#help-0
1 messages · Page 624 of 1
There'd be 8 '3d faces'
I see. The author (Gilbert Strang) didn't even mention these definitions so im having trouble. I still don't understand what a 3d face is, every face appears to 2 dimensional to me.
They just mean the cubes that border the hypersphere
hey ok so i have this problem i need to confirm my solution can anyone help me?
This is a very good way of conceptualizing it
😄
Cause imagine you had a line segment, that'd be a 1d cube, then you have 0d points which border it
For a 2d cube (which is a square), you have 1d cubes (line segments) which border it
And so on
Yeah, exactly
I see.
Probably a good way to explain it to laypeople too
Well it is a poor question in my opinion especially given the fact the he did not define any of this in the chapter.
Yeah, if Strang didn't give you any prior intuition to work on, that might not be an ideal question
I remember once my teacher asked us what's the minimum number of matchsticks to create four equilateral triangles
But I also think he was writing his textbooks for a certain student body - I think his original one was meant to be used for his course at MIT
And everyone was like, 9 ofc but then he was like, aha! but you didn't consider a tetrahedron!
Idk I just found that quite cool
Yes you are right @warped frost perhaps ill only consider doing questions that have relevance to me
You can also think about how other platonic solids generalise to higher dimensions
My question is, what books do I learn 4d from then?
So, that's a pretty broad question - it depends on your background
I know I picked up on these things when I tackled material focusing on simplicial complexes after a course in Topology
but there's also much friendlier ways to approach it
hmm I see. I guess I'll just have to google as I go along with the intention of only solving the problem at hand
In the year 2016, the total number of metric tons of copper produced in the world was 495,000.
Each year since, the total number of metric tons of copper produced has increased on average by about 3.25% over the amount produced the previous year.
Which function models the total number of metric tons of copper produced in the year that is x years since 2016?
c(x)=2010(3.25)^x
c(x)=495,000(1.0325)^x
c(x)=495,000(0.9675)^x
c(x)=495,000(1.325)^x
2nd one
4th is for 32.5%
3rd is for a decrease in copper
1st is just straight up nonsense
<@&286206848099549185>
@heady solar check your work, are you considering the action of G on the set or the action of U
hint: ||orbit-stabilizer||
is that the inverted axis of the action of my cock on your ass?
ok so you caught me cheating
he's my math teacher
he caught me cheating
cause you didn't answer my question in time
and now i'm gonna fail math
and i'll never be a dj
and i'll have to go back to the rice fields
F in chat bois
Use the rational root theorem
what is it?
1 sec
The rational root theorem describes a relationship between the roots of a polynomial and its coefficients. Specifically, it describes the nature of any rational roots the polynomial might possess. Let's work through some examples followed by problems to try yourself. Submit your answer A polynomial with integer coefficients ...
This has a good explanation
do you want an explanation?
yes
I don't understand
If a_n = n! / (2n)! then a_n+1 = (n+1)! / (2n+1)! no ?
so (a_n+1)/a_n = (n+1)/(2n+1)
You need to replace n with n+1
it's not what I do ?
thanks, i understand
no problem :)
I do what you say
it give me
(n+1) / [n! (2n+2)]
not
A_n+1 is (n+1)!/(2n+2)!
yes
but you don't understand
What I show you is not a_n+1
is a_n+1 / a_n
someone can help me pleas ?
@open elbow What is the question?
I have [(n+1)!/(2n+2)!] / [n! / (2n)!]
I want this :
But I found that :
(n+1) / [ (2n+2)n!]
Yes I know, you didn't cancel it out correctly
😅 Just check your working
Happiness
<@&286206848099549185>
$\frac{(n+1)!}{(2n+2)!} * \frac{(2n)!}{n!} = \frac{(n+1)!}{(2n+2)(2n+1)(2n)!} * \frac{(2n)!}{n!}$
le J
Happiness
What's happening?
Wait what's [10]
mod 10
Ah
...there's always the plug in and bash
If you just try 1, 3, -3, -1
Cause you've shown they're coprime so X has to be one of those four
Or maybe multiply by x
Then x^2+2x-x=x(x+1)=0[10]
And so x+1=0[10] as required
@ripe jasper
how
If you multiply by x on both sides
sides of?
how did u get that?
Of this equation
If you multiply by x you get this $2x^5+x^2-x = 0 [10]$
Happiness
It's a well known fact which essentially says and number to the power of 5 has the same units digit as itself
You can show it with case bash or fermats little theorem
Yh it's quite useful
Also for e.g. if you need to determine remainders of very high powers
Um I'm not sure, I would write it out quickly but I'm actually about to go to bed
You can probably find it online by searching this
Oh thanks Mosh
First one is the string proof
Anyway yh after that you can factorise LHS and since X=/=0[10] then you know it had to be -1
Cause it's a quadratic
@glass lichen I don't see the proof?
But anyway I would probably just plug in the four values
read the article
It's quicker than trying to be clever
which segment?
any, but the article suggests that the string proof requires least math knowledge
under combinatorial proofs
Hope I was being reasonably clear..😅
ty
i know what g'(x) is but for part d, how does g'(2x) = -1?
shouldn't it be undefined since you are dividing by 0 if you plug in 0 for x
g'(0)=-1
g'(0)=-1
oh is it because for every other value of n, it's 0?
they plugged in x=0
yeah
and in a polynomial, all the terms are non-negative integer powers of x
so the only thing that remains at x=0 is the constant
oh i think i get it
How do you get 2 <= n <= 43 from 2^n < n^8 ?
Do I have to check the numbers one by one?
after some initial n's, 8lg(n)-n is a monotonically decreasing function so you can do a binary search instead
So you still have to do it semi manually?
Isn’t there an easier way?
what am i doing wrong here
im fairly sure E and F are correct
ive tried swapping b and c and still doesnt work
try rewriting each equation in the standard form for a sphere, then figure out what the X, Y, and Z translations and scales are, then it should be easier to match to the pictures
yeah i did that
i cant even make out properly the green and blue sphere
what are the coords of the center
Looks difficult to discern. Might need to use process of elimination instead
Could be the perspective but the blue appears to be at z = -1.
hmm im not sure how thats possible
,w (2x + 1)^2 + 4 = 0
got it thx
can i get some help pls 
i understand that im trying to find WX but i cant do it while managing to fullfill UV/UZ=WX/WY
What is UZ compromised of?
And WY?
ummm
no so basiaclly this is what i understood right
im supposed to find WX right
and then
somehow
its supoposed to equal to 2/5 = WX/WY
so like
xy is 7
so WY would equal 7+x
and wx is just the X
So you should end up with something like $\frac{2}{5} = \frac{x}{x+7}$
dldh06
hmm
this is correct
Cross multiply, get x on one side constants on the other
How would you get rid of the denominators?
You must be new, don't tell the answers. Let the person solve it themselves
ohh
sorry
And if they have trouble you check their work
sorry i wont do it again sorry
Because the purpose is a learning process. If you the answer straight away, most people will trust your answer and just copy it down @hidden horizon
@wary stream my apologies
OHH
it makes sence
i get what u meant
since its division
we wanna get rid of it
so we multiply
yeahh
You tagged the wrong person but you're new, it's understandable
Exactly
okok
so i got
well no wait
how would ik which to put after the = or does it not matter
Getting rid of the denominators is the same as cross multiplying with like 1 to 2 less steps
Doesn't matter, as long as x is on one side, and constants on the other
order dosent matter coz it will be an equation anyway
When you cross multiply x will be on both sides, but then get x on one side and constants on the other
check again
.
one side messed me up lmaoo
2x+14=5x
isolate x basically?
yeah
So now get the x's on one side and constants on the other, so isolate
14=3x?
Yes
yes
Now find x
x=4.7
cool u got it !
Exactly
but thing is lmaoo
i was getting that aswell but when i try to put it in with the umm
OH WAIT
SO
OOOOOO
okok brain clicked
thank you humans smmm

cool bruh tc
@crude furnace are u here
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/830987746897559582/845773318324879380/Capture.PNG
where tf did he get the -5 from
also if you can please explain the whole thing i been stuck on this for days
hm
ok so w is the distance the dude walked and b is the distance he traveled by bus
(in kilometers)
he traveled w kilometers at 5 kilometers per hour
so how long would it take?
to travel the walking distance
Not sure why he chose to multiply by -5 but you can do 5 too, you get the same answer
yeah
-5 seems unnecessary
it basically just comes down to getting the equations w/5+b/60 = 1.5 and w+b = 35
then you can solve however you like
Canceling the denominators
do u understand the equation w/5+b/60 = 1.5
Simplying
like how it came about
Isolating w
not really
All the same thing
alright
so the dude walks from his home to the bus stop
the distance is w km and his speed is 5 km/h
how many hours would it take for that portion of the journey?
how would i know 
yes
distance is speed*time right
yes
wait is that a science formula or math
i seen it in science i think
well its applicable to both
We're creating a system of equations using the given info
so if youre moving at 5 km/h and youve moved w kilometers, then the time taken is w/5 hours
because rearranging distance=speed*time gives time=distance/speed = w/5
mhm
(be careful with units)
so it took w/5 hours to travel the walking distance
now we apply the exact same logic to the bus part
he traveled b kilometers at 60 km/h
how long would it take?
total?
no just for the bus part
yes
so whats the distance for the bus part
60km..?
oh
so if the distance is b km and the speed is 60 km/h then by time = distance/speed the time taken for the bus part is b/60 hours
so if the time taken for the walking section is w/5 hr and the time taken for the bus section is b/60 hr then whats the total time
1.5 hours
yes but in terms of the variables
if it takes w/5 hr for the walking section and b/60 hr for the bus section then the total time is simply the sum of these times
which is w/5+b/60
2 hours
so this is where the equation comes from
we also have another equation, w+b = 35
do you see where that comes from?
yes
ok
the walk distance and the bus distance
so we're basically solving the system of two equations
do u know how to do that in general
with systems of equations
not well
alright
there are several ways
i think substitution works best here
so all the ways basically do the same thing, they first get rid of one variable and solve an equation involving the other variable
then u plug in the value for the variable u just solved into one of the original equations and solve for the second variable
heres an example
what we want to do is isolate a variable
meaning rewrite one of the equations so one side of the equation has only one variable and nothing else
yea
where do you get the 5 from tho
now u get w+b/12 = 7.5
im simply multiplying both sides of the equation by the same number, which keeps both sides still the same
hm okay
i chose 5 because i want to get rid of the denominator of w
yeah

so after we get w+b/12 = 7.5 we can rewrite this as w= 7.5 - b/12
mhm
but now we remember the other equation
w+b=35
instead of w in the second equation we can plug in 7.5 - b/12
since the 1st equation has proven that w and 7.5 - b/12 have the same value
youll get used to it eventually lol
yeah exactly
youve got it
now all we have to do is isolate b
then solve for b
precisely
so we have 7.5 + 11/12 b = 35
or 11/12 b = 27.5
now if we solve for b by multiplying both sides by 12/11 we get b = 30
now the final step
now to solve for w
we go to the equation w + b = 35
since we already know b is 30, we just plug that in and get w + 30 = 35
and thus we find w = 5
and thats it
thanks a lot
np
@crude furnace sorry i gtg now
i will come back eventually
or maybe u can ask someone else in the mean time
heyy
Find an polar equation for the curve represented by the cartesian equation
<@&286206848099549185>
do you know how to transform x and y into polar form?
If your question has not been answered for a minimum of 15 minutes, you may use the Helpers tag once. Please do not try to bump your question using this ping unnecessarily. Do not abuse this ping. Do not individually ping users with the Helpers tag without their express permission.
rsin theta = 2
please wait 15 minutes before helpers ping
Sorry
that's good enough
or if you want you can make r the subject
it should be quite similar, the only difference is making r the subject probably
yeah, that's making r the subject
so maybe for your case, make r the subject for all the questions
or r^2
can you explain me how she made that?
👍
consider a different route where you factor 2 out of the numerator and consider the sum of two cubes
there is a special factorisation for the sum of two cubes
if you don't know it, consider looking it up
<@&286206848099549185> I need help with this
I think 15?
When the numbers add up to at least seven
How did u get that number
I counted the different numbers that reach a sum of 7 or greater
Can someone help me with this question
"Prove that that the sum of all angles at the vertices of a n point star is (n-4)x180 degrees"
did I count incorrectly?
okay
<@&286206848099549185>
"Prove that that the sum of all angles at the vertices of a n point star is (n-4)x180 degrees"
I tried to think of the possible ways to solve and ended up in none.
Can someone help me with this?
it can be done by angle chasing
Can u please explain?
If your question has not been answered for a minimum of 15 minutes, you may use the Helpers tag once. Please do not try to bump your question using this ping unnecessarily. Do not abuse this ping. Do not individually ping users with the Helpers tag without their express permission.
maybe try drawing a diagram? though there might be a problem in the sense there are many ways to draw a n point star
or else , he can draw a circle around the star
In geometry, stellation is the process of extending a polygon in two dimensions, polyhedron in three dimensions, or, in general, a polytope in n dimensions to form a new figure. Starting with an original figure, the process extends specific elements such as its edges or face planes, usually in a symmetrical way, until they meet each other again ...
yeah both of these are considered "stars" probably
as angle subtended at centre is double than that of any point of circle , arcs will measure from 2a , 2b , 2c...2n
so 2(a+b+c+.....n) = 360
u can proceed further by this idea
cheers
Thanks dude
np
Can anyone help me on a)(iii) and b) questions?
for a(iii) , check whether ABC is right triangle (it most prolly will be)
orthocenter of right triangle is midpoint of hypotenuse
Find the slope by y2-y1 / x2-x1
brackets
And C as a mid points
What brackets it direct to solve
You can find m and coordinate of C and then
Medians
remember to include brackets to group your math properly
also write your $x_1$ with subscript to make sure it's not ambiguous
Elερραnt118
Meadian are cut on the mid-point of the corresponding line segment
All mid point coordinates
ok thank you very much
Hey guys i have some qns on summation n sequences n series
Is this correct?
Is this also correct
yeah 2n is a constant that can be taken out
looks reasonable
okay thanks!!
it isn't a right triangle
basically find the lattice points P on x=6 and x=-6 such that the [distance between (3, 4) and P] <= 4
??? please i need the answer
As long as they are allowed on discord
erm... might want to stop using discord until you turn 13
^^
since bots can potentially record your messages here
yeah thats against TOS
yeah we'll have to remove you from here, come back next year
lol
<@&268886789983436800>
might want to pick a less active channel
we do it
btw this is probably the most interrupted channel, if you have a long question pick a less active channel
yeahh will do
asks for the area of the colored shapes one by one
I get 54, 120 and 90
I just want to check
@harsh acorn Looks good.
@alpine sable What's the formula for volume of a rectangular prism?
l×b×h
👢

@alpine sable As adithyan said, it's length times width times height.
So, multiply those together.
What do you get?
dont even help him he spammed all the channels
i think someone else is getting helped in questions-1 so im gonna put this here:
the L is the laplace transform btw
Just use the definition of laplace transform
i know, im kinda having trouble with the integration tho tbh :/
here lemme write out the definition just to make sure i have it right
$$\int_{0}^{1} t^{2}e^{-st}dt + \int_{1}^{2} (t-1) e^{-st}dt + \int_{2}^{\infty} 1e^{-st}dt$$
oreo
does that look right?
Looks correct
okay thanks
so
i would try integrating by parts for the left hand thing right
is there like a faster way to do this
No
because it takes me like 5 minutes each and i have way too many of them 
rip
$$\int_{0}^{1} t^{2}e^{-st}dt = - \frac{t^{2} e^{-st}}{s} - \int_{0}^{1} -\frac{2t e^{-st}}{s}dt$$
does that look right?
im not sure what to do with the right hand side now though
Yeah, it is
oreo
it should be that right
thanks
so ill try expanding it further
and yeah idk how to do the bar to show evaluating at the limit
like the vertical bar
so i kinda just left it out
$$\int_{0}^{1} t^{2}e^{-st}dt = - \frac{t^{2} e^{-st}}{s} - \left\frac{2te^{-st}}{s^2} - \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2 e^{-st}}{s^2}dt\right$$
oreo
does that look right?
im confused, when did i do that?
$$\int_{0}^{1} t^{2}e^{-st}dt = - \frac{t^{2} e^{-st}}{s} - \left(\frac{2te^{-st}}{s^2} - \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2 e^{-st}}{s^2}dt\right)$$
oreo
i had parentheses there
integrating the e^-st gets rid of the negative right
so then this should be right?
Yeah looks correct
(I just did it in my head though)
but is this angle 90 degree?
oh lol
it was the same thing i sent earlier
but you told me to check my signs
so i guess its right?
god this is gonna take forever i have 30 of these
Just compute the integral then we can verify the result
You don't have to do the computation everytime
Just use the results from previous questions
Does anyone know how to solve this?
do you know how to get the circumference of a circle?
when you're doing combinatorics in a circle, and say 3 people had to sit next to each other at all times out of 6 people, would it be 4!/4
@alpine sable channel occupied please move
3/4 of 2 pi r?
it will be 3pi.r/2 + 20mm
Assuming that that forms a 90 degree angle
yeah i got that, but i dont know why I have to add the extra 20 mm
for those two straight line
i.e 30pi+20 mm put value of pi and there u go
coz u hv to find perimeter
perimeter means length of boundary
i ended up getting $$\frac{(-e^{-s} (s^2+2s+2) + 2)}{(s^3)}$$ for the whole thing
oreo
,w integral of t²e^{-st} wrt t from 0 to 1
oh ok ty
cool
,w integral of t^2 e^(-st) dt from 0 to 1
Wolfram Alpha doesn't understand your query!
Perhaps try rephrasing your question?
Click here to refine your query online
,w integral of x²e^{-xt} from 0 to 1
,w integral t^2 e^(-st)dt from 0 to 1
Strangely, it has the answer if you click the refine query online link: https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=integral+of+t^2+e^(-st)+dt+from+0+to+1.
Wolfram Alpha doesn't understand your query!
Perhaps try rephrasing your question?
Click here to refine your query online
yeah sometimes it happens
Yeah
i have seen that happening before
ok so i guess i was right
yay
1/3 of one of 30 questions done
im gonna be up all night 
Reported the bug.
Chai (Tea) doing god's work
fr
Anyone know how to solve this problem?
what's troubling you here?
Do u know the formula for area of a circle and a triangle?
yep for area its is pi r sqaured divided by 2 because it is a semi-circle, and for triangle it is 1/2 x b x h
yeah and you have 8 semicircles and 8 triangles here
all the triangles are the same, and all the semicircles are the same
if you can find the area of one of the semicircles, and the area of one of the triangles, then finding the area of the whole shape is easy
the additive principle for areas is more useful than you might think
Yes
the arcs AB and CD add up to 120 deg. length of segment AB is 5 and the length of segment CD is 3.Find the radius of the circle.
Chai T. Rex
then?
Then u have 3 unknowns and 3 equations. You should be able to solve that
how would I solve it if I dont know measure of arcs here
Hi, for the previous question this was the answer, though i got 285.84, im not sure what is right
this was the previous question
hello?
anyone?
I think what you did is 3^2 pi / 2 to get the area of semicircle which is 14.137... and you rounded it down to 14.13 and multiply it by 8 which is 113.04
what they did here is. Since 8 semicircles is 4 circles, they computed the area of one circle and multiply it with 4
What differs from your solution to their solution is the rounding issue
But for me the more correct one is 285.9
I have no idea how to get rid of the 2
Chai T. Rex
Here’s what I got at the moment
@desert kernel First, notice that the powers of three are very similar.
Alright
Chai T. Rex
Ok
What do you get?
No.
Oh
The left side has the wrong power.
Note that the power you're dividing by is less than the original power of the left side.
So, you should have a positive power on the left side after division.
Ok
Second, 27 should be divided when you divide the entire right side.
Closer. What's 27 as a power of 3?
3?
3^3
Yea
Chai T. Rex
Is it the same thing
4-5x?
Right.
Chai T. Rex
oh ok ty, now i understand
U guys done?
A hand of 5 cards is dealt from a standard deck.
What is the probability that it contains 4 queens
Thanks man!!
@desert kernel No problem.
@alpine sable OK, so how many ways are there to get 4 queens in a hand of 5?
4!?
4!
Nope.
5!?
You know what 9C8 means?
Right.
So, 4C4 is the number of ways to choose 4 queens out of 4 queens.
And 48C1 is the number of ways to choose 1 card out of the 48 nonqueen cards.
Does that make sense?
well, that would be assuming that the order of the queens doesn't matter
right?
theres the diamond, hearts, spades and clubs
Right.
So, the number of ways to get 4 queens and 1 other card is 4C4 times 48C1.
What's the number of ways to pick 5 random cards?
52P5
so it would be
4C4 * 48/ 52P5
assuming that order of queens doesn;t matter
otherwise it would be 4! x 48/52P5?
Nope.
what d you mean
52P5 means order of the 5 cards matters.
52C5 means it doesn't.
On top, you have order of the cards not mattering because we used C.
On bottom, you should also have order of the cards not mattering.
OK?
No.
Right.
i don't understand
why doesn't 4! x 48 /52P5 work
there are 4 options for the first spot, 3 for the second, 2 for the third and four for the fourth if we want a queen
times that by the remaining cards, and we have 4! x 48
divided by the total number of ways you could pick 5 cards out of 52 cards
@oak chasm
is graph theory offtopic on this server ? I really need help but dont know where to find any
@alpine sable That also works.
You just need to have order mattering or not the same way on the top and bottom.
You can't mix them.
yeah
No problem.
Chai T. Rex
Either one.
that doesn't provide the same value though
oh nevermind
they are assuming different things
yep.
gotcha
thanks!
Chai T. Rex
There. That's how to do it with P.
You need to multiply by 5 to choose a place for the nonqueen card.
My question is about graph theory
So i'm trying to make a Path Finding Algorithm that return the shortest path possible between 2 points (in time or in distance)
But it also need to take in account a battery that is used to travel a distance
There is also Charging Stops that allows you to fill up your battery but takes 10 extra minutes
It looks a lot like a Dijkstra's algorithm but i can't figure out how to keep track on the Charging Stops
Like for example here a dijkstra algorithm would return the path on the top but it wouldn't be feasible and we would lose track of the one with the charging stop bellow
I also found a document on internet giving a pseudo code for this exact problem but it is very heavy and I don't understand how it works exactly
hmm
how do i find the angles of an irregular quadrilateral with no given angles (all sides are given)?
@slim coyote You know how you can take a square and push the top to the right to get a parallelogram?
yeah
So, that's a quadrilateral where the sides don't determine the angles.
If you fix one of the angles, though, you can get the other three.
Hi guys, can anyone help me with this please, we have two different answer I don't know which one is the right one
Basically the question is this:
An ant is starting from the point R going in the direction of the arrow.
At each intersection it have an equal chance to go in any of the three directions.
What are the chances for it to land on point E at the 4th intersection
I found that it can go in any direction on first intersection so
3/3 then I found in can go in two of the path so 2/3 and then only towards point E so 1/3
Which gives me 3/3 * 2/3 * 1/3
≈ 0.222
So, the first intersection is always C?
Yep
Yes, I think you're right.
3/3 will get you one closer.
From any point, 2 of the paths will get you one closer.
Then From any point, only 1 of the paths will get you to E.
Alright thanks 
I have this question: ```
A linear sequence has first term 7+12√5
The term-to-term rule is: add 9–2√5
One term of the sequence is an integer.
Work out the value of this integer.
``` I think I need the formula n = a+(n-1)d, where n is the nth term, a is the first term, d is the distance between terms.
So I have n = 7+12√5 + (n-1)(9–2√5) but I don't know what to do from here.
Could anyone help?
whether your term is an integer depends on whether it has a "sqrt(5)" term
consider how many times 2sqrt(5) goes into 12sqrt(5)
Hi guys
I have a 3d vector (3,2,5) + m(10, 5, 0), which is the path of plane 1
and I have another point (0,0,1)
plane 2 flies from (0,0,1) and has speed of 18, so in which direction should I fly to intersect with plane 1?
I don't get this, aren't there multiple directions plane 2 can go in in order to intersect with plane 1 since plane 2's speed is higher?
<@&286206848099549185>
@alpine sable is the question you typed complete? There is no information about the speed/position of plane 1
well speed is just sqrt(10^2+5^2) and startpos of plane 1 is (3,2,5)
Wait isnt that the equation of a line you gave
which equation
The vector
yeah its a 3d line
Yeah so it is not necessary that the plane starts at (3,2,5)
It can start at any point on the line
And I m not sure about how you found out the speed too
wdym plane
at m = 0, the line starts at (3,2,5)
How to turn that into standard ellipse formula?
the speed, which is the distance it traveled over the next unit is sqrt(10^2+5^2)
The vector line r = a + mb means a line passing through a and parallel to a vector b
Doesn't mean 'starting point' is a itself... m is some real number
Use definition of ellipse
what
The locus of all points whose sum of distance from two points (focii) is same
That's the definition of ellipse... Any point on it say p has the sum of distance from both focus as a constant
ye
And how to turn that into a standard equation?
And the formula you gave is basically is the sum of distance of a point (x,y) from (-3,0) and (3,0) equals 10
So the focus is at -3 and 3
Find the points it cuts the x and y axis at
Simply put x 0 then y 0
It will give the length of semi major and semi minor axis
Aka a and b in standard formula
yep, i understand that
but given that 3d line of plane 1, how do you find the direction plane 2 has to go in to intersect it
Infinite solutions tbh with all the information you gave. It can cut at any point on the line if no time+position of plane 1 is specified
and how to do that?
For eg put y = 0 it will give the point at which the curve intersect the x axis. The equation will be ± (x + 3 + x - 3) = 10
So the ellipse cuts x axis at (-5,0) and (5,0)
So 2a = 10
a = 5
Similarly you can find the y axis intercept by putting x= 0 in equation and it will give b
and what is b?
Can you find b for me?
I want to be a Therapist but mom wants me be an Engineer.
Lol sounds like india
$$ f(x) = e^(\frac{x}{2}+2) $$
is this channel busy?
andrewFTW8
how do i use maclaurin transform but have x^4 in the series?
can someone help me with this
1.The image of point A (−3, −2) is mirrored about the x-axis and then the image on the y-axis is ...
2.If the image of the point P (−2, −3) is reflected on the x axis then the image is reflected on the line y = 4, then the image is ...
3.reflection of the curve y = x ^ 2-4 to the line y = -5 gives the curve ....
4.The image of point B (10, −8) if reflected on the y-axis then continues to be reflected on the line x = −2, then the image is ...
5.The line 2x − 5y + 6 = 0 is reflected against the line x = 2 then continued with the line y = −1, then the equation for the image of the line is ...
6.Point A (2, −5) is mirrored against y = −3 then the result is mirrored back against y = 4, the image of A is ...
7.Point A (−5,8) is mirrored against the line x = 4 then reflected on the x-axis, then the image is ...
8.The image of point B (10, −8) if it is reflected on the y-axis then continues to be reflected on the line x = −2, then the image is ...
9.The image of the line y = −3x + 3 by reflection on the x-axis and followed by the line y = x is ...
10.The image equation 2x-y = 4 reflected on the x-axis is ...
,w ((x+3)^2+y^2)^(1/2)+((x-3)^2+y^2)^(1/2) =10
,w simplify ((x+3)^2+y^2)^(1/2)+((x-3)^2+y^2)^(1/2) =10
guys is the formula of variance in a population, and in a sample the same?
,w solve \Gamma\frac15
,w simplify \Gamma\frac15
5
69
69
2
ok
savage
I'm trying to graph a function to compare two systems. But I'm having a hard time figuring out how to write the function for one of them.
We start at x,t=(-9,0). Then, there's no change until t=19. At which point, x'=7/4 until t=27. x'=0 until t=55, x'=7/4 until t=63, and continues in this cyclic manner. So obviously, I could draw this out by hand on paper and figure out what I'm looking for, but it would be really nice to just be able to enter it as a function on desmos.
And I feel like I'm missing something obvious that I probably learned 10 years ago, but can't figure how to write it.
@spark shadow Answer is C
How do you do that ?
Please explanation
nicely done
can someone help me with this one? i don't know how to solve parametric inequalities and really dk where to start
c is a constant, more specifically a positive constant, while v is between -c and c
(yes, c is the speed of light)
Solve for what
hey
hammer?
i need help with this question
@alpine sable Diagonal
no problem
sooo anyone?
The volume of a cubical box is 474. 552 cubic metres. Find the length of each side of the box.
@void heron
help
The volume of a cubical box is 474. 552 cubic metres. Find the length of each side of the box.
yes
@void heron
@sullen novathanks
Where?
Where what?
Why did u ask this?
You were typing
No I wasn’t
I saw it
I just left something written in regard to some previous question but never pressed enter