#help-0

1 messages · Page 681 of 1

wise jewel
#

+4 - 2 = 2
-4 - 2 = -6

#

ohhh

#

i see

#

so how do i know at what point to apply the +-?

#

should it be from the beginning of my equation?

#

because its a quadratic?

glass lichen
#

any even root brings a +/-

wise jewel
#

ok

#

i will remember that

#

i get it now

#

ty all

brazen shell
#

I need some help on this, I have 10 more minutes till i can submit these two questions, if someone can help i would be greatful

#

transposing is my greatest enemy

brazen shell
#

i only got 10 minutes till the assignment goes late

alpine sable
#

ok obviously apply order of operations

#

and

#

how would you

#

how would you explain how to rearrange an equation verbally

#

algebraic manipulation

#

uh

brazen shell
#

sorry i dont really understand

bitter kite
#

hey uh is anyone available to solve my problem?

alpine sable
# bitter kite

ok you could apply some properties of shapes over here in terms of angles, consider AB||DE you could also apply some angles in parallel lines

#

and thats about it

alpine sable
#

Basic LaTeχ syntaxes include \sqrt[]{} \pi \cdot or \times \qty or \left\right for autoscaling brackets \frac for fractions

wise jewel
#

what about in this example? There are no x-intercepts, so how do they know what the third point is? they say to find one more point, and to determine the point for x = -1, where did the get -1 from? how did they know to make x equal that?

ocean sealBOT
quiet crown
#

I think thats correct

alpine sable
#

\times for the x and \cdot for the interpunct

ionic jewel
quiet crown
#

Interpunct?

#

lol

alpine sable
#

Central dot, middle dot, or whatever you call it

ocean sealBOT
quiet crown
#

oh

#

Getcha

ionic jewel
#

$\cdot$

ocean sealBOT
quiet crown
spring harbor
#

If you're given two line equations, how can you find the angle they make with each other?

alpine sable
#

wot

spring harbor
#

what?

#

Is my question unclear?

#

Let's say you have y= 2x and y=x, how can you find the angle they make with each other?

alpine sable
spring harbor
#

So I am supposed to do arctan(m1)-arctan(m2)?

#

It's given that it's an acute angle

#

But m1 is 2/3 and m2 is 3/2. How can I find the arctan of these numbers?

#

I am not supposed to be using a calculator.

alpine sable
#

hmm

spring harbor
#

and these are the possible answers

alpine sable
#

Trivial Trigonometric Identities maybe?

spring harbor
#

Such as?

alpine sable
spring harbor
#

Also using the formula I get 0.4 (if my calculator is in rads) which is none of the options

#

Hmm

alpine sable
#

Then convert them to degs

spring harbor
#

I get 22

alpine sable
#

actually

#

hmm

#

convert to gradians 👀

spring harbor
#

Oh wait actually

#

it's asking for cos alpha

#

with alpha being the angle

alpine sable
#

Can I look at the question itself

spring harbor
#

nevertheless i still get the wrong answer

#

Yeah sure wait let me translate it

#

this is a

scarlet heath
#

can someone helpm e out with this

spring harbor
#

Ren can't you see us talking here?

#

this is b

#

we need to find the tangent line of b

#

which i did

#

i got 2/3x + 3

scarlet heath
#

mb

spring harbor
#

then i need to find cos alpha of the angle they make

alpine sable
#

ok what does in het punt (3,5) mean

spring harbor
#

in point (3,5)

#

tangent line at that point

alpine sable
#

mk

#

wait gimmie a moment

hardy vault
#

can someone help me

spring harbor
#

Channel taken

alpine sable
#

hm i'm unsure

#

sorry

spring harbor
#

Yeah no worries, thank you regardless.

alpine sable
#

i'll look onto it though

#

Ok just to make sure

#

what angle are we looking for

spring harbor
#

But now that I think about it, tanx * tan y = 1, so we can say that cosx cosy = sinx sin y
maybe we have to use that for something

#

Channel taken

#

or
cos^2 x cos^2 y - sin^2 x sin^2 y = 0 <=> cos^2 x - sin^2 y = 1 => cosx = sin y => cos y = sinx

#

hmmm

#

cos(x-y)=cosxcosy + sinxsiny => 2cosxsinx = 2cos^2(x) tanx

#

cos^2(x) = 1/(1+tan^2(x)) so we get cos^2(x) = 1/(1+(3/2)^2) = 4/13

#

so 2 * 4/13 * 3/2 ?

#

or 12/13

forest pawn
#

Hello everyone, hope you are having a great day, I need help with this solid geometry question

hardy crest
#

is this right?

#

if not what should i change

#

<@&286206848099549185>

forest pawn
#

But no one answered my question bro, try another channel please

spring harbor
hardy crest
alpine sable
#

what

spring harbor
#

Don’t start clowning

alpine sable
#

Did you get your question answered

#

I still don't understand it

#

but i think your working is fine

hardy crest
#

who

alpine sable
#

Echo

spring harbor
#

Yup I showed the steps above

#

Did you read them?

#

Not sure if it’s correct though but it seems reasonable

gusty gorge
spring harbor
#

It seems so far fetched though

hardy crest
forest pawn
#

I will post my question in another channel

river hearth
#

why aren't these parallel?

gusty gorge
#

I fail to understand how that diagram is even possible

slate monolith
#

Lol wtf

#

Its not

#

Over 180

gusty gorge
#

Maybe if you bent the ends?

slate monolith
#

No

#

All straight lines are 180

#

U cant do more

#

Plus it doesnt look like 130

#

Legit is 110

gusty gorge
#

well yeah, but nowhere in the problem does it say that two lines are being cut by a single line

slate monolith
#

It does

#

I mean thats what the arrows are for

#

Why would there be multiple lines

spring harbor
#

yeah no that's totally wrong

gusty gorge
#

you could have something like this

slate monolith
#

Well yeah

#

But thats not gonna happen on a simple quiz

#

It would be impossible to solve

spring harbor
#

How would you calculate the height of this figure, given that the diameter of one of the circles equals 10?

queen wigeon
#

connect the centers of the circles and use the properties of equilateral triangles

slate monolith
#

Yikes

spring harbor
#

Like this right?

queen wigeon
#

yes

slate monolith
#

How did u come up with that so fast mchen

spring harbor
#

Yeah I kinda already had that, but not sure how to progress

slate monolith
#

Ok so

#

Its 60 deg

spring harbor
#

yup

slate monolith
#

Height is sqrt3

#

+1

spring harbor
#

mm?

slate monolith
#

heighr of triangle

#

306090 triagnle

spring harbor
#

diameter of a circle is 10

#

Ohh but wait I got it

slate monolith
#

Ye

spring harbor
#

We can split that in half, and use cos 30 = the height of that triangle, then we can add 10cm to it

slate monolith
#

Ye

spring harbor
#

or no we need to use sin 30 = x/20 my bad

slate monolith
#

Wut

#

Sin60 or cos30 works theyre the same

spring harbor
#

Oh wait yeah i messed up the angles

#

we get 27.3

#

thanks

silk terrace
#

Can someone explain this small step for me

#

why is the equality true?

#

I mean equal to 0

slate monolith
#

U in calc?

#

Use integration

queen wigeon
#

or expand $\frac{1}{n^2-1}$ by partial fractions, write it out, and see which terms cancel out

ocean sealBOT
#

mchen10

slate monolith
#

Wut

silk terrace
#

not in calc no

#

can i use dirichlet*

slate monolith
#

Whst

silk terrace
#

?

slate monolith
#

What is dirichlet

silk terrace
#

nevermind found the answer

slate monolith
#

Oh lol

hushed pasture
alpine sable
#

nice handwriting

hushed pasture
hushed pasture
alpine sable
#

anyways i am in 9th grade so i am out

hushed pasture
hushed pasture
solar pebble
#

@hushed pasture can I check that that says

#

$\lim_{n \to +\infty} \frac{|x-a|^{n+?}}{(n+?)!} = 0$

ocean sealBOT
#

Xetrov

solar pebble
#

I don't know what it says in the question marks

slate monolith
#

looks like a 1

hushed pasture
#

well i was doing a calculus exercice and then the prof said that this limit is tend to 0

#

but I didn't understand it

slate monolith
#

it cant tho

#

factorial always grows the fastest

hushed pasture
#

yeah that's logical, but there is a way to prove it

lean flower
#

Im starting 8th grade and i suck at algebra

solar pebble
#

@hushed pasture does that say 1?

lean flower
#

not to mention i am asian

hushed pasture
#

but I didn't get it

solar pebble
#

@hushed pasture No lol, the question marks

solar pebble
hushed pasture
#

could you prove it like you don't know the output yet?

#

that's what I'm looking for

solar pebble
#

you're ignoring me lol, I can't read the Profs writing

hushed pasture
#

what is your question, i thought that you didn't ask me

solar pebble
hushed pasture
#

so the fraction is (X-a)^(n+1)/(n+1)!

solar pebble
#

they're 1s?

hushed pasture
#

yeah 1

solar pebble
#

$\lim_{n \to +\infty} \frac{|x-a|^{n+1}}{(n+1)!} = 0$

ocean sealBOT
#

Xetrov

solar pebble
#

unknown x ya?

hushed pasture
#

yeah but the limit is for n not x

solar pebble
#

yes I see xD

slate monolith
#

how is that 0 tho

#

nvm it is 0

solar pebble
#

yeah it is lol

#

I'd imagine you substitute the factorial for the gamma function

hushed pasture
#

so you know how to prove it on paper?

slate monolith
solar pebble
#

probably L'hopitals but I've not tried it

slate monolith
#

usually u just assume

#

u cant use LH

solar pebble
#

I'm doing it in my head

slate monolith
#

lmao

coral pagoda
slate monolith
#

just say that

#

any factorial is gonna grow faster

slate monolith
#

and since its in the denom

coral pagoda
#

But tbh, the constant does not matter for the limit (just the theorem).

slate monolith
#

itll go to 0

solar pebble
#

hmm

slate monolith
solar pebble
#

yeah 😂

slate monolith
#

the error goes to 0 as the terms go to infinity

coral pagoda
#

Precisely :)

hushed pasture
#

that's the exercice in french, you can easly tanstlate it

solar pebble
#

but we're not French 😅

hushed pasture
#

i don't why the prof use Taylor-Lagrange instead of Young

solar pebble
#

or most of us anyway

hushed pasture
#

ok i'll translate it for you

ionic jewel
#

im extra not french

solar pebble
#

A bit like me giving you a question in Chinese and expecting you to be able to translate it just because I know Chinese

ionic jewel
#

well to be fair french is more readable than chinese to the average english speaker

solar pebble
#

that's a fair point, but similar concept

ionic jewel
#

matter of fact i think i can read that problem

#

Let f R to R be a function of class c^inf somethign something proper, there exists a polynomial of degree something something n geq 0 for all x in R

#

close enough

solar pebble
#

I took French in high school. Still can't read much

ionic jewel
#

i speak broken spanish so that probably helps

solar pebble
#

#bilingual gang

ocean sealBOT
#

dackid (jump king +)

slate monolith
#

,w translate soit F une fonction de R vers R tel que F est infiniment derivable. il existe un polynome P impair tel que

ocean sealBOT
hushed pasture
#
for every n of N: |F(x)| <= |P(x)|```
slate monolith
#

LMFAO

#

what is that

coral pagoda
slate monolith
hushed pasture
#

the 2nd question is to proof that F is null

#

and you should consider that that what ever the derivative of F, always F(a) = 0

candid bolt
#

For quesiom 17 is the following valid?

#

Proof by contradiction: assume there exists an int n such that (n^2+2) is divisible by 4. If this is the case it must be that (n^2+2) is even because 4 is a multiple of 2. Further in order for a number plus 2 to be even it must already be even. Thus n^2 is even. It is obvious that if n^2 is even n must also be even. Thus n is even. Thus n can be re-writren as n=2x where x is an int. Meaning n^2+2=(2x)^2+2=4x^2+2 this is not divisible by 4. Since 4x^2+2=4(x^2- 1) +2. Thus (n^2+2) is both divisible by 4 and not divisible by 4

#

Ie a contradiction

slate monolith
#

what is it asking @candid bolt

#

all I see is for every n, n^2 + 2

#

what is the Z

candid bolt
#

I posted the question in the above pictue it is asking for a proof that for every n in the int, that (n^2+2) is not divisible by 4

slate monolith
#

ah

#

It is obvious that if n^2 is even n must also be even. idk about this

#

but w/e

#

Since 4x^2+2=4(x^2- 1) +2 idk what ur doing here

#

this makes it more compex

candid bolt
#

Sorry that Is just showing it is indivisible it is just how my textbook did similar questions

remote heron
#

i feel like doing just by cases is easier here but idk if you cleaned this up (dont even really have to) i think itd be valid if weird

#

maybe easier pathway if you wanna just assume the n is odd case doesnt work

#

is just show that you can factor n^2 + 2 in a fancy way such that it's an odd number + 2

#

e.g. cant be divided by 4

#

sorry

candid bolt
#

Oh that would prolly be easier

remote heron
#

2*(m+2)

#

where m is odd

#

fuck

#

i cant type it correctly

#

maybe ill just scribble it

#

if you dont get what i mean

#

lemme scribble

candid bolt
#

Also I checked the proof, I think you can pretty easily prove with contraceptive n^2 even =>n even

#

That would be appreciated thanks!

remote heron
#

gimme one sec

candid bolt
#

Yeah take your time

remote heron
#

so something like this for even

#

i guess this should go first

#

sorry my writing is bad

#

you can be as pedantic as you want about all this

#

i probably wrote too much

candid bolt
#

No I can read it w well

#

I think this makes sense! Thank you so much

remote heron
#

something like "4 divides p implies that at the prime factorization of p includes at least 2 factors of 2..."

#

np

candid bolt
#

Got it

alpine sable
#

If I'm given (x) = x^2 and I'm told to evaluate f(2+3i) would that mean (2+3i)^2

#

?

#

If so I got -5 + 12i

remote heron
#

yea youd just plug the input into the square

alpine sable
#

Ty for clarification :)

hidden kelp
#

How do I start this?

#

And what does it mean when BM is perpendicular to AC

remote heron
#

they make a 90 degree angle together

#

its also marked in the image

#

by that tiny square near where they intersect

hidden kelp
#

So how would I find AB and BC?

remote heron
#

i dont actually know geometry sadcat

slate monolith
#

this looks hard

hidden kelp
#

I'm trying to practice for the SATs, but geometry is my weak point

slate monolith
strong furnace
#

proof would be the right angle and B or C (AA similarity)

woven pollen
#

I should have made x an h. because we are looking for the h of the triangle. but, you know....

slate monolith
#

whats x tho

woven pollen
hidden kelp
#

yeah i got that

#

thanks!

spring harbor
#

given f(x) = 2x - ln(2x), how can we find the tangent line of f(x) that goes through the origin?

slate monolith
#

itll be when the slope equals the y value

#

or is a multiple of it

spring harbor
#

Could you explain what you mean a bit further?

#

I need to find the tangent line equation

slate monolith
spring harbor
#

Yeah; Df(x)= 2 - 1/x

slate monolith
#

2 - 2/x

spring harbor
#

I believe you're wrong

slate monolith
#

so u gotta set f'(x) to f(x)

#

,w derivative of 2x - ln(2x)

spring harbor
#

You get 2-2/2x

#

or 2-1/x

ocean sealBOT
slate monolith
#

ah mb mb

#

i forgot

#

yes

spring harbor
#

no worries

slate monolith
#

set f'(x) to f(x)

spring harbor
slate monolith
#

basically

#

if u want it to hit the origin

#

the slope should be able to reach 0 from the inital value

#

wait wait

#

i messed up

#

it has to hit both

#

no im right

spring harbor
#

I am sorry I am not following

woven pollen
#

Is this correct?? I guessed.

slate monolith
#

it looks good

#

idka bout the answer

woven pollen
#

If it's wrong I will delete it.

slate monolith
#

depends on the function

#

does it have asympotoes

#

is it piecewise

spring harbor
#

@woven pollen the question is asking me for the slope of that tangent line; these are the options I got

slate monolith
#

any polynomial

spring harbor
strong furnace
#

the answer is not y=2x-1

slate monolith
#

is always continious

spring harbor
#

I assume yours is wrong

slate monolith
#

oof

strong furnace
#

y=2x-1 is the relation between y and x coordinate of the point of tangency

#

which also lies on the curve

slate monolith
#

well it has a veritcal asympotate at x = 0

#

so no

strong furnace
#

so y=2x-ln(2x) should satisfy it

woven pollen
strong furnace
#

so you have 2 simultaenous equations y=2x-1 and y=2x-ln(2x) for the point of tangency

spring harbor
#

@alpine sable Could you move to a different channel?

#

thanks.

strong furnace
#

you have slope in terms of the point

#

should be easy from here

spring harbor
#

Wait I apologize I am not exactly following

strong furnace
#

ok so if a line passes through origin it is of the form y=mx correct?

spring harbor
#

yup

slate monolith
strong furnace
#

if the point of tangency is (x1,y1) then line is y=(2-1/x1)x correct?

spring harbor
#

Why 2-1/x1?

strong furnace
#

thats the slope of tangent line you got by differentiating

spring harbor
#

Ohh i see

#

Yeah I get it sorta

jagged trout
#

$\frac{\Delta y}{\Delta x}$

strong furnace
#

(x1,y1) must lie on this line so y1=2x1-1

#

and it also lies on the given curve

#

so y1=2x1-ln(2x1)

#

solve for x1 get the line equation

spring harbor
#

We get e/2 = x

#

2-1/2/e = 2-e/2 = (2e-2)/2

#

which is one of the option

#

Hmmmmmm yeah I get it now

#

So basically set f(x) equal to f'(x) * x

#

Solve for x1 and fill x1 in f(x)

strong furnace
spring harbor
#

yeah normally it is y-fa = f'a(x-a)

last sinew
#

Hi please excuse me, is this channel soon to be open or should I redirect myself to another channel? Thank you :)

slate monolith
spring harbor
#

I learned that formula

slate monolith
#

so I was close

woven pollen
#

Why does f'(x) go through the origin origin again?

slate monolith
#

I see what they did

spring harbor
#

It's what the question asked for

slate monolith
spring harbor
last sinew
#

Thank you!

spring harbor
#

Thanks Sussy & Kefir

last sinew
slate monolith
#

sure thing

last sinew
#

Will someone kindly explain why sqrt(p(1-p)) must be less than or equal to 0.5? That is all that's troubling me

#

Any help would be highly appreciated

slate monolith
#

its because u need to be less than 2.5%

strong furnace
slate monolith
#

0.5^2 is 2.5

#

ah

last sinew
#

I-

#

Oh my god

slate monolith
last sinew
#

Ok thank you 😭

#

Wait sorry one more thing

slate monolith
#

mhm

last sinew
#

What does z*sqrt((p(1-p)/n) have to do with anything again

#

So where does the z pop out of 😭

#

Wait

#

NEVERMIND

#

I REMEMBERED

#

THANK YOU ALL SO MUCH

strong furnace
#

isn't z something in statistics

#

ohh nm

last sinew
#

Ok im good

#

Yessir

#

Thank you

#

Have a good day everyone :D

slate monolith
#

you too 😄

sleek elbow
#

I literally relate to this feeling so often 😄

humble anchor
#

How would I show that D_vf(0,0) = 0 for all unit vectors v?

humble anchor
#

bruh

#

<@&286206848099549185>

slate monolith
#

this looks like uh

#

hard calc

#

or linaer algebra

simple pond
red vigil
#

Hey yo guys, just came here for an emergency and because my head is going to blow xd, i have hours looking for any calculator and trying to simplify but i do not have found the answers i need.

#

Is someone available who can help me out?

slate monolith
#

monomial should just be a linear

#

mb mb

#

it means one term

#

so they can be the same

red vigil
#

I know, but also is asking me this

#

And this is where im stuck

slate monolith
slate monolith
#

2+ terms divided by 1 term

#

will have multiple terms

red vigil
#

Is an aleks exercise

slate monolith
#

split it into 3 fractions

#

simplify each

old swan
#

The graph displays the number of tests given at a particular school over a five-day period. Explain why this graph could be misleading.

The scale in the vertical axis is broken. It appears as if half as many tests were

given on Monday as on Wednesday, but actually twice as many tests were given on
Monday than on Wednesday.
The axes of the graph are wrong. The number of tests should be on the horizontal axis, and the days should be on the vertical axis. It appears as if there are fewer
days than the number of tests.
The scale in the vertical axis is broken. It appears as if 5 times as many tests were given on Monday as on Wednesday, but actually only 4 more tests were given on
Monday than on Wednesday.
The scale of the graph is wrong. The vertical axis should represent equal intervals of numbers. It appears as if 5 times as many tests were given on Wednesday as on Monday, but actually only 4 more tests were given on Wednesday than on Monday.

slate monolith
old swan
#

?

slate monolith
#

are those options for the answer

old swan
#

yes

slate monolith
#

or is that ur work

#

ah

#

well what do u think

old swan
#

im not sure all ik is it isnt the axis one

slate monolith
#

3 left

#

reread them carefully

old swan
#

ok

#

i have no idea tbh

minor crypt
#

waveypeepo bye

jagged trout
#

What was that?

slate monolith
#

only 1 word diff

old swan
#

The scale in the vertical axis is broken. It appears as if half as many tests were
given on Monday as on Wednesday, but actually twice as many tests were given on
Monday than on Wednesday.

#

is it that one?

slate monolith
old swan
#

idk how to explain it-

slate monolith
#

that one says half as many tests on M than on W

#

where is that on the grap

old swan
#

it shows it on Tuesday

slate monolith
#

what

old swan
#

please just say the answer

slate monolith
#

its not a or b tho

#

thats my hint

old swan
#

The scale in the vertical axis is broken. It appears as if 5 times as many tests were given on Monday as on Wednesday, but actually only 4 more tests were given on
Monday than on Wednesday.

#

that?

slate monolith
#

what do u think

#

ik its tiring

#

take a break if u want

old swan
#

i want to get it done i just have no clue how to do it

slate monolith
humble anchor
#

ill send it again cuz i still dont know what to do

#

How would I show that D_vf(0,0) = 0 for all unit vectors v?

#

my initial approach was using the limit formula with f(0 + hv1, 0 + hv2) - f(0,0)/h

#

and then subbing in the values and cancelling h out

#

but i end up with v1^2 v2^4/3 / (v1^10 + v2^2)

#

so idk how to show that equals zero

#

<@&286206848099549185> still struggling here! would appreciate help

humble anchor
#

pls someone i have pain

slate monolith
#

looks very hard

humble anchor
#

this is calc 3 tho

slate monolith
#

big brains tuff

#

@humble anchorask it in calc

#

or uni

simple pond
woven pollen
#

What does the D_u operator do?

simple pond
#

You’re looking for how to do question a?

humble anchor
#

yep'

#

i can tell u what i have so far but i think its wrong

woven pollen
#

Does D_u take the derivative of f(.) with respect to u?

simple pond
glass lichen
#

my guess is directional derivative in the direction of u

humble anchor
#

^ yea its directional deriavtive

#

so obvisouly this isnt 0 so idk what to od

woven pollen
#

did you divide by h ok? it looks off.

old swan
slate monolith
#

lol

humble anchor
#

i factored out h from both top and bottom

#

so it should cancel out

old swan
#

can you just tell me the answer this assignment is already 2 hours late

simple pond
old swan
slate monolith
woven pollen
#

e.g. (h · v_1)^10 = h^10 · v_1^10. how did you cancel 10 h's?

slate monolith
#

either one

#

read this

humble anchor
old swan
#

thats the one i chose

humble anchor
#

and wait tensor

#

lemme doublecheck

old swan
humble anchor
#

also can u guys use a different channel

#

cat girl

old swan
#

I was here first-

humble anchor
old swan
#

yea i was...

slate monolith
#

lmfao

old swan
#

look though the chat

slate monolith
#

u were 1.5 hrs later @old swan

old swan
#

idgaf

humble anchor
slate monolith
#

cmon

#

its not hard

humble anchor
#

kefir

#

do u know how to do my stuff

#

plz

old swan
woven pollen
#

The graph could be misleading because y = (1 .. 4) is cut off.

humble anchor
#

tensor do u know

#

ik i messed up with the cancelling

#

but i still dont know what to do

woven pollen
#

I'm working on it. gimme a few minute.

humble anchor
#

thank u

old swan
#

dude just give me the answer please

humble anchor
#

haha cathlene

#

ik hwo to do it

#

but nah

#

lol!

#

xd!

old swan
#

im not talking to you

slate monolith
#

i cant

#

thats not the point of this server

old swan
#

well i dont get it

slate monolith
#

what dont u get

velvet oyster
#

Hi. I want to know how to sold question5 in this photo.

humble anchor
#

@simple pond @woven pollen uhh i thought of another method to solve this questions

#

so i know this is true

woven pollen
#

I was just reading that! on a webpage.

humble anchor
#

i mightve messed fx up

#

and fy

#

cuz this doesnt make sense

#

ideally fx and fy should be 0, then that would make sense

#

maybe i cant math

woven pollen
#

yay. I'm trying to get my head around the correct way to make the substitutions

humble anchor
#

wait isnt that for a different equation

wise jewel
#

Hey guys does 9t^2 + 25t + 6 represent a soccer ball after being kicked off an initial height of 6 ft?

wise jewel
#

Why? @slate monolith

#

Ahhh

#

Probably because it doesn’t make sense for a ball to be 157 feet in the air after 3 seconds?

slate monolith
wise jewel
#

Ohhh

#

Ok

#

Ty!!!

old swan
#

A factory produces 15,000 computer monitors per day. The manager of the factory claims that fewer than 800 defective computer monitors are produced each day. In a random sample of 220 computer monitors, there are 5 defective computer monitors. Determine whether the manager's claim is likely to be true. Explain.
No, the manager's claim is not likely to be true. Based on the data, you can predict that there are 805 defective computer monitors produced per day.
No, the manager's claim is not likely to be true. Based on the data, you can predict that there are 810 defective computer monitors produced per day.
Yes, the manager's claim is likely to be true. Based on the data, you can predict that there are 346 defective computer monitors produced per day.
Yes, the manager's claim is likely to be true. Based on the data, you can predict that there are 341 defective computer monitors produced per day.

jagged imp
#

this channel just exploded lmao

#

2 of you post in different channels

old swan
#

lmao ikr

main panther
#

I’ll switch

jagged imp
#

looks like they're reflections of each other in the x axis

old swan
#

mine is the easiest in the chat i need halp

jagged imp
#

Every point (x,y) has been changed to (x,-y) so like on the blue graph, you can see (0,3) on the blue and (0,-3) happens to be on the black graph. This is true of every point, which means its a reflection in the x axis if you want ig an "empirical" justification

#

but i just looked at it and it looked like a reflection in the x axis

alpine sable
#

thank u

#

!

#

@jagged imp

#

could u please explain how its 1/n?

jagged imp
#

wait so you want to understand why the image of a dilation of 1/n from the y-axis gives you f(nx)?

sullen nova
#

Yoooooo

#

Halllllp

alpine sable
#

u could give me an example of a graph if u wish

sullen nova
#

Pls halp

jagged imp
#

I mean i can give you an example here of the dilation in action here, but I'm not sure if that's quite what you're looking for. I'm finding it hard to explain at your level since when I was at your level all i was told to do was memorise the rules so my intuition for this is based on some higher level maths(kinda higher level)

alpine sable
# sullen nova Pls halp

Best way is to pick a simple f (say a line), pick a value of n (say 2). Then graph it and see what's happening.

#

@jagged imp it makes perfect sense thank u

#

parabola was the best choice of functions to explain the concept

surreal merlin
#

People still have school?

nova widget
ocean sealBOT
#

g-e-o-m-e-t-r-i-c

jagged imp
#

or just coincidentally or for whatever reason aren't bad enough affected to have schools closed down

surreal merlin
#

Ima need this server in august

inner token
#

i don't understand how to do this

hybrid furnace
tough hatch
#

use the bounds of the first triple integral

sullen nova
#

Hello

#

Can someone halp me?

tough hatch
#

@sullen nova JustAsk

#

no need to ask if someone can help

inner token
#

i need help setting up this triple integral

#

I can solve em fine I just never know how to set em up

wise jewel
#
  1. (x + 9)^2
  2. x^3 - 9
  3. (x - 9)^2
  4. x^2 - 9
#

None of these are examples of the difference of two square right?

#

@tough hatch why the reaction?? Lol

simple pond
alpine sable
#

Is the derivative of natural log x³ = 3/x ?

inner token
inner token
alpine sable
#

🤔

wise jewel
#

Anyone know?

#

Nvm

wise jewel
#

Wdym

tough hatch
#

have u checked everything?

alpine sable
wise jewel
#

Well a difference of two squares, a^2 - b^2 = (a + b) (a - b)

alpine sable
#

Thanks

wise jewel
#

But none of those equal (a + b) (a - b)

tough hatch
#

well (x+9)^2 is just one square by itself

tough hatch
wise jewel
#

(x + 9)^2 = (x + 9) (x + 9)

tough hatch
#

a^2 - b^2 is what difference of two squares looks like

wise jewel
#

Right..

tough hatch
#

how about x^3-9

#

it's a difference right?

wise jewel
#

No?

#

-9 isn’t being squared

#

Right?

#

Idk lol

tough hatch
#

im asking if $x^3-9$ is a DIFFERENCE

ocean sealBOT
wise jewel
#

Yes

#

It is

nova widget
wise jewel
#

You’re subtracting

tough hatch
#

there we go

#

is 9 a square?

nova widget
#

yes

tough hatch
#

is x^3 a square?

nova widget
#

9 = 3^2

tough hatch
#

@nova widget stop answering the questions not intended for u

nova widget
#

sure

tough hatch
#

u keep trolling around lol

tough hatch
wise jewel
#

What

#

How am I trolling

tough hatch
#

not u

wise jewel
#

Oh

tough hatch
#

geometric

#

is x^3 a square?

wise jewel
#

Yes

#

It’s Bringen squared by 3

tough hatch
#

wtf is bringen

wise jewel
#

LOL sorry

#

Autocorrect

#

Being*

tough hatch
#

Being squared by 3

#

what exactly is ur definition of "squared"?

ocean sealBOT
alpine sable
#

x^3 is cubed

wise jewel
#

Oh right

#

Sorry

#

It’s cubed*

tough hatch
#

squared is different from raised to the exponent ___

wise jewel
#

Right

#

Squared is to the power of 2

tough hatch
#

so its not squared

tough hatch
#

if it's squared then it's raised to the power of 2

alpine sable
#

lol

tough hatch
#

so B is also not ur answer

#

in general u can check if

  1. it's a difference
  2. of BOTH SQUARES?
    OR
  3. it's a product
  4. in the form (a PLUS b)(a MINUS b)
#

@wise jewel

#

that's what we've been doing so far

#

now how about 3)?

#

NOTE: if it's a single square, it's not a difference of two squares

wise jewel
#

Well

#

#3 is just (x - 9) (x - 9)

tough hatch
#

since it's already a single square it's just in the form (a+b)^2

#

no a-b factor there

wise jewel
#

Sooo not correct

tough hatch
#

follow?

#

mhm

#

how bout the last one

#

x^2-9

wise jewel
#

Wait when you say single square

wise jewel
#

Wdym

tough hatch
wise jewel
#

Oh ok

tough hatch
#

is it a product or difference?

wise jewel
#

Difference

#

So that’s a check

tough hatch
#

ok,

#

of both squares?

wise jewel
#

Nnnnno?

#

-9 doesn’t have an exponent

tough hatch
#

i.e. is x^2 a square AND is 9 a square?

wise jewel
#

Well 9 has a square root

tough hatch
#

no think of it as c-d

wise jewel
#

Of 3

tough hatch
wise jewel
#

Ohhhh wait so this is after the square root has already been applied

tough hatch
#

9 IS the square of 3

wise jewel
#

Right

tough hatch
#

so now?

wise jewel
#

That means that $x^2 - 9$

tough hatch
#

is?

ocean sealBOT
#

¿Black Hat? ͜..

wise jewel
#

Is indeed a difference of 2 squares

tough hatch
#

yep

wise jewel
#

YAYYYY

#

Ty!!!!

#

Do I have to know how to factor by grouping when I can just use the slide n’ divide method to factor?

tough hatch
#

what is this slide n' divide

wise jewel
#

One second

#

A trick for factoring, I’ll post the steps here

#

^^ @tough hatch

#

It’s way easier than grouping IMO and does the same thing

tough hatch
#

factoring by grouping applies to more polynomials

#

u can probably use this when it's not possible to factor (let alone by grouping)

wise jewel
#

Oh ok

#

So if I’m factoring 6x^2 - 7x - 20

#

The middle term should be rewritten as -2x - 5x right? @tough hatch

lusty pewter
#

can someone help me with 7f

#

@wise jewel

wise jewel
#

?

lusty pewter
#

can u help with my question

tough hatch
#

uhhh

#

this channel is clearly busy

#

u may post on another #question- channel

lusty pewter
#

uhhh this channel is clearly busy SHUT UP MAN U WANNA GO ME

#

lmao jk

wise jewel
#

lusty pewter
#

ok

wise jewel
#

But yeah if I’m factoring 6x^2 - 7x - 20

#

The middle term should be rewritten as -2x - 5x right?

lusty pewter
#

yepp

#

i have no clue

wise jewel
#

#

@tough hatch any clue?

ionic jewel
#

idk what ur doing but I'd just throw that into the quadratic eqn tbh

hardy vault
queen wigeon
#

have you tried setting up an equation?

tough hatch
#

not solving for x

#

i doubt they only factor second-degree polynomials

ionic jewel
#

could use the quadratic eqn to factor

#

idk whatever trick he's doing

small holly
#

how do i factorise this

tough hatch
#

ur goal is to get a common term out

tough hatch
#

m^2 - mn = ?
3n - 3m = ?

small holly
#

i have to factorise it in pairs

#

like binomial pairs

ionic jewel
#

yes

thorn kindle
#

Good job!

tough hatch
small holly
ionic jewel
#

pull a -m out of the first two and a 3 out of the second two

tough hatch
#

factor these

small holly
#

m(m-n)

#

and

#

3(n-m)

toxic sleet
#

i was thinking it became (m-3)(m-n)

tough hatch
#

yes

#

so now
m^2 - mn + 3n - 3m becomes
m(m-n) + 3(n-m) or
m(m-n) - 3(m-n)

alpine sable
#

how do i learn 7 times tables

tough hatch
#

u follow?

small holly
#

yeah

tough hatch
#

@alpine sable channel is busy, u may post on another #questions- channel

small holly
#

im so confused

tough hatch
#

n-m = -(m-n)

small holly
#

yeah

toxic sleet
#

can you help me out with parabolic quadratic essays bro?

small holly
#

sheeeeesh ur big brained

tough hatch
small holly
#

wait so it becomes (m-3)(m-n)?

tough hatch
#

yes

small holly
#

but if i factorise that it becomes m^2 - mn - 3m + 3n not m^2 - mn + 3n - 3m

#

or is there no difference?

vale wigeon
#

there is no difference between these

#

-3m + 3n = 3n - 3m

small holly
#

oh okay

lusty pewter
#

What is the value of n if n is the largest of 5 consecutive numbers that multiply to give 95040?

#

@tough hatch

#

yo superficialsicko

#

i need help :]

tough hatch
#

@lusty pewter don't ping me as if i'm the only one who can help u

#

lol

lusty pewter
#

ok sorry

tough hatch
lusty pewter
#

ok lol

vale wigeon
#

have you made any progress on this?

lusty pewter
#

alll i know is:

#

(n-4) x (n-3) x (n-2) x (n-1) x (n)

vale wigeon
#

you should not use x for multiplication

#

but yes, n(n-1)(n-2)(n-3)(n-4) = 95040

lusty pewter
#

yeah

#

i am a bit confused

vale wigeon
#

confused at what, exactly?

lusty pewter
#

how to get 95040

vale wigeon
#

what do you mean by "get 95040"?

lusty pewter
#

like what does n have to be to get 95040

vale wigeon
#

"i'm a bit confused at how to solve this problem" in other words

#

which is not very informative unfortunately

lusty pewter
vale wigeon
#

i was attempting to narrow down where the confusion was

#

and failed

lusty pewter
#

what do you want me to stay instead when i have no clue how to solve it

vale wigeon
#

"i have no clue how to solve it"

lusty pewter
#

THATS BECAUSE I DONT

#

lmao

vale wigeon
#

anyway, if you treat this as an algebraic equation, it's going to be hard to solve, as it's 5th-degree
however, since we know n must be an integer, we can look at what 95040 is divisible by

#

you may notice that 95040 is divisible by 9 and by 10

lusty pewter
#

how did you figure that out

#

so fast

vale wigeon
#

figure what out

lusty pewter
#

like how it was divisible by 9 and 10

vale wigeon
#

these both have simple to check divisibility rules

#

a number is divisible by 10 iff it ends in a zero

#

and by 9 iff the sum of its digits is divisible by 9

lusty pewter
#

oh ok

vale wigeon
#

you know your divisibility rules, right?

lusty pewter
#

no

vale wigeon
lusty pewter
#

ill learn after this

#

what

vale wigeon
#

i mean ok

#

in any case

lusty pewter
#

lmao i am being bullied

vale wigeon
#

........

#

are you accusing me of bullying you, in complete seriousness?

lusty pewter
#

lmao

#

no

#

its joke

vale wigeon
#

and how exactly was i meant to know it's a joke?

lusty pewter
#

y do we need to find what it is divisible by

lusty pewter
#

r u trolling me

vale wigeon
#

i never said we 'need' to do anything

#

no, i am not trolling you.

lusty pewter
#

ok

vale wigeon
#

try writing down some products of 5 consecutive numbers that involve 9 and 10

#

there aren't many options for that

#

maybe you'll be lucky.

lusty pewter
#

y do they involve 9 and 10

vale wigeon
#

well 95040 is divisible by 9 and 10. maybe 9 and 10 could appear in the product directly

#

you know

#

when a number is divisible by 9, it can be written as 9 times something

lusty pewter
#

yeah

#

oh thanks so 9 is n

vale wigeon
#

it isn't

#

and i didn't say that

lusty pewter
#

oh so its 10

vale wigeon
#

it's not 10 either

#

,calc 9 * 8 * 7 * 6 * 5

ocean sealBOT
#

Result:

15120
vale wigeon
#

,calc 10 * 9 * 8 * 7 * 6

ocean sealBOT
#

Result:

30240
lusty pewter
#

close enough

vale wigeon
#

no

#

these are not 95040

lusty pewter
#

quiet close though

#

ill take that

vale wigeon
#

no, not nearly.

#

no.

#

at your level in math, you cannot get away with "close enough".

lusty pewter
#

what is my level

vale wigeon
#

from what i can see, you're studying basic algebra.

lusty pewter
#

yeah

vale wigeon
#

and right now, you're being stubborn.

lusty pewter
#

what is stubborn

#

oh i searched it up

#

ok

vale wigeon
vale wigeon
#

seeing as all i got from you were two incorrect guesses

lusty pewter
#

i did

#

19 18 17 16 15

vale wigeon
#

......

#

fine

#

,calc 19 * 18 * 17 * 16 * 15

ocean sealBOT
#

Result:

1.39536e+6
lusty pewter
#

yikes

vale wigeon
#

1395360 is too big

lusty pewter
#

im on the right track

vale wigeon
#

no you're not

lusty pewter
#

oh

vale wigeon
lusty pewter
#

9 is in 19

vale wigeon
#

it feels as if you're deliberately not following my instructions

lusty pewter
#

dude what

#

can you give me an example

#

idk what u mean

vale wigeon
#

13 * 12 * 11 * 10 * 9

#

like this

lusty pewter
#

wow spoiler

#

alert

vale wigeon
#

no lol

lusty pewter
#

is that answer

vale wigeon
#

no

#

it is not

lusty pewter
#

oh

vale wigeon
#

you can see for yourself

#

(unless you are unable to multiply five numbers together)

lusty pewter
#

oh i get it

#

so like 11, 10 , 9, 8 ,7

#

as an example

vale wigeon
#

yes that's an example of the kind of list i wanted you to write out

#

but this particular one won't give you 95040

#

it is but that's of no use here

lusty pewter
#

wow

ocean sealBOT
#

Result:

55440
lusty pewter
#

do i need to know that

ionic jewel
#

no

vale wigeon
#

no you don't, you can ignore what bunny said up there

lusty pewter
#

factorial

vale wigeon
#

yknow what. fuck it.

#

,calc 12 * 11 * 10 * 9 * 8