#help-0

1 messages · Page 675 of 1

ocean sealBOT
#

Xetrov

solar pebble
#

oh yeah

#

sorry didn't mention that

#

hmm this isn't so nice

wanton smelt
solar pebble
#

tbh I'd probably just stick it in a calculator

#

I'm not working today either, DW lol

wanton smelt
#

cant use a calc :(

solar pebble
#

I'll have another think

#

$3\frac{\log2}{\log0.2}\times \frac{\log5}{\log0.5}$

ocean sealBOT
#

Xetrov

solar pebble
#

(anyone wanna contribute? I'm just fumbling)

#

@wanton smelt I got it

#

log 2 * log 0.5

alpine sable
solar pebble
#

@alpine sable multiply by dx * beta* y

#

or you can attempt a Laplace transform

wanton smelt
#

omg what

#

one sec

#

oh lol i saw sloko's thing and thought you sent it

solar pebble
#

no lol

#

@alpine sable ?

wanton smelt
solar pebble
#

log (10/5) / log(5/10)

alpine sable
solar pebble
#

not telling you do it yourself

#

I've given you a hint already

wanton smelt
#

isn't it log2*log5?

alpine sable
#

still

solar pebble
#

$\frac{a}{c} \times \frac{b}{d} = \frac{ab}{cd}$

ocean sealBOT
#

Xetrov

$\frac{a}{c} \times \frac{b}{d} = \frac{ab}{cd}$
wanton smelt
#

oh i misread

solar pebble
#

You're doing a very poor job of justifying your laziness SLOKO

wanton smelt
solar pebble
#

yes :)

wanton smelt
#

how lol

solar pebble
#

try it

#

you should get -1

wanton smelt
#

yeah im not sure how to go about it

#

you mean like on a calc

solar pebble
#

nope

wanton smelt
#

yeah idk how to do it lol

solar pebble
#

hold on

#

I'm still writing out

#

I meant 1

#

-1*-1

wanton smelt
#

i'm still at 3((log(10/5)/log0.2)(log5/log(5/10))

solar pebble
#

notice that

#

$1 - \log 5 = -(\log 5 - 1)$

ocean sealBOT
#

Xetrov

solar pebble
#

$\frac{\log 2}{\log 0.5} = \frac{1 - \log 5}{\log 5 - 1}$

ocean sealBOT
#

Xetrov

solar pebble
#

@wanton smelt

wanton smelt
#

thats even more confusing lol

solar pebble
#

so we have

#

$3\frac{\log2}{\log0.2}\times \frac{\log5}{\log0.5}$

ocean sealBOT
#

Xetrov

solar pebble
#

agreed?

wanton smelt
#

yeah i was there

wanton smelt
solar pebble
#

by some stupid but useful property of the multiplication of fractions, you can swap the denominators

#

nope

#

actually yes

wanton smelt
#

ijaodiijdaoiwj

#

and then?

solar pebble
#

10/5 = 2
5/10 = 0.5

#

giving you

#

(a pain)

alpine sable
#

Hey everybody so if something takes 900 hours to learn and there are 8760 hours in a year and i have 2 years to learn this thing how much could i split the 900 hours into

solar pebble
#

$\frac{\log 10 - \log 5}{\log 5 - \log 10} \times \frac{\log 10 - \log 2}{\log 2 - \log 10}$

ocean sealBOT
#

Xetrov

solar pebble
#

@alpine sable are there any other factors such as forgetting xD

wanton smelt
#

jesus christ

alpine sable
wanton smelt
#

wait so

alpine sable
#

actually

solar pebble
#

okay

wanton smelt
#

-1*-1?

alpine sable
#

@solar pebble changed it to 900 hours just in case

solar pebble
#

I'm not quite getting your question

#

@wanton smelt yas

wanton smelt
#

omg

#

thanksss

solar pebble
#

so clean

wanton smelt
#

wait how long did this take

solar pebble
#

for it to click?

#

too long

wanton smelt
#

almost 1 hour

#

imma cry

#

i got 8 tests as homework due tomorrow still at my 3rd iodwaijwaijwa

solar pebble
#

in your honour

#

good luck!

wanton smelt
#

lol thanks

solar pebble
#

mind you

#

most of that page is garbage

#

irrelevant

wanton smelt
#

relatable

solar pebble
#

ya

#

maths is mostly trial and error whether you like it or not

minor elbow
#

what the heck

#

how do i start

#

what do i even write

wary stream
minor elbow
#

ah i see

#

how do i do that?

wary stream
#

Null space, I believe @minor elbow

harsh acorn
ocean sealBOT
vague coral
harsh acorn
#

Oh, Channel is occupied, sorry

wary stream
vague coral
#

yes

wary stream
#

So null space would give you the answers, for alpha, beta, and gamma

vague coral
#

oh wait, alpha, beta and gamma isnt a family

wary stream
#

To be more exact, a singular answer for alpha, beta, and gamma, based on the values picked

muted raft
#

they just want you write a particular solution it looks like

vague coral
#

if you have an infinite number of solutions, you dont call that null space

#

oh lord null space, I suck at english

#

Null, like ker f ?

viral rampart
vague coral
#

sorry I'm a bit dumb today

wary stream
vague coral
#

yeah your right

viral rampart
#

They just want one solution from null space yes

glass lichen
#

yes, checking independence of co-ordinate vectors uses kernel/nullspace/homogeneous system

wary stream
viral rampart
#

Moreover nullspace is 2D, so gamma can be anything

vague coral
vague coral
wary stream
#

Gamma will most likely be the free variable

vague coral
#

and write the other two in terms of gamma

muted raft
#

nullity = #of free variables

viral rampart
#

Wait it's expressed as columns

#

Take transpose first

glass lichen
#

you should probably wait for the person that asked the question to comment, so you're not just giving the answer

wary stream
#

If you take the transpose, then that row of zeros will become a column of zeros

viral rampart
#

Ye

wary stream
#

Making it overdetermined

viral rampart
#

What

wary stream
#

More equations than variables

viral rampart
#

No lol

#

It just is a matter of representation

#

Moreover it's not an augmented Matrix

glass lichen
#

solving independence is an augmented matrix

#

the column vector is just 0, so it'll never change with row operations

viral rampart
#

You can check independence without the 0 column

#

With just the square matrix, since it's homogeneous

glass lichen
#

yeah, it's still an augmented matrix

viral rampart
#

U is not an augmented Matrix

glass lichen
#

wow didnt know my eyes didnt work

wary stream
#

Taking transpose, means row of zeros becomes column of zeros, meaning gamma is zero, meaning 3 equations with 2 variables, so therefore should not take transpose

glass lichen
#

Im aware U isnt augmented

#

However checking independence is checking that A is invertible, which is checking that Ax=0 means x=0 only

viral rampart
#

I represent V1,V2,V3 as rows of a matrix to solve. It's simply a matter of representation as long as you know what you are doing

viral rampart
wary stream
#

You find null space of U, not of U'

viral rampart
#

My brain hurts

#

They're the same

#

Ty

glass lichen
#

b on FTIM is what's being checked

wary stream
#

Null space of U vs U' is going to be different, I believe

viral rampart
#

Yeah

#

That's not what I meant

#

I'm about to puke, I'm unwell

#

Cya later

wary stream
viral rampart
#

Lol, take transpose and find the relationship between rows

#

Big difference

wary stream
#

Thought you were saying take transpose then find null space

viral rampart
#

U'*[a b c]=0

#

I mean alpha beta gamma

#

I can't look at screen, my head hurts

#

Sorry

#

Bai

wary stream
mellow canyon
#

is this an error? I used to 10mm=1cm fact and 450 as an answer, not 45. and it looks like they switched it from 10 to 100 randomly in the steps

rigid smelt
#

No, its because they squared the the fraction

#

10^2=100

mellow canyon
glass lichen
mellow canyon
glass lichen
#

yes...

mellow canyon
#

ok that makes a bit more sense haha

#

I think I need a break I'm missing stuff like this...cya guys. thanks

wanton smelt
#

i need to find out the x for which (x^2-x)^(2x) is correctly defined
any help?

viral rampart
#

I'm sorry @wary stream @glass lichen. my head hurts, I didn't mean to talk like that

mellow canyon
#

or is this something from before

viral rampart
#

ye

glass lichen
#

something from before.

mellow canyon
#

ok nvm

minor elbow
#

how do i put tanh is this form?

#

im feeling hella braindead

#

i know the answer is ln(cosh(x))

#

but how do i put this in this particular form?

rigid smelt
#

Just do it like how you would do it for tan(x)

#

Using the fact that tanh(x)=sinh(x)/cosh(x)

minor elbow
#

sorry i cant do it

minor elbow
glass lichen
#

sinh(x)/cosh(x) is doable w/ u-sub..

quasi cave
#

Can sum help me with a simple question?

#

<@&286206848099549185>

glass lichen
quasi cave
#

oo okja

uneven garnet
#

Hello,\
How can I find the taylor series of $\ln(e^x -\frac{1}{2})$ [x=0, order 4] ?\
Someone advice me to find the $\frac{f^{(n)}(0)}{n!}$, but this method looks me too long… Is there a faster way to solve the problem ?

ocean sealBOT
vale wigeon
#

sure is

#

you can write $\ln(e^x - \frac12)$ as $\ln(e^x) + \ln(1 - \frac12 e^{-x})$

ocean sealBOT
vale wigeon
#

ln(e^x) is just x

#

er. ok hold on

#

this will be a little awkward

#

looks like we're better off with $\ln(1/2) + x + \ln(2 - e^{-x})$

ocean sealBOT
vale wigeon
#

by moving to a different channel because this one's currently occupied. @sharp sparrow

vale wigeon
# ocean seal **Ann**

and ln(2 - e^{-x}) in turn can be rewritten as ln(1 + (1-e^-x)) for which you can use the taylor series of ln(1+t)

uneven garnet
#

Ohh I see

#

Thank you !

alpine sable
#

I'm running into issues with understanding this formula

#

as far as I get it, the formula goes something like this 1/5 x 2,2833 x 1/Rk where Rk equals the 1/rj

#

however that seems to be incorrect since I don't get the same results as the wj(ROC) column

fervent locust
#

traductor: 1. The graph records the height of 40 3rd graders. high school. Build the frequency table: (Class mark, absolute frequency, accumulated absolute frequency)

#

plis :c

#

help

alpine sable
#

I'm pretty sure that posting in two channels is against the rules, beside I occupied the channel before you did

fervent locust
#

zorry

alpine sable
#

<@&286206848099549185> mind taking a quick look at my question?

heady sequoia
#

basically, summation sign means start from the index at the bottom and add till the index at the top

#

so lets fix j. w1(ROC) = 1/5 * (1/r_1 + 1/r_2 + 1/r_3 + 1/r_4 + 1/r_5)

#

w2(ROC) = 1/5 * (1/r_2 + 1/r_3 + 1/r_4 + 1/r_5)

#

and so on

alpine sable
#

ok jesus thanks @heady sequoia

#

I've been looking at it the wrong way the entire time

weary hazel
#

Hello, please help with this word algebra problem

#

The average height of Tom, Jerry and Sam is h cm. Tom is 84 cm tall. Jerry is twice as tall as Sam.

a) Find Sam's height in terms of h
b) If h=73, how much taller is Tom than Sam?

fallow jasper
#

$h=\frac{\text{Tom+Jerry+Sam}}{3}$

ocean sealBOT
#

Blackdeath39

weary hazel
#

Yeah but what is Sam's height?

alpine sable
#

you just gotta find the formula

#

$h=\frac{\text{84+2Sam+Sam}}{3}$

ocean sealBOT
#

Grincek

pallid lance
#

8e^-pi/4* i should be equal to 4sqrt(2) - 4sqrt(2) * i

#

right?

weary hazel
#

Is the answer of option b 39??

#

@alpine sable ?

alpine sable
#

Yeah I think so

weary hazel
#

Thank you 💕

crude moth
#

Someone help asap

torpid delta
#

eyo

crude moth
#

Hi

ebon wing
#

hi

#

i need help Find an equation for a line with a slope of 1/4, passing through (8, -2).

arctic mango
#

Write y = mx +c.
Plug in x = 8 and y = -2 to get a relation between m and c.
Substitute m = 1/4 into this relation.

cinder sleet
#

i need help

ebon wing
#

thankou

stark trail
#

$y-y_1=m(x-x_1)$ where m is the gradient or slope
and $(x_1,y_1)$ is one of the points where the line goes through

ocean sealBOT
#

Muzan Jackson

arctic mango
#

The slope-point formula for the equation of a line. It's very helpful to remember.

cinder sleet
#

can anyone help me

arctic mango
#

2x + 10 = 2(x+5), is that what the question is asking?

ebon wing
#

can someone help me Find an equation of a line perpendicular to y =1/3x − 5, passing through the origin.

cinder sleet
#

need help with this

weary hazel
#

g = (x-2)/3

glass lichen
#

not the answer.

#

don't just give the answer away as it does nothing

alpine sable
ebon wing
#

Find an equation of a line perpendicular to y =1/3x − 5, passing through the origin.
i need help

arctic mango
#

What's the slope of a perpendicular line?

alpine sable
#

The gradient of a perp like is the negative reciprocal of the initial

arctic mango
#

Yes. Now use the slope-point formula.

weary hazel
#

Take common factors, or just rearrange the numbers so that your subject stays in left side, and move all other numbers to the other side of the equation

alpine sable
#

hallo

#

so i understand picking the u here and all of the steps in getting the intergral

#

but i dont understand is how 3/5 was gotten

little quarry
#

How do I make the TeXit bot display my latex stuff with larger fonts?

#

Possibly causing "taller" images.

alpine sable
#

i thought that the u would make the intergral become 3/u....

#

can anyone explain it to me? 🙂

stark trail
alpine sable
stark trail
#

$\int nf(x)dx=n\int f(x)dx$

ocean sealBOT
#

Muzan Jackson

alpine sable
#

okay thats why 1/u is left

stark trail
alpine sable
#

thank you very much 🙂

stark trail
#

ur welcome

viral patio
#

what have you tried already? (also reply to my messages to i get ping'd pls)

wanton smelt
#

was told to multiply by 5+3i and got (16+30i)/34 but that sounds wrong

ancient creek
wanton smelt
#

ooh

#

16/34

#

fuck i forgot

viral patio
wanton smelt
#

i could do that

ancient creek
wanton smelt
#

thanksj aiuwhiudawh

ancient creek
#

np

wanton smelt
#

what about uh

#

tg(2arctg3)?

#

is tg(arctg3) just 3

visual imp
#

Can someone help me with the next questions?

#

How many diagonals can be drawn at a single vertex of an undecagon?

glass lichen
visual imp
#

There are 8 but I was not sure haha

glass lichen
#

yes, there are 8

#

an n-gon will have n-3 diagonals from any vertex (prove it for yourself)

visual imp
#

Calculate the number of sides and indicate the name of the polygon of 77 total diagonals

alpine sable
#

is the question wrong?

ancient creek
alpine sable
viral patio
cinder wedge
#

I have a question

alpine sable
#

yea

#

i see what i did wrong but all the choices look wrong D:

cinder wedge
#

$x²+y³= z^4$

ocean sealBOT
viral patio
cinder wedge
#

which is empty?

viral patio
viral patio
alpine sable
#

illl do that noww

visual imp
#

Determine the value of the exterior angles of the following polygon

#

I don't remember how to do thissad

alpine sable
#

i closed the old question the new one is this

minor elbow
alpine sable
#

i got 1,8x,10,9x=-10

minor elbow
#

so add all the equations and make it equal to 360

#

lad @alpine sable you asking a question on top of someone else's question

visual imp
#

Thankss

minor elbow
#

oh lol soz

#

i guess the other dude did it to you then lol

minor elbow
alpine sable
#

hello guys. are vertically opposite angles equal? I haven't came across it since years and I wanna make sure. they are the angles which form like an X shape right?

oak chasm
#

@alpine sable Yes.

alpine sable
#

@oak chasm thank you!

oak chasm
#

No problem.

tardy pulsar
#

I inputted an equation involving logarithms into symbolab and the answer is in an unfamiliar format, does anyone mind explaining/rewriting it?

ocean sealBOT
#

Chai T. Rex

tardy pulsar
#

yeah

oak chasm
#

ln means natural logarithm

#

Have you done logarithms?

tardy pulsar
#

what does that mean?

#

a little bit

ocean sealBOT
#

Chai T. Rex

tardy pulsar
#

er

#

im not sure

#

im only familiar with format like this

#

\log _a\left(x\right)

oak chasm
#

OK, so the base there is a.

ocean sealBOT
#

Chai T. Rex

tardy pulsar
#

yeah

ocean sealBOT
#

Chai T. Rex

oak chasm
#

,calc e

ocean sealBOT
#

Result:

2.718281828459
oak chasm
#

That's the value of e.

#

Very commonly used base of a logarithm.

tardy pulsar
#

ok, thank you so much!

oak chasm
#

You're welcome.

full dome
#

can someone check my trig answers in dms

toxic dust
#

Would |b| = 9?

viral patio
toxic dust
#

cause isnt it b-a sqaure root

viral patio
toxic dust
#

Ur finding magnititude

#

This is vectors

wraith cairn
#

the dot product finds how much 2 vectors go in the same direction. a dot b = |a||b|cos(theta)

viral patio
wraith cairn
#

try isolating |b| to see whether or not it is constant.

toxic dust
wraith cairn
#

no it is not

#

I don't even know what that means

wraith cairn
#

a and b are vectors. How do you square root a vector.

viral patio
wraith cairn
#

ahh that makes sense.

toxic dust
#

yeah thats what i meant 😅

wraith cairn
#

a and b in that theorem is completely different from this question.

#

it's like saying a^2+b^2=c^2

toxic dust
#

But according to what you said about how there needs to be a dot b = |a||b|cos(theta) There isnt enough information given to me so i wont be able to solve it

wraith cairn
#

it's not true for all of a,b and c for every single question.

#

yes that should be right

#

there is not enough information

#

as long as the "horizontal component of b relative to a" is the same, then it'll be true.

minor dagger
#

can someone help me with these

wraith cairn
#

@toxic dust here's what I mean. As you can see, the vectors on the left have different magnitudes, but the dot product will be the same.

viral patio
# minor dagger

i think this channel is still in use, i think you should ask your question in another (empty) channel

toxic dust
#

Speaking of which, can you guys also help me expain this one @viral patio @wraith cairn

#

So its 2a and 2b right

wraith cairn
#

it's asking (2a) x (2b)

toxic dust
#

Yeah but in Cross product right

#

So when we line those up

wraith cairn
#

just do it on paper. Try a=(a1,a2,a3) b =(b1,b2,b3) get the cross product, then try doubling both and see what happens to the cross product.

wraith cairn
#

that is not the cross product.

vagrant rover
#

Is greater infinity a thing?

alpine sable
#

how do you Calculate the SURFACE AREA and
PERIMETER

vagrant rover
#

ping me

Is greater infinity a thing?

alpine sable
#

aye yo is this chanell bussy?

toxic dust
#

?

dense snow
#

soryr, my bad

toxic dust
#

no worries

dense snow
#

i didn't read the whole q

remote heron
glass gale
#

oh crap I didn't see that

#

should I delete it from here or?

remote heron
#

up to you

glass gale
#

I'll do just so it doesn't clutter

unique tapir
#

hi

#

in used?

#

There are s students in the art club. Each member painted 13 pictures for the art show. Write an expression that shows the number of pictures the club painted.

Type an asterisk ( * ) if you want to use a multiplication sign and a slash ( / ) if you want to use a division sign.

#

if its not may someone help

barren mauve
#

Silly question - A, B, and R are matrices
Does A * B * R * B^-1 * A^-1 equal R?

gusty gorge
#

nooooo

unique tapir
#

wga?

#

what?

gusty gorge
#

there's actually an entire decomposition built around matrices that look like that

#

look up diagonalization

barren mauve
# gusty gorge nooooo

Ok the thing is I have some code I wrote ages back which essentially does this and I don't know why it works

gusty gorge
#

a lot of matrices can be written as $A = PDP^{-1}$, and $A \neq D$

ocean sealBOT
#

Saccharine

gusty gorge
glass lichen
#

someone asked before the matrix question

barren mauve
#

My context is rendering, and one of the matrices is a projection matrix, which is more than a skew right since it's not an affine transform?

glass lichen
#

@barren mauve channel was in use.

barren mauve
#

Apologies

unique tapir
#

yes

glass lichen
#

that doesnt answer my question at all

unique tapir
#

.

#

s/13

#

?

#

13s

steep briar
#

s/13 or 13s? Also, what's your reasoning? (does not mean you're wrong)

unique tapir
#

cuase it said each

#

so maybe diviade

#

didve

steep briar
#

Well, let's say there's one person (s=1)

#

then how many paintings were painted?

tardy pulsar
#

Can anyone help?

remote heron
# tardy pulsar

the leaves being 30 db implies the intensity is 10^15 w/m^2

#

well i guess i can describe the whole thing if you want

tardy pulsar
#

Yes please

remote heron
#

you just use the $\beta dB = 10 \log \frac{I}{I_0}$

ocean sealBOT
#

jan Niku

remote heron
#

I_0 is 10^-12 w/m^2

tardy pulsar
#

What does the left side represent?

#

The sound of the car?

remote heron
#

how many decibels a sound is

#

youll do one of these for each sound

#

so $30 db = 10 \log \frac{I_L}{I_0}$

ocean sealBOT
#

jan Niku

tardy pulsar
#

Yeah

remote heron
#

does it make sense why $\frac{I_L}{I_0}$ is 1000?

ocean sealBOT
#

jan Niku

tardy pulsar
#

cause 10^3?

remote heron
#

yea

#

then the log gives you 3, times 10 is thirty

#

so if I_0 = 10^-12 w/m^2, then I_L has to be 10^15 w/m^2

tardy pulsar
#

Oh I see

#

Ty so much!

remote heron
#

youre not there yet flonshed

#

alternatively i mean

#

this is really probably the long way to do it

#

generally you can just remember like

#

an increase in intensity of 10^k is an increase of k*10 decibels

#

so 10^3 more intense is 3*10 more decibles

small holly
#

i was looking at this graph and then saw functions near the top left of it

#

im pretty sure its calculus

#

what does it mean?

remote heron
#

statistical stuff

#

linear correlation

small holly
#

alright ty

remote heron
#

the function is the equation for the line that best fits the data

#

the R^2 probably better off watching a video lol

small holly
#

alright thanks

halcyon nova
#

<@&286206848099549185>

#

Anybody there?

merry burrow
#

I don’t think so

halcyon nova
#

Mhm

remote heron
#

check out uhh

#

maybe something like this?

#

i guess id have to ask what you tried or where you got stuck

halcyon nova
#

I know A=2

#

Idk how to get B

remote heron
#

i think youre close with the 2

#

note the shape tho

#

,w graph 2 sin(x)

remote heron
#

compare with yours, not the period just the general shape

#

here it starts at 0 and goes up

halcyon nova
#

Mhm

remote heron
#

so what does A have to be

halcyon nova
#

2?

remote heron
#

no its not 2 but thats close

halcyon nova
#

I thought amplitude is what A is

remote heron
#

it is, but another thing is baked into it

halcyon nova
#

What would that be?

remote heron
#

idk how else to say without giving it away thonk

#

hmm

#

it should be more obvious if you compare the two graphs

#

to make it begin going down

#

instead of going up

alpine sable
#

oops

halcyon nova
#

I am confused

remote heron
#

how would you flip a graph

#

around the x axis

#

do you see what i mean by its not going the correct way?L

halcyon nova
#

You would make the opposite Y values

remote heron
#

how do you do that, numerically

alpine sable
#

Y = opposite (whatever)

#

opposite = ???

halcyon nova
#

Ya

alpine sable
#

Hello people i need a question i have a sum of $ln(1+1/(2^(2^n)))$ from n = 0 to infinity

ocean sealBOT
#

macoro

halcyon nova
#

So -2 would be 2

remote heron
#

yup

halcyon nova
#

And 2 would be -2

remote heron
#

yea

#

so A isnt 2, but its...

halcyon nova
#

-2

remote heron
#

yea

halcyon nova
#

Ohh ok

#

Now for B

remote heron
#

for B is mainly that uhh

#

i wanna try explaining it

#

im not sure its gonna make sense

#

you know the normal shape of a sine graph like

#

you start at the beginning of a circle

#

and you go all the way around

#

back to where you started

#

thats the same as a sine graph starting at 0, going all the way up, back to the x axis, all the way down, then back up

halcyon nova
#

Ok

remote heron
#

so does that cycle take longer in your graph?

#

than normal a mean

#

or is it happening faster

#

or just normal

alpine sable
#

it takes twice as long on your graph right?

remote heron
#

how long should it usually take

halcyon nova
#

Umm I’m not sure

remote heron
#

heres a normal one

#

,w graph sinx

alpine sable
#

on your graph, 2 waves goes every 4pi

alpine sable
#

normally for sin(x), 2 waves go every 2pi

remote heron
#

how long does this cycle take

#

how long does it take in yours

halcyon nova
#

Mine is faster

remote heron
#

are you sure?

halcyon nova
#

No wait

remote heron
#

it takes 2 pi in a normal sin function

#

by what factor is yours slower?

#

like does it take twice as long

#

ten times as long

halcyon nova
#

Takes twice as long

remote heron
#

yup

#

so if you can imagine like

#

x starting at 0, and moving forward to 2 pi

#

in a normal sine graph

#

to complete the function

#

well, one period

#

you want this to happen half as quickly

#

(or equivalently twice as slow)

#

if you divide x by 2 in the input

halcyon nova
#

So I would do 2pi/2

remote heron
#

i dont think 2pi

#

you usually start doing that if your graph is intersecting on integers

#

but here its just intersecting on pi like a normal sine function (sort of)

#

but divided by 2 yea

alpine sable
#

ok

remote heron
#

if you divide x by two in the input

#

then x has to get twice as big to go one full rotation

alpine sable
#

this channel open?

remote heron
#

e.g. takes twice as long

#

so many people typing sad

wraith cairn
#

coefficient of x = 2pi/(length of 1 period)

tardy pulsar
#

erm i have a quick question

alpine sable
#

ive tried conversion into a product and observation of the next term, it essentially becomes ln (product from k = 0 to infinity of (1+1/(A^k)), where A = 2^(2^n),

halcyon nova
#

remote heron
#

,w graph 2 * sin(x/2)

#

@halcyon nova

#

oops

#

,w graph -2 *sin(x/2)

remote heron
#

ye

#

before you lose this channel completely haha

#

look right?

halcyon nova
#

Mhm

#

So what would x be?

remote heron
#

whatever you want

alpine sable
#

just a variable

halcyon nova
#

So B= x/2

remote heron
#

probably say B=1/2

#

its implied the x is there

#

since youre talking about graph

halcyon nova
#

Ok

alpine sable
#

,w graph 2sin(-1/2x)

alpine sable
#

alternatively this works

#

Hello people i need a question i have a sum of $ln(1+1/(2^{2^n}))$ from n = 0 to infinity

ocean sealBOT
#

macoro

alpine sable
#

ive tried conversion into a product and observation of the next term, it essentially becomes ln (product from k = 0 to infinity of (1+1/(A^k)), where A = 2^(2^n),

#

2^(2^n), here, is a constant in this case

ionic jewel
#

,w sum from n=0 to infinity ln(1+1/(2^(2^n)))

radiant blaze
#

do people know how to solve dfq in here? I have a question

alpine sable
#

do you rlly need alot of numbers using pi to multiply thousands of numbers?

#

Plz help

#

So anyone know how to simplify product from k=0 to infinity of (1+1/A^k) (A is a constant)

ionic jewel
#

well wolfram does give answer to your sum correctly

#

not sure how to do it by hand

wraith cairn
#

pretty sure that's a geometric sum

#

try using A = 2 on paper

alpine sable
#

its not a sum

tardy pulsar
#

hi i have a quick question is this statement true or false

alpine sable
#

false

tardy pulsar
#

how come?

wraith cairn
#

logn(a)/(logn(b)) = log_b(a)

alpine sable
#

test it, ln 10/ln 3 does not equal ln 10 - ln 3

oak chasm
#

@tardy pulsar Let's say the top is 3000 and the bottom is 300. Will the sides be equal?

tardy pulsar
#

Ah

#

Its false then?

alpine sable
#

@ionic jewel hmm so how do you get ln2

#

it looks oddly close to ln2 on wolfram

oak chasm
#

@tardy pulsar Well, the top can be 3000 if a is n^3000. The bottom can be 300 if b is n^300. So, is 3000/300 = 3000 - 300?

#

If not, then it's not always true.

#

So it's considered false.

tardy pulsar
#

Tyty

oak chasm
#

No problem.

alpine sable
#

hai

#

Anyone help me pls

#

do you rlly need alot of numbers using pi aka π to multiply thousands of numbers or you just like do 3.14 × 2,296?

#

channels not open, but for a quick answer, if ur talking precision with the thousands, id use 5 digits of pi

oak chasm
#

@alpine sable Do you know about significant figures?

oak chasm
#

Well, 3.14 lets you use up to 3 significant figures in your answer, depending on how many significant figures are in the other number.

#

If you need more significant figures, use more digits of pi.

alpine sable
#

OHHHHH

#

Okay thanks

oak chasm
#

No problem.

alpine sable
#

You saved my life

wraith cairn
alpine sable
#

its a product

wraith cairn
#

have you tried expanding out when A = 2.

#

I am talking about (1+1/2)(1+1/4)(1+1/16)...

#

it's a geometric sum 1+1/2+...

alpine sable
#

its not a geometric sum tho

wraith cairn
#

so the answer is ln(2)

alpine sable
#

yeah thats what wolfram spits out

wraith cairn
#

it's a geometric sum.

#

ln(1+1/2) + ln(1+1/4)+...

#

= ln(1+1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 +...)

#

= ln(2)

alpine sable
#

ok but why did you select A = 2

wraith cairn
#

because A=2 in the question.

#

pretty sure it only works with A^(A^n)

alpine sable
#

your calculations arent correct tho

#

ln(1+1/2) + ln(1+1/4)+...
= ln(1+1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 +...)

#

this part isnt

#

plus A = 2 would be completely arbitrary

wraith cairn
#

actually nope, it only works with A=2.

#

how is it not correct

#

have you tried expanding it.

#

do it on paper.

#

expand (1+1/2)(1+1/4)

#

then expand (1+1/2)(1+1/4)(1+1/16)

#

you will see a pattern.

alpine sable
#

I didn't, could you explain it

wraith cairn
#

what did you get on your paper.

alpine sable
#

1+1/4 + 1/8

#

1 + 1/4 + 1/8 + 1/16 + 1/64 + 1/128

wraith cairn
#

(1+1/2)(1+1/4) = 1+1/2+1/4+1/8

alpine sable
#

oh yeah mb

wraith cairn
#

(1+1/2)(1+1/4)(1+1/16) = 1+1/2+1/4+1/8+1/16+1/32+1/64 +1/128

#

in general, (1+1/2)...(1+1/2^(2^n)) = 1+1/2+...+1/2^(2^(n+1)-1)

alpine sable
#

wait a sec

#

no wonder i got a discrepency

#

did we multiply (1+1/8) if its A = 2

wraith cairn
#

no. That doesn't exist.

alpine sable
#

ln (product from 0 to infinity of (1+1/A^k)) right?

#

where A = 2

#

and if k = 3

wraith cairn
#

it's 1 + 1/2^(2^n)

#

as you said here

radiant blaze
#

can anyone help with this

#

kinda stuck on the yp(t)

alpine sable
#

oh ur talking about the original. I understood what you did, thanks for the help

radiant blaze
#

and finding the yc

wraith cairn
#

ok np.

radiant blaze
#

this is dfq section 4.4 btw

small maple
#

How can I factor x^2+1

alpine sable
#

u cant

#

can someone telel me why these two calculations yield different answers

#

i thought for directional derivative only the direction matters for 2nd vector

#

the first vector is the gradient

slender marten
#

It must be a unit vector.

alpine sable
#

really?

slender marten
#

The rate of change of f in the direction of u is nabla f dot u, where u is a unit vector.

civic elbow
slender marten
#

It from the derivation of the formula.

alpine sable
#

alright ty

radiant blaze
#

so fuck my question huh

elfin snow
#

yeah fuck it

west fern
rich gorge
#

Hi guys, I have a question, what x0 means? I've just started to learn functions and I don't know where I can find x0 thinkies

ionic jewel
#

its naming a specific point

rich gorge
#

thank u

rich gorge
acoustic kiln
#

can I get some help with this please

#

-6, -1, 6, 13, 15, 19, 20, 22, 23, 26, 29, 32, 37, 46, 52

#

here are the numbers in order

rich gorge
#

Thank you so much

acoustic kiln
west fern
#

isnt Q1 the mean of min and Q2?

acoustic kiln
#

if that was the case, it would be (-6+-1+6+13+15+19+20+22)/8=11

#

it's not right either

gray isle
#

Q1,Q2,Q3 refer to the quartile values

#

(Q2 would be the median)

acoustic kiln
#

yes

#

there are 15 values

#

so the median aka Q2 is 22

#

and the 25th and 75th quartiles should be 13 and 32 if I count correctly

gray isle
#

strange

alpine sable
#

Hey helpers can someone pls help me verify this

#

I think I have an answer

#

Hw problem

gray isle
#

maybe they want you to include the median value when calculating Q1 and Q3

acoustic kiln
#

:/

gray isle
#

i.e. find median of
-6, -1, 6, 13, 15, 19, 20, 22 for Q1
and
22, 23, 26, 29, 32, 37, 46, 52 for Q2

acoustic kiln
#

wtf

#

yep

#

it's that

#

I'm sad

#

thanks

gray isle
#

there's nothing wrong with the values you entered

#

just slightly different interpretations/definitions lead to different results

acoustic kiln
#

I followed the notes the teacher gave

dull shuttle
#

hello

nova falcon
#

help me?

dull shuttle
#

rotate

viral plover
#

Can someone pls help me with 15c it’s a homework problem and I’m unsure and confused what the textbook solutions did

nova falcon
#

what.

alpine sable
#

Hello

viral plover
nova falcon
#

ok

#

so (m2 - 6) z = z x m2 - z x 6

#

so 3x - 2y + zm2 - 6z = m - 4

#

i think thats the answer

#

simplified

viral plover
#

So your saying taht m =4

nova falcon
#

no?

viral plover
alpine sable
#

hmm

viral plover
nova falcon
#

wlc

alpine sable
#

y+z=0 and x=-2 are yielded from equations 1 and 2 I believe @viral plover

#

Maybe that's relevant for you, or maybe it isn't, I'm not sure

#

Then you could write m as a quadratic, with only 1 other variable, y or z [you get to pick]

#

But infinite number of solutions

viral plover
#

I’m just looking for a single value of m

#

All my teacher told me when u use elimination that your supposed to get 0=0

green fable
#

its a cone

#

the sa is total, not lateral

#

im trying to find the two pieces combined surface area

#

so top cone merged withbottom whats the new sa

gusty gorge
green fable
viral plover
gusty gorge
#

If you apply row operations, you get $\left[\begin{matrix}1 & 0 & 0 & -2\0 & 1 & 0 & - \frac{1}{m - 2}\0 & 0 & 1 & \frac{1}{m - 2}\end{matrix}\right]$

ocean sealBOT
#

Saccharine

gusty gorge
#

For m = 2, there is no solution

wispy ember
#

1+1=3

viral rampart
#

Or a million other possibilities

tawdry cedar
#

How do i do this? Can anyone help me please?

glacial hedge
#

hint

#

$(a-b) = (/sqrt(a)-/sqrt(b))*(/sqrt(a)+/sqrt(b))$

ocean sealBOT
#

Elonmosqito96

tawdry cedar
#

sorry but i have no idea what that means 😅

alpine sable
#

Oh sorry

gusty gorge
#

$(a-b) = (\sqrt{a} - \sqrt{b})(\sqrt{a} + \sqrt{b})$

ocean sealBOT
#

Saccharine

gusty gorge
#

there I wrote it for you

tawdry cedar
#

oh ok thanks

glacial hedge
gusty gorge
#

I guess it might be helpful to note that $(a-\sqrt{ab}) = (\sqrt{a} - \sqrt{b})\sqrt{a}$

ocean sealBOT
#

Saccharine

small maple
#

how do you factor x2+1

tawdry cedar
pearl marlin
ocean sealBOT
#

learn4math

glacial hedge
tawdry cedar
#

ok doin' it

#

then simplify it by 1/ sqrt a right?

#

or just keep it like that?

glacial hedge
#

i mean its fine as it is, but it is a common thing to rationalize the denominator

#

*propper thing

gusty gorge
#

tbh I prefer $\frac{1}{\sqrt a}$, but idk why most high school teachers don't like it

ocean sealBOT
#

Saccharine

tawdry cedar
#

imma do it anyways

#

Thanks for your support!!!

candid hill
#

Umm.guys can you give me atleast 5 algerbatic expression equation plss (THIS IS NOT FOR HOMEWORK)

glacial hedge
#

linear, quadratic, quartic?

woven pollen
#

$e^s = \frac{1}{(s-2)(s+3)}$

ocean sealBOT
#

tensor

woven pollen
#

there's one

#

$e^{-t} + e^{t} = \frac{\pi}{4}$

ocean sealBOT
#

tensor

woven pollen
#

two

gusty gorge
#

$x e^x = 5$

#

😉

ocean sealBOT
#

Saccharine

glacial hedge
# woven pollen there's one

regarding circular corodinate systems, on tripple integrals, for spheres do we restrict phi to be 0, pi? Because if we have phi go to 0, 2pi, don't we go over the volume twice?

#

whoops

#

didnt mean to tag u

ionic jewel
#

phi is bounded between 0 and pi

pearl marlin
woven pollen
#

🙂

#

$t'=\frac{t}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}$

ocean sealBOT
#

tensor

gusty gorge
#

ew

#

t' = $t\gamma$

#

better

ocean sealBOT
#

Saccharine

woven pollen
ionic jewel
woven pollen
#

my ipad is upstairs, is all.

gusty gorge
#

I never understood that 4-momentum stuff

#

well I did at some point

#

but whoosh

tacit mortar
#

hi

#

is this a quadratic equation

ionic jewel
#

no

#

that's a circle

sharp sail
#

no that's an ellipse

ionic jewel
#

ellipse with eccentricity 0

#

aka a circle

pearl marlin
ionic jewel
#

don't correct people if you aren't right

#

unless you were answering his question (badly) rather than correcting my answer

tacit mortar
alpine sable
#

can i ask questions?

alpine sable
#

can someone explain me how to approach this?

alpine sable
#

For proving the sequence given by $a_n := \frac{1}{(n+1)^2}$ converges to zero is a choice of $\frac{1}{\sqrt{\varepsilon}}-1$ appropriate?

ocean sealBOT
#

Maciekchelmicki

fair hamlet
#

Sort of, we want the answer to be < than epsilon, not epsilon itself, so replace epsilon with epsilon/2 and choose any integer larger than that and you should be fine

alpine sable
#

Thanks

fair hamlet
#

Np

twin haven
#

how to simplify 26x225x314x10^-12 using logarithms.

fair hamlet
left gate
#

How to find out the General SOlution of tan 2x = -cot(x + pi/3)

twin haven
#

yeah so log(26x225x314x10^-12)?

#

we will get log 26 + log 225+ log314 -12

fair hamlet
#

Yeah exactly

twin haven
#

after that i cant understand

fair hamlet
#

Well, isn’t this simplified?

twin haven
#

we need a no. value

fair hamlet
#

In that case you’re better off just multiplying. Do they want you to use log tables?

twin haven
#

um no idea, my teacher told me if you use logs the answer would come faster, so to save time i want to know.

fair hamlet
#

Well, maybe she meant log tables, those make multiplication and stuff quicker

twin haven
#

yeah my book once mentioned them, i dont know how to use them tho.

fair hamlet
#

Basically it is just a collection of log values for a lot of numbers. I had to use them in my school. They are kinda pointless these days though

twin haven
#

Hmmm so does higher level mathematics not use it?

gray isle
#

dunno why you'd use "logs" for that

twin haven
#

So it was a physics problem.

#

related to resistivity.

#

after rearranging all the values

#

i have to simplify the given ones. and calculator is not allowed

gray isle
#

$= \underbrace{2 \cdot 2 \cdot 225}{900} \cdot \underbrace{13 \cdot 157}{2041} \cdot 10^{-12}$

#

not logs, but properties of multiplication and exponent laws

wanton smelt
#

i'm stuck at
26(logx/log2)=18
if anyone can help

twin haven
#

wont this change the value?

gray isle
#

why would it change the value?

twin haven
#

oh so you broke it down

vale wigeon
#

2 * 2 * 225 is not equal to 10^3 is it?

#

it's 900, not 1000

gray isle
#

fk

#

typo sry

ocean sealBOT
#

ℝamonov

twin haven
#

yeah this made it easier

heavy mural
#

anyone have experience with r studio?

twin haven
#

Thanks for your time @gray isle @vale wigeon @fair hamlet

wanton smelt
#

how do make a sqrt into a cbrt

#

or vice versa

twin haven
wanton smelt
#

i got cbrt(2) over root(2^5)

full kayak
#

i was doing some basic differential calculus

#

and there was a question sayind

twin haven
wanton smelt
#

what

#

the second one is sqrt

full kayak
#

find dy/dt when y=1/x

#

so i did it

#

i did not get correct answer

#

can someone tell me how to do it

vale wigeon
#

stinkbug, maybe you're looking for converting all your roots into fractional exponents?

twin haven
#

um i dont know to write latex

wanton smelt
#

into what

#

im giving up on that one but like

#

what do i do if delta is negative

full kayak
#

hyelp

vale wigeon
#

what delta

#

@full kayak you will have to move to another channel, sorry.

twin haven
vale wigeon
#

@wanton smelt you're progressively making less and less sense

twin haven
#

do you mean this?

twin haven
wanton smelt
#

its a fraction

vale wigeon
#

$\frac{\sqrt[3]{2}}{\sqrt{2^5}}$

ocean sealBOT
wanton smelt
#

ah

twin haven
#

oh

wanton smelt
#

i gotta learn to use that bot sometimes

vale wigeon
#

so you want to simplify this?

wanton smelt
#

yea

#

Its actually log of each but hhh

vale wigeon
#

what

#

is it actually $\frac{\log(\sqrt[3]{2})}{\log(\sqrt{2^5})}$ ?

ocean sealBOT
wanton smelt
#

yup

vale wigeon
#

okay so this is very different lmao

#

log(x)/log(y) ≠ x/y

wanton smelt
#

oop

vale wigeon
#

anyway apparently you're unfamiliar with fractional exponents

twin haven
#

we can use the properties of log

#

if you know that

wanton smelt
#

wish I did

twin haven
#

log(ab)=log(a)+log(b) and log(a^b)=blog(a).

vale wigeon
#

i guess demoniccommander2 can take over from here.

twin haven
#

these are some properties

alpine sable
#

If x1= 5, y1= 7.5, x2= 7.5 then find y2 if x and y vary directly.

twin haven
vale wigeon
#

don't call me sir.

twin haven
#

ok

vale wigeon
#

seriously what the fuck is wrong with so many people who insist i'm a man 😒

#

it's getting old

alpine sable
#

If x1= 5, y1= 7.5, x2= 7.5 then find y2 if x and y vary directly.

#

plz help

wanton smelt
old swan
#

A factory produces 40,000 computer monitors per day. The manager of the factory claims that fewer than 940 defective computer monitors are produced each day. In a random sample of 200 computer monitors, there are 2 defective computer monitors. Determine whether the manager's claim is likely to be true. Explain.
No, the manager's claim is not likely to be true. Based on the data, you can predict that there are 950 defective computer monitors produced per day.
No, the manager's claim is not likely to be true. Based on the data, you can predict that there are 945 defective computer monitors produced per day.
Yes, the manager's claim is likely to be true. Based on the data, you can predict that there are 405 defective computer monitors produced per day.
Yes, the manager's claim is likely to be true. Based on the data, you can predict that there are 400 defective computer monitors produced per day.

twin haven
wanton smelt
#

yeah im trinna get the next ex done

#

i had like 8 pages due friday

#

whats sin(223pi/6)?

twin haven
#

um let me convert and see

wanton smelt
#

like not a number

#

but the pi can be lowered i think

#

is a full circle like 2pi

old swan
#

Can someone please help me

twin haven
old swan
#

well im fucked

twin haven
wanton smelt
#

figured it out

alpine sable
#

A bus travels 40kms in 30 minutes. If the speed of the bus remains same, how far can it travel in 3hrs?

twin haven
#

im actually a 10th grader so trigonometry is new to me