#help-0

1 messages · Page 586 of 1

rich bough
#

depending on sign

thorn kindle
#

Yes

rich bough
#

but if the denominator increases faster i think its 0 right?

thorn kindle
#

Yes

rich bough
#

okay thank you so much for the clairfication

#

also nice name hehe

#

^^

#

ty for the help again

ripe turret
#

i had a question

#

how is that right

gray isle
#

its not

ripe turret
#

isnt this right

gray isle
#

they should've had a 3 instead of a 5 at the front

ripe turret
#

wait i dont understand

#

u cant do anything to those numbers

#

like u cant get the gcf

#

so isnt what i did right

gray isle
#

what you did was legal but isn't fully factorised

#

since both 6 and 15 have a common factor of 3

ripe turret
#

oh im stupid

#

LOL

final crag
#

Geometric distribution

alpine sable
#

I did my work wrong i did not need to use distributive property after all since i was just looking for a simplified expression for the area 😆

thorn kindle
#

I mean area is length * width

#

How were you wrong? You just algebraically expanded the expression

#

Unless you're saying they wanted you to leave it in factored form

final crest
#

How do you do it

thorn kindle
#

Take the partial derivative with respect to x twice

#

Then take the partial derivative with respect to y thrice

ripe turret
#

i dont understand

#

how they solved this

alpine sable
final crest
#

Is anybody good with calculus here

potent knoll
dapper owl
#

Anyone mind helping me with a hint to solve the inequality for 3a? I keep trying to mess around with the values but I just don't know how the 1/4 comes about

#

At least where to start?

alpine sable
#

Could anyone help me find out the one with the algebraic tiles because when i tried doing the division statement that i got it did not really match with the left side( factor 1)

#

black rectangles represent x, black squares represent x^2 white rectangles represent -x

dapper owl
#

<@&286206848099549185>

alpine sable
#

Good night.

#

Is this channel taken?

jade coral
#

ok, so I have what I consider to be a very hard question and am not sure where to post it. But I would reeally like some help figuring it out

alpine sable
#

Feel free, my man.

jade coral
#

the question is as follows

#

You are given a set of points which must be fully linked.
Each point is given a random set of possible directions from which they may link expressed as a set x = {up, down, left, right} in which 1 means a connection is able to be made, and 0 means no connections can be made.

For example, if given the set of points A = {1,0,0,0}, B = {0,0,1,1}, C = {0,1,1,0}
Point A would not be able to form a link to Point B, but it would be able to form a link to Point C.

Likewise Point B would be able to form a link with Point C, but only from Point B’s right side to Point C’s left side.

Every set of points will contain a starting point and at least 1 point E = {0,1,0,0} which cannot be linked to the starting point.

The starting point of any given set of points will always have a 0 in the down space. {x,0,x,x}

No points may consist of {0,0,0,0}
The list of points may contain duplicates, and can consist of any number of points and no two points may share the same connection.
Connections between points may not intersect, and all consist of the same length

With these rules in mind, what constraints would any given set of points require to ensure that the list can be fully linked, and are there any set of constraints which would ensure that the list can be fully linked even if the two points being linked are chosen arbitrarily from the initial set of points?

#

Pic for clarification

#

I also dont know if constraints is the right word, just sounded closest to what I was thinking

alpine sable
#

Graph theory?

jade coral
#

I honestly dont know

#

This is just a problem ive run across in actual life and am trying to solve XD

alpine sable
#

Ooh, damn.

#

Ok, lemme give it a look.

#

Can two points be linked to a same point?

#

Say A={1,0,0,0} and B={1,0,0,0}?

#

Ok, that's not exactly what I meant.

jade coral
#

ah definitely need to add that to the question, but no

alpine sable
#

It's meant to be perfectly perpendicular, right?

jade coral
#

yes

alpine sable
#

Ooh, ok.

jade coral
#

I mean technically, they could be rotated so long as connecting lines do not overlap

#

if nothing else this is helping me figure out what rules i missed lol

final crag
#

could someone help me with part C?

alpine sable
#

This channel is taken, bruv, sorry.

#

But I'll try to help.

jade coral
#

I know nothing about probabilities, but i came out to 0.0000000001%
am interested to see what the real answer is

stone shard
#

She have to lose 10 games to lose all her money because 30/3 = 10

alpine sable
#

Well, since there's 0.1 chance she loses 3$, getting 27, there's 0.1^2=0.01 chance of losing again ... With what I believe is the final answer being 0,1^10, but I'm probably wrong.

jade coral
#

thats what i went with as welll

alpine sable
#

As well as for all points A={0,0,1,0}, there must be B={0,0,0,1}, right?

#

I guess that you could use that.

jade coral
#

Both of those options would stop the list from being fully completed

alpine sable
#

Let us call those points nodes.

jade coral
#

Id say first constraint is that no 2 connecting nodes may fully terminate

alpine sable
#

If we say there's a node connected upwards, that implies that there is a node up there connected downwards.

jade coral
#

yes, connections require the directions to be available on both Points/Nodes

alpine sable
#

You've forgotten one thing.

#

You've established which is the direction, but not to which node is a given node connected.

#

Very impolite of yours, aye?

#

was i supposed to post in a channel that's not busy?

#

That's in the rules, but I'mma help ye.

#

oh my bad

#

Wait, but the cat traveled for 4 minutes?

jade coral
#

why does t give you a range, and then expect an exact response?

alpine sable
#

Exactly.

jade coral
#

well, if you substitute T for the maximum of the cats speed (4) you do get one of those options as an answer

#

but I cant imagine why they gave you a range to work with, so I might just not be understanding this correctly

dark umbra
#

Are you guys done? I would like to ask

#

when you guys are over.

jade coral
#

honestly peeps just keep interrupting mine lol, but one of the other channels should be free

true hamlet
#

Please someone help

alpine sable
# jade coral You are given a set of points which must be fully linked. Each point is given a...

let x be an ordered set with four elements such that we'll call its first member up, second down, third left, fourth left, such that all its elements are either 0 or 1
no x can equal {0,0,0,0}
there is an x called E such that E={0,1,0,0}
let T be the set of all possible finite sequences of members of x, duplicates included
let R be a symmetric relation such that:
{1,0,0,0}R{0,1,0,0},
{0,0,1,0}R{0,0,0,1}
there is an element A, called the initial element
E is not related to A
What are the restraints that make a subset of T valid under R?

#

Probably poorly worded.

#

But I'm drunk as a donkey.

final crag
#

i think its .1 chance she wins right

alpine sable
#

Neutral element of multiplication is 1.

final crag
#

i meant .1 my bad

alpine sable
#

Np

alpine sable
final crag
#

wait so the answer still is .1^10?

#

im so confused about this question lol

alpine sable
#

That's what I'd answer.

#

Not sure if it's true though.

final crag
#

so .90 chance of losing

alpine sable
#

DANG BRO

final crag
#

lmao

alpine sable
#

I DID IT SO WRONG

#

LEEEEEEEEL

final crag
#

i think ur on the right track though

alpine sable
#

Prob .9^10

final crag
#

cuz u lose 90% of the time

#

thats 27

#

9/10 timess

#

-$27

#

cuz u lose 9 out of 10 times

#

i guess when u lose 10 times u lose $30

alpine sable
#

0.9^10, right?

final crag
#

no idea lolll

#

i think so?

alpine sable
#

Circa 0.3486784401000001

final crag
#

that makes sense i think

stone shard
#

"Your" probability of winning is 0.1
"Your" sister's probability of winning is 0.9
So her probability of losing is 0.1

final crag
#

this is a geometric distribution

#

if that changes anything idk

alpine sable
#

Bruv I'mma let actually smart people answer for me, lel.

final crag
#

LOL

#

idk wtf is going on now

#

i might just sleep on a L soon here

worthy verge
#

@final crag Go sleep, wake up, refreshed, grind.

final crag
#

damn i really wanted to figure this one out before i go to sleep tho

worthy verge
#

Heck you may even think of the answer while sleeping

#

Or dreaming

#

I know have 😆

#

The dreaming one, not while sleeping

#

Oddly

alpine sable
#

She haves to lose 10 times.

stone shard
#

The question is asking for "your" sister's probability of losing all her money, not "yours"

worthy verge
#

Go sleep man, when fatigued your thoughts are slowed

stone shard
#

So it is still 0.1^10

alpine sable
#

For the first time, she has 0.9 chance of losing.

alpine sable
#

SO I DID IT RIGHT?

#

LEL

true hamlet
stone shard
#

Idk could be wrong, lol

final crag
#

or could it actually be 1- .1^10

true hamlet
#

even the wrong answer will work

final crag
#

but that would just be .9^10

true hamlet
#

just answer

final crag
#

LOL

#

god dammit

alpine sable
true hamlet
#

yes

final crag
#

<@&286206848099549185> anyone want to help us sleep

true hamlet
#

what is coffecient

stone shard
#

Is the probability for her to win 0.1?

alpine sable
final crag
stone shard
#

Oh, then it is 0.9^10
Sorry for the confusion, I guess I did not read the question carefully

final crag
#

hmm what about this

#

every 10 game she wins one

#

actually nvm idk where im going with this

stone shard
final crag
#

all i can think of is .9^10

alpine sable
#

YEah

final crag
#

i feel like i gotta do something with geometric distribution tho rip

#

listen to tthis

#

p = .10

#

x = 30

#

1 - .00424

#

Bam?

#

or would x = 27 since she wins 3 in 30 games

#

that gives u .00581

#

which might be valid

#

okay im going with .9^10

alpine sable
#

I mean.

#

She got .9 chances of losing, then .9*.9 of losing again ... then .9^10

jovial edge
#

How do I do this question

#

I found the ratio of a: b: c but can’t seem to find the required fraction

wanton turtle
#

what did you find the ratio as?

jovial edge
#

Oh wait I’m overthinking this question

#

I can just find everything in terms of a and substitue it

wanton turtle
#

yes

jovial edge
#

This is irrelevant tho

vale wigeon
#

so then a : b : c = (1/21) : (1/18) : (1/28)

#

,w lcm(21,18,28)

vale wigeon
#

a : b : c = 12 : 14 : 9, if you rewrite the ratio to have all integer components

#

so no @jovial edge it's not irrelevant

fervent grail
#

When (2x³ + 2x² + px ) is divided by (x - 3), the remainder is 2. find the value of p

#

Pls help

vale wigeon
#

have you done questions like this before?

#

are you familiar with the remainder theorem?

#

also @fervent grail you should not post the same question across multiple channels

fervent grail
vale wigeon
#

let me check.

fervent grail
#

Hmm pls check

vale wigeon
#

also why didnt you say right away that you had an answer?

#

theres a big difference between "please help me with this problem" and "here's this problem, i got this as the answer, can someone check?"

fervent grail
#

And I am new ..... Sorry

#

Can u pls say that is this ans correct ??

vale wigeon
#

no, p = -68/3 is not correct

#

if you show your work, i might be able to see where you went wrong.

fervent grail
#

F( x ) = 2x³ + 2x² + px - 2 which is divisible by x - 3
F ( 3 ) = 54 + 18 - 2 + 3x = 2
P = -68/3

vale wigeon
#

wait

#

there was a -2 term in your polynomial?

#

you didn't have it at first.

fervent grail
#

Ooh that's a mistake 😕

#

F( x ) = 2x³ + 2x² + px
F ( 3 ) = 54 + 18 + 3x = 2
P = -70/3

#

Now is it correct ???

vale wigeon
#

F ( 3 ) = 54 + 18 - 2 + 3x = 2

#

why the -2 on the left-hand side, and why did the p become an x?

#

assuming these are both typos, now you have the correct answer.

fervent grail
#

So the ans is -70/3 ??

vale wigeon
#

yes i just told you

fervent grail
#

Ok thank👍

shell comet
#

Can someone please explain to me the process or the techniques? answer is b

wanton turtle
#

A^3 = -I

#

Cube both sides

#

it becomes A^9 = (-I)^3

#

(-I)^3 = -I

vale wigeon
#

satisfaced..... thonk

wanton turtle
#

(since I^n = I always)

#

then multiply A on both sides

#

you'll get option B

#

@shell comet

real loom
#

answer is b for this one?

#

i get cos2(t-(pi/2))U(t-(pi/2)) as answer

#

but its not there stare

alpine sable
#

Guys

#

What's the answer for htis

#

The percentage profit

vale wigeon
#

@alpine sable we don't give out answers here.

alpine sable
#

i MEAN like

vale wigeon
#

also this channel is occupied so you'll have to move to another.

real loom
#

@vale wigeon can you help with that one

vale wigeon
#

,w inverse laplace transform se^(-πs/2)/(s^2 + 4)

vale wigeon
#

θ is the unit step function i guess

real loom
#

but theres nothing like that in the given answers

jagged imp
#

trig identities monkaS

#

cos(x-pi)=?

real loom
#

sin x

vale wigeon
#

wrong

#

cos(x - pi) is not sin(x)

real loom
#

owh cos (x - pi/2) = sin x

jagged imp
#

cos(x-pi)=-cosx

real loom
#

owhh thanks

wanton turtle
#

No idea how to even begin to solve the question (15th)

#

myself and a couple of my friends are trying our best

vale wigeon
#

the wording of this question leaves something to be desired

wanton turtle
#

is the question itself wrong? i dont think it is because i havent had an incorrect question in this book so far

vale wigeon
#

i'm not saying it's wrong

#

i'm saying it's difficult to parse

wanton turtle
#

oh ok

#

i misunderstood

#

we tried to focus on the orthogonality condition for P

vale wigeon
#

so... $R = P^T Q^K P = P^T PA^KP^T P = A^K$

ocean sealBOT
wanton turtle
#

one friend made Q as equal to A, but he changed the order, which is not correct right?

vale wigeon
#

Q is not equal to A

wanton turtle
#

ye

vale wigeon
#

matrix multiplication is not commutative

wanton turtle
#

yes

vale wigeon
#

however P^T = P^-1

rough knoll
#

can some one help with this?

wanton turtle
vale wigeon
#

@rough knoll channel busy please move

wanton turtle
#

you substituted P that i understand

vale wigeon
#

$Q = PAP^{-1}$ so $Q^K = PA^KP^{-1}$

ocean sealBOT
wanton turtle
#

shouldnt it be P^K . A^K . P^-K ?

vale wigeon
#

no

#

$(AB)^n \neq A^n B^n$ for matrices

ocean sealBOT
wanton turtle
#

oh

vale wigeon
#

$(PAP^{-1})^2 = PAP^{-1}PAP^{-1} = PAAP^{-1}$

ocean sealBOT
wanton turtle
#

ohhh

#

only the first P and last PT remains

#

in the repeated multiplication

#

rest cancel each other out

#

right?

vale wigeon
#

yes.

wanton turtle
#

THANK YOU

vale wigeon
#

don't call me dude. but you're welcome

wanton turtle
#

oh sorry

#

hype thanks again

crude tendon
#

can anyone help me with this:
Find all function f: R->R such that f(xy-1)+f(x)f(y)=2xy-1 for all reals x, y.

fresh quail
#

in the equality, 6y=12x+30 since all 6,12, and 30 are divisible by 6, we directly divide 6y/6=12x/6 +30/6 to get y=2x +5 right? another example is 14y=420, both are divisible by 14 then we divide both sides by 14 so 14y/14=420/14 to get y=30 right?

crude tendon
#

absolutely

rough knoll
#

ok thanks

fresh quail
ocean sealBOT
#

PAYR!M9
Compile Error! Click the errors reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)

analog terrace
#

How many line segments can be formed from 6 given points with no three of which are collinear.

#

whats the value of n and r here?

#

6 and 3?

tame falcon
#

How many points do you need to uniquely describe a line?

analog terrace
#

so its 6 and 2?

tame falcon
#

Yes.

analog terrace
#

so what's gonna be the use of "three" in the sentence?

#

im actually confused lmao

tame falcon
#

If three of the points were to be collinear, the number of unique line segments would reduce

#

Suppose points A, B, C were to be all collinear

#

Then you'd get only one unique line through them

#

But if they were non-collinear, you'd get 3(AB, BC, CA would all be unique)

analog terrace
#

ohhh

#

i see

#

thanks

tame falcon
#

No worries!

analog terrace
#

so if it said "no four of which are collinear" the r would be 2 and 3?

tame falcon
#

No, 4 wouldn't make much sense. 2 points are always collinear, so when you say no three of which are collinear, it means that fixing two points, none of the remaining points lies on the line formed by them.

analog terrace
#

i get it now

#

thanks a lot

tame falcon
sly mantle
#

@pastel pelican what did you try?

alpine sable
#

don't really understand how to do this, help !?

vagrant rover
#

Is there are correct answer here? I feel like there is no correct answer.

radiant pasture
#

the definition of it

vagrant rover
# radiant pasture the definition of it

A relative maximum point is a point where the function changes direction from increasing to decreasing (making that point a "peak" in the graph). Similarly, a relative minimum point is a point where the function changes direction from decreasing to increasing (making that point a "bottom" in the graph).

#

^Khan academy

#

It's not A)

#

It's not B)

#

Is it C)? I don't understand exactly how you check for relative min/max

radiant pasture
#

eyeball it

#

literally

#

a relative min is a min relative to its near area

#

not for the entire function

#

a function like x^2 has one min, which is the absolute min

vagrant rover
#

Um

#

Okay but do you check from right to left

#

or left to right

#

Or does it not even matter

radiant pasture
#

doesn't matter

vagrant rover
#

@radiant pasture What is an even degree function

#

np

radiant pasture
vagrant rover
#

Wait so it could be either C) or D)?

#

Ohoh

#

Okay it's not D cause the given graph is an odd degree, not an even degree

#

So C)?

#

Cause it looks like it does have one relative minimum. The 2nd and third points on the graph.

radiant pasture
#

If so, show me the relative min

radiant pasture
#

2nd and 3rd points
1 min

vagrant rover
#

np

radiant pasture
#

Dude

vagrant rover
#

Wait

#

1 minut

#

e

#

I understand nothing loll

radiant pasture
#

Are you sure you've understood what a relative min is

vagrant rover
#

Yeah, decreasing slope?

radiant pasture
#

No

vagrant rover
#

K then I don't know

radiant pasture
#

A min is a point

#

one point

vagrant rover
#

Oh

radiant pasture
#

It's why I asked you for the definition

vagrant rover
#

Then the 3rd point only

#

It's a lower than the point before it

#

right?

radiant pasture
#

i'll give you a small tip

vagrant rover
#

Is that still wrong??

#

Oof

radiant pasture
#

for relative mins/maxs

#

think of a very tiny enclosure around the point of interest

#

is the point, within that tiny enclosure, the smallest value?

#

then it's a relative min

#

relative to the values around it

#

not absolute

#

i prefer this definition

#

some open interval

#

actually, i'm not a fan of that either

vagrant rover
#

um, so then there is no relative min since the third point isn't less than the first point?

radiant pasture
#

don't think in points

vagrant rover
#

I'm sorry if I'm not udnerstanding

radiant pasture
#

you're thinking in domains

vagrant rover
#

Okay 🤔

radiant pasture
#

see

#

think of it like this

#

you have that tiny area

#

is f(c) the largest/smallest value in that tiny area

vagrant rover
#

Okay sec

#

When you tiny area

#

Do you mean the two areas where you drew lines around

radiant pasture
#

yes

#

the little one enclosed in red

vagrant rover
#

Okay so two tiny areas

radiant pasture
#

and the little one enclosed in green

#

yes

#

2

vagrant rover
#

Okay okay

radiant pasture
#

a point relative to its immediate surroundings

#

not the entire function

#

have you done derivatives?

#

at every relative/absolute min/max, $f'(x) = 0$

vagrant rover
#

No, I'm just going back to review math that I never learnded

ocean sealBOT
#

Subdivisions X-1

radiant pasture
#

i see

#

well in any case

vagrant rover
#

Yeah this is why I'm not understanding much

radiant pasture
#

any positives or negative peaks you see

#

are relative mins/maxes respectively

#

when you have x^2

vagrant rover
#

So the green peak is a min and the red is a max?

radiant pasture
#

yes

#

also, look at this graph

vagrant rover
#

And the green is less compared to the red

radiant pasture
#

how many mins/maxes does this have

vagrant rover
#

One min?

radiant pasture
#

yes, one min

#

where

vagrant rover
#

(0,0)

radiant pasture
#

correct

#

is it a relative min, or an absolute min?

vagrant rover
#

Thank god, I thought I said something wrong

vagrant rover
#

absolute means that there is nothing around it that is less and relative means it is less relative to itwhat is around it?

#

THe peaks around it?

radiant pasture
#

no, not the peaks

#

the values

#

you have a function

#

a continuous one

vagrant rover
#

right

radiant pasture
#

f(x) = y for every x in the function's domain

#

in your graph, the points are just marked for easy reference

alpine sable
#

Is anybody here good at probability?

radiant pasture
#

doesn't mean the function does not return for every other value

radiant pasture
vagrant rover
#

🤔 right pandaThink

alpine sable
radiant pasture
#

what did i literally just tell you

alpine sable
#

I asked I didn’t ask to ask

#

My bad

radiant pasture
#

yes

vagrant rover
#

Lmao

radiant pasture
#

also

#

go to some other channel

alpine sable
#

I asked to get help not to ask

#

Man..

radiant pasture
alpine sable
#

I love you

radiant pasture
#

anyways

alpine sable
radiant pasture
#

@vagrant rover

#

moving on

alpine sable
#

helppp

vagrant rover
radiant pasture
#

This precalculus video tutorial provides a basic introduction into the relative maximum and minimum values of a function. It explains how to identify where the relative maxima and relative minima are located as well as determining the relative maximum and minimum values.

Precalculus New Video Playlist:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DrEXTC6mI...

▶ Play video
vagrant rover
#

Alright, let me watch

radiant pasture
#

i'm afraid i can't help

#

can't vouch for anyone else, but this is a maths server not a physics server

vagrant rover
#

Alright one sec

#

So you're tellin' me that x=-8 isn't a relative minimum?

#

The only relative minimum?

#

@radiant pasture

radiant pasture
#

-8 or +8?

vagrant rover
#

+8 my bad

#

Wait

#

Isn't relative minimum value written using the Y value?

#

So y = 0 is the relative minimum

#

right?

radiant pasture
#

we say a function f shows a relative min at x

#

referring to the position along the x axis

stable glen
#

Hi is anyone still using the channel ?

wanton turtle
#

you can ask your question @stable glen

stable glen
#

Thanks

#

If $A \subset [0,1]$ and A is a closed set, and that the convolution of f with g is continuous on R (f is the indicator function of A and g is the indicator function of -A), how can I deduce that the set A-A contain a neighborhood of 0?

ocean sealBOT
#

Perrier citron

stable glen
#

I can see how that true since A-A is basically right shifting -A by the values of A

#

But i don't understand how i can deduce the result from the fact that the convolution is continuous

#

<@&286206848099549185>

alpine sable
#

Hi everyone

Let's find you it's true or false (if false why?)

ocean sealBOT
wanton turtle
#

this is just an AP

#

with common difference 1

alpine sable
#

AP in English is?

wanton turtle
#

Arithmetic Progression

alpine sable
#

OK I translated

#

OK thanks

#

@wanton turtle

wanton turtle
#

anytime hype

peak lantern
#

so i have this question

#

and im stuck on this part of the question

#

"when does the balloon have the same speed as it does at 4:00pm"

wanton turtle
#

since this is a distance-time graph the speed is found through the slope

#

so we try to find where the slope matches

#

here, we need to compare only the MAGNITUDE of the slope since it's speed and not velocity

#

12 30 seems to have the same slope

peak lantern
#

this is what i had so far

alpine sable
#

Which function is not represented

A) f (x) = 1/x
B) f (x) = exp(x)
C) f (x) = log(x)
D) f (x) = x^3

wanton turtle
peak lantern
#

did u say 12:30 cause thats when the slopes look similar

#

to 4pm

wanton turtle
#

yes, the magnitude looks similar

dense violet
alpine sable
#

@alpine sable so that's the answer A

honest echo
#

In Chi Squared GOF tests, do both the observed and expected values need to be over 5?

#

Or does that rule only apply to expected values?

alpine sable
#

the sum of three consecutive numbers is 90. what is the smallest of the three numbers

stone shard
#

x + (x+1) + (x+2) = 90

#

x would be the smallest

#

You have to solve for x

swift igloo
#

not sure where to start with this

alpine sable
swift igloo
alpine sable
#

looks like the question is wrong then

#

that's odd

swift igloo
#

lol

vale wigeon
remote hound
swift igloo
# remote hound

a linear function would be applying y = mx+c. so multiplying the values in the x row by something, and adding something, gives the value in the bottom row

#

you can then setup either a simultaneous equation or just eyeball it

remote hound
#

ok

normal jasper
#

Could someone tell me what kind of problem this is called

noble sinew
#

Its binomial coefficient

loud barn
limpid spade
#

Permutation

normal jasper
#

Would the answer be 10?

alpine sable
#

,w 5 choose 3

noble sinew
normal jasper
#

Alright thanks

#

,w 1000 choose 1000

normal jasper
#

nice nice

#

Could someone double check I got this right

#

I used the binomial expansion theorem

alpine sable
#

in general $n \choose n$ = 1 as well as $n \choose 0 $ = 1

#

@normal jasper

noble sinew
#

yep sounds right, what did you get?

ocean sealBOT
normal jasper
#

17010

noble sinew
#

yep

normal jasper
#

Alright

muted whale
#

does anyone know how to do this problem

glass lichen
drowsy hinge
stable dune
#

can someone help me out with this?

crude tendon
#

A) 13.4

alpine sable
#

Anyone know the answers?

#

Please I’ll buy you nitro

stone shard
stone shard
alpine sable
alpine sable
#

They’re tryna expose me rather than help

#

Like wyd

stone shard
alpine sable
#

Anyone know this

#

Anyone k

stable dune
stone shard
alpine sable
#

and they do give you the answer

#

they explain

#

see look what you're doing

alpine sable
#

you're trying to expose rather than help

#

COULD YOU HELP ME PLEASE

stable dune
alpine sable
#

4^2+b^2=14^2
16+b^2=196
b^2 = 180
b = sqrt(180)

#

You don't add them togethee

stable dune
#

ah okay thank you

alpine sable
#

You subtract at the last step

#

Otherwise it's looking fine.

#

,w calc sqrt(180)

alpine sable
#

answer ^

stable dune
#

ah thank you

alpine sable
#

np

sick kettle
#

after i find summation, i multiply it by 2/3?

stable dune
#

never mind

#

found the answer

alpine sable
#

9^2 + 15^2 = c^2
81 + 225 = c^2
310 = c^2
c = sqrt(310)

#

,w calc sqrt(310)

tawdry urchin
#

Can yall please assist me

stone shard
tawdry urchin
alpine sable
#

What?

tawdry urchin
#

oh shit did i interfere

stone shard
#

306 = c^2

stone shard
alpine sable
#

Oh yeah I did the calculation in my head quick

stone shard
#

Lol, always check

alpine sable
#

so i might've messed something up

#

it should give a whole number as well

stone shard
#

You dont want to do that in a test

alpine sable
#

,w calc sqrt(306)

alpine sable
#

Should be 17

fresh wigeon
#

how do i do this

hoary zinc
alpine sable
fresh wigeon
#

i think

#

i just dont know how to join those things

alpine sable
#

uh

#

the LHS is the thing you want to get to the RHS

#

so

ocean sealBOT
alpine sable
#

you can multiply the denominator of the first fraction with the c term and then get a global denominator

#

doing that , you should quickly see the RHS

#

and btw the root will be removed since 1/2 power + another 1/2 power equals a full 1 power which means no square root

fresh wigeon
#

whats the c term

tender portal
#

root 3x+5

fresh wigeon
#

can someone plz write it out for me

#

im confused

tender portal
#

Am I supposed to use the derivatives rules here?

gray isle
#

yes

tender portal
#

Uh a little confused to how

gray isle
#

chain rule

tender portal
#

I think i got a and d right but b and c confuse me

#

Did I do them wrong because I was supposed to use the chain rule?

gray isle
#

yeh, you need to use the chain rule

tender portal
#

so I can't just plug the numbers in

#

I don't understand the notation on c either

#

what does g^2(x) mean?

gray isle
#

that notation is ambiguous and they should really state what it means when they write it

gloomy lintel
#

I assume it’s g(g(x))

gray isle
#

its usually interpreted as g(g(x)), but may also be viewed as (g(x))^2

#

but seeing as you have g(g(x)) in part d)

gloomy lintel
#

Yea they shouldn’t really write it like that tbf

tender portal
#

I think it's g(x)^2

#

just cause the next question is g(g(x))

gray isle
#

evaluated at the same value,
you should interpret it as (g(x))^2

tender portal
#

Alright

gray isle
#

part d) would be better if you added some parentheses

#

and you did apply chain rule for that question

tender portal
#

Oh yeah sorry

gray isle
#

so do the same for b and c

still hemlock
#

hello can somebody help me with this

tender portal
gray isle
#

at a glance yeh

tender portal
#

alright

#

if you have time to take a closer look it would be much appreciated

#

just tryna make sure I get all the details right before the test

chilly garden
#

hello

#

i am trying to create a study on the different rating systems for zero-sum games

#

i've found a few research papers already

#

but before my school approves it, they want to know how im going to approach it

#

but im not sure what to put in for these details

#

here's some BG info

tender portal
dense violet
#

Help with part b

sacred laurel
stone shard
sacred laurel
#

no cap?

stone shard
#

no cap

tender portal
alpine sable
#

guys

stone shard
alpine sable
#

Is this how do u calculate the fourier coeficients of a function?

#

$c_n = \frac {1}{2\pi} \int_{0}^{2\pi} e^{(-in\theta)} f(\theta) d\theta$

ocean sealBOT
#

nosequepasa

stone shard
alpine sable
#

you can man

#

how do you remember all these maths

wanton crow
#

Could iget help finding the preimeter of bcde

stone shard
#

Well, its a square so you can find the perimeter if you know the length of one of the sides

#

Consider using the pythagorean theorem

pastel mauve
#

i need help with the equation

regal whale
#

can someone solve this for me?
find a Linear equation that pass (1,5,1) and it's equal with this vector V=-1i+5j-1k

pastel mauve
#

can someone help me w mine first lol i asked first

alpine sable
# pastel mauve

in the first round there are 64 teams and 32 matches, so G(1)=32
after the first round the 32 losers get eliminated and the 32 winners move on
2nd round we have 32 teams and 16 matches, G(2)=16
so every round the number of matches gets halved
see if you can figure out an exponential function that would model this

pastel mauve
#

what i did was divide by two each time

#

to get the first answer

#

so uh

#

0.5(64)^x?

alpine sable
#

how did you get that

pastel mauve
#

wait no

alpine sable
#

try not to throw out wild guesses

#

so we are multiplying by 1/2 every time

pastel mauve
#

yeah

alpine sable
#

so what should the base of the exponential be?

dense violet
#

Help with part (b) and (c) pleasee!!

alpine sable
#

this one's busy

pastel mauve
#

i have no idea im trying to think

alpine sable
#

well we're multiplying by 1/2 every time so the base is 1/2

pastel mauve
#

1/2(64)

#

but i dont know

alpine sable
#

no

pastel mauve
#

what the exponent

#

would be

#

how do i make it go down every time

alpine sable
#

the base of an exponential function

#

(1/2)^x

pastel mauve
#

oh

#

okay

alpine sable
#

then you just need to make sure the starting points match

#

so our function will look like a(1/2)^x for some number a

pastel mauve
#

thank you so much

alpine sable
#

64*(1/2)^x works

pastel mauve
#

how about this

#

h(22)^(14/100)?

alpine sable
#

no

#

i feel like you're just guessing randomly

pastel mauve
#

im not

alpine sable
#

try to think about what happens every day

upper mesa
#

help?

#

@alpine sable

alpine sable
#

every day there is a 14% decrease

upper mesa
#

You don't have to hold hands for me haha

alpine sable
pastel mauve
#

each hour he gets 14% of the 22mg

#

so we have to find 14 percent of 22

alpine sable
#

no

#

its consumed at a rate of 14% every hour

upper mesa
#

Other channels are inactive so I'll just wait

#

till ur done with him

alpine sable
#

so every day there is a 14% decrease

#

100%-14%=86%

pastel mauve
#

oh mybad i read it wrong

#

22(0.14)^h

#

let me try that equation

alpine sable
pastel mauve
#

it should be the other way

#

like thats how much is being used

#

hm

#

22- 22(0.14)^h

alpine sable
#

every hour 14% of the magnesium currently in the body is removed

#

so that means 86% of the magnesium in the body remains
so every hour we multiply the amount of magnesium in the body by 86%=0.86

#

does that make sense?

pastel mauve
#

oh

#

so 22(0.86)^(h)

alpine sable
#

no

pastel mauve
#

.

#

what

alpine sable
#

oh yes

#

you edited it

#

now it's correct

pastel mauve
#

yea my bad i was testing it

#

im sure there are calculators that can do that ^

tender portal
#

any ideas anyone

proper wyvern
#

Ik #1 is wrong and I fixed it help with #2 and #3?

glass lichen
proper wyvern
#

no its hw

rocky tinsel
#

Can someone help me with this

glass lichen
#

Ok well what's the probability the first letter is A?

rocky tinsel
#

Oh is this channel being used

#

Well my question was, how am I supposed to work anything out without OA or AB

pseudo summit
#

3 + 5²² = 8²²?

glass lichen
alpine sable
hardy sparrow
#

can soemone help mee

glass lichen
alpine sable
#

0.7^-x = (0.7^-1)^x is this because -x is -1x?
and (0.7^-1)^x = 0.7^(-1*x)

pseudo summit
glass lichen
ocean sealBOT
#

moshill1

alpine sable
#

Thanks :)

rocky tinsel
glass lichen
#

so your first line is right $h(x)=H(\sin{x})-H(0)$

ocean sealBOT
#

moshill1

glass lichen
#

however finding h' was wrong

#

cause you didnt use chain rule and didnt differentiate a constant correctly

#

$h'(x)=\cos{x}H'(\sin{x})$

ocean sealBOT
#

moshill1

cyan saddle
#

Hi, I would like to know that's this symbol

gloomy lintel
#

For all

#

So for eg you can say for all x in the set of real numbers

#

P convenient over having to write out ‘for all’ in words

cyan saddle
glass lichen
#

you have to differentiate a composite function with chain rule always

final crag
#

is this binomial distribution?

#

n=34, p =1/7?

oblique stirrup
#

how do I put tan(30) into my calculator and get √3/3? If i put it in normally, I just get 0.57.

wanton turtle
#

If you simplify sqrt3/3, you'll get the same value

#

I'm pretty sure most calculators don't show 1/sqrt3 as the value for tan 30

gloomy lintel
#

I think it depends which calculator you have

#

Mine always gives it to me as a surd

#

But with a rationalised denominator

wanton turtle
#

Oh OK

#

Didn't know that

oblique stirrup
#

ok but using decimal normals would scew my numbers a bit because its rounded

wanton turtle
#

Be sure to memorize the values for the sin cos and tan functions for the angles 0,30,45,60,90

keen mason
#

\cos\left(0.5x+45\right)

#

2cos(0.5x+45)=3^0.5

#

how would u simplify that

alpine sable
#

$\cos(0.5x+45) = \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}$

ocean sealBOT
keen mason
#

resolve left forces

#

so

#

a^2=b^2-c^2-2bccosA

#

idk bro

#

im also special

#

==32

#

32.688

#

so thats resolve left

#

imma guess that t=29

#

coz like its halfway through

#

no

#

Im not

#

trust trust

#

IDK

#

FAM

#

Wait wait

#

Do u have the answers with u or no

#

OK

#

dont tell me

#

lemme figure it out

#

and tell me if its right

gloomy lintel
#

Think vertical and horizontal components

#

It’s a lot easier to see then

#

Resolve vertically to get psin x= something

keen mason
#

OK NGL

#

im special

gloomy lintel
#

Resolve horizontally to get pcos x= something else

#

Then manipulate one for the other

#

You’ll get a value for tan x

#

Find x and sub it to either one to find p

#

Yea

#

Oh crap lol didn’t even realise they used t

runic vine
#

Even tho this is math does anyone know chemistry ?

abstract hedge
next void
#

Can someone explain how to do this?

alpine sable
#

,av

ocean sealBOT
#
NRG Suger#9251's Avatar

Click here to view the image.

next void
#

<@&286206848099549185>

spark ibex
#

can someone verify i did question 5 correct?

#

<@&286206848099549185>

alpine sable
#

@spark ibex b part is wrong i think

spark ibex
#

wait really?

alpine sable
#

the position function has local extrema at the points where velocity is = zero

#

because that's the point at which it starts moving in the other direction

#

unless tha graph would "bounce off" the x axis

spark ibex
#

wait im confused lol

alpine sable
#

you can think of it like this: as long as velocity is positive, the object is moving in the positive direction, so at the moment when velocity becomes negative, position is the most extreme

spark ibex
#

here is the actual graph if its better to understand from this

#

so just a?

harsh swallow
#

yeah so you have the velocity graph

#

but the questions

alpine sable
#

think about it: if velocity is positive, what is happening with position

spark ibex
#

increases

alpine sable
#

yes!

#

so even after c, velocity is still positive

spark ibex
#

is my part a right tho?

alpine sable
#

yes

spark ibex
#

ok

#

let me see lol

tawdry bough
#

@spark ibex when you throw a ball in the air, the highest point is when velocity is zero

#

same with the lowest point

#

aka extrema

spark ibex
#

is it 0,b,d?

alpine sable
#

yes

#

and i don't know if you should also consider the ending point

spark ibex
#

f?

alpine sable
#

yes

spark ibex
#

the graph isnt at 0 on f tho

harsh swallow
#

they stopped measuring while it was still moving

spark ibex
#

so dont include f right

#

just 0,b,d

harsh swallow
#

at f the object is still moving in the negative direction

alpine sable
#

but i think it's just as much of an extreme as 0

harsh swallow
#

slowing down but still moving

spark ibex
#

what would you guys do

#

i was just not gonna include f

harsh swallow
#

i would leave out f

alpine sable
#

idk let katharine decide

spark ibex
#

im pretty sure im right on 4 but could you guys verify it real quick

harsh swallow
#

the function doesn't have a global maximum

alpine sable
#

it seems to me that there are two absolute minimums

harsh swallow
#

it goes up infinitely

#

i forgot if that counts

#

it has 2 minimums

spark ibex
#

oh wait i didnt update it hold on

alpine sable
#

@harsh swallow where does the function go infinitely up?

spark ibex
#

here it is

harsh swallow
#

x<0 and x > 3

spark ibex
alpine sable
#

the question says "on interval [0,2]"

harsh swallow
#

sorry didn't read

spark ibex
#

how does that look now

alpine sable
#

it seems fine now

harsh swallow
#

if the interval is [0, 2] then x = 3 doesn't exist

alpine sable
#

oh yes of course

#

katharine is right

spark ibex
#

so just at x=0 for min and x=1 for max

harsh swallow
#

yeah

spark ibex
#

not both x=0 and 3

alpine sable
#

yes

#

no not both

harsh swallow
#

yeah because x = 3 is not in the interval [0, 2]

alpine sable
#

so turns out you were right at the beginning 🙂

spark ibex
#

for question 2b i think i did it wrong

alpine sable
#

seems fine to me

spark ibex
#

mathway has the answer as this which is confusing me

alpine sable
#

your solution is correct

#

they made a mistake

#

thats the function at a larger scale

harsh swallow
#

from -infty to -8 the slope of the function is positive

#

then -8 to 0 it's negative

#

then 0 to +infty is positive

spark ibex
#

man mathway is slacking

#

i was so confused i was like im pretty sure this is correct

#

hey @harsh swallow @alpine sable

#

for that end of the graph would you say that it is infinity?

#

or it stops

harsh swallow
#

the graph just stops

alpine sable
#

what infinity?

harsh swallow
#

as if they stopped measuring

spark ibex
#

ok i wasnt sure if the graph keeps going or not

harsh swallow
#

or stopped notating it on the graph

north hemlock
#

can somebody help me with b?

#

I was thinking something like this:

#

$$V(x)=A_s(x)\cdot h(x) =\int_0^{2\pi} [4-f(x)]dx\cdot \int_0^{2\pi} d(x) dx$$
$$V=\int_0^{2\pi} [4-(\cos{x}+2)]dx\cdot \int_0^{2\pi} [2\cdot \sin{(0.5x)}]dx$$

#

since Volume is just the area of the section times the depth

#

and since they're both functions of x, we integrate both and then multiply them?

ocean sealBOT
#

Jukelyn

harsh swallow
#

i cannot see any problem with this

north hemlock
#

Me either

#

I think it's correct

#

but I'm not 100% sure and so that's why I'm here 😅

#

actually

#

I need to be more confident

#

this is correct.

#

I like my answer

#

it's 32pi

silent geyser
#

Anyone know how to do this?

ocean sealBOT
#

Chai T. Rex

#

Chai T. Rex

oak chasm
#

Then, you have a one variable expression.

north hemlock
#

plus 80?

oak chasm
#

Then you can take the derivative and find the minimum points.

#

Oh, yes.

north hemlock
#

haha

#

oops

ocean sealBOT
#

Chai T. Rex

oak chasm
#

No problem.

silent geyser
#

So I would plug in 4x^2 +80 into the root and derive right

#

And then set to 0?

ocean sealBOT
#

Chai T. Rex

oak chasm
#

Yes, that's right.

#

That'll tell you the extreme points.

silent geyser
#

Ah ok

#

I appreciate it

oak chasm
#

You're welcome.

silent geyser
#

Wait isn’t the only x value 1

oak chasm
#

What did you get for the derivative?

silent geyser
#

I got this as the derivative set to 0 and got 1 on Symbolab