#help-0
1 messages · Page 832 of 1
@devout hornet I know that this got buried, but if you have any questions/comments, please do
The way to find c in this case is to use the product and the constants given by (n+1)! and your (x-x_k)
xi is just another variable in the application I used there. In this part of numerical analysis, it's used as an arbitrary value to describe the exact error in polynomial interpolation
Yes, tbh zeta can be named anything, but it was just chosen with that variable for whatever reason
It's just conventional
someone needs to right a book full of these weird functions and there nmes as well as what they do
like the one where if you have an even number of factors you add 1 or an odd number of factors you subtract one
where it suprisingly can escape root n

hang on let me find the name of the function
Granted, the existence of the internet makes it kinda redundant for such a physical collection. I'm not aware of a collection of functions on the internet but there is the OEIS which is an encyclopedia of integer sequences
oh its mu
uh
I mentioned that functions can be named anything, the label like that isn't really as iconic as the zeta function
its part of mertenes conjecture
Yea, that's the notable part
thanks very much im giving it a go
Awesome, let me know if anything else comes up
what do you mean by buried tomc123?
I meant it got buried because there's a discussion happening in questions
while I was helping them lmao
oh thanks
also how do you make the bot screen your question
like this $\zeta(2)=\pi^2/6$
Mrmangoman1123
That's LaTeX, it's a typesetting language used typically in math, or other academic settings
i know but how do you right in latex
https://www.overleaf.com/learn/latex/Tutorials
This is a good resource, there is too much to say, it just requires practice
I've been using it for the better part of like 3-4 years now
thanks
it is helpfull
hey do you have a favourite constant
mine is the Buenos Aires constant and it equalls 2.920050977316...
it is used for finding primes
feigenbaum's constants are interesting, they represent the limiting ratio of the bifurcations of nonlinear maps
errrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr..........................
its approximatly 4.6692016
that is really cool
4 right? factoring, completing the square, quadratic formula, extracting the roots?
No, unless your assignment has "solutions" being ways to write a quadratic equation, there are 2 solutions, which means that for a quadratic function Q(x), there are 2 x such that Q(x)=0
oh ok ty
@covert cradle solutions in this case means roots
oh i thought the ways of solving lol
look into the fundamental theorem of algebra, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_theorem_of_algebra
The fundamental theorem of algebra states that every non-constant single-variable polynomial with complex coefficients has at least one complex root. This includes polynomials with real coefficients, since every real number is a complex number with its imaginary part equal to zero.
Equivalently (by definition), the theorem states that the field ...
yes it can be confusing, but do u understand why its two now?
part d?
yes
anyone good with matlab
👍
how about?
See.
We divide the coefficient of the linear term by 2 and then square it to get 50.
So $(bx/2)^2$ is 50.
Senku Ishigami
Solve for x.
ok
wow
anyone?
No idea, sorry.
do u want to solve the inequality
No it's not, you have to factor out 2 right?? So it would be 2(x²+ ... +25) then the answer would be 10x, since is multiplied by 2 it becomes 20x right?
Oh yeah you are correct.
Me wrong.
I forgot that part.
it is 10x but the method was still wrong
i dont know how senku got 10x with their method lol
oh wait it is fuck me
We all are confused.
So I would start here with the interface to take in the vectors,
then key in the 3 values you used to estimate the derivative and travel along j=1 to j=n using the boundary value given to you in the outline of the problem.
Granted, I would start by writing it in a for loop, then try to get a different solution vectorising it
I don't have the solution in front of me nor an inkling to use matlab rn, but that's what I would do
@wet cove multiply both sides by 7 and divide it by 5 (this is the same as multiplying both sides by 7/5)
som1 help meh
but i cant factor out 2x^2 - 20x + 50
You don't have to, it's just to make things easier, 2x²-20x+50 is still a perfect square
when I solve for the homogeneous solution, x_h for part a, i keep getting c1 and c2 = 0
is that how its supposed to be?
Or just use D=0
im trying to make a money printer script where it gives a bonus depending on certain variables;
There's ink_left, max_ink, paper_left, max_paper, print_amount, max_print_amount.
print_amount is the lower bounds of whats returned and max_print_amount is the upper bounds
if ink_left/max_ink == 1 and paper_left/max_paper == 1 then it will return max_print_amount
else if ink_left/max_ink == 0 and paper_left/max_paper == 0 then it will return print_amount
but i'm not sure how to get it working when ink_left/max_ink and paper_left/max_paper is anything but 1 or 0

pls help me
what language are you coding in?
if its c i can help
lua 😔 but its just maths is it not?
5 x (___) + 2 = 0 can you fill the blank?
subtract 2 from both sides, then divide both sides by 5
@alpine sable do you have the actual question?
Let me see,
so is the diffeq modeled by this just $3\ddot{x} + 3\dot{x}+x=4\sin(2t)$?
kirby
2x
yes right
nah, ive gotta make make the equation from scratch I just know the upper and lower bounds for what the answer should be
ok
so $\dot{x} = x=0$? as well if I'm reading the question correctly?
kirby
yes
Then yes, c1 and c2 will be 0
A way to think about this so you don't have to solve the first order system is just that this is after all of the exponential terms have effectively reached 0, so it makes sense that the differential equation solution is 0
so you're just left with the particular solution
ok so I used Acos(2t) + Bsin(2t) as the ansatz for the particular solution
$$x(t) = -\frac{3}{17}\cos\left(2t\right)-\frac{5}{17}\sin\left(2t\right)$$
and this is what i got
it is close but not quite 4sin2t when u plug it in

bee_ryan
when u plug this x(t) back into the original eqn, you dont really get 4sin2t back @warm brook
DO Y'ALL KNOW rational algebraic expressions?
can u pls verify my $x_p(t)$
bee_ryan
Yeah, just did, I got (4/3)sin(2t) using it
Well
4sin(2t)
I just divided out the 3 from the ddot(x) term
to make it easier to work with
doesn't change the soln
the imprecise™️ desmos check also seems to validate it
what in the
ok im just gonna trust your method
omg it worked!! thank you so much
wow
i should trust the math, and not doubt it
woah
put your faith in the mathematics
mm thanks wolframalpha
oh wait
I'm actually a dumbass
nope, even with x it still does the same thing
yeah, put your faith into your work bc tools clearly like to not work
I finally got it to work, and it verified the answer was correct, but considering it took 2 people to use wolfram alpha for it not to misinterpret something
yes
bro.....
what
Thank you :)
not you....
Yeah I also often have problems when there's much text but here I think you can use hos and hyp
adjacent and hypotenuse
@coral dragon
its asking you for the opposite in the first question
and you have ur hyp
so do you use sin cos or tan?
what
we do not have adjacent
bro
Failed to get a response from Wolfram Alpha.
If the problem persists, please contact support.
,w arctan^-1(6/15)
,w arctan(6/15)
Yeah I was right lol
bro you did ((tan^-1)^-1)
wolfram is goated
but that was my second attempt because it didnt work
,w arctan(6/15)
why can't it just it as what i want lol
Can someone like explain to me
Why the ^-1 is the inverse
Is it because it’s the reciprocal?
its not reciprocal
its inverse function of tan x
in case of tan, you get a ratio for a particular angle
but in tan^-1 you get the angle as result for a particular ratio
But what does -1 do
Compared to normal
Like why is the -1 do
Could you convert it into 1/tan(x)
no you can’t, it’s a problem in notation i suppose, but typically ^-1 attached to a function means the inverse. hence why arctan is also the inverse of the tan function
so $f^{-1}(x)\ne (f(x))^{-1}$ is what i mean by that. the left side is the inverse of $f$ and the right side is the reciprocal of $f$
kirby
Oh
Can someone please help me with question I attempted it several times and got it wrong and it even searched it up but the working is wrong
Ok so the -1 is just notation
yes
Three ants are located at the corners of an equilateral triangle ABC. The triangle has sides of length 1m. Ant A starts walking towards ant B, ant B starts walking towards ant C and ant C starts walking towards ant A. All the ants walk at a speed of 1cm/s. If the ants keep walking towards each other, will they ever meet? If so, where, and after how long in metres or centimetres?
Convert to the same unit first
Then just write it as a fraction and simplify
the one is in cm, the other is in m
Write them both in cm
Or both in m
Do that first
What did you get?
Incorrect
3m and 3cm are not the same
How many cm is one m?
No
No
@mental peak stop
Don't act dumb or I will call the mods to check the logs
<@&268886789983436800> keeps spamming images here and deleting, now acting dumb
who keeps spamming?
bea
iam not spamming wtf
i do see the deleted messages in the log
jeez 5 image deletions in 1 hour
what's the matter, @mental peak
sorry dude i sent the image on the wrong channe;
Now the ratio between two things is just the "fraction" comparing the two. So the ratio of 5 to 2 is 5/2, and the ratio of 60cm to 300cm is...?
5 times?
no 2 times
120*
sorry broo i got used to 30 ping jeez
apologies for the interruption.
i pressed the damn button so many times
@alpine sable
i think the ants will never meet
interesting
x = 1 + 1/2 + 1/3 + 1/4 + ...
Is the value of x finite?
No
how this applies to the above series
oh whops
An infinite series converges to L if the sequence of partial sums converges to L
The sequence of partial sums here is unbounded so does not converge to any L
But it seems that the value we add gets smaller
so why not the sum approach a particular value?
Because of the definition of convergence of series
It converges to a value if the sequence of partial sums gets closer and closer to that value
That's the defn
That does not happen here
The partial sums here can get arbitrarily big and is unbounded
can i ask sumthing
i'm dumb at math need to understand something about linear equations
3x + 2x × x = 12
Is this a linear equation? Cuz if we add the expression first than multiply the variable we'll get the value of x as square
But if we multiply any of the expression with the variable x first it'll not be possible to add the other expression later cuz the value will change to x² and we can't add two expressions with different variables 😀
can sumone explain that
n y
You can add x and x².
For example, 3 + 9 = 12
However, there's no nice way to simplify x + x²
It's not linear because there's no y (or, there's no input/output)
And there's an x²
aoh got it thats wut i needed to know thx
solving the differential equation and finding the curve.
That isn’t right lmao, because ants cna move inside the triangle
they will meet
at the centeroid of the triangle
like this
Question: Anton has n cubes with edge lengths a, a + b, a + 2 b,. . . , a + (n - 1) b, where n is a
is a natural number with n ≥ 1 and a and b are positive numbers.
By stacking some of the cubes on top of one another, he can build towers out of these; also a
A single cube should be viewed as a tower. The height of a tower is then the sum
the edge lengths of the cubes used.
First, let n = 4.
Show that a maximum of 14 different tower heights are possible.
Enter a pair (a, b) for which exactly 14 different tower heights are possible.
I do not understand the question with the series : a, a+b, a+2b...
Just a satisfying solution
just find the value explicitly
Replace everything in f in the equality you want to prove
You'll see that you can find a c
@elder glacier have you tried anything? like anything??
number of elements in A, Also channel busy@visual lake
ill chuck another 15 min at the question and ill see if i get any further.
@heavy otter @night geyser
@fading citrus
??
I am not going to argue with you mate
What actually is this right now, stop
I can check deleted logs as well you know that
Back on topic, thanks
Vee is saying you just factor out an x in the first equation, thal leaves you with an expression with y's in it only which you can solve
@alpine sable what do you mean
If I have difficulty with a concept or a question, I ask for help.
Just ignore them, they're known to troll
How have i trolled?
no, anheuser has
oh
did the channel is unoccupied ?
@alpine sable how is you asking me my purpose trolling tho xd
sigh
hey this isnt really math question but i know you guys are smart can someone explain to me why you can't calculate enthalpy directly for some reactions you have to do multiple components
just ping me if you know the answer, would be appreciated
Can anyone help me with these questions?
by Multiple components do you mean
multiple reactions' elthalpy are given and you gotta use hess's law?
@gilded turret
yes
like
im doing this lab report where we do that to get the bottom equation
but im confused why we cant just react Mg + 1/2O2
and measrue enthalpy change of tat
@sacred sapphire
hang on im just thinking
kk
ah yes
Hi
i think its cuz its easier ot measure the enthalpy change through those reactions that are given.
like experimentally
Everyone!
cuz
Oh Thermodynamics
if you see
Hemlo Enthalpy
so wikipedia says this but i dont understand why "it cannot be measured directly" for mg + 1/2o2
Enthalpy of Reaction... Enthalpy of Reaction... and enthalpy of formation nice
listening
Hess' law will allow u to add enthalpies as they are state functions lol
it lasts for a short time whilst allso producing high intensity light
which makes it hard to measure directly the emhalpy change to a satisfactory degree of acuracy
im not too sure as im not that much of an expert on this, but i remember our teacher talking about something related tothis
i read this but i dont get how it being "extremely exothermic" makes it difficult to measure
the fact that its extremely exothermic implies that theres ALOT of energy given awsay from the reaction . This happens really quickly as well hence making it hard to measure
yeah
thank you so much bro
all good m8
actually understood some chemistry for once
U answered this man's question, and that's what this channel for, I mean, He asked one question and he got an answer, but if he asks more, means it's another question than the first one, therefore, If I ask by the end of his question, that would mean I'm not interrupting him, It's my question now and u have to answer mine now
So are we clear?
ah yes that feeling
Alright that's fair.
Does the friction force happen or arise when two contacted bodies moving?
Why do people say that there's a friction though the body is not moving?
ooh physics
Therefore the static friction isn't a force since it's not moving!
Is it a force tho?
Explain to me then!
i was trying to d so
Therefore the static friction isn't a force since it's not moving!
no
bro chill out
yes listen to him
im am standing on the ground not. moving
If he has answers, I will
friction is a force
Weight? What is weight? I mean weight isn't mass
YES
U mean mass?
bro what does moving have to do with it..
weight
like
mass and weight are different
i mean weight
tension force
sigh
mass is the mass of the object, weight is the force of gravity on an object
mosh you explain
what is this kid lol
But weight isn't a singular force right? It consists of two things..
Tho we call it a force!
Yes, it's gravity
How come it is a force then?
same units as force
When it consists of two forces?
mass is mass
???
gravity is a force
what 2 forces are you talking about>
^^
Gravity is 1 (one) force
exactly
Isn't weight = m g
yes
i literally just said that bro
said that too..../
gravitational acceleration isnt a force either... it's acceleration
Then when the body isn't moving friction shouldn't be a force then! it's just friction!
i havent taken physics in 2 years cmon bro
It doesn't affect the body!
it does
????
It doesn't make it move, it doesn't change its state!
it prevents the object from moving
^
Buy what made us sure mass isn't a force?
bruh
units
im out i gotta finish my chem have fun dealing with him
If I push on a box and the box doesn't move, then there has to be a force counteracting my applied force by Newton's 3rd law
I can't understand what do u mean by that
mass clearly doesnt have the same units as force
so it cant be a force
[m] != [F]
ok bro
you're not measuring any force when you measure mass
when you measure weight you're measuring the force of gravity based on its mass
Okay What is mass?
look you r mass is the same wheather your on the moon or on jupiter or while floating in space,
BUT
your weight isnt
Aha
mass: the amount of shit in the object
ok bye bye fr
this is cuz weight is the force you are experiencinng by virtue of the gravitaional feild you are in
and the gravitational feild of earth isnt the same as that of the moon
eh?
oh wait
blocked, not dealing with it
are you the troll guy?
so hear me out. firstly For a force to exist need not mean there is motion.
Does space have mass?
no
depending on the normal force experienced by the object
"Does friction have mass" LMAO
i need to work on my chem but this is too funny
so in genral friction force experienced by an object does depend on that object's mass
actually
how bout i send you a website
If you're just going to comment to insult them, leave.
that explains this
sorry sorry
critical points can be found when either f'(x) = 0 - which I understood
but also it can be found when f'(x) is not defined or if it DNE
I don't get what that means
yes, Fermat's theorem
or how to calculate that...
So we can't see forces?
This will clear your doubts
Does any object have mass?
nope, but we can see their impact
Okay we haven't seen forces, How do we know they don't have masses or have some kind of special things or they have their own properties?
question:
U mean u can see the result? U can't actually see an imapct!
The honest answer is they're just a mathematical object to explain motion
what grade are you im just curous, you dont hae to answer if you dont want to
By imapct u mean what the forces did which is the result
yes
example the force of gravity pushes things down towards the center of the earth/body
(or pulls them, I digress)
Friction impedes motion, Normal force keeps objects on the surface they're on
etc
But how come the force of gravity be that way? To push them down flawlessly to the center?
I mean what makes it this perfect?
That's just how gravity works, there's an attractive pull b/w the planet and the object
Like how it controls it? I mean it's non a living entity or something
cause it's a function of mass
and distance the object is from the center
$\abs{F_g}=\frac{GMm}{R^2}$
What is a function of mass?
Mosh
I mean why it's always down to the center?
observation
cause we model everything as point masses.
I mean there is a reason
Physics is just a model to explain phenomena, it's not a set in stone rulebook for the world
a process of trying to match theory with observation
Okay how do we know that specifically this force is gravity? And how do we know that gravity is what pushes things down and not like an effect of gravity..
...
What made us so sure that graivty is one singluar force?
put something in a vacuum and let it drop
only force is gravity, and the object fell
so gravity pulls downward.
Okay Mass shouldn't be a force, but if it remained or became this way then it's a force since it keeps the object from changing
But if mass changes! then the object would be effeceted
Therefore, mass is a force
you would have learnt this in school?
Umm but different kind of forces I think because it dosen't have the abiilty to control
right?
mass isnt a force
But the rules of this channel is for answering question not for sending or reffering people to the people in school to answer question.
if mass changes, then the force of gravity changes... cause it's a function of mass
no, this server is to supplement in class education
nah i was just wondering what background knowledge yo u have
You should always be asking your teacher/educator questions about what they're teaching you, cause most people here aren't trained teachers
Never stated that u have to be in school tho? I guess? is there a rule that says? Maybe that's what the server is about but because that's what's common! But it doesn't specifiy that if u are not at school u can't come and ask
I guess there's no rule that says u have to be at a school in order to ask question
True, but you can also be self-reliant and google answers/find answers yourself
note: the rules also say to provide any progress. Progress may include what youve learned beofrehand regarding the question
i should probs leave this to mosh
Any chance I can slide in w a question if the previous one is resolved?
Therefore the mass is an indirect force if it affects something such as gravity?
no
Bruh I think u were wrong when u said gravtion force changes
it does change
Gravity doesn't depend on mass
Right?
Mass isn't what makes gravity?
Just because gravity changes! Doesn't mean the mass was the reason that made it change!
U couldn't answer the questions.
"U answered this man's question, and that's what this channel for, I mean, He asked one question and he got an answer, but if he asks more, means it's another question than the first one, therefore, If I ask by the end of his question, that would mean I'm not interrupting him, It's my question now and u have to answer mine now
So are we clear?"
I did answer the questions, you failed to understand what was being said many times
appreciate it
U blamed me for that? That's why I was asking questions. U answered the questions that I got it.. but it like beggs other questions.. of those u didn't asnwer.
U just got tired and frustrated
You kept saying mass is a force, when I said it wasn't
So u didn't actually answer my questions that are still not answered.
You weren't listening
well
Simply saying that doesn't make me understand! That's not what I was asking! I was asking why it isn't a force.
ok, stop pinging me. Im done with this conversation.
i literally sent you a resource
You're so annoying bro.
Thank u ❤️
@alpine sable I'm more than happy to get mods if you continue to troll
Because of u! U are the bad reason! Bad causes to be triggered. So u should be stopped!
Don't blame me of ur bad behaviour! U want me to stop and shut up?
not sure why you're wasting your time with a pointless troll.
rapidly changing topic (admittedly to my benefit)
(see eq below)
wolfram alpha gives a real solution as smth and an integer solution as a=3, b=3, how would I mathematically arrive at the integer solution? I admit the algebra is a bit scuffed because it stems from 2+sqrt(3) = (sqrt(a)+1)/(sqrt(b)-1) and I just messed around w it until I got the above, but unsure of how to proceed
Anyone want to jab at my question-3?
Timely Leaf
You told me to shut up.
Ahhh yeah I'll try that too - I'd tried rationalising the denominator when it was in its previous form but that didnt help much
yeah
got it to the current state to try and move the variables to one side and constants to another
its rly weird tho, cus symbolab gives the real solution too - only wolfram alpha gives both the real and integer solution
Exactly! Neither to anyone asking here, U are just here trolling and interrupting. which isn't the purpose of this channel.
Cause u are a troll, U didn't answer.
Thank u. @fading citrus
Well u should stop then if u think what I'm doing is wrong. U seem to know what is right and wrong. But choose to do the wrong.
lads please if someone sees this channel I just want them to see my question n help me learn maths
Well! Obv u don't get mad because it's funny to u, but I get mad because it isn't funny
F{x} ?
Me and u
wait sor eli this channels in use rn, not just by 2 trolls tho ;;
$(2+\sqrt{3})^{2}b=a+2\sqrt{3}\sqrt{a}+6\sqrt{3}+12$
Timely Leaf
for what its worth, for an integer solution both a and b are 3, so ofc if you just replace either of them with the same variable or have the prior knowledge that a=b then its piss easy n everything cancels out
but yeah no clue how this expression works normally
why the limits so hard to learn
If u really need an answer to ur question, then u have to ask the question u need an answer for.
wait,what??
This is related to u, Then u have to specifiy or give more information on why do u find it hard? So we can find the answer for u.Or give u the right answer.
yeah i dont knwo either i was wondering if it had to do with trig identities or smth
We would just tell u that either limts aren't hard and u are stupid or limits are hard for everyone... But there's always a reason for everything...
because just a sheer algebra method doesnt seem to get me anywhere
At a point u found out that limits are hard
yeah originally it goes
We need to know that point
So we can judge
And that's the question u are looking to answer for.
the original question is:
@young citrus Okay?
$tan(75) = \frac{\sqrt{a}+1}{\sqrt{b}-1}$
A little question. If set A is a ring, and set B is a ring too, A X B will be a ring?
Maybe we can help u.
Timely Leaf
Probably better off asking in like abstract algebra
The question does say use an addition or subtraction formula, so it did work through into tan 30 +45 which simplifies into 2+sqrt(3)
so ur saying that i need to find the reason why i see the limits so hard , right?
i think the question needs a more geometric approch
I think i dont have permision to write there
oh wait may be not
Limits are not hard, It's a problem, difficulty that made u judge it as hard. We need to know that type of a problem.
Ahhhhh, I just presumed I was on the right path with 2+sqrt(3) since thats what WA spit out
direct product u mean?
cartezian
Bro just tell us more how do u find it hard and why do u find it hard. That should be enough. @young citrus
yeah but u need to modify the operations a bit. what you are seeking is direct product. cartesian prod will not give you a ring because you don't have a + and . defined yet. that's what direct prod does
Because I'm sure it might be hard to get it, but it's not hard to understand.
ohh
i think its bc we need so much knowledge in maths before we can solve a limit
ty
and bc im dumb too
i sent my solution for @astral latch
Ahhhhh I see! Shit thats clever
sorry wait - how did you break it apart? my mental trig table is a bit rusty
is it the same just addition(sin) and subtraction(cos) rules?
with 30 and 45
sin75 = sin30+45
Ah yeah neato - makes sense! tysm
I think solving problems is just a special skill or ability..
we also have a small identity document pinned
Oooooh yeah
admitedly I meant the even dumber one where I never memorised sin(30, 45, 60) etc. 
Don't mix it with how sharp u are...
but yeah - question is resolved if anyone wants to pop in~
Thank u for explaining and helping people.
@glass lichen Can we just have a little and structured quick discussion?
That means I just have one question in my mind.
I guess u won't mind since u know the answer and I noticed that u help people.
I wonder, Is wind a force?
Does everything has an affection basically a force?
Well! Not again! it's the same question but was never answered.
you asked if water is a linear combination, so pipe down
@glass lichen
wind refers to a colective movement of particles
no
guys i failed in math
any help would do good :((
What u need help
Why don't we consider it a wind?
it can be a force. depends on the context
Doesn't it make a force?
idk i wanna improve my math grades
ah, no. it's a source of energy, but wind itself isn't a force
"wind" is not a force, rather it refers to collective movement
Yeah but it creates a force?
but when one says 'wond force acting on an object' that refers to the force that collective movement of paarticals applies onto an object
What grade
8
whats ur question
Why don't u consider it a force, when it changes the state of an object?
Ok what topics
What makes a force a force?
THE term "wind " is not a force
but "wind force " is a force. i.e the thrust force caused by the wind
Ok imma brb
wond resistance is a different matter which i dont think @red ledge wannted to talk about
What makes wind not a force?
How old are you?
Now, I'm the one who answers questions?
You may not be capable of it yet.
Maybe I am but u will never know. Therefore, I will ignore ur question.
Then your question will also be ignored, good luck finding someone who will answer it.
LMAO
Google also exists if you didn't know.
TRUE
I ignored ur question because u ignored my question.. So if u want me to answer ur question, U have to answer mine first.
U never answered my question, U just ignored it
And when i did the same!
wrong
U just got mad!
your question was answered
wrong
Wrong
correct
Correct
How did u answer this? did u forget to send the answer?
...
No one needs to answer it. We have human rights to stay silent.
i sent source
correct
do you want your questi to be answered????
U just sent me resources.
which have those answeres
that fact that you prioritise where you get the answers from as opposed to the answers themselvees show that you are asking questions for the pure sake of annoyance
Once again let me remind you one of the server rules.
We are not here to do your homework for you.
Figure the question yourself rather than being an ignorant little child.
Ok, drop the ad hominums
I did my homework, My homework has never had these questions.
Does that mean that he gave me the answer to my hw? I should hurry and make sure I get the answers
Wow
<@&268886789983436800>
What are u calling them for?
All of you need to calm down lol
These questions dont belong here abstract
these are conceptual physics questions
@sacred sapphire This person's just broke the rules and answered homework questions.
And the witness is
bro
If u consdier these were homework questions
u literally said those wernt hw questions
But u said they are homework questions!
So how did u know?
no he didnt
yessir
sir 
miss?
lord?
senpai?
Tor
oniichan?

Ñ
bruh
emoji's keep flowing from this mans keyboard
lol
hi clark
uhh yeah i need help on smth, hopefully its not too big. So, I need to learn the entire maths- further maths GCSE and further maths A level syllabus, the entire Discrete & computational mathematics Phd, and I need you to tell me how to solve the A B C conjecture
:))
Is TREE(10^100) larger than rayo's number
NOICE
Is rayo's number bigger than TREE(g64)
Assume that the cryptographic key (ie the pair (a, b) in [ax + b] _41) is changed daily. After how many days are you forced to repeat the same crypto? (Alternatively: on how many attempts is the encryption broken?)
You might be better off asking in a relevant topics channel tbh, maybe #discrete-math ?
ive tried
thanks

The answer is f.
You can say so, since you split 50 hours into at least 2 days.
In 24 hours, it'll be 9:00 AM.
Then 24 hours again, we get 9:00 AM.
Finally add two hours, since 50-48=2.
Now, we get 11 A.M.
2 mnutes
oh thx
before i have to submit
Well.
It's 12.
Since each game, four times get's us 28.
Since 4*7=28.
Now, since out of five, the mean is 40.
So then, 40/5=8. Now, 40-28=12, so that's the answer.
tysmm
yeah its 12
Your welcome.
gcf
greatest common factor?
yes
oh bet
oh yea i also got 6 thx tho
yww
\frac{\left(2x-\frac{3}{4}\right)}{\frac{3}{2}}+\frac{\left(4x-\frac{7}{3}\right)}{\frac{7}{9}}=\frac{8}{3}
how do i
{\frac{\left(2x-\frac{3}{4}\right)}{\frac{3}{2}}+\frac{\left(4x-\frac{7}{3}\right)}{\frac{7}{9}}=\frac{8}{3}}
Please Solve this on an 8th grade level for me
you're missing $'s at the beginning and end of your tex.
Hey guys just wanted to clarify that
A function can be continuous, but not differentiable, but if it is differentiable, it has to be continuous?
right?
yes.
Thanks!
You could do it the normal way, but do you know the concept "The exterior angle is equal to the sum of two interior opposite angles"
If I can get $20 a day and there's a savings account which gives 0.014% daily interest (5.35% apy), how long (Every x days) should hold I before putting my accumulated amount into the savings account if it costs $4 per transfer?
x = Every day/ 2 days/ every week/ every 2 weeks, etc?
is it compounded or simple
What is it asking for c??
It's compounded.
The first two parts are self explanatory but ya idk about c
i think this depends on precisely when you want to have the most money
Just want to know how what's the most efficient time interval/time range I should be Saving considering the rates, Daily earnings, and fee is constant.
No, you can't simplify fractions like that, what you can do is simplify the fraction by eliminating equal quantities or reducing divisible quanties
In this case you can do 1 simplification
Yeah
Keep in mind that alpha must be different than 0 and 180 though, bc you can't divide by 0
No you just didn't consider it anymore at a certain point, so yeah it's wrong
It was an equation
It should be cos(x) = 5sin(x)/13sin(x)
No it's not, you can continue from there
You can simplify both the sin
Yeah you got to the point at line 3 right?
Then you can simplify both the sines from the right fraction
Cos(alpha) = 5/13
.
So did you find the answer?
You can either do that or just use arccos(5/13)
You're welcome
Please wait 15 mins before you post the question @alpine sable </3
@alpine sable it seems to me that you are right
from the matching derivatives i got the a = 1 and then matching f(1) gives b = -1
It's 15 minutes before pinging helpers. They can post here if they like but the rule is usually posting in an unoccupied channel
there was no ongoing discussion
for the bottom function, ax + b if x > 1', should i just ignore that 1'? i dont really get what i should do there, or if itll change my answer
there might be another number, you just use this number to calulate the function value of that function at both "ends" and derivatives
There was only 5 minutes time gap between your question and the other person. A channel is normally unoccupied after like 30 minutes of inactiveness
that's.. a long time
help
there are also 10 channels
not like you need to wait for this specific one to be done
plus there's more channels for specific classes
It's because after you post the question, you wait 15 minutes before being able to ping helpers and then you wait another 15 minutes
#help-9 Looks open, if you want to post there
guys I was just wondering that
Hello guys, any of you now how to implement a Gaussian elimination? i am lost D:
how do I determine if the critical point is minima or maxima
like do you guys use the double derivative?
plug all critical points into original equation
calculate near points
wait what?
is this $2x+\frac{x^2}{x^4}$?
a disappointing son
and?
oh you don't want absolute min and max, nevermind. refer to what kai'sa said
For the second one do you mean sqrt(x³) or something else?
and?
.
after that?
well, if you're at a minimum, what are the points around your critical point gonna look like?
and just compare?
If you have a specific problem, post it in #linear-algebra
oh right okok
Go to another channel too busy here
rewrite as exponents and multiply
He means $x^(3*1/2)$
oh yeah
Andrea276
That didn't write it as I wanted :-(
You got what I mean though
((Cube root of 3)²)/sqrt(x) ??
testing $\nthroot{3}{x}$
I'm not good at that either
$\cbrt{x}^{2}$
im still learning the bot lol
Instead of a product you now have a quotient, so you can apply the same properties as before
a disappointing son
$\frac{\sqrt[3]{x}^{2}}{\sqrt{x}}$
PlesleronTepryos
ayyyyyy
What's the difference between finding minimum and maximum using the differentiable/continous law and finding minimum and maximum using double derivatives??
you can simplify that further
X^(2/3)/x^(1/2)
wait no exponents subtract
2nd derivative is concavity
not minima/maxima
more generally curvature right?
X^(2/3-1/2)=x^(1/6) so yeah it's right
curvature is another word for concavity
and what is stationary and non-stationary?
ah, gotcha
in what context
