#help-0
1 messages · Page 425 of 1
!occupied @granite iron
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
That's not what I meant. I meant how do I use that equality to find something
oh
arc length = R times theta
where theta is in radians
I don’t get where the R(y+1) goes into 2R 2/(y+1)
create a new channel
and ask
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
I still don't understand. If I divide arc length by circumference and I have the area of a circle then I can find area of sector by cross multiply and divide?
Is that what it means?
yes
That's weird. I'm gonna need to find a proof to believe that
just input the formula and check it out yourself
haha
Too much mathing for me lol
@daring echo Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Does this seem right
I found 5 btw
Any idea where to start on number 6 i havent done this yet
so sine is negative in which quadrants
note that sine is related to the y value
on the unit circle
4
mhm because they’re below the x axis
meaning y is negative
so you’re working in those two quadrants but they only want between pi and 3pi/2
which is what quadrant
yes it’s Q3
so draw your triangle in Q3
the vertical distance is down 7
the hypotenuse is 25
so just find the adjacent side
then tan is easy
and cos is easy
make sure you know
if cos is positive or negative in Q3
same with tan
what do you think
I assume negative
cos corresponds to the x coordinate
yes negative because it’s to the left
now what would tan be
tan is the ratio of sin/cos
if sine is negative
and cos is also negative
what’s tan
Negative
what’s negative/negative
Oh positive
mhm
Is it a right triangle too
yes
I assume yea
it says in a right triangle
Ah right lol
24
Cos = -24/25 right
mhm
And then yea tan is positive
and the ratio is
7/24
yup
Awesome thank you man
Except i think i might need sone help on 7 lol
ok so you know how negative angles work
I mean depression
yea
Somewhat
that’s just the top angle
so
negative angles go clockwise
from zero
instead of ccw
Yes
Negative
4
so what’s sin(60) normally
.87
Oh
Oh thats with sin included?
so for the unit circle the x is just 1
wdym
Well i never really knew why 30 60 90’s worked the way they did
sine is just the ratio of opposite to hypotenuse
yea 30-60-90 is a special right triangle
angle opposite the 30 degrees is half the hypotenuse
Ah
and you can confirm this all works with pythagorean theorem if you want
I believe u lol
1^2+(sqrt(3))^2=4
it works
anyways
you should memorize the ratios
for sin cos and tan
for both the 45-45-90 and 30-60-90 right triangles
Sqrt-3/2?
Or -sqrt3/2
Yea i just convert them all to degrees
do you know how many degrees are in pi/6
No but ik how to convert
30
pi/4 is 45
and pi/3 is 60
so these are the only ones you should know off memory really
and obviously pi=180
Alright
Yes i know this one at least lol
Its 150 degrees
210?
It’s supposed to be 180 i always do 360
it’s always how many degrees you are from the x axis
so
is sine positive or negative
and what about cos
and with those tell me what tan will be
positive or negative
Positive
Cos isnt?
so if sine is positive
Tan will be negative
and cosine is negative
what’s tan
yea
and i’m guessing you don’t know tan of 30
but
look at the triangle
opposite of 30 is 1 adjacent to 30 is sqrt 3 and hypotenuse is 2
so what’s tan(30)
Wait so is 30 the degree im basing my opposite and adjacent on?
yes
because it’s the reference angle
Yea im lost
What are the lengths of each side?
Im confused because someone said the hypotenuse was always 1 earlier
Is the hypotenuse 150?
that’s for the unit circle
and it is
i’m talking about
for the ratio
of the 30-60-90
triangle
the hypotenuse is twice the side opposite the 30 degree angle
and the side adjacent to the 30 degree angle is the sqrt(3) times the opposite side of the 30 degree angle
Yea i dont understand what you’re trying to explain sorry
How do i find the opposite side length?
well the ratio is always the same
that’s why they use x
so if you were to find tan(30)
you’d do x/(sqrt(3)(x))
which simplifies to 1/sqrt(3)
no
I just have no clue where you got this answer
from the special right triangle
these are just ratios you have to know
I just realized this sections not going to be on our test
Figures since we havent talked about this ahh i just wasted so much of your time im sorry lol
Ok well i just did 8 im probably right on that
9 ig ill do i do need help with one more thing if you dont mind
yea sure
Just one since the rest i can figure out after one
Im just confused about graphing it
Why is it in pi and not normal units but on a graph in desmos its normal units
Well unless i highlight the units
wdym
Nvm hold up
the x axis is in terms of pi
because
the multiples of pi are the important points for trig functions
like we don’t say sin(1 radian)
it’s always ya know 0,pi/6,pi/3,pi/4,pi/2,pi etc
The period on this should be 2pi right
yes
Yea
because the frequency is 1
And the amplitude is just 1 or
when you go to those special points where it’s a maximum or minimum etc those are just always going to be points that are in terms of pi for trig graphs desmos does this on purpose
yea
Ah ok
Yea sorry im basically learning waves for the first time again rn lol
Horizontal shift is 2
Vertical is 0 right
no
vertical shift
is 2
horizontal shift is zero
horizontal shifts have to do with the input
vertical shifts are some added number
But the line of horizontal is moving up by 2?
yes so it’s a vertical shift
horizontal shift is left/right
like if you had
sin(x-pi/2)
that would shift the graph to the right pi/2 units
Oh wait
It’s different for these graphs
Hmm weird idk why im thinking of it this way
like if you had
I got it now
Yea
Ah yea ok
So for b
Would it be amplitude of 2 period of 2pi horizontal shift of pi and vertical shift of 0?
so amplitude of 2
shift of pi to the right
no a stretch is essentially the amplitude atleast a vertical shift a horizontal stretch would be a factor attached to the x
meaning the frequency
Yea sorry my bad
for trig
yea no vertical shift
and P=2pi
that’s good
Awesome
Alr ill try the last one and then leave lol
So amplitude -3 period 2pi horizontal shift -pi/2 and vertical shift 1
amplitude is never negative
Oh
the negative tells you it’s reflected over the x axis
amplitude is how high/low it goes
Ah ok
so it’s just 3
Oh ok
and then yea P=2pi vertical shift is 1 and horizontal shift is pi/2 to the left
or -pi/2 to the right is you like
You too
@lethal salmon Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @lethal salmon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
any explaination pls
we can start by lining up the books
since they are distinct, we can first calculute how many ways there are to order 5 distinct books
what would that be?
2^5?
now we want to order the 5 books
so we have 5 options for position A and once weve used one of the books, we have 4 options for position B, ...
yes 5!
now that we have figure out the different ways we can line up the 5 books, we must figure out how to split between 2 bookshelves
have you learned the stars and bars method?
i can explain if you havent
oki oki,
i think it's gonna be
5,0
4,1
2,3
and opposite?
no I havn't learnt that..
wellll... you can technically do it like that since the numbers are small
but theres a really nice and neat formula that is much cooler and quite simple once you get the hang of it
pls teach me that...
so lets arrange our 5 books and image placing 1 divider
this divider will determine which books go into shelf 1 and which books go into shelf 2
for example:
A B | C D E -> (2, 3)
A B C D | E -> (4, 1)
| A B C D E -> (0, 5)
does this make sense so far?
yes it does
i just added their "equivalences" using the method you previously mentioned
can I ask a question here?
okay perfect
so now the question is, how many places/options do i have to place the divider?
ofc
why have we found this before it doesn't relate to finding arrangements of books....
ahh i see your question
the reason we first find the number of ways to arrange the 5 distinct books is because the second part of our method doesnt account for distinctness
i think it will become more clearly once we explain the full solution
oki oki understood let's go ahead and understand complete solution
i believe this is where we paused
yes
it's 3*2
yes, we have 6 options to place the divider
| A | B | C | D | E |
as we can see by the 6 bars i have used
but we only want to divide into 2 bookshelves so we only want to use 1 divider
so the answer would be 6 choose 1
because we have 6 places to divide the books but we only want to divide once
so our complete answer would be:
ordering the 5 distinct books which is 5! = 120 and then with that "lineup" of books, we insert a divider/bar to split into the 2 bookshelves which we have 6 options for
so the answer is 120*6 = 720
a good problem to practice with would be:
In how many ways can 10 distinct books be arranged in 4 bookshelves?
i can give you a solution if you would like
okii but it's a permutation ques 😅 (I believe as we haven't learnt combination yet till this lecture )
yes, which is why we started by ordering the books like you said: 5P5=5! =120
ahh i see
then perhaps your professor gave you small numbers so that you could just use the method you suggested earlier:
5,0
4,1
2,3
and opposite
yesss
but this would be very messy with large numbers, in which case the formula would help a lot 😄
ohh now I understood why wee had 6 divider here
it might sound silly but why are we multiplying 6 into 5!?
I mean is this a formula?
got it got it,
it's bcz we have 6 ways to put divider
and when we have options to choose from we use rule of multiplication
yes this kind of like a rule
the multiplication rule for independent events
the most basic example of this would be like if you have 3 different shirts and 2 pairs of pants, how many outfits can you make?
3 x 2 = 6
this is because what shirt your wear does not depend on what pants you wear and vice versa (the 2 events are independent)
yes exactly
so,
ordering the 10 distinct books which is 10! = 36,28,800
we only want to divide into 4 bookshelves so we only want to use 2 dividers
which is 6 chose 2 = 15
so the answer is 36,28,800*15 = 5,44,32,000
correct?
very very close
since we want to divide into 4 books shelves, we will need 3 dividers
the number of dividers is always one less than the number of "groups" you need to form (in this case the groups we are forming are the bookshelves)
like in the last example, since we had 2 bookshelves, we only needed 1 divider
it might help to draw out a scenario: a | b c | d e | f g h i j -> (1, 2, 2, 5)
so for the very end, it should be 6 choose 3 = 20
so the correct answer would be 10! * 20 = 72,576,000
amazing, this was a nice practice question 😄
Thank you so much for explaining. I reallly appreciate your help!! <333
ofc!! no problem! 😄
.close
Closed by @hazy kettle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
(x^2+3x+1)(x^2+3x-3) pls solve this
what is there to solve?
do you want to expand it? or factor it further? find the zeros?
like just simplify it
take x^2 and multiply it by each term in the second set of parentheses, then take 3x and do the same, and then the same for 1
add them all together
and dont forget about your negatives when multiplying
i don't need x^4 can i get my next step in ()^2??
can i send u the next step my teacher got??
send it here sure
just explain to me how did it happen
that would probably be helpful
Closed by @true bough
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm wondering if in my proof it is okay to assume that |a|=k is finite
I don't know how else you'd do this
the order of a is the cardinality of the subgroup generated by a
yes and couldn't this cardinality be non-finite?
that's my doubt
What is this relevant to? I'm not seeing it. And if it potentially is non-finite, then is my proof false?
injectivity of f means f is a bijection between <a> and f(<a>)
you'd have to account for k being non finite
why are you considering cyclic subgroups though?
because |a| = |<a>|
but couldn't |<a>| also be non-finite?
|<a>| is a cardinal number
when <a> is not finite then |<a>| = N
and f being a bijection says they have the same cardinality anyway
I guess I'm not following what the point of that is, sorry, could you elaborate?
ord(a)
= card(<a>)
= card(f(<a>))
= card(<f(a)>)
= ord(f(a))
which line doesn't make sense
a few, but I guess just the first line to start
|a|=card(<a>)
that is what i said up here
well, I see why that is true in the finite case
you can prove this statement separately
ideally you'd take it as a definition though
Okay for the infinite case, I'm not even sure how to make sense of |a|, because isn't |a| the smallest positive integer k where a^k=e
and if such a k does not exist
then
idek what to say about it?
it's the cardinality of the subgroup generated by a in that case
but when the subgroup is not finite
it can only be countable
Okay
So, taking for granted that |a|=card(<a>)
this is equal to card(f<a>) because f is a injective so both f<a> and <a> have the same amount of elements even if infinitely many
this is just the definition of the order of an element btw
and why is that equal to card(<f(a)>)?
f(<a>) = <f(a)> is something you should verify
in the non-finite case I'm not familiar with if we defined it that way (or at all), but I will have to check and for now just accepting that
this is because f is a homomorphism
👍
f(<a>) = the set of f(a^i) for i in Z
= the set of f(a)f(a)...f(a) i times =(f(a))^i because f is a homomorphism
= <f(a)> since i ranges for all of Z
objective
and then card(<f(a)>)=ord(f(a))
is
card(<f(a)>)=|f(a)|
so again just the definition ?
yeah
yep
So we have this
for the non-finite case
that proves
|a|=|f(a)|
But I liked my proof :(
it's correct though
I'll just append this for the non-finite case I think
Thank you
last part
|f(a)| <= k
suppose for contradiction that |f(a)|<k
and in particular is equal to j<k
then when we contradict this
we get
equality
oh yes carry on
verily
@keen plinth this is all I have for the non-finite case... odd because I don't think we defined it as you did ever
yeah that's a poor definition
you can show that if a has infinite order, then all the a^k's are distinct which makes {a^k | k integer} countable
because <a> will be infinite too
is how the two are equivalent
but ideally you want that infinity to be specifically countable infinity
We did this

yep so map the set {a^k | k integer} to the integers by a^k -> k
and it's a bijection
that's integer
you can just use your theorem 7.8 also to show |f(a)| = |a| for infinite case
if you don't wanna do the cardinality arugment
isn't it still the cardinality argument
i suppose it is still a cardinality argument 
unfortunately I feel more lost now
I don't know what emotions/thoughts KekPogFridge is supposed to illicit in me
definitely one of them
$kekw \cap pog \cap fridge$ obviously

chebyshev's infinite pee norm
so

use this mapping
then integers is same cardinality as N
doesn't that just show card(<a>)=|N|
yeah
but that's not showing |a| = card(<a>)
|a| is infinite
oh i see
so is card(<a>)
it could be uncountable?
why cannot
this shows it
<a> contains all the powers of a
pleas use the map a^k -> k
so there are only countably many
yes
I understand that card(<a>)=|N| by that bijection
I just wasn't sure why |a| = card(<a>)
no i was answering this part
i understand why you're confused about the |a| = card(<a>) since you're not defining it with order of the subgroup
let me think how to answer
it doesn't make sense for |a| to be uncountable
since you didn't even define it to be a cardinal
you just distinguish the two cases of finite and infinite
okay use the definition you posted from the book

least k>0 such that a^k = e
doesn't exist
and infinite if no such k exist
so hence |a| does not exist
no, you say it's infinite
so hence |f(a)|=|a| is non-sensical
when it's infinite, there are only countably many powers of a
why
ok |a| is infinite and there are only countably many powers of a
and infinite if no such k exists
depends on how you want to define it of course, but it is commonly defined like this , just not for your particular course
don't see why => |a| is countable
well you define it to be the cardinality of Z in that case
or, you just say it's infinite
but importantly I define it
we're not like deriving this from something vague in the text
right?
no this is how everyone should define it
your text will probably just say that two elements have the same order if they're both infinite
and consider the infinities to be the same
this is something that should be proven though
^ this is likely
since your text doesn't distinguish between infinities
so you just regard it as the one infinity

one doesn't have to talk about cardinalities to talk about infinities
you can just have some object called infinity
the infinity at the end of the real line isn't a cardinal
it's just some additional point that you add onto the real line
Okay
I will think of how to juggle with this existential threat to my algebra homework tomorrow.
thank you for your help

, ti austinu
if it helps think less about infinities
The current time for austinu is 02:46 AM (PDT) on Fri, 12/04/2024.
finite stuff is better for your sanity
well I was very happy to prove it for just the finite case
then you had to come in here talking about
daowdnaudwa
ok
.close
Closed by @vapid shuttle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

hungerford :^)
,, \mathrm k \mathrel\varepsilon \mathbf Z
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
GUYS PLEASE HELP WITH THE INTEGRALLL
hint :- $x^2-25+1=x^2-24$
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't know
?
standard process for integrating rational functions with higher degree numerator:
use polynomial division to rewrite the integrand
Umm
Just use long division
Ok i got what i gotta do but i cant do it 0_0
just type long division integral
Whats that
if you had typed it to google instead of asking me you would've got the answer
what do you mean by this?
Ok ill re arrange the polynomial athe the top and then divide?
no you just divide
👉 Learn how to evaluate the integral of a function. The integral, also called antiderivative, of a function, is the reverse process of differentiation. Integral of a function can be evaluated as an indefinite integral or as a definite integral. A definite integral is an integral in which the upper and the lower limits/boundaries are known, other...
just watch this one
Closed by @oblique sage
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, I want to find α(alpha)
in terms of s and a?
[ ] is floor function ?
it's a ()
is there some context
thanks
i only need alpha so i can solve for a just need alpha
but i'm not good at trig
.close
Closed by @potent cobalt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
Idk if it's a thing that changes a lot based on what country your learn in, but the f function seems poorly defined in question 5a
seems ok
Do you know how to evaluate with x = 1 in question 5?
Yes I guess
well do you know for example what the pair (2,3) means?
well in particular it means f(2) = 3
I'm confused
each pair is giving you an x value (the first number) and the corresponding f(x) value (the second number)
yes
yes, x and the corresponding y
yo
@lusty nimbus Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @lusty nimbus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Topic: Loci & construction (mostly construction in this case)
Without using a protractor, how would I construct a 30 degree angle??
(Ps. In the image above I used a protractor which wouldn't be correct as I didn't use any construction lines)
consider special triangles
wdym?
do you know how to construct an equilateral triangle?
yes
and do you know how to bisect an angle using a compass
yes
apply those two together
Closed by @odd hound
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have a group of ML models with different average scores on some data. I have highlighted the model with the best score. How do I calculate if this model performance is "statistically significant" compared to the other models?
Okay, So i have little understanding on what to do here but I can discuss what i know.
I think I have to define a null hypothesis saying H0 NeuralNetwork h5 performance is not statistically significant. Then a H1 where some p value that occurs < 0.05 says NeuralNetwork h5 performance is statistically significant.
I am just missing the process of getting this p value
@hexed garden Has your question been resolved?
So the null hypothesis can be "all of these models do not differ in predictive power" while the alternative hypothesis can be "the best model is better at predicting based on the loss metric". What you do is find the mean and stdev of all of the models, then set up a normal distribution and find the difference between the sample mean and best model. Finally, you can use a z-score to find the p-value. You'll be looking for a value of around 2 stdev more than the mean to reach a p-value of 0.05. However, you have more than 20 models here, so even if you hit the 1/20 chance I wouldn't be too sure it's significant.
Thanks this is clear I am going to try to do this. If I have any further questions are you cool with leaving this chat open?
I can't promise I'll be available, but if I am then I'm happy to help
Why does having 21 models mean I should not be too sure its significant?
Your proposed p-value for significance is 0.05, right?
This value represents the probability that this outlier would have occurred by chance rather than for a good reason.
So that's a 1/20 chance
The fact that you have 21 models means you should expect to hit that 1/20 chance 1 - (19/20)^21 times
Which is about 66% of the time
I would suggest instead using a p-value of 0.0025 or so
Which will give you about a 5% chance to hit the lucky shot with 21 different models
gotcha gotcha thanks
I did and there isn't any channel showing up for me under it
@twin nimbus I have calculated the z score of my highest performing model as -0.6865. is the p value im after the area under the standard normal curve to the left of this z position?
@hexed garden Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @hexed garden
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So let’s say I take k = 2 and n = 2
I have
My set will be {1,2,3,4}
The first thing I need to do is how many combinations can I make
1,2 3,4 1,3 2,4 1,4 2,3
Thats 6
Now I need to take these 6 elements and put them into groupings of 2, ie: {(a,b), (b,c)}
This is where I am stuck
I would say it’s 6 choose 2
But idk
Lmk if my approach is ok
I need help
#❓how-to-get-help and don't just say you need help. Say the question
@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Here is my potential solution
Order is immaterial
Gotta devivide
By n!
@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Quest: find all values of a for which there are exactly 2 solutions.
not necessarily abs x
Here I decided that we get the solutions when the top part is 0 so we can remove the denominator.
I noticed the top part is a parabola and decided to find all values of a for which the discriminant is bigger than 0
Another parabola which gives us a values this time
Then I apply the |x|!=sqrt(a) to this range and get this answer. The area slightly left to 0 is where a is negative so I didn't exclude it
However the answer I was given is this and I'm told it is supposed to use circles in a way. However I don't see where I made any mistakes. Could you help please?
?
to this part everything is correct
but the way you applied |x|!=sqrt(a) is just nonsensical
and to be easier for us il rewrite |x|!=sqrt(a) as x!=+-sqrt(a)
the way you should do it is, first: write x in terms of a (use quadratic fomula for x) and apply what you get to x!=+-sqrt(a)
👀
(write expression you got in the first step instead of x)
and solve it
then you get all a's that cannot be in your final answer
Can I ping you when I'm done with it?
yeah
How do I solve this tho?
I applied this formula to that but am not sure it's the best way
@timber cobalt Has your question been resolved?
@vapid drift I solved it successfully! I still can't understand why I couldn't apply the restriction the first way tho
@timber cobalt Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @timber cobalt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i have this problem
and in the video he says f(t) is the integral of sq(t)
and he takes the integral and there's a constant term
so to find the constant term, he finds the a_0 term of the fourier series of f(t) I think, but i don't understand why he uses 1/2pi in front of the integral.
isn't that part always 1/pi ?
@fervent ferry Has your question been resolved?
@fervent ferry Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey guys i have an easy one i think.
A spring with an unstretched length of 5 in expands from a length of 2 in to a length of 4 in. The work done on the spring is _________ in·lb .
so ive done that math and i get 4k but the answer key says -4k and im just not understanding how its negative
@long ice Has your question been resolved?
nope
is the spring compressed or stretched? Did it get closer to or farther than its natural length?
@long ice Has your question been resolved?
is the question the work done by the spring or something else?
cuz you used work done on the spring not by
afaik the work done by the spring is calculated using
$\int_{a}^{b} F_{s} dx = \int_{-3}^{-1} -k x dx = 4k$
Katharine
@long ice Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @long ice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help!
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
1
Firstly try and simplify the inside
Yh
cos^2x(sinx)/cosx
Yep

Cancellation
cosx(sinx)
Now it's just easy product lu
or simplify it more
how
That works too
@unkempt notch Has your question been resolved?
@unkempt notch Has your question been resolved?
@unkempt notch Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
where are you stuck at?
try to simplify the inside
then use the double angle formula
finally plug in the values
how
sin(x)cos(x)=1/2 sin(2x)
but i don’t know how to find the derivative of that
i give up
😢💔
.close
Closed by @unkempt notch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
I guess this form might easier for you to understand.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=17X5g9QArTc
This calculus video tutorial provides a basic introduction into the product rule for derivatives. It explains how to find the derivative of a function that contains two factors multiplied to each other. It also explains how to use the product rule to find the derivative of a function with 3 factors.
Derivatives - Fast Review: htt...
thank you!
np! hope you enjoy study math.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @mossy swift
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone please help me with question 1 a
i'm having trouble representing it as an equation
the stuff i've written is incorrect
@fallen estuary Has your question been resolved?
@fallen estuary Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@fallen estuary Has your question been resolved?
@fallen estuary Has your question been resolved?
@fallen estuary Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
where did this come from
video said they minused the "two equations"
not sure what it was tho
What do you get if you subtract the top minus the bottom equation
a-ar^(k+1)
sorry, not really clicking yet, wdym by solve for Sk?
a-ar^(k+1)
ie, $S_k-rS_k= a-ar^{k+1}$ right?
.doc
where S_k is the sum of first (k+1) terms.
solve for S_k
just an additional question while i solve it, whats the thinking behind getting rSk?
r S_k is just the sum of first (k+1) terms multiplied with r
you can always factor r from it
why do that though? is it like SOP for geometric series?
SOP?
It lets you do what you’re about to do
*standard operating procedure
Kind of hard to see until you see it lol
that’s the beauty behind geometric series,
you already have what you need
$\sum_{k=0}^{k} ar^k - r\sum_{k=0}^{k} ar^k= a-a^{k+1}$
.doc
maybe doing this way shows what’s happening
hmmm
would it be proper to say that a series is the length of a line
no nvm
if the derivative is rate of change/"slope in a sense", then integral is area under a curve. what is the equivalent of series in a graph, or is it not possible to graph
perhaps that would make it easier for me to understand
is it possible to visualise a series?
i’ll try to answer this first
are you familiar with convergence of a sequence ?
yes, i just studied it earlier, however only the basics i would assume
Say sequence {1/n}, it converges to 0 right?
yes, because of the limit
visually you can think as the terms of 1/n in a number line getting arbitrary close to 0
something like this, not drawn upto marking
effectively it moves, (1,1/2,1/3,1/4,….)
as it approaches infinity, it tends closer to 0
exactly
now, we use the notion of sequence to define convergence of a series
let me define the term a ‘partial sum’
hmmm so sequence is to series as derivative is to integral in a sense, not completely understanding though
forget about integrals and derivatives for now
i’m just giving how to visualise series
would that be the S_k
when i say S_10, i mean the sum of first 10 terms of the series
just add up the first 10 terms alr?
s_100, would be add up the first 100 terms
so, you get a sequence
(s1, s2, s3, s4, …, s101, …)
each term ‘in this sequence’ is really sum of series upto the number k
visualise this as a sequence
where each term of the sequence is sum of the series upto some number
sequence is more on individual numbers, like numbers in a line. series is the sum of all those numbers?
exactly
so, when we consider sum upto k terms we get individual numbers
and we want to know, where this limit of terms goes to
just to get it straight, series will always be exponentially greater than sequence, considering n,k e of N?
i don’t get it sorry
what im seeing rn(althought may be wrong), a series will always be greater than a sequence because it is basically the sum of all the terms within the sequence?
wdym by limit of terms
the partial sum of a corresponding series looks like (s1,s2,s3,s4,…) right?
s_100 is like sum upto 100 terms of the series
if this converges, it means if you add upto infinity it still converges
essentially, we say a series converges if it’s sequence of partial sum converges
suppose you have sequence of partial sums like this (3,5,6,7.1,7,7,7,7,7,7…)
this mean, add upto be 100000th terms in your series you get 7 as the result
so, we are basically treating the series as a sort of sequence through partial sums, so like
given an=1/n
S1=1
S2=1+1/2
Sk=1+1/2+1/3+.......+1/k
exactly
This S_k is really your sequence of partial sum
sum of the series upto kth term
if this converges, so does the series
oh okay so in my example, the one with Sk-rSk, we did that to find the sequence?
would that be the same for most series, using partial sums so we can express the series as a sequence of partial sums?
convergence of any series
this is how we define series convergence
there should be some formalising behind saying a series convergence right?
this is that formalism
$\sum_{k=0}^ {\infty} a_k$ converges if and only if $\sum_{k=0}^ {k} a_k$ converges
.doc


