#help-0
1 messages · Page 527 of 1
yes
negative just means going down
or backwards
all red lines are vertical or horizontal
can you write your problem in terms of a proper question?
i dont know how to write this up but ill try
its presumably just asking to find a slope, so it cant be that hard
if you can explain your diagram properly also it would be great
i dont know if reflection is the proper way to describe this
okay, so the negative numbers in the original make no sense
yeah that was just brainblast
This problem will be left as an exercise to the reader
I like how you made the angles to hide that it's 45 degrees
lmao bro knows my game
i know the answer and im not looking for why its the answer im looking for how
yeah but how do you knowwwwwwwwwwwww its a rectangle
here is a more bashy solution:
suppose the angle made by the line with $AB$ is $t$.\
then $BG = \tan(t)$. So $GC = 3 - BG = 3- tan(t)$. \
then note that angle $FGC$ is also equal to $t$. \
$So FC = tan(t)(3-tan(t))$\
So $DF = 3 - FC = tan^2(t) - 3tan(t) + 3$\
finally we know angle $EFD$ is also $t$\
So $tan(t) = \frac{1}{tan^2(t) - 3tan(t) + 3}$. Solve this cubic in tan(t) to get the slope of the line
,w tan(t) = 1/tan^2(t) - 3tan(t) + 3 solve ts
Wolfram Alpha doesn't understand your query!
Perhaps try rephrasing your question?
Click here to refine your query online
,w tan(t) = 1/tan^2(t) - 3tan(t) + 3
,w tan(t) = 1/(tan^2(t) - 3tan(t) + 3)
you can read my solution, where t is the angle made by the line and AB
it should not be negative just be looking at it
yeah i just noticed okay this problem makes sense now
this is t, in my solution
its just chasing angles and lengths till you reach full circle
to get an equation
Closed by @patent vale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Do yk what the diagram would look like for external division
No
But pq should be 3?
I’m using 2 and 1 to represent the ratio
Not the actual lengths
Call them 2k and k if it makes you happy
Wait the length of PQ isn’t even 3
What
Where is 3 coming from
2+1
Pr-2 rq -1
By definition, external division means that you extend the line segment to a point beyond the line segment
So if we divide externally in the ratio 2:1, then you’re extending to the segment to a point such that the “new” part is half the length of the overall new segment
Ok
Granted the question is a little ambiguous cause it never says whether you extend beyond P or beyond Q
So there’s that
“divides the line joining”
So R is on the line, not necessarily the segment
And like I said earlier, for external division, it won’t be on the segment
In general, if R divides PQ in the ratio m:n, then PR:RQ=m:n
(Assuming that you extend beyond Q and not P)
Note that this is the same ratio as internal division, it’s just that the location of R differs (on vs off the segment PQ)
@crude cloud Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @crude cloud
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
In the modulus inequalities , i do realize how it makes sense to include '+' and '-' for individual modulus in wavy curve method in a single equation but dont know how it does in the multiple modulus equation.
yes its the wavy curve method
i don’t know what that is but it’s best to just use the definition of absolute value for each
then break it up into intervals based on that
,tex .abs def
riemann
how would you do it your way for multiple modulus inequalitites
^
sorry but its the way i was taught , not well versed about the other method . Whats it called ? ill look up for it
umm so wut i am understanding is
it doesnt have a name as far as i’m aware
it’s just using definitions
,av vivseul05
hmm didnt get it , i know ill have to make cases for each and every modulus then , but dont know how to integrate together
i’ll do a simpler example only involving two ||
|x - 1| + |x| < 2
so we know that for x >= 0, |x| = x and for x < 0, |x| = -x. likewise we know that for x >= 1, |x - 1| = x - 1 and for x < 1, |x - 1| = -x + 1
then if x >= 1 we have |x - 1| + |x| = x - 1 + x (note that since x >= 1 we also have that x >= 0)
then for x < 0 we have |x - 1| + |x| = -x + 1 - x
and for 0 <= x < 1 we have |x - 1| + |x| = -x + 1 + x
this exhausts all the intervals now
just analyze each interval separately
x >= 1 : x - 1 + x = 2x - 1 > 2 —> x > 3/2
i really appreciate your effort , but itll take some time to really feel it
Should draw one of your patented screenshot hand drawn graphs again
need the keyboard in it too
but really i'd be really grateful to have someone to answer this query
lmao
doesn’t have the attention span for it i guess
hmm i know desmos just dont know how to use it for the complex ones
abs(x) also works
how do you do that for this?
it’s positive after the zero point for each of them and negative before it
if you read my written out example it would make sense
Closed by @lyric scaffold
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I do this
Do I need to use multinomial expansion theorem
not necessarily, you can treat this as a binomial system as well
how
Closed by @hot vale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why does the series have to be >5 ? does the integral guarantee anything about the series value ?
you mean why does the sum of the series have to be more than 5?
Because integrals are a continuous area and sums are a sum of rectangles
Like this
there is another relevant hypothesis here: decreasing function
It can be helpful to visualize an Upper Riemann Sum of a positive, continuous, and decreasing function.
Its the upper riemann sum coz f is decreasing
Might help to clarify that these have width 1
wait why does the sum has to be like that
F is decreasing
and the sum and integral start at the same point
i mean yea but is that what series are?
that sum is js bunch of rectangles?
the series just sums f(1) + f(2) + ..., which is simply f(1) * 1 + f(2) * 1 + ... which you can claim represents the area of rectangles
i thought its some continuous numer typa thing
Basically you're taking the value of the function at those discrete points, which can be visualised as a rectangle with height y and width 1
If that makes sense
Nah my explanation is kinda shit
what is the area of a rectangle?
in general
like the formula
height * width
great now look at this
f(1)*1 can be seen as width 1 and height f(1)
f(2)*1 can again be seen as width 1 and height f(2)
wait so series are js bunch of rectangles and i wasnt told this thing this whole time?
Thése rectangles have width 1 btw
It's just another way of looking at it
And the left end of the first one is at the start of the sum, x=1
just for better visualization
hmmm ok but why should it be greater then the integral? nowwhere did it said to use certain type of sum so it kinda depends? no?
The sum starts at x=1 and so does the integral
ohhh i get it
its js lowkey weird thing of series as a sum
wait no the series here is sum right
So the sequence decreases only when you get to x=2, which is the next term, but the function f(x) is decreasing the whole way
yea but like expressing series using bunch of rectangular feels wacky 😭
technically an integral is the same idea
But instead of rectangles of width 1 you use vanishingly/infinitesimally thin rectangles
but why is the series like that? shouldnt it be some smooth number?
@carmine topaz Has your question been resolved?
What do you mean by smooth number?
like isnt that what series are ? cuz some rectangles doesnt feel right ? no ?
well it’s just that you can interpret it as that
taking the width of each rectangle to be 1
and the height of the nth rectangle to be the nth term in the sum
but what is a smooth number
bunch of overestimate rectangle aint smooth idk how to explain but
smooth has a precise mathematical definition that isn’t relevant here
ok
you didn’t understand the pictures they sent?
here
i understood but i dont like thinking series in that way like it aint smooth 😭
so its like the integral expression is the exact one and the series are goofy verison of that ?
again, series can be interpreted as the sum of areas of rectangles with width 1
imma js accept this 😭
i mean do you disagree that it gives that area?
no but my brain cant be convinced to think of series as some wacky rectangle 😭
in my head series = smooth number
$\sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n^2} = (1)(1) + (1)\left(\frac{1}{4}\right) + (1)\left(\frac{1}{9}\right) + \dots$
don’t do this
so it js same width with changing height ?
the overestimate rectangle diagram js aint it 😭
knief
the area of those rectangles is precisely this sum
but since 1/n^2 is decreasing, the series is larger than the integral
like a left riemann sum
so its like series could be anything like a sum it doesnt really have to be smooth ?
yea
this is just taking the width of each subinterval/rectangle to be 1
and it’s a left endpoint sum
a series is a sum
doesn’t have to be interpreted as a riemann sum
but i mean by definition it’s an infinite sum
Closed by @carmine topaz
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
you’re welcome
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why does delta t go on the bottom when simplifying
dividing something is the same thing as multiplying by the reciprocal?
so why isnt it at the top
Change in time, no?
yes delta t
,, \frac{\Delta s/r}{\Delta t} = \frac{\Delta s}{r} \cdot \frac{1}{\Delta t}
The reciprocal of $\Delta t$ is $\frac1{\Delta t}$ lmao
yes but its already 1/delta t
right?
(\frac{\frac{\Delta s}{r}}{\Delta t}=\frac{\Delta s}{r}\div\frac{\Delta t}{1}=\frac{\Delta s}{r}\cdot\frac{1}{\Delta t}=\frac{\Delta s}{r\Delta t})
PajamaMamaLlama
dude typing texit so fast wtf
"dividing by something" which you're dividing by $\Delta t$ here
dividing by sth is the same thing as multiplying by the reciprocal of sth
;(
LaTeX gods.
bro im being overstimulated
Does this make sense
this helped
Closed by @frail walrus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help me solve for x.
Also dont help too much, id prefer to do most of the thinking
open all the brackets
Ok
also do u just have to get x in terms of a?
in terms of everything else
ohk continue
show ur work pls
im getting the same thing
Equation is wrong..check how you got this..maybe try posting the original question
ok that just means that no value of x satisfies the equation
what is it
yeah thats it
How do i close
.close
.close
type this
Closed by @weak latch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
I need it to translate from german bc i have no clue how the english terms are
!msgdel
The original post of this help channel has been deleted, and it will abruptly close and possibly lock. (This is irreversible.) Please claim a new channel, and don't delete the first message of any future channel you claim.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help
oh
sorry 😭
:D
anyway i dont undertsand jack also why did they use +6 as the asymptote instead of 4? erm yeah
what part don't u understand
a * b^x + q and a/x + 6?
yes
im GUESSING they want you to solve for a b and q
yes they do sorry for not mentioning
so we know f goes through the points (0,4) and (-2,-12) right
yes
well see i need to solve a and b
q is fine as it would be +4, and we'd substitute 4 into f(x) the +4 becomes -4 cancelling it out and making a =0
that frmo what i've tried
and that can't be true as if it was it would make b^x = 0 and the answer as q
yes...
so a = 4 - q
Closed by @slow plume
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What's wrong
pressed the wrong - sign?
yeah make sure to use the (-) button
I hate calculators
crazy that they can't code that in so that both - are the same
EXACTLY
why it makes perfect sense
I've only ever used desmos in a math class
yikes
oh they are atleast different buttons for them?
they do actually mean different things, but it's certainly possible to get a (not 100% reliable!) program which distinguishes them based on context (plenty of other calculator brands do), so it was a conscious choice on the TI programmer's part
this is correct, but - can be viewed simply as a shorthand for adding the multiplicative inverse.
additive inverse
typo
Yes
and in all the cases the context is very clear so this shorthand could be justified and not be confused with the inverse operator
need context
!xy
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
can you show a picture of the entire question?
so then sin^(-1) would give you this solution over here
Because of the interval of (0, 2pi), arcsin(-x) is not positive for x>0
think of $sin^{-1}$ as the inverse of this small piece of the sin function
qwertytrewq
because sin is periodic and behaves nicely, this small piece of sin gives us all the information about sin. But when you want a solution on a given interval, taking inverse is not enough. You would need to use this inverse, and the properties of sin function to actually translate the solution to the given interval (in this case [0,2pi]
@feral drum Has your question been resolved?
Oh
Closed by @feral drum
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I get Omega(w)?
,rotate
you know about trig pythagoras?
Yes
R u german?
yes
Können wir dann Deutsch reden oder ist das am Server nicht erlaubt
Technically allowed, i suppose.
Lets do it in german then
Du musst die ebene dir erstmal überlegen in dem der Winkel ist
you can no issues
darauf basierend musst du mit den gegebenen seiten die winkel und die seiten drumherumg ausrechnen
Ja aber in meiner Vorstellung wären das 90°
Vorstellung ist kein Beweis^^
Daher, wenn du es voll mathematisch ausrechnen willst brauchst du die ebene in dem der Winkel existiert.
Weißt du wie die Strecken lauten in dem der Winkel steht?
Du hast sie ja da auch gezeichnet in farbe
BG und BE
Richtig, diese strecken musst du ausrechnen
Die längen kannste dann ja mittels pythagoras
das würde gehen ja
Kannst dir auch nen rechtwinkliges dreieck definieren was den winkel oder einen teil des winkels beinhaltet
Aber ja cosinussatz ist vlt am schnellsten
(Ist doch erlaubt; Englisch zu sprechen wird nur empfohlen, denn die Wahrscheinlichkeit eine Sprache reden zu können ist im Allgemein am höchstens wenn jene Sprache Englisch ist :D)
-# (It is allowed; speaking English is just recommended, because the likelihood to be able to speak a language is generally highest when that language is English :D)
(wohl oder übel lol)
-# (for better or worse lol)
(hab keine Ahnung worum das Problem hier geht, hab einfach nur Deutsch gefunden 🤣)
-# (I've no clue what this problem's about, just found German 🤣)
Geht einfach nur um einen Winkel der nicht in die typischen Kardinalen Richtungen geht
Ist technisch etwas anspruchsvoller aber ja, Lafez hat effektiv die Lösungsstrategie, muss man nur einmal durchrechnen
Ah cool
einverstanden
,rotate
Ist Omega=87,2°?
2 . 8,1 . 10,8 sei gleich was?
Warum hast du also 7,29 cosw geschrieben
oh lol
Ja, die Multiplikation zuerst
dh du hättest [etwas] minus [etwas mal cosw] oder so was
es ist in diesem problem auch sehr hilfreich einfach die wurzeln stehen zu lassen. Kommazahlen geben immer etwas fehler. Ganz am ende kannste die einsetzen
Hängt davon ab, dass du gut mit dem(? grammatik) Algebra arbeiten kannst
e = sqrt(65)
d = sqrt(116)
z = sqrt(149)
Jup, nimmt dir auch keiner Übel
ach, "die Algebra" (im Nom.)?
Jup
Klingt korrect
Ich mache es nachher dann nochmal mit den Wurzeln
Danke für eure Hilfe❤️
(hab ne andere Ahnung - die Linien als Vectors zu nehmen, zwei Vectors konstruieren und dann ein Cross-Produkt rechnen)
(unnötig aber vielleicht interessant zu versuchen)
aber keine Sorge 🫡
.close
Closed by @meager kindle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
yo guys pppllllllssssssss dm me help me to understand powers must talk frensh but its ok if its english
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
For part d of question 9
This is what i have been doing but the answers apparently 20
Dont kind the area at the top that was a previous try
C is O btw mb
i think you didn't use the appopriate formula for this case
the formula you have used only works if and only if:
- those two segments are perpendicular
- both are bases and heights of the triangle
which is not the case
But since its an isosceles cant i split it in half and work that way?
actually yes
but either way 4*sqrt(2) is wrong for the length of AB
it should be 8*sqrt(2)
Yes
I split it in hlf
either way, when you have the coordinates of the triangle, save yourself from all this work
Thats why i took 4 swuarw root 2
and use the coordinate formula
Whats that
for any triangle with coordinates known (x_1, y_2) (x_2,y_2) (x_3,y_3)
A = 1/2 | x_1 (y_2 - y_3) + x_2 (y_3 - y_1) + x_3 (y_1 - y_2) |
just plug the 3 vertices in this formula
saves a lot of headache
yea, but for the whole triangle, you need to multiply it by 2 again
right know you are calculating just half of the triangle
No cause i didnt put in the half no?
Like half of the triangle would be 1/2 x bm x o m
Ffs autocorrect
O M
But i just removed th e half from the start
oh true
Let me try with the formula
for the coordinate formula, i've calculated rn and it gave A = 1/2 | 32 - 5 + 21 |
Is the book wrong
= 24
Ye ty
Okok ty
i'm 99% sure it is 24
i plugged almost everything in an algorithm and it gave 24.001
Okay yeah maybe the books weing
Ill ask my teacher tomorrow ty
no problem!
no problem! glad you found out
Closed by @robust nebula
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help drawing this out and the resultant of it
I will let you know if I need help solving if it dosent work out but so far its just hard to visualize
anbody know how to draw this out?
would be much appreciated
is it any of these options?
Lable N S E W
since its from north east the line at the bottom is what im using
unless its supposed to end when it hits origin
im not sure
Ok thanks
Is R the resultant vector?
yes
The diagram is correct
im not sure if i drew it properly tho
ok thanks but do i use the one on the right or left
or does it not matter
If you're asking the right or left diagram, it doesn't matter both are same
Closed by @leaden niche
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Ok so for question 1 i like combined all the resistances and got 18.4 ohms, idk if that's correct but like from there idk where to go like i have the total voltage and so i calculated total current but then what
for question 3 i just have no idea like i'm assuming i have to somehow like work backwards but i don't understand how to make sure like one of the resistors has 0.55A. like i think if one resistor must have a voltage drop of 26.0v across it then it just has to be in series with the source and the resistance total i think would be 26/1.09 which is 23.9? but then past that i'm just kinda lost
@mellow crane Has your question been resolved?
@mellow crane Has your question been resolved?
Have you asked this in the physics server?
for question 1 what else do you need to find
wait what i didn't know there was a physics server
um question 1 wants me to solve the circuit so i have to find all of the unknowns
like all the currents, voltages and resistances
? they gave me voltage total and all the resistances
yes
but like i have to find the voltage and current going thru each resistor
yea
So you get voltage through first resistor
i thought that voltage was split in a series circuit so like isn't the voltage thru r1 something smaller than 45.0
but idk what it is
thats why I wrote V1
ohh ok
Just use that
I think you can find everything
In series current is same
In parallel voltage is
so like cuz the totsl current is around 2.45A so it's that thru r1 too? and then i have resistance so i can calculate voltage right?
and also r4 and r5 are in series right? my friend said they were parallel so i wasn't sure
okk, yeah so like 45.0/18.4
yes
ok so if i don't use the rounded number i get 2.44539... so it's about 2.45
yeahhh, it's like 18.40196077...
yes
okkk, and then V1=ItR1 so i do v1= 2.44539...*10.0
yea ig u can do 2.45
ohhh, ic, ok i understand now
v123=ItR123
what 123
like from when i combined the resistances to find the equivalent one
cuz now i have to work backwards right
You have to find separate
For each
The part where I am not sure is
Voltage for r2 and r3
yeah but once i have that then i can separate them right?
right okk
so like for them combined i got 34.810868...volts
and then i can find for v23
and then get v 2 and v 3 separately
Ah I seem to have made a mistake
?
If you had the answer key it would be easier to figure it out
I think you should ask this in the physics server
draw 4 resistors, draw voltage 26v , current is 1.09 so 26=1.09 * R
idk about the rest
Closed by @mellow crane
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
@swanqueen doublt
?
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what to do 😭😭😭😭😭
derivative of 1 is 0 not 1
Closed by @thin atlas
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
(this channel still has somebody else's name on it. get your own)
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how did they get that final result of 145.5mA
im trying to find right hand triangles to use trigonometry but idk i cant find it
are they doing the difference of hypotenuse between l2 and l1
wait lemme try that
nvm not sure
@cerulean garnet Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @cerulean garnet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
"Find the number of ways in which r letters can be posted in n letter boxes in a town"
how would i approach this question?
wrong discord?
imagine you are the postman and you decide for each letter individually which of the n boxes it goes into
<@&268886789983436800>
<@&268886789983436800>
you will do anything? then stop spamming
that was disturbing
good riddance
so for every postbox i pick one letter and im left with (r-1) letters?
But also, are the letters distinct or identical?
I believe the answer changes depending on which it is
Each letter independently has n choices in that case - any of the letter boxes would work
hi
i see thank you
@hardy terrace Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @hardy terrace
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what next...

@thin atlas Has your question been resolved?
@thin atlas Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @thin atlas
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
.
i think you will get it simplified with some awful trig substitutions
maybe you can isolate all the terms with a y in the beginning and then differentiate both sides
with respect to either x (d/dx) or y (d/dy)
which simplifies it very nicely
@thin atlas Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @thin atlas
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Point P is any point on the plane of a rectangle ABCD. Prove that
PA^2 + PC^2 = PB^2 + PD^2
Using vector methods
I am not entirely sure how to approach this problem. I have tried equating some sides so far, but that has not seemed to work
BP - AP = CP - DP
BP + DP = AP + CP
??
I have tried equating some sides so far, but that has not seemed to work
Show work
it's a lot of incoherent rambling uhhh
along with the above
one can equate the side lengths of the diagonals
(BP + DP)^2 = (AP + CP)^2
similar reasoning for sides AD and BC instead of AB and DC, although with similar results
a potentially useful hint: any time you see the magnitude of a vector squared, you can think of it another way using a certain vector operation
the vector dot itself?
im just not sure how to get to PA^2 + PC^2 = PB^2 + PD^2
like PABCD are vectors
hm
i use ^2 as shorthand to mean dot itself most of the time
with vector PX = x
(b + d)^2 = (c + a)^2
b^2 + 2bd + d^2 = c^2 + 2ca + a^2
which is rly close to what is need but has those pesky 2bd, and 2ca terms.
probrably need to stop thinking of it in algebra terms
I would agree with your last statement lol
lol
I'd try writing your vectors out explicitly, like PA = (a1, a2), etc
like components?
yep, it does say to solve it using vectors
im not given basis vectors tho
and my math teacher does not like it when i redefine my basis vectors to make problems easier...
but i'll give it a shot
oh no
got it
how to close
.close
Closed by @short vapor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me with this probability exercise
so I think for a is just 35 for the expected total time and 245 for it's variance
and for the second one am I supposed to use gamma distribution?
@soft pecan Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @soft pecan
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what's troubling you
the 6.04*10^5
ok so do you know in general
how to convert numbers from standard form into ordinary
yes
Just solve it simply
so like u put it into calculator and u get the ans
but i wanna learn without calc
yes
what does it mean
1000000
no
6.04 = 604/100
that's a million
yes
In a teach store , there are 9 different gadgets and 8 available display racks. how manu distinct ways can the gadgets be arranged on the racks, ensuring that each rack hold at least one gadget and all 9 gadgets are used.
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
100k
@vale wigeon I think he's trolling
@crude cloud benefit of the doubt.
according to my calculator 604000
you should be able to do this WITHOUT a calculator.
do you know how to multiply a number by ten?
you slide the decimal point 1 slot to the right
which, if the number is whole, looks like appending a zero
you should be saying "append" and not "add"
bc "add a 0" sounds like +0
which is not right
ok
englissh my second language
what's your first language
Russian
Chatgpt give me another answer and gemini give me another answer can you explain me how you do it please
нули не прибавляются, а дописываются
!nogpt
Please do not trust ChatGPT or similar AI tools for mathematical tasks, as they often generate output which "sounds correct" but has numerous factual or logical errors. Use of these AI tools to answer other people's help questions is strictly against server rules (see #rules).
о, ты русская?
да
прикольно
Please english
@pliant sphinx you are not the one getting help
helping someone in a language that they speak is 100% kosher
@ornate bronze так вот, умножение числа на 10^n -- то же самое, что сдвиг десятичной точки (или запятой) на n позиций вправо
Ann you are very impressive sorry for interrupting I just wanted to say you are very impressive to me!
это можно и нежно делать безо всяких калькуляторов
thank you
получается к примеру 6.4*10=64?
да
спасибо за помощь 🙂
пожалуйста
при умножении на отрицательную степень десятки точка движется влево
тоже самое но влево, получается 0.0005012
именно так
Closed by @ornate bronze
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Squaring both sides does not work like that.
Notice how, if you plug your x values into the left side, it evaluates to -1.
$$\sqrt{13 - x^2} = 1$$
$$13 - x^2 = 1$$
$$\sqrt 1 =-1$$
@mossy reef
Give me a few minutes to take a closer look at your work.
Yeah that’s pretty much it, there is a range restriction with the square root function. However when you square the equation you actually consider extra solutions than if there existed ones originally, and since you found that there weren’t any complex solutions at the end then there wouldn’t exist complex solutions for that equation
This top right expression is equal to 1. Can you multiply both sides by sqrt(13 - x^2)?
Uh, it’s actually equal to 0 because she moved the 1 to the LHS
Yes
Closed by @fallow quest
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
There is a real solution though. Try multiplying both sides by u here.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why is this A not B I lowkey figured it out and then forgot
because if it were B, f' would be positive at 1 and 3, and therefore f would be increasing at 1 and 3
because it’s only increasing in [1, 3] which means f’(x) < 0 for x not in [1, 3] but in B between 0 and 1 it’s not
but we know that f is not increasing there
by intermediate value theorem
isnt both only increasing at 1,3 cuz f' > 0 only in that part ?
since at x = 0 it’s -1 and at x = 1 it’s 1 means that f’ is positive for some x in between 0 and 1
You have to think about what happens just to the left of 1 and just to the right of 3 in B
does that matter ? cuz there might be a larger jump or...
no it’s continuous
so it can’t have a jump by intermediate value theorem for example there exists x in (0, 1) such that f’(x) = 0.5
which means it’s increasing there
continuous doenst mean it cant move 2 at once?
contradicting the assumption that f’ is only increasing in [1, 3]
yes..
intermediate value theorem
no jumps
a jump is a discontinuity
but then why does f' between 1 and 3 in option A move 2
because they only gave you information on integer inputs
it doesn’t mean f’ is only defined at integer inputs
they just listed value of f’ at integers
and didn’t give you information about for example f’(sqrt(2))
this should be familiar by now no?
this is a very common type of question
is B wrong cuz its increasing on other parts too or cuz its discontinuous
if i made a table of for example y = x^2 and listed the values of x and y where x is say -1, 0, 1, 2, 3 does that mean x^2 is discontinuous just because i decided to make a table of the integer values?
not really
you didn’t read what i said
but like wdym IVT why does it appear here
they state that f is only increasing in [1, 3]
so if we can demonstrate that there exists some point where f’ > 0 outside of this interval then we’ve contradicted this assumption
now
ohhhh i get it
since f’(0) = -1 and f’(1) = 1 and f’ is continuous this means that f’ has to pass through all values between -1 and 1 through the interval [0, 1]
f' > 0 only between 1 and 3 so B have violated that cuz it hit positive before 1
for example it must go through y = 1/2 between 0 and 1 now since this is outside the interval [1, 3] this means we have arrived at a contradiction
yes
and this is valid by intermediate value theorem
since f’ is continuous
Closed by @carmine topaz
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
lol good luck
Hola
louisiana purchase
about to bomb the leq 😭
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how can it appears to ln C suddenly instead of just +C
C is a arbitrary constant
c is an arbitary constant, we just expressed it as ln c for convinience
c is just a constant so ln|c| is also one and vice versa.
so i can just express C as what it is i want it to be as long as itt helps me solve the problem?
C could be C + 23902309 or ln|C + 239239| or e^C^2^2^2
as long as C is a real number
There are some restrictions, and it doesn't always work, especially in cases like higher order differentials but yes for most general bijective functions you can prolly do that no issue
but there time like when changes happen to C, i need declare it as another variable, for example if C is multiplied by 2, i need to say A, A=2C, or is this not revelant rn
thats just for reference dw
thats if you define c first tho , here it directly wrote ln|c|
so thats a constant too and there were no change
hence no decleration , you could write it with your method but just a extra step( check with your grading teacher tbh)
alright thank you
@strange beacon Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @strange beacon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello guys, i'm struggling with Matrix. I made this matrix - Determinant. I decided to made my row elimination i/o column. I have different determinant, wolfram has different on chat gpt i feel lost... where i made mistake ?
Please do not trust ChatGPT or similar AI tools for mathematical tasks, as they often generate output which "sounds correct" but has numerous factual or logical errors. Use of these AI tools to answer other people's help questions is strictly against server rules (see #rules).
if you can provide me with a value that you think is correct, I can let you know if it's correct.
other than that, you can try to use row reduction to find the determinant, it's probably faster than finding 4 determinants of 3x3 matrices.
you forgot minus in front of 4
third row second column
as u can see above i made row reduction of 4th column. Correct answer is 211, but i don't know where i made mistake
right, i will try this
thx m8, that was the problem
.close
Closed by @cloud palm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
nmzc byq
Jeden minus a tyle problemu
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$a_0 = 1 - 1 = 0 $, that is correct. $a_1 = 6 + 1 = 7$ which is also correct.
Induction hypothesis, Let k element of N and k greater / equal 1.
$a_k = 6^k - (-1)^k ?$
Yikes
Brett
Yeah now put this is in the equation
in a n+2?
but I must do it for k+1 right?
$a_{k+1} = 6^{k+1} - (-1)^{k+1}$ but normally u just split it and stuff and it will be fine or is it strong induction?
Brett
Closed by @warm quarry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
did i multiply the fractions correctly here? something tells me FOIL is making no sense
your $\cos^4(x)$ comes dangerously close to looking like $\cos(4x)$
Ann
yea i suck at writing
also the last 3 lines look weird
how so?
What even do they mean
…as in the last 3 lines?
Yes
(4+4)/2=4+2?
yeah no lol
ok wait let me redo it then in that case
i need something to remind me when not to cancel out
Besides your whole fraction is kinda pointless
As it has denominater cos^2 x
Just like rhs
So you could just multiply both sides by cos ^2 x
Uh, I think the first thing you should do is note that $\sin^2(x)+\cos^2(x)=1$.
;(
Makes life hella easier
oh i’m so dumb
how did i miss that lol
i knew that smh
ok thanks give me a sec folks
You get it with practice
i’ve been practicing like crazy for the past 2 days
and i’m still missing it 😭
And then you can apply this again
comes quicker for some, took me ages to master trig identities if this random stranger's anecdote is any consolation
theeeere we go
that was a doozy
alright so i went way too far in the wrong direction
thanks yall
.close
Closed by @grizzled ermine
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Well
Not necessarily
i’d rather not waste time like that honestly
especially if it comes to the point where i’m doing that on a test 😭
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can you highlight the earliest line which makes no sense to you
(also i will say the limits in terms of h should all really have $h \to 0^+$ not merely $h \to 0$)
Ann
get what exactly
They take off the parentheses and simplify the 5 together
(5-h)-5 = 5-h-5 = -h
What is f(x) ?
thats erm the input for the function? its |x-5|
x = 5 - h and 5 + h
erm wha
erm the first 5 is the input, i say again
you have x = 5 - h
the second 5 is just part of the function
|x-5|
Closed by @wicked gazelle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone explain Q2 wouldn't the Y= 3 and x=-5 ?