#help-0
1 messages · Page 456 of 1
They actually have a real question in another channel
But yes, I shouldn’t have closed it before getting consent
@lean rose Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @lean rose
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help
During a meeting, n-people are sitting around a round table. They all disperse for lunch break and come back after an hour to resume the meeting. In how many ways can they sit around the table so that no one sits immediately to the left of someone they sat immediately to the right of before leaving for lunch?
Say the initial arrangement is 123...n
Can someone verify my answer?
@unreal phoenix Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is there a way to integrate $$\int_0^a \arcsin(x) : \dd x \quad 0 < a \leq 1$$ without using integration by parts?
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
i don’t know but why would you want to
ibp for the inverse trig functions is pretty simple
I got this challenge from a friend and I can't seem to find a proper substitution or something, so I would like to know if somebody got any hints.
.close
Closed by @tight pier
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
yes but it's only feasible if a = 1, sqrt3/2, 1/2, etc (values for which you can calculate arcsin(a))
weierstrass substitution?
I figured it out
I made a change of coordinates
so simple goddamn
To polar?
✅
Closed by @tight pier
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi everyone.
I don't know where to start with this summation.
$S(n)= \sum_{k=0}^nk(k+1)$
I only know the formula for the sum of the first natural numbers (Gauss' formula)
What are the steps to solve this one?
PS: please excuse any mistakes in my English, I'm Italian
Shadow91518
you can use this
Thank you.
Even if the index is k=0?
well 0^2 = 0 so nothing changes
so how should I rewrite this summation?
only the first step, after that I try to solve
multiply out k(k+1)
@inner finch Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, could someone explain why ai = ai-1 + ai-2 + ai-3
the string is either of the form .....11 or .....101 or .....1001. each of those is counted by one of the a_i
because for example the one ending in 101 is a string of length i-2 ending in 1 plus the string 01
so for each allowed string of length i-2 you get exactly one such string ending in 101
why cant it be of form say ....00
.close
oh whoops thats from the previous one that they have to end in 1
ooh okay
okay i think I get it
if u delete the last 1 from 11 you get all the ones ending in 1 and similarly with 101 and 1001
by taking away 01 and 001
yeah thats what you said
yeah thats from the second answer but its for the recursion for P(n)
the a_i dont have the requirement of ending in 1
yeah
but similar idea. it either ends in 1, 10 or 100. by cutting those off you get an allowed string of length i-1, i-2 or i-3
Closed by @delicate geyser
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So for step 2, I did 117.2 minus 90 to get 27.2. So now looking at the big triangle, and pretending I cut a line down the middle, I have 90 degrees, 27.2 and for step 3 Id use the pythag theorm which is all sides should equal to 180. So 90 plus 27.2 =117.2 so the last missing angle is 117.2. Now, Im stuck on step 4, where I have to find the missing side length there, i dont how what to do to find that
forgot a step, I would do 180 minus 117.2 to get 62.8 to be the last angle on the top part
@delicate citrus Has your question been resolved?
no..
I think I figured it out, just need someone to help me confirming the degrees bc if those are wrong then everything is wrong
@delicate citrus Has your question been resolved?
@delicate citrus Has your question been resolved?
No I need help..
No but ive heard of it
I think its 27.2 but id like someone else to confirm it
is the other angle opposite 27.2
i have 62.8, 90 and 27.2
I want to confirm that 27.2 is correct
since if thats wrong I dont believe my further calcs will be right
Ok,
no but can I find the height first by doing this,
Not rlly
height =9.11?
Does this work?
@sly cedar
erm
ok, then area of triangle = 1/2 base times height so,
id just do 17.5 times 9.11
and not need to divide by 2 since 1 triangle is added to the other
@sly cedar can u explain the law of sines rq
in a triangle with points ABC and side lengths abc
an angle and it's opposing side that are known can be used to find an unknown angle or side using their opposite angle/side
Ok
you can use it in ur question with the topmost angle of the triangle
and it's opposing side is 35ft
which is the length of the base of the triangle
yeah but i cut that triangle half to be 17.5
So what do I do next @sly cedar
oh nvm when you use law of sines you look at the entire triangle
@delicate citrus Has your question been resolved?
not rlly
.close
Closed by @delicate citrus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@strange fractal Has your question been resolved?
noo not always
ive been playing games for 3 hrs
LOL
IM ON THE GRIND
yes
Alr, tell me how it works
Alr. Do you know what does theta stands for in the matrix?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@pseudo badge Has your question been resolved?
@pseudo badge Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @pseudo badge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What graph will be formed on round(√(a-b)) such that a & b are natural numbers < 10001 and a > b. (3 dimensional coordinate plane).
@fresh cliff Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi
So im trying to understand this proof of heine borel, namely every open cover has a finite subcover implies that K is bounded and closed. How can we be sure that the finite subcover does not march to infinity?
Like, suppose K is an open interval (0, infty) because we havent shown bounded, then my finite subcover here must be infinitely many, no?
(0, infty) is not bounded
@proper radish Has your question been resolved?
since {x1,...,x_n} is a finite set, we can find the maximum distance between every point
name it D
since every point of K is at a distance of at most 1 from one of them
there's a distance of at most 1 + D + 1 between every point in K
(1 is to go from the first point to the closest open ball
the other 1 is to go from the closest open ball center to the second point
and D is to go between ball centers)
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if i have a line in space , will i get the direction vector of the line using 2 points of the line ?
Closed by @frigid yarrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
in trapezium ABCD, BAD=ADC=90°, diagonals AC and BD are perpendicular, AB=sqrt7 and BC=sqrt217, find ad
@raw jetty Has your question been resolved?
@raw jetty Has your question been resolved?
ok
hmm what next? cant seem to think about anything that i couldve gotten by using coordinates unfortunately, any hints?
Can I check what you have proceed so far?
Have you tried finding DC?
im not sure what to start
not yet, lemme try
try setting cord B with k
b would be (sqrt7,k)
$y=\frac{k}{\sqrt{7}}x$
Skill_Issue
$y=-\frac{\sqrt{7}}{k}x+k$
Skill_Issue
i think
i think its $(\frac{k^2}{\sqrt{7}},0)$
Skill_Issue
yeah
that's correct
the given info mentioned that BC = sqrt217
Plus, k represents the length of AD
which is also wat you are looking for
i got $y=-\frac{k}{\frac{k^2}{\sqrt{7}}-\sqrt{7}}}(x-\sqrt{7})+k$
what is this for?
Skill_Issue
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
right
which determine the distance between two points
$\sqrt{k^2+(\frac{k^2}{\sqrt{7}}-\sqrt{7})^2}}=\sqrt{217}$
Skill_Issue
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
$$k^2+(\frac{k^2}{\sqrt{7}}-\sqrt{7})^2}=217$$
let $a=k^2$
$$a+\frac{a^2-14a+49}{7}=217$$
$$a+\frac{a^2-14a+49}{7}=217$$
$$a^2-7a+49=1519$$
$$a^2-7a-1470=0$$
Skill_Issue
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
how can i solve this quadratic without a calculator 😭
you have two options from now
wait this is multiple choice
its either 42 or 46 cause 31 and 35 are too small
is it?
correct
i think it works
Closed by @raw jetty
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Congrats getting helpful again
thank you very much!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Does this hold?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I don't know how they get from (1) to (2). Can anyone provide a demonstration of that?
@analog garnet Has your question been resolved?
@analog garnet Has your question been resolved?
@analog garnet Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
@river osprey Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i have ton find the convergence interval
i used root test and got
lim (n->infinity) of x/n
but if i plug infinity i got 0
and for root if result is smaller than 1: the serie is converges but what is the interval than ?
<@&286206848099549185>
!15min
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
oww oke
no worries, just a little fyi
Remember that for the root test, if you're doing the "general" version, you want the values such that the limit of your |x/n| is less than 1, but you deduced that for any choice of x, the limit becomes zero, right?
the thing that i thought is
the value of x could be anything
but like in other excercices i got as result x
but here i got a number so does this mean that it is convergent for every reel numbe or not
It is convergent for all real numbers, yes
Closed by @wraith stirrup
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the ans for this question is 5040 but can anyone explain how to get that value through working?
do you know how to find the number of ways to arrange if all 3 were together?
yes
how would you do that
6!/3! x 7?
how did you get this?
i found the all the possible arangments for the letters other than G then i multiplied it by all the possible positions the 3 G's can occupy
am i wrong?
did you group all 3 G's as one?
yes
you could do the same for 2 G's and then subtract the number of cases where all 3 are together
wait i dont understand could u explain a bit
group 2 G's together as (GG) R E E N A G E
find the number of permutations of this
there would be some cases in which all 3 G's are together and that's what you need to exclude
Closed by @unkempt urchin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How to do this? I don't know how please help me
what are you supposed to do here?
Yeah, what are we supposed to evaluate?
Is there any context to this?
Are you multiplying like 5*(-1/3)p(2/5)*q?
If so then make a common denominator and you can distribute. Like 15/3 for 5. X E.
@tight ocean It is converted to root form
If it is in root form what do you want done, it should be about as simple as it gets right?
Oh, roots, as in powers, sorry. X E.
Can't you?
Actually now that I know it is powers, I guess it can be simplified, but sorry but I can't help you much. X E.
It doesn't matter
@desert jackal Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @desert jackal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I guess use a calculator for 5 to power -1/3. X E.
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
.close
Closed by @tight ocean
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
I think there is a glitch, I was trying to message old occupier and it still says my name, it should say your name Astra. Problem, hope you find a solution. X E.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey all, is this answer correct? If not, where is the mistake?
Find a δ for f(x) = x^4 with limit a^4
Solution:
ε > |x^4 - a^4|
or, ε > |x^2 + a^2| * |x + a| * |x - a|
or, (ε)/(|x^2 + a^2| * |x+a|) > | x - a |
Now,
AxAε: ε > (ε)/(|x^2+a^2|)*|x+a|) > |x-a|
So ε = δ [i.e. any ε can be a δ]
@royal scarab Has your question been resolved?
@royal scarab Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185> Help, please!
Seems like you started with ε and used that to conclude a value for δ. For this to work, you need to set δ to be something in terms of ε and then use that to prove that |x^4 - a^4| < ε.
Also I don't see why this inequality is true
ε > (ε)/(|x^2+a^2|)*|x+a|)
Or how you concluded this
ε = δ
Because ||x^2+a^2|*|x+a| is positive
Oh actually
It could be <1
yeah
Thanks
You should probably choose your δ to take that into account. But of course δ can't depend on x (only a and ε).
.close
Closed by @royal scarab
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
you have 7x - 8y = 2, knowing that (6 , 5) is a solution, solve for the rest of the solutions.
where x and y are integers
i'm getting into this type of math after studying basic calculus stuff
There are infinite solutions
y = 2 mod 7 suffices
and for x?
also i gotta get used to seeing "mod" and actually knowing what it means 😭
Parametric function would work
If you’re looking for a function that concludes every solutions
Closed by @final tundra
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help me someone please help me
Hello what is the question
I keep getting it wrong and I can't find my way out it is a maze and endless maze
Take a screenshot of the question please.
It is in Swedish
It's fine.
plug than just the value of x in the function
can you take a screenshot of the question maybe?
bro I wrote the question down but I can definitely SHOW MY WORK
Okay ...
$$f(sqrt 5 + 2) = (6/x) - 2x$$
LikiKush
it isnt a calculator question
put than everything on the same denominator
that might work actually i will try that and get back to you
you forgot to put - before 8sqrt5
👍
yeah u are totally right it is so obvious when someone points it out
i got stuck but i have decided i will revisit the problem tomorrow i have been doing math for a while now and im getting tired
thanks for the help anyway
.close
Closed by @heavy prairie
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
find the convergence: (-3)^n/n*3^n
$$frac{(-3)^n/n*3^n}$$
LikiKush
${\frac{(-3)^n/n*3^n}}$
:D
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
${\frac{(-3)^n}{(3n)^n}}$
:D
this?
You can start by simplifying the expression
LikiKush
i tried
(-3)^n = (-1)^n * (3)^n
i got 1/n
So you would get (-1)^n / n
isnt this
and got 1/n
alternate harmonic
Leibnitz rulee yes
not for alternate
For alternating series
1/n
Diverges yes
I don't remember exacly what leibnitz rule tells you
and what are the conditions for alternate series if it converges or diverges
Let me see
Limit of the expression goes to 0
And it is a decreasing expression
Which is not the case
So by leibnitz you cant tell that the expression converges
im confused rn
bro wait
so, what are we tryna do
i first used alternating series
and than we can use the other test to prove diverges/converges
but i used p-test
and got tha for p-test in diverges
what does that mean than ?
for the absolut value of a(n)
u just use alternate
cuz
p-test is usually for all positive ones
when u see alternate, u just check whether the sequence is decreasing or not
ow wait
cuz i used alternate to get a positive serie and than used other test to prove the diverges/converges of this positive serie
so i just check the conditions and if they are completed it means that he positive serie and the absolute serie is converges right ?
.close
Closed by @wraith stirrup
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Nr 38, find AB by just knowing that DE is parallel to AB and that DE is 8 cm. How do I do this?
similar triangles
Closed by @twin epoch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Given the identity...
determine (A + B)n
That's not what I am supposed to do
put θ = 0 and you get A = 1
you enjoy doing this?
I do it, bc I want to improve my math skills
alright
Do you have any hint?
restart from here
factor the 6th powers using difference of cubes, not difference of squares
Ok, I'll do that
Closed by @keen maple
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
cross-posting here for more visibility
#1260424130822541403 message
I am gonna heroically step up and say that your proof/solution is incorrect
but I won't tell you why
it is not even my proof for once
lol
the proof given in the book is wrong

@summer dirge Has your question been resolved?
@summer dirge Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @summer dirge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
i have a questio
question
i have this linear equation in 2 variables
3x+4y-72=0
and i need to find the maximum value of xy which lies on this line
there positive
yeah
theyre
Calculus can do this
i do not understand it
i have not studied it yet
i can try understanding basic boundary line calculus
Yorkshire
Closed by @naive terrace
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
cross-posting one of my proofs again
#1260424130822541403 message
@summer dirge Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @summer dirge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so g(f(2))?
since they are continuous, yes
@mystic nebula Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @mystic nebula
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello
I am confused on what the solution means
This is the question
This is the answer
But I don’t know what the answer means
@idle thorn Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Add an appropriate middle term to complete a quadratic trinomial that can be factorised over Q
Show the correct factorisation:
x^2 (term placeholder) -32
Amir
basically you have product of two numbers to be -32
now b is the negative of sum of those two numbers
so you can find any possible pair of rationals that satisfy xy=-32
for your convenience, you may chose integral values
@mild delta Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
whats the answer
!noans
The purpose of this server is to help you learn, not to hand out answers. Do not ask someone to give you the answer directly.
Using the method of isoclines you should be able to find the answer easily
And I'm happy to help explain that
So an isocline is a stationary value
It's a value where the derivative is 0, and as a result the value never changes as time passes
So we have dp/dt = 7p - 4p^2
Our isoclines are when the function is stationary meaning what equation holds? @wanton juniper
Ok, based on this, can we eliminate an answer?
A?
Looks like C is just B but negative
Ok so if we plug in a specific value of p, would we be able to distinguish the two cases?
yes
What value do you propose?
1
Sure try that
What is equal to 3?
7p - 4p^2
Ok, how can we use that then?
3 is a positive slope
its b?
Yep
Nice
👏
Sure
!show
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Uh
So
For (b) I do not know what lim p(t) is referring too
Idk if its the equation 7p - 4p^2
Or the graph we just answered
The equation is a differential equation
You solve a differential equation to get a family of functions that are solutions for the differential equation
Ok
So the graph shows a bunch of those functions all at the same time
Yes, or more specifically 1750, because it's talking about population
Because of course it does
Ok, so in order for that to happen, you would need to cross what special value?
Exactly, is that possible?
Closed by @wanton juniper
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
hi
any math question to ask?
any work done so far?
we can extend af
to point x
where bx is perpendicular to ex
ax = 40 since cos eaf = 0.5
so fx = 8
notice fcx and fba are similar triangles
and that aecf = aex - cfx
bx = ae = 20
bf = sqrt(400 - 64) = 4root21
ab = 4root85 by pythagoras
by solving for all needed values using pythagorean theorem and similarity of triangles
sm1 posted this exact question not long ago 👀
we get aecf = aex - cfx = 40root85 - 4root21
which is apparently incorrect
i dont see where i went wrong
where?
this is wrong
cannot assume bx is 20
why -4root21?
like how did you get cfx=4root21
this is also an assumption
by similarity
you are assuming lines EC, AF, and BX are collinear (which is false)
fc = bf/4 = root 21
oh
I guess i took the diagram to seriously
how would i approach this then?
and is there a way to prove they're not collinear or do we just assume not collinear until proven otherwise
oh i think i got it
(and we are not sure if EX is perpendicular to BX)
fx is 8?
yea
fc = 8/root 3?
yep
Closed by @toxic fable
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
surely it has to be 4 comparing with 1
but the options are 1,2,3 or none of the above
and none of the above is wrong
If you need help in physics, its better to ask there https://discord.gg/physics
Here are mostly math help, you have better chance to have someone who will answer on the physics server
remember that an ideal wire will have no voltage drop
And that the voltage drop across all resistors in parallel is the same
@opal gulch Has your question been resolved?
🤔
people ask physics questions here all the time. and a bunch of people who hang around these channels are also well-versed in hs/early college physics
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello, i know this is a simple equation but i just don't know exactly how to start solving it. any tips would be appreciated
isn't it just 4^3?
yes
okay
good luck
no question is silly :)
.close
Closed by @lucid aurora
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi can someone help me through this whole question
ive done a lot of stuff but it dsnt rly make sense
what lvl is this
first year uni
dam I'm second year and haven't lesrnt this
did you start ?
well its maths fro physics so not pure maths
kinda but it got very confusing
you can ask about what is confusing you
mostly the parts where its like a in negative and positive
i don't think you will be able to do taylor, the function isn't defined at zero
ahhhhh ok yeah makes sense
whats the best way to wrtie down a as positve and negative
like thats where im confused
this is what i did before
does it make any sense
you substituted, it works. honestly you can just leave it as it is and keep in mind it's negative
like whenever you work through the solution treat it as negative and that would be it
you mean small argument ?
yeah for a
honestly yes
i wouldn't stop at that though
if you assume the argument is so small that $\alpha x << 1$ then you can even describe what the function looks like for small argument
Mohamed Mohsen
ahh ok
it will behave as if $\alpha$ was zero.
Mohamed Mohsen
but dont we already have a bit asking what happens if a=0
yes we do and nothing prevents them from being similar
in fact regardless of what alpha is, the first part always behaves as $\frac{1}{\sqrt{x}}$
Mohamed Mohsen
for small arguments
ah i see
cool
so i can state that these all act very similar, like 1/sqrtx at small x
yes
cool ok, so onto b
great
oh, and they all go towards infintiy
you mean b ?
for a, for small argument they go towards infinity
yes they do, I would prefer you say they all act like $\frac{1}{\sqrt{x}}$, it holds more information than just saying infinity.
ok cool
Mohamed Mohsen
got it
for when a is positive , we have 1/sqrtx(1+ax)
so we have 1/(sqrtx+ax^3/2)
so if x is getting larger its going to act like 1/(ax^3/2)
yeah
so all three cases will be different in that case
this goes towards 0, the first case
they will go towards zero in all cases, but differently
hm yeah
you gotta explain how differently they do
depends on how you graph it xD
if it's on the y axis it comes from above
so yes it approaches from the right i think
limit wise
cool , yeah it apporcahes from the right as its going to be positive getting smaller and smaller
this is where it got confusing before
$f_{\alpha}(x) \to 0^+$ as $x \to +\infty$ is the mathematical way to write it i think.
Mohamed Mohsen
cool
that's for positive alpha
yeah for negtaive it comes from the left
same? but its 1/sqrtx
yes, it has a different order
to make the answer perfect, keep that in mind in your answers
great !
yes
so ill just do that or each case
yes
think about that again
(1+ax)(sqrtx)=0
okay
sqrtx=0, 1+ax=0
you get two answers yes but you gotta use your understanding
are both of these possible ?
uhmmm okay xD
no?
sqrt one is a valid one
ah
look
if you write the question correctly
is it cos u cant have a negative
under a square root
like if i subbed this x back in
thats not a real solution
find the limit points $x$ of D where D is the domain of $f$ at which there is an asymptote
yes that's correct
so you gotta take the points only if they are in the domain
ahhhhh
well even the actuall points aren't in the domain xD but they are limit points to the domain
so they can be asymptotes
the other one doesn't have the function defined around it
so it can't be
Mohamed Mohsen
yes
b = - alpha right ?
it's okay you can do it
i just wanna make sure i understand
yes that makes sense
great so it's similar to case 1
why not ?
so you do
ahhhhh
it's the only one that has an extra asymptote
yeah forgot
and tie the loose ends, did you notice two was the only one that approached zero from the left as well ?
case 2
yes
ah cool
only case with an extra asymptote and only case approaching 0-
maybe it's not a coincidence
you will realize what that means in the next part of the question
because you gotta sketch it
ok, so can we go onto d
yea
this is where is topped last time it got quite onfusing but i understand it more not i think
yes the thing is you can't solve d on its own
you had to have solved all previous points
because you will use past results to sketch in d
yeah kinda annoying but yeah
it's fun to me xD
i like interconnected questions
yeah if u get them right, its horrible if u cant do one part in the exam and it just keeps coming
anyway
for case 1
yea i understand if you fail one part you faill the whole thing
a>0
so for 2, what is going on in the bit between the asymptote
yea i want you to figure it out
ahaha ok
you are smart
left or right ?
basically
well thats where i got confused last time, and aslo the first time i thought of rh and lh limits the whole question aha
ok so
im doing it from the rh first
we kinda were doing it the whole question xD
so x coming from top
ik but when i did it myself
okay
I barely helped you though
i think you just needed a confidence boost
what do u mean coming from top, is it not just coming from rsh
yea coming from the right sorry directions xD
nws aha
okay is it infinity or -infinity ?
yeah thats what im trying to figure out
so coming from rhs, approaching 1/b from values basically bigger than 1/b
true
the (1-xb) part, wil be negative till it gts to 1/b
becase x will be bigger than 1/b and we are subratcing
alright go ahead xD
ok for lhs
What did you get for lhs
positve infinity
hm, so are we gonna have like , an arch looking thing in the middle
we know that, for small x, it goes to + infinty
Is it all gonna be above zero ? That arch
it approches 0 rom lhs , its whats happening around zero in the bit inbetween the asymptote
Lemme put that here so we don't have to scroll up
ok aha
You can see that in the arch part. It's not really approaching zero but it's always positive
