#help-0
1 messages · Page 533 of 1
cauchy?
$$1-\frac 1 x \le \log x \le x - 1$$ with equality only at x=1
gfauxpas
just using the upper bound and replacing "x" with "1-x" gives
$\log(x-1) < -x \text{ for } x>2$
gfauxpas
gfauxpas
$\le \sum \frac {-1}{3k} = -\infty$
gfauxpas
aah no this just shows the product converges
becaue you would say exp(-infty)=0 but the original product isn't 0, it's 1, infinity is tricky like that
infinity is always tricky 😭
trying to figure out what went wrong
okay so accordin to AI (grain of salt! but I was stuck)
pi(3k-1)/(3k) ~ (constant)/(cube root n)
and it is NOT asymptotically 1
so I apologize for not noticing that, but, i checked its work, it's right
Once in a blue moon
going over my work now to see if we got the right roc
actually chatgpt o4 is not bad at math, and grok is okay too, in think mode
i checked in the appendix
Interesting, yeah ig it does help for parts of the reasoning but if you depend on it for the answer as a whole you doomed
why cant they just make math easier...
Cause then other subjects would get harder and we would struggle even more on those 
subject economics
Manmade subjects are dumb
okay
i think the best thing to do here
is take one more term in the log approximation
${\log\left( 1 - \frac{1}{3k + 3}\right)}$
k
?
$\log(1-x) = -x-\frac{x^2}{2} -O(x^3)$
gfauxpas
the log is in a sum tho
that's okay
$\frac{(3n-1)!!!}{(2n)!!}=\prod\left({ \frac {3}{2} n - \frac {1}{2n}}\right)$$
gfauxpas
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
youre right
as I said, i was looking for mistakes, you foujdn it first, so, ignore that
$\prod_{n=1}^k \left({\frac 3 2 - \frac {1}{2n}}\right)$
lol nooooo
gfauxpas
gfauxpas
anyway you're PROBABLZY just supposed to say sometrhing like
$(3n-1)!!! ~ \text{constant} \cdot 3^n n!$
gfauxpas
,w 3 - 1/4
this is allowed, right?
,w 3/2 - 1/4
anyway is fine
great, so, how to make a substitution so this looks like log(1-y) for y= something?
we have to factor 3/2 tho, rgiht?
yes!
in which case we have y = 1/3n
$=\sum_{n=1}^k \left({\log(3/2)+\log(1-\frac {1}{3n})}\right)$
gfauxpas
yup
$\sum_{n=1}^k \left({\log(3/2) +\frac {1}{3n}+\frac{2}{9n^2} - O((3n)^{-3})}\right)$
gfauxpas
back to product sum land?
$$\prod_{n=1}^k \frac 3 2 + e^{3^{-1}n^{-1}} + e^{2^19^{-1}n^{-2}} + O((3n)^{-3})$$
and we can simplify $$O((3n)^{-3} = O(n^{-3})$, and then put $x^n$ and bring it back to an infinite sum
gfauxpas
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
$$\prod_{n=1}^{+\infty}\left({\frac{3}{2}x^n}\right) \cdot \left({ \exp\left({\frac{1}{3n}}\right) \exp\left({\frac {2}{9n^2} }\right) \cdot O(n^{-3})}\right)$$
whew!
sure, ill explainit!
we just ... took e^everything
the way we go from a product to a log sum is taking the logarithm of everything
to go from log sum back to product you take exp of everything
shouldnt the e^ be multiplied together then
oh, yes, you're absolutely right
gfauxpas
why is there x^n
oh right
lol chatgpt found a shortcut
but
this was good brain exercise, it just, found a shortcut that didnt require knowing how to simplify (3n-1)!!!
my way or the short way?
my brain is numbed 😭
either way
step 1. okay with this?
oh i meant that
that mistake is fixed in the next step
but good eye
convert the product to log sum
here I discarded the n, because i never meant it to be there anyway
yup
factor out the 3/2 so I get something of the form log(1-y), because that has a known power series
here y = 1/(3n)
yeah
this is the expansion
except diid I switch the sign
I did switch the sign but it doesnt change the answer
$$\sum_{n=1}^k \left({ \log(3/2)- \frac 1 {3n} - \frac 2 {9n^2} - O((3n)^{-3}) }\right)$$
gfauxpas
Yup
now i go from logsum back to product. here I simplify O((3n)^-3)=O(n^{-3}), and I put back the x^n, and I put the product limits as to infinity, to get it equivalent to the original problem
So this?
$\prod_{n=1}^\infty \left({\frac 3 2 x^n }\right)e^{(3n)^{-1}}e^{\frac{-2}{9n^2} \cdot O(n^{-3})$
gfauxpas
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
yeah actually I forgot the root test works on the log series
so it should have been log(x^n 3/2) you want to analyize
and the rest of the terms vanish because they shrink so fast
now, want to see the smart way to do it
that was all the stupid way because i didnt see the smart way
$\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{(3n-1)!!!}{(2n)!!} x^n$
gfauxpas
Yup
so if the coefficient is (3n-1)!!!/(2n)!!
then the ratio test tells us that the radius is equal to
$L=\lim \sup \left \vert {\frac {a_{n+1}}{a_n}} \right \vert$
rather, it's 1/L
gfauxpas
here a_n is a ratio
of two sequences, call them N_n and D_n for numerator and denominator
N_n = (3n-1)!!!
N[n+1]=(3(n+1)-1)!!!
D_n = (2n)!!
D[n+1]=(2(n+1))!!
,w (3n-3)/(2n+2)
ratio test, take n->infity
Its the ratio test all along?
Omg
let me cheer you up with a story
Jesus
I had an okay-ish Calc II professor
but she was an unfair grader
and I worked so hard and got every problem right on the take-home midterm
and she gave me like a 70 or 80 or something for it because I didn't "simplify" enough and didn't "show my work" enough
even though to most math professors it would have been fine
‘Simplify enough’ 🥀
including my calc I professor, who was a professional, a researcher, he taught me what standards he liked; the calc ii professor was a comp sci teacher
so
I was a teacher's pet but I wanted revenge anyway
in a passive aggressive way, not aggresive
so for the final
every single problem I used a method that was long and complicated and for sure was not on her answer key
using obscure hyperbolic trig identities
"weird" convergence tests
doing things like what we did with logarithm series
and on my grade, which of course I got an A on that exam, you can tell she marked "X" then erased it and marked "right" then erased it back and forth before she decided right
I'm quite sure it took her way longer to grade my test than any other student's
it's okay she liked me
she said, when I get to university proper, i should take topology, I for sure will love it - she was wrong lol
But ure still very creative in math
That’s the thing I’m struggling with
Anyway
Thank u for everything
Since the start
U’ve helped a lot and i appreciate it
Wish you luck
.close
it takes practice
Closed by @unique dune
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please help me to understand and solve this problem
$Let X_i, i=1,2,3 be standard normals, let Y be defined Y_1=X_1+X_2+x_3, Y_2= X_1-X_2,Y_3=X_1-X_3. Obtain the joint of Y_1, Y_2, Y_3$
Alex
please help us understand your problem.
Let $X_{i, i}=1,2,3$ be standard normals, let Y be defined $Y_1=X_1+X_2+x_3, Y_2= X_1-X_2,Y_3=X_1-X_3.$ Obtain the joint of $Y_1, Y_2, Y_3$
Thanks, first time using that option
walking rat
I'm not entirely sure, but from what I understand it's looking for the joint density function of Y, and as far as I know, I should use the Jacobian
@livid marsh Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
where does one go after differentiating, i need to find the max value somehow but idk how
Find the zeros/critical points
And then plug into F(x)
Whichever is largest value
Thats the maximum
yes but dont i need to plug it into F'(x) somehow?
Solve F’(x) for zeros
Set equal to zero
And solve which X’s make it zero
As you notice you have a polynomial you can solve multiplied by an X so you know atleast one x is zero
Factor the inside or use quadratic formula
Which line don't you understand first
From 4x^2+3x+1= ... i understand how to do it but how do we transition to that to the"Since F'(x) changes sign.."
sorry if im not making sense, but why do we have to do this and why does it help with the boxes below
@crystal summit Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @crystal summit
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
See it is like F'(x) <0 for maximum first we find the critical points by doing F'(x)=0 since there is only one real rool x=0 critical point is 0 now put it in the function
You will get 26
thanks that makes a lot more sense :))
Since we have proved that 4x^2+3x+1 is positive term we can apply wavy curve for only -x<0
ohhh yes thank you
Welcome
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why is this wrong?
cos(37π/12)= cos(3π+ π/12)
It this a test
can you work with this
yup
Cos(pi/3 + 11 pi/4)
shame! shame!
OHHHHHH i see now what i did wrong
Check it
Yup and pi was a typo
Closed by @radiant oasis
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey guys! I don't really understand this solution, particularly the application of pigenhole principle
Like I understand that if it's prime that either g(ri) or h(ri) is a unit, but i don't understand why by PHP that g(ri) must be a unit for at least nM distinct indices
@gray tulip Has your question been resolved?
@gray tulip Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @gray tulip
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me with this question
my initial thought was to find where L1 and L2 intersect then we can determine the direction vector and a vector equation for P
but L1 and L2 are skew lines
@obtuse berry Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey, what is overcounting? How do I know if I'm doing overcounting when im doing combinatorics questions?
For example, let us consider this question: "How many ways are there to split a dozen people into 3 teams, where each team has 4 people? How many ways are there to split a dozen people into 3 teams, where one team has 2 people, and the other two teams have 5 people each?"
Is there any method that I can follow to understand when there is overcounting going on, and how do I adjust for it? Please help! Thank you.
overcounting is when you count the same arrangement/selection/whatever two or more times
there isn't really a "method" to recognizing when it happens
you learn it organically
can you solve the question I mentioned? so that I can see at least how to approach
ok so let's look at a 4-4-4 split
let's pretend for a moment that the teams have distinct identities (ie Team A, Team B, Team C)
then the number of team allocations could be phrased as, for example, $$\binom{12}{4} \cdot \binom{8}{4},$$or a bit more elegantly as $\frac{12!}{4!^3}$
this is not the answer yet, but i want you to tell me whether it makes sense to you thus far
@rugged ermine
Ann
$\binom{12}{4}$ ways to fill team A, then $\binom{8}{4}$ ways to fill team B once we've already put 4 people into team A --- and then team C gets whoever is left.
Ann
then where is the overcounting part here?
im gonna get to it soon
this one looks fine
and understandable
first take 4 ppl
then from the remaining 8 take 4 more
ok, so when making this count we assumed that the teams themselves are distinct (ie there's a Team A, a Team B and a Team C)
this made it possible for us to do the count but it also made us overcount everything
i dont get wdym by made overcount everything
because you could take a team allocation like that and, for example, put everyone from team A into team B, and vice versa -- and the team allocation wouldn't be essentially different
no
but they would have different members
i really suck at this kind of maths so please bear w/ me
compare the following rosters:
Team A: Albert, Beth, Carl, David
Team B: Eve, Fred, George, Heather
Team C: Ian, Joan, Kelly, Larry
vs.
Team A: Eve, Fred, George, Heather
Team B: Albert, Beth, Carl, David
Team C: Ian, Joan, Kelly, Larry
do you agree that these are essentially the same team partition
they dont look the same on paper...
but if teams are indistinguishable
then yeah
thats the point
if all i can see is groups of ppl
the original question had the teams be indistinguishable
i MADE THEM distinguishable in order for counting to be possible
but now we need to correct for that
and the way we do that is that we note that the teams can be shuffled around in 3! ways
(without changing who is teammates with whom)
and because of this, we divide our count by 3!
so we always divide by (number of industinguishable)!?
like in banana
we have 3 indistuinguishable As
so divide by 3!
?
like in counting the rearrangements of the word BANANA?
yeah, it's the same idea here.
so always divide by number of industinguishable stuff
we first pretend the A's are distinguishable and then correct for that by dividing by 3!
hesitant to pose that as a rule tbh
why
?
How many ways are there to split a dozen people into 3 teams, where one team has 2 people, and the other two teams have 5 people each?
Wait lets try this
lets assume indisinguishable
assume distinguishable, you mean.
yep, my bad
that would be 12C5
well the group with 2 is always distinguishable from the groups of 5
hmm
yeah good point
the main realization is that when we are doing the formulas, we are accounting as number of ways to choose two teams of 5, but we are not including the point that during the calculation, for some unknown reason, we are overcouting, which happens only when indistinguishable stuffs are present
so we divide by that factorial
amiright?
this wording looks a little off the mark to me but i don't know how to fix it.
i think the same
i cant get a proper feel for how we are overcounting in the process
like, how does the binomial coeff formula forget to consider the overcounting
just tell me how which applying the binomial coeff formula, we are unintentionally overcounting
and why we are dividing instead of subtracting
`lemme ask a diff question , how many ways you can arrange the word ARA to form new 3 letter words
RAA
ARA
AAR
thats all
how would you have counted it
3 words 3 spaces
3! -> 6
oh but wait you just counted 3 , can you explain what happened
if it was abc, and three spaces
then for 1st place: 3 options
2nd place: 2 options
3rd place: 1 option
so 3!
so 6
but here it is ara
in the answer sheet answer is (b)symmetric but why isnt reflexive?
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
and...
can you see what you are overcounting
what casses are being overcounted
yes, abc != cab
but ara == ara
yeah exactly thats what mainly happens when you over count
RAA' | RA'A
ARA' | A'RA
AA'R | A'AR
hence we divide the number of same terms after arranging
i.e. 3!/2 here
can you try mississippi now
after that try to overlap that into what ann was saying
i get it now... but why divide, instead of subtract?
well I can think of the two teams of 5 as A and the single team of two as R
dividing and subtracting are two peas in a pod
what does it mean to multiply for example
3*2
what are you doing here, adding 3 two times?
yep
similar case is for dividing ,
15/3
what does it mean to divide here?
number of 3 required to vanish 15?
yes!
so when we talk about dividing the ghost A' from ARA'
we are essentially saying to remove the extra number of A
if we go on subtracting its gonna take a lot of time for big words such as mississippi
got it!
it makes sense now
thanks
but
one last question
im selecting k ppl from n ppl
nCk?
yes
and..
by multiplication rule
n(n-1)(n-2)...(n-k+1)
but then
prof says
he divides by k!
because "you can choose k ppl in any order"
and then the formula becomes nCk
order? where did the order come from?
yeah cause thats choosing
permutation and combination are different thingsa
choosing means to just choose k data points from n set
for example i have a basket of 5 candies , i wanna eat 3
there are different type of candies in the basket , there is a candy corn, a candy cane , chupa chups , bubble gum , dark chocolate
now choosing 3 candies would mean , i am gonna take any 3 from the 5
however permutation or arranging them would mean the order i eat it in
hence arranging/permutating means to arrange the chosen data points in order
hence
nCk *k! = nPk
Closed by @rugged ermine
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi
How do math people find out where they are going wrong in calculations
Write clearly. You'd be shocked at how helpful it can be to put some effort into making your calculations pretty
Eventually you get into a habit of making every part very clear, and it helps with catching mistakes
It can also be helpful to see if your answer makes sense within the context, if it’s a word problem.
I am doing calculations programmatically
what kind of calculations
wdym programmatically
ah
you're... being a bit vague in what you are actually doing and actually want to know
^ How is this vague ??
I am calculating averages, when I do manually I get different answer, when I use excel I get different and when I do using python I get different
How do i know which one is correct
The problem is the numbers are in float and very precise
There could be rounding stuff going on I have no idea
If you're getting different values in all of them you're probably typing the formulas wrong
I cross checked that many times
Then you should get the same values or very similar to a lot of decimals
well you have to show us your work for all 3
AND the data
Do you know about RSI
i do not know what that abbreviation stands for, no.
Closed by @sudden eagle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey guys, I really don't know what to do from here
As far as I am aware
T (being the transitional matrix) * X_0 should be X_1, which is February
Then T * X_2 would be March, and T * X_3 would be April
But that's too tedious, I am guessing I can somehow make it easier by
diagonalizing T with
T = PDP^-1
when I tried to find the eigen values though i couldn't find values for lambda where the determinant would be = 0
i ended up with this equation = 0
this tells me nothing though
this just says x = 0.95 and x = 0.998
while the solution here says this instead
so im really confused
nvm had one wrong value
.close
Closed by @real quail
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Says here that x+dx = 100*1
But i dont get why it gets multiplied instead of adding.
Also since dx =1/10 and that x is 100, i think that x+dx should look like 10/100. Somebody tell me how this works
thats notation for 100.1
some countries use that
or its because the book is old
Still dont get it, please explain it to me further
100+0.1=100.1
Closed by @green oasis
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
tam má log(x-2) < 0
ty tam máš -log(x+1) < 0
když odděláš to - tak by to mělo fungovat
ale je to trošku přebytečný
jo, takhle by to mělo jít
Ale ajtak to je cele zle 💀
Vypadá to dobře, akorát to teď musíš dobře zkombinovat
(-inf,-2/3)U(2,inf)
(-1,-2/3)U(2,inf)
Dobre ale tu je spravna odpoved (0,1/9)U(1,inf)
Aha, ono je to totiž napsaný jako $\
\log_3({x}) + 1$
MathIsAlwaysRight
Proto nemám rád když se vynechávaj závorky
Toto je trošku jiný než log(x+1)
No, každopádně, absolutní hodnota něčeho je > 1 právě když je to něco buď menší než -1, nebo větší než 1
takže stačí řešit
log(x) + 1 > 1
log(x) + 1 < -1
(log je myšlen se základnou 3 samozřejmě)
log(x) + 1 není to samý jako log(x+1)
Ja som menil len ten prvy riadok
ano, ale nemůžeš změnit log(x) + 1 na log(x+1)
To chapem
tak co se stalo tady?
Tu metodu tvýho doučovatele vůbec nechápu, ale nemyslím si že by se tam mělo něco měnit
možná bude lepší to prostě udělat normálně
A to jak
jenom tady tento sloupec
bohatě to stačí
ten druhej sloupec je úplně zbytečnej
|něčeho| > 1 právě tehdy když
něco > 1
nebo
-něco < -1
takže ti stačí vyřešit ty dvě nerovnice a nemusíš řešit nic navíc
@quasi sonnet Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have a homework in measure but I am completely stuck
Can anyone give me an idea
@bright fiber Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Which idea is the final
One sec
can you please type it out
Ohh
So you intergrated
And took the value to 0,1
I mean your on the right path
ok let f in the space L^1 the space of lebesg integrable function from X to [0,1 ] such that the integral of f over x is the same as the integral of f^2 over x show that there exists a measurable set E such that f = X_E
yah the problem i am stuck now i dont now how to pass from the set E to x to compleat the contrapositive
Which after should be integral X then “fdų= intX f^2 dų then
Did you prove theres an measurable set
do you mean the exsistence of E
Yea
in the direct method no i didnt now how to construct one
Integral , X E ų
You get it after this
this is the measure of E
ok
ok
when
Ye
aha
That should be the last part
Of where you need to go
Idk if you went off after that
Then you
but the thing this is the integral over E but i need the integral over X
the main problem is that in the contrapositive proof i don't know how to pass from this integral to say that the integral of f over X is not the same as of f^2
ok
Im making a pdf
!nopdf
Please post images (such as PNGs or JPGs) of the question rather than other filetypes such as PDFs which have to be downloaded. Non-image downloads can potentially contain viruses or other security risks.
Back
yo did your phone died ?
well in any case welcom back
It bugged my words are we deadass
like did your space bare got broke ?
can you translate it
this one says "always holds. but since the intergral are equal
how does the equality of the integrals implys that f(x) almost evry where
i think i did atleast
mb
if i didnt mbmb
i cant help nomo my battery gonna die
if it isnt solved later ill help
whait i dont thik that the equality of the integrals is equvalent to the equality almost evry wher
well thats what i had wrote i might be wrong tho
ok you give me some clearness tho ty very much go charge your phone
I think i did it, @lapis jungle I just want to ty you gived me the idia of how to construct E, I am sure i was not gonna find it with out you bro ty so mush
.close
Closed by @bright fiber
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
find alpha (all angles in black are also alpha)
!xy
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
It's exactly as I said. A zigzag line starts at point A, which is endpoint of a diameter AB of a circumference. Every angle of the jump is equal to alpha, as show in the figure. After 4 "jumps", the zigzag line ends at point B. What is the value of alpha
The answer is apparently 72
I think this problem might be wrong
Yeah, honestly, probably is
.close
Closed by @fringe cliff
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how's my proof here?
fine
Closed by @zinc haven
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help doing the integration here.
I have drawn the graph (hopefully its correct)
But the result I find is not even close to the answer [432/15]
wait i need to type slowly
Otherwise its just simple area finding 😅
uhm like domnt you just have to dom double integral on that area then done?
Dom?
@obtuse sky Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @obtuse sky
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I must proof this
I have this so far:
or maybe f: X -> Y , f(C,D,E) = (?, N \ {D u E}, D u E)
i am not sure about the functions :/
@warm quarry Has your question been resolved?
@warm quarry Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
did you try drawing a picture
Send the picture
yea no one can tell unless you share your picture
@solid seal Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is a)ii) x=2?
what is your reasoning?
When the equation is equated to 0 the value is 2
what equation?
so the values are x<2 and x<2
what's the difference btw those two inequalities?
23456789 why are you setting it equal to zero that is polynomial solving for x
0^-3 is impossible
(ii) is asking for the range of x values for which your expression in (i) is valid
so start by telling us your answer from (i)
then how can x=2 be valid?
ur doing A level maths?
yes
id check TLmaths website he does free full course of video teachings i used it to teach myself alone. he has a entire section of ranges of validity
it is very good
https://www.buymeacoffee.com/TLMaths
Navigate all of my videos at https://www.tlmaths.com/
Like my Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/TLMaths-1943955188961592/ to keep updated
Follow me on Instagram here: https://www.instagram.com/tlmaths/
im like 90% sure first part doesnt affect 2nd part
Is the answer -1<x>1
you have to take the validity of your own question, that is the validity of his question
he is saying this is fundemental validity
of the basic expression where x is just x
so if x is 2x, it changes the validity of x
as it becomes modulus 2x < 1
so the answer is -1/2<x<1/2
your is not 2x
it is x/2
if you think (1+x)^n = (1+x/2)^-3, you can see n=-3 and x=x/2
so using the rule modulus x<1, and you know x=x/2. the new validity is modulus x/2<1
@pseudo aurora Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @pseudo aurora
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Im trying to understand this..
i get that hadamard basis is 1/sqrt(2) times the "amplitudes" but i just dont know
should i do 1/sqrt(2) * 2/3... then 1/sqrt(2) * sqrt(5)/3, then add the two... or do i need to apply borns rule and square each first?
What's the Hadamard basis?
So it seems to me you just apply to apply a change of coordinates
Unless I'm not reading well into the physics
whats the point of giving the + sign here? ... if when we apply hadamard we need to do both plus and minus?
like would the outcome be any different if there was a negative sign in there?
It's kinda like rotating the system 45 degrees i suppose
Sorry that was probably not a useful way of explaining it
i guess you are referring to the qubit itself?
Its like, describing a point with respect to two different coordinate systems?
should i think of all of this like a sphere?
You just have a vector written in components wrt |0>, |1> and are asked to express it in terms of |+> and |->
The value +2/3 and +sqrt(5)/3 have no special meaning here, that's just what the text has given you
a 2d vector?
so given this: .... no matter what just disregard that plug sign in the middle? as it really doesnt matter?
If you change the sign you change the exercise
hmm maybe i should take this a step further back
is this saying theres 2/3 of a chance its outcome is 0
and sqrt(5)/3 chance it is 1?
I'm sorry I don't know the phyisical interpretation, I'm just reading it as any linear algebra problem where you're changing the coordinates of a vector from 1 basis to another
Think back to you basic linear algebra
i didnt take linear algebra 
oof
Well that's rough
You might find more luck in a physics help server then ^^;
i was told it wasnt needed when signing up for this class.. and the linear algebra lecture was the only lecture labeled as "optional"
i will find my way there then
Yeah it might not be necessary, but it'd definitely help
I honestly think some basic linear algebra is too fundamental to be skipped in any physics course
Yeah
But physicists always manage somehow
like i think of a vector as a list
like an array
with elements inside
that can be strings
im so cooked
Thats definitely one interpretation, but there's a ton about writing vectors in terms of a basis that you're missing out on
You can think of your "state" as just the list (2/3, √5/3)
Same goes for |+>, |->
But understanding what a basis is and how to switch from one another needs some more learning
That's straight up linear algebra
that im so clueless on
There's a formula for the inverse of a matrix
Yh
so basically i just plug it into the fraction there?
And the entries
Where did the extra - come from?
The one before
Why a minus before the fraction?
thats whats in the formula?
That's an equal sign
So, what's the inverse matrix?
-1?
wait
so i diregard the fraction?
is it as simple as just plugging in the numbers here?
You don't disregard it, you have to compute it as well
In this specific case it's 1 so it doesn't affect anything
so its -1 followed by this with the plugged in numbers?
If, say, you got 5/3 as a result, you would have to multiply each entry by 5/3
Why do you keep saying it's -1?
We agreed that's not a minus before the fraction
It was an equal sign
1 times that matrix leaves it unchanged, so yes, that matrix there is the inverse you were looking for
Would you know what to do if that number was, idk, -3?
Correct
@serene vault Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
It would be best if you moved to another channel
.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone explain recursive sequences pls i forgot how to do it
It's been a while since I've done this but iirc, you start be giving a starting term (2 and 1 in this case) and then let the following term be the computation of the previous term (in this case you have previous term and 2 terms before sum together).
@opal coral Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @opal coral
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can i ask for help with a electrical math question?
@craggy egret Has your question been resolved?
!da2a
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
can somebody explain this to me i dont get it
@craggy egret Has your question been resolved?
basicaly both
i didnt go onthe day this was taught because i was lick
sick
did you learn about negative feedback?
and lecturer didnt hae voice on recording
also have you done nodal analysis?
you don't know KCL and KVL?
that's basically what the equations state
that the sums of the currents in/out of a node are zero
so does that explain to you where the equations come from?
oh yeah
as for why V- is 0, it's because of the negative feedback
wait do you know what an op amp does?
amplifies signals
sure, but that's a very general notion
like do you know how it decides its output voltage?
basically in an op amp, Vo = 1000000(V+ - V-)
where the 1000000 is some very large gain
hmm
so it takes the difference between V+ and V-, scales it up by a really large number, and that's the output voltage
sorry if dont respond in time im also doing boolean elgebra atm
oh ok
do you see that the output voltage is fed back into the V- slot through some resistors?
there is 1 beetween v2 and v-
is that the feedback resistor
yes
now imagine that the V- is some nontrivial positive voltage
you see that V+ is 0
so that means the Vo is going to be a really large negative voltage
and that'll bring V- to some negative voltage
likewise, you can see if that V- is some nontrivial negative voltage, it's going to make Vo really positive and bring V- positive
there's "negative feedback" here in the sense that if V- is anything but really close to zero, the output swings to bring it toward zero
hmm
so V- ends up being a really small value close to zero
hmm
and in general, because the gain of the op amp is so high, V+ and V- are really close to each other because of negative feedback
hmm
note if you have positive feedback, the op amp just produces one of the voltage rails
You can assume V+ = V- for op amps in negative feedback
and in this case, V+ is tied to 0V, so V- is also 0
hmm
and that's basically it
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@dry zephyr Has your question been resolved?
@dry zephyr do you know the answer?
i do but i just dont know how to find it
is the answer -x+5y-22z+114=0?
yes it is
so its not a standard approach but i just thought how that plane would be and i figured if you take any point on one line say (2,-4,3) and take a random point on the other line (5k, k-6, 5), then the line formed by midpoints of these two points lies on the required plane.
I would suggest helping him and not just handing him the idea
similarly if you take any point on the 2nd line, say (0,-6,5) and any random point from 1st line (2+3t, 5t-4, t+3), so the line formed by midpoints of these two points also lies on the required plane
Let him do it on his own
the same way you find midpoint btw two points (x1, y1, z1), (x2, y2, z2)
i am telling him a way to solve it, not giving him the answer directly
by taking the average right?
you will get two vectors which both lie on the required plane
yes
ok i just have a question
why cant i just take the two points given and take the midpoint of that>
might be a dumb question
you can do that, but that will give a coordinate of a single point on the required plane, how would you find the equation of the plane by knowing the coordinate of just 1 point?
Your first message was literally telling him what you did
moreover as I said, my way isn't standard, so there is a better way sure
Sigh nvm just continue let's not waste his time as well
ok
I tried plugging the two points into the plane equation and find the mid point.
and what you got?
you should get something like
(x, y, z) where each of x,y,z are functions of t or k
well i got a number doing that
oh that, you plugged the given points and found midpoint
i plugged (2,-4,3) and (0,-6,5) into -x+5y+22z=C
and took the average of them
yea it didnt give me the right answer tho
i have also tried finding the distance
yes idk how to solve it that way but, from my way, you will get 2 vectors that lie on the required plane. Then you can convert those two vectors in parametric form and then take their unit vectors and take its cross product to get the normal vector from plane.
Now you have - Normal Vector from Plane in form (a,b,c)
and you also know coordinate of a point on the plane in form - (x1, y1, z1)
you can use point normal form of plane to find equation of plane
do you understand?
isnt that a bit extra though?
for the normal
i just crossed the two direction vectors
unless that is what you meant
yes, that's what cross product mean
(a, b, c) × (d, e, f) and you will get the normal vector from plane in form (g, h, i)
ok so what do i do after finding the average between the two points
you will not get any fix coordinate after finding average, instead you will get something a vector, did you find the midpoint?
yea, you can ping helpers and see if someone gives a normal answer, if you don't want to do it this way
yea i got (1+(5/2)k, -5+(1/2)k, 4)
convert it into parameteric form
i dont mind exploring other ways
okay
what you got?
x= 1+(5/2)k
y= -5+(1/2)k
z=4
i took midpoint of (2,-4,3) and (5k,-6+k,5)
correct
now these are the two vectors that lie on the plane, you can easily take t=0 or k=0 to get exact coordinates of 1 point that lies on this plane
(because we need atleast 1 point to use point-normal form of plane equation)
a(x-x0) + b(y-y0) + c(z-z0) = 0
you know this? point normal equation of plane
what is the point-normal form actually
yea no, i was never introduced that
where x0, y0, z0 is any point that lies on the plane and (a,b,c) is the normal vector to the plane