#help-0

1 messages · Page 730 of 1

tidal solar
#

WHAT?!?! there's a proof for 2+2?

alpine sable
#

Here we go

paper oar
#

Quantitative

stable grail
#

a 2,-3 b 6,7 C - 8,5 find all sides <@&286206848099549185>

fallow jasper
alpine sable
stable grail
#

PLZ help

#

<@&286206848099549185>

alpine sable
#

how to solve this

#

over a Sphere with radius R

#

the easiest way

tawdry saffron
#

how to calculate the surface area of a circle only knowing the length of 2 cords and in between the 2 cords and that the 2 cords are parallel

#

don't know if they are opposite of the centre or not, one cord is 8cm, other is 12cm and the distance between them is 1

red phoenix
#

Then use the refraction equation for theta 2

#

.

crisp grove
alpine sable
tawdry saffron
#

I guess they are on the same side since they differ 4 cms in length but only 1 cm between them

red phoenix
#

I meant 90-theta 1 + phi = 90

#

Phi = theta 1

tawdry saffron
#

In a circle [AB] and [CD] are two parallel chords with lengths 8 and 12. The distance between AB and CD is 1. What is the area of ​​that circle? @crisp grove this is all I got

#

but I don't really know the properties of chords in a circle

#

so idk how to solve this

#

I tried with triangles but didn't work out

alpine sable
red phoenix
#

Correct this is wrong

#

I saw the normal as orange instead of the gray one

alpine sable
#

Yup the normal is grey, I'm terrible at labeling

red phoenix
#

I did find something earlier tho

alpine sable
#

Logically there is enough there for a solution, but finding it.....

crisp grove
tawdry saffron
red phoenix
#

If you continue the initial orange line down, you can find another phi by alternate angles, I mingled this into something . Also if you extend the gray normal to intersect with the other one , I also found something

#

But I don’t have any paper around to work on this rn 😦

crisp grove
tawdry saffron
#

appearantly it was possible with triangles

crisp grove
#

it is

#

this is the rough idea

#

@tawdry saffron

tawdry saffron
#

thank you!

red phoenix
dreamy crow
#

is this open for questions?

alpine sable
#

Eldritch nightmare unlocked

blazing sage
#

Hi guys im new here. Soo

winter hull
#

Is this channel free for a quick question?

alpine sable
winter hull
#

Can someone please help me why (sin 2^24 * 56 degrees)/(2^24 * sin 56 degrees) = 1/2^24

blazing sage
winter hull
#

= 1/2^24

#

why

blazing sage
blazing sage
# blazing sage

This is my solution. I just wanna double confirm if its correct or not.🙂

#

Its on laplace

crude hazel
#

how can I solve for x in sin(x) * cos(x) - sin(x) + cos(x) - 1 = 0

blazing sage
noble sinew
#

factor then use zero-product property

crude hazel
blazing sage
#

Anyone can help with my solution on laplace?

#

^^ doc.1

vale wigeon
crisp grove
blazing sage
#

Here it is the question. And my solution

crisp grove
#

looks ok to me

crude hazel
#

what do I do to solve (cosx)^3 + (sinx)^3 = 0

#

would I factor, use an identity, or etc...

crisp grove
#

tan³(x)=-1

crude hazel
#

not sure where that came from, could you show me what u did

crisp grove
#

divide both side by cos³(x)

#

and rearrange

crude hazel
#

I don't think you can cancel cos^3(x) in cos^3(x) + sin^3(x)

blazing sage
#

Bro heres my friend solution. Its abit different. So i wanna double check here. See whose correct

crude hazel
#

they are seperate terms

crisp grove
#

@crude hazel non zero

crude hazel
blazing sage
#

@crisp grove u can see my friend ans above. Thanks man!

crisp grove
#

your friend is correct here

dreamy crow
#

is this correct?

crisp grove
dreamy crow
#

oh im sry i didnt know this channel was taken

#

my bad

blazing sage
blazing sage
crude hazel
#

you can't cancel cos^3(x) so where did you get tan^3(x)

crisp grove
crisp grove
blazing sage
crude hazel
crisp grove
unique tapir
#

Hello

crude hazel
# crisp grove

which identity is that, I don't think I learned this yet aaaaa

unique tapir
#

how do I find the equivalent fraction?

#

Like for the first one 2/4 do I times it by 2

#

4/8?

vale wigeon
#

that's one way to do it, but not the only way

#

you say "the" equivalent fraction as if each fraction has one and only one of those...

unique tapir
#

Oh

vale wigeon
#

also, going from $\frac{2}{4}$ to $\frac{2 \times 2}{4 \times 2}$ is not ``timesing it by 2''; if anything, you should specify that you're multiplying \textbf{the top and the bottom} by 2, so as not to make people think you're talking about $\frac{2}{4} \times 2$

ocean sealBOT
alpine sable
#

U multiply it by an even number @unique tapir

vale wigeon
#

don't post misleading info, justak_.

unique tapir
#

So I can’t

vale wigeon
#

it doesn't have to be even.

unique tapir
#

.

vale wigeon
#

and machen, don't put words in my mouth.

#

all i did was criticize your terminology.

unique tapir
#

what

#

uhhh

vale wigeon
#

i pointed out the mistake you made with your word choice.

unique tapir
#

oh

#

My grammar sorry

vale wigeon
#

and i even told you "that's one way to do it", which means that what you did is correct. multiplying the top and bottom by 2 does give you a fraction equivalent to what you started with.

#

it's not the only way to generate equaivalent fractions though.

unique tapir
#

oh so it works with like 4

vale wigeon
#

if anything, you can multiply the top and bottom by any number, so long as you multiply by the same number on both.

unique tapir
#

oh

vale wigeon
#

for example, you could go from $\frac{2}{4}$ to $\frac{2 \times 42069}{4 \times 42069}$

unique tapir
#

I can use any number

ocean sealBOT
unique tapir
#

OHHH

#

TY

#

ANN

#

I GET IT

#

ty

crude hazel
#

what trig identity is sin(x) + cos(x) = tan(x) + 1

vale wigeon
#

it's not a trig identity

crude hazel
vale wigeon
#

it is definitely not true lmao

#

just take x = pi/4

#

you have sqrt(2) on the left and 2 on the right

quartz oxide
#

Did you misread something?

vale wigeon
#

did you want to treat it as an equation and solve it for x?

tranquil parcel
vale wigeon
#

pretty enormous misread then innit

#

@crude hazel do you have a screenshot or something

tranquil parcel
vale wigeon
#

i have looked at it and don't feel like involving myself in it

tranquil parcel
#

Lmao

#

Why not

vale wigeon
#

i don't have enough time or energy for riemann sum fuckery

tranquil parcel
#

Yea fair enough

crude hazel
#

strange

vale wigeon
#

did it say rewrite or did it say divide both sides by cos(x)?

#

because it's very likely the intended move way to divide both sides by cos(x), as that takes you from sin(x)+cos(x)=0 to tan(x)+1**=0**

crisp grove
quartz oxide
#

And the denominator does not matter (unless it is 0) since the whole fraction is 0

glacial tiger
#

need some help lol

crude hazel
glacial tiger
#

yes

stark trail
glacial tiger
#

how do i prove that

stark trail
#

PRQ and SRT are vertical angles

glacial tiger
#

ok

#

so thats an angle

stark trail
#

PR/TR=QS/SR shows that the two pairs of corresponding sides are similar

stark trail
glacial tiger
#

so

#

SAS?

stark trail
#

Yes

glacial tiger
#

ok

#

after i prove that

#

then

#

whats the reason why they are parallel

#

if they are equal

glacial tiger
stark trail
#

Lemme think :v

stark trail
#

What I do is

#

I draw a new line that I assume is parralel to PQ and goes through R

#

Then compare both lines using this new line that I just made

#

By looking at the angles

glacial tiger
#

but like

#

whats the reason

#

lol

stark trail
# glacial tiger ?

I kinda forgot what’s the relation of the angles called but I’m sure that the fact <PQS = <TSQ proves this a triangle

glacial tiger
#

uhh

stark trail
#

Aternate interior angles

#

@glacial tiger

glacial tiger
#

ah yes

stark trail
#

When alternate interior angkes are equal,then both lines are parallel

glacial tiger
#

yess

#

ty

stark trail
#

Sorry for not responsive

glacial tiger
#

no ur fine

alpine sable
#

how do i solve the equation

crisp grove
#

$cos(x)sin(y)=\left( sin(x+y)-sin(x-y)\right) /2$

ocean sealBOT
#

Ryuzaki

alpine sable
#

what

gray isle
#

look up product to sum identities

alpine sable
#

okay

dapper tendon
#

n^1000000000/2^n=? ( n tends to infinity )

#

how do i solve this?

wild marten
clever locust
#

What a monstrosity of a limit lol

#

Like, in what context would you ever care about $\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{n^{1000000000}}{2^n}$?

ocean sealBOT
#

Lorago

wild marten
clever locust
#

Yeah, looks like it

wild talon
#

what does this expression mean?

#

all values of N are greater or equal to 0?

#

so all values of N are positive?

#

or does it mean that the series of numbers is increasing

#

or none of those xd

clever locust
#

It's a quantifier

#

So what it's saying is "for all n greater than or equal to n_0"

#

So usually you use it to say that something is true for all n that are greater than or equal to some n_0 (in this specific case)

#

If I were to write something like

$$\forall n \geq 0 : \sqrt{n} \geq 0$$

what I would mean, in words, would be:

"For all $n$ that are greater than or equal to $0$, it is true that the square root of $n$ is greater than or equal to $0$."

ocean sealBOT
#

Lorago

clever locust
#

Does that make sense @wild talon ?

#

In your case, n_0 is some fixed number

wild talon
#

wait what do i assume n nought to be if it isnt specified

clever locust
#

If it isn't specified, then you simply don't know what it is

#

Just that you can call it n_0

wild talon
#

ah ok

#

makes sense

#

thanks 👍

clever locust
#

No problem, if you're still confused, feel free to ask more

clever locust
#

It boils down to using L'Hôpital's rule 1000000000 times

#

It's actually a quite simple solution, but there are other solutions that are much better lol

#

If you're still interested, I can share it, but you haven't responded to anything so I'm guessing you just left it at that

alpine sable
#

looking at the denominator

#

|p-q|

#

distance of two points in R^3

#

represented in spherical coordinates is what i want

#

but this is assuming same polar angle from both points p and q?

ornate peak
#

I'm not getting this one, pls can anyone help me

alpine sable
#

<@&286206848099549185>

#

i have an idea if you could ping me i'd present you my answer and wait for an approval lol

#

ping me then

alpine sable
#

How do I determine where this cosine function = 0? - https://imgur.com/a/jlwrpei. I'm a bit confused looking at this on what the easiest way to determine where 2cos(2x) = 0. First I would divide both sides by 2 but then what number do I plug in as the x? I know that a standard cosine function is equal to 0 with either pi/2 or -pi/2. I'm not sure if there's something I can do with that information.

austere bridge
ocean sealBOT
#

cgodfrey

alpine sable
#

Ah, it was that simple.

#

Thanks.

austere bridge
#

np!

swift peak
#

how is (x1/2)^2 + (x2/2)^2 + (x3/2)^2 = x3^2?

#

what happened to 1/2?

vale wigeon
#

that's chi, not x

swift peak
#

ye

vale wigeon
#

chi-squared variable with three degrees of freedom

swift peak
#

but what happened to 1/2?

vale wigeon
#

what 1/2?

swift peak
#

the one with the normal rvs

vale wigeon
#

you gave no info about the distribution of X_1, X_2 and X_3. are they N(0,4)?

swift peak
#

its mean = 0 and sd = 2

#

is that it?

vale wigeon
#

aha

#

so X_k/2 are all standard normal

#

so the sum of their squares is chi-square

swift peak
#

this is confusing

#

i thought snd was with standard dev = 1

alpine sable
#

hi all

#

how could i set up this integral

alpine sable
#

lmao :/

alpine sable
crisp grove
alpine sable
#

right but im a bit confused :/

crisp grove
#

$\int_0^1 \int_0^1 f(x,y) dx dy$

ocean sealBOT
#

Ryuzaki

alpine sable
#

so

#

why from 0 1

solar cradle
#

You're calculating the probability

alpine sable
#

and not like 2 to swrt 3

crisp grove
#

sub f(x,y)=⅓xy

alpine sable
#

ah ok i got 1/12

#

tysm

#

i kept putting sqwrt 3

#

and 2

#

for the inner one

#

so i kept getting it wrong

crisp grove
#

👍

alpine sable
#

can i ask u one more question

#

how could i set up this integral

crisp grove
#

cylindrical coordinate

solar cradle
#

Here's a short source on calculating surface area

#

note the notation $f_{x} = \frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{x}}$

ocean sealBOT
#

Billy Clintorus

astral patrol
#

hey guys, I don't understand how (s+3) was cancelled

vague coral
#

(s+3-3)/(s+3)² = (s+3)/(s+3)² - 3/(s+3)²

astral patrol
#

because it was originally s/(s+3)^2

vague coral
#

because +3 - 3 = 0

#

we basically did nothing

alpine sable
#

Does anybody know how this is true?

#

I feel like it's simple but I really can't think today.

astral patrol
vague coral
alpine sable
#

I guess if I do 3x^2 + 2x = -1. Divide by the constants. There's no x^2 + x that'll equal the result?

vague coral
#

oh, then it's simple, since g'(x) has no real solution, nothing can cancel it

#

you are overthinking it

alpine sable
#

I don't get what you mean exactly.

vague coral
#

Ok, I'll ask you, you know what is the point of finding the solution of an equation like this : ax²+bx+c=0 ? right ?

alpine sable
#

The point? Erm...

#

To solve for x?

vague coral
#

to solve for x such as the values of x cancel out ax² + bx + c

#

and since 3x² +2x + 1 = 0 has no real solution, that means nothing can cancel out 3x²+2x+1

#

that's why g' is never equal to 0

#

you can graph it, you will see

alpine sable
#

i think i get it...

vague coral
#

it's really simple, you are just overthinking it

alpine sable
#

im going to take a nap and then relook at it. thanks :p

#

you're right

vague coral
#

ok take your time

alpine sable
#

👋

zenith dawn
#

Wassup, what is a mathematical operation to gradually turn a square wave into a sine wave?

#

Hopefully that makes sense to someone

#

Pretty much something like this, by a configurable amount

zenith dawn
#

you'll have to explain in english as I have no idea what that means

limpid spade
#

exactly

#

Fourier series

#

You have Sum x=1 to inf sinx

#

nvm 5hat won't turn to a square

#

dunno what the capital pi represents

glass lichen
#

product, however I think that's just regular pi fucked up

limpid spade
#

lol

glass lichen
#

$f(n)=\sum_{i=1}^n \frac{\sin((2i-1)x)}{2i-1}$ will give a function of x

#

as n goes to infinity you get a more and more square wave

ocean sealBOT
zenith dawn
#

I'm not a maths expert so I don't really know what any of this means. Perhaps I didn't mean "operation", and I was using the sine wave as an example. Basically I need to do what I said for each value for x.

glass lichen
#

you didnt say anything to an individual x

#

you just asked how to make a wave square

#

which was answered

limpid spade
#

also

#

,w plot floor((sin(x))

#

nvm

zenith dawn
celest anvil
#

pls thx

glass lichen
celest anvil
#

dont know how to solve

glass lichen
#

well it tells you how to

glass lichen
#

chegg sully

celest anvil
#

i dont have chegg

limpid spade
#

it's from chegg

celest anvil
#

no the answer is on chegg

#

you need to sign up to see it

glass lichen
#

yeah and you shouldnt use chegg to begin with

carmine lion
#

hmm

#

how to solve this

#

$\sin^2{x}=\sin{2x}$

ocean sealBOT
carmine lion
#

apart from x=0

lofty gorge
#

sin(2x)=2sin(x)cos(x), and now you have a common factor.

carmine lion
#

oh yea

#

sorry

#

didnt see that

carmine lion
#

$\frac{\sin{2x}}{2}> \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\sin^2{x}$

ocean sealBOT
carmine lion
#

because the maximum of sin function is 1

#

so i wanna find where both of them are one

lofty gorge
#

Why? You would want to find where the two sides are equal, to find boundary points.

carmine lion
#

oh yea

#

so i do the same?

lofty gorge
#

So you would want to solve with those coefficients, which isn't harder (and makes the solution nicer)

#

yes

carmine lion
#

ok

#

ty for helping

alpine sable
#

hi all why is this incorrect

median tendon
alpine sable
#

im not entirely sure how to set it up but the first one was from -9 to 9

#

then -sqrt(9-x^2 ) to positive sqrt(9-x^2)

#

and then

#

integrate over the f(x,y)

median tendon
#

but basically this is that u want to find the surface area of

#

$x^2+y^2=z^2$

ocean sealBOT
#

_Youssef_

median tendon
#

the perimiter of a circle is 2 pi r

#

that is the surface area of the function you want at one instance of the z value

#

does that make sense?

alpine sable
#

somewhat

#

i guess my question is how do i set up the integral exactly in this case

median tendon
#

ok, so pretty much its integrate the perimeter equation from z=0 to 9

#

and you know that the radius of a circle in this case is z, right?

alpine sable
#

yeah

placid zinc
#

Take a quick look through your book/internet, there is a "surface area by integration" formula

median tendon
#

are u still confused on how to proceed?

alpine sable
#

yh im not that good at setting up the integrals :/

median tendon
#

integrate 2 * pi * z from 0 to 9

#

integration is pretty much the same as addition over an infinitely small steps between two intervals

#

if u think about the graph at the top, you have infinite amount of circle perimters that you want to add up

#

since the graph is made up of infinite amount of circles that are insreasing in raduis

alpine sable
#

so its not a double integral then?

median tendon
#

not with this setup

#

but u could definitely do it in the x y coordinates and have two integrals

alpine sable
#

i get 81pi

#

but thats not right ;/

median tendon
#

why do u think thats not right?

alpine sable
#

i submitted it and it marked it wrong 😛

median tendon
#

huh

#

im sorry lmao

alpine sable
#

its ok

median tendon
alpine sable
#

the integral gave me 81pi

#

i tested it in symbolab also to make sure i was right

#

heres the link

median tendon
#

i know, that method was wrong for some reason, not sure why though

alpine sable
#

its not a test its homework, u have 10 submissions

#

and i cant enter that bc it wants exact numbers, not decimals

#

so like fractions or ints

median tendon
#

ok just post question again and ping the helpers i think

alpine sable
#

thank u so much though for ur help

alpine sable
placid zinc
#

You don't seem to be aware of the formula you're expected to use

glass lichen
#

dont ping random users, and what have you tried?

hasty nacelle
glass lichen
#

ok

alpine sable
#

this?

median tendon
#

@alpine sable

median tendon
# median tendon idk

if u use those formulas, you end up with the same answer as the google tool in the pic I'm replying to without the r term in the brackets (the r term in the brackets takes into account the closed end of the cone which is not what you are after I think)

alpine sable
median tendon
#

$\frac{81}{}

#

ops

#

$81\sqrt{2}*\pi$

ocean sealBOT
#

_Youssef_

alpine sable
#

ah tysmm ❤️

#

that worked

median tendon
#

np

#

im sorry if i confused u before

sterile gust
#

Pls help me find a way to do it

#

(using Fourier series)

placid zinc
#

Note that you get the left when x = pi/2

#

Is there any closed form for f(x)?

alpine sable
sterile gust
crisp grove
#

differentiate both side u get a sum of cosines, use AP sum formula for cosines

sterile gust
crisp grove
#

well then it's easier

#

bn = 1, ½, ⅓, ...

#

u just have to calculate inverse of this

sterile gust
#

How is bn=1, 1/2, 1/3,.... (Iam quiet a newbie)

crisp grove
#

f(x) = a0/ +a1 cosx + a2 cos2x + ... + b1 sinx + b2 sin2x + ...

#

compare both sides

sterile gust
#

Ok.... Thank you!

heavy spear
#

6000 dollars is invested in a bank account at an interest rate of 6 per cent per year, compounded continuously. Meanwhile, 12000 dollars is invested in a bank account at an interest rate of 5 percent compounded annually.

#

i keep getting 73.1

#

years but it says that is wrong

#

can someone help me with this

gray isle
#

what's 73.1 supposed to be.
what's the actual question

heavy spear
#

ok

#

1 sec

#

uh k

gray isle
#

<@&268886789983436800>

heavy spear
#

nice

gray isle
#

show your work

tall wing
#

o

#

is this an exam

#

or wait did the thing already get dealt with

gray isle
#

some questionable vid

tall wing
#

oh ok

heavy spear
#

i do 6000 * 1.06^x = 12000 * 1.05^x then solved for x\

#

i am on pc cant send pics

heavy spear
# tall wing o

no it is homeworkfor ap calc i dont understand why i keep getting it wrong though

wanton vortex
#

maybe the "compounded continuously" (in the first sentence) and "compounded annually" (in the second sentence) have to do with it

gray isle
#

^

heavy spear
#

oh

#

thx

#

lol completly missed that

wanton vortex
#

i did too as i was initially reading the problem

heavy spear
#

thx i got it right

#

i know i am asking a lot of question but im full on raging cause i dontt understand what im doing wrong here

rigid island
#

@heavy spear

gray isle
#

it looks like you're omitting important signs when separating and grouping terms sidd

heavy spear
#

oh ok

#

you see im dumb

#

since i learned nothing during online schooling xd

fallow karma
#

hello, can someone teach me how to do this question??

  1. A map has a scale of 4cm to 1 km. if the distance two towns is 8 km, calculate the corresponding distance on the
    map
vale wigeon
#

1 kilometer in real life corresponds to 4 cm on the map
8 kilometers in real life correspond to how many cm on the map?

#

@fallow karma do the words "map distance is proportional to real distance" ring any bells to you?

heavy spear
#

ye it is a converstion so 4cm on map/1km real life or the other way around so 8km in real world * 4cm on map / 1 km in real world so the km in real world caancel out and you get 32

#

cm

alpine sable
#

The angle of elevation from question 5 is 76 degrees and the answer for a is 14 degrees, but I’m not sure where I’m going wrong in 7b

glacial hedge
#

Is the answer all except a? because the derivatives of all of them are continuous, except for g(x) there shouldnt be a 1??? Or am I missing something very obvious???

vale wigeon
glacial hedge
vale wigeon
#

let g(x) = int[0,x] f(t) dt

#

then g(0) is forced to be 0

#

and of course g' = f

glacial hedge
#

Oh i see

#

ty

warm cipher
#

what are derivatives?

vale wigeon
#

to put it very briefly and in one sentence, the derivative measures a function's rate of change.

#

for a more complete description, take a calculus course or read an online resource like paul's online math notes.

warm cipher
#

ok ty

snow nest
#

can someone explain how to derive x^-2 using first principles?

#

everytime i do it i seem to get -2x-1/x^4

vale wigeon
#

differentiate, not derive.

#

$\frac{1}{h}\paren{\frac{1}{(x+h)^2} - \frac{1}{x^2}}$ is what you're starting with, yes?

ocean sealBOT
snow nest
#

yup

snow nest
vale wigeon
#

okay, so what do you do next?

#

do you rewrite 1/(x+h)^2 - 1/x^2 as a single fraction?

#

as in, is this what you specifically tried to do?

snow nest
#

yeah, x^2 - (x+h)^2 / x^2 * (x + h)^2

vale wigeon
#

in plaintext you need parentheses

#

(x^2 - (x+h)^2)/(x^2(x+h)^2)

#

anyway, ok

snow nest
#

wait multiply? where's the slash?

vale wigeon
#

typo

snow nest
#

ah okay

vale wigeon
#

so what you have here is $\frac{x^2 - (x+h)^2}{hx^2(x+h)^2}$

ocean sealBOT
vale wigeon
#

because let's not forget the 1/h out front

#

what did you do after this?

snow nest
#

yeah i got to here

#

then you expand the (x+h)^2 at the top, cancel the 2 x^2s

#

so i get (-2hx - h^2)/hx^2(x+h)^2

vale wigeon
#

uh huh, so far so good

#

what do you do next?

snow nest
#

cancel the h out

vale wigeon
#

mhm

snow nest
#

and i get (-2x - h )/x^2(x+h)^2

vale wigeon
#

uh huh

snow nest
#

make h zero, kind of?

vale wigeon
#

let h approach zero, yes.

snow nest
#

-2x - 1/ x^2 * x^2

vale wigeon
#

and since we've done all the necessary work to avoid division by zero, we can just set h = 0

snow nest
#

so -2x-1/x^4

vale wigeon
#

no, set h = 0, not 1.

#

why are you setting it to 1 in the numerator

#

also parentheses

snow nest
#

oh shit

#

i keep getting confused

#

because when you cancel out variables, you set the value to one

#

ahh damn it

#

i see where i was wrong

#

as in, if i had the (x - h)/h, it becomes x - 1, right?

#

and i keep forgetting to set it to 1 instead of zero

ionic jewel
snow nest
#

wait, is it wrong?

vale wigeon
#

no

#

(x-h)/h becomes a division-by-zero error upon setting h to 0

#

also yeah like, this

because when you cancel out variables, you set the value to one
is kinda flawed

snow nest
#

right, so when i cancel out h, i set it to 1, but when i'm left with h after canceling the h at the bottom, it becomes zero

vale wigeon
#

1 is what happens when you divide something by itself.

#

you don't set h to 1. at no point was that actually happening in your work.

alpine sable
snow nest
#

not in this question but say i somehow got (x-h)/h, in this case i would slash out both h's and make the top h 1

alpine sable
#

hi all how can i set up this integral

snow nest
#

anyway i figured it out so yeah, help out xoxo if you can

snow nest
#

cause i sure have no idea how to

vale wigeon
#

you cannot cancel out the h's in (x-h)/h

snow nest
#

wait what

vale wigeon
#

by your logic, 7/3 = 10

snow nest
vale wigeon
#

@alpine sable @tawdry pawn this channel is still busy sorry

vale wigeon
snow nest
#

nani

#

what

alpine sable
#

u cant cancel out a term when its being subtracted

vale wigeon
#

again

short turtle
#

cannot cancel

vale wigeon
#

$\frac{10-3}{3} \wtfeq 10 - 1$

snow nest
#

oh god tell me i haven't fucked my entire life up

ocean sealBOT
snow nest
#

oh i'm an idiot

#

wait so

#

wait

alpine sable
# alpine sable

if the channel is not busy and someone knows how to solve this pls ping me ❤️

snow nest
#

still busy sry

alpine sable
#

i meant for after hehe

snow nest
#

how do you do the bot thingy

#

it's cool

vale wigeon
#

@alpine sable you can and should move to another channel. there are 10 of them for a reason.

#

@snow nest the bot uses a markup language called LaTeX. there are some resources on it in #latex-help and #latex-testing if you want to learn more.

snow nest
#

i guess i'll check it out once i understand this

#

so when i cancel out the h at the bottom

#

i make the h's at the top 1s, right?

#

as h/h is 1

#

if h isn't by itself

tawdry pawn
#

is this channel free now

snow nest
#

yeah ig so

tawdry pawn
#

idk how to solve this question: Express log x-2 log x+3 log (x+1) - log (xsquare - 1) in single logarithm

vale wigeon
#

$\log(x) - 2 \log(x) + 3 \log(x+1) - \log(x^2 - 1)$

ocean sealBOT
vale wigeon
#

is this what you meant? @tawdry pawn

#

also you really should be using this symbol: ^ for exponents. like this: x^2

tawdry pawn
tawdry pawn
#

but the brackets are wrong

vale wigeon
#

but the brackets are wrong

#

are you going to be hellbent on NOT writing parentheses around the input of log whenever possible, or do you ACTUALLY mean i parsed your message incorrectly and this isn't the right expression?

tawdry pawn
#

log x-2 log x+3 log (x+1) - log (x^2 - 1)

vale wigeon
#

do you have a picture of the problem?

tawdry pawn
vale wigeon
#

are you going to be hellbent on NOT writing parentheses around the input of log whenever possible?

#

i don't get it

#

as far as i understand, what you have is this:

#

$\log(x) - 2 \log(x) + 3 \log(x+1) - \log(x^2 - 1)$

ocean sealBOT
vale wigeon
#

but you are sending me mixed signals as to whether or not this is what you're starting with

tawdry pawn
vale wigeon
#

do you object to me writing $\log(x)$ instead of $\log x$?

ocean sealBOT
tawdry pawn
#

yea

#

i mean no

#

don't write log (x) write log x

vale wigeon
#

yea
i mean no

#

here you go again

#

so you DO have an objection to it?

#

too bad

tawdry pawn
#

i am so confused rn

alpine sable
#

ann is saying to use parenthesis to make it clearer tldr

#

if u do log x - 1

vale wigeon
#

i'm pasking patrick_syco if he has an issue with it

alpine sable
#

that could be log (x) - 1 or log (x-1)

#

so using parenthesis clears that up

vale wigeon
#

and he can't even answer this simple yes-no question

#

which is a little disconcerting

alpine sable
#

haha iconic

vale wigeon
#

@tawdry pawn you are going to insist that i write log x instead of log(x). is that the case? Y/N

tawdry pawn
alpine sable
#

bad question

vale wigeon
#

answer my question

alpine sable
#

ambiguous

vale wigeon
#

it doesn't look ambiguous

tawdry pawn
#

i can't understand yours

alpine sable
#

oh wait nvm i read it wrong

vale wigeon
#

since patrick FINALLY provided a picture

#

but in patrick's plaintext rendition, the spacing threw me right off

#

patrick i am asking my question as clearly as possible

tawdry pawn
#

:(

vale wigeon
#

i want to understand whether or not this notation issue is going to be relevant!

tawdry pawn
vale wigeon
#

i want to understand whether or not you are okay with me putting parentheses around the x in log(x) !!!

#

and you're not telling me!!!!!

#

you're leaving me in the dark!!!!!!!!!!!

alpine sable
#

patrick say yes

#

put us all out of this

tawdry pawn
#

yes

#

you are right

vale wigeon
#

okay fine

#

i guess i'll have to just abandon my habit just this once

#

patrick, are you familiar with log laws?

#

such as $\log(xy) = \log x + \log y$

ocean sealBOT
vale wigeon
#

and $\log \frac{x}{y} = \log x - \log y$

ocean sealBOT
vale wigeon
#

and $\log(x^p) = p \log x$

ocean sealBOT
vale wigeon
#

are these familiar or foreign to you?

tawdry pawn
#

foreign

#

nvm i solved it till you tried to understand my expression

alpine sable
#

ann if u have a minute can i show u my expression for this problem bc im almost certain its right or fairly close to right

vale wigeon
#

how did you solve it if you were unfamiliar with log laws wtf

#

uncooperative much

alpine sable
#

im confused abt this bc my expression looks like this and im fairly certain its right or close to it

#

idk how to latex on here :/

ionic jewel
#

is a torus the donut shape?

alpine sable
#

close to it, do u want me to send a pic

vale wigeon
#

$\int_0^{2\pi} \int_0^\pi \int_0^{7 \sin(\varphi)} r^2 \sin(\varphi) \dd{r} \dd{\varphi} \dd{\theta}$

ocean sealBOT
alpine sable
#

it looks similar to this

vale wigeon
#

just writing out your integral in latex

alpine sable
#

oo

vale wigeon
#

great then why don't you go to google for all your math problems 😒

misty pebble
#

If 0 < a < 90 and cos a < 0.5, then which of the following is correct? A<30, A>30, A<60, A<45, A>60. How do I work this out?

tawdry pawn
#

it was a simple expression

vale wigeon
#

YOU were confusing me w/ your aversion to parentheses

tawdry pawn
#

and you could'nt understand it

vale wigeon
#

oh, i am SO sorry for paying attention to spacing.

#

i am so fucking sorry for being thrown off by log x-2 log x+3 log (x-1) making the x-2 and x+3 appear as single units

ionic jewel
#

basically find where it's equal to 1/2, and see which side (higher or lower angles) are larger

alpine sable
#

w the torus clarification

ionic jewel
#

the integral looks right, assuming r starts at 0 for toruses

alpine sable
#

yeah

#

i even put it into symbolab

#

to like

#

verify my solving was right

#

and i get the same thing there but its wrong when i submit

misty pebble
#

@sonic elk is this with unit circle? how do i find where cos(a) is larger than 0.5

alpine sable
#

OMG LMAO

#

i submitted it /3 and not /4

#

im so stupid

#

when u cant type

ionic jewel
#

,w integral from 0 to 2pi of (integral from 0 to pi of (integral from 0 to 7sin(y) of r^2 sin(y) dx)dy)dz

alpine sable
#

omg im so sorry bunny

#

i got the right answer

alpine sable
#

i didnt enter it properly

ionic jewel
#

yeah i wanted to see if Wolfram could parse it

#

well glad u got it

alpine sable
#

ahh ok

#

thank u !!!

misty pebble
#

If 0 < a < 90 and cos a < 0.5, then which of the following is correct? A<30, A>30, A<60, A<45, A>60. How do I work this out?

misty pebble
ionic jewel
#

do you know the unit circle?

misty pebble
#

Not very well

ionic jewel
#

well go look at it and find the abswer

glacial hedge
#

This is false correct?

#

because any linear transformation maps the zero vector to a zero vector

#

and zero vector is always zero???

plush wagon
#

Q.4, I solved the question but there is a confusion that why there is Y in numerator with {{sec^2 x +Y}}

#

This is answer

#

Why is there -y in numerator?

rigid smelt
#

can you show your work?

plush wagon
#

Ok wait

rigid smelt
#

derivative of xy wrt x is not xy'

plush wagon
#

What is it than?

rigid smelt
#

xy is a product of two functions, x and y

#

and not a product of function y and a constant "x"

plush wagon
#

Please tell me derivative of xy

#

Is it 1y'?

rigid smelt
#

no

#

again

#

what im saying is, x is also a function

#

and not a constant

#

how do you differentiate a product of 2 functions?

plush wagon
#

There is formula for that

rigid smelt
#

so apply it

plush wagon
#

U'v + ....

rigid smelt
#

theres another part

#

write it out clearly so i know you are right

plush wagon
#

uv' + v'u / v^2

rigid smelt
#

no

#

see what i mean when you dont write out the whole thing?

#

the formula for derivative of a product of 2 functions is (uv)'=u'v + uv'

plush wagon
#

Yes

rigid smelt
#

so apply it

#

u and v are representative of x and y

plush wagon
#

Okay

#

I got it, thank you😃

dry berry
#

xy = x * f(x); (xy)' = f(x) + x* f'(x) = y + x*y'

#

pretty cool

carmine lion
#

How do I approach part 4

ocean sealBOT
carmine lion
#

will this take me anywhere

tight locust
carmine lion
#

wdym differentiate

#

differentiate what

crisp grove
#

sin2a = 2sin a cos a ?

carmine lion
#

yes

crisp grove
#

take out common factor ans then try maybe

carmine lion
#

from that i get a < pi/6

#

idk if that is correct

#

i remember a similar problem that did use derivative

dry berry
#

you must find the exact value of a not the domain

crisp grove
#

$sin(a)(cosa-sin(a)/\sqrt{3})>0$

ocean sealBOT
#

Ryuzaki

crisp grove
#

so u want a general solution?

carmine lion
#

exact value

crisp grove
#

wait what was the question again? I started from the inequality

#

oh got it

carmine lion
#

idk if my inequality is correct

#

or if im supposed to use dA/da

crisp grove
#

The are is $(\cos(\pi / 3) - \cos (\alpha))\sin(\pi/3)$ ??

carmine lion
#

what?

#

are?

#

wdym

crisp grove
#

with r

#

nvm

#

it's given in the q3

#

u have to maximize A

#

you know for maximum values dA/da = 0

#

btw are you allowed to use caculas?

carmine lion
#

uh yea?

#

shouldn't it be dA/da = 0 for minimum values?

crisp grove
#

then use the fact that at max value dA/da will be 0

crisp grove
carmine lion
#

so why did u say max values

crisp grove
#

mistake

carmine lion
#

so shouldn't i find $\frac{d^2A}{d\alpha^2}$

ocean sealBOT
carmine lion
#

and then $\frac{d^2A}{d\alpha^2} < 0$

ocean sealBOT
carmine lion
#

?

#

to find max

crisp grove
#

no

#

after finding points for which A(a) = 0

#

what you are referring to is the second derivative test

carmine lion
#

yea?

#

oh right

crisp grove
#

we use that to check if the value is indeed max / min / saddle

carmine lion
#

it can be either min/max

#

with dA/da

#

i find nature with 2nd

#

my bad sorry

crisp grove
#

find value of a then put it in d2A/da2 and check ifi it's < 0

carmine lion
#

$\frac{dA}{d\alpha}=r^2(\cos{2\alpha}-\frac{\sin{2\alpha}}{\sqrt{3}})$

ocean sealBOT
crisp grove
#

yes seems alright

carmine lion
#

$\tan{2a}=\sqrt{3}$

ocean sealBOT
crisp grove
#

solve?

carmine lion
#

should i expand using tan2a formula or

crisp grove
#

up until now yes

#

what angle given tan(x) = sqrt(3)?

carmine lion
#

pi/6

crisp grove
#

6?

carmine lion
#

wait no

#

thats 1/sqrt3

#

pi/3

crisp grove
#

so...

carmine lion
#

2a=pi/3

crisp grove
#

6 ?

#

...

carmine lion
#

sorry

#

a=pi/6

#

i was skipping steps in my head

crisp grove
#

rolling shutter

carmine lion
#

huh??

crisp grove
#

nvm

carmine lion
#

ok

#

now what do i do

#

since r is a constant

#

there should only be 1 turning point yes?

#

or not?

crisp grove
#

2nd derivative test?

carmine lion
#

oh yea

#

but i only got 1 value

#

for dA/da

#

soooo

crisp grove
#

,ask second derivative test

woeful pulsar
#

are you supposed to use calculus

carmine lion
#

i am allowed to yes

#

i think we're supposed to

#

cuz i used it in a similar problem

woeful pulsar
#

there's probably a method using R-forumla

#

but yeah you are probably allowed to

carmine lion
#

so is pi/6 my answer

woeful pulsar
#

yeah you need to check if it's a local maximum

carmine lion
#

but i only have 1 solution to dA/da=0

woeful pulsar
#

also check endpoints

crisp grove
carmine lion
#

what... ok

woeful pulsar
#

Alternatively, you can plug it in at every point

#

every critical point and end point to make sure it's the largest there

crisp grove
carmine lion
#

so what about this inequality

woeful pulsar
#

it is doable by R-formula

#

but I think the intention is just plug in all the critical points and endpoints

carmine lion
#

ok so i have a critical point a=pi/6?

#

wdym by endpoints

woeful pulsar
#

like a=0 and a=pi/3 i think are the endpoints

#

just say the rectangle has area 0

carmine lion
#

how do you know those are endpoints

woeful pulsar
#

what's the valid range for a

carmine lion
#

uh

#

they don't give one

#

in the question

#

or should i know it

woeful pulsar
#

which angles of a are reasonable in this question?

carmine lion
#

positive

woeful pulsar
#

so a>0

#

and how big can a go?

carmine lion
#

hmm

#

pi/4?

woeful pulsar
#

how about pi/3

carmine lion
#

why pi/3

woeful pulsar
#

like you can get arbitrarily close to it

carmine lion
#

i dont get ur reasoning

#

also if i solve the inequality

#

i get $a<\frac{\pi}{6}$

woeful pulsar
ocean sealBOT
woeful pulsar
#

we can get a very close to pi/3

#

and the closer to pi/3 the smaller it is until it reaches an area of 0

carmine lion
#

yea?

woeful pulsar
#

yeah so a is at most pi/3

#

we can plug in the endpoints of 0 and pi/3

#

as well as pi/6 and we should be done

carmine lion
#

ok..., but can u have a look at what i posted above

#

i dunno if my approach is valid or not

#

if a<pi/6

#

wouldnt that mean

#

thats the max

woeful pulsar
#

where do you have a<pi/6

carmine lion
#

from the inequality above that

woeful pulsar
carmine lion
#

why

crisp grove
#

where are you getting the inequality?

woeful pulsar
#

that 1. something is definitely not pi/6

carmine lion
#

of iii

#

if Area has to be maximised,

crisp grove
#

why inequality?

carmine lion
#

r^2 will always be positive

#

so that means the other part

crisp grove
#

shouldn't that be a =

carmine lion
#

must also be positive

woeful pulsar
#

yeah that means 0<=a<=pi/3

woeful pulsar
#

something happened somewhere

carmine lion
#

,w solve sin2a/2 - sin^2(a)/sqrt(3)>0, 0<=a<=pi/3

carmine lion
#

lol

woeful pulsar
#

nothing new

crisp grove
carmine lion
#

$\frac{d^2A}{d\alpha^2}(\alpha=\frac{\pi}{6})$

ocean sealBOT
woeful pulsar
#

no

#

but this is

carmine lion
#

like i wanna say

crisp grove
#

that's definately pi/6 on the graph

#

and that indeed is the maxima

woeful pulsar
#

$\left.\frac{d^2A}{d\alpha^2}\right|_{\alpha=\frac{\pi}{6}}$

ocean sealBOT
#

Element118

carmine lion
#

lol i haven't learned integration

#

ur evaluating the lower bound

#

?

woeful pulsar
#

this is the notation for the second derivative evaluated at alpha=pi/6

carmine lion
#

ah ok

#

because i've seen integration do that

carmine lion
#

why are we evaluating at boundaries

#

don't we already know its a global max for 0<=a<=pi/3 after finding the nature of the turning point

#

i found that its negative so its concave down at that area

#

meaning its max

woeful pulsar
carmine lion
#

shouldn't that information be enough

#

evaluating at end points even though u know a max seems redundant

woeful pulsar
#

you can either

  1. evaluate at boundary and critical points
    OR
  2. determine the nature of all the turning points to figure out which local maximums to evaluate
#

there's two different approaches

carmine lion
#

but for both u need dA/da yes?

woeful pulsar
#

yes

#

but for method 1 you don't need the second derivative

carmine lion
#

alr

#

i think i would be able to do method 2 faster

#

ty for the help

carmine lion
#

i have a better understanding now

#

these type of questions are called maximising and minimising?

crisp grove
#

yes

woeful pulsar
#

well that's one way to describe it

crisp grove
#

optimization in general

carmine lion
#

alright

jade peak
#

i have this function, that accept two parameter and use 'pow' as power, not sure what it measures: cRnd(a,b)=>round(a*pow(10,b))/pow(10,b)

#

any idea?

crisp grove
#

Latex pls

woeful pulsar
#

looks like rounding to b decimal places

jade peak
#

round is a built in function

#

and pow is also

jade peak
#

based on b decimals?

#

just dont understand why need power