#help-0
1 messages · Page 847 of 1
what answer did you get for 3 ?
60?
good, because for 3 it's just an equilateral triangle
then, what about k = 4
So answer is e^3(cos1 + i sin1) ??
im pretty sure
90
i dont know though maybe you should ask someone else as well
but im pretty sure thats right
hmm
But it says compute real and imaginary
oh
guys i know its a dumb question but
right, cause here it's a square, then keep on going with k = 5 and so on
oh
what if you distribute it though
oh i think i might get it
good, then you'll see by rounding the number you'll be getting closer and closer to 180 and you know it cant get over that, so you'll stop there
now the second one
Dont have any idea about 2nd one
wait
the third one would be the same with some minor adjustments
i just compute it, it might be long, but at some point you'll see the increase one degree by one, there you can deduce all the following degrees until 180 will eventually be there
ok i see
Can someone help with these algebra problems I just need help getting started and finding the equations
if you dont tell us what these problems actually are, noone cant really help
Maybe i should do multiplcation with 2nd one
the answer is 26 right?
Any idea in b? <@&286206848099549185>
nvm thanks tho
a bit higher than that
umm
not a native english speaker, rounded off means getting the closest integer or the one below it ?
closest integer
then you get 14 different values first, then you're at 158 and it start increasing one by one (all the others will follow
so 159 is the 15th value of n, 160 is the 16th, (...) 170 is the 26th, (...), 180 is the 36th
you mistyped then, you wrote 26 instead of 36, but you got the write answer 😉
maybe try using trig identities
sum identity gets you sin(1)cos(i) + cos(1)sin(i)
wait no
you know that cos(t) = ( exp(it)+exp(-it) )/2, this can be used with t = 1+i
but its sine
i have a question
if q (a positive integer) can be expressed as the sum of two squares, prove that 5q can also be expressed as the sum of two squares
no
would have just made things easier, but still you can use the 2 formulas i just gave
correction after mistyping : sin(t) = ( exp(it)-exp(-it) )/2i
the problem was from another guy
you can get them from exp(it) = cos(t) + i sin(t) btw
okay
i guess i'm getting a bit to tired mixing questions asker and answerers lol
lol
still confused about this one though
i finished the first part which proved 2q is the sum of two squares
Question : Ok so I have a game I and I have a problem to calculate a thing. I have 25 stages and they are randomely generated and each stage has a number from 1-25 respectively. Now each game have 6 stage generated randomely. So how many stages can be generated randomely?
For example
{1,3,5,2,1,5}
{7,21,4,4,2}
Like this tables above how many tables can be formed?
uh
25^6?
@alpine sable I know i can be an asshole sometimes on purpose, but i dont want to help someone who just spammed the 10 help topics
tonk for ur answet
hello, I have a qns. 4^x+2 = 32^x ------- why isn't it x = 1 ?
$4+2\neq 32$
a disappointing son
Hey I’m having some trouble with 2 questions in my math homework.
It wants me to solve these
3/x + 6 = -45
x-2/5 = 10-x/8
But I’m not quite sure how to go about it
isolate x
@dusk tiger What's the first step in isolating x
in the first one, what would you do first?
?
You're not subtracting -45
you want x on one side by itself
Would I subtract the 6 from the -45
yes
Subtract 6 from both sides is what you should say
that would be the first step
What is the equation now equal to
3/x = -51
<@&286206848099549185>
Would I have to divide since x is on bottom?
Divide by what?
3
No you wouldn't want to do that
well if q can be represented as the sum of 2 squares, a^2 + b^2 = q
In order to get rid of the fraction, you need to use an operation that's the inverse of a fraction (which is dividing)
yes
So would I have to divide by X?
Btw next time please don't help someone who posted in every channel, which would be unfair to the other people who are wiaitng to get helped.
So wait
What's the opposite of division?
Also, I proved before that 2q is the sum of (a-b)^2 + (a+b)^2
Multiply
Exactly, so we would multiply both sides of x
The reason is
$\frac{3}{x}\cdot :x$
eggdog
but how does that help u prove that 5q = a^2 + b^2
when you distribute the sums cancel out and you end up with 2(a^2 + b^2)
i have no idea
thats the second part of the problem
eggdog
You see how it becomes 3x/x right
So then if I divide that by 3 it’d isolate the x?
Ok
Multiplying by x on both sides will do that
Because 3/x will become 3x/x
and x/x is just 1
So on the left side it'll be 1, but on the right side we multiplied -51 by x
Oh
$\frac{3}{x}\cdot \frac{x}{1}$ So here's what that step looks like again
Oops wrong one
$\frac{3}{x}\cdot \frac{x}{1}=-51x$
Bruh
eggdog
3x/x
Which is?
1x
3x
eggdog
So then divide both sides by 3 to isolate it
That won't isolate x though
And remember we want to get rid of the fraction before we isolate
Ok after we multiply both sides by x the x's will cancel out and it'll just be 3 = -51x
Omg this is so confusing lol
$\frac{3}{x}\cdot \frac{x}{1}$
eggdog
do you see why this gets rid of x? @dusk tiger
eggdog
You know that right
Yes
What is x/x
X
Well when you multiply it’d be squared
A whole
LMAO
OHHHHHH
lmao
easy peasy lemon squeezy
$\frac{3x}{x}$
eggdog
Ok tysm 😂
do you see why now lol
Yes
Ok now the equation looks something like this
3 = -51x
what can you do to isolate x
Now that we got rid of the fraction
Divide by -51
Ok thank you so much
Kk
eggdog
Should probably do that so it makes more sense
What'd you get
-1/17
Yes 🙏
i tried splitting it up into 4q and q but that gets me nowhere
$\frac{x-2}{5}=\frac{10-x}{8}$
eggdog
eggdog
Now time for the other assignment 😂
Oh did you already complete it?
Only had 3 things to do
What'd you get
X = 66/13
Great
yeah
then set up the equation: (35 + x)(18 + x) = 2(the area of your current enclosure)
then itll be easy
oh wait its a quadratic lmao
okay just use factoring or quadratic formula
if you can
okay imma try it
it shouldnt be too hard
If it’s not too much trouble, can someone help me with this
First use the binomial theorem to find expressions for lambda_k and mu_k. Then use those expressions and the other givens to solve for a.
im not so sure but im going to assume lambda_k and mu_k are the weird symbols
$\lambda_k,\quad \mu_k$
nix (@ me for the love of euler)
ah i see
ayt gimme a min
so is this enough or to i need to express more of the 2 equations
oh wait
i think im starting to see smth
thx nix!
Is this channel open
i think so
what is an extreme value?
ah i see
Application of derivatives
Yes I know that
in that case i cant help ya yet, we just started module 2 maths so i dont now much myself
sorry :/
gl with ur question tho!
I’m going something wrong I think
so where the derivative is 0 and the graph is increasing ok
i get it
i will have a look at it
Thx
ok, in our country we just say evaluete the monotonic properties of the function "lambda", we dont say extreme values xD
dont write the exponent as (-1) it makes it harder, write it as a fraction
then derivate with chain rule
then the derivative should be something like $\frac{-x^2+1}{x^4+2x^2+1}$
Danajax
it that what you got?
Yes
-1, 1
Yep
$\pm1$
Danajax
so what's your problem then?
you dont know how to get the y value?
you have the x values though, so what is the issue?
you need to plot the x values into the function f
Yes and I don’t know how to tell which is a max and which is a min
for x = 1 $\frac{1}{1+1} = \frac{1}{2}$
Danajax
the maximum is the one with the greates x value, and min with the smaller value
How do you tell that
or you could derivate for x = 1/2, x = 3/2, x = -1/2 and x=-3/2, which will also tell if something is a top or bottom on a function
how i tell that something is a top-point?
Ya
derivate for x = 1/2, x = 3/2, x = -1/2 and x=-3/2, which will also tell if something is a top or bottom on a function
or look at the y values
the function has to have an "extreme" point if the derivate is 0, for which we already found corresponding x values
If 36 and 48 are the two smaller numbers in a Pythagorean Triple, what is the third
number?
answer it
urgent
Just use pythagorean theorem
Hi, can anyone help me?
60
|x+2|+|x+1| = E(x)
sure #help-1
Ok
Don't give answers
Don't give answers
oh sorry
i havent memorised the formulas and i have no idea how to do this
this is the ans
Draw a triangle
how @slate mesa
Like I said, pythagorean theorem
Do you know what pythagorean theorem is?
is this for an exam
ya
obvio
You know that cos = adj/hyp
Then use that concept
yeah no, that’s not allowed here
can't
if you meant exam
Also, you can't get help on exams
how do i know if its in 2nd or 3rd quadrant?
ASTC
but both 2 and 3 have negative cosine
guys pls
so is it in 2 or 3?
If this is an exam, you cannot get help for it
I told you, pythagorean theorem
true
write the answer
No
no!
Not my job
stop begging for answers, figure it out yourself
This is not the place to be getting answers
c = sqrt (a^2 + b^2)
sub in 36 = a and 48 = b
spend 5 mins on your own and you will figure it out
You figure it out yourself, using the info given
Is this channel open?
yah
Just need help taking that derivative
Where am I wrong
On 24
x^1/3 (x+8)
Product rule
If you know that cos = adj/hyp and hyp = sqrt(x^2 + y^2), that means hyp is going to most likely be positive meaning that the negative sign goes with value in numerator. So that means (-1)/3
do you have knowlegde about chain rule
Yes
like this? I dont have a very good grasp of ASTC
thanks i got it
wait omg calc err
ok i get it now, tysm!
did your answer look something like $g'(x) = \frac{2x+8}{3\sqrt[3]{x^2}}$
Danajax
@late parcel
whats the formula of decomposition of improper fraction into partial farctions? i cant find it on google
is it just long division
is there a formula, i just do it in my head xD
hi
i mean like improper fractions of polynomials
such as?
guys is dis da answer u need
have you learned about complex numbers
nope
oh ok, pretty much lets you factorize anything
i was wondering if there was a version of this for improper fractions
that didn't answer your question at all though sorry
oh ok
i never learnt that
you just need to attempt to factorize i suppose
its ok, i think i can manage with long division and factorisation. Thanks though!
good luck
Chai T. Rex
See this ^
ohh so the formula is just the same but adding another factor D behind?
Is this channel open?
You'll get three simultaneous equations and A, B, and C to solve for.
ohh alright thanks alot!
No problem.
Hello I need help with question 8 am I understanding the question correctly?
So the question is invalid
d=-3
@glass estuary I'd take it to mean that the total decrease is 3 per row.
Oh, never mind.
On each end.
I thought it was 3 per row too and then I saw that part
And the answer on the back page is 3549 for some reason
I'm losing faith on my text book each day
Is this channel open
Hi, I'm wondering why (8x - 2)(3x - 1) is
8x * 3x + 8x * (-1) - 2 * 3x -2 * (-1)?
@alpine sable The distributive property.
(a + b)(c + d)
(a + b)c + (a + b)d
ac + bc + ad + bd
(a + b)(c + d) = ac + ad + bc + bd
See how I used the distributive property three times?
I see, but why does this happen
ye
You take what the parentheses are being multiplied by and you multiply it by the terms in the parentheses.
x(y + z) = xy + xz.
yes
So, (a + b)(c + d) = (a + b)c + (a + b)d.
This is because (a + b) is just a number that's multiplied by the (c + d) parentheses.
Just like x was before.
Does that part make sense?
x(y + z) = xy + xz, so whatever is in front of the parentheses is what you multiply y by and what you multiply z by.
I get this
OK, so (a + b) is some number just like x is.
Why (a + b)c + a + b)d tho
Because you have this:
x(y + z) = xy + xz
And you do the same thing here:
(a + b)(c + d) = **(a + b)**c + **(a + b)**d
Whatever is multiplied by the parentheses, no matter how complicated, gets multiplied by each term in the parentheses.
ohh
Does that part make sense so far?
OK, now we do the same thing.
We have (a + b)c + (a + b)d.
(a + b)c = ac + bc.
Whatever's multiplied by the parentheses gets multiplied by each term in the parentheses.
Does that make sense?
help, i need create a equation
@rapid coral Sorry, this channel is busy.
Yeah
Step 1:
(a + b)(c + d)
**(a + b)**c + **(a + b)**d
Step 2:
(a + b)c + (a + b)d
ac + bc + ad + bd
I got it
OK 🙂
You're welcome.
24^2 - 14x + 2 right?
Yes, except with an x² in the first term:
(8x - 2)(3x - 1)
**(8x - 2)**3x - **(8x - 2)**1
(8x - 2)3x - (8x - 2)1
24x² - 6x - 8x + 2
24x² - 14x + 2
Im pretty sure you just plot your points but add 3 eg 1 is 1+3, 2 is 8+3, 3 is 27+3 etc
Or differentiate f(x) and solve for f'(x) = 3
Also could anyone help explain how to find the area of the outer blue circle
Can someone help me derive that a•b=length(a)length(b)cosθ, knowing that a•b=a_x b_x+a_y+b_y?
think about it from a physical perspective
W = F.d
the maximum work is done when the force is entirely in the direction of the displacement
Please help explain how it got the answers on the right.The symbol is supposed to be Pi
and the minimum work is done when it is perpendicular
so it must be proportional to cos(theta)
Thanks for the intuiton but I am interested how to derive this from the other definition of the dot product
The Stack post I gave you does the derivation in R^2, going to R^3 just uses spherical co-ordinates, but follows the exact same process.
in R^4 and further the geometric formula starts to lose it's grounding, cause we then define the "angle b/w 2 vectors" as arccos(stuff)
(a_x, a_y) = (acos(theta_a), asin(theta_a))
(b_x, b_y) = (bcos(theta_b), bsin(theta_b))
a.b = abcos(theta_a)cos(theta_b) + absin(theta_a)sin(theta_b)
a.b = ab(cos(theta_a - theta_b))
you just have to use the identity:
cos(x-y) = cos(x)cos(y) + sin(x)sin(y)
i'm pretty sure that you can derive this on the spot with euler's formula
exp(i(x-y)) = exp(ix) * exp(-iy)
cis(i(x-y)) = cis(x) * cis(-y)
cos(x-y) + isin(x-y) = (cos(x) + isin(x))(cos(y) - isin(y))
cos(x-y) + isin(x-y) = cos(x)cos(y) - icos(x)sin(y) + isin(x)cos(y) + sin(x)sin(y)
compare real and imaginary parts
cos(x-y) = cos(x)cos(y) + sin(x)sin(y)
bruh
i need help?
exp(iz) = cosz + isin(z)
exp(-iz) = cos(z) - isin(z)
exp(iz) + exp(-iz) = 2cos(z)
(exp(iz) + exp(-iz))/2 = cos(z)
exp(iz)-exp(-iz) = 2isin(z)
(exp(iz)-exp(-iz))/2i = sin(z)
cos(x)cos(y) = (exp(ix)+exp(-ix))/2 * (exp(iy)+exp(-iy))/2 = 1/4(exp(i(x+y)) + exp(i(x-y)) + exp(i(y-x)) + exp(-i(x+y)))
sin(x)sin(y) = -1/4(exp(i(x+y)-exp(i(x-y)-exp(i(y-x))_exp(-i(x+y))
cos(x)cos(y) + sin(x)sin(y) = 1/4 ((exp(i(x+y)) + exp(i(x-y)) + exp(i(y-x)) + exp(-i(x+y)) - (exp(i(x+y)-exp(i(x-y)-exp(i(y-x))_exp(-i(x+y))) = 1/2(exp(i(x-y)) + exp(-i(x-y)) = cos(x-y)
bruh
Hello
In terms of probability and machine learning, may I ask what is the difference/meaning of:
P(C1 | x)
and
p(x | C1)
C1 is just a class to classify in ML context
So, what is the difference between the capital P and p?
help factorizing
2x^2 - 2x - 9 =0
i think i can use psf
with product being 18
and sum being -2
but idk how to get a number that satisfies those criteria
is there a trick or something?
sorri fo dumb question, i just really wanna pass the upcoming exams :(
Quadratic formula could be used
No
how do u know?
yea ok, but how would u know
i need to be able to tell if it is factorizable or no
It's not
how would i know though
AC method
ac?
Take A times C
yea
thats what i call psf
ahhhhh
Therefore not factorable by hand
so u look at the factors and what they add up to
So quadratic formula
understood
Yes
thx
Factors of 18 are 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 18
1 and 18 doesn't equal 2, neither does 2 and 9 or 3 and 6
....................................................................................................................................................................................
Ok so we all know that Abel proved that there are no general formula of finding a solution for n > 5, therefore there should exist a general formula for 5th degree polonomials! I, mean why use complex numbers when you could use the general formula 😎 . Anyone care to share it? So it would be the ABCDEF formula?
If this channel isn’t taken, does anyone mind telling me what I'd do next with this formula as I'm unfamiliar what to do next after moving over the constant
what is your problem?
I think you have to solve for t
yes use the general ABC formula
Where do I go next with the equation/formula in this case is the question after moving over the constant.
You moved it the wrong way
have you learned ABC-formula???
It should be equal to 0
H(x) = 147, but do I really just set T to 0 in this case?
when looking to see when a ball will be at a certain height using an equation, you can set the equation equal to that canstant then solve for that new zero
i suppose he means that you are supposed to find $$-16t^2+100t-144 = 0$$
Danajax

then it is easier to proceed straight forward with abc-formula or divide by (-16) @bold monolith
I see, I'll try it from there on my own if thats the case since I get what you mean.
Thanks guys
sure, let us know if you need more help
I think dividing by 4 is the best, not 16
how do i find the range
Because you'll end up with decimals
If you can use a graphing calculator, use that
Plot it
i can´t, my teacher requests process
yeh, makes sense as 100/16 $\in \mathbb{Q}$
Danajax
well you can use the fact that the highest degree is even and has a positive coefficient to get the upper bound
^
Help explain how it go those answers please
but tbh idk how youd get the lower bound without calculus
inf(f(x))
unless this is a calc class in which case you should be able to find it
it might be kinda tedious since it means solving a cubic but theoretically its possible
if you create a new state with a density of 22,35 what could be the cuantity of homes in that state?
can somebosy help me?
or somebody that speaks spanish?
Not enough info
privet, me llamo Ecuador
i'ts in spanish but i don't think it's important
If you're basing it off the avatar, that's probably not what the person looks like, the avatar just exists and doesn't have to represent the actual person
haha yes, i'm european, if i would base it off your avatar then you would be a discord application
u know
it feels different
talking to a asian about maths problems
its kind of racist
but asians are smarter i feel
depends how you define smart, however this is a text channel for questions not discussions, so we should probably call it quits
how do you get 1
and not 0
factoize
after I factored I got (x-y)/1
yes
than when I plug in x I get 1 and when I plug in y I get -1
1-1/1 = 0
omg thanks Idk what's wrong with me
but what does x not equal to y have to do with solving this prob
np nothing is wrong with you, tbh i have never worked with limes that have mulitple variables, which is sort of wierd, because I have studied a lot of math
thanks @lapis sluice
How do I solve this? Do I have to use the Gaussian cofefficient binomial?
you can check where it's derivative=0 if the derivative has 3 roots check for the one for which there exist least minima and at that point gives the lower limit and upper limit is +infinity you can say by seeing its degree
Can someone check if this is right?
woops instead of 6 x 10^9 and 7 x 10^9 its supposed to be 10^7
i) 6·10^2, ii)(2/3)·10^8 ?
If the y value was substituted as 75 how would you calculate x?
Hi can someone explain me what does the R2 value tells me in a polynomial trend line?
like normal binary but you have a decimal place and each value is 2^-n
convert the fraction to a decimal first @alpine sable
Convert the fraction to decimal and do the multiply by 2 trick I demonstrated before
ok
This is decimal notation, not binary
I know
They asked for binary
I know, read what I tried to do after that line
That line after makes no sense since that's still a decimal value
That's if you can see it, there is a mathematical way of do it instead of guessing powers of 2
<@&286206848099549185>
The method for converting a base 10 decimal value to binary is just multiply by 2
$$7/16 = 0.4375$$
$$0.4375 \cdot 2 = 0.875$$
$$0.875 \cdot 2 = 1.75$$
$$0.75 \cdot 2 = 1.5$$
$$0.5 \cdot 2 = 1$$
Therefore $$0.4375_{10} = 0.0111_{2}$$
Because you read the value before the decimal point from top to bottom
dldh06
Do you know what 0 + 0, 0 + 1, 1 + 0, and 1 + 1 results in binary?
oh i forgot about this method
So if 1 + 1 = 10, then the 1 is the carry bit
It's like addition in base 10
see this is what I got for the first one
Is it right
Or is it not a carry it
Carrybit
To answer this, same concept applies with
1
+1
10
Both values were one bit but added created a 2 bit number
What's 1 + 1 + 1 in binary?
11
So do you know how to take it from there?
So it’s c:1 110?
Are you saying $111_{2} + 111_{2} = 1110_{2}$?
dldh06
Yea
Then yes
Could someone help me with a proof?
Yes
What did you do?
21121
That makes it even more confusing since you didn't carry the bits
haha
Idk
Right to left, what's 1 + 0?
That's how math works
So I solve it from left to right but put the answer right to left
Oh
Wait nvm
I forgot what right was
If you had
45
+55
You still do right to left
Hi guys I’m looking to get really good at math and I’m in 9th grade what should I use?
1+0+1 is 10 again
Yeah
So then what did I do wrong
Khan Academy
Are you guys good with proofs in geometry H?
That far left column, it's 1 + 1 + 1?
😦
This is the answer
Really
Yes
,w 11011_2 + 10110_2
See 110001
Is the 1 always a carry bit
If it's at the far left
Because it overflows
Like 6 + 9 = 15, technically the one is the overflow
Also only use this to check your work after you make an attempt
Wolfram is a powerful software
,w 100011_2 + 11110_2
And I do suggest if you check your work, use #bots
So you don't blow up this channel with the bot
Can someone help with how to solve B ?
how'd you solve a?
http://www.sosmath.com/algebra/factor/fac12/fac12.html
Not sure if this is useful
No Title
nvm, i think i got it. I was confused as how to solve it cause there were 5 terms instead of 4, but seems like its the same thing ? But ill just have 4 roots instead of 3 ?
Yeah, the highest power normally denotes up to how many roots you have
also, ive been using rational zero theorem, but it takes quite long
is it supposed to be ? Or is there a quicker way ?
ive been following the steps of organic chem tutor in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iaq7z7reznM
This precalculus video tutorial provides a basic introduction into the rational zero theorem. It explains how to find all the zeros of a polynomial function by using the rational zero theorem and by factoring polynomials. The rational zero theorem helps you to identify the first zero by listing all possible rational zeros and then evaluating t...
Finding the roots of any function that has a power greater than 2 is normally tedious
ah ok
actually I do have a question lol. So is this correct so far ?
Do i have to do rational zero theorem again with this new equation ?
how is this not 16
What's the derivative of h(x)
f'(g(x))g'(x)
How are you getting 16?
are you by chance looking at the value for f(x) instead of f'(x)
im dumb thanks
how are you calculating your slope?
so what exactly did you do?
i did 4-5 over 0-3
$\frac{4 - 5}{0 - 3}$
dldh06
haha
can someone still help me with this ? 😅 I've gotten up to here, and I'm wondering if I'd need to use rational zero theorem again
Write an expression for the sequence of operations described below.
subtract the quotient of 9 and 5 from 10
Do not simplify any part of the expression.
help
idk what that means i have no idea what to do
what i have so far is x-x^2=4^-3x
Do you know what slope is?
something that has a higher level at one end
Mathematical slope
im not sure
the trick is to write 64^(-x) as 4^(-3x)
yes i have that
What happened to the 4 on the left side?
x-x^2=4^-3x
oh
uh
4x-x^2=4^-3x
x-x^2=-3x
becomes this
and im kinda suck on solving it
So move all the terms to one side, aka setting equal to 0
Then solve for x
No
can someone help me with this please f(x)= 2x+6 g(x)=√x+10
Find (g(f(x))
Take the f(x) plug it into g(x)
so you plug in sqrt 2x+6 +10
was i right
i read it g of f so g is inside f?
nah f is inside g im so sad
If you had f(3), do you know what that means?
Also is it $$g(x) = \sqrt{x + 10}$$ or $$g(x) = \sqrt{x} + 1$$?
dldh06
ok thank ya
You have to wait at least 15 minutes before pinging helpers
oh mb, i’m sorry
Also that's an isosceles triangle
Determine from there
Can someone verify this?
sin(x) = 1 / csc(x)
Likewise,
sin^5(x) = 1 / csc^5(x)
Right?
I’m having one of those moments of uncertainty in math
yes... csc(x):=1/sin(x)
But raised to any power would be the same right?
yes.
Can someone help me solve this please
Oh ok
is this right
can i get help on my trig work
ok
Don't ask to ask
what
just send the question you dont need to ask to ask
It wont let me send the photo
oh
file too big
its a picture?
yes
Was asked in different channel
I tried it ealier and just couldnt get it
Oh, alright then. Go back to that channel and someone will help you 🙂
can you help me
since you won't respond in the other channel, what have you tried?
aaand of course now you respond
what am I doing wrong?
i found the derivative and then replaced x with 0
and used that as my m
plugged it into y-y1=m(x-x1)
what is your derivative?
ln(5) x 5^x
so your slope is...?
a more accurate slope would be just ln(5)
yeah the slope is ln(5), not 1.6
how do i do question 5 part b?
do i work out the circle formula and change y to k and find k?
k=2?
If you know what y=k looks like and then try drawing it as a tangent to the circle, the answer would follow immediately
yup, basically a horizontal line
Mind if you can hep me with another question lool
Im just confused on part C
what can you tell about the line segment (which is part of the x-axis) that cuts across the circle?
i can use its gradient to find perpendicular