#help-0
1 messages · Page 647 of 1
IdK how to find vertex
Complete the square on y and then that shows you the translation in the y direction for the vertex
yeah, so imagine rather than a particle moving around a circle you've got a piece of string that you're wrapping around a tube
the length of the string is what they mean when they say distance, i.e. the total PATH distance the particle has traveled
displacement though, you're not wrapping the string around, you're just holding the string tight between its start location and where the particle is after you've moved it
so you aren't measuring circles with displacement, just a line segment from position_old to position_new
so if you move the particle away from its starting position, then move it back, the total displacement is 0
but the path length it traveled isn't 0 if you ever moved it
OHHHH
holy shit
wow
thanks, and thats what makes the 1.5 and the 2.5 displacement, 20m right?
yep, any 'half round' would put it at the maximum displacement it can be along the circle
displacement caps at the diameter of the circle
thanks so much
np
i might come back again with the same doubt, dumb ik, but i just get confused again sometimes.
mmmbyeeeeee
can someone help me in vc?
so i can screenshare
im doing a mini quiz on surface area and cant figure out some of the questions
@obtuse cove still need help?
Yes.
so the costs of the cakes + cupcakes totals $420, right?
@obtuse cove
X = amount of cakes sold
Y = amount of cupcakes sold
20x+15y=420
@autumn apex sorry
Yeah idk really how to explain that xd
yeah explaining it without giving away the answer is hard for this one
I'll try
Lmao.
You need to have 2 variables
x and y cuz it's easy
You want an equation to know how many cakes you've sold (after looking at the data, this is the only possible equation situation thingy you can have)
Therefore you have
X + y = 420
But now you're saying that you sold 420 in total
You wanted it to be money
Now find a way to implement the price of them
Ayo hope that's a better answer 😄
Ok.
What is The probability of getting 60 questions right in a row and each question has 5 answers?
assuming you pick randomly?
Yes
so that'd be (1/5) 60 times in a row, right?
what would the answer be if it were only two in a row?
yes so 60/300?
try to answer the easy one first, what is your probability if you're only given ONE question
and then answer for two, then for 60
1/5, 2/10, and 60/300?
those are all the same number
oh wait so is it 1/5 * 1/60
if you have two trials in a row at 1/5 probability each, you get the probability of getting them both right by multiplying (1/5)*(1/5)
I'd like to add that this is binomial, therefore required to add a combination in front
If I'm not mistaken
(1/5)^60
oh thank u so much
@autumn apex
I don't think so @surreal delta, but I could be doofing it up 😛
I got that the abs max is f(4)=5
And no abs min
But I think I got the absolute maximum wrong because it says the value of F on the interval [2,5]
Does that matter
abs max is at x=4
Result:
1.1529215046069e-42
wait s rhat the percent or the decimal
yeah that applies if you're counting successes out of some maximum, but the maximum is the number of successes which simplifies it (so this is a simpler special case)
Decimal
ohhh ok , so the % is 0.115
it's extremely improbable to get all 60 correct, that's a super small number
ok tysm
18/6 = ?
Not 4
What is the critical numbers here
No tangent line in such a point
the 'empty circle' is the symbol for 'undefined at this value'
Would it be at the dots that aren’t filled in??
function is undefined at that value
That's with f', but that's just an explanation
You only have the graph
You have to look at the top and bottom of your graph
Okay so then how do we find the derivative as 0
If we already got the undefined ones
in that example the empty circle can mean a discontinuity too
How about that random dotthat isn’t even connected to the graph
derivative 0 means the tangent of the curve would be a horizontal line
and a discontinuity isn't differentiable
so the derivative isn't defined there
Does the dot that’s underneath The graph that isn’t connected to anything is that a critical number or it doesn’t even matter
it can't be a critical point unless the derivative is defined there
Ok
No tangent line on just a point
How do you answer critical numbers. Can you answer like this (1,4) , (6,4), (6,2)
usually you'd just supply the x value that takes F to 0 (that is, y=0 for F)
So x=1,6
There’s an empty dot on 6,4
yep, empty dot means discontinuity
So empty dot DOESNT mean a critical #???
correct, it can't be one
Empty doesnt mean critical
it explicitly means the opposite, empty dot strictly implies it is NOT a critical number
Talkin about this question
you listed discontinuities(empty dots) as critical numbers
there will be 2 critical numbers
How. (6,4), (5,3), (2,2), (1,3) aren’t empty dots
(1,3) isn't a continuous portion of the graph, so the function is discontinuous at this value
Ok
there being any empty dot in that vertical line counts
As a critical #???
the opposite.
So 1,4 is critical ??
Ohhhh
Wait
I thought we said empty dogs don’t ever count as critical numbers
there can't be a critical number on that vertical line (the vertical line through x=1)
Ok ok
the graph needs to be differentiable at an x value to have a critical point there, among other conditions
they give you some examples of things that break differentiability, like discontinuities (x=1) and cusps (x=5)
yes
(5,3)*^^^
yeah I just noticed that too 😛
So the critical points are (6,4) and (2,2)
why do you think (6, 4) is one?
this
So if there’s a cusp then that whole line doesn’t count ???
Sorry I mean ...
there is a discontinuity at x=6
the empty dot tells you that it can't be differentiable for that x value, just like a cusp does
That whole line has an empty dot
the whole vertical line, identified as x=6 for all y values, can't have a critical point
yes
even if it's defined somewhere on that line, it won't be continuous with the rest of the function, so its derivative becomes undefined
no you missed one of them
you only found a minimum at x=2, but there's a maximum too
4,5
keep in mind you only need the x values
So 4
yep
So x=2,4
correct
Can anyone help me with 2,3 and 4? Im stuck and dont have much time
@sharp harness still need help?
@raven crypt sure
so the exponent being negative -- do you know what that does?
if I have x^(-1), that's 1/x. Works the same if the -1 becomes a negative fraction
All good now, thank you
cool
so it's -1?
no
the exponent you're dealing with is (-4/7), not (-1) (nor is -1 the answer)
I'm just checking you know what a negative exponent means
show me the step, with explanations
usually people ask for help 😛
but you're in luck, the answer I just started giving the last person is the same for you
thats good to hear
so, for example, do you know what number 5^-1 is?
5 power of Negative 1
yes, but what is it equal to
haha, I was trying to socratic method him @devout tundra
asking people questions so they reveal the answer to themselves
it's a way to avoid giving away the answer (and to get at where people are stuck)
can someone help me out?
7000 people will ski each day at a local ski resort if tickets cost $75 each. Attendance will decrease by 150 people for each $5 increase in the ticket price. The ski resort needs to make a minimum of $300000.
What is the highest ticket price the ski resort can charge and still make at least the minimum amount of money desired?
Enter the ticket price (NOT the number of price increases!) to the nearest whole dollar (do not include the dollar sign)
question for systems of equations and inequalities
@toxic cave still need help?
Would anyone be able to walk me through solving this so I have a better understanding to do the rest?:
Show that a ≡ b (mod m) if a mod m = b mod m
first maybe use the definition of ≡:
a ≡ b (mod m) means that (a-b) is divisible by n, or equivalently, that a-b (mod m) = 0 (mod m)
An airplane ticket has an area of 119 square centimeters. Its perimeter is 48 centimeters. What are the dimensions of the ticket?
is the fundamental theorem of calculus, and finding the area under a curve the same formula?
axb=119, 2a+2b = 48?
FTC II is the way to compute an integral
Integrals can be regarded as the signed area under a curve
Yeah, both are the same right? Def integ is the area?
yes, definite integral is the signed area under the curved bounded by the integration variable axis
welp thx
dumpling
then im not sure what to do next
consider the result you reached in part a)
-3 is miles away from what 5a) asked for
is it right to say that the decimal form of a fraction can never result in a number that is bigger than 1?
-3 is NOT a proof of anything
b^2-4ac<0
Imaginary numbers goes brrrr
oh... you meant the value of the discriminant
that alone isn't enough to prove that x^2 + x + 1 is greater than 0
you'd need an additional statement.
however I was referring
to the fact that (x^2 + x + 1) was confirmed to be greater than 0
try and use that in b)
Super-basic question, but my brain is breaking rn:
probability of rolling n amount of heads without rolling 3 tails
its a binomial 
yeah something like
yeah
can someone answer my question? i had my question first
what is the probability of getting to a certain number of heads without hitting 3 tails
oh geez sorry ak youre right
il try
@merry coral can you move to another channel
bump
huh?
these are just two uhh
paraboloids right
have you looked at their traces at all?
yea
theyre the same surface right
well sort of
ones just rotated
idk what else youre supposed to say here 
I think it's V(x) = (12-2x)(20-2x)x
for the bottom one
wow thanks for giving away the answer
you're welcome
how can i show that the sequence $a_n=\frac{k^3}{3^k}$ is monotonic decreasing?
its finally correct
alef0
i need help with b and c tho as well
show that the derivative is always nonpositive
the thing i cant use derivatives because we have not seen that topic i was trying by induction for im stuck haha
can you help me with the last two
or can you help me
if you paypal me $20
I wasnt done with my question
I am unemployed.
how can i do that
lazy bum
do. i plug numbers into the v(x) equation?
what is V(x)
(12-2x)(20-2x)x
(12-2x)(20-2x)x > 210
volume of the box
expand the lhs
what
4x^2-64x+240
now what is (4x^2-64x+240) * x
4x^3-64x^2+240x
4x^3-64x^2+240x > 210
4x^3-64x^2+240x-210 > 0
now find the roots of that polynomial
in the context of the problem, only the positive real answers should make sense
so this. is tthe answr?
ok
probability of rolling n amount of heads without rolling 3 tails
no one ever came to a good solution for this
wut
ok sure
You can take the exponent and put it out in front
try to solve $a_{n+1}-a_{n}$
learn4math
so this is b
thats cool
I learned something

What grade are you in?
this is probably 6-9th grade somewhere
Alg 2
might be alg 1 depending on curriculum
engineering math 1
You will learn it later
I still have basic understanding of them
Thats good
when doing charting / technical anylasis I use log charts a lot
Oh, cool
Seems complex
for example
8th grade btw
oh i dont know whats that
yeet I boosted the server
$\sec(\theta)= \frac{1}{\cos(\theta)}$ can you use this
learn4math
ummm
yeah i mean got the answers
i just need to clarify whether its right or wrong
$\sec (\theta) $ should be $\frac{25}{24}$
learn4math
oo
-7/24 should be tan?
apart from that is everything good
nop
and this all happning in fourth quadrant because sin is negative and cos is positive
sin fancy 0 is -7/25, cos fancy 0 is 24/25
probability of flipping n amount of heads before flipping 3 tails
I'm trying to calculate odds in the form of 1:x for something
it's not a fancy zero, it's the greek letter theta
this feels weird and undersrated. are you flipping n+3 times in all, or are you flipping indefinitely until you hit n heads or 3 tails, whichever comes first? does "3 tails" mean 3 tails consecutively or 3 tails anywhere in your flip sequence?
why is √2/ 2 written as 1/ √ 2?
when in algebra I learnt about rationalization , that we have to eliminate √ from the denominator
we do not.
What is the ratio of the side of a square that is inscribed in a circle , to that of the radius of the circle? if we let side of square = 1, then diagonal which is diameter of the circle = √2, so radius = √2/2..so the required ratio =
1 : √2/2
2 : √2
but answer is √2 : 1
these three ratios are one and the same
just as 5:7 is the same ratio as 500:700
so too are the ratios 1 : 1/sqrt(2), 2 : sqrt(2) and sqrt(2) : 1 all equivalent
yeah but my problem is I will calculate upto 2 : √2 then I won't find the answer,,how do I know these are the same..
you already have the answer. 2 : sqrt(2) is the correct ratio.
you can multiply both sides of sqrt(2):1 by sqrt(2) and you will get 2:sqrt(2)
these ratios are all distinct
anyway, what you can do is write your ratio in the form 1:x
and compare against b and c
or write it in the form y:1 and compare against a and d
to see what matches
ok thank u ann
then what can be said about f'(x) and g'(x)?
guys how to simplify this?
is that a z or a 2
2
why would you lie to me?
my bad i didnt see properly
is this even your own work?
yea

log(x) + 2log(y) = 3log(z)
log(y^2) = log(z^3/x)
y^2 = z^3/x
yeah that's all you can say
!
when a chord intersect a tangent at the circumference ..does it make 90 degree angle ..or it's only true for the radius?
yeah it looks like it does
yeah that sure does look like a 90 degree angle
no it does not
yes.
are u being sarcastic
no
ok enough discord for me today 
lol. you can actually prove that the only chord that makes a 90 degree angle with the tangent is the diameter
i try my best
squaring both equations might help you see more clearly how you could do it
square both then add them
oo thanks bruv
image is not clear.
the smart way to do this is just use the formula for the area of a circle
$\pi r^2$
\theta and \frac{a}{b} for a/b
bunny
is what you meant to type
not sure why you squared that or added the 1/2 i don't remember having to do that
2cos minus cos
The squares should be seperated
I'm ready not sure why we didn't just subtract the area of one circle from the other
pi(1)^2 - pi(1/2)^2 = 3pi/4
it's basic geometry
you want the area in between the two circles
take the area of the big circle, then subtract the area of the small circle
you definitely learned that stuff
just because you can solve something using a more complex method doesn't mean you have to
but either way (afaik) nyannn is right if you wanted to do it this way
You can argue that it wasnt stated which method you should use to solve
Q- THE POINt P is on the intersection of the two planes given by x + y +z =1 and 3x + 2y +z = 6 which is closest to the origin.
My attempt
I've calculate intersection plane in parametric form like
x = 4 + t
y = -2t - 3
z = t
How do I convert parametric form of plane to standard form?
itsDaman ඞ
In case you want the way of doing it using integration the formula would be ((2cosx)^2-(cosx)^2))/2 integral of this from 0 to pi
$\frac{e^2+1}{e^{-2}+1}$ $\frac{e^2+1}{\frac{1}{e^{2}}+1}$\ $\frac{e^2+1}{1+e^2}\times e^2$
pls have a look at my ques
it's not the same thing
i need just some tips
ask a question in a channel where a question was not asked 30 seconds before yours
No
oh ok
That would be freshman's dream
$A=\frac12\int_0^\pi(2\cos\theta)^2-(\cos\theta)^2 , d\theta$
,calc 3*pi/4
,calc 3/4 *pi
You should listen to bunnies
Circle method is the better method
took me about 5 seconds in my head and didn't have the trouble with all this
this is fair, but always be on the lookout for simpler solutions
Simple solutions is how the brain grows
ngl my first thought when i read this was a double integral with f(x,y)=1
then i was like wait this is a circle
that's like saying all numbers are even
becuase it's true sometimes
yeah i suppose it actually makes sense when you derive it from the double integral
hmm
super interesting, just made that connection
you could also solve this problem with
$\int_0^\pi\int_{\cos\theta}^{2\cos\theta} r , dr , d\theta$
bunny
so you can see how this simplifies into the "weird" 1/2 integral r^2 dr form
c
He meant first
itsDaman ඞ
i know but I'm pointing out that it's wrong
your writing of it was wrong
x-1/4 is not the same as (x-1)/4
you use $\pm$
bunny
wait i solve on paper
$\pm(\frac{x-1}4)<1$
bunny
so for positive we get x < 5, and for negative we get x > -3
that is (-1)^k not -1, alternating sequence of 1 and -1
not -4^k its (-4)^k
k with both -1 and 4
$(-4)^k = (-1)^k \times (4)^k$
learn4math
alternating series test
sorry for typo, (great mathematician name its Leibniz's test,)
Need help, could someone explain my homework to me pls?
What's a nevair steak?
you sound like a troll, soap.
@uneven root don't post troll questions
Aight
Ah hah! At least somebody doesn't mind helping XD
@tight locust is that lowres on purpose?
Funny people 👏

Bleidorb
my books says this is a perfect cube?
but I don't recognise it as a perfect cube?
but it does not have the form of
a^3 + b^3
or a^3 - b^3?
how did you get the x-1?
Quick maths
(a+b)^3 = a^3 + 3a^2 b + 3ab^2 + b^3
$(x - 1)^3 = x^3 - 3x^{2}(-1) + 3x(-1) + -1^{3}$
Bleidorb
I need to check this, if I am doing this right.
I forgot that
$a^2 + b^2 \neq (a + b)^2$
Bleidorb
Akhandanand Tripathi
yup
thanks man (:
Ann and Akhandanand .
https://www.dummies.com/education/math/algebra/how-to-factor-the-difference-of-two-perfect-cubes/
why is a^3 - b^3 called a perfect cube 🤔
To factor the difference of two perfect cubes, remember this rule: the difference of two perfect cubes equals the difference of their cube roots multiplied by the sum of their squares and the product of their cube roots. The binomial expression looks like this: The results of factoring the difference of perfect cubes are A […]
or is it just a mistake.
a^3 - b^3 is not a perfect cube, it's a difference of cubes
Someone knows an easier way to prove that $(-1)^n$ diverges ?
Herels
do you mean the sequence or the series
the sequence
easier than what
If you accept the fact that if a sequence converges, then any subsequence of that sequence converges to the same thing as the original, then it’s easy
is there a proof you're looking at rn which is hard to understand?
I saw a proof by contradiction but I didn't understand a single thing
oh I forgot about subsequence :o
yeah that must be a good idea
did it not boil down to 'if the limit exists, all subsequences will have to approach it too. but the even subsequence is a constant 1 and the odd subsequence is a constant -1, and 1 ≠ -1'
no it was using an other thing
If I want to prove those things now, I'll just use subsequences then
guys im having a very basic confusion
Should we put value of 0 normally here or instead ignore that
hope this is question about rational number between -3/4 and 1/3 if yes then you can put zero there
Can someone help me with 3b)? I already finished 3a but i seem to be stuck on b.
what problem you are facing while solving?
Do you when you try to reduce the equation to like row echelon form?
It should look like this
but the top middle and middle right part cannot be reduced to 0
or at least i tried to reduce it to 0 but it just wont let me keep the whole thing as reduced echelon form
this is all the work i was able to do so far
no need to look like this just make 1 on piviot in each row
you are trying to make it identity matrix it may not be possible if matrix is singular.
What does that mean?
are u saying this form can still be correct even if it doesn't look like that?
you have solved the question
Ohhhh. SO wait my teacher wont say anything if these aren't zeros?
remove the last coluom ,they just said to make rref of cofficient matrix
In linear algebra, a matrix is in echelon form if it has the shape resulting from a Gaussian elimination.
A matrix being in row echelon form means that Gaussian elimination has operated on the rows, and
column echelon form means that Gaussian elimination has operated on the columns. In other words, a matrix is in column echelon form if its tran...
So my final answer should only look like this?
made -2 zero
-2 needs to be 0?
yup
i have not checked you calculations i am answering this question on the basis of your last step
If i turn that -2 into 0 then the 0 next to it turns into 2
if you are going fro the reduced row echelon form
only the columns with leading entry = 1 needs to have all other coefficients 0
its ok
that will be your final answer
Hello I'm having troubles with this question
I need to find A,B the information I have are: A is y=2x + 1 and B is y= -0.5X-1 also the AB length is 6 and he answers are the following A ( 0.4,1.8) (-5.6,1,8)
so i figured out A,B,C but now they ask to determine the value of m and c. I dont fully understand what i have to do
If line is intersection y axis at 3 ,then c is 3 , now y=mx+3, put this in function f , find m
thanks let try
;-;
should i put it in function f or g?
you have 2 points you know are on g(x): (0,3) and C
thus you can find the slope of the line m
can someone help me with this
distance formula
can you send it
oh
nvm I know it
But I don't have the Y or x for either of the points
right, yeah
Does they are making a right angle triangle?, Or something more instructions are given in question
sorry but im still having issues
slope formula.
Like this ???
how do you know (3,18) is on the line?
These are othogonal lines because their slop product is =-1 , may be we will get a hint from here
yoh im lost
ok well im asking about your work
so if you have no clue what you wrote, why did you write it?
So I did this for the first question
did you arbitrarily pick (3,18) out of thin air?
right.. so (3,0) and (0,3) are on the line
not (3,18) like you made up
no
Mosh
would -1 = m
Mosh
im really sorry i took so long im genuinly lost my teachers are not the greatest
Both are intersecting at x axis where y is zero so put y=0 , in g it will give you X=+-3, take +3 , now point is (3,0) pUt in line 0= 3m+3 m= -1
thanks guys sorry but ima be troubling u guys alot more
Its ok , atleast you are learning something
Which grade question was this?
11
Which country?
south africa
no not yet
ill quicky google a tutorial thanks alot
I wouldn't say using quadratics is easier, given they already had C...
#old-network and ask in chemistry?
ah ok srry
what formula do i have to apply to find D
<@&286206848099549185> ;-;
Solve for the intersection of the line and quadratic
how do i do that
can anyone help me
Intersection of both line and curve. Just put line in curve
<@&286206848099549185>
Roots or factors ?
@pearl marlin
Pls send the sol
im so lost
Ohk
solve
y = 18 - 2x^2 and
y = -x + 3
How did you already have 3
first one is y=18
How have you done the second step ?
Rational root test,
After that division use karna
i still dont undertsand
Long division method ?
Yes
have you solved systems of equations before?
found where (in a simpler case) where two straight lines intersect algebraically?
i have not
that is a pretty big issue
Acc to rrt 6/4 ke factors uske roots ho skte hai pr uske baad ka smjh me nhi aya🥲
have you solved quadratic equations before?
no
Uske baad ka thora sa explain kr skte ho pls🙃
@pearl marlin
well what you did there was solving a relatively simple system of equations involving a quadratic
ok
i.e for B, C,
you were effectively solving the system
y = 18-2x^2 and y=0
ok let me quicky try
similarly, here the system you want to solve is
y = 18-2x^2 and y=-x +3
hi
ugh...
Ramanov can u pls help me in this.......
you're going backwards
what x value would i use
It will take time , i have to make its rrots properly.
the x value of D is what you're trying to find
have you done stuff with substitution before? or familiar with the transitive property of equality?
i have
anyone here from malaysia I need help wit my math
apply that to:
y = 18-2x^2 and y=-x +3
Okay pls send me when u will complete

so x is 3 right
I got x as -5/2 in D
Is this correct?
you are interested in finding the other solution (that's according to the graph, less than 0, for the coordinates of D)
have you done stuff with substitution before? or familiar with the transitive property of equality?
i have
apply that to:
y = 18-2x^2 and y=-x +3
currently what I'm asking of you requires a single step
don't overthink this part
hmm
yeah no i dont understand
have you done stuff with substitution before? or familiar with the transitive property of equality?
you said you have
do you know the basic idea of substitution?
no
you can replace something with something of equivalent value
transitive property of equality
is pretty intuitive too
things equal to the same thing are equal
ok
and here since you are looking for values where:
y = 18-2x^2 and y=-x +3
and either by substituting the value of y from one equation into the other,
or noticing that both18-2x^2and-x +3are equal to y,
that logically leads to the equation
18-2x^2 = -x + 3
ramonov
ok i get this
would you have been able to arrive at that without my explanation?
nope
Would I solve like this
huh
no wtf how
6x⁴+x³-3x²-9x-4 = 0
How to factorise it ?
Ok let me retry
this is a quadratic equation
6x⁴+x³-3x²-9x-4 = 0
How to factorise it ?
you can not - x^2 and x
you can rearrange into general form
and then factorise or be lazy and apply QF
but I'm highly recommend that you put this on hold, and go back and review basic algebra as you're heavily ill equipped to solve these types of problems
6x⁴+x³-3x²-9x-4 = 0
How to factorise it ?
Hey, what's a one sentence answer as to why you cannot log negative numbers
rational root theorem
combined with polynomial long division / synthetic division
@prime ice basically, the variable AND power have to match to add or subtract
can i ask a question here
oh ok
hhiiii syphax :))
logs aren't well defined for negative arguments
wdym by well defined
how can i calculate this if im given f(x)'s and f'(x)s graphs?
Substitute the equations for f' and f (please correct me if i'm wrong lol)
would i factorize
you wouldnt get real solutions ig
write it like this −2x^2 + x + 21 = 0
wdym
You'd get 2 answers for x since it's quadratic so yeah, you need to factorize
ok so x=-3 and x=3.5
−2x^2 + x + 21 = 0
isn't right
eish
how are you getting that from:
18-2x^2 = -x + 3
−2x^2 + x + 15 = 0
no
is my eqaution even possible to factorise
your quadratic is definitely factorisable
if you're not confident with your factorisation skills
be lazy and apply QF
You're really really close, you just missed 2 things and you've got it
wlog (2,4) and (4,2) would be considered the same solution
usually for something like this, you'd assume something like a > b or b > a
there are also infinitely many solutions if you're allowed a=b
i factoised 2x^2+x+15=o
do you guys know any science server
looking for a specific science?
go to the explore public servers
and search science
we do have some connections
@alpine sable
i did
but i got banned lol
for no reason
from that stem thing
same
got banned last year
cause i evaded ban
messed with the mods
uh was being annoying
but i was popular with some people
ig
2 months ago when i needed help so i asked qs and they thought i was trolling
got a question to ask here though?
no
i'm writing a paper on dark matter
mk
what does that mean
@alpine sable join homework help server
thank
u
$A^{3}+A^{2}=I$ \ take inverse on both sides we will get A^{2}+A=A^{-1}$ i'm considering that A is invertible
learn4math
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
multiply inverse of A on both sides
X intercept is the point where the line touches X axis ie where y=0 and similarly for y intercept
ok
can anyone explain how this is true?
probability of flipping a total of n amount of heads before flipping a total of 3 tails (you stop when either condition is met).
I need odds in the form of a decimal
start for n=1,2,3 then deduce a general formula after
ok bet here are some rough numbers
I meant actual exact calculations not a simulation
3 is obvi 50%
you can't deduce a formula from that
you can check your work doe
Hey guys I have a question, why are power functions considered transcendental?
Also are all periodic functions trancedental?
t t t
h
t h
t t h
?
Also where do you place reciprocal functions?
Like is it under rational functions?
this problem is harder than I thought
there are only 4 ending possibilitys:
zero tails (yay)
one tails (yay)
two tails (yay)
three tails (sad)
but the probability gets scewed
Going for one heads odds are 7/8
Three odds are 4/8
yesn't
that would be plotting all values of n right?
forming an arc I think
that would be calculating it exact instead of simulating it
and would allow us to find a formula for n

Oh well I guess my question is just there, do you guys know here I should post it?
*where
there are 3 positive outcomes (n+2 flips, n+1 flips and n flips) and a lot of negative ones (3, 3+1 ... 3 + n − 1)
tricky one
if you start calculating it exactly (not simulating!) for n=1,2,3
the answer should follow
i mean it's a lot of work to do n = 1,2,3

probability of flipping a total of n amount of heads before flipping a total of 3 tails (you stop when either condition is met).
I need odds in the form of a formula
n=1 is 4 different lengths
we have another condition doe
im aware
so, that's a lot of work
yesn't
no
i'm literally not gonna do it
didn't ask you to do it
i mean it as evidence lol
and it would take me 1 min to find for n=1,2,3
and....
just trying to calculate odds for a game I made lol
anyways, ping me I gtg
so for n=1 the prob of flipping 1 head before 3 tails is 1- the prob that we hit tails 3 times - agree?
that we can calculate with binomial distribution
1-dbinom(3,3,0.5) is for n=1
(or type pbinom(2,3,0.5))
agreed
for n=2 you can do 1-(dbinom(3,4,0.5)+dbinom(4,4,0.5))
your probabilities are wrong and there is a pattern in the formula
which one is the first wrong one?
4/5 is wrong
What's this GUI?
RStudio
Thanks
This is probably more of an Excel question. But maybe not really... In Excel I can generate a random number with RANDBETWEEN(). But this will generate a number within the specified interval with an equal probability for any number. Is it possible to apply some kind of bell curve-like probability for the generation of numbers within the interval? For example If RANDBETWEEN(1;100), I would like 50 to be the most probable outcome and 1 or 100 to be the least probable. And if possible, I would like to be able to adjust the "probability curve" so that it isn't necessarily a normal distribution.
youre gonna need to be a little more specific about what distribution you're looking for here.
I don't know how to be more specific. Can you make an assumption and provide an example?
Sure
RANDBETWEEN(1,50) + RANDBETWEEN(0,50) will do the job, i think
tho it will have both 50 and 51 as modes
but it will have the property that values toward either end of 1:100 are less likely
Damn that was not at all what I expected, but that might be quite genius.
I will test it out, Thanks
guys how do u do this? im confuse

<@&286206848099549185>
thank you
for n=2 you can do 1-(dbinom(3,4,0.5)+dbinom(4,4,0.5))
was that wrong?
they are equivalent
maybe i don't understand what's dbinom
just nicer to look at the other formula because otherwise for larger n it gives a very big expression
is 1-(dbinom(3,4,0.5)+dbinom(4,4,0.5)) same as (dbinom(0,4,0.5)+dbinom(1,4,0.5)+dbinom(2,4,0.5))?
yes
Hi, i need to find multiplicative inverse of 13 mod 79
Ive tried a method but am confused :- 79 = 13 * 6 + 1. where di I go from here?
you write 6 as answer
oh that's it, thank you very much
I saw a lec on yt and it said you do this backward chaining till you hit 1 at the right, I hit in first step
it has to be minus 1
any idea how can I get there?
this might sound pretty dumb now but:
a local minimum is a minimum within a certain interval
whereas the minimum or global minimum is the minimum value across all numbers
gimme a second to illustrate it 😄
in this example, the global minimum is obviously to the left because its overall the lowest value
but lets say you only look at positive x
then the local minimum is to the right (because we dont care about anything thats to the left of x=0)
correct!
and the global minimum would be -inf because it goes to -infinity in one of the directions ^^
