#help-0

1 messages · Page 527 of 1

lost belfry
#

did you mean this to be 1?

patent vale
lost belfry
#

this drawing is making little sense

#

what are the numbers supposed to indicate?

patent vale
#

or backwards

#

all red lines are vertical or horizontal

lost belfry
#

can you write your problem in terms of a proper question?

patent vale
#

i dont know how to write this up but ill try

lost belfry
#

its presumably just asking to find a slope, so it cant be that hard

#

if you can explain your diagram properly also it would be great

patent vale
#

i dont know if reflection is the proper way to describe this

lost belfry
#

okay, so the negative numbers in the original make no sense

patent vale
#

yeah that was just brainblast

tranquil lagoon
hushed locust
fluid compass
# patent vale

I like how you made the angles to hide that it's 45 degrees

patent vale
#

i know the answer and im not looking for why its the answer im looking for how

fluid compass
#

best method would be to 'complete the rectangle'

#

and join the 2 points

patent vale
lost belfry
#

here is a more bashy solution:
suppose the angle made by the line with $AB$ is $t$.\
then $BG = \tan(t)$. So $GC = 3 - BG = 3- tan(t)$. \
then note that angle $FGC$ is also equal to $t$. \
$So FC = tan(t)(3-tan(t))$\
So $DF = 3 - FC = tan^2(t) - 3tan(t) + 3$\
finally we know angle $EFD$ is also $t$\
So $tan(t) = \frac{1}{tan^2(t) - 3tan(t) + 3}$. Solve this cubic in tan(t) to get the slope of the line

patent vale
#

,w tan(t) = 1/tan^2(t) - 3tan(t) + 3 solve ts

ocean sealBOT
patent vale
#

,w tan(t) = 1/tan^2(t) - 3tan(t) + 3

ocean sealBOT
#

fastrack_and_backtrack

patent vale
#

,w tan(t) = 1/(tan^2(t) - 3tan(t) + 3)

patent vale
#

pi/4

#

okay

lost belfry
#

as you can see, we indeed get pi/4 to be the principal colution

#

that is 45 degrees

patent vale
#

isnt it negative though

#

oh wait

lost belfry
#

you can read my solution, where t is the angle made by the line and AB

#

it should not be negative just be looking at it

patent vale
#

yeah i just noticed okay this problem makes sense now

lost belfry
#

this is t, in my solution

#

its just chasing angles and lengths till you reach full circle

#

to get an equation

patent vale
#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @patent vale

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

lone heartBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

crude cloud
lone heartBOT
crude cloud
#

How to find externally

rustic coral
crude cloud
#

But pq should be 3?

rustic coral
#

I’m using 2 and 1 to represent the ratio

#

Not the actual lengths

#

Call them 2k and k if it makes you happy

#

Wait the length of PQ isn’t even 3

#

What

#

Where is 3 coming from

crude cloud
rustic coral
#

???

#

You’re not dividing it internally, but externally

crude cloud
#

Pr-2 rq -1

rustic coral
#

By definition, external division means that you extend the line segment to a point beyond the line segment

#

So if we divide externally in the ratio 2:1, then you’re extending to the segment to a point such that the “new” part is half the length of the overall new segment

crude cloud
#

Ok

rustic coral
#

Granted the question is a little ambiguous cause it never says whether you extend beyond P or beyond Q

#

So there’s that

crude cloud
#

The question says r divides pq

#

R divides pq ?

#

@rustic coral

rustic coral
#

“divides the line joining”

#

So R is on the line, not necessarily the segment

#

And like I said earlier, for external division, it won’t be on the segment

#

In general, if R divides PQ in the ratio m:n, then PR:RQ=m:n

#

(Assuming that you extend beyond Q and not P)

#

Note that this is the same ratio as internal division, it’s just that the location of R differs (on vs off the segment PQ)

crude cloud
#

Ok

#

I got it now

lone heartBOT
#

@crude cloud Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @crude cloud

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

alpine sable
#

In the modulus inequalities , i do realize how it makes sense to include '+' and '-' for individual modulus in wavy curve method in a single equation but dont know how it does in the multiple modulus equation.

buoyant saddle
#

wavy curvy

#

🤔

alpine sable
buoyant saddle
#

i don’t know what that is but it’s best to just use the definition of absolute value for each

#

then break it up into intervals based on that

tacit arch
#

,tex .abs def

ocean sealBOT
#

riemann

alpine sable
buoyant saddle
alpine sable
#

sorry but its the way i was taught , not well versed about the other method . Whats it called ? ill look up for it

alpine sable
buoyant saddle
#

it doesnt have a name as far as i’m aware

#

it’s just using definitions

#

,av vivseul05

ocean sealBOT
#
vivseul05's Avatar

Click here to view the image.

alpine sable
# ocean seal **riemann**

hmm didnt get it , i know ill have to make cases for each and every modulus then , but dont know how to integrate together

buoyant saddle
#

i’ll do a simpler example only involving two ||

#

|x - 1| + |x| < 2

#

so we know that for x >= 0, |x| = x and for x < 0, |x| = -x. likewise we know that for x >= 1, |x - 1| = x - 1 and for x < 1, |x - 1| = -x + 1

#

then if x >= 1 we have |x - 1| + |x| = x - 1 + x (note that since x >= 1 we also have that x >= 0)

#

then for x < 0 we have |x - 1| + |x| = -x + 1 - x

#

and for 0 <= x < 1 we have |x - 1| + |x| = -x + 1 + x

#

this exhausts all the intervals now

#

just analyze each interval separately

#

x >= 1 : x - 1 + x = 2x - 1 > 2 —> x > 3/2

alpine sable
#

i really appreciate your effort , but itll take some time to really feel it

tacit arch
#

Should draw one of your patented screenshot hand drawn graphs again

buoyant saddle
#

need the keyboard in it too

alpine sable
buoyant saddle
#

lmao

tacit arch
#

It'll help to do the simpler one knief gave you first

buoyant saddle
#

doesn’t have the attention span for it i guess

alpine sable
# tacit arch

hmm i know desmos just dont know how to use it for the complex ones

tacit arch
#

abs(x) also works

alpine sable
#

how do you do that for this?

buoyant saddle
#

it’s positive after the zero point for each of them and negative before it

#

if you read my written out example it would make sense

alpine sable
#

oh there are no sol for it

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @lyric scaffold

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

lone heartBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

hot vale
#

How do I do this

lone heartBOT
hot vale
#

Do I need to use multinomial expansion theorem

jolly notch
#

not necessarily, you can treat this as a binomial system as well

hot vale
#

how

jolly notch
#

[(1+x)+(x^2)]^5

#

two terms

hot vale
#

oh ok

#

ima try that then

#

Would this be the best way to do the expansion

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @hot vale

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

lone heartBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

carmine topaz
#

why does the series have to be >5 ? does the integral guarantee anything about the series value ?

lethal belfry
#

you mean why does the sum of the series have to be more than 5?

carmine topaz
#

ummm the answer is D and it says the series > 5

#

so...

#

yea

woeful zenith
#

Like this

keen idol
#

there is another relevant hypothesis here: decreasing function

mossy reef
sour mica
#

Its the upper riemann sum coz f is decreasing

woeful zenith
carmine topaz
#

wait why does the sum has to be like that

woeful zenith
#

and the sum and integral start at the same point

carmine topaz
#

i mean yea but is that what series are?

woeful zenith
#

Yeah

carmine topaz
#

that sum is js bunch of rectangles?

sour mica
#

the series just sums f(1) + f(2) + ..., which is simply f(1) * 1 + f(2) * 1 + ... which you can claim represents the area of rectangles

carmine topaz
#

i thought its some continuous numer typa thing

woeful zenith
carmine topaz
#

wait this doesnt make sense why is a series like that

#

am i tripping 😭

woeful zenith
woeful zenith
keen idol
#

in general

#

like the formula

carmine topaz
#

height * width

keen idol
#

f(1)*1 can be seen as width 1 and height f(1)

#

f(2)*1 can again be seen as width 1 and height f(2)

woeful zenith
#

wait are my msgs sending

#

Okay now they are

carmine topaz
#

wait so series are js bunch of rectangles and i wasnt told this thing this whole time?

woeful zenith
woeful zenith
woeful zenith
keen idol
#

just for better visualization

carmine topaz
#

hmmm ok but why should it be greater then the integral? nowwhere did it said to use certain type of sum so it kinda depends? no?

woeful zenith
carmine topaz
#

ohhh i get it

#

its js lowkey weird thing of series as a sum

#

wait no the series here is sum right

woeful zenith
#

So the sequence decreases only when you get to x=2, which is the next term, but the function f(x) is decreasing the whole way

carmine topaz
#

yea but like expressing series using bunch of rectangular feels wacky 😭

woeful zenith
#

But instead of rectangles of width 1 you use vanishingly/infinitesimally thin rectangles

carmine topaz
#

but why is the series like that? shouldnt it be some smooth number?

lone heartBOT
#

@carmine topaz Has your question been resolved?

winter light
carmine topaz
#

like isnt that what series are ? cuz some rectangles doesnt feel right ? no ?

buoyant saddle
#

taking the width of each rectangle to be 1

#

and the height of the nth rectangle to be the nth term in the sum

buoyant saddle
carmine topaz
#

bunch of overestimate rectangle aint smooth idk how to explain but

buoyant saddle
#

smooth has a precise mathematical definition that isn’t relevant here

carmine topaz
#

ok

buoyant saddle
buoyant saddle
carmine topaz
#

i understood but i dont like thinking series in that way like it aint smooth 😭

buoyant saddle
#

an integral is a series

#

just with decreasing width of rectangles

carmine topaz
#

so its like the integral expression is the exact one and the series are goofy verison of that ?

buoyant saddle
#

again, series can be interpreted as the sum of areas of rectangles with width 1

carmine topaz
#

imma js accept this 😭

buoyant saddle
#

i mean do you disagree that it gives that area?

carmine topaz
#

no but my brain cant be convinced to think of series as some wacky rectangle 😭

#

in my head series = smooth number

buoyant saddle
#

$\sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n^2} = (1)(1) + (1)\left(\frac{1}{4}\right) + (1)\left(\frac{1}{9}\right) + \dots$

buoyant saddle
carmine topaz
#

so it js same width with changing height ?

buoyant saddle
#

yes

#

let me make it on desmos

#

hold on

carmine topaz
#

the overestimate rectangle diagram js aint it 😭

ocean sealBOT
buoyant saddle
#

but since 1/n^2 is decreasing, the series is larger than the integral

#

like a left riemann sum

carmine topaz
#

so its like series could be anything like a sum it doesnt really have to be smooth ?

buoyant saddle
#

wdym by smooth though

#

i mean you’re ok with left/right riemann sums right

carmine topaz
#

yea

buoyant saddle
#

this is just taking the width of each subinterval/rectangle to be 1

#

and it’s a left endpoint sum

carmine topaz
#

so its js sum

#

series shouldn't be sum 😭

buoyant saddle
#

a series is a sum

#

doesn’t have to be interpreted as a riemann sum

#

but i mean by definition it’s an infinite sum

carmine topaz
#

ok

#

i get it

#

its js my brain doesnt like it

#

thanks for explaining 😀

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @carmine topaz

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

buoyant saddle
#

you’re welcome

lone heartBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

frail walrus
lone heartBOT
frail walrus
#

why does delta t go on the bottom when simplifying

#

dividing something is the same thing as multiplying by the reciprocal?

#

so why isnt it at the top

north rover
frail walrus
#

yes delta t

hushed locust
#

,, \frac{\Delta s/r}{\Delta t} = \frac{\Delta s}{r} \cdot \frac{1}{\Delta t}

north rover
ocean sealBOT
frail walrus
#

right?

proven leaf
#

(\frac{\frac{\Delta s}{r}}{\Delta t}=\frac{\Delta s}{r}\div\frac{\Delta t}{1}=\frac{\Delta s}{r}\cdot\frac{1}{\Delta t}=\frac{\Delta s}{r\Delta t})

ocean sealBOT
#

PajamaMamaLlama

frail walrus
#

dude typing texit so fast wtf

north rover
modern sedge
ocean sealBOT
frail dagger
#

LaTeX gods.

frail walrus
#

bro im being overstimulated

north rover
frail walrus
frail walrus
#

ok thanks guys

#

latex gods

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @frail walrus

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

weak latch
#

Help me solve for x.

lone heartBOT
weak latch
#

Also dont help too much, id prefer to do most of the thinking

potent mirage
#

open all the brackets

weak latch
#

Ok

potent mirage
weak latch
#

in terms of everything else

potent mirage
#

ohk continue

weak latch
#

How did i get x=x+2

#

💔

potent mirage
#

show ur work pls

modern sedge
#

im getting the same thing

weak latch
hasty hill
#

Equation is wrong..check how you got this..maybe try posting the original question

potent mirage
# weak latch

ok that just means that no value of x satisfies the equation

weak latch
#

Ohh

#

The question does have a marking

#

Hint

potent mirage
#

what is it

weak latch
#

It just said the answer

#

No value satisfy

potent mirage
#

yeah thats it

weak latch
#

How do i close

potent mirage
#

.close

weak latch
#

.close

potent mirage
#

type this

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @weak latch

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

lone heartBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

#
Channel closed

Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.

north rover
#

skel

meager kindle
#

I don't get the b)

meager kindle
# north rover skel

I need it to translate from german bc i have no clue how the english terms are

tacit arch
lone heartBOT
# lone heart

The original post of this help channel has been deleted, and it will abruptly close and possibly lock. (This is irreversible.) Please claim a new channel, and don't delete the first message of any future channel you claim.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

slow plume
lone heartBOT
cobalt oriole
#

oh

slow plume
#

sorry 😭

cobalt oriole
#

:D

slow plume
# slow plume help

anyway i dont undertsand jack also why did they use +6 as the asymptote instead of 4? erm yeah

kind trellis
#

what part don't u understand

slow plume
#

well basically the equations

#

so 2 and 3

kind trellis
#

a * b^x + q and a/x + 6?

slow plume
#

yes

kind trellis
#

im GUESSING they want you to solve for a b and q

slow plume
#

yes they do sorry for not mentioning

kind trellis
#

so we know f goes through the points (0,4) and (-2,-12) right

slow plume
#

yes

kind trellis
#

from the graph

#

so what happens if you put x = 0 and f(x) = 4 in the equation?

slow plume
#

well see i need to solve a and b

#

q is fine as it would be +4, and we'd substitute 4 into f(x) the +4 becomes -4 cancelling it out and making a =0

#

that frmo what i've tried

#

and that can't be true as if it was it would make b^x = 0 and the answer as q

kind trellis
#

if x = 0 and f(x) = 4, then we get a * b^0 + q = 4

#

which is a + q = 4

slow plume
#

yes...

kind trellis
#

so a = 4 - q

slow plume
#

yeahhh im stumped

#

lmao forget it im clocking in early

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @slow plume

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

lone heartBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

feral drum
#

What's wrong

lone heartBOT
kind trellis
#

pressed the wrong - sign?

hushed locust
#

yeah make sure to use the (-) button

feral drum
#

I hate calculators

kind trellis
#

I have exactly the same one

#

you can check all ur answers on tests

#

it's so good

onyx swallow
#

KEK crazy that they can't code that in so that both - are the same

feral drum
#

EXACTLY

kind trellis
#

why it makes perfect sense

feral drum
#

I've only ever used desmos in a math class

undone ledge
#

yikes

kind trellis
#

(-) means Times -1

#

and - means subtracting

undone ledge
#

oh they are atleast different buttons for them?

hushed locust
#

they do actually mean different things, but it's certainly possible to get a (not 100% reliable!) program which distinguishes them based on context (plenty of other calculator brands do), so it was a conscious choice on the TI programmer's part

onyx swallow
#

additive inverse

#

typo

kind trellis
#

Yes

onyx swallow
#

and in all the cases the context is very clear so this shorthand could be justified and not be confused with the inverse operator

feral drum
#

Why doesn't sin^-1(-0.2) give me the right answer

#

Like why do I have to add pi

onyx swallow
lone heartBOT
# feral drum Why doesn't sin^-1(-0.2) give me the right answer

Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.

feral drum
#

Not the -0.7cos

hushed locust
#

can you show a picture of the entire question?

feral drum
hushed locust
#

so then sin^(-1) would give you this solution over here

north rover
onyx swallow
#

think of $sin^{-1}$ as the inverse of this small piece of the sin function

ocean sealBOT
#

qwertytrewq

onyx swallow
#

because sin is periodic and behaves nicely, this small piece of sin gives us all the information about sin. But when you want a solution on a given interval, taking inverse is not enough. You would need to use this inverse, and the properties of sin function to actually translate the solution to the given interval (in this case [0,2pi]

lone heartBOT
#

@feral drum Has your question been resolved?

feral drum
#

Oh

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @feral drum

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

meager kindle
#

How do I get Omega(w)?

lone heartBOT
meager kindle
#

,rotate

ocean sealBOT
static saffron
#

you know about trig pythagoras?

meager kindle
#

Yes

meager kindle
static saffron
#

yes

meager kindle
#

Können wir dann Deutsch reden oder ist das am Server nicht erlaubt

static saffron
#

Technically allowed, i suppose.
Lets do it in german then

#

Du musst die ebene dir erstmal überlegen in dem der Winkel ist

static saffron
#

darauf basierend musst du mit den gegebenen seiten die winkel und die seiten drumherumg ausrechnen

meager kindle
static saffron
#

Daher, wenn du es voll mathematisch ausrechnen willst brauchst du die ebene in dem der Winkel existiert.

#

Weißt du wie die Strecken lauten in dem der Winkel steht?

#

Du hast sie ja da auch gezeichnet in farbe

meager kindle
#

BG und BE

static saffron
#

Richtig, diese strecken musst du ausrechnen

meager kindle
#

Oder meinst du die Länge der Strecken

#

Ohhhhh

static saffron
#

Die längen kannste dann ja mittels pythagoras

meager kindle
#

Jaja

#

Und dann einfach Cosinussatz

static saffron
#

das würde gehen ja

#

Kannst dir auch nen rechtwinkliges dreieck definieren was den winkel oder einen teil des winkels beinhaltet

#

Aber ja cosinussatz ist vlt am schnellsten

grave matrix
# meager kindle Können wir dann Deutsch reden oder ist das am Server nicht erlaubt

(Ist doch erlaubt; Englisch zu sprechen wird nur empfohlen, denn die Wahrscheinlichkeit eine Sprache reden zu können ist im Allgemein am höchstens wenn jene Sprache Englisch ist :D)
-# (It is allowed; speaking English is just recommended, because the likelihood to be able to speak a language is generally highest when that language is English :D)

#

(wohl oder übel lol)
-# (for better or worse lol)

#

(hab keine Ahnung worum das Problem hier geht, hab einfach nur Deutsch gefunden 🤣)
-# (I've no clue what this problem's about, just found German 🤣)

static saffron
#

Geht einfach nur um einen Winkel der nicht in die typischen Kardinalen Richtungen geht

#

Ist technisch etwas anspruchsvoller aber ja, Lafez hat effektiv die Lösungsstrategie, muss man nur einmal durchrechnen

grave matrix
#

Ah cool

meager kindle
#

Irgendwo habe ich mich sicher verrechnet

grave matrix
#

,rotate

ocean sealBOT
meager kindle
#

Ist Omega=87,2°?

grave matrix
meager kindle
#

174,96

#

Oder meinst du wieso es dort drinnen steht

grave matrix
#

Warum hast du also 7,29 cosw geschrieben

meager kindle
#

Ohhhhh

#

Ich habe zuerst die Subtraktion gemacht und das cos ausgelassen

#

Thx

grave matrix
#

oh lol

#

Ja, die Multiplikation zuerst

#

dh du hättest [etwas] minus [etwas mal cosw] oder so was

static saffron
grave matrix
#

Hängt davon ab, dass du gut mit dem(? grammatik) Algebra arbeiten kannst

static saffron
#

e = sqrt(65)
d = sqrt(116)
z = sqrt(149)

grave matrix
#

oh ja das auch

#

Wurzeln stehen zu lassen geht besser

static saffron
#

Jup, nimmt dir auch keiner Übel

grave matrix
#

ach, "die Algebra" (im Nom.)?

static saffron
#

Jup

meager kindle
#

So

#

w=79°

grave matrix
#

Klingt korrect

meager kindle
#

Ich mache es nachher dann nochmal mit den Wurzeln
Danke für eure Hilfe❤️

grave matrix
#

(hab ne andere Ahnung - die Linien als Vectors zu nehmen, zwei Vectors konstruieren und dann ein Cross-Produkt rechnen)

#

(unnötig aber vielleicht interessant zu versuchen)

meager kindle
#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @meager kindle

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

tawdry matrix
#

yo guys pppllllllssssssss dm me help me to understand powers must talk frensh but its ok if its english

lone heartBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

robust nebula
#

For part d of question 9

lone heartBOT
robust nebula
#

This is what i have been doing but the answers apparently 20

#

Dont kind the area at the top that was a previous try

#

C is O btw mb

woven hedge
#

i think you didn't use the appopriate formula for this case

#

the formula you have used only works if and only if:

  • those two segments are perpendicular
  • both are bases and heights of the triangle
    which is not the case
robust nebula
#

But since its an isosceles cant i split it in half and work that way?

woven hedge
#

actually yes

#

but either way 4*sqrt(2) is wrong for the length of AB

#

it should be 8*sqrt(2)

robust nebula
#

I split it in hlf

woven hedge
#

either way, when you have the coordinates of the triangle, save yourself from all this work

robust nebula
#

Thats why i took 4 swuarw root 2

woven hedge
#

and use the coordinate formula

robust nebula
#

Whats that

woven hedge
#

for any triangle with coordinates known (x_1, y_2) (x_2,y_2) (x_3,y_3)

A = 1/2 | x_1 (y_2 - y_3) + x_2 (y_3 - y_1) + x_3 (y_1 - y_2) |

#

just plug the 3 vertices in this formula

#

saves a lot of headache

woven hedge
#

right know you are calculating just half of the triangle

robust nebula
#

No cause i didnt put in the half no?

#

Like half of the triangle would be 1/2 x bm x o m

#

Ffs autocorrect

#

O M

#

But i just removed th e half from the start

woven hedge
#

oh true

robust nebula
#

Let me try with the formula

woven hedge
#

it'll give 24

#

i though you've included the half

#

my bad

robust nebula
#

It also gives me 14

#

24

woven hedge
#

for the coordinate formula, i've calculated rn and it gave A = 1/2 | 32 - 5 + 21 |

robust nebula
#

Is the book wrong

woven hedge
#

= 24

robust nebula
#

Ye ty

woven hedge
#

i can calculate in the computer

#

since the book gave the formula

#

one sec

robust nebula
#

Okok ty

woven hedge
#

i'm 99% sure it is 24

#

i plugged almost everything in an algorithm and it gave 24.001

robust nebula
#

Okay yeah maybe the books weing

robust nebula
woven hedge
#

no problem!

robust nebula
#

@woven hedge my bad

#

O isnt the center

woven hedge
#

no problem! glad you found out

robust nebula
#

Ty very much

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @robust nebula

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

leaden niche
#

I need help drawing this out and the resultant of it

I will let you know if I need help solving if it dosent work out but so far its just hard to visualize

leaden niche
#

anbody know how to draw this out?

#

would be much appreciated

#

is it any of these options?

queen mirage
#

Lable N S E W

leaden niche
#

since its from north east the line at the bottom is what im using

#

unless its supposed to end when it hits origin

#

im not sure

meager kindle
#

Wait

#

Im trying to sketch it too

leaden niche
#

Ok thanks

queen mirage
leaden niche
#

yes

queen mirage
leaden niche
#

im not sure if i drew it properly tho

#

ok thanks but do i use the one on the right or left

#

or does it not matter

queen mirage
leaden niche
#

ok thanks

#

i had one more small question

#

would the angle be 135?

#

since 180 - 45

queen mirage
#

Of the resultant vector with east ?

#

Which angle are you talking about

leaden niche
#

this one

#

the feta

queen mirage
#

90+45

#

135

#

Yes

leaden niche
#

ok thanks

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @leaden niche

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

lone heartBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

mellow crane
#

Ok so for question 1 i like combined all the resistances and got 18.4 ohms, idk if that's correct but like from there idk where to go like i have the total voltage and so i calculated total current but then what

for question 3 i just have no idea like i'm assuming i have to somehow like work backwards but i don't understand how to make sure like one of the resistors has 0.55A. like i think if one resistor must have a voltage drop of 26.0v across it then it just has to be in series with the source and the resistance total i think would be 26/1.09 which is 23.9? but then past that i'm just kinda lost

lone heartBOT
#

@mellow crane Has your question been resolved?

lone heartBOT
#

@mellow crane Has your question been resolved?

shell agate
#

Have you asked this in the physics server?

shell agate
mellow crane
#

wait what i didn't know there was a physics server

#

um question 1 wants me to solve the circuit so i have to find all of the unknowns

#

like all the currents, voltages and resistances

shell agate
#

Yea there are servers for every subject

#

Yea

#

Only current is unknown?

mellow crane
shell agate
#

yes

mellow crane
#

but like i have to find the voltage and current going thru each resistor

shell agate
#

Oh so current and voltage through each

#

so V1=IR1

mellow crane
#

yea

shell agate
#

So you get voltage through first resistor

mellow crane
#

i thought that voltage was split in a series circuit so like isn't the voltage thru r1 something smaller than 45.0

#

but idk what it is

shell agate
#

thats why I wrote V1

mellow crane
#

ohh ok

shell agate
#

Just use that

#

I think you can find everything

#

In series current is same

#

In parallel voltage is

mellow crane
#

so like cuz the totsl current is around 2.45A so it's that thru r1 too? and then i have resistance so i can calculate voltage right?

#

and also r4 and r5 are in series right? my friend said they were parallel so i wasn't sure

shell agate
#

total current is total voltage/ total resistance

#

yes r4 r5 series

mellow crane
#

okk, yeah so like 45.0/18.4

shell agate
#

yes

mellow crane
#

ok so if i don't use the rounded number i get 2.44539... so it's about 2.45

shell agate
#

ok

#

it's not exactly 18.4 also

mellow crane
#

yeahhh, it's like 18.40196077...

shell agate
#

yes

mellow crane
#

okkk, and then V1=ItR1 so i do v1= 2.44539...*10.0

shell agate
#

yea ig u can do 2.45

mellow crane
#

ohhh, ic, ok i understand now

shell agate
#

So you can solve ?

#

Ok try

mellow crane
#

v123=ItR123

shell agate
#

what 123

mellow crane
#

like from when i combined the resistances to find the equivalent one

#

cuz now i have to work backwards right

shell agate
#

You have to find separate

#

For each

#

The part where I am not sure is

#

Voltage for r2 and r3

mellow crane
#

yeah but once i have that then i can separate them right?

shell agate
#

yes

#

voltage for r2= voltage for r3

mellow crane
#

right okk

#

so like for them combined i got 34.810868...volts

#

and then i can find for v23

#

and then get v 2 and v 3 separately

shell agate
#

Ah I seem to have made a mistake

mellow crane
#

?

shell agate
#

If you had the answer key it would be easier to figure it out

#

I think you should ask this in the physics server

mellow crane
#

okk i'll try

#

do u know how to do q3 by any chance

shell agate
#

draw 4 resistors, draw voltage 26v , current is 1.09 so 26=1.09 * R

#

idk about the rest

mellow crane
#

okk tysm, i'll ask in the physics server

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @mellow crane

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

slate wind
#

@swanqueen doublt

shell agate
lone heartBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

thin atlas
#

what to do 😭😭😭😭😭

lone heartBOT
vale wigeon
#

derivative of 1 is 0 not 1

thin atlas
#

ok yea I'm still not getting

#

oh

#

ngm

#

got it

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @thin atlas

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

hollow crypt
#

Sup

#

How did they arrive at the second step?

vale wigeon
lone heartBOT
vale wigeon
#

(this channel still has somebody else's name on it. get your own)

lone heartBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

cerulean garnet
lone heartBOT
cerulean garnet
#

how did they get that final result of 145.5mA

#

im trying to find right hand triangles to use trigonometry but idk i cant find it

#

are they doing the difference of hypotenuse between l2 and l1

#

wait lemme try that

#

nvm not sure

lone heartBOT
#

@cerulean garnet Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @cerulean garnet

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

hardy terrace
#

"Find the number of ways in which r letters can be posted in n letter boxes in a town"
how would i approach this question?

vale wigeon
#

wrong discord?

vale wigeon
nimble sleet
#

<@&268886789983436800>

lethal belfry
#

<@&268886789983436800>

vale wigeon
#

you will do anything? then stop spamming

lethal belfry
#

that was disturbing

vale wigeon
#

good riddance

hardy terrace
nimble sleet
#

But also, are the letters distinct or identical?

#

I believe the answer changes depending on which it is

hardy terrace
#

theyre distinct if im correct

#

but that is all that is mentioned

nimble sleet
#

Each letter independently has n choices in that case - any of the letter boxes would work

coral veldt
#

hi

hardy terrace
#

i see thank you

lone heartBOT
#

@hardy terrace Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @hardy terrace

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

thin atlas
#

what next...

lone heartBOT
#

@thin atlas Has your question been resolved?

thin atlas
lone heartBOT
#

@thin atlas Has your question been resolved?

lone heartBOT
#

@thin atlas Has your question been resolved?

thin atlas
#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @thin atlas

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

thin atlas
#

.reopen

lone heartBOT
#

thin atlas
ivory igloo
#

maybe you can isolate all the terms with a y in the beginning and then differentiate both sides

#

with respect to either x (d/dx) or y (d/dy)

#

which simplifies it very nicely

lone heartBOT
#

@thin atlas Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @thin atlas

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

short vapor
#

Point P is any point on the plane of a rectangle ABCD. Prove that
PA^2 + PC^2 = PB^2 + PD^2
Using vector methods

I am not entirely sure how to approach this problem. I have tried equating some sides so far, but that has not seemed to work

BP - AP = CP - DP
BP + DP = AP + CP
??

crude cloud
short vapor
#

I have tried equating some sides so far, but that has not seemed to work

crude cloud
#

Show work

short vapor
#

it's a lot of incoherent rambling uhhh

#

along with the above

#

one can equate the side lengths of the diagonals

#

(BP + DP)^2 = (AP + CP)^2

#

similar reasoning for sides AD and BC instead of AB and DC, although with similar results

tiny fable
#

a potentially useful hint: any time you see the magnitude of a vector squared, you can think of it another way using a certain vector operation

short vapor
#

the vector dot itself?

#

im just not sure how to get to PA^2 + PC^2 = PB^2 + PD^2

#

like PABCD are vectors

#

hm

#

i use ^2 as shorthand to mean dot itself most of the time

#

with vector PX = x
(b + d)^2 = (c + a)^2
b^2 + 2bd + d^2 = c^2 + 2ca + a^2
which is rly close to what is need but has those pesky 2bd, and 2ca terms.
probrably need to stop thinking of it in algebra terms

tiny fable
#

I would agree with your last statement lol

short vapor
#

lol

tiny fable
#

I'd try writing your vectors out explicitly, like PA = (a1, a2), etc

short vapor
#

like components?

tiny fable
#

yep, it does say to solve it using vectors

short vapor
#

im not given basis vectors tho

#

and my math teacher does not like it when i redefine my basis vectors to make problems easier...

#

but i'll give it a shot

#

oh no

#

got it

#

how to close

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @short vapor

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

soft pecan
#

can someone help me with this probability exercise

soft pecan
#

so I think for a is just 35 for the expected total time and 245 for it's variance

#

and for the second one am I supposed to use gamma distribution?

lone heartBOT
#

@soft pecan Has your question been resolved?

soft pecan
#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @soft pecan

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

ornate bronze
lone heartBOT
vale wigeon
#

what's troubling you

ornate bronze
#

the 6.04*10^5

vale wigeon
#

ok so do you know in general

#

how to convert numbers from standard form into ordinary

ornate bronze
#

yes

vale wigeon
#

ok how do you do it

#

describe to me in words how you understand it

crude cloud
#

Just solve it simply

ornate bronze
#

so like u put it into calculator and u get the ans

vale wigeon
#

no

#

this does not need a calculator

ornate bronze
#

but i wanna learn without calc

vale wigeon
#

ok first off

#

do you know what 10^5 means

ornate bronze
#

yes

vale wigeon
#

what does it mean

ornate bronze
#

1000000

vale wigeon
#

no

crude cloud
#

6.04 = 604/100

vale wigeon
#

that's a million

ornate bronze
#

yes

vale wigeon
#

a million is 10^6

#

what is 10^5

pliant sphinx
#

In a teach store , there are 9 different gadgets and 8 available display racks. how manu distinct ways can the gadgets be arranged on the racks, ensuring that each rack hold at least one gadget and all 9 gadgets are used.

lone heartBOT
ornate bronze
#

100k

vale wigeon
#

ok

#

so what's 6.04 * 100,000

crude cloud
#

@vale wigeon I think he's trolling

vale wigeon
#

@crude cloud benefit of the doubt.

ornate bronze
#

according to my calculator 604000

vale wigeon
#

you should be able to do this WITHOUT a calculator.

#

do you know how to multiply a number by ten?

ornate bronze
#

yes

#

u add a 0

vale wigeon
#

you slide the decimal point 1 slot to the right

ornate bronze
#

yes

#

u add a 0

vale wigeon
#

which, if the number is whole, looks like appending a zero

#

you should be saying "append" and not "add"

#

bc "add a 0" sounds like +0

#

which is not right

#

ok

ornate bronze
#

englissh my second language

vale wigeon
#

what's your first language

ornate bronze
#

Russian

pliant sphinx
vale wigeon
#

нули не прибавляются, а дописываются

lone heartBOT
ornate bronze
#

о, ты русская?

vale wigeon
#

да

ornate bronze
#

прикольно

pliant sphinx
#

Please english

ornate bronze
#

щ

#

no

vale wigeon
#

@pliant sphinx you are not the one getting help

#

helping someone in a language that they speak is 100% kosher

#

@ornate bronze так вот, умножение числа на 10^n -- то же самое, что сдвиг десятичной точки (или запятой) на n позиций вправо

heavy prairie
#

Ann you are very impressive sorry for interrupting I just wanted to say you are very impressive to me!

vale wigeon
#

это можно и нежно делать безо всяких калькуляторов

vale wigeon
#

да

ornate bronze
#

получается 605000

#

ой

#

604000

vale wigeon
#

да

ornate bronze
#

спасибо за помощь 🙂

vale wigeon
#

пожалуйста

ornate bronze
#

а как насчет

#

_4

#

-4

vale wigeon
#

при умножении на отрицательную степень десятки точка движется влево

ornate bronze
#

тоже самое но влево, получается 0.0005012

vale wigeon
#

именно так

ornate bronze
#

спасибо:)

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @ornate bronze

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

lone heartBOT
mossy reef
#

Squaring both sides does not work like that.

#

Notice how, if you plug your x values into the left side, it evaluates to -1.

#

$$\sqrt{13 - x^2} = 1$$
$$13 - x^2 = 1$$
$$\sqrt 1 =-1$$

ocean sealBOT
#

@mossy reef

mossy reef
#

Give me a few minutes to take a closer look at your work.

empty mason
#

Yeah that’s pretty much it, there is a range restriction with the square root function. However when you square the equation you actually consider extra solutions than if there existed ones originally, and since you found that there weren’t any complex solutions at the end then there wouldn’t exist complex solutions for that equation

mossy reef
#

This top right expression is equal to 1. Can you multiply both sides by sqrt(13 - x^2)?

empty mason
#

Yes

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @fallow quest

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

mossy reef
#

There is a real solution though. Try multiplying both sides by u here.

lone heartBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

carmine topaz
#

why is this A not B I lowkey figured it out and then forgot

summer dirge
#

because if it were B, f' would be positive at 1 and 3, and therefore f would be increasing at 1 and 3

buoyant saddle
#

because it’s only increasing in [1, 3] which means f’(x) < 0 for x not in [1, 3] but in B between 0 and 1 it’s not

summer dirge
#

but we know that f is not increasing there

buoyant saddle
#

by intermediate value theorem

carmine topaz
#

isnt both only increasing at 1,3 cuz f' > 0 only in that part ?

buoyant saddle
cold cargo
#

You have to think about what happens just to the left of 1 and just to the right of 3 in B

carmine topaz
buoyant saddle
#

no it’s continuous

#

so it can’t have a jump by intermediate value theorem for example there exists x in (0, 1) such that f’(x) = 0.5

#

which means it’s increasing there

carmine topaz
#

continuous doenst mean it cant move 2 at once?

buoyant saddle
#

contradicting the assumption that f’ is only increasing in [1, 3]

buoyant saddle
#

intermediate value theorem

#

no jumps

#

a jump is a discontinuity

carmine topaz
#

but then why does f' between 1 and 3 in option A move 2

buoyant saddle
#

because they only gave you information on integer inputs

#

it doesn’t mean f’ is only defined at integer inputs

#

they just listed value of f’ at integers

#

and didn’t give you information about for example f’(sqrt(2))

#

this should be familiar by now no?

#

this is a very common type of question

carmine topaz
#

is B wrong cuz its increasing on other parts too or cuz its discontinuous

buoyant saddle
#

if i made a table of for example y = x^2 and listed the values of x and y where x is say -1, 0, 1, 2, 3 does that mean x^2 is discontinuous just because i decided to make a table of the integer values?

carmine topaz
#

not really

buoyant saddle
carmine topaz
buoyant saddle
#

they state that f is only increasing in [1, 3]

#

so if we can demonstrate that there exists some point where f’ > 0 outside of this interval then we’ve contradicted this assumption

#

now

carmine topaz
#

ohhhh i get it

buoyant saddle
#

since f’(0) = -1 and f’(1) = 1 and f’ is continuous this means that f’ has to pass through all values between -1 and 1 through the interval [0, 1]

carmine topaz
#

f' > 0 only between 1 and 3 so B have violated that cuz it hit positive before 1

buoyant saddle
#

for example it must go through y = 1/2 between 0 and 1 now since this is outside the interval [1, 3] this means we have arrived at a contradiction

buoyant saddle
#

and this is valid by intermediate value theorem

#

since f’ is continuous

carmine topaz
#

solving ts when i have apush in 3hr 💔

#

thanks for helping!

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @carmine topaz

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

buoyant saddle
oblique egret
#

Hola

buoyant saddle
#

louisiana purchase

carmine topaz
#

about to bomb the leq 😭

lone heartBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

strange beacon
#

how can it appears to ln C suddenly instead of just +C

kind trellis
#

C is a arbitrary constant

undone ledge
#

c is an arbitary constant, we just expressed it as ln c for convinience

zinc bolt
strange beacon
#

so i can just express C as what it is i want it to be as long as itt helps me solve the problem?

kind trellis
#

C could be C + 23902309 or ln|C + 239239| or e^C^2^2^2

#

as long as C is a real number

zinc bolt
strange beacon
#

but there time like when changes happen to C, i need declare it as another variable, for example if C is multiplied by 2, i need to say A, A=2C, or is this not revelant rn

undone ledge
#

thats if you define c first tho , here it directly wrote ln|c|

#

so thats a constant too and there were no change

#

hence no decleration , you could write it with your method but just a extra step( check with your grading teacher tbh)

strange beacon
lone heartBOT
#

@strange beacon Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @strange beacon

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

cloud palm
#

Hello guys, i'm struggling with Matrix. I made this matrix - Determinant. I decided to made my row elimination i/o column. I have different determinant, wolfram has different on chat gpt i feel lost... where i made mistake ?

cloud palm
twin nimbus
#

So I have the correct value for this determinant

#

!nogpt also

lone heartBOT
#

Please do not trust ChatGPT or similar AI tools for mathematical tasks, as they often generate output which "sounds correct" but has numerous factual or logical errors. Use of these AI tools to answer other people's help questions is strictly against server rules (see #rules).

twin nimbus
#

if you can provide me with a value that you think is correct, I can let you know if it's correct.

#

other than that, you can try to use row reduction to find the determinant, it's probably faster than finding 4 determinants of 3x3 matrices.

fading trench
cloud palm
cloud palm
cloud palm
#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @cloud palm

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

fading trench
cloud palm
lone heartBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

warm quarry
lone heartBOT
warm quarry
#

$a_0 = 1 - 1 = 0 $, that is correct. $a_1 = 6 + 1 = 7$ which is also correct.
Induction hypothesis, Let k element of N and k greater / equal 1.
$a_k = 6^k - (-1)^k ?$

jaunty olive
#

Yikes

ocean sealBOT
jaunty olive
#

Yeah now put this is in the equation

warm quarry
#

in a n+2?

#

but I must do it for k+1 right?

#

$a_{k+1} = 6^{k+1} - (-1)^{k+1}$ but normally u just split it and stuff and it will be fine or is it strong induction?

ocean sealBOT
warm quarry
#

aah i might have figured it out

#

got it :)

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @warm quarry

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

lone heartBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

grizzled ermine
#

did i multiply the fractions correctly here? something tells me FOIL is making no sense

vale wigeon
#

your $\cos^4(x)$ comes dangerously close to looking like $\cos(4x)$

ocean sealBOT
grizzled ermine
#

yea i suck at writing

vale wigeon
#

also the last 3 lines look weird

grizzled ermine
#

how so?

tranquil tartan
#

What even do they mean

grizzled ermine
#

…as in the last 3 lines?

tranquil tartan
#

Yes

grizzled ermine
#

there

tranquil tartan
#

Oh my

#

Thats not

#

How you cancel out fractions

grizzled ermine
#

did i screw up the terms again

#

god i suck at that lmao

tranquil tartan
#

(4+4)/2=4+2?

grizzled ermine
#

yeah no lol

#

ok wait let me redo it then in that case

#

i need something to remind me when not to cancel out

tranquil tartan
#

Besides your whole fraction is kinda pointless

#

As it has denominater cos^2 x

#

Just like rhs

#

So you could just multiply both sides by cos ^2 x

grizzled ermine
#

what do you mean multiply both sides

#

as in both the LS and RS?

tranquil tartan
#

Yes

#

Thats kinda what u usually do to equations

north rover
ocean sealBOT
north rover
#

Makes life hella easier

tranquil tartan
#

Yes

#

Definitely

grizzled ermine
#

oh i’m so dumb

#

how did i miss that lol

#

i knew that smh

#

ok thanks give me a sec folks

north rover
#

You get it with practice

grizzled ermine
#

and i’m still missing it 😭

north rover
#

Bruh

#

Well, don't worry

#

After that it should reduce to a simpler equation

north rover
proven leaf
grizzled ermine
#

theeeere we go

#

that was a doozy

#

alright so i went way too far in the wrong direction

#

thanks yall

#

.close

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @grizzled ermine

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

north rover
#

Not necessarily

grizzled ermine
#

i’d rather not waste time like that honestly

north rover
#

Yeah

#

You did take the harder route

grizzled ermine
#

especially if it comes to the point where i’m doing that on a test 😭

lone heartBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

vale wigeon
#

can you highlight the earliest line which makes no sense to you

#

(also i will say the limits in terms of h should all really have $h \to 0^+$ not merely $h \to 0$)

ocean sealBOT
vale wigeon
#

get what exactly

forest marsh
#

They take off the parentheses and simplify the 5 together

#

(5-h)-5 = 5-h-5 = -h

#

What is f(x) ?

vale wigeon
#

thats where

#

they plugged that shit into the formula for f(x)

winged pawn
#

thats erm the input for the function? its |x-5|

#

x = 5 - h and 5 + h

#

erm wha

#

erm the first 5 is the input, i say again

#

you have x = 5 - h

#

the second 5 is just part of the function

#

|x-5|

lone heartBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @wicked gazelle

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

lone heartBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

harsh lantern
#

Can someone explain Q2 wouldn't the Y= 3 and x=-5 ?