#help-0
1 messages · Page 695 of 1
Like I know it’s infinatly small, but idk about large
this is a test
It's over long ago
I just want a different approach to solve it
I have solved it .. want my solution!? .. then try another way to solve this
what should i do
what should i do
If it is long overdo, ask for them to send full screenshot with proof that it’s long overdo
Simple 😄
ohk
@fallen sentinel send an ss of entire screen
If they don’t have proof, u may administrate punishment
😐 you want the source !?
But if they are telling truth, that shouldn’t be a problem
hmm
I mean a not cropped screenshot
I THINK that might count as valid proof, they got from another source, so I think that’s fine
ok ig
Cause it doesn’t seem they cropped it themselves
So it's a question from a grp .. of my friends
And so I ended up with this q.
I'm Indian.. grp is for IIT jee people
Yes
which grade are you in
12th .. 2022 my first attempt
me too
Nice
hmm
..
..
is this yr 12?
do u want soln of all questions?
yes
ok
be quick pls
Highschool
but i shouldnt tell u the answer
why?
i'll help you get the idea
ah ok
its not my test
you should also try solving it
good teacher fr
so i'll just guide you
ok!
ok
so
for the 15th one
so lets ignore the lines for now
so how many points of intersection will be there for circles?
2 are concentric
@vagrant kayak
concentric will not have any point of intersectiion right?
yes
ok
Omg exam in 10 mins
so now take another circle and draw it such that it will intersect both the concentric circles
pls tell the answers
teacher said
I guess summarize and lead miracle to answer, but don’t tell the answer
Use time to explain now, don’t talk, explain, if time is short, best to explain then to talk
k
.
Explain as in lead, but not give direct answer
I don’t know what u are talking about so I can’t really help lol
I’m just taking notes on infinity and pondering about infinity lol
@vagrant kayak draw circles and make them intersect the concentric circles. now draw lines that intersect the circles
do something like that
ok
Lol I have given up on PnC
These questions are still bit easier... but I literally haven't solved any PnC problem in months ..
;-;
Why man, STUDY HARD.
Is anybody is of Class 9 or below?
just ask your question if you have one
I was wondering what is wrong with my query
,w solve ( 4 choose 3) * (3 choose 1) * (2 choose 1) + (4 choose 2) * (3 choose 2) * (2 choose 1) + (4 choose 2) * (3 choose 1) * (2 choose 2) + (4 choose 1) * (3 choose 2) * (2 choose 2) + (4 choose 1) * (3 choose 3) * (2 choose 1)
Wolfram Alpha doesn't understand your query!
Perhaps try rephrasing your question?
Click here to refine your query online
,w solve (4 choose 1) * (3 choose 3) * (2 choose 1)
(4 choose 1) * (3 choose 2) * (2 choose 2) + (4 choose 1) * (3 choose 3) * (2 choose 1)
,w solve (4 choose 1) * (3 choose 2) * (2 choose 2) + (4 choose 1) * (3 choose 3) * (2 choose 1)
,w solve (4 choose 2) * (3 choose 1) * (2 choose 2) + (4 choose 1) * (3 choose 2) * (2 choose 2) + (4 choose 1) * (3 choose 3) * (2 choose 1)
So, to solve the following a very convinient sol. has been given here : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ePIKlri8FYg
Instead of such calculations and me being in 8th grade I just verified that; lets assume 10 before the infinity radical then;
10x10 = 100 and sqrt.100 = 10 continuing this process the last ans comes as 10*10 = 100 hence, i replied for the following as x = 100 though the ans, was correct can we appreciate this as a solu. for such similar questions, also maybe this wont work with nums. in series such as the 2nd example from the vid. mentioned above,
where a series of nums. (3, 5) were used
A version of this problem appeared in a math competition for 16-17 year olds. Can you figure it out? Thanks to Abdelhakim in Algeria for suggesting this problem!
Subscribe: https://www.youtube.com/user/MindYourDecisions?sub_confirmation=1
Playlist to watch all videos on MindYourDecisions: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=UUHnj59g7jezwTy5G...
Geyo
100 checks out
Are we to assume Z+
Wait no nvm thats not possible
Assume a=b=c
3x=3x^2=1
No i dont think that works nvm
,w expand (a+b+c)^2
2(ab+ac+bc)=0
Divide by abc you have your ans
Oh damn thats it
Are we giving the answer now
Fun problem
Gg
almost every question is p&C
EEEEEEEE
IT WAS THE ONLY TOPIC I DIDNT STUDY'
UGHH
ded
Its ok bro shit happens dont let it get you down
P&C?
p&C
permutations and combinations i think
Lmao i hate that
ME 2
welp
Its the only basic math topic i was never taught in school
when did they teach u that topic
I was never taught it
p&c are taught starting at 8th Grade nowdays i think
But its kind of intuitive and you can brute force it if all else fails
bruh
they taught me basics of pnc in 7th grade
now i am in 9th
still dont even understand the basics -_-.
can i use this channel?
guess i can
So
if i get tan 270
what do i do in this case
since its undefined
,w tan(270 degrees)
you say undefined
but
ok wait check this
show that: $\tan(v - 270) = - \frac{1}{\tan v}$
how do i add space
MEOWBRO 父
ye

no idea how im supposed to solve this
and what did you get
I found the maximum possible no. of student using circle venn diagram.
how to find the minimum no. of student
max I assume you got 85?
for minimum I get 60, but I'm not completely sure that's right
and sorry meowbro, idk how to finish your problem
no problem!
<@&286206848099549185>
same I got 48.
I don't know if there's anything lower than that
tan(v-pi)=tan(v) , tan(pi/2-v)=cot(v) , cot(x)=1/tan(x) , this is what you need
thanks
Not supposed to use any reciprocal identities
Like cot and sec
Interesting
wait how do you get 48
10 in all 3, then the best you can do is have everyone else in two clubs
oh
i see
i can't do mental math this late
Can I convert inh2o to mmscfd
mmscfd?
x = log3(6561)
The 3 is small and is on the bottom of the log
Does anyone know how to do this?
I can't find it anywhere, they are always slightly different.
Here's the screenshot.
How do I solve these two ?
I don't know much about logarithms yet but it's easy to see that $3^8=6561$ if you haven't found yet
Callaway
Where did the X go
hm
other way around
its ddown arrow
if that even exists
like the small number is on the bottom
oh i got that too
idk what to do from there tho
can i put x in the power????????
damnn
im doing it wrong then
i used the solver on graphics calculateor
thats for X right
rule 5
wait no
ya but idk how to do in the calculator
but thats the power of be
B*
I dont understand 💀
wait are you new to logarithms
Nah
i literally did them like 9 weeks ago
i just forgot bruh 💀
i got an exam on wednesday
algebra + probabibility
it'll be fine tho
thanks mate for all the rules
can anyone here help me understand/clarify the concept of the principle argument in complex numbers? im more comfortable with DM's if it helps but im fine talking about it here.
its less of a question and more of a clarification on a topic if thats allowed. i do not understand the principal argument or how it works. all i know is that it helps somehow with dealing with the multiple angles that arise from computing the angle of a complex number.
I know if dot product of two vector is 0, then it means both are perpendicular to each other
but how to make it lie in the plane P ? or verify if it lies in the plane P
a vector will lie on the plane P if it satisfies the equation for the plane P
i.e. the v = lambda(6,6,9) + mu(7,8,10)
soz i can't latex
umm
actually let me just see if i can do this q first
do you have answers @alpine sable
we get (1, 2, 1)
and scale it to unit vector by dividing by v/|v| i.e. root 6
well it lies in plane P, but how can i verify that and what if it does not lie?
well the way i verified it was by subbing it into the plane eqn
but i'm more curious as to how you got ur vector in the first place
because i had to dot product the plane and vector and find a lambda and mu value, which is already enough confirmation that it's on the plane
dot product should be 0
yea i got the right answer
(1/sqrt(6))(1,2,1)
but i doubt that you would need to confirm it given that you've already dotted the plane and the vector
unless ur teacher is super pedantic or smth
in that case you can sub ur vector back into the plane eqn and confirm that it satisfies all three simultaneous eqns
after you equate the x, y and z components
How can I justify part (a)?
For part (b), I think the acceleration is forward, since his cheeks are going back, so wind is hitting against them
yah you gots it
But how do I justify part (a)/
for part a i think you gotta assume that he's experiencing an unbalanced force
and objects that are moving at constant velocities do not experience any net force
like if ur in a car and the car is moving at 60kph without speeding up or slowing down, you don't feel like it's movingi
i.e. ur not experiencing any force
but then when the car speeds up or slows down you jerk back
i.e. ur experiencing a force
because ur acelerating
*accelerating
Yeah but we haven't been introduced to forces yet
wait so ur telling me that you learned acceleration before u learned forces?
Well, the velocity is. Acceleration Depends if he's slowing down (braking or accelerating)
Yeah, he is accelerating because his cheeks are backward.
So the acceleration is forward.
It wouldn't matter that the velocity is forward I think.
I learned acceleration before forces too.
whats 1 + 1?
A person standing on the edge of a cliff at some height above the ground throws one ball straight up with initial speed v0 and then throws another ball straight down with the same ini- tial speed. Which ball, if either, has the larger speed when it hits the ground? Neglect air resistance.
How do I build equations for this?
y = y0 + v0y * t - 9.8/2 t^2 is the position of the ball at time t, where y0 is the height of the cliff
So the velocity is y'(0) - 9.8t
I have no idea how to account for making it fall straight down or thrown up first, though
<@&286206848099549185>
let $y_0$ be the starting height of both balls and let $v_0$ be the magnitude of the balls' initial velocities (the same for both balls as stated by the problem)
Ann
then the equations of motion for our balls are:
$y_1(t) = y_0 + v_0t - \frac12 gt^2 \ \ y_2(t) = y_0 - v_0t - \frac12 gt^2$
would i ask for help here or is this being used
Ann
kay nvm
@dull onyx this channel is being used. ask in one that's free.
sorry!
How do I know this is true?
one's going straight up, the other's going straight down...
they are subject to the same gravitational acceleration and start at the same height
all that differs is the direction of their initial velocity
do you have any objections to this?
No that makes sense
So we would be comparing |v_0 - gt| and |-v_0 - gt|
But when its position equal to 0
At some time t
we would be comparing their velocities at the time of their landings
these are different
for the two balls
Oh
but also i suppose we could cheat a little
Yes that is right
and avoid the laborious computations
How?
i'm making a picture, hold on
doing it this way (with minimizing the LP) is an overkill. At the moment I am very busy, maybe I can post al solution the next 24 hours
the red and black parabolas are the position-time graphs for our two balls
the solid parts of them, in any case
but the guy is throwing the ball straight up
the horizontal axis is time.
It's up to scaling
do you agree that for any parabola, the slopes of the two tangent lines at the x-intercepts are equal in magnitude (and opposite in sign)?
if your only objection is that you don't see how it relates to the problem, hold that thought. i'll get to it in a moment.
Yes of course, a parabola is a reflection of its other branch across a line going through its vertex
okay great
well now here
the black parabola is a reflection of the red about the y-axis
Yes
yeah so there you have it

the slopes of the tangent lines at all four horizontal intercepts visible in the picture are the same (in magnitude)
Why would it be a reflection of the other parabola about the y-axis axis?
Ann
if we ignore the restriction of t ≥ 0 for a moment
Makes sense, thanks
Does this mean that both balls have same speed when they hit the ground?
that's the conclusion i've been leading up to.
But I thought the one you threw up would have higher speed since the potential energy would be larger than the potential energy of the other ball
mgh=mv^2 /2
But what about reasoning it like this: The ball thrown directly up has more time to accelerate while coming downwards, since it'll be higher up?
yeah but the ball that's thrown down starts with a speed and keeps accelerating, while the other one decreases in speed and once v=0 it starts accelerating
or something at least from what I just understood
but it also starts with velocity going the wrong way
it has more time to accelerate, but that time will be spent getting its velocity to zero and then pointing downward
Thanks
That doesn't bother me now
in fact, once the upward ball falls back to the same height it was thrown from, it behaves identically to the downward ball, only delayed in time
actually we can try this out, let's say we're at h=5 and the start v0 = 5m/s and both balls have m=2kg
We get for ball that's going down: 5.10.2 + 2.5^2/2 = 2.v^2 /2
<=> v ~ 11.18 m/s
For the second ball: mgh=mv^2 /2 + mgh
2.10.h = 2. 5^2 /2 + 2.10.5 or h = 6.25
so we get mgh = mv^2 /2 or 2.10.6,25 = 2.v^2/2 or 11.18m/s as well
damn that's sick
Physics 
The rules said not to allow 12 or younger than 12
I'm turning 13 in 6 days so... am I allowed?
unfortunately them's the rules
ok Ill wait then
I feel like such a grandma when I read that people on here are like 12 or 13.
Ive been looking over this one question, as self study but I'm not able to figure out how regions in the venn diagram are being wrote as values of x
wtf dude
???
thanks
🤔
lol
thanks dGhost
All good :)
btw am I allowed to ping mods if stuff like this happens? @fading citrus
okay ty
If someone could answer my question, I would appreciate it
x is the number who take all 3 languages.
we know that 25 take F and G. This covers 2 possible regions; (F, G) and (F, G, S).
so (F, G) + (F, G, S) = 25.
(F, G, S) is x, so (F, G) + x = 25.
(F, G) = 25 - x.
Ohhh, thanks
Hmm, it seems it's too late for me to explain this for someone has already explained it, oh well
A second ball is dropped down an elevator shaft 1 s after the first ball is dropped. (a) What happens to the distance be- tween the balls as time goes on?
For ball 1 the distance from ground is y'(0)t - gt^2/2
For ball 2 it is y'(0)(t + 1) - g(t + 1)^2/2
Subtracting, we get -y'(0) + gt - g/2
So as t -> infinity, the distance -> infinity, right?
If x is a
prime number, then LCM of x2,x4,and x6 is. Please explain it throughly
$\text{You did an error in the equation}
\text{first ball has:}
y_1 = at^2 + y_0
\text{second ball has:}
y_2 = a(t-1)^2 + y_0
\text{so the distance between the two balls is:}
y1-y2 = at^2 - a(t-1)^2
= a(2t +1)
\text{so what you should say at the end is that the distance between the two balls is gradually increasing (as t is a positive variable) }
\text{also note that a = g}$
Pealover
Please answer this I have to complete my homework
Is it x multiplied with 2 or x to the power 2
you could note for the next time to just write $'s inside math code, and leaving the text outside, saves some time, as well as if you want to create a different line to use double \.
X to the power 2
So the answer is x7
X8
U take x2 common so in first term there nothing left and in 2nd term x2 and 3rd x4 so when u multiply x2 x2 x4 = x8
Term them into fraction
Ok my silly mistake
what are you stuck on?
stem is the start of the number
1st stem is 1
the leaves are just the ones digits
first line of the plot is 1 0
yeah, cause there's only 1 10..
since x is prime, you just need to consider the LCM of the powers themselves
Is answer x6?
you dont have any data that starts with 2, so clearly not
What does part (a) mean? I don't understand the English.
If I consider x=2 that x^6 is the correct answer
actually yes it's x^6
But why does this logic fails
because you can make it smaller
the quick LCM is just multiply them all together
but you then check if it can be reduced via prime factorization
Ok
ex the LCM of (2,4,6) is 12 because 2=2, 4=2^2, 6=2*3, so the LCM has to be 2^2*3
Ok thanks for your help
yes, -1*-1=1
even if it is in parenthesis
it's still -1*-1...
ok thanks m8
$-1\cdot -1\cdot 8q$
Mosh
looks like it
33k-15 is the answer
that's not helping
8k +25k - 15
33k -15
Can someone help me on how to solve this?
= RS
How do I find x here
X^5 +2x - 7 = 0
Either completing the square, factorization, quadratic formula
@stiff moth sec^2(x) = 1 + tan^2 (x) and cosec^2 (x) = 1 + cot^2 (x)
Use these identities
im confused how would that work
Start from LHS and write sec^2 (x) as 1 + tan^2 (x)
But for cot^2 (x), rearrange the identity cosec^2 (x) = 1 + cot^2 (x)
Plug in whatever u get for cot^2 (x) too
@warped phoenix What you basically have is $(81 x^6 y^7 )^{\frac{1}{3}}$ And recall that $(abc)^n = a^n b^n c^n$
Sup?
what function satisfies f(x+y) = f(x) + f(y)
I am not talking about the results, ofc
just the syntax
yes
yes, but usually its written like it is on the right side. however, rational functions with one in the numerator are written as, for example, $\int \frac{dx}{x}$
mchen10
Aight! Thank you both!
A school offers three subjects: Mathematics, Art and Science. At least 80% of students study both Mathematics and Art. At least 80% of students study both Mathematics and Science. Prove that at least 80% of students who study both Art and Science, also study Mathematics.
Students can study any combination of Art, Math and Science. Draw a Venn diagram and you see that the set of students can be split into 8 different groups. Now we introduce the following variables: none is the number of students that do not attend a course. a is the number of students that only attend art, but no other course. am is the number of students that attend art and mathematics but not science. ams is the number of students that attend arts, mathematics and science. m, s, ms, as are defined in a similar way.
From the Venn diagram we see, the number of all students is none+a+m+s+am+as+ms+ams. The number of art and science students that is attending the math course is ams, the number of art and science student that is not studiing math is as. The number of students that study at least math and science is ms+ams, the number of students that is studing math and arts is am+ams. So your problem can be stated in the following way:
Given the nonengartive integer numbers none, a,m,s,am,as,ms,ams.
if
am+ams\<= (80/100)*(none+a+m+s+am+as+ms+ams)
and
ms+ams >= (80/100)*(none+a+m+s+am+as+ms+ams),
then
ams >= (80/100)*(as+ams).
ProofWe have
none+a+m+s\>=0
and so
am+ams >= (80/100)*(am+as+ms+ams)
and
ms+ams >= (80/100)*(am+as+ms+ams).
These inequalities can be transformed to
-4am+ ms+ams >= 4as
ma-4ms+ams >= 4as
If we add these two equations and divide them by 2 we get (1/2)*(am+ms)+ams >= 4as. But -(1/2)* (am+ms)>= 0 and so
ams>= 4as. Adding 4ams and dividing by 5 gives
ams >= (80/100)*(as+ams).
Hey guys
what is domain and range?
I am learning to graph radical functions and its asking me what the domain and range is
how do i find it
from what i can tell its what x and y can be on a graph?
so how do i find it
that could be any point on the graph
x and y
@velvet forum
for domain
visual a straight horizontal line across anypoint of the graph
if the horizontal line only touch the graph once then it's domain function
called horizontal line test
vertical line test for range
for example a parabola have 2 roots or points that a horizontal line would touch
therefore it's not a domain function
but is a range
basically any x value that doesn't repeat is a domain
and of course y is range
at least that's what i can remember after a year out of school
makes sense?
kinda
what does it mean when they say the domain is all real numbers
@velvet forum
who can help me with some statistics is something complicated
it means any real number can be plugged into the function
@glass lichen how would i figure that out?
you'd look at the function
then its all real numbers?
@warped phoenix The domain of a function is the set of all x-values of a function, which gives the range. (Or, the set of y-values of a function from a given set of x-values.)
For example, let's take y = 2x + 3. This function has a domain and range all consisting of real numbers. When graphed, you can visually see this is true.
Let's take y = x^2 + 2x + 5. Just by looking at it, you can use any real number as an x-value. But, the output is not infinite. When graphed, you can see it has a minimum* value. of 4 when x = -1. Thus, the domain is (-∞, ∞), but the range is [4, ∞).
There are some functions that have restrictions with their domain. For example, y = sqrt(x). We know that the square root of a negative number creates imaginary or complex numbers, so anything x-value below 0 will give an imaginary output. Thus, the domain is [0, ∞). The range is also affected by this, and thus, the range is also [0, ∞). You can see this visually by graphing it.
So, in short, the domain is the set of x-values of a function/relation, and the range is the set of y-values of a function/relation.
Wdym by "the output is not infinite"?
the range isnt R
so y is not guaranteed to a real number? @glass lichen
i didn't read the question but I imagine he means the y is a real number, but not every real number is a possibility
read: a subset of reals
It is since functions map from R to R, it just means that maybe some real values wont be reached (the function isnt surjective is the proper phrasing)
im...still confused
ok, are you gonna ask a meaningful question or just state you're confused?
wow
Hi, I am just starting geometry and I’m struggling to understand it and didn’t do so well on my last test. Any tips for understanding it and studying effectively???
main thing is probably practice
may I ask what kind of practice? Such as online worksheets or using the textbooks? But ty for your help!!
first comes understanding tho
I imagine worksheets probably
Alright thank you so much!
also if you have trouble understanding stuff, feel free to ask here @neat mesa
So, how i can manipulate this limit to get the answer and dont fall on 0/0 ?
You have to rationalize
Actually
Use L’Hôpital’s
Yea that’s easier
@hazy dome i don't know L'Hopital's
Do you know what a derivative is?
It's before the book demonstrates L'Hopital's
Yes
Basically take the derivative of the top and bottom and reevaluate the limit
But i just saw y'=( f(h+x) - f(x) )/ h
@warped phoenix
This is because i can found the derivate throughout the limits and vice versa?
In this chat right? Also again thank u for your help!!
No. Basically L’Hôpital’s rule states that should a fractional limit yield an indeterminate form via direct substitution, that the limit of the derivative of the numerator divided by the derivative of the limit of the denominator will yield the same result
or.. just dont resort to L'H
Don’t mind the sec stuff on the top. Just look at the limit stuff as a point of reference
How else would you go about it?
rationalize
How? It seems very difficult and cumbersome to do
like any other rationalization.. just need to know difference of cubes and squares
But it’s the difference of cube roots and square roots
$\frac{\sqrt[3]{x}-1}{\sqrt{x}-1}\cdot\frac{\sqrt{x}+1}{\sqrt{x}+1}\cdot\frac{\sqrt[3]{x^2}+\sqrt[3]{x}+1}{\sqrt[3]{x^2}+\sqrt[3]{x}+1}=\frac{\sqrt{x}+1}{\sqrt[3]{x^2}+\sqrt[3]{x}+1}$
Oh wow
yup
Mosh
The second one is the difference of cubes?
The numerator is
At least it can be manipulated to be one
yeah the fraction w/ 3 terms is the congujate for difference of cubes
$(a-b)(a^2+ab+b^2)=a^3-b^3 \ a=\sqrt[3]{x} \ b=1$
I cant remeber that
Thanks for reteaching me that
Mosh

I prefer L’Hôpital’s in this case tho because it’s easier
Yes
Thanks
why is sin of 2x 's period 2pi divided by 2 instead of 2pi multiplied by 2? Graphically it's obvious but wanted to know if there was a formula or something to reach this result
hello
I have to clear the variable x from the function
so that i'm left with something like x=...y...
r u trying to find the solutions or something
ohno he wants to isolate x
FROM THIS
sorry english isn't my main language
LEMME GRAB MY CUBIC FORMULA REAL QUICK
@gilded novar u trying to find the inverse maybe
not the inverse
I'm trying to solve a solid of revolution exercise
I'm given that function
And it rotates around x=0
wth
in the (0,1) interval
In mathematics, engineering, and manufacturing, a solid of revolution is a solid figure obtained by rotating a plane curve around some straight line (the axis of revolution) that lies on the same plane.
Assuming that the curve does not cross the axis, the solid's volume is equal to the length of the circle described by the figure's centroid mult...
Hey guys, having a bit of trouble with this problem:
Find the equation of the tanget line to y = x^3 - 3x at x = 2.
Watching a video on it and I don't understand this one step.
Wouldn't it be (2 + h)^3 - 3(2 + h)? where did they get the end part from?
why are you using limits?
Are you allowed to differentiate normally?
if not,
then
the (2 + h)^3 - 3(2 + h) is like x^3 - 3x but u put in 2+h instead of x
thats f(2+h)
then they subtract f(2), which is 2^3 - 3 * 2
oh so its for the entire thing! got it, thanks
just following a tutorial currently
@alpine sable by definition, $f'(x_0) = lim_{h \to 0} \frac{f(x_0+h )-f(x_0)}{h}$
magnos
np

Simplify the expression, leaving your answer in its factorised form. 2(2x – y)² – 6x(2x – y)
can someone tell me how I can work this out?
Whats is the derivative of this function? The answer on my book is (e^x)(3x²+x-5) but my result is (e^x)(3x²+11x+5)
$f'(x)=e^x(6x+5)+(3x^2+5x)e^x$
Mosh
your answer is correct.
how do i solve this?
105 = 25m + 9c + 16s
what do you want to solve for?
ok, so in order to solve for all 3, i need to solve 3 times?
Im not sure you can
?
mm, lemme give a word problem, this was my attempt in coming up with an equation to solve
we have a case of https://xyproblem.info
Asking about your attempted solution rather than your actual problem
was hoping it would help, but if not nw ill bounce
add the original qquestion, might help
What? 3380000 is what? And where does 105000000 come from? (It isn’t 3380000 * 5 * 6)
And right below you say they make another amount
yes, thats where the 105 comes from
Result:
1.014e+8
Notice that isn’t your number
wdym
.
And why do you say a new amount just below?
platinum is being converted into the other number
Instead post original question wording instead of this
What?
ah nw, i think since i wrote out the word problem myself i can probably solve now
thanks for the help!
idk how to close the channel if thats a thing here
The other thing still applies
?
,w 338000065
Notice that isn’t 105,000,000
o right, 😕 mb
this isnt in a book or anything, its a real world problem
but ye, ill just calc for the hour
instead of trying to calc for the whole thing at once
thanks 😄
mm, i lie, my math isnt good enough
18,200,000 = 25m + 9c = 16s
finding the lcd and solving for m [3600 is the lcd for 25, 9 and 16, and multiplying by 144 got me the next line], m, c and s being arbitrary
2,620,800,000 = 3600m + 153c + 2304s
Piper Nakamura Mawji
if you're not going to ask a question, dont type in the help channels. #❓how-to-get-help
Did you get the job
again, only use the help channels if you have a math/math-related question
Did you?
#❓how-to-get-help , this is a help channel.
If you are not going to follow the rules of the server, then stop typing.
Again, this is a help channel either use it properly or leave
Yeah 
And can confirm they should be banned in ModMail / dms
OH GOD NO
I AM GOING TO BE BANNED FROM THE MATHEMATICS DISCORD SERVER?!
WHAT WILL I DO
MY WORLD IS ENDING
Hopefully look at yourself and the mirror and reflect on what your life is
MY LIFE IS NOTHING WITHOUT THE MATHEMATICS DISCORD SERVER
PLEASE DONT BAN ME!
I WANT TO ROLEPLAY ON MINECRAFT WITH MOSH
hi

why'd you guys ban them
they seems like a cool guy
👍
Not of your concern.
k
we cant do it for you
do you mean you need help doing it or are you just looking for a calculator
lmfao wtf. just read the conversation
alright is this a hw question?
We can move to a different channel
alright do you have your notes on polynomial long division? the textbook can help too
sure whcih one
1 is free i think
thats very courteous of you. thanks
ofc! ❤️
<@&268886789983436800> same person as Gombo

how do we know this is gombo again?
i mean i guess
"don't ban me again"
is obvious
but
they're saying the exact same stuff
Ty
How would you prove the following limit? $lim_{m,n\rightarrow\infty}\frac{(-1)^n}{(-2)^m}=0$
econguy
set x = m= n;
because they both approach infinity
or wait
u mean like formal proof?
Formal proof. Epsilon style proof
😦
F
uno seconda
that's an F
yo thats lame who would make u do that
for
epsilon > 0 and delta >0
$ 0 < \sqrt {(x-a)^2+(y-b)^2} < delta$
uh
$0 < \sqrt {(x-a)^2+(y-b)^2} < delta$
Elonmosqito96
\delta
have a question
can yall help?
i need a run diwn on how to solve this and simplify
?
then:
$|(-1)^n/(-2)^m-0|<\epsilon$
Elonmosqito96
run down
dafuq people stop spamming
pls i just need help man
jesus this is a mess
- Before asking a question, make sure that the channel you are using is not currently in use. An occupied channel would generally have an ongoing discussion or a trailing unanswered question. Likewise, when you are done using a channel, make this clear so that it's open for others to use.
afaik @zinc oar was here first but idk if they actually want to go through their problem or not
Is this channel available?
can somone help me in channel one
no. there are like 3 people trying to ask questions at the same time lmao
sorta being used rn
Sorry, will go to another
Okay, so why this then?
yikes man
im not very fluent with epsioln delta proofs in multi var case
😩
Haha neither am I. It’s kinda crazy. Otherwise any other kind of approach, I guess I can work with that
I used Matlab to kinda check if this was true, but that’s it
were u not paying attention.....
this channel is sorta being used...
he asked way before u
yeah man... u cant really use the like formal way because u cant plug in a and b in $ 0 < \sqrt {(x-a)^2 +(y-b)^2} < \delta$ because they are inf
$0 < \sqrt {(x-a)^2 +(y-b)^2} < \delta$
Elonmosqito96
yeah that looks great
actually it looks like aral was first
Thanks man, at least I don't feel dumb for not knowing how to do it @glacial hedge . Good to hear a second opinion
ye that was the result
youre good
i thought that was what he was dividing
what should i use for latex code inside of html for ease?
um
is there not a good browser extension or something?
probably mathjax
seems a lot of junk software out there
mathjax is pretty well trusted and pretty good too
i forgot i had that already lol
not sure what that means but ok xD
Twenty bored students take turns walking down a hall that con-
tains a row of closed lockers, numbered 1 to 20. The first student opens all the
lockers; the second student closes all the lockers numbered 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14,
16, 18, 20; the third student operates on the lockers numbered 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18:
if a locker was closed, he opens it, and if a locker was open, he closes it; and so
on. For the ith student, he works on the lockers numbered by multiples of i: if a
locker was closed, he opens it, and if a locker was open, he closes it. What is the
number of the lockers that remain open after all the students finish their walks?
draw a picture
why is it as h approaches 0 again?
h is the distance b/w the 2 points you base the secant off
so to get the tangent you make the points get closer and closer
right right, its the run in rise/run i believe? so as it approaches 0.. it means, yeah, they get closer and closer (the points)
yes, h is the run
the slope of the tangent right?
yes
WaIt
I just had a flash of brilliance
the abs in the proof
removes the -'s
so
(-1)^n
doesn't affect the thing
so its really
1/2^m
which can be proven using single var stuff
Well, but holding m=1 and allowing n to vary we would have something (1/2 -1/2 1/2 -1/2...) so it diverges
But my apologies, what I want to prove is $\lim_{m,n\to\infty}\frac{(-2)^n}{(-3)^m}=0$
econguy
@glass lichen what does it mean when youre given a function and not 2 points? youre still trying to find the slope of the tangent line (the tangent line in this case is f(x) = 1/x right?), just without the 2 points?
You have 2 points
(x,f(x)) and (x+h,f(x+h))
those are always the 2 points, which you can get by reading first principles
oh, it all clicked now. thanks
are all countably infinite sets numerically equivalent??
i think the idea is that you can find a 1:1 correspondence but someone can correct me
How would I start this one?
P = principal amount
(20,000)
e I believe refers to Euler's natural number
r = rate which we have to find
A = 43,957.90
t = 15 years
Yeah
aight then rearrange the equation in terms of r
How would I do that?
Yeah
great
so once u divide A/P
u get around 2.198 = e^(15r)
now take the log base e of each side
on the right side, according to the inverse property of logarithms u get 15r
and on the left side u get log base e of 2.198
so log _ e (2.198) = 15r
on a calculator, u input (log 2.198)/(log e)
u get .787547 so on
divide that by 15
and u get .0525 around
so 5.25 percent is the answer
Thx so much
Can someone who knows R help me find the correlation values for my data set?
I have over 90 columns, I want to test the correlation between all of these variables against one other variable which is already contained in the 90.
This is what I have so far
for(col in 1:ncol(longitudinalbl)){
myCortest = cor.test((longitudinalbl)[col], IDE.BL$SSI_worst, na.action=TRUE, method = "sp")
myCortest$estimate
}
kevinFDG
Can someone give me a good math problem? (Of any topic)
the one above, i was asking about how I can find the correlation values in R for my dataset. i posted the code I have so far above
Travelling Salesman
@rich basin you have to ask in a channel where someone hasnt asked a question, I just posted above.
Your good, I dont think anyones gonna answer mine anyway so you can have it actually.
Thanks
where can i post my question?
You can post on question 1
okay thanks!
<@&286206848099549185>
I'm sorry. I didn't realise
,w solve 81/127
,w solve (8 choose 4) / ((2^8)/2-2)
Why the -2?
,w solve ((10 permutate 6) + (10 permutate 5) + (10 permutate4) + (10 permutate 3) + (10 permutate 2) + (10 permutate 1))/ (15 permutate 6)
@coral pagoda So this is all the combination minus the combination when one person hold all of it




