#help-0
1 messages · Page 770 of 1
okay sure
i got the answer 0.1354. can someone pls tell me if they are getting the same answer?
^0.1354 is wrong apparently
Could someone help me with this question please?
6! x 35 (the 5th tetrahedral number since after placing books 1 and 3, you then have 5 positions 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 to place the remaining book; this arrangement can be shifted along each position with one less at the end each time) x 3P3 for the arrangements of Conrad books.
Maths is based
0.5 + x/5 + x = 0.3, where x is amount of antifreeze to be added
What is i here?
sqrt(-1)
can i use the channel ?
i got it already
f is a function that as input takes elements of E (where E is a subset of R n), and returns real numbers
do you think the gcd should be something else?
2x^2 = 2 * x^2
9x^3 = 9x * x^2
that's how
Oh wow, you explained it better than I could ever 😅
I usually add extra steps for no apparent reason
$2x \cdot x^2$ would be $2x^3$
Ann
???
what?
i don't know what you mean by "no matter the exponent it's always x^2"
are you talking about the more general case of gcd(ax^m, bx^n)?
i illustrated to you how x^2 is a factor of both your monomials
???
you asked why gcd(2x^2, 9x^3) = x^2
i factored x^2 out of both 2x^2 and 9x^3 in front of you
you have it the wrong way around
it's how many times x^2 fits into x^3
and the answer to that would be x
of course??
x^2 * x = x^3
you know how exponents work, do you not?
nobody said x was 1
x is x
no
x^2 is the same as x * x, yes.
by definition
yes, sure, x^3 = x * x * x
you misunderstand
x * x is not "two x's"
it's not 2x
7 fits evenly into 21 because 7 * 3 = 21
x^2 fits evenly into x^3 because x^2 * x = x^3
there is none
no the coefficients are just independent of the exponents
3 * 3 * x * x * x
right here
yes there is, so what?
there is no remainder...
a remainder would be something added
but there's no addition happening here
can someone explain me how the square root of 22 is an irrational number
all irrational number are number that cannot be divided by an integars
what integars can square root of 22 be divided by? There is none, hence it is an irrational number
this is very bad wording
very bad
@prime sparrow have you seen the proof that sqrt(2) is irrational? it can be adapted to work for sqrt(22) with some modifications
ive seen it on khan academy
generally the square root of any integer that isn't a perfect square is irrational
ok
ye
i understood it
from the proof
just wanted to make sure it was real
here
idk how to clear up your confusion here
what's 2^3
do you also think 27 is not divisible by 9?
"i'm seeing it like 27 = 3 * 3 * 3 = 3 threes and 9 = 3 * 3 = 2 threes and 2 threes don't fit into 3 threes"
this is what you sound like rn
so mean :P
i'm trying to help
by pointing out flaws in your reasoning
you can and should tell me "fuck off i don't need your help and i think you should die" if you want to tell me that right now
do you understand the basic exponential laws
in your case it'd be the top one
okay so
x * x is the same as x^1 * x^1
this was just a semi related example
let me finish please
x^1 * x^1 is the same as x^(1+1)
which is x^2
and your question is how the greatest common divisor is of 2x^2 and 9x^3 = x^2
so
divide both sides by x
what do you get
no, x^2 / x = x
as shown by this
yes
but you're not dividing by x^3
you're dividing by x^2
yes
the question is asking how the gcd of 2x^2 and 9x^3 = x^2
divide both by x^2, you'll get 2 and 9x
you cant divide 2 by any more x's
so therefore x^2 is the gcd
not quite
you do them separately
in this case you can because 2 and 9 only have 1 as a common divisor
but if it was 3 and 9, you could do 3x^2
and you'd be left with 1 and 3x
yes
that's exactly it
you're welcome
xx
I need a little bit of help on the following question
(1+1/2)*2
2
Pls explain
Don't give out answers
Apply order of operations, PEMDAS
And it's not 3
@wary stream
Then explain
Why did you just ping me?
brackets first
Ok so let's do brackets first then
rq
$\paren{1 + \frac12} \cdot 2 = 3$, no?
Ann
dldh06 why are you claiming (1 + 1/2) * 2 isn't 3
I read that as to the second power, my bad
Sorry
we don't have $\frac{1+1}{2}$, we have $1 + \frac{1}{2}$
Ann
Imagine being such a bot
Exactly
@vale wigeon
what
Don't ping people
why are you pinging me
When asking for help, do not insist on getting just the answer; we are here to help you learn, not cheat. Likewise, if you are providing help to others, try your best to explain and elaborate instead of simply giving away the answer.
-_-
If your question has not been answered for a minimum of 15 minutes, you may use the Helpers tag once. Please do not try to bump your question using this ping unnecessarily. Do not abuse this ping. Do not individually ping users with the Helpers tag without their express permission.
How do you call specific rules ?
anyway the reason you got no response is probably because you didn't share some essential info
such as the amount of progress you've made
Maybe if you read the rules, you would understand that you had to wait at least 15 minutes before pinging helpers, which I don't think you did before
wdym
i see
You waited 5 minutes last time
Can someone please help me with this and get the solution? <@&286206848099549185>
If your question has not been answered for a minimum of 15 minutes, you may use the Helpers tag once. Please do not try to bump your question using this ping unnecessarily. Do not abuse this ping. Do not individually ping users with the Helpers tag without their express permission.
What's 15+27304040
Just add 15 to that big value
How can ab <= |a||b| be justified?
you could use the angle inbetween the vectors formula
ahhh then im not sure then
No, they're real numbers.
This is for an exercise in ch 1.1 of Thomas, justifying steps in the proof of the triangle inequality
if thats the case, consider the cases where a and b are both negative, both positive, and where their signs are different
may i know if theres something in between A & B, is it also considered as A is directly above of B? im trying to solve a combinatorial problem
probably not, but can you show the exact problem statement anyway
<@&286206848099549185> someone please help
have you made any progress so far?
oof. this all sounds really hairy but at the same time i don't know what else you could've done here.
but also i have a feeling your equation for the line through (6,1) and (2,8) is wrong
you made a sign error
it should be y = (-6/5)x + 4.6
Yep thx for that. I just don’t know where to go from there
I know I have to simplify them but can’t think how to simplify the -6/5x-4.6 part
Yeah ik, but this problem is making me super confused and I can’t think of how to get a solution
I’ll probably just email my professor and ask
Find a given that: P(-1, 1) and Q(a, -2) are 5 units apart
I got a = 3
but it's saying there is another answer?
can someone explain how there can be two answers, I'm new to this
how did you get a=3?
ok can i comment on your handwriting a little before i get to the part where you made a mistake
cause i have some shit to say about that
yeah just get it over with
- in your first line, the square root symbol extends only over the first term, which is incorrect (even though you do extend it all the way in the second line, which makes this only a typo
- your
aand9look very similar. consider using a different shape for either one
now to the actual mistake
you got to 16 = (a+1)^2 just fine
but you should have had a+1 = **±**4, not a+1 = 4 as you wrote.
why is it ±4 and not 4
you would agree that the equation $x^2 = 16$ has two solutions, yes?
Ann
uh isn't the root of 16 just 4?
sqrt(16) = 4, that's true.
but think about the equation
x=-4 is also a solution of x^2 = 16.
ohh right
I see where I went wrong
thanks
Three boys, four pizzas. Every pizza must have an owner. (Distinct Pizzas) How many ways the pizzas can be distributed?
My answer is 72.
I did this ->
First I'll select any 3 pizzas by 4C3 then no. of ways they can be distributed among the guys 3!. Now no. of ways the remaining 1 pizza would be given way 3C2
my ans be -> 4C3 3! 3C2
Is it right?
I need to prove that property
I did a similar question but E[Xi] < inf and I could use the monotone convergence theorem
But I'm assuming I can't use the same theorem because there needs to be infinite amount of functions, where in (b) there is a finite amount of functions
o,o! oof im confused
can you do this one
Q-14
@alpine sable still need help?
yes
B is a 3 × 2 matrix. The element in row i and column j is given by bi j = i × j.
Construct the matrix.
@alpine sable channel busy please move
ok
Well the question is a little bit weird if I read it semantically but whatever
I guess it is asking for the number of onto functions that satisfy the previous condition? Otherwise no idea why that’s written there
Also no idea what the point of n and n-10 is
lol no point in that
im getting n = 24
but answer is given 18
:/
n = 18
you really only need to find how many ways you can map {x1, x2, x3} to {y1, y2} in an onto fashion
not exactly, no.
i think you meant {y3, y4}, but still, even disregarding that
you would miss some functions
Oh, right
okay so very simple question I think: why would you rewrite (x+p)(x+q) to:
x^2+(p+q)x+pq, and not
x^2+xq+xp+pq?
Especially if the assignment is to remove the braces? It's shown in my book as the solution once and I thought hmm.. don't know why they put it that way. But then on the next page they use this "solution" to it again, and they keep sticking to it. Which makes me think there is a definite reason for rewriting it in that specific way instead of the IMO more straightforward one. Because I believe I cán definitely say that I'm probably not wrong in anyway, as far as I can tell. It's just different. Does that alternative rewrite offer benefits further down the line?
when considering this as a quadratic in x, the form x^2 + (p+q)x + pq highlights the fact that the linear coefficient is p+q
which is useful to know for factorization purposes
okay, that's very good to know. thanks
hi @vale wigeon have you done anything on the topic of my question?
.-.
sure do love getting pinged out of the blue
no, i don't remember the proof of that particular result in probability theory unfortunately
Ok revision: find how many ways you can map size 2 subsets of {x3, x4, x5} to {y3, y4}
Then the unused element in A is free to be mapped to any element in B
this may overcount things
it's probably easiest to just write these out explicitly...
alright i've written them all out explicitly in lexicographic order
for each function i wrote out its values at x_1 through x_5, omitting the y for brevity. e.g. a 3 in the table means y_3
Hi, can someone help me with this pls
then you're screwed lol
pls help someone
this question is very poorly stated
just from knowing the volume alone you cannot conclude what the dimensions should be
anyone?
Channel occupied. Go to another
can we please not gang up in one channel
hey guys, so can someone remind me if the (y=mx-c) functions are direct or not because itsnot increasing by the same ratio?
I want to quickly address a previous problem, as it has not been answered
when you expand, and collect like terms, you will get a quadratic
after that it is simple where the minimum of a quadratic occurs
Can u show me how to expand it pls? Sorry, i'm a bit new to these type of math
Each term is of form $(a+b)^2$, expanding it yields $a^2 +2ab+b^2$. Do that for all such terms
peaceGiant
Ah, i think im starting to understand now, thank a lot for your help!
Np
how does i go around simplifying this $$\frac{\left(2^{2n+3}-\left(2^n\right)^2\right)}{2^n}$$
̗̀➛☄. *. ⋆ 彡‗ ❍¡! ❞ˏˋ°•*⁀➷୨⎯୧
notice that 2^(2n) is a common factor of the numerator
Can someone help me with C1?
I have the answers but answer sheet doesnt tell me how to get the answer
C1b=438.17 K
then dx = o'(t) dt and you sub dx in the integral, x too
Is the answer for 7 0.6 and 10.44
may someone please explain to me how i would solve this equation?
,w \left(\sin \left(\frac{\left(y-10\right)}{1}\right)+0.5-0\right)^2+\left(y-10\right)^2=12.5^2
you probably wouldn't. this looks too nasty to solve.
i mean all i really dont understand is how to get y out of sin(10-y)^2
,w sin(10-y)^2
I'm struggling with conditional statements. How can I convert an implication using logical operators? I know that P -> Q is equivalent to ~P v Q, so would P v Q ->R be equivalent to P v ~Q v R ?
P v Q -> R <==> ~(P v Q) v R <==> ~P AND ~Q v R
<@&286206848099549185>
@tawny lion I think just calculate it normally, forget the zero balance
really?
yeah
,w 100(1 + (0.04/12))^(240)
thats it
yeah sup this is an annuity
no that's not it

we gain 4% interest and then we add another 100 euro

100 euros added every month?
yes
Ah
so then what do we do
there's a number of different ways to phrase it
i'll denote the amount added every month with the letter A for convenience
so A = 100 euro in our case
and i'll also denote with the letter r the interest rate per compounding period, in our case it's 0.04/12
so we start with 0
each month we multiply the amount already there by (1+r) and add A
so we have A
then A(1+r) + A
then A(1+r)^2 + A(1+r) + A
then A(1+r)^3 + A(1+r)^2 + A(1+r) + A
do you see where this is going yet?
or should i continue explaining
it's gonna be a geometric series of 240 terms with ratio (1+r)
you just said "i see"
i thought that meant you understood where the things i wrote came from
at the end of the 20 years you will have A(1+r)^239 + A(1+r)^238 + ... + A(1+r) + A
but isn't R u_2/u_1
ah wait I think I understand, but how do we account for the additional A
???
b ecause if we use the formula for the sum of a geometric sequence we don't account for the +A that is added
i think you misunderstand
if you want to do this as a recurrence, then it's $$u_{n+1} = (1+r)u_n + A$$ and $u_0 = 0$ and you're looking for $u_{240}$
Ann
alright, thank you
hii, is this chat open for a new question now? or is it still ongoing? if not then can anyone help me with my mini ia?
those are the data i've collected and im trying to figure out the equations for each ditch digger
its like two ditch diggers trying to meet up in the center.. if that makes sense
oh.
so uh can u help or u just had a problem with the language??
racist??
you said ||digger||
digger? as in, the word meaning "one who digs"?
its a math problem, what was i supposed to say😭
wtf is this guy haha
is there anything racist about this besides the similarity to the N-word, to which it bears no relation?
look i was just going along with it
yess
not at ur level yet 😦
aight lets head to #chill
teach me to be truly sigma
uh
no
...
me when
girl?
ok will um when u guys are done, can anyone help with my math problem..?
foul???
wtf
oh so you'll be transphobic to my face
okay then
<@&268886789983436800> we got a transphobe over here
everything lol
if youre gonna be transphobic at least don't do it so overtly
let alone to a trans person's face
but u shouldnt be disrespectful, theres a difference between not supporting and just being straight up rude
Can someone plsss explain part two of q 7
never thought i'd see a transphobic nut with my own two eyes
oh looks like he's gone already thank god
waittt i had a question first but uhhh thers currently an ongoing argument..
Banned
Ah I’m sorry
its okk
I need help with a question, You play a lottery where 6 numbers are chosen from 45 at random. you get 3 numbers the same on your ticket. find what the chances where using combanatorics?
...
appreciate it
do whor3!s question first
thank you😭
Move where
aight ima go to q1
to another questions channel
one that doesn't have a conversation in it at the moment
@bleak charm can you repost your question again
um so this is the data i have and basically im supposed to find out if they will ever meet, the digging rates of each person, and how long is this ditch..
but i already figured out that they wont meet
and that the ditches they are digging are parallel so they will apparently have to connect it with a perpendicular line, and right now im just trying to figure out the equations for each person
sorry.. its a lot
anyway
it looks like you figured out the slope of each ditch as 1/2
what else are you asked for
yepp
the digging rates, which i thought was the slope, but my teacher said it wasnt..
so im a bit confused abt that
i think the digging rate is supposed to be the distance dug out per day
ohhh
which would be the distance between two adjacent points in your data
so i have to use the distance formula right?
...yes
also..
how would i find the equations of each digger?
i know i need the slope but thats all i have
they are both digging in a straight line
so their equations can both be written in the form y = mx + b
you know m = 1/2 for both diggers
obviously their b's will be different
but still
sorry what?? im confused on that part😭
this channel occupied @fluid scarab
aight which channel can i use then?
use common sense and find one that isnt in use
literally any other unoccupied channel
the amt of ppl that keep going to this channel
ikr
How do I do this, kinda confused, tried L'hopital
^^sorry i'll make it more clearer that i still kinda need help
Try y=mx and x axis( i am saying because from both the paths i am getting different answer so seems limit don't exist)
tyvm
Can please tell me what does it means, because every time i came accorrs a new word, then i have to google it 😂😂
thank you very much^
Ohhh 🙏
yepp
plz ping me whenever u guys are ready :)))
$\overline{v}={\frac{\Delta x}{\Delta t}}
you can use urbandictionary if u don't understand some slang
can someone help with this question]
what have you tried / thought about
<@&286206848099549185>
Too small letters
what have you tried / thought about
I dont really know how to answer these type of questions
do you know the properties of a parallelogram
yes
did you determine the sizes of the angles
thats the difficult part
i get confused with substitution
what specifically about it
like 6u-4 and 5u+4
the expression for the angle in the top left is
6u - 4
what happens when u is 8
i wouldnt know how to substitute
really don't overthink this
do you understand that 6u represents the product of 6 and u?
what i know is that you have to substract 6u from 5u and substract the +4 part and the -4 part
and when doing substitution you're pretty much replacing something with something of equivalent value
what i know is that you have to substract 6u from 5u and substract the +4 part and the -4 part
no
really don't overthink this
6u - 4
what happens when you substitute/replace u with 8, (inserting appropriate signs or parentheses if needed)
Looks beautiful and correct ( better then mine drawing 😂)
ty so it doesn't matter how it looks as long as it matches the criteria right?
From my side it is good
Ah okay ty :)
Likely just rounding, but I'd argue 35 is correct cause after 35 days it'd be under 1/2 the value
Ahh ok
,w calc ln(.5)/ln(.98)
identical
ie the LHS and RHS are exactly identical, with no distinction aside from notation
ok thanks for your help mosh
Also means equivalent to
I'm not exactly sure of the notation v^., but I know that it's not equal
that sign means congruent
so x ≡ 5 mod 6, means x can be 5, 11, 17......
is v^. a unit vector?
I've never seen that before
it's $\dot{v}$
Mosh
what does that mean though
1st time derivative
oh
Like I said.. the LHS and RHS are identical
so then in this case, it's equivalent
yes, almost like I said that
but in general, ≡ does not mean equal
I also said I didn't know what the v meant.
My bad, I meant equal
Is this right?
Is it sin?
yes
0/0 will never give you answer
Try to approch zero from different curves
Take x^2+y^2=r
Then approch r to zero , you will get 1
because sin(r)/r = 1?
Looks good
ty
Hey guys i wanna ask why the question has the following answer
^because wouldnt that answer be the domain?
And if im wrong what method of calculation should be used to obtain the answer?
yeah
ok
nice
this is an upwards pointing parabola
that means the function will have a slope at 0 at it's vertex/minimum value
right?
yeah true
so if you take the derivative and find where it's equal to 0, you will get the vertex which is also the minimum value
right?
yeah
ok so taking the derivative gives 2x+4 = 0
which means x=-2
the y value of the function at x=-2 is 4-8 = -4. So, the minimum y value is -4
since -4 is the minimum value, f(x)>=-4
the domain is all possible x's. In this case, x is an element of the real numbers as per the right column. That means all real numbers work.
alternatively.. f(x)=x^2+4x+4-4 =(x+2)^2-4
is f(x) = 3 just a translation 3 units up..?
school just started so yeah..?
lol
@split oriole just asking again, I did x=0 for this one and I got that +infinite and -infinite, is that why it doesn't exist?
hi guys
When you put x =0 it will give you 0
i want to find a number that should multiply by -7 and get output 66
can anyone pls help me out?
just do 66 / -7
how? I got ycosy/y^2
then cosy/y
then 0/0+ and 0/0- that +infinite and -infinite
what I did wrong?
When x is zero whole numerator will become zero
oh god
I'm dumb
you're right
what's the other option to me get that it doesn't exist?
ok , thanks
Take y=x
Please help me to evaluate this expression
what have you tried?
so all the options I can test is x=0, y=0, x=y, y=x?
Hey guys im kinda confused how to solve this
Just two are sufficient
also just fucked up algebra
So what the answer for 28?
(2n+1)!=(2n+1)(2n)!
Like you did 27 perfectly fine, then proceeded to do the same thing poorly for 28
What is inside integral?
Its arc length and i thought i knew i what i was doing
I need help to understand
@vale wigeon
sadge,, but nvm i dont need help anymore
pls help
I’m pretty sure u have to intergrate like this first
I though you got to find the derivative first
you never posted a question, you posted random work and expected us to know what you want
yeah, the answer i gave was just based on my assumption what the question is
hi i need help on this question, i plugged it into the equation, so im not sure what i did wrong
Probably did not plug it in correctly
hello! about this question, I chose Pr(X leq 2) = 0.4 as there is a flat line until 2 on the x-axis when the probability is equal to 0.4. However, the answer is apparently wrong. How should I approach this problem then?
you have to multiply the constant with the coefficient of the first term
you have to do -10 x 2 = -20 and then split -20 into factors that allow for factorization
hm i double checked a couple of times and got the same answer though
How did you plug it in
@idle trench
This is correct, I will write it in latex to make it clearer for them if you don't mind
please, feel free
Consider using the quadratic formula:
$x=\frac{-1\pm \sqrt{1^2-4\cdot :2\left(-10\right)}}{2\cdot :2}$
Captain_Mat01
is this chatroom free?
yes
i need help on this question because i don't know what they did
^
wait what? that simple? wait let me see again
yh its that simple, the way they explain it on the website is not great
I mean, its good
Just using to many definitions, which can lead to confusion
because one of the equations doesn't have y at all, it's just a matter of solving for x and subbing it into the equation with y
<@&286206848099549185>
no worries bud, now you know :)
Oh I did not see that
no worries!
oh no
it's alright!
Thanks
lmao
how would I solve for x in this problem?
so two of the angles in this diagram have a special property
is it vertical angles
oh
or congruent or whatever they call it
now I think i can solve it
ok good
thanks I got the answer
no problem
−3x=12
x=4 this is wrong right? its -4
lol
lmao
This is rly easy math but still
how can they get that wrong
Its the website we got from our school 😄
when you have sin(ax)sin(bx),
it should not = 0 when you integrate over a period if a = b
but when you use the double angle formula to separate it,
you you can get a sin((a+b)/L) - sin((a-b)/L) which = 0?
I know you can use another identity to show that it equals 2L,
but idk why I'm getting this answer using the double angle formula
what's this double angle formula that you're using?
this seems like the formula you would use when a=b
yeah, that one gives me 2L
but lets say you ignore the fact that n=m for a second
and then apply the same trig I that you would if n=/=m
in the end I got 0, even when I subbed n=m at the end
I mean, you get the result in the same form as n=/=m
but when m=n, you get sin(2n) - sin(0)
@carmine reef
I'm not aware of such a trig formula
that's how you show orthogonality when n=/=m
yeah
but the one up higher is sin - sin
oh, did you integrate that one already
but then the denominators shouldn't both be L
yeah, sin(a)sin(b) = 0.5(cos(n-m) - cos(n+m))
but you integrate it over L < x < -L, to show orthogonality if = 0
so then you get sines again
you get Asin(n-m)
what's A?
1/n-m
no problem!
-3/2 @warped phoenix
ur right 🤦♂️
wait so
oh
nvm
ty
hey whoever was just in here the channel is free now
@sinful moth
oh i didnt want to hold you up so i deleted it and went to a different channel
oh ok nw
Hi! Please someone help with this.
Here is the expression
I wanna know this
By using this definition:
I know there are easier ways to do this, but the exercise asks specifically to use this definition
Hello, what have you tried so far?
I mean, what did you get after using this derivative definition?
So I am very confused about something and google is messing up because of a minus sign in the search bar.
Can someone explain to me how -ln(cosx) = ln(secx)
TATTTTAATATATA
wait so lnx multiplied by something puts that multiplier as the exponent for what's in the logorithm?
Like, if I were to just randomly have 2ln(cosx), that would = ln(cos^2(x))
yes
You have just made my trig integration homework much easier
Oh god, you have no ideia how far I tried, but I did again (So I could sent it to you, since I striked out (not sure those are the correct words, my English is bad) my other attempts.) But I finally solve it!!!! Here’s the resolution. @ancient saddle
The other attempts I talked about:
Anyways, thanks!!!
Ahahah this is only training work for my final exam, I am lucky enough to organize my mind in my own mess.
is this channel free???
if anyone is willing to help, i would appreciate it a ton:)
my answers got sent in the wrong order
i particularly need help with Q3
please ping me if anyone responds:)
<@&286206848099549185>
please could you send the question you have to solve?
ty
i messed up (a), but for (b i) AD: 3y=x-5 BE: 5y=-3x-12
ok tysm
i'll attempt it now
hello
thank you
can someone help me out with this
apparently its not DNE or does not exist
nvm its just 0
how would i go about solving this?
Hello, have you tried graphing the function?
im confused on what to actually graph
and how would i enter it in to the calculator
wait i got it
As long as x1 goes with y1 and x2 is paired with y2, order doesn't matter
i don't know what i'm doing wrong here but when i do (2-2) / (3-(-5)) i get 0/8, but if i do (2-2) / (-5-3) i get 0/-8
it's something to do with the negative signs
thats throwing me off
oh, so either -8 or 8 is right?
If you had different y values, then you would have the same slope
No
Yes
thanks
What have you attempted?
kk I'll do that then thnx
What do factors have to do with factorial?
$n!=n(n-1)(n-2)...(2)(1)$
Mosh
Kinda... the definition of factorial for natural numbers n as well as n=0
Kinda what?
what factorial and factors have to do with one another
that's correct, though you can just pick a value of a
the question does not specify any details like y intercepts for me to quantify a though
elaborate? you lost me there
If you read the question, you will notice the 2nd and 3rd word is "an equation"
an means specific/singular
so can I just write my answer, but then on the side a !=0 and is a member of a real number?
yes
and what I choose is inconsequential because even if there are ton of possibilities
they all meet the requirements set in the question
yes.
polynomials and place value are the same thing
think about it
take any integer in base 10
for instance 1234
that's just 1*10^3 + 2*10^2 + 3*10^1 + 4*10^0
it's just a polynomial in 10
or rather the polynomial 4321 evaulated at x = 10
I don't understand how I can do this question
an isn't a linear function bn is, I can't think of any changes to the rate of change or intercepts that could make a linear function a non linear function
.
there's another way I did where you make n = 0, and then sub everything in assuming (an = bn) , you get A+B = 1
3A +B = 4, 9A + B =13
this system of linear equations is contradictory
but I don't it would be in the form ax + b
just try it
how?
it becomes very clear once you do
is this correct?
I don't get it
try putting i at the end?
are you sure it's contradictory
a_0 = 1
a_1 = 3(a_1) + 1 = 4
a_2 = 3(3a_1 + 1) + 1 = 13
a_3 = 3(9a_1 + 4) + 1 = 40
a_4 = 3(27a_1 + 13) + 1 = 121
a_n = sum(3^k from k = 0 to k = n-1)
eh is the channel open
how would i write " two decreased by the quotient of the number a and 7 and increased by a multiplied by 3" as an algebraic expression
Hi. i was wondering how to find line through a point (x,y,z) that intersects a plane (ex. 2x+y-z=5) perpenidcularly
Are you talking about / familiar with parametric equations? If so, this the video for you https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_W3aVWsMp14
@lean nacelle
Get any two vectors on the plane.
Take their cross product. This will give a new vector normal to the plane.
Place it at the point.
someone plz help me
its my summer packet for calculus this year. im so lost and the class hasnt even started yet
just post your question
uh ok i dont even know where to start but
i took pre-calc over the summer this year so I feel like my knowledge is a bit shallow
is it E??
what do you get when you plug in 1 to the function?
4 ?
right, but if you plug it in to the expression
you'll get a different, equivalent answer
plug it into x or y
oh shit i know what you mean
so 6=A+B?
then do the same thing w. -1 and solve a system?
exactly
yep!
OK THANK YOU!
Does this look right?
Thank you.
