#help-0

1 messages · Page 717 of 1

kindred lion
#

We haven't been taught telescopic sum yet so can you like do it in a simpler way if possible?

true crystal
#

Have you seen fraction decomposition ?

kindred lion
#

Yeah

true crystal
#

Decompose 1/((2k+1)*(2k+3))

kindred lion
#

Okk

true crystal
#

then you'll notice something

#

Which is really nice if this is the first time you see it

kindred lion
#

I got 1/2(2k+1)- 1/2(2k+3)?

true crystal
#

Yeah that is right

kindred lion
#

Yeah okk

true crystal
#

Now explicit the first terms

kindred lion
#

1/4k+2 and 1/4k+6?

true crystal
#

No I mean replace k by 0, 1 etc

kindred lion
#

Oh ok got it

#

Ok what after it? Replaced by 0 got 1/6, with 1 got 1/10

alpine sable
#

GP i see

true crystal
#

by 0 you get 1/2 * (1 - 1/3) by 1 1/2 * (1/3 - 1/5) by 2 1/2 (1/5 - 1/7) etc

#

If you sum all these terms what happens ?

alpine sable
#

answer = 20 ²⁰⁄₂₁

#

is this correct if u have the anwer key?

kindred lion
kindred lion
alpine sable
#

hi all am i missing something here

kindred lion
#

Thanks for the help!

ancient bear
#

What am I doing wrong?

#

the problem

#

the answer

#

I get a 1/2 in front of that

true crystal
#

@kindred lion are you sure the answer is not 40 / 21 instead ?

kindred lion
#

No the answer key shows 440/21

true crystal
#

400 / 21 is a pretty big number for the sum

#

and I got 40 / 21

kindred lion
#

It's not in the options

true crystal
#

Yeah but to be sure it is 2 times 2 /3 etc

kindred lion
#

Hm yes

true crystal
#

Wolfram gives this too

alpine sable
#

$test$

kindred lion
#

Should the number be 22 instead?

#

Shouldn't**

true crystal
#

Why ?

kindred lion
#

Number of terms are 10 so basically should be 22 rather sorry

proper ibex
#

Is there an elegant way of making an area drawer given some equation that can give true/false if you pass it a position?
While one can just go through every single point out there, i'd assume theres a better way

#

My assumption was first randomly select a point that is "in" the shape that the function would create, and then go in one direction until you hit a border, at which point go along the border until you come back where you started, but this happens to ignore "islands of false" inside the shape

#

(This is all talking about a solution by code btw)

ionic jewel
#

its basically just passing in all the points, but theres some clever approaches

proper ibex
#

So theres no way of avoiding passing all points

ionic jewel
#

like I said, theres tricks

#

you can do a uniform grid of point checking over the entire area, then guess based on that for example

#

or spread out around each one in the area to get more accuracy

#

its how they calculate definite integrals sometimes, look up the techniques, its plenty fast

proper ibex
#

Also the wiki seems to be talking about getting an area from it

#

I simply want to check integer positions

#

Its not for getting the shapes area, its about getting a polygon (set of points describing said shape)

#

Well i suppose i could use said algorithm of random points and look for a spot inside the known shape where the function is dangerously close to being false, and investigate a small area around that point

#

Anyway, thanks

light quartz
#

how do i find the derivative of log(secX/2)

#

the uh udv - vdu rule?

alpine sable
light quartz
#

is it same as the quotient rule?

#

I'm not getting the answer for this one

glass lichen
light quartz
glass lichen
#

look at your notes or google it if you dont know it

alpine sable
#

Yeah it’s fairly basic

#

If you meant integral instead, it looks like a really difficult one

acoustic swift
alpine sable
#

It’s more like f(g(x))’ = f’(g(x)) * g’(x)

light quartz
#

maybe I'm wrong but I dont recall my teacher teaching that one

acoustic swift
#

Learn it, it's useful but more important, very necessary

#

and easy

proper ibex
#

Arent some integrals straight up impossible or something

#

You end up in loops

alpine sable
#

Yeah, i just checked that one on wolfram alpha and it looks intense

alpine sable
#

Oops i missed the /2

proper ibex
#

Huh the integral curve doesnt freak out

#

Must be the work of the log

light quartz
#

Why am i getting Tan x

#

as the answer

#

just tanx

alpine sable
#

Yes my thing above simplifies to tan x

light quartz
#

oh

alpine sable
#

I got my math confused

#

Soz

light quartz
#

Oh it's fine

#

I'm getting it as

glass lichen
alpine sable
#

It’s 1/(sec x /2) * 1/2 tan x sec x

#

So tan x

light quartz
#

2/secx X (secxtanx - 0)/4 now

glass lichen
#

$\dv{x}\ln(\frac{\sec(x)}{2})=\dv{x}\ln(\sec(x))$

ocean sealBOT
glass lichen
#

the 1/2 is irrelevant

light quartz
#

lemme see

alpine sable
#

Right you do the log thing mb

light quartz
#

now i'm getting 2 tan x

alpine sable
#

Wait how

#

Just delete the 2 it’s irrelevant

light quartz
#

I definetly made a mistake here

light quartz
#

which is 1/x

#

in this case 1/(secx/2)

alpine sable
#

If you didn’t get it, ln (x/2) = ln x - ln 2

glass lichen
#

$\dv{x}\ln(\sec(x))=\tan(x)\sec(x)\frac{1}{\sec(x)}$

ocean sealBOT
alpine sable
#

And ln 2 is a constant

#

So you ignore the denominator

light quartz
#

but it's a part of the log function

alpine sable
#

But you can rewrite it to remove it

glass lichen
#

$\ln(\frac{x}{2})=\ln(x)-\ln(2)$ so differentiating will get rid of the constant term

ocean sealBOT
light quartz
#

Sec x/2 tho

alpine sable
#

It’s (sec x) / 2

glass lichen
#

unless you fucked up writing it out originally...

alpine sable
#

Yea lmao

light quartz
#

,w derivative Log ( (Secx)/2)

light quartz
glass lichen
#

yeah..

light quartz
#

i am so sorry

#

i messed that up

alpine sable
#

That’s how you learn

#

Please, can anyone help with this?

#

It’s the least common multiple

#

What else am I supposed to add?

#

ASA?

spice canyon
#

For a I think you also have you say they have AD in common

alpine sable
#

Hm, okay

spice canyon
#

b I don't Know ,did'nt even Know sides could be congruent

alpine sable
#

yeah i’m not sure

#

been trying to complete this for a while now

jovial ether
#

hey

#

is this channel in use

#

or can i ask my question

alpine sable
#

Just try another, easier

#

my question wasn’t completely answered so i’m not sure if someone else can

#

so i believe yes it is

#

@alpine sable Maybe you can mention that the kite is symmetric

#

Or that AD and BC are perpendicular

jovial ether
#

because the kite is symetrical

#

he can use the angle bisector

#

thing

#

and he gets two angles from those

#

and they share a side

#

so he gets his last from there

#

so its SAA right?

alpine sable
#

Is it SAA or ASA

#

How do I solve for x

#

27x + 2 = 180-70

#

assuming the lines are parallel

celest anvil
#

how do you find the transition point?

alpine sable
#

by transition point do you mean the points where it switches from decreasing to increasing and viceversa?

sand mica
#

I assume it means finding the vertex of maximum / minimum point(s), so yeah

alpine sable
#

Yeah you're right, I don't know what else it could mean

celest anvil
#

idk either

#

so it's max and min points?

sand mica
#

your's sounds more right because I realized it's a cubic

alpine sable
#

I guess how you find them depends on how you've been taught to

celest anvil
#

Transition points are points where the basic shape changes due to a sign change in either 𝑓′ (local minimum or maximum) or 𝑓″ (point of inflection).

alpine sable
#

Oh you have differentials

#

Just find their roots

celest anvil
#

roots of the original function?

alpine sable
#

of the derivatives

celest anvil
#

1st and 2nd?

alpine sable
#

yes

celest anvil
#

ok thanks

cursive sorrel
#

Does anyone know the rules for reflection like for reflecting points over a line?

alpine sable
#

If you don't get that you can ask again

cursive sorrel
#

I have started with the basics

#

I just need to know the rules

#

There are like 4 or 5 of them

alpine sable
#

I don't really know how you're learning it

#

You got any notes?

cursive sorrel
#

Here's an example of one of the assigments I have to do

alpine sable
#

oh I guess you're doing it graphically

cursive sorrel
#

I need to know the rules

cursive sorrel
alpine sable
#

to reflect a point over a line, draw another line from the point perpendicular to the first line

#

then extend it past the line by the same distance it took to get from the point to the line

#

I'll draw you an image

cursive sorrel
#

I think it is easier knowing the rules

alpine sable
#

haha these esoteric rules of yours intrigue me

#

But this is the best I could come up with without an appeal to formulae

cursive sorrel
#

Ok thanks

cursive sorrel
#

It's some really basic rules to follow in order to make solving these kinds of problems easier

#

I was introduced to them in class

#

I should have noted them down somewhere

alpine sable
#

Sorry this is in use

#

Oh I thought it was finished, apologies.

#

Np

true crystal
#

btw Pazerx it is correct

alpine sable
alpine sable
cursive sorrel
#

That is one of the rukes

alpine sable
#

And across the diagonal (-x,-y)

#

But I’m just deriving these from what you’re telling me

cursive sorrel
#

Yes I believe those are correct

alpine sable
#

You should ask about the rules in class next time, i imagine they’ll be more helpful

cursive sorrel
#

but before I go and loose points, lemme confirm with my teacher tommrowo and then submit the assigment

#

Alright?

alpine sable
#

Yea go for it

cursive sorrel
#

Thanks for your help doe

alpine sable
#

Anytime

marsh valley
#

$x^3 + 4x > 5x^2$

ocean sealBOT
#

BAAPA|INDIAN ELITES

marsh valley
#

so we got that it has to be greater than 4 but idk the other answers

#

We first factored out x

#

then factored and got

#

x(x-4)(x-1)>0

#

and we know x>4

#

but idk what to do next

#

<@&286206848099549185>

alpine sable
#

don't ping helpers before 15 minutes

marsh valley
#

oh shoot

#

sorry

alpine sable
#

dw

#

anyway, figure out the roots and see what sign the equation takes between them

noble sinew
#

All positive is the x>4 part

marsh valley
#

Thank 😄 , ill let u know what i get

#

But I already knew that and now I am stuck again

noble sinew
#

Find when two of them are negative and 1 positive

marsh valley
#

How would you find them?

noble sinew
#

For x to be negative x<0, for (x-4) to be negative x<4 for (x-1) to be negative x<1

#

So the solution is?

marsh valley
#

uh

noble sinew
#

If x>=4 none are negative so that won’t work. If x>=1 only one is negative so that wont work either

#

If x<1 then two are negative wuhuuu

#

When does it stop working?

marsh valley
#

Ohh my god

#

wait wait

noble sinew
#

If x<=0 all three are negative so that doesn’t work

#

So 0<x<1?

marsh valley
#

but

#

i thought x<4

noble sinew
#

What?

marsh valley
#

so 0<x<4

noble sinew
#

If x=3 then we have two positive and 1 negative term

#

Don’t we?

marsh valley
#

yeah

#

but u need 2 neg

noble sinew
#

So x=3 doesn’t work

marsh valley
#

yeah

noble sinew
#

So 0<x<4 is not a solution

#

Clearly

marsh valley
#

but 0<x<1 isnt

noble sinew
#

0<x<1 is a solution?

marsh valley
noble sinew
#

Both x>4 and 0<x<1

#

You said x>4 yourself

marsh valley
#

oh lol

alpine sable
#

Can someone help i dont remember these like the explanations

"If the first differences are the same, the relationship is"

and

"If the first differences are not the same, the relationship is"

ionic jewel
#

arithmetic, non-arithmetic (although the only one of this kind you likely know is geometric, so that might be the answer)

deep pivot
#

Could someone tell me how I can make a plot similar to this one? It should basically be a line but at equal intervals it flattens out for a set width and then continues on its old path

alpine sable
#

is this right?

deep pivot
#

the vertical lines are axually gaps

#

actually*

alpine sable
alpine sable
#

but that seems unintuitive

dark granite
# alpine sable is this right?

like @alpine sable said, this is correct. This is because the thing you marked is saying run/rise which isn't the slope

alpine sable
#

hopefully someone can save the day

deep pivot
#

I'm trying to make an sdf for a dashed line

alpine sable
#

sdf?

deep pivot
#

signed distance field

alpine sable
#

yup no idea what that is

#

sorry

#

I got a

#

I just need b and c

#

Pls

alpine sable
ionic jewel
#

you add all the side length together for perimeter

#

yea

alpine sable
#

and do you know the formula for right triangle area?

#

hint: like taking half the area of a rectangle/square

#

dependent variable changes because of a change in the independent variable

#

in this situation what change in smth will affect the other

dark granite
#

You can think about it @alpine sable in terms of cause and effect. The independent variable is the cause, the dependent variable is the effect

alpine sable
#

yea that's a better explanation for it

#

you got the answer @fathom cosmos?

fathom cosmos
#

um

#

i have a question

alpine sable
#

yea I saw you deleted it lol

fathom cosmos
#

can we go into dm?

alpine sable
#

uhh I like here better unless it's an emergency hmmCat

fathom cosmos
#

ok

#

so how do i check the slope on desmos

#

i mean

alpine sable
#

you'd need the slope to graph

fathom cosmos
#

does rhombus have slopes?

alpine sable
#

that's a shape

#

wdym slope?

fathom cosmos
#

so

#

ok

alpine sable
#

are you graphing a rhombus?

fathom cosmos
#

this is the question

#

Sammy and Pippa's teacher gives them a homework question to solve. She tells them to plot the points A(5, -1), B(9, 4), C(15, 1) and D(11, -4) on a grid and decide whether the shape is a square or a rhombus. Sammy and Pippa do their slope calculations and Sammy insists the shape is a square whereas Pippa insists the shape is a rhombus. Who is right? Show your calculations in your reasoning!

fathom cosmos
#

i have to show my works

alpine sable
#

if it was a square then two pair of points would be in the same y coordinate and the other two pairs would have the same x-coordinate

#

you get what I mean?

fathom cosmos
#

yes

fathom cosmos
#

but its not, so it is rhombus right?

#

90 degree?

alpine sable
#

yea but how to prove it using math

#

hmm

dense frost
#

Can’t a shape be a square and be at an angle such that all values are different

#

So no

alpine sable
#

Yeah

#

if it had diagonal lines

#

never thought of that

#

hmm

fathom cosmos
dense frost
#

For it to be a square, the distance between all two points must be the same

#

Maybe you could use that fact

#

In a rhombus you have one pair which has a shorter length

#

I dont know why you’d calculate the slope of lines connecting two points

fathom cosmos
#

um

alpine sable
#

I guess by slope calculations they also mean finding the distance between two points? No idea lol

fathom cosmos
#

so what do i have to do?

alpine sable
#

use the formula for finding the distance between two points

tight locust
dense frost
#

And?

fathom cosmos
dense frost
#

If there is a problem let me know

#

English isnt my first language

alpine sable
tight locust
alpine sable
#

so finding the distance between points wont help

dense frost
#

It still can

pearl solar
#

you need to show that atleast one of the angles is not 90 degrees

alpine sable
#

or I don't think so

dense frost
#

But true

#

Doesnt hold true every time

tight locust
dense frost
#

No

#

Surely it can

#

If out if all pairs of points

alpine sable
#

so that's where the slope equations come in

#

ahha

dense frost
#

Ah whatever

#

Slopes it is

alpine sable
#

I'll leave you to it then catthumbsup

fathom cosmos
#

um

#

?

dense frost
#

My definition of rhombus was off I forget square is also one

#

Again, not my main language I dont learn math in english

#

My bad

#

Yeah uh idk red chicken lol

fathom cosmos
#

um is no one able to help me?

alpine sable
fathom cosmos
#

guess not

alpine sable
#

how would i graph this?

tight locust
#

0

alpine sable
#

then the slope of one

#

is the negative recipricol of the other

#

$m = -\frac{1}{m}$

fathom cosmos
#

?

ocean sealBOT
fathom cosmos
#

whats that formula for?

alpine sable
#

two perpendicular lines

#

the slope of one

#

is the negative recipricol of the other

dense frost
#

I think checking for distance is still the best option

#

The question clearly differentiates between a square and a rhombus

#

So the diagonal lines must be different lengths if its a rhombus

pearl solar
#

no

dense frost
#

How so

pearl solar
#

a rhombus can have all its sides equal

alpine sable
dense frost
#

But the question differentiates between a square and a rhombus

#

If it can be a square then dont answer the question at all

pearl solar
#

if you measure at least 1 angle to be not 90 degrees, then it is a rhombus

#

if you measure all angles to be 90 degrees, then it is both a rhombus and a square

fathom cosmos
#

Square Rhombus
The diagonal lengths of a square are of the same measure. The diagonal lengths of a rhombus are of different measure.
All the interior angles of square measures 90 degrees (i.e., right angle) In a rhombus, the opposite angles are of the same measure.

dense frost
#

Read the question again

#

Sammy says square the other says rhombus

#

Then we will take square as a shape where all points are equal length apart

#

Whereas rhombus will have diagonals at different lengths

#

Yes thank you red

pastel jungle
#

anyone know of examples/ practical uses of lissajous curves?

alpine sable
ocean sealBOT
alpine sable
#

where b = base and h = height

alpine sable
deep pivot
alpine sable
#

how would i solve a problome like this

alpine sable
#

Where m is the slope

#

Since there is no x here, m is 0

gaunt roost
#

Can anyone help me with this?

true crystal
#

The two functions have to be definite

#

For the first which values of x could make a problem

#

?

gaunt roost
#

I don't understand

#

this is the whole question

true crystal
#

What is the domain of square root of x+1 ?

gaunt roost
#

x is greater than or equal to -1

true crystal
#

Yeah

#

And for the second

gaunt roost
#

x < -1

true crystal
#

yeah

#

and since you want the domain of f - g you need to consider those two inequalities

#

Both f and g must be define

glass lichen
gaunt roost
#

so there's no answer?

#

undefined?

#

king1219?

#

cuz the textbook gives an answer

true crystal
#

What is it ?

gaunt roost
#

XER | -1 is less than or equal to x is less than 1

alpine sable
#

for the rhombus I mean

true crystal
glacial hedge
#

is this channel being used?

alpine sable
#

? help please

glacial hedge
#

what are the slope of the 2 lines?

#

what heppens when 2 lines have the same slope they are ____

gaunt roost
#

I believe you tho

glacial hedge
#

@gaunt roost whats the question

alpine sable
#

nonvertical parallel lines?

glacial hedge
#

one word

glacial hedge
alpine sable
#

negative slope

gaunt roost
glacial hedge
#

and its not nonverticle

alpine sable
#

oh

glacial hedge
#

there isnt anything special about a nonverticle line

gaunt roost
#

there it is @glacial hedge

glacial hedge
#

isnt it

#

just x=-1?

gaunt roost
#

that's what I thought

true crystal
#

no

glacial hedge
#

yes

alpine sable
true crystal
#

log 0 ?

alpine sable
#

paralell *

#

Parallel

glacial hedge
#

oh right

#

then f - g isnt defined

#

on real numbers

#

so domain is {}

alpine sable
#

how would i do this one

glacial hedge
#

😦

#

ddue

#

dddddudde

#

look at the slopes

alpine sable
#

im not good at this stuff its above my grade and i only got a day to learn it soo its still pretty hard for me

glacial hedge
#

ok sorry that was sorta mean

#

hint

#

a line with -1/slope of some line is perpendiciular to said line with that slope

alpine sable
#

Ok @alpine sable what are the slopes of the equations

glacial hedge
#

xD

alpine sable
#

You gotta try to do each one for a while

glacial hedge
#

yes i would suggest reading the textbook or watchign somne videos online

#

and try drawing both lines

fickle dock
#

Hey, I'm trying to prove by induction that for any positive integer n, 3 divides n^3 - 4n + 6 evenly, am I on the right track here?

#

Would anyone mind helping me with the next step please?

alpine sable
#

You can't assume that the k+1 expression is equal to 3q

#

That's what you're proving

#

You need to derive it from the induction hypothesis

#

However, the proof itself is done

#

You simplified the k+1 expression down to the k expression and some terms multiplied by three

#

Which is trivially divisible by 3 using IH

glacial hedge
#

Question: I think the answer is false because the transformation is 2 * I and the det of that is 4 but not -4 but I am still confused

#

nvm im stupid

#

[0 2]

#

[2 0]

#

nvm

#

xD

#

stoopid

fickle dock
alpine sable
#

Nothing

safe pewter
#

How come the answer is possible youtube sources says you cant make a sum of unequal root values?

alpine sable
#

Unless you've been taught some specific form these arguments need

fickle dock
#

not that I remember, I think that should be ok

safe pewter
#

So should i ask in a diff

alpine sable
#

Yea just try another

fickle dock
#

so I get to the last equation, and now the left side contains the k expression plus some other expressions

alpine sable
#

Yes

#

Then the k expression is equal to 3m

fickle dock
#

but how do you know that that k expression + some other expression is still divisible by 3?

alpine sable
#

Because the other ones are all multiplied by 3

#

Which you can factor out

fickle dock
#

ohh true

alpine sable
#

So yeah your proof is fine, it's just the method that's a bit confused

fickle dock
#

so then I would end up with k^3 - 4k + 6 + 3(k^2 + k) = 3m(3q + 3)?

#

the right side is wrong isn't it

alpine sable
#

Forget about the q haha its not a good way of doing induction

fickle dock
#

but k+1 and k cannot have the same multiplier of 3

#

or might not

alpine sable
#

You end up with 3m + 3k^2 + 3k

#

Where k and m are natural numbers

#

This is equal to 3(m + k^2 + k) which is divisible by 3 for any value of m and k

fickle dock
#

ohh it seemed a little weird to me that I could just throw out the right side but it makes sense in the end

alpine sable
#

Yeah, you only get to the right side at the end

#

I need help

#

Shoot

fickle dock
#

alright man I got it, thank you so much!

alpine sable
alpine sable
#

For 4 you can calculate ab using the area formula for triangles and the length of AE

#

Then I think you have a formula for the area of a trapezoid

alpine sable
#

(A+B)/2 times height

#

Yea exactly

#

Height is given by AE

#

Which you have to figure out using the area of the triangle

#

For which the formula is base * height / 2

#

For this would I use the centroid theorem?

warped phoenix
#

when im calculating an intersection of two graphs, what does it mean when it asks me for first and second curve? one of the graphs is y = x and the other is a parabola

#

it seems that no matter where i place the "curves" I still get the same answer for my placement of "guess?"

alpine sable
alpine sable
#

?

glacial hedge
#

How do I do this?

#

I think its the inverse of A

#

but not sure

alpine sable
#

can someone help

glacial hedge
#

plug in $\sqrt {x}$ for z

#

getting

ocean sealBOT
#

Elonmosqito96

glacial hedge
#

$\frac {x} {x^2+9}$

ocean sealBOT
#

Elonmosqito96

alpine sable
#

so that would be the correct answer?

glacial hedge
#

yes....

alpine sable
#

Says its wrong?

glacial hedge
#

?

alpine sable
glacial hedge
#

you forgot

#

x^2

#

it should be

alpine sable
#

OH

glacial hedge
#

x/(x^2+9)

alpine sable
#

Damn it's wrong 😔

glacial hedge
#

??

alpine sable
#

It's somehow squaroot of x/2(x^2+9)

#

Should I debate with my teacher @glacial hedge

glacial hedge
#

wait wut

alpine sable
#

Ikr?

rough compass
#

no

#

thats correct

glacial hedge
#

yeah i think i messed up somehwere

rough compass
#

when u do that u need to multiply by the derivative of root x

#

u prob missed that part

alpine sable
#

Bruh

rough compass
#

you get this and then multiply by (1/2 x^(-1/2)

#

and then rationalize denom

dire pilot
#

can I get help

alpine sable
#

I'm going to tell me teacher

glacial hedge
#

Oh my bad i forgot that it was a composite funciton since its not integral of 1 to x

rough compass
#

your teacher had it right

dire pilot
#

so can I get help

#

im relearning algebra

#

and I really need help with this question

rough compass
#

A

shrewd oracle
dire pilot
#

@rough compass how did you get A

rough compass
#

that was the correct answer

rough compass
dire pilot
#

oh ok

#

thanks

shrewd oracle
#

Oh thought you were saying it was wrong for a min

rough compass
#

nah its correct

dire pilot
#

thanks

shrewd oracle
#

Yeah im aware

alpine sable
#

Did I do this correctly and if not can someone tell me how

upper pebble
#

isn't CG also parallel to AH

#

and wouldn't BI also be parallel to DG

alpine sable
#

Thank you @upper pebble

#

I'm not sure how to figure out the numbers though

#

Those were complete guesses.

upper pebble
#

i don't completely understand it either but i think you can use trigonometry

#

looking at triangle AIC and trying to determine the length of IC, we can recognize that AI is 10 feet and AC is 14 feet, since I is the midpoint of AH and C is the midpoint of AE. maybe that helps

#

can't use Pythagorean theorem since it's not a right triangle so idk what to do there

#

but i encourage you to figure out how to do it instead of guessing

rough compass
#

is this channel open

upper pebble
#

i think Pazerx's question kind of still needs an answer

rough compass
#

ok

alpine sable
#

Im so confused on what to do

timid karma
#

To add animation during their soccer season, the team leaders decide to use a mascot for each of the 20 maths. They wonder whether they should buy or rent the costume. Rental rates are $ 10.50 for each game

The seamstress who would make the costume asks for $ 128.00 for the sewing work and the fabric that would be used sells for $ 25.50 / m2

The mascot costume will be a reproduction of a soccer ball. The dimensions will be 4 times larger on the mascot than on the ball

Balloon volume: 4189 cm3

Determine the cheapest option

#

plz I need help

#

anything

warm vine
#

what is the difference in magnitude notation between |v| and ||v||

charred hound
#

Hi Gents,
How are you going?

Each node is connected to the other. Connection from Node1 to Node2 is not the same in the cost as connection from Node2 to Node1.
What's the name of this graph?

Is there any solution to find the fastest route between node1 and node2?

alpine sable
glacial hedge
#

could someone explain this to me?

#

*this is a t/f question

#

i think its true

hybrid parcel
#

quick question, is the x and y intercept in a quadratic equation always the same?

#

im a high school freshmen btw

glacial hedge
#

????

#

no

glacial hedge
#

y = (x-1)^2 for example

#

y intercept is x=1

#

*x intercept

#

y intercept is 1

#

versus y=x^2

#

with x and y intercept of 0

hybrid parcel
#

alright thank you

tired hamlet
#

How is (x-2)^2 =y-12 not the answer? It said I was wrong

dull lance
gaunt magnet
#

hi

#

You are given a polynomial function and two of the known roots.  You must determine the values of m and n and then use polynomial division to determine the other x-intercepts and then write the function in factored form.  Use polynomial division to determine the other x-intercepts.  Show your work!

#

so for this question
I got n=-42 and m=-11
and then using these value we need to find x intercept using long divison
and then x intercepts i got are x=2, - 1, 3/2

#

am i correct

glass field
#

theres a few ways you can check your own work... first you can stick 7 and -4 in for x and see that your values for m and n make it so the expression is equal to zero. then i guess you can do the same for the other roots you found or you can expand the factored form to see if it matches with your expanded form

tired hamlet
#

Anyone wanna help me with mine😢

glass field
#

youre supposed to complete the square or something?

#

everything looks right in your solution except that the last line is not consistent with the 2nd to last

glass field
#

i think so too

robust cradle
#

Anyone help?

clever folio
#

For (i) you see how the long side of A is 18 m and the short one is 3m?

#

@robust cradle

robust cradle
#

Yea

#

@clever folio

clever folio
#

So then do you know the formula for area of a rectangle?

robust cradle
#

Length x width x height

#

But I’m trying to find the side

clever folio
#

Nah rectangle

robust cradle
#

Length times width

clever folio
#

Exactly.

robust cradle
#

How do I find the side

clever folio
#

Using the picture

robust cradle
#

18x4 for A?

#

Correct?

clever folio
#

Nah 18x4 would give you the area for the bottom and top faces. Do you see?

robust cradle
#

So what do I do for side A

#

4x3

#

?

dire pilot
robust cradle
#

Channel taken

clever folio
#

You see how Ixm seeing that in the pic right?

robust cradle
#

Ye

#

For B is it 18x4

#

?

#

I got the answers

clever folio
robust cradle
#

what abt this?

upper pebble
# dire pilot

do you know what the formula for the area of a semicircle is

robust cradle
#

@clever folio

floral jungle
#

anyone able to do this with steps?

old cobalt
#

Can anyone verify I did this right I don’t really know what the question is asking

clever folio
#

Oh this one?

#

Ah I think aleko was here first tho

old cobalt
#

My bad

clever folio
#

So that gives two eqns in two unknowns to solve.

floral jungle
#

would you be able to show how? cause im still confused

clever folio
#

For ex c=-5 so y=ab^x -5

#

Then we have a pt (0,-8) so -8=a(b^0)-5 so one of the equations is just -8=a(1)-5 which you can solve for a.

alpine sable
#

hi all how can i do this

floral jungle
old cobalt
#

Is this occupied?

alpine sable
#

wym occupied?

topaz scaffold
old cobalt
#

@topaz scaffold are u able to help me with the question?

topaz scaffold
#

If it's within my tiny window of knowledge

old cobalt
topaz scaffold
#

Oh let's go that's in my tiny window of knowledge

#

Standard form is $ax^2 + bx + c$

ocean sealBOT
#

RipeOrange

topaz scaffold
#

And all you need to do it to multiply everything out

old cobalt
#

Ok thanks fam

lofty jasper
#

Ooof ripe

lavish lichen
#

Please help me

topaz scaffold
gaunt magnet
#

Oi hello

#

anyone check my work

dark granite
#

huh?

dire pilot
#

can anyone walk me through solving this problem please

topaz scaffold
#

If the circumference is 10π, what is the radius?

dire pilot
#

5?

#

so the distance from p to o is 5

topaz scaffold
#

Yep

#

And P to R is 10

#

And since PQR is an isosceles triangle, we can conclude that QO is perpendicular to PR

#

Which means we can use those 2 lines as our base and height

dire pilot
#

oh ok

#

so 5 x 5 x .5

#

would be the math to get the area right?

topaz scaffold
#

No

dire pilot
#

why

#

the heigh and base would both be 5 right>?

topaz scaffold
#

PR has a length of 10

dire pilot
#

so thats are base

#

so

#

10 x 5 x .5?

topaz scaffold
topaz scaffold
dire pilot
#

25sq ft

topaz scaffold
#

Where you get the feet from?

dire pilot
#

oop

#

meters

topaz scaffold
#

Just square units

dire pilot
#

units

#

**8

#

to tired for this sht

#

trying to learn all of algebra 1 in 1 nght

sharp sail
#

The number of ordered pairs (x,y) such that 2^x + 3^y = 5^(xy) is

#

Can someone help me with this

ionic jewel
#

im pretty sure theres just the one solution

topaz scaffold
#

Wolfram? 👀

#

You lying to me?

ionic jewel
#

uh lemme check wolfram

#

,w solve 2^x + 3^y = 5^(xy)

ionic jewel
floral jungle
#

anyone able to do this?

topaz scaffold
#

1 integer solution

#

Many non integer solutions

sharp sail
#

So 1 integer sol. and infinite real solutions

dire pilot
#

can anyone help me through this

topaz scaffold
#

Use exponent rules

sharp sail
#

So the answer is 8 ofc

dire pilot
#

wait so

#

what

sharp sail
#

umm the question and the given condition simplifies to the same thig...

dire pilot
#

im to dumb rn

#

its like 2 am happy_cry_cat

topaz scaffold
#

Using the rule $$\frac{c^a}{c^b} = c^{a-b}$$

ocean sealBOT
#

RipeOrange

dire pilot
#

so

#

9 - 6 = 8???????

#

or what

#

or is it

alpine sable
floral jungle
topaz scaffold
alpine sable
#

Oops

alpine sable
sharp sail
dire pilot
#

im to fucking dumb for this man

topaz scaffold
#

$\frac{m^9}{m^6} = m^{9-6} = m^{3} = 8$

dire pilot
#

but how does that equal 8

alpine sable
ocean sealBOT
#

RipeOrange

topaz scaffold
dire pilot
#

and how is 3 equal to 8

alpine sable
#

2 to the power 3

dire pilot
#

ok

sharp sail
#

In a triangle ABC, point D is chosen on BC such that BD:DC = 2:5 . Let P be a point on the circumcircle ABC such that angle PDB = angle BAC . Then PD:PC is?

#

Anyone?

true nebula
#

Someone can help me in a problem of mats?

#

Its to examen please

#

I dont know how resolve it

#

√121

#

Well, it is not for exam but it is for an assignment for which they give points for the exam

brittle grove
#

what is the problem?

#

√121=11 if that is what you are asking for

true nebula
#

i dont know how resolve it

#

thx you very much

brittle grove
#

np

true nebula
#

You can teach me

#

how to resolve it?

#

please

#

You are pana walter 😮

brittle grove
#

it is not really a simple formula for finding square roots

#

you just need to find a number that when multiplied by itself gives the number inside

topaz scaffold
brittle grove
#

11*11=121

alpine sable
#

There are a few algorithms

topaz scaffold
#

Saw one by some Indian guy as always

brittle grove
#

i didn't know

alpine sable
#

You could reasonably use newton's method

true nebula
#

thx

brittle grove
alpine sable
#

Tho would you want to ahaha

topaz scaffold
brittle grove
#

yeah

true nebula
#

i dont speak english, i speak spanish srry if i write wrongly a word

brittle grove
#

yeah its fine

topaz scaffold
#

We're not talking about √121 anymore are we?

#

Just general case?

#

Oh

brittle grove
#

yeah

true nebula
#

Its ilegal use mayus?

brittle grove
#

in general you just memorize what numbers are perfect squares

topaz scaffold
brittle grove
#

mayus?

true nebula
#

Mayus = mayusculas

#

mmh

#

Mayus = IERNMCEUEQWIAAAAAAAAAA

topaz scaffold
#

I do not know what that is

true nebula
#

No mayus = iernmceuqwiaaaaaaaaaaa

#

Mayus = HIIII

#

No mayus = hiiii

alpine sable
#

I'm really sorry, but i'm not really understanding
its not your fault

true nebula
#

😦

#

Mayusculas

#

MAYUSCULAS

brittle grove
#

i google transalated and Mayusculas = Capital letters

true nebula
#

mmh

#

I do not know how to explain it to you

#

Mayus = ARBOLITO ARBOLITO ARBOLITO

#

No mayus = arbolito arbolito arbolito

#

When you write in big print

brittle grove
#

k, i think i understand

#

maybe

true nebula
#

yes

#

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA = mayus

#

haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = no mayus

#

:(.

brittle grove
#

yeah, but you asked if it was illegal to use them

#

when?

true nebula
#

mmh

#

in

#

algunos

#

servers its are ilegal

#

On some servers it is illegal

alpine sable
#

I dont think its a problem

true nebula
#

idk why but they can mute me in the server

#

When you divide a negative number, is the result positive or negative?

brittle grove
#

depends

alpine sable
#

If the number you are dividing is positive then dividing by negative gives negative

dark granite
#

@true nebula If it's illegal some servers, why are you saying it lol?

true nebula
#

In others servers

#

they mute me

#

for use mayus

#

:(.

dark granite
#

why? doesn't seem like a bad word

true nebula
#

no

#

i only say

alpine sable
#

By mayus he means to use all caps

true nebula
#

IDK WHAT YOU ARE SAYING

#

I say it

#

and

#

they mute me

dark granite
#

oh gotcha

true nebula
#

5h

alpine sable
#

Because Mayus means capital in spanish ye

dark granite
#

ah gotcha

true nebula
#

B(

#

I speak spanish 😄

#

:D.

dark granite
#

They prolly mute you cuz it looks like you're yelling at them

alpine sable
#

^^ bump

true nebula
#

prolly...

#

or they hate trees

#

...

alpine sable
#

Logician i was wondering if you could help me out with a combinatorics question

true nebula
#

yes

alpine sable
true nebula
#

ehm

alpine sable
#

I've tried case bashing, but it does not seem to work

true nebula
#

i have bad english

#

wait i use traductor

alpine sable
#

Thats completely fine

dark granite
true nebula
#

Hes have a dog

#

And the dog

#

Move it

dark granite
#

huh?

true nebula
#

eh

dark granite
#

what dog?

#

I'm so confused

true nebula
#

Bob is dog?

brittle grove
#

is this even math anymore?

true nebula
#

eh

alpine sable
#

Philosophy now

true nebula
#

yes

dark granite
#

@alpine sable What was your question?

alpine sable
#

Sorry I think it got lost in the thread

dark granite
#

okay, what have you tried so far

alpine sable
#

I've tried to case bash

#

But thats been pretty fruitless

#

I've also tried to draw a tree diagram but that hasnt worked either

dark granite
#

yeah I'm not surprised the tree diagram hasn't worked because there's some serious dependency here

#

I'd count the complement and subtract from the total

alpine sable
#

Thats problematic

#

I've been thinking about that

true nebula
#

what

alpine sable
#

but when I try grouping shirts together, i cant stop double counting

true nebula
#

I do not understand much of your method to solve

dark granite
#

You need to use something called the PIE

#

the Principle of Inclusion and Exclusion

alpine sable
#

Ok

#

I'm unfamiliar with that ideo

#

I remember hearing that in derangements?

dark granite
#

yeah it comes up in combinatorics from time to time (quite often actually) For instance let's say I asked you to find the number of 5-digit codes that have start with 5 or end with 2.

alpine sable
#

start with 5 or end with 2

#

Ok

#

then i can do two cases

dark granite
#

three actually

alpine sable
#

oh ye

#

both

dark granite
#

because PIE

#

right

#

so what'd the answer be?

#

to the question I asked

alpine sable
#

i dont understand what you mean by PIE

#

but i can do the question

#

like its just 10^4 or 10^3 for your cases (right?)

dark granite
# alpine sable i dont understand what you mean by PIE

if all you do is take 2*10^4 as the answer, you'll overcount because you'll have counted the codes that look like 5....2 exactly twice, but we only want to count those exactly once so you'd need to subtract off the number of codes that look like 5...2

dark granite
alpine sable
#

aah i see

#

its like adding two sets together

#

with an intersection

dark granite
#

exactly taking their union

alpine sable
#

ok

dark granite
#

if the sets are disjoint (i.e., if the 'or' is exclusive) all you need to do is add. However, if the intersection of the sets is nonempty, then you need to do some subtracting

alpine sable
#

That makes sense yes

#

And here there is definitely some intersection

dark granite
#

yes

alpine sable
#

yo

dark granite
#

so the answer to my question should be $2\cdot10^4-10^3$

ocean sealBOT
#

logician_pdx

alpine sable
#

can anyone help me with geometry

#

Ok

dark granite
alpine sable
#

sure

#

Ok that sounds fair to me

#

Tho... I'm kinda unsure how to apply it to this instance

dark granite
#

well so that was just to give you an idea about an instance when you need to use PIE

alpine sable
#

ok

dark granite
#

Now looking at your question....

alpine sable
#

I can put it here again

dark granite
#

All good, I got it open in a new tab

alpine sable
#

ok

dark granite
#

So you've probably tried counting this directly. I bet that was pretty hard if not impossible

alpine sable
#

yep

dark granite
#

so let's count the total, then the complement.

alpine sable
#

Sure

dark granite
#

What would the total be?

alpine sable
#

I found the total to be 8! / (2!)^4

dark granite
#

yes

#

okay, now let's count the number of ways in which some two shirts are next to each other.

alpine sable
#

Some two shirts are next to each other

dark granite
#

there's going to be some casework

alpine sable
#

Ok. Are we going to try and group two idnetical shirts together ?

dark granite
#

yes

alpine sable
#

that would be (7!)/(2!)^3 for each shirt right

dark granite
#

I'd recommend having this picture in the back of your mind:

#

$AABBCCDD$

ocean sealBOT
#

logician_pdx

dark granite
#

each letter represents a type of shirt

alpine sable
#

Ok

dark granite
alpine sable
#

yep I'm already using that notation lol

#

Well i was thinking

#

if we group AA together

dark granite
#

okay

alpine sable
#

Then it would be 7 objects

#

and 7! x 2! / (2!)^4 ?

dark granite
#

yes

#

yes

alpine sable
#

and do we repeat that for B,C , D (so we multiply by 4) ?

dark granite
#

yes

alpine sable
#

OK