#help-0

1 messages · Page 771 of 1

alpine sable
#

Okay so I need help I can't manage to get the right result while solving this thing

#

If anyone could explain it to me step by step I would be so grateful

#

I'm practicing for an exam tomorrow by the way

#

@alpine sableok let's do it

#

when doing fractions the most important thing is the denominator

#

what do you notice about the denominators

#

Well I don't think I need to touch them except the first one

#

so I did 2(x-4)

#

the are all composed of x

#

and x-4

#

so we multiply them out

#

however it is under the assumption that they are nonzero

#

so we add the constraint that x does not equal to 0 and 4

#

okay

#

so what do we get

thorn sundial
#

can you guys help me??

alpine sable
#

we are busy

thorn sundial
#

ok

alpine sable
#

use another channel

#

I'm a bit lost sorry English is not my first language

#

So maybe give me a visual hint pretty please

#

ok

#

Ok I see

#

Kind of

#

But why these two multiplications have these results?

#

@alpine sable srry for ping if you are busy

steep briar
alpine sable
#

Yes

wary stream
#

You use the FOIL method

#

First, Outer, Inner, Last

alpine sable
#

Ohh I see I'm dumb sorry

#

I understand now what I did wrong

#

Tysm all of u

#

Low-key very anxious about the exam and this helped

foggy crypt
#

If there is a gamble game like this
10 USD for a
1/20 chance of getting
One of these three outcomes. And when you hit that 1/20 every outcome has the same chance
-500 USD
-100 USD
-5 USD
how likely I am to get back more than i spend, it is worth trying?

thorn sundial
#

do you guys know this?

rich basin
tight locust
#

W = Fdcos(theta)

modern crystal
#

is anyone available ?

tight locust
#

sure

next hatch
#

im confused as to how im supposed to do this

#

the condition's making me think that it's integration by parts but i tried that and got 0

#

idk if i did it wrong or something but

#

its confusing the fuck out of me

prime mural
#

idk man im in geometry

modern crystal
#

i’m super confused, i keep getting undefined but it’s not an option

#

am i doing it wrong ?

tight locust
#

note that 196 is a perfect square

modern crystal
#

mhm mhm

#

still confused 😩

tight locust
#

so the denominator can be factored as a difference of squares

wary stream
gray isle
#

consider (sqrt(x))^2 = x

modern crystal
#

i’m still getting undefined

wary stream
#

How would you factor x - 196?

next hatch
#

bruh my question

west solstice
wary stream
#

Using what ramonov stated

modern crystal
#

what are y’all getting ?

#

so i can work backwards cause

wary stream
#

Use difference of squares to factor x - 196

sick frigate
#

How to get good at math

wary stream
#

$$a^2 - b^2 = (a + b)(a - b)$$

tight locust
#

a^2

#

not a^a

ocean sealBOT
#

dldh06

wary stream
#

Good catch, thanks

#

What?

tight locust
#

no

wary stream
#

No

tight locust
#

let u^2 = x

wary stream
#

Also, stop trying to give answers

tight locust
#

then as x-> 196, u^2->196 meaning u->14

west solstice
#

rationalizing is considered factoring?

solid blade
#

@next hatch take the given equation as a function of alpha (say) and use Feynmans trick to differentiate under the integral sign but you have to differentiate it twice

wary stream
#

You don't have to rationalize

#

x - 196 is factorable using difference of squares

west solstice
#

seems like thats what id do with this problem, then cancel out a part of the denominator

next hatch
#

its okay ill ask it another time theres already a question being asked rn

solid blade
#

Kk no worries you can dm for the solution if u want

west solstice
gray isle
#

if you're uncomfortable with factoring x - 196
you could always consider the conjugate of the numerator,
the principle of the difference of two squares will still be applied

wary stream
#

Why are you trying to give out answers?

#

You don't do that

solid blade
#

Sorry I'm new here

#

I didn't know that

west solstice
#

@modern crystal still with us?

wary stream
solid blade
#

Yea I'm sorry

modern crystal
#

hows this looking

rigid smelt
#

Seems good

modern crystal
#

nice

#

having some troubles with this one too

#

might be right though

rigid smelt
#

Its wrong

#

Check A and C again

modern crystal
#

are they both 15?

solid blade
#

Check c

modern crystal
#

A and C ?

solid blade
#

If you figure the mistake in c all others are evident too

modern crystal
#

i’m guessing it’s that

#

but then again

#

wouldnt it be neither > or < if it’s just 0

jovial knoll
#

I heard math is applied philosophy. What philosophy book should I get started with to improve my math.

buoyant kayak
#

,rotate

ocean sealBOT
gray isle
#

what have you tried?

jovial knoll
#

me?

gray isle
cyan owl
gray isle
#

what did you do after that?

#

you'll have a linear equation that should be relatively simple to solve

cyan owl
#

oh ok wait nvm ty!!

gray isle
#

also -6 not 6

warped phoenix
#

I’m a little confused

#

When I substitute x for -8 in x^2, am I supposed to be putting -8 in parenthesis or not?

kindred warren
#

yes

warped phoenix
#

Oh ok, is that just a rule I should know?

kindred warren
#

because you are squaring 'x' and since 'x' is '-8' then you have to include the '-'

placid zinc
#

f(x) = x²
Is saying "take the input and square it"
f(-8) has an input of -8
So you square the entire input, not just the 8

warped phoenix
#

Ohhhh

#

Thank you both of you 🙏

#

Can someone double check my answer?? We are supposed to write our coordinates as an ordered pair

#

I got (-8, 88) for this one

kindred warren
#

yse thats correct

warped phoenix
#

Awesome

kindred warren
#

f(-8) = 88

warped phoenix
#

Ty!!!

hushed marlin
#

hello, I need help in the function decomposition of tan^2(3x) ?

summer goblet
#

Of complex numbers

#

By decomposition you mean find tan(x)?

hushed marlin
#

find f(x) and g(x)

summer goblet
#

What do you mean by decomposition?

#

Oh...

hushed marlin
#

Like split it into 2 functions, ya

summer goblet
#

Split into two...

hushed marlin
#

would it not be f(x) = x^2 and g(x) tan(3x) ?

summer goblet
#

You mean writing tan^2(3x) = f(x) + g(x)?

hushed marlin
#

ya kind of like that.

summer goblet
#

Moivre's formula.

hushed marlin
#

Not that.

summer goblet
#

Yes you can. Look.

#

It is hard to see at first.

hushed marlin
#

It's not the formula I need.

#

I just need to decompose the function tan^2(3x) into 2 separate functions if you understand me.

summer goblet
#

tan^2(3x) = sin^2(3x)/cos^2(3x)

hushed marlin
#

nevermind.

#

I got it thanks.

summer goblet
#

Look

#

Moivre formula

summer goblet
hushed marlin
#

ok

summer goblet
#

This formula

#

Ignore r

#

n will be equal to 2

#

What you have is sin^2(3x)/cos^2(3x)

#

You must develop the question for sin and for cos

summer goblet
#

You develop the real part and the imaginary part.

#

In the end you'll probabily find a value for sin^2(2x) and

rigid smelt
#

You do know Evan, was talking about function composition right? And it has nothing to do with de moirve's theorem

summer goblet
#

cos^2(3x)

#

Yes

#

It is function decomposition

#

Using complex numbers.

#

It is another perspective.

summer goblet
rigid smelt
#

I really really cant see how you wil bring de moirve's theorem into function composition

#

Or you just have no clue what composition of functions is

summer goblet
#

See there

#

If you solve the equation

rigid smelt
#

sigh

summer goblet
#

You'll have clearlly a decomposition for sin and cos.

#

Isolating Im and Re.

#

It can be used to decompose even sin(2453x) if you want.

fiery walrus
#

<@&286206848099549185>

#

can you help me solve the star wars one

sinful geyser
#

how is this written in interval notation ? <@&286206848099549185>

rigid smelt
#

Thats a graph of a function, you represent it with an equation

#

Or unless theres more context to this problem that you are deliberately opting to not show

#

Also ping helpers after a minimum of 15min

next hatch
#

i think they're trying to say how to describe the domain and range

sinful geyser
rigid smelt
#

Look at the graph, the limit wont exist when there is a jump or an oscillation

#

Point out the spot where f(x) might have a jump

sinful geyser
#

(-inf,-1](-1,2](2,+inf) @rigid smelt was thinking something like this idk if this is the form theyre asking for

rigid smelt
#

Thats like saying a is in (-infty, infty) but you are try to look cool

rigid smelt
sinful geyser
#

im new to this haha i see it but am not sure how to put down in interval notation

rigid smelt
sinful geyser
#

the jump seems to be from 2 to 1 when x is 2

rigid smelt
#

Yes, the jump is at x=2

#

Meaning a can not be 2

#

So there are many ways you can notate that

#

You can either write (-infty, 2)U(2, infty)

#

Or (-infty, infty){2}

undone patio
#

is this room in use?

#

or can i ask a question

rigid smelt
#

What do you think? Is it in use?

undone patio
#

well i think your done explaining but idk

rigid smelt
#

Are two people talking to each other seems like its not in use?

undone patio
#

i thought u were done lmao

sinful geyser
#

i got it thank you lots @rigid smelt

rigid smelt
#

Its free now

undone patio
#

ok so

#

i was wondering how i would go about doing this problem

tight locust
#

a1 = 1/k, a2 = 1/k^2
a_n = (1/k)^n

#

(1/k^m - 1/k^(m+1)) = (k-1)/(k^(m+1))

#

= ((k-1)/(k^(2)))^2 + ((k-1)/(k^(3)))^2 + ...

undone patio
#

ah ok i think i have an idea abt what i can do

#

thankss

tight locust
#

= (k-1)^2 * sum from m=1 to m=n of (1/k)^m

proud swift
next hatch
#

you don't square the square root

tight locust
#

the square root of a number squared is equal to the absolute value

gray isle
#

(a^m)^n = a^(mn) applies for a>0

#

and isn't necessarily true for other values of a

#

generally sqrt(x^2) = |x|
while (sqrt(x))^2 = x

proud swift
ripe mountain
#

how do you do #16

#

iirc when u find the inverse function of something you swap the variables so it would look like x=y^5 + y^3 + y and then you solve for y, but u can't solve that, can you?

#

is there another way you're supposed to do it

#

oh wait do you do this with derivatives

gray isle
#

f^-1(3) is the value of x where f(x) = 3

#

and there is a trivial solution to
3 = x^5 + x^3 + x

ripe mountain
#

x=1 right

gray isle
#

yes

ripe mountain
#

ahh i see

#

you can't do that for the second part of it though can you?

gray isle
#

well for the second part, you can just apply the definition of the inverse

ripe mountain
#

what's that?

gray isle
#

exactly as what was just applied

ripe mountain
#

2= x^5 + x^3 + x?

gray isle
#

f^-1(3) is the value of x where f(x) = 3

#

similarly f^-1(2) is the value of x where f(x) = 2

ripe mountain
#

so would it just be f(2) then

gray isle
#

no

#

=f ( f of this gives 2)
= ?

ripe mountain
#

f(x^5+x^3+x)?

gray isle
#

no

#

don't overthink this

#

similarly f^-1(2) is the value of x where f(x) = 2
do you understand that?

#

(don't try and do any unnecessary solving)

ripe mountain
#

ehh

ripe mountain
gray isle
#

its pretty much applying the definition of an inverse function

ashen dove
#

can anyone help me with this :))

gray isle
#

$f( \underbrace{f^{-1}(2)}_{\text{$f$ of this value gives you 2}})$

vale wigeon
#

@ashen dove channel busy please move

ocean sealBOT
#

ℝamonov

ashen dove
#

ah ok sorry

ripe mountain
#

oh okay

vale wigeon
#

f^-1(2) is the number that, when passed as input to f, gives 2

ripe mountain
#

i don't really see how that helps me other than 2=x^5+x^3+x

#

i guess i'm really overthinking it

#

idk

gray isle
#

you're overthinking it

ripe mountain
#

f(2)

gray isle
#

no

#

f^-1(2) is the number that, when passed as input to f, gives 2

#

f(f^-1(2)) is the expression that represents f^-1(2) being passed into f

ripe mountain
#

yeah

vale wigeon
#

what happens if you take the number that gives an output of 2 when plugged into f... and plug it into f?

ripe mountain
#

it gives an output of 2

gray isle
#

exactly

ripe mountain
#

LOL

vale wigeon
#

there we go

ripe mountain
#

okay i think i see

rich basin
#

Why is it inversely proportional when the d is increqased by 50 percent, the v is also increased by 1.5?

olive forum
#

correct one?

pastel schooner
#

What exactly is a limit? Is it the same value as f(x)?

#

For example as x goes to c the limit is 2.

#

Would f(x) = L as x goes to c?

#

This channel is occupied.

ionic jewel
ionic jewel
#

the value at that point is irrelevent

pastel schooner
#

So aproaching at a y point right?

#

So if limit is 2, then it is aproaching 2 but not on 2

#

with 2 being on the y-axis

ionic jewel
#

wait what

#

$\lim_{x\to2} f(x)$ is what f(x) approaches as x approaches 2

ocean sealBOT
ionic jewel
#

not sure where your y-axis came from

pastel schooner
#

I mean that in terms of f(x) = y

tight locust
#

f(x) = y(x)

pastel schooner
#

For me its like learning a language and translating it in my old native language

#

if that makes sense lol

tight locust
#

y is something we call a dependent variable

pastel schooner
#

while y(x) is dependent on x

#

right?

tight locust
#

yes

pastel schooner
#

cooleo

pastel schooner
#

I thought it was as y aproaches 2

tight locust
#

x is the independent variable.

ionic jewel
#

you see how the thing under the limit is written as "x to 2"

tight locust
#

you use the value of x to determine what y does

#

not the other way around

ionic jewel
#

there are other things you can put under there, but in my example (and how you first learn limits) it's x approaching the number, not y

tight locust
#

lmao

pastel schooner
#

is this correct for the equation of the graph?

#

not up to scale lol

#

so L = 2

#

cause as x aproaches 1, f(x) aproaches 2

tight locust
#

remember that limits must go from both sides

ionic jewel
#

and also you wrote (x), not f(x)

pastel schooner
#

oh whoops yea

tight locust
#

also what bunny said

pastel schooner
#

So would this new graph satisfy that for each side x - > 1 lim f(x) = 2?

tight locust
#

yep

ionic jewel
#

assuming f(x) is something like 2x, then yes

tight locust
#

good job

pastel schooner
#

like f(x) = 2x

ionic jewel
#

it's probably good form, yes

pastel schooner
#

I see. Thank you guys.

#

So simple definition is "limit (or variable L) is the value of f(x) as x aproaches c" right?

#

for x -> c

ionic jewel
#

yes

pastel schooner
#

Fantastic.

tight locust
#

ask something more interesting now

pastel schooner
#

That solves my questions. I will soon lol.

alpine sable
#

hi! ive never learned this before so im not sure where to go about this, may i get help with how to solve this equation, please?

jagged imp
#

write both sides as powers of 6, so you have something like 6^a=6^b. Then, a=b (either by taking log base 6 of both sides or just assuming that it must be true. If you don't know what a log is, you're just going to have to take my word that if 6^a=6^b, then a=b)

alpine sable
#

Is Quadratic equations a part of which subset of algebra?

tight locust
#

how can the absolute value be negative

#

wtf

alpine sable
alpine sable
tight locust
#

it can't

#

so you rule out those options

alpine sable
#

i figured ye, i just cant remember the whole same base situation but ill try to figure it out

tight locust
#

(1/36) = 6^(z)

#

what is z

jagged imp
alpine sable
#

WAIT

#

DO YOU BRING THE DENOMINATOR UP N THEN LIKE UM

#

whats the word

#

why cant i think of it

#

square root to get base 6?

#

n then square 5x+2 in the exponent

tight locust
#

1/x = x^(-1)

alpine sable
#

okayokay, thats what i thought

#

was the square root part correct? or is there a different method

heavy acorn
#

Find Total Surface Area and the value of y.

#

please help

#

<@&286206848099549185>

next hatch
#

bruh wait 15 minutes before pinging

#

also someone else is answering a question

tight locust
alpine sable
#

Hi i am a 15 year old wanting to learn linear algebra. I do have basic understanding of high school algebra. Do ineed to learn more or is it enough

heavy acorn
next hatch
#

ask it in another channel, and wait

#

you're not an exception to the rules

alpine sable
jagged imp
#

elementary algebra

#

typically its just called algebra

#

abstract and linear are very different

tight locust
#

lmao

alpine sable
heavy acorn
alpine sable
olive forum
#

Guys can anyone math the following with the correct answer. im too week for this..happy_cry_cat

woeful briar
#

btw guys

#

umm

#

x < 5y and 5y > x is the same right?

#

just making sure

jagged imp
#

yes :)

heavy acorn
woeful briar
#

ok thanks

low topaz
#

Is a parabolas height infinite

tough hatch
tough hatch
low topaz
#

Ok

#

If i graphed x^2, Would there be a point were the Parabola Stops going up on the y axis

tough hatch
#

yes

#

but that does not happen for all parabolas

#

the vertex of y = x^2 + 1 is not on the y-axis

tough hatch
pallid folio
#

can someone help me with these questions?

#

(anyone of these)

violet jetty
#

Log laws

steady jewel
#

😩

prisma glade
violet jetty
#

Ie in a you can take the log of both sides and bring down the x-1

pallid folio
#

ok thanks.

prisma glade
violet jetty
#

You find both roots and look at which one is positive @soft belfry

#

Did you get the roots?

#

Have you learned the quadratic formula?

prisma glade
# pallid folio

For e) , you need to square both the sides so the base is same & then further substitute the value of x.

violet jetty
#

You still need to know the quadratic formula to use the calculator

#

Like to solve for t

#

You use this formula

#

Oh

#

You use the third formula

#

You put a as the number that is before x^2

#

In this case 1

soft belfry
#

Because it’s t^2

violet jetty
#

So

#

Isnt t^2 = 1t^2

sly mantle
soft belfry
#

Ty

pallid folio
#

find the amount compounded annually on rs 9000 for two years if the rates of interest for two years are 8% and 10% respectively.

#

please help me once again guys

alpine sable
#

how do i do iv?

#

i did; 1 x 0 + 1 x3

#

it wasnt right

#

<@&286206848099549185>

vale wigeon
#

you tried to answer with a single number?

alpine sable
#

?

vale wigeon
#

you know the answer will be a 1×2 matrix, right?

#

not a single number as you tried to present just now with your 1*0 + 1*3

alpine sable
#

yes

#

so what do i do with these matrixes?

vale wigeon
#

you multiply them.

alpine sable
#

1 x 3

#

ok

vale wigeon
#

your book has no doubt explained how to multiply matrices.

#

if you must know, 1 * 0 + (-1) * 3 would have been the first entry in AD.

alpine sable
#

ok thanks

warped jay
#

x^(2)+5=0 identify the value of a b and c

#

help <@&286206848099549185>

lone heartBOT
#
Rule 4

If your question has not been answered for a minimum of 15 minutes, you may use the Helpers tag once. Please do not try to bump your question using this ping unnecessarily. Do not abuse this ping. Do not individually ping users with the Helpers tag without their express permission.

shell widget
#

@warped jay I think u might be study quadratic equations(quadratic equations are of the form ax^2 + bx + c)

#

Compare ax^2 + bx + c to x^2 + 5, you'll easily find the values of a,b,c

urban lily
#

Can Someone explain how it got simplified from the first to the second and from the second to the last?

frigid aspen
#

The value of t =23????

Pls tell me i m waiting 😇😇😇

frigid aspen
#

😇😇

alpine sable
shell widget
#

@urban lily Multiply divide (y'/x) by xy^2, multiply divide (-y/x^2) by y^2, multiply divide (1/y) by x^2y, and multiply divide (-xy'/y^2) by x^2

#

This way, all terms have the same denominator, you can add them under one denominator, and then it's simple factorization

#

For the second to third step, the denominator cannot be 0, hence (y^2 - x^2)(xy' - y) must be 0, so either (y^2 - x^2) = 0 that implies y=+-sqrt(x) or xy' - y = 0 which implies y' = y/x

vernal remnant
#

Given the measure of an acute angle in a right triangle, we can tell the ratios of the lengths of the triangle's sides relative to that acute angle.
Here are the approximate ratios for angle measures 55\degree55°55, degree, 65\degree65°65, degree, and 75\degree75°75, degree.
Angle 55\degree55°55, degree 65\degree65°65, degree 75\degree75°75, degree
\dfrac{\text{adjacent leg length}}{\text{hypotenuse length}}
hypotenuse length
adjacent leg length

start fraction, start text, a, d, j, a, c, e, n, t, space, l, e, g, space, l, e, n, g, t, h, end text, divided by, start text, h, y, p, o, t, e, n, u, s, e, space, l, e, n, g, t, h, end text, end fraction 0.570.570, point, 57 0.420.420, point, 42 0.260.260, point, 26
\dfrac{\text{opposite leg length}}{\text{hypotenuse length}}
hypotenuse length
opposite leg length

start fraction, start text, o, p, p, o, s, i, t, e, space, l, e, g, space, l, e, n, g, t, h, end text, divided by, start text, h, y, p, o, t, e, n, u, s, e, space, l, e, n, g, t, h, end text, end fraction 0.820.820, point, 82 0.910.910, point, 91 0.970.970, point, 97
\dfrac{\text{opposite leg length}}{\text{adjacent leg length}}
adjacent leg length
opposite leg length

start fraction, start text, o, p, p, o, s, i, t, e, space, l, e, g, space, l, e, n, g, t, h, end text, divided by, start text, a, d, j, a, c, e, n, t, space, l, e, g, space, l, e, n, g, t, h, end text, end fraction 1.431.431, point, 43 2.142.142, point, 14 3.733.733, point, 73
Use the table to approximate ABABA, B in the triangle below.

alpine sable
shell widget
#

@alpine sable Yes your answer is correct

alpine sable
#

ok thank you

elder widget
#

Hi, if lim x-> infinite of f(x) = 0

#

Can we say that lim x-> infinity of f'(x) = 0?

#

And what about if lim = constant?

urban lily
urban lily
shell widget
#

It seems that there are counter examples for the first one

#

For the second, no. Take y = e^x - 1. Then lim as x approaches 0 of f(x) is 0, but lim as x approaches 0 of f'(x) = e^x is 1

#

@soft belfry $\sqrt{9x^{\frac{2}{3}}} = (9x^{\frac{2}{3}})^{\frac{1}{2}} = (9^{\frac{1}{2}}) (x^{\frac{2}{3}})^{\frac{1}{2}} = 3 (x^{\frac{2}{3} \cdot \frac{1}{2}}) = 3 x^{\frac{1}{3}}$

ocean sealBOT
shell widget
#

remember ur power rules, (ab)^c = (a^c)(b^c) and (a^b)^c = a^(bc)

elder widget
#

ty

rich basin
#

why is it calculating the power for which it will decelerate to 85 to 65

#

and not when it will go from 85 to 75 km

#

So what i did was to calcualte the accelerating force to find the time for which it will go from 85 to 75 km per hour from the v =u + at

alpine sable
#

can anyone answer these before 6pm

#

i really need it fast

#

and also need the steps

#

pls

alpine ledge
#

Hi

#

Hello

#

Can anyone help in this

alpine sable
#

help on question 11

#

sorry my bad

#

ill move on

shell widget
#

@alpine ledge Which one?

alpine ledge
shell widget
#

@alpine sable Just do what it says, multiply and then equate

#

@alpine ledge I'll just show how one is done, the rest you can do yourself. (1/2)^n = 1^n / 2^n = 1 / 2^n = 2^-n

#

So you have 2^(-n) = 8

#

Recall that 8 = 2^3, so you have 2^(-n) = 2^(3).

#

Since bases are same, powers must be the same as well, and we get -n = 3, or n = -3

alpine ledge
shell widget
#

$\int_{10}^{s} \dd{s} = \int_{10}^{s} 1 \dd{s} = s |_{10}^{s} = s - 10$

ocean sealBOT
shell widget
#

$\int_{4}^{t} 5 \dd{t} = 5t |_{4}^{t} = 5(t) - 5(4) = 5t - 20$

ocean sealBOT
shell widget
#

And so, you have s - 10 = 5t - 20

#

Which is just s = 5t - 10

#

@soft belfry

soft belfry
#

Ty

dense panther
#

when do use the open and closed circles when graphing functions?? plsss send help

wary stream
dense panther
#

yess i get that but like don't you use it on just inequalities or nah?

#

or is like for all functions?

alpine sable
glass lichen
#

You use hollow and filled circles to represent exclusion and inclusion respectively

slim elbow
#

What is the multiplicative inverse of -1 1/8?

wary stream
ocean sealBOT
#

dldh06

slim elbow
#

It’s a mixed fraction

quiet glade
#

how do you know whats on top when you're doing systems of linear equations?

slim elbow
quiet glade
#

like for c

#

when doing elimination, how do i know what goes on top

gray isle
#

first combine your mixed fraction into a single fraction

#

wdym what's on top?

quiet glade
#

when i’m subtracting the stuff

gray isle
#

it doesn't matter

quiet glade
#

really? because it’s fucking me up

#

this gets me 7y-7z=2

gray isle
#

as long as you're adding and subtraction properly, eliminating variables then it doesn't really make a difference

quiet glade
#

but it’s inverse gets me -7y+5y=-22

gray isle
#

how are you getting -7z

#

and how are you getting 2

quiet glade
#

deadbrain

#

i have brain lag

wary stream
#

Channel busy

glossy current
#

lmao noob @pine zealot

quiet glade
#

i’m good

pine zealot
#

what

#

smh

finite scroll
#

ok

#

need help with finding the internal angles on this trapezium

#

nvm

#

figured it ot

neat merlin
#

How to draw this in geogebra?

clever plaza
#

Hey so is the parallel chord method guaranteed to converge no matter the initial value?

alpine sable
#

am i tripping or the answer sheet is wrong

#

MADE PAINT ONE EASIER TO SEE

#

<@&286206848099549185>

#

<@&286206848099549185> is it row SPEAKS to coloumn?

#

i guess it is

#

oof

bronze pelican
#

Very nice

alpine sable
#

yes

quiet glade
#

like when i have the substituted value, does it matter where i put it?

wary stream
sage dune
#

does anyone know how to solve this?

iron loom
#

am i right?

#

question is no 5 c

#

also i need help with 5 a and b

#

is 5 a and b the same as y-y1=m (x-x1)

warped phoenix
#

when do i distribute in a function?

#

if it says "apply a vertical stretch by a factor of 3 followed by a translation 3 units downwards to the parent function of f(x) = x", there is no distribution right?

#

so g(x) = 3x - 3

#

but if it told me to do the translation first and then the stretch, it'd be g(x) = 3x - 9?

small bear
#

Correct, what exactly is the question?

warped phoenix
#

Wait

#

What about this

#

Let’s say I have this equation

#

@small bear 4(2x – 3) + 2

#

Im told to apply a vertical shift downwards by 3 units and then a horizontal shift to the right by 1 unit

#

My new equation would just be 4(2x-4) - 1 right?

shell widget
#

integrate 12 - 3t^2, you get 12t - 3t^3 / 3 = 12t - t^3. Plug in the limits, you get (12t - t^3) - (12 - 1) = 12t - t^3 - 11

light sleet
#

how do i do the same thing for 6 = °75 when it comes to <1

rigid island
#

look at the properties of parallel lines with a transversal passing thru

#

there are certain rules ig

alpine sable
#

not alterate

#

um whats the term called

light sleet
#

ah i see

alpine sable
#

I'm trying to find the radius between Q1 and point P and my triangle (first image) is wrong. My professor says it's "in the wrong plane" and should look like the second image but I'm not sure what he means by it being in the wrong plane.

ancient saddle
livid storm
#

Hola! quería preguntarles cómo hallarían una formula general para la relación entre el área de dos polígonos irregulares? Es decir, una fórmula que con sólo los datos del primer polígono, pueda calcular el área del proporcional...

alpine sable
#

hey I'm a bit confused on this considering ik where the speed goes but the other three confuse me I'm only in ninth grade and I'm a bit bad at math if anyone could just explain what each thing means it would mean the world

orchid kayak
#

Eyo is this channel free?

#

Bcuz if yes, I got a hw problem to do

#

that I didn't understand

#

someone help?

#

<@&286206848099549185>

#

This is the problem I got to do

dense citrus
#

what did you do so far. And don't tag so fast please

orchid kayak
#

Nothing yet, bcuz I didn't understand anything
Also sorry for tagging fast

jagged ermine
# alpine sable hey I'm a bit confused on this considering ik where the speed goes but the other...

The question is volountarily tricky, it is just using synonims to confuse you.
volume is really length * length * length, which is m to the third power, also called cumic meters. The fact that it is using centimeter doesn't really matter from the point of view of measuring unit, it only changes the "amplitude" of a measure.
area is length * length, so meters to the power of two, also called square.
Speed is length / time, so meter per second.
Perimeter is a sum of lengths. When you sum measurements you are not changing the measurement unit, but just the value, so the unit remains meter.
length, distance, width, as I implied, are all the same.

dense citrus
#

how about you get rid of both fractions first?

orchid kayak
#

How do I do it?

dense citrus
#

how would you do it if you had only one?

dense citrus
#

$\frac{3}{x+1} = -1$

orchid kayak
#

I would multiply by x+1

dense citrus
#

how would you solve this?

ocean sealBOT
#

lyinch

dense citrus
#

exactly

alpine sable
#

im gonna ace this math test >:D

dense citrus
#

do this, but this time for both fractions

orchid kayak
#

Mk

dense citrus
#

and then see what you get

orchid kayak
#

I multiply with x+1 or 1-x

dense citrus
#

both

#

because otherwise you can't get rid of both fractions

#

first with one, then with the other

orchid kayak
#

o alright

alpine sable
#

hey anyone know raitos that can help me

#

I need to know from the beginning

#

I would really appreciate it

dense citrus
# orchid kayak o alright

don't expect a solution after multiplying. There's a little bit more work to do. But did you understand why we multiply with both?

orchid kayak
#

Yep

#

to delete the fractions

dense citrus
#

I hope that the next step now looks familiar to you

orchid kayak
#

It will be 3 + 4 = -3( x+1 )( 1-x )

#

is that correct?

#

@dense citrus Sorry for ping

dense citrus
#

no worries. let me check

alpine sable
#

Expand the brackets if it is ig

dense citrus
#

I have 7+x on the lhs

orchid kayak
#

lhs?

dense citrus
#

3(1-x)+4(x+1)

#

left hand side

orchid kayak
#

o

#

but what will happen to the other ''3''?

dense citrus
#

3(1-x)+4(x+1) = -3(x+1)(1-x)

orchid kayak
#

o

dense citrus
#

I only showed one side 🙂

orchid kayak
#

alright, so then it will be 3 + 4 = -3(x+1)(1-x)?

dense citrus
#

mmh you're still missing one x on the left

orchid kayak
#

wait where?

dense citrus
#

left side

orchid kayak
#

x + 3 + 4 = -3(x+1)(1-x)?

#

o wait

#

I think I got it

dense citrus
#

3(1-x)+4(x+1) = 3-3x+4x+4 = 7+x

#

that's your left side

#

so then you have 7+x = -3(x+1)(1-x)

#

and that's a normal equation. I guess you know how to solve it?

orchid kayak
#

lemme see

#

3x² - x - 10 = 0?

#

If yes, I think I can do the rest

dense citrus
#

I got something different

#

but you know what to do. Expand, bring it to the typical 2nd degree form and solve

#

note that you have a typical identity on the right

#

(a-b)(a+b)

orchid kayak
#

yeap

dense citrus
#

afterwards you can use wolframalpha to check the solution yourself

fiery bronze
#

I don't understand what the question is asking me to do here..

#

am i allowed to choose what to put in front of n^2?

#

@dense citrus I don't understand what you mean by that reaction lol

dense citrus
#

that I don't understand the question myself lol

fiery bronze
#

ohhh lol

#

nervermind then

dense citrus
#

it's strange haha

fiery bronze
#

it is ahah

#

i'll just put a 1 in front of n^2

dense citrus
#

yes, try that. Simplifies your life

fiery bronze
#

and square the original sequence

dense citrus
#

do you see the solution straight away? I'm curious what they actually want you to do

fiery bronze
#

it doesn't allow me to put more than two digits in the blank spaces

dense citrus
#

lol

hushed pasture
#

show the hole question

glass lichen
#

Then not really, cause you'd get $cx^TX^T$ just changing the scalar name

ocean sealBOT
glass lichen
#

unless you know X is say skew sym or sym, then X^T is just X^T

thorny hound
#

Doing sat practice and I forgot how to do this kind of problem and I just need some guidance on what to do

topaz scaffold
#

Find the slope of f(x)

#

Find the slope of a line perpendicular to that

#

Use point slope to find g(x)

#

Plug in -1

remote heron
#

its a really fundamental concept

#

starts with an e

#

well

#

idk if the name for c starts with an e

#

but the concept does

#

sounds german

#

i guess we dont have to play hot/cold

#

i think so thonk

#

the idea of constant scaling is not uhh

#

not the key thing

west bronze
#

b is an eigenvector of A and c is an eigenvalue of A

remote heron
#

but its a big feature

#

just watch 3b1b linalg on 150% speed

#

youll be fine

#

itll come back

#

well mostly

#

i did the same thing 😄

#

ah lol

#

so were in the same boat almost

#

so just enough to scrape by

#

a true ml student

glass lichen
#

C) Yes, though I'd personally say non-invertible

#

cause Ax=0 has only a non-trivial solution iff A is invertible

crisp comet
#

Isometry I would guess

remote heron
#

o geez

#

i remember e

#

what the heck is it

#

thats something you see during diagonalization right

crisp comet
#

Pos def

#

I think

glass lichen
#

Yeah, I'd say Positive Definite

remote heron
#

err, decomposition

#

damn maybe i need to review too

west bronze
#

(a) symmetric
(b) eigenvector and eigenvalue
(c) non-invertible?
(d) orthogonal
(e) positive-definite

misty moat
#

any1 help?

crisp comet
#

None its inconsistent also should probably be on normal maths server

#

Nvm lmao

remote heron
#

are you in linear algebra?

#

or just normal algebra

#

you could get through this visually

alpine sable
#

@livid sail are you mongolian by any change?

#

chance*

remote heron
#

and can you find a place where these lines cross?

#

try setting them equal

alpine sable
#

yea idk the anglo spelling

misty moat
#

its fine i got it right anyways lmao

#

but what about this

#

isnt it infinite?

#

both the slope and y-intercept are equal so isnt that infinite @remote heron

topaz scaffold
#

The y-intercept isn't equal tho

atomic blaze
#

How would i simplify by combining like terms: x(x-y)+y(y-x)

glass lichen
#

what have you tried?

atomic blaze
#

i tried distributing and got 2x^2 -xy + y^2 - yx

glass lichen
#

where did 2x^2 come from?

atomic blaze
#

is it suppose to be x^2

#

?

glass lichen
#

yes...

atomic blaze
#

ahhh okok

glass lichen
#

How you did it both wrong for the xx and correct for the yy

#

No clue

#

However

#

yes $$=x^2-2xy+y^2$$

ocean sealBOT
glass lichen
#

which has a well known factorization

atomic blaze
#

so u just added the xy?

glass lichen
#

yes... -xy-xy=-2xy

atomic blaze
#

alr bet thanks

alpine sable
#

who can help me

#

how many bonus points do I get with 50%?

#

like 10,16,50,4 maybe

#

eii

#

@alpine sable here

#

yh i see it

#

ok

#

c:

#

what do u think

#

idk i am confused

#

chill

#

<@&286206848099549185>

#

help, plys

next idol
alpine sable
#

realy?

next idol
#

multiply second fraction by 4

#

your second fraction will become 12x-8

#

in result you'll have (8x-1-12x+8)/20 = -3/4

alpine sable
#

wow, thanks really

next idol
#

then you multiply -4x+7 by 4 and 20 by -3

alpine sable
#

could you help me with 2 more I'm bad at some

next idol
#

and solve the linear equation you've got

#

you should get 11/2

#

(actually i've just wrote your problem in mathway then came up with the solution but we'll drop that part)

next idol
alpine sable
#

thanks

#

I'll try to translate for you, because I'm from Brazil

next idol
#

por favor (no offense)

bleak nacelle
#

cool,i am brazilian too

next idol
#

but my wild guess is you need to find this figure's diagonales?

#

(i am russian and am not familliar with math terminology in english)

#

(so idk how is this figure called in english)

alpine sable
#

watch the diamond

Find the values ​​of angles x and y

next idol
#

oh angles actually?

alpine sable
next idol
#

well Y is 25 and X is 55 i believe

#

wait no

#

i screwed up because things don't sum up

#

wtf is wrong with me, i mean, Y is absolutely 25 and

#

khm

#

X 65 and Y 25

alpine sable
#

thanks

#

I have 2 more

#

do you know a game called brain out?

next idol
#

Sorry, but no.

alpine sable
next idol
#

oh that one is easy

#

although i'll bring up libremath this time

alpine sable
#

Calculate x and y values ​​without parallelogram EFGH

#

gave a translated

#

ST is still there?

next idol
#

weird

#

i messed up somewhere

alpine sable
#

like this?

next idol
#

i constantly come to x = 55 y = 40 and idk why

#

my equation looks like this

#

x+2x = 3x
20-5 = 15
180 - 15 = 165
3x = 165, x = 55

#

y+2y = 3y
65-5 = 60
180 - 60 = 120
3y = 120, y = 40

#

either i don't know how to solve such problems or i suck at geometry

#

that's why i never visit these channels to help

#

well there is an other way

alpine sable
#

you tried at least

next idol
#

let me try something else

alpine sable
#

ok

next idol
#

nevermind i still got to the same conclusion

alpine sable
#

I think it contains obtuse angles there

next idol
#

i assumed that <E + <H = 180 and <F + <G = 180 (instead of my <H+<F = 180 and <E + <G = 180 thought)

alpine sable
#

these are the possible answers

#

esperi

#

wait i sent the wrong answers

quaint trout
#

@alpine sable opposite angles in a parallelogram are equal

#

Use that to set up your equations

alpine sable
#

okey

dull musk
#

so, this is my first time here

#

am i supposed to ask things here?

next idol
#

i tried to solve the task based on that fact

#

and did not succeed

quaint trout
#

No

next idol
#

Wait it's not 180?

#

just equal?

quaint trout
#

5 = 5 but 5 + 5 ≠ 180

#

Why does being equal mean the sum is 180?

#

Totally different things

#

Yes, the sum if not 180, they're just equal (the opposite angles)

next idol
quaint trout
#

@next idol dont just give answers

#

Help people do it themselves, although it looks like they're gone now

next idol
#

alright

hard compass
#

How would I factor x^2+x-30?

fossil nova
hard compass
#

an explanation

fossil nova
#

so to factor this, you need to break the 30 down to two numbers that can multiply to give you that 30 and add up to give you 1, due to the coefficient of x being 1

#

so when you can use 6x - 5x

#

this gives you x, and when multiplied, gives you 30

hard compass
#

oooooooooooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

#

im stupid

fossil nova
#

you get it?

hard compass
#

yeah now I do

fossil nova
#

good good

#

good luck

hard compass
#

thank you for the assistance

fossil nova
#

no problem

warped phoenix
#

Let’s say I have this equation: 4(2x – 3) + 2, Im told to apply a vertical shrink by a factor of 2, and then a vertical shift downwards by 3 units, and a horizontal shift to the left by 2 units.

Would my new equation be: 2(2x - 5) + -2 ?

rugged minnow
#

help

median tendon
rugged minnow
#

i dont understand

#

can u teach me the steps

median tendon
#

It literally has every step by step instruction on there, any particular steps you dobt understand?

alpine sable
#

How do I do this thing again can someone explain to me how to do it not the answer because I wanna figure it out

#

Can someone please explain the reasoning behind this? The answer is log1/2:

median tendon
#

1=log10

#

Then use logarithmic laws to combine

misty moat
#

someone tell me the answer please

thorn vortex
#

@misty moat When a system of equations has infinite solutions, what does that imply for their lanes

misty moat
#

the lines overlap at every point?

thorn vortex
#

Yes

#

What can you then deduce from that assertion

#

@misty moat

misty moat
#

@thorn vortex i dont know

#

just say it

thorn vortex
#

It means the lanes are the same

wary stream
thorn vortex
#

Then what does it means about their equations

#

(this question is easy)

misty moat
#

there equal

#

the lines are equal

thorn vortex
#

Yes their equations are equal

#

Now you can easily guess the answe

#

r

misty moat
#

both are equal?

#

slope and y intercept?

thorn vortex
#

Yes

#

You guessed right

rugged minnow
ancient saddle
rugged minnow
#

killing my seld

#

can u do it

#

for me

wary stream
alpine sable
#

Hi! Is this correct?

hushed pasture
alpine sable
#

Ok, thanks

#

salah

#

how would I go about solving this?

jade birch
#

expand the binom

#

and some things cancel each other out

tidal bane
#

I apologize if I missed it but i have looked in a few of the other channels and can't seem to find it.

I'm looking for a solid textbooks on probability as well as statistics (not together though). Additionally it would be really great if people could refer a great online class. Ideally one that is designed for beginners, has lots of practice problems and is pretty rigorous in it's teachings.

jade birch
#

and when you get rid of the denominator, then substitute h=0

alpine sable
#

alright bet thank you

jade birch
weak oasis
#

i have a question,would h(-2) when h(x)=x^2+4x-7 be equal to -11 or -19?

jade birch
#

that would be -11

#

h(-2) when h(x)=x² is h(-2)=(-2)²

weak oasis
#

ok thanks

#

that’s what i thought

jade birch
#

Yes, you are correct

weak oasis
#

i was just checking because apparently i’ve been reading squares wrong my whole life

jade birch
#

The notation can be a little confusing but you'll get the hang of it with enough practice

weak oasis
#

i just learned yesterday that it’s read -(2)^2 without parenthesis present and: (-2)^2 when they are

jade birch
#

what do you mean by "read"?

weak oasis
#

i mean like when solving an equation e.g. -2^2 +5

hollow beacon
weak oasis
#

so that is right correct?

#

i mean it makes sense

hollow beacon
#

yea

weak oasis
#

0-2^2

#

order of operations

#

oh and which way do you think my math teacher would want me to answer? P(D)= 4D-20/3
or P(D)= 4/3 (D-5)

jade birch
#

ugh

#

those two aren't the same

#

do you mean

#

P(D) = (4D-20)/3?

plush quest
#

how do i solve for [1/5] to the 4th power

jade birch
#

$(\frac{a}{b}) ^n=\frac{a^n}{b^n}$

jade birch
ocean sealBOT
#

.itsjustnai

plush quest
#

so 1/625?

#

💀

jade birch
#

yes

#

@plush quest

#

I was in a different channel

patent hill
#

🤓

modern crystal
#

anyone available?

jade birch
warped phoenix
#

Let’s say I have this equation: 4(2x – 3) + 2, Im told to apply a vertical shrink by a factor of 2, and then a vertical shift downwards by 3 units, and a horizontal shift to the left by 2 units.

Would my new equation be: 2(2x - 5) + -2 ?

prime badge
#

or 2(2x - 1) + -2

gray isle
#

those are expressions not equations

modern crystal
#

is this right ?

#

or would it be e

#

cause it’s not asking to completely simplify it if that makes sense

jade birch
#

I'm not sure what they mean by equivalent tbh

icy dirge
#

x = 9 - (-2) =22

jade birch
#

If you evaluate it you get +inf, but if you evaluate the last two they also give you +inf

modern crystal
#

this is the “practice shown” next to it

#

so that’s what they mean by equivalent

jade birch
#

well this is scenario 3

jade birch
icy dirge
wary stream
# modern crystal

You take the leading coefficient terms from the numerator and denominator, then simplify

wary stream
modern crystal
#

if i’m not mistaken the leading term is x^2 and x right?

#

would it be the last answer choice then ?

wary stream
#

Which picture?

modern crystal
wary stream
#

Not the last choice

#

Close though

modern crystal
#

B?

wary stream
#

No

modern crystal
#

i don’t think it’s a c though

#

cause it’s asking for the equivalence not it simplified ?

wary stream
#

You "ignore" the limit part

wild shard
#

whats the best approach to fit a bezier curve?

#

specifically a cubic bezier

modern crystal
#

it was the last one 😃

wary stream
#

It was? Huh, interesting

gray isle
#

technically both the last two would be correct

#

as they ultimately have the same limit as x→inf

alpine sable
modern crystal
#

all good

alpine sable
#

help

#

pls

gray isle
#

what have you tried

alpine sable
#

yes

#

i dont get it

gray isle
#

is not a yes/no question

#

do you know what factors are

alpine sable
#

ik

#

umm

#

no

gray isle
#

that is a major issue

#

so if i were to ask you for the factors of 4, you won't know wtf i'm asking for?

alpine sable
#

um

#

idk

gray isle
#

i'd highly recommend you read up on factors of integers