#help-0
1 messages · Page 621 of 1
THANKS!!! so much
we dont care

if you're on a flip phone, you cant have discord. so if you're on discord, you're not on a flipphone and thus can google
Kinda easy
why would we need to drop out?
is this channel taken
what the heck
@kindred crater shut up please
no
just shut up
ok
just a troll
hold up let me type this out in latex
use your calculator app
$\sum\limits_{n=2}^\infty \frac{1}{x\ln(x)}$
EndTimes
ok.
this should converge, should it not?
because this is greater than the harmonic series
I believe integral test?
and anything greater than the harmonic series should converge
right?
like let's say you have a sum of the form
$\frac{1}{n^{1+\epsilon}}$
EndTimes
for epsilon greater than 0
anything even slightly bigger than the harmonic series will converge
yes by p-series
exactly
but 1/xlnx isnt a p series
I believe this channel is currently in use, please ask in a different, inactive channel
it's not a p series but you should be able to compare it to a p series
this is called comparison test
it diverges by integral test
ok thx
the sum you have
,calc 90*ln(90)
The following error occured while calculating:
Error: Undefined function ln
,w 90*log(90)
$\int_2^\infty\frac{1}{x\ln(x)}\dd{x}$ DNE
Mosh
hence divergent
right. but why?
cause if you go through and compute that integral you get something divergent
and integral test says that if the general term is monotone decreasing and positive, the sum converges iff the integral does
so why doesn't the comparison test work then?
comparing it to the p series
$\frac{1}{n^{1+\epsilon}}$
EndTimes
for epsilon > 0
Usually p series comparison works when you can add subtract something to simplify it iirc
But that sum is just the quintessential teaching integral test one imo
Did that help?
How did you get these values?
i tried different proportionalities
60/117=x/130
60/130=x/117
only one is right there and i dont know which
Which side is similar to which other? Like side UV, what is its similar side on the other triangle?
a=1, p=-3, q=0
it wasnt really stated
i only assumed using opposite angles of both triangles and finding the remote side of it... and from there i built the proportions
i dont really know how to word out my process better lmao
Do you know what a similar triangle is?
@wary stream I keep messing up
its was actually discussed to us last week
i also thought about tutorials on youtube but many were quite confusing
Can you repost the question again?
Yeah
If you take a triangle and just like, scale it up while the angles remain conserved, the triangles formed is called similar to the original
Similar triangles are triangles, that have the same attributes but different sizes. So for instance, in your question, side TV is proportional LM, but just different lengths
This is what I got i was redoing the problem ima see if i can factor it @wary stream
The equation for y, is $ax^2 + bx + c$
dldh06
So starting with $y'' - y' -2y = 9x + 5$, the general equation for the right side is, $y = ax^2 + bx + c$. Now $y' = 2ax + b$, and $y'' = 2a$. Plug those in and solve for a, b, and c. So $2a - (2ax + b) -2(ax^2 + bx + c) = 9x + 5$
dldh06
You should be able to finish from there @keen trail
Set the $x^2$ terms equal, the x, and constants
dldh06
So notice in my example, I set all the $x^2$ terms equal @keen trail
dldh06
Yeah I understand that part, let me write it down
@wary stream i just want to have confirmation if i did it correctly
The bx and c should be negative
So it should be $-2ax^2 = 0x^2$, $-2ax + - 2bx =9x$, and $2a - b - 2c = 5$
dldh06
What did you get for a, b, and c?
Did you get a = 0, b = -9/2, and c = -1/4? @keen trail
So the equation $y_p = \frac{-9}{2}x + \frac{-1}{4}$, correct? @keen trail
dldh06
I messed up at isolating i got it now thanks
that would work
or you could just solve the differential equation, it's variable-seperable so pretty straightforward
sombody solve this
sum of all the angles = 360
I need a bit of help with linear algebra
I am not familiar with the term "orthanormal"
It's just making me so lost because this class in general always expects me to know the processes without showing me >_<
Well, first, what does the term Orthogonal mean?
Yes their inner product is 0.
Now, two vectors $\vec{v}, \vec{w}$ are said to be \textbf{orthonormal} if they are \textit{orthogonal} and each vector has \textit{norm} $1$.
zslya
zslya
Okay, then I need to get started on determining which are orthogonal
1 0 0 0 0
1 1 1 0 1
1 0 1 0 1
1 1 1 1 1
0 0 0 0 1
@final crag and it is acyclic
so the matrix there is if you can get to element column from element row
i have to make an equation to solve for x but this makes no sense
how did you get that matrix?
the (i,j) element in the matrix is if you can get to node j from node i
the block thing means its 90 degrees
what have you tried?
idk
can you setup an equation?
my friend is in a private school and he doesnt get it too
uh sorry i still dont get it :l
can you get from node a to node a?
no right
ur already there
theres no self loop there
so you absolutely can
you dont need a loop
each node can get to itself by taking 0 edges
so node a can reach node a
hmm okay and then why is the first row 1 0 0 0 0
so therefore the first element in our matrix is a 1 (can reach)
cant d reach a?
ohhh
A can only reach A so its 1 0 0 0 0
lol
thats the transitive closure matrix?
or u gotta first do that and then make it into a transitive closure?
ahh this makes sense now
In coordinate geometry, what is the answer to gradient*gradient
i forgot if it's 1 or -1 or something else
thanks for the help
yw
what 5x - 9 equal if x is 3
so first replace x with 3 so it would be 5 x 3 - 9
do 5 x 3 which is 15 then subtract by 9 = 15 - 9 = 6
would the 2nnd row be 1 1 1 0 1 btw?
I'm p sure u have to subtract it by the first row
@final crag
R u trying to put it in rref?
Oh wait I didn't read above
oh wait
i have the value of gradient, the value of c and the value of 1x coord and 1y coord. How can I form an equation for the line?
D can reach itself
Thank you
find the pattern think about how you can write the nth term
1/((n(n+3)) is the nth term
Is 3² 3x3 or 3x2
wow i didnt even have to ping mods how convenient
its 3 times 3
Wow thank you
$3^2 = 3\times3$
bunny
@alpine sable thank you, appreciate it
yes
Ok
5x - 9 is not 5x * (-9)
Hi, i was looking through my textbook and found "R^2" randomly refered to, can anyone explain what R^2 or R^3 mean in this context?
use the exponent properties for #1 (power to a power, multiplication of like bases, and 1/x=x^(-1))
log properties for #2 (addition/subtraction rule)
you learn that somewhere in algebra so I'd guess somewhere between 7 and 10th
Not sure why I get different answers for c her
Is the original logistical differential equation
what's that extra +y_n doing in this
this is not the logistic map
not as-written anyway
and in either case you're trying to fit a continuous model to a discrete simulation
X(3X-7) ; X = 3
can someone help me with this?
how much progress have you made so far?
Okay so
So far these are the equations i was able to come up with
First i let C rep. Caps and B rep. Brim hats
then i came up with the following:
7C + 10B (since caps cost 7 bucks to make and brims cost 10 bucks)
0.2m^2 + 0.4m^2 <= 1000m^2 (cotton)
0.2m^2 + 0.1m^2 <= 500m^2 (polyester)
But after that i felt stuck because i had a feeling i did something wrong and that im obviously missing something
0.2m^2 + 0.4m^2 <= 1000m^2 (cotton)
you are missing something very crucial here
the variables
also you are not minimizing cost you are maximizing profit
the profit is $8 per cap and $5 per wide-brim hat
Ann
$8 and $5? Where would i get that from the question?
caps cost $7 but sell for $15
Ann
profit = revenue - cost
like for this one. What vvariables am i missing? Since there is already the m variable in it
Oh yeaa true
your first inequality should be 0.2C + 0.4B ≤ 1000
AHhh so i did get it almost right but i messed up the variable parts
How would i know if my equation shows that its maximizing rather than minimizing?
yours doesnt show it either way
you should write "max" or "min" somewhere
your objective function was wrong anyway
Ahhh i see. So i redid my equations and this is what i have now
max. 3C + 5B
0.2C + 0.4B <= 1000
0.2C + 0.1B <= 500
I got the 3C by using the Profit equation to find the profit for caps (10-7=3) and the profit for brims in order to get 5B (15-10=5)
@vale wigeon Does that seem correct now?
Oh yea i forgot to do that. BUt wait look here
It says that they sell for 10 tho...
Or am i looking at all of it the wrong way
Lol its all good
Right here is my updated solution
max. 3C + 5B
s.t. 0.2C + 0.4B <= 1000
0.2C + 0.1B <= 500
C >= 0
B >= 0
Thats how its supposed to be right?
uhhh
im gonna pretend like i didn't see that lol
Quick question, is this correct? :
R1 = {(1, 1), (1, 2), (1, 3), (2, 2), (2, 3), (3, 3)}
R2 = {(1, 3), (2, 1), (2, 2), (2, 3), (3, 1), (3, 3)}
R2 o R1 = {(1,1), (1,2), (1,3), (2,1), (2,2), (2,3), (3,1), (3,3)}
(discrete mathematics)
@kind jungle Input of 1 to R1 gives 1, 2, 3. Input of 2 to R1 gives 2, 3. Input of 3 to R1 gives 3.
Input of 1 to R2 gives 3. Input of 2 to R2 gives 2, 3. Input of 3 to R2 gives 1, 3.
Input of 1 to R2 o R1 gives 3, 2, 3, 1, 3 = 1, 2, 3. Input of 2 to R2 o R1 gives 2, 3, 1, 3 = 1, 2, 3. Input of 3 to R2 o R1 gives 1, 3.
(1, 1), (1, 2), (1, 3), (2, 1), (2, 2), (2, 3), (3, 1), (3, 3)
Looks good.
Can anyone help me check if this is the right way to find a Jordan Normal Form
Of a matrix, thanks
@thick sigil you didn't show how you found S
How do you do that?
how'd you find S?
what did you say the eigenvectors were ?
I used the JNF calculator online lol
Eigenvectors in this case is -1
But yes looking through examples online
-1 is an eigenvalue not an eigenvector
so eigenvector is
1 2 1
0 0 0
-1 -2 -1
?
that's a matrix
lol kill me
Example of Jordan canonical form with dimension 3, in this case, the eigenspace corresponding to the only eigenvalue, has dimension 2, so we have to calculate a eigenvectors form the two given by the autoespace spanned by the eigenvalue
Theres an example here that states similar, but I'm confused how they then got the eigenvectors after this
did you solve the above yet
Whats there to solve tho
its 2 systems of linear equations w 3 unknowns
and the 2 systems are same just one +ve and one -ve
super confused
do you mean solve to find the unknowns x y and z?
yes
wdym
how do u solve 3 unknowns w a system of 2 linear equations
thats what i mean
thats not doable no
so I know the characteristic polynomial is (x+1)^3
I am lock for this equation :
I do a solve the derivation ( fonction exponentielle )
@thick sigil if you're stuck here then i sense a knowledge gap. you must know how to solve linear systems way before learning to find eigenvectors
Can someone walk me through how do integrate e^(2x) I’m getting very confused and flustered. I understand how to do u substitution for some functions but every time I try this one my brain hurts
so basically the idea is that we know how to integrate e^x
but here its 2x, so its a bit complicated and we just want it to be a varible
so we can u sub here
because if we sub u=2x, we both have it in the form e^u and can cancel out the x's
But then how do you integrate e^u that’s where I get stuck
e^u no?
e^u
yeah
But then you sub 2x back in and get back to e^(2x) that’s where I’m lost
ok lets do it from the start
waler
now we sub u=2x
and when we do that
we should also change the varible of integration
so can you tell me whats du=?
2
Okay yeah I got that
right so then whats dx?
du/2
waler
since 1/2 is a constant, we can take it out
so now its just that easy integral of e^u
Thank you so much! It still feels weird treating dx and du as variables you can move around but that makes a lot of sense now. Thank you so so much
yeah, you just need to treat them like so
even tho they are not
more practice will get you used to it
yeah seems good
oh and another way you could appraoch this is that
since you know derivative of e^(mx+b) = me^(mx+b) you could find some function that when differentiate gives e^(2x)
so by the reversed chain rule (which is not a thing), e^(2x)/2 is our answer
and dont forget a +c
that backward working only works for some few cases like linear functions and such
1
Well, multiply the element with its inverse.
Chai T. Rex
yeah
That's not an element of the ring.
does 24x + 15 even have an inverse in Z_32[x] 
this is what i did
@haughty plaza OK, so we have (24x + 15)(ax + b) = 1.
Expand the left.
What do you get?
give me a second
OK.
24ax^2 +15ax +24bx+15b = 1
OK, so coefficients now.
Does that make sense?
yes
OK, so 24 isn't coprime to 32, so let's not do the first equivalence.
15 is coprime to 32, so let's get b.
Chai T. Rex
15?
Chai T. Rex
What do you get after filling in b?
15a+360=0
,calc 24*15
Result:
360
OK, now what's 360, modulo 32?
8
@haughty plaza Sorry, computer delay.
OK, so subtract 8 from both sides.
What equivalence do you get?
15a-8=0
Does that make sense?
ah yes
OK, so we already know the multiplicative inverse of 15, which is what?
15
Multiply both sides by 15. What do you get?
we do this ? 15a15=2415
225
Right, but anything times its multiplicative inverse is 1.
That's what multiplicative inverse means.
oh yes thats why i was confused
So, the left side is 1a or a.
yeah
What's the right side?
360
What's that reduced modulo 32?
8
Chai T. Rex
right
Chai T. Rex
Does that make sense?
yes thanks alot !
@haughty plaza No problem. Here's my working and checking the answer:
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/488104216678760469/845247211746099200/537482727557955597.png
don't come here to block the questions channels with low quality content, please
i cant save the image
nvm yeah i can now thanks
No problem.
i'd like some help finding out the chance of scoring a first-roll Yahtzee twice, and a second roll Yahtzee within the same game.
also, the odds of all of those Yahtzee's being all 5's
homeskillet
i have big brain question
for a big brain person
dang it my paste broken
one sec
aight
so im doing a practice quiz and this question no make sens ;(
i understand how to get the answer im pretty sure
but i dont understand how to get it in that form
isnt that like gellometric mean or somthin
@serene jolt Do you know SOH CAH TOA?
yessu
Chai T. Rex
i used cosine for dis
Oh, what equation did you start with?
yuh
Which side is hypotenuse?
Chai T. Rex
Chai T. Rex
0.86602540378443864676372317075294
Chai T. Rex
See this table?
is this channel free?
@mossy mulch No, sorry.
what abou table
OK, see how all the fractions are over 2?
OK, see how all the tops of the fractions are square root of 0 to square root of 4 for sine and backwards for cosine?
There's a pattern there.
y-yeah
And see the angles at the top?
mhm
They're the most important angles in a triangle, 0, 30, 45, 60, 90 degrees.
yuh
So, what's the cosine of 30 degrees?
Chai T. Rex
Does that make sense so far?
yuh
OK, what's 50 divided by 2?
25
Chai T. Rex
wowowo
but like
will the cosine of the angle alaways be-
oh wait
nvm
thank you very much
i appreciate it
No problem.
William Brown
$\int_s^\infty \frac{1}{s^2+2s+2}ds$
dang homes
can someone help with this?
@serene jolt If you memorize the pattern of the table, it will help you get exact values of sine and cosine for the usual angles.
hi
@limber ledge Sorry, channel is busy.
@limber ledge Yeah, but then @junior thorn came in.
oh ok
I asked after I'm sorry
can I get help after
@limber ledge Best to ask in empty channel, like #help-7|zen1thxyz.
William Brown
I am next in the q
Could someone help out real quick with a possible method?
.
,calc 6+9+6*9
Result:
69
@trim schooner
Result:
420
Mfw you doing it intentionally?
,calc 69419+1
Result:
69420
ah
Do it in DM with TexIt then
^
no


I need help
Im stuck
At 17.50 Kristina will rent an electric scooter.
At company A, she has to pay 10 kr at start-up, and then 3 kr for every quarter of a minute she uses the bike.
At company B she has to pay 5 kr at start-up, and then 1.50 kr for every minute she uses the bike until 18.00, and 4 kr for every minute she uses the bike after 18.00.
a) Make a graphic representation in a coordinate system that shows the price y kroner that Kristina has to pay when she uses a bicycle for x minutes at both of the two companies.
b) How long does it take for Christina to use the bicycle for the company?
I have 0,058=10^-1,63x how can I solve for x?
so is this channel taken or not?
is this a test?
Do you see any marks ?
I see radio buttons
what have you tried?
if I told you what property and idea they use will you be able to come up with something?
No bro I'm dumb
do you just want the answer?
I am not gonna give the solution straight
I'm going through my notebook to find stuff
But can't find it even if I can it's jumping over my head
Yes pls
I've got like 13 more questions and my teacher is eating my head
damn unlucky
idk why you would want straight answer if its an assignment
I need to submit this assignment real quick
pretty sus
Online teaching is also sus
But nobody complains about it
5. While asking questions, make sure you mention all relevant details, including the context, what you have tried and what you're stuck at. Do not expect others to simply solve your questions for you. read #❓how-to-get-help before posting problems
This is an assignment
My teacher is eating my head
We have to submit answers in MCQ.
because our Teacher is to lazy to check our solution
I haven't tried anything
Well if you can't give away the answer
Explain me the process real quick
if you haven't tried anything , how is some1 supposed to help you
you are supposed to use telescopic sums
And ?
trigonometric properties related to tan()
1 specific property
not giving anything else unless you try something yourself
I am not going to give you the answer but why don't you try to solve it ?
Given ans is ||ABD||
This is the solution given for option B-
||But f(0) cannot be either 2 or -2 coz then that would give us f'(0)=3 which is not possible.||
||Can someone propose a different soln or is the information available insufficient?||
Do you know what are the internal and external angles of a regular polygon?
Do you know what the sum of the angles in a triangle is?
I am rlly bad at math u know
It's not even my field and they still force me to do math
Chai T. Rex
I feel dumb
OK, a triangle has 3 sides, right?
Okay
Chai T. Rex
So, a square has 4 sides, right?
Ohhhh i got it
Chai T. Rex
So, what's the sum of angles in a pentagon (5 sides)?
540?
OK.
1080?
,calc 180(8-2)
Result:
1080
Yep.
So, we have a pentagon and an octagon in the picture.
How many angles are in a pentagon?
5
Chai T. Rex
108°?
1080°
Right, how many angles in an octagon?
5
Oh sorry
So, 8 sides, 8 angles.
That's Penta
Yeah.
Okay so
hey can anyone help me with this problem?
@wide plaza Sorry, channel is busy.
No problem.
@alpine sable Stuck?
Chai T. Rex
135°?
Right.
Chai T. Rex
It's saying 1 times itself + a growth factor * y in relation to the logistical relationship as defined by m - y_n
@alpine sable So, it says the polygons are regular polygons, right?
OK, so in regular polygons, all the angles are the average angle.
So, see the bottom right angle in the pentagon?
Yeah
Chai T. Rex
Okay done
You see how that angle and x add up to the bottom right angle in the octagon?
-90°
What?
Hold on.
You see how the bottom right angle in the octagon minus the bottom right angle in the pentagon is the x angle?
Wait nvm nvm
Dude I answered it
@polar whale sorry
It's ok
@polar whale You used the wrong formula. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regular_polygon#Angles.
@alpine sable What did you get?
Can anyone help me with this...I'm stuck with calculation of PI (particular integral)??
@rapid condor Sorry, channel is busy.
@polar whale It's like triangle is 180 degrees, and you add 180 degrees for each additional side.
That's how I remember it, at least.
Right.
And u get the lower right corner?
Alright i think i got it I'll tell u and tell me if it's correct or not
Yeah
See the angles I marked?
I see them
135 for the octagon corner. 108 for the pentagon corner.
OK, so the big angle minus the small angle leaves x left over.
So 27°
Right.
Okok thank u
Yea I understand The concept probably messed up the formula. Thx for rectifying
No problem.
how would i go about doing this?
it helps to use a rule for the transform of a derivative
Try s=ut+1/2 at^2.
its quadratics
factoring / quadratics
idk what that means im in grade 10 man
Hmm?
This question is based on it man
The acceleration due to gravity??
Hi
Ok
I will try
its not based on gravity whatsoever
You are throwing it from the top of a buullding
its based on the trajectory of a parabola
@fierce shoal it's a graded quiz?
Then also you need it. Gravity is involved. + one more velocity
Sorry but we can't help in quizzes
its not a gravity question
Then sorry i dont know what to do then.
Help
Oh sorry i misread the q
You could start by drawing the three distinct surface pairs and labeling their dimensions from the picture. Then compute the area of each and finally add them
Use the formula for the area of a trapezium, and one for parallelogram and one for rectangle
Can someone help please
okay
No sorry not the parallelograk
@alpine sable For each inequality it helps to figure out where it intersects the x and y axes. Do you know how to figure that out?
Yeah
Would you know how to solve this? @alpine sable
Then since these are linear, you connect the points by a line. Finally figure your which side of the line to make “off-limits” based on the inequality
For the first equation I got x≥ −y+35
What value of y gives you the value of x when the function touches the x-axis?
Seems like a trick question. It’s actually simple though so don’t psych yourself out
Use the formula of the area of a square. Then first find the area of the bigger one then the area if smaller one. Then subtract. Then, tell what you get
Turn it into an equality first then worry about the inequality layer. Graph x +y =35 first
Then when you make it an inequality, you only have to figure out which side of the graph (the line in this case) the inequality allows the function to visit. The other side can be scribbled out or shaded to indicate its “off limits”
for the factored form i got (3x+2)(x+4)
Sort of like
You need to figure out where the intercepts are from the function then figure out which side to shade as off-limits
Hey can someone quickly help me?
At Qdoba, 40% of customers choose a burrito instead of a bowl or tacos. Calculate the probability that 5 of the next 12 customers get a burrito.
Round to 3 decimals
The way I tried to do this was very wrong
Yo guys can someone dm me
If they can help me out, its some algebra trig stuff. Thanks
there are too many questions at the same time
Yeah lol
probably go find a channel where the last timestamp is quite a bit ago
can you guys help me with my homework if okay with you i want to hop in a vc cause i cant explain it
Yeah, I got some algebra trig stuff that I did work on but Wana check so I don't get it wrong
Get what I mean?
Yeah just want to make sure every answer is right with someone smart, like everyone here
can you find a way to plug back in your answer to verify?
it's my go-to method to verify my own work
Good evening,I needed a small help,can anyone pls read the statements tht I have underlined,I am only 10th grade pass,Idk how to read those mathematical notations,by reading I mean for example a statement-cotan=45°,so by typing what I read the statement as "complementary tangent is equal to 45 degrees"
So in case I was the one who didn't know trigonometry and 360° system,asking abt reading this statement,I can then google "complementary tangent" and "degree system",and learn abt it
this looks very specific domain knowledge
I think this needs more context here
are you sure you attached the right picture?
It's the google mu zero research paper
Um can u elaborate a little bit
U mean these functions are interconnected to some previous slides?
probably
One sec I will swap all slides
well the answer I have right now is 954 but Im not sure
how did you get that?
Yep it's right I guess (954.56)
@woeful pulsar hey mate is it fine if I link the drive link
So it should be 955*
probably ig
because that's the only source we'll be able to get
looks like you didn't copypaste the full link
so that slide you gave is where they defined the functions
Yh frm pg 35
it was quite blurry so I didn't get the entire context
Wait I will link the video u can then get to the drive link in the description ,it would probably be clear thn
so p and v are policy and value I guess
yeah it doesn't seem like there's anything to do with trigonometry
Nah I meant something else with the message
oh
I meant tht by reading the function you would type them like this as an example
okay so what they are trying to do here is define f, g, h as how they would write it our rigourously
basically they are introducing the notation for input and output for those functions
importantly, the arity, the specific inputs and the specific outputs
At the side of dynamics in the pic how do I read tht 0 with stomach slashed
What does it represent
oh, theta?
$g_\theta(s^{k-1}, a^k)=r^k,s^k$
811ττερραlE
you mean here?
Yes mate
Wht topic in maths do I need to google to be able to read these types of equations
hard to pinpoint a topic
remember the notation where they write $s^{k-1}$ is not exponentation
811ττερραlE
it's the k-1 th value of a sequence s
🤔,I actually thought it as s raised to power k minus 1
yeah it's probably not that
Wht topics thn?
have you read up monte carlo tree search?
I think understanding that can help with reading the rest
Yh I googled in morning got a little grasp
A(x) = 200+10x, B(x)= 800+ 5x. How come this formula is right? I dont Get it
Ok cool I will update aftr I read tht
Ty fr help mate
May god bless you
have a magically enchanted day
I think you are missing a substantial amount of assumed mathematics to understand the mu zero paper. It’s primarily probabilities and machine learning but it will expect you to understand linear algebra and the notation typically used in that field at the very least
This channel being used?
But I appreciate your effort nonetheless! Just focus on the fundamentals and over time it will make more sense
Um can u pls pinpoint specific topics,fr example there r many topics in statistics
If it's possible 👉👈 @magic lichen
I mean if u have time
Can someone give a hand with physics? (If it's possible, I won't ask you to do my exercise but just go suggest me something because I'm stuck)
It’s primarily probabilities and probabilistic inference, which will use linear algebra and calculus at times. I recommend you start learning classical machine learning and figure out what core mathematics are confusing, figure those things out then move on to deep learning only when you are comfortable
For example, understand how linear regression and logistic regression work before you tackle the alpha go stuff
There’s a whole field of other examples that lie between the basics and the cutting edge being published by experts. Don’t be afraid to take the journey. Rushing to the very complex end will only confuse and discourage most people
Ok cool,I have taken note,I think by a rough estimate it will take me around 3 weeks to get through the things u listed, before I had a plan like if I am able to make sense of every term mentioned in the mu zero paper and then keep googling and learning them,I would be able to get through the paper in some weeks, but makes more sense now
3 weeks! That would be quite impressive! I don’t know your level but please don’t be afraid to take your time
Ok lol
Haha, You really do need to understand these subjects if you want to contribute to the worlds collective knowledge of what’s possible. It’s okay that it can take a long time to really understand what’s going on. I mean the google researchers that developed the method have probably spent at least 5+ years on this field of machine learning alone.
0_0
Not to mention the 15+ years of fundamental math leading to that
Can I add u as a friend if you don't mind?
i didnt understood half of what you said, can you teach me english?
I mean I won't be bombing u with questions but probably just ask some topics
Bro just use Google translate to translate in ur language
jk i did understood but had no context at all
Haha, I don’t mean to offend but It would be best if you lean in this community since there are very many experienced, intelligent, and helpful people here already. I’m afraid I wouldn’t be able to respond in a timely and consistent manner
Um...ok..
i dont understand this one
Besides it’s better to ask in public so everyone benefits from the discussion
A golf ball is hit and stays in the air for 6s. The ball reaches a maximum height of 40m. Find an equation that models the flight of the golf ball. Write the equation in standard form.
what does u2 mean in this situation
Bruh
what is cosa
Cos(alpha)= 5/(√34)
@sage rapidsthankss
i have 2 more question
can u help me?
the question ask cot(ACB) =?
this channels free since hes gettin ghelp in another so.
|x+y-2pi-e|=|x-2pi+y-e| <= |x-2pi| + |y-e|
|x-2pi| => |x| - 2pi and |y-e| => |y| -e
this is all i have rn and im stuck
3 option d
yo do you mind checking over my work?
Yes I can, show me
thanks
$\abs{(x+y)-(2\pi + e)}=\abs{(x-2\pi)+(y-e)}\leq \abs{x-2\pi}+\abs{y-e}<\frac{2}{1000}<\frac{1}{100}$
channel is in use
wow ok
Mosh
each of the abs value are less than 1/1000
right
so their sum must be less than 1/1000 + 1/1000
okay
and
why were u allowed to say that thats < 1/100
is it cuz of the order on the reals
cause 1/100 - 1/500 >0
like ik why in terms of common sense but
right
ok i looked at it, have a nice day
plz
if it is right
looks like a test
You should try to keep the ratio between the sides, it's 10:15, or you can say 2:3, so if u draw PR of 2cms, u should nearly draw QP of 3cm
so then what's preventing you to just check it yourself on a calculator. .?
