#help-0
1 messages · Page 675 of 1
ijadwojdaw wtf
tbh I'd probably just stick it in a calculator
I'm not working today either, DW lol
cant use a calc :(
Xetrov
(anyone wanna contribute? I'm just fumbling)
@wanton smelt I got it
log 2 * log 0.5
?
log (10/5) / log(5/10)
so what's the answer
isn't it log2*log5?
still
$\frac{a}{c} \times \frac{b}{d} = \frac{ab}{cd}$
Xetrov
$\frac{a}{c} \times \frac{b}{d} = \frac{ab}{cd}$
oh i misread
You're doing a very poor job of justifying your laziness SLOKO
does it simplify anyhow
yes :)
how lol
nope
yeah idk how to do it lol
i'm still at 3((log(10/5)/log0.2)(log5/log(5/10))
Xetrov
$\frac{\log 2}{\log 0.5} = \frac{1 - \log 5}{\log 5 - 1}$
Xetrov
@wanton smelt
thats even more confusing lol
Xetrov
agreed?
yeah i was there
so this * log5/log0.2?
by some stupid but useful property of the multiplication of fractions, you can swap the denominators
nope
actually yes
Hey everybody so if something takes 900 hours to learn and there are 8760 hours in a year and i have 2 years to learn this thing how much could i split the 900 hours into
$\frac{\log 10 - \log 5}{\log 5 - \log 10} \times \frac{\log 10 - \log 2}{\log 2 - \log 10}$
Xetrov
@alpine sable are there any other factors such as forgetting xD
jesus christ
wdym nah lets just say thats perfect
wait so
actually
okay
-1*-1?
@solar pebble changed it to 900 hours just in case
so clean
wait how long did this take
almost 1 hour
imma cry
i got 8 tests as homework due tomorrow still at my 3rd iodwaijwaijwa
lol thanks
relatable
I think it wants you to solve the system, when you set it equal to 0
Null space, I believe @minor elbow
Hyl1s
i dont think its null space. Alpha, beta and gamma are linear independant, they definitely have a value on their own.
Oh, Channel is occupied, sorry
That problem has infinitely many solutions
yes
So null space would give you the answers, for alpha, beta, and gamma
oh wait, alpha, beta and gamma isnt a family
To be more exact, a singular answer for alpha, beta, and gamma, based on the values picked
they just want you write a particular solution it looks like
if you have an infinite number of solutions, you dont call that null space
oh lord null space, I suck at english
Null, like ker f ?
Parametric equation
sorry I'm a bit dumb today
Which is null space concept
yeah your right
They just want one solution from null space yes
yes, checking independence of co-ordinate vectors uses kernel/nullspace/homogeneous system
I refer kernel as null space often. I learned the term null space first before kernel, even though it means the same
Moreover nullspace is 2D, so gamma can be anything
I was a bit lost with null space, I thought it was empty set for a second I dont know why
gamma will stay gamma maybe
Gamma will most likely be the free variable
and write the other two in terms of gamma
nullity = #of free variables
you should probably wait for the person that asked the question to comment, so you're not just giving the answer
Don't think that's necessary
If you take the transpose, then that row of zeros will become a column of zeros
Ye
Making it overdetermined
What
More equations than variables
No lol
It just is a matter of representation
Moreover it's not an augmented Matrix
solving independence is an augmented matrix
the column vector is just 0, so it'll never change with row operations
You can check independence without the 0 column
With just the square matrix, since it's homogeneous
yeah, it's still an augmented matrix
U is not an augmented Matrix
wow didnt know my eyes didnt work
Taking transpose, means row of zeros becomes column of zeros, meaning gamma is zero, meaning 3 equations with 2 variables, so therefore should not take transpose
Im aware U isnt augmented
However checking independence is checking that A is invertible, which is checking that Ax=0 means x=0 only
I represent V1,V2,V3 as rows of a matrix to solve. It's simply a matter of representation as long as you know what you are doing
There are 10 other ways to check independence
You find null space of U, not of U'
b on FTIM is what's being checked
Null space of U vs U' is going to be different, I believe
.
Thought you were saying take transpose then find null space
.
U'*[a b c]=0
I mean alpha beta gamma
I can't look at screen, my head hurts
Sorry
Bai
I normally do U * [α β γ]' = [0 0 0]'
is this an error? I used to 10mm=1cm fact and 450 as an answer, not 45. and it looks like they switched it from 10 to 100 randomly in the steps
I see that, why though? 1cm=10mm, it says nothing about squaring
you need to change cm^2 units
oh we're canceling cm^2
yes...
ok that makes a bit more sense haha
I think I need a break I'm missing stuff like this...cya guys. thanks
i need to find out the x for which (x^2-x)^(2x) is correctly defined
any help?
I'm sorry @wary stream @glass lichen. my head hurts, I didn't mean to talk like that
talk like what?
or is this something from before
ye
something from before.
ok nvm
how do i put tanh is this form?
im feeling hella braindead
i know the answer is ln(cosh(x))
but how do i put this in this particular form?
Just do it like how you would do it for tan(x)
Using the fact that tanh(x)=sinh(x)/cosh(x)
sorry i cant do it
my head hurts
sinh(x)/cosh(x) is doable w/ u-sub..
oo okja
Hello,\
How can I find the taylor series of $\ln(e^x -\frac{1}{2})$ [x=0, order 4] ?\
Someone advice me to find the $\frac{f^{(n)}(0)}{n!}$, but this method looks me too long… Is there a faster way to solve the problem ?
Thk
Ann
ln(e^x) is just x
er. ok hold on
this will be a little awkward
looks like we're better off with $\ln(1/2) + x + \ln(2 - e^{-x})$
Ann
by moving to a different channel because this one's currently occupied. @sharp sparrow
and ln(2 - e^{-x}) in turn can be rewritten as ln(1 + (1-e^-x)) for which you can use the taylor series of ln(1+t)
I'm running into issues with understanding this formula
as far as I get it, the formula goes something like this 1/5 x 2,2833 x 1/Rk where Rk equals the 1/rj
however that seems to be incorrect since I don't get the same results as the wj(ROC) column
traductor: 1. The graph records the height of 40 3rd graders. high school. Build the frequency table: (Class mark, absolute frequency, accumulated absolute frequency)
plis :c
help
I'm pretty sure that posting in two channels is against the rules, beside I occupied the channel before you did
zorry
<@&286206848099549185> mind taking a quick look at my question?
not sure how you get this
basically, summation sign means start from the index at the bottom and add till the index at the top
so lets fix j. w1(ROC) = 1/5 * (1/r_1 + 1/r_2 + 1/r_3 + 1/r_4 + 1/r_5)
w2(ROC) = 1/5 * (1/r_2 + 1/r_3 + 1/r_4 + 1/r_5)
and so on
ok jesus thanks @heady sequoia
I've been looking at it the wrong way the entire time
Hello, please help with this word algebra problem
The average height of Tom, Jerry and Sam is h cm. Tom is 84 cm tall. Jerry is twice as tall as Sam.
a) Find Sam's height in terms of h
b) If h=73, how much taller is Tom than Sam?
$h=\frac{\text{Tom+Jerry+Sam}}{3}$
Blackdeath39
Yeah but what is Sam's height?
Grincek
Yeah I think so
Thank you 💕
eyo
Hi
hi
i need help Find an equation for a line with a slope of 1/4, passing through (8, -2).
Write y = mx +c.
Plug in x = 8 and y = -2 to get a relation between m and c.
Substitute m = 1/4 into this relation.
thankou
$y-y_1=m(x-x_1)$ where m is the gradient or slope
and $(x_1,y_1)$ is one of the points where the line goes through
Muzan Jackson
The slope-point formula for the equation of a line. It's very helpful to remember.
can anyone help me
2x + 10 = 2(x+5), is that what the question is asking?
can someone help me Find an equation of a line perpendicular to y =1/3x − 5, passing through the origin.
g = (x-2)/3
they asked for help.
not the answer.
don't just give the answer away as it does nothing
factor out the common factors
Find an equation of a line perpendicular to y =1/3x − 5, passing through the origin.
i need help
What's the slope of a perpendicular line?
The gradient of a perp like is the negative reciprocal of the initial
Yes. Now use the slope-point formula.
Take common factors, or just rearrange the numbers so that your subject stays in left side, and move all other numbers to the other side of the equation
hallo
so i understand picking the u here and all of the steps in getting the intergral
but i dont understand is how 3/5 was gotten
How do I make the TeXit bot display my latex stuff with larger fonts?
Possibly causing "taller" images.
i thought that the u would make the intergral become 3/u....
can anyone explain it to me? 🙂
the 3 comes from the original equation but the 5 comes from the dy equation where dy=1/5 du
so, you can just seperate the 3 from the U like that?
yes it's a constant number multiplied with a function so you can take it out
$\int nf(x)dx=n\int f(x)dx$
Muzan Jackson
okay thats why 1/u is left
yes
thank you very much 🙂
ur welcome
what have you tried already? (also reply to my messages to i get ping'd pls)
not much, no idea what to try
was told to multiply by 5+3i and got (16+30i)/34 but that sounds wrong
yea, that's 16/34 + 30i/34.......... so what is the real component of this?
so that's the first step - you've now got a real denominator so things are easier to work with
can you split the complex numbers into its real and imaginary components? don't forget to simplify
i could do that
yup
thanksj aiuwhiudawh
np
Can someone help me with the next questions?
How many diagonals can be drawn at a single vertex of an undecagon?
draw a undecagon and count..
There are 8 but I was not sure haha
yes, there are 8
an n-gon will have n-3 diagonals from any vertex (prove it for yourself)
Calculate the number of sides and indicate the name of the polygon of 77 total diagonals
is the question wrong?
Yes, tan(arctan(3)) is 3
nvm i see now
do you still need help?
I have a question
$x²+y³= z^4$
Samed
can you go to an empty room? we're still using thhis one
which is empty?
have you tried to solve each of the options?
have a look, find the one whose last message is the least recent
illl do that noww
Determine the value of the exterior angles of the following polygon
I don't remember how to do this
i closed the old question the new one is this
exterior sum of any polygon is 360
so add all the equations and make it equal to 360
lad @alpine sable you asking a question on top of someone else's question
scroll up
Thankss
nws
hello guys. are vertically opposite angles equal? I haven't came across it since years and I wanna make sure. they are the angles which form like an X shape right?
@alpine sable Yes.
@oak chasm thank you!
No problem.
I inputted an equation involving logarithms into symbolab and the answer is in an unfamiliar format, does anyone mind explaining/rewriting it?
Chai T. Rex
yeah
Chai T. Rex
OK, so the base there is a.
Chai T. Rex
yeah
Chai T. Rex
,calc e
Result:
2.718281828459
ok, thank you so much!
You're welcome.
can someone check my trig answers in dms
why
cause isnt it b-a sqaure root
what?
the dot product finds how much 2 vectors go in the same direction. a dot b = |a||b|cos(theta)
yes i know
if you have a . b = 9
how did you get to |b| = 9?
(also can you reply to my messages so i get ping'd)
try isolating |b| to see whether or not it is constant.
To find the magnitutude isnt it Sqr a + b
More information is required
a and b are vectors. How do you square root a vector.
i think there's confusion with sqrt (a^2 + b^2)
e.g. when the vector has co-ordinates (a,b)
ahh that makes sense.
yeah thats what i meant 😅
a and b in that theorem is completely different from this question.
it's like saying a^2+b^2=c^2
But according to what you said about how there needs to be a dot b = |a||b|cos(theta) There isnt enough information given to me so i wont be able to solve it
it's not true for all of a,b and c for every single question.
yes that should be right
there is not enough information
as long as the "horizontal component of b relative to a" is the same, then it'll be true.
@toxic dust here's what I mean. As you can see, the vectors on the left have different magnitudes, but the dot product will be the same.
i think this channel is still in use, i think you should ask your question in another (empty) channel
Yep
Speaking of which, can you guys also help me expain this one @viral patio @wraith cairn
So its 2a and 2b right
it's asking (2a) x (2b)
just do it on paper. Try a=(a1,a2,a3) b =(b1,b2,b3) get the cross product, then try doubling both and see what happens to the cross product.
Like this?
that is not the cross product.
Is greater infinity a thing?
how do you Calculate the SURFACE AREA and
PERIMETER
ping me
Is greater infinity a thing?
aye yo is this chanell bussy?
?
soryr, my bad
no worries
i didn't read the whole q
i feel like asking in #category-theory is better place to get responses fwiw
up to you
I'll do just so it doesn't clutter
hi
in used?
There are s students in the art club. Each member painted 13 pictures for the art show. Write an expression that shows the number of pictures the club painted.
Type an asterisk ( * ) if you want to use a multiplication sign and a slash ( / ) if you want to use a division sign.
if its not may someone help
Silly question - A, B, and R are matrices
Does A * B * R * B^-1 * A^-1 equal R?
nooooo
there's actually an entire decomposition built around matrices that look like that
look up diagonalization
Ok the thing is I have some code I wrote ages back which essentially does this and I don't know why it works
a lot of matrices can be written as $A = PDP^{-1}$, and $A \neq D$
Saccharine
Maybe A and B are orthogonal matrices and therefore rotation matrices, so it just rotates the thing and doesn't skew it?
someone asked before the matrix question
My context is rendering, and one of the matrices is a projection matrix, which is more than a skew right since it's not an affine transform?
@barren mauve channel was in use.
Apologies
what have you tried..?
yes
that doesnt answer my question at all
s/13 or 13s? Also, what's your reasoning? (does not mean you're wrong)
the leaves being 30 db implies the intensity is 10^15 w/m^2
well i guess i can describe the whole thing if you want
Yes please
you just use the $\beta dB = 10 \log \frac{I}{I_0}$
jan Niku
I_0 is 10^-12 w/m^2
how many decibels a sound is
youll do one of these for each sound
so $30 db = 10 \log \frac{I_L}{I_0}$
jan Niku
Yeah
does it make sense why $\frac{I_L}{I_0}$ is 1000?
jan Niku
cause 10^3?
yea
then the log gives you 3, times 10 is thirty
so if I_0 = 10^-12 w/m^2, then I_L has to be 10^15 w/m^2
youre not there yet 
alternatively i mean
this is really probably the long way to do it
generally you can just remember like
an increase in intensity of 10^k is an increase of k*10 decibels
so 10^3 more intense is 3*10 more decibles
i was looking at this graph and then saw functions near the top left of it
im pretty sure its calculus
what does it mean?
alright ty
the function is the equation for the line that best fits the data
the R^2 probably better off watching a video lol
alright thanks
I don’t think so
Mhm
this is almost a normal trig function
check out uhh
maybe something like this?
i guess id have to ask what you tried or where you got stuck
compare with yours, not the period just the general shape
here it starts at 0 and goes up
Mhm
so what does A have to be
2?
no its not 2 but thats close
I thought amplitude is what A is
it is, but another thing is baked into it
What would that be?
idk how else to say without giving it away 
hmm
it should be more obvious if you compare the two graphs
to make it begin going down
instead of going up
oops
I am confused
how would you flip a graph
around the x axis
do you see what i mean by its not going the correct way?L
You would make the opposite Y values
how do you do that, numerically
Ya
Hello people i need a question i have a sum of $ln(1+1/(2^(2^n)))$ from n = 0 to infinity
macoro
So -2 would be 2
yup
And 2 would be -2
-2
yea
for B is mainly that uhh
i wanna try explaining it
im not sure its gonna make sense
you know the normal shape of a sine graph like
you start at the beginning of a circle
and you go all the way around
back to where you started
thats the same as a sine graph starting at 0, going all the way up, back to the x axis, all the way down, then back up
Ok
so does that cycle take longer in your graph?
than normal a mean
or is it happening faster
or just normal
it takes twice as long on your graph right?
how long should it usually take
Umm I’m not sure
on your graph, 2 waves goes every 4pi
normally for sin(x), 2 waves go every 2pi
Mine is faster
are you sure?
No wait
it takes 2 pi in a normal sin function
by what factor is yours slower?
like does it take twice as long
ten times as long
Takes twice as long
yup
so if you can imagine like
x starting at 0, and moving forward to 2 pi
in a normal sine graph
to complete the function
well, one period
you want this to happen half as quickly
(or equivalently twice as slow)
if you divide x by 2 in the input
So I would do 2pi/2
i dont think 2pi
you usually start doing that if your graph is intersecting on integers
but here its just intersecting on pi like a normal sine function (sort of)
but divided by 2 yea
ok
if you divide x by two in the input
then x has to get twice as big to go one full rotation
this channel open?
coefficient of x = 2pi/(length of 1 period)
erm i have a quick question
ive tried conversion into a product and observation of the next term, it essentially becomes ln (product from k = 0 to infinity of (1+1/(A^k)), where A = 2^(2^n),
…
whatever you want
just a variable
So B= x/2
Ok
,w graph 2sin(-1/2x)
alternatively this works
Hello people i need a question i have a sum of $ln(1+1/(2^{2^n}))$ from n = 0 to infinity
macoro
ive tried conversion into a product and observation of the next term, it essentially becomes ln (product from k = 0 to infinity of (1+1/(A^k)), where A = 2^(2^n),
2^(2^n), here, is a constant in this case
,w sum from n=0 to infinity ln(1+1/(2^(2^n)))
do people know how to solve dfq in here? I have a question
do you rlly need alot of numbers using pi to multiply thousands of numbers?
Plz help
So anyone know how to simplify product from k=0 to infinity of (1+1/A^k) (A is a constant)
its not a sum
hi i have a quick question is this statement true or false
false
how come?
logn(a)/(logn(b)) = log_b(a)
test it, ln 10/ln 3 does not equal ln 10 - ln 3
@tardy pulsar Let's say the top is 3000 and the bottom is 300. Will the sides be equal?
@tardy pulsar Well, the top can be 3000 if a is n^3000. The bottom can be 300 if b is n^300. So, is 3000/300 = 3000 - 300?
If not, then it's not always true.
So it's considered false.
Tyty
No problem.
hai
Anyone help me pls
do you rlly need alot of numbers using pi aka π to multiply thousands of numbers or you just like do 3.14 × 2,296?
channels not open, but for a quick answer, if ur talking precision with the thousands, id use 5 digits of pi
@alpine sable Do you know about significant figures?
Yes
Well, 3.14 lets you use up to 3 significant figures in your answer, depending on how many significant figures are in the other number.
If you need more significant figures, use more digits of pi.
No problem.
You saved my life
this is very much a geometric sum.
its a product
have you tried expanding out when A = 2.
I am talking about (1+1/2)(1+1/4)(1+1/16)...
it's a geometric sum 1+1/2+...
its not a geometric sum tho
so the answer is ln(2)
yeah thats what wolfram spits out
it's a geometric sum.
ln(1+1/2) + ln(1+1/4)+...
= ln(1+1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 +...)
= ln(2)
ok but why did you select A = 2
your calculations arent correct tho
ln(1+1/2) + ln(1+1/4)+...
= ln(1+1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 +...)
this part isnt
plus A = 2 would be completely arbitrary
actually nope, it only works with A=2.
how is it not correct
have you tried expanding it.
do it on paper.
expand (1+1/2)(1+1/4)
then expand (1+1/2)(1+1/4)(1+1/16)
you will see a pattern.
I didn't, could you explain it
what did you get on your paper.
(1+1/2)(1+1/4) = 1+1/2+1/4+1/8
oh yeah mb
(1+1/2)(1+1/4)(1+1/16) = 1+1/2+1/4+1/8+1/16+1/32+1/64 +1/128
in general, (1+1/2)...(1+1/2^(2^n)) = 1+1/2+...+1/2^(2^(n+1)-1)
no. That doesn't exist.
oh ur talking about the original. I understood what you did, thanks for the help
and finding the yc
ok np.
this is dfq section 4.4 btw
How can I factor x^2+1
u cant
can someone telel me why these two calculations yield different answers
i thought for directional derivative only the direction matters for 2nd vector
the first vector is the gradient
It must be a unit vector.
really?
The rate of change of f in the direction of u is nabla f dot u, where u is a unit vector.
oh ok i see
It from the derivation of the formula.
alright ty
so fuck my question huh
yeah fuck it
alright so how did you get this answer?
Hi guys, I have a question, what x0 means? I've just started to learn functions and I don't know where I can find x0 

just means the point x=5
its naming a specific point
thank u
can I get some help with this please
-6, -1, 6, 13, 15, 19, 20, 22, 23, 26, 29, 32, 37, 46, 52
here are the numbers in order
yea
Thank you so much
i really don't understand how I am wrong in this
isnt Q1 the mean of min and Q2?
if that was the case, it would be (-6+-1+6+13+15+19+20+22)/8=11
it's not right either
yes
there are 15 values
so the median aka Q2 is 22
and the 25th and 75th quartiles should be 13 and 32 if I count correctly
strange
Hey helpers can someone pls help me verify this
I think I have an answer
Hw problem
maybe they want you to include the median value when calculating Q1 and Q3
:/
i.e. find median of
-6, -1, 6, 13, 15, 19, 20, 22 for Q1
and
22, 23, 26, 29, 32, 37, 46, 52 for Q2
there's nothing wrong with the values you entered
just slightly different interpretations/definitions lead to different results
I followed the notes the teacher gave
hello
help me?
rotate
Can someone pls help me with 15c it’s a homework problem and I’m unsure and confused what the textbook solutions did
what.
15c?
Hello
Yh
ok
so (m2 - 6) z = z x m2 - z x 6
so 3x - 2y + zm2 - 6z = m - 4
i think thats the answer
simplified
So your saying taht m =4
no?
Ohh is ur answer in the form of an equation
hmm
yes
Thanks for the help
wlc
y+z=0 and x=-2 are yielded from equations 1 and 2 I believe @viral plover
Maybe that's relevant for you, or maybe it isn't, I'm not sure
Then you could write m as a quadratic, with only 1 other variable, y or z [you get to pick]
But infinite number of solutions
I’m just looking for a single value of m
All my teacher told me when u use elimination that your supposed to get 0=0
its a cone
the sa is total, not lateral
im trying to find the two pieces combined surface area
so top cone merged withbottom whats the new sa
wtf did they tell you to do
you need to bring the system to rref and then you should have some terms with m in there
At this point I’ll just follow what the textbook says which makes no sense
If you apply row operations, you get $\left[\begin{matrix}1 & 0 & 0 & -2\0 & 1 & 0 & - \frac{1}{m - 2}\0 & 0 & 1 & \frac{1}{m - 2}\end{matrix}\right]$
Saccharine
For m = 2, there is no solution
1+1=3
If addition is defined as a+b=a+b+a.b
Or a million other possibilities
How do i do this? Can anyone help me please?
Elonmosqito96
sorry but i have no idea what that means 😅
Oh sorry
$(a-b) = (\sqrt{a} - \sqrt{b})(\sqrt{a} + \sqrt{b})$
Saccharine
there I wrote it for you
oh ok thanks
yep i suck at latex xD
I guess it might be helpful to note that $(a-\sqrt{ab}) = (\sqrt{a} - \sqrt{b})\sqrt{a}$
Saccharine
how do you factor x2+1
omg thank you so much!
and $\sqrt{a^3} +a = a(\sqrt{a}+1)$
learn4math
if you do it right you should get sqrt(a)/a
i mean its fine as it is, but it is a common thing to rationalize the denominator
*propper thing
tbh I prefer $\frac{1}{\sqrt a}$, but idk why most high school teachers don't like it
Saccharine
Umm.guys can you give me atleast 5 algerbatic expression equation plss (THIS IS NOT FOR HOMEWORK)
linear, quadratic, quartic?
$e^s = \frac{1}{(s-2)(s+3)}$
tensor
tensor
two
Saccharine
regarding circular corodinate systems, on tripple integrals, for spheres do we restrict phi to be 0, pi? Because if we have phi go to 0, 2pi, don't we go over the volume twice?
whoops
didnt mean to tag u
yes
phi is bounded between 0 and pi
put x=e^t and make quadretic
tensor
Saccharine

what happened to handwritten solutions :o
my ipad is upstairs, is all.
no that's an ellipse
circle is also a ellipse
don't correct people if you aren't right
unless you were answering his question (badly) rather than correcting my answer
ok thanks
can i ask questions?
can someone explain me how to approach this?
For proving the sequence given by $a_n := \frac{1}{(n+1)^2}$ converges to zero is a choice of $\frac{1}{\sqrt{\varepsilon}}-1$ appropriate?
Maciekchelmicki
Sort of, we want the answer to be < than epsilon, not epsilon itself, so replace epsilon with epsilon/2 and choose any integer larger than that and you should be fine
Thanks
Np
how to simplify 26x225x314x10^-12 using logarithms.
log(ab)=log(a)+log(b) and log(a^b)=blog(a). This should help you out i hope
How to find out the General SOlution of tan 2x = -cot(x + pi/3)
It gets turned into the sum of the logs, like log(26)+log(225)+..etc
Yeah exactly
after that i cant understand
Well, isn’t this simplified?
we need a no. value
In that case you’re better off just multiplying. Do they want you to use log tables?
um no idea, my teacher told me if you use logs the answer would come faster, so to save time i want to know.
Well, maybe she meant log tables, those make multiplication and stuff quicker
yeah my book once mentioned them, i dont know how to use them tho.
Basically it is just a collection of log values for a lot of numbers. I had to use them in my school. They are kinda pointless these days though
Hmmm so does higher level mathematics not use it?
dunno why you'd use "logs" for that
So it was a physics problem.
related to resistivity.
after rearranging all the values
i have to simplify the given ones. and calculator is not allowed
$= \underbrace{2 \cdot 2 \cdot 225}{900} \cdot \underbrace{13 \cdot 157}{2041} \cdot 10^{-12}$
not logs, but properties of multiplication and exponent laws
i'm stuck at
26(logx/log2)=18
if anyone can help
you can use the properites
wont this change the value?
why would it change the value?
oh so you broke it down
ℝamonov
yeah this made it easier
anyone have experience with r studio?
Thanks for your time @gray isle @vale wigeon @fair hamlet
hmm? for eg.
i got cbrt(2) over root(2^5)
so cube root of 2 and 32nd of cube root?
find dy/dt when y=1/x
so i did it
i did not get correct answer
can someone tell me how to do it
stinkbug, maybe you're looking for converting all your roots into fractional exponents?
um i dont know to write latex
hyelp
@wanton smelt you're progressively making less and less sense
do you mean this?
it be like that
do you mean this ?
$\frac{\sqrt[3]{2}}{\sqrt{2^5}}$
Ann
ah
oh
i gotta learn to use that bot sometimes
so you want to simplify this?
Ann
yup
oop
anyway apparently you're unfamiliar with fractional exponents
wish I did
log(ab)=log(a)+log(b) and log(a^b)=blog(a).
i guess demoniccommander2 can take over from here.
these are some properties
If x1= 5, y1= 7.5, x2= 7.5 then find y2 if x and y vary directly.
yeah no wories sir
don't call me sir.
ok
seriously what the fuck is wrong with so many people who insist i'm a man 😒
it's getting old
x1/y1=x2/y2

A factory produces 40,000 computer monitors per day. The manager of the factory claims that fewer than 940 defective computer monitors are produced each day. In a random sample of 200 computer monitors, there are 2 defective computer monitors. Determine whether the manager's claim is likely to be true. Explain.
No, the manager's claim is not likely to be true. Based on the data, you can predict that there are 950 defective computer monitors produced per day.
No, the manager's claim is not likely to be true. Based on the data, you can predict that there are 945 defective computer monitors produced per day.
Yes, the manager's claim is likely to be true. Based on the data, you can predict that there are 405 defective computer monitors produced per day.
Yes, the manager's claim is likely to be true. Based on the data, you can predict that there are 400 defective computer monitors produced per day.
im extremely sorry
did you use the properties
yeah im trinna get the next ex done
i had like 8 pages due friday
whats sin(223pi/6)?
um let me convert and see
Can someone please help me
um sorry but i dont know that
well im fucked
um im not sure about this
figured it out
A bus travels 40kms in 30 minutes. If the speed of the bus remains same, how far can it travel in 3hrs?
im actually a 10th grader so trigonometry is new to me

