#help-0
1 messages · Page 645 of 1
why wud i need help
i think that trapezoid on the top right of that one pic is impossible too
hypotenuse 11 one side is 10 and the other is 4
wait prolly not let me check
like i just explained
but i mean the triangle part might be impossible
@trim hull you should email/contact your teacher lmao, atleast 2 of the questions are impossible.
Bruh no its impossible due to triangle inequality
with a special case here since its a right angle, the hypotenuse cant be smaller than the other sides but in that example it is.
i guess you can still get a value with the right equation thats all the teacher wants
its not drawn to scale obviously
huh
the shapes in the problems are degenerate. You'd basically be guessing how the teacher wants you to solve it (which i assume is using 1/2(a+b)h)
what? drawing to scale has nothing to do with shapes being possible/impossible lmao.
try drawing a right angled triangle with 5 as the base, 4 as the height and 1 as the hypotenuse @alpine sable lmao
oml just coz hypotenuse isn’t the longest value who cares, they just want the answer to the questions
thats like saying bob bought 20 apples from a store that only had 10 and saying its because the drawing didnt have all the apples he bought
🤔 if its not mathematically possible then there is no answer to the question.
nice idc

@pure olive Got the solution?
look up circle theorems
i went to homework help and it told me to look at math notes that said something about inscribed angles
wait am i dumb
40+63=103
180-103=77
so measure QSO is 77?
where did you get 40 from?
can u tell me when u guys are done
Is this correct?
👍
Thanks
bruh we just had a whole convo about it earlier
the same one?
scroll up
its an impossible question. same with the one top right. I would email your teacher.
its just the top right one but different values
no its just the area dont bother with emailing your teacher being like "tWo QueStiOnS aRe TecHniCaLlY nOt PosSiBle sO i DiDnT dO thEm"
base is 9
b1+b2/2 *h
height is 12.5
huh
shouldnt parallelograms have two sets of parallel sides
12.5 and 7
those arent parallel
ik
channel already in use
she did this on purpose
🥲
is this taken ?
ok then just find the area of the triangle and area of the rectangle separately and add if that didnt work
yup
Need some help on this one
use arcsin
sin(B)=8/17
B=arcsin(8/17)
@knotty oxide@trim hull
you guys still need help?
yup
,calc arcsin(8/17)
The following error occured while calculating:
Error: Undefined function arcsin
,calc sin^-1(8/17)
The following error occured while calculating:
Error: Unexpected type of argument in function pow (expected: number or Complex or BigNumber or Fraction or Unit or Array or Matrix or string or boolean, actual: function, index: 0)
Result:
0.48995732625373
what do you need help with? I said either divide the shape into a triangle and rectangle, find the area of the individual shapes, then add them together or use the formula b1+b2/2*h
,calc 0.48995732625373*180/pi
Result:
28.072486935853
divide into two triangular prisms and the trapezoidal prism or whatever its called
i meant rectangular prism not trapezoidal prism
or you can just find the area of the trapezoid then multiply it by its depth
How would I do that?
b1+b2/2*h then multiply by depth
How would I set that up?
b1 and b2 are the two bases of the trapezoid
so 5+3/2
4
then multiply 4 by the height
then by depth
the height is 4
What’s the depth. I’m at 16
Arctic
oh
i dont know how to make it look like a fraction
just imagine the 2 is under 5+3
$$5frac2$$
idk
$$5frac/2$$
$\left(\frac{5+3}{2\cdot4}\right)\cdot9$
bunny
that would be 9
I have been hit with confusion
do you want me to add = 9
whats the question
if you want to integrate the second one, split it into 3 integrals, then you can do each one itself easily
,w integral from 1/2 to 3 of -2x/3+7/3-1/x dx
perhaps some wrong arithmetic something but the idea looks rigjt
or perhaps i misread your handwriting somewhere
you got it right @alpine sable
all of your work is correct
so hopefully you understand that?
if you just copied it from Wolfram i can explain it
that emote is in my frequently used now lmao
Show what you have done so far
,rotate
The last integral is from the +7/3 in your original integral
it's $\int_{0.5}^3 \frac73 , dx$ but they pulled the 7/3 out
bunny
The 1 is redunant
$\frac73 \int_{0.5}^3 dx$
$$\int_{\frac12}^{3} -\frac{2}{3}x , dx + \int_{\frac12}^{3} \frac{7}{3} , dx + \int_{\frac12}^{3} -\frac{1}{x} , dx$$
bunny
this is what its actually splitting into ^
Em
then wolfram is doing extra work to put it into a different form
First one polska
Yes
First, put all constants in front of integrals so you can see better
For example, you have integral -1/x dx Write it as minus integral of 1/x dx
Then you can try and find the exact integral in the table
Do the same for others too
2/3 is a constant as well
So is 7/3
Do that too
Then we can look at the table
Looks good
Now look for the first integral in your table
Yes
No, the integral is gone
You will add them
After you write it out, $-\frac23 \frac12 x^2 |$
No
@ionic jewel how do I do line
Em
$\biggr\rvert_a^b$
bunny
might just be able to do $\frac12\left|_a^b$
You dont need c for each, they all are a constant and constants add up to one constant
bunny
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
nah thats pretty ugly
I wont remember that, but thank you
$\left. \frac12 \right\rvert_a^b$ should automatically scale
bunny
@alpine sable yes
Even better, cancel out the 2's then multiply
Yes
Yep
Now, the way you deal with bounds is you sub in the top bound and subtract the subbed in lower bound
Waiting
$-\frac13 [(3)^2-\big(\frac12\big)^2]$
This
Em
Your first was x^2
So you sub in 3^2 minus (1/2)^2
Instead of x
Top instead of x minus bottom instead of x
Yes
And subtract top from bottom
Yep
Yes, and 7/3 in front
One problem, should be minus ln
Second problem, -(ln3 - ln(1/2))
is anyone able to help with this?
have you learned about sin?
Is that power of 3 or just 3
Ln(x) is a function as a whole. It's not ln times x
That's fine then
Work out the mixed numbers and fractions
Yep
So you can multiply -1/3 and 35/4
Same foe the second one
For ln you have the rule: ln(a)-ln(b)=ln(a/b)
Yes
That's the same solution as wolfram
End result
Nope, the c stays
there shouldn't be a C
Oh yeah, its a definite integral
there should be no C in the entire problem, although technically there is but it cancels out halfway
You didnt need it at all with a definite integral
first one is dividing by two, second one is multiplying by 1/3
Dont blaspheme, you're welcome hi5
An unused channel
what do i put as common difference (f) im confused
unused channel is a good idea
unless this one is now open
also I do not see an f in your problem
it's a geometric sequence
and I gave the common whatever u wanna call it
i gave the common ratio
i think only arithmetic sequences have a common difference
Ratio is literally like devision
so if i said something like Apples to Orange is 1:2, than I could also say Apples/Oranges=1/2
but if I said
Apples:oranges:pineapple = 1:2:3, this isn't 1/2/3
hi can anyone help me with this question, i tried using ASTC but i cant get the second answer.
find the 0s of the function in that interval
Is x ln(x) = x?
not in general
there is a value which should make that statement true
it is a conditional equation, not an identity
But if it was a log it would be right?
or am i just mixing up different rules 😅
this is called power to product rule of logarithms
yes i am oops
ln(a^b) = b * ln(a)
it doesn't even have to be ln, it works with any base
Can someone solve these for me real quick?
153
107
Could you please explain b?
wait its not 107
108
@alpine sable @alpine sable Please read the rules in #❓how-to-get-help. Just giving answers is not allowed here.
ok so they tell u that Un is 45 right?
Yes
so then you can substitute in 45 instead of Un right, since you know what it is now?
Right...
So now you have the equation $2n^2-5n+3=45$
sxkura
Any thoughts on what to do next?
Ugh
Subtract 3 from 45
I get what ur thinking but then you would have $2n^2-5n=42$ and you can’t really solve that can you
sxkura
yes, yes you can, just subtract 42 from both sides
Have you learnt about quadratic equations?
Honestly I don’t know shit and I’m in high school
Instead of taking away 3, take away 45 so the equation is equal to 0, this way you get a quadratic equation which you can then solve
tell me what u get now from doing what i just said
4n - 8n
no
take away 45 from $2n^2-5n+3=45$
sxkura
Umm
lets break it down
2n^2 - 5n + 3
what would happen to the right side when you do 45-45
0
what is 5+6
correct
and whatever you do to one side of an equation you do to the other
so now what’s 3-45
honestly I’m totally confused
This is not the way I got told to do it
-42
sxkura
We have a quadratic equation now and we have it equal to 0 which is what you need to solve it
Have u learnt how to solve quadratic equations
Nope
What you would do next is you solve that equation that we have for n, to find out what n is
MIT grad shows how to factor quadratic expressions. If you want to skip to the shortcut method, jump to 5:06. Nancy formerly of MathBFF explains the steps.
Follow Nancy on Instagram: https://instagram.com/nancypi
Twitter: https://twitter.com/nancypi
The shortcut method ("The Magic X") helps you factor any tough quadratic that doesn't begin wit...
watch that, it’s easier than explaining
or just use the quadratic formula
yeah I have too much to learn for this exam
I understood so far
Hopefully my scientific calculator can do the rest
Is this right sorry
good luck, youtube videos r really good plus this discord always has ppl who explain rlly good, sorry i couldn’t help more
nah I appreciate your help. My bad I haven’t studied for years to regret it now.
Prob will be back for more
anyone down to help?
what are you struggling with to begin with?
Uh heres the translation : a,b,c,p,q,s forms an arithmetic series where the difference between the integers is a constant not equal to 0.
Show that the system only has one unique solution.
I know the answers are there but i'd like to know how to do the problem
Comme a,b,c,p,q,s forme une suite arithmétique, de raison k par exemple, tu peux remplacer a par nk, b par (n+1)k, c par (n+2)k ...
I did that but couldnt figure out where to go from there
I guess you just have to solve the system
also, wouldnt a stay as a and b be replaced by a + k then a + 2k so on
ah, true
the channel is taken right now
ok
wait no
i dont remember how to do those acc my b
ok wait
i had
it simplfied
to
yd = a + 2d
3dx + 4dy = a + 5d
where d is the difference
then put them together and just got 3dy + 3dx = 3d
so y + x = 1
which is on the right track i guess
i have y + x = 1 too
have you tried to replace x by 1 - y in the previous equation ?
yeah
in the 3dy + 3dx = 3d one it wouldnt work cuz thats just where we came from
and if i took the
yd = a + 2d
3dx + 4dy = a + 5d
ones
i would also have to solve for a
which we dont know either
ok wait im just going to try anyways
i dont think it works
well, give me a minute to look at your equations
no, this channel is taken for now
do you agree that ax + (a+d)y = a + 2d ?
if you replace x in this equation, you'll get y
replace x?
x = 1-y
x = 1-y, not y-1
you're welcome
min at x = 1.53 & y = 3.07
but why is my answer wrong?
can someone help with this
Arithmatic sequence, which part do you not understand?
Welp
the equation is going to be something like a_n = initial_value + common difference * n
Arithmetic
oops
is there any way to make a function from a vaalue table? I know you can do it with excel etc. but i need to know if there is a manual way
A ball is thrown upward at an initial speed of 14.7 m/s. The height h in meters that the ball reaches t seconds after being thrown is given by the equation h=14.7t-4.9t^2. When will the ball be 9.8 meters high. how many seconds will the ball be in the air
barlow move to next channel
Given any finite number of points (or countably infinite), there are infinite possible functions that go through every point
if I had to guess I would think you may be looking for a least squares approximation
I need help with this I think I have everything right up to there but don’t understand how to continue
<@&286206848099549185>
just isolate for x
$2(x-5)^2=18$
Mosh
would i square root everything first to take the 2x^2 and take away the ^2
you cant take sqrt of both sides yet..
unless you want to deal with unneeded radicals
so what would i do to get rid of that ^2
oh so i need to take away the 2 first
yes, you need to isolate the a^2 still
no
cause you completely disregarded everything I said
if you want to expand everything then sure, go ahead. Im trying to show you the quicker way given it's in vertex form..
wait would i take the 2x^2 to the other side and then divide by 2
so now it would be 10x - 16 = x^2
Ok you're still heartset on expanding everything
idk what im supposed to do then
$2x^2-20x+32=0$ if you're insistent on doing it the long way
Mosh
$\implies x^2-10x+16=0$ which is factorable
Mosh
they want to do it this way 🙃
idk its just the way my teacher taught it
i guess they get some bonus factoring practice
Solving it like this is sorta like using the quadratic formula when you can easily factor it in your head
it also works but its extra work for no reason
how can i do that tho
$2(x-5)^2=18 \ (x-5)^2=9 \ x-5=\pm 3 \ x=5\pm 3$
Mosh
oh i get it
$$2(x-5)^2 = 18$$
Divide by 2
$$(x-5)^2 = 9$$
sqrt
$$x-5 = \pm 3$$
solve for x
$$x = 5 \pm 3$$
bunny
my teacher never taught that
bunny
i have another question
@glass lichen do u know how to do thicker newlines
whats the "completing the square" method
that little trick doesnt work with fractions well
Nope
its the same thing as the last question but completing the square
I could explain this, but frankly its probably better to just look it up and watch a video
ok
converting a quadratic from standard to vertex form
^
$y=ax^2+bx+c\to y=a(x-h)^2+k$
Mosh
is it possible to express these in exact form without the i?
ty i looked up a khan academy video and got the work done
only 7 more
@alpine sable Remove the i and put a negative sign inside the radical that i is next to.
What is the millionth decimal digit of the 10^10^10^10th prime?
inside???
Chai T. Rex
here's what i did
v
i need serious help
do you know what is
read the rules
I have no clue how to do this ngl
I know how on a calculator but not algebraically
^^
Isn’t discriminant formula -b/2a
im mentally broken
b^2 - 4ac
Oh ok ty
its a problem sir 🙏
-b/2a is x coord of vertex of a parabola
Um does anybody know how to find parallel lines in the slope by the equation?
just same slope
^
Yesss only 5 more
Ok
How bout Y=2x +4 and Y= 4x +2
just look at the coefficient of x
if its the same then parallel
in this case, the first coefficient is 2 and the second one is 4
so its not parallel
try using desmos
just play around on https://www.desmos.com/calculator
good
How bout fractions? In the equation
ofc
slope ?
0 = 0
gotcha


@vital relic stop trolling @plucky gate stop shitposting
okay
but no actual manual method right? i gotta do a presentation and if theres a manual method id have to know
Can you specify your problem more
are you trying to create a line that gets as close to all the points as possible
or are you trying to make a function that goes through some arbitrary amount of points
you didn't do anything, so there's no next step
Yea
when it hits the ground, what's the height of the projectile?
0
so solve for t given that...
What does it mean what is the equation of the line though the points?
u have the points given and u just sub it into y = mx + b
so like say a line goes through (2, 3) x = 2 and y=3
so u get 3=m2 + b
2,3 and 4, 5 is y=x+1?
if you alrdy have slope, input the coords of the points to find the 'b' from y = mx + b
@edgy owl
^
Ok
remember the properties of a square, if TS=TR how would you write the equation if you have the whole of PR
Uuum well like ST=PR? @_@
no because PR is the whole thing and ST is a little part you’re going have to multiply by 2 to equal it out
$$2(x+8) = 4x + 6$$
karskaa
this wouldn’t make sense however PR=QS would though
but given ST then it’s the equation i gave
OoO then it's gonna be 2x+8=4x+6?
why does this mean we assume x = y?
yes
OOOOO thank u!!!
if there are no solutions where x does not equal y
then you must assume that x = y
2x^2 = -1/2
x^2 = -1
hmm how do you solve that?
you have a negative number you have to take the square root of
i'm not sure that's possible
is it?
so we assume x = y, because there are still no solutions which doesnt change the problem?
but it makes the problem easier?
yeah pretty much
Think of each sector as part of a circle as AC and BC being radii of circles of different sizes
All you need to do is find the difference between the circle sector with radius BC and the circle sector with radius AC
and that's the shaded area
well, what is the circle area formula, and how would you find the area of a 30 degree sector in a 360 degree circle?
circle area formula is Area = pi(radius^2)
ok, lets simplify things
what would the area of a semicircle be
what is a semicircle ?
a semi circle is a part of a circle
like a circle cut off
but the area formula is
area = pir^2 /2 = pid^2/8
Just pi*r^2/2
A semicircle is actually a circle cut in half; by definition it is half of a circle
So if its half a circle, the area would be pi * r^2 / 2 (since it would have half the area)
which you seem to understand
But where does that 1/2 really come from?
Let's think
yeah ik what a semi circle is
What is the angle of a semicircle at the centre?
if this is our semicircle, what angle would it have
ohhh 180
mods do ya thing
yeah, 180
So we know that a full circle have an angle value of....
360
and so since a semicircle has an angle of 180 degrees, we see that the area will change based on how much its changed from the original circle right?
yes
lets say 180 degrees = a, how can we use a in our formula pi*r^2 to find the area of the semi circle
but we are trying to find this
we'll make a generalization before we get to the solution
ok
so that you can understand it better
yeah alrighty
Think carefully, semi circles have 1/2 the area, and their angle value is 180 degrees, while the angle of a full circle is 360 degrees
am i modifying that formula?
180
what formula is this?
semi circle
area?
let me say half circle from now on haha
yeah ahaha
half circle will have half the area because its angle value over a full circles angle value will be 1/2
That is:
angle of half circle: 180 degrees
angle of full circle: 360 degrees
area = 180 / 360 * pi * r^2
yes
which is also equal to?
the area of a semicircle?
How would this be solved? It's a review for my final in 5 days!
yeah! because 180/360 = 1/2
mhm
So we can generalize this to any angle
since it will just be a ratio to a full circles angle value
which is 360 degrees
yes, so then how would it be used in this context?
ohhhh
i get you
so for this im guessing
it will be
30 / 360 * pi * r^2
in this context
yes, exactly
A = angle/360 * pi * r^2
and there we've done it, we've described the circle sector area
so then what else will be used in this context to find the "shaded area"
now we have two different radii right
well what should i plug into the equation we came up with
here is the question again
since there's two different radius values
we see that one is larger than the other, and since the smaller circle sector is inside the larger circle sector, what can we do to find the area in between the two circles?
if I have a square with area 5 m^2 inside a square with area 10 m^2, how would I find the remaining area?
we can see the distance between them from what it says in the question
This problem requires strong induction
They assumed P(k) for all k that is less than n
i actually wouldnt know im very confused
I solved the problem the same way for all k that is less than or equal to n
this channel is full
sorry
how about this?
the red square has area 10
the blue square has area 5
how would i find the green area?
You would actually subtract
Because the smaller square is part of the larger squares area right?
yes
we know the difference would be the shaded area
the same idea applies to that circle question
so what should i do now with the problem
the circle section with the smaller radius - lets call r1 - is inside the circle section with the larger radius, r1.
So A1 = area of smaller circle sector
= 30 / 360 * pi * (r1)^2
A2 = area of larger circle sector
= 30 / 360 * pi * (r2)^2
so the shaded area, as you may have guessed, would be the difference between which values?
oh is it a and b
BC is the biggest radius, see the line between B and C?
yes
and which would be the small radius? remember, the radius must touch the centre
a and c
well we obviously have the 30 degree angle
and then the distance of the shaded area is
3 inches
and the other part is 8 inches
right, so how can we describe that line
the non shaded region
which line would be 3 inches? BC, AB, or AC?
AB
right, and which line would be 8 inches?
a and c
Okay, so we want BC first
since we said that it is the largest radius
But wait, it doesn't say what its equal to, how can we calculate BC?
^
we need to find r2 first!
so how we do that
how would we calculate the distance between b and c?
is 11inches
right, exactly
and there we go, we have both the values we need
r1 = radius of small circle sector = AC = 8 inches
r2 = radius of large circle sector = AB = 11 inches
now we find the difference in the larger sector's area and the smaller sectors area and we get the ?
So A1 = area of smaller circle sector
= 30 / 360 * pi * (r1)^2
A2 = area of larger circle sector
= 30 / 360 * pi * (r2)^2
A2 - A1 = ?
What would A2-A1 calculate?
since its just 30 degrees we would only be calculating one right?
But in the question, it says that all four are the same!
times it by 4
yeah let me calculate this
this was the hardest problem on the sheet i have a few more questions if you dont mind answering
sure! I'm going to leave in a bit though, so I'll try to help you out as simply as possible
yep! make sure to explain what A1 and A2 are!
do i divide 30 by 360?
here's the area formula if you need
well, A2 would be A1 + the shaded area, the whole thing
which is why we use the long radius BC
ok let me just do the other questions i only have like a few let me ask you these if you have to leave soon
this is one of them
just to make this clear:
yeah i just gotta get it started lol
and i have a few that are very simple (2) and then one i gotta finish but i did the majority of work on
let s represent the arc length, and r represent the radius
then s = r*theta, where theta is the angle of the circle sector
just rearrange and solve for theta, not too much to include here 🙂
right, but we have s and r right?
ignore my ugly circle
i hope this gets the point across
yes
we have the numbers on the graph
the radious of the rotation is 25
and the arc for ab is 58
right, so lets rearrange the formula
s = r*theta
theta = ?
(hint: its shown in the question)
the arc?
if c = a*b , then c/b = a
if we divide b on both sides
similarly
s /r = r * angle / r
angle = s/r
r*angle/r = (r/r) * angle = 1 * angle = angle
so what would i out for this situation tho
if s = r * angle, then dividing r on both sides, we can isolate the angle
cause we dont have the radius
because we want to solve for the angle
oh so divide by 25
right, or in other words: angle = s/r
I haven't solved the question btw, that was all you 🙂
I just gave you the proper steps, I have no clue what the solution is
divide 25
thats probably it
just a linear congruence, just solve using common factor or euclids algorithm
looks good
in layman's terms?
use the same formula as mentioned above
lmao the hint is just misinformation
uh oh hahaha
they forgot the half
do yk what it is tho i wanna go to sleep lmao
i did this and got 8x pi if anyone can double check please
draw the height of this triangle, you'll find that it'll split the triangle into 2 right triangles each with an angle of 68°
?
How do I find the turning point?
no
try not to just guess randomly.
you know your basic trig, right?
ig
Any1 can assist me ?
Getting 40
Hope you can try further
4 = 2^2
thank you i must of did sum wrong them
X= -2 , 3
i officialy got both -2 and 3 but shld I have only 1 ans ?
Both are answer of this equation ,because we made a quadratic polynomial out of that and also you can see fundamental theorem of algebra .
It depends what is asking for ( integers, natural ,real , complex ) solution
got it thks !!!
Notation for adding an element to a set?
I have a set A and want to add x to it, how would I write that?
U
Union should work here
Union
how about just $A \cup {x}$
jan Niku
Like Au{x}
Is that really all you need? Was expecting something to signify that it was a permanent change
A = A U {x}
ah yes A; x too
there's no tricks on this graph, it's the same way you would do it for any other one
take the shortest path u traversed at all times, then update the shortest distance table as needed
this one i mean
so for the first iteration D would be 2 and B would be 7 right
and A is 0
and everything else is infinity
well you have to define iteration better than that
but no
you would take AD first, then DB
B would never be 7
dijsktras always picks the shortest available path, it's a greedy algorithm
1 and 2 are the two shortest, so that's what it would do
although I'm not sure why they did it like that either
tou don't go two at s time unless it's modified version
alright so ill just go 1 path at a time
can u clarify this one @ionic jewel why is the shortest path from A to D: A,C,E,B,D I get A,C,E and D but why b
the shortest path from A to D is A->C->B->D with length 9
ACEBD isnt even a valid path
read what its actually asking for
which order are the nodes visited
it doesnt ask for the path
it asks for the order of nodes visited when you run dijkstras on the graph
and dijkstras always uses the shortest path available
okok
so can i remember it like when i run dijkstras
i got ACE
B has to be fourth as D should be the last
How can I find of x and y in the geometric sequence -2, x, y, 1024
Wait is this channel busy oopp
like I really dont know what else to say here that can help you, it wants you to run dijkstras and keep track of the order you visited nodes
its fine
geometric means common ratio
lets make the common ratio k
I did another one that wasn’t consecutive variables
but this one has two variables together so idk
ok
so we have
-2, -2k, -2k^2, -2k^3
you agree thats how the sequence goes with common ratio of k?
yes
Yes
,w -2k^3 = 1024
now we found k, so you know how to find x and y from that?
-2k and -2k^2
yep
wow u smart thx
is this channel free now?
Yes

