#help-0
1 messages · Page 875 of 1
Yes
correct?
my apologies i thought yall were finished with your problem. sorry for interrupting
and the first one*
help
can't you just cancel the square and square roots?
then its just 2(root12-4) + (root 48 - 6)
no, its a squared + 2ab + b squared
u cant cancel anything
like i kinda know how to do it, but its too complex for me to figure it out
take a look at this
you can't do that?
not sure if it helps lol
then cancel it down further etc
idk
yeah, he got a point
leme get on paint
Hi guys
there.
Don't do people's work for them
ah
it wasnt correct anyways
the answer was 2
this was correct
who's the sad that keeps deleting the messages lol?
sorry, had to delete
cause this
anyways
you know the answer know
though it doesn't show all the steps to get there
Think of it as coordinates
1,4 in the matrix
So row 1, column 4
That element
What equation would I use to set this up?
I do not need the answer I just need to know how to setup or just what this type of equation is called so I can watch a YouTube video
Do you agree that base * height = area
Yes
its german
Just plug what you know into that and you have your equation
can someone please explain <@&286206848099549185>
I got that x = 2sqrt(10) but it’s not right from the equation 50 = x^2+10 @bleak ridge
can someone please help me on math space
<@&286206848099549185> please help
i want my last bounds to be wrt z
so integral from 0 to 4 of A dz
where A = area of each "layer"
i need help finding the double integral for A
can someone help me with my pre calc
Depends
how would you identify the answer
Where is 270 degrees on the circle?
B
ok remember the - in the -5
that means instead of being B it would be A because you are going in the opposite direction
so the steps to solve these kinds of questions are
first find the degrees on the circle
then if there is a negative symbol choose the opposite direction
so would this one be C
yes
okay thank you
no problem 🙂
what if the degree and radians are negative?
Then you go the other way around the circle, you can find out what amount of degrees this is by doing 360 - (degrees negative). For example say you have -90 degrees then you do 360-90 = 270 degrees (from there just solve it normally)
I have -60 so would i pick the line that is on 300 right?
yes
thank you
np
They might give you a question where the degrees are more than 360, say for example 900. What you do there is subtract 360 till you get a number less than 360. i.e. 900-360 = 540, 540 - 360 = 180 then you use 180
is this channel available ?
I think so unless @hollow dew has anymore questions?
im good thank you
Maybe ya should work out the scale of y axis first? >_>
lets say i have a 1% chance to win the lottery
how many tries must i take in order to up it to 80%
or around 80%
160
that's not possible
if you have a 1% chance to win the lottery, then you always have a 1% chance to win the pottery unless the probability itself changes
that's pretending to not understand
1 − 0.99 ^ x = 0.8
0.99^x = 0.2
x = 0.99log 0.2
x = ln 0.2 / ln 0.99
x = 160
Pottery 😂
so when i have a 100% chance to win the lottery, and i try ten times, do i suddenly have a 1000% chance of winning?
yeah, you don't get 1000% doing this
Probability of any event is strictly less than or equal to 1
But this q is intriguing for me
you can't increase the probability of something happening just by making it happen multiple times.
you can't try several times, and know that your next try is 80%
that's imnpossible, it's gambler's fallacy, 2/3 is right
but you can commit to doing 160 tries, and you'll have 80% to win
so depends on which one you want
either impossible or trivial
Because of the controversy you never have to use a bracket right
Only parens if you want?
you can use parentheses all the way, but sometimes multiple instances of them can be nauseating
What’s nauseating
an issue here is whether a "try" is for the same lottery or for the next
So i don’t even need to know how to ever use a bracket in Calc and just always use parens. Cool
uncomfortable to look at, i meant
yeah, that's a third interpretation
Can I give you an example
that's definitely pretending to not understand
Or I’ll wait till you help frowny
i'm clear, thank you it's actually π_π after me
you don't do parens for the fraction
yeah all parens everywhere is what people do
About the lottery problem, i think every lottery should be independent of one another
So the chance of you winning the lottery can only be 1% for every lottery
Correct me if I’m wrong
Is this channel open
Where is that undefined
Is it at -2
The fact that the denominator is squared is what’s confusing me
Yeah, It's at -2. Only at -2 in the real numbers
Why does number 5 how no POI
This is my work
I got the correct derivatives
I did the first derivative test correctly
I think the second one is done correctly also but why is there no point of inflection
Is it because it is undefined at -2?
Can someone help me with 1A and 1b
I missed class directions
And I have no clue if the acceleration that is solved from the equation is plugged into the velocity or the initial or final acceleration is plugged into the velocity equation
I had a question in progress
help
i did product rule but idk how to simplify it
i dont even know if i did it right
What you need to differentiate it?
yes
you dont even need to use the product rule for this one
chain rule, yes
ok can u tell me how to do it
f(x) = g(h(x))
f'(x) = g'(h(x))*h'(x)
i got the derivative of each
but idk how to simplify
what'd you get after you took the derivative
(3sin^2(x))(cos(x)(-3cos^2(x))(sin(x))
WAIT
i typed the
negative sign wrong
yes i believe so, it looks like you're multiplying everything together
(3sin^2(x))(cos(x)-(3cos^2(x))(sin(x))
ok so i did this
is it wrong
yes that's correct
ok how would i simplofy it
simplify
factor terms
how
do both sides have a 3
Painful but basically for 1).
4^2 is 16 right?
So you know the root of 17 will be 4. Something
hundredths? yikes
But cause you want it to the nearest hundredth you need it to be 4.ab
Which is painful
Oh that’s even more painful than I though
Is there any calculator for this shit tho
Any calc can do this
But cause it said approximate I thought you had to work it out mentally
@north needle okay what equation could I say to the calculator
Like Photomath
To recognize it
use (a+b)^2 = a^2+2ab+b^2
and
set a to 4 and be to like 0.1
what's next
If you want to do it on a calc all you are doing is plugging in numbers
why to hundreths bruh
You can literally do this
Approximating to the hundredths is pain
That’s 2).
yeah
how are you meant to mentally approximate to the hundredths
I'm only 13 grade 7 lawl and they ask me to approximate to 100
i guess just take a guess, then square it
if it’s too big go down a bit
too small go up a bit
anyone know how to create a slide with only one function/graph that will let the marbles slide and hit all the stars
here’s an example of how it works
but the trick is you can only use one function to solve this
The population of City X in 2010 was 896000. It grew to 1444000 by 2020. Assuming the maximum supportable population of this city is 2300000, use the logistical growth model to predict the population in 2030.
Can someone dm me please
It's actually simple if you take a closer look at it. Just think which two triangles you need to prove as congruent so as to conclude that AB=ED? @summer sage
so if bc=ad and ea=ac then ab=ed cuz it's sss?
where's the f?
Check again dear. There's no F
oh sry lol I meant ea
ss alone does not imply congruency between triangle ACB and EAD
Think. You're supposed to prove that AB=ED. So you can't use SSS then
can I use sas?
For that you need an angle to be equal. Now tell me can you see/find a pair of equals angles?
bca and ead?
how would you prove that they're equal?
That's right. But you gotta find a way to prove that they're equal
that's where I'm stuck on actually
Dude. Change your picture man. It looks like you're laughing at other discord users 😂😂😂
It's kinda funny though
lmao
Check triangle ACD
it's kinda cute
I'm confused
Angles opposite to equal sides are equal
Nooo
uh
the specific measures of the angles aren't really relevant to the problem
hmmm
In triangle ACD check which two sides are equal and then which two angles are equal because of the previous reason
You're not wrong but the reasoning behind it is wrong
hmm
the important clue here is complements
Can anyone here help in logic?
Please help me 😔
I've been asking all day and have not gotten any help
It's annoying that I need to keep asking
I will pay someone to help me
See in triangle ACD,
AD=CD(given)
It implies that ACD=CAD
BCA and EAD both are supplimentary angles of ACD and CAD respectively
So we can conclude that ACD=EAD
@summer sage
ohhhhhh thank you so much
mouse moment
So sorry man. I don't know how to go about this problem but I surely will think about it though
how do i solve this with either direct comparison test or limit comparison test?
i dont get to use ratio test
testing for convergence or divergence
Here it forms a geometric progression with a particular first term and common ratio.
But I haven't come across these terms though, direct comparision test, limit comparision test and ratio test
I can help you find the sum of this series up to infinity. But I don't know if that's required here
i need to prove it converges
Have you done logic, @lethal ore?
Simple to show it converges by geometric series
can someone help me on this
probably show that $\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{\frac{9^2}{10}\left(1-\left(\frac{9}{10}\right)^n\right)}{1-\frac{9}{10}}$ converges would be enough?
Muzan Jackson
I got nothing. Sorry ☹️
You still there?
In order to prove that the series is converging, we gotta show that the sum of those term would be a constant term. I can prove that the series is converging in this way. Let me know if you wanna know further @agile fulcrum
is this channel open?
is the limit of a log the log of a limit?
no
for when x > 0, possibly
actually, it might always be equivalent, i am unsure
i'll go with yes, yes it is
no brainer question, welp
If anyone is interesting in helping lemme know
Help
Multiply across and simplify if possible
Bro what does that even mean
I’m tryna get answers 😭
howd you get that
wait ill show 1s
cheers
Huh?
idk if its correct u can check
$$\frac{a}{b}\cdot\frac{c}{d}=\frac{ac}{bd}$$
Leslie Miller
Lol messed up
@west glen basically i subtracted an extra tan^2 (x) from both sides to get the identity sec^2 x - tan ^2 x = 1
and then u get 2tan^2 x = 8
Tanx = 2
What is considered the standard inner product of vectors?
-2 aswell
oh sorry
Henlo again
@rough compass thx man
Yep
can someone help me with ppart a?
my course material never explicitly states how to determine the bandwidth off a sine, since it goes negative and all
is this channel open?
P and J have pills, if P has 2 more pills thans he has irl, they would have each one 11 pills . If J has 2 more pills than he has irl, they would have each one 10 pills, how many pills has P and J ?
and what's troubling you here?
do you have some work to show?
Yep
okay, then out with it
you should have presented it at the beginning instead of waiting for someone to come along and ask
there are several mistakes here
Really?
one that can be attributed to a typo - the denominator in the second line is supposed to be 3 - 2i^2
and another that isn't: 2i * (-sqrt(2)i) is not equal to -2sqrt(2)i.
Can u explain why?
why don't you instead explain why you think $ai \cdot bi = abi$?
Ann
because it seems that by your logic multiplying i with itself would just give you i again instead of -1, and that flies in the face of the very definition of the imaginary unit.
You said my mistake was in -2i times -2sqr(2i) right?
It should be -ab
at no point did i mention -2sqrt(2i), and at no point did that appear in your work either.
do not shove i under a square root when it was not under a square root.
you have an i^2 that you have for some reason chosen not to rewrite as -1
Yeah, but what would that change?
What would I do after that?
It would just be + 2 (sqrt 2)
yeah well you now have some real terms and some imaginary terms
i hope it doesn't take a huge stretch of the imagination to rewrite -2i + 2sqrt(3)i as one term
Then what would I do?
Lol
your fraction is almost done
all that you need to do now is a little cleanup
(sqrt(6) + 2sqrt(2) + (-2+2sqrt(3))i)/5
Math written in words confuses me
Lmao but thanks
I pretty sure I know what i need to do
how do u solve dis
I’ll write out the first term for you
n=1
t_1= 2t_0 - 3
t_1=2(1)-3
t_1=-1
Now use this idea for the next 3 terms. Plug in n, then see that the (n-1) term has already been found by the last iteration
i) because AC, BC and AB are the radius of the circle
AC = BC = AB = 10cm
ii) now ∆ABC is equilateral therefore angle b = 60° or π/3
Now use the Linear pair property and find out the angle CBE.
iii)you can calculate the region CBE perimeter by add the radius and the arc length.
Arc length: S = r*theta
iv) To calculate the area of CBE use sector area formula.
If your question has not been answered for a minimum of 15 minutes, you may use the Helpers tag once. Please do not try to bump your question using this ping unnecessarily. Do not abuse this ping. Do not individually ping users with the Helpers tag without their express permission.
oh sorry
log(0.5) is a negative number, so 2log(0.5) > 3log(0.5)
ok ty!
do you mean pi + pi/2?
oh, so you think the stuff you circled should be pi + (pi/2)/2?
yes
can someone explain
so pi + pi/4, in other words.
yes like that
pls
...ok @hardy geyser we're gonna have to move
how
i tried
is it like t
they replace x with 0 to find y
and they replace y with 0 to find x
it says to find the intercepts it occurs when or the other is 0
yes
so i’m guessing that’s how i do it
i just figured it out
u
thanks
oh cool
nice name
thanks
hiya fellas how would i do this? I'm guessing t is the subject so i'd put p there instead but then what?
???
^ Yes. Remove anything not attached to p and then anything attached to p
i don't get it xd
the inverse of -2 is?
+2
yeah add it to the other side
yes so what do u do to the other side
idk
3p = t + 2
ooohh
the inverse of multiplying is dividing
@alpine sable YouTube search how to calculate square root with division method.
In a cubic equation let's say
ax³ + bx² + cx + d = 0.
How do we write this in form of
my³ + nx + o = 0?
Tried watching YouTube and they were trying something with synthetic division but didn't understand why they were doing that.
Ping if possible.
sup y'all
i've tried to graph a parabola in ALEKS but the result is always seems to differ from the Mathway ones
is there any solution for this, from a mathematical perspective?
Yes. Remember what a function is. For an input you get an output.
For synthetic division to work you need to create placeholder terms to account for the missing terms w/ variable
@alpine sable hey is my answer right here
The other one is the question
And the one below is the answer
Looks good 
@lapis hedge All correct?
ye
doesn't look related lol
fuck
where is 138 from
Totally fucked up
also your presentation is oof
It looks reasonable but tbh how were you supposed to approximate it?
I don't even know they just said appromixate to the nearest hundretjs
@woeful pulsar anyways my answer here is all spot on right?
tbh I don't feel this should be simply "plug into calculator" assignment
but since you have it, it feels really pointless lol
so this is basically right @woeful pulsar lol
yeah I guess, assuming you rounded correctly
can someone tell me an equation to sum
1+1/2+1/3+1/4+1/5.…....+1/n
there's no closed form iirc
why do you want to sum it
i was watching something then i found this thing called the euler-macheroni constant (i probably spelt it wrong)
i was wondering if i could calculate it from
(integral from 1 to inf of 1/x) - (that sum at n=+infinity)
yeah there are ways let me check something
hi there is french students here by coincidence ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fw1kRz83Fj0
yeah hmm, this might help
The longest Mathologer video ever! 50 minutes, will this work? Let's see before I get really serious about that Kurosawa length Galois theory video :)
Today's video is another self-contained story of mathematical discovery covering millennia of math, starting from pretty much nothing and finishing with a mathematical mega weapon that usually on...
but idk, it seems to only sum converging series ig
mathologer has quite a bit on it
1/n diverges i think
let me search other stuff
welp found this from another mathologer video @strange coral but I don't think it converges that quickly
The value of Euler's or Mascheroni's constant $\gamma = \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} (1 + \frac{1}{2} + \cdots + (1/n) - \ln n)$ has now been determined to...
Apparently that power sum thing can be used, Donald Knuth used it to calculate it to 1271 places @strange coral
oh wow
what's your aim here?
any further questions?
nope
was just a random thought while watching random math videos lol
Seems to be true, however I might be wrong
@vapid oak thank you very much
do you think it is true or false?
good morning! I need some assistance on an assignment
if someone could pls just tell me how to do it and the process before getting the answer, that'd be great!
Depending on what branch of math it is, I'd be happy to help as best as I can
it is statistics for advanced math decision making
Yeah I'm sorry I can't help you there. Either someone else can help you or you can ping the helpers in 15 minutes 🙂
send help
is it 1/216
<@&286206848099549185> Hi! Could really use help on my statistics work, I just need someone to coach me through all six questions please! :)
repost of what I need done ^
what's the difference of the 'a' in the formulas of ellipse and hyperbola?
can no one help me?! 😭
Ans me first
it is the green triangle, in the first round the blue square cannot be the prize since of its unique shape and the yellow circle cannot be the prize because of its unique color, otherwise one of them would know where the prize is at. In the second round the three remaining shapes are the green triangle, the blue triangle and the green circle. The green circle cannot be the prize since it has a unique shape of the remaining shapes and the blue triangle cannot be the prize since it has a unique color of the remaining shapes. This only leaves the Green triangle by the start of the third round which means that both people would know the prize.
how do i get better at maths? without the help of school
any good tips
im not entirely shit
i mean
where do i learn about new stuff
if its not for school
try these channels they're pretty cool
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCoxcjq-8xIDTYp3uz647V5A
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCYO_jab_esuFRV4b17AJtAw
3Blue1Brown, by Grant Sanderson, is some combination of math and entertainment, depending on your disposition. The goal is for explanations to be driven by animations and for difficult problems to be made simple with changes in perspective.
For more information, other projects, FAQs, and inquiries see the website: https://www.3blue1brown.com
☝️
though its not school - related
if you say what you’re interested in you might get better recommendations
Hi can somebody help me with this please, ty
which one?
all 4, i am not good at geometry
for 1st use pythagoras
PM would be sqrt(13^2-12^2) and AM would be sqrt(15^2-12^2)
AM-PM=AP so there you go
tyy
now the second q
PR+QR is basically the diameter so the radius should be 5 cm
so the distance OR is radius-PR which is 2 cm
now, drop a perpendicular from O to AB
and name the new point (lets say S, for example)
since perpendicular cuts AB in half, AS=BS=AB/2
I think you have your formula wrong
guys one question at a time
Electric flux is = EAcos(x)
It's the same formula everywhere
Yeah the one above is in vector form but still
It should be E/A according to the definition right?
why should it be E/A
Electric field lines per area
That is what electric flux is
And since the formula for electric flux is EAcos(x) and the electric field lines hit the vector surface perpendicular you have cos0 = 1
@rare ledge he is correct it really is EA
But I don’t get why you think it would be E/A
@rare ledge may I ask what grade you are in
12th grade
Don’t worry about the derivation then
do you know what the discriminant is?
I mean, you could look it up there’s plenty of online explainations of the derivation for electric flux but I wouldn’t worry about it
E/A is called field intensity
No EA is flux
What
no thats what need help with
No it’s correct
its field over an area
I meant the one I sent in the picture
so the discriminant is basically the part inside the square root in the quadratic formula
That is correct man
lets say my teacher gave me 1 class on this 2 weeks ago and i forgot how to do that
so the quadratic formula is $\frac{-b^2 \pm \sqrt{b^2 -4ac}}{2a}$
codeo
no, the stuff in the root
$D = b^2 - 4ac$
oh
codeo
that's the discriminant
mb
@arctic gust ty for the 2nd one! now only 3rd and 4th
ok
so because it's inside a square root there are only real roots when D is not negative
if D is 0 there is only 1 root and otherwise there are 2
Guys I have a doubt in probability
🔴 In a large population 40 % votes for A and 60 % for B. Suppose we select at
random 10 people. What is the probability that in this group exactly 4 people will
vote for A?
Could someone help please : (
the random variable for the no of people voting A is a binomial distribution
so 10C4 ( 0.4)^4 * (0.6)^6
wait
this would be the answer ?
yep looks right
How will I solve this?
Thanks
If p + (1/p) = 5, show that p² + (1/p²) = 23
are you sure it's not show that p² + 1/p² = 23 ?
Sbs?
Square both sides
So (p + (1/p))² = 5²
Yup
Hmm what do I do after that
Expand and the answer should be right in front of you
Oh
you see it
1² = 5²
Bro what
Nvm I divided it
??
2p² = 5²
no
.
Just expand (p+1/p)^2
Do you know that (a+b)^2 = a^2 +2ab + b^2
Oh I see
Sorry..
All goods
What?
Cus thats a + b
hello
$(a+b)^2=a^2 + 2ab +b^2$
noway124
If you have these possibilieties you can simply calculate it for k=0 and k=1
$p² + 2(p * (1/p)) + (1/p)²$
JUGisMUG🎃
There u go
whats the ans
You can do this yourself. Don't be lazy.
<@&286206848099549185> Could I get help with the 2nd and 4th one?
to infinity
Ah why just give ans
sometimes it helps , he can solve other questions in a similar way
interesting
@lethal dock if you have any doubt with the solution, lemme know
Now I have a probability question, I need a little help with that 😂
🔴 A box has three identical-looking coins. However, the probability of success
(Heads) is different for each coin: coin 1 is fair, coin 2 has a success probability of
0.4, and coin 3 has a success probability of 0.6. We pick one coin at random and
throw it 100 times. Suppose 43 Heads come up. Using this information, assess the
probability that coin 1, 2, or 3 was chosen.
What the point of this and how is it equal to 2?
Same thing
I see
ye
Great : )
I need help with number 15
hmm.... p² + (1/p²) is 25, how did that 2 colored in red come from to make it 25-
nono p² + (1/p²) + 2 = 25
2 goes to other side
p² + (1/p²) = 25 -2
p² + (1/p²) = 23
just put it in a calculator and check
But if (p + (1/p))² can be 5² which is 25, where does the 2 come from
And how does 2 move the RHS
From here
do open formula (a+b)^2
a = p , b= (1/p ) , 2ab = 2 * p * ( 1/p ) = 2
Bruh.
Isn't 2ab ignored? Like p² + (1/p²) + 2(p * (1/p)) is the same as (p + (1/p))²
$2 \frac{1}{p} p = 2 \frac{p}{p} = 2
<@&286206848099549185>
they got canceled,try solving it in paper
My fractions are weak, how did p × (1/p) become (p/p)
mate
that's how fraction multiplication works
you multiply straight across
Ohhhh
Hi, how can I think about negative exponents? I don’t quite understand. For example, how can I know 2^-3 = 0,125
@gleaming sluice tysm!! That cleared my doubts
2^-3 = 1/2^3 = 1/8
I know that 2^-3 = 1 / 2^3, that would be 1/8, how can I then know the answer to 1/8?
Say it was a different number like 1/32
you can just only look at the denominator and see that 2^3 = 2 * 2 * 2 = 8
you want answer in which base? e.g if in base of 2 its 2^5 ig
What I meant is finding the answer in decimals
for instance what would 3^-3 be? 1/27, then what would the answer be in decimals?
then you have to perform simple division by old school method,
1/27 solve it by keeping the "1" in dividend and "27" in divisor, then quotient will be 0.037
<@&268886789983436800> can I post picture of answer??
sure
hey any mods around
sup
check this
find the minimum value for x+4y
please use an empty channel, this one is currently taken. also, you don't need mods for this
when channel becomes empty?
when the previous question has been answered or no one has posted anything in a while (~20 min)
Not sure where to ask so i'll do it here. If you have an answer, please ping me.
Trying to derive the "multiplier" term for the regula falsi method of approximating roots (in my class they call it the "radius of convergence")
Basically, the recurrence for approximating the root is (for a fixed constant a)
$x_n = a - f(a) \frac{f(x_{n-1}) - f(a)}{x_{n-1} - a}$
random variable
I want to find the constant $R$ such that if $\alpha$ is the root of the function f, then $|x_{n+1} - \alpha| \sim R |x_{n} - \alpha|$
random variable
taylor expanding $g(x) = a - f(a) \frac{f(x) - f(a)}{x - a}$ is not giving me the expected result, which is apparently $ (a-\alpha)\dfrac{f''(\phi)}{2f'(\phi)}$ for some $\phi$ in an interval near $\alpha$
for Regula-Flasi, rate of convergence is ϕ I think
random variable
Nice stuff sth i could never understand(
I have a question but I'm not sure how to phrase it well, sorry if it's a bit confusing.
I have 2 coordinates on a grid, a center point of a circle (P1) that is 100m in radius, and a random point within the circle(P2). I need to find the coordinates(P3) of the closest outer edge of the circle relative to P2. Attached is a poor mspaint drawing demonstrating what I mean, the inner colored points are various P2's, with the ones on the edge the missing P3 I need to find. I assume this is trig, which I sadly missed in school, so please don't judge if this is a stupid/easy question.
nice stuff
Hello, is this what you mean?
find equation of the line joining p1,p2
sex?
then find where the line intersects the circle
you can do this by substituting in the circle equation
which is (x-g)^2+(y-h)^2=r^2
where g and h are coordinates of P1
i hope u got ur answer @next lynx
PapaBread
But I guess that's just a matter of preference
Where || is the magnitude of the vector
If this is your problem, I suggest to draw vertical segments from P2 to R and from P3 to R so you get 2 similar right triangles
What is y and h in that?
Surprisingly enough that's an interesting way to derive my equation
What exactly is the output of this, don't I need 2 end values, the X and Y for the unknown point?
I'm just writing it shorthand where every operation is applied to both x and y
So you get a coordinate pair
Ah Im dumb I see now
$\frac{(P_2-P_1).x}{|P_2-P_1|}=\frac{(P_3-P_1).x}{R}$
PapaBread
Yeah that's a direct derivation of the x part of this equation
Geometry
Cause the x distance from P2 to P1 is to the distance from P2 to P1 as the x distance from P3 to P1 is to the radius
And the same but opposite for y
So yeah that's what the broken down equation looks like ig
Do you know how to add fractions
Just multiply both sides by 2
so 2x = 20
Do you mean like the relationship between two variables?
ok so here are my steps
PapaBread
There's a 2 on all terms of the top and bottom so you're left with x
2*3X/4-2xX2=2 *5
thats my first step
2*3X/4-2xX2=2 *5
first one
3X/4-2X/2=10
2nd step
x/2=10
last one
idk what todo now
I don't follow your work
That's for when you only have one x
fk
And what you do once you simplify the two fractions into one
what i do
The first step I would do is to simplify the two into one
am so confused
Do you agree that x/2 is the same as 2x/4
ye
Just multiplying top and bottom by 2
So you can do that and then you can add the two fractions
So you get 3x/4 - 2x/4 = 5
Then you just subtract the two fractions because they have the same bottom part
And go from there
i got $\frac{3x/4} = 10$
$\frac{3x/4} = 10$
King_Of_Lion
{3x}{4}
imma go
Hello, do you guys have tutor sessions here?
uhm, EQUIVALENCE RELATION
hmm probably ppl who can help you but idk about tutoring
I thought I understood the concept but then when I tried to answer them, I was shocked to find myself scratching my head lol
like what sort of question?
uhm..
Let me get back to you, I'll try to re learn it 😄
Our professor's just sharing his screen to show videos from YouTube and I can't ask questions because of that
not a spectator sport 😄
what does that mean if I might ask
like you should try to engage with the material as soon as you have the tools to do so
even if its just constructing trivial examples
well i guess classes are good too
idk what youre supposed to get out of a class where you watch videos and cant ask questions
like showing = is an equivalence relation on the real numbers using the definition
Apparently, our professor has a "malfunctioning" mic and uses that as an excuse to share yt videos from our topic
Maybe I still am misunderstanding this, so P3(x) = radius *[ {P2(x) - P1(x)} / Abs{P2(x) - P1(x)} ] + P1(x) and P3(y) = radius *[ {P2(y) - P1(y)} / Abs{P2(y) - P1(y)} ] + P1(y)?
find some common binary operators and test those
in the case of equivalance relation, whenever I encounter a mathematical problem, Im perplexed
do you know the definition?
just memorize the 3 pieces
then find some operators, i think = < and > are the common first ones
show that they are or why they break
like uhh
we know that for any equivalence relation and some element $a$, that $a \sim a$
jan Niku
there are other conditions that must be true, but this is one of them
so can you tell me out of: $=, >, <, \leq, \geq$
jan Niku
which ones can we already rule out as being equivalence relations?
(aka check, is 1=1? is 1<1?)
Ye
1=1 is a reflexive
Well actually the one thing that isn't separated is the bottom part
The |P2-P1|
this is not true
That has to stay constant, you'd probably just use pythag for that part
yea
so youve lost reflexivity, and < or > are definitely not equivalence relations
because they are not reflexive relations
next one to check is symmetry, you want $a \sim b \leftrightarrow b \sim a$
jan Niku
so you still have left out of the pool of 5: $=, \leq, \geq$
jan Niku
which are symmetric?
I dont know what you mean by this
So the two equations would be
uhm
how about just for =?
Hey i can help you
can you guys start a thread 
this is true
Theres a conversation going on so lets move to a different channel
Or dms i dont mind
this is true when your relation is symmetric
its not true in general
consider an example like uhh
$P3_x = r * \frac{P_2.X-P_1.X}{\sqrt{(P_2.x-P_1.x)^2+ (P_2.y-P_1.x)^2} + P_1.x$
Sorry one last thing
$a \sim b \to a-b > 0$
jan Niku
well 5 ~ 4 because 5-4 is 1, which is greater than 0
Bruh
but 4-5 is -1, which is less than 0
so even though 5~4, 4 isnt ~5
so ~ as defined here isnt symmetric
then its not an equivalence relation
~ = equivalent, right?
related
ohhhhh
im sorry about that
because as you can imagine that ~ as defined has like
i mean infinitely many numbers are related to 4
any number bigger than 4 should be related to 4
doesnt really work as a function (fails in a lot of ways)
but still useful
ur fine relations are weird
Im a bit confused, are you giving me sample questions?
im just saying like
well you mean what we were on before?
these are like the trivial or easy examples
Im just new in this channel. I was shocked that you can "code" here lol
It's epic
jan Niku
okay so
Is it okay if you can give me a real example?
try the one i defined before
Im getting the general concept of it but there is another right? The transiitive one
let $a \sim b$ if $a-b >0$ be defined over the real numbers. Show that $\sim$ is an equivalence relation or explain why it is not.
jan Niku
well i guess i already explained why 
lmc
trying to think of another one thats just numbers
how about like
Let $a \sim b$ iff $2 \mid (a+b)$ over the positive integers.
jan Niku
show its an equivalence relation, or explain why its not
( 2|(a+b) means a+b is even)
so like, 2=2
not quite
did you want to try again? Or i can show an example of a case for reflexivity
brb
I think the latter, I thought I can handle the examples.
well what if i just asked
we wanna show that a~a right
for some positive integer
what would it mean for a~a
using how ~ is defined
yes
so our relation is
some number is related to another if their sum is even
so what does it mean for a number to be related to itself
if it is related to itself, then it is reflexive
uhm...