#help-0
1 messages · Page 452 of 1
Kepe
Let $\lambda$ be an eigenvalue of $A$. Then $\beta(Av, v) = \beta(\lambda v, v) = \lambda \beta(v, v) = \lambda ||v||^2$
Kepe
calm down buddy, no eigenstuff needed here
Alright 
this is also intended from elementary stuff
yeah but I said standard dot product
So..?
You mean I should rather write it as < , >?
yeah, beta is unnecessary
Kepe
So $\langle A \cdot v, w \rangle - \langle v, A^* \cdot w\rangle = 0$
Kepe
Now how do we write this as one scalar product?
the point of it being the standard one is you can use its definition much more simply
Ah
Is this what you wanted?
yes
this wouldn't be so recognizable without the standard dot product
I compared both sides, though not sure if that's a very rigorous argument
hence the orthogonal group is the matrices whose inverse is their transpose (no matrix in between)
Maybe we should argue by plugging in unit vectors for v and w or something like that?
you've just proven a special case of a theorem you've seen
yeah proving they're equal because they generate the same function is a necessary step
Choosing smart vectors is a way
Closed by @thick lynx
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
there's more theory about the orthogonal group but ig I'll stop here for now
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
theres a second part to this question
b. Calculate an estimate of the lower boundary of the masses of the heaviest 50% of these animals.
a is 159 and b is 636
could someone explain to me how and why the answer to this is 23.5kg
like i first did 50% of 2226 which is 1113 so we know we get heaviest starting from number 1114
but afterwards then i calculated cumulative freq which showed me that 13-32 has 1590
but if we bring that in half to 13-22 and 23-32 which is a freq of 530 and 530 each
then we get to now 1060 which is even closer
then finally using that i got 23kg
but how do u get 23.5
@fervent crystal Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@fervent crystal Has your question been resolved?
@fervent crystal Has your question been resolved?
@craggy dagger
@fervent crystal Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@fervent crystal Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is this not considered the same answer??!?!
maybe try writing it like $-24x^2\sin\left(2x^3+28)^4\right^3$
kheerii
hmm ok thanks I assume the answer would've been correct if I've written it with the brackets like this lol I didn't realize it made a difference
@paper fulcrum Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am not sure what the relative minium is
To get a relative minimum you need the function to go from decreasing to increasing. Looking at your intervals can you see where this happens?
(3/4,1)?
@grim pagoda Has your question been resolved?
Well this is just a part where it's increasing.
Find a point where it's decreasing right before it and increasing right after.
@grim pagoda Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi
Closed by @worldly sequoia
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is the answer 8+2pi?
no
what is the integral of this function from -2 to 2 ?
8?
artemetra
what do you get if you evaluate this by hand
Wait its not 8+2pi? Woah
yep
yeah 0
I'm getting that too
it was me who was wrong
(I put the 2 above instead of beneath the curve by accidnet)
Exactly
yes 8+2pi is correct
Closed by @jaunty sierra
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
In a triangle a / b = sin(alpha) / sin(beta) then a - b / a + b = ?
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
1
@errant gull Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@errant gull Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
is that (a-b)/(a+b)? or a - (b/a) + b? and also what is the meaning of "in a triangle"?
can you just send the original question
what are alpha and beta then?
angles
are they two angles in a right triangle?
in a triangle
i do not think right
i think as according to sin law
a / sin(alpha) = b / sin(beta)
oh, a is the length of the side opposite to alpha?
this is all information that's necessary to solve the problem 😭
a / b = sin(alpha) / sin(beta)
??
you mean it is incomplete
I'm saying we can't guess what you mean
is this right
are you sure you can't take a picture or something
sorry man
okay well one thing you could try is dividing numerator and denominator by b
then you get (a/b - 1)/(a/b + 1)
Isnt this true in every triangle?
and then you can substitute in a/b = sin(alpha) / sin(beta)
yeah
ya
Then basically there is no given information you just have to find (a-b)/(a+b)?
right
btw i have an idea
correct me if i am wrong
What about we use Commando and dividendo theorem
Yeah thats correct
ok
I just looked that theorem up
let gooooo
Never heard of it
Closed by @errant gull
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
m,n,p are roots
find...
@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
?
@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?
@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?
I join
hhi
@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?
Literally just write the question here and then someone can try to help
Or make your own channel for it
Oh this isn't their channel, oops
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
gi
help me how to sketch a quad graph from the given equation fx = -2(x-1)^2 + 3 from -4 <= x <= 0
i know that the shape of the graph is downward
i know that the vertex is x = (1, 3)
how do i shape it halp
and how can i start
try finding two other points and connecting them
for example plug in x=2 and x=0 into f(x)
why that number tho
any number works but those are easier to draw since 2 and 0 are close to 1
actually nvm those numbers aren't good for the range
pick three numbers between -4 and 0
yeah try that
@distant heath Has your question been resolved?
can anyone explain me how integration came ?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Prove, without Fermat's and with induction only, that any power of 17 is expressible as the sum of two squares.
Fermat's trivializes this so it's not allowed
Notice that $17^{n+1} = 4^2 \cdot 17^n + 17^n$
Ari
oh
I'm not sure if that's the correct way but it looks like it could be useful
wait
no
i tried this
nvm
sp $17^n = a^2 + b^2$. Then you get $(4a)^2 + (4b)^2 + a^2 + b^2$
RedJive
<@&286206848099549185>
maybe i should've asked in the elementary number theory channel
Perhaps use 17^(n+2) = 17^2 17^n instead
that's smart
You'll need two base cases tho, one for n=0 and one for n=1
right
hm
ok thanks
i'll go ahead an try that
much appreciated to both @slate vortex@real gazelle
.close
Closed by @zenith latch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
you're welcome!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The white is the question and the green is the solution
Im confused about something in the solution, why is it 1/2sqrt(x+1) ? why not x/2sqrt(x+1) ?
the derivative of $\sqrt{x+1}$ is $\frac{1}{2\sqrt{x+1}}$
artemetra
so we pick 1/2sqrt(x+1) for h'(x) because it has a known and easy antiderivative
there's no rule to this; with integrals you just have to be very observant but over time something like this becomes very clear
you can try going with your option and you [might] arrive at the result but it will definitely take more work
Closed by @warped topaz
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
stuck with /(x+2)(x-4) +1
not sure where to go next
im trying to find the equation
got that wrong
?/(x+4)(x-1)
idk about the +1
(x+2)(x-4)/(x+4)(x-1)
(the first two are from x intercepts, last two are from vertical asymptotes, i know that there is no constant multiplying it as if you expand the brackets and compare the coefficient of the highest power it should be 1)
i thought x intercepts where from the denominator
x intercepts are where the f(x) = 0
ah
while the y intercept is f(0)
yea i realize what hole means now
which there arent in your equation
i've never heard of it called that but yea
i thought it meant undefined value for a second and got so confused
lmao
Closed by @kind sparrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I think it's easier to simply post the link here:
I'm looking to find the area of the spaces between the circles
I was thinking I could theoretically find the area(?) under the spiral by integrating with respect to the angle
But that number is way too big
Also I just noticed that the spiral doesn't go through the tangential points of the circles anyway so its useless
@fickle tinsel Has your question been resolved?
I have an idea but I'm not 100% sure
I could construct triangles from the centers of circles n, n+1, and the origin
And stopping at the triangle with the 7th and 8th circles
Then making a triangle between the 8th and the 1st
I calculate the area of that, calculate the area of the circles partially included, then geometric series the ones that are fully included
@fickle tinsel Has your question been resolved?
@fickle tinsel Has your question been resolved?
@fickle tinsel Has your question been resolved?
real
<@&286206848099549185>
I'm trying to find the areas of the gaps inbetween the circles
My current strategy is taking the triangle formed by the centers of $C_n, C_{n+1}$, and $C_{n+8}$ as well as $C_n, C_{n+7}$, and $C_{n+8}$
7aman
You can play around with the T parameter under the "sectors" folder to visualize this
$C_n$ is externally tangent to $C_{n+1}, C_{n+7}$, and $C_{n+8}$
7aman
C_0 is a unit circle a distance d away from the origin
and given $C_n$, $C_{n+1}$ is created by scaling the radius of $C_n$ as well as the distance of it away from the origin by $S$, where $S \approx 0.906331406149$
7aman
(yes I need the precision)
After that, I subtract the sectors of the circles that are shaded in the triangle
But the problem is that the sectors are somehow calculated to be bigger than the actual triangle
this is all in the "explicit area" folder
(I ran out of variable names so please excuse the arbitrary numbers and letters)
Q is for the triangle formed by $C_n, C_{n+1}$, and $C_{n+8}$ while q is for the triangle formed by $C_n, C_{n+7}$, and $C_{n+8}$
I've triple checked this and I can't seem to find the mistake
And there's no one nearby whose awake, able, and willing to help me

<@&286206848099549185> save me please
7aman
Here's the screencap of the original problem
A website dedicated to the fascinating world of mathematics and programming
@fickle tinsel Has your question been resolved?
help
this channel is already taken, please open your own help channel (see #❓how-to-get-help )
ok
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@verbal kindle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Im a bit confused
is the reason I can't integrate this funciton using the ln function
immediately
because the denominator is a product expression
ok thanks
You can write the numerator as m+(1-m)
Closed by @jaunty mulch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
wait
what is i
the square root of negative 1
so basically what i did is
i first tried to make the fraction easier to work with
by multiplying it by 3+7i/3+7i
coincidentally it became 58(3+7i) / 9(58)
so that was good
so its 3+7i/9
so now i have z^2 = 1 + i + ((3+7i)/9)
yep
start by splitting that frac
3/9 + (7/9)i
uhh
how do i get the roots of
(16/9)i
the real part would just be like
2 root 3 / 3 yea
or 2/root3
a^2 + 2abi - b^2
@paper portal I have the solution for your last problem
u can do this by inspection i believe
what's inspection
just looking at it
2 numbers that multiply to 8/9 and the difference of their sqaures is 4/3
a is -4/3 and b is -2/3
Here for help
!original
yeah this looks fine
how would i get that with a formula
but remember there should be 2 different roots
sub this for a in a^2-b^2
a^2 - (8/9b)
yeah
What about expressing in Euler form?
= 4/3
idk that
Ok imma check
oh that sub is wrong
yeah
can we not just express z=x+iy and square it and compare real and complex parts both sides?
(64/(81b^2)) - b^2 = 4/3
what we are doing
Okok
i've been trying to do that
yep
b^2 should suffice
i have never worked with exponents higher than two lmao
its just a quadratic
fr?
yeah try letting x=b^2
yeah
yeah
i think that notation is confusing
$\frac{-\frac{4}{3} \pm \sqrt{(\frac{4}{3})^2-4(-\frac{64}{81})}}{2}$
Galaxy
exactly
i think thats good
yes
correct
bro listen
nah this is off
Im getting z as +-√(20/9) * e^i(53/2)
???????
53/2 is in degree
right
what does that mean
2/3 i
yes but remember z is a+bi where b and a are real numbers
+-√(20/9)[cos(26.5°)+isin(26.5°)]
when did trig come in
mod arg form
U all talkin bout this right?
yess
If yes then this is the answer
we had the solution ages ago
So what you all were discussing imma getting confused now
fastest is way is by inspection
yea
just solving the
system of equations
i wanted to get it without inspection
But Instead of solving I used euler
is that easier?
Listen bro every complex number can be expressed as
finding the modulus and arguments of the complex number
ok nvm
z=mod(z)*e^i(arg(z))
i don't know what any of those are yet
Fr bro is correct
idk what that ccourse is but you should get taught it
I don't know bro I studied complex numbers separately
ah
oh its this curriculum called IB
i will be taking the highest level of math so im tryna be prepared beforehand cause im not that good in math but enjoy it a lot
thanks guys
.close
Closed by @upbeat escarp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
A factory that gives rewards and monthly commission . if the employee are 3 types according to their time of work . Workers that works at night receives double monthly commission to those who works at day , Workers who have part-time receives a commission that is 1/3 the commission of who works at night . If the day workers is paid 3600 pounds for each as a commission . Then find the commission of those who have part-time .
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
- I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
you know the day workers are paid 3600
yes
how much are the night workers paid
Is this the exact problem?
yes
Where did you get this problem from?
Do you have a picture of the problem from the assignment?
nvm of the logo
It should be 2400 indeed
@iron pendant Has your question been resolved?
well idk
Mistake from book
i dont think its a typo in the book
imma tag a helper
its in the rules
<@&286206848099549185>
Yo
yo
The answer should be 2400, but its not in the choice, wanted the opinion of a helper
weird that there are no <@&286206848099549185> to be found
It should be 2400
Closed by @iron pendant
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
First things first, you need to have decent mental calculation skills
what im typing might be a bit long
try bear with it
@alpine sable
Break Down Problems:
For addition and subtraction, break numbers into parts. Add or subtract hundreds, tens, and ones separately. For example:
(712 + 281): Think “700 + 200,” “10 + 80,” and “2 + 1.” Then combine to get 993.
(37 + 45): Think “30 + 40 = 70” and “7 + 5 = 12.” Add 70 + 12 to get 82.
Adjust problems to work with round numbers, then correct at the end. For instance:
(596 + 380): Round 596 to 600, add 600 + 380, and then subtract 4 to get 976.
Learn to Add Many Numbers at Once:
Reorder numbers to create convenient sums. Look for pairs that add up to 10 or other round numbers. For example:
(7 + 4 + 9 + 13 + 6 + 51): Reorganize as ((7 + 13) + (9 + 51) + (6 + 4) = 90).
Multiply from Left to Right:
Keep track of hundreds, tens, and ones places. Start with the leftmost digit:
(453 \times 4): First, (400 \times 4 = 1600), then (50 \times 4 = 200), and finally (3 \times 4 = 12). Add them to get 1812.
For larger numbers, break it down further. For example, (34 \times 12):
((34 \times 10) + (34 \times 2) = 408).
@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @candid cedar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I wanted to solve this for fun but I realized it's not as easy as I thought so like where do I even begin? 💀
Take it geometrically
dx under root 💀
First distribute
What does that even mean
Didn't think of that
Dx is not suppose to be under root
looks like that meme problem, and someone fked up trying to copy it
Yeah
Anyway what do you get after distribution ?
@sonic otter Has your question been resolved?
Sorry, my pc took a while to start.
I think I can figure it out from here, though. 🤔
Can you tell what is the parity of the function at right
?
@sonic otter Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @sonic otter
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Wasn't negative values unaccepted?
was it due to finding the intersection point, which requires 2 x values, then comparing to find the intersection point
@carmine solstice Has your question been resolved?
,rotate
Closed by @carmine solstice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me with (ii) please?
Np
Hint: Think about the original triangle inequality and the fact that a = (a - b) + b
I don't get how that helps 😢
the triangle inequality says |x+y| <= |x| + |y| yeah?
What if x = a-b and y = b?
Why is it ||a|-|b|| instead of just |a|-|b|?
$|a|-|b|$
DapperJaguar197
🤣 With the modulus around both
because you need to make an argument that the modulus is still less than. Should either be a cases situation a<b and b<a, or playing with the order (i think, i haven't written the proof up)
What does that mean?
@crude flint Has your question been resolved?
@crude flint Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @crude flint
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Well, ever heard of pythogoras' theorem?
A bit but not a lot
Right, it's not much. Essentially, for any given right angled triangle, let the hypotenuse be c, and the two sides be a and b
Then this equation holds true
$$ a^2 + b^2 = c^2 $$
StrangeQuarkAL
- The triangle in the image is always a right angled triangle as it's formed by a diameter and a point on a circle
Yes
- the pink area(semicircle)'s diameter is always the hypotenuse of the triangle
No problem
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is it correct to use average and standard deviations if you have data where A + B + C = 100% and you know triplicate data was used for (A, B, C)? To me it feels wrong to indicate stdev because I presume adding or removing ±σ randomly to the average results in A + B + C =/= 100%. Is there a different way to handle them?
The specific data I'm working with is the following:
@elder stratus Has your question been resolved?
@elder stratus Has your question been resolved?
just normalize, then +1/3 for A B C
@elder stratus Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @elder stratus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone explain to me how i would do this?
i may be stupid but whats a b and c here
i know that
but im saying
which number represents a, which represents b and which represents c
have a guess
not quite
😭
when i said the rule i was more just focussing on solely the first term
after you can factorise
@hazy nexus Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @hazy nexus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Vectors, colinear with a line, form a 1D real linear space
our lecturer said that on a line exists a single linearly independent vector
but how?
what's the definition of linear independence?
the linear combination for a certain amount of vectors is the 0 vector only and only when the scalars are 0
right
if we have two collinear vectors, what happens?
they are linearly dependent
right, why?
they can be expressed as a scalar multiple of the other vector yes
so if we have vectors v and w which are collinear
then by definition, v = kw for some nonzero k in F
so v - kw = 0
this is a nontrivial linear combination of v and w that equals the 0 vector
therefore v and w are not linearly independent
so on a line, we can have only one linearly independent vector
does that make sense?
right yeah

what do you mean more?
Closed by @vocal tapir
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
like if we had three collinear vectors?
you can just set the coefficient on one of them to be 0 and do the same thing we just did in that case
still a nontrivial lin combo that hits 0
so not LI
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
was helping a friend out with this porblem and this is a new topic for me too was hopign someone could just make sure i am not leading them in the wrong direction
Grammar sir
also im not rly sure how to progress with this
That’s insane
Fk
I think I got it
@alpine sable Sailor
Could you give me the correct answer please
Let me check
i only checked gpt to make sure i was doing somethign right
is my work so far wrong
I got (30+31+…+89) + 29
i like
genuinely do not know
how to go further with this
or if im even doing this right anymore
Set D60s as some number
i set them as x
and the d100s as y
and set them up as an equation where if you added all 8 it equals 120
where x is 1-60
and y is 1-100
and then i made them a fucntion
by subtracting by 1 so it would be easier to make it
so it became x!1 where X1 is 0-59
and y!1 etc
where y! 0-99
well
after i made the function
and grouped the 2
thats where i couldnt
thats just what went in my head
at the time
I didn’t make any function tho
I just sort of operate it in my mind and get the number
Let A to be the D60s
B and C to be the two D100s
Note that B and C are identical.
Then for the number of solutions where A=[1,60]
You there?
Yes
the number of solutions where A=[1,60] should be (30+31+…+89)
How did you get here
That’s a flawed claim tho
<@&286206848099549185> can we have someone check both of our statements I am lost rn…
You could actually set A as 60 and operate it to get the number of solutions within such limitation.
You would get there are 30 ways to distribute 60 to B and C.
Ho
YoYo
Hi
Hi
Check the answer
Luv u
Aw 💞
Here
Here
And then this is what I did
And idk this to
It is permutation, no?
With 6 d60 and 2d100yeah
My bro is on something strong
Yes
Bro just woke up
Yea took strong black ☕
Tell me
How u all approaching this one
Basic counting or making cases individually
Sure
I did this
That’s my approach
So what’s the answer you got
Bro imma start doing now
Show me your answer
It is fine
I took 6D60 as X and 2D100 as Y
So X lies from 6 to 360
And Y from 2 to 200
We need solution for X+Y=120
Help me proceed
I think there’s no need to model it as some function?
But I think it will get simplified what u think?
Ok bro what answer did u come up with
Yea bro listening
The first is A=[1,60] and B=[30,89].
^
Okok
Then you got (30+31+…+89) for the number of solution in such limitation
Bro listen the problem is that I am getting stuck let the sum of D60s bes X then the sum on D100s should be 120-X
Now X has minimum value of 6
So 120-X=114
That’s the problem
Now on D100s there are many ways for 114
You are overcomplicating it
When you model it as a function
Like these algebraic assumptions and operations is unnecessary
No
There are I think 85 ways for 120-X to 114
Im quit bro
Ok bro you tell
I love you
But you are good at treating me right
@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?
Do I just ping helper again then
Sure
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?
@craggy dagger
stop pinging helpers
are you being sarcastic
@hollow aurora Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have got the formule = 3x - 5y = 10. and i want the 5y infront so -5y= 3x +10
youre changing the side the 3x is om
thats like saying 3-2=1 —> -2=3+1
doesnt make sense
I see, but why does the 10 stays a 10?
cause we dont touch the 10. its already on the other side
an example, 3-2=1, if we change that its -2=-3+1
you see how we only moved the 3
the 1 stays there so it stays pos
Closed by @worldly jungle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
a little lost on how to proceed here, what steps can i take?
see how you have a x^{1/3} dx already in your integral
youre just missing that 4/3 to replace it with du
so you can multiply by 4/3 and divide by 4/3 to do that
constants don't matter in substitution, you just need the derivative in your integral
Oh shit yeah
is this process correct
looks good to me
@devout cypress Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
1
Like what theory?
components of vectors can be added up using the triangle or parallelogram rule
how did you get C
consider just the vector F1
draw a right triangle, with legs parallel to the axes and F1 its hypotenuse
that should also contain the 60 degree angle
ok better description, draw a vertical line from the tip of vector F1 to the x-axis
now that's a right triangle lol
yeah i got it
the (magnitude of) the x-component of F1 is now just (the length of) the bottom leg
right
and we know from trig tricks that the cosine of an angle is the same as the lengths of the adjacent side over the hypotenuse
call the adj side length x momentarily, we have that the hyp length is 10 and the angle in question is 60 degrees
let me try that again
it's adj length over hyp length
hence cos(60) = adj / hyp = x/10
thus x = 10cos(60)
and cos(60) is discernible
yeah 1/2
and thus the horizontal component of F1 has magnitude 5
the same procedure can be done for F2
then the resulting force is just the vector sum of F1 and F2, having horizontal component just the sum of F1.x and F2.x
and then they just add up?
yup
i love physics vectors ❤️
they're like real vectors so it's nice
makes sense, i tried adding F1 to F2 and drawing triangles but kept getting nowhere
yeah it's difficult because the resulting force may have a more annoying angle
it's easier to determine the angle from the components, rather than the reverse
at least I think so
*of the sum of two vectors
Closed by @limber ember
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
dot product
Closed by @brazen wadi
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the question needs me to find two pairs of coordinates and graph them and write where they intersect, finding the intersection point is easy but I can't graph it correctly
I tried substituting 0 into x and y for both equations and got x = 2.5 and y = 5 for the 1st equation, and x = 0.8 and y = -4 for the second equation
I feel like you'd have to divide 4 with -5 to find x in the second equation
X should be negative afterwards
