#help-0
1 messages · Page 793 of 1
Nope
I am not
was a joke, love yall
Trust me there are people here
That when they speak I think they are just typing random words
And not forming sentences
yo
4
is it busy in here
yeperoonie
Even my calculator couldn’t figure that one out
fk u
Dude, don’t ping everyone
b&
goddamn it mutherfukcjaer
You had posted your question 3 minutes ago. Be patient
you dear sir are an inconsiderate piece of aluminum foil that i will promptly discard
What?

i aint got time for this. im out
@dusk canyon nice name
thats an example of when you can ping someone you dummy dum dum
still love you though
piece of shit
yeah kvictor this is just how i treat people it means little, its all a figure of speech
if you are telling me to be respectful then well
naw
be respectful bro
Send me that question
What is this? thanks @wary stream
anyone tagged?
Sigma
Capital sigma

you're on thin ice
everyone who has the analysis role, there was a pingspammer. disregard it
Who is pinging like bruh so annoying
i already took care of their question in dms
its good he found it
in no way do i personally thing i should be on "thin ice"
But i dont mod this server
Now if you could remove slow mode that would be nice
(unless like thats just how this channel normally is)
hey
How do I get the closed formula for an if the sequence (an)n=0,1,2… is defined as a0=1, a1=2, and an=an-1 + 6an-2 +2
<@&286206848099549185> I asked this in question 1 a half hour ago but my question got drowned - with this question i managed to get to Pr(X - 3Y > -40) after standardizing but i'm not sure what to do from here
Wait, you can divide random variables???!!!!!
I don’t know what will happen if you do so. And I don’t know how you managed to get to X-3Y but continuing from that is the easy part. You have that a linear combination of normal random variables is a normal random variable so you can let W=X-3Y and you can get E(W) and sd(W) from the formulae then you can standardise and find in the table.
This is the same thing as asking to find the probability that X - 2Y > 0
i'm taking a slightly different approach now so i can standardize the right hand side
i have a couple questions regarding this.
is E(X/Y) = E(X)/E(Y)?
and in a ratio distribution, what do we do to the variances of two random variables, X and Y, to obtain the variance of the random variable X/Y?
Dude , you can't talk to people like that...
Hey, I've been struggling how to answer this kind of questions. I only understand a little
What do you mean invertible? Sorry I'm kind of dumb right now
Hmmmm....alright let me dial this back a bit.
f(x) is just a fancy way of saying y, which means you put x in and get f(x) so y is your solution set, right?
Ohh, so I'm just plugging it in?
i can if its obviously sarcasm
i guess this isnt the server for it
STOP TROLLING IN THE QUESTIONS CHANNEL 
Bro, coda... Let me ask you something...how is anyone supposed to know you're being sarcastic via text?
So the first one would be f(3)>0?
No war, I'm just calmly trying to explain Emotional intelligence here.
Also, don't you understand what respect is?
The people here work hard to get their brains big, do you think we work hard just to be disrespected?
Would You Want to work hard only to be disrespected?
Be honest.
experience and the ability to hold cognitive dissonance is how you can parse sarcasm, its not nessesarily easy but is a useful skill on the internet
but you can ask me more questions in dms
Coda, that makes no sense man and even if it did? It's not welcome here so you're just being disrespectful and thinking of yourself without thinking of others.
This channel is for asking questions not for having discussions, there’s a channel for that. Or do that in private.
Sorry Williammm, I'll have a talk with coda see if we can sort this out.
sure sure, i got the picture it wasnt welcome here when the other mode said something
i respect the fact that in this context what i did was not great at all, it was wrong. however i am now being questioned on it, so i am answering honestly
It got slow-moded woah.
Um
Dammit shadow I'm in the 98%
yo uh
i was lost at the part with the grapes
given
f(x, y) = (y³ - 4y, x³- 4x)
α(t) = (t, 2t)
how do I evaluate f(α(t))?
hey, i got to this point, but i realised that regardless of what the mean or stdev of the new variable is, the right hand side will be 0
so Pr(X - 2Y > 0) = 0.5 is what i got, but it's wrong by the looks of it
bro..............
isnt it just f(t, 2t)
so
t³ - 4t, 2t³ - 8t? im not really sure 
double check your working pls this is a calculating error
OH I got it
I got y= 18x + ___ just having a hard time getting the y in the problem and my bad
just need helping solving it, my math is going wrong
I’d foil (3x-8)(3x-8) right
what's the question.....?
how do I get the y that's perpendicular using -4 2 from the original set
perp slope is negative reciprocal of one another
it is I already got the neg recip it's 1/18 which turns into 18x
that isnt negative reciprocal
can you help me understand where I went wrong because since of the fractions that's what I got 1/6 over 3
yeah, the slope is 1/18, what's the negative reciprocal of 1/18?
18x I stated that already
I just need help solving for the y intercept of the equation since I went wrong there
negative reciprocal, also reciprocating doesnt introduce x's
$\frac{1}{18}$ has a negative reciprocal of $-18$ so then plug that slope and the point into slope-point formula
Mosh
I know that I'm just stating it as 18x in general I know what the negative is of it
Ok, well what you've said is wrong.
I just need help with the y intercept in the equation since that's where I go wrong
Refer to what I said 2 messages ago..
Plug the slope of -18 and the point (-4,2) into point slope
-18(x+4)+2
2(3x-8)^2
dude this is what is being shown to me by example smart ass
on the question
why do you think Im asking you
It’s literally the math discord why do u think ppl r gonna join
Yeah, you still cant change stuff around willy nilly
which you are doing, and have said you know you're doing it
-18 is -18, not 18
dude I know I have to put the negative ignore it, if you wanna be anal
this is what's being shown to me in example
Look ur subject up on YouTube and find someone by the name of “the organic chemistry tutor”
this clearly shows you didnt, since you proposed -18*4+2 was positive.
my guy
I still got the answer correct
-18x-70
but take your ego elsewhere
there is no right way to anything in life
:KekwLaugh:
It's not a matter of ego, you posted your working and I pointed out the error, to which you admitted to knowing it was wrong and why it was. What's the point of asking for help if you're just going to mess around?
If you want help, accept that people will point out the flaws then attempt to correct it with you
because negative reciprocal means you can ignore everything and then add the negatives after to make the equation correct but good for you
It doesn't
i need some help with understanding the nature of an array
would someone help me out with that
?
Problem #3: (40 points)
Given an array A of N distinct integer elements with the following property:
• The first k elements (0 < k < N - 1) are in strictly increasing sequence followed by the
strictly decreasing sequence.
Example:
A = {1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 14, 11, 7, 2, -4, -8}. It monotonically increases from 1 to 14, then
decreases from 14 to -8
Implement a sub-linear (O(logN)) running time complexity program in Java that, given an
array with the previous property, determines whether a given integer is in the array
Is that cs?
yeah but not really
i just need help understanding what this array is supposed to look like
You need to search?
So?
i just need to know if this means that it starts decreasing directly in the middle
or just anywhere
I only have basic knowledge of cs
im assuming that k is a constant that a user would provide
It just means some numbers in ascending order followed by some numbers in descending order
so i would know
The array is built with these propertues
That there is a number somewhere where it starts decreasing
I guess that’s that
You need to make the algorithm for any k
any idea how to do this? should I just try to put an equation into my calculator? how do I know where it would end on the outer limits
A graphing calculator?
So I guess the equation is in the form y=ax^2
And you have (40,10) as a point
Sub it in to get the a then graph the equation
Yes, or you can just use something like desmos I guess. How would you get it so that the parabola ends at 40cm?
That’s trial and error
doesn't a parabola with that kind of graph go out forever?
how would it abruptly stop like that?
hmm maybe the illustration just stops there because that's all you need?
Or you can cheat from Elsie and her 1/4a=40
Yes that’s what I mean
well that makes a bit more sense. so I just need to find 40,10 and move into from there I suppose
To get the a
?
To find what
that's interesting, do you mean the a in ax^2?
Move where
Yes
to find the 4 different areas I just need to find the 40,10 line first and then move inward from there by 10 each time
how does that work? I thought that 1/4a was to find the focal part
And you have a function
yes I know. so if I just move x back each time by 10, then I can solve for height
You have a function
You can plot it
And just see what y values are at x=10, 20, and 30
well for now I have a non to scale drawing
yes, y values for 10,20etc
You get the y values from a function
This function you plot
On a graphing calculator
well that's the questoin
how would I find an equation with this little information?
I guess I have 40,10
It told you the equation of a parabola
Just put k and h as zero
Because they are not important
And now we need to find the a
So our function is y=ax^2
You can use the (40,10) point
As in 10=a(40)^2
To get the a
ahh yes I see
Yup to solve for the constants
ahh that is quite cool, didn't know you could do that. thanks
You’re welcome
i need help
with what
wow, we had no idea...
lol
are you going to ask something meaningful or just.. mess around?
i'm gonna ask chill
where r the ppl that were here yesterday?
@alpine sable
@glass lichen
help pla
Do you need help for the circumference questions?
no the word problems
Ohh
ye
can someone define postulates.. im in 10th geometry
cuz i need help understanding it
The first one you find the circumference and then mutiply it by 2
there was no reason to ping me
ye i get that one
ok
bruh i literally asked for help
Dont care
Second one you find the radius
dont ping random users
well leave then..
and then use that to find circumference
yeah
2pir r
yeah u have to times it by 2
its simple then just find the value of r
pie r times 2 yeah
ohh
r is the radius
so do i do 4.5*2 whatever the answer u times it by 3.14?
in b part ?
oh wait
ok
4*pi *2 ?
yeah so its saying that he skates twice that circle
unless im missing something
ye so?
4.5*
times pi
which is 9
yesyes
It would be 2 * 3.14 * the radius
well i always take the value of pie 22/7
yes ]
wait what?
yeah its the same
The circumference of a circle is 2πr
omg
to find the circumference
π is about 3.14, and we need the radius
π what's that?
pi
Pi
pie the 3.14 thing
lel
so then what do i dooo?
Do you have the radius yet?
yeah
yeah
isn't it supposed to be 4.52+93.14?
2πr
r = 4.5, π is about 3.14
circumference is about 2πr = 2 * 3.14 * 4.5
ohh ok
pro
whats the answer??
u tell
nooo
pog
loll
tell even if its wrong
28.26?
just say 9pi
wym kinda Imao
he goes 2 times
multiyly it by 2
so first 2*3.14?
see 2 *3.14 *4.5 was just for one revolution
if u do multiply it again by 2
wait isnt it 18pi lol
yeah
sed
yeah its getting late lol
Don't ping people. Just be patient
ok
Yeah
did u get it?
56.52?
yeahhhh
no
o
what about ques 5?
yeah everything is given
It's just circumference formula
what's diameter again?
its the twice of radius
how do i know if it's a diameter or radius?
the question will say it
45.9m
Yes, that's the number
see diameter is twice the radius
no u need to find the radius
do that
umm opposite caculation that u were doing yesterday
oh noo
2*r=45.9
wait so
find r
ohh
ok
now calculate the circumference
72.063?
diameter is the entire distance across the circle
Radius is just halfway
How did you calculate that?
oh
lol
And if you ever want to find the radius
when the diameter is given
divide the diameter by 2
How did you calculate that number
u did 2* pie* r right ?
Not the right formula
3.14
Wait
I was thinking of area
2 pir r
My bad
lol square
o is the answer right?
no
........
so what do i do next?
what was the value r that u got
,calc 22.95*pi
oh
ye
Result:
72.099551399886

You just did 22.95 times pi
maybe u did not myltiply it by 2
yeah
yeah
The formula is 2pi*R
3.14
3.14
3.1415
didn't i alr do that???
ye
144.126?
correcto
You found r first
Yes
Diameter divided by 2
You should either write down the steps or pay more attention to the people helping you
repost the question
for the diameter i need to divide??
here....
You have the diameter
So you need to divide the diameter by 2
to get the radius
then apply the same formula from earlier
b part
to get your circumference
I was just explaining lol
yep
5b
yee
You must do 5a first
unless you already have the circumference
ye
and what did you get
144.126
yeah
and the circumference is 144.126
So how would you go about finding out how many cars are there in total?
it's on the outside
the entire circumference is 144.126
and the distance between each car is 6 metres
yes
Hi , where can i find free algebra problems to solve?
oh
google it?
google exists lol
Imao
just type in whatever you want exactly
and it'll show up
or there's always kutasoftware
which has good practice sheets
And what did you get?
so how many cars are there
if one were to have a distance of 6 metres
ok so times it by 6?
each car covers 6 metres
So how many cars would you need
to get 24.021?
or 24 metres in total
LOL
count up by 6
wym
each car has a distance of 6 metres
6 cars?

is that the answer?
oh yeahh' so 4?
np
💙
help
1/2 ( -3y + 10 )
Combine like terms to create an equivalent expression.
Enter the any coefficients as simplified proper or improper fractions or integers.
yes
yes
how to find y
have you learned of the distributiv property?
yeah
0.5 * (-3y + 10) is what?
28
how did you get 28=
now, 0.5 * -3 is -1.5, but remember its -3y
yes
you need the y
so you have -1.5y and 5
how are you getting -7.5
can you add 1 and 1/2 into a fraction
that is the answer
but you did it yourself, which is a lot better
ok
I WILL DO THIS TO U
what was the answer?
hi for second question, how do i know when to use brackets or parentheses when making it interval notation. i got the first question right already.
brackets include the given number. parentheses exclude
you just know theyre minecraft gamers
those damn pfps
(3,4] would mean greater than 3 to less than or equal to 4
Well, what makes sense for a weight?
ok
band
🤔
b&
🤔interesting
any positive number
Non negative
yea
so would it be w>0
W>=0
What? I had already said 0 was sensical
ya just realized that
for the first term u can use the formula (u'v - uv')/v^2
this being used?
My question is when I use the law of sines to get B it says no solution, and I cant use the law of Cosines because I ont have enough information
is it just no solution?
is there a channel for graph theory?
help..
In guessing terms I can guarantee it’s not E
Wouldn’t it just be a * b * c * d * e = 45?
mm
i don’t know
i have an explanation but i don’t get it
Does each letter have to be a different number
yes
hint: all factors are integers
6-a, 6-b, etc
what are the prime factors of 45 ?
6-a, 6-b, ... are five distinct integers such that there product is 45
now you should see a way
hmm
45 = 3²*5
you have to write 3²*5 as a product of 5 distinct integers
and that's why there is a unique solution
hey
So as we've talked about, you're interested in the vertex of that parabola. Where is it?
(0,-200)
how do i solve for turning point if v and t are both undefined
t is the independent variable, so you'd be taking the derivative in terms of t
v is a real number and you don't know it yet. Leave it as v and solve
we need to find v so that we reach 200ft
is this in use?
How do I do this?
Is it the absolute value?
Oh
Could u show an example?
So if h(-4) what would I do
Find the point on the x axis that is -4
Draw a vertical line to the function
See what y value the function has there
Yeah like that
So wait what am I looking for
So h(-4) is what
What do I put there
6
So
I see
There isn’t one
Wait
Is it -1
-2*
Right)
Sweet
So for the answer I just write -2
?
Ban
@restive tendon multiply by conjugate
@alpine nacelle got it will do
ty
also one more question, im guessing i use some sort of identity in this question but which one
to eval limit
Do you know Taylor formula ?
let me think 2 sec about an easy way
kk
idk it might be
interdeterminate
so im thinking if i apply some sort of trig identity it would work out>?
but im not sure
it is 0
oh ok cool
oh indeterminate****
whnat wopuild me
it's still not
is anyone able to help me with a math question i don’t understand how to start it off
@restive tendon https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indeterminate_form
In calculus and other branches of mathematical analysis, limits involving an algebraic combination of functions in an independent variable may often be evaluated by replacing these functions by their limits; if the expression obtained after this substitution does not provide sufficient information to determine the original limit, then the expres...
oh awesome ty
0/inf is not one of those
preciate it
so it's not indeterminate
There isn’t a point of 6 for g(x) should t it be 5?
Why do these two have different graphs?
I don’t know but I think the bottom one is the one you focus on first.
It’s kinda blurry 😅
First, draw the function's graph.
as well as the line's graph
At four locations, this line meets the graph of the function f(x). As a result, there are four possible values for b.
Only three of them are positive.
Because the graph of the function and the graph of the line y=2 cross at the positive values, f(x)=2, then for the three b with positive values
I think
Because of the order of operations
Okay so imaginary numbers do not have graph?
@vague coral I tried substituting 9-y in place of x
Well, they do, but not in the x,y on R
so in ur case
-1 can be put in the first equation but no the second
It's because $\sqrt{x^2}=|x|$
jswatj
or u can just think of it like it's being squared first so it can handle numbers in R
The answer will be imaginary number if I substitute negative integers to the second equation.
Is this correct?
Yes
Okay Thank you!
how do I take the second derivative of a circle? I am able to get the first one through implicit differentiation, which is -x/y, but I am so confused for the second. how do i find a derivative of an expression?
if anyone knows how to explain pls @ me
Hello, differentiate 2 times the circle's equation
yeah
i differentiate the equation once to get -x/y right
and then i differentiate that
but idk how
use the quotient rule
what happened with dy/dx?
wdym?
$\frac{d}{dx}\left(-\frac{x}{y}\right) = -\frac{y-x(dy/dx)}{y^2}$
leonardogtf
Notice that you already know what dy/dx is too, so you can replace it
on the numerator: derivative(x) * y - x*derivative(y)
Implicit differentiation avoids quotient rule I believe, should be easier to do.
Yes, but it has the same amount of steps, so I considered continuing what he already had worked
True
the answer is -R^2/y^3, right?
i can tell this is a dumb question but why is the derivative of y just dy/dx?
dy/dx means the derivative of y with respect to x, just a definition.
dy would be called the differential of y, on the other hand.
does dy/dx mean you are dividing the derivative of y with the derivative of x?
or what does it really mean for something to be respect to x?
Agreed
(-3,4) reflected over the x axis, would that be (-3,-4)??
just a quick question, sorry for bothering
No, it does not mean division. It's an abuse of notation that sometimes works, but in general it does not. The technical term for it is d/dx is an operator.
If you say y=f(x), dy is like saying "f(x+ε)-f(x)", as ε goes to 0. But that's just 0, which doesn't help. If you divide it by dx, which is like saying "(x+ε)-x", then you get an actual number (try it for simple polynomials like x²). That number is the slope of the function at that point (aka "tangent" line).
yeah that makes sense
i guess i just have no idea how to make sense of it when it comes to implicit differentiation
because with -x/y, i dont know how to take the derivative when there are two variables in the expression
Oh one moment
^ so that's the chain rule, again an abuse of notation, but here you can think of it as the dg/dg cancelling out (this is only really true for single variable functions, which f is).
In this case, y is a function of x, so we say d(y(x))/dx=dy/dx * dx/dx, but dx/dx=1 so it's just dy/dx
(so f(g(x))=y, and g(x)=x if you're looking at the picture)
Additionally, 3b1b YouTube channel has a series of videos that can give you a lot of intuition about fundamental concepts of calculus, there's even a chapter about implicit differentiation. Maybe you should try watching those too
sorry, for d(y(x))/dx, is dx/x the other function, and is y(x) the inner function? would you mind going thru the specific steps in the chain rule for this?
@ancient saddle i did! i might have to watch them again lol
i watched a couple of them
how would i solve #21 i don’t exactly understand what it’s asking for or how to write an answer
i think what i am asking is does dy/dx mean the change in y per change in x? and the respect to part just means the bottom one?
Yes.
thank you so much!
its asking u to draw a graph on the interval [0,4] that doesnt satisfy the intermediate value theorem
"if f is a continuous function whose domain contains the interval [a, b], then it takes on any given value between f(a) and f(b) at some point within the interval."
dy/dx is analogous to Δy/Δx by the way, which is the slope of a line from algebra.
so if theres a jump discontinuity @noble goblet , something like this will satisfy that question
at x = -3, is that point differentiable or not??
ohhh ok so i j draw the graph based on the info given?
ohhh tysm lmao i can’t read
anyone know how to do this, little confused on how it would work with radicals
so i’m not too sure i did it right
@alpine sable
d(√x)/dx = 1/(2√x)
Remember to use the product rule here
alright thank you ill try that out
#21 is satisfied if thats what you're asking, I didnt check the rest
ok tysm
Hey guys I’m so confused how the square root of 1 doesn’t equal -1
Sqrt(1) = +-1
So it does equal it?
Yea...
that’s so weird khan academy counts it wrong
Nope
Im wrong
Its just 1
Because you cant get to negative numbers by using square roots @upper dagger
How do I find x here:
And that is 3x -1=64x-32
And then we shift x to the one side and numbers to the other
So its
Bongo
Thank You Man. Appreciated 👍
can i ask sumn or is this still taken
3x-64x=-32 +1
yea np
Sure
i need some help mking sense of this proof
@fiery adder im bad at proofs 😦 sry dude
rip
Could anyone help me out with 3 (a). I know you have to do the conjugate but idk why it’s throwing me off so hard
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/326138772477575180/886762895084486706/image0.jpg
Bongo
Because when I try 2 it gives me something weird
like its not correct can some1 help
The two as in the base?
No you can't cancel that out
ok but if I convert it to logarithm fomr I get:
$\frac{3x-1\log2}{4x-2\log2}=\log16$
Bongo
No
Because it's not possible
ok
when I convert it to log form its not shwoing it
showing*
the one on the right is the logarithm form and the left is exponent form