#help-0

1 messages · Page 568 of 1

jade birch
#

Thanks

#

I got to do sth, I'll be back in 20 if no one has helped you till then

sterile zealot
#

Okay.

alpine sable
#

yall what's x?

sterile zealot
#

The line CM connects the vertice to the midpoint

#

1 sec @alpine sable

alpine sable
#

k

#

if they're equal ik how to solve it

#

but i dont think they are

sterile zealot
#

So @alpine sable, the area of MBC would have to be 1/4 of the parallelogram, because mirroring over line MC would show a perfect fit for another triangle, and a remaining parallelogram. This being said, the answer is 32 cm2.

#

Now @alpine sable

#

Let's get to you

alpine sable
#

yes

alpine sable
sterile zealot
#

Equal as in similar?

alpine sable
#

yeah

sterile zealot
#

Because the marks of congruency for the hypotenuse(s) show that the triangles are indeed similar

#

And the scale factor is 1/2

alpine sable
#

okay well

#

thanks

#

i have

#

another questio

#

can you help?

sterile zealot
#

Fire away

#

As in yes I can help

alpine sable
#

its asking for the perimeter of the circle

#

The bearing of P from Q is 070°. What is the bearing of Q from P?

sterile zealot
#

@alpine sable I sadly don't seem to understand what you mean. You may want another helper.

alpine sable
#

...

sterile zealot
#

@alpine sable here's a hint: try the Pythagorean theorem

#

Did that help?

alpine sable
#

yes

#

alright

#

thanks

sterile zealot
#

Anything else?

alpine sable
#

In the following diagram find the size of the angles marked x and y .

#

one sec

sterile zealot
#

@alpine sable All quadrilaterals have a total interior angle measure of 360 degrees. Using the provided exterior angle, you can determine the missing interior angle, and thus work from there to determine the values of x and y

#

Did that help?

alpine sable
#

A yacht starts from L and sails 12 km to M on a bearing 120°
. It then sails 9 km on a bearing of 152° to K. Find ∠LMK

jade birch
#

Did you draw it?

main dagger
#

So, this has more to do with signal theory but maybe someone can help me.

#

I have an exercise where a causal LTI system responds for a rectangular pulse $$ s(t) = rect(t) $$ with $$g(t) = \Lambda(2t)$$. The task is to find out what the impulse response for this system is. The solution is $$h(t) = \frac{d}{dt} h_{\epsilon}(t) $$ because $$\delta(t) = \frac{d}{dt} \epsilon(t)$$

ocean sealBOT
#

Witchfinder

main dagger
#

I don't really understand the solution and the text book doesn't explain the approach. May someone be so nice and explain it to me?

#

Especially why h(t) looks like this

terse iron
#

lost

sterile zealot
#

Ah, the sohcahtoa

#

A way to remember the values of the sine, cosine and tangent.

#

...ringing a bell?

#

@terse iron do you got it or do I need to further elaborate

terse iron
sterile zealot
#

There you go!

#

@round path bring your question here, the other person is good now.

round path
#

find the shaded

#

area

sterile zealot
#

Okay, so to start we have the entire shape to consider

terse iron
#

thats it

sterile zealot
#

Shaded and unshaded

#

@terse iron yes

#

@round path find the total area, then we will continue.

round path
#

22x44

sterile zealot
#

No, look closer and make sure to get the right dimensions

round path
#

44x44

sterile zealot
#

Correct, evaluate

round path
#

1936

sterile zealot
#

Alright, now keep this number saved

#

What we do now is try to remove the area taken by the 4 semicircles

#

They all have the same area, so finding just one will get you the answer for them all

#

The diameter of all the semicircles is?

#

[The measure you mistook earlier]

shell pilot
#

I an stuck on this question

#

Can somebody please help me

glass lichen
#

factor

untold tide
#

Can I ask questions about fourier analysis here?

#

(I don't know how to get access to the advanced maths section...)

vale wigeon
#

type ,iam adv

untold tide
#

thank you!

vale wigeon
untold tide
#

Yeah i missed that, cheers

alpine sable
#

Can anyone explain what unit vectors are ?
You can dm me personally 🙂

vale wigeon
#

a unit vector is a vector whose length is equal to 1

#

that's it

alpine sable
#

How do I solve this for q?
0.2q + 5 + 40/q = 0

jade birch
#

It's a quadratic in disguise

#

Multiply everything by q

manic quail
#

It has no real solutions though.

jade birch
#

True

manic quail
#

,w solve[0.2q + 5 + 40/q = 0]

ocean sealBOT
vale wigeon
#

WA is being a bit weird with the form it gives for the solutions

jade birch
#

"+-5i"
huh?

manic quail
jade birch
#

I want whatever wolframs on

vale wigeon
jade birch
#

@alpine sable

vale wigeon
#

i pung them with my reply

manic quail
#

pung?

jade birch
#

I thought it was "pinged"?

vale wigeon
#

pinged, but i like to pretend ping is an irregular verb

manic quail
#

Pung sounds better tbh.

jade birch
#

True

ocean sealBOT
#

BinaryVector

vale wigeon
#

did you mean $ba = 0 \implies \mathrm{im}(a) \subseteq \ker(b)$?

ocean sealBOT
vale wigeon
#

if so then... yeah i guess

tacit breach
#

latex is the most simplest but most useless thing you could ever have, its not that hard to use

sonic cave
#

would this be reflexive or not?

vale wigeon
#

what do you think?

sonic cave
#

hmmm

vale wigeon
#

notice how c doesn't have a loop attached

sonic cave
#

yeah

#

so it wouldn't be reflexive right? coz x R x and by the definition of R x, x is greater or equal to x?

#

im not entirely sure so idk

tacit breach
#

That looks hella complex

vale wigeon
#

but yes your relation is not reflexive

sonic cave
#

im sorry 😦

vale wigeon
#

cRc is false for your relation, therefore it (your relation) is not reflexive

jaunty torrent
#

Guys
I never sent or used this server before... Idk.. like can I send question and stuff here in tgis exact chat

#

Heyy Guys*

#

😅

vale wigeon
#

not right now since this channel in particular is occupied

sonic cave
#

thanks ann

vale wigeon
#

#help-6 is free rn so you can go there instead @jaunty torrent

jaunty torrent
tacit breach
#

herm

knotty garnet
#

Hint: what is arc QRS?

tacit breach
#

55?

#

Im guesing- looks like opposite angles to me

#

u gonna flex ur latex math skills?

#

arc qrs is 110

#

not 55

knotty garnet
#

Latex is extremely useful, it gives just about anyone the ability to elegantly typeset math

#

What other options do you have?

#

Is there an alternative?

tacit breach
#

Yes plenty

knotty garnet
#

QRS is not 110

tacit breach
#

I dont know then

knotty garnet
#

You just got that RS is 110

#

So how can QRS be the same?

#

Another hint: erase all the lines except QS

tacit breach
#

RQS=55 aswell

#

bro

#

alright lol

manic glade
#

10 channels are not enough to not ask a question on top of an unanswered pending question? :/

sand summit
#

How many roots would tan2x have in the range 0<= x <= 3600?

#

Would it be 80 or 40!

#

*?

willow lake
#

still no answer

#

is the statement false

#

or is the proof nontrivial

paper temple
#

best way to find a function from a function table?

#

,rotate

ocean sealBOT
willow lake
#

you can infer a polynomial function from a table using polynomial interpolation

knotty garnet
#

Couldn't you just take the dual of the polyhedron and see that it is impossible for any face to have 2 vertices?

#

Or is that too easy

manic quail
paper temple
paper temple
manic quail
#

Yes, exacty.

paper temple
alpine sable
# paper temple

for questions 4 a and 4b you dont need to find the function

#

4a just wants you to find f( f(2) )

#

f(2)=0

#

f( f(2) )= f( 0 )

#

f(0)=-1

paper temple
knotty garnet
#

@paper temple also just a quick extra note to re-emphasize that functions aren't always an equation you plug and chug, functions can literally just be pairs of things (input, output) like this table lookup

#

Or sometimes a definition that is so difficult to compute we don't even know what the values are or if they even exist but that's a bit more esoteric

paper temple
knotty garnet
#

Yep

manic quail
#

To give you even more information: There would be infinitely many functions which pass through those points.

knotty garnet
#

Functions often times are not that, but they COULD be and that's one way to think about them

paper temple
gentle fox
#

Alright so ive got this question on my review and it puzzles me

#

I am under the assumption that f'(x)= sqrt(x) hence f'(4)= sqrt(4)=2

#

Or am I completely wrong in how I am trying to solve it?

#

It could be 0 because there is a horizontal tangent at g(4) and f'(4) = g(4)

#

Either way, some additional insight would be greatly appreciated

left spear
#

The horizontal tangents only gives you information about g' (specifically: g'(4) = g'(8) = 0), which is not going to be very helpful here as far as I can tell.

#

The integral of g(t)dt from 0 to x is, by definition, the antiderivative of g whose value at 0 is 0. So I'd consider the h(x) = f(x²) function, derive it and try to find a relation between f' and g.

neat venture
#

How many 16 character combinations will there be if there are 36 different characters?

gentle fox
#

Now that confuses me. I am not familiar with how I can find a relationship between h(x) = f(x²) and f'(x)=g(x)

#

Or what importance it serves in that matter

left spear
#

f' ≠ g
However if you define h the function such as h(x) = f(x²) then h' = g (because sqrt(x) in the integral then becomes x, so you have an anti-derivative of g)
h is the composite function of f and the square function, so by applying the derivation rule for composite functions, you can link derivative of h (i.e. g) and the derivative of f.

#

It's useful because once you know that relationship between f' and g you can calculate f'(4)

gentle fox
#

Im sorry, that is all too confusing for me.

#

That explanation goes way over my head and is unlike anything I had seen or heard before

#

Thanks for the help though.

half epoch
#

Um, are you doing the same question still? Where did you get an h and how did you figure f’(x) = sqrt(x)?

#

This looks like a case of the leibniz rule to me

gentle fox
#

I did not say anything about an h

half epoch
#

Actually just reduces to the fundamental theorem of calculus even

gentle fox
#

but I figured, given f(x) = the integral of g(t), then f'(x) = g(t)

left spear
#

That would be true if there wasn't a square root in the integral's upper bound

half epoch
#

It’s just a nice u-sub away from being an u

gentle fox
#

Ive never done u sub for something in the bounds

half epoch
#

Okay, how about we plug x^2 for x and go from there? That should be easy enough to follow

#

$f(x^2) = \int_0^x g(t) ,dt$

ocean sealBOT
#

Learath2

half epoch
#

Due to the FTC we know $f(x^2) = G(x)$ and that $G’(x) = g(x)$

ocean sealBOT
#

Learath2

half epoch
#

Do you follow so far?

gentle fox
#

So what I gather from this is you squared both sides to eliminate sqrt x

half epoch
#

I plugged x^2 for x. Squaring both sides would not be very useful

gentle fox
#

alright

#

I see that

#

that makes more sense

half epoch
#

What would the derivative of the left side be?

gentle fox
#

perhaps f ' (2x)

half epoch
#

Nope, careful applying the chain rule

gentle fox
#

f'(x^2)*2x

half epoch
#

Yep. So overall we have $2xf'(x^2) = g(x)$

ocean sealBOT
#

Learath2

half epoch
#

Now we are looking for f'(4) what do you plug in for x to get a f'(4)?

gentle fox
#

2

half epoch
#

Yep, just check the graph for the value of g at 2

#

And we are done

gentle fox
#

and thats 2

#

but thats not a possible answer

half epoch
#

g(2) = 0 not 2

left spear
#

No, it is 2

half epoch
#

Oh wait, lol I misread that, badgraph

#

Anyway it still works

left spear
gentle fox
#

ill repost it so we dont have to scroll

left spear
gentle fox
#

would it make sense to isolate f'(x) by dividing both sides by 2x

half epoch
#

Just plug x=2 and solve it like you’d solve any other equation

#

It’s just algebra at this point

gentle fox
#

So 1/2

left spear
#

Sounds good to me

gentle fox
#

Wow

half epoch
#

Yep, that’s what I have aswell

gentle fox
#

Thank you both so much

#

This is what happens when your professor (in my pfp) gets questions which he never explained how to do before

#

Thank you again!

dusky notch
#

hey guys Im trying to do some comparison test practice ques but im not sure what to do

#

what am i supposed to be comparing here if i only have one sum?

left spear
#

You'd want to compare to a series that you know converges - the usual one is 1/n^a which converges when a > 1

#

More specifically, the greater the denominator the smaller the fraction, so you can see the terms of your series are lower than 4n/5n^3

dusky notch
#

so I would compare 4n/5n^3+3 to 1/n^a?

#

and take the limit to see what each approaches?

left spear
#

Well 4n/(5n^3+3) < 4n/5n^3 and you can rearrange the latter as 4/5n², which looks a lot like 1/n²

#

And Σ 1/n² converges

dusky notch
#

how do we know that 4n/5n^3 is larger?

#

oh since we're adding 3 it makes denom larger

#

which makes it smaller

#

so in every comparison case will we always compare to 1/n^a?

left spear
#

Σ 1/n² (or generally Σ 1/n^a where a>1) is prolly the one that you'll find the most in exercises based on series comparison

dusky notch
#

oh that makes sense, thank you!

#

I appreciate your help

#

i have 1 more question

#

so with this one

#

if we drop the -1 and compare it

#

since 1/n^a and a is equal to 1 does this mean its divergent?

noble sinew
#

its -1 so you make the number smaller if you remove -1 from denominator

dusky notch
#

oh so as long as the one we are comparing it to is > the original sum then its convergent? and I thought when 1/n^a where a had to be greater than 1 to compare

noble sinew
#

So since n^2/(3n^3-1)>1/(3n) and we know 1/(3n) diverges

#

then so does the original

#

(You wrote down +1 in what you posted, when the original had -1)

dusky notch
#

how do we know that 1/3n diverges?

#

if the denom gets smaller doesnt it apporach 0?

noble sinew
#

pull the constant out of the sum, so we have (1/3)*sum from n=2 to inf of 1/n, which diverges from p series rule, 1/(n^p) diverges for p<=1

dusky notch
#

ooo ok that makes sense

#

these series are so confusing tbh

#

theres so many tests

#

how do u know which one to use?

#

if not prompted to use a specific one?

noble sinew
#

I use comparison like 95%

dusky notch
#

oh so you can pick and choose which one to use?

#

so could u use the ratio test on these problems as well

noble sinew
#

But requires knowing some important series to use (the more you know the better)

dusky notch
#

oh like what you said about 1/n, its useful to know whether a compared sum is div/conv

noble sinew
#

Yes you could use ratio

#

Sometimes tests come back inconclusive and then you have to try something else though

dusky notch
#

is there usually one that typically second best?

#

like if you start with ratio/comparison

#

what would be the second best option?

noble sinew
#

Depends on how it looks

#

But root test more powerful than ratio

dusky notch
#

ah ok that makes sense, thank you for the wonderful insights. I really do appreciate it!

buoyant vale
#

how do i get the critical range

#

my teacher wants me to solve it this way

noble sinew
#

Have you made your H_0 and H_A?

buoyant vale
#

Ho: p=0.2
H1: p>0.2

noble sinew
#

Assuming critical range is the same as critical region then its just the set of all values where we reject the null hypothesis

buoyant vale
#

how would i get it ?

#

i cant rememver how to get it but i remember that it is usually in the format X>=y

noble sinew
#

So if the null hypothesis is true then X ~ Binom(5,0.2). So we want to find for what outcomes the prob of that happening is less than 0.05

strange lagoon
#

Can anyone help me witht his question

#

im thinking its A but not sure

buoyant vale
#

im with you

noble sinew
#

So we want 0.05=P(X>=C_1|X~Binom(5,0.2)=1-P(X<C_1|X~Binom(5,0.2)

#

Then write out cdf and solve for C_1

strange lagoon
#

lol

noble sinew
#

Then remember it is discrete so it can only obtain integer values

buoyant vale
#

to get that id need to do PX>=3

#

which is 1- PX<=2

#

right?

noble sinew
#

Well we don't know what values are the critical values yet, in fact P(X>=3)>0.05

#

hence not part of the critical region

#

Depending on how much you need to show it might be enough to just show P(X>=3)>0.05 and P(X>=4)<0.05 hence our critical region is {4,5}

#

but otherwise write out CDF (or sum of PMF's) of binomial and solve

buoyant vale
#

think i got it

#

thank you

noble sinew
#

$\sum\limits_{i=C_1}^{5}{5 \choose i}(0.2)^i(0.8)^{5-i}$

ocean sealBOT
#

ScapeProf

noble sinew
#

Was a way to solve for the critical region

crystal cape
#

how do i solve thiis

vale wigeon
#

what's the most important thing to know about any geometric progression?

#

or rather, the two most important things

crystal cape
#

?

#

first term and ratio

left spear
#

Yeah, you should try to determine the ratio in the first place

#

Or rather what can p be such that these three terms can be a geometric progression

#

And the ratio would follow

crystal cape
#

how would i do that ?

left spear
#

Well by definition if it's a geometric progression the ratio between any two consecutive terms is the same, so you have that the second term divided by the first one is equal to the third term divided by the second one

#

That leads to an equation you have to solve

crystal cape
#

ok

#

ill try that

#

that gives me 6p^2 + 10p + 12=0

vale wigeon
#

that's not an equation.

#

did you mean 6p^2 + 10p + 12 = 42069.777?

crystal cape
#

how did u get that?

vale wigeon
#

i didn't

#

okay, so how did you get 6p^2 + 10p + 12 = 0?

vale wigeon
#

show your work

crystal cape
#

ok

vale wigeon
#

you're clearly missing something that will not be solved just by throwing words around

crystal cape
#

Here's my work

vale wigeon
#

first step after the ratio equation is wrong

#

$(-2p) \cdot (-2p) \neq -4p^2$

ocean sealBOT
crystal cape
#

oh right

umbral folio
#

how to find the velocity vector at a point?

left spear
vale wigeon
#

@umbral folio this channel is busy, please move.

umbral folio
#

ok

crystal cape
#

sorry wrong one

#

p^2+5p+6=0

#

so i get -3 or -2 as the possible values

vale wigeon
#

no

#

you're still insistent on not writing the =0

#

as if you're allergic to it

crystal cape
#

oh sorry

vale wigeon
#

and no the equation you get is not p^2 + 5p + 6 = 0

crystal cape
#

then?

#

i got 2p^2+10p+12=0

vale wigeon
#

why do you keep writing expressions instead of equations

#

equations have equals signs in them

#

go through the algebra again

#

show me your work again but now with your mistakes corrected

crystal cape
vale wigeon
#

,rcw

ocean sealBOT
vale wigeon
#

last step.

crystal cape
#

i dont know after this

vale wigeon
#

your last step is wrong.

crystal cape
#

oh yeah

#

p=6 or p=-1

vale wigeon
#

great

#

so which is it?

crystal cape
#

6 since its positive

vale wigeon
#

@midnight cedar @alpine sable this channel is occupied, please move.

crystal cape
#

ohk thx

midnight cedar
#

Okk

crystal cape
#

i think i can do it from here

#

thx

vale wigeon
#

yes, p=6.

#

great.

crystal cape
#

how to solve this

left spear
#

Do you not have a starting point

crystal cape
#

no

left spear
#

The line intersects the curves at points that satisfy both equations

crystal cape
#

so equation of line= equation of curve?

left spear
#

It doesn't really make sense in that context to say that two equations are equal but that's the idea

#

(it would be y=2x+m(2x+1) and y=6x+4 hence 2x+m(2x+1)=6x+4)

crystal cape
#

and?

#

i mean there are no values given

#

so i dont know what to do after that

vale wigeon
#

you need to show the equation 2x^2 + m(2x+1) = 6x + 4 always has two solutions

#

it may help if you do some algebra to it to write it as a quadratic equation in standard form.

#

and think about a certain value that you can calculate when faced with a quadratic equation in standard form, and what this value can tell you

crystal cape
#

can u show how to do that?

vale wigeon
#

how to do what

left spear
#

do you know what the standard form of a quadratic equation is?

crystal cape
#

ax^2+bx+c=0

left spear
#

(almost)

crystal cape
#

now?

#

2x^2+2mx+m=0

left spear
#

That's not the standard form

crystal cape
#

what bout now

left spear
#

Well that is a standard form but that's not equivalent to what you previously had

#

Your equation is 2x² + m(2x+1) = 6x + 4
You want to put everything on the same side of the equation, and separate the term in , the term in x, and the constant

vale wigeon
#

2x^2 + m(2x+1) = 6x + 4, not 2x^2 + m(2x+1) = 0 as you did.

#

you cannot just ignore some terms of your equation simply because you don't like them

crystal cape
#

he told thats not the standard form

vale wigeon
#

2x^2 + m(2x+1) = 6x+4 : relevant to your problem, not standard form
2x^2 + 2mx + m = 0 : standard form, but has nothing to do with your problem whatsoever

crystal cape
#

yeah what to do after writing that?

vale wigeon
#

nothing

#

backtrack because you fucked up

vale wigeon
#

@thorn compass channel busy please move

thorn compass
#

Ok

vale wigeon
#

go back to the equation 2x^2 + m(2x+1) = 6x+4 and turn it into standard form using actual algebra (i.e. not just throwing terms in the trash at random)

#

@crystal cape

crystal cape
#

ok

vale wigeon
#

and pay attention, pay attention, pay attention to what you're doing

#

and especially to what you write out here

#

because remember: i see nothing beyond what you send here

crystal cape
#

how do i put it general form cause theres a m variable here

#

yeah ik

vale wigeon
#

treat m as if it were a number.

#

collect all the x^2 terms, and all the x terms, and all the constant terms, as you normally would.

crystal cape
#

2x^2+2x(m-3)+m-4=0

#

is that right

round raven
#

i was sent this question on discor

#

i got the percentage as 9.68 something something

#

but the person who sent it says its 1. something

#

whats right?

#

i used the sides and and angle using 1/2absintheta to find the area of the triangle

#

i then found the circles radius by reverse calculating its circumference

#

later i divided the two

#

what did i miss?

vale wigeon
crystal cape
#

what i do after this

vale wigeon
#

have you ever heard of this thing called the discriminant

crystal cape
#

b^2-4ac=0

vale wigeon
#

no

#

i didn't say it should be equal to zero

#

the discriminant of ax^2+bx+c=0 is b^2 - 4ac

#

what does it tell you about the solutions of your equation?

crystal cape
#

0

vale wigeon
#

speak in complete sentences.

crystal cape
#

the solutions are real and unequal

vale wigeon
#

there are two distinct real solutions, therefore what?

crystal cape
#

b^2-4ac>0

vale wigeon
#

yes great

#

so now calculate the discriminant for your quadratic

#

it's going to be in terms of m

crystal cape
vale wigeon
#

great and now you should verify that m^2 - 8m + 17 > 0 is true for all values of m

crystal cape
#

how?

#

b=root(b^2-4ac)/2a

#

?

vale wigeon
#

??

#

no

#

you should verify that it's never equal to zero

crystal cape
#

ok

#

no idea then

ancient bear
#

Hello friends

#

May I tek

opal sundial
#

let's say I have a set of numbers that I want to average out.

#

how big does a number n have to be to offset the decrease in the result of the mean?

#

you know since the denominator goes up?

#

wait does it just have to be >= 1?

wild shard
#

how would I solve for plane cuboid interseion

hardy geyser
#

Help I keep getting the wording wrong

dire wren
#

write 2 equations to solve the system of equations

#

let q = number of quarters, n = number of nickels

alpine sable
#

is this channel open?

dire wren
#

no..

hardy geyser
#

ok

mighty copper
#

Anyone understand finite difference method (elliptic)

#

I'm just trying to put my equation into a matrix

coral frigate
#

two particles, A and B, of masses 2m and 3m respectively, are moving on a smooth horizontal plane. The particles are moving in opposite directions towards each other along the same straight line when they collide directly. Immediately before the collision the dspeed of A is 2u and the speed of B is u. In the collision the impulse of A on B has magnitude 5mu.
a) Find the coefficient of restitution between A and B
I need some help here lol
how do you find v1 and v2 for both particles

#

because for impulse i do

#

5mu = m(v-u)

#

since m for A is 2m

#

I sub in 5mu = 2m(v1 - 2u)

#

cancel m

#

5u = 2(v1 - 2u)

#

5u = 2v1 - 4u

#

9u = 2v1

#

v1 = 9/2u, which is not right apparently

#

the answer book says 7/2u

daring chasm
#

might be more fitting on the physics server

coral frigate
#

oh, thanks

idle lintel
alpine sable
#

can i ask a bio question here

wind gorge
#

Not sure

upper mesa
#

Got a general question for u all
for grade 12 physics
where would I be able to learn more about mirrors?

#

I think I should do some studying before I start asking questions or bailout so

ashen wave
#

is anyone familiar with factoring quadratic equations?

mighty copper
#

yes

#

post

ashen wave
#

I just started the unit so I dont know much about it

mighty copper
#

wait

ashen wave
#

I need help with this problem-

#

x^2+x-6=0

mighty copper
#

You can watch this video, should be able to solve the question after

ashen wave
#

alright ill watch it

mighty copper
#

there are many videos online that show how to solve quadratic equations, id recommend watching one or two

ashen wave
#

what if your factoring a really big number? like with this equation 24x^2+24x-4368=0?

mighty copper
#

You won't ever be asked to do that

ashen wave
#

but I am haha

#

its in my worksheet

mighty copper
#

Okay

#

you divide everything by a common factor to make it smaller

ashen wave
#

what?

mighty copper
#

nm

ashen wave
#

oh

mighty copper
#

divide everything by 24

ashen wave
#

alright

#

so it would be x^2+x-182?

#

=0

#

then what?

ashen wave
mighty copper
#

usually you find two numbers that multiply to make -182, but add to make the x coefficient 1

ashen wave
#

what do you mean?

mighty copper
#

if you have $2x^2+3x-10$

ocean sealBOT
mighty copper
#

you get 2 numbers that multiply to make 10

#

but add to make 3

ashen wave
#

right but didnt you divide out the numbers?

mighty copper
#

Yes, because these aren't really big numbers

#

if you divide here, you get fractions

#

we don't want that

ashen wave
#

right ok

mighty copper
#

Okay, so 2 numbers that multiply to make the term without the x

#

and add to make the term with the x

#

$2x^2+3x-10$

ocean sealBOT
ashen wave
#

are we talking about that equation?

#

oh ok

#

2 and -5

mighty copper
#

so in this case, 5*-2 = -10

#

and 5+ -2 = 3

ashen wave
#

oops wrong way

#

alright

mighty copper
#

yh

#

so

#

(2x-2) and (2x+5) is our answer

ashen wave
#

oh!

mighty copper
#

its 2x because we kept the 2 infront

ashen wave
#

ok but how do you know when its no like a number before it

#

hold on let me find an example

mighty copper
#

there was a way I used to factorise really quickly, and was easier too but i;ve forgotten lol

ashen wave
#

I cannt find one but its like (2)()()

#

(2)(2x-2)(2x+5)

#

something like that

mighty copper
#

you mean (x-2)(2x-2)(2x+5) ?

#

not sure what u mean here

ashen wave
#

no its just like one number before it

#

Ill try to find an example hold on

#

give me a min

mighty copper
#

$2(2x-2)(2x+5)$?

ocean sealBOT
ashen wave
#

yeah something like that

mighty copper
#

and what does it usaully ask you to do?

ashen wave
#

just like the problem you solved before

#

but when do you know there is a number in front of the parenthesis

normal kindle
#

can someone help me with this I can’t seem to figure out how my answer is wrong

mighty copper
#

Say you have something like

#

you've factorised and then you arrive here:

split hinge
mighty copper
#

$(4x-2)(4x+10)$

ocean sealBOT
ashen wave
#

alright

mighty copper
#

so this is a factorised form

ashen wave
#

right

mighty copper
#

you can take out a common factor of say 2

#

to get $4(2x-1)(2x+5)$

ashen wave
#

oh

ocean sealBOT
ashen wave
#

I dont know if this is too much to ask for but do you think you could find a equation just like that but start from the beginning xD? because everytime there is a problem like that I get stuck on the factoring

mighty copper
#

erm, I'm not sure what u mean, I should factorise and end up with an equation like this?

ashen wave
#

yeah I suppose rip

mighty copper
#

Okay, The equation:

#

$16x^2+32x-20$

ocean sealBOT
mighty copper
#

here we have big numbers, we want to make them simpler

ashen wave
#

alright

mighty copper
#

so lets say we divide by 4

#

we get $4x^2+8x-5$

ocean sealBOT
mighty copper
#

yes?

ashen wave
#

so this only works if you have a common factor

#

then you divide them all by it

mighty copper
#

yes

ashen wave
#

okk

mighty copper
#

otherwise you end up with fractions

ashen wave
#

oh right

mighty copper
#

if you cant divide by a common factor, usually you have to use another method to solve the question

ashen wave
#

alright

#

now what do you do

#

5 only factors with 1 and itself

mighty copper
#

no, youre forgetting we have a 4 infront of the x^2

#

usually if the equation looks like this $x^2+8x-5$ then you're right

ocean sealBOT
mighty copper
#

we have a 1 infront of the x^2

#

but here we have an x^2

ashen wave
#

??? what do you do with the 4 then?

mighty copper
#

you multiply 4*5

#

so we need 2 numbers that make -20 but add to make 8

#

$4x^2+8x-5$

ocean sealBOT
mighty copper
#

if it was $x^2+8x-5$

ocean sealBOT
mighty copper
#

we do only 1*5

ashen wave
#

5+4?

mighty copper
#

but its 4 so we do 4*5

ashen wave
#

oh ok we just add that one step

mighty copper
#

its a step we usually ignore if the number infront of the x^2 is 1

#

but if its not 1 we dont ignore it

ashen wave
#

oh ok

#

ok so im confused bc when you add 5+4 you get 8 but its a -20 so it wouldnt we need to add the negative to one of the numbers?

mighty copper
#

so you wanted this: $4(2x-1)(2x+5)$

we started with this equation
$16x^2+32x-20$ ;

divide by 4
$4x^2+8x-5$ (-2*10= -20)
$(4x-2)(4x+10) $

if we take out a common factor here

$2(2x-1)* 2(2x+5) $
we get
$4(2x-1)(2x+5)$

ocean sealBOT
mighty copper
#

looks a little messy, but thats all of it

ashen wave
#

ok so wait when you are factoring the -20 I got -54 and 5-4 but when you need to find 8 do you just discard the negatives?

#

other than that I understand

#

thanks for helping me btw sorry that took so long

alpine sable
#

whats the answer 😔

#

im prepping for my ap exam

mighty copper
#

nah its kl

alpine sable
#

is it D

#

i think its D

#

right

mighty copper
#

@ashen wave so 5 and 4 dont work for -20

ashen wave
#

oh

mighty copper
#

and we dont ever discard the negatives

#

although 5*-4 = -20

#

we cant get 8 from 5 and 4

ashen wave
#

ok ill keep that in mind then

mighty copper
#

but 2 and 10 work for both, we can get 8 and -20

ashen wave
#

oh alright

mighty copper
#

@alpine sable it's not D

#

it/s C

alpine sable
#

oh bet bet

mighty copper
#

once we bring the power down, we always take away from the power

nocturne swift
#

YES TRUE

#

AGREED

#

PERRY AGREES WITH YOU

ashen wave
#

$4x^2+x-3$

ocean sealBOT
#

TheCrabywoomy

ashen wave
#

uhhh can anyone help me out with this

sterile zealot
#

...factor?

#

Or what?

winter bay
#

@ashen wave if you need help factoring we can help you out

#

Well I mean I can help u out

eternal juniper
#

yo how are you supposed to solve this? looked through my textbook a few times and couldn't find anything. i assume its just something simple that i'm missing

livid orbit
#

help pls

alpine sable
#

Write |f(x) - 1| = |x^2 - 1| < 0.5, factor, reverse engineer the delta

eternal juniper
glass lichen
eternal juniper
#

(-infinity,1.5)

glass lichen
#

no

eternal juniper
#

or 0,1.5

glass lichen
#

no

#

$\abs{a}<b\iff -b<a<b$

ocean sealBOT
#

moshill1

alpine sable
#
  1. Four short-order cooks can make 24 omelets in 10 minutes. if a diner gets a to-go order for 90 omelets that needs to be ready in 15 minutes, then how many cooks do they need to complete the order on time?
#

15?

alpine sable
#

c and o are directly proportional, o and m are directly proportional , c and m are inversely proportional

#

trick is to realise that the quantity c*m/o will be constant

#

4*10/24=k

#

k=5/3

eternal juniper
glass lichen
#

Use what I wrote.. then solve the double inequality

alpine sable
#

c*15/90=5/3

#

10 cooks

glass lichen
#

that will correspond to a range of y values, to which you can find the corresponding x values

#

then find delta

eternal juniper
glass lichen
#

Yes, so if f(x)=0.5, what's x?

eternal juniper
#

root of 0.5

glass lichen
#

yes, and f(x)=1.5 means x = sqrt(3/2)

eternal juniper
#

yea

glass lichen
#

so if $f(x)\in(0.5,1.5)$ then $x\in\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},\sqrt{1.5}\right)$

ocean sealBOT
#

moshill1

glass lichen
#

so $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}<x<\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}$

eternal juniper
#

yeah

ocean sealBOT
#

moshill1

glass lichen
#

am I doing this right one sec

shrewd warren
#

Hi can you help me make a normal curve

eternal juniper
glass lichen
#

Yeah you're better off just doing the epsilon-delta sully

#

then using that to determine delta, given the epsilon

eternal juniper
#

so what's the more efficient way to solve it

glass lichen
#

eps-del

eternal juniper
#

yea what do you do for that

alpine sable
#

Could someone help me with regents review?

#

Please

#

<@&286206848099549185>

zealous igloo
regal spruce
#

<@&286206848099549185> i need help, how do i find the equation of this function with just the graph

night blade
#

dont ping helpers immediately its so annoying just be patient

#

it will make you less likely to be helped

night blade
alpine sable
#

Ok

#

Is this right?

#

The graph part

uncut osprey
#

I'm a bit too lazy to check the accuracy of the points you've placed, but the general shape and position are correct

alpine sable
#

Ok thanks

#

Also i have one more question

#

Ik how to do the last part of this but how would i do the first part

#

I think i need to find like the vertex

#

But then what

#

Oh wait

#

Or do i use the table

#

And find out how many feet it is at

#

Between 1-2 seconds on my calc

uncut osprey
#

It might be easier if you visualize what the equation looks like first

alpine sable
#

The graph would open downards

uncut osprey
#

mmmhm

alpine sable
#

Am i supposed to look on my calc

#

For the points?

uncut osprey
#

You could if you'd like

alpine sable
#

Wait im so confused

#

How would i find this on my calculator

#

Do i look at x value 1?

#

And see what y is?

uncut osprey
#

Actually I'm kinda confused too on the wording of the question too

alpine sable
#

Or the second after the vertex?

uncut osprey
#

Oh ok the wording makes sense now I think

alpine sable
#

Please explain lol

#

First off what second was it dropped at loo

#

Lol

#

0?

uncut osprey
#

It's asking for the change in height between 1-2 seconds

#

I believe

alpine sable
#

So do i look here?

#

Then do i subtract?

uncut osprey
#

Yes

alpine sable
#

Ah i see

#

Ty

uncut osprey
#

np

alpine sable
#

I may have another question if i get stuck in the next problem

uncut osprey
#

Wait is this a test?

alpine sable
#

No regents review

#

Ill show u

#

A pic

#

Of front page

viscid yacht
#

I’m her sister hi

#

@uncut osprey

#

I need help

alpine sable
#

The rest of the info has private school info

viscid yacht
#

Last page

alpine sable
#

Wait anna

#

He’s still helping me

#

This channel is occupied

viscid yacht
#

No

#

I’m her sister and we have the same questions

alpine sable
#

Do i set it equal to zero?

viscid yacht
#

She’s an idiot

#

It’s a test

alpine sable
#

Oh it cut off to reach the ground

viscid yacht
#

It’s a test

#

She’s cheating

alpine sable
#

Shut up its not

#

I sent him a pic

#

Its regents revuew

#

Review

viscid yacht
#

Yea of a different packet

#

She’s cheating

alpine sable
#

If it was a test ud be cheating too

#

Since we have same@packet

#

And why would u have a test

#

Late at night

#

Could you please help?

#

Is this right so far and if so what do i do next?

#

Wait

#

I think i got it

#

Ill send u the answer and could u tell me if its right?

#

I checked on my calc and i believe its 4 and i did it algebraically too:)

#

Oh lord

#

Im confused on the next thing

#

Could someone explain this to me?

#

Its the last thing i need help on

#

I forgot about system of equations its been so long

#

And i really wanna go to sleep after this but my dads forcing me to finish this regents review:(

cold monolith
#

Mario buys some Doritos and some Funyuns and it costs him a total of some amount

#

x is the price of Doritos, so if you buy 5 Doritos, that would be 5x

alpine sable
#

Wait i have to put these equations in y=mx +b form right?

cold monolith
#

Or Ax+By=C, but yeah

alpine sable
#

Can we do y=mx+b lol

#

Thats what im familiar with

cold monolith
#

It’s your call but that’s not how the problem is set up to be started

alpine sable
#

Oh-

#

So im confused now

#

What equation do i use

cold monolith
#

It will be easiest to start with ax+by=c then solve for y

alpine sable
#

Quadratic formula?

#

Or slope?

#

My sister says she did it in slope formula im so confuseddd

#

Wait but is it still possible to do y=mx+b?

cold monolith
#

If Joe buys 4 Doritos for $x each and 3 Funyuns for $y each and pays $30 total, then you can write a linear equation from that of 4x+3y=30

#

From there you can turn it into y=-4/3x + 10

alpine sable
#

Ok so for mario

#

Can we do

cold monolith
#

Note: I made up everything except the x and y parts

alpine sable
#

3x +2y+ 19?

#

Is that correct for mario?

cold monolith
#

If you replace the 2nd + with an =

alpine sable
#

Ohh i see

#

OH

#

So

#

3x+2y=19

#

Then for marioo...

#

I mean

#

Luigi

#

2x+4y=24

#

Right?

cold monolith
#

So far so good

alpine sable
#

So do i use substitution or elimination method? Or wth do i do next loo

#

Lol

cold monolith
#

Either

alpine sable
#

Wait

#

When it says

#

Write a system of equations that describe the situation what does that mean

cold monolith
#

Or since it says to graph the system you could graph both lines and figure out where they intersect

#

The system of equations is the two equations you just came up with

alpine sable
#

Oh

#

So do i put then in y=mx+b form now or use my calc and do it

#

She said to show work so idk which method to use

cold monolith
#

You can graph them however you graph lines

alpine sable
#

To graph it

#

Oh wait

#

I have to put them in y=mx+b form to graph from my calc right?

cold monolith
#

Most calculators require that, yes

alpine sable
#

Ok so

#

Mario was

#

3x+2y=19

#

Ima convert it to the formula and can you chec

#

Uh what do i do here

cold monolith
#

Looks like for Mario you have y=-3/2 x + 19/2

#

So you should probably rewrite Luigi’s equation now

alpine sable
#

Ok

#

Thx

#

Y=-2/4x+6?

cold monolith
#

Can you simplify that first fraction?

alpine sable
#

Oh yes

#

-1/2

cold monolith
#

Right

#

Now graph both lines

alpine sable
#

Ok now i need ur suggestion lol

#

Look what my math teacher did to me

#

She printed it out but the printer lines are barely visible what do i do 😭😭

#

Could we skip to the next question

#

I can graph it and draw the lines later

#

Im good with that

#

We can skip to the next question ig

cold monolith
#

Making your own marks and lines is literally what you should do

alpine sable
#

Yea ill do that after we do the next question

#

Bow

#

Now

#

Heres the last thing i need help with

cold monolith
#

The one where you find the price of the snacks?

alpine sable
#

Yes

cold monolith
#

It’s where the lines cross

alpine sable
#

How?

#

How do you know thats the answer

#

Could u explain why i mean

#

The question is the one that starts with determine btw

cold monolith
#

Alternatively, since you now have two equations solved for y, and y is the same in both equations that means the other sides have to be equal too

alpine sable
#

Im confused

cold monolith
#

Y is the price of a bag of Funyuns

#

In both equations

#

And it didn’t change from Mario to Luigi

alpine sable
#

Ok

cold monolith
#

So if y=A and y=B, then A=B

alpine sable
#

Ah i get it

#

Wait

#

Actually

#

On the graph

#

Theres a part im confused on

#

So

#

Would there be four lines on the graph?

cold monolith
#

No

#

There will be two lines

alpine sable
#

Wait

#

So what would the x -axis be?

#

Snacks?

cold monolith
#

Unless you decide to count the axes as lines too

#

The x variable represents the cost of a bag of Doritos

alpine sable
#

What about funyuns?

cold monolith
#

The x axis is a number line for the purpose of displaying that value

#

The y variable is the price of a bag of Funyuns

#

That’s what the words say

alpine sable
#

Well dont we need an axis for cost tho?

cold monolith
#

How do you mean?

alpine sable
#

Ait

#

Wait

#

Maybe

#

Id understand better if u can explain what relations the graph is supposed to be showing you?

cold monolith
#

If you pick one of the equations, say Mario’s equation, then any point on that line is showing you how much a bag of doritos and a bag of Funyuns would have to cost for him to buy 3 Doritos and 2 Funyuns and spend $19

alpine sable
#

So would i lable the y axis cost?

cold monolith
#

When x is 0 that would mean the Doritos were free and the Funyuns had to make up the total he spent

#

No, the x axis is the cost of Doritos and the y axis is the cost of Funyuns

alpine sable
#

OHHH

#

ok ty for ur help

#

Im good now tysm

cold monolith
#

The amount he spent determines the location of the line

alpine sable
#

Ye i see

cold monolith
#

Ok, good

alpine sable
#

Thx

cold monolith
#

Ye

heady light
#

This is probably pretty sad, but is anyone half decent with 9th grade algebra?
I have 10 problems im clueless on

woven thorn
#

there is definitely people here who can do 9th grade algebra just drop the problems

#

@heady light

fresh salmon
#

Hey can anyone help me with some year 10 advanced mathematics area questions?

#

Just on a call real quick there’s only 1 or 2

shrewd warren
#

Hii help me this

heady light
alpine sable
#

posted his entire homework lmao

heady light
#

not all of it

#

the rest is quadratic functions

#

and hence why i said “prob pretty sad”

fresh salmon
#

Anyone know how to help? Sorry

shrewd warren
noble cape
#

Why is the range of sqrt(x) restricted to positive values? I read this in a few books, but both -2 and 2 should be the images of sqrt(4)

viral root
#

If x + 12 = 15, then x + 32 =?

oak chasm
#

@noble cape The square root symbol is the principal square root, which is generally the positive square root.

alpine sable
#

can someone help me with this questions

upbeat gorge
#

petition to rotate your picture 90 degrees counterclockwise so people don't break their necks

alpine sable
#

,rotate

ocean sealBOT
alpine sable
#

,rotate

ocean sealBOT
upbeat gorge
#

for #8 evaluate it individually

alpine sable
#

idk how to do it

#

ive been absent for a while from school. was at the hospital

#

apparently im supposed to know how to do this so im not excused

short turtle
#

how is the answer 6 and 1 ??

upbeat gorge
#

do you know cycles of i, ggwp?

short turtle
#

nope

oak chasm
#

@short turtle Go through all the numbers from 1 to 20. See how many match set A's definition.

upbeat gorge
#

as in $i^1, i^2$, and so on

ocean sealBOT
oak chasm
#

Similarly, see how many match both A and B at the same time.

short turtle
#

so the question ask us to find the matches?

spare sage
#

yeah so in normal language its basically asking how many multiples of 3 are strictly between 1 and 20 for part i and how many are both multiples of 3 and 4 and are also strictly between 1 and 20 for part ii

#

i think im not sure but if its interpreted that way then the answers are 6 and 1

short turtle
#

how bout part ii

spare sage
#

ok so set A is all the multiples of 3 and set b is all the multiples of 4

short turtle
#

intersection between a and b?

spare sage
#

so what would A intersection B be

#

it would basically be all integers that are in A and B, meaning it must be a multiple of both 3 and 4 right

#

so how many such integers are between 1 and 20

short turtle
#

so part i is asking to find how many multiples of 3 between 1 to 20 and part ii is asking how many intersections between a and b from 1 to 20??

spare sage
#

i think so

upbeat gorge
#

for reference n(S) is the cardinality of S, or the number of elements in set S, or basically how many things satisfy the conditions of S in your case

spare sage
#

im not solid on set theory but it works out with the answers

short turtle
#

Oo I got thanks so much

spare sage
#

np

alpine sable
#

damn

ruby plover
#

Hello!

My solution to this was (5÷4)×(3×3) = 11.25 but it's the wrong answer.

(5÷4) to get the value of each individual mini square.

(3*3) to get the total amount of mini squares in the second bigger square.

Why is my answer incorrect?

woeful pulsar
#

obviously 11.25 is not the total number of squares

ruby plover
#

why would it count the squares

woeful pulsar
#

there are 5 squares in the top diagram

ruby plover
#

it says the value of the first big square is 5

woeful pulsar
#

but they didn't say how they get that value

ruby plover
#

okay so it also counts the square that contains all the mini squares inside

woeful pulsar
#

idk what the question is though