#help-0
1 messages · Page 487 of 1
like sum of the positions of each letter
@junior kernel
like a = 1, b = 2, c = 3 etc
oh
Count vowel and consonants

Yay!!!
thank you

Exam?
Are you asking for help on an exam?
@junior kernel
Answer or you get modded
no, it was for an exam i gave before
i skipped this one
i can send u a pic of the answer sheet
Oh ok 😂
and the time right now
Nah nvm
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
Closed by @junior kernel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
wait what was the answer, how to solve it?
count the vowel and consonants
the nubmer of vowels is the first digit
number of consonents is 2nd
oh goddd
yeah
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
confused about notation. do we use NABLA only when it's a vector of partials? why r' is not expressed as nabla as well?
can anybody teach me integration
nabla, not delta sorry. i've corrected above
nabla is used to denote operations that concern functions that take in several inputs
For a univariate function the derivative at a point, if it exists, is defined as the limit (f(x+h)-f(x))/h
note that that definition makes sense even if the function takes on vectors as values
but as soon as the function takes in several inputs it's no longer obvious how you'd extend that definition
And nabla is basically an attempt to define certain "derivative-like" operations for functions that take in several variables
You write r' instead of nabla r because r takes in a single variable (namely time)
Although technically the gradient of a single variable function is more or less just the derivative
(it's a 1x1 matrix whose sole entry is the derivative function)
(or, more precisely, it's a function mapping each input to a 1x1 matrix corresponding to the value of the derivative at that point)
@fervent ferry Has your question been resolved?
sorry this part is unclear.
can you make an example? how would i do vector+h ?
is h a vector?
If f(t) = (g(t), h(t)) for high school functions g and h then f'(t) (by the high school definition) is (g'(t), h'(t))
So f is vector-valued even though its derivative could be computed by a high schooler
However if f(s, t) = s + t then "the derivative of f" no longer makes any sense
However the gradient of f (denoted nabla f) is the function that maps (x, y) to (1, 1)
yea so the derivative of f is the gradient
kind of yeah
i'ts a vector whose components are its partials
yeah exactly
what you mean vectors as values then?
as inputs?
f(t) and t is a vector?
or f(t) outputs a vector?
i think i understood but i want to be sure i get what you were saying here
as outputs
ok fine
the value of a function is its output
the "takes" confused me
takes on
english is not my language, i tend to associate with takes IN
ok
thanks, all clear
no worries ^^
.close
Closed by @fervent ferry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
hi! is anyone able to help?
yeah wassup
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello! I was wondering how i could solve this question..
So I want to find the limit, is that what they are asking for ?
how
?
no
do you know what the condition is for a geometric series to converge?
That the partial sum tends to a limit?
no, that's true for any series to converge
what condition must there be on the common ratio?
yeah that one
it's the 2nd term divided by the 1st term for instance
$\frac{-10e^{-x}}{5} = -2e^{-x}$
south's secret twin brother
Okay and how di know if the absolute value of this is less than one ?
but this will never happen?
there is no such x that will make it converge
well $|-2e^{-x}| < 1$ implies $e^{-x} < 1/2$
south's secret twin brother
it's definitely possible
ohhhhh
south's secret twin brother
the sign flips when you take the reciprocal
wait so e^x > 2 yes that's correct
and x > ln(2)
cause e^x is a 1-to-1 increasing function
yeah the beauty of this approach is from 2 < 3, you actually have e^(-2) > e^(-3)
the sign flips cause e^(-x) is decreasing
or just solve for x and note the shape of the graph of e^(-x), also works
@grizzled falcon Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @grizzled falcon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, the question is to descide wether the statements are true or not. The first one is:
∀x ∈ R ∃y ∈ R : x2 + y2 ≥ 4
I understand this is
For all X in the Real numbers there exists a y in the real number so that X^2+y^2>=4
you don’t have to pick the best y, just one y
So is it correct?
I’ll let you think about it some more 
for any given x, what y would suffice so that the inequality x^2 + y^2 >= 4 is true?
there are multiple different values of y that’ll work, but you only need to find one
y=2?
yeah!
y = 2 works perfectly
so does y = 10, or y = 472648203748 
but y = 2 is sufficient
note that this y actually proves a stronger statement:
∃y ∈ R : ∀x ∈ R (x^2 + y^2 ≥ 4)
bro did everything but use latex 😭
I just copied
me too
@hot crescent Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @hot crescent
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
,, \sum_{k=0}^{100}\begin{pmatrix}
100 \k
\end{pmatrix} = 2^{100}
vrsth
So i know that
,, \begin{pmatrix}
100 \k
\end{pmatrix} = \frac{100!}{(100-k)!\times k!}
vrsth
but after that I am not sure what I shall do
,, \sum_{k=0}^{100}\frac{100!}{(100-k)!\times k!}
vrsth
Should i rewrite it like this?
hey guys. im confused as to why in the second picture (uppgift 15), we are not needed to do a divide by n.
(screenshot from gemini is actually a translation of the answer from the professor)
this channel was quite occupied already
Nvm can have this channel i solved the question
.close
Closed by @hot crescent
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please I have to show that with the recurrence
,rccw
start by substituting U_n-1 and U
@ocean hound Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How would I do BII?
you can resolve the absolute value
f(x-2) for x ≥ 0
f(-(x+2)) for x < 0
can u explain why its f(-(x+2)) for x<0
bacc (unhelpful)
ok
im kinda confused how i would draw that
- means reflection at the y-axis and x+2 means shift by 2 units to the left
the blue is the first transformation
you flip it at the y-axis
then from blue to green you translate it by 2 units to the left
ok
@austere nexus Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @austere nexus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How much should pablo invest at 5.75% rate compounded semi-annually for 5 years if he wants to accumulate 45,000 dollars
A=P(1+r/n)^(n×t)
r is your rate as a decimal
t is time
n is number of times compounded
A is the amount you have after t years
r = 0.0575 is the annual interest rate of 5.75%
n = 2
t = 5
PV = 45,000/1.32769549
I did that
,calc 45000/1.32769549 * (1+0.0575/2)^(2*5)
Result:
45000.000226313
@paper trellis Has your question been resolved?
@paper trellis Has your question been resolved?
@paper trellis Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Any explanation?
A is a linear operator, you can think of it as taking linear combinations of x to get y
differentiating Ax gives you a constant
namely, A itself
Doesn't A multiplied by x give a column vector
Then by differentiating that it gives a column vector, not A
But the column vector with sums
yes, but you are taking the partial with respect to every single entry in x
so the derivative will really be an m by n matrix
So kinda like this? How would we know when we do it this way?
yes this is what i mean
what do you mean, when to do it this way?
this is the definition of the jacobian
Oh I see
What if x depends on z?
y=Ax
dy/dz = ?
then you should apply the chain rule
Is it the same as the normal chain rule in calculus or is there a difference when it is linear algebra?
it is essentially the same, $J_{f\circ g} = (J_f \circ g)\cdot J_g$
Bair
the proof is somewhat more technical
@umbral arrow Has your question been resolved?
Help I’m unsure how to even do these problems
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
A question like this is very common
Like a chain rule with a product rule
Seems like you’re in need of dire help… are you trying to differentiate the expression?
Yes
||Logrithmatic differentiation ||
Sorry didn’t specify
Calc 1
Simplify but that’s chain rule
Yeah, seems good - that’s the derivative of (3x-1)^5
Yes
Well, you can just continue using the product rule
Derivative of the first one multiply second function plus the second function of the first one
OK let me try actually yeah

Seems right to me
And I can’t simplify the expression on right because the exponent ^5 has to opened up first right?
Yes, but you can pull out a common factor of (3x-1)^4 from both terms
I see
Not necessary atm for scope
Thank you
.close
Closed by @marble crown
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
Just did this as well
More in depth
Quotient rule + Chain rule + product rule
Using logarithmic differentiation (I didn’t do it that way) is the one closest to my answer my best is that they factored out (3x-1)^4 ?

@marble crown Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can anyone help me with the c part of this question
how do you solve this Q without using higher than quadratic degree formulas
@timber briar Has your question been resolved?
@timber briar Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
,rotate
So I think that the answer to b should be 0
Btw in the white space it's supposed to say:
1,2,2²,2³,...,2⁸
Because 2⁸ = 2⁷ + 2⁶ + 2⁵ ... + 1
And you can't fit 2⁸ in all sums so there's no way all of them can come out equal
And by a I've found out s = 8097 but I haven't found s = 8104
Can someone help me find it or help me prove that there isn't one
@unreal terrace Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what's the question
i dont get how to answer it
what is the quesiton
which exponent do i simpify first
order doesn't matter
oh
but is this right?
@tacit arch
what do i do next after this?
,w simplify (-2x^(-11/3))^6 * (4x^2)^(9/2) / (8x^36)^(1/3)
pain
write 4 = 2^2 and 8 = 2^3 then combine the numbers together as a single power of 2.
then do the same thing for all the powers of x
,tex .exp rules
riemann
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
huh
.reopen
✅
what part of that was confusing?
then what will happen to their exponents?
the 4^9/70 and 8^1/105
use power of power
after this
,rotate
this? @tacit arch
you still have multiple terms of power of 2.
do you know how to combine them into a single power?
huh?
no
$a \cdot b \cdot a = a^2 b$
riemann
just put some powers on a and they combine the same way
i rly dont get what u mean
which part
of this?
@covert sonnet Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need to find MLE estimates for the exponential and pareto distributions for right-censored data
I think I've found the likelihood functions:
For exp:
klog(lambda) - lambda x sum(obs) - lambda (n - k) M
For pareto:
klog(alpha) + k x alpha x log(lambda) - (alpha + 1) sum(log(obs + lambda)) + alpha (n - k) log(lambda / (M + lambda))
where k is the number of observed data points, n is the total number of data points, M is the censoring point, obs is the vector of all the observed data points
Pareto is defined as the two parameter version, alpha x lambda^alpha/(lambda + x)^(alpha +1)
I hope you can check if these likelihood functions are correct because when I optimise and plot it, it doesn't seem to account for the censored points
@mossy crypt Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
@mossy crypt Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This question says these forces are in the horizontal plane; doesn't that mean the particle's weight should be into the page in the vertical plane? The worked example seems to ignore that.
No that would not be considered
But there would be a weight into the page? I just wanna know if I interpreted it correctly.
@brazen swan Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @brazen swan
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
try multiplying the inequality by f(x) and squeeze theorem
aha squeeze theorem?
also called sandwich theorem in some places
actually my sir doesnt tell methods/names, directly teaches what to do
yup
unfortunately squeeze theorem wouldn't rule out (A) if the left and right limits are different
might help if you bounded f(x) in terms of x first
x in [1/(n+1), 1/n) implies 1/(n+1) <= x < 1/n implies 1/x > n
there's another bound with the first inequality
ahaa
yeah nvm, its hard for me to understand over messages
will ask someone tmrw
as i am sleepy rn
thanks tho
cya gn
.close
Closed by @sterile trench
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
it is ques from one of toughest exam in world
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Math book won't give an answer so
@elfin rapids Has your question been resolved?
The question was.
Find m value
i see. binomial coefficients satisfy symmetry
$\binom{m}{m-k} = \binom{m}{k}$
apply that with $k=3$ and solve for m
riemann
Ah, my bad. I noticed that picture look awful.
Here, a screenshot.
@tacit arch
So, for the first one...
(m n) = ( m m-n)
Yea your n is my k
therefore
Just apply
Is my approach correct in question D and E?
I tried Pascal.
(m n) + (m n-1) = m+1 n
,w 11 choose 2
,w 5 choose 3
FUCK YEAH
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
There's an adjacent sum identity you can use.
Pascal, right?
I think it works for both d and e
Yes, that's what I did.
So, 16 9 it seems
So, I did it flawless. = )
I'm gonna pass my test.
and be a math king.
. close
.close
Closed by @elfin rapids
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am asked to prove that a bijection F : R2 -> R2, whose images on lines are lines and F(0) = 0 is a linear function.
I've only managed to prove that F preserves parallelity, I don't know where to go from here.
Of course, we are talking about R2 as a vector space, not just a set of real pairs without any other structure
@robust crypt Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @robust crypt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Given the regular expression $\newline P \to PBP \newline B \to BB \newline$ How do I get the [n, m] interval of the Nth line?
3rd line would be PBPBBPBP, so [3,6] would be PBBP
Megu
The starting seed is P
@untold lake Has your question been resolved?
In the Nth line you have 2^(N-1) 'P's and clusters of 'B's in between them. So there are 2^(N-1)-1 of these B-clusters. The number of B-s in k-th cluster equals the binary number formed by 1 and trailing zeroes in binary expansion of k. For example in 5th line you have 4 B in 12th cluster as 12=1100 and 4=100. I think this is enough to make fast algorithm to get [n,m] segment.
@untold lake Has your question been resolved?
Could you run me through using this way to find number of P's in [27,41] of 5th line? I'm having some trouble visualizing it
I'm not yet ready to give a complete algorithm. Here is the rule for forming this sequence.
How do I know what cluster 27 and 41 fall in though
yeah, I agree, it needs further thinking 🙂
You can get the starting index of the n-th cluster by summing n+1 (number of P's) + sum of number of B's up till that point, I guess
but that doesn't help much
and when you're working on the 1000th line, the numbers add up quick
You see, if we take some number n, then we know how many ones, how many 2s and so on are there before that n. I think this should work fast
so lets take that 27
oops, I forgot there are P in between.
I think the number of pees can be predicted too.
cluster n has n P's behind it
Do you need an algorithm/program or just the formula? What are the limits for N?
just the formula
lines go up to 1000, positions up to 10^16
so in [n,m] if n lies in the i-th cluster and m in j-th cluster, you'd have j - i P's?
Any time limit?
what is the maximum length of [m,n] or maybe you give a link to this?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
well, if m is 1 and n=10^16 do you still need to output all the string?
I just need to output the number of P's
oh, thats easier
I didn't ask correctly, yeah
Ok, I'll take a break. Possibly figure it out tomorrow, if it's still relevant
@untold lake Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
inverse function theorem
right
use 0 + 0 = 0
thank you
@crystal valley Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
where did i go wrong?
this is not correct
so what would v equal?
@craggy remnant Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @craggy remnant
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i do part b?
Idk what theorems you know to show that a function like this dont have an existing limit but what you could and also should do is try to "go to the limit" from different directions if you know what i mean
@dense garden
@dense garden Has your question been resolved?
how do i show the epsilon delta proof
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@sacred haven Has your question been resolved?
@sacred haven Has your question been resolved?
@sacred haven here you go:
sure, you're welcome
@sacred haven Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @sacred haven
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im stuck which is wrong or right in this equation for rational function mines is the solution 1 and the solution 2 is my friends im quite weary on the graph as well
solution to what
for this equation
what are you trying to find
brother
stating an equation is not a question
there is nothing to solve
do you mean the roots
do you mean the asymptotes
the asymptotes
A vertical line that guides the graph?
solution two finds the domain of the function, but as @buoyant saddle said, “solution” means nothing here
you both need to specify what these steps are for
but yes, solution 2 solves for the domain and therefore vertical asymptote. looks like they solved for the vertical intercept as well. the graph looks okay
solution 1, i’m sorry, is very misguided
there is no reason you should equate the numerator and denominator of a rational function, like, ever
@twilit solstice
@twilit solstice Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @twilit solstice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Log(X²-7x-30)-Log(x+3). Log base 6 but that doesn't really matter.
In this question, you factor the quadratic (x+3)(x-10) and simplify to log(x-10). I get that. Now when it comes to stating restriction I get confused. I know that it has to be positive because 6 to whatever power will never be negative or 0. So what my teacher does I'd (x+3)(x-10)>0. x>10, x<-3. I agree with this, but the method he uses for the 10 is x-10>0 -> add 10 to the other side x>10. Now for the 3 I have no idea why he flips the sign. I know that if you graph the quadratic it's positive before x=-3, so I agree with the restriction I just don't know how he got the restriction without Graphing it. Am I just missing something? Any help would be appreciated
Also my final statement in this case would be log(x-10) x>10, x<-3 right?
The way I've been imagining it is just whether the graph opens up or down and where the intercepts are, but idk how to show my work for that
he flips the sign becuase becuase if x>-3 then sure x+3>0 but x-10 isnt, hence their product is negative
but thats not really how you solve it
it isnt just about flipping a sign whenever
i recommend you search up sign chart for inequalities on youtube
@coral night hop on clash bro
Yea so he's been doing sign charts, but he hasn't been plugging in values to test he's just been filling then out, and a sub said testing values takes too much time. I'm about to go to bed so I just skimmed through a video, but it seems they just plug in values to test
i mean you can just do it in your head eventually
And it's x<-3 isn't it?
you know its positive if and only if the two factors have the same sign
so you just look for where they are both negative or both posiitve
Wait hold on, so my final statement for this would just be x>10? But isn't 10 negative when x<-3 or do I put them in like -3>x>10?
Because like if I do a sign chart for the factors, it's positive in the red areas but our answer is only on the right
Oh wait I think I get it, so if we just have the function log(x²-7x-30), we do get an answer before x<-3, but because we have the restriction from the second part of the question where the restriction is x>-3, it leaves only x>10 as the restriction where all are positive
But that leave the question, why does the factor (x+3) and the second part of the question (x+3) have different restrictions?
because we cant use the simplified function at values for which the original function isnt defined
yo saladman98
Well yea but if we just look at the 2 (x+3)s, they have different restrictions on them. I get that the restriction comes from the very start of the question I'm just confused in why one gets the sign flipped
your pfp is so heat bro
Thanks king
i thought i explained this already
^
we need (x+3)(x-10) > 0 and (x+3) > 0
now, since x + 3 > 0 we can omit values of x such that x <= -3
and if x+3 > 0 then the only way (x+3)(x-10) > 0 is if (x-10) is also > 0
Yea I get that but we have to state every restriction, and I'm not sure how to show my work for the x<-3
hence x > 10
you dont need to
its useless
because you already know x > -3
so who cares about
but again i can show you how he got that if youd like
despite being utterly useless
Yes please, I understand that it's useless but he wants us to state all restrictions and then do the unit chart to find the one that works
But then I have to show how I get to x<-3
ok, so ill reiterate, a product with two factors is positive if and only if both factors have the same sign (i.e both positive or both negative)
Like he said he's gonna take marks off if I go straight to x>-3 from the equation I gotta write x+3>0 lmao
since we need to solve (x+3)(x-10) > 0 we need either (x + 3 > 0 and x - 10 > 0) or (x + 3 < 0 and x - 10 < 0)
so that they have the same sign
hence for the first part where both factors are positive, we take the intersection of the two intervals, namely x > -3 and x > 10 ; thus the intersection is x > 10
then for the second part where both factors are negative (meaning their product is positive) we take the intersection of the two intervals (x + 3 < 0 and x - 10 < 0) hence x < -3 and x < 10. the intersection of these intervals is just x < -3
yo thesaladman98, i just wanted to say that youre my fucking guy bro
i love you too bro
Aight I gotta head to bed I'm so cooked today
🐐
How do I mark this as answered
.close
Closed by @coral night
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
can someone pls explain me this part
!help
To ask for mathematics help on this server, please open your own help channel or help thread. See #❓how-to-get-help for instructions.
didnt get it
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&286206848099549185>
Shouldn't it be 34.6
yea
Yea
So the answer in book is wrong
Thanks
@molten arch Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @molten arch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I’m tryna do this invertible matrix question, where A,B, and X are invertible square matrices of the same size. Solve for X in terms of A and B and simply result as much as possible. What I did here is it correct?
@pallid ferry Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
yes
🙏
yep
.
@pallid ferry Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Ohhh
You guys were saying yes to the answer
Lmao
.close
Closed by @pallid ferry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
My approach would be to use a piecewise function of asymptotes or tan
I assume you might not be able to use the latter though lol
like arctan ? 😅
Not quite. Think of how you can create a map which covers all of R^2 using tan
if im being entirely honest i haven’t revisited geometry in a long time so give me a second
nah i think im a little lost 
@pliant terrace Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Computer organization help
@keen saffron Has your question been resolved?
@keen saffron Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @keen saffron
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why is the answer infinity
If I rationalize the expression and then evaluate the limit, I get -3
rationalize the expression?
not completely sure
but i think your second line is correct
your third line is not because square roots are always positive so you're not allowed to simply factor out the x from under the root
from here, top becomes +infinity and denominator approaches 0
this makes sense as well if the limit was x->+infinity it would approach -3 (i graphed in desmos)
uhm, i hope that makes some sense
@arctic tulip Has your question been resolved?
Can u explain this part again??
it's kind of a weird convention
the square root symbol as used above essentially refers to the principal (positive) square root of the radicand
although mathematically speaking, there are two square roots but conventionally the specific symbol only outputs the positive version
thus, to perform the operation in this way, you would need to do x in the numerator and |x| in the denominator
edit: careful of how you factor the constant 1 though since it will be become negative 1
Ahhh I seee it now
It does make sense
Also I just noticed that
If I plug infinity into the limit directly
It becomes infinity+infinity
Which is also just infinity
Thanks mate 👍
.close
Closed by @arctic tulip
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
yes but
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
technically it's an "indeterminate form" though so we can't say exactly say that
but that only matters more when we have expressions like infinity/infinity when each infinity is a different "size"
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
.close
Closed by @weak hound
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey, im going through my notes from the beginning on fourier series, and having now gone through a textbook chapter, course notes, and a couple videos, each of them introduce the idea of representing f(x) as an infinite sum of sines and cosines as something along the lines of 'suppose we can do this, then later we'll prove we can do this' , is there a good argument for choosing to represent functions this way, does it just come later?
@outer lark Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i simplfy this to match the inductive hypothesis
I tried expanding it out, but nothing was simplfying
what does 1^2+2^2+3^2...+k^2 equal to
not 1^2+2^2+3^2...+k^2+(k+1)^2
in our assumption
i am asking you what information can we assume
well this is equal to
so would you agree that $1^2+2^2...+(k+1)^2=\frac{k(k+1)(2k+1)}{6}+(k+1)^2$?
the breadwave
because $1^2+2^2...+k^2=\frac{k(k+1)(2k+1)}{6}$
the breadwave
hmmm yes, that would be another way to write that, because you take the total of the previous term, and add the (k+1)^2 to it
did i just set it up wrong?
yes
no
you just didn't use the assumption that's given in the inductive hypothesis
i thought this was the assumption
yes, you were supposed to use this information
then I replaced k, with k+1
so we did here
you're trying to prove the equality for k+1 using the equality we assume to be true for k
and I cant do that?
you can
we did here
im not completely following, but I can try to simplify this?
correct
we are using the assumption that $1^2+2^2...+k^2=\frac{k(k+1)(2k+1)}{6}$ is true for $k$ to show that $1^2+2^2...+(k+1)^2=\frac{(k+1)(k+2)(2k+3)}{6}$ is true (which proves for $k+1$)
the breadwave
shouldnt we be showing that it's equal to this instead?
maybe try showing me $\frac{(k+1)(k+2)(2k+3)}{6}=\frac{k(k+1)(2k+1)}{6}+(k+1)^2$
the breadwave
im ngl this is making it more confusing
try expanding $k(k+1)(2k+1)+6(k+1)^2$ out
the breadwave
and $(k+1)(k+2)(2k+3)$
the breadwave
the whole thing?
the same way you did with (k+1)(k+2)(2k+3)
like distribute the k, distirbute the 6((k+1) * (k+1)),
ya so you just end up with a polynomial
ok this is going to take a while
is there a point to this?
i feel like its over complicating it
not a gf
yay
so we know that $1^2+2^2...+(k+1)^2=\frac{k(k+1)(2k+1)}{6}+(k+1)^2$ and that $\frac{k(k+1)(2k+1)}{6}+(k+1)^2=\frac{(k+1)(k+2)(2k+3)}{6}$
and that concludes the proof?
the breadwave
well I see you can solve this in two ways
one by substituing k+1 directly in the equation
and the other way by appending it to the end
OH WAIT
do you get what we're doing now
yeah we were using the fact that we know $1^2+2^2...+k^2=\frac{k(k+1)(2k+1)}{6}$ is true
so we just proved that because its equal, it means that the ladder holds true
the breadwave
so therefore $1^2+2^2...+(k+1)^2=\frac{(k+1)(k+2)(2k+3)}{6}$ is true (as we demonstrated $\frac{k(k+1)(2k+1)}{6}+(k+1)^2=\frac{(k+1)(k+2)(2k+3)}{6}$
the breadwave
hmmmm ok
but why does this take 100 steps to prove
i feel like there has to be a simpler way to prove they are equal
once you have the idea it's just basic algebra
i usually dont show my steps because it's just basic algebra but if your teacher wants that

right but there probably some laws that can show they are equal faster than distribtuing everything to find a one-liner polynomial
right?
yeah you can use whatever method you can to show those 2 are equal
but that's not the point of the exercise
the point of the exercise is to see whether you can set up induction correctly
well in that case, did I? because I see two inductive hypothesis
or wait
you are not seeing two inductive hypotheses
I guess the hypothesis is appending (k+1)^2
and then the inductive steps are substituing k+1 in
and arriving at the same conclusion
our hypothesis is that $1^2+2^2...+(k+1)^2=\frac{(k+1)(k+2)(2k+3)}{6}$
the breadwave
our proof was using the fact that $1^2+2^2...+(k+1)^2=\frac{k(k+1)(2k+1)}{6}+(k+1)^2$ to demonstrate $1^2+2^2...+(k+1)^2=\frac{(k+1)(k+2)(2k+3)}{6}$
the breadwave
woah
ok
i sort of get it
my teacher might take off points for doubling its complexity
but
ig it still holds true
i just cant figure out the algebraic shortcuts
@ocean ravine Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @ocean ravine
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Find second derivative with respect to y
Problem: $x^2+4y^2=7$
Light
Did I do this correct?
you mean with respect to x, but answer in terms of y, right
Yes
Implicit differentiation
nope sadly, i got a different result
why do you make things into fractions before differentiating, it makes it complicated :d
why dont you differentiate like straight forward instead!
try again, you should get $\qquad \ddot{y}=-\frac{7}{16, y^3}$
Milena
@brittle lake Has your question been resolved?
physicist
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
Yeah i realise it's SAS congruency
which triangles
The Congurency of the figure is SAS
yes
Both of them are equal
state the name of the triangles
Triangle ABD is congurent to Trange BAC
oh wait
correct
so what two angles are equal
once we prove congruence
we can use CPCTC(corresponding parts of congruent triangles are congruent)
so angle BAC and ABD are equal
Now, we just need to find another congruence to show that triangles BCD and ADC are equal
can you do that?
Oh no it's proved
i understood
thanks
.close
Closed by @hard cloud
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
am i doing something wrong here?
.close
Closed by @mellow frigate
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
i need to compute the integral above, given a>3/2
these are the steps i’ve taken so far but i feel like i’ve reached a dead end so i was wondering if anyone could guide me
thanks
1+1
.
hi
? Wdym
<@&286206848099549185> :)
You watch football?
👍
flexo would you like to take a look
<@&286206848099549185> i need help with the problem 😭
I am sorry but I am not really good with these types of questions. Others will help.
What is the name if the aplication to use plz??
@keen wasp Has your question been resolved?
tangent one specifically, try setting x = tan(theta) and use the 1 + tan(theta)^2 = sec(theta)^2 identity
idk wat the a is for?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what does “/{x}”mean
could you show the context?
yeah one sec
f(x)?
i’m reading my lecture notes and it says
i jus don’t know what the curly brackets is there for
set difference
so {x_0} is the set containing only the number x_0, and (a,b) \ {x_0} is the set difference, which means the set that has all the elements of (a,b) except x_0
Closed by @oblique wharf
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Tips?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i solve this?
Closed by @broken violet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is this how we are supposed to do it?
The book didn't mention chain for 2 or more independent variables so...
when you do partial differentiation, all other variables become constants so it follows the same rule
can you walk me through your thinking here
looks correct to me
Closed by @strong sandal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What do they mean by reflect the figure over the line and the y=-1?
reflect over the line y=-1
y = -1 is the line
that you reflect over
I did that I just gave the opposite sign
wdym by just giving the opposite sign
as your answer?
its the same as reflecting over the x axis just bring all the points down 1