#help-0

1 messages · Page 747 of 1

glass lichen
#

stop saying nonsense

#

it's asking for the rth, read the question

ashen agate
#

im bad with theoretical questions like this

candid thistle
#

This isnt theory

glass lichen
#

it's just a pattern, again.. that ive spelled out for you

candid thistle
#

It's just counting :/

glass lichen
#

.

ashen agate
#

what does it mean by rth tile

glass lichen
#

the rth choice.

candid thistle
#

If you have 10 items and you have picked out 6th items, how many are going to be remaining for you to choose for your 7th one

glass lichen
#

like how 1st means... first

#

rth means the rth one

ashen agate
#

does it start with r?

candid thistle
#

damn this geometry problem is hard :/

ashen agate
#

3-r?

candid thistle
#

Where did the 3 come from

#

Do you know how many tiles there are?

ashen agate
#

no

candid thistle
#

Then where did the 3 come from?

ashen agate
#

idek then should it be 2-r since u picked 2 tiles

candid thistle
#

(Please don't guess, think about that)

candid thistle
#

If you are picking out your rth tile, how many have you already picked out?

#

That would help

ashen agate
#

3 tiles

candid thistle
#

What is r equal to, exactly?

ashen agate
#

4th tile?

candid thistle
#

No

#

Do you know what variables are?

#

It's a constant that you don't know the value to

#

Perhaps ask someone in person, itll be easier to explain than asking digitally.

#

Is it possible to find the area of a triangle from the semiperimeter and the inradius of the triangle??

#

Or am I just wasting my time by doing that? Perhaps I should try a different approach

ashen agate
#

@candid thistle n-r-1?

#

or n-(r-1)

warped phoenix
#

Hey guys do you think 3 days is enough time to review the entirety of the Algebra 2 course?

candid thistle
candid thistle
#

I don't think it is nearly enough t understand everything about that course but if you manage to pull it off then congrats you're a madman :P

ionic jewel
warped phoenix
#

yeah

#

mb

ionic jewel
#

if you are trying to learn it all, no

warped phoenix
#

i should havbe calrified

ionic jewel
#

okay then its definitely possible

warped phoenix
#

i meant that

#

its review

#

ok, ty!!!!

candid thistle
#

Ahh if you werre learning from it, then I would think you are crazy
If it is review, go for it

#

(So you already have learnt most of the stuff in the course?)

warped phoenix
# ionic jewel okay then its definitely possible

btw, do you know any good resources for review?? Right now I'm just using Khan Academy's mastery course and then reviewing what I get wrong off of that, but I'm not sure if there's something out there better

warped phoenix
#

2 months was the deadline

#

i was like 2 weeks behind at one point

candid thistle
#

Ahh KA's one is kinda doable, not that hard

warped phoenix
#

it was a miracle i cought up while keeping an A

candid thistle
#

(or not alg 2 but in general)

candid thistle
#

I hate that :(

harsh steeple
#

how can i prove that △BED is congruent to △KEC, if i know that △KBD is congruent to △BKC, △KBE is an equilateral triangle and ∠BDK = ∠BCK? is there a way to write that you can just "subtract" off the shared △KEB?

candid thistle
#

Hmm, what parts of the circle are BED and KEC touching?

#

First off, what is one property that the two triangles have similar?

#

What stuff do you know are similar?

harsh steeple
#

ΔBED ~ ΔKEC, ΔKBD ~ ΔBKC

candid thistle
#

But you have to prove the first part

harsh steeple
#

no, i already know that ΔBED ~ ΔKEC

candid thistle
#

Oh ok

#

what are you trying to prove then?

harsh steeple
#

i need to prove that ΔBED is congruent to ΔKEC

candid thistle
#

Ahh

#

Well you could actually subtract out

#

That's way simpler than what I had thought

harsh steeple
#

my problem is i have no idea how to do write that

#

"formally"?

candid thistle
harsh steeple
#

it would but, how do u write it haha

#

plain subtraction?

candid thistle
#

Ahhh I dont know either

candid thistle
harsh steeple
#

😂 alright

#

just wanted to confirm

candid thistle
#

honestly I should not be the person to ocme to for help for how to write stuff

#

I end up dragging out my proofs to be longer than harry potter :/

harsh steeple
#

haha

alpine sable
#

super confused o this one

#

why Pt instead of Pr or just P

red phoenix
#

we want to mek to r = something

#

So we need to remove Pt from the r side

candid thistle
#

You are trying to isolate r

alpine sable
#

i looked at the answer key to this question but I still don't understand some steps

celest anvil
# alpine sable

so basic exponent rules here. calculate the product inside the parentheses, divide by the denominator, then calculate for the exponent

alpine sable
#

this is the answer key

#

k so

#

let me write what is confusing

#

At the part where it shows the -1

#

under the 5^4

#

when it goes to the next step

#

how did they get rid of the -1

celest anvil
#

because taking a number to an even power makes it positive

#

so they did 5/-1 =-5 and -5^4 becomes positive then you take the power of 2

#

which is just 5^(4*2)=5^8

alpine sable
#

how did -5^4 become positive

celest anvil
#

let's do it this way

#

-5^2=-5*-5=25

#

-5^3=25*-5=-125

#

-5^4=-125*-5=625

#

you see a number to an even power always becomes positive?

#

so 625^2 is same as 5^8

alpine sable
#

OHHHHH

#

wait

#

yeahhhh

#

because like the power is completely separate from the number

#

????

#

i mean the negitave

#

not power

#

like its kind of like -(6)^4

#

you put in the neg after everything kind of

celest anvil
#

nope you keep the negative cause that's the sign

#

you know negative * negative becomes positive right?

alpine sable
#

yeah

#

wait so the rule is, any negitave number with a positive exponent is always positive?

#

wait so back to this

#

im confused because like when they got 5^8 from 5^4 from the exponent 2, dont you have to apply the exponent to the base (5) as well?

#

or just the exponent

celest anvil
#

so the reason why 5'4 went to 5'8 is because when you take an exponent of an exponent, it multiplies instead of adding

#

so 5^8=5^4*2

celest anvil
alpine sable
celest anvil
alpine sable
#

oh

#

ty for the photo btw<

#

and tysm for the help

#

i will try and do it now (:

celest anvil
wintry vortex
#

I did COS(25.29 Degrees)=H/7616 and got H=6886

Then Sin(25.29 degrees)=0/6686 and got O= 2916

#

What did I mess up on?

#

Ugh I dont see what I did wrong, i just did the rpoblem again and got the same answer

strong falcon
#

Sin is opposite over hypotenuse (SOHCAHTOA), so sin(25.29 degrees) should equal x/7616

topaz wedge
#

What’s the best way to minus 1 unvigintillion minus 1?

limpid spade
#

calculator

wintry vortex
#

what did I mess up on?

#

sorry if my handwritting is alittle bad haha

gray isle
#

you didn't interpret the angle of depression properly

#

actually

#

...

#

can you draw a better diagram

wintry vortex
#

i can try xD

#

omg i think i just found my mistake

#

nope

#

i did not

#

634.06 is also wrong

gray isle
#

why are you drawing your diagram rotated?

wintry vortex
#

idk haha, does the rotation of it matter? Is that whats messing me up?

#

if it is thats hilarious

gray isle
#

well an incorrect Orientation may end up confusing yourself

#

However the issue with calculations here is that aren't giving your answer to the nearest tenth

wintry vortex
#

ffs your right, where does it say nearest tenth? 0_0

#

oh it does

gray isle
#

unless you have a really good reason... the "horizontal" should be more or less horizontal in your diagram

wintry vortex
#

i didnt have a good reason, just kinda drew it lol

candid thistle
#

If all three lines are angle bisectors (lol bad drawing) would x = 2y

#

If so, how could I prove it

#

(perhaps with similar triangles?)

#

I know that the area of all 6 triangles are equal

oak chasm
#

What are x and y referring to? They're close to multiple sides and some angles.

candid thistle
#

oh one sec

#

red = y, blue = x

oak chasm
#

@candid thistle OK, looked into it. The point where the angle bisectors meet is called the incenter.

amber spindle
oak chasm
#

@amber spindle Sorry, channel is busy.

amber spindle
oak chasm
candid thistle
#

ok

oak chasm
#

So, (x = (x + y)(a + b)/(a + b + c)).

ocean sealBOT
#

Chai T. Rex

gaunt magnet
#

hi

candid thistle
#

ok

oak chasm
#

x/(x + y) = (a + b)/(a + b + c)

candid thistle
#

okay

oak chasm
#

Now you think x/(x + y) = 2/3

gaunt magnet
#

$x/(x + y) = (a + b)/(a + b + c)$

ocean sealBOT
candid thistle
#

so that means that x = 2, y = 1?

#

or a scaled up version of that

#

so yea

oak chasm
#

So, the triangle would probably have to be equilateral.

candid thistle
#

ah ok

oak chasm
#

Because the two triangle sides next to the angle have to be 2/3 of all three sides of the triangle.

candid thistle
#

ok

oak chasm
#

Hmm, not exactly.

#

Let's see.

#

The side length opposite the bisected angle has to be the average of the other two side lengths.

#

There.

candid thistle
#

ok

oak chasm
#

(a + b)/(a + b + (a + b)/2)
(a + b)/(3(a + b)/2)
2/3

#

Yeah, so that's the general solution if you want x to be twice as long as y.

candid thistle
#

okay thank you

oak chasm
#

No problem.

tight locust
#

how do you eat water?

sudden crypt
#

freeze it

oak chasm
#

You mix it with food powder.

candid thistle
sudden crypt
#

but idk about "eat"

candid thistle
#

(real)

oak chasm
#

Sometimes, I eat liquid food. I guess it's not pure water, but.

tight locust
#

yeah you don't really crunch down on an ice cube more just suckle on it until it melts

candid thistle
tight locust
#

i guess if you "eat" a popsicle though then you can eat ice

wintry vortex
#

Im alittle lost on this solution if anyone could help clear it up

#

This is the actual question

tight locust
#

given two points (a,b) and (c,d) the slope of the line between them is (d-b)/(c-a)

#

you can take that as axiom

#

i'm pretty sure this is one of euclid's postulates

#

you can't really prove the slope formula because it is the definition of slope itself

wintry vortex
#

well with their formula i got -0.8/0.5=0.8/-0.5

tight locust
#

for which one

wintry vortex
#

which idk how thats helpful lol. Is there another better to find the slope?

oak chasm
#

@tight locust The last image.

tight locust
#

it's just basic arithmetic man. find d-b, then find c-a. then divide

oak chasm
#

Now make the fraction have integers.

#

Or divide and use a decimal.

tight locust
#

multiply by 10/10

#

10/10 = 1 so the equality will still hold

wintry vortex
#

ty 🙂

#

The way they worded that solution was just confusing the hell outa me

cinder sundial
#

Is it possible to get the N’s value

#

I tried it myself, it seems impossible

vale wigeon
#

8N = S, 32N = S+120?

#

how is it impossible? just subtract the two equations and you get 24N = 120

cinder sundial
#

let me try

#

N=5

#

S=40

vale wigeon
#

i think you lost sight of the fact that these are linear equations in N and S simply because the coefficients on N were written as powers

cinder sundial
#

what if i got equation(1): n * 2^13, equation(2): n * 2^15

#

can i divide them

#

i was tryin to divide them

vale wigeon
#

i mean, you could divide them, you'll get (S + 120)/S = 4

#

which you can solve for S and then use that to get the value of N

#

you can also subtract them instead and get (2^15 - 2^13)N = 120

#

or 3 * 2^13 * N = 120

cinder sundial
#

2^15-2^13

#

im not sure what it is

vale wigeon
#

2^15 - 2^13 is 2^15 - 2^13

#

if need be, you can write 2^15 as 4 * 2^13 to simplify it to 3 * 2^13

cinder sundial
#

got you

#

(S + 120)/S = 4 seems like those Ss will cancels each other out

#

if they cancels each other out, then i cant find S'svalue

vale wigeon
#

no they won't

#

you can't cancel out from a sum

cinder sundial
#

let me try

#

seems like i can

vale wigeon
#

no you cannot cancel like this

cinder sundial
willow wadi
#

i take channel

#

Pikaboo

vale wigeon
#

@willow wadi this channel is busy

willow wadi
#

no please

#

ni

#

no

#

😭

vale wigeon
#

@cinder sundial well now that isn't some bullshit cancellation, thank god

cinder sundial
#

but it seems like i can

#

its legal to cancel them out

vale wigeon
#

no

vale wigeon
#

it is not legal

willow wadi
vale wigeon
willow wadi
vale wigeon
#

i can swear like a sailor if i so desire

#

also you're being disruptive rn

cinder sundial
#

i remember i did sth familiar like this before

willow wadi
cinder sundial
#

let me give you an example

vale wigeon
cinder sundial
#

yes its illegal

willow wadi
#

we go to the same university

cinder sundial
#

it should be 4/3 instead

willow wadi
#

dont u know me

vale wigeon
#

is that so

cinder sundial
#

"you can't cancel out from a sum" its true

#

the question is solved now

dreamy cedar
#

@willow wadi please move out of this channel while people are trying to use it for help

cinder sundial
#

thank you @vale wigeon

sly mantle
#

muted

vale wigeon
#

what an idiot

gaunt magnet
#

can i get help

cinder sundial
#

this channel is free

gaunt magnet
#

good

#

who gonna carry me

#

@sly mantle hi i need active role

#

because im active mod

#

the blue role

sly mantle
#

active role is automatically given based on server activity

vale wigeon
#

you will get it in due time

gaunt magnet
#

ok

#

then

wind bane
#

what have u tried so far?

gaunt magnet
#

$y=f'(1)(x-1)+f(1)$

ocean sealBOT
wind bane
#

great, so you just need to compute f'(1) and f(1)

gaunt magnet
#

$y = 5/6 (x - 1) - 1$

ocean sealBOT
wind bane
#

if you havent made any computational errors, then you're done

gaunt magnet
#

shouldnt

#

i simplify that

wind bane
#

uh, ig you could. as its written its perfectly fine

gaunt magnet
#

if i simplify i get 5x/6-11/6

ornate wharf
#

i have a quick question

#

for completing the square (quadratic equation) i identify b#, halve it and then square it

#

what if b# is negative, do i include the negative?

#

for example r^2-3r=1

#

(3/2)^2 or (-3/2)^2?

oak chasm
#

They're the same.

sand jetty
#

it does not matter

oak chasm
#

Both are 9/4.

ornate wharf
#

ok thanks

final bane
#

2+2

upbeat solstice
covert berry
#

a, b, c are positive real numbers. Prove:

#

I have tried using AMGM on the RHS and prove the new term is lesser or equal to LHS, but didn't work out.

woeful pulsar
hardy mirage
#

Umm how can I solve this?

oak chasm
#

@hardy mirage Sorry, the last question hasn't finished yet. It looks like #help-8 is open.

hardy mirage
#

Ok, I will move to there

#

Sorry for interrupting

ionic jewel
#

why is it urgent

warped phoenix
#

how do i do this?

#

ive gotten the equation as D(t) = 0.2 x sin(b*t) + 1

#

now what?? how do i find b?

fickle latch
#

key word

#

maximum height

#

at t=0, it's at the middle of the oscillation

#

at t=pi/4, it's at the maximum height

#

what conclusions can we draw from this?

warped phoenix
fickle latch
#

That's a pretty long second

warped phoenix
#

im back now

fickle latch
#

ok

warped phoenix
#

so at t = 0

#

its at the midline right

#

since its at the middle of the oscillation

#

and at t = pi/4, it's at the peak of 1.2

fickle latch
#

ye

#

so

warped phoenix
#

um

fickle latch
#

just as a hint

#

you should be able to get both frequency and period from this

warped phoenix
#

well i mean

vale wigeon
#

those last three terms should be subtracted rather than added

gaunt magnet
#

hi

fickle latch
#

hewwo uwu

gaunt magnet
#

hi

#

question

fickle latch
#

what's your question soldier

gaunt magnet
fickle latch
#

differentiate and plug in

#

there should be a formula in your textbook somewhere

gaunt magnet
#

yes got x-3 after doing that

fickle latch
#

yes and your question is?

graceful river
#

dont quiet understand what the q is asking tbh

fickle latch
#

do you know how to find the distance between the curve and (4,1)?

graceful river
#

idk what that means

#

like between what point of the curve

fickle latch
#

okay rephrasing a bit

#

How far is the curve from touching the point?

warped phoenix
#

is this somewhat right?

graceful river
#

oh the horizontal distance?

warped phoenix
#

srry it took me a sec to draw it

#

i got confused lol

fickle latch
#

the distance distance

#

@warped phoenix It's a liitle bit off but I guess it captures the idea

graceful river
#

4 units to the right and 1 unit up

#

wait no

fickle latch
#

I guess I should draw it out

graceful river
#

oh

#

3 units to the right

#

?

fickle latch
#

Intuitively, this is how far the curve is from (4,1)

graceful river
#

oh

#

so the closest distance

fickle latch
#

Yeah

graceful river
#

between the curve and (4,1)

#

...

fickle latch
#

Now, what is the x coordinate of the point on that curve that is closest to (4,1)?

#

Is what the question is asking

graceful river
#

no clue

fickle latch
#

god dammit

graceful river
#

lol

fickle latch
#

Google it then

#

equation for closest distance

graceful river
#

?

#

this?

fickle latch
#

This should help

graceful river
#

oh

#

is it the point that makes a perpendicular line to the tangent of the poibnt on the curvbe?

warped phoenix
#

the frequency and period are there

#

right

#

i think

#

cuz frequency is just how many times it repeats right

#

from going from 0 to 2pi

#

or is that period

fickle latch
#

@warped phoenix Guess the period

graceful river
# fickle latch yeah probably

now the problem is i still don't know which x coord that gives the tangent which tne forms a perpendicular line with (4,1)

fickle latch
graceful river
#

oh

#

nvm

fickle latch
#

That should give you an idea

graceful river
#

i got it

#

wow its that straight forward lmao

fickle latch
#

Yes

#

yes it is

graceful river
#

so after symplifying the ans is

#

can u check for me pls?

fickle latch
#

uh

#

no

#

and besides

#

you're supposed to find a value for x

graceful river
#

yeah

#

i squared it

#

and diffed it

#

then set it equal 0

#

and x is 1.39

#

i followed the website guide u gave me

fickle latch
#

yeah that's about right

warped phoenix
#

its from that bottom peak

#

to the next bottom peak

#

right

fickle latch
#

Okay

#

okay

#

how many cycles does it take to go from peak to peak?

graceful river
#

thank you

vale wigeon
#

have you made any progress on this so far?

#

dear god

#

that's just signing yourself up for a million arithmetic errors left and right

#

have you tried gaussian elimination?

#

$\left[\begin{array}{ccc|c} 1 & -2 & -1 & 2 \ 2 & 1 & -2 & 0 \ 3 & 4 & -3 & c \end{array}\right]$

ocean sealBOT
vale wigeon
#

i have deliberately rearranged the equations somewhat to make the first elimination step easier

#

you mean -2R1 + R2 -> R2?

#

yes, sure, you can do that

#

doublecheck your right-hand side

#

you will get 5y = -4

#

would you like to take a convenient shortcut that just presented itself?

#

we basically just got the value of y for free.

#

y = -4/5

#

we can use that to rewrite the other two equations as:
x + 8/5 - z = 2
3x - 16/5 - 3z = c

#

simplifying, we get:
x - z = 2/5
3x - 3z = c + 16/5

#

thus for the system to be consistent we must have c + 16/5 = 3 * 2/5

#

well 3x - 3z = 3(x-z), no?

warped phoenix
#

i mean cuz like 1 cycle gets it back to where it started

fickle latch
#

ye

#

how about valley to peak

#

@fringe robin I was working on that

fringe robin
fickle latch
#

good boy

fringe robin
median osprey
#

Hi

#

can someone please help me to revise log rules

#

i forgot them

#

for the question above do we do bring the powers down and then put ln to cancel e?

fickle latch
#

pi/2 - 2 via wolfram

#

must be black magic for pi to show up

median osprey
#

oh sorry i thought its free channel

fickle latch
#

$e^{a+b} = e^a \cdot e^b$

ocean sealBOT
#

COVER Corporation

fickle latch
#

@median osprey

median osprey
#

where can i find these rules?

#

can you recommend me a website

fickle latch
#

Wikipedia

#

I dunno it's everywhere

median osprey
#

whats the keyword to find them

fickle latch
#

Google exponentiation rules

#

Or exponentiation properties

median osprey
#

thank you

#

found them

fringe robin
fringe robin
fickle latch
#

ye

fringe robin
#

ill check

#

oooo got it thanks

surreal meadow
dire patrol
#

help

#

<@&286206848099549185>

fringe robin
#

use the y=xtan theta formula

dire patrol
#

huh

#

whats the working out

#

i created two equations

#

y=10 and y dot = 0

#

and then i did simultaneous idk

#

im not geting the answer

placid zinc
#

Are those the equations you created?
Try creating one for height at time t, and another for horizontal distance at time t

dire patrol
#

ye

#

x=vt cos theta

#

and y=-5t^2+vtsin theta

#

and then i created two equations

#

0=-10t + v sin 36

#

and

#

10=-5t^2 +vtsin36

#

in the question is 10m not the max height?

placid zinc
#

No. Merely that the projectile passes through (20,10)

#

You don't benefit from taking a derivative

dire patrol
#

fgk

#

ok

#

i thought 10 was maxheight

#

hm

#

i found distance of the particle

#

i dont know how that helps though

#

how am i menat to use that

#

to find velocity

placid zinc
#

What is "distance of particle"?

dire patrol
#

idk

#

i used pythagorus

placid zinc
#

The projectile passes through (20,10). Plugging that point in, you have these two equations:
20 = vtcos(36)
10 = -5t² + vtsin(36)

#

That's two equations with two unknowns, it should be possible to get both v and t here

#

Of course you only want v

waxen furnace
#

anyone get the wording on D?

#

I graphed the first histogram but I have zero clue on what it's asking me

surreal meadow
#

@waxen furnace this channel is being used rn

waxen furnace
#

oh my fault

#

which one do I use

dire patrol
#

ye @placid zinc

#

i cant solve that

#

its impossible bro

surreal meadow
waxen furnace
#

ight

#

thanks

surreal meadow
placid zinc
#

@dire patrol
Take the first equation:
vt = 20/cos(36)

Use that in the second:
10 = -5t² + (20/cos(36))sin(36)

And now it's easy

dire patrol
#

ye but sub it in

#

its so messy

#

i couldnt simplify to get v by itself

#

i got some random quadratic with sine and cos

placid zinc
#

Rewriting that last line:
t = √[2 - 4tan(36)]

Then sub that back into that first line I wrote:
v = 20/tcos(36)

gaunt magnet
#

intresting

#

<@&286206848099549185>

gray isle
#

what u try

gaunt magnet
#

i got y=x-3

#

dont ask how

sharp sigil
#

Differentiate plug value get slope and put into y=mx+c and plug in point and get c done.

gaunt magnet
#

yes y=x-3
me right?????????????????????????????????????

gray isle
#

what's making you unsure of your answer?

gaunt magnet
#

i will always double check

#

them

gray isle
#

so why the ping and do you actually need help with this?

gaunt magnet
alpine sable
gray isle
#

yes it seems to check out

gaunt magnet
#

yes i will check that

alpine sable
#

^ but please ping helpers after a while if no one answers

gaunt magnet
#

yes

gray isle
#

though you can check whether its correct using other resources

gaunt magnet
#

you could just say its correct by now

#

🥱

#

im waiting

alpine sable
surreal meadow
gaunt magnet
#

i will read how to get help

#

very soon.

rugged nexus
#

How do you do this question

#

?

placid zinc
#

From the first line:
y = 9 - x

Sub that into the second line

#

You'll get a quadratic in x, solve as you would

rugged nexus
#

Yes I did that but

#

What’s the answer you’re getting tho

#

Because I’m getting an answer that has a simple i

#

What does that mean?

gray isle
#

can you show your work and solution

sudden crypt
#

always solving for one variable and plugging in smh, that's how you get complex solutions on accident. The way to solve these kinds of questions is to evaluate the expression without knowing what x and y are on their own

#

oh nvm I overlooked the = 0 in the second equation

rugged nexus
#

Is this correct ?

ornate grove
#

In terms of the
,
,
coordinates of a fixed space frame {s}, the frame {a} has its
-axis pointing in the direction and its
-axis pointing in the direction , and the frame {b} has its
-axis pointing in the direction and its
-axis pointing in the direction . Draw the {s}, {a}, and {b} frames, similar to examples in the book and videos (e.g., Figure 3.7 in the book), for easy reference in this question and later questions.

Write the rotation matrix . All elements of this matrix should be integers.

#

Could you please explain how problems solve 🥺

alpine sable
#

Anyone have time to explain a somewhat complex problem regarding possion distributions ?

strong carbon
#

Does (f - g)(3x) equal to 9x^2 - 3x if (f - g)(x) = x^2 - x ? Are there any tricks or can we just replace like that

unreal valley
#

15 cm and 4 mm in mm is 154 mm right?

#

PLEASE TELL I HAVE TO SUBMIT THIS IN 30 MINS

#

10 more left plssss tell

gloomy lintel
#

When it’s f(3x), it’s a stretch horizontally of scale factor 1/3

unreal valley
strong carbon
#

Busy, quit spamming please

unreal valley
#

ohk

#

sorry

strong carbon
#

I don't get this part

gloomy lintel
#

Wait never mind I got confused lulll,

#

F(3x) means a stretch horizontally scale factor 1/3

#

Is what I was trying to say

#

But yes it’s still subbing in

#

3x

#

For x

strong carbon
#

So how do we find (f - g)(3x) if (f - g)(x) is given

gloomy lintel
#

Sub in 3x whenever you see an x

#

So (3x)^2 -3x

strong carbon
#

Oh so it 9x^2 -3x

#

Thank you

alpine sable
unreal valley
alpine sable
unreal valley
#

idk

alpine sable
#

then how did you get this number

unreal valley
#

f i remember

#

its 1540

alpine sable
#

why would it be 1540?

unreal valley
#

idk

alpine sable
#

then how did you get this number

unreal valley
#

i multiplied it

alpine sable
#

why

unreal valley
#

....

alpine sable
#

just look up in your notes or book

#

what is cm

unreal valley
#

centimetre

alpine sable
#

yeah but how many milimeters is 1 centimeter?

#

check your notes

#

or book

unreal valley
#

10

alpine sable
#

yeah

#

so how many milimeters are in, for example, 5 centimeters?

unreal valley
#

50

alpine sable
#

yeah so how many milimeters in 15 cm and 4 milimeters?

unreal valley
#

154

alpine sable
#

why?

unreal valley
#

15 cm = 150 mm + 4mm = 154 mm

alpine sable
#

yeah exactly

#

see, you can do it on your own

unreal valley
#

phew thanks

alpine sable
#

no need to spam

unreal valley
#

okk

#

thanks

alpine sable
#

next time I will ban you if you spam

unreal valley
#

ok sorry

alpine sable
#

all good

alpine sable
#

You really think a 'Role that does nothing' really wouldn't do anything?

strong carbon
#

@gloomy lintel sorry for bothering again but can we find the value of f(6) by writing x = 2

if f(3x) = 9x² -x is given?

#

Does it work that way?

alpine sable
#

ye

gloomy lintel
#

Yes that’s fine

#

Wait

alpine sable
#

ye its fine

#

move forward sir

gloomy lintel
#

Ye Lol I was getting myself into a trap then lull

alpine sable
#

same

#

probably same trap

tranquil yoke
#

Hi I had a question like dis and it said find x it was on MN and it had radical numbers behind x or something idk how to really explain it :/

#

I'm trying to give an example but I don't really remember how it was written

limpid spade
#

Thales theoem?

tranquil yoke
#

This is the midpoint theorem

limpid spade
#

does this help

tranquil yoke
#

Yes kinda but the question had find x and x was on MN but there was a radical number behind √.. x something like this

#

If u can't help it's ok my friend can help but he is sleeping rn ;-;

sterile beacon
#

help please 😦

cobalt coyote
#

Could anybody please explain how the derivation of those christoffel symbols came I'm some confused while deriving those for polar coordinates

cinder lily
sterile beacon
#

yes, I found it

red phoenix
#

Plug in the metric and you're good to go

cinder lily
alpine sable
#

When working with Rieman sum in Definite intergrals, is dx always dx = (b-a)/h or can the formula change?

red phoenix
#

the way things are specified, I cannot think of any other way to write dx.

jagged raptor
#

thats what Δx is

alpine sable
#

Okay

#

I got another question

#

Can you use the fundamental theorem of calculus to solve most intergral problems? Or does it only work on accumulation functions?

quaint pond
#

hey, could someone help me understand the solution to this problem:

noble sinew
#

what about it

quaint pond
#

i just dont know

#

how to solve it

#

i know the answer

noble sinew
#

start with figuring out what j's have a non zero probability

quaint pond
#

but i dont understand it

quaint pond
#

dont they all have non zero probability?

noble sinew
#

how would I get 1 correct?

#

is that possible

quaint pond
#

well

#

no'

#

yeah because

#

but

#

say i have cards abcd

#

and i guess a is green and b is green

#

if only 1 of my guesses is right

#

say a is green

#

then isnt it possible?

noble sinew
#

read the text again, you will then be saying c,d is not green

#

one of those will indeed not be not green

quaint pond
#

oh yes

#

so then yeah 1 is not possible

noble sinew
#

so what j's are possible

quaint pond
#

well 0

#

2

#

4

#

i guess if 1 is not possible

noble sinew
#

indeed

quaint pond
#

then 3 isnt too

#

okay so i know

#

there are

#

4! ways to arrange the cards, right?

#

@noble sinew

noble sinew
#

sure if you count the same coloured ones as distinct

#

but can just do, what is the probability of guessing 1st one correctly? That is 2/4. What is probability of guessing 2nd one correct. That is 1/3. So P(J=0)=P(J=4)=2/4 * 1/3=1/6

quaint pond
#

why is the second one 1/3?

noble sinew
#

Say you have two black cards and two red cards. If you guess 1st one correctly (black) there is only 1 black left and 3 cards in total

quaint pond
#

okay

#

i think i got it

#

for 0,4

#

but for 2

#

using the same logic

#

that would be: 2/4*2/3 ?

noble sinew
#

1 = P(J=0) + P(J=2) + P(J=4) is one way. Otherwise P(J=2)=2/4 * 2/3 * 2 (2 ways to arrange it)

quaint pond
#

wdym

#

2 ways

#

to arrange it

noble sinew
#

I can get either get 1st correct and 2nd wrong or 1st wrong and 2nd correct

#

But you also know sum of probability of all possible outcomes must be equal to 1, which is why you know 1 = P(J=0) + P(J=2) + P(J=4)

quaint pond
#

yeah makes sense now

#

thanks

cobalt coyote
#

Anybody please help me

#

I finally got this answer

#

How to find modulo of theta vector in polar coordinates

alpine sable
#

hi
I am working really hard to score well. I used to study from 5 pm to 1pm (recently learnt that its gonna have long term effects and stopped).Yet I am not able to always score well .My marks are very inconsistent and are unacceptable imo .Can anyone please suggest any strategies or habits that i shall develop in order to top or score extremely well (out of experience)?

#

would be really helpful and would make a world of difference

#

@alpine sable what are you trying to score on tho, plus I dont think this is the place for your question

alpine sable
#

I mean you can still ask tho @alpine sable

#

what book is this 👀

keen jasper
#

discrete mathematics

alpine sable
#

oh okay

#

I was trying to solve a relativeistic dynamic problem and I notice that something might be wrong with my conception of relativistic momentum
I have a particle with resting mass m that is moving at a certain speed u and bumping into antoher particle stationary and with the same mass. They are supposed to get together as a single body and I'm asked to find the final resting mass
now conservation of momentum gives me that the final momentum should be $m\gamma(u)u$ but how do I find the velocity the body is moving after the bump? Do i need to use conservation of energy too?

ocean sealBOT
#

Stephen

alpine sable
#

The physics discord is a better place to find an answer

lusty hull
#
Let there be a group of n men where every man has one hat. The hats are redistributed and every man gets a random hat back. What is the expected number of men that get their original hat back?

My approach is

E[n]= expected number of people that get their hats back out of n men 
E[n]=P(1st guy gets his hat back)(1+E[n-1]) + ((n-1)/n)(E[n-1])
E[n]=1/n+E[n-1]
But this gives wrong answer, where am I going wrong here in this recurrence?
noble sinew
#

should be very simple by just using that expectation is linear

oak chasm
#

@lusty hull Well, take n = 2.

#

E[1] = 1

lusty hull
oak chasm
#

E[2] = 0.5(1 + E[1]) + (1/2)E[1] = 0.5(2) + (1/2)1 = 1 + 1/2 = 3/2.

#

But this isn't the expected number of people with 2 people.

#

Either both get their hats or none do.

#

So, the expected number of people is 1.

lusty hull
#

Yea makes sense, actually I know that my answer is wrong, but I am not sure what the correct recurrence would be

lusty hull
oak chasm
#

OK, so you have the last expected number.

#

You add one more person.

#

Let's see.

noble sinew
#

why tho - its legit just n * 1/n=1 using that fact

#

why make it more complicated

oak chasm
#

OK, let's try 3.

lusty hull
oak chasm
#

(1, 2, 3), (1, 3, 2), (2, 1, 3), (2, 3, 1), (3, 1, 2), (3, 2, 1)

#

(3 + 1 + 1 + 0 + 0 + 1)/6 = 1

alpine sable
#

hi

lusty hull
#

I think I found my mistake

#

I am unknowingly making the assumption that each person receives a random hat one by one

alpine sable
#

hi

lusty hull
#

So this would mean that the probability of each person getting the correct hat is no longer 1/n

#

But in reality it is

lusty hull
#

So in my original solution if I just treat 1/n constant rather than a function of n, then I believe I would get the same answer

dense blaze
#

,tex $(p \ \vee \sim q) \wedge (p \vee q)$

ocean sealBOT
#

sevenseas

dense blaze
#

can i ask if there's any way to simplify this, to eventually equate it to p?
this is under logic equivalence

#

,tex the original proving qn was
$\sim (\sim p \wedge q) \wedge (p \vee q) \equiv p$

ocean sealBOT
#

sevenseas

dense blaze
#

but i simplified it using De Morgan's

regal zinc
#

pls help

oak chasm
#

@regal zinc Please don't post to multiple channels or when a question is still open. See the rules at #❓how-to-get-help.

dense blaze
regal zinc
#

sorry

dense blaze
#

its okay

regal zinc
#

so will u help me pls

oak chasm
#

@regal zinc You have to find a channel that's not busy. Check whether the last messages say they're done or whether the last timestamp next to chat was more than 30 minutes ago.

Looks like #help-9 is open.

#

@dense blaze

ocean sealBOT
#

Chai T. Rex

light magnet
#

Hi im not sure if this is really related but lets say i have this uncompleted morse code sequence x.xx...x.xxx..-xx-.xxxx.-.-xxx.-.x..x.xxxx..x.xxx.-.-.xx-.-xxx..-.xx.x.x.--x.xxx. Im supposed to fill in the X's either a dot or a line, can anyone tell me how many possible combinations are there? and how exactly did they get to that number?

oak chasm
#

@light magnet Are there two possibilities for each x?

light magnet
#

yes

oak chasm
#

OK, so let's take two xs.

#

How many possibilities are there for that?

light magnet
#

4

oak chasm
#

List them off.

#

Right.

#

OK, let's take three xs.

#

How many possibilities are there for that?

light magnet
#

quite a lot lol

oak chasm
#

Well, list them off.

#
...
..-
.-.
.--
``` What else?
light magnet
#
---
--.
-..
-.-
...
..-
.--
.-.
oak chasm
#

OK, now there's a pattern here.

light magnet
#

yea i see

#

2^number of xs

oak chasm
#

Right.

light magnet
#

thanks

oak chasm
#

No problem.

dense blaze
# ocean seal **Chai T. Rex**

@oak chasm i have issues with the sign
i only learn to use distributive law for p Λ (q V r) ≡ (p Λ q) V (pΛr). Hence, im confuse when theres conflicting sign for
(p Λ p) V (p Λ q) V (p Λ ~q) V (~q Λ q)

#

i have bolded the signs im confused with

oak chasm
#

You have (a S b) T (c S d)

#

Where S and T are both and or or.

dense blaze
#

yeah

oak chasm
#

(a T c) S (a T d) S (b T c) S (b T d)

#

See how the T was outside the parentheses to start with?

#

Now it's inside.

#

And the S was inside the parentheses to start with.

#

Now it's outside.

#

This is like basic algebra.

dense blaze
#

Yeahh

oak chasm
#

(a + b) · (c + d)
(a · b) + (a · d) + (b · c) + (b · d)

#

Do you still have a question?

dense blaze
# ocean seal **Chai T. Rex**

yeap i finally understand this step thanks sm, but im unsure how the second step (p Λ q) V (p Λ ~q) is simplified to p?

oak chasm
#

Well, let's say q is true.

#

The first one is the only one that can be true.

#

It's true when p is also true.

#

Let's say q is false.

#

The second one is the only one that can be true.

#

It's true when p is also true.

#

So, in both cases for q, the part that can be true is true when p is true.

#

So, regardless of what q is, the whole thing is true when p is true.

#

So, it's equivalent to p.

dense blaze
#

Oh right yeahh I get what you mean

#

Thank you!

oak chasm
#

You're welcome.

#

@dense blaze Oh, wait.

#

Distributive property.

ocean sealBOT
#

Chai T. Rex

candid thistle
#

Question: For a right triangle, the diameter of the circumcircle that is drawn around it is just the hypotenuse, right?

oak chasm
#

That's how to do the algebra.

candid thistle
oak chasm
#

Those are boolean algebra for logic.

candid thistle
#

Ahh

#

If you go into light mode you can't even see TeXit's username

dense blaze
oak chasm
#

It doesn't, but this is how you show it algebraically.

candid thistle
#

Also using the formula where the radius of the incircle times the semiperimeter = area. We can find the radius of the incircle, right?

oak chasm
#

Like without my long explanation, you can just say distributive property.

#

@candid thistle Yes, the hypotenuse is the diameter.

candid thistle
#

Why does math have to have extremely confusing and difficult signs for basic elementary school stuff?

candid thistle
oak chasm
#

No problem.

dense blaze
# oak chasm Well, let's say q is true.

ahh okay, is the general approach of logic proving qn is to try to simplify as much as possible with the rules, and then try to deduce/simplify further like what you did here when it no longer fits any rule

#

sorry im q new to this topic, so quite noob

oak chasm
#

Yeah, it's easier to justify if you can point to a rule.

#

So that's usually the way to go.

#

For very complex stuff, you can use a truth table.

dense blaze
#

right thanks again!

oak chasm
#

You're welcome.

oak chasm
candid thistle
#

Okay

unique latch
#

Man

#

U guys do hard stuff

#

I am starting geometry next year

#

Like when school starts

glass lichen
#

I mean.. it's a server for most branches

#

So it's expected there to be things above your level

oak chasm
#

Has video lectures and practice problems.

dense blaze
#

@oak chasm wait i got another qn does Λ or V take precedence, like for example the "operator" in each bracket may be different, and in algebra, - is above +, so like (a-b)(a+b) we take the minus

oak chasm
#

Well, with 1s and 0s for true and false, you have multiplication is and.

#

And addition is or.

#

So, and goes first.

#

And:
0 · 0 = 0
0 · 1 = 0
1 · 0 = 0
1 · 1 = 1

Or:
0 + 0 = 0
0 + 1 = 1
1 + 0 = 1
1 + 1 = 1

#

I always put parentheses around the first thing I want to do, though.

#

To avoid confusion.

dense blaze
#

ohh that makes sense yeah i didnt think of it as this way, this is much clearer

#

icic yup 👍

granite narwhal
#

can anyone help: identify the equilibrium values. Which are stable and which are unstable? dy/dx=y^2-2y

unique latch
oak chasm
#

It's like where you're listening to your teacher teach.

unique latch
#

Oh

#

A lesson

#

Basically

oak chasm
#

Right.

#

@desert moon Sorry, channel is busy.

meager leaf
#

btw a question I made

#

i did it by this way

vale wigeon
#

@meager leaf wym by "circle size"?

meager leaf
vale wigeon
#

well then there is no properly stated question at all

#

do you mean the radius is 5, or that the diameter is 5, or that the area is 5?

meager leaf
#

the area is 5

vale wigeon
#

so... you have two pieces cut out of it, one whose area is 3/3 (aka 1) and another whose area is 12/8 (aka 3/2)

meager leaf
#

that be 5.5 then

vale wigeon
#

and you are asking for the area of what's left?

meager leaf
#

yes

#

!

vale wigeon
#

then it's neither 2 nor 5.5

#

it's 2.5

granite narwhal
#

ok nvm about taht one

#

but how to do this implicitly differentiate y^2-2y

#

so d/dx(y^2-2y)

meager leaf
#

@vale wigeon what question can it be

#

to make my method doing it right?

#

or u don't know that

vale wigeon
#

i have precious little idea what you're doing in the first place

#

you're doing some arithmetic, and it seems not only overcomplicated to hell and back, but also looks like it has nothing to do with anything

#

it... sounds like you wanted to calculate 12/8 - 3/3 but it didn't occur to you at any point to reduce either fraction before doing the subtraction

dense blaze
bitter sage
#

is this true?

onyx pawn
#

does it hold for f(x) = x^2 ?

bitter sage
#

x^2?

#

idk what they mean by x0

onyx pawn
#

It's just a variable, could be any value in the domain

bitter sage
#

but is it x times 0?

onyx pawn
#

no

#

it's just a symbol for a variable

bitter sage
#

ok

#

so x^2\

#

critical point is (0,0)

#

so its f''(0) = 0?

onyx pawn
#

Yeah but f''(0) = 2

rugged tree
# bitter sage

False. The critical point is when f'(x0)=0 not f''(x0)

bitter sage
#

ok that makes sens

#

thanks

onyx pawn
#

you're welcome

bitter sage
#

for this question

#

shouldnt it be that f''(c) = 0?

onyx pawn
#

yeah that looks like an error to me 🙂

meager leaf
#

@vale wigeon i did a mistake

#

i should have add the 2 fractions and minues the 5

#

not minus the 2 fractions and minues the 5

#

my answer is now

#

-2.5

rugged tree
meager leaf
meager leaf
#

5 is the total of the circle

rugged tree
# meager leaf 60/24 was the given number

I am asking why are you subtracting 5 when the result is going to be negative? The proper way is to subtract 60/24 from 5, since 5 is the area of the entire circle, right?

meager leaf
#

yes

rugged tree
rugged tree
meager leaf
#

ok thx

#

u fixed a mistake of mine

pearl solar
#

Help