#help-0
1 messages · Page 834 of 1
isnt my base the hypotenuse
handwriting is better than mine
whered you get the 30 from
half of 60
But your height would equal the sqrt( -(base/2)^2 + (side)^2)
Adjust as desired
so whyd you half 60
pythagorean theorem only works on right triangles so they had to cut it in half to get a right triangle
If you look at the diagram above, the height is also directly above the center of your base for the triangle
pythagorean theorem...
bruh
read if you're going to comment
so
so..... what
how do i rationalize C
channel is occupied bruh
i dont see anyone typing
nah
But there's a conversation going on
Several people are typing
were ghosts bro
just because someone doesn’t send a message every second doesn’t mean there isn’t a conversation
i don’t see anyone typing lol what
wouldnt you need the area to find the height tho
read the rules bruh
did you ever say anything about area?
?????
Have you like not read anything we've said
Ok, go fuck yourself then
bruh
seriously @glass lichen
its called sarcasm
if you don’t listen we aren’t going to talk
but you usually aren’t given the area and no dimensions
ik
actually you never are lol
tf is a p2
power
idk
^2
ok
or just make it clear what you're saying, not ambiguous stuff like "40-30 squared"
a^2+b^2 = c^2 where a and b are legs and c is the hypotenuse
the right triangle doesn't have a side of 60
do you always use Pythagorean for triangles?
no
@sterile thistle only for right triangles
ok
Pythagorean theorem is only applicable on right triangles
yo @glass lichen how to find acceleration with mass and v1
not sure where you got v1 from
A sub-atomic particle, mass 1.673 x 10-27 kg, is accelerated from an initial speed of 4.60 x 106 m/s along a frictionless path 2.00 km long. What acceleration would be necessary for the particle to approach the speed of light, 3.00 x 108 m/s?
bruh
were kinda occupied right now
this diff one
i don’t even know if the channel is occupied at this point
flying was using prior to these 2
someone said that b4
pretty sure mass isn't needed
whats the formula
@sterile thistle someone asked an identical question
probably the same thing with cm behind it
$v^2-v_0^2=2a\Delta d$
Mosh
?
that's the direct kinematics eqn for it
o ye
that's basic math, do it yourself.
but yes
yes
$$ Height = \sqrt{{(\frac{Base}{2}})^2 + Side^2 }$$
Libster
how do you do that
Copypasta.
Karkess
like type them in
Do you just... not know how to ask questions coherently?
A good chunk of your questions have seriously been lacking in details
been answered already
pythagorean theorem READ BEFORE BITCHING
IS THE COMMAND
,help
A brief description and guide on how to use me was sent to your DMs!
Please use ,list to see a list of all my commands, and ,help cmd to get detailed help on a command!
,help cmd
You really shouldn't take it literally :upside_down:. Please type ,help ping, for example!
The full command list may be found using ,list.
It's been explained.
Use ,ls to obtain a briefer listing, and use ,help <cmd>to view detailed help for a particular command, or ,help to view general help.
If you still have questions, talk to our friendly support team here.
Render LaTeX code and configure rendering options.
tex: Render LaTeX code.
ctan: Searches the ctan
texdoc: Searches the texdoc
autotex: Toggle whether your LaTeX is automatically rendered.
preamble: View or modify your LaTeX preamble.
texconfig: View or modify your personal LaTeX rendering options.
guildpreamble: View or modify the guild's default LaTeX preamble
Guild administration
config: View and set the guild configuration.
rmrole: Deletes the provided role
disable: Disable commands in this guild.
editrole: Create or edit a server role.
autoclean: Automatic deletion of messages in the current channel.
forgetrolesfor: Forget stored persistent roles for one or all members.
Yeas.
yoo
i got a result thats not available
what did you get..?
okok
- v is suppose to be the speed of light, v_0 is initial
- the speeds are squared
already told you this.
Is this some broken form of the quadratic formula?
lol @dark compass apparently theyve said it
Courtesy of Symbolab
you asked for exact and I gave you exact. If you meant you wanted an approximation, then ask "What's the height approximately?"
Dont ask a question you dont want the answer to
Yes
no @dark compass
yeah your question is shitly presented
Well, you didn't ask a question
and this channel is clearly in use
you have 30^2+h^2 = 40^2, h^2 = 40^2-30^2, h = sqrt(40^2-30^2) = sqrt700
teach me how to use three test points
24.86 is not equal to sqrt700, not even approximately
you’re just putting in random numbers
Just ignore them at this points
No point in wasting time
the answer is approximately 26.5
2 perfect squares that are 100 apart?
what is going on here
in use.
You did not ask a question and you asked in a channel that is busy
Mosh dont be rude, chiro no one owes you help
this channel is crazy
we did.
@dreamy cedar their anger is often unnecessary but here it’s understandable
read.
@glass lichen 3/3 ty
np
i basically made an educated guess
the number
@glass lichen they don’t understand your conversions so probably just don’t do them
no ones as smart as you
i won’t even explain my process because literally anyone could do it if they got a minute
i don’t even know who’s talking to who
Im just gonna let them handle it themselves tbh
probably a good idea mosh
It’s entertaining at least. Got some laughs
you shouldn’t be on here then
can't be a worse dumpster fire than it already is
if you’re in year 6
13
13...
im 6
i hope you’re not serious
i think i’m done
every time i explain something 20 more questions get asked
also if you’re under 13 i literally don’t have to help because you shouldn’t even be on here
too young
the profile picture says so
That's against discord's TOS
your photo
i know you irtl
irl
i know you irl
bud
thats why were friends on discord
Oh boy, underage and doxing
I’m glad the internet wasn’t such a thing when I was so young.
Woah, calm yourself there
@glass lichen i completely believe their ages now
<@&268886789983436800>
if you talk like this you are automatically 12
ty Nami
Hurb
wb Moth
I hate it here
that was definitely interesting to say the least


you missed all the annoying stuff @cursive crescent
Probably best to drop it at this point
my mans telling me to noose
true
I liked the diagram at the beginning.
ok people ask more questions
Channel's free.
@cursive crescent same with the impossible triangle
@dark compass
ok seriously stop lol let people ask questions
Hi I’ve got a few questions for an open book assignment I’m doing
Unit is solving polynomial inequalities
Post the specific question you have
Alright
This is the first one
Sorry for bad lighting
So I know i have to get the X-intercepts first which for this inequality is, x=1, -2, and -3
But I'm not sure what to do after that
-3 isn't an x-int
Once you have the x-ints, then test the points between them to see what their signs are
is a=1, b=5, c=2, so a+b+c is 8?
hey this ones occupied rn man
oh sorry
If you're unsure, try plugging -3 and 3 in
Then to actually check the signs, plug a few points in between in.
x = 0 is an easy point here
Similar triangles
Use similar triangles
the impossible triangle buzz
ok
Can somebody help me with some linear algebra
I’m not sure if I did 4b correctly
@sterile thistle
bro did you make another account just to join this server again lmfao
How do you find the scaling factor
don’t you just do something like 57/43
i should add you only know 1 image size
and that’s how much bigger the second one is than the first?
It'll be different for each one
$width of small square/length of small square= width of big square/length of big square$
these were taken at different resolutions 4:3 5:4 19:9 21:9
well that doesn’t matter because we still have the side lengths
unless i understand horribly incorrectly
beautyiskeytosuccess
say you only have the data 19:9 and 60x60 then you trying to find scale factor for 5:4 (but you don't know 57x57)
$(width of small square/length of small square)= (width of big square/length of big square)$
beautyiskeytosuccess
i can't do 57/43 becasue i don't know about 43
$\frac{\text{width of small square}}{\text{length of small square}}= \frac{\text{width of big square}}{\text{length of big square}}$
dldh06
Huh? what is there to know about 43
That's what you wanted, right?
Yes ty i did it way wrong
nope lol , say we know width and height of big square and that it somehow tied to screen res 19:9 we need to find scale factor to lower it to 5:4 (57x57) or 4:3 (43x43) but we don't know the width and height of these small squares only that some how tied to 5:4 and 4:3
oh i don’t know then sorry
hi, i just learned about f(x) = ax + b. does anyone know what a & b represents here (in simple terms)?
Slope and y intercept
@elder glacier what
A refers to slope and b refers to the y-int if ur confused about which is which
ok thanks a lot
So
If you have something like z = y^3+x^2. x, y, z are all variables.
and x is a function of y and z
then how do u find partial derivative of x wrt y
Does the gregory-newton formula also works for non-integers outputs?
yeah
<@&286206848099549185>
f(x,y,z) = z-y^3-x^2 = 0
so if youre finding partial of x wrt y, how would you do that
Take the standard cubic formula and evaluate the derivatives in symbolic form, and once you get to the third derivative you can set f’’’(-2)=12, and then work your way backwards
Once you get started it should start to be apparent :)
for f'''(x), i got 6a=12, a=2?
If that’s how it worked out. I can’t work it out right now, but that work make sense to me.
AX^3 => 3X^2 => 6X => 6, seems right,
Axis
Yep, and you have a
What exactly do the arrows denote?
The arrows denote the lines (axis)
Did this help you @wary stream?
Not exactly
Like the arrows point in different locations
I understand the quadrants thing but the arrows, not really
The arrows point towards the x-axis i guess?
Truth be told you can forget the arrows
I agree I think the arrows might confuse things a little bit.
How do i show that f is not differentiable at (0,0)?
I keep getting a different answer to the key
Any chance someone could tell me how come the sin and cos become squared?
derivative of sin is cos and derivative of cos is -sin, so they just multiplied them together and said it was squared
so like d/dx (sin(x)cos(x)) = cos(x)cos(x)+-sin(x)sin(x) = cos^2(x)-sin^2(x)
For the whole numbers 6, 10 and 14, check the associative property of the subtraction
of whole numbers.
help
pls
Go ahead quantum.
@shrewd tundra don’t post that in every single channel
I'm good here.
@high palm if you’re still here you can ask
Channel occupied by quantum.
Could I get some help after this channels available
this channel is available
ahh
For the whole numbers 6, 10 and 14, check the associative property of the subtraction
of whole numbers.
read the rules bruh
f(x,y,z) = z-y^3-x^2 = 0
so if youre finding partial of x with respect to y, how would you do that if x is a function of y and z
lmao
For the whole numbers 6, 10 and 14, check the associative property of the subtraction
of whole numbers. - help
pls
no body reads the rules....
@amber iron you can delete and repost your question
ok dude actually stop
you’re basically not listening
me?
very annoying
I'm here all day I got a pile of questions
ahhhhhhh
So is it okay if I post it?
i literally don’t know at this point
If not I can just go to another channel
probably do that
It's really not a big deal
the dude is probably trolling
Maybe swap to a different channel and let ykj3 use this one
@amber iron unfortunately i don’t think they are
I think hes foreign or something and wasnt reading the messages.
yeah
👍
so how would you be able to find partial of x with respect to y for that function
@amber iron you can repost your question
f(x,y,z) = z-y^3-x^2 = 0
so if youre finding partial of x with respect to y, how would you do that if x is a function of y and z
can someone tell me this answer please

bruh
Do u understand roaster form?
go to another channel lol
Anyways, isolate y and do the derivative with respect to x, and treat everything that is not x as a constant
im new and idk anything bruh fr but the teacher wants me to answer olease help
@cursive crescent its not dy/dx
@cursive crescent they are making it like x = something though
its partial of x with respect to y
that won’t work
aka dx/dy
Server rule can't tell answers
We don't work
if you try to do x = something, you’ll be excluding some solutions
Oh maybe I flipped it
can u dm?
like in the case of isolating x or y in x^2+y^2 = n
i really need it ugh
pay attention in class next time
its math, the world is not gonna end if you dont do it
actually maybe the world does end
@amber iron did you read what i said? i’m not an expert in partial derivatives but it seems right
idk why i answered if i don’t even know how to do it really lol
Would you not just take care to be sure to include both the positive and negative solutions of the root and get the solutions, or am I confusing something?
x is a function of y and z
so its a bit of a chain rule usage too, but i dont know how to use it
@cursive crescent well would you combine them after taking the derivative?
maybe you could do x^2 = something idk
and divide by 2 afterwards?
ugh that sounds wrong
you can't treat x as a constant here
x and y, both are not constants
Yeah yeah, I had the thing flipped. So it’s partial x / partial y?
I’m like 90% sure you isolate x and the do the derivative with respect to y and treat z as a constant.
z is a variable
Right but this is the partial, not implicit differentiation.
like if it was asking for dy/dx instead of dx/dy, and x was a function of y and z, im pretty sure i'd be able to do it
can someone pls tell the anser to these quesions
Also, we are not here to give you answers
then ?
probably at least 10% of the time that i say bruh is in this kind of context
explain them atleast
channel is occupied tho
talk about this in a different channel
is it possible to just find partial y/partial x and then its reciprocal?
i think so
does it work like that
cool
damn, my teacher expected me to do all that in the exam
woah this is a homework question?
Okay, so what was the question? I’ll write it on paper to see if I get what’s going on/what you’re looking for
z = ln(10-x^2-cos(y)). given x is a function of y and z, find partial x / partial y
Gotcha
how do i show that f is not differentiable at (0,0)
whats f
well, the work wasn't as hard as i thought looking back
i completely zoned out
@cursive crescent is that a total derivative?
It’s implicit partial derivatives using the chain rule to evaluate for each variable, or something.
can we proceed to #help-2 for convenience
I looked back at old notes and just slammed down variables
@cursive crescent woah
But does that seem familiar at least?
something else that sounds interesting that i gotta look up and forget about a minute later
oh wait someone occupied it .-.
Well it seems easy. Just take the partial of the function with respect to y and again with respect to x, and divide them with a negative sign maybe
maybe
A lot of maybes here. I don’t remember this really at all.
But that’s what my notes made it seem like B)
i just did it directly, and the whole denominator didn't matter cause there was a 0 on the other side
What do you mean did it directly?
@amber iron do you still need help on the first question?
Gotcha.
i'm fine, thanks
ok
Hey guys, I just wanna double check out whether my answer is correct or not.
Is there anyone who can check out whether my answer is correct or not for the conditional probability problem in a below image?
Can anyone tell me how do i evaluate limits?
I don’t need the solution, can just someone tell me if its the same as finding the limits or its a whole different process
This I believe would be an application of L’hopital’s rule
If my mental math is correct this evaluates to 0/0
Using appropriate identity evaluate 30.8 ×29.2.
pls tell
Using appropriate identity evaluate 30.8 ×29.2.
Using appropriate identity evaluate 30.8 ×29.2.
Thanks for the help!
Of course :)
It seemed like you already had that worked out
i think its wrong
it looks right…?
wait actually
i kinda forgot calc stuff, but a way to be sure ur second derivative is correct is by doing Lo D Hi minus Hi D Lo over Lo squared
and then subbing in the first derivative where necessary
👍
bruh what did my teacher do?
I'm confused can anyone pls help?
like why did she make xlnx into lnx/(1/x)?
you can write $x\ln(x)$ as a fraction $\frac{x\ln(x)}{1}$ and divide the numerator and denominator by $x$ to get $\frac{\ln(x)}{\frac{1}{x}}$
Sneaky
first of all damn bro
you really know how to operate this thing
like is it matlab thing?
? its LaTeX and I didn't misoperate anything
tex?
anyway, thanks a lot for the help. I actually understand what you meant!
oh
ohhh right Latex my bad
not matlab
i thought you said you really dont know how to operate it
n = 3 will be 1 3 3 1
i think
makes more sense now thanks
yes
hi guys does anyone know how to differentiate this
If you take derivative from left side and derivative from right side using limits can you say that derivative is the same?
For piecewise question
Limit as x approach a?
no
So if i calculate the derivative from the left and right
If they evualte the same then its f
G*
Or do I have to take derivative of actual function
Cause i end up with 0/0 for that
yea actual function
Derivative in terms of θ?
dr/dθ = 2sin(5πθ)cos(5πθ)5π
Note the triple chain rule here
Take the derivative of the outer function, keeping the inner intact, then multiply the derivative of the inner
first i made f(x) continuous
But using definition of derivative my shit ends up being 0/0 for my middle function.
ok
Well, 0/0 means you haven't found the answer yet
I get A - A/0
how do i pay taxes
A-A / X
And x is zero
And A is zero
And when I plug it into a graph it literally looks like the derivative from the left and right
But your saying it cant be?
You're saying a lot of things
So yes, you can prove the limit exists by checking the left/right sides
Why cant i use definition of derivative tho?
Cause its just a fancy limit
And treat limit from left equal to limit from right
Boom
Heres my work if anyone could give me a hand
<@&286206848099549185>
looks ok to me
What do you need clarification of?
See YouTube if you haven't yet. Some of the best tutorials there
Take any two sets, I'll call them A and B.
Put some arrows between these sets. Every arrow has to start at some element of A, and end some element in B.
All of these arrows are their own set, called a relation between A and B.
All functions are relations but not all relations are functions. This is due to the fact that functions are relations that have one output for an input. A relation shows the relationship between inputs and outputs and do not necessarily only have one output for one input.
I see
There is clear difference between function and relation
Let's understand this difference from example
Not for u
Not for me
This is a clear difference in math
In existence
Our job is to understand them
No no this is very normal to student
input x and output y
Y is the output of a relation or function
x is the input of a relation or function
For any value of x you get specific y
Take a relation (that is, a set of arrows)
This relation can also be called a function if every element in A has exactly one arrow leaving it.
If there is a element in (input) that doesn't have a arrow leaving then it's not a function
In y=5x function can you tell me a value of x that gives 2 values of y?
That's why a function can't have more than 1 outputs or 2 arrows in 1 input
There can be many inputs but output is 1 value only in a function
Can see the problem with the second relation, that two arrows are leaving from 5. Can't call that a function.
Like in quadratic function 2 values of x can have 1 value of y but there can't exist 2 or more y who will have one x
Yup
Though there might be case where 2 value of x can have same y
But there can't be 2 unique value from one x
Yes
Like in quadratic equation
X has 2 values but y is one value
x^2+5x+4=0
You really research deep lol
I guess
I mean try to think of a example
Where power is 1 and u have 2 values of x for one unique value
Np
I want to write a quadrantic equation that has a zero in the equation from the picture, but I don't know where to start.
@scarlet leaf conjugate roots (if you know of them)
z = 1 - 2i, 1 + 2i
multiply the roots and you have the quadratic equation
$z^2 - 2z+ 5$
omsai
should be the thing ig
so (1-2i)(1+2i) -> z^2-2z+5?
can anyone help me??
i missread lol
so you know how the answer came, right?
not entirely sure no
okay so
you know of the theorem that states that if a quadratic has a imaginary root
then the conjugate of that root is also a root of the equation
hmm
so you have the roots, multiplying the factors of the quadratic gives you the quadratic
so the factors of the quadratic are? @scarlet leaf
I don't know man, english isn't my native tongue so math termonology is kind of hard to grasp at times
your english is pretty good tho
so I conjugate the rootz and get z= 1-2i and 1+2i?
yes
and then I multiply the roots
not really
The factors
I said the factors
wsnd
so should I move over z to the other side initially to get 1-2-i-z = 0 or where did you get x from?
I'm pretty sure z was for 'zero'
so how did you get x into the two roots?
Factor theorem
what?
here from wikipedia... : The factor theorem states that a polynomial f(x) has a factor (x-k) if and only if f(k) = 0 (k is a root)
(x-k)(x-k) = (x-(1-2i))(x-(1+2i))
as I said above, my understand for english mathematical terms are incredibly flawed, I think I'd find it easier if you showed me the steps on how you solved it, or something like that
so you insert the function into k in this case then?
the roots
right, 1-2i and 1+2i
So by knowing that, we can refer to the factor theorem which gives: (z-k)(z-k) = (z-(1-2i))(z-(1+2i)) in our case
correct
and what would be the easiest method of epxanding (z-(1-2i))(z-(1+2i))?
does foil work in this instance?
easiest to group
like how? find it difficult since they're multiplied
Using associative property,
(x-1+2i)(x-1-2i)
((x-1)^2+2i*-2i)
Hello, I would appreciate if someone can tell me what the "hat" above the Beta exactly means, in terms of AI?
Beta hat is the coefficient vector of the least squares hyperplane
Yes, so in terms of terminology, the hat what does it mean then? Thank you for your response
Hats are typically used to say that this quantity is the estimator
Oh okay, I get it. Thank you! May I ask another thing? This is the formula of the ridge regression. Do you know what I need to change to get the lasso regression formula?
Typical multi linear regression formula
Ridge Regression
And the lasso? 🙄
how do i differentiate with respect to x and with respect to y?
There is no closed form solution for lasso
hi guys.. can anyone please help with this?
why are they making reference to "even integers"?
<@&286206848099549185> any fella available?
Cause they're arguing why a isn't surjective
No even number is mapped to by a, so it's not surjective
Is there a known algorithm to factorize a polynomial of degree 4 into the products of 2 polynomials of degree 2?
@glass lichen , anyone available
Are you able to demonstrate? I’ll send a pic of my attempt and you’ll be mortified
show how you proved the first line
i guess you could also consider
e^(kx + n) = e^(kx) * e^n
The inside function is kx+n, the outside is e^x then evaluated at kx+n
U able to show using the wolframalpha stuff please?
d/dx e^(kx+n)=(k)e^(kx+n)
What's derivative of the inside?
What do you mean when you say inside? I was taught the chain rule by substituting with u and then multiply dy/du with du/dx
Ah ok
Ah I see
O I PUT U AS THE POWER not as e^x
Should be able to do it now, thank you.
Thanks
Is there a known algorithm to factorize a polynomial of degree 4 into the products of 2 polynomials of degree 2?
Answered in another channel, ferrari's method is a well-known one
Don't ping helpers that early, see #❓how-to-get-help
Anyway, think of a way to write m<FEK in terms of x
No
guys i ran into this in my homework is it solvable?
Thanks for your answer! I really appreciate it. Then, if I want to do lasso regression, I need to do it with the Sum of the Squared Errors + lasso formula (lambda * |w|
if I remember correctly) and then the gradient descent?
Yes
Understood. Thanks a lot!!
Hellpppp badly needed. Thank you
Does this make sense?
(I need to prove f is injective)
Am I allowed to assume that f(x,y) = f(a,b)?
yeah i would write something like "Assume there exist x,y,a,b \in R, such that..."
Hey, I've got a question about game theory, specifically about the Nim game. Consider any position with 3 heaps where only one heap has one token. I would like to get all the loosing positions.
Ping me, whoever has ideas about this
Anyone know how I do simpsons rule here
i dont understand how to do it about the y-axis
what's the first and second derivative of (x+2)^2 (2x-1)^3?
Product and chain rule
lmao
-2x - (3y + 5) + 3x ?
commutative law, expand the bracket by multiplying in -1 to all the terms in it
$-2x -1*(3y+5)+3x$
Bagel
$-2x-3y-5+3x$
Bagel
Bagel
2x^2 = 1/3
<@&286206848099549185>
given 2022 real numbers $x_1\leqslant 2x_2\leqslant ...\leqslant x_{2022}$ such that $x_1+2x_2+...+2022x_{2022}=0$
prove that for some arbitrary t,
$x_1 \floor{t}+x_2 \floor{2t}+....+x_{2022} \floor{2022t} \geqslant 0$
Minh Baka
Everyone burying poor @blazing rose ‘s question 😛 Do you know simpsons rule?
I don't recall much about Simpson's rule but I used this resource a lot for calculus
https://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/classes/calcii/approximatingdefintegrals.aspx
In this section we will look at several fairly simple methods of approximating the value of a definite integral. It is not possible to evaluate every definite integral (i.e. because it is not possible to do the indefinite integral) and yet we may need to know the value of the definite integral anyway. These methods allow us to at least get an ...
Just get a new channel? We have 10 of them you know
bruh
wait guys how many lines of symmetry does a pyramid with a square base have?
It's 3 yeah?
Well since josh seems gone, I guess we can do the next one
i just realized that he pinged everyone but i think the mods fixed it so that no one will get pinged
bruh
it doesnt work lol
help 
So what did you find w to be?
$cis(\frac{2\pi}{7})$
hduxueiwkwnxudi
im bad at latex 
is it this?
Yep
What I tried was connect the two vectors
4x2yz3+5x3y2z2
so I drew $cis(0)$ and then connected $cis(\frac{2\pi}{7})$ on its tip
hduxueiwkwnxudi
would adding polynomials do i also add the numbers in front
so then I have an isosceles triangle
If I conect the tips
do u get me @half epoch
like 4x^2yz^3 + 4x^3yz would equal 8x^75y2z
yeah ik the formula but idk how to use it when i have to rotate around y axis
thanks. looking now
?
polynomials
Yes, but don’t think this will get you an answer really
i dont get what you are saying
why not
do u not know what 4x^2 means
I mean you can draw the resultant like that, surely. But I doubt that’s the answer they expect
They want the new argument in terms of pi
Reformat this using parentheses, for readability
How many lines of symmetry does a pyramid with a square base have <@&286206848099549185>
and does anyone have a diagram for 3d shapes with their symmetry lines
(4x^2yz^3) + (2x^yz^2) = ?
I mean around the exponents too
yes but thats how the question is formed
Like (4x^2)(y)(z^3)
yes but in the equation they aren't seperated
bro please someone?
do you even know what you are writing
i need explaination
because i
do not get it :/
Because it's text formatted it looks like $4x^{2yz^{3}}$
dldh06
Which is probably not what you meant
ohyea no
So $4x^{2}yz^{3}$?
dldh06
yea
Do you have a screenshot of the actual problem?
How to make n subject?
Logs
i have no idea how to find z
Or you can do something more useful, z are the points that are 2 away from the complex number 2 + 2i
ok
Learath do you mind helping me with the Simpsons rule problem?
Sure, write out simpsons law and the integral we want to calculate using it
this?
this is for revolving around the xaxis which i also need help with since i got it wrong
over f(xi)
take $G(x) = f(x)^2$ then your problem becomes $\int G(x)$. use simpson's now and see where u did wrong
Ryuzaki
nvm i got it for the xaxis
but i still dont know what to do for the yaxis
original problem
Can anyone check my work for the first half (the line integral) and then help me with the second half?
So let's begin with the line integral
z is only defined when $1-x^2-y^2 \geq 0$, so it forms a natural boundary when $1-x^2-y^2 = 0$
feather
Anyone here good at stats for data science ?
That is, its boundary is the unit circle
Which we can parameterize as $\vec{r}(t) = <\cos(t), \sin(t)>$
feather
Then $F(\vec{r}(t)) = <-\sin(t) + 0, \cos(t) - 0, \cos(t) - \sin(t)>$
feather
and $\vec{r}'(t) = <-\sin(t), \cos(t)>$
feather
Now since we want the integral over the entire circle, we'll integrate over 0, 2pi
So $\int_{0}^{2\pi} F(\vec{r}(t)) \cdot \vec{r}'(t) dt = \int_{0}^{2\pi} dt = 2\pi$
feather
holy fuck what is that awful formatting with the derivative of r(t) ._.
anyways yeah that's my line integral
So now for the surface integral we evaluate the curve
idk how to tex determinants so skip skip but I got <-1, -1, 2> for the curl
Now the problem I'm having is parameterizing z so I can find dS and finally take the dot product
And normally I would use the z = f(x, y) formula with dS = <-f'_x, -f'_y, 1> but here since it's a square root that's gonna be really ugly to integrate
what do i subtract from?
think
y axis?
(a to b) = (0 to b) - (0 to a)
i dont understand
Find the sum by suitable rearrangement. State the properties used. 253 + 352 + 347 + 648 . Is it Umm Associactive property?
@acoustic sable
the answer is 0.160 but im not sure how to get the answer
please can somone help me?
What did you choose as your substitution?
i dont know where to start tbh
You want to look at your integrand for two pieces, where one looks like the derivative of the other
Take a moment, see if you notice something that looks like that
not sure, (4t) and (πt^2)
2t
So if you let u = 2t^2, then du = 4tdt which is part of your integrand
okay
Make that substitution, and try to solve from there
i have no idea

You don't know how to make a direct substitution?
i dont know what u mean
Make these substitutions into your integral
i dont know how
Then you need to look at your notes for integration by substitution
i am at the moment
Because this is the easy part, it's finding the correct substitution that is supposed to be the "hard part"
253 is 3 above 250. 347 is 3 below 350, so 253 + 347 = 250 + 350, which is easier to add together.
$\int_0^{0.48} \sin(\pi t^2) \underbrace{4t \dd t}_{\dd u}$
Steakanator
what do i do from there
how do i do that
Your notes hold the answer to that question
im looking at my notes now
Do they have an example in there?
Does it make sense?
They set u = -t^2, so every instance of -t^2 in the integrand is replaced with u
Yes
What are you unsure about?
so i need to replace something in this equation with u
Don't overthink it
You have a t^2 in your integrand, and you know exactly how u is related to t^2
It's not sin(2pit^2), it's sin(pit^2)