#help-0
1 messages ยท Page 729 of 1
yeah that was a mistake
Yeah okay all good
:v it doesnt mean that you cannot calculate it
i mean i suppose but that would insinuate x and y are imaginary
theres no need to solve for x and y
69 and 6969
i randomly chose those numbers :v
Do you isolate x^4 and y^4 for each of equations to one side then sub it into the equation you want to be calculated and then somehow things get simplified?
i havent tried that
I think that OP just made some random equations and wants to solve them, I don't think there are any nice answers
Either really difficult or some weird trick to simplify it
maybe try using 1 lol
here's my view: the solutions no matter what will be imaginary, that doesn't mean that x^4 + y^4 is tho
an example would be
bruh
what is wolfram alpha doing.....
bro im sorry. if you make up a random system of equations you arent just going to get some nice integer solutions.
actually
the real a
is the solution
others idk how wolfram managed to get that
i dont even understand what youre saying im sorry
so uh im going to cook dinner too so ill just post the hint here if u want
||square both equations and add them up :D||
brb....
i think your algebra may be incorrect
how does squaring both equations give you anything close to the solution?
With a quick glimpse, I dont see how either the x^12 or y^12 can be cancelled with that
i think when they said square the equations, they literally just double the powers in the equation and nothign else.
didnt even square the -3
because thats the only way you could possibly get the desired equation
and notice that if you square both of the equations, there is noway a +3x^4y^4(x^4+y^4) would be in there
i mean if it would, there is definitely another term that wont be cancelled out
Ok there are too many versions of this written down xD
But yeah it does turn out to be equal
something is really wrong, (a+b)^2 expanded is giving 3 terms and hence when added the two equations together, you get in total of 6 terms, (a+b)^3 expansion gives 4 terms
...
clearly (x^6-3x^2y^4)^2 + (y^6 - 3x^4y^2)^2 does not have any terms cancelled out
im sure i didnt
idk, but thats the logic, lemme write it out on papers then
Terms don't get cancelled out, but u do get some terms with same coefficient and so u can add them
well you cant turn a 6-term expression into a 4-term expression iwthout cancelling two of the terms out
idk but im writing to see if something cancels
oh wait nvm, something did cancel out
factoring 3x^4y^4 from all of the terms except x^12 + y^12 will give -2(x^4+y^4)+3(x^4+y^4)
but yeah, my point still stand, you cant go from a 6-term expression to a 4-term expression without cancelling something
Look at that pic above
i know
There are 6 terms
im not saying it doesnt factor to (x^4+y^4)^3
im saying that you cant go from a 6-term expression to a 4-term expression without cancelling something
And u can add terms together to make it 4 terms
trust your algebra and not the computer, to make expression with 6 terms into an expression with 4 terms, you MUST cancel something out
why do all the points on a line satisfy the equation?, like how did it come to that?
for example with something like x^2 + xy + y^2 + 1 can be rewritten as (x+y)^2 + 1 -xy, observe that in the end, the amount of terms the two expression have are equal
so basically, something DID cancel out, its just that i didnt see it
For example, 9x^4y^8-6x^4y^8=3x^4y^8 there is no cancellations here, right?
Its just addition
well technically something
9x^4y^8 - 6x^4y^8 cancels with each other and introduce another term which is 3x^4y^8
gosh writing these powers close together hurts my head
That's a strange way to think about imo
im just saying, to turn some kind of expression with more terms into an expression with less term, there is some algebraic cancelling, either by division, subtracting, addition or simply multiplication
i guess cancel is a bad word to use
"simplify" should fit more
When I think about 'cancellations' I think about something like this x/x where x gets cancelled out causing the state to not be observable
I have one question
ask
How get honourable batch on my profile?
Should i move to discussion group for its answer?
How do I prove
$$gcd(p^aโ1,p^bโ1)=p^{\gcd(a,b)}โ1$$
, where $p$ is a prime number, and $a,bโ\mathbb{N}^{+}$?
whale
can I cancel out (y+1) in y(y+1) = x(y+1) + 6
Euclidian algorithm
Can anyone help me understand what the symbols mean? Like the arrow and the tilde
the tilde means negation if im not wrong
like you have a proposition P, ~P is the negation of P
what xD?
e.g : p : I eat a banana
~p : I don't eat a banana
ohh okay thank you
and the arrow means "implies"
'Prove (n) = n' Sorry for the bad notation, I'm not sure how to show the single larger bracket but I'malso not sure how this works
(1)
I think it's meant to be a vector
@glass lichen
Ok im back
heres the picture for reference again
so to find P(N), I did $0.8=\frac{P\left(N\right)\cdot 0.75}{0.75}$
TheMane3
you would multiply both sides by 0.75, giving that P(N) = 0.60, since 0.8 isnt 0.6, it's not independent (dependent)
did i do it right ๐
i feel so dumb... but i need help with this..
you want to find the angles?
What do you mean when you say find pi?
You mean find the values of T in radians?
why does it relate to angles
because the variable inside the cos is an angle
hi
hey
i have a ask
@oak chasm i just wanted to know how my lecturer got he pi with cos3t
I got P(E) = 0.085, P(B) = 2.53, and P(E|B) = 0.215, they want to know if P(E) and P(B) are independent, and the formula for independence between two events is if P(E & B) = P(E) * P(B), then it's independent
I'm not told what P(E & B) is, so how am I supposed to know the answer?
sorry
all g lol
lol
8.5 percent is equal to 21.5 percent?
thats not what the answer is saying
if thats what u just said
it is?
the 21.5 percent is a conditional probability (can be seen by the statement "given that...")
now you are saying they are independent because the prob of earning more than 75 thousand is equal to the conditional probability
aka 8.5%=21.5%
ugh sorry i gtg for like an hour, can we resume this when im back ๐
you had yesterday that you knew they were independent if P(E)=P(E|B)
since not equal not independent
why are you even trying to find P(E and B)? And besides P(B) is not equal to 2.53 (a probability can't be above 1)
why do all the points on a line satisfy the equation for that line?, like how did it come to that?
I understand that you can find points that represent a solution, but how come you can just make a line and all of the points on that line is a solution
cause a line by definition is the set of points that satisfy it
this is true for any graph of a function
yeah, I understand that, however, did someone just go like "oh, if you were to sample all possible x's and find any y's, it would fill the gap between these 2 points and make a line"
if you sample all x values, you wont have gaps to fill
cause you'll have hit all of the numbers in R
it forms a line because every step it increases by the same amount, right?
yes, slope is constant
is this channel being used
nvm
can someone briefly explain how to do a) and b) and c), this function is kinda confusing
so it's correct to say that it forms a line because "y increases by the same amount every step", correct?
yes, every step of the same size...
yeah i was gonna say that's not the most formal definition but the idea is right
of the same size?
This function doesn't appear to have any algebraic definition, so just lookat the graph itself. It's asking what g(-5) is, and if you look at x=-5 on the grid, and find where the function is, that will give you g(-5). Do the same for b, but in reverse; look for where g(x)=5 and find its x value. An inverse funciton essentially does the funciton in reverse; if you input the output of g(x), you will get x, so g^-1(g(x))=x, and g(g^-1(x))=x
ah
and the definition of function is any input only outputs one value
yeah ik
if the increase is always the same, that makes it linear
Just making sure ^^
so i just put the function on the x=-5 online
g(x) is the function
ohhhh
the wobbly "line" is g(x)
it appears nothing is on the x=-5 line
accept*
like for the question a) , what type of format is the answer in
It'll probably be a value
value as in 1, 2, 10, etc
if you look at all points where x = -5, find where g(x) crosses it
yes
g(x) does not cross it tho
Not even at one point?
I see a point where it intersects
no, sometimes it takes a bit
(-5,6)
and for b i just take the answer from a and try and find it
wait its just where 5 interacts
so instead of looking at a vertical line you're looking at a horizontal line
so 0 and -3
Made of pieces of defined funcitons
made of parabola and 2 lines
yeah it just isn't defined
Yes
I just saw that
Although it doesn't appear that you'll need that knowledge for this problem
yea
But it's still cool to see
A refleciton, yes
is domain just all the x points
make sure to use open bounds and closed bounds appropriately. there appears to be no open bounds to this, though
How I was taught was something like this:
D:[min-x-inc,max-x-exc)
exc is excluded (open)
inc is included (closed)
hmmmm
Just replace min/max-x-inc/exc with your min and max values of x
similar thing for range, but range is for y values
ah
so for instance the domain of f(x)=sqrt(x) would be D:[0,infinity)
right, so it forms a line because y increases by the same amount every step, i guess that would be correct to say
Yes, your question has been answered like 5 times, that is correct
`yeah thats what i thought but 0.8 * 2.53 does equal 0.215, anyway, im looking for P(E & B) because the questions asks if P(E) and P(B) are independent, right? If it was asking for If P(E) and P(E|B) then the question would be "Are the events 'earns more than $75,000 a year' and 'earns more than $75,000 a year given that they have a bachelors degree'", right?
But instead its asking if "earns more than 75,000" P(E) and "having a bachelors degree" P(B) is independent
not the former
Think anyone could help me out with A and C ? Just need to know how to set it up <@&286206848099549185>
read this https://www.probabilitycourse.com/chapter1/1_4_1_independence.php (would honestly recommend whole chapter 1)
If one event tells us nothing about the other, they are independent
and doesn't make sense to ask if E and E|B are independent - that isn't a thing.
that site says "Two events A and B are independent if and only if P(AโฉB)=P(A)P(B)."
The question doesn't have a given anywhere though
it doesnt say "are events "blah blah blah" and "blah blah blah given etc." independent
"earns more than 75000 per year given that"
there certainly is given that in the text
if P(E|B) = P(E) is true, then yes those two are independent, but that doesn't make events P(E) and P(B) independent right?
then P(E) and P(B) are independent
read the whole page (preferably more of chapter 1) (for example whole 1.4) then come back
1.2 useful to visualise probability
can someone tell me how to go about doing this
either i wasn't paying attention or my teacher is bad at teaching
can someone explain what a bearing of 210, or 245
means
in angle math
never mind i got it
You can distribute the sqrt(5)
although that may make it worse
Anyone able to help me out with this?
do you wanna see the answers?
sure
ask in a different channel for now
honestly not trying to "cheat" i just have no clue how to do this
Nothing looks too bad about those answers
it's a multiple choice question
but how would i solve the problem
I'm trying to figure out if my immediate response would be wrong
so I can help you get to the correct answer better
oh alright
Distribute the $\sqrt{5}$ to all the elements in the parentheses
dldh06
Then simplify, if necessary
how would i distribute?
Do you know how to distribute in general?
(a*sqrt(b))*(c*sqrt(d)) = ac*sqrt(bd)
So if you have x(x + 2), what would that be, if you distributed?
x + 2x?
Close but not quite
x2
x^2, yes
It would be $x(x+2) \equiv (x * x + 2 * x)$
dldh06
Correct?
So my initial answer was correct, but ye just distribute the radical
ok so if i did it would be this on right?
No, not correct
10*sqrt(5) != 5*sqrt(2)
dldh06
How would you distribute that? Like the x(x + 2) example
ok i read the page
im back
Not quite
if you'd like to
How are you obtaining $5\sqrt{2}$?
dldh06
Actually no
I mostly came here to learn and observe how you guys answer questions
Sorry I thought I had this equation in the bag
I just joined and have been answering questions like I normally do
Im just here to learn so just move on like im not here please
What was the first step that we did with the x(x + 2) example?
distributive property
And that looks like?
If you don't simplify, how would you distribute x(x + 2)?
So in general, $a(b + c) \equiv (a *b + a*c) $, correct?
sorry i got a quick phone call
yeah i understand
So apply that concept to $x(x + 2)$
dldh06
Keeping the multiplication signs too
wouldn't the x cancel out since it's a like term?
x times x + x2
Both terms
both terms? wdym?
It would be $x * x + 2 * x$, correct?
dldh06
Because remember, $a(b + c) = a * b + a * c$
dldh06
ok thank you
Now apply that same concept to $\sqrt{5}(10 - 4 \sqrt{2})$
dldh06
No, apply the a(b + c) = (a * b + a * c) concept first
would i apply it to the sqrt2 as well?
Yes
ok, not sure how i should present it to you though
feel like it would be hard to understand what i'm doing through text
So the first step is distribute and getting it in the form of a * b + a * c, correct?
What would that look like?
How can I learn to read such statements (as in using the curly brackets and the "such that")?
set builder notation
Yes, so far so good, but next time add in the multiplication symbols
thank you
infront of the 10 and 4?
Yes, so $\sqrt{5} * 10 - \sqrt{5} * 4\sqrt{2}$
dldh06
ok, that's what i have right now
So, next step, can things be simplified?
can i lower things to there GCD?
oh.
So can you combine $\sqrt{5} * 10$?
dldh06
no?..
Like is $\sqrt{5 * 10}$ a legal thing to do?
dldh06
ok, can i add both sqrt5?
dldh06
you're fine Katherine lol
One is $10\sqrt{5}$ and the other is $\sqrt{50}$, correct?
dldh06
.
So back to that, can you combine $\sqrt{5} * 10$?
dldh06
no, the 10 would go in font of the sqrt
Now, what about $\sqrt{5} * 4\sqrt{2}$?
dldh06
Two triangles are congruent if they have a pair of correspondingly proportional sides and each pair of angles adjacent to each of these sides also equal to each other?
no, but can you add sqrt5 and sqrt2 to make sqrt10 while 4 is in front?
help me please :(
Not add but multiply
find an unused Question channel
and wait for a reponse
Ask in a not busy channel and be patient, someone will answer you
oh ok
thanks
Yes
Yes
ok thank you so much @wary stream for the little tutoring session
i really appreciate it
im a bit confused about โ
i know that a single โ is squaring i think
xโy = x^y
and that tetration would be โโ
how'd you type that lol
alt code or something
and tetration with โโ would look like
$\uparrow$
Katharine
tetration: xโโy = x^xโฆ y times
yes
whats the symbol for a flipped }
and the gist of โโโ i get is basically
xโโโy = x^(xโโy)
how do i read these coordinate things
or function value at x
the fโs
what does -1, f mean
(-1, f(-1)) = point x = -1 y = f(-1)
f just means function
a function is a thing that assigns a new number to a number that you have put in
f(-1) so x = -1?
yes
yes
but does xโโโy = x^(xโโy)
f(-1) is when x = -1
f(x) means?
so the function is the line right
yes
hello
so if x is 5, then at x the function is 5?
hi one sec sam
if x = 5
f(x) = f(5) = -5+3
in this case
because f(x) = -x + 3
f(x) = -x + 3
$x \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow y = x \uparrow \uparrow (... \uparrow \uparrow x)$ y times
@wary stream it was correct, thank you again :)
???
Katharine
still doesnt make much sense
so it would be xโโโy = ((xโโx)โโx).. nested y times?

$x \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow y = x \uparrow \uparrow (x \uparrow \uparrow(x \uparrow \uparrow(... \uparrow \uparrow x)))$ y times
Katharine
just nested
k
it's difficult without numbers
cuz with numbers you can actually complete the nests
you know what i mean?
yeah
you needed help
would it just be that but the nested โโโs were โโโโs
It's just another way to denote a function
no f(x) is shorthand for a function
It's equivalent to y
a function is just a thing that takes a number
oh
and gives you another number
it may be the same number
it may be 3 times the number
so if f(x) = x+2
then y = x+2?
maybe it's the number but - 2
So f(x) = x + 1 is the same as y = x + 1
exactly @inner sequoia
but why is it called f(x)
because f(x) are special cases
It's to denote the function with a value input
So f(x) = x + 1, if you denote like this f(5) = x + 1, then you plug in 5 for x
it means the y value when you look at when x = something
So it would f(5) = x + 1 => f(5) = 5 + 1
f(6) is f of x = 6 | f at x when x is 6
so f is function right
the difference between functions f(x) = and y =
is that sometimes y =
can have multiple values for one x =
while f(x) is always only one
for every x
there is one f(x)
does that make sense
yes
OH
so f at x
means if i input x (lets say 5), then f will be at f(x) (lets say f is 20), meaning f(x)= 4x?
perfect
why
which means x = 5 and f(x) = 20
Or $f(x) = \frac{100}{x}$
dldh06
how do i tell if its addition or multiplication
you don't have to work backwards
you will be given the f(x)
and have to calculate stuff with it
is the channel in use?
yes
my bad
If all you're given is x = 5 and f(x) = 20 you cannot figure out if it is division, multiplication or addition
you would need more information
f(x) = โx + 3
it is a way of writing down points on the x, y graph
(-1, f(-1)) = (x, y)
x = -1
oH
the comma separates the x and the y
so if x = -1
then -x = 1
and then add 3
so f(x) = 4
f is function, and x is input
alr
so
f(x) is function at input
then
uh
f(x) = 4
oh shit thats why im confused im making problems in my head without enough data
It's denote f(x) but f is an arbitrary variable. You can label it with any variable you want to. Like s(x) is valid notation too
oh so f is just f
f is just chosen because it means function
not a variable
yes
that's not allowed
because f is a function that does something to a number
to an input
so having it just loose doesn't work
so if f were by itself would it be like a tunnel without an entrance?
it's more like if i were to write down an equation
like
y = x
but instead i wrote
y =
it doesn't work
does that make sense
yes
we can talk about y = in a way
but we cannot do mathematics with it
similarly we can talk about f
but we can only use it when it's f(x)
Hi can somone explain why a rational function can only have 1 oblique asympote
Hi guys I understand how to solve this but im confused by the fs
As I solve this equation I donโt get any extra constant f, please Iโm stuck
f = 0?
Yeah but then how is there are pssquared in numerator
Thereโs nothing Iโm doing that gives me that
Okay I found the answer I made a mistake when grouping Y(S) values mistakenly grouped one I shouldnโt have which would move on the other side of the equation given me the fs
And how about this one?
I know I multiply F(s) with Laplace of e^-2t which is 1/s+2 but when multiplying I donโt know how to get it into that form
Partial fractions?
Anyone please?
<@&286206848099549185>
I think this is something that can be found in the tables
I think this might help
@dark parcel
This is incorrect. That is:
L(xy) โ L(x)L(y)
See Youssef's picture above
Ah yes thank you youssef for that picture and thanks kaynex
Just remember F(s) times exponential is always shifted
But why doesnโt that linear rule apply here?
<@&268886789983436800>
Why would linear rule mean L(xy)=L(x)L(y)?
Linearity implies superposition, which is L(x+y)=L(x)+L(y)
And also L(cx)=cL(x), where is c is a constant
np
A paintball court charges an initial entrance fee plus a fixed price per ball.
The variable p models the total price (in dollars) as a function of n, the number of balls used.
p=0.80n+5.50
What is the entrance fee?
Could someone help me with this word problem?
Ok, sure
What have u tried so far, or atleast any initial thoughts on how to tackle it?
Hint: how many balls have been used when you first enter the game?
I first thought about adding 0.80n + 5.50 to get 6.30n but then I scratched that because I knew it wasnt right
Then i tried looking for a value for n like 1, 2, 3, 4 etc. but then I realized there is no guarantee the question could accept multiple possibilities so none of those would be right
And now I'm just stuck
Whats the answer to my hint?
0....
Ok, when do u pay an entrance fee?
There we go
It wasnt a trick question i just had to fully read the problem
And its not the first time Ive done that so thats something I have to work on
Shouldnt it equal 3/13...?
the dog has to be brown, there are 13 brown dogs, and 3 dogs of those 13 are large, the probability that a dog is large given it's brown is 3/13...
10 sounds right
how????
Cause those three are already included in the other numbers
If the three dogs are large and brown, then they must have been already included in the 5 large and 10 brown
When they say 10 brown, it doesn't mean they can't be large either
how was i meant to know it was included
channel in use dude
ok look at this
here they do 11/23
huh?????
this channel is in use
use a different one
@median tendon and in the above self drawn diagram am i not doing the exact same thing as they're doing in the first problem
what changed
Ok, let's look at the second question
23 have seen the film adaptions
23 is not put in the circle
For the first question, you are putting 10 in one of the circle, this is wrong
why? the circle i put it in is for dogs that are only brown, of which there are 10

Show me where the word 'only' appears in that question
nowhere ๐ฆ
The union is 10
i think what u need/all so 3/12=1/4 like 10 we dont need
the intersection is always going to be included in both figures
Try drawing the circles again for q1
ok
Yes
ok then ill try to always remember that
that the intersection is always going to be included
never a separate thing
thus "intersection" i suppose
The wording is very important
Np
im having a lot of damn trouble with probability so ill be back in a bit probably hahahahahha
"what is the probability that @warped phoenix is going to open up discord again given that @warped phoenix is having issues with 99% of probability" ๐
there probably is a very specific answer to that
Ques - let the number of integers between 1 and 2021 with the property that the sum of its digits is 9 is p. find p / 2
Your question implies that p=9?
$pi/2 = 2\int_{-3}^{3}\sqrt{9-x^2}$
music lounge
dont post nonsense.
if you're gonna type in the help channels be helpful not a pain
#latex-testing as well
noo , P is the no. of integers between 1 and 2021 whose sum of digits is 9
well I mean the blunt way is to just find p then find p/2
so along the lines of how many partitions of 9 exist into 4 numbers, then how many permutations of those 4 numbers give a number under 2021
ok so u r spamming
<@&268886789983436800>
spamming in a math server, very productive
thanks.
Could somebidy please help!!
I'm not sure how to input this in a formula
<@&286206848099549185>
alright so do you know the compound interest formula?
yes
so write it out using all of the information the question gives, and use P instead of the principal amount
and then solve for P
so si it
Omfish
do you have the formula anywhere in your notes, or maybe look it up online
Omfish
no its compounded 10 times because for 5 years, it is compounded twice
Waitttttt
so is this what im supposed to have?
so its compounded two hundred times?
well yes but now is your chance to ask me some questions
no i rewrote the number $\frac{0.08}{2} as \frac{8}{200}$
Omfish
Ohhhh
because we are compounding at 8% twice a year, so to make the fraction easier to deal with i multipled both sides by 100
wait no almost
swap around the A and the 10000
because 10000 is the desired amount, and we are trying to solve for the principle amount
my pleasure
maybe I havent checked
Please do
that isnt what i just got
notice that your answer is bigger than 10000, theres no way you could compound and lose money to return to 10000
19.6?
thats just a number im not sure what you want me to do with that response
uhh
no
?
it equals 4563.8
how??
Omfish
i would then divide by everything on the RHS except P
$\frac{10000}{(1+\frac{0.08}{2})^{20}}=P$
Omfish
and then chuck it into the calculator
yep
if you are solving for P
if youre solving for A you would do the process to solve for A
What am i solving for!?!?
well in this problem you are solving for P
but im just saying that in a problem where you arent solving for p, the process will be different
like if you want to solve for T, which will never happen tho
yay
you guys are done right? can I ask
yep
I'm struggling to find the CNF form of this expression
(ยฌa ^ b ^ ยฌe ^ d ^ ยฌc) v (a ^ ยฌb ^ e ^ ยฌd ^ ยฌc)
Got to this point then just dunno how to proceed from then
=ยฌ(ยฌ(ยฌa ^ b ^ ยฌe ^ d ^ ยฌc) ^ ยฌ(a ^ ยฌb ^ e ^ ยฌd ^ ยฌc)) (De Morgenโs law)
=ยฌ((a v ยฌb v e v ยฌd v c) ^ (ยฌa v b v ยฌe v d v c)) (De Morgenโs law)
either i dont know of the kind of problem youre doing or i dont understand this format
yep i dont know of this
It's boolean expression
sorry should have just ingored it then
Minh Baka
assuming the logic here is correct, how does the phrasing look like? is it understandable? too verbose? too informal?
total 9-digit numbers whose digit sum is 4 ?
Consider a set of all polynomials with real coefficients, I wanna check if it is a field or not. I can see it satisfies all the axioms of a field except for the multiplicative inverse. For that, after multiplying a polynomial by it's multiplicative inverse, are we supposed to get the product equal to 1 or another polynomial with all coefficients equal to 1?
how did this multiplication happened?
Seems like a mistake to me
yeah that's for sure a imstake
is 1+3i odd or even?
that's not a valid question to ask for complex numbers
it's like asking if 1/2 is odd or even
So i tried googling that and found:
๐ is odd if and only if (โ1)^๐ = โ1.
๐ is even if and only if (โ1)^๐ = 1.
dont know how true that is
(i had the wrong quote)
you can define it however you'd like, but there's not much sense asking it without any context
no you can't
Why not?
Let $(a+1)(b+1)(c+1)=69, (a+2)(b+2)(c+2)=169, (a+3)(b+3)(c+3)=269,$ calculate (a+4)(b+4)(c+4)
Minh Baka
use \\ to make a new line
depends
if you talk about something known as the Gaussian integers - which is the set of complex numbers whose real and imaginary parts are both integers - there actually is a way to talk about evenness and oddness in that context which still makes sense!
there are a couple different ways to characterize it, but in essence, to find whether a Gaussian integer is even or odd, add its real & imaginary parts and take the parity of that.
under this rule, 1+3i will be even.
a consequence of this is that, while in the integers all even numbers are multiples of 2 (and vice versa), in the Gaussian integers all even numbers are multiples of 1+i instead. (and 2 = (1-i)*(1+i) )
<@&286206848099549185>
@lime gate do u know differentiation and kinematics

I dont know it
Me searching for indian guy jo hindi me smjha de
hey i have a quick conceptual question
does order of integration matter for triple integration?
for example
i switch the (0,2pi) and (-1,1) and also the dr and dx
if the integral gives a finite answer when integrand is replaced to abs value of the integrand you can swap
in this case i can right?
yes assuming P_B is just some constant
aight thanks

,rcw
$P_n = \frac{3n^2 - n}{2}$ and $Q_n = n^2$ and $T_{n-1} = \frac{n(n-1)}{2}$. Now sub these values in your question and you will get the answer
Schrรถdinger's Smile
$circle location = 2\int_{-3}^{3}\sqrt{9-x^2}$
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
any progress so far?
nvm I found the answer
k
k
k
$a = arcsin(\frac{sin(I)}{n}) - I$
DavidNickisson
I have been struggling to solve for 'I', been beating my head against the wall for the past hour
Any help would be greatly appreciated
do you want to solve for I in terms of a and n?
Yes
this strikes me as hard if not impossible to get in closed form
where did this equation come from?
Formula is derived from Snell's law for a very specific use case
is there any reason why you need an exact solution for this?
would theta_2 not just be 42ยฐ?
Unfortunately not that simple
nvm i interpreted the diagram incorrectly
so $n_1$ and $n_2$ are the refractive indices of two different materials?
Ann
Yeah, I didn't do the best job of making it clear
Correct
does the light ray enter the n_2 material head-on?
as in, perpendicular to the surface, meaning the angle of incidence is zero?
this diagram isn't very clear
Replace 4 with n and 3 with a here. 17 comes from 4^2+1, so n^2+1 and 8 from 4 * 2, so n * 2
lmao this is brutal
Enters at angle theta2 to the surface
Woah
honestly i'm really struggling to make sense of your diagram
did you copy it from somewhere?
My head ๐
Angles of plano-convex lens and trying to figure out what angle it needs to be at the edge to refract out at 90 degrees from the normal of the flat surface
That's where it came from ๐
if Snell's Law is $n_1\cdot\theta_1=n_2\cdot\theta_2$ can I ask what's the differing factor in your diagram?
Omfish
the law is n1 sin(ฮธ1) = n2 sin(ฮธ2) is it not?
Yup
this made almost no sense
sorry but you'll have to produce a better diagrm
diagram*
This is all the information apart from n2, theta 1 and n1?
how do i find a differentiable function? i got the value of f(256) = 10
Could someone check for me if this is correct?
can someone pls tell me what is
2 + 2?
is this serious or are you trolling?
hes obviously trolling
maybe i can get him to admit it outright
$2+2=(2+1)+1=$
$\succ(2)+1=$
$\succ(\succ(2))=$
$\succ(3)=4$
Blackdeath39
excuse me,how can i get second formula??
chain rule
I see , thankyou!!
what?
It's 4
I gave you a simple proof in case you were going to doubt that
a (2,3) - 3 b (6,7) C (- 8,5) find all sides