#help-0
1 messages · Page 822 of 1
hi
im doing regression analyiss/report and we had to throw a ball 10 times at 10 distances... i have to attach a photo of the setup
would I get away with this u reckon?
Guy literally just asked a question
idk, you are kinda walking over me
ohl
i asked this
ill help 1 sec
You mean, the one in calculus?
yes
im to prove this with the reciprocal rule
how would i go about doing that, and what does the rule mean?
1- use the difference quotient limit definition of derivatives
2- it shows the relation between derivative of function and derivative of its reciprocal
i think this could help you.. it explains how the reciprocal rules work https://youtu.be/1IzOta0ILqI
Some of the links below are affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. If you purchase through these links, it won't cost you any additional cash, but it will help to support my channel. Thank you!
►PRODUCT RECOMMENDATIONS https://www.amazon.com/shop/brithemathguy (affiliate links)
Reciprocal Rule: Reciprocal Ru...
cheers, i will check that out ^
why didnt i think of that lol, thanks
Does this mathematic formula work: https://youtu.be/eMKwC6WyIMQ??
Best of Devon Larratt - Armwrestling Champion
Best of created by Max Krest
Information:
The used music and video footage of the matches doesnt belong to me.
The 2021 match original video footage: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHVeV67qBv0&t=842s
WAL 405 original video footage: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNMqJS61NT0&t=632s
im trying to solve systems of equation and the matrix det is 0 hence no inverse
that means there could be 0 solutions or infinitely many solutions right?
Ye
say I got something like this
x+5/4z=0
y+1/4z=0
z=-4/5x and z=-4y
thats it's two solutions right..? or is there way more
Infinitely many
To better understand, set one variable to be "free":
x = 5z/4
y = -z/4
Now, give any value of z you want, and get an x and y that solves the system
There's a one-dimensional subspace of solutions
integral sign?
integral
Thanks!
whats the fastest way to do this with calc?
nono i mean the convesrion from m n sec to km n h
just the time
whats the fastes way to fo it?
250m is 0.25km right
how do u convert the time
5/3600?
Everyday a fruit seller sells 50% of his stock. 10% of
the stock gets spoiled during the night. If a total of 1983
fruits got spoiled in three days period, how many fruits
did he start with?
I’m so confused, how do I get the mean without the standard deviation/how do I get the standard deviation without the mean?
I’ve got the answers now, but I’m still a bit confused so I wouldn’t mind an explaination on how to get them
mean will be the central value for a symetric distribution , as long as its symmetric it will even out regarldess how it looks and thats what youre supposed to get from them saying its normal dist
So with a question like this the mean is always just the middle of the two numbers given?
As long as it’s normal distribution
provided its a symetric distritbution yes, if its skewed it wont work that wouldnt be a normal one though
Ok
So for the standard deviation we would find the Z value of 0.49 right?
Then rearrange the Z=X-mean/standard deviation formula
And use the 10500 and 15000 (or 6000?)
how do u calculate elo uwu
e
Yoo so is 7:30am to 10:30am 3 hours and 30 minutes?
@plush shuttle i believe your z value is too low, 2 standard deviations is about 96% so it should be slightly above, might be wrong though didnt do this for a while
I would’ve thought you’d find the Z value for 0.49 as it’s half of the 98% they give you in the question
ah okay i thought you meant your z is 0,49, z for 0,49 is right
2.326 I think is what I got
yeah looks good, thats what i meant with should be above 2
np, what i originally wanted to ask myself: manhattan distance is x+y, it there a name for max(x,y) ?
No idea sorry
nvm found with google Chebyshev distance
any clue?
btw my exam is over i just wanna know if i did it correct
here further proof ig
?
this one also
what did u mark
i marked b
if its A then right
25
doing
ok
but 25 im sure is A
alr
that middle step is so wrong
Second line is wrong
k/3 + 1
yes
instead of (k+1)/3
which is this
How ?
(k+1)(k+2) is taken out as common
u are left with (k/3) +1 in the parentheses
which is (k+3)/3
np
for first principle u do [f(x+h)-f(x)] / h
how do i exactly sub that lol
do you have the statement for "radius and tangent" theorem?
uh nope
i guess it just that theorem of two tangents equal from external point
and for radius uh i no idea that theorem
theres multiple it hink
and i dunno how it helps for this
oh, radius-tangent is just the fact they're orthogonal
what is orthogonal
perpendicular
perpendicular
oh lol
your function's graph is a semicircle of radius 3 centered at (0,4)
wym by that
isnt it cuase - infront of x^2?
... the sqrt is positive
righh
so this?
wait but is my theory correct too then?
what theory...?
or wrong
no, that's just from the algebra... has nothing to do with the fact it's the upper semicircle.
,w graph sqrt(9-x^2)+4=y
does it have to do with where it concaves?
????
Ive told you why the shape is what it is
righh
anyway, they want you to find the slope of a radius then take the perpendicular slope.
righh
right*
k
thanks for that
can i hassle u with my 2nd inquiry
which is a continuation of that concaving thing
so it doesnt matter if there is a - in front of the x^2?
it can curve up or down if - is the coeff?
Negative leading coefficient of a quadratic leads to a concave down parabola
so it has a maximum as shown by differentiating
oh so my statement is correct then right
so if + coeff it would concave up?
Yes coz then the stationary point would have be negative if u do f’(x)
negative is max
- has a min so concave up
Then for higher order polynomials u look where the function decreases and increasing ie point of inflexions
but know quadratics first then build up
yee
How would you differentiate sin(3x) where x is in degrees?
<@&286206848099549185>
using chain rule
i know that
but i ended up with (pi/60)*cos(x) in radians
but the answer is (pi/60)*cos(3x) in rad
yooo
can i ask what ur name is
i have a friend who has the exact same initials and same pfp lol
?
you should get 3cos3x
where did you get pi/60 from
it doesn’t matter whether x is in degrees or radians, the differential is the same
yes should always be 3cos3x
is 94.72225 7 siggnificant figures
that's just a mere coincidence
yes
then whyy the hell was i wrong
whats the q
Yes, but a circle isn't a polynomial in the sense you're talking about
Help
Help
Help
Please
So this is the solution and the very left problem is the original question. can someone explain what is happening in each step?
Do you know row reduction / Gaussian elimination
yes
i have a question though
so i know that the goal is the make the numbers below the diagonal all 0s
but it seems like sometimes it gets super messy and there are various ways to do it
but do they all lead to the correct answer?
i swear sometimes i try these on my own and it seems like i took the wrong "path"
@cerulean wolf also why is there a negative?
in front of the matrix
like the first step he did he just swapped row3 and row1, where is that negative from?
@vital delta they are just the range from n to 2n-1
4.5 square using identities
what is pascals traingle


Yo guys
I’m really confused
Dividing polynomials by long division
Why do you need to divide the first term of the numerator by the first term of the denominator
is this the original q?
Hi I need halp :P
How does it equalt 19,958,400 ? When i plug in the number 6 in the equation I get 12
@hidden junco there are 12 holes, not 6
Is that not 2 seperate graphs ?
There are 12 verticles, instead of 6
11!/2 is 19,958,400
I believe not
bruhhhhh
it couldn't be 2 graphs if the answer is 19M
Topic is about Rational Fractions, I already found their y but I have a value that has an undefined y. Do I need to include it to the graph? If so, how?
how do i factorise with a leading coefficient that is not 1
Quadratic formula is a for sure method
Or look up any factoring method
i spent like 20 mins trying to factorise it before realising it couldnt be factored further 🤦
Is that for all the imaginary numbers? (Sorry for late reply)
can someone explain me how to get to 1/2(cos^2xcos^2y + 1) from the equation above?
eh?
oh wait lemme try
yeah, idk....
yea
alright
Kinda messy :v but so far I got to this
Leave the original equation which is cos^2xcos^y and try to eliminate the rest
could someone pls tell me if i did this correctly
(A+b)^2 != a^2+b^2
Like leave cos^2xcos^y alone
And work on the rest
oh
Did it :v
But now I have to somehow reverse it
yeah just figured that out
haha
thanks alot
what is the inverse of the slope for?
Could someone explain this to me ?
i tried to understand
but it's confuses me a lot
Hmm, so if you are familiar with derivation, antiderivation is the operation you can use on the result of derivation to get the original function back
but how do i find this function ?
The operation is useful for multiple purposes such as computing the area of curves, but it has some issues and limitations, for example the derivative of 2x+2 is 2 and the integral or antiderivative of that is clearly 2x but information on if there was a constant added such as we had 2 there is lost
depends on what you are computing the integral for. polynomials are rather easy as they are easy to derivate, but computing integrals is often about trying to check what could have been derivated to get the function you are integrating
http://integral-table.com/ you can check some formulas form there or from some other similar source
its basically just inverse derivative
its called indefinite integral
integrals can be used to find the area of a certain part of a curve
and there are other uses too
but there's a table of those primitives?
i'm looking into my book and in one of the examples f(x) = x² and F(x) equals x³/3
or i just have to take like
ahh thank you! I'm so forgetful with all these math words haha
if x² is the derivative of x² so A*C *X^(C-1) should be euqal to x² ?
How did he go from the top form to bottom form
if you expand that, you get 2 summations. but doing that doesnt get you that result
i^2 and i
<@&286206848099549185>
- If your question has not been answered for a minimum of 15 minutes, you may use the <@&286206848099549185> tag once.
@vital delta
And what is the sum of i and i^2? Use those identities to transform it into what is written there
||https://brilliant.org/wiki/sum-of-n-n2-or-n3/ The identities can be found on the link, though you should have them covered||
I know the identies but im failing to see how they simplify to get that result
What can you factor from those identities?
n+1
just n+1?
n+1/2
What are you doing with the Collatz conjecture 🤔
Great, factor them out
What are you left with?
(inside the parenthesis)
(n(2n+1)/3)+n
Can you show me a picture perhaps, that doesn't look right
What are you trying to solve for, in this question?
I don't see any factoring done
i saw people talking about it
i wanna know how to do it
Does it make sense to you why
$\frac{n(n+1)}{2} + \frac{n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6} = \frac{n(n+1)}{2} \left( 1 + \frac{2n+1}{3} \right)$
i factored (n+1)/2
i need help here
ok
peaceGiant
yes, we take everything out
Now, simplify inside the brackets
Write that 1 as 3/3 and go from there
try to match the given expression you had
thank you @small bear
Right, x->3- means the limit goes to -inf
It isn't bounded from below, though it is from above
yeah, in that case it's unbounded
No, unbounded means it doesn't have any value where it stops (The asymptote here is vertical anyway so that doesn't matter)
Bounded would mean there is a precise value it goes to
Exactly
Can someone help me with that? I tried to translate the question so it might have some errors, but i guess it is ok.
Idk how to solve this, idk too much of chi-square, and its relation to degrees of freedom..
i guess it is true cause is 4*(Normal Distribution^2) so might be 4 degrees of freedom
No, if Y is normally distributed, then any c*Y is also normally distributed for any scalar c
but is not cY, it is cY^2 no?
and (Y^2) is chi-square
am i wrong?
My mistake, but in that case it should be a chi-squared distribution with just one degree of freedom
yaya
those aren't the subsets those are the elements of the set
{6,8} is a subset too
hi i have no idea on how to format this for an answer
ummm
I watched this video, i guess if it's 4*Z^2 so (Z²+Z²+Z²+Z²) and as shown at the video this means that is 4 degrees of freedom right?
you're right but wrong reason lol
it's 2^4
you can make subsets by asking "is 6 in it? yes/no" etc
to get 4 yes/no questions, so 2*2*2*2
Yes but like I linked you before, we're not dealing with 4 copies of i.i.d. variables, but 4 multiplied by one single variable
It's like saying throwing two dice is the same as multiplying the outcome of one dice with 2
Hm......
what is i.i.d? sorry
identically independently distributed
np
the question asks which one of these is a function, i havent learned a lot about these but im guessing that b is sin x?
4 choose 4 + 4 choose 3 + 4 choose 2 + 4 choose 1
,w (4 choose 4) + (4 choose 3) + (4 choose 2) + (4 choose 1)
also 4 choose 0
Oh do you have to count the empty set?
In the library at the moment
Can someone help me answer a question?
Test got postponed for tmrw so we are all in the library atm
Dont mind the calcs. Used a different formula on accident
How do we find local extremes in general?
We set the derivative of the function equal to zero
f'(x) = 0
and then we solve for x
Can you do that?
f'(x) is given, set it equal to zero first
??
Can you tell me what f'(x) is?
@eternal arrow i think i’m pretty good at this so i can answer anything that confuses you
umm ok
what do you not understand?
just go to priv dm. Dont need to clog this question channel
oh ok
Im just confused how to solve this :/ I learn off of solutions cuz its hard to learn something u dont understand from discord text lol
you might need second derivatives to tell you if it’s a local minimum or maximum
It's given that x>0, so it wont be
[5] is 5 points is awarded for the mock question
ye
(It just wants the coordinate of A)
ok so yeah you need to find the value of x when f’(x)=0
the other guy already said that i know
Just send the solution and il stiudy off it
usuallly how i learn that orchanic tutor on yourube
you have to at least try
f’(x) = 3x^2-8x-3 = 0
i just learned this stuff off of articles
you can rewrite this as 3x^2 = 3+8x
i can’t help you if you don’t try just so you know
Does anyone know how to find area of c ik the answer 75 but I don’t know why
<@&286206848099549185>
Its fine il do it myselg
Boys and girls , please reccommend me good combinatorical book
<@&286206848099549185>
Help?
I have a test on this stuff on Thursday
I'm scared out of my mind that I'm going to fail
how do i find the period from the questions 5-10 when the coefficient of x isn't there?
no answers just step-by-step solution
<@&286206848099549185>
What exactly do you need help with tho?
I don't know, @prisma dove
Umm.. for 3.6 I had the idea of using boundary points to prove that any finite set should be closed, but I don't think this is correct
Probably not, and I should be ashamed that I had such a stupid idea
Ok, let's do 3.6 then
First
Notice that finite union of closed sets is still closed
Try to prove this if you haven't
Okay
Now
Let's prove that a point in a metric space is a closed set
using a bunch of different definitions (ways)
A set is closed if it contains all of its own boundary points
That's kinda what I was thinking
Yup, let's now compute the boundary of a point in a metric space.
They can, depending on the topology.
for instance
If you have (0, 1), for instance, this can't be finite because you have an infinite number of points that get closer and closer to 1
Wait
Okay
I see
We could have the trivial metric on a set X
And you notice that in the topology induced by this metric
every point is open
and every point is closed
so finite sets can be open
depending on the metric/topology
And now we are dealing with general metric spaces
You need to have this in mind
Okay
Okay
anybody available?
What happened?
\textbf{Theorem}
\
\
Let $X$ be a metric space and $x \in X$ a point in $x$, we have that
$$
{x}
$$
Is closed in $X$.
\
\
Indeed, first we prove a lemma.
\
\
\textbf{Lemma} Every metric space is Hausdorff, i.e for every metric space $X$ and $x,y \in X$ distinct points in $(X,d)$, we have that there exists $U \subset X$ and $V \subset X$ open sets with $x \in U$, $y \in V$ and $U \cap V = \varnothing$
\
\
\textbf{Proof of the Lemma}
\
\
Indeed, let $x,y \in X$ be distinct points in a metric space $(X,d)$. Then, we have that $d(x,y) > 0$. Now, take $\varepsilon := d(x,y)$. \
\
We have that $x \in B(x, \varepsilon / 2)$ and $y \in B(y,\varepsilon / 2)$ are open neighborhoods, but $B(x, \varepsilon /2) \cap B(y, \varepsilon / 2) = \varnothing$.
\
\
That's the case, since if $z \in B(x, \varepsilon /2) \cap B(y, \varepsilon / 2)$, we would have that $d(x,z) < \varepsilon / 2$ and at the same time $d(z,y) < \varepsilon / 2$. This would imply then that
$$
d(x,z) + d(z,y) < \varepsilon := d(x,y)
$$
But by the triangle inequality, we have that
$$
d(x,z) + d(z,y) \geq d(x,y)
$$
Which is a contradiction, so every metric space is Hausdorff ; $\square$
\
\
\textbf{Proof of the Theorem}
\
\
We will prove that for a metric space $(X,d)$ we have
$$
{x} = \overline{{x}}
$$
Hence every point in a metric space is closed. Indeed, suppose by way of contradiction that $\exists y \in X$ with $y \neq x$ and $y \in \overline{{x}}$. This is a contradiction, since this would imply that any open neighborhood of $y$ intersects ${x}$. But by the previous lemma, we always have that there exists an open neighborhood of $y$ that does not contain ${x}$.
\
\
So indeed
$$
{x} = \overline{{x}}
$$
And every point in a metric space is closed ; $\square$
MisterSystem
That might have been a typo
I have corrected it now
\textbf{Corollary}
\
\
Finite sets in a metric space $(X,d)$ are closed.
\
\
Indeed, finite sets are a finite union of points, and since points are closed in a metric space and finite union of closed sets are closed, we get the result ; $\square$
MisterSystem
Anyways, I tried to be very detailed and highlight everything I have used
The fact that metric spaces are hausdorff is pretty important and you use that a lot
for instance
(Hint : Use the Hausdorff condition to solve problem 3.10)
if I have two grades, 70 & 93, but one is worth 60% of overall grade and the other is worth 40%, how would I calculate my grade
Which one is worth which
Can someone help me out with a problem im having in R, even if you have an idea on how to implement in python I can look up function equivalents in R. I have a CSV file with Columns being thousands of variables and rows being individual patients. I added a row at the bottom that calculates missing data for each variable. I simply want to filter based on this final row, but I dont know how because the filter function wont work since its not a variable (or column) The row is also not named, anyone have an idea?
@dusty willow idk if you have seen it btw
Seen what?
70 worth 60%
the correction
2^a = 3^b = 6
Is the sum of A and B equal to the product of A and B?
Any idea on how I can approach this?
Btw, not supposed to solve with logarithms.
Yeah so, that's a classic question in introductory topology/real analysis and so on
anyways, feel free to comment on the proof and ask too
but try the other problems
Sum of A and B is rarely equal to the product of A and B
hey
In this case the answer is just "Yes". I didn't get any solution or reasoning.
'ello
i posted my hw here didnt get the answer
can yall help
5-10
whats the period
and how to find it
The distance between the repetition of any function is called the period of the function
the period of sin and cos is 2pi and the period of tan is pi
Could you please help me at this
It is Homogeneous differential equations of the first order.
Looks like exact with integrating factor
how is this k(k-1)/2
it should be k(-k+1)/2
splitting the summation gives
k(k+1) - n
]
?
that's the sum of natural numbers from 1 to the k-th natural number
rigjht but what aboutt the 1
That equals k after the summation
Cause 1+1+1...+1 k times is k
Alternatively you can just reindex the sum with x=n-1
Then its sum x=0 to k-1 of x
i don't understand what y'all are saying but fax
i know 3.1 has no solutions, so i'm unsure why 3.2 would be any different ^
Do you mean that the sum of 1 from n=1 to k is 1(k+1)?
this is what the prof did
sum of 1 from j= i -1 is (i+1)
sum of (i-1) from i=2 to n is not n(n-1)/2
its n(-n+1)/2
help
use another channel michi
which one
doestnmatter. this one taken
Ok, you should show you work, I'm sure that n(-n+1)/2 is wrong because it leads to a negative number, and I'm sure that what Mosh said is true
I'll just send a query to wolfram so you can see the final result is indeed n(n-1)/4
,w sum from i=2 to i=n of (sum from j=1 to j=(i-1) of 1/2)
ccan someone help
Idk hoe to find values of f(x) with a graph of y = f’(x)
me neither
Ik that f(4) is concave down and f(6) is concave up but idk what to do with that
exactly, now just add up those numbers
Would it be f(6) since that’s where there’s a positive slope?
Pls man idk how to do these
Hello, what exactly do you need help with?
Hey guys. Some help with this problem would help! thanks
Hello, do you know chain rule?
Derivative of the outside
Plug in the inside
Then multiply by the derivative of the inside
Of course, the derivative of f(x) is f'(x)
$\sum_{n=1}^k 1=k$
Mosh
is what I said.
so what do i do first
wouldnt the derrivative of wlnxplus1 just be 2overxplus1
yes
that's g'(x)
yeah thats gprimex
sorry im on a small keyboard i cant type hard things without effort
(f(g(x))' = f'(g(x)) * g'(x), that's the chain rule
What is 2/(x + 1)?
Is that some derivative of f or g?
derrivative of gofx
just follow chain rule, you don't know what f is, so f'(g(x)) stays like f'(2ln(x+1))
So you'll want to keep the objects you're working with straight.
g(x) = 2ln(x + 1)
g'(x) = 2/(x + 1)
yes
And that's handy, as the chain rule has a g'(x) in it
@ancient saddle i got fprime4ln
which isnt even an option
wait there is an option for the unsimplified version of it
nevermind
i thought my teacher would have simplified it
this would be just 2 only right
because you can use chain rule for one and two
im really confused on what its asking
i think its just one, right
maybe im just getting confused on what its asking
how would you simplify it?
nvm lol
do u know the answer for the one above though
is it just one
or option two or three
i think its just one
becuase two uses product and three uses quotient
channel
busy
I think it's correct
yeah i think that too
Hey. Can someone help me understand that matrix play that happened here. In the second line how we got the X transpose.
They ended up making ATheta=B kind of equation.
This makes me scared of going to uni lol
Vectors
D dimensional
It said something like "because it is a scalar, it's transpose would be equal as well. "
oh 
Yup
But the new A became a D×D matrix
Didn't really get the play that happened
Yes
Dot is a dot product
Damn
I don't understand a thing of the pic u sent
Gl
Just focus on the marked part. And see if the vector/matrix play makes any sense
I'm in 11th grade
Yes
Okay
I think I get it now
The three matrix can be multiplied in any order right?
I meant like A*(BC)=(AB)*C
Cool. Makes sense now
Thanks
Yes. I studied it . Just a bit rusty. Thanks for your help.


Help
Number 13
How do I apply the formula rise over run to this
<@&286206848099549185>
Yes
You have the right idea but it's not quite that easy
5 and -4 are just point
Points*
You have to find the change in y and the change in x
And divide change in y by change in x
Am I making sense?
Ok
Yes
But there is 4 different points, the questions im used to are just two points on a graph and a line through both of them
And u find the slope with that
That's a good observation
This is the same thing
You can pick any two points
It doesn't matter which points you pick from the table
Why?
Ok
If the line is truly straight, the slope between point 1 and 2 will be the same as between 3 and 7. Or 1 and 8903949. Does that make more sense?
Yup!
Well I got it from here, thanks for the help
Yeah ya do! And ofc
yo how do i simplify this using binomial approximation? https://i.imgur.com/9zZ2EYa.png
you can convert the top to (1+2x)^0.5
and then do the binomial expanison on it and then multiply it by the biomial expansion of (12+4x)^-2
The sum from j=2 to i of 1
The sum is shifted from 2 to i
Don't over-complicate it, what does it mean to sum 1's from 2 to i
1+1+...+1 i-1 many times
its no different than 1 to i
What do you mean
$\sum_{j=2}^{i} 1 = \sum_{j=1}^{i-1} 1 = 1 \cdot (i-1)$
peaceGiant
when we sum a constant, it doesn't matter if we start from 2 and go to i or start from 1 and go to i-1 since it is the equal amount of iterations
sum from 3 to n of 1?
yes
is this really true ?
n-2
it doesnt follow the formula
Second sum does
The formula says, if you add c, n - many times, you get c*n
OH you just offset by one in that calculation
Yeah
What are those type of equations called?
exponentials
There is no equation in the image, though we are looking at an expression involving negative exponents
how would that affect say n(n+1)/2 if it was j = 2
Sum of i (from 1 to n) = n(n+1)/2
If we skip first step, which is summing a 1
Sum of i (from 2 to n) = n(n+1)/2 - 1
so the formulas themselves dont really change
they just shift by a factor a -n depends on where you start from 1
Sure, that is one way to look at it
np
can you show how you will simplify after multiplying?
the correct answer is 1/144(1+x/3) but idk how to get to that
Hi, can anyone help me see if my proof is in the right direction? I don't know how good my proof is. I don't know if it's a bad proof, or what. I am new to proof writing.
had only 5 weeks in my proof writing class so far
how do I calculate how thick my aquariums glass would need to be to hold the weight of the water on inside?
Im trying to build my own aquarium!
I need help https://fog.ccsf.edu/~wjeh/math95/circle_approach/trig_answer_circle.pdf for 3g I'm getting the opposite wrong. I need help on H 4 too😓
dont ask to ask.
any1 can help with this? <@&286206848099549185>
i want someone to show how to get to the answer: 1/144(1+x/3)
The sum of the n-th row of a binomial expansion is ?
it's like 2^n right
One less, 2^(n-1)
oh i see
Occupied
256 = 2^(?)
ohh i see
wow literally no one reads the rules
that gets annoying and i don’t even ask questions
no we're at the 7th? right because (n-1)
not exactly
Actually the opposite, let me make the analogy
ah ok im here to listen!
Should I now ask in a different chat?
The sum of the n-th row is 2^{n-1}
The sum of the 9-th row is 2^{9-1} = 2^8
wait so it is the 7th row or am i missing something😅 sorry im a litte confused
As you can see, the 9-th row's sum is 2^8 = 256
So which row would it be?
9th?
yeah
No problem, I want to additionally say that wikipedia starts the Pascal's triangle with row 0. I find that unnatural and perhaps you should ask your teacher about what the questions asks
@clever hare
"I find that unnatural"
Programmers: I have no such weakness
True, but counting in mathematics starts from n=1, so that's why I am making the remark
(eh, it's controversial but still -.-)
ahh i see, i will ask for you!
If we start with row 0
n-th row's sum is 2^n
If we start with row 1
n-th row's sum is 2^{n-1}
can anyone help me find the domain and range
im struggling atm to understand domain and range
The domain describes the amount of inputs you're allowed to put into the function (so the valid values of x).
In your case, as you can see the values of x start from zero and extend to infinity, so the domain is x > 0
<@&268886789983436800> Ayo somethings not right here
Banned
then domain would be something like 0 >
right
but what would the number on the right be
0 < x <
x, on the graph, is greater than or equal to 0
yea
but i got 0 is less than or equal to x is greater or equal to 24
You can prolly put infinity on the right if you really want to
Can you show the function?
Because the graph itself with this arrow show that the x can be up to infinity
wym
u want me to show the whole problem
or something
Maybe. I just want to know what functions form this graph (if you have the equation of any)
Does the marking scheme or model answer tell you this?
no thats what my teacher got and im tryin to figure out how she got it
lol
cause idk how she got 24
she got -1.5 < y < 0.5 for range
There must be more info given somewhere
Yeah that's a fine range
Oh sure, the range describes the.. range of Y values lol
yea ik that
But the thing is, it describes the range of Y (output) values for all inputs (X) you can enter
ok
Is that second summation correct ?
So yeah in the case of a drawn graph, getting both the range and the domain is done by just looking at the points on the maximum and minimum possible x or y points on the graph
so how is it 1.5?
Based on the algorithm it should be i - 1. Not i
Do you see when the x is 6?
Isn't the y at 1.5?
Oh it's actually not apparent
there's no way the graph has all the info you need
would this make more sense
the top question relates to the graph “describe the stock price as a function”
I don't think so
actually if you look on the graph at x = 3, you'll see y = -1.5
which is the lowest that y has went to
yea and 0.5 would be?
and if you look at x = 6, you'll see that y is 0.5 which is the highest that y has went to
What does the question say?
That seems to be the case for what's after day 35 but I still want to see the question to understand you better
Okay so an increasing function is the part of the function in which it goes up.
yes
Whats 3x +1?
If the point marked C is called a constant, then this is the point at which the gradient is 0
i dont get it
Did you learn differentiation yet?
x is a variable, if u only have "3x+1" x can be anything
no
Well then, it is the point at which the graph turns
if u have "3x+1=something" (that something being a number) x can be only one thing and u can find x
oop forgot to tag @alpine sable
oh
I can't tell what a negative or positive function is so I'll go instead of confusing you
lol
But now you know that C is not a point at which the function is increasing
yk that range is the lowest and highest it went what would domain be
Hiii, this is my first time on the server. I needed some help with calc hw and I asked my brother and classmates but they don't seem to understand it well enough to teach me. So literally a minute ago I wished there was like a server for calculus because so many people take the class and so here I am after my search!
This is the question I need help with <@&286206848099549185> . I was thinking that after I plugged in fx into the formula on the right, h would cancel out but it didn't. A little confused on how to find the derivative.
i can help in a sec but you shouldnt ping helpers so fast
what work do you have so far?
oh my bad i read the guide wrong
any progress?
i decided to work other other problems and come back to this one later
ah, alright, did you still need help?
ty
yes
same problem?
yea
if we had asequence of 2,4,8,14,22
how would u find the nth term>
quadratic seiqeneces
i use an ipad
um so basically rn i changed the sqrt to the power of 1/2
becuase my brother told me theres a shortcut in finding derivatives
where u get rid of part of the exponent and make it the coefficient or something lilke that
jan Niku
yes this thing
hmmm i got an answer using the rule
i will try it out and see if it works
Why is the eigen vector of this [1,0,0]?
If the first row is all 0s it’s just assumed that the same row on the eigen vector is a non zero number?
Or is it if there’s no dependence on x1 it’s a number
@alpine sable the cardinality is just how many elements are in the set A intersect B
so would it be 2
use definition of eigenvector
- Number of not the value of
@sly mantle o ic so it can’t be the 0 vector cus it needs to equal {1,0,0}
v is an eigenvector of A if v!=0 and Av=cv for some scalar c
check A(1,0,0)=c(1,0,0) for some scalar c
That's a way to check my work but I just forgot how free variables worked when solving matrix problems
free vars arise in solving linear systems so you may want to review that
Can anyone help me with this question?
So theres a trick that my instructor gave us, which is:
(x)(x') + (y)(y') = (r)(r')...
so I did
(r)(r') = x(-y-x^3) + y(x)
This simplifies down to -x^4 = (r)(r')
Transfer that to polar which is r' = -(r^3) (cos^4 theta)
but im not sure where to move from here.
Thank you for this I am almost done with my calc hw for the day!
calc seems hard
<@&286206848099549185>
i don't think its hard I just have a sloppy professor
hey! i'm having issues trying to figrue out this problem
I understand that you swap X and Y and solve for y, but im stuck with x = y^3 +7y - 1 and i'm not sure how I would go about solving for Y
@shut crest if you have a good tutorial or teacher it’s not that bad
would this mean you get a center at r=0?
or uhh
i mean that you have a trivial solution
idk if thats what the problem is even asking 
but it looks like ur gettin buried
Oh i'm sorry I didn't realize this wasn't empty
yeah Im supposed to get a center... but im also supposed to show that the origin itself is a spiral.
I saw the smalltalk and figured it was empty
and im not sure how to do that lmao.
ok
I mean i set it into a jacobian and I got purely complex eigenvalues.
this guy goes over something like that
at 7 minutes
maybe 
wish i knew more about this stuff
or which channel to ask in
questions 0 you will get buried too fast
so for the graph i showed you eariler it would be 0 is less than or equal to x greater or equal to 6
since the highest for x is 6
Can someone help me with math graph?
Can someone explain me the solution to this?
<@&286206848099549185>
I need help in my elementary statistics problem I am doing
A or b? Also can you get better photo?


