#discrete-math
1 messages · Page 224 of 1
oh sorry, what is this channel for? it says discrete math
and i am working with discrete math
okay
there's nothing strictly speaking wrong with asking an objective question when the channel is inactive @mighty dust
true
sorry lol im just having a bad day @weary tiger
(poof!)
can anyone explain why $P \implies Q$ is true if P is false but Q is true?
so we know x^2 >=0 for all x in R, and the Riemann hypothesis is either true or false hence there are two possibilities
FT and TT
which both imply that the proposition is true?
Let’s say I have a coin and I say “if my coin is a penny, then it is worth one cent”
But then I show you my coin, and it’s a dime, does that mean my statement is false?
P=>Q just means “P implies Q”, ie. when P is true, Q must also be true.
It places no restrictions on when P is false
Otherwise if “False implies X” were false, implies would be equivalent to and
so if A ⊆ B then A is a subset of B but also the subset A=B?
and A ⊂ B is the subset A thats not equal to B?
bad wording

A ⊆ B includes the possibility that A = B, while A ⊂ B excludes it -- however, some authors use ⊂ in the inclusive sense, so you should be careful using it that way
ah ok
to write that $A$ is a proper subset of $B$ and be unambiguous about it, you can do $A \subsetneq B$.
Ann
that looks more proper i think ill go with that
How can ı solve this
I tried Catalan numbers but ın lesson we always solved with (0,0) to (x,y) problems, I didn't solve that because of
you don't need catalan numbers here
any path from (3,3,3) to (12,12,12) can be encoded as a string consisting of 9 each of the letters R, L and U
How can we solve this with pie
with what?
One approach is to split according to how many nodes have degree 3 in the spanning tree.
0: The spanning tree is a line graph, and for each color we need to decide which sequence the nodes of that color appear in when we move down the line starting from the leaf of that color.
1: A central node is connected to all three nodes of the opposite color. Each of the two remaining nodes of the center color must hang off different nodes of the opposite color.
2: The two degree-3 nodes must be from different sides; otherwise they create a cycle. Once we choose which nodes they are, everything will be connected.
In each of these three cases it is fairly easy to count the ways to assign nodes to roles in the tree; they then sum to 81.
i think you mean path graph and not line graph, at least if Wikipedia is to be believed with terminology
use kirchoff's matrix tree theorem :P
(replied to the wrong person, mbmb) @tardy comet if you're interested in a more linear algebra approach. trop's is way more direct
What’s S4
also, by PIE, I'm assuming you meant https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inclusion–exclusion_principle
ie, principle of inclusion/exclusion?
yea line graphs are roughly when you turn the edges into vertices and vertices into edges, it's a completely different thing from path graphs
but it's understandable regardless
Literally there are no solutions bc max(x1+...+x8) = 120
No, because you don't seem to have asked any question.
does the fact that any graph with chromatic number >= k is k-constructible imply that any k-critical graph is constructible (by hajos construction)?
both things seem to be true, but i'm having a hard time figuring out how does one follow from the other
nvm it doesn't follow
wait no
this is wrong, it needs to have a k-constructible subgraph
yeah it all makes sense now
Is there any geometrical interpretation to combinatorics concepts?
Or the discrete nature of the latter permits any 1 to 1 correspondence in between ?
i think it depends. for graph theory for example the closest you might get are planar graphs. and i'd still argue it's more related to topology than geometry
actually i remember there was a field of research called discrete differential geometry which might be a nice blend of the two
but i can't think of geometrical interpretations to most concepts rn
Where does this equality come from?
Could you help me out for this two questions? Or at least could you recommend a channel for this questions
$[(1+x+\cdots +x^5)(1-x)]^3=(1-x^6)^3$
jswatj
could someone clarify, here when they say every edge at every stage has the same probability of being chosen as the next, im not sure what they mean. If the probability of picking an edge not chosen yet is p, and this is uniform through every stage, then we dont have a probability measure do we?
Do you know about cyclic subgroups?
is this a group under multiplication?
yes I do
I believe so
normally it's written as GL(2, R)
I thought that superscript x referred to the group of units of M_2(R)? My algebra is pretty rusty though.
that would be the same as GL(2, R) right?
Pretty sure? I honestly don't remember.
But if it is a group then there's a way to look at the question in terms of cyclic subgroups. Have you characterized cyclic subgroups in terms of smallest subgroups containing certain elements?
nope
Hmm. They might have taught you it, but if G is a group and a is an element of G then <a> is the smallest subgroup of G containing a iirc.
Idk if you should use that if they haven't taught it though 
I got the answer could I ask another q
You can keep posting questions here so long as they are appropriate for the channel.
I don't mind looking but I might not know the answer.
Have you tried looking at/for any examples/counterexamples?
Rings from modular arithmetic are a nice place to start.
Would this be one example
Yeah in Z_10 right?
In general any time you have a ring like Z_(mn) for m,n two nonzero integers then you will have mn=0
Rings where any product of two nonzero integers is a nonzero integer are called integral domains iirc.
Sorry not integers specifically
Rings might contain items besides integers lol
It's basically just rings where you habe the zero product property by contrapositive of this condition.
ah
I've got a following sequence of numbers: 2, 7, 18, 41, 88, 183, 374. How can I generalize this sequence, so to be able to retrieve any nth term?
Initially I thought that this sequence is quadratic, but quadratic sequence requires a constant second difference.
The first difference of this sequence is:
5, 11, 23, 47, 95, 191
Here's the second one:
6, 12, 24, 48, 96, ....
And then I figured out that am able to generalize the latter:
6 * (2^(n-1)) where n is a term's number.
Still struggling with generalizing initial sequence, though
Let (a1,a2,...) be the original sequence, (b1,b2,...) be the first differences and (c1,c2,...) be the second differences.
By your observation, we have that bn-b1 is always 6 times a sum of consecutive powers of 2. Such sums behave nicely; they're always one less than the next power of 2.
So let's try to add 1 to each of the bn's which will let us divide by 6 and look for a nice relation there.
The sequence of (bn+1)/6 turns out to be: 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, ...
So we have bn = 6·2^n-1.
Now $$a_k = 2+\sum_{n=1}^{k-1} (6\cdot2^n - 1) = 2 + 6\sum_{n=1}^{k-1} 2^n - \sum_{n=1}^{k-1} 1 = 2 + 6(2^k-2) - (k-1)$$
why is m^2 even in this proof is it because m^2 can be written as m^2 = 2k where k=n^2 ?
Troposphere
Try rewriting the proof so it doesn't mention m². If you succeed, we can look at whether the result as convincing as what we started with.
It's true that m²=2n² by assumption, but I'm not sure how you propose to speak about the relation between 2n² and m without saying "m²" or something equivalent to that.
ok im just trying to understand their justification of m^2 being positive, i suspected it’s because m^2=2n^2 could be rewritten as m^2 = 2k where k=n^2
or how about breaking m^2 up into cases where case n is odd or n is even
if n is odd then n^2 is odd and it’s even (2) times n^2 (odd) and even * odd = even
if n is even then n^2 is even and it’s 2*even = even
so in either case 2*n^2 is even whether n is even or odd
is that a proper justification why m^2 is even
@coral parcel
Sorry, I think I spectacularly misunderstood your question. When you wrote
why is m^2 even in this proof
my brain somehow converted that to "why is m^2 mentioned in this proof at all". 🤦 I should go get some sleep.
haha
But yes, the reason m² is known to be an even number is that it is assumed to be 2 times n².
Yeah, but perhaps the latter is more verbose than it needs to be. By definition a number is even if it is twice some integer; you don't need to split it up according to whether the "some integer" is odd or even.
Yes.
k ty!
Because f^-1(4) is only defined if there is a unique input that the function f maps to 4. There isn't here -- both f(2) and f(-2) are 4.
assuming f: A -> B, where A, B are elements of R, then (-2) shouldn't exist in the set A,B regardless
so 2 would be a unique input
also, where do you get that it's defined by having to be a unique input?
R stands for the set of real numbers, and -2 is certainly one of those.
oh
you're right, im thinking of natural numbers
regardless
it doesn't specify the function is injective right?
Usually the notation f^-1 is only defined if f is injective.
(I briefly thought your problem looked like it considers f^-1(x) to be defined for a non-injective function f just as long as x is hit by exactly one element of the domain -- but this would be a rather nonstandard usage, and is not really necessary to make sense of the exercise, so let's forget about that).
Does "stars and bars problem" ring any bell? Otherwise look that up.
You need to choose 18 people out of 118 total students
After that it's identical to (b)
Well in (b) you choose 19 out of 119 students
That is the only difference
Shouldn't (b) be just
$\ 3 \binom{119}{19} (19!)$
Drake
If Toni is first in line,you can ignore her and think of the problem as arranging the remaining 19 people in 19 slots
Same for 2nd and same for 3rd
so the only difference in (c) is that we are going to
$\3\binom{118}{18} (19!)$\
Anti_spiral69420
This is just (19C3)
19*18*17 may not preserve the alphabetic order
For example you could get
BACT
i need to think lol, my little brain isnt able to wrap around lol
AH
i get it
thanks
this is the last question i wnna ask
i couldnt figure it out to be honest
i mean i am sure there is 10C3 but what else after that
what am i supposed to do to avoid the common sides
perhaps you could count how many triangles do share a side
and how many triangles share two sides
i was planning on overcounting and subtracting
this
but how am i supposed to count the common sided triangles
Couldn’t you count permutations on one side?
well the decagon has ten sides
fix one side in particular. how many triangles include that side?
i was thinking abut that, like a typical circular table question but
i dont know how to approach it
I mean you could break it down, and use a smaller shape (less sides) and see if a pattern arrises also
i think i will fix one point and then draw manually to see if some pattern arises
yeah that
thanks talking to you guys set things straight
Hey guys, can anyone help with the following:
Prove that There’s a subset of R^2 that intersect exactly every line exactly twice
Q: Does anyone know of an algorithm that can find the graceful vertex labellings of complete binary trees?
I have spent the past week searching and creating my own, and it is driving me insane. I don't want a brute force approach that involves just finding the permutations for a given n, because it is far too inefficient and its practical value is next to nothing (just try solving this problem using the brute force paradigm for any n greater than 11...).
This is the closest I have found (as far as papers go), but the authors have erred in saying that their algorithm constructs one for a complete binary tree (its just a binary tree).
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Dipta-Gomes/publication/346604572_Graceful_Cascading_Labelling_Algorithm_Construction_of_Graceful_Labelling_of_Trees/links/60277c18299bf1cc26c0ecff/Graceful-Cascading-Labelling-Algorithm-Construction-of-Graceful-Labelling-of-Trees.pdf?origin=publication_detail
Can you do transfinite induction?
We learned that, still confused when working with ordered groups that are not numbers for some reasons but yeah, that's an option
forgot to reply
There are |R| distinct lines in the plane. Well-order them so their order type is the initial ordinal of cardinality |R|. Go through the lines one by one, choosing up to two points on each if it doesn't have two points yet, while being careful not to add any point that is collinear with two points you have already chosen. At each step you will have chosen strictly fewer than |R| points yet, so there are also fewer than |R| points on the line you have to avoid (this requires a bit of additional argument which I'll leave to you), meaning there will always be points left over that you can choose.
I'll give that a shot, the idea is clear now even if I won't succeed doing it, thanks a lot!
This seems to depend on the exact details of what "the transfinite reduction theorem" and "the preliminary form of transfinite recursion" mean. Even though transfinite induction/recursion are a common concepts, there is no standard for exactly how to express it with which variable names and assumptions, nor for which special case to single out as "the preliminary form".
Okay, so to prove "(i) holds for every t in A" by transfinite induction, you need to prove an induction step:
Let t in A be arbitrary and assume that (i) holds for every u < t. Then we have to prove that (i) holds for t too.
The induction hypothesis tells us that for every u < t we have F(u) = G(f restrict seg u). But since G is a function that maps into B this means in particular that F(u) is in B.
This means that $F \upharpoonright \operatorname{seg}t$ is a function whose domain is $\operatorname{seg}t$, and whose values lie in $B$. But that's just what it means to be an element of $^{<A}B$. So $t$ is not in case (ii); therefore it must be in case (i), as required.
Troposphere
What's a good syllabus/ gradual book that's freely available for an utter beginner to learn discrete math?
Very beginner friendly
http://discrete.openmathbooks.org/dmoi3.html
Do you guys find Discrete Math harder or easier to understand than Statistics and Probability?
I would like some help understanding this paragraph.
I have almost no formal training in structures like rings and fields, though I do know my vector spaces.
A simple explanation would be nice.
(I've put this here because the context is a problem in combinatorics; if this is relevant to another channel, feel free to direct me there.)
the space of homogeneous polynomials has a 'natural' basis consisting of unitary monomials
to give a more concrete and less symbol-heavy example, the space of homogeneous polynomials of degree 2 in 4 variables $x, y, z, w$ is spanned by ${x^2, y^2, z^2, w^2, xy, xz, xw, yz, yw, zw}$
Ann
Makes sense to me.
Ahhhhh, I think I get it now.
Basically, we want the degree of our monomial in x+1 variables to be equal to y.
That's it, right?
yes
Makes sense. It reminds me of a generating polynomial.
All the same, it's a pretty funny way of understanding this combinatorial idea.
Thank you!
I'm having trouble understanding this argument.
An even number of persons are seated around a able. After a break, they are again seated around the same table, not necessarily in the same places. Prove that at least two persons have the same number of persons between them as before the break.
which part of the argument is tripping you up?
I have a lot of issues with this, really.
First: I don't agree with the very first assertion. Isn't it only true for a row of chairs, rather than a round table which wraps around?
For instance, given 10 chairs, if 1 and 3 get permuted to 1 and 9, then....
They still have one guy between them, but 2 is not equal to 8. Or am I misreading something here?
well
hm
actually they might be proving a stronger statement here
that there exists a pair that ends up in the same relative position (mod 2n) after the permutation
I'm struggling with the second part, too. It's a little hard for me to get an intuition for the mathematical statement they have provided.
I'm imagining a polygon with P0 at the top and moving clockwise through P1, P2... to P_{2n-1}.
yeah that will work
In that sense, $a-\sigma(a)$ denotes how far anticlockwise $a$ gets permuted.
Wishes
And ditto for $b-\sigma(b)$.
Wishes
Again, I'm bothered by the fact that the congruence statement doesn't really match the simple example I gave earlier, in which 1 goes to 1 and 3 goes to 9. If they're actually proving a stronger statement than asked for, then saying that the problems are "equivalent" seems a bit rude to me!
The frustrating part of this explanation is really that I have no idea why the writer has written what they've written, haha.
Hello
My problem is in how many ways there is to set 3 numbers >=0 thats the sum of them is 300
D(3,300) ?
Maybe as a clue suppose you've solved D(2,N).
Then you can set the first number to 0 and you'll have D(2,300) ways to set the other two numbers.
Or you can set the first to 1 and have D(2,299) for the rest. etc.
If the order isn't important, you can minus away the overcounting
Otherwise google stars and bars (combinatorics).
What about this
?😅
also what the equation of 1+2+3……n
Not related to this
(1+n)n /2 ?
💀
Yes
Kinda bad with terms so I wanted to ask
The infimum of a set is the element with the lowest value?
And supremum respectively vice versa
Not always,The infimum need need not be in the set
Consider $\left{\frac{1}{n} \middle | n \in \bN-{0}\right}$
Drake
ah
wait but in this case there isn't an infimum is there? @unreal stump
how is it 0? if you don't mind explaining
Suppose inf is not 0
Then let x=inf(A)>0
Now 1/x is a positive real number and hence lies between floor(1/x) and floor(1/x)+1
ah
Hi so, in an undirected graph G and a matching M is every node that's contained in an edge of M, M-saturated?
By definition a node is "M-saturated" if it's an endpoint of some edge in M
u can also directly show inf=0
My book says that to solve the recurrence
$$C_N = C_{\lfloor N/2\rfloor} + C_{\lceil N/2\rceil} + N, \qquad N \geq 2$$
with $C_1 = 1$ when $N = 2^n$ is a power of two, we can rewrite the recurrence by letting $a_n = C_{2^n}$ and then $a_n$ satisfies the recurrence
$$a_n = 2a_{n-1} + 2^n, \qquad n \geq 1$$
with $a_0 = 0$. Why isn't $a_0 = 1$?
ooooh lemme see
EdgarAlnGrow
i think this is false too btw
.>
consider the set of all real numbers between 0 and 1
sup is one
and inf is 0
neither of which are in set
its clear 0 is a lower bound. in fact its the greatest one since, for any x>0, the archimedean property says some 1/n falls under x, so x is not a lower bound
for predicate calculus, anyone know how to LaTeX the logical conjunction symbol?
∧ this shit
$\wedge$
Renegade
okay just answered my own question
Either \wedge and \vee, or \land and \lor will work.
Is this a mistake? The two boxes clearly contradict each other
The negation of ∃x, P(x) is not ∃x, ¬P(x)
(It's ∀x, ¬P(x) )
The first box is clear because there are no elements in the empty set
The second box says the exact same thing: the first box holds for all statements, but ¬P(x) is also a statement
73^1567 = x mod 11
73 mod 11 is 7
I then try to use the Chinese remainder theroem but can't get it to work
Unable to get -1 or 1 without getting an extremely big number
The exponent and the mod p isn't the same though
How should I use it on my equation? Really lost here
@stray reef
Thanks a lot but how do you get 1567 mod 10 in the exponent?
Probably need to check some videos on Fermats to really get it
Got it now, thanks a lot for your help 🙂
7^10 = 1 mod 11 so the exponent can be reduced by 10 without affecting the value
Hey, I’m trying to think of a way to algorithmically solve this problem but I’ve been stuck on it for these past 3 days. The problem is as follows:
You have a directed graph with weights (distance) where some vertices S you must avoid as much as possible. You have to go from vertex A to B. Essentially you need to find the path that maximizes its vertices distance to S (as in one of the vertices in ur path is the bottleneck). So what I did first was to compute how far every vertice is from S. I thought that was a good starting point, but then now I’m really confused about finding the path with the maximum distance from S.
I can see a way to do it in O(v^2*log(v) + e) but I’m required to do it in O((e+v)^1.4) and I can’t figure out how!! I feel like I’ve tried everything. Any help would be appreciated
Sort the vertices in order of decreasing distance to S; add them to a new graph in that order while keeping track of connected components with a union-find structure. By the time you have added both A and B and they're in the same component you have how far your can stay away.
so hang on. what are we minimizing?
are you sure you didn't mean max[v in path] min[s in S] dist(v,s)?
avoiding things as much as possible seems to mean maximizing distance to me
That's how I read it too.
and we have a directed graph, so are we talking about dist(v,s) or dist(s,v)? because one of these may well be +∞ sometimes
I overlooked that it was directed. Then my suggestion won't work, or at least not right out of the box.
You can still do a binary search for the threshold distance in O((v+e)log v) time, though, checking reachability from A to B from scratch for each guess.
Sure one vertice might be unreachable by S. Yeah it’s important that it’s the distance from S to V (part of the path) that is maximized
Oh yeah sorry I mean maximize
wym with connected components?
I thought at that point the graph was undirected, so disregard that proposal.
ok
this too disregard?
No, that should still work.
What do you mean with threshold distance?
How far you can stay away from S and still get from A to B.
Sorry I don't get it, do you mean I use my computed values of distances from S or do I not need that?
Yes, you use your precomputed distances from S.
So do I start from a specific point like A and do some kind of graph traversal or is the idea to do some completely different?
Because I've legit spent days on trying different ways to traverse the graph and do some smart things to find the solution. I just don't see it.
You make a guess at what the threshold is, and do a bog-standard reachability problem to see if you can get from A to B through only the nodes whose distance from S is >= your threshold.
yeah but wouldn't that exceed the required time complexity?
Reachability can be checked in time O(e).
Where does the v factor come from?
well there can be v unique distances from S what was I was thinking, worst case scenario
so if ur doing test from A to B for each those unique ones u get v*e, no?
I'm not testing for every possible distance -- that's where the binary search comes in.
It means you only have to do log(v) tests to know where the boundary between "possible" and "not possible" is.
oh my god obviously
yeah thinking not my greatest suit always
Thx I will see if this suits my needs
I had a discussion about this with my friend, quite recently, I mean my go-to strategy would be BFS or DFS but those are often described as O(e+v) which isn't an issue here. However, I've seen this claim you make elsewhere, I'm a bit confused to as to how? Is it that we can only take e edges anyway and thus we can stop looking after e edges as we would have found what we were looking for by then?
The difference between O(e+v) and O(e) is only relevant if e<v -- that is, when most of the nodes in the graph aren't even connected to anything.
If you want to compute a BFS/DFS ordering of all the nods you need to restart the search if it runs dry before it has seen all the nodes -- but here you're not interested in ordering the nodes, just to get a yes/no answer to "is node B reachable from A". For that, you don't need to restart the search.
It still becomes O(v+e) if you need to reset a "seen yet?" flag for all of the nodes each time you start a new search.
But you can avoid that by being clever, e.g., by just maintaining a "which instance of the reachability search was this node last seen in?" field instead, and comparing it to a sequence-number for the current instance.
Thx
They’re called “nodes”, not “nods”. Please try to refrain from attempting to answer questions pertaining to topics about which you’re uneducated👍
real men call them vertices but ok
nods in agreement
Let V be the set of all strings of length 2 in the alphabet {A,B,C,D}. Define a graph G with vertices V by putting an edge between the string s and the string t in V if s and t differ at exactly 1 entry.
How do I find the number of vertices in G and the degree of AB? I initially thought it would be 16 (4 choices for the first)x(4choices for the next), and the degree of AB would be 9 (3 choices to differ)x(3choices to differ)
Finally how many edges there are? I choose 72 (degree)x(vertices)/2 but idrk if that's correct
the degree of each of your vertices is 6. by multiplying 3 and 3 you count how many differ in both letters, not one
identity
just like 0 is for addition and 1 is for multiplication
since 5+0=5 and 5*1=5
e is kinda the generalized version of that
I would like a check on my mathematics here.
We are concerned with how many numbers in the domain are mapped to odd numbers. If an odd number of them are mapped to odd numbers, then the sum is odd, and it is even otherwise.
So the number of functions are $\sum_{n=0}^{999}{1999 \choose 2n+1} 2^{2n+1}. 2^{1999-(2n+1)}$
(2^{2n+1} represents that for all the 2n+1 numbers mapped to odd numbers, we have 2 choices for where they go. Ditto for the other power of 2.)
Wishes
And so, simplifying, we have $2^{1999} \sum_{n=0}^{999}{1999 \choose 2n+1}$
Wishes
We know that the sum of odd coefficients of a binomial is equal to the sum of even coefficients.
So this is $2^{1999}.2^{1999}/2$
Wishes
Or 2^3997.
This also has something of an intuitive appeal: There are 4^1999 = 2^1999.2^1999 total functions, and it makes sense that half of them have sum odd and half even.
Is this correct?
From where can i add this bot to my server ??
seems correct. alternative approach:
we intuit that about half of the functions from {1,…,1999} —> {2000,…,2003} have even sum and half have odd sum.
take f such that the sum of the outputs is odd. set g(x) = f(x) for all 1<= x < 1999 and set g(1999) = f(1999) + 1 if f(1999) != 2003, g(1999) = 2002 if f(1999) = 2003. then g has even sum.
this gives a bijective correspondence from the set of functions with odd sum to the set of functions with even sum.
Thank you!
A reasonable strategy would be to start by googling texit -- and when that only gives you results about Texan secessionists, refine the search to texit discord bot.
Im trying to find the number of binary sequences with n 1s and m > n 0s s.t. if you scan the sequence from left to right, you will always have encountered more 0s than 1s
if m = n + 1, then the number of these sequences is the nth catalan number
is there any way to extend this to arbitrary m by counting the number of ways to insert the remaining m - (n + 1) 0s after you form a sequence with n + 1 0s and n 1s?
what is x^2 mod 5 for the first 100 positive ints mean?
What remainder do the squares of the first 100 natural numbers leave when divided by 5?
There's a pattern to it.
every number can be expressed in terms of 5x+1,2,3,4
so the remainders repeat
bad wording
Can someone explain to me why are (a) and (b) false ?
sorry
A,B are sets
consider like x=1, A={1,2,3}, B = {{1,2,3},a,b,c}
here, x belongs to A, and A belongs to B but x doesn't belong to B
and almost same with b). too
C={{a,b,c},d,e}, B={a,b,c}, A={b,c}
here $A \subseteq B$ and $B \in C$ but $A \notin C$
usernamephobic
you know $\notin$ exists, right
Ann
I didn't know but thank you
Can somebody tell me what does “A:B “ mean?
not standard notation; should be defined in your textbook somewhere nearby
How many possibilities to put integers number inside this block thats the sum of them is 300
Or like how many posiblities for x + y + z = 300
x,y,z >=0
C(302, 2)
it's possible to make a bijection between triples of nonneg integers (x,y,z) st x+y+z=300, and arrangements of 300 white stones and 2 red stones in a row
if you notice the message immediately below the one you replied to, i explained exactly why
i don't know what the notation D(n,k) = (3,300) is supposed to mean
any one know, how it's done ?
.... how what's done?
you're asked to make a graph based on a poorly typeset definition and then you're shown a completely wrong solution...
@amber patio
then your book is shit.
^ i can confirm, the definition of G has 2 "(" and 3 ")"
not only that but their picture doesn't even correspond to their defn
you would have one loop at 4 and one edge from 3 to 4 and that's it
notation on the right is bad but you drew what i described accurately
Can someone explain to me why am I wrong or right? I'm lost
i answered:
-
(a,b) =/ (b,a) not equals
Hence, aR/b not related -
R: A implies B = {(a,b)|a is element of A, b is element of , (a,b) element of A x B
Then the relation of A to B is a subset of AxB
honestly I just copied this in my textbook thinking that this answer makes sense
-
R is a subset of B x A so it is not a relation from A to B.
-
Q is a relation from A to B because it is a subset of A x B
is my proof at no. 1 wrong?
I see, thank you for answering tho.
but if you have time, would you enlighten me on why no. 1 is not a relation?
it is a relation, just not a relation from A to B
How many possibilities to set on 12 chair , 6 boys and 4 girls
Without any restrictions
Thats my answer
Or just( 12 10)^t
what if you can seat multiple people on top of each other
("Without any restrictions" 🤡)
Does anybody know how to prove that its surjective?
The expression has no value for x=-sqrt(2), despite the question claiming the function is defined on all of R-{sqrt(2)}.
Other than that, this is a follow-your-nose exercise: Let a be an arbitrary element of R, and show that f(x)=a always has a real solution (by expanding the definition of the function and going where the algebra takes you).
heey
do you guys know during the tableau method (for linear optimization)
you have these coefficient for your artificial variables however at the best solution those variables are equal to 0. So I was wondering what these values represent
is there any way for me to recover these values if I only have the best solution ? ( suppose I used an online solver to get it )
Hey guys, do you know how to solve this?
can someone help me out with this
answer is : x^2, y < x (theorem: if a < b and c > 0, ac < bc)
i dont understand why so
you want to contradict minimality
to do this you want to find an element in S that is smaller than x
how would i know to square x?
is it becuz x is known to be >0 and <1
what if i do something like, x - k where k is a number smaller than x
where are you going to get a number smaller than x?
how about 1.7 thou?
i dont see where that theorem is used
the theorem guarantees you that since x < 1 you have x*x < x*1
ah
i see it now, tysm!
Can you explain to me why c is the correct answer in this problem ?
the more i analyze what the worksheet given, the more I find myself stuck
convert the first condition into
“if Binh is not the tallest, then An is the tallest”
so that you can check which make sense between Binh being the tallest, in the middle, or shortest.
if Binh is the tallest, then Tam is the tallest, and we can’t have two tallest people in a group (assuming that nobody is the same height)
if Binh is in the middle then An and Tam are both the tallest, which again doesn’t work
i tried your way a few times but i didn't get it until now
I think we just need to test each answer one by one to check whether each of them fit the given condition
1.if an not tallest -> bin tallest
2.if binh not shortest -> tam tallest
a) an is tallest -> 1 and 2 applies -> possible
b) bin is tallest -> an isnt the tallest (undecided position), tam is also tallest -> not possible
c) tam is tallest -> 1 doesnt apply (either an or binh are tallest), 2 applies -> not possible
@spice basin
idk if this explains anything new
a is the only possible way
Anyone familiar with ceiling/floor equations and discrete?
> Discrete math channel
> "Anyone know discrete math?"
Any Java experts around?
So, the truth table they've given you directly gives you the SOP expressions for the function X and minterms. I haven't done much with POS and maxterms but they should just be based on duals so it should be super similar.
Let me give a simpler example. Consider the truth table of A+B (go look one up or write one down to see what I mean), each row containing a 1 for the A+B column corresponds to a minterm in the SOP expression for A+B. They are AB,(-A)B and A(-B), so A+B=AB+(-A)B+A(-B).
These minterms are derived by looking at the 1's and 0's of each row containing a 1 in the A+B column basically. For example (-A)B is the row with A+B=1,A=0,B=1.
You might wanna be a little careful and make sure this all matches your books/notes because I haven't done this kinda thing in a while btw.
For simplifying an expression via kmaps I'd recommend looking up examples done in youtube vids. It's easy enough, but it's pretty graphical and I don't know of an easy way to explain it.
What’s the best method here?
I know the answer, but got it by guessing kind of.
Removed the ceiling and just solved x = 5 and continued with range =>
5-n <= x <= 5+n
Correct answer:
4.25 <= x <= 5.25
So n= 0.25
Not sure how to get n other than guessing though
4.25 <= x <= 5.25 doesn't sound right. The value of ceil(4x-7) increases by one at x=4.75, but the value of ceil(2x+3) doesn't -- the the equation cannot be true at both 4.7 and 4.8.
Ah, perhaps that was a typo and you meant 4.75 rather than 4.25. But it should still be 4.74 < x <= 5.25 with a strict inequality at the lower end.
This suggests a way to think of the equation, though. The function f(x) = ceil(4x-7)-ceil(2x+3) increases by one at every odd multiple of ¼, but at even multiples of ¼ the two ceilings both jump in opposite directions, so f(x) don't change. So therefore the solution to f(x)=0 must have the form of the interval between one odd multiple of ¼ and the next odd multiple of ¼.
Locating that particular interval by removing the ceilings sounds like as good a method as any.
Meant .75 yes*
But 4.75 works no? 13 = ceiling 12.5 => 13
No at x=4.75 the equation ends up claiming ceil(12) = ceil(12.5).
Oh u right, it’s getting late 👴🏻
But i guess you meant
4.75 < x <= 5.25 then
Argh, yes. The .74 was definitely a typo.
Muphry's law strikes again.
I’ll read it tomorrow and see if i can understand the method, but yea, think i got it decently:)
Can I get a little help with this? I keep coming up with the wrong answer
Which wrong answer do you keep getting, and what do you do to get it?
That seems to be complete different numbers than the question you first posted.
yeah it is, I plugged in my numbers into my teacher's notes
in this case the 23=54939 and the 61=91608
Based on the available information I have no idea what you're doing wrong. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Ok I actually got it, I found an algebra error in it that I solved and now I got it right
can someone tell me the idea of how to prove this?
what can you say about X if X is in P(A intersect B), i.e., what is X a subset of, what is A intersect B a subset of?
@plucky escarp a proof by element-chasing ought to work
i.e. to prove two sets are equal prove they are subsets of each other
right hand: choose 2 animals from n dogs and 1 cat 😆
So Let's say you have {1,2,3,4...n+1} and you have to pick 2 numbers. Let the numbers be x and y with x>y WLOG
So let's say x is k
For y you have (k-1) options
if x were 1 ,you can't choose a y
So (1-1)=0 options
If x were 2 ,y={1}
x=3 ,y={1,2}
...
x=n+1,y={1,2,3,...n}
So this corresponds to
0+1+2...+n
Animals don't have an ordering
there’s no ordering here
I wonder if this generalises to
\sum_{i=1}^{n} i^k
Well if x were k,there being (k-1) options for y requires order
Because I ordered the set as
1<2<3...k-1<k
what r u studying
pretty sure he's trolling 😂
@proven relic can u stop being an asshat
bahahahhaha
consider n coins each having a value k for k between 1 and n. i want to find out how much money i have, so i have to add the value all the n coins, which is 1 + … + n. this is fine and dandy, but takes a long time.
a friend notices that if we group the kth and (n-k)th coins together, then each group of two coins has the same sum. if n is even, then there are n/2 pairs of coins each having value n+1. if n is odd, then there are (n-1)/2 objects with value n+1 and 1 coin with value (n+1)/2.
adding the values of the groups coins in either case results in n+1 C 2
friend has solved the problem and it no longer takes me forever to find out how much money i have
@proven relic this work for you?
they are muted
oof
really nice word description tho, nice to conceptualise
thanks
When I have to prove 1^3+2^3+3^3…n^3 =(n^2(n+1)^2)/4
What does the left hand side imply
That every n will be some cube?
it works for my base case but when I plug in n>1 I get results such as 9 for n=2, 36 for n = 3 etc
you have to show that the sum of the first n cubes is n^2(n+1)^2/4
firstly, I solve this problem by f(x) = f(y) => x = y
by doing that way, i have proof that both of them are 1-1 func
but when i used a graph calculator
i see that the f(x) is 1-1 as it only intersects with the y-axis whereas g(x) is not 1-1 because it crossed two points
so are both of them 1-1 funcs ?
maybe i misunderstand the way we proof by using graph
Hi everyone. So, l have this problem that l can't solve about combinatorics.
How many ways can 40 books be arranged on a shelf, if among them there are 10 books that are 10 volumes of a novel and are marked with the numbers 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10, so that these 10 volumes are in ascending order (they do not have to be next to each other on the shelf).
My first approach was by using combinations. So, l have to place 30 books that are not marked between those who are marked, for example, l can have between novel 1 - 2 about 5 books, about 2 - 3 none, about 4 - 5 let's say 10, etc.., so l used this formula for Combinations,
C( 30 + 10 - 1, 30) = 39! / (39-30)! * 30! and l got 211 915 132.
My friend decided first to use combinations to place those 10 books on the 40 places that are available,
C(40, 10) = 40! / (40-10)! * 10!, and when calculated, he can do that in around 800m ways, l don't remember the exact number, doesn't matter, but after he calculates that number, using combinations, he then multiplies it with 30!, that's the number of ways that those 30 books can be placed, and in the end, the number of ways for the whole problem is just too big, like it goes to infinity.
Sorry for my poor english, l tried my best to explain the way l approached the problem and my friend, l want your opinions on this and how would you solve it.
I think you made a mistake in your proof that f(x)=f(y) implies x=y.
Notice f(1)=2,f(-1)=2, but 1 is not -1.
Oh wait. 
This never happens from N to N.
Actually yeah. They are both 1-1 on the domain N.
When you graph them you have to be careful to graph them on the correct domain.
your friend is right: first choose where the 10 books will go, place them there, then fill the last 30 slots with the rest of the books
in the end you get C(40, 10) * 30! = 40!/10! = 224844379201911853600532206127677440000000
it's big, because the 10 volumes constraint is really not that big compared to 40!
yeah I realised the mistake, thanks though 😄
Here's another one l have doubts with
39 students from the first, second and third year should be selected for one survey, so that at least 8 students are from the first and at least 3 are from the second year. In how many ways can this be done?
About arguments / validity
I know if all hypothesis / the argument is true, and the conclusion is false, then the argument is invalid
but what about the opposite (not all hypothesis are true, but conclusion is true) / if there is no situation where all arguments can be true at the same time
At least I think this is the correct channel to be asking about this
Guys how to solve this in python.. I tried somehow.. is my approach anywhere near solution
Its given in 1st text
Dm if you can explain a solution
Plz
for future reference, x = ||3||
Guys does anybody know a book with the same chapter covered in it? Cause I am find it hard to understand this book.
A first course in discrete mathematics, John C. Molluzo and Fred Buckely
hii
I am asked to prove this partition identity by using durfee squares but tbh I don't even know what the left hand side represents. Does anyone know what the left side represents geometrically / ferrers diagram
because of the n^2 in the exponent I assume its related to building the ferrers diagram by using lots of durfree squares
but it just doesnt make sense yet
Thx
How is the left hand side evaluated at n=0?
hmm 1 I guess ?
How would you relate this to partitions , like the coefficients are the partitions?
This 1 means that the partition of 0 can only be written in 1 form which is 0
hmm not sure if thats what you meant
Oh so n is the number being partitioned, yea that helps
where did the values come from? what does it mean "by algebra"
like where did the 7 come from
you just multiply out the parenthesis: $(15-13)\cdot 6=6\cdot 15 - 6\cdot 13$ and thus $13 - 6\cdot 15+ 6\cdot 13=7\cdot 13-6\cdot 15$
Ursus1234
gotcha thank u!
why is 7 paired with 13 tho
shouldnt it be 15?
Maybe it's related to the number of partitions you can make with a durfree square length n, that are not larger than n+n^2
Did you figure this out?
hii
I decided to take a nap because this week has been cruel with me
Ill get back on it a little later
I shall test this
it sounds very close to some other proof I saw on the internet
Oh gotcha, sry your week has been tough. Rest up!
oh no its fine !! I appreciate you trying to help me !!
no, why would it be paired with 15?
or paired with is a weird frasing. you have 13 and then you have 6 times 13, which makes it 7 times 13
I found that the generating function for a sequence $f(m, n)$ is
$$F(x, y) = \sum_{m, n}f(m, n)x^my^n = \frac{xy}{1-(x + y)}$$
I tried expanding it as a geometric series and i got
$$F(x, y) = \sum_{r \geq 0}\sum_{k = 0}^r\binom{r}{k}x^{r - k + 1}y^{k + 1}$$
Is there any way I can use this to find a closed form expression for the coefficient of $x^my^n$?
EdgarAlnGrow
never mind, i got it
f : [1..n] →[1..2n] such that for all x in the domain, either
f (x) < x or f (x) ≥2x. How many distinct functions are there of this form?
where n is a positive int
anyone have any advice on how to do these types of problems?
Given an x, how many valid possibilities are there for what f(x) can be?
Multiply all those counts.
Am I allowed to use simplification on this conditional on the conclusion of it?

does that mean no?
Ok so this is what I got:
(the z^n controls how many parts)
(so in the denominator the (q;q) will vary only the size of the parts while te (zq;q) will change the number of parts therefore the left side says something like this:
build a durfee square with sides n then the (q;q) will be responsible for adding more parts to the ferrers graph while the (zq;q) will be responsible for increasing the size of the parts (adding dots to the right of the durfee suare )
the right side of the identity is basically every partition possible
so on the leftside we will be adding every partition that has a durfee square of sides n (with as many dots we want to the right of the durfee square) and (with as many dots we want below the durfee square)
hmm that text is very confusing
thats more like an argument than a proof
but I think it is something along these lines
ok in other words
build a durfee square with sides n
now the denominator will be responsible for adding dots below and to the right of that durfee square
Oh I sort of get that, you should draw some examples
yeah! and I forgot to mention but the reason why the (q;q)_n goes up to n is so that we don't draw dots to the diagonal of the square (therefore making a new square which we don't want)
in this class
proofs that are more of drawing and giving arguments
sounds more powerful than any proof using only math
which is cool
What class is this for?
I don't really know how to translate it to english
one sec let me see if I can find on the internet
its called enumerative combinatorics
Cool, I'm just interested in this things. I need to take some actual classes tho
I'm still not sure how the denominator gives every partition with a n durfree square. Could you draw out an example for n =2?
I think its something like this:
take the (q;q)_2 = (1-q) (1-q^2)
so like 1/{1-q} = (1+q+q^2 ... )
and 1/{1-q^2} = (1+q^2 + q^4 .... )
so like you will be able to draw
lines of size 2 or 1
represented by green and blue dots
in this case q^4 from 1{1-q^2}
is the same as drawing 2 columns of green dots
and the same idea for the (q;zq) but instead we would draw those green and blue lines below the durfee square
because adding +1 to the exponent of z means adding one more part
Hmm thanks, I get it a bit more. I will have to try to draw the 3 square myself.
If a, b and c are the roots of the polynomial 3x^3+11x-14 and sum of the roots is 0, then find the value of a^3+b^3+c^3.
how to do this
First write $3x^3+11x-14=3(x-a)(x-b)(x-c)=3x^3+(...)x^2+(...)x+(...)$, where each $(...)$ is some expression of $a,b,c$. These expressions should be fairly nice. Then by compare coefficients you know what those expressions equal to, and now try to write $a^3+b^3+c^3$ in terms of those expressions
Whoever
This might be a bit difficult so you want to know what newton's identities are
@cursive aurora
Does anybody know how is the circled part justified ? Cause it does not make sense based upon the definition of Cartesian product.
Hey guys, can you explain why the answer is 917
By doing traditional method, i get approximately 600
i just plug in i from 1 to 5 into the inside-parenthesis equation
i think maybe whoever wrote this intended to have $2 \times 3^i$ and not $(23/10)^i$
Ann
also i goes from 0 to 5 anyway, not from 1 to 5
let me try that again
Does the book have answer sheet ?
yes but only for odd numbered problems, the answers is in the end of book
With explanation?
no
if you want help in any problem you can send here
Yeah, that's not valid at all. The two lines are globally equivalent, but the circled parts of them are not themselves equivalent. I'd call that a bug in the proof.
hey guys, i was wondering on the solution for the first function with n^0.99999 log n , how can i make sense of the solution ?
how is n^0.999999 log n = O(n^0.999999 * n^0.000001) ?
log(n) grows slower than any power function
recall that for any c > 0, log(n) is O(n^c)
they take c = 0.000001 here
ooo
thank you. lol its been awhile i worked with any math - is it basically this? how is it we can accept the conversion to be base n , wouldnt base become 10 by default? like O(n^0.999999 * 10^0.000001) ?
what are you talking about base n here?
no, this is not about the definition of logarithm at all...
oh
also tbh that looks like a terrible explanation you posted
tbh, im lost as well LOL.
@tribal bolt hey
Is the set of all equivalence classes equal to the partial ?
Is A/R equal to the Partition of A?
What is the meaning of highlighted parts?
Wanna make a group of 4 people:
We have 5engineers, 12 worker, 8cleaner’s.
How many possibilities to make this group thats in this group have 1 from every type of work
It's pretty bad typesetting, but: The first highlighted part tells you the symbol for the new relation it's about to define. The second is the actual definition, using the common infix notation for relations: x R y stands for "(x,y) element of R", but here instead of R we have the new symbol shown previously. (Plus some parentheses with absolutely horrible spacing).
The thing that looks like a miniature integral with a dot to the left of it is probably supposed to be a script capital S.
You can either use inclusion-inclusion, or divide into three cases depending of which of the three professions you have two of.
Yeah, but that counts each solution twice, because if the last person is, say, an engineer, you could also have chosen him first, and then chose the other engineer in the group as the fourth group member.
So you can do that, but you need to divide by 2 afterwards to correct for the overcounting.
The book is shitty and confusing af. Do you know a better book that covers the topics below? ( it would be amazing if the book has answer sheet for at least some of its practice questions.
Sorry, no.
Still no?
Topics in the pics
Yeah -- I'm very bad at recommending books.
Ok, thank you so much for the explanation:) it was very helpful
I'm a bit confused for 9g as to why the universal quantification for w is utilized
how did u calculate it ?
(x + y)^n = sum (n C k) x^k y^n-k from k = 0 to n
choose appropriate values of n, x, and y
how does one do C
the answer for a and b are
29 choose 9
and
19 choose 9
I am flabbergasted on C and completely delusional on what direction to approach this question
every child has to get at least one chocolate, so there are 10 chocolates left after giving each child one choco. now its the same as asking how many ways i can put k balls (give away k chocolates) into 10 boxes (to 10 kids), then summing the result from k = 0 to 9, since you dont want to get rid of all 10 chocolates
@serene marlin
you are missing all the cases where we give out, say, only 8 of the 10 remaining chocolates by choosing 9 every time
also, where is 19 coming from? what items are you referring to?
what Im doing is there are initially 9 dividers + 10 chocoaltes --- hence the 19 ( 10 comes from inital 20 chocolates - 10 given out to 10 kids since each has to have one
then
for the choose 9
I am choosing 9 dividers to seperate the remaining candies into 10 baskets
ah okay i was misinterpreting then
According to my logic would the answer be appropriate then?
this method will work but you are calculating it incorrectly
of the 19 items, choosing 9 arbitrarily doesnt guarantee that you have chosen 9 dividers
you could have chosen 3 chocolates and 6 dividers
which messes up how you are giving away your chocolates
See what ur saying makes sense but our prof went over something like this in class (not C but B) and he did it exactly the same way
this assumes that all of the bananas need to be distributed
we dont want to get rid of all ten chocolates here
then what could I do to resolve this?
this is the method of stars and bars (distribute n objects into k distinct bins such that each bin has at least one object). it should be (n - 1) C (k - 1), so in the banana example, 9 C 4
ahh ok, ill give that a shot, thansk sm man
im not sure why i just didnt do this first
lmaoo
allg
Before i let u go I jsut wanna make sure I did D correctly
i just took 19c9 - the number of bad options
is it that simple or am i missing a step
let me think on it
@serene marlin just to clarify, the number of ways to put n balls into k boxes with each box non-empty is (n - 1) C (k - 1). to see why, there are n objects lined up. there are n - 1 gaps between all of the objects. i need to choose k - 1 of these gaps to fill with a divider to determine a pairing of n objects into k boxes. the number of ways to do this is (n - 1) C (k - 1). in your case, it would be 19 C 9, i apologize all the confusion i caused earlier.
then yes for part d), just calculate the number of bad options and subtract it from 19 C 9
im quite tired atm haha
ur crazy for being tired and wanting to help ppl for math for fun
yea im just procrastinating all the work i actually need to be doing rn
np 🥲
just going through the first page of discrete mathematics textbook, the first questions asks:
'Use variables to rewrite the following sentences more formally.
- Are there numbers with the property that the sum of their squares equals the square of their sum?'
the solution goes,
but im wondering how how did we arrive that there is only variables of a + b
and wouldnt be a^2 + b^2 + c^2 = (a + b + c)^2 as well ?
or infintely more..
yeah I agree, the way it's phrased it's vague, what you said sounds good
thanks for clarifyin 👍
you're welcome
Any Idea to check isomorphism
Or
Sol.
The vertex you marked "a" definitely can't be it, since it has only two neighbors in the drawing, but three neighbors according to the list.
oh, sry i forgot to mention.
{a, b, c, d, e }
i think you may want to draw graph 1
okay well now looking at the drawings are you able to tell if they are isomorphic?
Nope, edges are different
i asked about isomorphism, not literal equality.
do you want the formal version or the informal version
Vertices-edges same ?
Just informal
I want to solve this just
two graphs are isomorphic if they are the same when stripped of all vertex and edge names
Okay
With different edges?.
what do you mean by "different edges"?
C has 2 edges a&d in graph one
But in graph 2 c has 3 edges a,d& b
these graphs are not equal, yes.
even though their vertex sets are the same, the edges are different.
but (and i am speaking informally here as you asked) ignoring all names produces the same picture for both graphs.
no
Can somebody please explain the first part of the proof( the part placed into parenthesis)? Because I literally don’t get it
This is not discrete math but you have a right triangle.
Next time try #precalculus
oh ok
could someone clarify to me what "lists of branded items can he come up with" mean?
does it mean how many branded items in total is available in the supermarket that he can get?
or does it mean how many variations of different brands can he get
he was asked to buy 2 detergent
and there are 5 brands of detergent there so I believe it asks how many ways he can buy 2 detergents
same for the others
5^2?
uuh no but idk
yeah i get what u mean
wait
to my understanding u just add all those
you should multiply them
because for every list of detergent he will also have a list of floor wax and also have a list of soda
hmm
can the generating function for $a_n^2$ be expressed in terms of the gf for $a_n$?
EdgarAlnGrow
@hollow mantle
sorry for the ping
have u been in touch with l'arithmétique recently?
nyways
so for part 2 1c
ive used the fact that x n y are a solution
so gcd(17x^(p-1);y^(p-1))=gcd(2021;y^(p-1))
then gcd(17x^(p-1);y^(p-1);p)=gcd(2021;y^(p-1);p)
and since gcd(2021;p)=1
then gcd(17x^(p-1);y^(p-1);p)=1
off, i remember that in terminal... I suffered
I don't remember the ^ notation tho
it's le plus grand diviseur commun
idk if u'll be able to help
Oh, so they are coprime
should I keep going?
no but wait
yes
mb i was thinking abt something else
anyways heres where i end up
wtf
i can eliminate the first case by setting p=17
the second one will give me the reslut i want
but idk how to discuss the third one
Honestly, it was a too long time ago, i'm sorry....
all good 😭
this means i have to translate
then im not going to translate it
Assuming I have
I think it doesn't
Because under mod 12
a is in a specific congruence set, and it's equivalent to all numbers in that congruence set
To change the modulo adds/decreases the number of congruence sets, and thus changes the meaning of what a repsresents
But I'm not sure if there's any relationship whatsover
?
And if I do
a = 3 + 12k
a * 3^- 1= 3^-1 * 3 + 4k
a ^+* 3^-1 = 1 + 4k
so
$$a * 3^{-1} \equiv 1 mod (4)$$?
ShadowIo
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
Is this true then?
Yes
But what if I wanan look at mod 24
$$a = 3 + 12k$$
$$2a = 6 + 24k$$
$$2a \equiv 6 \pmod{24}$$
ShadowIo
Doesn't this add issues
The inverse of 2 doesn't even exist
So does this only hold when you simplify or smth?
Because by multiplying I added solutions
Well not add solutions
like....made them all have a gcd > 1 :/
There's an idea called zero divisors
2 is a zero divisor of 24 and {2*12,2*0} are the only things that reduce to 0
So a-3 has to be 12 or 0 mod 24
Both cases reduce to your original solution
Actually you can never add solutions by multiplying with a constant that's not (new mod) or 0
Hmm I see
So like here, even though a = 15 would technically work, we can't consider it a solution
Because we have to take into account that a equiv 3 mod 12?
Yea
So here I wanted to find x such that 2x=24 ,2x=48 etc
You get x=12,x=24 etc which are 0 mod 12
Ah gotcha
@unreal stump Just wondering then...is they any approach I can take specifically that I can take with this.
I'm thinking that with any given modulo, you can learn more about modulo where it is a multiple of that modulo or a factor of that modulo
And that each time you have to make sure the number of solutions/the type of solution remains consistent?
Say you have a solution x=a mod m
And you consider solutions for kx=ka mod km
Then
k(x-a)=0 mod km
Which implies km divides k(x-a) which implies m divides (x-a)
Because k(x-a)=p km implies
k(x-a-pm)=0
Hmm, I see, that makes sense
But while doing this, you have to ensure your m remains an integer
And you have to remember not to lose or add any solutions?
Aka keep it consistent?
We started with m as an integer
I guess you meant p
We can take k as a common factor so that works out find
Hello , I just want to ask how is the answer, 6 in the second box
Let $a_n = 106$ and $a_{n-1} = 100$, do you see now?
Renegade
ohhh yes, thank you
to find the 10th term do i just have to substitute the n's by 10?
Hi, does anyone know what subject this is?
combinatorics
does this video explain it?
how can I tell you if I haven't watched the video
you have to watch it
are you perelman ?
What have you tried?
I just want to know what are the hypotheses and conclusions in these two proposition, could you help me?
I mean like
What do you think?
I could give you the answer sure
But that defeats the point of the question
I donno, I tried for 3 days, I'm stuck in implication, what's the answer? and why tell me pls
What did you do for those 3 days?
This is not a "figure out some complex trick to solve a puzzle" exercise. It's a "verify that you've understood what these words mean" check question. If you don't know that, you should have used your 3 days to look up the explanations of the words in the question in your textbook or whichever other source you're using.
Does your book/class/material/etc define "hypothesis" and "conclusion"?
tell me the answer just -_-
No.
I don't think that's productive at all, you might just have similar questions in a test and fail it if you just copy answers from a discord server
It's fine if you are unsure and even if your approach is completely off :p
But providing a starting point ensures ppl can help you master the concept...not the question, which will help you on ur exam
Your time will be spent much more usefully by actually trying to learn the material, than by begging for random people on the internet to tell you an answer so you can fake having understood something you feel is beneath you to even attempt.
Good try. Nope.
I know the definition of hypotheses and conclusion
look at the picture
these two proposition are different
Then what prevents you from answering the question yourself?
if you know, then why can't you give the answer simply?
Because that would just be enabling your habit of thinking you don't need to learn anything yourself.
seriously?
Yes.
As I said, this is not a puzzle.
Then why do I need think here?
It is a simple check question that verifies you have understoo what the words mean
Everything demands you think.
What do you think of the phrases? You know what a hypothesis and a conclusion is, what connection can you make to each word in the sentence?
If you had spend the same amount of effort on actually looking up what those words mean that you have now used on whining here because we won't help you cheat, you could already have answered the question.
I mean sure the question is simple... but just because something is simple doesn't mean the answer is given to you on your exam
okay tell me the definition of hypotheses and conclusion
I made this question by my own
That's cool and all xD
But.........let's start at the basics. What is a hypothesis? What is a conclusion?
What is the basic meaning of any conditional statement p -> q?
as my pdf says, p is hypotheses and q is conclusion


