#help-0

1 messages · Page 699 of 1

ionic jewel
#

pi is 1/2 of the way around the circle

#

(where it says -1)

#

wait this is linear approximations

#

lemme find the relevent formula

#

same answer

#

in the case of sin it means they have the same height

#

but please look up linear approximation to learn more

#

it's not hard, it's just easier to explain with graphs and stuff so a webpage would be better than me

#

no, you should learn how linear approximations actually work and apply it to your problem

#

it's basically using the derivative at a point you know (x=2 in this case), and linearly extending that to guess and points that are very close (x = 2.001)

#

i learned it in calc 1

#

it's reasonable to know if you know derivatives and have a bit of critical thinking, the topic isn't complex

#

no

#

okay

#

I'm gonna call it theta

#

instead of x

#

does ur class use radians or degrees

#

radians obviously for this I'm dumb

#

anyways

#

since theta is in the first quadrant, you know $0\leq \theta \leq \frac\pi2$

ocean sealBOT
ionic jewel
#

do you agree with this so far?

#

not you

#

yours has no theta or pi

#

clyda please just look it up, i can't explain it as well as a good video or website

#

you agree?

#

okay

#

so now we have

#

we are doing pi minus theta

#

so

#

$\pi-0 \geq \pi-\theta \geq \pi-\frac\pi2$

#

which is

ocean sealBOT
ionic jewel
#

sure if you want

#

what?

#

do you not see what or not how it's not in the second quadrant?

#

yes that's the power rule for derivatives

#

yes that is good

#

check the inequalities direction

#

lol yw, hopefully that actually helped

#

pi minus theta is greater than or equal to pi/2

#

okay

#

so what i did

#

take the original inequality

#

with the 0 to pi/2

#

then you want it to be pi - theta

#

so you can multiple everything by negative 1

#

then add pi

#

but either way this is just a proof that it's right

#

it's not actually understanding

#

it's basically subtracting the angle from pi, If that makes sense

#

because we want it to be pi minus theta

#

each of the three terms

#

and that's why you have to flip the less than to greater thans

#

when you multiply inequalities by a negative number

brittle mantle
#

When y’all are done can I get help with smth pls 👩🏽‍🔬

ionic jewel
#

no not at all

brittle mantle
#

Wait wrong channel I think

ionic jewel
#

$0\leq \theta \leq \frac\pi2$

ocean sealBOT
ionic jewel
#

start with this one

#

then do what i said

#

it'll show that pi-theta is in the second quadrant

#

Ignorw the sin and cos for now

ionic jewel
brittle mantle
#

What do I say there

ocean sealBOT
#

TheMane3

#

TheMane3

ionic jewel
#

you forgot to flip the inequalities

brittle mantle
ocean sealBOT
#

TheMane3

ionic jewel
#

yes, but change the middle one to pi-theta, and simplify the rest, then you can see that (pi-theta) is in quadrant 2

#

i mean i guess it seems okay, but i wouldn't mention linear approximations unless you know how to do them

ocean sealBOT
#

TheMane3

ionic jewel
#

look at the last term

#

pi-pi/2 = pi/2

#

once you do that, do you agree that angles between pi/2 and pi are in the second quadrant?

#

i mean if you ever happen to need to prove it, you can do something like that

#

this worked specifically because you had theta and wanted pi-theta

#

but you don't really seem to understand why it works

#

here let me try an easier idea here

#

let's say you have a number

#

it's between 0 and 1 inclusive

#

lets call it x

#

what range of values could you get if you do 2-x?

#

what

#

why is 0.01 the smallest?

#

what about 0.001?

#

or 0.0000000000001

#

I've changed the problem to make it easier

#

x is now between 0 and 1 inclusive (could be 0 or 1)

#

now what is the range for 2-x

#

you what

#

2 - 0 = 0

#

would you like you rethink this

#

no not quite

#

what's the new range

#

not 0 to 1

#

yes fantastic

#

now let's say our x is between 0 and pi/2 (inclusive again)

#

what's the range of pi - x?

#

it's pi

#

pi is a number

#

you can do the same work as last time

#

why is this one so much harder?

#

well

#

<=, but yes

#

who cares

#

leave it in terms of pi

#

i don't care

#

ok

#

which is?

#

what's pi - pi/2?

#

okay

#

and pi-0 is pi

#

so the range is pi/2 to pi

#

right?

#

so the range is pi/2 to pi

#

wow this sounds an awful lot like the second quadrant

#

(it is)

#

that's why pi - x is in the second quadrant

#

ok

#

wait

#

what

#

that's a nonsensical statement

#

perhaps you mean to say (pi+x) is in the first quadrant, or x is in the first quadrant

#

no stop

#

sin(something) can't be in a quadrant

#

sin(something) evaluates to a number

#

the stuff you put inside the sin can be a quadrant

#

yes

#

sin(anything) isn't in a quadrant

#

uh

#

i don't think that's true

#

pi+x is in the third quadrant

#

pi - x is in the second

#

sin is positive for values in the second, but negative for values in the third

#

if x is first quadrant, all of those other ones are true, yes

#

would be sin(-x)

#

uhhhhh

#

well there's a few ways to prove it

#

but it should intuitively make sense if you can think about it on the unit circle

#

pi+x is third quadrant, x degrees away from the x-axis

#

-x is in the 4th quadrant, x degrees away from the x-axis

#

No but close

#

it's because the distance from pi+x to the x axis is the same as the length from -x to the x axis

#

remember sin is the y value, or height, or distance from the x axis

#

yes

#

yes

#

that is true

#

I'm not sure what that means so glad u got it urself lol

#

,w -sin(x) = sin(-x)

ionic jewel
#

sin is an odd function so that's why that property works

#

my bad it's not strictly distance

#

the sign also matters

#

sin is positive in quadrant 2 remember

#

so it can't be equal to the same thing in quadrant 3

#

what we can say is that sin(pi+x) = - sin(pi-x)

#

yep

#

feel free to check both of those in wolfram

#

oh no

#

no no no

#

let's think about this for a second

#

where is 2pi?

#

yep

#

2pi = 0

#

so...

#

sin(2pi-x) = sin(-x)

#

yes

#

yep

bleak igloo
#

Is the discussion going on here should I ask in another channel

ionic jewel
#

signed distance to the y axis is right

bleak igloo
#

ok

ionic jewel
#

yes, you can also think of it as the x value

#

(like cos(0) = 1 because it's the point (1,0) and 1 is the x value)

#

but continue

#

uhh

#

pi + x is in the third quadrant

#

-x is in the 4th quadrant

#

cos is positive in one of those and negative in the other, so not quite

#

hint: ||cos is positive in the 1st and 4th quadrants|| DONT CLICK IF YOU WANT TO FIGURE IT OUT URSELF

#

yeah ur right anyways tho

#

,w cos(pi+x) = cos(pi-x)

ionic jewel
#

tangent is sin(x)/cos(x)

#

yea

#

uh huh

#

well

#

that's true but it's not the intended solution

#

find another one

bleak burrow
#

2+2

#

=5

ionic jewel
#

those are both in the 4th quadrant

#

cos is positive in one other quadrant as well

#

yea

#

yes

#

okay but

#

that's still not the intended solution

#

despite being true

#

well let's think about it

#

what is sin(pi+x) equal to?

#

wait

#

this ain't gonna work out like this

#

okay scratch that

#

is sin positive or negative for pi+x?

#

okay

#

how about cos for pi+x

steel monolith
#

find the sum of the following APs 2,7,12.......,to 10 terms

ionic jewel
#

yes

#

so then for tangent

#

you have tan(pi +x) = negative/negative = positibe

#

so what other quadrant is tangent positive in?

#

hint:||it's where both sin and cos are positive||

#

yes

#

so tan(???)

#

,w tan(pi+x) = tan(x)

ionic jewel
#

woah hold on

#

this ain't true

#

yes

#

no

#

that doesn't exist

#

you just care about the sign of tangent

#

yep

#

you want the other quadrant where tangent is negative

#

also wrong channel

#

hold the area near the message

#

if mobilw

#

on PC there's a drop-down on the right of the message

#

well idk what to tell u

#

just go find a new channel I'm working with mane

#

speaking of which, what's your answer mane

#

go ahead and check it with wolfram

ionic jewel
#

🎉

#

I'm glad it's worth it since i stayed up to 4am for it 😂

austere elk
#

Can someone please help me solve this

ionic jewel
#

go find a document of limit properties

marsh shard
#

Pleasee help me someone

austere elk
#

Cuz I’m still kinda confused

austere elk
#

@alpine sable yeah thank you, i was overthinking it. It’s so easy and I was just thinking there was something else to it

stone scroll
#

Please help me know what the right answer is

#

My teacher said that my answer is wrong

unborn kernel
#

what does 360/5/2 as a fraction give

#

is it 144 or 36

stone scroll
#

I think 36

unborn kernel
#

but 360/5 divided by 1/2

#

gives 144

#

one calculator of mine shows 36 and the other 144

stone scroll
#

360/5 is 72

unborn kernel
#

yh but 360/5 divided by 1/2

#

is 360/5 * 2/1

#

which is 720/5

#

which is 144

undone dock
#

Why times?

minor heath
unborn kernel
#

when you divide by faction

minor heath
#

(360/5)/2=36

undone dock
#

360/5 ÷ 2/1
=360/5 × 1/2

unborn kernel
#

my alevel calculator shows 144 and my gcse shows 36

stone scroll
#

My calculator also shows 144

#

Now I'm confused

unborn kernel
#

same

stone scroll
#

I don't know the answer

minor heath
#

what

#

,w 3601/51/2

minor heath
#

there

unborn kernel
#

then why wold my a level calculator show 144

minor heath
#

because those kinds think of 360/(5/2)

#

instead of (360/5)/2

stone scroll
unborn kernel
minor heath
stone scroll
valid bone
#

Hey guys I have a question. f(x) has a domain of [-2,4]. What is the domain of f(x+3)

#

<@&286206848099549185>

shell widget
#

@valid bone f(x+3) means the function is shifted 3 units to the left.

#

So the domain will be shifted 3 units to the left.

valid bone
#

So would it be [-5,7]?

shell widget
#

No

valid bone
#

[-5, 1]?

shell widget
#

Yes

valid bone
#

Thank you

shell widget
#

np

chilly panther
#

Can someone explain how on earth this rearrangement is possible?

#

,rccw

ocean sealBOT
shell widget
#

the middle part?

noble crypt
#

well if you're talking about $\frac{(t+1)-2}{t+1}=1$ part then it's cause -1 can also be represented as +1 - 2

ocean sealBOT
#

わたし

noble crypt
#

the same way 3 can be represented as (5 - 2)

chilly panther
#

Yeah.... my head is so in algebra mode for some reason I saw that as -2(t+1) thank you 🙏🏻

noble crypt
#

no problem

plucky sun
#

I tegers

dry jay
#

How can i factor this expression fast without foiling all the terms?

minor heath
ocean sealBOT
#

G3oG0dly

wind bane
#

pull out a 3(a+2)(a-2) from both terms

#

then use the hint godly gave

vagrant rover
#

Can someone explain this. Like what is that sign?

#

Walk me through it

teal epoch
vagrant rover
#

Yeah that one

teal epoch
#

Well that's sigma
It's usually used for summation notation

vagrant rover
#

What is summation notation?

wind bane
#

a convenient and condensed way of writing out the addition of many terms. for example, $1+2+3+\dots+n=\sum_{k=1}^nk$

ocean sealBOT
#

coycoy

teal epoch
vagrant rover
#

ohhhh

#

Okay that makes sense

vagrant rover
#

Do I substitute 1 in place of each m?

teal epoch
vagrant rover
#

oh so substitute 1,2,and 3 in place of M in (2m + 1)^m-1. And then add the three results together?

vagrant rover
#

Awesome, thank you

#

And when we substitute 1,2, and 3 we get a sequence, right?

teal epoch
#

One example how to do these things:
$\sum_{k=1}^3{2k}\implies 2(1)+2(2)+2(3)\implies2+4+6\implies12$

ocean sealBOT
#

Callaway

teal epoch
vagrant rover
ocean sealBOT
#

Callaway

vagrant rover
#

Oh, okay

#

So what if we have a sequence of numbers, such as 1,2,3,4,5 and we want to find the sum of the sequence? Are we forced to manually add each integer together or is there a faster way to do it using an equation? @teal epoch

teal epoch
teal epoch
ocean sealBOT
#

Callaway

vagrant rover
#

A sequence

#

not for substitution @teal epoch

teal epoch
umbral orchid
#

Let G be a group of order 315 which has a normal Sylow 3-subgroup. Prove that Z(G) contains a Sylow 3-subgroup of G and deduce that G is Abelian
is the first condition necessary here?

#

The Sylow 3-subgroup has order 9 so it must be Abelian and be a subgroup of its centralizer

severe hearth
#

Can someone please help me with the transition matrix

umbral orchid
#

mfw I forgot everything after passing LTAM😆

ember ether
#

hello i have a question about fuctions

#

so when you draw a function

#

you need x to get f(x) the image

#

but if x is a none decimal number

#

how are you going to know where x is

#

like if x = 0,9999999999999999999999....

glass lichen
#

well that's x=1

ember ether
#

huh ?

#

so you are telling me that 0,999....=1

glass lichen
#

$0.\overline{9}=1$

ocean sealBOT
glass lichen
#

but if you mean something like x=sqrt(2), then just eyeball it w/ a decimal approximation

ember ether
#

and if it's a number like Pi how are you gonna knw now

glass lichen
#

pi ~ 3.14

ember ether
#

yes

glass lichen
#

so put it just after the x=3 mark..

ember ether
#

then tracing your function won't be exact right ?

glass lichen
#

nope

sleek elbow
glass lichen
#

unless it's trig in the case of pi catshrug

ember ether
#

yeah thanks

#

i like math a lot but i ask to much questions because i wanna know everything

#

so we just trace what about look like the function so we can study it

sleek elbow
glass lichen
#

$0.\overline{9}=x \ 9.\overline{9}=10x \ 9+x=10x \ x=1$

ember ether
ocean sealBOT
ember ether
#

thanks

sleek elbow
#

Thats confusing @glass lichen , how can adding 9's to the end ever make it to 1? that seems very weird

ember ether
#

idk

glass lichen
#

Yeah math isnt suppose to be intuitive catshrug

ember ether
#

i guess it's a thing called uncertainty

glass lichen
#

no

ember ether
#

oh

sleek elbow
#

How is it not impossible to get to 1? If I imagine myself writing 9's at the end forever, how will I get to 1

ember ether
#

not nine

#

but

#

0,999999999.....

#

to infinity

#

you are just getting closer to one

#

but not touching it

sleek elbow
#

yes

glass lichen
#

yes, a decimal expansion with infinitely many 9's = 1

ember ether
#

so saying its equal to one its kinda of confusing

sleek elbow
#

is it just defined as such?

glass lichen
#

they're the same number

#

similar to how you can write 1/2 and 2/4

sleek elbow
#

Cause it doesnt make sense that if I write infinite decimal 9's I will get to 1

ember ether
#

yeah because a number represents a certain amount of stuff

glass lichen
#

yeah it doesnt make sense, but by the constructions of R they are the same number

ember ether
#

Real numbers

sleek elbow
#

oh ye

ember ether
#

and it's just gets to me

#

like when you are tracing a function you need those two axes

#

x and y

glass lichen
#

graphing*

ember ether
#

my bad i study math in french so it's kinda hard to tell what i'm talking about in english

ember ether
#

uh so

crisp sleet
#

I study math in french too

ember ether
#

can i speak french ?

#

here ?

crisp sleet
#

no clue

#

but I'm not french

ember ether
#

oh

crisp sleet
#

in my country

ember ether
#

i'm not french too

crisp sleet
#

physics , chemistry , biology and math

#

are all in french

ember ether
#

me too

crisp sleet
#

I'm from morocco

ember ether
#

me too

crisp sleet
#

wait fr?

ember ether
#

yeah

crisp sleet
#

that was

#

unexpected

#

what grade?

vale ridge
#

twice a number less three is one half of three times the number

#

whats the equation

sleek elbow
#

2x -3 = 1/2 * (x/3)

flat tundra
# sleek elbow Cause it doesnt make sense that if I write infinite decimal 9's I will get to 1

Maybe it may seem counterintuitive, but that's because we can't actually comprehend infinity, but it makes sense that if something goes closer and closer to 1 for infinity it equals to 1 itself. It's counterintuitive because infinity doesn't have an end from our point of view , but asking what does 0.99999... equals to , is like asking what it equals to with a "complete" infinity of 9s , so it actually becomes intuitive that it is 1

sleek elbow
sullen nova
#

help
The histogram on the left shows the number of hours students in a British Literature class read last week, rounded to the nearest hour. Which of the following statements offers the best description of the median number of hours students in the class read last week?

flat tundra
sleek elbow
#

@sullen nova it tells you that b is right, no?

noble sinew
#

the easiest way to convince yourself imo is what would 1-0.999.... be equal to if not 0

#

and if you agree it is equal to 0 then they are in fact the same number

noble sinew
#

you can't have inf 0's then something after

noble sinew
#

so 0.0...1 doesn't make sense

sleek elbow
#

hmmm ye

flat tundra
sleek elbow
#

thats true didnt think of that

vale ridge
#

three times one number added to another is 14. Twice the first number, minus the other number is 1. What are the numbers?
options are: 9 and 5, 10 and 4, 8 and 6, 3 and 5

noble sinew
# sullen nova

it is just count how many is in each interval, then use definition of median

noble sinew
sullen nova
#

how to do

noble sinew
#

20 is between 0-4

#

add them all together

#

then calculate (n+1)/2

#

and see which interval that corresponds to

sullen nova
#

= 32

#

what does it correspond to?

noble sinew
#

you tell me

sullen nova
#

B

#

but why

noble sinew
#

if first 20 are in 0-4

#

then next 22 is in 5-9

#

so clearly 32 is in the interval 5-9

#

{21,22,23,...,42} is in 5-9

flat tundra
sullen nova
#

OMG

vale ridge
#

do parallel lines have the same x-intercept

glass lichen
coral cosmos
vale ridge
#

okay thanks

coral cosmos
#

well because suppose y = log N (to the base b)
which signifies b^y = N
so now if you take b any negative integer for example -2, and you take y as 1/2
you get sqrt(-2) which leads us to complex numbers and then it becomes to difficult to comprehend [giving wierd irrational values]

vale wigeon
#

because logs to base 1 are nonsensical, as are logs to bases that are zero or negative

glass lichen
#

yes, exponentials with base 1 or negatives dont make sense as exponentials

coral cosmos
#

I mean I know one would argue that (-2)^3 = 8 and it does makes sense I agree... but then you can't calculate things like sqrt(-2) etc. which leads to many many exceptions, so we avoid the negative values along with 1 and 0 altogether

ember ether
#

so 0.999..... does not exist

#

only one

#

exists

glass lichen
#

.999... exists

#

it just equals 1

ember ether
#

how about 0.44444444....

#

this time it's not equal to any number right ?

glass lichen
#

it's 4/9

noble crypt
#

you can always approximate a recurring decimal to a fraction

ember ether
#

well yeah

glass lichen
#

but no, .4444.... is just that, 4/9

noble crypt
#

yeah that'll be the case for any recurring non terminating decimal number

#

it'll always have a fraction

thin wolf
#

i made 1 + 2cosx = 0 (x-axis) to show x-cords for A is 2pi/3 already, how do i find x-coordinate for B? Is it by cosine graph or can i use cos x = cos (360 - x)

rigid smelt
#

cos(x)=-1/2 has many many solutions, but there are two general solutions

#

you can find B from the other general solution

smoky relic
#

6 × 14/8
Am i could simplify 6 and 8 become 3 and 4?
If yes, why?

rigid smelt
#

and well you can use the identity that cos(x)=cos(2pi-x) but it might not give you B

rigid smelt
smoky relic
rigid smelt
#

lets move to another channel

smoky relic
#

Okay

thin wolf
rigid smelt
#

cos(x)=a for -1<=a<=1 have two sets of solutions:
x=a + 2kpi
or
x=-a + 2kpi
for integers k

thin wolf
#

ah

#

i see

rigid smelt
#

?

vague coral
#

cos(x) = y (-1<= y <= 1) implies there exists -pi< a < pi such as : cos(x) = cos(a) = y and then x = a + 2kpi or x= -a + 2kpi for k integers

rigid smelt
#

oh right, i forgot the arccos(a)

vagrant rover
#

6!

#

What does the ! mean here?

#

how does this equal 720?

noble crypt
#

it's factorial

#

6! factorial means you need to multiply all natural numbers till 6

#

so 6! means 1 * 2 * 3 * 4 * 5 * 6

vagrant rover
#

On interesting

#

Is 0 included

noble crypt
#

n! factorial means multiplying all natural numbers till n

#

no

vagrant rover
#

ok

#

ty!

noble crypt
#

it's natural numbers so 0 is not there

#

whole numbers means 0 is there

vagrant rover
#

got you

noble crypt
vale sapphire
#

ehh

#

that's not the biggest problem

#

if 0 were included, the factorial would be a dull function

noble crypt
#

lol yeah

vale sapphire
#

always being equal to 0

noble crypt
#

it would always result in 0

vale sapphire
#

for the record here the natural numbers include 0

noble crypt
#

wdym

vagrant rover
#

what is this?

vale sapphire
vagrant rover
#

How do you evaluate that

noble crypt
vale sapphire
#

It's not that outlandish, yknow

#

0 is a convenient number to have around

vagrant rover
ancient creek
#

that's from the topic of combinatorics, you read it as "8 choose 6". Here is the formula:

noble crypt
#

then why are whole numbers there

vale ridge
#

can someone help me for my last question

vale sapphire
#

If we want to exclude it we write ℕ*

noble crypt
#

it's something related to binomials

#

idk either

ancient creek
noble crypt
#

yeah see @vagrant rover here there are ! marks which means factorial

vagrant rover
#

ahh alright

vagrant rover
vale sapphire
# ancient creek

Horrible formula alert!!! Jokes aside, this doesn't explain what this is

vagrant rover
#

ty

vale sapphire
#

"n choose k" is the number of ways to pick k things from a set with n elements

ancient creek
vale sapphire
#

Where you just care about the elements and not their order

vale ridge
#

can i ask a question here or someone asking already

#

?

hazy dome
# vale ridge ?

Use your intuition and common sense by looking at the time stamps of the most recent messages

vale ridge
#

mb

vagrant rover
#

What do you mean the number of ways to pick? @vale sapphire

#

You knw what, I'll just watch the vid

#

Watched the video, makes sense now. Thanks guys!

valid bone
#

Is there a way to rewrite absolute value x

hazy dome
noble crypt
#

,rccw

ocean sealBOT
alpine sable
#

Help needed for 22

hazy dome
#

Not quite

#

Do you remember what a piecewise is?

valid bone
#

No

hazy dome
#

It looks like this

valid bone
#

-(x) and x for absolute value x?

hazy dome
#

F(x) is just an example

valid bone
#

So I should rewrite this equation as piecewise

hazy dome
#

Absolutely

#

Because imma tell you, in Calculus, absolute value is SO ANNOYING

#

We just want piecewise to make everything easier

#

I don’t understand where this +1 is coming from

#

It’s just x and -x, like you said

valid bone
#

Yes

vagrant rover
#

Would the third term here be 21a^5 b^2 ?

shrewd otter
vagrant rover
#

ty

#

so the coefficent of the third term is 21 and the coefficient of the second term is -7, right? @shrewd otter

shrewd otter
#

I'm not sure. It depends on whether the binomial is a sum or difference.

#

I guess it's true since you can express both as a sum.

vagrant rover
#

Okay thanks 😄

rustic mango
#

hey can someone explain this to me?****

#

how does that turn into... THAT

coral cosmos
#

Which gives

#

(3x-2)^4 [ 4(3x-2) + 60x ]

#

Now the rest is easy to figure out, I suppose

rustic mango
#

so what does taking (3x - 2)^4 common mean?

#

oh wait i think im getting it now

glass lichen
#

common factor

coral cosmos
#

Yea

coral cosmos
rustic mango
#

yup i see now

#

where i live they dont use perfect english so ive never used the actual term "common"

coral cosmos
#

Ooh I see

alpine sable
glossy tendon
#

I think you can use this rule

sage jacinth
glossy tendon
#

oh wait b^(logb(x)) = x right

sage jacinth
#

$x^{\textmd{log}_{x}(n)} = n$

ocean sealBOT
#

(バカ) baka

alpine sable
#

My friend ane me both couldn't solve this, we are ||morons||

sage jacinth
#

i got the answer with that rule

glossy tendon
alpine sable
#

Still confused

glossy tendon
#

$10^{\log_{10} 8x-3} = 8x-3$

ocean sealBOT
glossy tendon
#

also note that $log_e(x) = ln(x)$

ocean sealBOT
alpine sable
#

Wait,...

#

Logarithm is stupid

#

Why didn't we have this before

lone wraith
#

How do I solve this?

#

Rational equation btw

minor heath
lone wraith
#

How tho

minor heath
#

$x^2-y^2=(x+y)(x-y)$

ocean sealBOT
#

G3oG0dly

lone wraith
#

Done

#

Now i can remove denominator right?

minor heath
#

yep

#

cancel

lone wraith
#

Done

#

I got root(6x) - 7

minor heath
#

okay

#

now try to simplify $\frac{4\sqrt{6x}-3}{3}$ in the rhs

lone wraith
#

What do i do next?

ocean sealBOT
#

G3oG0dly

lone wraith
#

without touching 6?

minor heath
#

channel occupied, maybe try going in an unoccupied one

ember ether
#

ok

lone wraith
#

I got 7root(6x) - 12/3 = 6

minor heath
lone wraith
#

Did i mess up some where?

minor heath
#

nvm

#

right were in $\sqrt{6x}-7=6-\frac{4\sqrt{6x}-3}{3}$?

ocean sealBOT
#

G3oG0dly

lone wraith
#

ye

minor heath
#

multiply both sides by 3

lone wraith
#

why?

minor heath
#

to get rid of the denominator

lone wraith
#

oo

#

wait i think i found where i messed in previous step

#

i think i got it

#

Now if i square both sides i can get 6

minor heath
#

wait whats the equation you are now on?

lone wraith
#

root(6x) = 42/7

#

root(6x) = 6

#

And then x = 6

minor heath
#

yea

lone wraith
#

Thanks

minor heath
#

i guess, even tho you made me skip more than half of the steps

lone wraith
oblique pulsar
#

Hi I have a quick question is there any one that made a multi-use conversion and scale equation? I want to know if I just spent about 2 hours of my life creating a easier method or just stumbled into a worse / equal version of one that is already available.

alpine sable
#

If you spent only 2 hours of your life most likely you did nothing significant

oblique pulsar
#

I am not saying it is best of the best. I know it won't change much maybe stream line something but nothing else.

vagrant rover
#

(2a + 1)13
This has 14 terms, right?

slender thorn
#

is my answer correct?

tawny condor
#

Is this real?

#

<@&268886789983436800>

alpine sable
#

no

#

of course not

tawny condor
#

so what was it

slate agate
#

Seemed legit to me

alpine sable
#

nobody would randomly give out nitro that expires in 361 hrs? I mean people could but thats like hella rare

tawny condor
#

I clicked it and it brought me to the discord nitro place

alpine sable
#

and nitro gifts usually have a lifetime of 48 hrs

slate agate
#

Anyways, can someone explain this? Wouldn't 5/3 make the fraction bigger?

glass lichen
#

the values in the sequence get bigger

slate agate
#

Oh .-. I thought it was getting smaller 🤦‍♂️

#

ty

alpine sable
#

How do I solve this?

vague coral
#

The best you can do is to see for x = 1

alpine sable
glossy tendon
#

$$
\begin{align*}
\frac{\frac{x-1}{x}-1}{\frac{x-1}{x}} &= \frac{1}{1-x} \
\frac{\frac{1}{1-x}-1}{\frac{1}{1-x}} &= x \
\end{align*}
$$

ocean sealBOT
#

robin
Compile Error! Click the errors reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)

glossy tendon
#

not sure if anything useful...

teal epoch
vague coral
#

this equation is tricky for real

alpine sable
#

hmm

vague coral
#

maybe we can study the parity

#

well, learn it

strong furnace
vague coral
#

3-1/3 = 2/3

#

@alpine sable

strong furnace
#

and 1/(1-(x/x-1))=x

#

if we take g(x) to be (x-1)/x

#

and f(x) to be 1/(1-x)

alpine sable
#

Ah, my bad, I did my calculations wrong

strong furnace
#

f(x)=-g(x)+1

#

and f(g(x))=x

alpine sable
#

This guy got you ^

strong furnace
#

inverse function

#

f(x)+g(x)=1

#

x+f(g(x))=2x

#

this does not solve anything yet

#

but might be a step

#

I am just thinking out loud here

vague coral
#

since f and g are inverse, you can use that to find a function that respects the equation

strong furnace
#

there's no way to use that and avoid 1/x so its still useless

alpine sable
#

so we just need to sub x with x-1/x

hollow kite
gilded kiln
#

Is this channel being used?

vague coral
#

yes

alpine sable
hollow kite
#

a

alpine sable
#

<@&268886789983436800>

strong furnace
#

ok I have it

#

1/(1-x) = f(x)

#

1/x = g(x)

tame falcon
#

@terse oracle Do you have anything meaningful to ask/contribute?

strong furnace
#

x = h(x)

#

(x-1)/x= d(x)

#

f(d(x))=x

#

f(x)+g(d(x))=1

#

g(x)+d(x)=1

#

why am I overcomplicating this lol

#

1/(1-x) was inerse

vague coral
#

xd

strong furnace
#

but we got 1/x

#

but if we take the linear

#

x

#

we get x+1-1/x

#

which cancels out the 1/x and gives us a linear function

#

the problem after taking the inverse turned into a linear functional equation

#

and we are still missing 2 constant terms

#

so x+1/x+1/(1-x)+1 should suffice

alpine sable
#

not sure if this is where I should be asking this question but, any idea what software is used to draw these?

#

I want to embed such graphs in my latex document

strong furnace
alpine sable
#

Thank you and sorry for the inconvenience

warped phoenix
#

can someone help walk me through this?

restive glacier
#

sorry

warped phoenix
#

I thought 2pi was the farthest the unit circle could go?

#

on the right side

spring harbor
#

hm?

warped phoenix
#

well

warped phoenix
#

360 degs. = 2pi

glass lichen
#

yeah

warped phoenix
#

so how would 3pi or 4pi be possible

glass lichen
#

cause you can keep rotating

#

hence the periodicity of trig

warped phoenix
#

oh wait is 3pi = 2pi and 4pi = 2pi?

glass lichen
#

no

spring harbor
#

no

glass lichen
#

clearly not

warped phoenix
#

but it's just another rotation

glass lichen
#

0 and 2pi are coterminal angles

#

pi and 2pi likewise

#

$\theta +2\pi n, n\in\mathbb{Z}$ will be coterminal with $\theta $

ocean sealBOT
warped phoenix
#

whats that e sign

#

and what does n stand for

#

and whats z

#

😅

glass lichen
#

\in means is an element of

#

n is a variable

#

\bZ is integers

warped phoenix
#

oh

#

is this right?

glass lichen
#

no

warped phoenix
#

😦

glass lichen
#

cause a full rotation isnt pi

warped phoenix
#

a full rotation is 2pi

glass lichen
#

yes

warped phoenix
#

ohhh

#

so 3pi would be halfway

glass lichen
#

yes..

warped phoenix
#

and 4pi would be what i drew 3pi as

glass lichen
#

yes

alpine sable
#

Hello Guys. How can I resolve a fractional equation?

glass lichen
warped phoenix
#

ok so they said to sketch it on the interval, -pi, 4pi

#

so i get why its sectioned off there

#

but what do they mean by "partition the interval 0, 2pi into 4 equal parts?

glass lichen
#

split it into 4 equal parts

alpine sable
#

No, in the next year, we need this again, but I forgetten this, how I make this.

glass lichen
#

channel is still in use.

alpine sable
warped phoenix
#

we're using this channel

#

you need to move to an empty one

alpine sable
#

Oh, now I unterstand. Sorry, my mistake.

warped phoenix
warped phoenix
#

how do i...split it

glass lichen
#

into 4 equal parts

warped phoenix
#

its the highlighted red

#

so just cut it vertically?

glass lichen
#

sure if you feel the need to physically partition

warped phoenix
#

(pi/2, 0)

(pi, -3)

(3pi/2, 0)

glass lichen
#

but the important values in graphing sines and cosines are the multiples of pi/2

warped phoenix
glass lichen
#

3

warped phoenix
#

since that's where the points are labeled

#

oh

#

well i could use either 0, 3 or 2pi, 3 for my fourth right?

#

since it's on the period

#

i think thats the right term

#

period

glass lichen
#

you typically use 0,pi/2,pi,3pi/2,2pi

#

since that is 1 period

warped phoenix
#

oh so all points possible ok

#

well no

#

just the points that cut it equally

glass lichen
#

yes..

warped phoenix
shell heron
#

hello

glass lichen
#

@shell heron dont be a pain in the ass.

warped phoenix
#

LOL

glass lichen
#

There is no need for reaction spam, find something productive to do with your life.

shell heron
#

reading is productive

#

arent u the one playing minecraft

#

🤔

warped phoenix
#

:0

glass lichen
#

Im clearly helping Mane, thought you were reading.

warped phoenix
#

anyway, i see then, the reason we find 5 points is to plug the x value into that little table

shell heron
#

say what

glass lichen
#

yes

warped phoenix
#

which finds us our y value??? helping us complete the graph???? :000000

glass lichen
#

yes

warped phoenix
#

YAY

glass lichen
#

since then you can just repeat the shape

warped phoenix
#

TY!!!!

#

If i run into more problems ill be back

rigid ocean
#

How would you move the y's to the left? Would it just be -3y+y/2^2 = -x+1 ?

#

I want to move the y's to the left because they want you to put it in a(x-h)^2+k form

sleek elbow
#

I would do

  1. *2
  2. -y^2
  3. -6y
    @rigid ocean
#

think that works, did it only in my head tho

scenic flame
#

is this free?

rigid ocean
#

What

alpine sable
scenic flame
#

Pls help

alpine sable
alpine sable
#

"Complete the square on the right side"

#

Obviously this is an inverse equation considering x and y are switched. If you attempted to get x alone, it would be impossible to complete the square

#

Try completing the square with y instead of x

wet frigate
#

quick question

#

does this mean tat the output of Q should have the same shape as A

#

or same number of components basiclly

vagrant rover
#

Use the following data set to answer questions

14, 12, 12, 16, 10, 16, 10, 12, 14, 12, 12, 16, 16, 10, 12, 16

What is the mean rounded to the nearest tenth?

Can someone help me with this?

glossy tendon
#

do you know how to get the mean/average?

vagrant rover
#

No

glossy tendon
#

(sum of all the data)/(number of data)

vagrant rover
#

Ah okay, and when do I have to order it?

#

Like order the data?

#

From least to greatest

glossy tendon
#

you dont need to order it to get the mean

#

since addition is commutative

vagrant rover
#

Yeah but when do I have to order it?

#

To find the median or something?

glossy tendon
#

but for getting the mode it is optional, but it is easier to get it if it is ordered

sleek elbow
#

wait

#

that did something weird

#

lol

#

idc 😄

vagrant rover
#

And rounding to the nearest tenth is would make 13.125 become 13.1?

#

@glossy tendon

vagrant rover
#

ty!

#

😄

#

10, 10, 10, 12, 12, 12, 12, 12, 12, 14, 14, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16

#

Would 12 be the median?

sleek elbow
vagrant rover
#

{5, 7, 8, 4, 5, 6, 3, 8, 2, 1, 0, 6, 8, 9, 4, 0}
And how do I find the interquartile range of the above data?

sleek elbow
#

no idea what "interquartile range" is, sorry. I would consider googling, but I have no idea how complicated or simple it is so do whatever you think fits @vagrant rover

vagrant rover
#

Okay thank you : D

sleek elbow
#

You're welcome : ) @vagrant rover

sleek elbow
#

yup khanacadeemy always good 🙏

fair sentinel
#

i recently had a maths exam wanted to check if one of may answers was correct

#

im only in year nine so it should be easy

red phoenix
#

What are you trying to work out here?

fair sentinel
#

perimeter of the square

red phoenix
#

ah

#

k

fair sentinel
#

cheers

#

i used Pythagoras

red phoenix
#

You rounded, but it looks good

fair sentinel
#

thanks you worked that out fast!

red phoenix
#

np 🙂

vagrant rover
#

Can someone help me with this? What population are they talking about, but most importantly what is a standard deviation of the mean mean?

red phoenix
#

It means how many scores are within (mean + or - one standard deviation)

vagrant rover
red phoenix
#

You can look up the formula online

#

It represents how spread out the data is

vagrant rover
#

oh

fair sentinel
#

looks complicated

warped phoenix
#

hey guys

#

whats the name of that one math concept

#

i hear the word but idk how to spell it because writing it out gives me no results on google

#

i hear "conn exceptions" or "connexections" or something like that

#

it has to do with directrix and focus if that helps?

fair sentinel
#

conic sections?

#

@warped phoenix

warped phoenix
#

Ty!!

wooden harness
#

what is 1.5+y2
y=6
the y2 is y to the second power

obtuse root
#

37.5?

vagrant rover
wooden harness
#

alr

vagrant rover
#

^ means to the power of

fair sentinel
#

$1.5+y^2$

ocean sealBOT
vernal dragon
#

hello do u guys use slader

#

?

warped phoenix
#

Hey guys how would I simplify "sin $x$ tan $x$ + cos $x$"

ocean sealBOT
#

TheMane3

#

TheMane3

#

TheMane3

vernal dragon
warped phoenix
#

wait

#

why did you do cos^2(x)/cos(x) and not just cancel out cos(x) from the numerator and denominator? @vernal dragon

#

oh wait you're not multiplying all the terms

vernal dragon
#

ok

warped phoenix
vernal dragon
#

tan is sin/cos

#

cos=cos^2/cos right?

glass lichen
vernal dragon
#

yea adding fractions

warped phoenix
#

oh

#

right

glass lichen
#

you dont add the denominators

warped phoenix
#

wait how does $\frac{\sin ^2\left(x\right)+\cos ^2\left(x\right)}{\cos \left(x\right)}=\frac{1}{\cos \left(x\right)}$

ocean sealBOT
#

TheMane3

warped phoenix
#

moreover how does sin^2(x) + cos^2(x) = 1?

fair sentinel
#

$ sin^2(x) + cos^2(x) = 1$

warped phoenix
#

you added a space

fair sentinel
#

oh ye

#

$sin^2(x) + cos^2(x) = 1$

ocean sealBOT
warped phoenix
#

yeah

#

how does that equal 1

fair sentinel
#

we don't know what x equals so we can possibly have an answer without x right?

vague coral
fair sentinel
#

huh?

#

wait doesn't that only correspond to right angled triangles?

alpine sable
#

Well yes

#

But its just like every other Diophantine equation, plus Ig you can construct a right-angled triangle based off of the pythagorean theorem

#

here's a proof using a right angled triangle and the trigonometric ratios

fair sentinel
#

this is out my league lol

#

ill have a look

#

so x would be the internal angle

warped phoenix
#

then what

amber urchin
warped phoenix
#

?

clear chasm
#

guys, im in an argument with someone

nova shard
#

are there any possible solutions for a and b?

warped phoenix
sleek elbow
nova shard
clear chasm
#

whats, a^2 + b^2

warped phoenix
sleek elbow
vague coral
#

it's the easiest proof

warped phoenix
#

oh

#

so thats just a rule?

#

the sin and cos of x means you have a right triangle

vague coral
#

only in the unit circle, since sinx and cos x are coordinates

warped phoenix
#

oh ok

#

so i take the square root of both sides

#

and then sin(x) + cos(x) = 1

vague coral
#

hell no

warped phoenix
#

😭

vague coral
#

sin²x + cos²x =1

bleak vapor