#help-0

1 messages · Page 770 of 1

split trail
#

@alpine sable tysm

alpine sable
#

@rich basindo you want to go to video call

#

voice call

#

in mathematics

rich basin
#

okay sure

little cape
#

i got the answer 0.1354. can someone pls tell me if they are getting the same answer?

#

^0.1354 is wrong apparently

prime sparrow
#

Could someone help me with this question please?

fringe spindle
#

6! x 35 (the 5th tetrahedral number since after placing books 1 and 3, you then have 5 positions 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 to place the remaining book; this arrangement can be shifted along each position with one less at the end each time) x 3P3 for the arrangements of Conrad books.

thorn sundial
#

could y'all help me with this

alpine sable
#

Maths is based

sharp sigil
#

0.5 + x/5 + x = 0.3, where x is amount of antifreeze to be added

tight locust
#

(0.5 + x)/(5+x) = 3/10

#

parantheses

thorn sundial
split oriole
carmine reef
#

sqrt(-1)

alpine sable
#

can i use the channel ?

thorn sundial
alpine sable
#

what does this mean

#

wait actually

royal shard
alpine sable
#

ooooooo

#

makes sense

#

thanks thanks

vale wigeon
#

do you think the gcd should be something else?

#

2x^2 = 2 * x^2
9x^3 = 9x * x^2

#

that's how

cinder finch
#

Oh wow, you explained it better than I could ever 😅

#

I usually add extra steps for no apparent reason

vale wigeon
#

$2x \cdot x^2$ would be $2x^3$

ocean sealBOT
vale wigeon
#

???

#

what?

#

i don't know what you mean by "no matter the exponent it's always x^2"

#

are you talking about the more general case of gcd(ax^m, bx^n)?

#

i illustrated to you how x^2 is a factor of both your monomials

#

???

#

you asked why gcd(2x^2, 9x^3) = x^2

#

i factored x^2 out of both 2x^2 and 9x^3 in front of you

#

you have it the wrong way around

#

it's how many times x^2 fits into x^3

#

and the answer to that would be x

#

of course??

#

x^2 * x = x^3

#

you know how exponents work, do you not?

#

nobody said x was 1

#

x is x

#

no

#

x^2 is the same as x * x, yes.

#

by definition

#

yes, sure, x^3 = x * x * x

#

you misunderstand

#

x * x is not "two x's"

#

it's not 2x

#

7 fits evenly into 21 because 7 * 3 = 21
x^2 fits evenly into x^3 because x^2 * x = x^3

#

there is none

#

no the coefficients are just independent of the exponents

#

3 * 3 * x * x * x

#

right here

#

yes there is, so what?

#

there is no remainder...

#

a remainder would be something added

#

but there's no addition happening here

prime sparrow
#

can someone explain me how the square root of 22 is an irrational number

rich basin
#

what integars can square root of 22 be divided by? There is none, hence it is an irrational number

vale wigeon
#

very bad

#

@prime sparrow have you seen the proof that sqrt(2) is irrational? it can be adapted to work for sqrt(22) with some modifications

vale wigeon
#

generally the square root of any integer that isn't a perfect square is irrational

prime sparrow
#

ok

#

ye

#

i understood it

#

from the proof

#

just wanted to make sure it was real

#

here

vale wigeon
#

idk how to clear up your confusion here

carmine reef
#

what's 2^3

vale wigeon
#

do you also think 27 is not divisible by 9?

#

"i'm seeing it like 27 = 3 * 3 * 3 = 3 threes and 9 = 3 * 3 = 2 threes and 2 threes don't fit into 3 threes"

#

this is what you sound like rn

carmine reef
#

so mean :P

vale wigeon
#

i'm trying to help

carmine reef
#

this is the right channel

#

ik

vale wigeon
#

by pointing out flaws in your reasoning

#

you can and should tell me "fuck off i don't need your help and i think you should die" if you want to tell me that right now

next hatch
#

do you understand the basic exponential laws

#

in your case it'd be the top one

#

okay so

#

x * x is the same as x^1 * x^1

vale wigeon
#

this was just a semi related example

next hatch
#

let me finish please

#

x^1 * x^1 is the same as x^(1+1)

#

which is x^2

#

and your question is how the greatest common divisor is of 2x^2 and 9x^3 = x^2

#

so

#

divide both sides by x

#

what do you get

vale wigeon
#

no, x^2 / x = x

next hatch
#

yes

#

because x^2/x^1 is the same as x^(2-1)

next hatch
#

yes

#

but you're not dividing by x^3

#

you're dividing by x^2

#

yes

#

the question is asking how the gcd of 2x^2 and 9x^3 = x^2

#

divide both by x^2, you'll get 2 and 9x

#

you cant divide 2 by any more x's

#

so therefore x^2 is the gcd

#

not quite

#

you do them separately

#

in this case you can because 2 and 9 only have 1 as a common divisor

#

but if it was 3 and 9, you could do 3x^2

#

and you'd be left with 1 and 3x

#

yes

#

that's exactly it

#

you're welcome

#

xx

deft frigate
#

I need a little bit of help on the following question
(1+1/2)*2

alpine sable
#

2

deft frigate
wary stream
wary stream
deft frigate
#

I thought it was 3

#

I just asked the question for fun, wanted to see who was alert

wary stream
#

And it's not 3

alpine sable
#

@wary stream

deft frigate
wary stream
alpine sable
#

brackets first

alpine sable
#

with this

deft frigate
alpine sable
#

rq

deft frigate
#

1+1/2 = 1.5

#

1.5*2=3

vale wigeon
#

$\paren{1 + \frac12} \cdot 2 = 3$, no?

ocean sealBOT
vale wigeon
#

dldh06 why are you claiming (1 + 1/2) * 2 isn't 3

alpine sable
#

1+1=2

#

2/2=1

wary stream
#

I read that as to the second power, my bad

alpine sable
#

1*2=2

#

o

#

wai

#

t

wary stream
#

Sorry

vale wigeon
#

we don't have $\frac{1+1}{2}$, we have $1 + \frac{1}{2}$

ocean sealBOT
deft frigate
deft frigate
alpine sable
#

@vale wigeon

vale wigeon
#

what

wary stream
#

Don't ping people

vale wigeon
#

why are you pinging me

lone heartBOT
#
Rule 7

When asking for help, do not insist on getting just the answer; we are here to help you learn, not cheat. Likewise, if you are providing help to others, try your best to explain and elaborate instead of simply giving away the answer.

vale wigeon
#

wait no

#

wrong rule

alpine sable
#

-_-

vale wigeon
lone heartBOT
#
Rule 4

If your question has not been answered for a minimum of 15 minutes, you may use the Helpers tag once. Please do not try to bump your question using this ping unnecessarily. Do not abuse this ping. Do not individually ping users with the Helpers tag without their express permission.

vale wigeon
#

this one

#

second half of it

wary stream
#

How do you call specific rules ?

alpine sable
#

i pinged

#

helpers

#

got

#

no

#

response

#

before

vale wigeon
#

can

#

you

#

send

#

more

#

than

#

one

#

word

#

per

#

message

#

please

alpine sable
#

why

#

its just how i type

vale wigeon
#

anyway the reason you got no response is probably because you didn't share some essential info

#

such as the amount of progress you've made

wary stream
# alpine sable i pinged

Maybe if you read the rules, you would understand that you had to wait at least 15 minutes before pinging helpers, which I don't think you did before

alpine sable
wary stream
alpine sable
#

Can someone please help me with this and get the solution? <@&286206848099549185>

lone heartBOT
#
Rule 4

If your question has not been answered for a minimum of 15 minutes, you may use the Helpers tag once. Please do not try to bump your question using this ping unnecessarily. Do not abuse this ping. Do not individually ping users with the Helpers tag without their express permission.

warm comet
#

What's 15+27304040

wary stream
#

Just add 15 to that big value

alpine sable
#

How can ab <= |a||b| be justified?

lusty ibex
#

you could use the angle inbetween the vectors formula

jagged imp
#

I assume a and b arent vectors here

#

and ab is not the dot product of a and b

lusty ibex
#

ahhh then im not sure then

alpine sable
#

No, they're real numbers.

#

This is for an exercise in ch 1.1 of Thomas, justifying steps in the proof of the triangle inequality

jagged imp
#

if thats the case, consider the cases where a and b are both negative, both positive, and where their signs are different

untold tapir
#

may i know if theres something in between A & B, is it also considered as A is directly above of B? im trying to solve a combinatorial problem

vale wigeon
#

probably not, but can you show the exact problem statement anyway

alpine sable
vale wigeon
#

have you made any progress so far?

alpine sable
#

Yeah, but its really confusing and I can’t get to the solution

vale wigeon
#

oof. this all sounds really hairy but at the same time i don't know what else you could've done here.

#

but also i have a feeling your equation for the line through (6,1) and (2,8) is wrong

#

you made a sign error

#

it should be y = (-6/5)x + 4.6

alpine sable
#

I know I have to simplify them but can’t think how to simplify the -6/5x-4.6 part

vale wigeon
#

you're overthinking it a bit

#

all you're integrating is linear functions anyway

alpine sable
#

I’ll probably just email my professor and ask

alpine sable
#

Find a given that: P(-1, 1) and Q(a, -2) are 5 units apart

#

I got a = 3

#

but it's saying there is another answer?

#

can someone explain how there can be two answers, I'm new to this

vale wigeon
#

how did you get a=3?

alpine sable
#

hold on let me take a picture of my work

vale wigeon
#

ok can i comment on your handwriting a little before i get to the part where you made a mistake

#

cause i have some shit to say about that

alpine sable
#

yeah just get it over with

vale wigeon
#
  1. in your first line, the square root symbol extends only over the first term, which is incorrect (even though you do extend it all the way in the second line, which makes this only a typo
  2. your a and 9 look very similar. consider using a different shape for either one
#

now to the actual mistake

#

you got to 16 = (a+1)^2 just fine

#

but you should have had a+1 = **±**4, not a+1 = 4 as you wrote.

alpine sable
#

why is it ±4 and not 4

vale wigeon
#

you would agree that the equation $x^2 = 16$ has two solutions, yes?

ocean sealBOT
alpine sable
#

uh isn't the root of 16 just 4?

vale wigeon
#

sqrt(16) = 4, that's true.

#

but think about the equation

#

x=-4 is also a solution of x^2 = 16.

alpine sable
#

I see where I went wrong

#

thanks

sly mantle
#

@alpine sable don't troll

#

b&

alpine sable
#

Three boys, four pizzas. Every pizza must have an owner. (Distinct Pizzas) How many ways the pizzas can be distributed?

My answer is 72.
I did this ->

First I'll select any 3 pizzas by 4C3 then no. of ways they can be distributed among the guys 3!. Now no. of ways the remaining 1 pizza would be given way 3C2
my ans be -> 4C3 3! 3C2

#

Is it right?

vale wigeon
#

i don't think so

#

i think you're double-counting some outcomes here

tepid jungle
#

I need to prove that property

#

I did a similar question but E[Xi] < inf and I could use the monotone convergence theorem

#

But I'm assuming I can't use the same theorem because there needs to be infinite amount of functions, where in (b) there is a finite amount of functions

alpine sable
#

o,o! oof im confused

#

can you do this one

#

Q-14

#

@alpine sable still need help?

#

yes

#

B is a 3 × 2 matrix. The element in row i and column j is given by bi j = i × j.
Construct the matrix.

vale wigeon
#

@alpine sable channel busy please move

alpine sable
#

ok

alpine sable
# alpine sable yes

Well the question is a little bit weird if I read it semantically but whatever

#

I guess it is asking for the number of onto functions that satisfy the previous condition? Otherwise no idea why that’s written there

#

Also no idea what the point of n and n-10 is

alpine sable
#

im getting n = 24

#

but answer is given 18

#

:/

#

n = 18

#

you really only need to find how many ways you can map {x1, x2, x3} to {y1, y2} in an onto fashion

vale wigeon
#

not exactly, no.

#

i think you meant {y3, y4}, but still, even disregarding that

#

you would miss some functions

alpine sable
#

Oh, right

brazen acorn
#

okay so very simple question I think: why would you rewrite (x+p)(x+q) to:
x^2+(p+q)x+pq, and not
x^2+xq+xp+pq?

Especially if the assignment is to remove the braces? It's shown in my book as the solution once and I thought hmm.. don't know why they put it that way. But then on the next page they use this "solution" to it again, and they keep sticking to it. Which makes me think there is a definite reason for rewriting it in that specific way instead of the IMO more straightforward one. Because I believe I cán definitely say that I'm probably not wrong in anyway, as far as I can tell. It's just different. Does that alternative rewrite offer benefits further down the line?

vale wigeon
#

when considering this as a quadratic in x, the form x^2 + (p+q)x + pq highlights the fact that the linear coefficient is p+q

#

which is useful to know for factorization purposes

brazen acorn
#

okay, that's very good to know. thanks

tepid jungle
#

hi @vale wigeon have you done anything on the topic of my question?

vale wigeon
#

.-.

#

sure do love getting pinged out of the blue

#

no, i don't remember the proof of that particular result in probability theory unfortunately

alpine sable
#

Ok revision: find how many ways you can map size 2 subsets of {x3, x4, x5} to {y3, y4}

#

Then the unused element in A is free to be mapped to any element in B

vale wigeon
#

this may overcount things

#

it's probably easiest to just write these out explicitly...

#

alright i've written them all out explicitly in lexicographic order

#

for each function i wrote out its values at x_1 through x_5, omitting the y for brevity. e.g. a 3 in the table means y_3

royal drift
#

Hi, can someone help me with this pls

normal star
#

do you have exam helper

#

i have an exam in 2 hours and i am not prepared

#

😢

vale wigeon
#

then you're screwed lol

acoustic crescent
#

pls help someone

vale wigeon
#

this question is very poorly stated

#

just from knowing the volume alone you cannot conclude what the dimensions should be

ashen axle
#

anyone?

small bear
#

Channel occupied. Go to another

vale wigeon
#

can we please not gang up in one channel

urban lily
#

hey guys, so can someone remind me if the (y=mx-c) functions are direct or not because itsnot increasing by the same ratio?

small bear
#

when you expand, and collect like terms, you will get a quadratic

#

after that it is simple where the minimum of a quadratic occurs

royal drift
small bear
#

Each term is of form $(a+b)^2$, expanding it yields $a^2 +2ab+b^2$. Do that for all such terms

ocean sealBOT
#

peaceGiant

royal drift
small bear
#

Np

little wadi
#

how does i go around simplifying this $$\frac{\left(2^{2n+3}-\left(2^n\right)^2\right)}{2^n}$$

ocean sealBOT
#

̗̀➛☄. *. ⋆ 彡‗ ❍¡! ❞ˏˋ°•*⁀➷୨⎯୧

rigid smelt
#

notice that 2^(2n) is a common factor of the numerator

little wadi
#

mhm

#

o

worthy verge
#

Can someone help me with C1?

#

I have the answers but answer sheet doesnt tell me how to get the answer

#

C1b=438.17 K

dire nacelle
#

Pls answer

vague coral
#

then dx = o'(t) dt and you sub dx in the integral, x too

stark lion
#

Is the answer for 7 0.6 and 10.44

barren helm
#

umm which 1 is true?

hearty quail
#

may someone please explain to me how i would solve this equation?

#

,w \left(\sin \left(\frac{\left(y-10\right)}{1}\right)+0.5-0\right)^2+\left(y-10\right)^2=12.5^2

vale wigeon
#

you probably wouldn't. this looks too nasty to solve.

hearty quail
#

i mean all i really dont understand is how to get y out of sin(10-y)^2

#

,w sin(10-y)^2

hearty quail
#

wat

#

yea dw about it ann its all good. i think this is above my pay grade

alpine sable
#

I'm struggling with conditional statements. How can I convert an implication using logical operators? I know that P -> Q is equivalent to ~P v Q, so would P v Q ->R be equivalent to P v ~Q v R ?

shell widget
#

P v Q -> R <==> ~(P v Q) v R <==> ~P AND ~Q v R

tawny lion
#

stuck with A

#

because of the starting point being 0

tawny lion
#

<@&286206848099549185>

shell widget
#

@tawny lion I think just calculate it normally, forget the zero balance

shell widget
#

yeah

tawny lion
#

so u_1 = 100(1+0.04/12)^240?

#

or u_1 = 100

#

I don't understand why it might be 100

shell widget
#

,w 100(1 + (0.04/12))^(240)

shell widget
#

thats it

tawny lion
#

an additional 100

vale wigeon
#

yeah sup this is an annuity

shell widget
#

Every month there is an interest of 4 percent, that's it.

#

Oh

vale wigeon
#

no that's not it

tawny lion
vale wigeon
#

we gain 4% interest and then we add another 100 euro

tawny lion
shell widget
#

100 euros added every month?

vale wigeon
#

yes

shell widget
#

Ah

tawny lion
#

so then what do we do

vale wigeon
#

there's a number of different ways to phrase it

#

i'll denote the amount added every month with the letter A for convenience

#

so A = 100 euro in our case

#

and i'll also denote with the letter r the interest rate per compounding period, in our case it's 0.04/12

#

so we start with 0

#

each month we multiply the amount already there by (1+r) and add A

#

so we have A
then A(1+r) + A
then A(1+r)^2 + A(1+r) + A
then A(1+r)^3 + A(1+r)^2 + A(1+r) + A

#

do you see where this is going yet?

#

or should i continue explaining

tawny lion
#

yup

#

I see

vale wigeon
#

it's gonna be a geometric series of 240 terms with ratio (1+r)

tawny lion
#

why 1+r?

#

uh

#

we're also adding A

vale wigeon
#

you just said "i see"

#

i thought that meant you understood where the things i wrote came from

#

at the end of the 20 years you will have A(1+r)^239 + A(1+r)^238 + ... + A(1+r) + A

tawny lion
#

but isn't R u_2/u_1

#

ah wait I think I understand, but how do we account for the additional A

vale wigeon
#

???

tawny lion
#

b ecause if we use the formula for the sum of a geometric sequence we don't account for the +A that is added

vale wigeon
#

i think you misunderstand

#

if you want to do this as a recurrence, then it's $$u_{n+1} = (1+r)u_n + A$$ and $u_0 = 0$ and you're looking for $u_{240}$

ocean sealBOT
tawny lion
#

alright, thank you

bleak charm
#

hii, is this chat open for a new question now? or is it still ongoing? if not then can anyone help me with my mini ia?

#

those are the data i've collected and im trying to figure out the equations for each ditch digger

#

its like two ditch diggers trying to meet up in the center.. if that makes sense

#

oh.

#

so uh can u help or u just had a problem with the language??

hearty quail
#

xd

#

i aspire to become you

bleak charm
#

racist??

hearty quail
#

you said ||digger||

vale wigeon
#

digger? as in, the word meaning "one who digs"?

bleak charm
hearty quail
#

wtf is this guy haha

vale wigeon
#

is there anything racist about this besides the similarity to the N-word, to which it bears no relation?

hearty quail
#

look i was just going along with it

hearty quail
#

not at ur level yet 😦

#

teach me to be truly sigma

#

uh

#

no

vale wigeon
#

elagabalus

#

this isn't the place to talk about that sort of stuff

hearty quail
#

...

vale wigeon
#

...

#

'brother'?

#

i'd ask you to not call me either of those terms

hearty quail
#

me when

vale wigeon
#

but i don't think you'd listen

#

do not call me bro.

#

i don't like being called bro.

hearty quail
#

girl?

vale wigeon
#

you can just call me by my name lol

#

also what's with the shushing

#

yes, so what?

bleak charm
#

ok will um when u guys are done, can anyone help with my math problem..?

vale wigeon
#

foul???

hearty quail
#

wtf

vale wigeon
#

oh so you'll be transphobic to my face

#

okay then

#

<@&268886789983436800> we got a transphobe over here

#

everything lol

#

if youre gonna be transphobic at least don't do it so overtly

#

let alone to a trans person's face

bleak charm
#

but u shouldnt be disrespectful, theres a difference between not supporting and just being straight up rude

stark lion
#

Can someone plsss explain part two of q 7

vale wigeon
#

never thought i'd see a transphobic nut with my own two eyes

#

oh looks like he's gone already thank god

bleak charm
tame falcon
#

Banned

vale wigeon
#

thank you manan

bleak charm
hearty quail
#

I need help with a question, You play a lottery where 6 numbers are chosen from 45 at random. you get 3 numbers the same on your ticket. find what the chances where using combanatorics?

bleak charm
#

...

hearty quail
vale wigeon
#

okay cures and heera one of you will have to move

#

or maybe both. preferably both

hearty quail
#

do whor3!s question first

bleak charm
#

thank you😭

stark lion
hearty quail
#

aight ima go to q1

vale wigeon
#

to another questions channel

#

one that doesn't have a conversation in it at the moment

stark lion
#

I’ll go

vale wigeon
#

@bleak charm can you repost your question again

bleak charm
# bleak charm

um so this is the data i have and basically im supposed to find out if they will ever meet, the digging rates of each person, and how long is this ditch..

#

but i already figured out that they wont meet

#

and that the ditches they are digging are parallel so they will apparently have to connect it with a perpendicular line, and right now im just trying to figure out the equations for each person

rich basin
vale wigeon
#

jesus fuck

#

this channel is cursed

bleak charm
#

sorry.. its a lot

vale wigeon
#

it's not you whor3!

#

it's the interruption

bleak charm
#

ohhh

#

yea

vale wigeon
#

anyway

#

it looks like you figured out the slope of each ditch as 1/2

#

what else are you asked for

bleak charm
#

yepp

#

the digging rates, which i thought was the slope, but my teacher said it wasnt..

#

so im a bit confused abt that

vale wigeon
#

i think the digging rate is supposed to be the distance dug out per day

bleak charm
#

ohhh

vale wigeon
#

which would be the distance between two adjacent points in your data

bleak charm
#

so i have to use the distance formula right?

vale wigeon
#

...yes

bleak charm
#

also..

#

how would i find the equations of each digger?

#

i know i need the slope but thats all i have

vale wigeon
#

they are both digging in a straight line

#

so their equations can both be written in the form y = mx + b

#

you know m = 1/2 for both diggers

#

obviously their b's will be different

#

but still

bleak charm
#

right

#

so for the second guy, how would i figure out b?

vale wigeon
#

...same as for the first lol

#

you would use one of the points he went through

bleak charm
#

sorry what?? im confused on that part😭

carmine lion
#

this channel occupied @fluid scarab

fluid scarab
#

aight which channel can i use then?

glass lichen
carmine lion
#

literally any other unoccupied channel

bleak charm
#

the amt of ppl that keep going to this channelkekw

carmine lion
#

ikr

alpine sable
#

How do I do this, kinda confused, tried L'hopital

bleak charm
split oriole
alpine sable
#

tyvm

split oriole
# alpine sable tyvm

Can please tell me what does it means, because every time i came accorrs a new word, then i have to google it 😂😂

bleak charm
#

thank you very much^

split oriole
#

Ohhh 🙏

bleak charm
#

yepp

bleak charm
alpine sable
#

$\overline{v}={\frac{\Delta x}{\Delta t}}

alpine sable
#

can someone help with this question]

normal star
#

need help

gray isle
#

what have you tried / thought about

alpine sable
split oriole
alpine sable
gray isle
#

what have you tried / thought about

alpine sable
#

I dont really know how to answer these type of questions

gray isle
#

do you know the properties of a parallelogram

alpine sable
#

yes

gray isle
#

did you determine the sizes of the angles

alpine sable
#

thats the difficult part

gray isle
#

don't overthink it

#

its just basic substitution

alpine sable
#

i get confused with substitution

gray isle
#

what specifically about it

alpine sable
#

like 6u-4 and 5u+4

gray isle
#

the expression for the angle in the top left is
6u - 4
what happens when u is 8

alpine sable
#

i wouldnt know how to substitute

gray isle
#

really don't overthink this

#

do you understand that 6u represents the product of 6 and u?

alpine sable
#

what i know is that you have to substract 6u from 5u and substract the +4 part and the -4 part

gray isle
#

and when doing substitution you're pretty much replacing something with something of equivalent value

#

what i know is that you have to substract 6u from 5u and substract the +4 part and the -4 part
no

alpine sable
#

+4 part and the -4 part

#

oh

gray isle
#

really don't overthink this

#

6u - 4
what happens when you substitute/replace u with 8, (inserting appropriate signs or parentheses if needed)

alpine sable
#

ok

#

but where did you get 8 from

gray isle
#

from the question

#

did you read the question

alpine sable
#

how

#

yes

#

wait

#

i missed that part

#

one second

#

ok

#

thanks

#

for your help

scenic wind
#

Is this correct

#

?

split oriole
# scenic wind

Looks beautiful and correct ( better then mine drawing 😂)

scenic wind
scenic wind
#

Ah okay ty :)

trail elm
#

Can someone check if i got the right answer for 2b

#

book says 34 but i got 35

glass lichen
trail elm
#

Ahh ok

glass lichen
#

,w calc ln(.5)/ln(.98)

vernal dragon
#

what is the meaning of three lines

#

why not use only two?

glass lichen
#

ie the LHS and RHS are exactly identical, with no distinction aside from notation

vernal dragon
#

ok thanks for your help mosh

wary stream
fleet glacier
#

that sign means congruent

#

so x ≡ 5 mod 6, means x can be 5, 11, 17......

#

is v^. a unit vector?

#

I've never seen that before

glass lichen
ocean sealBOT
fleet glacier
#

what does that mean though

glass lichen
#

1st time derivative

fleet glacier
#

oh

glass lichen
#

Like I said.. the LHS and RHS are identical

fleet glacier
#

so then in this case, it's equivalent

glass lichen
#

yes, almost like I said that

fleet glacier
#

but in general, ≡ does not mean equal

glass lichen
#

it does

#

it means identitcal/congruent

fleet glacier
fleet glacier
alpine sable
#

Is this right?

split oriole
#

Is it sin?

alpine sable
#

yes

split oriole
#

0/0 will never give you answer

#

Try to approch zero from different curves

#

Take x^2+y^2=r

#

Then approch r to zero , you will get 1

alpine sable
#

because sin(r)/r = 1?

split oriole
#

Yup

#

Sinx/x as x approces zero

alpine sable
split oriole
#

Looks good

alpine sable
#

ty

loud sentinel
#

Hey guys i wanna ask why the question has the following answer

#

^because wouldnt that answer be the domain?

#

And if im wrong what method of calculation should be used to obtain the answer?

fleet glacier
#

ok so

#

you want the minimum value of x^2+4x

#

do you know calculus

loud sentinel
#

yeah

fleet glacier
#

ok

#

nice

#

this is an upwards pointing parabola

#

that means the function will have a slope at 0 at it's vertex/minimum value

#

right?

loud sentinel
#

yeah true

fleet glacier
#

so if you take the derivative and find where it's equal to 0, you will get the vertex which is also the minimum value

#

right?

loud sentinel
#

yeah

fleet glacier
#

ok so taking the derivative gives 2x+4 = 0

#

which means x=-2

#

the y value of the function at x=-2 is 4-8 = -4. So, the minimum y value is -4

#

since -4 is the minimum value, f(x)>=-4

fleet glacier
loud sentinel
#

oh okay understood

#

Thank you

glass lichen
#

alternatively.. f(x)=x^2+4x+4-4 =(x+2)^2-4

warped phoenix
#

is f(x) = 3 just a translation 3 units up..?

split oriole
#

If you are adding in function then yes

#

Like g(x)+3 will shift g(x) upward by 3

warped phoenix
#

so this would work

twin spruce
#

Damn

#

Y’all got homework still

warped phoenix
#

school just started so yeah..?

twin spruce
#

Oh

#

Yeah true

warped phoenix
#

lol

twin spruce
#

It’s ass Alittle tho

#

But the math part nope

alpine sable
#

hi guys

split oriole
alpine sable
#

i want to find a number that should multiply by -7 and get output 66

#

can anyone pls help me out?

alpine sable
#

then cosy/y

#

then 0/0+ and 0/0- that +infinite and -infinite

#

what I did wrong?

split oriole
#

When x is zero whole numerator will become zero

alpine sable
#

oh god

#

I'm dumb

#

you're right

#

what's the other option to me get that it doesn't exist?

tepid jungle
#

is this true?

#

I am not sure how to answer this type of questiobn

alpine sable
gentle turtle
#

Please help me to evaluate this expression

glass lichen
alpine sable
loud sentinel
#

Hey guys im kinda confused how to solve this

gentle turtle
glass lichen
#

27 is correct, but 28 isnt

#

cause I have no clue where (1n+0)/(1n) came from

split oriole
glass lichen
#

also just fucked up algebra

gentle turtle
glass lichen
#

(2n+1)!=(2n+1)(2n)!

#

Like you did 27 perfectly fine, then proceeded to do the same thing poorly for 28

tidal grail
split oriole
tidal grail
#

Its arc length and i thought i knew i what i was doing

glass lichen
#

That doesnt answer what was asked

#

They asked for the integrand

tidal grail
#

I need help to understand

tidal grail
bleak charm
vale wigeon
#

augh

#

those multi-hour delays

tidal grail
#

pls help

loud sentinel
tidal grail
#

I though you got to find the derivative first

loud sentinel
#

Do you have like the question with you

#

Idk what the question is

glass lichen
loud sentinel
#

yeah, the answer i gave was just based on my assumption what the question is

storm swan
#

hi i need help on this question, i plugged it into the equation, so im not sure what i did wrong

wary stream
#

Probably did not plug it in correctly

jagged plover
#

hello! about this question, I chose Pr(X leq 2) = 0.4 as there is a flat line until 2 on the x-axis when the probability is equal to 0.4. However, the answer is apparently wrong. How should I approach this problem then?

#

you have to multiply the constant with the coefficient of the first term

#

you have to do -10 x 2 = -20 and then split -20 into factors that allow for factorization

storm swan
wary stream
#

How did you plug it in

stuck jolt
jagged plover
#

please, feel free

stuck jolt
#

Consider using the quadratic formula:

#

$x=\frac{-1\pm \sqrt{1^2-4\cdot :2\left(-10\right)}}{2\cdot :2}$

ocean sealBOT
#

Captain_Mat01

pale cloud
#

is this chatroom free?

stuck jolt
pale cloud
#

i need help on this question because i don't know what they did

stuck jolt
#

They just solved for x

#

And plugged it in to y

#

x>5/2

jagged plover
#

^

pale cloud
#

wait what? that simple? wait let me see again

stuck jolt
#

I mean, its good

#

Just using to many definitions, which can lead to confusion

jagged plover
#

because one of the equations doesn't have y at all, it's just a matter of solving for x and subbing it into the equation with y

pale cloud
#

ah okay ty for the help

#

i cant believe it was that easy lol im so dum

jagged plover
stuck jolt
jagged plover
#

no worries!

stuck jolt
#

Ah, forgot how to solve this

#

Lemme see if I can find a book of some sort

jagged plover
#

oh no blobsad it's alright!

gentle turtle
tight locust
#

lmao

alpine sable
#

how would I solve for x in this problem?

carmine reef
#

so two of the angles in this diagram have a special property

alpine sable
#

is it vertical angles

carmine reef
#

<DCE and <BCA

#

yeah

#

vertical angles are equivalent

alpine sable
#

oh

carmine reef
#

or congruent or whatever they call it

alpine sable
#

now I think i can solve it

carmine reef
#

ok good

alpine sable
#

thanks I got the answer

carmine reef
#

no problem

dusty oxide
#

−3x=12

x=4 this is wrong right? its -4

carmine reef
#

yeah

#

x there is -4

dusty oxide
#

Dumb website telling me 4

#

lmao

carmine reef
#

lol

carmine reef
#

lmao

dusty oxide
#

This is rly easy math but still

#

how can they get that wrong

#

Its the website we got from our school 😄

desert moon
#

when you have sin(ax)sin(bx),
it should not = 0 when you integrate over a period if a = b
but when you use the double angle formula to separate it,
you you can get a sin((a+b)/L) - sin((a-b)/L) which = 0?
I know you can use another identity to show that it equals 2L,
but idk why I'm getting this answer using the double angle formula

carmine reef
#

what's this double angle formula that you're using?

#

this seems like the formula you would use when a=b

desert moon
#

yeah, that one gives me 2L
but lets say you ignore the fact that n=m for a second
and then apply the same trig I that you would if n=/=m
in the end I got 0, even when I subbed n=m at the end

#

I mean, you get the result in the same form as n=/=m
but when m=n, you get sin(2n) - sin(0)

#

@carmine reef

carmine reef
#

I'm not aware of such a trig formula

desert moon
#

the angle formula is sin(n)sin(m) = 0.5(cos(n-m) - cos(n+m))

#

then integrate that

carmine reef
#

hmm

#

i see

desert moon
#

that's how you show orthogonality when n=/=m

carmine reef
#

I think the formula is right

#

when a = b, what's sin((a-b)/L)?

desert moon
#

sin0

#

sin (a-a)

carmine reef
#

is it supposed to be cosine instead?

#

the formula you gave is cos - cos

desert moon
#

yeah

carmine reef
#

but the one up higher is sin - sin

#

oh, did you integrate that one already

#

but then the denominators shouldn't both be L

desert moon
#

yeah, sin(a)sin(b) = 0.5(cos(n-m) - cos(n+m))
but you integrate it over L < x < -L, to show orthogonality if = 0

#

so then you get sines again

carmine reef
#

but before you integrate

#

well, if you try to integrate cos(n-m), what happens

desert moon
#

you get Asin(n-m)

carmine reef
#

what's A?

desert moon
#

1/n-m

carmine reef
#

what's n-m?

#

when m = n

#

I should have said integraate cos((n-m)x) probably

desert moon
#

oh..

#

1/n-m = 1/0 when n = m

#

ahh

#

kek

carmine reef
#

lol

#

exactly

#

so you have to go back to the cos((m-n)x) step

desert moon
#

yeah, its 1, so you get 2L

#

thanks 🙂

carmine reef
#

no problem!

warped phoenix
#

how is this wrong?

#

1/2(-3) = -1/2 ?

vague coral
#

-3/2 @warped phoenix

warped phoenix
#

wait so

#

oh

#

nvm

#

ty

#

hey whoever was just in here the channel is free now

#

@sinful moth

sinful moth
#

oh i didnt want to hold you up so i deleted it and went to a different channel

warped phoenix
#

oh ok nw

alpine sable
#

Hi! Please someone help with this.

#

Here is the expression

#

I wanna know this

#

By using this definition:

#

I know there are easier ways to do this, but the exercise asks specifically to use this definition

ancient saddle
ancient saddle
# alpine sable

I mean, what did you get after using this derivative definition?

gray vapor
#

So I am very confused about something and google is messing up because of a minus sign in the search bar.

Can someone explain to me how -ln(cosx) = ln(secx)

dawn galleon
#

TATTTTAATATATA

desert moon
#

-ln(x) = ln(x^-1) = ln(1/x)

#

1/cosx = secx

gray vapor
#

wait so lnx multiplied by something puts that multiplier as the exponent for what's in the logorithm?

Like, if I were to just randomly have 2ln(cosx), that would = ln(cos^2(x))

desert moon
#

yes

gray vapor
#

You have just made my trig integration homework much easier

alpine sable
#

Oh god, you have no ideia how far I tried, but I did again (So I could sent it to you, since I striked out (not sure those are the correct words, my English is bad) my other attempts.) But I finally solve it!!!! Here’s the resolution. @ancient saddle

#

The other attempts I talked about:

#

Anyways, thanks!!!

clear apex
#

holy

#

do it on a new clean page

#

and you will feel like uve accomplished something

alpine sable
#

Ahahah this is only training work for my final exam, I am lucky enough to organize my mind in my own mess.

#

is this channel free???

#

if anyone is willing to help, i would appreciate it a ton:)

candid thistle
alpine sable
#

my answers got sent in the wrong order

#

i particularly need help with Q3

#

please ping me if anyone responds:)

alpine sable
#

<@&286206848099549185>

fringe spindle
fringe spindle
alpine sable
#

i messed up (a), but for (b i) AD: 3y=x-5 BE: 5y=-3x-12

alpine sable
#

i have no clue how to do (ii)

#

and it’s np:)

fringe spindle
sick frigate
#

hello

alpine sable
#

thank you

sick frigate
#

gg./math : O

#

this is awesome

#

pls help me do math

#

*/ dies

unborn dome
#

can someone help me out with this

#

apparently its not DNE or does not exist

#

nvm its just 0

alpine sable
#

how would i go about solving this?

ancient saddle
alpine sable
#

im confused on what to actually graph

#

and how would i enter it in to the calculator

#

wait i got it

night sinew
#

does it matter which point you start with first with x1 , x2 and y1, y2?

wary stream
#

As long as x1 goes with y1 and x2 is paired with y2, order doesn't matter

night sinew
#

i don't know what i'm doing wrong here but when i do (2-2) / (3-(-5)) i get 0/8, but if i do (2-2) / (-5-3) i get 0/-8

#

it's something to do with the negative signs

#

thats throwing me off

wary stream
#

It doesn't matter because the numerator is 0

#

So the slope is 0

night sinew
#

oh, so either -8 or 8 is right?

wary stream
#

If you had different y values, then you would have the same slope

wary stream
glass lichen
#

0/8=0/-8

#

=0

night sinew
#

ah

#

ok ok i see

#

it's just 0

wary stream
#

Yes

night sinew
#

thanks

inner sky
#

question about synthetic division

wary stream
#

What have you attempted?

inner sky
#

I know how to do with x degree of 1 but

#

I donno how to do it with x^3

#

or x^2

glass lichen
#

You cant synthetic divide if it isnt a linear divisor

#

you have to do long division

inner sky
#

kk I'll do that then thnx

tropic sail
#

What do factors have to do with factorial?

glass lichen
#

$n!=n(n-1)(n-2)...(2)(1)$

ocean sealBOT
glass lichen
#

Kinda... the definition of factorial for natural numbers n as well as n=0

glass lichen
#

what factorial and factors have to do with one another

inner sky
#

another question

#

right track or am I off?

glass lichen
#

that's correct, though you can just pick a value of a

inner sky
#

the question does not specify any details like y intercepts for me to quantify a though

glass lichen
#

It says "an equation"

#

not the family

inner sky
#

elaborate? you lost me there

glass lichen
#

If you read the question, you will notice the 2nd and 3rd word is "an equation"

#

an means specific/singular

inner sky
#

oh ok

#

right but

#

my question still stands; a is undefinable

glass lichen
#

it is

#

it's a non zero number...

inner sky
#

so can I just write my answer, but then on the side a !=0 and is a member of a real number?

glass lichen
#

No

#

Just pick an a

#

then you have an equation

#

instead of the entire family

inner sky
#

ok

#

so I'll just choose value a

glass lichen
#

yes

inner sky
#

and what I choose is inconsequential because even if there are ton of possibilities

#

they all meet the requirements set in the question

glass lichen
#

yes.

inner sky
#

even if they all will be different equation got it

#

thanks so much

tight locust
#

polynomials and place value are the same thing

#

think about it

#

take any integer in base 10

#

for instance 1234

#

that's just 1*10^3 + 2*10^2 + 3*10^1 + 4*10^0

#

it's just a polynomial in 10

#

or rather the polynomial 4321 evaulated at x = 10

mystic sinew
#

I don't understand how I can do this question

an isn't a linear function bn is, I can't think of any changes to the rate of change or intercepts that could make a linear function a non linear function

tight locust
#

this is very simple

#

can you find the explicit formula for a_n?

mystic sinew
#

.
there's another way I did where you make n = 0, and then sub everything in assuming (an = bn) , you get A+B = 1
3A +B = 4, 9A + B =13
this system of linear equations is contradictory

mystic sinew
#

atleast I can't

tight locust
#

it's very simple

#

just think about it

mystic sinew
#

but I don't it would be in the form ax + b

tight locust
#

just try it

mystic sinew
#

how?

tight locust
#

it becomes very clear once you do

mystic sinew
#

how do you express it explicitly/

#

oh wait nevermind

thorn sundial
#

is this correct?

mystic sinew
#

wait

#

actually no

thorn sundial
mystic sinew
#

I don't get it

woeful pulsar
thorn sundial
#

nope

#

i got it

woeful pulsar
tight locust
#

a_0 = 1
a_1 = 3(a_1) + 1 = 4
a_2 = 3(3a_1 + 1) + 1 = 13
a_3 = 3(9a_1 + 4) + 1 = 40
a_4 = 3(27a_1 + 13) + 1 = 121
a_n = sum(3^k from k = 0 to k = n-1)

analog nymph
#

eh is the channel open

harsh cargo
#

somebody help plssssss

#

<@&286206848099549185>

thorn sundial
#

i need help

atomic blaze
#

how would i write " two decreased by the quotient of the number a and 7 and increased by a multiplied by 3" as an algebraic expression

lean nacelle
#

Hi. i was wondering how to find line through a point (x,y,z) that intersects a plane (ex. 2x+y-z=5) perpenidcularly

magic tusk
placid zinc
#

@lean nacelle
Get any two vectors on the plane.

Take their cross product. This will give a new vector normal to the plane.

Place it at the point.

cosmic coral
#

someone plz help me

#

its my summer packet for calculus this year. im so lost and the class hasnt even started yet

magic tusk
#

just post your question

cosmic coral
#

uh ok i dont even know where to start but

#

i took pre-calc over the summer this year so I feel like my knowledge is a bit shallow

#

is it E??

austere bridge
cosmic coral
#

4 ?

austere bridge
#

right, but if you plug it in to the expression

#

you'll get a different, equivalent answer

cosmic coral
#

plug it into x or y

austere bridge
#

for x

#

there is no y

cosmic coral
#

f(x) i mean

#

like have x^3 ---- etc be equal to 4

austere bridge
#

sort of, yeah

#

but you also know that x=1

#

so it simplifies a lot

cosmic coral
#

oh shit i know what you mean

#

so 6=A+B?

#

then do the same thing w. -1 and solve a system?

austere bridge
#

exactly

cosmic coral
#

ok swag hold on

#

so 8?

austere bridge
#

yep!

cosmic coral
#

OK THANK YOU!

magic tusk
#

Does this look right?

placid zinc
#

Yes

#

@magic tusk

magic tusk