#help-0
1 messages · Page 771 of 1
If anyone could explain it to me step by step I would be so grateful
I'm practicing for an exam tomorrow by the way
@alpine sableok let's do it
when doing fractions the most important thing is the denominator
what do you notice about the denominators
Well I don't think I need to touch them except the first one
so I did 2(x-4)
the are all composed of x
and x-4
so we multiply them out
however it is under the assumption that they are nonzero
so we add the constraint that x does not equal to 0 and 4
okay
so what do we get
can you guys help me??
we are busy
ok
use another channel
I'm a bit lost sorry English is not my first language
So maybe give me a visual hint pretty please
ok
Ok I see
Kind of
But why these two multiplications have these results?
@alpine sable srry for ping if you are busy
You mean why (x-4)(x-2)=x²-6x+8? and why (x-4)(3x+1)=3x²-11x-4?
Yes
Ohh I see I'm dumb sorry
I understand now what I did wrong
Tysm all of u
Low-key very anxious about the exam and this helped
If there is a gamble game like this
10 USD for a
1/20 chance of getting
One of these three outcomes. And when you hit that 1/20 every outcome has the same chance
-500 USD
-100 USD
-5 USD
how likely I am to get back more than i spend, it is worth trying?
do you guys know this?
W = Fdcos(theta)
is anyone available ?
sure
im confused as to how im supposed to do this
the condition's making me think that it's integration by parts but i tried that and got 0
idk if i did it wrong or something but
its confusing the fuck out of me
idk man im in geometry
i’m super confused, i keep getting undefined but it’s not an option
am i doing it wrong ?
note that 196 is a perfect square
so the denominator can be factored as a difference of squares
Factor
consider (sqrt(x))^2 = x
i’m still getting undefined
How would you factor x - 196?
bruh my question
can you even factor this?
Use difference of squares to factor x - 196
How to get good at math
$$a^2 - b^2 = (a + b)(a - b)$$
dldh06
no
No
let u^2 = x
Also, stop trying to give answers
then as x-> 196, u^2->196 meaning u->14
rationalizing is considered factoring?
@next hatch take the given equation as a function of alpha (say) and use Feynmans trick to differentiate under the integral sign but you have to differentiate it twice
No, that's two difference concepts
You don't have to rationalize
x - 196 is factorable using difference of squares
seems like thats what id do with this problem, then cancel out a part of the denominator
the what
No need, just factor
its okay ill ask it another time theres already a question being asked rn
Kk no worries you can dm for the solution if u want
ok i see it now, yes factor the denominator, dont bother rationalizing
if you're uncomfortable with factoring x - 196
you could always consider the conjugate of the numerator,
the principle of the difference of two squares will still be applied
@modern crystal still with us?
Read #rules and #❓how-to-get-help
Yea I'm sorry
Seems good
are they both 15?
Check c
A and C ?
If you figure the mistake in c all others are evident too
i’m guessing it’s that
but then again
wouldnt it be neither > or < if it’s just 0
I heard math is applied philosophy. What philosophy book should I get started with to improve my math.
,rotate
what have you tried?
me?
@jovial knoll try #book-recommendations
me? not much just stuff like 6= equation and replacing x with -3
what did you do after that?
you'll have a linear equation that should be relatively simple to solve
oh ok wait nvm ty!!
also -6 not 6
I’m a little confused
When I substitute x for -8 in x^2, am I supposed to be putting -8 in parenthesis or not?
yes
Oh ok, is that just a rule I should know?
because you are squaring 'x' and since 'x' is '-8' then you have to include the '-'
f(x) = x²
Is saying "take the input and square it"
f(-8) has an input of -8
So you square the entire input, not just the 8
Ohhhh
Thank you both of you 🙏
Can someone double check my answer?? We are supposed to write our coordinates as an ordered pair
I got (-8, 88) for this one
yse thats correct
Awesome
f(-8) = 88
Ty!!!
hello, I need help in the function decomposition of tan^2(3x) ?
You can use Moivre's formula.
Of complex numbers
By decomposition you mean find tan(x)?
find f(x) and g(x)
Like split it into 2 functions, ya
Split into two...
would it not be f(x) = x^2 and g(x) tan(3x) ?
You mean writing tan^2(3x) = f(x) + g(x)?
ya kind of like that.
Moivre's formula.
Not that.
It's not the formula I need.
I just need to decompose the function tan^2(3x) into 2 separate functions if you understand me.
tan^2(3x) = sin^2(3x)/cos^2(3x)
sec^2(3x)-1
With Moivre's formula
ok
This formula
Ignore r
n will be equal to 2
What you have is sin^2(3x)/cos^2(3x)
You must develop the question for sin and for cos
So you you substitute this in moivre's formula.
You develop the real part and the imaginary part.
In the end you'll probabily find a value for sin^2(2x) and
You do know Evan, was talking about function composition right? And it has nothing to do with de moirve's theorem
cos^2(3x)
Yes
It is function decomposition
Using complex numbers.
It is another perspective.
It terms of other components.
I really really cant see how you wil bring de moirve's theorem into function composition
Or you just have no clue what composition of functions is
sigh
You'll have clearlly a decomposition for sin and cos.
Isolating Im and Re.
It can be used to decompose even sin(2453x) if you want.
how is this written in interval notation ? <@&286206848099549185>
Thats a graph of a function, you represent it with an equation
Or unless theres more context to this problem that you are deliberately opting to not show
Also ping helpers after a minimum of 15min
i think they're trying to say how to describe the domain and range
Look at the graph, the limit wont exist when there is a jump or an oscillation
Point out the spot where f(x) might have a jump
(-inf,-1](-1,2](2,+inf) @rigid smelt was thinking something like this idk if this is the form theyre asking for
Thats like saying a is in (-infty, infty) but you are try to look cool
Try to answer this first
im new to this haha i see it but am not sure how to put down in interval notation
I know, but can you answer this?
the jump seems to be from 2 to 1 when x is 2
Yes, the jump is at x=2
Meaning a can not be 2
So there are many ways you can notate that
You can either write (-infty, 2)U(2, infty)
Or (-infty, infty){2}
What do you think? Is it in use?
well i think your done explaining but idk
Are two people talking to each other seems like its not in use?
i thought u were done lmao
i got it thank you lots @rigid smelt
Its free now
a1 = 1/k, a2 = 1/k^2
a_n = (1/k)^n
(1/k^m - 1/k^(m+1)) = (k-1)/(k^(m+1))
= ((k-1)/(k^(2)))^2 + ((k-1)/(k^(3)))^2 + ...
= (k-1)^2 * sum from m=1 to m=n of (1/k)^m
??
you don't square the square root
the square root of a number squared is equal to the absolute value
(a^m)^n = a^(mn) applies for a>0
and isn't necessarily true for other values of a
generally sqrt(x^2) = |x|
while (sqrt(x))^2 = x
Oooo
how do you do #16
iirc when u find the inverse function of something you swap the variables so it would look like x=y^5 + y^3 + y and then you solve for y, but u can't solve that, can you?
is there another way you're supposed to do it
oh wait do you do this with derivatives
f^-1(3) is the value of x where f(x) = 3
and there is a trivial solution to
3 = x^5 + x^3 + x
x=1 right
yes
well for the second part, you can just apply the definition of the inverse
what's that?
exactly as what was just applied
2= x^5 + x^3 + x?
f^-1(3) is the value of x where f(x) = 3
similarly f^-1(2) is the value of x where f(x) = 2
so would it just be f(2) then
f(x^5+x^3+x)?
no
don't overthink this
similarly f^-1(2) is the value of x where f(x) = 2
do you understand that?
(don't try and do any unnecessary solving)
ehh
i gues it makes sense its just foreign to me lol
its pretty much applying the definition of an inverse function
can anyone help me with this :))
$f( \underbrace{f^{-1}(2)}_{\text{$f$ of this value gives you 2}})$
@ashen dove channel busy please move
ℝamonov
ah ok sorry
oh okay
f^-1(2) is the number that, when passed as input to f, gives 2
i don't really see how that helps me other than 2=x^5+x^3+x
i guess i'm really overthinking it
idk
you're overthinking it
f(2)
no
f^-1(2) is the number that, when passed as input to f, gives 2
f(f^-1(2)) is the expression that represents f^-1(2) being passed into f
yeah
what happens if you take the number that gives an output of 2 when plugged into f... and plug it into f?
it gives an output of 2
exactly
LOL
there we go
okay i think i see
Why is it inversely proportional when the d is increqased by 50 percent, the v is also increased by 1.5?
correct one?
What exactly is a limit? Is it the same value as f(x)?
For example as x goes to c the limit is 2.
Would f(x) = L as x goes to c?
This channel is occupied.
you didn't pick one
no it's as the function approaches that point
the value at that point is irrelevent
So aproaching at a y point right?
So if limit is 2, then it is aproaching 2 but not on 2
with 2 being on the y-axis
not sure where your y-axis came from
I mean that in terms of f(x) = y
f(x) = y(x)
For me its like learning a language and translating it in my old native language
if that makes sense lol
y is something we call a dependent variable
yes
cooleo
wait so if L = 2, then its actually talking in terms of as lim f(x) is approaching as x aproaches 2?
I thought it was as y aproaches 2
x is the independent variable.
you see how the thing under the limit is written as "x to 2"
there are other things you can put under there, but in my example (and how you first learn limits) it's x approaching the number, not y
lmao
is this correct for the equation of the graph?
not up to scale lol
so L = 2
cause as x aproaches 1, f(x) aproaches 2
remember that limits must go from both sides
and also you wrote (x), not f(x)
so this would satisfy that
oh whoops yea
also what bunny said
So would this new graph satisfy that for each side x - > 1 lim f(x) = 2?
yep
assuming f(x) is something like 2x, then yes
good job
Should that usually be stated with these graphs?
like f(x) = 2x
it's probably good form, yes
I see. Thank you guys.
So simple definition is "limit (or variable L) is the value of f(x) as x aproaches c" right?
for x -> c
yes
Fantastic.
ask something more interesting now
That solves my questions. I will soon lol.
hi! ive never learned this before so im not sure where to go about this, may i get help with how to solve this equation, please?
write both sides as powers of 6, so you have something like 6^a=6^b. Then, a=b (either by taking log base 6 of both sides or just assuming that it must be true. If you don't know what a log is, you're just going to have to take my word that if 6^a=6^b, then a=b)
Is Quadratic equations a part of which subset of algebra?
pre
thank you sm! ill see if i can figure it out from there!
good question, ive been wondering the same thing
i figured ye, i just cant remember the whole same base situation but ill try to figure it out
can you be more specific with what you mean here?
WAIT
DO YOU BRING THE DENOMINATOR UP N THEN LIKE UM
whats the word
why cant i think of it
square root to get base 6?
n then square 5x+2 in the exponent
1/x = x^(-1)
okayokay, thats what i thought
was the square root part correct? or is there a different method
(1/36^(5x+2)) = (1/36)^(5x+2) = (1/6^2)^(5x+2) = (6^(-2))^(5x+2) = 6^(-10x - 4)
Hi i am a 15 year old wanting to learn linear algebra. I do have basic understanding of high school algebra. Do ineed to learn more or is it enough
I am in bit hurry so
Like there is linear algebra abstrat algebra etc.
elementary algebra
typically its just called algebra
abstract and linear are very different
you have not even indicated what tsa is
lmao
Ok
Total Surface Area
okayokay so i understood how to get base 6, but how come only the 2 became a negative when you move it to the numerator and not the 5x+3 too?
Guys can anyone math the following with the correct answer. im too week for this..
yes :)
help
ok thanks
Is a parabolas height infinite
you can ask on a different (unoccupied) questions channel so as not to get interrupted and not to interrupt others
that question is ambigious
Ok
If i graphed x^2, Would there be a point were the Parabola Stops going up on the y axis
yes
but that does not happen for all parabolas
the vertex of y = x^2 + 1 is not on the y-axis
i assume you are referring to the vertex of the parabola here
Log laws
😩
Indices laws.
Ie in a you can take the log of both sides and bring down the x-1
ok thanks.
You find both roots and look at which one is positive @soft belfry
Did you get the roots?
Have you learned the quadratic formula?
For e) , you need to square both the sides so the base is same & then further substitute the value of x.
okey
thanks!!
You still need to know the quadratic formula to use the calculator
Like to solve for t
You use this formula
Oh
You use the third formula
You put a as the number that is before x^2
In this case 1
@soft belfry physics in #old-network
Ty
find the amount compounded annually on rs 9000 for two years if the rates of interest for two years are 8% and 10% respectively.
please help me once again guys
you tried to answer with a single number?
?
you know the answer will be a 1×2 matrix, right?
not a single number as you tried to present just now with your 1*0 + 1*3
you multiply them.
your book has no doubt explained how to multiply matrices.
if you must know, 1 * 0 + (-1) * 3 would have been the first entry in AD.
ok thanks
If your question has not been answered for a minimum of 15 minutes, you may use the Helpers tag once. Please do not try to bump your question using this ping unnecessarily. Do not abuse this ping. Do not individually ping users with the Helpers tag without their express permission.
@warped jay I think u might be study quadratic equations(quadratic equations are of the form ax^2 + bx + c)
Compare ax^2 + bx + c to x^2 + 5, you'll easily find the values of a,b,c
Can Someone explain how it got simplified from the first to the second and from the second to the last?
👍
😇😇
@urban lily Multiply divide (y'/x) by xy^2, multiply divide (-y/x^2) by y^2, multiply divide (1/y) by x^2y, and multiply divide (-xy'/y^2) by x^2
This way, all terms have the same denominator, you can add them under one denominator, and then it's simple factorization
For the second to third step, the denominator cannot be 0, hence (y^2 - x^2)(xy' - y) must be 0, so either (y^2 - x^2) = 0 that implies y=+-sqrt(x) or xy' - y = 0 which implies y' = y/x
Given the measure of an acute angle in a right triangle, we can tell the ratios of the lengths of the triangle's sides relative to that acute angle.
Here are the approximate ratios for angle measures 55\degree55°55, degree, 65\degree65°65, degree, and 75\degree75°75, degree.
Angle 55\degree55°55, degree 65\degree65°65, degree 75\degree75°75, degree
\dfrac{\text{adjacent leg length}}{\text{hypotenuse length}}
hypotenuse length
adjacent leg length
start fraction, start text, a, d, j, a, c, e, n, t, space, l, e, g, space, l, e, n, g, t, h, end text, divided by, start text, h, y, p, o, t, e, n, u, s, e, space, l, e, n, g, t, h, end text, end fraction 0.570.570, point, 57 0.420.420, point, 42 0.260.260, point, 26
\dfrac{\text{opposite leg length}}{\text{hypotenuse length}}
hypotenuse length
opposite leg length
start fraction, start text, o, p, p, o, s, i, t, e, space, l, e, g, space, l, e, n, g, t, h, end text, divided by, start text, h, y, p, o, t, e, n, u, s, e, space, l, e, n, g, t, h, end text, end fraction 0.820.820, point, 82 0.910.910, point, 91 0.970.970, point, 97
\dfrac{\text{opposite leg length}}{\text{adjacent leg length}}
adjacent leg length
opposite leg length
start fraction, start text, o, p, p, o, s, i, t, e, space, l, e, g, space, l, e, n, g, t, h, end text, divided by, start text, a, d, j, a, c, e, n, t, space, l, e, g, space, l, e, n, g, t, h, end text, end fraction 1.431.431, point, 43 2.142.142, point, 14 3.733.733, point, 73
Use the table to approximate ABABA, B in the triangle below.
<@&286206848099549185>
@alpine sable Yes your answer is correct
ok thank you
Hi, if lim x-> infinite of f(x) = 0
Can we say that lim x-> infinity of f'(x) = 0?
And what about if lim = constant?
Righttt! didn't come across my mind, Now that's easy thank you so much :)) @shell widget
correct answer
It seems that there are counter examples for the first one
For the second, no. Take y = e^x - 1. Then lim as x approaches 0 of f(x) is 0, but lim as x approaches 0 of f'(x) = e^x is 1
@soft belfry $\sqrt{9x^{\frac{2}{3}}} = (9x^{\frac{2}{3}})^{\frac{1}{2}} = (9^{\frac{1}{2}}) (x^{\frac{2}{3}})^{\frac{1}{2}} = 3 (x^{\frac{2}{3} \cdot \frac{1}{2}}) = 3 x^{\frac{1}{3}}$
Sup?
remember ur power rules, (ab)^c = (a^c)(b^c) and (a^b)^c = a^(bc)
ty
why is it calculating the power for which it will decelerate to 85 to 65
and not when it will go from 85 to 75 km
So what i did was to calcualte the accelerating force to find the time for which it will go from 85 to 75 km per hour from the v =u + at
can anyone answer these before 6pm
i really need it fast
and also need the steps
pls
@alpine ledge Which one?
3rd and 4th
@alpine sable Just do what it says, multiply and then equate
@alpine ledge I'll just show how one is done, the rest you can do yourself. (1/2)^n = 1^n / 2^n = 1 / 2^n = 2^-n
So you have 2^(-n) = 8
Recall that 8 = 2^3, so you have 2^(-n) = 2^(3).
Since bases are same, powers must be the same as well, and we get -n = 3, or n = -3
Thanks bro
$\int_{10}^{s} \dd{s} = \int_{10}^{s} 1 \dd{s} = s |_{10}^{s} = s - 10$
Sup?
$\int_{4}^{t} 5 \dd{t} = 5t |_{4}^{t} = 5(t) - 5(4) = 5t - 20$
Sup?
Ty
when do use the open and closed circles when graphing functions?? plsss send help
Open circle does not include that value while closed includes it
yess i get that but like don't you use it on just inequalities or nah?
or is like for all functions?
theyre used for inequalities, yes!
You use hollow and filled circles to represent exclusion and inclusion respectively
What is the multiplicative inverse of -1 1/8?
Is that a mixed fraction $-1 \frac{1}{8}$ or $\frac{-11}{8}$?
dldh06
It’s a mixed fraction
how do you know whats on top when you're doing systems of linear equations?
It’s a mixed fraction
when i’m subtracting the stuff
it doesn't matter
as long as you're adding and subtraction properly, eliminating variables then it doesn't really make a difference
but it’s inverse gets me -7y+5y=-22
Channel busy
lmao noob @pine zealot
i’m good
ok
need help with finding the internal angles on this trapezium
nvm
figured it ot
How to draw this in geogebra?
Hey so is the parallel chord method guaranteed to converge no matter the initial value?
am i tripping or the answer sheet is wrong
MADE PAINT ONE EASIER TO SEE
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185> is it row SPEAKS to coloumn?
i guess it is
oof
Very nice
yes
for c again as an example, does it matter which equations replaces which?
like when i have the substituted value, does it matter where i put it?
Nope, doesn't matter because at the end, you'll still end up with the same x, y, z values
am i right?
question is no 5 c
also i need help with 5 a and b
is 5 a and b the same as y-y1=m (x-x1)
when do i distribute in a function?
if it says "apply a vertical stretch by a factor of 3 followed by a translation 3 units downwards to the parent function of f(x) = x", there is no distribution right?
so g(x) = 3x - 3
but if it told me to do the translation first and then the stretch, it'd be g(x) = 3x - 9?
Correct, what exactly is the question?
Not exactly any question, it was just a concept I wanted to make sure I understood
Wait
What about this
Let’s say I have this equation
@small bear 4(2x – 3) + 2
Im told to apply a vertical shift downwards by 3 units and then a horizontal shift to the right by 1 unit
My new equation would just be 4(2x-4) - 1 right?
integrate 12 - 3t^2, you get 12t - 3t^3 / 3 = 12t - t^3. Plug in the limits, you get (12t - t^3) - (12 - 1) = 12t - t^3 - 11
how do i do the same thing for 6 = °75 when it comes to <1
look at the properties of parallel lines with a transversal passing thru
there are certain rules ig
i forgot the term, but i think its supplementary angles. a supplementary angle is 180° so if you take 180-75, you would get 105. with that 105, you would use alternate angles to explain angle 1
not alterate
um whats the term called
ah i see
I'm trying to find the radius between Q1 and point P and my triangle (first image) is wrong. My professor says it's "in the wrong plane" and should look like the second image but I'm not sure what he means by it being in the wrong plane.
Hello, I think he wants you to find the angle Q1 at the triangle ∆Q1 P Q5
Hola! quería preguntarles cómo hallarían una formula general para la relación entre el área de dos polígonos irregulares? Es decir, una fórmula que con sólo los datos del primer polígono, pueda calcular el área del proporcional...
hey I'm a bit confused on this considering ik where the speed goes but the other three confuse me I'm only in ninth grade and I'm a bit bad at math if anyone could just explain what each thing means it would mean the world
Eyo is this channel free?
Bcuz if yes, I got a hw problem to do
that I didn't understand
someone help?
<@&286206848099549185>
This is the problem I got to do
what did you do so far. And don't tag so fast please
Nothing yet, bcuz I didn't understand anything
Also sorry for tagging fast
The question is volountarily tricky, it is just using synonims to confuse you.
volume is really length * length * length, which is m to the third power, also called cumic meters. The fact that it is using centimeter doesn't really matter from the point of view of measuring unit, it only changes the "amplitude" of a measure.
area is length * length, so meters to the power of two, also called square.
Speed is length / time, so meter per second.
Perimeter is a sum of lengths. When you sum measurements you are not changing the measurement unit, but just the value, so the unit remains meter.
length, distance, width, as I implied, are all the same.
how about you get rid of both fractions first?
How do I do it?
how would you do it if you had only one?
OMG I UNDERSTAND NOW TYYY
$\frac{3}{x+1} = -1$
I would multiply by x+1
how would you solve this?
lyinch
exactly
im gonna ace this math test >:D
do this, but this time for both fractions
Mk
and then see what you get
I multiply with x+1 or 1-x
both
because otherwise you can't get rid of both fractions
first with one, then with the other
o alright
hey anyone know raitos that can help me
I need to know from the beginning
I would really appreciate it
don't expect a solution after multiplying. There's a little bit more work to do. But did you understand why we multiply with both?
I hope that the next step now looks familiar to you
It will be 3 + 4 = -3( x+1 )( 1-x )
is that correct?
@dense citrus Sorry for ping
no worries. let me check
Expand the brackets if it is ig
I have 7+x on the lhs
lhs?
3(1-x)+4(x+1) = -3(x+1)(1-x)
o
I only showed one side 🙂
alright, so then it will be 3 + 4 = -3(x+1)(1-x)?
mmh you're still missing one x on the left
wait where?
left side
3(1-x)+4(x+1) = 3-3x+4x+4 = 7+x
that's your left side
so then you have 7+x = -3(x+1)(1-x)
and that's a normal equation. I guess you know how to solve it?
I got something different
but you know what to do. Expand, bring it to the typical 2nd degree form and solve
note that you have a typical identity on the right
(a-b)(a+b)
yeap
afterwards you can use wolframalpha to check the solution yourself
I don't understand what the question is asking me to do here..
am i allowed to choose what to put in front of n^2?
@dense citrus I don't understand what you mean by that reaction lol
that I don't understand the question myself lol
it's strange haha
yes, try that. Simplifies your life
and square the original sequence
do you see the solution straight away? I'm curious what they actually want you to do
it doesn't allow me to put more than two digits in the blank spaces
lol
show the hole question
Then not really, cause you'd get $cx^TX^T$ just changing the scalar name
Mosh
unless you know X is say skew sym or sym, then X^T is just X^T
Doing sat practice and I forgot how to do this kind of problem and I just need some guidance on what to do
Find the slope of f(x)
Find the slope of a line perpendicular to that
Use point slope to find g(x)
Plug in -1
its a really fundamental concept
starts with an e
well
idk if the name for c starts with an e
but the concept does
sounds german
i guess we dont have to play hot/cold
i think so 
the idea of constant scaling is not uhh
not the key thing
b is an eigenvector of A and c is an eigenvalue of A
but its a big feature
just watch 3b1b linalg on 150% speed
youll be fine
itll come back
well mostly
i did the same thing 😄
ah lol
so were in the same boat almost
so just enough to scrape by
a true ml student
C) Yes, though I'd personally say non-invertible
cause Ax=0 has only a non-trivial solution iff A is invertible
Isometry I would guess
o geez
i remember e
what the heck is it
thats something you see during diagonalization right
Yeah, I'd say Positive Definite
(a) symmetric
(b) eigenvector and eigenvalue
(c) non-invertible?
(d) orthogonal
(e) positive-definite
any1 help?
are you in linear algebra?
or just normal algebra
you could get through this visually
a good question is whats the most places a line can cross?
and can you find a place where these lines cross?
try setting them equal
yea idk the anglo spelling
its fine i got it right anyways lmao
but what about this
isnt it infinite?
both the slope and y-intercept are equal so isnt that infinite @remote heron
The y-intercept isn't equal tho
How would i simplify by combining like terms: x(x-y)+y(y-x)
what have you tried?
i tried distributing and got 2x^2 -xy + y^2 - yx
where did 2x^2 come from?
yes...
ahhh okok
How you did it both wrong for the xx and correct for the yy
No clue
However
yes $$=x^2-2xy+y^2$$
Mosh
which has a well known factorization
so u just added the xy?
yes... -xy-xy=-2xy
alr bet thanks
who can help me
how many bonus points do I get with 50%?
like 10,16,50,4 maybe
eii
@alpine sable here
yh i see it
ok
c:
what do u think
idk i am confused
chill
<@&286206848099549185>
help, plys
11/2 (D)
realy?
multiply second fraction by 4
your second fraction will become 12x-8
in result you'll have (8x-1-12x+8)/20 = -3/4
wow, thanks really
then you multiply -4x+7 by 4 and 20 by -3
could you help me with 2 more I'm bad at some
and solve the linear equation you've got
you should get 11/2
(actually i've just wrote your problem in mathway then came up with the solution but we'll drop that part)
i am bad as well but i could try to help you
por favor (no offense)
cool,i am brazilian too
but my wild guess is you need to find this figure's diagonales?
(i am russian and am not familliar with math terminology in english)
(so idk how is this figure called in english)
watch the diamond
Find the values of angles x and y
oh angles actually?
massa
well Y is 25 and X is 55 i believe
wait no
i screwed up because things don't sum up
wtf is wrong with me, i mean, Y is absolutely 25 and
khm
X 65 and Y 25
Sorry, but no.
Calculate x and y values without parallelogram EFGH
gave a translated
ST is still there?
like this?
i constantly come to x = 55 y = 40 and idk why
my equation looks like this
x+2x = 3x
20-5 = 15
180 - 15 = 165
3x = 165, x = 55
y+2y = 3y
65-5 = 60
180 - 60 = 120
3y = 120, y = 40
either i don't know how to solve such problems or i suck at geometry
that's why i never visit these channels to help
well there is an other way
you tried at least
let me try something else
ok
nevermind i still got to the same conclusion
I think it contains obtuse angles there
i assumed that <E + <H = 180 and <F + <G = 180 (instead of my <H+<F = 180 and <E + <G = 180 thought)
@alpine sable opposite angles in a parallelogram are equal
Use that to set up your equations
okey
but that would mean that sum of opposite angles is 180 degrees?
i tried to solve the task based on that fact
and did not succeed
No
5 = 5 but 5 + 5 ≠ 180
Why does being equal mean the sum is 180?
Totally different things
Yes, the sum if not 180, they're just equal (the opposite angles)
C (X 25 Y 70)
@next idol dont just give answers
Help people do it themselves, although it looks like they're gone now
alright
How would I factor x^2+x-30?
do you want the answer or an explanation?
an explanation
so to factor this, you need to break the 30 down to two numbers that can multiply to give you that 30 and add up to give you 1, due to the coefficient of x being 1
so when you can use 6x - 5x
this gives you x, and when multiplied, gives you 30
you get it?
yeah now I do
thank you for the assistance
no problem
Let’s say I have this equation: 4(2x – 3) + 2, Im told to apply a vertical shrink by a factor of 2, and then a vertical shift downwards by 3 units, and a horizontal shift to the left by 2 units.
Would my new equation be: 2(2x - 5) + -2 ?
https://www.mathsisfun.com/data/least-squares-regression.html
This should help
Math explained in easy language, plus puzzles, games, quizzes, videos and worksheets. For K-12 kids, teachers and parents.
It literally has every step by step instruction on there, any particular steps you dobt understand?
How do I do this thing again can someone explain to me how to do it not the answer because I wanna figure it out
Can someone please explain the reasoning behind this? The answer is log1/2:
@misty moat When a system of equations has infinite solutions, what does that imply for their lanes
the lines overlap at every point?
It means the lanes are the same
Overlap means they’re the exact same line
Hello, what have you tried so far?
No
Hi! Is this correct?
yes
I apologize if I missed it but i have looked in a few of the other channels and can't seem to find it.
I'm looking for a solid textbooks on probability as well as statistics (not together though). Additionally it would be really great if people could refer a great online class. Ideally one that is designed for beginners, has lots of practice problems and is pretty rigorous in it's teachings.
and when you get rid of the denominator, then substitute h=0
alright bet thank you
have you tried #book-recommendations
Ask in #book-recommendations
np
i have a question,would h(-2) when h(x)=x^2+4x-7 be equal to -11 or -19?
Yes, you are correct
i was just checking because apparently i’ve been reading squares wrong my whole life
The notation can be a little confusing but you'll get the hang of it with enough practice
i just learned yesterday that it’s read -(2)^2 without parenthesis present and: (-2)^2 when they are
what do you mean by "read"?
i mean like when solving an equation e.g. -2^2 +5
yes, if you put it into a calculator thats what it does
yea
0-2^2
order of operations
oh and which way do you think my math teacher would want me to answer? P(D)= 4D-20/3
or P(D)= 4/3 (D-5)
how do i solve for [1/5] to the 4th power
$(\frac{a}{b}) ^n=\frac{a^n}{b^n}$
You distribute the power to the numerator and denominator
.itsjustnai
🤓
anyone available?

Let’s say I have this equation: 4(2x – 3) + 2, Im told to apply a vertical shrink by a factor of 2, and then a vertical shift downwards by 3 units, and a horizontal shift to the left by 2 units.
Would my new equation be: 2(2x - 5) + -2 ?
or 2(2x - 1) + -2
those are expressions not equations
is this right ?
or would it be e
cause it’s not asking to completely simplify it if that makes sense
I'm not sure what they mean by equivalent tbh
x = 9 - (-2) =22
If you evaluate it you get +inf, but if you evaluate the last two they also give you +inf
well this is scenario 3
and scenario 3 are also the last two limits here
You take the leading coefficient terms from the numerator and denominator, then simplify
if i’m not mistaken the leading term is x^2 and x right?
would it be the last answer choice then ?
Which picture?
B?
No
i don’t think it’s a c though
cause it’s asking for the equivalence not it simplified ?
You "ignore" the limit part
it was the last one 😃
It was? Huh, interesting
technically both the last two would be correct
as they ultimately have the same limit as x→inf
help
all good
what have you tried
that is a major issue
so if i were to ask you for the factors of 4, you won't know wtf i'm asking for?
i'd highly recommend you read up on factors of integers