aside about Hackenbush
afterward
owo
Well so that you get things like Ļ+1, Ļ-1, etc
yeah
They'll have already seen such numbers because we're looking at the superreals first as a class
S_omega^2 probably wouldn't be surpassed by them
Well like
There's no reason to not see why such things would exist if you really can just "keep going" š
It's easy enough to see what the number, say, ϲ - Ļ + 5 - 3ε would look like
Yeah I doubt we'll get into epsilon_0
Though I've at least mentioned it before in previous years
Hello
Hi
hi
Hey doggie
Aaaaaa I leave for the summer program Wednesday and I am hype š
that's not how i expected that to be read 
thats how i read it first
Isn't that how you normally read that?

<@&268886789983436800> just above
wot happen
some wtf ad posting
bad
what happened lol
lol
Lol i need a trignometry teacher to stick around in dms
not the place
How should I handle teaching someone the mathematics behind a Laplacian transformation? The context here is for engineering students that will use it for practical system analysis later on.
I was thinking about giving a background on how to solve the integral for the transformation, but quickly switch to a dictionary style translation of functions between t domain and p domain.
@kind radish
The approach that worked best for me was using it to solve a DE. The transform turns problems of derivatives into problems of algebra. That's likely all they will ever use it for
any good resources to learn any of this advanced math?
I really wanna know what's being discussed in here lol
@urban notch
Copy-paste a message that interested you
Also probably not here
Where?
Ehh, this is an odd enough request we don't have a channel for it. So, feel free to post it here
Either of the discussion channels works well too
Alright
Well, nothing in particular stands out
I'm just trying to get a better grasp of the terminology used
especially regarding logic
just wondering if anyone knew any resources I could use
I mean
The best "resources" for uni-level math are, by and large, textbooks
You might find videos of lectures on YouTube or MIT OCW
But the textbooks are still good for alternative explanations and as a reference - and, more importantly, to provide practice problems
if you plan on tackling a textbook, consider a study group of some kind for mutual accountability
i feel like those work better with people you know irl but thats hard to set up initially
as in finding the people
to begin with
unless ur at a place with a bunch of people who are compatible at the moment to study with you
eeek
Just wondering, are lecture notes good to have or is it better to say let the student make their own or maybe email them some noted after the lecture
as a student, lecture notes make my life a lot easier
and I hate it when there aren't any
Agree with įįŖįį³įŖ
I like to have the lecture notes printed out and annotate them during lectures
and a lot of students do sth like that
Ah ic
So like lecture notes that contain the important information i guess?
Like donāt go through entire proofs but just show the outline
My favourite ones were the 800 page Analysis notes
that contained absolutely everything in it
my notes would just be highlighting important steps, or annotating references with what they refer to (I hate "from 3.1.16 and 4.7.3 it follows, using equation (16) that x=y (compare also equation (5))")
kinda also feel that theres no purpose to the lecture if the notes contained everything XD
I've never had a prof that didn't add to the notes somehow through extra explanation or little side-journeys or whatnot, usually the lecture is at least a little better lol
In my opinion, I think a decent number of math undergrads are mature enough and responsible enough to decide for themselves whether the lecture is worth it for them over just some notes
hmm thats quite true actually
Like donāt go through entire proofs but just show the outline
I wonder about the opposite, namely doing the major points of the proof in the lecture and leaving the details for students to read in their home, with the detailed proof either in lecture notes or in an accessible reference
Personally, I think the plus that lecture notes should have over merely reading a book is that the lecturer explains things in a way not found in books
That's an interesting thought actually
I feel like if people are getting lost in classes, it's because there's some long proof with a ton of details that they can't keep up with
But if a teacher just gave a large picture overview of how the proof goes, the students would just believe it and then move on
And then the students could go over the proof in details on their own time and at their own pace so they could fully understand it
ah
maybe you need study group to study detail of proof for motivation?
as in?
i think the whiteboard really liked it XD
oh the satisfaction of cleaning that board
i wanna do it
spritz the cleaner and just
wiping it all away
n u t
hhhnnnng i wish my highschool had a whiteboard i could use with my friends whenever
like during lunch in some emptyish location
trying to do math with friends on small paper when i have huge handwriting is annoying
Classroom whiteboard?
ye but i feel weird asking for it during lunch and afterschool
i just straight out abuse it mdr
shit you're teaching kids p-adics that's sick
Shit is probably what most humans now alive would think p-adics are worth ... so few people care about "real" math ... so sad. Pure math ... the only thing that gets lower poll numbers than Trump :).
Sucks, but being sad about it doesn't really do anything
do what Ashura does and make sick lesson plans to get people interested in math
We'll see how it goes!
I tried my best to write it so that you can probably get a good ways in with just precalc
Also, that's just one exploration that one group is going to do. The other three groups will be doing different explorations of different number systems (hyperreal, surreal, supernatural), then the next day they'll reassemble into different groups and share what they've learned.
@craggy verge Did you really just come in here to say that?
don't ping me
lol
hmm thatās quite a interesting intro but irritates the part of me seeing a divergent sum casually being equated to a finite value XD
@round robin Any particular one, or all of them? š
The point is to get them to play with them as formal objects, see that there's some consistency there, and then see in what context it could actually make sense
We've already talked about why convergence matters, so this is kind of a continuation
@craggy verge you want to at least describe why you think it's so bad?
I don't think that's necessary. Let's just move on. š
That being said I'm up for legitimate feedback on anything that could be made more clear. I'm probably going to be fine creating the other two explorations, but this one took some effort to figure out how to sequence it.
@lament wraith sure
the core of the issue is fundamentally the approach to math
the idea of these modules is that math is about coming up with random shit
and doing it for fun
it's stated quite explicitly in the document and is clear from the choice of topics as well
and that's when it becomes a concrete issue
teaching useless nonsense like hyperreals and surreals and supernaturals to kids, who are probably starting to develop interest in math, diverts them completely
it takes their useful interest and sends it into nonsense
and kids at that age need guidance in order to start developing good mathematical intuition and a taste for what math is about
a good format for explorations is to come up with puzzles which have creative solutions that kids can come up with, and which also happen to be an application of some tool of theoretical interest
and it becomes about both creativity and learning about the field of the tool
an example that's widely used is burnside's lemma
I think what this is going to accomplish, is mostly confuse the kids about what mathematics is, make them waste time and effort into pursuing useless topics, and ultimately doing a disservice to young talent
when doing any kind of thing like this, designed to guide young students into math, I think it's crucially important to seek guidance from professionals in mathematics
or at the very least someone like graduate students
to avoid these kinds of issues
and that's how most outreach activities done by universities do it
I 100% disagree with most of your assessment.
shut the fuck up
this isn't for you
it's for him
since he asked
you don't deserve any feedback or explanation
what you deserve is a bullet to the brain
Excuse me, but no. You can disagree with me, but that kind of tone is completely unnecessary. Keep it civil.
excuse yourself
Yikes
Is it wrong to learn useless nonsense?
It depends on your definition of useless
OK I admit I don't have precise definition of useless, but I suppose it's something that doesn't seem to be immediately useful, like calculus or "real" math, whatever that's called. Maybe to go to the extreme it's like abstract symbol manipulation, with your own prescribed rule?
@misty peak yeah I feel like if it at least is interesting to kids then that's all that matters
Not them actually learning something that's relevant? I mean they're high schoolers like they'll have plenty of time to learn relevant things
I do get the argument that people will mistake what pure math is actually about
But I'm not sure you can make that argument for the p adics which literally come up all over the place in many different fields
@wispy slate lmao
good riddance
Personally i would like to start with axiomatic foundation but thatāll probably scare people away haha
I feel like it makes sense to first give some motivating examples and first properties
starting directly from the axioms just feels too unmotivated
I'd start off by giving someone/people a problem, asking how they'd go about it, and then trying to take previous knowledge to solve it (to some extent.) Atleast for more advanced classes.
For more basic classes/young children, I think one of the best ways to teach math is, by far demonstrating that you really can do anything. So long as it "makes sense".
(obviously there's more to it than makes sense)
I feel that, from looking at my peers, many people don't understand why the things we do can be done because they were taught fundamental in a poor manner for their taste.
It's really crazy to see someone even within a few years of my age try and explain what exponents and multiplication represent.
I agree with lots of y'all.
In particular one of the things I keep saying is this --- mathematical foundation does not mean pedagogical foundation.
Just because mathematically you need to start with x to get to y doesn't mean that's how you should teach it.
What do you mean? You don't teach high schoolers the axioms then present proof after proof and don't tell them the underlyong motivation? (I am kidding.)
well, no, you donāt actually present proofs to high schoolers
you just tell them the results and then give them 50 mindless tasks that are all the same thing but dressed up differently, to teach them that you donāt acutally need to read the entire exercise, only pick out some numbers
from When Good Teaching Leads to Bad Results: The Disaster of āWell-Taughtā Mathematics Courses (Schoenfeld), which is a great read: http://jwilson.coe.uga.edu/TiMER/Schoenfeld (1988) Good Teach Bad Results-2.pdf
wow
why are you putting this here
wrong channel ???
also yeah i agree with sascha
that way is pretty dumb
formulaic is sad and its prevalent in the usa
but showing proofs to highschoolers doesnt work either bc kids arent really prepared to deal with logical arguments
its gonna have to go wayyyy back some
sow the seeds of logic somehow
on an unrelated note
do yall think the number of kids in a class affects how well they learn?
i would think that it does affect it, because maybe fewer kids in a room would reduce the pressure to engage in class discussion... but
maybe a good lecturer could explain things well enough
and could answer questions in and out of the class period well
regardless of the size of the class
is the wrong channel stuff regarding some deleted comments or was that directed at me cause my stuff relates to the above āteaching todayā stuff
do yall think the number of kids in a class affects how well they learn?
so in Switzerland school classes cannot have over 24 students (and even that is considered exceptional, our classes were usually 17-20 students). during high school I went to brazil for a year and the class I was put in there had some 30-odd students. teachers had zero control over the class, and students didnāt learn anything. this is surely not soley because of the class size (seemed more of a cultural thing, tbh), but it certainly didnāt help either
at university, we have tutorials (which I give myself as well) which are intended to have about 10-20 students, but Iāve been in much larger and much smaller ones too
I found 10 to be about the sweet spot
if itās much smaller, then it gets more personal, but it also often seemed less instructive just cause less people āāÆless questions. but the 30+ classes were much worse too, because at that point it has to be restricted to only frontal lecture and silent work, but the tutor doensāt have the ability to answer everyoneās problems at once if multiple people get stuck on a problem
also I found that Iām more motivated to teach if I have more students
it depends on your self discipline
some people can manage in 30+ just fine
some people need to be manually put back on track
if itās much smaller, then it gets more personal, but it also often seemed less instructive just cause less people āāÆless questions
I had the exact opposite experience
Small classes always meant that the classes are more a conversation and not normal teaching
You go through material slower, but I learned much more
You can e.g. discuss definitions with the lecturer and other students
I.e. "Why don't we define it like that?"
Currently I TA a class set up kinda like that
People discuss questions in small groups and I'm there to listen to their ideas and modify them if they're stuck or give tips if they don't know how to start
Also give additional insight into why we do things and why I think they're interesting
It is the best teaching experience I had so far
Small classes always meant that the classes are more a conversation and not normal teaching
yea, that does happen too, but it also derailed much more and in the end you learned less. the other thing I had happen twice was that the tutor liked to go a bit more in-depth. then students who didnāt like that left. now thereās about 5-10 students left who are actually interested. but then the tutor goes too far in that direction, because he actually gets interesting questions asked. and in the end you didnāt get anything but fluff out of it anymore
That's why I like my current setup
Groups that are not that good, I can help with the basics
But if someone wants to know more in-depth stuff I can talk with them kinda in private
Because I help each group of students individually
Obviously you can't design a lecture like this, this is just additional exercise classes
I'm actually surprised it works so well this semester, I tried doing it in the past
Had the first half of classes be normal teaching, and second half students work on problems and small group and I offer immediate help
But more than 50% of class left, once I stopped writing things on the board they can just copy
yea thatās how it went with my classes a lot too
I had some success sometimes when I made the problem-solving stuff
a) not at the end but in the middle and
b) more interactive, breaking it down into subtasks and occasionally bringing everyone up to date on the last subtask
@brazen pendant it was some deleted stuff
ok cool answers from yall
thx
yeah about the point about the more interested kids seeing the teacher later and talking about it
i like that a lot
What if we taught radians right from the start, and left out degrees?
I know it wouldn't work in the same sense as metric wouldn't work in the US, as it is so well established in people's lives, but what if?
Itās kinda nice to work with whole numbers mentally tho working in fractions is kinda cumbersome for eyeballing purposes
I've seen well known geometers use degrees instead of radians, I don't think using one over the other is a big issue
I personally prefer to think in fractions of a circle
which easily converts to either, multiplying by either Ļ or 360, depending on what you need
thatās actually also my main motivation for liking Ļ, you can just think of the symbol as meaning āturnsā or so
and ignore that it has a numerical value until you need it
That's interesting take.
Finally finished my other two explorations.
Holy fuck I'm exhausted.
27 pages of writing
smh
WHat's up @lost raptor
not much
still floundering about
Might have fixed some issues I had with a nasty F function in something of mine
lol physics
wait
what is that
is that even physics
i just saw Ļ and thought of physics rip
apparently at my school physics with calculus is easier than physics without calculus
AP phys is easier than phys Honors
ive had physics with literally 0 calculus usage
algebra-based calculus?
i just crash courses calc mdr
it's the asvab, did you expect something crazy?
I don't know lol
I'm going for Navy Nuke due to my love for numbers, physics, and legal policy
I think I'll have the right type of skills for the job.
A-Level Further Mathematics class here was 1h30min long and just three students - was pretty fun
We could cover an entire unit on the course within a day's work of discussion and example
Teacher also spent time proving whatever we encountered using math we knew
Probably the greatest math class I've sat in
Plus the conversational approach just seemed better
It wasn't a board with him writing away, it was all of us messing around on a notebook to see the point
Heck he even went out of his way to explain properly how Root-Mean Squares worked when we got to the mean values of functions
Root-Mean Squares was on Physics but never explained with any math or something
There it was a magical process where dividing peak voltage by ā2 always yields the answer
I hate the Physics course for this lack of math...
For you, nice
@lost raptor
We had Pure, Mechanics and Stats components
Pure
ā Viete's root formulae applied to polynomials
ā Summations of series
ā Further Differentiation & 2nd Order Differential Equations (Homogeneous and Nonhomogeneous)
ā Polar Coordinates
ā Further Integration - Means, Centroids, Curve Lengths, Surface Area of Revolution and Reduction Formulae
ā Complex Numbers & DeMoivre's Theorem
ā Further Vectors - Cross Products and their uses
ā Matrices & Vectors - Dimension, Rank, Null Spaces, Range Spaces, Eigenvectors and Eigenvalues
ā Mathematical Induction
what was De Moivre's?
(Cos(x)+iSin(x))^n = Cos(nx)+iSin(nx)
Aye
of course, all the stuff that went into it originally is kinda trivialized by the whole euler thing
of course
it's not trivial in deriving it (though a little bit since you know the answer already), it's just kinda trivialized
most of that seems fairly nice, the diff eq one is interesting
The 2nd Order Diff Eq stuff was probably the easiest to tackle
Hardest stuff on the tests was always Complex Numbers and Matrices
I assume it was probably mostly in methods of solutions seeing as diff eqs get very nasty very quick
It was just using the auxiliary equation to determine the complementary function, then summing it with the particular integral if possible
Then finding the particular solution if possible
Coefficients were constants
probably with laplace mentioned somewhere in there
Nope
really?
I wish he was but alas
huh
black box
read the earlier convos a tad bit late
but one thing I've noticed in lower classes and helping out my sis
none of the early kids get how things like the distributive property work
weird
like, they get it once they're told about it and all
but until then they have no idea why taking a common works
just do
they can't apply things like commutivity
don't see where associativity works
boggles my mind
like, how can kids cover quadratic equations but not know why each step works
they just treat it as rote algorithms
then there's this weird bit about memorizing "algebraic identities"
nobody ever sees why sin²x+cos²x=1 is just pythagoras
they never make that leap even in the class with the unit circle
Saying that nobody ever sees that is a bit
I'm not sure how the school handles classes, but I am somewhat scared - not sure if it's irrational or not
sounds like a byproduct of a shitty teacher or rushed syllabus
probably
Yeah, not super representative of math education as a whole
mhmm
seems to be common among private school kids here now though
that and the dreaded "the exam technique outweighs the knowledge" thing
^^^^^^
so many kids are just training to be professional exam takers
without actually understanding
it is tragic
but that's how they wanna get thru it quickly :(
also might be a money thing ??? if better scores lead to more funding
Not Maths, but my High School Physics lessons were always on the idea and understanding, and nearly all syllabus material (memorisation bit) was learnt as homework. I think it worked really well.
Idl to teach physics without the math tbh, it spoils the physics for me
I didn't like Physics without the math
It worked in early classes sure
But at higher classes it felt like we weren't evolving much from old material
It is especially misleading as well
Since higher physics is math heavy
Physics without it feels pretty limited in how derivations and interesting questions can be designed
Plus the lack of math means failing to explain certain practices because "it just works"
No Uni-level professor likes what they've done to high school physics here at least
high school physics where?
in uni then yeah physics should be math based, but the level of math most high schoolers know isn't really enough to actually do much of anything
even physics C is pretty basic
Pakistani Private High Schools that use British A-Levels
I'm training to become a math teacher
š¶
how does that work actly
probably depends a lot on your country.
In switzerland, if you wanna become a math teacher at the high school level (which here is generally speaking the earliest level where you study to become a math teacher and not a teacher who happens to also teach math) you do a masterās degree in mathematics followed by a 3-semester teaching diploma (includes an internship and stuff) and then youāre considered qualified to be hired as a teacher
standards are pretty damn high, but salaries are very good too
I reckon about half my teachers had a phd too
In India many teachers have fake degree .
O_o
@turbid zenith
Did/do you have a particular focus?
I'm trying to find more resources on textbook/course/lesson design for linear algebra AND also approaches for communicatic geometry/linear algebra/spatial concepts to people who are blind ( and possibly also deaf )
I really want to look into variations of mastery based grading in undergraduate math
@brazen pendant that's incredible. I don't think I had a single math teacher in highschool who knew more than multivariable calculus themselves
same tbh
I canāt find the document rn but thereās a document somewhere that explains why you need a masterās degree
and it basically boils down to āyea, with a BSc youād have all the necessary knowledge to teach the curriculum, but high school teachers donāt only teach the curriculum. You also have to supervise semester projects and teach advanced classes where you can bring up your own interestsā
(one of the mandatory things to get a high school degree in switzerland is writing a project over the course of about a semester. for all intents and purposes this is another subject. you can do more or less whatever you want, in math that tends to boil down to researching some undergrad level topic and writing up a thingy about it. a friend of mine did sth about julia sets, another one looked at the mathematics of shuffling cards, yet another one studied the differential equations governing the motion of a non-mathematical pendulum)
(one friend built some measuring device. forgot what exactly but something something light frequencies. another programmed a simulation for colliding objects. another composed a song. not everyoneās a mathematician ^^)
maybe someone here knows a good book with problems AND ANSWERS TO THEM from introductory group theory/abstract algebra?
@meager elk Look up Contemporary Abstract Algebra by Joseph A. Gallian
will do, thx!
me doing a math project
my teachers actually understanding it
once i did some partition function analysis for liquid crystals and my teacher was like
Ah number theory
just cuz a jacobi theta appeared XD
wait you can compose songs as projects .-.
well yea, in music
they let you do just about anything as long as you can find a teacher whoās willing to supervise it
someone built an alphorn
a few years back someone painted a large mural
every year thereās a few people who write a book
one of my classmates studied the salt levels over time in a river that was situated below a dam
another retraced the history of a relative of his who left switzerland to fight for the nazis through letters he had written to his family
I constructed a language
Your highschool is a cultural hub lol
Once my teacher took us out for an ice cream
However there are some similarities here for math teachers, like maybe qualifications required
Salaries are not included in the similarities though, I suppose xD
my highschool has 1200 students and 160 teachers, it's quite big
only high school that offers the full program in three languages, afaik
wtf thats a huge amount of students and teachers...
only public high school for a huge region
weāre talking some students come from places four hours away (by public transport, about two by car but they canāt legally drive at first)
the school is accessible to everyone ni the red area (about 70k people live there, itās extremely mountainous). thereās other schools but theyāre much smaller
this is the only Kantonsschule in that region (āstate schoolā i.e. government funded)
(note of those 70k, about half live in the town where the school is)
wait, how do the logistics of that work
do students commute to school for 4 hours every day?
or 8 with way back
dorms
itās not a plausible commute
and I meant 4h each way
itās only 3h actually
now, I commuted more or less from Chur to Zürich (top left) and that segment takes 1h15
such is the power of mountains
wow those projects actually sounds pretty fun
switzerland 
Best time to visit Switzerland ?
5 pm
You missed it, it was yesterday
lmao
is it true tho
...maybe?
meh bell curve it
Ok but why did you post this here
(Deleted a message that had nothing to do with the channel and was already posted on several other places.)
tbh i prefer bell curve gradingš
I would find another school.
@shadow basalt What do you mean by percent-grading? Like saying that a particular percentage of A's are available, etc? Or something else?
Well the former is def silly to me, I think curving makes no sense because itās very possible to have an unusually gifted class
Iām more against formal exams
Iāve had a few discussion based / oral finals for math
I found them all to be more interesting, and I never lost points on silly mistakes because professors could point them out live and I could fix the@
Ahh gotcha. Yeah I'm with you.
I also am a big fan of like, research projects being a decent chunk of a grade or something
I did a cool TDA project for algebraic topology and it was cool to think about
TDA?
Topological data analysis
Ahh interesting š®
all these initials 
Yeah, lots of TLA's in education
š
But hey that's cool to hear about alternate assesssment methods being talked about in higher education
That's something I want to investigate a lot
Anyway, I do think that grading on a percent-based system is stupid š
Like what's the real difference between a 79 student and an 80 student?
One mistake
Well yeah but you know what I mean.
No that was my point like
Is one mistake indicative of a difference in skill?
Or chance?
Ahh yeah. Exactly.
It's entirely within statistical variation, but we use it as a cutoff point between "good" and "meh"
And GPA's are calculated with them to the hundredth or thousandth of a point
do you want to do this dm

Why even grade on a bell curve
weeder courses tend to do bell curve
mainly bc they wanna screw over as many people as possible
It looks bad if too many students do well, supposedly
Everybody wants to say their program is "rigorous"
doesn't that ignore the case of just having a good class though
my school couldnāt actually afford it if everyone passed
but the philosophy is very different
cause itās nearly trivial to get in
and then really hard to stay in
lol that's such a bad system imo
itās a requirement for swiss universities to allow everyone with a swiss high school diploma (which I must emphasize is nontrivial to get and while I donāt know the statistics, out of my secondary school of 20 students, only 5 went to high school and this was considered a relatively high number)
I personally think it is a much better system than having to fight your way into a college, often with ridiculous competition
Huh, where do the rest go?
learn jobs
Pragmatic
I mean quite literally, switzerland strongly supports apprenticeships
Much better system than the academic bloat that we have in the rest of West for the sake of "securing a job"
Another reason to like Switzerland
honestly, i love trade schools
basically the choice is between:
-do you want to learn a specific job right now, make money as young as 16yo and have a qualification at 20 or
-do you want to go to school until youāre 20 to get a paper allowing you to go to school even more only to then, eventually have a chance at a better-paying or more prestigious job
also, interestingly enough, a lot of jobs like garbage collection and construction often pay higher in the us than many that require a degree
itās a choice between stability/security and a much riskier but potentially higher reward
and the majority go for the former
mainly bc everyone's gone to college to get college jobs so demand is high
often times with the intention to work your way up the slow way while working
Yeah, a lot of people go to college for the secure lifestyle - which ironically doesn't always pan out
e.g. my father learned electrician
then got a bunch of extra educations over the years while working
And get yourself into a fuck load of debt while you blunder through unessential education
and now has a high paying IT job working for the cantonal (state) government
it's just a lot of unfair societal pressure in the us now
and also some rather deceptive stuff by the universities as well
Oh big time "college is supposed to be the best years of your life"
You mean your honeymoon isn't?
they said the same about high school 
Fucking riperoo
high school was trash
university is just fucking stressful
id honestly rather the majority went to trade schools, because the amount of bullshit competition and the horrible ways the uni tries to handle bloat just deceives the students
Hey man, if you're in somewhere like ETH Zurich and you want to keep on trucking academically - you are in a very nice position
that is exactly where I am
like. how is it in any way reasonable to allow students to get a major, and then try to fail them out of it in the first few months
dunno if Iām gonna go down the academic route tho
Iāll do my masterās and the teaching diploma
ooh nice
and then decide whether I wanna apply for a phd position or go straight to teaching
It isn't for everyone, does that teaching diploma let you teach undergrads?
i assume it's like. hs right
the teaching diploma is for becoming a high school teacher
teaching undergrads is a professor thing
Ah gotcha, gotcha
never seen an important class taught by a phd student or sth
Its only recently that we've required people to have PhDs and professorships to teach
minor electives sure
but not like, mandatory classes
as for TAing
Iām in my 4th semester and have TAd already
Noice
ive seen like. a weeder sorta class taught by a phd student
weeder in a loose sense
discrete math functions as a weeder class for many cs majors, and i remember multiple of those classes being taught by students
So what accounts for the drop outs?
overall difficulty
you canāt get through unless youāre actually diligent
a lot of dropouts happen because people are lazy in the beginning and never manage to catch up
Oof
ah
Meanwhile in UK universities first year isn't even taken into consideration with the final degree grade
thats why tutors get hired tho 
of course you can repeat but many students choose that itās not for them
and change majors or even universities
Could you change back into an apprenticeship?
Right
Oof
if you do that
I assume most people who fail the first time round try again at a different major or university and succede, having learned from their mistakes
Gotta communicate your value over a gullible 16 year old
and some never learn but I like to believe idiots arenāt that common
(slash canāt pass high school)
it should be mentioned that our high school education is deliberately broad, so that you can pursue any direction in university
enough people cheat that I'm afraid the latter hope does not hold well
e.g. one of my best friends (and one of the best math students I know) actually focussed on latin in high school
and then almost at a whim decided to study physics (and we both changed majors to math after our first year)
Watching a Chinese kid google translate an assignment and then get a distinction for his thesis was all the proof I needed that the game was rigged.
tbf, that only worked because you didnāt rat him out
I was sleeping with him, so that wasn't exactly on the menu
Dude came from rich ass family though, so there's some weird going on there
is that more of a statement on the people who reviewed the thesis than him?
did a new building show up the next year due to an anonymous donation
The Tong Institute
No unfortunately not, but there's definitely some greasy stuff going on at my last uni - esp. when it came to the Chinese
said friend had to do some catchup to do (because she was e.g. not familiar with differential equations and physics 1 kinda assumed youād either seen them somewhere or could pick it up) but it pretty much just proved that itās like 90% diligence if you wanna get through a math degree at ETH
Iāve also seen the opposite, sadly
well, that's rather impressive and motivating!
another good friend of mine has some learning problems - canāt focus for long enough to get enough work done. extremely motivated, but it wasnāt enough :(
one of my friends works with my unis math department and some local schools to try to make sure students who are going into stem majors have some decent math background before coming so they dont have to catch up as much
sheās changing universities now to one that lets her do part time study
Iād just like to know if she got accepted already (due to not having passed her first year within 2 years she was technically banned from ever studying physics again in switzerland but due to medical issues that got kinda revoked but she had to go through a special application process and theyāre slow af to answer)
so she actually still doesnāt know whether sheāll be starting physics or chemistry in september
jesus
itās to stop people from wasting too many years of taxpayer money on something they canāt do
how do they justify banning someone from a
ugh
still
ig it's different bc it's not like us private unid
*unis
where u pay to buy extra tries
like, the thing is, you almost have to actively try to waste your time to get banned
which she of course did
because she thought she could do it
the second time round
and thatās essentially what they donāt want to see
people who think they can do it, but canāt, and keep trying
still saddening to hear
I do think the two year limit on passing the first exam block is a bit overly harsh
but I think thatās more to deter people from postponing their first year exams and continuing their studies regardless
and then it has unfortunate side effects sometimes
usually what kicks people out is failing an exam block twice
(you can only retake exams once, so if you fail a mandatory exam twice you lock yourself out of graduating)
I guess you gotta draw a line in the sand somewhere, a policy will always have casualities somewhere
yea. and they do consider the individual
she has a medical/psychological condition, and this is taken into account and she is likely gonna be given a blank slate
One more try
I think so, yeah
well itās more like⦠she is but theyāre probably gonna ignore it
and pretend she never studied anything
Well that's a lot more elegant than the British system which kinda wants to have this vocation at 16 thing but classist snobbery kind of inflated every uni and polytechnic into a booming diploma mill
So now there's way to many graduates flipping burgers.
So they're now pumping up the prices of UG and paving the road to apprenticeships to go the same way as the Swiss and Germans really
But they also give everyone complete tuition loans (up to the doctoral level) that are basically interest free and then paid back as a tiny sliver of your wage when you're making bank. So its done nothing except give the government a future way to tax graduates into the future
BTW, "I was sleeping with him" wins for today's line-that-made-me-double-take

lol

lol
What are y'alls thoughts on flipped classroom?
For teaching math
My math teachers started doing it for Honors Algebra 2 and Trig (a historically hard class in school) and for calc BC
And the grades have been way higher than they've ever been
But I want to hear your guy's thoughts
If the classroom is upside down I feel like I'd have trouble focusing
Thankfully I'm not in Australia so it's still right side up
is flipped classroom the one where youāre supposed to research the topic as homework and then do problems in school as opposed to the other way round?
sort of, in my experience you're given resources to learn about the topic outside of school
(a friend of mine has a class that had such low attendance that now the prof just puts online video lectures and the lecture itself is for problem-solving and heās there for question)
So the teacher would give us a guided notes sheet (examples theorems and problems)
Then they'd make us a video walking through the sheet
And we'd go home and we're supposed to watch the video
And then in class we can do practice problems and ask questions
Because normally you don't have that much time to ask questions in class because they gotta get a lecture in to teach the material
I personally thought it was really really good because I could have a full conversation with my teacher about certain topics
in high school, my physics teacher (in the advanced physics elective) liked to mix things up occasionally, so we had a few different ways topics were taught. some topics heād just teach regularly. others weād have time in class to read about them in a textbook and heād be there for questions, and we got regular homework. finally, for some topics, we got some resources to read at home and then had time to solve exercises in groups during class, and in the beginning of each class weād do a quick repetition of last weekās material.
of those, the in-class research was bad, the frontal lectures were alright and the last one was a blast
probably helped that those were the most interesting topics tho
(special relativity and an intro to the basics of QM)
for me i had flipped classroom in a chemistry class in high school and that worked quite well imo and i rly liked solving problems as a group in class
there was one problem on one of the SR problem sheets that we discussed with the teacher over the course of like two weeks because we were sure there was some mistake - in the process we learned a lot
ultimately it turned out to be miscommunication
the question was ambiguous in a way neither us nor the teacher noticed, he was thinking of one interpretation and we of the other one, and both had answered the respective question correctly
I taught a flipped honors calculus class last year
I think it's a good thing to offer but I think this was a weird level to offer it at.
The students had never seen proofs before and so they never really learned how to write proper proofs. They were given theorems and stuff to prove on their own and present in class, and so they learned how to write proofs by watching other students write proofs on the board, but those students learned by watching other students...
And so nobody really knew what made a good proof until like 2/3 through the year
(for the record, I was told I was teaching it flipped, I didn't make the decision on my own)
My teacher would go through proofs in the lecture videos (not rigorous proofs)
The way our class was set up, there were pre-made "scripts" that had all the lemmas/theorems on them
The only thing the students had to do was take the notes and do the homework/quizzes/tests
students would figure it out on their own, and then in class they would volunteer to give the proofs on the board
there were no quizzes or tests
and ask questions if they had any (which was the main reason for flipped classroom)
with the exception of a short final exam
Oof my physics class was no quizzes or tests and that was hell
wait if you are supposed to do problems in school doesnt school become like a tutorial session with no lectures
what do you mean?
Lectures are videos and you get a notes sheet with example problems that you try on your own and get walked through
that you do at home
and then you do the problem sets in class
for practice
and then you can ask the teacher for help if you have specific questions
you get more 1 on 1 time with the teacher
As a student
All of my friends who have had them
Hated inverted classrooms
They considered a waste of their money and found the reading/video learning format awful
Although the IBL style bunch was describing isnāt quite that
Due to the presentation portion (I took a class like that)
Inverted stuff is just not the same and having tried to self-study a portion of math doing this it just works so much better when you can bounce ideas off someone who knows what they're doing. There's a lot of false starts and it can cut a lot of the bs (even if it makes you look dumb)
don't you still get that opportunity to ask questions and bounce ideas off of the instructor during the class time? I thought the whole point of inverted classrooms was to maximize the amount of time where you could do that
as opposed to having to spend a lot of class time getting lectured on stuff that you could just read in a book
I'm just playing devil's advocate here, I do see some drawbacks with the inverted model that the standard lecture model does better
From what I hear, as long as a professor isn't a jerk about office hours
you already can get the time you need with them
But not having an interactive lecture is brutal for learning
emphasis on interactive
just having someone spew words at you for an hour isn't good for learning haha
most of my math lectures have been plenty interactive and people often ask questions
I had inverted classroom as a Student for my real analysis and abstract algebra classes
it was great
our teacher basically wrote a book that we had to read
we had simple online assignments
and class was asking questions about the reading of the week
and more simple exercises
there were additional homework and tutorial sessions
I mean in high school you don't get office hours
so yea maximizing question time is the goal
if you're doing flipped classroom as a teacher
provide good video lectures that you made yourself preferably
and give a guided notes sheet
and go through example problems
basically do everything you can to avoid people asking "what is this topic" in class
you want people to ask specific questions if they ask questions at all
For those doing physics
Are landau books like still good for studying physics nowadays? havenāt rlly read them but have some people asking me about LLās books
Personally Iāve read like the first 2 books
Imo his mechanics seem to assume knowledge of mechanics
Classical field theory had quite a pretty sr intro, otherwise itās basically like griffiths but relativistic, while the GR is basically hilbertās derivation from plugging lagrangians
Not too sure about his other books tbh, tho splitting qm into nonrel and rel seems quite uh unnatural imo
(dont really want to like recommend a book without actually reading through)
i should just isolate myself for like 2 month to binge read all of landau
I mean what level are we talking here, from times I've been bullied by physicists with LL, I'd probably imagine they're only appropriate for physics grad students. And even then to be taken as a supplement to a seminar or a second treatment of a subject.
Its the physics equivalent of "oh cool, you wanna learn AG, go read Hartshorne!"
Wait thatās what I did to start AG lol
Rough intro imho
You need some good algebra background to take on Hartshorne on the first try
Oh I mean I have a good algebra background
I think it would be fair to say that most undergrads should probably take a look at Eisenbud or something a bit more involved than D&F before attempting Hartshorne
But listen, I'm not exactly the one that should be measuring the average undergrad with my smol pp here
LOL BULLIED BY LL
@round robin Ayy, maybe read it, turd blossom
would prob take a few months to read through the books
I canāt really give you a good answer, since youāve read the only two Iāve got experience with already
I really didnāt like the style
Hey guys I'm studying to be a math educator and I was hoping if there were some pointers in what to add into my resume if I want to get a tutoring gig. I have no history other than being a sophmore in university and being a part of 2 education programs geared toward being a prepared teacher and a good STEM educator.
@ me or DM me. I'm not frequent here. I'm just looking for work.
@signal smelt Add those for sure, as well as a list of what subjects you would be comfortable in tutoring
For me I listed out a bunch of classes I was able to tutor in, especially AP's and such
also, i know that some tutors will take an exam for the subject they wish to tutor in, such as if you're tutoring for the bio SAT for example, you would go in and take the bio SAT. If you were tutoring for AP Calc BC, you would try to find a way to take it and aim for a perfect. Since you're in uni, listing your GPA can't hurt either
Is there a difference between doing math as an undergraduate and math as graduate versus <some other major> as an undergraduate and then math as a graduate?
Well, I'm sure there is a difference, but could anyone elaborate on it if there is anything to elaborate on?
i know some physics majors, who switched to (pure) math after their undergraduate. they were strong enough in math, that it wasn't much of a problem, but still had to work more their first year and (re)learn some things
Hm okay. I am going to be a freshman engineering major this fall (engineers will declare their official major after their second semester at my school). I really like math and have considered majoring in math, but I figured if I majored in math, I would want to do more than a bachelors. So if its all the same, I figured why not major in electrical/computer engineering or comp sci, and then go to graduate school for math if I still care by then.
Is that something that people do?
@boreal yacht it is what my plan is if I decide to keep going to school after I graduate with my EE degree next year. I know another EE guy who is also considering getting a masters in math after getting his bachelors in EE. Given that so many engineers enjoy math quite a bit (I feel bad for anyone who is in engineering and doesn't like math) it is not uncommon for engineering students to either double major in math or go on to get a masters in math later
also, because of the massive overlap in bachelors engineering and math degrees, you would be taking most of the math classes you would need for a BS in math by getting a BS in engineering
i see. thanks.
And I asked in this channel because im looking for more informed opinions
gasp you don't want random people screeching baseless advice at you? The nerve!
if you don't want that, why are you on discord? 
eh, true. I guess I am also kinda directing the question to teachers. Is this a good idea, bad idea, or does it not really make a difference in their opinions?
Good point tho colorado 
you are in the US right?
bcs in Europe, Germany specifically there is no overlap between engineering and mathematics bachelor's
and it would be very hard to make the switch
im in the US. Tbh tho, im not really sure that there is that much overlap. calculus and ODEs overlap. Linear algebra seems like a grey area right now, not really sure. Then there is another 20 to 30 credit hours of math that engineers don't take. I intend to just take all of the math I can, and hopefully I will have time to continue studying math stuff on my own to make up the difference š¤·
also did you even take a proof based class yet
maybe you don't even like mathematics
I've read about half of "Linear Algebra Done Wrong" (~ 1 semester worth) and done pretty much all of the exercises. I've been trying to learn group theory lately. I think I enjoy proof based mathematics, and I have definitely really enjoyed doing algebra so far. I agree its too early to take the plunge. I feel compelled to at least give engineering a try.
i did study 1 semester of engineering before i switched completely to mathematics
i had a very good "math for engineering" professor who got me hooked
so yeah, if you are unsure start with engineering
especially if calculus is compulsory for both majors anyway
but switching to math later will only get harder i think
because mathematics is purely proof-based and engineers don't really care about that
and mathematicians also care a lot about things engineers don't care about at all
š¤
Ok so I'm going to start tutoring once the school year starts
I have a question
What's a good way to get notes for classes I've already taken?
I have my AP Calc BC (calc 1 and 2) notes but nothing before that
@scarlet perch to be honest my GPA isn't the greatest. Lol I had a rough couple of semesters. I'd be proud of a 2.8 but I'm not even that.
hm, do you have a major gpa? if so if that one's higher, i'd recommend including it
@signal smelt
if you're tutoring for specific courses, i'd recommend putting the grade you got from those courses
other than that you probably don't really need much
wait what do you need your grades for?
@brazen pendant they're applying to be a tutor and looking for things to put on their resume
For those teachers/TA's for whom classes are starting soon ... best of luck this semester! š
i need to get my techer to downlead discord and have him join this place lol
I mean Iāll be fine DM; thereās only one subject that actively worries me
and the grade is averaged over five subjects
with my current guess of how the first exam went, even if that one goes as poorly as possible I still only have to barely pass the other two
and if todayās goes as well as Iām hoping itāll fully compensate anything on that one critical exam
even a 0% grade
(of course it would still wreck my over-all average and make it impossible to get a distinction when graduating, but thatās basically impossible already because I only had āreally goodā grades last semester, which is not enough for that)
(graduation with distinction requires a grade average of ā„95% over all your major-related subjects from second year onward)
(itās hard enough to get that in one subject)
ā„95% compared to your peers or on test scores?
peers are irrelevant
that statement applies to life as a whole
Where do you guys get practice problems?
I'm tutoring a precalc student, algebra I student, and two elementary schoolers
So I need practice problems for them
Do I just make then up as I go?
thing is
you want to make them up in advance in some form because
the more advanced it gets the messier the numbers become
and sometimes the messiness of the numbers takes away from the ease of the problem, which will take away from the student's focus in understanding the goal of the problem
or method
whatever it is
doing it in advance isnt an easy way to do it tho
since ur gonna be meeting the day of and u probably dont know what they need to work on unless u are continuing from before meeting
idk
i would just steal them
like find some competitor textbook
and use their practice problems
(make sure the practice problems actually align w what the student knows)
Metal I'm the worlds foremost expert on avoiding doing any work myself
Hmmm I have the textbook my school used for honors Algebra 2
I can use that
And yea the plan is to focus on making sure they're doing homework and tests correctly
But if I want to brush up on a topic/make sure they're doing it correctly practice problems would be gucci
students are really bad at telling you what they dont know
or what theyre not sure on
you can ask "do you understand this?" and they'll say "yeah"
and then you ask them to do it
blank stare
practice problems keep them honest.
agreed^^^^^
Also, just don't ask "who doesn't get it". One of my teachers (the best one I've ever had) always asked: "Raise your hand if you understand". He would try to explain everything again if atleast 25% students didnt raise the hand.
in high school pretty much noone understood physics cause noone was brave enough to say 'I dont understand, could you explain it again', thinking others get it.
ahhh
that sounds a lot better actually instead of like
so yall understand? great lets move on
I find if I'm explaining something to someone that telling them to walk me through a problem or just explain a concept is a good thing
One thing I've heard, in terms of how wording matters, is how instead of asking "Does anybody have any questions?" (expected that there are none), you can ask "What questions do you have?" (expected that there are some). But even then, I find a lot of students have trouble realizing they even have questions until they're kind of "released" to answer them, either as HW or classwork.
like when doing flashcards, it's better to ask yourself "do I want to remember that better?" instead of just "did I know that?" when deciding which flashcards to put in the "again" pile. Phrasing definitely helps with honesty
(actly how does flashcards work never used them b4 someone explain pls?)
for me i just write my own notes
Ugh. What is the point of having eight graders multiplying three-digit-by-three-digit decimals by hand.
What do they honestly think the value of that is.
oh yeah I did do that
It's just ... meaningless, no context, etc
"Can you memorize this algorithm and do it by hand"
Then you get stuff like "Maria can type 48 words in 6 minutes. What is her rate in words per minute?" Answer: "Terrible"
I don't think three-by-three multiplication does much to build number sense. š I think it kind of destroys it.
Maybe it's required in everyday life
I think it's important that people can do it, although one could argue it's bad to teach it at this point (or even in a math classroom at all)
hey i was wondering if anyone here is a hs math teacher in california?
does that also include asking for advice on becoming a math teacher? because im not tryng to ask about my math homework lol
just trying to confirm
oh lol, thats fine sorry
but i cant help with that
dm worked as one for a while iirc
Not in Cali
o yeah didnt see that
Um. Hmm.
Yeah I can't help with California yeah. :/
Best to look online for resources. Often states have their own requirements.
So you want to be familiar with those.
Licensure, etc.
Maybe it's required in everyday life
yea no not really. knowing the multiplication table is extremely useful a lot. knowing in theory how multiplication algorithms work can come in handy in a pinch, but rarely. practicing to get fast at it is a waste of time
in general, a lot of early math teaching is justified under it being useful, because it wouldāve been 100 years ago if you wanted to become an accountant or vendor
How many sides does a circle have?
Asking for a friend and her kindergartener daughter. If possible, please comment a reason for your answer.
This should be fun... Never too early to show students that definitions matter and math can be full of interesting discussions! ...
what does it feel like when students confuse you with stupid answers
two: inside and outside
proof: jordan curve theorem
sides in the sense that a square has four: doesn't make sense. That definition relies on straight lines connecting vertices. You could broaden it to define sides as the number of C1 segments in the curve, in which case a circle has one side
that's actually probably the most elegant way to go about it, what do you think? @turbid zenith
LOL I love it
And yeah, C1 segments is what I was thinking about
Though would it be able to be called a segment if there are no endpoints?
when I say segment here I suppose I mean an injective C¹ function from (0,1) to ā² which can be continuously extended to [0,1]
which channel should I ask about ergodic and dynamical systems?
I⦠donāt think we have an appropriate channel for it. I guess whichever of #advanced-analysis and #point-set-topology feels less wrong to you
(Iām aware neither really fits)
we havenāt really had demand for a channel for that; at least I havenāt really seen and discussions about it
I mean you also have to understand that the vast majority of the people on this server arenāt even at a level where they know what dynamical systems is. we only have a few active people who have finished their bachelorās degree
Iām gonna miss out on the dynamial systems lecture next year (there isnāt a regularly occuring one and I have other priorities, but Iām sure itād be very interesting)
who here has experience with online homework platforms?
those that my sch tried are rather crip physical is still nicer tbh
(ok my sch tried like ms teams and one note both are ehhh not so nice)
What exactly are you asking
https://youtu.be/Z5T_onnzYS4 How would you guys explain question 4 in this video? I have a hard time giving a good solution for that one..
In this video, I will be solving the first five questions of the official ACT math practice test! Official ACT Math Practice Test Questions: https://www.act....
Yeah I feel like you should start off by talking about what greatest common factor even means
Some of your viewers and audience may have forgotten
The usual way to find greatest common divisor is to prime factorize all the numbers, and then just take the lowest power of each prime that you find


