#help-0
1 messages · Page 473 of 1
Can someone please help, I think it’s x=1
Did you understand how I used the slope to find the other points?
X=1,3,5?
Yes, assuming the endpoints are excluded
Thanks a lot
i will read again what u said
@candid dune Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey! Is this correct? I first did 1/3R1, then R2+R1, then R3+3R1
<@&286206848099549185> 😓
@nimble jasper Has your question been resolved?
ahhh can anyone help me out
yes but the rank is off
Oh really? Can u please explain why
Because I thought rank was based off of rows that were linearly independent and
None of these rows are the same as each other
yes
now tell me are they linearly independent based on your form?
R2 and R3 are multiples of each other
sorry I thought linearly dependent means they’re all different rows
But you’re right
So since r2 and r3 can become each other
So you basically have a zero row
would the rank be 2 then
ye
I probably should’ve had it fully reduced then
no worries
you dont wanna skipp basically entries
like the red path does
Ahhh okay
@nimble jasper Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
x=1 since its a rule that where you see a pointy structure you cannot differentiate those , in this case at X=1
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have solved this question 3 times, getting the same answer each time, i've asked chatGPT and everything for help...
I need a math wizzard to tell me what I am doing wrong
can you show your work?
,rccw
oh
im sorry for having caveman writing 🙏
basically multiply by 2 the second equation, so the -y cancels the 2y on top
then 10x = 9
div 9/10
x = 9/10
plug into original equation 2x + 2y = 1
19/10 simplifies to 9/5 + 2y = 1
2y = 1 - 9/5
u mean y=-2/5
you got the same answer this time
right
it ask for the y value
yes and u said x=-2/5 before so i corrected u
im so annoyed because I get a free CLEP voucher if i score good but this stupid website keeps telling me im wrong
the site says "answer: -2/5" which is the same as what you got
no
thats mine
it doesnt show the "right" answer
it displays mine
forgot to lead with that
I cant retry the same set, but I wanted to confirm that I am not like messing up some super small detail in my solving
your answer is correct, it may be a formatting issue or other site problem
thank you
Closed by @peak pelican
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi! I wanted to ask some help in clarifying what the supremum does in the definition of the lesbegue integral.
From what i understand the supremum of a set takes its least upper bound
Example: $sup{1, 2, 3} = 3$
But here i have: $\int_X f d\mu := sup{I(h) : h \in S^+, h \leq f} \ $
Where $h$ are simple functions: $h = \sum_{i=1}^{n} c_i \chi_{A_i} \$
And $S^+ := {g: X \to \mathbb{R} : g \text{ simple function}, g \geq 0}$
@tribal axle Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
I really wish i can help, but I didn't learn much about lesbegue integral.
But one thing, supremum of a set may not always be the least upper bound of the elements of the set.
e.g. sup[0,1) = 1
huh, in this case taken the supremum meant "taking thinner and thinner step functions"
basically you approximate the function you are integrating with step functions
ah i see
like a riemann integral
sorry for the confusion
and the supremum meant taking the thinnest step functions, kinda like the limit
all good, im also confused as to how the supremum is working like a limit
Supremum of a limit of bounded simple functions is well defined yes
Could you provide a definition that i can look more into
Starts around page 50
https://www.stat.rice.edu/~dobelman/courses/texts/qualify/Measure.Theory.Tao.pdf
Closed by @tribal axle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello, i'm trying to get a geometric meaning of the row space of a matrix.
The column space is the linear combination o the column vectors of the matrix. To have a visual intuition of the transformation i imagine what happens to the orthonormal basis vector when i apply the matrix to them. So in a sense the matrix is transforming the space and if i just plot the columns vectors of the matrix it would tell me where the basis would go, and i can see the effect of the transformation.
I don't what am i seeing if i plot the row vectors. can anyone help me out?
@fervent ferry Has your question been resolved?
you can see the row space as being orthogonal to the null space
@fervent ferry Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Given an acute triangle ( \triangle ABC ) with ( AB \neq AC ). Let ( I ), ( O ), and ( H ) denote the incenter, circumcenter, and orthocenter of ( \triangle ABC ), respectively. Point ( M ) is the midpoint of ( BC ). The line ( MI ) intersects ( AH ) at ( N ), and the circle with diameter ( MN ) intersects the circumcircle of ( \triangle BHC ) at ( P ) and ( Q ). Points ( X ) and ( Y ) lie on lines ( MP ) and ( MQ ), respectively, such that ( X, A, Y ) lie on the circumcircle of ( \triangle ABC ) in that order. The line ( XY ) intersects ( AB ) and ( AC ) at ( D ) and ( E ), respectively. Given that ( IO \parallel BC ), prove that ( MD = ME ).
6EQUJ5
@void carbon Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
this is the question i’m stuck on. i have been stuck on for hours. i don’t rlly know how to sketch it since it doesn’t gives me a right angled triangle and when it does the bearings are off
@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?
You didn't draw a picture?
c is the distance from E to G.
Bearings are measured clockwise from north
Draw cardinal axes at the points and approximate the direction and distance from the point
Use basic Geometry theorems to fill in one unknown angle
My notation is all shit
Using A B C when we started with E F G
Anyway
Law of cosine finds c = EG
Law of sines finds angle B, which fills in the complete bearing angle from E to G
@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello. I have got as question in my math book I have to proove that:
\newline
\newline
if $a_1 \equiv b_1 \mod m$ and if $a_2 \equiv b_2 \mod m$ then $a_1 \pm b1 \equiv \mod m a_2 \pm b_2$ and then $a_1 \mul b_1 \equiv a_2 \cdot b_2 \mod m$
\newline
so I wrote:
theorem:
\[if $a_1 \equiv b_1 \mod m$ and $a_2 \equiv b_2 \mod m$ then $a_1 \pm b_1 \equiv a_2 \pm b_2 \mod m$ and $a_1 \mul b_1 \equiv a_2 \cdot b_2 \mod m$
\]
proof:
\[
as $a_1 - b_1 \mod m \implies (a_1-b_1) | m$
as $a2 - b2 \mod m \implies (a2-b2) | m$
\]
so as:
$(a1-b1) | m$
and as
$(a2-b2) | m$
then:
$(a1-b1) - (a2-b2) \mid m$
it follows that:
$(a1-b1) + (a2-b2) \mid m$
and as:
$(a1-b1) \mid m$
and:
$(a2-b2) \mid m$
then:
$(a1-b1) \cdot (a2-b2) \mid m \newline$
\newline
Is the custom proof that I wrote correct please?```
superctf
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
a1 - b1 is 0 mod m, and a2 - b2 is also 0 mod m. So they are certainly equivalent. But a1+b1 is 2*b1 mod m, and a2 + b2 is 2*b2 mod m. So theres no reason for the sums to be equivalent
The theorem would be true if it were a1 ± a2 is equivalent to b1 ± b2 (mod m)
hello. I am very confused is it a - b | m or m | a - b
m | a - b is true in general since we can expect a-b to be larger than m or equal to m
then is a - b | m true?
not necessarily since a-b can be 2m, and 2m is not a factor of m
ah ok thanks. then my proof is wrong?
your proof only tackles the a1-b1 part and not a1+b1 part...
so since the "theorem" is itself invalid, I suppose you should also include a disproof for the a1+b1 part of the problem
i think that's just a typo tho
like surely it's to prove a1 + a2 = b1 + b2 mod m
yea thats what I said earlier
I mean should I do m | a - b in my proof instaead of a - b | m to proove it?
You are technically doing that, but you seem to have messed up the notation
like its true if you write 2|6, but if you write 6|2 then its false
@smoky crane Has your question been resolved?
ok I see perfectly the mistake then
@smoky crane Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @smoky crane
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
can I ask again when I will have finished latter please?
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what is the coeffecient of x^3 in the expansion of (1+3x-x^2-x^3)^3
<@&286206848099549185>
!15min
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
Just expand it using foil
hell nah
no need for that
why use foil, there's prob an easier solution
how tf do you use the binomial theorem here
or maybe i shouldn't use the binomial theorem
think about all the ways you can choose 3 summands in 1+3x-x^2-x^3 and multiply them to get an ax^3 term
wdym by that? like (-x^3), (-x^2)(+3x)?
not sure what you mean
cuz i tried adding the coefficients of these.
since (-x^3) + (-x^2)(3x)
(-x^3) + (-3x^3)
-4x^3
so the answer is 4?
i tried that and it was the wrong answer
how to solve hahaha
i tried ai, it gave me different answers
no surprises there
i don’t really have the energy to explain what i mean by this, sorry
oh damn
Hello I need help w something this is a lil bit stupid but I can’t figure it out :(
huh
bro.
SORRY THIS IS MY FIRST TIME USING THIS DISCORD SERVER
I DIDNT KNOW MY BAD
sorry again 
its oke, i was like that the first time i was here
and anyways
<@&286206848099549185>
@lunar plank Has your question been resolved?
$$ (1+3x-x^2-x^3)(1+3x-x^2-x^3)(1+3x-x^2-x^3) $$
RadMeerkat62445
To find the coefficient of x^3, multiply products of terms that can give x^3 term
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Factor the numerator and denominator
yea i did stuff like that before
see this one? its easy
but this one is much more complicated and i dont understand it
Hint, if there is a point wise discontinuity, then (x+2) will be a factor
am supposed to multiply the numerator and denominator with 4+x power 2 right?
(because x+2 = 0 when x = -2)
if i do the regular factoring that i sent in the other pic
it wouldnt give me the right answer
no dont try to multiply or divide, just factor something out
ill give you a hint, the bottom factors into x^2(2+x)
no not like this
You can't solve this one this way
look at the top
You have to find the common factor between the numerator and denominator
hint: ||(a^2 - b^2) = (a+b)(a-b)||
use this if you dont get anywhere after a bit
as in something to divide both of them to remove the power?
like 2
to make the 4x power 2 a 2x
no see here, the top and bottom both share a factor
you dont have to multiply and divide by anything, but just have to make that observation
am not good with factorization rules
if theres any old rule that am supposed to know from a younger grade
show it to me
you can see the top is a difference of two squares
.
Also this
so i just use this on the bottom numbers
@sonic sedge
what does that even mean ok i made the observation now what
Here is a similar problem solved as an example
You use this thing you're talking about when you have roots (mainly)
and your rule wouldnt reven work on the bottom numbers cause its not (a^2 - b^2) its (a^2 - b^3)
The key is factoring both numerator and denominator. The rest is just simplifying and plugging in
well yea thats obviously what i need to do
And what's troubling you?
is that its not factoring
\begin{align*}
\lim_{x \rightarrow 3} \frac{x^2 - 9}{x^2 - 5x + 6} &= \frac{(x+3)(x-3)}{(x-2)(x-3)} \
&= \frac{x+3}{x-2} \
&= \frac{6}{1} = 6
\end{align*}
OmnipotentEntity
This is a similar problem to yours
We factor the numerator and denominator, find the common factor that vanishes at the limit point, cancel it, and evaluate at the limit point
In the case, because the limit is as x goes to 3, the term (x-3) vanishes
So this is the term we must eliminate (because 0/0 is not defined)
In your case the limit is x goes to -2
So the term you need to eliminate is (x+2)
Which implies that if this limit exists and is finite then it must be the case that the numerator and denominator share factors of (x+2)
@sonic sedge does the above make sense, if not do you have questions?
Difference of squares
First mentioned here
9 = 3^2
You factor the quadratic. I observe (-3)(-2) = 6 and (-3)+(-2)=5
ohhh you just did the normal quadratic factorization ok
what numbers multiply = 6 and add = -5 right?
Exactly
alright i understand but one more question
would cancelling the x here be wrong?
because you cancel stuff in division
Cancelling the x meaning you get what exactly?
-9 / -5x+6
-9/(-5x + 6) ?
yes
Yes, that would be wrong
You can only cancel things that multiply
Not things that add
Notice that I do cancel the (x-3) later on
Because they multiply
you cant cancel minus and addition?
Not in a division
Closed by @sonic sedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone explain c and d
@vestal crown Has your question been resolved?
Show the working you did for parts a and b and it should be a lot easier to demonstrate
But basically only 2 means you need EXACTLY 2 that DON'T have defects, and at most 1 means there must be either 0 or 1 that DO have a defect
Oh you mean you wanted to explain how the answer book did it
Yes
Let's talk about c to start.
You have 3 chips
only 2 do not have defects
The probability that they DO have one is 0.05, so the probability that they DON'T is 0.95
There are multiple combinations of chips for the next 2 parts, unlike the first 2.
Either chip 1 and 2 don't have defects, chips 2 and 3 don't have defects, or chips 1 and 3 don't have defects.
I hope this helps a bit for the start at least
That's why they have so many probability listed, because the different placements are the different chips since you assume each of them have a unique option
Ohhhhhhh
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
hm
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
for this probability question
where it ask for probability of exactly a pair of cards from 3 cards picked in a deck of 52
I got a ridiculous which doesnt make sense
o right thats why
wdym by divide the numerator by 6
7488 × 3 / 6
oh so 52 x 51 x 50 = 22100 x 6
but that's the same as doing 52×51×50
why did i think it wouldn;t work
yeah ok either one
you can do 52c3 if you remove the order from the numerator as well
i don't know what you're supposed to do
it's the same answer, so it doesn;t matter what you;re supposed to do
wait but 52C3 is 52!/49! x 3! which is 52 x 51 x 50 / 6
7488 × 3 gives you ordered hands, each unordered hand appears 6 times
so you divide by 6
and then 52c3 would be right
What does the c mean? Never learnt that notation
the choose in n choose r function
alr
is there a scenario when i should use 52C3 and when i should just use 52 x 51 x 50
52C3 is not the same as 52 * 51 * 50
52C3 = 22100, which is the total number of possible 3 card combinations. 52 * 51 * 50 = 132600
Closed by @cunning flower
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
h is 90
why
did you just look at it or is there a trick to it
i'm also confused
How?
it's always true
It might now be though?
oh yeah that's true
wdym
Its not marked in as a right angle though?
Yeah because they want you to figure it out
the ange subtended by a diameter is 90 degrees
Note that the largest chord is marked with a circle (which is meant to be the centre of the circle). They marked it so that it should ring you a bell
given the other questions, i feel like that's too much to ask
u can prove it if you want
draw a radius the point
and use isosceles triangles have equal angles
But how is it 90?
but u do it like this
Are you 100%sue its 90
yes
It won't work
There's a theorem stating that
Because you would have 22+90+45
Why 45°?
Which = 157
That's half of 90
Mmh I'm not following you
Prolly @cinder compass does, since he's helped you from the beginning
i is not half of h
H is 68
Yes
Is it though
h is 90
But how?
Did you mean h, or i?
Idk
inscribed right angle theorem
i is 68, sure 
Closed by @stiff falcon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey
So the question says the probability function is:
$$P(\xi=x)=\binom6x0.1^x0.9^{6-x},\quad x=0,1,2,3,4,5,6$$
Totalani
It then asks me to get these but honestly not sure hwo to being with these.
actually I think I get it
for a I ahve to add x= 1 and 2 and 3 together
will try it to confirm
I must be doing something wrong cuz im not getting the correct asnwer
$$\begin{aligned}&P(\xi=0)&&=\quad\binom600.1^00.9^6=0.531,\&P(\xi=1)&&=\quad\binom610.1^10.9^5=0.354,\&P(\xi=2)&&=\quad\binom620.1^20.9^4=0.098.\end{aligned}$$
Totalani
I get 0,983, the book says 0,468 ?
Wait don't think I'm suppose to add 0
That explains it
We guchi boys
.close
Closed by @manic flame
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, can someone help me with equations with 2 absolute values? |x-2| + |x-3| = 3
sure
till now I've done just equations which had just one absolute value, for example,
|x-2| = 3 => { x - 2 = 3
{ x - 2 = -3 and so on
but I'm quite confused when we have 2 absolute values
hello
3 u mean
what do you call two guys that love math? algebros!
youll have to split it into a few more cases
x>2, x<2
x>3, x<3
so theres 2<x
2<x<3
3<x
no, incorrect
its x<2, and also 1 more case: 2<x<3
what do I need to write exactly
u have to first write the cases and then check for each case and depending on what the expression inside modulus is (negative or positive) open the modulus according to the definition of modulus function
another method:- square both sides, solve for x
you will get two values of x, both of which are correct
you just need to know how to factor quadratic equations for the end result
how did you get that
oh yes mb
and you just add the quadratics
ye
yea subtract 9 from both sides
divide by 4
I mean you can simplify it
to x^2 -5x +4
now just plug it in the original equation
both values
check if it satisfies or not
4-2+4-3 = 3
and
|-1| + |-2| is 1 + 2
so it's 3
yea
it satisfies
thank you so much
yea and I think those are the only two values
I will see on wolfram wait
actually, if you've got time, can you help me with one more thing?
yep those are the only integer solutions
1 min
hmm
@hollow trench so you need to solve two equations
first x+|x-3| = 5
x+|x-3| = -5
and in those two equations you get two more cases for each equation
so 4 equations
you get few complex solutions
yea
if you get them you leave it
ohh
oh, the exercies mentions to do this equations in R
yea
basically you find the point where the absolute function turns zero, so |x-2| is zero at x=2, now x can be >2 or <2, similarily for |x-3| x=3 and x can be >3, <3
if you combine x>2, x<2, x>3, x<3 you get three conditions: x<2, x>3 and 2<x<3
in each equation isolate variables and constants and then solve for x
plug those values and verify
yep
I am wrong somewhere?
I think while making equations
Or I'm supposed to get values that won't satisfy
4 + 1 is 5
well u said
x+|x-3| = 5, -5
x-3 = 5-x
why
its the only integer solution satisfying the original question
no problem
there are complex solutions
but this is the only integer solutions and also present in Real number system
I can't wait to study complex numbers :D
but unfortunately you don't really learn much about them in highschool
in my country
yea
But I won't use them very much at school, and without practice I will probably forgot what I'm learning from youtube
oh alr
I'll go and watch it, thank you for telling me
is complex numbers in algebra 1 or algebra 2?
or in none of them
I don't really know
.close
Closed by @hollow trench
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have already shown the last part, but how do show that f(x-a) has a Fourier transform in the first place?
plug f(x-a) into the definition and do a substitution
Yeah I know
But I'm wondering how to show: "if f(x) has a Fourier transform, so does f(x-a) for any a in real numbers"
is it enough to just show that?
It's not functional analysis, but alright. Don't know what L^1 is either .-. Haven't learned anything about it
In the class i'm taking right now we're learning Laplace- and Fouriertransform, PDE's and Complex Analysis. Doubt that there's a umbrella term for those topics
then yes
Closed by @viral falcon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey !
Can i write this to say that i take a couple a,b,c in R^3 but with a different of 0 ?
a =/= 0
i think i do not need to translate this one but if needed tell me
i want to know if i can write :
or if it's nonsense
oh yes $R^*$ is normal to exclude 0 because 0 doesn't have an inverse in the ring R
riemann
So i wrote it right ?
no haha
explain pls
$a \in \R^$ and $(b,c)\in\R^2$ is more clear. or also $(a, b, c) \in \R^ \times \R^2$ is also okay
riemann
Closed by @elfin pulsar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Working on this problem for a calc III class
No clue how to do it, I’ve tried some partial stuff, some algebraic stuff, making y a function of x, etc.
I know the answer is for x>0 but have no clue how to prove it
,rccw
is basically asking u to find the domain for whic hthat is a one-to-one function
is graphing it possible?
and then try teh horizontal line test?
Yea
That’s what I did but I’m looking for a proof
I also would graph it out
well thats rather nontrivial to graph
But u don’t have to
im thinking maybe smth to do with the monotonicity of the function?
if u can differentiate it maybe u will discover smth interesting /shrugs
But u can use the Formel
Partials with respect to x and y don’t offer anything very interesting
Like the steps
Formel?
Like steps to solve a function without graph
implicit diff
U don’t now?
I did implicit diff already, doesn’t give anything
maybe spam implicit function theorem
Yea
Like smth like that
U didn’t got many information to graph it out
So u have to calculate
Oh I think that would work
Let me read up on the theorem
Wait but doesn’t implicit just tell you that a function can model points in the neighborhood?
How would I use it to show bijectivity
U have to do it like 2-3 times
Wdym
Like I just show that there are functions on different y values and where they end?
So like, I show that there’s a top curve function with one point, a bottom curve function with another, then show where the bottom curve function ends?
@fast oar Has your question been resolved?
@fast oar Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I dont get it why burgers equation isnt linear?
As i understand i cant do u*∂u/∂x which would equal to u ∂u^2/∂ux?
uu = u^2 and ux = ux and in that case it would fit that it's isnt linear since it's not to the first power
u^2 is not linear in u
How would product of u and ux break the rule of them not being to the 1st power
Well yes u^2 is not linear in u but how do i know it's u^2? As i understand i can't just do u * u = u^2
u * du / dx is also nonlinear
In this picture red x is multiplication.
My tought process was that if i multiply u by those values i get the equation on the right and that would break the linearity.
Can i think of it like that or that's wrong way to go about it?
Okay. homogeneous linear PDE is if sum of terms, each of which involves dependant variable (u in this case) or one of it's derivative to the 1st power.
How does u du/dx break this rule?
Thank you, now i get it
I need to practice writing the right questions straight away lol
.close
Closed by @formal oracle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&286206848099549185>
What's up
you are supposed to ask the question and wait
pinf the helpers if no one answers it
after 15 min
Where's the question
!15m
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
@hushed crown Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Number 69 a, would I find derivative of f first of g? Like it would be 4(2) then I find the inner derivative of g to multiply it by which is 6, so it would be 4(2) times 6 right?
Or am I dumb or stupid
@brittle lake Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @brittle lake
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
✅
Guidance with number 72 please?
I know that the derivative of f(x) is about -1
Since part a is asking me to find h’(2)
I’d find f’f(x) then f’(x)
Well, I’m stuck on that part
So if someone could aid me
🙏
Apply the chain rule to h first
Didn’t I just do that
With this
Show me
Write it out explicitly
That’s often the first step in getting unstuck in a problem
I mean it’s just this but replace x with 1
f’(f(1)) * f’(1)
Where did you get 1 from?
Right
So you have h(2) = f’(f(2)) * f’(2)
Now, can you figure out what f’(2) is?
-1
Closed by @brittle lake
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
Problem 86. a
Would velocity be derivative of the equation of motion
Motion is still position right
yes 1st derivative
ok (so true)
i see what you saying (yes)
Oh ok thank you (thank you)
no problem (no problem)
Given that v = -Asin(w) is that my answer for a (?)
wrong derivative
damn what happened to poo
so given this derivative how would I find the velocity at time t?
Would
Actually
Isn’t it just the derivative
yes
Is velocity 0 when the harmonic motion is at the end or beginning
I mean
End and beginning
I’d assume so
Because
It’s stopping
Due to negative acceleration
But
How would I find this value with
My derivative
Oh
I see
Why am I thinking through texts
LOL
I’m writing my thoughts
Acoustic moment(?)
.close
Closed by @brittle lake
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
wtf
Me
You can instead divide by -A too
bacc
Whoa whoa
whoa whoa
How do I apply arcsin I’ve never used it before
You apply the inverse function
this is the last problem so it’s suppose to be like a trick challenge thing I think
If you apply the inverse function on your function, the they cancel each other out
you are the trick challenge
Noooo
bacc
You can also deduce that sine is 0 for multiples of pi
bacc
So you can solve this for t
Did I save your life?
haha
yes
Or are u one of those high school genius
i am one of those college idiots
.close
.close (didn't close what the heck)
That’s lie if that was true you would drop out of math and be homeless addict
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i am homeless addict with math
You opened up a help channel
How can I help
spread your light across the world
You’re violating the rules, ask help for math designated questions only
aight bet
(I sometimes ask chemistry questions here)
you should moderate the server
No I don’t wanna be on discord too much I only use it mainly for help with subjects I need help with 😢
Closed by @tight pier
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Do you study often
no
Lady, that's an omega.
Oh
Ok I got to go thank you for your help man 👨 🙏
I’m sure you are a very fun person to hang out with
Tell your friends I said hi
Or something
Ok bye
😂
I will tell my 0 friends hi
(I’m gonna assume this is a joke)
But I’m sure many people will like your humor
I think you’re a fun person
no
Yes
I feel like you would be in a club with lots of people to talk like this around
I’m sure you’re fun you just haven’t found the people yet then
:)
Ok bye for real now
this some edating
LOL
💀
discord romance
I already got someone 🤐
tell him i’m sorry
idc
😬
🥶
You made him mad
2024
lol i am not mad
(we know)
maybe you should stop calling girls e-girls and you'd get people to like you
i’ll let you discord lovers get back to it
you’re hilarious
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@floral bone Has your question been resolved?
What have you tried?
You can use the Exponential Growth formula?
So you can you $x_t = x_o(1+gr)^{t}$.
Sukiyaki
For your first question, 22 years will elapse since 1950. Your initial volume of oil will be 530,000,000.
$x_t = 530000000(1+0.075)^{22}$.
Sukiyaki
So it would roughly be 2.6 Billion Tonnes.
@floral bone
I guess you can perform the same for the following 3 questions and you should be fine..:)
@floral bone Has your question been resolved?
@floral bone Has your question been resolved?
@floral bone Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
school never taught me this property so I'd really appreciate it if it can be done without this
thanks regardless, more knowledge is always better
to prove, u = -x
I'll try it and get back to you thanks
can you show me the proof please
@livid sage <@&286206848099549185>
Yo
hey.
Yo
Let there be a function f(x)
Simple proof
See
Let there be a integral of f(x) from a to b
okay
yeah
yeah
yep
alr
so we can say f(-t)=f(t)
yes
So we get -f(t)dt from -a to -b
yes
hey can you please go a little faster
i don't want to be stuck on this for any longer
Okok
See we begin fast
We have integral f(x)dx from -a to a
Now I say f(x) is even
So
f(-x)=f(x)
So now we sub x=-t
so dx=-dt
So we get
f(-t)-dt from a to -a
go on

