#help-0
1 messages · Page 688 of 1
(-1)^4 = 1, so yes.
Also 2 * 4 isn't 16
yeah that was my confusion
It looks like you wrote an 8 first, which would've been correct
But then you crossed it out and replaced it with 16
Ur stuffing up another one of your exponent laws
$\frac{a^m}{a^n} = a^{m -n} \neq a^{\frac mn}$
ℝamonov
$\frac{x^8}{x^4} = x^{8 -4} \neq a^{\frac 84}$
ℝamonov
notation can be improved a bit,
= signs are used inappropriately in the first half of the work
should I use therefores instead?
would be better if you introduced
**kx^4 = **
anyone good with probabilities ?
how do I reach that value?
the teacher didn't put the formula
Calculate P(Y = 1) and P(Y = 0), add them up, and subtract the sum from 1
hello, I need help with this problem
how?
integrate twice to find y
you have enough information to determine both constants of integration as you introduce them
remembering that the slope of the tangent line at x=a is y'(a)
using the binomial probability formula or a calculator that can do it
no
do you know the formula for binomial probabilities?
cause the pmf is just a fancy way of saying that
it's just a formula you memorize it
I procrastinated and started studying way too late
you could look up a derivation but I'm sure it's not that nice
well actually it's probably pretty simple, you don't need any calc for discrete prob functions
huh what language is that
i can't read Portuguese but looks like calculations for mean and variance
i'm not sure how the teacher solved it
yes
it uses mean and variance
idk what she does after having both values tho
what kind of distribution is it?
normal
then it's just using the formula
if you have the mean and variance then u can evaluate probabilities
,w normal distribution (1900, 500), P(X>= 2000)
hmm
no
values don't match
still doesn't match tho
so you have to take the square root of your variance to get standard deviation
yes I agree
teacher got 0,02
i guess that means it's not a normal distribution
perhaps your teacher has messed something up
yeah looks wrong, I'd trust wolfram
4.1 Calculate the probability that, on a given day, the value of sales for traditional trade exceeds that of department stores.
4.2 The factory will set a target of 2000€ of sales per week. What is the probability of reaching this goal? (Consider 1 week = 5 working days.```
Can you confirm?
It's ex 4.2
their answer is just wrong
mean of 1900 and var of 2500 intuitively doesn't make P(x>=2000) that low of a nunber
they much have been solving for something else, or messed up

ah yes
gives the value now
so my mental math is slacking
you did 500
got it
xd
thanks lol
well fwiw i didnt notice that either
is it open note?
as long as u can do it on ur GDC or whatever youll be fine
if you don't know the formulas and you don't have a way to use them you fail
yes
that's the PDF yes
you may want the CDF as well
well
the CDF is ugly
but you might need calculus then
hmm well technically the notes is the PDF the teacher gives so this is all we have to use
do u get to use a calculator
scientific
is this a good resource
graphic calculator i mean
most graphic calculators can do normal PDF and CDF
how
depends on your model
casio fx-CG 20
ive never even seen one of those before uhhh you might need to check your manual
you see how here it said P.D
u should be able to find another option that says Normal C.D
what lower and upper means is it calculates P(lower ≤ X ≤ upper)
I can't do lower: 2000 upper: 0
yeah because P(2000 ≤ X ≤ 0) is nonsense
btw if I seem dumb is because it's 3am and ive been studying for 10hours
so im a bit slow atm
real quick question, are trigonometric functions considered algebra II content?
u want to set lower to 2000 and then upper to some number like 3000
after like 5 standard deviations from the mean the probabilities are almost zero
it's 0.22
can you tell me the diff between Npd and Ncd?
I didn't understand that part
Npd calculates the probability of a single value
Ncd calculates the probability of a range of values
thats why Ncd makes you specify a lower and upper number because itll find the probability of all values between the lower and upper number
oh aight
makes sense
i'm so tired
that I tried taking a screenshot
in my calculator..
u should sleep before your test like
i did it like this for the 4.1
gave the correct value
thanks
i didn't know the calculator could do this
thanks
eh.. I'm not gonna sleep
im pulling an all nighter
way too behind on the things
your teacher shouldve told u about this like
no sane person with a GDC is going to be out here trying to calculate 1/√2πσ² etc.
imma be honest
im in college
with covid most classes were online
online classes are very hard to not skip
rip
Hey guys, for $x(x^2 + x - 2) = 0$, I got x = 0, x = 1, and x = 1, does that mean there are only 2 roots, 0 and 1?
TheMane3
im pretty sure theres more than 2 distinct roots
the calculator should have a poisson CDF
hold on isnt that a binomial distribution
it's -2, 0, 1
aw thats nice
learning more from you
than from my teacher
in her defense i attended very few classes
i gotta memorize where to use each of the distributions tho
still not sure
sometimes itll say in the question
3.1. Present the variable that models the above situation, indicating its distribution and parameter(s).```
in this one it didn't
how do you figure it's poisson?
poisson distribution takes one parameter, which is the expected value
here u only have one parameter and its the expected number of soaps the equipment can process (per minute)
oh aight
makes sense
can the calculator do intervals of confidence?
idk whats the name in english
maybe, im not sure
Could you please try to me explain me this one Lollipop?
The question is to calculate the confidence interval for Homen (h) at 95%
but i don't understand anything going on
here's the table
sorry uhh i havent learnt about confidence intervals
someone else is gonna have to help. im just as lost as you are
Do you think this data is "normally" distributed? If so, use the standard error for a normal and the 95% CI number from the normal table. I'm sure you have a formula. This is classic material.
yeah idk maybe this will help https://www.statisticshowto.com/probability-and-statistics/confidence-interval/#CISample lol
What is the value of 12 ÷ 2 (5 – 2) = ?
2 or 18?
based on bodmas/bidmas/birdmas/pemdas (different places call it different things), you do brackets first, then indices/exponents, then multiplication/division (from left to right), then addition/subtraction (from left to right)
follow that, we get:
12 ÷ 2 (5 – 2)
= 12 ÷ 2 * 3
= 6 * 3
= 18
help me pls
sin=opposite/hypotenuse
cos=adjacent/hypotenuse
tan=opposite/adjacent
so is it going to be 2
Look at which side is opposite to angleA
angle b
Side not angle
C
What's the side length of the side that's opposite to AngleA I mean
idk
thx
i understood everything
except the yellow part
what's that z?
Can a problem like this can be solved without LCM? If so, will the answer be different?
,rotate
Ummm im pretty sure you need the lcm so that you can actually add or minus them.
me when the differential equation
well you have h'(t) = 1.4t + 5 so how would u go about finding h(t)
yes and then use the boundary condition to find the value of c
so itd be .7x^2+5x+15 right?
i think so
ok thank you
In your case z=1.96. And this is what you multiply the Standard Error by to get your confidence interval, at the 95% level. Different levels of confidence (e.g. 90%) will have a different z value. Most of us have memorized the 1.96 for z, because 95% confident intervals are so commonly used.
originally you said there were two distinct roots
if u look at it harder theres actually three distinct roots
yeah i screwed up the math sorry
hello… i have to check if a decimal part of a number is equal to 0,5 or above but im not sure how i can do it in a program.. like how the hell would i check that
yeah its the negative x axis
ok awesome, ty!
Hello
1+1
no its 6+4i
How do I find "b" in this piece wise function problem? I've looked up several ways and can't seem to find a way how people got "b" in their equation.
@ me if you answer
well the line segments have to line up @muted portal
What do you mean by that?
Yes
so..if i ask any q, u guys will help me ?
ok hold on i need to think about this
Yes in a channel that's not in use
ok so i graphed the first part of the function
basically if u look at it theres a break in the graph at x = 22000
so what u have to do is set the value of "b" such that these two line segements line up
Oh ok, so without the graph, how would I find "b"?
Yes
well if you approach x = 22000 from the left side you have 22000 * 0.09 = some number
but if you approach x = 22000 from the right side you have 22000 * 0.16 = some other number
Ok I get what you're saying. So both of those values subtracted by each other, the 2nd equation being the 1st number?
👍 Thank you so much
the same goes for the other ranges of x, basically u just dont want any breaks in the graph
wait I am a little confused on a trig question can someone help? I know it is 51.08 but I wanna know the steps
tan20=opposite/adjacent
opposite=48tan20
hypotenuse^2=adjacent^2+opposite^2=48^2+(48tan20)^2
@civic elbow
So ik the opposite is 17.47
I wanna know just without the opposite how I can find the hypotenuse with cos
so cos(20)=48/y?
yep
No wdym
is it a test?
No homework
log(23)? where are you getting 23 from
nope jb8
Oh wrong problem lol I was looking at a different one on my screen
Hey, can someone explain why πR2 - πr2 = π(R2- r2)
Like, not the meaning of the formula or anything, just the algebra stuff
πR² - πr² = π(R²- r²)
Where did the second π go?
It gets distributed to the (R2-r2)
distributive law, the pi is common in both terms
its like A * (B - C) = AB - AC
It’s πr2 and π-r2
is -1 - x the same as x - 1?
No
-1-x =/= x-1
Because the x on the left side is negative
and the other is positive, therefore, it's not a true statement
Doesn't sinc function is an acceptable wave function
i wouldn't recommend taking your pictures while ur jumping out of a train
can you take a worse picture next time
we literally cannot read it
okay fantastic, distribute the exponents then simplify
the power
how i tried it and i got a very long number
What is (5^2)^3
like 2 is the power of 5 and 3 is the power of both
i need help
fast
somebody
??
Result:
15625
Simplify (a^b)^c
What is vanishing Ricci curvature?
how
Such that theres only 1 exponential
(a^b)^c = (a)^bc
why does it only include 3 answers and not all 5
my bad
i got a similar issue with another question
,w solve sin^2(x)=1-cosx on [-pi,pi]
looks like theres only 3 solns
but wouldn't -pi/6 work s well
do you still need help?
can someone help me ?
Yakınsaktır mean converges
Iraksaktır mean diverges
how can i find that series function
The answers should give a pretty solid hint - What's the taylor series of ln(1 + x)? Your book may have it
@obtuse valve
You can find it by hand too, or Google if you're feeling lazy
Or Wolfram Alpha is a good tool
,w Taylor series ln(1 - x)
thx
anyone know how to do this
all i know is v max is when x is at centre
im a bit stuck
Allowed to use calculus?
So the equation describing the motion can be:
s(t) = asin(bt)
The only thing the alpha would change is the start time. As you'll see when you start taking derivatives, it doesn't matter anyway
OHHH
wait hold on
ok ok
so do we not consider it at the start
if it doesnt say anything in the question
More like, we can make our life simpler by just letting it start at the midpoint
Yeye
Then that would tell you what a and b are
is max accel when velocity is 0?
Other way around. Max accel is when a'(t) = 0
ye
,w Taylor series 1/2-2x
Mind you, the maximum of abcos(bx) doesn't need an algebraic proof. The max is when cos = 1
wait ok ok
ill try derive twice see where i get
wait
actually
how do u know it starts at sin
because it could start at cos
it doesnt say anything in the question
That's the same idea as the alpha
about the initial condition
We have control of the start time, so start at the simplest possible time
ok now i am confused ahah
All we care about is the simple harmonic motion (motion is a sinudoid)
So let it be any sinusoid. We'll choose the easiest one to work with.
Yeah you could make it cos(bx + 1) but ehh.
Kaynex, is it alright if I ask a question next after this?
wait
Ping me in a different channel I'll help there
it doesnt even make sense
cause we have displacement in terms of time
if i want vmax dont i need like velocity in terms of displacement
like v^2=n^2(a^2-x^2) ?
Nah vmax is just a velocity
Ignore the time and place it happens
I suppose I already know in advance that in asin(bt + alpha)
a and b change the velocity and acceleration
alpha does not
If you're wary of this, it isn't a big deal to include it
v(t) = absin(bt + α)
That is maximized when sin = 1. So the max actually is just ab
Gives us ab = 3
good job
Happy to help. Feel free to ask if you have any other questions.
can someone help with this?
how would i find the derivative of f(x) = x^2 e^-2x
is it (f g)’
and then the derivative of e^f(x)?
it's a product so yeah, use product rule
Ohh and positive means it’s always positive?
yes
make it into a quadratic, then use discriminant
I did
I’ll show u
Is that right so far?
@glass lichen
And then I thought to do p^2-4(x+1)
no
Oh
$x^2-(p-1)x+1=0$
Mosh
If I do the discriminate for that it would be p^2-2p-3
Um sorry the channel is taken
yep sorry just saw!!
$(-(p-1))^2-4(1)(1)\geq 0$
Mosh
Yes
so just solve that inequality
I did but I got p^2-2p-3
yeah looks right
So shouldn’t it be x less than or equal to -1 or x is greater than or equal to 3
I mean p
yes
Ahh okay thanks
$p\in (-\infty , -1]\cup[3,\infty )$
Mosh
-x = 2x - 3x
As to why they chose 2 and -3, that's because when we multiply 2 and -3, we get -6(the term without any x)
Hey guys how can an angle be bigger than 270 but less than 180
Is there a typo or am I just blind
it says less than 270 and bigger than 180
@crisp sleet You can find f(1). Then find f'(x) and show that it's > 0 and so for all x>=1, we have f(x) >= f(1)
For the other part, you should know that x^2 / (1 + x^2 ) < 1 for all x
since the denominator is larger than the numerator
again, dont ask to ask
you have a force which varies with time
you're told that F varies linearly from t=0 to t=20 and that F(0) = 20 and F(20) = 0
it does not actually matter that this time-dependent quantity is a force, as far as part a goes
you are told that $F(t) = at + b$ for some constants $a$ and $b$
Ann
oh
i.e. is linear as a function of time
ohh okj
ye i got it now thanks
sory but i dont know how to do part b aswell ahah
@vale wigeon
how would i do part b
Ann
yes
and you know that the particle has a mass of 10 kg
thus you know its acceleration for $0 \leq t \leq 20$ is described by $a(t) = 2 - 0.1t$
Ann
so you need to find v(20)
i integrated
knowing that v' = a, and v(0) = 0
right ok i got it
sory to bother but how do i do c @vale wigeon
i tried integrating velocity
then let x=0 but i got t=60
when answer is t=5
what did you get for the velocity at t=20?
20ms^-1
20 m/s, ok
gonna take your word for that
now we have a force of 40N slowing our particle down
remember our particle has a mass of 10 kg
what is the deceleration of the particle?
your particle starts out with a velocity of 20 m/s and is decelerating at 4 m/s^2; how long does it take before the particle is at rest?
,w solve 3 tan(2θ) = 2tan(θ) on [-pi,pi]
you're overthinking it woa
,w solve sin x = cos x on [0, 2pi]
#bots or just use regular wolfram...
if you dont have a question, dont use the help channel
Prove that f is continuous if for all monotonic sequences (x_n) converging to x_0 we have lim f(x_n) = f(x_0)
I tried using the theorem that all sequences have monotonic subsequences, and that f(x_n) is a sequence that is a subsequnce of some other sequence f(x_k). Now, f(x_k) is bounded because its monotonic subsequence converges. I am unable to show lim f(x_k) = lim f(x_n)
Kindly ping me if you reply
<@&286206848099549185>
all [converging] sequences have a monotonic subsequence
So you shown that a subsequence converges to f(x_0). However, the other elements are kinda in the way. Is there a better way to perhaps rearrange the sequence to get rid of the non-monotonic bits?
or use epsilon delta
a contrapositive argument works well here right, suppose f is not continuous on x_0, then you can construct this sequence inductively which doesnt converge to f(x0) even though x_n -> x0
by shrinking the delta balls
Hey wdym by construct a sequence inductively?
if it was not continuous at x_0 then theres an epsilon ball around f(x_0) so that for all delta ball no matter how small around x_0, the image of the ball through f will contain points outside the epsilon ball
so pick a ball of radius 1, find a point in that ball that gets mapped outside epsilon ball, then another point from ball of radius 1/2 mapping outside ep-ball around f(x_0), and so on..., creating a sequence x_n converging to x_0
hullo guys
If the degree of accuracy is not specified in the question, and if the
answer is not exact, give the answer to three significant figures. Give
answers in degrees to one decimal place
what is meant by this. It was on my exam paper
a past paper
for example for non-angle answers if you got sqrt(2) as your answer then write 1.41. and if your answer is some angle then you write it in degree form to 1 d.p.
wait nvm
ignore the first part since sqrt(2) is exact i guess
what is meant by exact in this context?
yea I'm not sure
It probably means not algebraic, although that even may be too far
With my exams, the maximum you'd go to before putting your answer to 3dp is probably: using fractions; using pi; using surds
So if you have a sin / arcsin in there, they probably want dp
u doing calculus?
I mean they probably want you to assume you're making a rectangle
Altho u could be cheeky.
I'll check if rectangle is the best case but if we assume this (this is what they usually do), then you have the following setup:
Find the Area expression and differentiate it and equate it to zero
still not sure how to get the area expression xd like i literally need someone to explain it to me D:
okay
okay
thats ^
When does a rectangle have maximum area?
only 90 metres of rope?
wait
oh
yeah
you do only have 90
so basically you distribute it to both A and B?
You need to use calculus, but first, is it possible to make an expression for the area of the rectangle just given side a?
As in, knowing side a, can you find out side b
no
why not?
What I mean, is if you know how long side a is, do you know how long side b is?
For any configuration of the rectangle
I don't think you do, side b will be longer than that because that would be a square?
wait let me clarify that
You know that there are 90 metres of rope
yes
So can you say anything about the sum of the rope used in all the sides?
ohhhhhh
I am not sure on how to find the sum of the rope of all sides, is there some sort of formula to know?
I can't possibly divide it to 3 because that would be a square
man.
a and b are different / don't have to be the same
What is the perimeter of the red lines?
see the pic,, and relate a and b , and the length of the rope
NO
LOL
I mean that is wrong
Have you done algebra?
i never learned anything since online classes happened
The general expression bro.
I mean it would be a kind thing to give the answer, but at the same time, it's going to be useful for jezreel in the future to know maths
ouef
Have you ever seen expressions like a + b = 10, or been asked to solve for a in a^2 + 5a - 10 = 0 ?
i used to xd
ok so that's good
but like i dont even like math so i forgot either ways
😦
xd
So see the pic jezreel
Do you know how to find the perimeter of a shape?
Ok epic
xd
Enough man.
now do it for this shape, but remember that the house isn't part of the rope
but like the thing is how could you do it with 3 sides tho idk
you add up each side
wdym?
I mean say the expression already... He will probably not get the expr by himself . but next time he'll use this thing
XD
So the rope is 90 metres
a + a+ b = fence length
And you have the sides a, a, and b in the fence
ok
thanks for ur tip

but how are you going to distribute it at all 💀
see the drawing once.
Calculus 👀
We are not finished yet
The area of the rectangle is a * b, right?
ok
And you can define b in terms of a
What is b, in terms of a?
It's an algebraic expression, not a number
heh
Rearrange this to get b
we havent found a and b yet .. how come you say 45?
EPIC
So you know b = 2a - 90
So can you define the area of the rectangle, a * b, using just a
um
given that b is the same thing as 2a - 90
okay
u can do it?
a * 2a - 90? idfk
because 90 is bigger than 2? idk
But you were pretty close
You do the same thing to both sides of the equation, because if both sides are equal, if you do the same thing to them, they'll still be equal
okay
2a + b = 90
Subtract 2a from both sides
2a + b - 2a = 90 - 2a
b = 90 - 2a
why did it become - 2a
why did i choose -2a?
We add -2a to both sides, because if we do the same thing to both sides, the equation is still true
ohh
uh
As in there's a value of a where you have the greatest area
Yes
ok
yeah my dumb ass doesnt know what calculus to use here xd
Firstly, a(90-2a) = 90a - 2a^2
(I mean this equation you don't even need calculus, but they probably want you to use it )
ye
Does this make sense?
a * (90-2a) = a * 90 - a * 2a = 90a - 2a^2
do you know how to take derivatives?
$\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}x}$
TrueBoxGuy
you don't know at all?
nao
TrueBoxGuy
Basically, each term between + and -, you take the derivative of, and the derivative of $a$ is $1$ and the derivative of $a^2$ is $2a$
TrueBoxGuy
derivative of 9 * smth is 9 * derivative of smth
Ok so try these ones:
Derivative of $5a$
TrueBoxGuy
Derivative of $5a + a^2$
TrueBoxGuy
Can u do those ones?
Oh man.. still going on?
Dont you know differential calculus? 🙂
How do you expect to do the problem then? 🙂
tru that
when it comes to math 🙂
You want the solution?
It you want to catch up on what you missed
im just doing this because the deadline of all of my requirements is just until now at 12:00 am XD
Ye perhaps we do this step
and my dumb ass doesnt know how to answer it 💀
Answer is 90 - 4a
You then solve for 90 - 4a = 0 to get a
You can calculate b using that
And then a * b is the area
\dv{a}
Cute thanks
thank you for teaching me guys, and im sorry that i literally dont know anything
^not really but
You should have the answer there 🙂
yea
Perhaps in another channel (BurnedGalaxy has asked a question)
ah sry
i will try to answer if u ask in another channel, but can't guarantee i'll be able to 🙂 (
is this right?
exscuse me but can someone explain to me what I5I notation means |5 − 8| − |2 − 5|
i got it by doing 2^2 - 2 - 1 which equals 1, and -1^2 - -1 -1 which equals -1. since the "formula" goes x_f - x_i, I plugged in the values, which leaves me with 1--1..
right
f(-1) isnt -1
but anyway
you can also notice that the secant line (that goes thru f(-1) and f(2)) is parallel to the x axis
which means that the average change is 0
You can also differentiate and match the x with the interval
use euclid's division lemma to show that the square of any positive integer is not of the form 5m + 2, 5m + 3
can anyone help me with this?
Hey guys how is a interval sometimes positive and sometimes negative?
You can just consider numbers of the form 5a + b for b = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4
thats it?
Well you have to square them and show that none of the cases result in a number of the form 5a + 2 or 5a + 3
Np
What is so special about 5, that so many primes stem from its branch if you make an inverse of the Collatz conjecture?
- Not looking for a specific answer, just some thoughts some of you more experienced mathematicians may have on it.
<@&286206848099549185>
The fact you broke a rule
and pinged helpers right away... given I responded to the helper ping
Oh
Sorry, didn't see the one about 15 minutes.
But do you perhaps have any thoughts?
Okay, so you know of the Collatz conjecture right?
f(x) = {x/2 \in \doubleZ divide by 2 if x\2 \notIn \doubleZ multiply by 3 and minus 1 }
well every collatz trajectory that ends at 1 and that is not from 16,8,4,2 or 1 either goes through 5 or through 32
I am not aware of any result about the asymptotic proportion of the numbers that go through 5 or 32
Has this been proven or is this just observational?
not even that it actually exists
Also, what does "asymptotic proportion" mean 
I think asymptotic density might be more correct
the asymptotic density of a subset A of the positive integers is limit of 1/n * size of A intersected with {1...n}
the limit may or may not exist
your observation that there are more numbers that go through 5 than 32, could be turned into a more precise mathematical statement saying that the set of numbers that goes through 5 has asymptotic density > 1/2
but who knows if that's true
ahh...
Didn't think about that. In fact, I had heard about the zeta function, but I didn't know its connection to primes.
This is actually very interresting...
that's uuuh pretty irrelevant to collatz
Yeah, but at this point I don't care so much about proving the actual conjecture. I just like figuring out what makes it go like it does
or what it tells us about numbers
ah well I am sad to admit that I have found absolutely nothing of worth when I thought about those questions
For example, if each new odd integer in the inverse function is a branch, and the even number it stems from is its stem.
You can figure out what number the next branch will have by summing up the branch with its stem.
Really?
I mean, I haven't started uni yet so I might just be fascinated by all maths. But I've found some very cool patterns
Its very simple, because 3 is the lowest non-even prime and 2 is in half of every number. So there are a lot of intuitive discoveries or what you might call them.
- but back to the original question.
Do, again, have any idea why 5 is so comparatively special?
So far the only thing I've found is that 5 is the very first branch, except for 3 itself.
it just so happens that besides the 1-2-4 cycle, the only ways to get there is 5 -> 16 -> 8 -> ... or 32 -> 16 -> 8 -> ... and that 5 or 32 split is the first one
the first one of many splits
Oh,
But 32 isn't a split.
1 -> 2 -> 4 -> 8 -> 16 ->32
*5 -> 10->20....
*3......
Literally all numbers will have to pass through either. But there are no primes on the first branch.
I am thinking more of the intrinsic properties of 5.
Like 3 + 2 = 5, which are the denominators (I assume there is another name for that?) of the function.
Or 5 = 1 + 2^2, which looks a bit like a complex number.
then replace all of my 32 with 16
Wait
why do you think there are no primes on 32's branch
So... More numbers pass through 5, than any of the branches that have a stem in the original 1->2->4 branch...?
Well, if every odd number denotes a new branch, and the even number it came from a stem.
Then the first branch is just 1*2^n, which as you might recognize will only contain even numbers.
- but was my first question correct?
but it still has lots of splits
Because that would be very weird
Yes, but they are new branches
You see, in the inverse function, if you get an odd number twice you will reach 1
there are still primes that won't go through 5
Yes
There are
but did you say that more will go through 5 than not?
That would be quite interesting
yes I said that we can observe something like that
Wow
but I can't actually prove it
nope




