#help-0

1 messages · Page 826 of 1

charred flint
#

in the end it doesn't matter at all yeah

#

choosing a point where the function switches makes it easy to split the integral into 2 parts

sturdy grail
#

it doesn't make sense, we are to get b_n, and the functions intervals is given above, I mean can we choose intervalls that exceeds the boundary?

charred flint
#

the function here goes on forever

#

you just want an interval that's the length of the period to integrate over

sturdy grail
#

and how is -1 the length of the period?

charred flint
#

T is the period length

#

d is a starting point you choose

sturdy grail
#

it feels weird i can choose the starting point random

#

some people uses pi and some not

charred flint
#

so like the function repeats with length 2 right?

sturdy grail
#

yes

charred flint
#

the fourier formula you posted is an integral of length 2, so no matter what d is, you're adding up each point in the function once

sweet marlin
#

Can someone help me with #16

sturdy grail
#

but don't d represent intervall on the x axis, on the bottom it doesn't add with length 2

#

@sweet marlin not done yet

sweet marlin
#

K

charred flint
#

not sure what you mean

#

when you plug d=-1 and T=2 in it's an integral from -1 to 1

#

which the question gives f(t) for

sturdy grail
#

what if we choose

#

d = 100

charred flint
#

then the integral is 100 to 102, which gives the same a_n's and b_n's

sturdy grail
#

oki I see, but is it good to choose d = 1 ?

charred flint
#

that's fine too

#

either way you're going to split the integral into f=0 and f=1 parts

sturdy grail
#

normally I'm used to have negative on the bottom of the integral

#

but it doesn't matter

hybrid plume
#

I know the channels busy plurmorant when you’re done here can u come to channel 5?

sturdy grail
#

@charred flint but let's say we have -1 to 1, which function should I insert, 1 or 0?

#

what is f(t) in between -1 to 1

charred flint
#

well it's 0 then it's 1 as you go along

#

to do the calculation you split up the integral from -1 to 0, and 0 to 1

sturdy grail
#

but then we have two integrals

#

are they to multiply with each other

charred flint
#

nah you just split them with an plus* sign

#

this sort of thing

sturdy grail
#

but with -1 to 0, the function is 0

#

and integrate of 0 is 0

#

so we can skip -1 to 0

#

and focus on 1 to 0

#

@charred flint but this would only have worked if you actually chose -1 it would have worked if you used d = 5

charred flint
#

any d will do the same thing yeah

sturdy grail
#

nah, if we chose d = 5 and our period is 2 we will get 7 to 5

#

right

charred flint
#

sure

#

and 5 to 6 has f(t)=0

#

and the integral will really be from 6 to 7 with f(t)=1

sturdy grail
#

what

#

how

#

but

charred flint
#

what part don't you believe

sturdy grail
#

so first of I don't think you can split 7 to 5, into 5 to 6 and 6 to 7

charred flint
#

I'm going with 5 to 7

#

not sure why you're writing it backwards

sturdy grail
#

yeah but how can you split 5 to 7, into 5 to 6 and 6 to 7

charred flint
#

that's how integrals work idk what you mean

sturdy grail
#

oh

#

yeah

#

my bad

#

yeah you can split into functions like that

#

okay but how is 5 to 6 has f(t) = 0

charred flint
#

so the question says -1 to 0 is f(t)=0

sturdy grail
#

yes

charred flint
#

it also says f(t+2)=f(t)

#

so we can shift those numbers up and down by multiples of 2 and it still works

#

so -1 to 0 is 0, 1 to 2, 3 to 4, and 5 to 6...

sturdy grail
#

the reason why I'm so confused is because they are not negative numbers, but I just forget it is just periods that repeat it self. it is just odd that it repeat it self on positive x axis

charred flint
#

right

sturdy grail
#

but it is about the inter vall not the x axis perse

#

but what if we had three conditions on the picewise what would we have done? then split integral into two pieaces would have done it ?

charred flint
#

for piecewise you split it every time the function changes yeah

sturdy grail
#

@charred flint should d be in t ??

#

when you subtract

charred flint
#

huh

sturdy grail
#

when you have a integral that has a intervall, you are ought to substract when you put these values in the inte finnish product

#

nvm yes you should put it in t

#

so for an example we have the integral -1 to 0 and we are to integrate cos(wnt)

and we get sin() and now we are to plug it in and we get

sin(1)-sin(0) = -sin(wn)

#

does this mean a_n = sin(wn) ?

alpine sable
#

-1 to 0 is 0

sturdy grail
#

I meant

#

1 to 0

alpine sable
#

Integral of cos is?

sturdy grail
#

sin

alpine sable
#

sin(1nw)-sin(0nw)

sturdy grail
#

oh

#

waiiiiit

#

nvm

alpine sable
#

Got it?

sturdy grail
#

we get sin(nw)

#

as you typed

#

but then a_n = sin(nw)

#

right?

alpine sable
#

Yep

sturdy grail
#

but

#

wait

alpine sable
#

Waiting

sturdy grail
#

we get

#

but then we get

#

wait

#

what is a_o

#

is a_o the amplitude?

alpine sable
#

How much is n

sturdy grail
#

infinite

alpine sable
#

What about for a_0

sturdy grail
#

it is 0

#

so we should plug in 0?

alpine sable
#

Sub in 0 instead of n yeah

sturdy grail
#

but then we get sin(0) = 0?

alpine sable
#

Is it a problem?

sturdy grail
#

no, but then we only have the sum

#

but how are to deal with the sum I forgot about it

#

so we have sum( sin(nwt)* cos(nwt))

#

what are to do with the sum should we leave it there

spice breach
#

can i quickly ask how does multiplication work with roots? (like is 2* sqrt(16) same as sqrt(32)?

gentle ingot
#

Nop

sturdy grail
#

@alpine sable

spice breach
#

because i got the answer (2-sqrt(32))/2

#

and it says the final answer is 1+2sqrt(2)

rancid wave
#

Hey, can anyone help with trig functions and triangles?

sturdy grail
#

guys this channel is not done yet

#

we are done very soon

rancid wave
#

What channel can I go to rn?

alpine sable
#

Dunno, depends on what the problem asks I guess

sturdy grail
#

idk but we are done soon

#

thats the problem

alpine sable
#

Yeah leave it in that form

sturdy grail
#

and we wouldnt leave in that form what would we do then?

#

it wants the fourie series

charred flint
#

lhopital's or taylor series to solve that limit

#

e^x ~~ 1+x+x^2/2+...

placid zinc
#

That's one of the "common limits" too

alpine sable
#

@sturdy grail check how it behaves for a_1, a_2

sturdy grail
#

@alpine sable ah really that ez?

#

Fourie series got abit easy to understand now. thank you

#

I don't understand why I would need fourie series in EE

#

rn we have signals and systems

alpine sable
#

a_3 etc. What you usually get is certain behaviour for odd or even values

#

You'll see when you get to fourier transform, laplace

sturdy grail
#

I know about laplace transform

#

what is it you transform in fourier?

#

@alpine sable derivtate demoniator and numerator

#

but if you get wishy washy answer, then you should use taylor formula

#

inotherwords if you get complex dneominator and numerator you should go with taylor formula

hybrid plume
#

Epic while he searches can you check questions 1? Quick question should only take a few seconds

sturdy grail
#

you can perhaps ask ur question

#

i think

hybrid plume
#

It has 2 small pictures

#

Don’t want to take up room here

sturdy grail
#

ask if that animu dude is done

#

no

#

dont think so

alpine sable
#

@sturdy grail you transform time domain functions to frequency domain

sturdy grail
#

I see

#

@alpine sable i think you would do taylor formula then

alpine sable
#

Gives you another domain to analyze a signal from

#

Making some things easier to see

sturdy grail
#

@alpine sable oh frequency domain

#

ye

alpine sable
#

Sum of many waves. Hard to see which waves specifically in time domain

sturdy grail
#

is the blue frequency

alpine sable
#

Yes

sturdy grail
#

why would you want that

alpine sable
#

For filtering

#

For example, I only want the low frequency. I make a low pass filter. The freq domain helps me see where the cutoff mark is

sturdy grail
#

what effect does low frequency have on that square wave?

alpine sable
#

Filters out the ripples in the high and low parts of the wave for example

sturdy grail
#

@alpine sable you filter this

alpine sable
#

Yes, just an example

sturdy grail
#

but you make it smoother adding constants tho

#

so there is no need to filter?

alpine sable
#

Explain

sturdy grail
#

the more constants we have in our fourier series, the more we can replicate the function ie, that wave will smothen out @alpine sable

#

I don't think I've worked with rienmen sum I think not sure. I'm not so well versed in that sorry.

hybrid plume
#

Np

sturdy grail
#

@alpine sable can I dm you? do you study EE too?

alpine sable
#

I finished some time ago. You can

sturdy grail
#

you graduated?

alpine sable
#

I forgot half

#

Yes

sturdy grail
#

what do you work as?

alpine sable
#

Technical writer and tutor in my free time

hybrid plume
#

Em could u take a look at my question?

compact meadow
#

Who good at algebra but with graphs

hybrid plume
#

@raw shard are you online?

raw shard
#

@hybrid plume yes

#

@hybrid plume sorry i don’t really remember anything about riemann sums

hybrid plume
#

Np, do you know any helper who would?

raw shard
#

you’d honestly be better off just looking it up lol

#

no i don’t

#

i would say just post it and wait for an answer

sweet veldt
#

do i need to make the 2.7 into .27 10^3 or 3.7 in 37 10^4

raw shard
#

@sweet veldt neither, scientific notation is x*10^y, where y is an integer, and x is an number between 1 and 10

sweet veldt
#

so this is my problem right? 2.710^4-3.710^3 correct?

#

so i have to bring the 2.7 to 27*10^3?

#

@raw shard

raw shard
#

put \ behind *

#

edit your message

#

so it doesn’t do italics

sweet veldt
#

do i leave it that or make it 2.33*10^4

#

okay sorry im not familiar with the commands

raw shard
#

you should do 2.33*10^4

#

because 2.33 is between 1 and 10

sweet veldt
#

but also because it was originally 2.7*10^4 correct

velvet perch
#

hi <@&286206848099549185> , is there any way to prove that {NOT, AND, OR} is functionally complete?

#

it means that you can construct every boolean expression with binary operands using just those three operators

#

operands meaning the inputs to the operator

#

well the idea is that you don't need any others

#

just AND, OR, and NOT

#

because XOR is just ((P OR Q) AND NOT (P AND Q))

#

but im trying to figure out how to prove that this is the case

inner lantern
#

busy?

#

wont take too long

velvet perch
#

no worries

inner lantern
#

Like im just wondering how i go from this to x >= 9

velvet perch
#

i mean

velvet perch
#

precisely

inner lantern
#

the answer is x >= 9

velvet perch
#

yeah

#

rewrite the expression as sqrt(x - 9) >= 0

#

because it is guaranteed that the principle square root of any quantity must be nonnegative

#

how would i construct the proof tho

#

would i start with an arbitrary truth table of size n

#

no no no

#

im asking how would u start the proof

#

idk what i can assume

#

what would that look like

#

ye

#

so for an arbitrary expression T(p1, p2, p3, ..., pn)

#

T is logically equivalent to the DNF of every case

#

right

glass lichen
#

So it's just the domain

velvet perch
#

every case where T(some input set) = 1

inner lantern
#

not sure what your saying

#

all i know is if i square both sides it eventually equals x>=10

#

which is incorrect

velvet perch
#

you can't square both sides

#

but just ask urself this: can sqrt(anything) be < 0

inner lantern
#

no

velvet perch
#

right

inner lantern
#

so its also sqrt(x-9) >= 0?

velvet perch
#

so we know for a fact that the set of numbers in [-1, 0) is not in the domain

#

so we can ignore them

velvet perch
inner lantern
#

Oh oh

velvet perch
#

because of the domain restriction of the sqrt() function

inner lantern
#

i see

glass lichen
#

Which I the same as just the domain

inner lantern
#

a square root can never be a negative

velvet perch
#

ye

inner lantern
#

gotcha

bold quail
#

is this channel free

bold mantle
#

Help

#

Number 7. Please

alpine sable
#

,graph 5x-2

#

,w plot 5x-2

alpine sable
#

Done

bold mantle
#

I need to know how to actually do it on my own so when I have a test I can do the question

#

pls

alpine sable
#

Make a chart

#

Like this

bold mantle
#

Is 5x the x value and 2 the y value?

#

but it doesn't give me the rise over run thing so idk where to plot the other points

alpine sable
#

x | -1 | 0 | 1 |

y | | | |

#

Sub in -1 into your equation and calculate for y

bold mantle
#

Where did u get-1 from

alpine sable
#

I picked it. You can pick any numbers

bold mantle
#

Why

nocturne juniper
#

and the number after is the y intercept

alpine sable
#

It's domain is over the whole set of real numbers. It exists for any value. Whatever x i give it, i get a y back

nocturne juniper
#

if you have a line with a slope of 5

#

then

#

for each unit of x there are 5 * x units of y

#

so

#

if you move 2 x

#

you move 10 y

#

good so far?

alpine sable
#

Our methods are different. Choose your path

bold mantle
#

why must math have so many paths

alpine sable
#

Mine is better

nocturne juniper
#

i think mine is simpler

#

so

alpine sable
#

Choose any 2 numbers elon musk

nocturne juniper
#

tf

bold mantle
#

3,8

nocturne juniper
#

uh

#

so heres my method

pseudo quarry
#

hELP

alpine sable
#

3 and 8.
5(3)-2=
5(8)-2=

#

Solve elon musk

bold mantle
#

Oh

nocturne juniper
#

if you have a line with a slope of m, then for each x-position unit you move along the line, you will move m*x y-position units

bold mantle
#

13,38

pseudo quarry
#

can any one help me with this ?

#

busy ?!!?

alpine sable
#

are u blind

pseudo quarry
#

no

#

😄

alpine sable
#

you are wasting more time than u need

nocturne juniper
#

the y-intercept just changes the starting y-position

alpine sable
#

it is faster to just LOOK then ask

#

like wtf

nocturne juniper
#

so if you have y intercept of 3 and slope of 5

#

then you start at x = 0, y = 3

alpine sable
#

First point is (3,13)
Second point is (8,38)
@bold mantle
Find those coordinates and put dots there

nocturne juniper
#

and for each x-position unit you move 5 y-position units

bold mantle
#

Ok

alpine sable
#

Take ruler and connect them and extend the line in both directions

bold mantle
#

Mhm

alpine sable
#

Now, if you picked 0, 1

#

It would have been easier to draw and calculate

#

Makes sense?

bold mantle
#

Ok

alpine sable
#

You pick the numbers that work easier for you to calculate and find on plot

bold mantle
#

Would u mind doing f(x) = 6 for me, step by step, I learn well that way

alpine sable
#

Plot the function f(x) = 6?

bold mantle
#

graph the linear function

nocturne juniper
#

here

bold mantle
#

Ok

alpine sable
#

,rotate

ocean sealBOT
bold mantle
#

oh ok

nocturne juniper
# nocturne juniper

another method you can use is just graph two different points of that function

#

and make a continuous line between them

alpine sable
#

My method yes

bold mantle
#

Could you do f(x) =3/4x - 2 please

alpine sable
#

You tell me

#

What x should I choose

bold mantle
#

1

alpine sable
#

How much is y

bold mantle
#

2?

alpine sable
#

y = f(x) = f(2) = 3/4(2) -2

#

y = f(x) = f(1) = 3/4(1) -2

bold mantle
#

,rotate

ocean sealBOT
#

Couldn't find an attached image in the last 10 messages.

bold mantle
#

,graph 5x-2

nocturne juniper
#

ok here

bold mantle
#

,w plot 5x-2

nocturne juniper
#

the other method

ocean sealBOT
bold mantle
#

Ok

grizzled sundial
#

Thanks but I can't read it lol 😦

hardy geyser
#

this channel is done?

#

why is it not c?

#

im guessing because it reaches to the 25 and 4 ?

half skiff
#

How to not procastinate

ancient saddle
quartz osprey
#

how do i find the relative minimum?

#

2 was super specific

#

everythign around it was positive

#

so i couldnt pin point it was 2 but after guessing and checking it worked

#

is there a way to find out that is is 2

past sundial
#

Random question but am I doing this right?
6^5 x 6^-3 = 6^5 / 6^3

raw shard
#

yes

ivory thicket
#

is there a hypothesis in a maths report?

atomic lodge
#

Can anyone help me with this question

#

Question 13

#

I tried but I am getting DNE

#

The correct answer is ||-8||

#

I googled and found this

#

But I don’t understand how did they simplify

#

Anyone?

alpine nacelle
#

They factor x-2 out of the numerator (so it cancels and remove the problem when x->2)

atomic lodge
#

Hmm

amber depot
#

@past sundial Yes

#

@quartz osprey If you graph the equation you should x = 2 as your relative min then.

#

In order to locate any relative minimums/maximums you need to graph the equation first.

slender bane
#

I am so lost on this trig right now

#

I will literally pay someone to explain this

quartz osprey
amber depot
#

@quartz osprey If you don't know how to solve the polynomial, here is a video that should help https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HKDdzBuffoY

This algebra 2 video tutorial explains how to factor higher degree polynomial functions and polynomial equations. It shows you how to factor expressions and equations in quadratic form using substitution. It shows you how to factor cubic polynomials using the factor by grouping method and how to factor special cases such as difference of squar...

▶ Play video
#

what is iirc?

#

How did your teacher do it? There might be other ways my bad

slender bane
amber depot
#

oh, thanks

#

@quartz osprey or this is the other way to do it or that you might be doing https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WCq3sRzsJfs&t=73s

This calculus video tutorial explains how to find the local maximum and minimum values of a function. In order to determine the relative extrema, you need to find the first derivative, set it equal to zero, and solve for x which represents the critical numbers of the function. You need to put these numbers on a number line and create a sign ch...

▶ Play video
alpine sable
#

any ideas, must be done without L hopital

ocean sealBOT
#

Andreww

alpine sable
#

Ahh ok

quartz osprey
#

it was -2,0,2

#

the thing was that -2 was- 0 and 2 were both +

#

i couldt pinpoint the exact location it was a min or a macx

#

min

#

cuz as you know it was _ + +

amber depot
#

That's good you solved it

#

or understood it

north dune
#

Busy?

#

Please help

#

How do i figure this out

stoic elbow
#

how can I turn this displacement over time graph into a velocity over time graph

north dune
#

Oh ok thanks can you help me woth this one also

#

This is it -4

#

Anyone

stoic elbow
north dune
#

Okay

#

No

#

Its credit recovery

north dune
past sundial
#

Random question but am I doing this right?
10^-4 x 10^5 = 10^5/10^4

past sundial
#

Okie thanks!

north dune
#

I dont need help anymore by the waypandaThink

stoic elbow
#

cool

raven bluff
#

guys, I think i'm over thinking this one... how does the 24 become a 4? is it simply because it's being divided by 6?

remote heron
#

yea

raven bluff
#

thanks man

remote heron
#

np

#

that was easy blobsweat

#

too easy

raven bluff
#

just needed to make sure. a beautiful subject but holy crap it makes you overthink to an unnecessary degree at times

remote heron
#

ye

#

i mean just ignore constants right

#

dealing with variables

#

'some constant' times the important part

#

once you got the variables you can go back and get constants anyways by letting vars be some convenient value

tawny lion
#

how do I find the interval of convergence?

#

when I ratio test it I just get 0

raw shard
#

@raven bluff nice choice of site to learn calculus

#

i use that site too

raven bluff
#

it's just algebra at the moment. hoping to get to calc at some point. wait... maybe what i'm learning is used in calc idk yet

raw shard
#

oh lol

#

yeah i think it might be

#

simplifying stuff

quartz osprey
#

how do i find the critical points?

#

i know its 0 and

#

idk how to find the other number

remote heron
#

other?

quartz osprey
#

theres no way its just 0

remote heron
#

oh, its not 0 i mean

#

your original function isnt defined at 0

#

so thats gonna be a problem

#

critical points will come from g'(x) = 0

quartz osprey
#

yea im finding the critical points or where the derivitive is not defined

remote heron
#

critical points are not where the derivative is undefined

quartz osprey
#

oh

#

where its disconnected

#

or i got no clue 😭

tawny lion
#

can u not post your q after mine was unanswered lol

remote heron
#

oh sad

tawny lion
#

its fine now cuz ur getting help but its just bad ettiquette

remote heron
#

u gotta use the ratio test

tawny lion
#

yeah I tried that

remote heron
tawny lion
#

it didn't yield anything

remote heron
#

hmm

tawny lion
remote heron
quartz osprey
#

oh yea its where the derivitive = 0

#

not where its undefined

#

lmao

remote heron
#

converges everywhere

toxic zephyr
#

Isn't it also when the function is not differentiable? Which in this case is when the original is undefined?

tawny lion
quartz osprey
#

im not sure

remote heron
#

oh idk

tawny lion
#

bru

remote heron
#

thats the interpretation right

#

its more a joke than anything bearlain

#

maybe ill try 1s

quartz osprey
#

cant i just set it 4x=-864/x^2

#

im ngl idk how to solve that now 🤪

remote heron
tawny lion
#

wait nvm

remote heron
#

turn it into 1 fraction

#

@tawny lion ?

#

whatd you find

quartz osprey
#

4x^3-864/x^2

remote heron
#

wheres a fraction 0

#

what makes it 0? what condition

tawny lion
remote heron
#

okay bearlain

tawny lion
#

r tends to infinity

remote heron
#

yea

#

oh

#

factorial trumps polynomial

tawny lion
toxic zephyr
remote heron
toxic zephyr
#

youre looking for when the function is either not differentiatable (original is undefined) or when the differential equals 0

remote heron
#

8 maybe?

toxic zephyr
#

yeah nws

remote heron
#

im curious about kuramas

quartz osprey
weak heron
#

Need help on how they got the unit Run

fresh wigeon
#

if someone could explain this to me i would appreciate it

#

i know my answer was wrong i chose a random one

#

i just didnt know how to solve it

stable pivot
#

is anyone here able to help me with a linear algebra problem

abstract fractal
#

Just post the problem. If someone can help, they will

stable pivot
toxic zephyr
sick ledge
#

Could someone explain to me how this is (k-1)ak+ak derived from the question?

toxic zephyr
#

its f(x) reflected across the line y=x

#

or, when f(x) has its y and x flipped

#

hence, g(x) is equal to f(y) at point x

tidal thistle
#

how do you generate an equation using the bot in here

sudden gorge
#

hi

#

uniform velocity is instantaneous velocity?

maiden dagger
#

I am so lost

#

is this supposed to be a derivative?

weak heron
#

nvm i solved my own question

rigid smelt
#

suppose that g^(5005) is just an exponentiation

#

just find g(-3pi/4) and raise it to the power of 5005

stable pivot
#

hey waler would you be willing to help me with some lin alg work

rigid smelt
#

just post it in an unoccupied channel

maiden dagger
rigid smelt
#

yes

#

supposing that we are talking about exponentiation

maiden dagger
rigid smelt
#

but sometimes f^n(x) can also be used to notate f(x) is compound in itself n times

maiden dagger
#

hmm

#

okay

rigid smelt
#

tho if it really does mean f(x) is compounded in itself n times, then theres probably some kind of theorem here

#

or maybe some cancelation in g(x) that can make the composition really easy to solve, but i cant see that for now

maiden dagger
#

yeah.. we're in the derivative unit

rigid smelt
#

eh no, this has nothign to do with derivative

maiden dagger
#

okay

#

ty

alpine sable
#

can anyone help me with question 21?

#

also draw the triangle for me

stable pivot
#

sohcahtoa :)

#

can someone help me with this

placid zinc
#

So A = LU and we want to solve LUx = b

#

What's the solution to Ly = b?

#

Once you have that, realize that Ux = y, and solve that

ember stream
#

can I know whether |AB x AC| = |AB| x |AC|
and if so, why?

#

cross products and vectors I am talking about

south arch
#

hiiii can someone pls explain why the 6xyz turned into 6yz & 6xy(dz/dx)?

tidal thistle
#

may I ask

rigid wind
haughty falcon
#

One message removed from a suspended account.

jagged imp
haughty falcon
chilly veldt
#

Or Wikipedia

haughty falcon
#

One message removed from a suspended account.

raw shard
#

bruh

haughty falcon
#

One message removed from a suspended account.

raw shard
#

you’re trolling

rigid wind
#

273/1 ?

#

lol

haughty falcon
#

One message removed from a suspended account.

haughty falcon
rigid wind
#

2730/10 if you wanna be sophisticated

haughty falcon
#

One message removed from a suspended account.

rigid wind
#

ah just random troll

haughty falcon
#

One message removed from a suspended account.

raw shard
#

now i know for sure you’re a troll

haughty falcon
#

One message removed from a suspended account.

raw shard
#

thanks

#

now stop

haughty falcon
#

One message removed from a suspended account.

#

One message removed from a suspended account.

#

One message removed from a suspended account.

#

One message removed from a suspended account.

raw shard
#

keep doing it i don’t care

#

i’ll just get a mod or something

haughty falcon
#

One message removed from a suspended account.

#

One message removed from a suspended account.

raw shard
#

no

haughty falcon
#

One message removed from a suspended account.

raw shard
#

yes

haughty falcon
#

One message removed from a suspended account.

raw shard
#

both of those are integers

haughty falcon
#

One message removed from a suspended account.

#

One message removed from a suspended account.

raw shard
#

the numerator and denominator must be integers

haughty falcon
#

One message removed from a suspended account.

raw shard
#

idk why i’m replying to you, you’re a troll

haughty falcon
#

One message removed from a suspended account.

#

One message removed from a suspended account.

#

One message removed from a suspended account.

hardy gulch
ocean sealBOT
haughty falcon
#

One message removed from a suspended account.

#

One message removed from a suspended account.

hardy gulch
#

yuh

raw shard
#

if they don’t know what a rational number is they won’t know what that means @hardy gulch

haughty falcon
#

One message removed from a suspended account.

late kernel
#

im struggling with this question , can someone help please, thx

velvet perch
#

i presume direct proportion means that x^2 = ky for some constant k

covert juniper
#

@late kernel So x^2 is proportional to y. So if x is doubled, (2x)^2 =4x^2 so y is multipled by 4

#

How would I do an epsilon n proof for $\frac{3x+3}{\sqrt{x^2+1}}$

ocean sealBOT
#

ALBERTO BALSAM

late kernel
#

ok i understand now thanks alot dud

covert juniper
#

np

ember stream
#

that it approaches a specific value?

covert juniper
#

Yeah, sorry meant to put n instead of x, I want to prove it converges to 3

ocean sealBOT
#

Ryuzaki
Compile Error! Click the errors reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)

covert juniper
#

Ill rewrite it

tender belfry
#

Can i define a mathematical point as a hypothetical geometrical figure having no width, thickness or length i.e x=0,y=0,z=0?

covert juniper
#

hey im already in this channel boss

#

find another

tender belfry
#

Ok

ocean sealBOT
#

ALBERTO BALSAM

white kiln
#

How do i solve this Im helping a friend

amber depot
#

@white kiln See what both numbers are divisible by. 18 and 24 both are divisible by 6 and 3. Use the highest one so you don't need to reduce it more.

silk pivot
#

can someone tell me where f and f' is continuos

#

please

#

please someone help me

alpine sable
#

u got your solution in other chats so ill assume i can ask here

#

can sb pls help me w this

#

i got 2880 lol

#

i drew the pentagon and counted the number of possible cases each vertex so 6x6x5x4x4=2280

#

can sb pls help me ;-;

kindred warren
#

shouldnt it be 6!

#

6 factorial

#

oh wait there are 5 corners nvm

#

wait it should still be 6 factorial

alpine sable
ocean sealBOT
alpine sable
#

thats the problem ;-;

kindred warren
#

by ends of the diagonal you mean the corners right

alpine sable
#

yeah

#

like AC cant have the same colour

kindred warren
#

ok

#

so for one corner

#

you have 6 options

#

second corner you have 5

#

third corner you have 4

#

and so on

#

that just becomes 6x5x4x3x2

#

hmm

#

but that becomes 720

#

and that isnt an answer

alpine sable
#

yeah :'(

kindred warren
#

interesting

alpine sable
#

i dont understand the explanations

#

There are $6$ ways to assign a color to $A$. WLOG, give vertex $A$ a color; we can multiply by $6$ at the end. Since vertices $A$ and $C$ cannot have the same color, there are $5$ ways to assign colors to vertex $C$. Using this same logic, there are $5$ ways to assign a color to vertices $E$, $B$, and $D$, giving a total of $5^4=625$ ways. However, vertex $D$ cannot be the same color as vertex $A$. To use complementary counting, we need to find the amount of ways for $D$ and $A$ to have the same color. Notice that this is equivalent to the amount of ways to arrange colors among the vertices of a square. Using the same logic as above, there are $5^3=125$ ways, except we must subtract the number of ways for a triangle. Each time, there is $1$ less vertex, so $5$ times less ways to color. This process stops when there are only $2$ vertices left; in this case there are simply $5$ ways to color this figure. So in conclusion, there are $6(5^4-(5^3-(5^2-(5))))=6(5^4-5^3+5^2-5)=\boxed{3120 \ \mathbf{(C)}}$ ways.

ocean sealBOT
kindred warren
#

OHHHH, i thought every corner must have a different colour

alpine sable
#

so how can we solve it? :p

kindred warren
#

but its just that the ones next to it cant have different colours

alpine sable
#

so how can we do this ;-;

kindred warren
#

hm

alpine sable
#

😭

kindred warren
#

why cant A and C have the same colours?

#

they're not next to each other

alpine sable
#

idk

#

dkfhaksdjfh

#

ded

#

could i ping a helper later ;-;

kindred warren
#

sure

alpine sable
#

Each vertex of convex pentagon $ABCDE$ is to be assigned a color. There are $6$ colors to choose from, and the ends of each diagonal must have different colors. How many different colorings are possible?

#

can sb pls explain this ;-;

kindred warren
#

oh i know

#

so A cant have the same colour as D and C

ocean sealBOT
alpine sable
kindred warren
#

B cant have the same as E and D

alpine sable
#

yep

#

thats true

kindred warren
#

yeah but im stuck on how to find the total possible combinations

alpine sable
#

same 😭

#

i suck at math

#

i always get stuff wrong at casework so i rather not do it

#

can sb pls explain solution 3 ;-;

edgy orbit
#

hi

alpine sable
#

hi

#

;-; can sb pls help

#

;-;

#

ok ig u can take this channel ill move

daring cradle
violet glacier
#

anyone?

slate patio
#

solve for tan A using quaddratic formula, then use trig ratios?

alpine sable
#

Can you calculate definite integrals using only arithmetic?

violet glacier
#

show

#

the steps

crisp grove
placid zinc
#

Some, yes. See Guassian quadrature

velvet perch
#

when u add an edge, u add a pair of vertices right

#

thered be a connected component when neither of those vertices are contained in the subgraph i think

#

does it say G is connected

#

why would u construct A that way

#

whats the context

#

Oh

#

well even if A is connected, adding vertices that arent in A but are in G would create a connected component right

#

yeah

#

but if A is connected, that doesnt imply that G is connected right

#

you could add an edge that isnt connected to A

#

wdym

#

well udk if G \ A is connected either

olive inlet
#

Is this channel free?

charred flint
alpine sable
#

help anyone?

unkempt remnant
#

Can someone help explain this question to me? I solved everything correctly besides the part about additional material wasted on support structure being 14% i’m not sure whether to add 14% of the weight or take it off. And if i add it, from where do i find the 14%?
X=0 Y=0 Z=4

alpine sable
#

ok

charred flint
#

you'll have to explain to me every part of that question

unkempt remnant
charred flint
#

@unkempt remnant add the weight

#

since it's extra cost

olive inlet
#

Sorry I didn't saw his question D:

unkempt remnant
#

Yeah so the weight i got of the finished product is 2.897kg, then i added 0.33kg to it from the CNC machning bit which adds up to 3.227kg. What’s left is the 14% additional material wasted, how do i find out what value do i get 14% off to add

charred flint
#

it's fine, I just don't know what m or Decoder are

#

idk what the CNC bit is because I can't see question 5, but the answer is just adding the normal cost plus 14% of the material cost extra

unkempt remnant
#

Oh so like if the final cost is $4500 i multiply it by 14% and then add 4500 to whatever that value is?

charred flint
#

yup that works

#

if that final cost is the material cost, idk the full situation

unkempt remnant
#

Final cost is for the raw material before any machining

charred flint
#

sounds good

unkempt remnant
#

But we don’t know what the weight of the raw is

soft zodiac
#

Can someone help me to solve: arcsin(sin(10pi/9))? It has to be an exact value and we can't use a calculator.

soft zodiac
wary stream
#

Make it appear on the unit circle

strong furnace
wary stream
#

Oh, wait, it's divided by 9

broken valve
#

Guys what is 4+3

wary stream
#

Don't ask troll questions

broken valve
#

I'm serious

strong furnace
#

definition of arcsin() is inverse function of sin(x) for x in [-pi/2,pi/2] btw

wary stream
broken valve
#

Okay so what's the square root of 980

wary stream
#

Use a calculator

strong furnace
#

Baguette I hope you find something better in life I wish you nothing less

broken valve
#

Ok

broken valve
strong furnace
#

you're gonna have to decide that based on the restriction of domain of sin(x)
(restriction is [-pi/2,pi/2] so you would want your input to be something like arcsin(sin(a)) with a in [-pi/2,pi/2])

mental peak
#

Guys need help with my pre calc

#

Can someone hep me with this

#

everything.

#

lmfao

soft zodiac
covert juniper
#

Does there exist a 3x3 invertible matrix A such that $BA^T=A^{-1}C$ where B and C are are arbitrary 3x3 matrices?

ocean sealBOT
#

ALBERTO BALSAM

mental peak
#

lmao

#

just giev me the damn answer my parents are not gonna pay for my tuition if i dont pass the test

#

4

strong furnace
mental peak
#

common

#

no

#

its 3 in the damn morning

#

i have a test in 5 hours

#

i havent took notes and studied at all

#

frick my parents are gonna kill me

#

ffs

#

i told them i got a perfect score on my last pre calc longtest

#

the truth is i failed

#

i got 47%

#

ffs

rigid wind
#

lmao

strong furnace
#

I know you're trolling but if you lied about your results and actually feel guilty you can use that energy to redeem yourself, I have done it more than once

mental peak
#

yes exactly

#

i learned my lesson

#

not to get caught

strong furnace
#

your plan depends on others helping you out so I wouldn't say you learned your lesson even if it was academic dishonesty but sigh 😕 you are not going to get help here when you phrase it like that

mental peak
#

its my parents fault

#

i want to be a damn lawyer not an engineer

#

what a waste of tuition money man

strong furnace
#

if they are more blatant about cheating on a test even if it as a joke I would ping mods but I am 99% they are trolling cuz last time they asked a fractions problem and now they're on some basic calculus within 2 days

mental peak
#

oh

#

ig iam too dumb to be true

mental peak
#

sigh.. im just gonna drink hotdog juice after the test bye

#

.

#

iam not trolling wtf ...... i only troll on valorant

#

XDD\

#

iam kinda wasting my time when i waste ppls time

sly mantle
#

they left vvThink

sly mantle
covert juniper
river remnant
#

Is this question a typo?

#

How do you get cos(2x)=1? The triangle wouldn't exist, right? You would just end up with a straight line

compact lynx
#

@river remnant I'm lost on what you're asking

river remnant
#

the question is giving me cos(2x)=1

compact lynx
#

yeah, I'm lost on why you're asking about a triangle being a straight line

river remnant
#

but cos(any angle) shouldn't be 1, because the triangle wouldn't exist, right?

compact lynx
#

hmm

#

it won't be a traditional triangle

#

you've done the unit circle yes?

river remnant
#

yeah the answer would just be x=0 right

#

probably typo

compact lynx
#

x=0, x=pi, x=2pi

river remnant
#

when x=pi wouldn't it be -1 not 1

compact lynx
#

no, because it's cos(2x) not cos(x)

#

which means the period is 2pi/2

#

anyway yeah cos(x) = 1 means it's not a traditional triangle but cos can still equal 1

#

remember cos is just the measure of the ratio between the adjacent and hypotenuse

#

or x/r

#

and that occurs on the horizontal line portions of the unit circle

river remnant
#

yeah thanks

ocean sealBOT
#

ALBERTO BALSAM

remote silo
#

x^2 divided by 7x^2

anyone?

compact lynx
#

how would you solve

#

5x

x

#

@remote silo

#

also yea sry i dont remember enough lin alg to help :(

remote silo
#

x is counted as 1 right?

#

nvm

compact lynx
#

yeah i mean, how would u simplify that

#

i'm also asking that as an example for him, not a question

#

@remote silo But yeah,

compact lynx
#

how would u simplify 5x/x

remote silo
#

5x^2?

compact lynx
#

hmmm

#

how would you solve say

#

10/2

remote silo
#

yes i know

remote silo
compact lynx
#

how about 5*2 / 2

#

you can either evaluate that as 10/2

#

OR you can cancel out the 2s on the numerator and denominator

#

and get the answer, 5 right

remote silo
#

yeah

compact lynx
#

so how about 5*x / x

remote silo
#

still 5x?

compact lynx
#

why x?

#

look at the 5*2 / 2 example we did above

#

just think of x as a number

#

because that's what it is

#

it's just some arbitrary number, it's not anything too complex or different

remote silo
#

so its 5?

compact lynx
#

yes, you just cancel the 5 term from the numerator and denominator

#

so how about x / 7x

remote silo
#

7

compact lynx
#

no

#

think about the placement of the division sign

remote silo
#

-7?

compact lynx
#

no

#

how would u simplify 14/21

remote silo
#

14/21 or 21/14?

compact lynx
#

what..

kindred warren
#

14/21

#

if you scale the numerator of a fraction, and scale the denominator by the same number, then the fraction has the same value

#

so what is the highest common factor is 14 and 21

compact lynx
#

i think you gotta really brush up on basic arithmetic skills before moving onto / continuing in algebra

remote silo
#

can you help on multiplying and dividing rational expression though?

elder glacier
#

@remote silo what is 2 /( 2 * 7)

compact lynx
#

especially if whatever you want to do in the future requires further mathematics you'll struggle a lot at this rate, it'd be in your best interest to go through various lessons from sites / youtube channels

compact lynx
#

@remote silo if you are unable to simplify 14/21 or 5*x / x giving you the answer to your question wouldn't help you at all

elder glacier
#

no man

#

just cancel the 2's

#

and your left with 2/2 on the numerator

#

which is 1

#

and (7*2)/2 on the denominator which is 7

#

so you get 1/7

#

i really can't see why my solution of y=4x/3 + 5/3 is incorrect, ive been stuck on it since last night, could someone share some wisdom

north blade
#

What is the chance of a 1.4% thing happen twice in a row

elder glacier
#

@north blade (1.4%)^2

compact lynx
#

(0.014)(0.014)

north blade
#

0.000196%?

compact lynx
#

no, this is the raw probability between 0 and 1

#

if u want it back into probability u need to multiply by 100

north blade
#

oh yeah

compact lynx
#

it's like how P(A) = 1 means there is a 100% chance of event A occurring

elder glacier
#

<@&286206848099549185> can someone explain why my answer is incorrect im so lost.

#

i even changed the syntax of the equation to 4x/3 + 5/3 since it was incorrectly written in my answer

harsh belfry
#

Was wondering if someone could help me figure out where I was a big stupid dumb idiot.

#

I first differentiated the function between f(x) and g(x)
and their primes, one using power rule the other using chain rule

#

then I utilized product rule to put it into this equation

#

(second writing out their derivatives)

placid zinc
#

No need to consider -2 as its own function

#

Constant multiple rule: Take the derivative as if the -2 isn't there, and throw it back on after

#

d/dx[-2f(x)] = -2f'(x)

harsh belfry
#

o

#

interesting

placid zinc
#

The product rule will work and get you the same thing

harsh belfry
#

yeah so my issue was actually that I didnt use chain rule on g(x)

#

instead I used power rule and completely forgot about the 1/2

#

so I ended up with an extremely similar answer

harsh belfry
#

vs the real answer

harsh belfry
#

I keep neglecting that constant multiple rule exists

#

thanks!

ancient shale
#

Could someone give me a hint? I know how to simplify this sums without the 5 * in front but not with it.

placid zinc
#

Simplify? Just get the sums

#

5[(1 + 3/5) + (1 + 6/5) + (1 + 9/5)] - [...

ancient shale
#

yeah sure i could but is it possible to simplify two sums when i have a factor in front`?

harsh girder
#

You can combine the two summations into one

placid zinc
#

It just means "compute the sum, then multiply it by 5"

#

Notice I gave that part explicitly

ancient shale
ancient shale
#

will try it now

#

it was correct

harsh girder
ocean sealBOT
#

秋水

elder glacier
#

can someone explain why my first answer was incorrect, ps i changed the notation so now its 4x/3

harsh girder
elder glacier
#

yea i had changed it

#

to 4x/3

#

still incorrect

#

ive been stuck on all last night and all this morning

harsh girder
#

do you have *

elder glacier
#

yep

#

tried all notation

#

syntax*

ancient shale
harsh girder
ancient shale
#

thx man

spare vale
#

Can someone help when youre done

ancient shale
#

im done

spare vale
#

Okay let me send it

#

Q6

harsh girder
# spare vale

You just need to calculate the distance from the origin to the line

spare vale
#

So route 10

#

I dont know what that means

harsh girder
#

Or you combine the two equations and then the two real roots of the quadratic equation are equal

spare vale
#

Eh

harsh girder
ocean sealBOT
#

秋水

spare vale
#

What do i do from there

#

Expand?

#

Is that what im meant to do

#

But if i find x what do i do eith it

harsh girder
#

$(-3x+10)^2=9x^2-60x+100$

ocean sealBOT
#

秋水

harsh girder
#

not 9x^2+100

spare vale
#

Huhhhh howd u get that

prime fjord
#

$(a+b)^2 = (a+b)(a+b) = a^2 + 2ab + b^2$

ocean sealBOT
#

egg bird

spare vale
#

Okay now what

prime fjord
#

Find x, find y

#

Then since one point from the line touches the circle, it must be a tangent

spare vale
#

Is x 3 and y 1

prime fjord
#

Yes

spare vale
#

How do i say that shiws its a tangent

#

Shows*

prime fjord
#

Say that since the line and circle intercept at just one point, it must be a tangent

spare vale
#

Okay thankksss

harsh belfry
#

Found it!!!!!

gentle ingot
#

!!!

#

Great job

harsh belfry
#

Haha thanks

#

Careless mistakes are my downfall.

gentle ingot
#

Same though

harsh belfry
#

Hey asher...

#

Never mind

#

how is that not my answer?

harsh belfry
#

is there any chance I screwed up somewhere else I didnt notice?

harsh girder
#

yes, you are correct

harsh belfry
#

huh wow

#

but it got marked wrong

#

will email my professor

harsh girder
#

may be write as

#

$\frac{6 x}{\sqrt{6 x^2+1}}$

ocean sealBOT
#

秋水