#help-0
1 messages · Page 615 of 1
it would be easier if you expanded the brackets first
oh
Log5*log5=log25 is that how it works or is it log10
neither
huh
it's (log5)^2
Oh
oh
as i mentioned, treat lg 5 as just a number
2•log5 basically
Ok
log 5^2 and (log 5)^2 are 2 different numbers
just leave it as it is
so it will be (lg5)(lgx)?
yes
it should be (lg5)^2, and (lg2)^2
make lg x the subject
but i do not know how to bring the other lgx over
move the terms with lgx to one side, and the rest to the other side
Find the domain of the equation first (here because of the power of (5x)^lg5 and (2x)^lg2 are irrational so this equation's domain is x>0) and then cross multiplying to make the equation become:
(5x)^lg5=(2x)^lg2 <=>10^((lg5)^2)×(x)^(lg5)=10^((lg2)^2)×(x)^(lg2)
<=>(1/10)^((lg2+lg5)(lg2-lg5))=x^(lg2-lg5)
You got the point now, the equation becomes f(g(x))=f(h(x)) with f(x)=x^(lg2-lg5); g(x)=(1/10)^(lg2+lg5) and h(x)=x ; now the solutions of the equation will be equal to the solutions of g(x)=h(x) that satisfy the conditions of both f(x), g(x), h(x). And your solution is a point so you don't need to proof something else.
Natsumi is typing since an hour
I don't know if my answer is correct; but I hope it would help you.
Can we switch to DM ? Iam at work and can’t follow the whole chat currently
Ok
Thanks
i got (lgx)(lg5-lg2)=(lg2)^2-(lg5)^2
THANK YOU
i would see later
@indigo jetty is this it
are you allowed to use a calculator?
nope
ah ok
so just divide the whole expression by (lg5-lg2)
now notice (lg2)^2-(lg5)^2
does it resemble a^2-b^2?
yes
no need
the expression is screaming to you that it simplifies to a very nice number
its lg10
yes
which is 1
gd
so
so what is lg x?
0.1
OMAI GAWD
now, good practice, verify your answer
What is the procedure to go from the step of the first green arrow to the second green arrow?
I hope my translation is not so bad
It would be easier if you go back to the original series at the top, and write out the series term by term
then you notice that you can split up the series into odd-indexed c and even-indexed c
then apply the expressions in the first green arrow to all the c
Ok, imma try...
how do I go about doing this?
I've found the angle between l and π1
but I don't understand what I meant to do to get the equation of the plane perpendicular to π1 including l
basically, pi2 contains l, so it contains the direction vector of l, which is one vector that defines pi2. Now you need another defining vector for in pi2. Notice that if pi2 is perpendicular to pi1, what can you tell about the normal of pi1?
it'll be a vector parallel to pi2, I get that
but I need like a Cartesian equation
not the uhhh
the 3 vectors and a point one
I just need a general methodology type thing so I can figure it out meself
you need at least 2 defining vectors to get the defining normal vector of pi2, and then you can get the cartesian equation from there
cross product of two vectors on the plane?
yes
the most important form for planes is the r.n form
because you can switch between vector and cartesian
r.n=0?
where r is a vector on the plane and n is the normal's unit vector?
I think?
r.n = a.n
a is a point on pi2
easiest is to get it from the line l
which is the origin
if i have a sample which is right skewed, can i still compute the 95% confidence interval normally using this formula?
i can take the natural log of the variable to obtain a more normal looking distribution, but do i need to do this?
if the sample is large enough (usually n >30) then the central limit theorem would apply
so the sampling distribution of the sample means would be approximately normal
ahh okay, so even though the sample data doesn't look normally distributed, n>30 means the distribution of the sample means would be normally distributed so any confidence interval would be valid
why would it be better to transform the data to make it more normal though?
this is actually part of a set of practice problems where it asks me to compute the confidence interval
but the previous question asks why it would be beneficial to take a log transform before analyzing the sample data (because the dataset becomes less skewed)
i'm just not sure whether that ties into this question or not
i'm guessing the benefit would be by transforming the data to make it more normal, you could use a confidence interval even with a smaller sample size where n<30
oh we're given a sample of 500 which is pretty right skewed
and it's asking why taking the natural log would make it better
i just said that it makes the distribution way less skewed
but the next question asks for the 95% confidence interval of the population mean
so i don't know whether to keep the log transform
maybe that would fudge the numbers because then i'd have to undo the log to find the confidence interval
i guess since n>30 i dont need to change the sample and i can just assume they intended for the questions to be independent?
like i get that this is a benefit but we're already given a sample and the only effect that taking the natural log has is making the histogram more symmetric
oh if it's given that the sample is pretty large already then idk what the benefit of a log transform would be
maybe it'd give a better approximation?
that would totally mess up the numbers though right? if i took the log, then found the confidence interval (for the next question), and then did undid the log
like i think the weirdness of the former question is confusing me
it asks what the benefit is of doing a log transform of a sample of 500
and i said: to make it more symmetric (i dont even know what implications this has, it just sounds good)
next question is to compute the 95% confidence interval of the pop. mean
does the log thing have anything to do with this is my confusion
i think it wants you to use the log transform to compute the confidence interval for the next one
how do i do this?
im taking the mean +- sd/sqrt(500) of the log transformed sample
and then i got the interval
do i just undo the log?
yeah you apply the inverse of the transformation
alright, thank you so much
not sure how to do the last part because the function has multiple equations in it
M = 6n - \sum_{i=1}^j\ (6 - f_i) = 6(N-1 - j) + \sum_{i=1}^j\ f_i
Hello, I am new herw.
here
to post formulas, is that of the Latex use?
M = 6n - $\sum_{i=1}^j\ (6 - fi)$ = 6(N-1 - j) + $\sum{i=1}^j\ f_i$
Fantinatti
Thank you sir.
No need to call me sir
This is the formula for the DOF (Degree Of Freedom). Why do I have "-1" on it? Because the last resource can't be changed? Fixed? Just to clarify this idea.
How do you determine the domain of inverse function if you're given the actual function?
i tried it
i did ln(y+1)=x
which gives -0.63
and then plugged that into ln(x+1)=y
which gives -1
so my teacher is probably smoking crack @strong furnace lol
@strong furnace U had a question, I assume you figured it out?
Not really
I can't give the solution without giving away the answer so let me think how I can convince you without doing that
idc about the answer
tell me the proccess of doing it
i have a test in 2hours
and this is study guide questions
You're supposed to find the domain of inverse function
of ln(y+1)=x
when you do dy / dx or d / dx how do you know where to write that?
heres a problem as an example:
Find dx/dt when x = e^t
I know that I would take the derivative of e^t and get e^t but would I write that as follows?
dx/dt x = e^t
dx/dt = e^t
?
Actually never mind I am smoking the same stuff as your teacher
That seems to be a typo
mhm
@strong furnace yep like i though
though
thought
but i would find the domain of the inverse @strong furnace then what?
If this was a proper problem then -1 would not lie in the domain of its inverse
f^-1(f(-1)) should have been the problem
@strong furnace how would u do 8b
ik the proccess but how do u get 0.08 out of 3 and 5
i wanna know so i dont get stuck on that during test
Hi can someone tell me about algaber with an know one number please quickly tomorrow I have tast
wdym??
I didn't understand what are you saying
unknown?
do you know the formulas for surface are / volume of a sphere?
The base is 10 I assume?
You have to use log(2*5)=log2+log5=1 in this case assuming log(10)=1 is trivial
hi everyone, i was playing around with a physics equation and stumbled upon a strange thing that i'm not sure if it's entirely correct (and i quite feel it's not)
the equation for the relativistic addition of velocities tells that
u = (u' + v) / (1 + u'v/c^2)
so, for a school homework i had to evaluate the derivative of this equation (respect to u'), and i think i discovered thath
du/du'=(dt'/dt)^2
does this make any sense?
make y the subject of formula
y= 4-x
then substitute it into the above equation to solve
Is this how you’re supposed to do this? Should I be getting a negative 36
i think you dropped a negative
36=(x-3)^2
x=-3, 9
then find the y-coordinates and you're good to go
can somone help me get ready for a fractions math test involving bedmas
dm me if you can help
what math are you in
Calculus and Vectors
grade 8
ok i can help you
Ah thank you
give me any question involving bedmas
Can anyone give me a question with Hands on Equations-
ok thank you
People here may help if you post the question you want to ask
But before hand, please read #❓how-to-get-help first
ok sure
Is this correct?
have a test in 15 min
needa know if my work is right so i know how to do it during the test
Don't post twice!
twice lol hes spammed it on every question
@thorny mirage sorry for bad handwriting
Maybe this helps you
Text in curly bracket is explanation
Wooops
Is there anyone to help with physics?
me
Aight
dm
Since no one is using this channel rn, I’ll ask tm question
Resolve into two or more factors:
$2a^2x^2 - 2(3b-4c)(b-c)y^2 + abxy$
Prak
I don't understand
cos2x = 1 - 2sin^2x right
Yep
I still don't understand
what should i do for 4ø
The angle is just doubled
Do the same for cos4x as you do for cos2x but double the angle
(2-2sin^A)×2
?
Where did this come from
is thwre other way to do it
Hint: ||cos(4x)=cos2(2x)||
^ do this
Yes
Resolve into two or more factors:
$2a^2x^2 - 2(3b-4c)(b-c)y^2 + abxy$
Prak
Anyone???
Ping me if you get here I am closing discord and moving on from this question for jwp
Now
Could anyone please help me with this? I'm stuck.
I tried factorising it. Doesn't work.
Hi! I'm really stuck here in the graph. We need to start Y AXIS from 0. The highest Y value is 23. How do I number the Y AXIS?
make every 1 cm 3?
who was first
i can help you with yours
thanks bro
Which is -2 * x and -2 * 2
oh ok
So the correct answer would be x = 11
thanks
You catch my drift right
Is you question about continuity?
My question?
So x is kilometres
and y is the price in my local currencies
so for between 0 and 10 km bus ride you pay 36
They ask me to write up the function for f
but the function changes depending on what x is
so what am i gonna do
I am using Geogebra btw
It's fine, f is then a piecewise defined function
does that mean I should write f(x) multiple times
what does a piecewise defined function mean
this is what i got so far
what should i write next?
Means that the interval is broken up into pieces like (0,10], (10,20] and so on
aight got it, thanks
this correct though right
Yeah
Okay
ive been puzzling over this for some time now
the common ratio for between the 1st and 2nd term is different than the ratio between the 2nd aand 3rd term
wouldnt this make it not a geometric progression?
You gotta find out x that makes this sequence a geometric sequence i think
1/x=x/(2x^2+x)
hmm ok ill try that thank you!
wait actually, I tried this but it just simplifies to x=0
which doesnt work for a geometric progression
this is D
So x=-1
ok
ohhh that makes sense
$\log_4(x)=\frac{1}{2}\log_2(x)$ by change of base
Mosh
can someone help me with this pls
so you want $\log_2(x+4)=-\frac{1}{2}\log_2(x)=\log_2\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{x}}\right)$
Mosh
since the bases are the same it's equivalent to solving $x+4=\frac{1}{\sqrt{x}}$
Mosh
@alpine sable
tq
Having trouble integrating this
split the fraction, then use u-sub for one and the other will be an inverse trig
Can someone explain the steps taken to get the bottom equation?
the j is a complex number
I dont understand this
where does the minus come from?
i^2=-1
I see so they have multiplied top and bottom by i?
like I said. . yes
great thanks 👍
$\frac{1}{if_n}\cdot\frac{i}{i}$
Mosh
Thats perfect thanks
u=x^2+4
ok I'll try that
how would i go about this?
would i just use the limit definition and check if f(c) = the limit?
Definition of continuity
f(c) = the limit of f(x) as x approaches c?
$\lim_{x\to a^-}f(x)=\lim_{x\to a^+}f(x)=f(a)$
Mosh
ahhh so i would just check if the limit exists at 4?
how would that give me k sorry
f(4) is clearly 0
yea
so you need the sided limits to converge to 0
Can someone help me to solve this? (c is the speed of light)
oh so i just set the limit equal to 0 and solve for c?
i think im misunderstanding
;-;
yes
OH
thank you so much
wait mosh
just checking
this should equal 0 ?
because thats the limit on the left side
that shouldnt equal 0
oh
$\lim_{x\to 4^+}f(x)=0$
Mosh
how would that get me k? i think thats where im missing something
cause you can find that limit as a function of k
CAESAR
this?
im kinda confused sorry
i know that the left and right side limits have to be the same
so I got the wrong answer here should be -1/2 ln(x^2 + 4)
and that f(4) has to equal those
but im not sure how i could get k from knowing that the graph is continuous
$\lim_{x\to4^+}f(x)=16k-8-1$
Mosh
OHHH so youre setting the right sided limit equal to the function and just plugging in 4?
yes
and then we know that the right side limit goes to 0?
so we would just solve for k?
i got 9/16 = k i think
thank you btw
Hello everyone
derivative of phi(u) = u^3, u(x,t) = x^2*t^2 + x + 1? can someone explain how to find it?
whats everyone's input on 2a)?
My exams done just checking if I did it right
I got neither A or B has first order stochastic dominance
But some of my mates are saying B dominates A in first order
What is 25 % of 200
50
Can someone help me with this¿?
Doing a mock paper before my exams does anyone know how to do epsilon - N proofs like these
You may find it helpful to note that 0 < n < n+4
I've found it converges to 0
Posted in another but someone is spamming Q's in there. I got everything aside from D. How does U become root gd?
Could you help me out with what this means ?
Choose a channel other than questions 0 if you don’t want questions to get spammed out
How would you start the proof?
And is this for the first one?
Yeah this is
I'd probably start by saying it converges to 1 and say a = 1?
But I feel I've skipped something but automatically saying it converges to 1
What does say a = 1 mean?
Ok sure
Arbitrary notation though
So you want to prove the sequence a_n converges to 1
I think I just want to show it converges
And I have to use the epsilon to N proof apparently
Converges to 1 implies it converges
Sorry then, I don’t have time to go through that from scratch
Okay thanks anyways
Just one thing though, do I need to find a value of epsilon first?
No, what you’ll be “picking” is N
I give you any epsilon, you give me an N back which makes some properties hold (the implication in the definition)
Since you need to find an N for every epsilon, N will depend on epsilon
So to prove this I need to show for any epsilon > 0, there is a number N ?
Yes, a number N such that...
A number such that for all n > N, | a_n - a | < e?
Im not sure how to show that bit though ^
Yes, that’s the idea
So to clarify I should pick a value of N or e to start?
Let epsilon be any positive real number to start
And pick a value of N which is in terms of epsilon (deciding what to pick is the tricky part)
can someone help me with my nmath hw
wait
how is this +3?
I thought c should be -1?
is this a mistake from the book?
Any mistake?
confused with d
D should be 6yx⁴-12y³x⁴+2yx³
Thank you
I'm doing it on paper right now
O
@indigo storm Can you tell me what steps you took with solving it
O wait
I did it on my mind
I'll write steps
You're really smart
Thank you
,rotate
@indigo storm Looks fine, except you usually put variables in alphabetical order.
Huh
When you multiply 2yx³ with 3x you should multiply 2×3×y×x³×x
Yey
You are correct, first order neither is dominated
I wanted to help him
B does not dominate A because there are 3 options that are nonzero, and A does not dominate B because B's maximum is higher than A max
I have a question
Where the therefore part is, I can't figure out how they went from there to the next line
oh nvm
jeez louise
lul
no help needed for me
matrices, what's the process in solving this?
brute force matrix multiplication would work
how do i do 3 tho:(
go from right to left
you'd have to do two multiplications
so i do 2 first and then the last one into that?
yeah
ohh that makes sense thank you
the ones on the right and left are supposed to be rotation matrices right
yeah
in that case there might be an easier way, but i'm not sure
replace x and y with the values given, so 1. is 200 = 258+10, check if they're even on both sides. if 258+10 is not 200 then the variable values are not a solution to the equation
goddamn i meant 25*8+10
did that answer your question or did you need help w something else?
How does (cos^2 x - sin^2 x) = cos 2x ?
I have a roundabout method which is longer but gives a more general more satisfying answer
Would you like that?
Yh sure
So are you familiar with complex numbers?
Yes
Are you familiar with the idea that complex numbers can be written in both rectangular and polar form?
do you know DMT?
ok excellent
No whats that
so here's an interesting thing about complex numbers
if you want to multiply two complex numbers
you multiply their magnitudes and add their angles
voila, complex numbers multiplied
if $z=r(\cos(t)+i\sin(t))$ then $\forall n\in\mathbb{Z}, z^n=r^n(\cos(nt)+i\sin(nt))$
Mosh
mosh im getting to that
anyone please help
yeah so if 260 = 25 * 10 + 10 then it means the variable values given are a solution to the equation. it needs to be even on both sides. then the last one you can try out other values for x and y to try to make it even^^
Yh so Modulus-Argument form?
yeah do you know the concept behind why that's true?
yeah, so if we assume z is on the unit circle $\abs{z}=1$, then let n=2 $$(\cos(t)+i\sin(t))^2=\cos(2t)+i\sin(2t)$$
Mosh
then by comparing components you get the desired result
Oh ok thanks I get it now
Thanks @knotty garnet aswell
is the relationship for "the Average wrist circumference, by age" continuous or discrete
What is a possible value of x so that the distance is √29 between the two points with the given coordinates: (-9, -5) (x, -3)
can someone help me with this im so stuck
it tells you to make up your own values for x and y, so you can just put in a random value for x and solve it and then your answer is y. for ex. if x=5 then 25*5+10=135 and 135 is your y
you can determine whether your function is linear or quadratic from the first and second differences
8 139.46
9 147.31
10 150.12
11 152.65
12 154.46
13 162.04
14 162.50
15 168.64
16 170.45
17 169.59
18 170.05
19 170.82 (are their outliers?)(edited)
\
What is the equation of the Line of Reflection if triangle LMN is reflected as triangle L'M'N' as shown?
x = 1
Hi so I've been having troible with this problem my girlfriend asked me about and I want to seem smart
Can anyone help?
Wait I still need help?
Hahahahahah
Best thing I've read all day
I need help 🤣
Ok
So basically as X goes to negative infinity you see the graph also goes to negative infinity
As X goes to positive infinity the graph also goes to positive infinity
I see that yes
That's all you need to say for 'end behaviour'
The number of real zeros is the number of times it crosses the X axis
Okay thank you!
Or touches
Touches counts as one (repeated) zero
Np, good luck impressing your gf hahaha
I will!
How to solve 429.5 = 578 (sin(x))
solving this would be: 8x tan (55) right?
can you explain why? My idea was random variable A has a higher pay-off for x = 2 and the random variable B has a higher payoff for x = 5. Hence neither dominates
@upbeat dirge is this quiz graded?
But some of my friends came out with combining the payoff
Make sure you know precisely what surjective means and what needs to happen for it to be surjective 🙂
No! its a practice quiz to go over what we learned in preparation for a real quiz, and my teacher sent a video but it has not explained how to find the sides using trig! I tried looking it up and I think i've gotten the hang of it, but when I used this equation it gave me a really big negative number so I wanted to make sure my equation is right!
and with their idea, it looks like B can also > A w/ first order stochastic dominance
@knotty garnet
This channel is getting flooded 😅
i'm not asking for the answer btw, i just wanted to make sure my method is right!
nvm i just saw this thanks!
is there an equal sign missing?
is there supposed to be an equal sign in this equation?
every equation has an equal sign lol
i'm suspicious bc of 'quiz' in the url and the points attached to each question. i'll take your word that it's practice
it should be tan(55 degrees) = opposite(x)/adjacent(8)
just gonna repost cause I got flooded~
How do you solve 429.5=578(sin(x))
Thank you so much! I will try that equation, I really appreciate it! And sorry for the dumb question, i'm not really the brightest when it comes to math
no problem everyone has their weakness/strength
isnt this just sin^-1(429.5/578)
lmk if im right
thats what i thought but that doesnt give me the answer on the key
did u change to radians
I believe it worked! If i'm correct, the answer should be 11.42
Thank you so much once again!
np
yeah you gotta change it to radians
Hey can anyone explain to me the inequalities?
of?
Should I be setting this up differently? I did 429.5=1/2(34)(34)sin x
your initial set up is fine
someone help
Getting a different answer with it than whats on the key tho. I’m getting 48 degrees from that while the key says 132
note that sin(x) = k
has two solutions for 0<k<1 and0 < x < 180°
you are told your angle is obtuse
use the appropriate shift to get your obtuse solution
Care to elaborate? Only really one way i can think of to set this up
Ok, that works for the answer, but I don’t get how that really makes sense/how to show the work
properties of the unit circle and/or sine
sin(x) = sin(180° - x)
note that sin(x) = k
has two solutions for 0<k<1 and 0 < x < 180°
x = arcsin(k) , 180° - arcsin(k)
?
someone help pls
Top one i think LOL
hold on
can someone pls help me out on question 5
i think its the top
there are no real solutions, the square root of anything can never be negative
There's no real solution s
my brain hurts
whats the question
this looks like an answer key
does anybody have an answer for this
standard parabola has directrix at x=-a if that helps you , you can rotate this parabola to get what you want
-
(a) x²+6x (b) x²+4x (c) x²+8x
(d) x²-10x (e) x²+7x (f) x²-5x
sorry if i was a little slow LOL
hold on i'm doing some more for you
you're not supposed to do that :/
??
giving answers straight
its not just about the test , you're supposed to help them get there not just give them the answers thats in the rule as well
ok
no idea what im doing, help
hello
anyone here can help me with a very complex math/excel question?
i tryd it several times now no luck so far with some ppl
@gaunt coyote me if u think u can help me i will explain then everything
stuck
i asked so many times its no so easy to explain it
You need to ask first
Anyone here?
😄
The sum of two numbers is 46. One number is 12 less than the other. What are the numbers
sounds like a system of equations
I need to make the into a linear equation
have you been able to make any progress so far
No
lets say a is the lower number, and b is the higher number
can you write an equation for b?
like if i tell you the lower number, whats the equation for figuring out what the higher number is, given the information in the prompt
Idk
hmm can you identify the piece of information that might help you here
We’ll just take the lower number and Minus it from 46
to toopy you mean?
@wild nest Get an equation for this part only: The sum of two numbers is 46
sure
Ok
What did you get?
23
Channel busy
That's not an equation
Mb
A + b = 46
Ok
A-12 + b = 46
That's not correct for the statement
Make an equation for this
I don’t know how
You don't know how to state that a number is 12 less than the other?
Not in an equation
What is substraction used for?
If I am 30 years old and you're 15 years old, how many less years you have than me?
15
Then make an equation for this
Ok
Sorry but I’m stumped and i forgot all math
You probably think I’m an idiot and that’s ok
Focus on this situation
u need help with this?
M = Max's age
T = Toopy's age
If I am 30 years old and you're 15 years old, how many less years you have than me? You said 15
So you can say M = T + 15
So once again
Oh
Make an equation for this
A = b +12
Yes
A + B = 46
A = B + 12
The second equation can be rearranged, if you wish so, to
A - B = 12
Solve the equation system
Which one
If you need help with simultaneous equations I would recommend putting one variable to one side and then substituting.
Idk man
What methods of solution did they teach you?
Then, with all respect
Pick a book and read about solution methods
I suggest you to check substitution and elimination
yes
Otherwise, me solving this for you would be doing nothing for your learning
And the ability to solve linear equations system is important
You already got the equation system, so you're about 80% done
can someone help with this. i dont know where to start with the polynomial
What's the formula of a perimeter?
depends what shape
just add up all the sides like 4a for a a square
is a polynomial just a quadratic
k thx
no, polynomial can have any degree (n ) n in W , a polynomial with degree 2 is called quadratic
can someone prove the divisiiblity rule for 8 and 9
<@&286206848099549185>
ping me when u there
You can just google search this?
12 - 6root3
60
incenter is the intersection of angular bisectors , you have to use this and the fact that tangents are perpendicular to radius
28 = 4*7 and 63 = 9*7
i have no idea what a surd is but i was giving you a hint
I don’t think Americans learn it
aka radicals
yes I learned this math, my hint should be helpful if you know radical (surd?) rules
$\sqrt{ab} = \sqrt{a}\sqrt{b}$
bunny
for non-negative numbers 🙂
@ionic jewel
stop pinging me
plz help me out
no
lol
bruh you helped him
you posted on top of his question
I was helping him
not only were you rude, your question looks unfun to solve
can you help me now?
can anyone help me out?
Use photomath
how was I being rude lol?
just asking a question???
you posted on top of someone elses question, then pinged me twice when i was clearly helping someone else instead
yes, cause I know that I will be unanswered if I dont
the irony
bro just leave it lol
<@&268886789983436800> le epic troll @alpine sable
ok, I am sorry for being rude
Calm down both and return to math help
Pick another channel and ask there
what have you tried?
i thought ABG was a triangle
and since tangents share a common endpoint \
the tangents are congruent
so the triangle is isosceles
ok
so 180 - 30 = 150
and since base angles are congruent in an isosceles triangle
150/2 = 75
how does that help us in finding what they are asking for?
yes
I will tell you how I would look at this problem
the tangent angle
we have to use this info
but this is not doing much as of right now
lets look at the other piece of information
they have given an arc
ok whose measure iis 50 degrees
now angle of arc is the angle subtended by a chord at the center
and we know something about the angle subtended by a chord at the center
we can find the angle subtended by this chord at any point on the circle using the relation
do you see how we could use this to get closer to what we need?
ummm not really?
the angle of arc is 50 degrees right?
yeah
<@&286206848099549185> 🙏🏽
how did you get to that?
ah, i can't get exact result, but here is my reasoning so far:
- In a circle, any two inscribed angles with the same intercepted arcs are congruent.
let me draw
I know it has to be > 45 because of this
How do we know whether this statement is true
if we don't know whether they logically follow
@rich basin bro wait cant you see that we're in the middle of something? ask in a different channel
Sorry
Hi, I want to define a domain of possible inputs of a random fuction, this domain is the same as the image, how can I write this mathematically? (sorry for my bad english)
$-1 \leq x \leq 1$\
$-1\leq y \leq 1$
bunny
or
$-1\leq x,y \leq 1$
bunny
or something like
Can I write this: $f(x) = -1\leq x,y \leq 1$
madeira
i cant read that
no you cant
f(x) makes it a function
what I wrote is a range of x and y
what you could do is
$f(x,y) = {(x,y) | -1 \leq x,y \leq 1}$
bunny
how can I research about it to better understand?
Thank you ❤️
Yes I wood like some help pleese my home work says 2-3 and we haven’t learn that
thank you btw
Could you help me
so if i have 10 letters and they can be either lowercase or uppercase how many total possible combinations r there?
So my brother is making macaroni shapes in real life which needs 6 table spoons but we want to know in a measurement cup (measures in cups) how much milk we need. All I know is that there’s 16 tablespoons in 1 cup and we need 6 tablespoons and 1/2 a cup is 8 tablespoons and 1/4 cup is 4 so if we need 6 tablespoons how much of a cup would we need?
1/4 cup is 4 tbsp, then 1/8 cup is 2 tbsp, so 1/4 + 1/8 = 3/8 cups
(assuming 16tbsp = 1 cup is right)
So if we need 6 tablespoons and 1/4 cup 4 tablespoons and half a cup is 8 tablespoons so half way between 1/4 cup and 1/2 a cup is 3/8 cups?
yes the average of 1/4 and 1/2 is 3/8
1/16 th of a cup is 1 tbsp, so 6 tbsp is 6/16 = 3/8 cups
Hi
So I'm learning about the shell method and using it to solve this problem:
So I figure I rotate this shape here
And I think it would make this sort of shape, could be wrong
indeed the shape it makes is very unaesthetic
I understand why the radius of the shell is 2-y, but my teacher says the height/depth of the shell is 2-x, which I don't understand. As such I can't move forward with the problem
Does it look about right?
where can i quickly learn about trig?
Using this channel. Also read #❓how-to-get-help before asking questions
hmm, imagine that the funny-looking curve is a set of (x, y) points for a second here
they actually are defined like that, but that's a conversation for another day
let's say we're considering the shell indicated by the red line
the radius is 2-y, as you've correctly noted
and do you agree that the height of the shell is the length of the red line?
Yeah the x
the x?
The length on x axis becomes the height of the shell
that's not a precise statement
do you agree that the height of the shell is precisely the length of that red line?
Yeah, I just thought I knew what the red line was :P
right, and that red line has a length of 2-x
can someone help me with 2 9th grade math assignments?
whats the property that states that 2x = x + x ?
Why is that?