#help-0
1 messages · Page 979 of 1
b=pr+s, 0≤s<r.
Yeah
you'd still need to justify that p is at least 1
you're only given that p is an integer
ah would I just say since a and b are greater than 0 then p also has to be greater than 0 but i don't think that works
that's a good start
if p was negative then b would be negative (given the restraints on r and s)
you need a little more than that for excluding 0
why can't b = s?
because s<b
by transitive property, yes
Closed by @balmy plank
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone explain the first part to me
How does x^3 -xy + y^3 differentiate to 3x^2-3y with respect to x
yes
Why is it 3y then
error maybe
@solar oasis Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
by 16 years, 99% of patients have at least a 2-year period of remission
can this be solved?
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
99% of the patients will have a crisis 2 out of 16 years
what percantage of time will one patient stay in crisis
@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @barren tulip
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
will somebody help
brother ive never seen this shit in my life
@lofty tartan Has your question been resolved?
So the line you've got there says
"The battery starts at 25% and drops to 0% one minute later"
Can you see why your line is saying that?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have no idea what to do here
i know theres 2 properties that determine if a function is a homomorphism
f(X + Y) = f(X) + f(Y)
and
f(c * X) = c * f(X)
where X and Y are vectors
but how do i check these properties
For the first property, choose two arbitrary vectors in the domain, in this case quadratics, say ax^2 + bx +c and dx^2 + ex + f. Plug these into the function, and see if you can manipulate one side of the property to get the other.
Less stylish but usually easier, simplify both f(x + y) and f(x) + f(y), show you get the same thing
Might not matter here though.
can you explain
im a little slow in lin alg tho so bear with me
we have f(x) = ax^2 + bx + c
right
thats the function they give us
Ah I see the problem
Yeah we should be consistent here
f(x) = ax² + bx + c
We shouldn't really think of this as a function, it's a polynomial. In this context, it doesn't take inputs/outputs, it's just an algebraic element in its own right
h(x) is the function they gave you, which takes quadratics, and returns members of R²
oh yeah so h requires quadratic inputs and gives back a matrix in 2 dimensional space?
In order to complete the question, you want to prove that
h(u + v) = h(u) + h(v)
h(au) = ah(u)
h gives back a vector with two real entries, yes
So as per the suggestion, compute h(u+v) for some general quadratics u and v.
Show that this is the same as h(u) + h(v)
ok ill give it a try right now
thank you
@placid zinc im confused
i am not doing this right
try collecting like terms on that last line
there are none ?
are there
ax^2 + dx^2 = ?
yep
OH
wait
do i group c + f
then i have a coeff for x^2, x, and 1
so then i can put that in the form of a matrix
right
a vector yes
a vector?
it looks like a matrix, but the rows in the example in the question are a+b, a+c, not a b, a c.
OH
RIGHT
righhtttt
ok so then i do the right hand side too
and see if they are equal
yes
brb
gonna try
]89
so this is the left hand side
BOOM
so since these are equal to each other, the function h is a homomorphism
perfect
right
thanks so much
linear algebra is so confusing
i feel like theres so many gaps that havent been closed
in my knowledge of this subject
it gets easier with practice
next time you have to prove something is a homomorphism, the argument will be very similiar to the one you just did
remember we aren't really treating the quadratics like functions currently
yes
wait
@blazing rose Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey I need some help with a calculus problem I don't know how to come up for more than one answer and I don't know how I am supposed to use non identity functions to solve the function operation
I keep getting 9-x for f(x) and square root of x for g(x) but that's apparently incorrect
doesn't it mean f composed with G
yeah but I've done that and I keep getting an incorrect answer and I don't know what they mean by non identity funcionts
*functions
an identity function is like y=x
where nothing changes the output from the input https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identity_function
In mathematics, an identity function, also called an identity relation, identity map or identity transformation, is a function that always returns the value that was used as its argument, unchanged. That is, when f is the identity function, the equality f(X) = X is true for all values of X to which f can be applied.
no identity functions is basically just saying don’t cop out and do something like f(g(x))=sqrt(9-g(x)) where g(x) is just x
it’s not what you did wrong
okay so let me try it again...
@hidden hazel Has your question been resolved?
almost there
so if F composed with G= H(x) which is square root of 9-x then I need to find the values of f(x) and g(x) that will equal h(x) when multiplied right?
not necessarily multiplied
or do they just want me to find the two functions
think of f(x) as an outer function and g(x) as an inner function
oh. wait...Yeah that helps a lot thanks
it might be helpful to rewrite it as
$\f(g(x)) = (9-x)^{\frac{1}{2}}$
got it so rewrite it and then solve. I kept trying to derive the answer from H(x) but that's not going to help so I'll rewrite it and try again
Dogecode
okay I'm officially stuck.
What r u trying to do
I'm trying to solve this problem but I can't figure out the two solutions or how to use the correct values
ill tell you those answers would be correct if it was asking for gof(x) [aka g(f(x))]
but it's not if Fog. so what do I need to substitute] differently
think about what you can separate out as the inner function that can be plugged into an outer function
this is a really good couple of examples of how this works
okay
do you have an answer? I think I know how it works but I want to be surer
*sure
also so I can prevent getting stuck like this on the SAT
yeah I'm really stuck
sorry
huh? You were just told it was correct if it asked for g(f(x))?
so try flipping definition of f and g?
@hidden hazel Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This rule of alturnating interior angles was mentioned nowhere in my textbook
why did they mention it here
also my textbook is algebra and trignometry by openstax
sorry
taken
i it took a while to upload sorry
okay
@native temple Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@native temple what’s the question exactly
Do you not know what “alternating interior angles” means
yes
I have no clue
Ah
It’s from geometry
Give me a sec
“Alternating interior angles” is just a fancy name for this Z shape
The thing about Z shapes is their angles are always equal. This is because a Z shape is symmetrical: it looks exactly the same if you rotate it a half turn around its center point. That means the angle at the top must be the same as the angle at the bottom. Does that make sense?
@native temple
I forgot geometry class
Don’t worry, just read that explanation and think about it for a second
yes it does
Ok cool
That’s really all there is to it
In your problem the Z is a little hard to see, but it’s there
waitI'm having trouble in my trig class who's final lectures are about problem solving
does this mean I just have to practice more math problems
yes....
Yeah so practice is really all there is to it, but there are a couple caveats.
First, you need to understand what you’re doing and why. If you’ve only learned how to mechanically solve a type of problem, but don’t really know why the method works, you’ll have a lot of trouble when the problem switches up a little bit.
Second, you need to have some good problems on hand. You can’t just keep doing the same type of problem over and over again. The whole vibe of problem-solving is being able to take a fundamental set of ideas and tools and apply them to a wide range of problems; having some good problems is very important for this.
openstax textbook?
No, I may have heard of it tho
free textbooks
Ah
…what?
Ok I just checked it out
This is my worst nightmare
It’s like they copied and pasted the same problems over and over again
Ok gimme a sec
I think I found a place with some good problems
how?
They just do the same category?
this textbook is bad???
It’s not bad per se
They have some good stuff
But the problems look dreadful
It’s like the students are chimpanzees, trained to do one task over and over again
It’s just sad
huh
I don't get it
it's just repeating the same problems
right?
Yes, that’s the issue
If you know how to do one of them, you know how to do all of them
There’s no new skill being attained; you’re just getting faster at doing one very specific type of problem
I think it's practice
in case you still struggle with one type of issue
besides I don't do all of those exercises
because that's just ehhh practice
Yeah
Well in any case
We need to find some trig problems that vary
I’m trying to look online
These are very good problems, pretty difficult
Do the first three (do not look at the solution until you have a final answer)
And let me know how it goes
I have to leave for 20 minutes now sorry
those don't they have different categories
I mean those are problems for a unit
Wdym by different categories
Like this is “law of sines” problem, this is a “Pythagorean identity” problem
So this might sound foreign to you, if you’ve never done problem-solving stuff
But that’s rubbish
Good problems are ones that arise naturally, and that you don’t know how to solve yet
They may use a variety of different ideas and techniques
how is that part of a unit?
Like if I say law of sines you would want to bring in law of cosines
and vectors
or polar coords
I suck at that with math
every time a lecture bring in someht8ng I didn’t know I get frustrated and fail
There’s no such thing as a “law of cosines” problem. You can have problems that use the law of cosines in the solution, but not the entire problem is based off of it
2 years ago I was crying about this literally not kidding
I totally get it
I know all this might sound ridiculous but the school system sucks at teaching math
my dad said it’s how school works I never fully accepted it
IDK i can’t judge the school system
Every mathematician would agree with this
I’ll only judge it when I’m out
You can absolutely judge it, you are the buyer, the consumer
Can someone help me with linear relations
I like to think I am, but I’m far from a professional one lmao
You probably have an idea that criticizing education as a student is “not your place”
it isn’t
It absolutely is your place. You’re the one receiving the product; you have the right to have an opinion about it
You just told me you were crying about this two years ago, and now you’re saying you as an individual have no right to criticize it
Yes
You don’t see the obvious problem here?
You were pushed to tears because you couldn’t do some math problems. You’re rejecting the evidence of your eyes and ears; the system is terrible and you know it
alright
Anyway
anyway
Uhh practice right?
Idk what you’re talking about there but practice problems that come a bit out of left field right?
I’m trying to help
But I can try to find some practice problems
You said you had that book
What was wrong with those problems?
@native temple
nothing
Really
Just I need to do them I guess
Ok
The problems don’t vary
But that’s irrelevant now
Im sure the problems in the book are fine for your class
Yeah, I think that’s a good idea
Definitely go across multiple units
Make sure you don’t forget anything
yep
Ok cool
So I think it would be good to review a bit of geometry
As you saw in the problem you posted, you need some tools from geo
I have baron’s regents geometry 2020
That was from a textbook not my course
the problem it was a similar one though
That’s probably fine
But it might be hard searching through a big textbook looking for review material
For example you won’t need to know about quadrilaterals
I can do it
Ok
uhhhh…right
Page 1 I guess
or that khan academy course
probably both
Khan academy is great
You could skim through their geometry course and stop whenever you see something you don’t know
Not exactly
Textbooks are mostly reference materials
They’re not really pedagogical, meaning they’re not good for learning something the first time through
But if it’s review then you’ll be fine
so what happends if you buy a textbook to learn soemthing and go thri it covor to covor
Someone did this right?
Yeah I did that once
I swear someone did this
What happends?
you’ll probably need a tutor if your school doesn’t have/isn’t at this class yet
Well the thing is, you need to buy the right textbook
The one I bought was meant for self-study
but what happenns?
do you not learn it?
No it was a great experience
That’s why I said it was like a course in book form as a good one has the same infomation
I learned everything very thoroughly and it was fun
Yeah
You gotta get the right textbook tho
I bought a textbook once that was not pedagogical, and it was really painful trying to self-study it
And of course @native temple if you have trouble with any problem feel free to post it here
Oh the openstax is is definitely pedalogical(literally just looked up what that meant)
Oh that’s great
Are you comfortable reading their explanations? Some textbooks are quite dry
there was one explaination of radians
that was confusing but
everything else is fine
Ok that’s good
Openstax?
yes
From what I’ve seen they’re super mid
But the fact that they’re free kinda makes up for it I guess
wdym mid?
oh
I may be judging too harshly
probably mathmaticiand made this
It’s a standard textbook, I’m sure any course could use it and it would be great
Ehh
The mathematician may have wrote the book
but they probably didn’t come up with what to teach, or any of the problems, or any of that
Often it’s school boards and whatnot that decide those things
Which is why what you learn from year to year is pretty disconnected and random
uhhhh Did you expect above avergae IDK what that even looks like
I mean a textbook if it’s good snd pedatricsl contains the same info as a course
I mean, when the average is garbage, then what can you expect? yknow
sometimes right down to assignments(science textbooks’
This is garbage?
No, I’m exaggerating a bit lol
It’s not garbage it’s very okay
Again maybe I’m judging too harshly, this is an okay textbook for a high school or university course
Nah lmao
I’ve been exposed to math outside the school system, so I have an ounce of perspective
Here
you’re a college student
I will leave this here, maybe you’ll understand my strong views on this subject
This is a fantastic essay (written by a mathematician, no less) criticizing the K-12 math education system
Even if you disagree with his argument, I think it’s worthwhile to read because his writing is excellent
Anyway, I have to go
Let me know if you have any trouble with any problems
See ya
@native temple Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If you buy 6 pens and one pencil, you get 1$ change back from your 10$ bill, but if you buy 4 pens and 2 oencils, you get 2$ change, how much does each cost?
have u tried setting up a system of equation?
the thing is idk how
we got this in the homework and we havent done it
i tried something like 6x+y=9 and 4x+2y+8, is that what you meant?
something like that. idk if that eq is 100% for sure, but definitely the thought process I was thinking
I would rearrange the first eq u proposed so it equalled y. then sub it in
the 6 would be negative and the 9 positive
@short cobalt ive tried numbers but i cant find one that makes sense in the other equation
what do u mean?
like i cant sub in anything that makes sense
@calm bone Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone explain to me this? I get how it could be pi/2, and 3pi/2, but not the other two
can you post what you've done so far?
this isn't right
sadkid
d/dx sin^2(x) = 2sin(x)*cos(x)
lol
double angle
ye
when you set cos(x)=0 you get pi/2 and 3pi/2, but there should be another factor aswell
did you simplify further?
I emailed my prof, i think I got it now
👍
.close
Closed by @stone hill
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
Find angle V first
Yes
so
You need to find WVU first so you can then find WVX
No
What
So first we know that the angles of a triangle make 180
yes
For angle V? No
they said add
So W + U + WVU = 180

Then you would substitute the angles you know for each of the values
So W + U then add W again?
oh
Its sometimes important to differentiate angles, so thats why i put <WVU
No
WVU=WVX?
No, thats the thing
The letters show the points that create the angle, the letter in the middle showing where the angle is
The point is in X?
Points/vertices*
points
Lets just move on
ok
No, slow down for a sec
Ye
ok
But we still dont have our answer
ye
So to complete the angle from 74degrees
do we add
No
subtract?
74 -
180-74
Thats the answer
Closed by @warm latch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is there such thing as an element of a matrix
like could I say $a \in \begin{bmatrix} a & b \ c & d \end{bmatrix}$?
guh mode
or am I being dumb
y value is same for every x.
please get your own channel
sorry
What do you mean?
Closed by @elfin snow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @sterile vale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do you show that a point. say |X| at 0,0 is not differetiable? I know if their derivitives arn't equal its not differentiable.
Eg at 0,0 the derivitive on the right is 1 and the left is -1
is that all I need to say?
yes
@daring kindle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I stuck at here
Idk how to deal with the f(tx,ty) and f(x,y) since the question just said f
@zenith compass Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @zenith compass
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
This is my question
This is my work
@zenith compass Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
f'(x,y) doesn't make sense
The prime notation only makes sense for functions of one variable
f is a function of two
@zenith compass Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Two connected pipes have inner diameters 8cm and 10 cm. Theese pipes want to be replaced with one pipe so, that the flow speed will stay same. How big should be the pipes inner diameter?
@wild pebble Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@wild pebble Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
product?
recursion?
integral?
@dark schooner Has your question been resolved?
I mean you can obviously also integrate a discrete function.
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can anyone vouch that the best way to learn math is by practicing?
yes
I mean you still need to be able to understand and learn the theory before being able to practice on it
But yes, practice is the most important component to learning math in my opinion
@static basin Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @static basin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Thank you!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
7x3+3/3=8
what is the truth value of this? do we consider pemdas? if i use pemdas, it will be always false
if the mathematical sentence is true or false
The Fractalogist
that's the problem, the sentence is ambiguous
?
it is written this way 7x3+3/3=8
Closed by @valid tundra
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i kind of want a full explanation on solving 5.
@desert compass Has your question been resolved?
@desert compass Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please help, lesson title is : Polygon and Other Related Terms
What parts do you know?
@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?
@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Question 14. Im stuck on it
So you have the interest, rate, and time
You can calculate the principal
Closed by @sturdy kayak
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i get the parametric representation for a line out of something like this?
or carthesian, doesn't matter
just a way to find the direction vector?
a more efficient way than just finding 2 random points
well you could take one of the variables (doesnt matter which) as your parameter
and express everything else in terms of it
Closed by @neat apex
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If there is a horizontal tangent at point (c,f(c)), does that mean f'(c) = 0
yes
Closed by @grave oyster
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Read this.
Huh
Not that hard to see/read
I’m trying to calculate t so I added 5 to u and left v w alone and it’s wrong
Try using u + t = v
So U is negative because that is t’s origin
Or is there a different reasoning for it
.close
Closed by @misty eagle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Could someone help me with this please
Could someone show me step by step explanation? I have no idea how to do it
<@&286206848099549185>
@violet panther Has your question been resolved?
-((x/2)-3)^4 -3
I think
Set
f(x) = -(x^4) -3
You add the minus 3 part because you’re going down 3 units on the y axis
Then you also need to make the x^4 negative because you are reflecting on the x axis
Now u need to find f(x/2 - 3)
For translations on the x plane, you do the opposite (if you want to move three right, you need to subtract three)
Same for dilation on the x axis. If you want to dilate by a factor of 2 about the y axis (which spreads it wider horizontally on the x axis), you need to instead divide by 2
So your equation is
^
^
Closed by @violet panther
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can anyone explain me how i know in which corner is the angle alpha, beta or gamma?
@sharp storm Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, problem is a student is waiting for a bus to school, there are 2, bus A and B, and the time they appear are 2 random variables of exponential distribution, for which I have 2 parameters, λa = 1/10 and λb = 1/20. Let T be the time the student is waiting, I need to demonstrate that T is a exponential variable of parameter 3/20.
At the top of my head I could think I just have to sum both parameters, but what's the explanation for that?
How do you prove that the solution set to the system of linear equations Ax=b is not a vector space?
@slim idol Has your question been resolved?
@mellow saffron
oops, wrong ping, sorry
<@&286206848099549185>
@slim idol Has your question been resolved?
Google poisson distribution bus problems
Closed by @slim idol
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
someone help please
<@&286206848099549185>
@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?
@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?
@alpine sable use your chain rule
To find what F'(x) would be
oh sorry
Note how the channel has a name next to it
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@worldly skiff
Coolio
This is another property that ideally you wanna prove to use to save time for that question
So you don't have to keep repeating it
I see
The online proof also uses it to say r|a and r|b implies r|s
since s is the gcd(a,b)
I'll post the full proof here again
yeah so why are you allowed to just assume a|b a|c and what frame of mind leads you do decide to do that?
I think for proofs the most important part to get down is the frame of mind
Like for example for regular induction equality proofs my frame of mind is to
"try to match IS with IH by separating k+1 terms"
Person online is just stating the property to use
They actually don't do anything with that 1st statement
OHHH
They mention it as reasoning for why r|b and r|d tells us that r|d-bc
And why s|a and s|b implies s|a+bc
how exactly does r|d-bc work?
And then they use algebraic manipulation with d=a+bc to get r|a and s|d
I can post that snippet as I finished that part
but yeah here's my (so far) frame of mind for euclidean proofs
1. Take gcd(b,c) = a and turn it into a|b, a|c
I think I'm missing s|a+bc part but I'm kind of confused how to incorporate that
I took out the property the online proof used to show how long it is to prove this
When you can just prove the property or mention it (if allowed) to save time
So yeah. That's why that person did so
similar reasoning for s|a+bc part
why were you aiming for r|(d-bc) ?
the reason why was that we know d=a+bc
we wanna say r|a
and from d=a+bc we get a=d-bc
it comes up later in the proof, but we want r|a
So that we can say r|a and r|b, so r|gcd(a,b) aka r|s must be true
Are you familiar with Bezout's lemma by any chance
ok then why do you know that
r|b, r|b means r|d-bc or r|a?
absolutely not
Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh okay then proving r|a and r|b implying r|gcd(a,b) will be a bit trickier
so r|d-bc and r|a are equivalent
because a=d-bc
yeah I get that a = d-bc
We know that r|b and r|d means r|d-bc by what I posted up a bit earlier
A lot of divisibility proofs starts with the definition and then algebraic manipulation
damn this is really tricky please give me like 2 minutes
For sure
I'm gonna get food rn, so I might be a bit before I respond
Or I'll be responding a bit slower cause phone
Once you’re done looking at that. Take a look at this
This shows why s|a and s|b implies s|a+bc
I'm just wondering from how you did r|d-bc
Is it True to also say that
For some x,y in whole numbers
r|dx-by
using the same frame of logic?
You are basically applying
a|bx+cy frame of logic but subtraction so it is valid right?
(I'll also go get food will still be on discord)
Yep. All statements you said are correct
I'll eat for a bit and then can explain the r|a and r|b implying r|gcd(a,b) part
I'll also go eat.
I guess a more general formula for this would be
$gcd(b,c) = a \implies a|b \land a|c \implies a|bx \pm cy \land a|cy \pm bx$, Note that x and y can be 1.
Salt
I'll ask about the later steps after I get food then
tysm
No problem. Def work on what else you need or take a look at other questions in the mean while
I'll @ when I get back to my dorm room after class
@cunning raven Has your question been resolved?
@cunning raven Has your question been resolved?
@cunning raven Has your question been resolved?
@cunning raven
hihi
I can't help too much for longer as I gotta work on some hw with a friend, but I got like 30 minutes to go over stuff atm
aight
So we got through most of it. We just have to do the r|a and r|b stuff onwards
I'm gonna post this theorem called Bezout's Lemma. I'm not sure if your professor has gone over it yet or not. But I can post the proof if you want it. Unsure though what you learned in Discrete rn though, so proof may not make the most sense
This is Bezout's lemma
We need to use this theorem to prove that if something divides a and b
Then it also divides it's gcd
And here is that
I just picked random variable names. This has no relation to the problem. It's just showing why the property works
So that's why from r|a and r|b, they could say r|gcd(a,b). And since gcd(a,b)=s, r|s
And then they do the same thing for s|b and s|d. So s|gcd(b,d). gcd(b,d)=r. So s|r
a|b, a|c, a|bx+cy is bezout's lemma?
a|b, a|c, a|bx+cy is not bezout's lemma
Bezout's Lemma is that for any integers a,b
There exists some other integers x,y that we can multiply against them
Such that their sum equals the gcd
So ax+by=gcd(a,b)
I can try to explain the proof, but it might take a bit. Do you know about well ordering principle and division algorithm? If not then for now, just accept that Bezout's Lemma is true and that we can use it to show that d|a and d|b implies d|gcd(a,b)
Ofc go back and take a look at it when you have more time
I kind of know division algorithm for euclidean but idk what well ordering principle is
Ah okay then no problem. Well Ordering Principle is simple enough. It says that every non-empty set of positive integers contains a least element
But for now then we'll not worry about it. Let's accept Bezout's lemma at face value and using that we get d|a and d|b implies d|gcd(a,b)
wait so with bezout you can do
$a|b \land a|c \implies a|gcd(b,c)$
So using that same property and logic. r|a and r|b implies r|s. s|b and s|d implies s|r
Salt
So a|b and a|c getting the whole a|bx+cy is a different thing than Bezout's Lemma
$a|b \land a|c \implies a|bx+cy$ is a property of divisibility. doesn't have any fancy name I am aware of
3K
so altogether you have
$a|b \land a|c$
$\implies a|bx \pm cy \land a|gcd(b,c)$
Salt
Bezout's Lemma says that there exist some x,y such that you can make a linear combination with a and b, so that ax+by=gcd(a,b)
So for Bezout's Lemma all you need to know is are a,b integers
$\forall a,b \in \mathbb{Z}, \exists x,y \in \mathbb{Z} \implies ax+by=gcd(a,b)$
3K
So all you need to know is that a,b are integers. Then boom Bezout's Lemma applies
I can post the proof at the end for you to look at after we sort out through the current proof
is it possible to form a relationship between property of divisibility and bezout's lemma?
since I noticed that they have the same conditions of $a|b \land a|c; a,b,c \in \mathbb{Z}$
Salt
But there's multiple properties of divisibilities, so not one good way to generalize it
And ah so here's a big distinction
a|b and a|c, where a,b,c, are integers, are the necessary assumptions to say that a|bx+cy
bezout only requires that a,b are integers
so that divisibility property requires 3 conditions. bezout only requires the one
you use a lot of them in conjunction with each other. you can def try to generalize some stuff using both together
but be careful to not mix up conditions
This is all the theorems I have so far
Oh shoot I should have specified. That's my bad
First three are all good and yes. All divisibility proofs you work on should have everything be an integer
The one you have below it is not Bezout's lemma. That's just another property of divisibility and gcd
1 is actually just more simplified version of 3
That theorem is correct. It's just not Bezout's Lemma
Here is Bezout's Lemma
Yeah. There's a lot of overlap between them
This is Bezout's Lemma
Kinda tiny to see though
Lemme see if I can make it bigger
is there much importance in deliberately stating the x and y part in proofs?
I thought it's main use is just get c|gcd(a,b)
You use Bezout's Lemma actually for a lot of other things, so it is still important
ok
the c|gcd(a,b) is just one of the things you can prove using Bezout's Lemma to help
ax+by looks really similar to divisibility
Yeaaaaaaah. Divisibility, Bezout, Division + Euclidean Algorithm, gcd, lcm stuff are all really similar
I kinda group them all together in my head as they rely on divisibility definition a lot and algebraic manipulation
I'm kind of confused how the separate divisibility preconditions apply for bezout
c|a and c|b for example
how does it satisfy ax+by
wait
I'm messing up lettering
fixed?
Notation looks all fine with what you have. The separate divisibility preconditions don't matter for Bezout at all
Maybe it would have been better if I picked different variable names for Bezout
But the c|ax+by from c|a and c|b
Is not necessarily the same for ax+by=gcd(a,b)
c|ax+by NEEDS the preconditions of c|a and c|b to be true
ax+by=gcd(a,b) does NOT need the precondition of c|a and c|b to be true
it only needs that a,b are integers
oh wait
c|ax+by is essentially the same as c|gcd(a,b)
so bezout uses same process as divisibility before it reaches c|ax+by
bezout is just the conversion of ax+by into gcd(a,b)
That's one way to think of it. I'm sure your teacher will cover it in more detail when the time arrives
How long has the discrete class been going
Are you guys on a quarter, trimester, or semester system
I watch another prof's lectures online but like i said he's sick for divisibility and euclidean
uh
we're on semester system
my current prof's lectures confusing af
Ah gotcha. Our discrete classes are structured differently then. I'm on quarter system and we learned divisibility first then sets when I took the class
And yeah it's rough. Idk if your teacher is super old or not
quick question does ax-by or by-ax still work for gcd
he's new to teaching this course this is his first year
But our math department has a lot of really nice professors, but they're all really old
And with COVID their technological skills leave room for improvement
Ah gotcha
do you mean like does bezout's lemma still apply for ax-by=gcd(a,b)?
and such
yeah that's also fine
x,y can be positive or negative
same thing a,b
so signs and order don't matter too much
since addition is commutative
aka yes what you said is correct
😎
Alright let's try to finish off the proof. So we have r|s and s|r because we proved that d|a and d|b implies d|gcd(a,b) part
So now we just have the last two lines to explain. The last one is self-explanatory. It's just restating what we wanted to prove, so I won't go over that
The last really important part is understanding why r|s and s|r means that r=s
yeah that's the core of the frame of mind when doing this proof imo
your target is to match the two
but I'm still confused
Exactly
So, a key implication from r|s
That you might wanna write down with the definition of divisibility is that r|s implies r<=s
$r|s \implies r \leq s$
3K
Let's think of this intuitively. We know that r|s is saying that r is a factor of s
yeah that part makes sense
yeah
Then we can finish up the proof
So we know r<=s from r|s
Then we also know that
$s|r \implies s \leq r$
3K
I see
So we have these two inequalities that we have to satisfy and BOTH have to be true
Because we know that r|s and s|r
So the only way for both inequalities to be true is if s=r
Thus, from the two inequalities s=r
And those were set equal to the gcd stuff
So then you just rewrite what the question wanted you to prove
And you're done
so how do you know right away that you are trying to match the two just from the question itself
If there's any other last clarifications you need lemme know, but I think that about covers it. I'll post Bezout's lemma here too for you to look at
But you don't need to fully understand it
So, that's part of some proof strategies
With the information that you're given, you should first assume that the proof is divisibility based
like for example this one I didn't have to match the two
This is because of the definition of gcd
so let me get that for you
Again a bit small unfortunately
but the gcd definition is based off of divisibility
and this just comes with practice
but a common way to prove something is equal to one another in divisibility
is by getting a|b and b|a
So the person realized "Hey. This is a gcd problem where they want me to get something equal. I know that gcd definition involves divisibility, so if I can get r|s and s|r. Then I know r=s"
Did I mess up writing 4 then?
Let me take a look
was it supposed to be
$(ng)|h \land h|(ng)$