#help-0
1 messages · Page 796 of 1
^
2+2+3 means (2+2)+3 but this is equal to 2+(2+3) so it doesn't matter
what i mean is you donwrite (a) + (b) - (c) + (c) * (100)
t dont
you only add parenthesis
when you need them
but you are saying there is always a parenthesis around a number
not around a number
They are always there, you just leave them out sometimes when there is no chance of confusion
so 6 is always (6) you just dont write the parenthesis
basically
Yes you can view it like that
anyone can help
don't overpost
ok
@unreal pier Please read the rules and tips for getting help in #❓how-to-get-help.
The "+" thing takes two values, one on the left and one on the right.
So 2+3+4 wouldn't really make sense if we don't agree that this means (2+3)+4
I.e. (2+3) is on the left and 4 is on the right
wdym not around a number?
i just need to know if there is always a parenthesis around a number, sometimes u just dont write em
"For every real number x , there is an real number y such that y is less than or equal to x ."
Yes. You can think of it like that. You just don't write them when the expression doesn't give rise to confusion and you know exactly where you'd put them.
That's actually a good assumption
Because you cannot just swap x and y. For example the given statement isn't true, however for every real x there is actually a y less than it, i.e. y=x-1 so the second statement is true
well my instructor made it so "For every real number x , there is an real number y such that y is less than or equal to x ." is considered wrong? @alpine sable
the last sentence: "this can be done no matter what y is" is wrong
only when y is negative
y = -2
-2 -1 < -2
-3 < -2
correct
What I tried to illustrate here is that the statement ∃y ∀x x ≥ y is not equivalent to ∀x ∃y x ≥ y because one is false and one is true. In general you cannot swap ∀ and ∃
No, it's correct.
yeah yeah
If y is 100, then x = 99 will work.
?
Can someone help me for this question.
A quadratic polynomial when divided by (x+2) leaves a remainder 1, and when divided by (x−1), leaves a remainder 4. What will be the remainder if it is divided by (x+2)(x−1)?
so then only the last two are right
for example here
why can the first option not work
@whole herald but why'd u say not around a number
because no matter what x is chosen there always something larger no?
If they mean "expression for the statement" as in "equivalent statement" then yes
Because when you multiply both sides by two, the parenthesis is around all numbers
a + b + c = d
2(a + b + c) = 2d
not a number
Although assuming the real number axioms, all false statements are equivalent so 
okay
You can translate "no matter which element is chosen in S" as ∀x ∈ S and "you can find another element" as ∃y ∈ S. [Although I'd have to point out that they should probably have said "in S"]
@whole herald but you only add the parenthesis to it when it's necessary?
when working with "linear functions" what does this mean? ("
f(3)=11 and f(-2)=23,5")
that when x is 3 the value is 11
ok thanks
hey guys I have a question about this… see when I enter the value on the left on my calculator my answer differed from the answer in the mark scheme// the working on the right is the work scheme… but I wonder does rationalizing or not raitionalizing the denominator makes a difference
Cause I get diff values
Such a linear function does not exist unless linear means affine
Idk I could be dumb
In US high schools, linear means affine
@whole herald do u only write the parenthesis there when it's necessary
for example when u had to multiply by 2 u added the parenthesis instead of it being invinsible
would this be correct @alpine sable
No
which one is incorrect?
how is n element of natruals a statement
n ∈ ℕ is stating that n is a natural number
@magic viper dansker?
but there is no true or false to that?
Does your class have a definition of the word "statement" that deviates from the usual use in english?
ja lol
LOL
Well either n is a natural number or not, depending on n
lol, arbejder I med lineære funktioner?
but n is not given
?🤨
jep 1.g
Does "statement" mean "formula without free variable"?
var syg da de begyndte på det der var basic så fattede det ikke
I.e. this
det matematik i den her server er nok lidt mere kompliceret
hvad går du på?
er næsten lige blevet færdig med niende
så du er også 1.g'er?
ja
hh?
men en lineær funktion er bare af typen $f(x)=a\cdot{x}+b$
Lil Sachi
hh?
Bestem forskriften for den lineære funktion
f(x)
i hvert af nedenstående tilfælde, når:
f(3)=11
er der ikke mere?
jo men det er bare en af dem
send billed
den jeg har problemer med
11 = a * 3 + b
ngl det spørgsmål er lidt mærkeligt da en lineær funktion ikke er f(x) men f(x) = ax + b eller y = ax + b
What language are you guys using?
når du har indsat 3 på x's plads så har du 11 i værdi så jeg tænkte 11 = 3a + b
men ved ikke om det er rigtigt
danish
$\textcolor{green}{11}=\textcolor{blue}{a}\cdot\textcolor{purple}{3}+\textcolor{magenta}{b}$
Lil Sachi
er du stx'er hhx'er eller htx'er?
jeg fandt frem til at det giver 11=10*8+0,2
yes, that's what i wrote
uhm
hvor får du $10\cdot{8}+0.2$ fra
Lil Sachi
0.2 er b værdien, den er ikke givet i det spørgsmål
nej
(3p - 4)(2p2 + 4p -5)
can someone explain this to me? 2 = squared/cubed
$(3p - 4)(2p^2 + 4p - 5)$
Lil Sachi
distribute the terms
idk how to
btw htx her
nice
idfk how i got in higher level in the first place 🤷♂️
3p * 2p^2
eller har min lærer bare været mærkelig
nej, det er to forskellige forskrifter
log((10^(x*log(a)))) = x*log(a) why does the 10 disappear?
oh im starting to understand it now. i thought log was opposite i think. if something is inside log, it makes it smaller the larger the number is right?
aah yea of course, thanks a lot. i feel stupid now haha
but square root is the inverse of a power too right?
yes ok. but so basicly what log((10^(xlog(a)))). is. is just, the inverse power of 10 to the power of xinverse of a. - that makes sense
so if you have 10 to the power of something. and put it inside a log. it will just cancel the it out. makes sense now. thanks agian
yeah but i want to know what exactly it states
It states that if you complement a union or intersection, you change the operation to the other one and complement the two sets.
okay got it
Can someone help me define this set recursively or find the pattern
this is so hard
I have been looking at those numbers for an hour
yeah
It is on my ps
and it requires us to find a recursive set for i
(it doesn't ask whether there is one or not)
yeah, like I can't even see how this can be constructed like a string
@alpine sable like the other once are easy, just this one
(c) might be like (d) if you convert to binary
@safe stone wdym
@safe stone that's might work
so this is the binary list
I am confused if he is adding numbers to each other
wait I have some errors in my converting
This is the true list
hm the first one is correct actually
1001 seems to be odd
a stretch but it could be all binaries number that has the number of 1 >= half the length of the number
actually no because then 1001 should be there too
i think you just missed 111 in the original list
no, adding 1 doesn't give us all numbers
The last two numbers are the same there.
ghci> map bin [1,2,5,7,10,12,25,27][1,10,101,111,1010,1100,11001,11011]```
I wrote them wrong
but I still can't see the pattern for the numbers before
I give up guys
let him just give me wrong on this one
no pattern at all
If there is a typo I leave uni, and go open a supermarket
never squeezed my brain so hard
I mean staying up is not enough for this
maybe we should convert the numbers to hexadecimal lol
if not we try all the notation from 2 to 100
@keen salmon Well, one possibility is natural numbers that are coprime to 5354228880.
idk what you mean
Never mind, it's not right.
@alpine sable bro could u help me
@alpine sable just forget it
I will ask the other students, and I will ask if the numbers are written wrong
I don't get what you mean here
The question is to find AB × AC wich are 2 vectors
The thing in yellow is the answer btw
But I don't know how we should know that BAC = 45
The angle BAC I mean ofc
And how AC = 4sqrt2
I don't understand
Each angle of this should be 90 right
So BAC
Should be cos(90)
Wich is zero
No?
Look
The answer is BAC=cos(45)
But I don't know how to find this answer
And the question is to find AB × AC knowing that ABCD with center O is a carré(the thing I draw) where AB=4
can i get some help please?
can the question be in another language if im able to translate it into english?
A is square root of b-a
pythagoras
you square root it
how do they work
i havent learnt it
could someone help with this problem?
so what im thinking so far is if the tangent line is perp. to x-3y=1 [or y=(1/3)x-1/3], than it must have the same slope of 1/3. So y'=3x^2 -6x = 1/3.
Its perpendicular nit parallel
So slope of tangent is -3
Yes ^
god i promise im not as stupid as i sound
?
bruh
i have no idea what you're asking me rn
im taking calc 1 at university
ok so x=1
plug into orig equation? or derivative
its all good
so ok x=1, now what
no
idk
wait yeah no
i didnt
$x^3-3x^2+4$
ski
well of the perp line yes
so 3x^2-6x = -3
oh
wait
yeah no i did that right correct?
not sure how to do that
oh u just set the two expressions equal to each other
to find point of intersection
Uhh no need to do that just put x= 1 in y=x³-3x²+4 and you got (a,b) = (1, y)
well i got x=1 by setting y' = -3
was i supposed to do tha
Yes now put x= 1 in original equation to get y co-ordinate
y= 2
Yes
$\frac 12(x² - Ax^{-1})$
Spica
ok so im done with hw, and i understand most of it but there's still one i don't get 100%
$\lim _{x\to :4^-}\left(cx^2-b\right),:\lim _{x\to 4^+}\left(-2\sqrt{x}+c\right)$
ski
ski
ski
now plug in 4, 8c=-1/2
divide by 8, c=-1/16
now plug c in
$-1/16x^2-b=-2\sqrt{x}-1/16$
ski
ski
and i get c= -1/16, b=49/16. this alright?
This both equal and
$$\lim_{x\to 4^{+}} f'(x) = \lim_{x\to 4^{-}} f'(x)$$
Spica
First one proves continuity 2nd one proves differentiability
so take derivative of both sides
and solve for c
then when i plug c back in, do i plug into this? $cx^2-b=-2\sqrt{x}+c$ or this $2cx=\frac{-1}{\sqrt{x}}$
ski
would have to be first one bc theres no b value in second
and it doesnt really matter right bc they're equal anyway
$$\lim_{x\to 4^-}\qty(cx^2-b) = \lim_{x\to 4^+}\qty(-2\sqrt{x}+c)$$
$$16c-b = -4+c \dots (1)$$
$$\lim_{x\to 4^-} 2cx = \lim_{x\to 4^+}\qty(\frac{-1}{\sqrt{x}})$$
$$4c = \frac{-1}{2} \dots (2)$$
Spica
triangles must equal 180 degrees, and channel is occupied
can someone help me through it?
oh uh ok and sorry
:D
ok so 2 is -1/4?
lyes
From (2)
c = -1/8 then put c in (1) to get b
Ohh wait c = -1/16 I forgot its 2cx not cx
can i get help?
feel free
i thought u said give help lol my bad
check the other question channels for an unoccupied one
or me and spica are ab done here could wait until then
so i got the same thing i had before. c=-1/16, b=49/16
Yes
i was meant to go before btw
root 12
it said 10 is the term
oh yeah
@ivory gulch are you free
square root
sin(x) + sin((10.0 / 3.0) * x)
im want to scale this function uniformly by 50% but I have no idea how I would do it
each attempt i do leads in it loosing its form or being to squished or squashed
does anyone know how scaling this would be done?
Hi guys anyone knows how this number happened as the answer
But the answer is 100g the correct answer
How do I solve this :|?
oh
grade 9
I just want to know in what order you do that
like how would you guys solve it.
I downloaded that thinking it was the awnser to my question 😐
I swear.. everyone in this chat rn is on drugs or something
what no lol
No

Ffs
Aa


Ugh

?wtf
yo wtf
I dislike the guys who do this
entitled shits

Apologies for the ping everyone, a user just started mass role pinging. They've been banned.
so funny
and i was excited about a new talk
who is the one I'm going to kill
Ok.
Lads, everyone relaxxxxxxx

It is what the person wanted
owo
Let’s not let him get his wish
I have a suggestion. how about only those with the advanced role be able to ping the advanced helpers? if that's possible
it's not.
ah. that sucks
discord ping perms are really limited
What a great idea
it is possible to only be able to ping on the respective channel?
a role is either pingable everywhere or nowhere
60 seconds to write a message, oof
there are workarounds using a bot for this
thats what we do with talks
but honestly the advanced helper roles are probably gonna be overhauled soon anyway
sooo
who slowmoded tf
how/why so?

theyre not really used for their intended purpose atm
might just end up deleting them
The question is how do you have Honorable role with only about 2793 messages.
why do you care so much
I was very active on short period
man this is why i want to decolour roles
and no it is not a lot
people start using them as status symbols or some shit
I was just asking.
Ping?
Welp.

Need some help on this a bit clueless
Well then I will stop doing that, is that fine?
Hey,
I got an question
Here in my theory
In the third point
It says AB × AC = 1/2 (AB² - AC² - BC²)
But here in the correction of an ex I did
It's typen that AB × AC = (AB² + AC² - BC²)
Could anyone help me and tell me why did we changed?
Here's the correction btw
is that high school
How do i solve this problem? If there is two r values, is this still simultanous equations?
how is the answer root(5) for the adjacent side?
i keep on getting root(1) when i use the Pythagorean theorem to solve for the adjacent side
@rustic rock yh it's highscool
So i want this to be scaled so the maxima is 50% higher. And when I squish and squashed it, it lost its shape
The function?
ah so i'm not going insane?
would anyone mind helping me with some basic geometry
I'm not really understanding it
send the screenshot here
ap college math geoligmathics class
wait what do u need help with??
dam
finding the perpendicular bisector?
im 80 dont remember 8th grade
ye
oh then ez
also have oldtimers that might be a reason
okay let me try it myself first
a bisector, by definition, is a division of two parts. perpendicular is essentially what the roads at an intersection look like (90 degrees from origin)
hmm okay
so would this be a way to construct a perpendicular bisector of AB?
the line might not be perfectly 90 degrees, which is why geogebra is saying it's wrong probably
^ shes not know
okay
draw the line between c and d
so I have cd already, and I used the compass tool to make two circles from cd, and found the intersecting point
"what is he saying" -kami
and a line through those points should give me the perpendicular bisector right?
busy?
she doesnt
hmm okay
i’m on my phone so it doesn’t rly align perfectly
oh yeah, it says you can use CD or EF which implies that they are perpendicular bisectors of AB
is that correct?
okay
but why doesn't this work still
that should be the perpendicular bisector
umm idk what ur doing here idk what this is, like as in what you’re working in
does that make sense?
its
Try using a different tool?
GeoGebra
I'm working in geogebra
geogebra requires you to be really precise, so that might be the problem?
Perhaps
I have a few more questions, and I should be fine
I don't really understand what it means by "construct a regular hexagon with line segment AB as one of its six sides"
it’s -5
@tacit mesa I think that's the big problem I have right now
yeah
yeah
I'm just confused on that
I don't know why, maybe it's because I have apathy for math?
I don't understand how other people can do this fine, but I just can't
even if I rack my brain
yeah I just don't really understand how to find the hexagon from that
ngl idek what a hexagon looks like
LOL
lmao
I just kinda need some help with this
since math really stresses me out in school
as it's somehow the one subject I am trash at
and because of how bad I am at it, I am slowly growing a hatred for it which probably isn't that good
could anyone help me out?
Just search for a graph plotter
16
good u know
Just pick the third checkbox
this was a classwork, when the teacher was online, and obviously now he's not lmao
Maybe
You should've been attending to your class 
Then ask
whats the Euler-Mascheroni's constant
It's a constant related to the gamma function, that's why it's represented as $\gamma$ , it's also the limit between the natural logarithm and the harmonic series, you could also just google it
The gamma(n) = factorial (n - 1)
BeyondTheInfinity
who the heck keeps ghost pinging me
PEMDAS
how would i do #17
google Big O notation
im still confused iendekdkkw
and then use the equation of a straight line with your slope and point
basically you truncate the taylor at n and everything else is larger than stuff on the order (y-x)^(n+1), so the truncated terms are O((y-x)^(n+1))
f(x)=x^n, then f'(x)=nx^(n-1)
@glass lichen so rather than writing out the truncated terms, you just write O((y-x)^(n+1))?
do u know how PEMDAS actually works tho?
What do you not understand?
@noble goblet you just drop the power of the x and subtract 1 from it, and constant terms are equal to 0
Just look up differentiation
Big O notation is a mathematical notation that describes the limiting behavior of a function when the argument tends towards a particular value or infinity. Big O is a member of a family of notations invented by Paul Bachmann, Edmund Landau, and others, collectively called Bachmann–Landau notation or asymptotic notation.
In computer science, big...
know fully
like for example $e^x=\sum_{i=0}^\infty\frac{x^i}{i!}=1+x+O(x^2)$
Mosh
Ya, reading it now
where I truncated at the linear term
so as x tends to 0, e^x is "asymptotically equivalent" to 1+x
can i just ask 1 more question of you fam
I am just high on mdma at the moment and trying to figure this question I have to do but I can't see properly
So this is basically asking
find a p such that all this stuff on the left is less than or equal to the truncated stuff of h^P
@glass lichen don't tell me the answer because it's a quiz question, but the direction
Yeah.. no clue lol
yeah I only know big O for doing physics approximations 
I took some md to do a bit of partying with my girl but then I realised I have this quiz due
bruhjhhhh
you study physics????
im having some trouble with this question - im trying to approach is as P(person 1 doesn't draw their own name or person 2's name) times P(person 2 draws their own name) but idk how to calculate the second one of those
i think the first one is (n-2)/n
but i dont think 1/(n-2) is enough for the second probability
also because this having probability 1/n doesnt make sense
why would it be 1/n
n-2/n is prob you pick a name other than your own and other than person 2's
Who pinged
P(person 1 doesnt draw their own name or person 2's name)
oh I thought you meant what I was referring to
just brute force 4 names
sorry I am not of help at this moment
i think with 4
3/4 chance they don't pick 2
for the first person
so there's a 1/4 chance the first person
's name is picked
lket me rephrase
@fiery adder there is a 1/4 chance the 2nd person's name is picked by person 1
so the Pr of never stopping = 1/4 + STUFF
then
there is a 3/4 chance
of person 1 picking anything other than person 2
therefore
And this is why nobody uses that symbol anymore
which symbol
guys am I doing a stupid by taking Calc 3 AND Diff Eq. at same time?
One gives 1 and the other gives 16
@fiery adder therefore, the Pr of finishing at 2 is Pr=1/4 + (3/4)*(1/3)
cause rn my C3 is great but im totally lost in Diff. Eq.
What's the probability that I'm going to fail this semester?
@fiery adder therefore, the probability of finishing after 2, is the complement of that
@fiery adder therefore, the probability of finishing AFTER 2 is Pr = 1 - [1/n + (n-1/n)*(1/n-1)]
The obilus?
Is that what it's called?
Okay. Cool.
From memory the obilus only divides the succeeding term, while the solidus is enacted on all following terms
Even if that's true, it's still good to use parentheses with the solidus because of order of operations.
1/n+1 vs 1/(n+1) are technically two different statements
help I am stuck
I don’t understand how am I supposed to proceed
I don’t see any paths, it’s like guessing, how am I even supposed to find an answer
hi super basic question but what does x <<< 0 mean
i cant find anything on this
context?
one sec
x much less than 0
"what do the uncertainties reduce to if the uncertainty in $x$ (i.e., $\delta x$) is very small (i.e., $\delta x \lll 1$)?"
rеd
and then there's a few equations i've been evaluating for uncertainties
like it literally means much much much less than 1
oh so x is much less than 1
oh lovely
can i just say it's approaching 0
and calculate as though it was 0
nuiance says no
cause "being less than 1" and "approaching 0" are technically different
example .1
.1 isnt approaching anything, but we can pretty much say it's <<1
Can someone please help me with this question
maybe in the exact context you can just say tends to 0, but id say verify with your prof
gotcha
yeah it's just a lot of expressions
so saying that it basically = 0 just makes it a lot more cohesive
i'm 90% sure that's what the prof was going for but i'll double check
Whoever keeps calling, please stop
I know this is a math server, but can anybody help me with this quick computer science question?
don't ask just send
Its fairly simple
Ok
I didnt know if it was considered math
How would an ipad process data
just do the basic operations so x is on one side of the equation. then its solved
k
hi can someone explain how do i say this
Post the question no need to ask
i want convert ms to ns
how would i say it in english languae
how many nanosecon are in one 1 milli second
Milli to nano
but isnt like 1 millon ms per ns
so there is 1 million ms per every ns
yeah but im trying to understand in terms of prefixs and to derive it myself
how in the world do you find a quartic function for 3 given (x, y) points (just those points are given)?
yes but from the pic i posted
how can you explain it
to be the answer from your point of view
because it is correct
there are 1 million ns in in 1 ms
1000
ms
milli is 10^-2
3
yes
yes
1 billion
10^-9
ok i see
there are many ns in 1 second because ns is smaller
1000
if i divide 10^-3 / 10^-9
this is 10 ^6 right
i think i just want to focus on the pic i posteds it is too much numbers and to keep track of
10^-3 / 10 ^-9 is 1000000
one million correct
?
isnt it 10^6
im just saying based on the pic
-3 - -9 is 6
my textbook did this
lol
so now im confused lol
i see your point
but cant i say 1 million ms per ns?
ok i see so i will try your apparoach and see what i get it
thank you!
so i need to help with geometry even though it might be super basic i need help
so should i send pic or smthing
Alright what’s the area of the rectangle?
Do you know how to find the area of a rectangle?
yeah
Which is b*h right?
So 8*6=48 and that’s the area of the rectangle
im sorry the ones that are
Sorry what’s the height of the rectangle? The picture is a bit hard to tell from
i think 8
So it’s 8 across and 8 high?
So what’s the arrow at the bottom showing with the 8
my teacher made her own measurements
Oh ok that’s cool gotchu
So the rectangle as we know then is 80
And we also know that the triangle’s base is 10 too right?
Ok….?
is it possible to solve a system of three equations with 5 variables per equation?
No you can’t lol
how can you tell that a line is perpendicular to another line just from the slope? Is it inverse?
bruh my teacher gave this as an exercise during class and nobody could figure it out
lol
I’ll tell you what… the perpendicular line’s gradient is -1/(the first lines gradient)
Lmao I would be interested to see the picture
how is this incorrect
so the negative reciprocal?
f(x) = 4th degree poly, points (1,3), (2,6,), and (-2, 138)
ig there would be multiple answers
That’s an interesting question I woulda just started by drawing it out in a graph form and see from there
Whatttt
The answer says its 9.15 to 9.25 cm
wtff
wfff
I really don't know what the people who made this book were thinking
how does that make sense lmao
derivative of e^pasta = e^pasta
but pizza = pizza(chimken)

then it's a chen lu
or substitution, I mean
Quick question, how would I use FOIL for this? My math class just started today and I forgot how I solve it, lol
What’s foil
Foil 2 at a time
What’s foil guys that’s the first time I hear such an expression
choice is yours what 2 you do first since multiplication here is associative
Oh, which terms would I FOIL?
.
It's kind of like a formula, not really sure how I would explain it here...
I'd personally do the (x-4)^2 first cause that has an explicit formula
Is foil an abbreviation of sth?
First Outer Inner Last
Lol
google it if you dont know it
That’s actually cool
I know how to expand brackets just didn’t know that there is such a thing called foil
Okay, thanks!
But that would only work in binomials
A more general one wouldnbe
Just have every possible combination dude
Would I be in the right step?
last line is wrong, cause the x+6 doesnt magically disappear
Yea, I was wondering how I would foil (x + 6) with a different term
yes FOIL is only for binomials, the general process is the same as FOIL though
Since there are 3 terms...
Istg I know how expansion works it’s just that I didn’t know that abbreviation thing
$=(x^2-8x+16)(x+6) \ =x(x^2-8x+16)+6(x^2-8x+16)$
Mosh
by regular distribution
The trick I do is do it in order
1,1 1,2 then 2,1 2,2 then 3,1 3,2
Oof I think what I just sent is confusing as heck
Idk read it out loud it may make more sense that way
yeah.. it doesn't
In general you add up all products of terms. Ie you multiply the x^2 by x and 6, the -8x by x and 6, and the 16 by x and 6
Will this be correct?
It’s not
I am not superman to check every term but I know there has to be x^3
Also incorrect lol
Largest power you have is x^3
Do it in steps dude
First have your bracket (x-4)^2 simplified with the x+6 next to it in the third line
Then in the fourth have the whole thing
And then the simplified finalized in the fifth
No it’s occupied
simplify
Oh you’re helping
A helping beluga
What a blessing
I am not sarcastic tho it may sound like I am
(Not at all) fun fact: I have a full portrait of beluga on my pc from 2019 before it was cool. And I discovered it by chance when I was trying to organize that mess of a hard drive.
Just ping me ford focus when you finish because I am starting to get bored here
(-1)^(12) - will this product be positive or negative? how do you know?
@golden nymph
Even powers give positive numbers
Negative times negative is positive
And powers is just repetitive multiplication
So yeah
@golden nymph I'm pretty sure this is wrong, but I just can't figure out what I did wrong...
Look
When you multiply the x terms together
You treat the coefficients (the numbers) alone and the variables alone
What you do to the coefficients is multiply them
Okay
What you do to the variables (only if you have the same) is add their powers
Then you return them to be together
The fault is in the third line in the fourth and sixth terms
You didn’t multiply the coefficients you added them
See what I mean?
(-8x)(6)
What will it be?
Yo
-8x + 6?
I am saying multiply them
-48x?
Exactly
I see now
What you did wrong is that you added -8 to 6
Yea
Okay, thanks!
In rolling three fair twelve-sided dice simultaneously, what is the probability that the resulting
numbers can be arranged to form a geometric sequence?
That’s one evil question
in calculating the probability, do you take each individual geometric sequence possible, then add all the probabilities?
That’s what I would do
Each outcome is equiprobable
i initially skipped this problem in the placement test bc i thought it would waste too much time
now i have to do it as homework lmao
,calc 16*6
Result:
96
Idk just try to count them efficiently
Oh, shoot. Didn't mean to put that. It was from the last one I did
Other than that it’s all good
Okay, thanks!
how would i get all the sequences
or part of them
under 12
like any systematic way to do it
You know that if you have a,b,c forming a geometric sequence
Then that means c,b,a form one too
So that’s useful
You can try to make a<=b<=c
And start with a being 1
And then do the b from 1 and rising
And see if there is a c which will make it a geometric sequence
If so include it
Then step the a by 1 and repeat
Yup lol they do
I just told you how I would do it though I think there could be more efficient ways
2
Can someone explain to me simply what a determinant is? I dont understand the "by the book definition" its complex for me. 
Hi Traveler, Paimon thinks you can ask your question in a non-occupied channel!
I don’t think that’s so good
